11/25/2015

Sound bytes:

I have a few ideas that I won’t make a separate list for, simply because there’s not much to say about them individually. However, I’ve decided to put them together in one list and call them ‘Sound bytes’. I think I got that name from a magazine that talked about computer related issues I read years ago. I don’t recall the name of that magazine. Besides their brevity, another thing in common these ‘sound bytes’ have is that they all are created based on their tv show or movie references. Basically, it may be said that their tv show or movie references are them, with some advice related refurbishing involved, of course. The 3rd thing in common that these ‘sound bytes’ have is that all of these ‘sound bytes’ are used by me to make more ideas. For example, if you have your own web site or blog, there are tools provided to you from the web site or blog that you may use to add more information or upgrade your web site or blog that are provided by the web site or blog. One recommendation that I offer you is that you use these ‘sound bytes’ to help you make more ideas, for example, like the way you would add more information to your web site or blog, said in relation to advice, of course. How to use these ‘sound bytes’ will be more clear as I explain them. [And finally, the reason I am typing these ‘sound bytes’ now is because of the next idea I plan to type in. Hopefully, I will start that next idea today, if I am able to finish explaining these ‘sound bytes’ ideas today. Oversimplifyingly said, the next idea I believe is kind of serious in such a way that I believe it’s in your best interest if you have some sort of other useful idea before that useful idea is explained.

Point taken:

In my opinion, I believe ‘Point taken’ is the best ‘sound byte’ idea I have to offer you. Of course, there are other schools of thought that may not agree with my opinion. I just thought that such a stated fact may be useful to you. According to Amazon Video, the ‘sound byte’ reference is located 27 minutes and 50 seconds into episode 3.2 ‘The Ensigns of Command’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1989)’. Here is a quote:

Deanna Troi(Marina Sirtis):-‘We conceptualize the universe in relatively the same way.’

Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart):-‘Point taken.’

In relation to advice said, I recommend you watch the rest of that conversation between Troi and Picard for further context, of you choose to. Now, when you imagine Picard saying the words ‘Point taken.’, that is when you are making certain ideas in your head that you may choose to put in the form of a conversation you are having with someone. For example, you may imagine one of your teachers, a co-worker, or your boss giving you some sort of advice or constructive criticism that you may need to practice experiencing. You may want to give that person a proper response, so when you imagine that person talking to you, and you just need to imagine the conversation itself only, not who they actually are, and that person is done talking to you, you then collect yourself to see if you have listened to them, whatever a proper response may be to you, and then when you are ready, you say the words in your head only quote-‘Point taken.’

Here’s a question for the advice:-‘Why imagine it?’ Recommended answer: The expectations of others may not always align with your own expectations. You may think of situations where the use of ‘Point taken’ may be useful to you, even though such situations may never actually occur. Also, ‘Point taken’ may be used just as part of an idea, and may not have an actual identity of a conversation.

Face value:

This ‘sound byte’ reference according to Amazon Video is located 11 minutes and 8 seconds into episode 3.1 ‘Laws of Nature’ from series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2015)’. Here’s a quote:

Phil Coulson(Clark Gregg):-‘I’ll take it to her myself. I wouldn’t want you to do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable.(Keep in mind that tv show ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ is science fiction. This is the moment when Coulson takes off his robot hand.)

Lance Hunter(Nick Blood):-‘Yea, I know that sarcasm, and I’m choosing to accept your thoughtfulness at face value.’

Basically, as a recommended evaluation to use, when a person portrays something, let’s say in a conversation, those singular portrayals are not the only portrayals involved in that person’s livelihood. In the ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ example, Coulson presented to Hunter 2 obvious portrayal examples. One of the portrayals is identified by his actual words:-‘I wouldn’t want you to do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable.’, and the other portrayal was when Coulson removed his robot hand, a portrayal that I am guessing is designed to give Hunter a comparison to Hunter’s use of reservation. Hunter identified the removal of Coulson’s robot arm example as sarcasm, and chose to give ‘face value’ credibility to the actual words that Coulson said to him, and that Hunter interprets Coulson’s words as being thoughtful.

