9/30/2015

Smack attention:

Even though I believed that the previous list, Wishlist #1016, was presented as a hygiene issue, based on imagination, I discovered a day or so after I have typed in the episode that other people, kids and adults, may have still experienced some sort of embarrassment, even though at the time I typed in the advice I thought that my embarrassment alone may have been the only problem. Well, since I have made the imagined discovery that other people may have also experienced embarrassment, whether induced by instigation or other reasons, in relation to advice said, of course, I decided to make the next idea in a way that is capable of existing in the embarrassment of others(Keep in mind that I am just using that ‘existing in the embarrassment of others’ idea to help me make a new idea. I am not certain what your embarrassments are really like). The ‘existing in the embarrassment of others’ idea is based on a scene in episode 3.7 ‘Equilibrium’ from series ‘Seaquest 2032(1995)'(Of course, the scene is refurbished for advice, and is not interpreted literally). Although season 3 is not available on DVD, according to the search engine google.com, it is available for streaming to your computer, or you can watch the scene for free in web site youtube.com. According to youtube, the scene starts 27 minutes and 24 seconds into the episode. That is when Captain Bridger(Roy Scheider) shows Lucas(Jonathan Brandis) algae that is able to live in the microbe contamination.

When this past Monday came around, I wasn’t able to remember the original bookmarks that I had invented using the ‘Seaquest’ episode. Although I think I can back-track to a previous moment and work my way to recalling those bookmarks, I believe I have invented a replacement for those bookmarks that may be better than the bookmarks I have forgotten, since I can still sense the replacement bookmark’s ‘attention span’. And so, the bookmarks that I have recently invented around 9/28/2015 are the bookmarks I am explaining right now. It’s understanding bookmark form is called ‘Surprise reciprocate.’, but the bookmark you may use when you experience the instigation it identifies is called ‘Smack attention.’ Although I am optimistic that you will find this idea useful, I still recommend 3 concepts that I have already introduced in this blog, 1)the composure idea(Wishlist #1003-1008), 2)articulation not the same(Wishlist #1013), and the ‘Pinch’ bookmark, which is located in Wishlist #1015 dated 9/2/2015. Since this is meant to be standard demographic advice, if you use those 3 concepts, you may be more likely to find useful the new idea I am typing in now.

Reciprocate:

Since understanding bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ is really 2 bookmarks joined together to form a new idea, I will explain the 2 bookmarks separately, then I will explain it’s combined meaning. The 1st bookmark I will explain is ‘Reciprocate.’

I am beginning the explanation of ‘Reciprocate.’ with it’s reference. The scene is from movie ‘How to Deal(2003)’, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 45 minutes and 37 seconds into the movie. That is when Halley Martin(Mandy Moore) opens one of the porcelain vases that she believes has cigarettes in them, takes one of the cigarettes, and smokes it. Of course, I am not promoting the smoking of cigarettes. The point is that, at least refurbished for advice, Halley did not even think twice, so to speak, when she smoked that cigarette. Let’s say, for example, that scene in a movie context was supposed to exist in 1980. It is my belief that most of the guests who smoke cigarettes who enter that bathroom would choose to smoke those cigarettes. And that is one example of reciprocation. The definitions I have found in the internet for ‘reciprocation’ seem to be lacking, so therefore I will try to explain it myself. ‘Reciprocate’ as it is used in this advice means-‘to expect something in return, or something that is deserved’. When Halley smoked that cigarette, she believed that it was something that was expected to be available for her to use.

Now, this is how I invented the bookmark ‘Reciprocate.’ I recently imagined a non specific courtesy given for me to use, and the man who gave it to me, who has no discernable features, like he is partially speaking in the shadows of a room, says quote-‘Why does he need reciprocation for that?’ I suppose that, without being aware of the details, I was using that question as a diagnostic for certain imagined goals. Anyway, the point is that I originally invented that situation to specifically help me identify an instigation I was only able to sense at the time, and this is the specifics that I have discovered with the question-‘Why does he need reciprocation for that?’

Before I begin, the purpose of this explanation is to help you more tenably experience an unavoidable instigation, not to dismiss it. For example, when I will explain the concept of another person getting your attention, the purpose of this advice is not to simply dismiss or ignore such a person, but to make such interjections of attention more manageable. And so, here are the specifics: An instigator may improperly impose a sense of grabbing your attention by imposing a false sense of reciprocation for that attention.

