In a rush solve:

Because of an obligation I made to myself, I try to give you at least one idea a week. And so, I would like to start with an idea that is both a test and a lesson to what you have learned from previous bookmark ‘Chosen effort commitment.’ Of course, many of you have given ‘Chosen effort commitment.’ some use. However, for other expectations, it is also just a possibility for other things to occur, and just having a possibility for these other expectations that you may not be aware of does not mean you automatically have those other things that may occur with such a possibility. And so, let me begin with a bookmark I 1st introduced from the Amazon lists. I think this bookmark is located around Wishlist #850 in Amazon.com. It is originally called ‘Liability.’, but for here, I will call it ‘Asset portrayed as a liability.’ The illustrating reference for ‘Asset portrayed as a liability.’, according to Amazon Instant Video, is located 17 minutes and 57 seconds into episode 4.22 ‘What’s In The Box?’ from series ‘The Good Wife(2013)’, when Zach(Graham Phillips) is being cross-examined by Patti Nyholm(Martha Plimpton). That is the moment when Zack looks at his mom. Of course, refurbished for advice, you can look at the rest of the courtroom scene for content. As I understand the episode, Zach wants to testify with the result of helping his father Peter Florrick(Chris Noth), but while he was being cross-examined by Patti Nyholm, he believes his efforts are being harmful instead of helpful. And so, refurbished for advice, this ‘Good Wife’ episode shows that a person’s asset can be portrayed as a liability. Keep in mind that Zach is a teenager, not a lawyer like his mom Alicia(Julianna Margulies).

Now, the point I am trying to make with ‘The Good Wife’ episode is that an instigator can portray a certain aspect of you asset as a liability. For example, let’s say you have done nothing wrong as you experienced an instigation that bothers you. Even though you have done nothing wrong, the fact that the instigation bothers you contemplationally causes you to allow the instigation to successfully portray a sense of your innocence as a liability. In other words, you allowed a casually induced minor instigation to allow an aspect of your asset, your innocence, to be portrayed as a liability. To clarify, let me give you an imagined example of me experiencing such an instigation. A lady imposes an instigation for me to experience that just mildly bothers me. However, since I know that the possible purpose of such an instigation is to disparage the fact that I have done nothing wrong by intent to that lady, I objectively experienced the instigation, but I did not let it’s bothersomeness unnecessarily adversely affect my sense of innocence. Even though she may have tried to portray an aspect of my asset as a liability, I did not let her attempted portrayal actually affect the fact that I did not do anything wrong to her.

The reason I am mentioning this to you now is because I believe that, if you have chosen to learn bookmark ‘Chosen effort commitment.’ you now may have the ability to see that an instigation that just bothers you a little may try to portray your sense of asset as a liability, like how Zach felt when he was testifying in that ‘Good Wife’ episode. If you keep in mind that you, for example, just had good intentions by intent, then maybe such an instigation won’t bother you as much as it did in the past. This is the end of the test and lesson coming from bookmark ‘Asset portrayed as a liability.’

Now, I’d like to introduce to you the new bookmark called ‘In a rush solve.’ It starts with a refurbished reference from movie ‘The Pursuit of Happyness(2006)’, when Chris Gardner(Will Smith) is sharing a cab with Jay Twistle(Brian Howe). According to the movie, Mr. Gardner was so immersed with solving the Rubik’s Cube(a puzzle game) that Mr. Twistle introduced him to, that he lost track of time in the taxi, and was unable to pay the taxi driver the fare he owed the taxi driver. He chose to run away from the taxi driver. Anyway, this is where I chose to add to the story: Because of that incident, Mr. Gardner believed that, if he was going to pursue a stockbroker career, he had to learn to manage how he interacts with inclinations of solving. And with the help of that refurbished ‘Pursuit of Happyness’ example, I have discovered this past Sunday and Monday, just a few days ago, that an instigator may improperly impose an inclination to resolve an aspect of an experienced instigation by encouraging you to be in a rush to resolve it, even though there is no need to be in a rush to resolve such an aspect of an instigation. For example, when you present yourself in a sincerely genuinely non inappropriate manner, and the instigator improperly imposes a false accusation upon you, that experience may be bothersome to you, and you may try to make the experience more tenable when you think about it. And as you try to make the experience more tenable, the experience itself causes you to be in a rush to make the experience more tenable. That is why I called such an instigation ‘In a rush solve.’ Have you ever heard of the phrase ‘Don’t rush me!’, when someone believes he/she is being inappropriately rushed into doing something? Well, that is how the instigation feels like, like it’s improperly encouraging you to find a more tenable experience to the instigation in a rushed capacity.