purchase viagra online That in turn lowers the blood pressure. But it is a fact that suicide is a temporary solution for a permanent soft viagra tabs problem. Once PDE5 is inhibited, the action of cGMP is required given it results in smooth muscle mass relaxation in the intimal cushions within the helicine through the entire process of vasodilation. generic sildenafil The only difference between the two purchase viagra no prescription is the price. So, why is ‘face value’ important? It’s just another idea to help you make more ideas. You may also use it for added clarification when you consider talking to certain people. For example, certain portrayals that you may notice people presenting, maybe those portrayals shouldn’t be used in the context of certain actively used circumstances. After all, even though I am assuming most people have private lives, you still use the same body and brain to exist in those private lives, and your body (and use of brain) are still presented to other people, for both public and private circumstances. In other words, even though I may see many people going to work in a public transportation area, those many people also have private lives that is none of my business to comment on, even though they are using the same bodies as they publicly go to work for their private lives! To avoid some ambiguity, there’s that movie ‘New in Town(2009)’, the reasons why Lucy Hill(Renee Zellweger) was leaving Minnesota crying. Some of the townspeople were clearly embittering how Lucy Hill interpreted the portrayals presented to her by the townpeople that wanted her to leave. In other words, certain portrayals presented to Lucy Hill were designed to cause Lucy HIll to leave town, and the reasons Lucy Hill eventually chose to stay is an example that people are more than just the portrayals they present. However, it is the initial ‘face value’ of certain townspeople in the beginnings of the movie that did cause Lucy Hill to leave town crying. I hope that ‘New in Town’ explanation was helpful.

Resistance:

For the use of sound byte ‘Resistance’, it is my belief that the actual words that I type in are what kids are using to be skeptical with. If that is true for you, then I recommend you have 2 forms of skepticism to use, 1 for what I type in now, and 1 that takes into consideration the next list I type in. Of course, you don’t have to do that. I’m not asking you to compromise anything. It’s just that the use of ‘resistance’ as a concept will be addressed better in the next list. Right now, I’m just giving you 2 examples of ‘Resistance’ that you may find useful.

The 1st example comes from movies ‘Superman II(1980)’ and ‘Superman III(1983)’, starring Christopher Reeve as Superman. Basically, you’re imagining looking at Superman blocking a white beam of energy with his right hand. When you see Superman, his right arm is outstretched. You can also clearly see that letter ‘S’ on his shirt, and as the brightness of the white light from the beam gradually expands, like way a dimmer light switch controls the brightness of a white light bulb, you see Superman’s face show his teeth as he is resisting the energy beam. The white energy beam is coming from the left to the right according to your vantage point as Superman is using his right hand to ‘resist’ the beam coming from the left. Superman’s arm is outstretched as he is blocking the beam. [Of course, the examples will help clarify how that looks. According to Amazon Video, the rental of ‘Superman II’ shows the reference at 1 hour, 48 minutes, and 12 seconds, when General Zod(Terence Stamp) said quote-‘We must combine our strength!’. Soon after saying that, that’s when Zod, Ursa(Sarah Douglas), and Non(Jack O’Halloran) were at the same time zapping a beam of white energy at Superman. When that was happening, Superman’s right arm was outstretched as he was using his right hand to ‘resist’ 3 white energy beams at the same time. [The 2nd example, according to Amazon Video, starts 1 hour, 50 minutes, and 35 seconds into movie rental ‘Superman III(1983)’, when Superman(Christopher Reeve) again blocks a beam of energy using his outstretched right arm and right hand.

So, here’s a question for sound byte ‘Resistance’: ‘Why should I imagine Superman blocking a beam of energy?’ If you choose to, you may find that, while making certain ideas, a sense of resistance may be useful to you, so what you may choose to do is imagine Superman blocking a beam of energy. You may choose a portrayal of Superman from actor Christopher Reeve from the movie, or you can choose another actor. I recommend actor Henry Cavill, who portrays Superman in movie ‘Man of Steel(2013)’. Since there are a lot of convenient illustrations of Cavill portraying Superman in that movie, it should be easy for you to imagine Mr. Cavill’s portrayal of Superman blocking the energy beam.

For the sake of variety, I offer you a 2nd illustrated example of ‘Resistance’. This example is based not just on movies, but also on certain specific participations the actor has in real life. Refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice, of course, the illustrated example is Conan from movies ‘Conan the Barbarian(1982)’ and ‘Conan the Destroyer(1984)’, the main character Conan portrayed by Arnold Schwarzenegger, participating in ‘tug of war’ with 4 or 5 people from your job. According to web site wikipedia.com, ‘tug of war’ is a sport that directly puts two or more teams against each other in a test of strength: teams pull on opposite ends of a rope, with the goal being to bring the rope a certain distance in one direction against the force of the opposing team’s pull. In the web site, there are several pictures of people playing ‘tug of war’. The reason I chose Arnold Schwarzenegger as Conan is also because, according to wikipedia, Schwarzenegger was a popular bodybuilder(for example, his movie ‘Pumping Iron(1977)’, and he was Governor of California. So, if you put those 3 things together, you may get a convenient Conan to imagine participating in ‘tug of war’ with several workers from your job. When I do it, from my vantage point, I see Conan to the left pulling the rope, and from the right side of the rope, 4 or so people wearing suits, a mix of men and women, are pulling the rope. Since Conan is a human being, as compared to Superman, when you zoom in on him, you can imagine seeing his muscles strain as he pulls on the rope, and if you choose to, you can hear him groan, from the resistance he is using pulling that rope. He is also sweating.