Let’s start at the beginning for this ‘grabbing your attention’ instigation with a generalistic example. Let’s say, before this particular instigation occurs, the same instigator wants to improperly impose an instigation upon you that is designed to get you angry. I believe the idea behind the angry inducing instigation is to get you to use a contemplation effort coming from you, so that the 2nd instigation, the ‘grabbing your attention’ instigation, becomes more effective. However, if you read bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.(Wishlist #1013)’, your sense of chosen objectivity is somewhat protected, which means that, with the help of bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’, you can more objectively notice that the instigation is trying to cause you to lose focus with your own anger. In short, that ‘angry’ trick won’t be as effective on you. And now, here is the 2nd instigation: The instigator improperly imposes a sense of reciprocation upon the sense of attention that the instigator wants you to experience. For example, have you ever experienced an instigation that clearly shows to you that you have done nothing wrong, and yet you are still bothered by the experience hours after it happened? The possible reason why is that the instigator is ‘grabbing your attention’ for the experience by focusing his/her efforts on the attention itself by using an impression of a reciprocation requirement upon the attention’s identity.

Here is an example of an instigator ‘grabbing your attention’. In episode 2.22 ‘Tom Connolly’ from series ‘The Blacklist(2015)’, according to Amazon Instant Video, 13 minutes and 25 seconds into the episode, here is a quote:

Elizabeth Keen(Megan Boone):-‘What are you doing?’

Raymond Reddington(James Spader):-‘I have an appointment. This is a war that must be fought on many fronts. You have yours. I have mine.

I’m using ‘The Blacklist’ quote to show you that your possible experience that is ‘grabbing your attention’ is coming from a different ‘front’ that maybe you are not too familiar with, even though you may have experienced such an instigation many times before. [Well anyway, I am going to continue with this explanation. If you have some trouble understanding this ‘grabbing your attention’ point, maybe you will better understand it after I finish explaining the entire idea.

Surprise:

An instigator may use an imposed sense of surprise to cause you to not more tenably experience an instigation that is introduced with the imposed surprise. For example, if an instigation you experienced was just a minor insult, you may be able to easily allocate the experience. However, if the minor insult was introduced to you with a sense of surprise, then the insult may have been experienced without the convenience of allocating minor insults that don’t have an associated sense of surprise with it. Now, if you experienced ‘a lot’ of such insults throughout the course of 1 day every day, it could add up to be an obvious burden to you.
overnight cialis delivery robertrobb.com Its effect lasts for four to six hours. A woman’s ovaries produce large amounts of sex hormones – progesterone and oestrogen. cheap viagra tablets Vegetables Pureed or mashed sweet potato, carrots, pumpkin, visit that storefront viagra price green peas, spinach etc. 3. In patient that had http://robertrobb.com/a-way-to-get-schools-more-money-now/ cheapest cialis india problems with heart may increase stroke or arrhythmia.
Surprise reciprocate:

Combine both ‘surprise’ and ‘reciprocate’, and you have an instigation identified by bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ One interpretation of ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ is that the instigation is using a sense of surprise to cause you to have more of a difficulty to more tenably identify a sense of your attention being grabbed with the use of a sense of reciprocation for the identity of the attention that is grabbing you itself. For example, if you choose to, if you recall several of the instigations that bothered you for hours after experiencing such an instigation, you can use bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ to check if the instigation is using a sense of surprise and attention directed reciprocation to make it more difficult for you to recall the experience more tenably.

Shock surprise:

The word ‘Shock’ is used to identify an experienced instigation that has a certain bothersome intensity of experience. The word ‘Shock’ is not used literally. Here are some examples where the word/bookmark ‘Shock’ may be used to identify a sort of intensity of experience. In episode 2.12 ‘Fear Her’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2006)’, according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 21 minutes and 11 seconds into the episode. The Doctor(David Tennant) grabs a peanut butter jar, opens it, and uses his fingers to eat it. Now, the 1st time I watched the episode, I clearly remember both Rose(Billie Piper) and Trish(Nina Sosanya) both expressing an obvious disapproval of The Doctor eating peanut butter using his fingers. I remember Rose shaking her head with a certain associated mild shock, and Trish complementing(something that completes) Rose’s disapproval. Now, if you look at the Amazon Video that is available, Rose still shakes her head with disapproval, but it’s not the same as compared to the 1st time I watched it on tv. Anyway, using the version I watched, I use the word ‘Shock’ to identify the intensity of experience that Rose and Trish experienced when they disapproved of The Doctor eating peanut butter using his fingers.