The solution I recommend I believe may be the most difficult for you to follow, based on the recent lists that I have given in Amazon, and based on bookmark ‘Chosen effort commitment.’ The reason is because the recent ideas I have been recommending to you, at least up until now, have been very easy to learn. For example, all a person would have to do is read it with the intent to want the idea to work, and his/her brain would do all the work for him/her. The solution I am about to recommend to you may likely require you to make a more active participation in order for the solution to work. Basically, the 1st thing you do is identify inclinations to solve from instigations and related inadvertencies, and learn to more objectively manage them. For example, I just made this idea up a few days ago, while I was washing my clothes in the laundromat. First, before I go to the laundromat discovery, here is something I learned a little while ago about inclinations to resolve from instigations and inadvertencies. You may choose to identify inclinations to resolve in a generalistic sense. For example, in the movie ‘The Pursuit of Happyness’, when Mr. Gardner experienced the inclination to resolve the Rubik’s Cube, he chose to interact with the circumstance where the inclination to resolve the Rubik’s Cube came from. If you choose to identify inclinations to resolve in a generalistic sense, you don’t have to be so actively involved with where the inclination to resolve came from. One easy example is a college student talking to another student, and the conversation leads into the other student’s class that is going to begin in a few minutes. The other student does not get involved with the class because the other student does not attend the class, and before the class begins, the other student who does not attend that class leaves, clearly unaffected by any inclinations to solve that comes from that classroom that that other student who is leaving does not even recognize. I’d like to think of it as an ability a college student may have that is not bothersome to use.

[I have yet again underestimated(to make an estimate lower than that which would be correct) how much time I have available to finish this idea, and so what I plan to do is finish this idea next week, AND make another idea next week.

5/20/2015: Last week, I tried to explain bookmark ‘In a rush solve.’ The plan then was to explain that bookmark, and then next week, I would be able to give you basic bookmarks that is supposed to help you make your own bookmarks. Well, last week, I wasn’t able to finish bookmark ‘In a rush solve.’, and it looks like I can’t finish it this week either. I plan to address bookmark ‘In a rush solve.’ at a later time. Since I try as much as possible to not delete the words I type in, except of course for basic editing and reasons I can’t think of right now, I have chosen to leave the explanation of bookmark ‘In a rush solve.’ that I did type in. I plan to simply start explaining the new bookmark in this list. Now, this may seem frustrating for some of the kids who are reading these ideas, but it is my belief that knowing the fundamental ideas first will allow you to make useful more what ideas I type in. In other words, you will get more out of it.

Not agree to address certain notions:

It will keep you fit and you will experience a youthful vigor orgasm at any age. purchase viagra from canada appalachianmagazine.com The pills should at least do justice and must treat the issue buy viagra tabs from the person so that it should not affect the person for their life long. India has state-of-the-art Hospitals and the well qualified shipping free viagra doctors. Even, we suggest viagra prescription appalachianmagazine.com that one should adopt the competitive pricing policy to boost their product in the market. With the use of bookmark ‘Chosen effort commitment.’, this is the 1st fundamental idea I recommend for you to use. The bookmark is called ‘Not agree to address certain notions.’ Let me 1st describe it in a form that identifies it as part of a definition of what a particular instigation is: An instigator may improperly encourage you to address certain notions in a private, contemplation context, that not only did you not originally agree to address such notions, but such notions are also in a form that is out of context, and/or inappropriate  for you to address. Here’s an example that is not an instigation, but it addresses the concept of not agreeing to address certain notions. Less than an hour or so ago, I rented the movie ‘Mean Girls(2004)’ from Amazon Instant Video, and 1 hour and 10 minutes into the movie, teacher Mr. Duvall(Tim Meadows) asks the teenage girls the question quote-‘So who has a lady problem that they’d like to talk about?’ Refurbished for advice, a teenage girl asked a question that involved women specifically that was beyond the expertise of teacher Mr. Duvall, and Mr. Duvall said quote-‘Yeah, I can’t do this.’ Mr. Duvall clearly chose to not directly and not contemplationally address such a notion. [Here’s another example of a man who chooses not to address a certain notion, because the notion is woman specific, and the man finds the notion inappropriate to think about contemplationally. The reference is in episode 1.14 ‘The Children’s Hour’ from series ‘Cupid(1999)’. Even though as far as I can tell, the episode is not available from Amazon or on DVD, you can still get the quote on web site www.tv.com. Here’s the quote: Trevor:’I’m a friend of Luther’s. Is he here?’ Ellen: No, he went to get me some medicated pads for my…’ Trevor: ‘Medicated pads! That’s all the information I need.’ You see, Trevor did not even want to hear the rest of the explanation from Ellen. [The 3rd example of not agreeing to address certain notions is from episode 4.19 ‘Angel of Mercy’ from series ‘Nash Bridges(1999)’, when Joe(Cheech Marin) tried to talk to student Daniele(Aislin Roche) regarding a school soccer game. When Daniele told Joe that she did not recognize him, she said the words ‘Stranger in my space!’, which caused the crossing guard lady to knock Joe to the ground. The point of the reference is that it is my belief(since I don’t have kids of my own, I don’t know for sure) that many parents teach their kids to not talk to strangers. One of the reasons why they should not talk to strangers is because the parents don’t want their children to think of anything inappropriate. The ‘Nash Bridges’ episode is refurbishedly used here to illustrate how a student may avoid addressing certain notions imposed by a stranger. Now, of course, if you are a student, and another student instigates you, the idea of the ‘Nash Bridges’ episode is to not encourage you to say ‘Stranger in my space!’ to another student. The 3 examples are meant to show you that there are reasons that you may choose to not address certain notions, whether they are just in your mind, or in the form of an obvious conversation.