Since this may be the 1st time you have used such ideas, before you judge it now, I recommend you reserve a more serious judgement of the use of these 2 ‘Resistance’ ideas until you are actually in a situation that you may choose to believe that such ideas are useful for you to use, or maybe even needed for you to use. When that happens, then you may notice more how Superman blocking a beam or Conan pulling a rope may be useful to you. For example, if you are an adult at work, there may be moments where 2 such men used as a ‘sound byte’ may prove useful for you to imagine, within reason, of course. [Of course, I also try to take into consideration kids reading these ideas. The ‘Superman’ idea should be easy enough to imagine. As for the ‘Conan’ idea, well, it’s just that the ‘Conan’ idea takes into consideration employment situations. Said to the kids, so to speak, if you had such a job, and if you were an adult, you would probably understand. If it’s any consolation(comfort, solace), I am an adult, and I use the ‘Superman’ example more. [I forgot to mention that both the ‘Superman’ and ‘Conan’ examples are conceptualizations of resistance that are supposed to be in your favor. You can, of course, change that default use, within reason, if you choose to.

Layered evaluations:

Based on what I have already typed in, for example, I explained ‘Shuffling bookmarks’ in a previous list in this blog called ‘The beginnings of bookmark use’. If you are using bookmarks, and this is just an example, not that you are actually doing this, according to ‘Shuffling bookmarks’, you would take a bunch of phrases and you would ‘shuffle’ them contemplationally, so that you would only need to use just one phrase, one bookmark, to use for a specific experience of instigation. If you started off with 10 phrases, for example, after you have shuffled them, you would no longer need to use any of those phrases as a direct bookmark to reference, since you know what all of those 10 phrases are. After you have shuffled them to make yourself familiar to them, you can then choose a phrase that can, let’s say, identify the brunt of the instigation that is bothering you, and lessen it’s effect with it. That is just one example.

After shuffling bookmarks for a while, now and then, perhaps only a few times a month, you may encounter an instigation that, even though you also shuffle bookmarks, the instigation may still require for you to identify certain particulars of that instigation using separate evaluations. I call such a situation ‘Layered evaluations’. For example, you may experience an instigation that requires several separate evaluations that are consecutive to each other, like you are describing the different stages of a project. Like I said, you may encounter such an instigation only a few times a month, if you experience any instigation at all.

Now, there are 3 basic examples that I use to help me interpret layered evaluations, each example may offer you a unique perspective to help you interpret such evaluations. If memory serves, the 1st one that I started to use, according to Amazon Video, starts 1 hour, 35 minutes, and  4 seconds near end of movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan(1982)’, when the Enterprise is escaping the explosion caused by Khan(Ricardo Montalban). As the Enterprise is escaping the explosion, you see the impression of rings following the Enterprise. I refurbished that scene and used the rings as representations for different layered evaluations. The 1st ring is the 1st layer, the 2nd ring is the 2nd layer, the 3rd ring is the 3rd layer.

The 2nd example, according to Amazon Video, is located 33 minutes and 20 seconds into movie ‘Escape from the Planet of the Apes(1971)’, when Dr. Otto Hasslein(Eric Braeden) starts to explain how ‘infinite regression’ works. I’m only using the illustration of a picture within a picture within a picture part of the explanation. Technically, refubished for advice, you simply select a limited amount of pictures within a picture, let’s say you select 4 pictures. After you have done that, each ‘picture’ that you have pre-selected can be used as a reference for a layered evaluation. As Dr. Hasslein is explaining ‘infinite regression’, there is an illustrated example in the movie where there is only 4 pictures in the illustration, making it easy for you to use the movie reference.