The 2nd example of using the word ‘Shock’ to identify an intensity of experience, which I highly recommend because the episode illustrates the effects with slow motion, is from episode 2.2 ‘Jane Seymour’ from series ‘Hi-Jinks’, episode available from Amazon Video. According to Amazon Video, the episode begins 16 minutes and 49 seconds into the episode. Basically, the scene gives you a few examples of individual families taking their kids to an art museum, and when they would see a particular painting, someone in a costume would break through the painting. Of course, the kids are with their parents when this happens. You get to see in slow motion how each of the kids responded to seeing the person in a costume break through the painting. Refurbishing the episode for advice, of course, I recommend you use the word ‘Shock’ to identify the intensity of experience for those kids, and use that as an example for mild to moderate instigations. [I think 2 examples are enough to give you a starting sense of how the word ‘Shock.’ may be used to identify certain intensities of experience you may have with instigations.

Shuffling bookmarks:

And now, what I will do is try to give you an example of ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ using the bookmarks I have addressed in this list. First, one reason you may choose to group bookmarks together, separate them, then group them again with other bookmarks, is to familiarize yourself with the various meanings in order to decide which bookmark will be used to eventually identify the instigation. Let’s say you familiarize yourself with a particular bookmark. Since you know it, you don’t have to repeat it, and so, you no longer have to ‘say’ that bookmark in your head, since you already know it’s meaning. OK, so here’s the example. Let’s say that an instigator from your job or school imposed a minor instigation in the form of an insult that is using both surprise and shock in it, and the experience is still bothering you, even after a few hours after it happened. Basically, you are on your bed, and you are a little restless. You are losing some sleep over it. So, let’s start from the beginning of this premise.

Let’s use bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ The instigation has elements of both ‘surprise’ and ‘attention grabbing reciprocation’, but the instigation still bothers you. At least now, you are familiar with bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’, so you think of your selection of bookmarks. Let’s say such a selection consists of these bookmarks: ‘Pinch’, ‘Sting’, ‘Snap’, ‘Smack’, ‘Attention’, and ‘Shock’. After you consider your options, you choose bookmarks ‘Shock attention.’ and ‘Shock surprise.’ That allowed you to address some of the brunt of the instigation, but you don’t want to keep using such intense bookmarks, and so you eventually settle with bookmark ‘Smack attention.’ or ‘Smack surprise.’ Of course, you can use any of the bookmarks you are already familiar with, in case you change your mind, or maybe you just want to review to yourself what those familiar bookmarks mean. And that’s it! That is, of course, just one example of ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ that you may choose to use.

Next week, I plan to introduce to you some? basic concepts of bookmark use.

[Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Seaquest 2032’, rated PG-13 discretion for movie ‘How to Deal’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Blacklist’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Doctor Who’, and some viewer discretion for series ‘Hi-Jinks’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Surprise’, ‘Reciprocate’, Surprise reciprocate’, ‘Shock’, ‘Shock attention’, ‘Shock surprise’, ‘Smack attention’, and ‘Smack surprise’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

10/1/2015:

Shock complain reciprocate:

Since the next idea I plan to type in will be a new one, I thought it would be prudent(wise or judicious in practical affairs) to type in one of the upgrades I invented to this idea now, and this is how it goes: You take what I said earlier, about the instigator for a particular instigation trying to cause you to get angry, but your use of bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’ allows you to more objectively see that. However, what the instigator may still try is cause you to contemplationally think/imagine that the instigator is complaining/arguing to you about the instigation he/she imposed upon you. So, let’s say you did nothing wrong, so to speak, when you experienced the instigation. However, the instigator may still have caused you to imagine that the instigator is complaining about the instigation imposed upon you to you.

The solution is that, even though the instigator in reality will believe what he/she wants, you did not agree to complain/argue with the instigator. Think about it: You are imagining that an instigator is arguing or complaining to you about some instigation he/she initiated, but you did not even agree to participate in such a discussion! Well anyway, I call the experience ‘Shock complain reciprocate.’ because the complaint is probably using some sort of brunt interjection from the instigator that may have offended you, and the word ‘Shock’, a word previously explained, may help you more objectively identify such an interjection. Other bookmark variations I also recommend are: ‘Smack complain reciprocate.’, ‘Interrupt complain reciprocate.’, ‘Shock complain.’, and ‘Smack complain.’

Use mental bookmarks ‘Shock complain reciprocate.’, ‘Shock complain.’, ‘Smack complain reciprocate.’, and ‘Smack complain.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.