The study plan/reason that I have given you this idea first(the ‘not agree to address certain notions’ idea) is so that you can develop it’s use as you choose to use the bookmarks that I plan to type in next. I’d like to think of this idea as a big box with very little inside of it. The reason the box is almost empty now is because you may choose to put more things in it later. For example, you may give more depth to the chosen? fact that there is a difference between actively addressing a notion and just privately and contemplationally addressing a notion. Once you know the difference, you can also develop more that there are other categories of contemplationally addressing a notion. For example, when you are in a bus and there are other people in the bus talking, you are not actively addressing notions with those people. Those people are having private conversations amongst themselves. [The next bookmark I plan to explain here called ‘Inclination to sense.’ addresses how you contemplationally address a notion. (This ‘Not agree to address certain notions.’ may seem kind of frustratingly bland now, but when I add more bookmarks, you may see that this idea may be very useful to you.)

Inclination to sense:

I’d like to start this idea with a story: William Forrester from the movie ‘Finding Forrester(2000)’, refurbished for this story, is a lobbyist for a company and is on the lobbyist floor. Although this story sounds like he should be a stockbroker instead, I believe the meaning works better if Mr. Forrester is instead seen as a lobbyist. Now, his company sent Forrester to be there to purchase a certain amount of property there. However, the property is not looked at favorably by the lobbyists. And so, when Forrester makes an announcement that he wants to purchase a certain amount of a certain property that is not favorably looked upon, some of the lobbyists, as a reflex action, laughed at what Forrester had just said. However, even though some of the lobbyists laughed, the company that Forrester works for does have a purpose for that property.

[I want to take a break from typing today. Next week, I’ll try to explain at least 2 more bookmarks. I think I can do it. It’s just that I haven’t been prioritizing these bookmarks like the way I used to when I was typing them in Amazon. I’d like to also say that, even though I’m not meeting my quota for typing in bookmarks, I am making new bookmarks. I considered typing in the new bookmarks in, but that would be like giving you a bowling ball with my name on it. I want the advice to be more for your benefit. Also, keep in mind that I have already typed in 1000 lists in Amazon. Many of the expectations I have now did not even exist during the moments of those older Amazon ideas. What I’m trying to say is that I don’t want the expectations I am using now to mislead the expectations you are using when you are making your own ideas. So, I’ll see you next week.