The 3rd example is from the illustrations of Russian nesting dolls. According to www.wikipedia.com, Russian nesting dolls, also called ‘Matryoshka dolls’ according to wikipedia.com, refers to a set of wooden dolls of decreasing size placed one inside another. There are illustrations of Russian nesting dolls in web site wikipedia.com. Although the primary reference, if memory serves, is located in one of those earlier ‘Nikita(2010)’ episodes starring Maggie Q as Nikita, I could not find which specific episode where the nesting dolls were illustrated. I used search engine google.com, but I still could not find it. Therefore, the only example I can offer you for this advice that has a Russian nesting doll reference, according to Amazon Video, starts 13 minutes and 36 seconds into movie ‘The Watch(2012)’, when Bob(Vince Vaughn) is discovering for the 1st time what a Russian nesting doll is. Bob illustrates that there is a smaller doll within a bigger doll, and so on and so forth. Of course, you only use that reference with Bob discovering the nesting dolls, that reference is refurbished for advice, and you ‘throw away’ the rest of the movie.(I was hoping that I could offer you the ‘Nikita’ reference, because of it’s cool, serious ambiance. Instead, you have just the comedy illustration of what a Russian nesting doll is. My apologies). [So, how do you use a Russian nesting doll for layered evaluations? One example is that you imagine using the 1st nesting doll, let’s say that’s the biggest nesting doll, as the 1st layered evaluation reference. The 2nd nesting doll, the smaller doll inside the larger one, is the 2nd layered evaluation reference, and so on. The Russian nesting doll example is probably easy enough to imagine, especially with the help of Bob from movie ‘The Watch’. So, for example, if you experience an instigation that has 3 layers of evaluation, you can call that ‘3 nesting dolls’.

Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’ and ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’. Rated PG for movie ‘New in Town’. Violence and rated PG viewer discretion for movies ‘Superman II’ and ‘Superman III’. Violence and rated PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Man of Steel’. Violence and viewer discretion for movies ‘Conan the Barbarian’ and ‘Conan the Destroyer’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Escape from the Planet of the Apes’. Violence and rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘The Watch’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Point taken’, ‘Face value’, ‘Resistance’, and ‘Layered evaluations’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

11/18/2015

Not good enough:

I’d like to start this idea with a reference from Greek mythology concerning Apollo, the son of Zeus. As punishment, according to the internet, Zeus exiled Apollo to live and work on Earth as a mortal for one year. His assignment was to assist King Admetus, a kind and pious man who treated Apollo well.

From that reference, it is my opinion that, in the context of interpreting Greek mythology, that Apollo learned the valuable lesson of humility. Now that it’s 2015, I speculate that the kids who are attending American schools have an incorporated sense of humility in such a way that it is not seen as something as obvious as Apollo working on Earth for one year, but rather that sense does not even seem to be needed to be recognizable, like it is not even there. Anyway, what I am trying to say is that, even though it is possible that people may believe that a lack of adequate humility could be the problem for certain issues, this idea identifies an instigation where the problem is not humility, but rather a notion identified by bookmark ‘Not good enough’, and I offer you the best reference I can think of that identifies such a problem.  According to Amazon Video, the reference begins 3 minutes and 13 seconds into episode 4.9 ‘Final Mission’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’. Captain Dirgo(Nick Tate) quote:

Captain Dirgo:-‘Captain Picard. Captain Dirgo of the shuttlecraft Nenebek.

Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart):-‘Ah, Captain. It’s good to meet you.’

Ensign Wesley Crusher(Wil Weaton):-‘Captain? Of a mining shuttle?’

Captain Dirgo:-‘Yes, Ensign. Captain. My ship isn’t pretty, she isn’t big, but we’ve logged almost 10 thousand hours together.
These days, the men buy Kamagra to keep things alive in their relationship. deeprootsmag.org tadalafil soft Vardenafil like any other drug can cause complications like cardiac arrest, blood pressure problem and asthma attack. price levitra generic Side Effects Thus, ed pills is safe for utilization only by physically fit adult men. Yes, there is no dearth cialis for order of couples who flaunt their good looks, dress nicely and enjoy a secure ordering process. Or, it can be said that intercourse is so easy, and it does not take much to get a good (or bad) reputation based on you viagra without prescription online communications capabilities.
Captain Picard:-‘Oh yes, she seems a very…a very sturdy craft.’

Here is how I describe the instigation identified by bookmark ‘Not good enough’: Certain various mild to moderate instigations that you may experience may give you the impression that you’re ‘not good enough’ for something, but the real target is for such instigations to adversely manipulate how you respond to certain notions that do not meet up to the expectations of other, fortified notions. For example, when Dirgo addressed himself as Captain Dirgo of a shuttlecraft to Picard, Wesley Crusher said quote-‘Captain? Of a mining shuttle?’ Clearly, Wesley was comparing Captain Dirgo’s shuttlecraft to the Enterprise. Of course, one solution example is how Picard communicated with Dirgo. Watching the reference for that one type of solution example is recommended.

Here’s an extrapolated example that I just imagined for this advice. Let’s say an adult man has been experiencing certain mild to moderate instigations ever since he was a teenager, instigations that gave him the impression that he was ‘not good enough’ for something. Now that he’s an adult, let’s say in his 30’s, in this example, he is talking to one of his friends, a woman that he met in the company that he works for, and she introduces something along the lines of that ‘Star Trek’ reference that I have introduced to you, extrapolated for this advice, of course, let’s say it is about some sort of project participation that she believes in, and then she says to the man quote-‘Why, not good enough for you?’, and the man who was manipulated by years of instigation, replies in a context that basically says that the expectations of his subscribed notions have better results when compared to her presented notions. He uses humility to emphasize the point, but like Wesley, his response seems to be apathetic(indifferent or unresponsive) as compared to how she treats the project.

Now, I’m not discouraging people from having certain acceptable project motivations. What I am saying is that all those ‘not good enough’ instigations caused such a man to be too indifferent, too apathetic, upon how others treat certain projects that are presented to him to be aware of.

Now, let’s say you use this advice, you try to be a little like Picard in the ‘Star Trek’ episode, and you still believe you got it wrong. My question is ‘How did you get it wrong?’ Even though the results of your intentions were not accurate, the content of your intentions in the context of this advice shows that you are no longer being manipulated by your past experiences with such ‘not good enough’ instigations with the same intensity. In fact, since I just discovered ‘Not good enough’ recently, but based on my experiences with the idea, you may experience a certain relief when you recall certain mild to moderate instigations that you already have experienced, when you use the ‘Not good enough’ bookmark on them. Of course, I am assuming that you are also using the ‘Overlapping’ bookmark that I have recommended for you to use in a previous list in this blog.

[Violence, viewer discretion for series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Some discretion for the Apollo Greek mythology reference. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and series. [Use mental bookmark ‘Not good enough’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[I was going to start explaining another idea today, but I had to eventually go to the Department of Motor Vehicles, which I did today, and so instead I offered you one of my new ideas. However, next week, I plan to type in 2 lists.

11/4/2015

Before I begin, I would like to recommend an expectation for reading this advice. For those of you who read Wishlist #1017, this advice is like that, so to speak. I speculate that, for many of you who read it, the best part of that advice was when I explained ‘Shock complain reciprocate’. If you look at your copy of the idea, or at the blog, you will notice that ‘Shock complain reciprocate’ was created at 10/1/2015. I typed that last part in the morning after I thought I finished explaining the idea, something I rarely do nowadays. I also imagined a boy explaining Wishlist #1017 to someone, saying that quote-

‘It was really good at first, but then it got really stupid at the end.’

Of course, the reason I imagined the boy explaining Wishlist #1017 was because of what I imagine the list to be it’s phenomenal success. You see, I speculate that the word ‘argue’ from that last part of that list is probably called one of the best ideas that I have ever made, even though it may seem to others that I have invented the idea by accident. Well anyway, the point of this speculation is not to brag about bookmark ‘Argue’, but just to recommend to you what type of expectation you may want to use to read this advice. I recommend you use the expectation that I speculate you have learned by reading Wishlist #1017. Basically, when I would recall Wishlist #1017, I see it as 5 words: 1)reciprocate, 2)attention, 3)surprise, 4)shock, and 5)argue. Since I am here, as an imagined exercise, I recommend that you imagine using those 5 words as if you are in a specific moment in episode 1.6 ‘Eggheads’ from series ‘Sliders(1995)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference recommended is located 39 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode, when Quinn Mallory(Jerry O’ Connell) is playing a sport called ‘Mindgame’. Within reason and refurbished for advice, of course, just imagine doing what Quinn did, but instead of answering the question ‘What is pi to 13 places?’, you use the 5 words as the answer in the context of ‘Mindgame’. In other words, you are running around like Quinn, but you are giving the 5 words as the answer: 1)reciprocate, 2)attention, 3)surprise, 4)shock, and 5)argue.