5/26/2015: [1st, I’d like to say that I have just changed the theme for this blog. The blog service I am using comes with 9 themes, templates to change the look of the blog. There’s also an option to buy more themes, but I just want to use the themes that are already available to the blog. Compared to the 1st theme I was using, this theme seems to be easier on the eyes. [2nd, I’ve decided to give an example of using bookmark ‘Chosen effort commitment.’, the bookmark that is from Wishlist #1003-1008, before I continue. I plan on explaining bookmark ‘Inclination to sense.’ in the next list. Since I at least try to take into consideration that kids could be reading this, I want to at least add more of a reassurance that the kids have some sort of viable use for the idea. [And so, the example begins from episode 2.3 ‘Daniel Radcliffe’ from series ‘Extras(2007)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the example begins 14 minutes and 37 seconds into the episode, when Andy Millman(Ricky Gervais) is having dinner with his best friend Maggie Jacobs(Ashley Jensen). The example is a simple enough exercise. All you have to do, for the advice, is notice the composure that Andy is using before Andy realizes the misunderstanding that the boy Andy believes is making a ruckus is really a teenager with Down syndrome.(If you are unfamiliar with Down syndrome, according to Wikipedia.com, if you look up ‘Down syndrome’, at the end of the description, there is a category called ‘Advocacy groups’. According to Wikipedia, the advocacy groups are quote-‘these were organizations advocating for the inclusion of people with Down syndrome into the general school system and for a greater understanding of the condition among the general population, as well as groups providing support for families with children with Down syndrome). So, this is the situation: when you look at the scene in the restaurant from Amazon Instant Video or DVD, you should in imagination be able to sense the composure that Mr. Millman is using before he realizes his misunderstanding. The idea is that when Andy Millman realizes his misunderstanding, he would have forgotten the composure he was using before the realization of misunderstanding, and he would create a new sense of composure that is influenced by the misunderstanding. Andy Millman is not even aware that he has forgotten his original composure. So, when you play the restaurant scene again, refurbishded for advice, of course, just imagine being able to sense the composure that Andy is using while he is having a meal with Maggie. Even though Andy is complaining, both Andy and Maggie are still there in a non-working circumstance. And when Andy becomes aware of the misunderstanding and forgets his originally chosen composure, you can still easily recall the composure that Andy had originally chosen to use, but had forgotten. [Now, the reason I think this ‘Extras’ episode is useful to you is because it is something you can easily think of as a sort of validation for one of your uses of bookmark ‘Chosen effort commitment.’ It is a very conveniently illustrated reference, and it only costs about 2 bucks to buy the episode from Amazon. In fact, if I may dare say so, even though TV show ‘Extras’ is just a comedy, I believe the episode in general allowed many of the adults who chose to use this advice to believe that instigators and related inadvertencies causing innocent people to forget their original chosen composure is nothing new. Such an event has been happening for thousands of years. This ‘Reggie’ who is presenting this advice is just a man who managed to discover a means to help people remember their chosen composure more. Of course, such thoughts are private thoughts, and I am just imagining that many of the adults who use this advice in an obviously intented manner have thought about that, so to speak.

Another example is just something I imagined some kids doing, and it goes like this: Three girls during school who want to practice having the ability to remember their chosen composure chose to have a conversation with one of the younger boys in their school. Basically, while the 3 girls are talking to each other, the younger boy would walk into their conversation and interject something verbally. The interjection is supposed to represent something that would cause a normal person without the ability to remember more their chosen composure to forget his/her original composure. Of course, the interjection is just for practice. And so, after the boy did his verbal interjection and left, the girls would wait a little while, and then they would describe to each other the composures that they have chosen originally before the younger boy verbally interjected. The girls have proven to themselves that they clearly remember their chosen composures, even though the younger boy interjected.

Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Good Wife’, PG-13 rated discretion for movie ‘The Pursuit of Happyness’, PG-13 rated discretion for movie ‘Mean Girls’, violence and viewer discretion for series ‘Nash Bridges’, PG-13 rated discretion for movie ‘Finding Forrester’, viewer discretion for series ‘Extras’. Use only refurbished for advice references mentioned. Throw away rest of episode, tv show, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not agree to address certaion notions.’, ‘Asset portrayed as a liability.’, and ‘In a rush solve.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

5/27/2015: I just thought of this a few minutes ago(It takes some time for me to turn on the computer and log into this blog). The advice I give you, for certain respects, are just recommendations. The references I offer you are just recommendations. In relation to advice said, you can use the advice and references the way you want to. For example, when you use the ‘Extras’ reference where Andy Millman makes a misunderstanding with a teenager with Down syndrome, you can remove and/or change the ‘Down syndrome’ reference part for your own use, or if you are monitoring how kids use this advice, you can change the use of the references for the kids as well. To me, this is just advice, and the ‘Extras’ episode is still a comedy with actors portraying characters.