Well anyway, here is the example of what type of expectation I am recommending for you to use for this idea: It has been over a month now since you may have started using the ‘Argue’ bookmark, but even though it may seem like your use of the word ‘Argue’ is just the explanation I gave you for ‘Argue’, you imagined/speculated that, if all I did was give you the definition of the word ‘Argue’, then you would not use the word ‘Argue’ at all(This deduction is just from your 1st thoughts. You know what you mean). You then made the logical deduction that the effectiveness of the word ‘Argue’ was from the entire explanation from Wishlist #1017, even though you may not use the other parts of the explanation at all. [So, what I am trying to say is that, even though the beginnings of this advice may not WOW you in the beginning, after you read the whole thing, so to speak, you may be logically surprised as to what you may eventually find valuable in it.

Brace:

Before I begin the explanation, I recommend that, if you choose to use this advice, you try to remember what you were like before the use of this advice. For the kids who read this advice, whether or not you have one, I do not expect you to have an obvious technique that you can call upon to remember distress, like the way you may anticipate watching a new movie. However, for the adults, I recommend that you try to remember what you were like before this advice, if you choose to use it. All right, here it is: I’d like to start by identifying an instigation you may not be aware of that I call ‘Brace’. That is when an instigator tries to improperly impose an overemphasized non preferred sense of bracing upon you to obligate to. The best example I can think of right now in my opinion for ‘bracing’, not the bookmark ‘Brace’, is from movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan(1982)’. For the Amazon Video reference, I am using The Director’s Cut version of the ‘Khan’ movie. The reference is located 51 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie, when Khan sent a photon torpedo at the Enterprise, and Kirk said quote-‘Hang on!’ to help the crew brace for impact. Of course, there are all sorts of varieties of bracing that an instigator may improperly impose upon you. The one I am referring to for this advice is from a bookmark I call ‘Up curve justification’. Basically, the bracing the instigator may impose upon you for this example is a bracing from your composure that, not only will you be aware of it, but you will have the option to declare what it is to others. That is what the instigator is counting on, because when you experience an instigation that uses ‘bracing’ in this manner, the response that you have probably may have given in the past to the instigator is like, without actual words of course, it’s like you are trying to show them as a clarification that you have been offended in some sort of way. Right at that moment, you are trying to show the instigator that you have experienced some sort of indiscretion. (Now, this is just the 1st part of this advice, so I recommend that you reserve your final judgment until you see the rest of the advice.) Now, if you have read the composure idea(Wishlist #1003-1008), which is located at the beginnings of this blog, then I believe you may have the ability to productively consider this: Adults who experience some sort of employment related transition may experience some misunderstandings during such a transition. Of course, the company probably issued some sort of explanation and courtesy to help with the transition, but there still may be some misunderstandings as employees interact with each other, let’s say several different categories of employees are learning to interact with each other. [Now, this ‘bracing’ instigation, in my opinion, could discourage you from transitioning with the new company situation. I mean, look at how you are responding: Even though it is clearly the instigator’s fault, your presentation of declaration, just by how it looks, and the seriousness involved, in my opinion, can inhibit your ability to transition to the company’s new policy. In other words, you are in the right to have a reason to respond to such an instigation, but the manner in which you choose to respond to such an instigation, the declaring appearance that you have been wronged, in my opinion, that is one way how the instigator wants you to respond, because such a response can inhibit your ability to transition to a new situation.

Now, the solution that I recommend is that, with your composure idea, you have the ability to decide what your chosen composure is, so when the instigator imposes a bracing experience that gives you the justified right to declare that you have experienced some sort of indiscretion, you can make a contemplation note of it, but instead of presenting an obvious declaration that you have been offended, you can instead present a more reasonable composure response. The point of this 1st ‘bracing’ idea is that you have the ability to transition to new situations, even though you may experience certain mild to moderate instigations that encourage your sense of bracing to feel justified to declare itself.

Jittery understand:

[Recently, I just accessed from Amazon Video the movie ‘The Chronicles of Riddick’. 40 minutes and 46 seconds into the movie, when Riddick(Vin Diesel) was captured by the mercenaries, Toombs(Nick Chinlund) said to the other mercenaries quote-

‘Maybe we should think about upping our game here a little bit.’

That brings us to the next bookmark I want to introduce you called ‘Jittery understand’. To help you remember the word ‘Jittery’, I recommend a word association to music video ‘Wake Me Up Before You Go Go’ by the English duo ‘Wham!(1984)’. According to youtube.com, the video has been watched over 57 million times. The phrase ‘The Jitterbug’ is repeated 4 times at the beginning of the music video. Now, the quote-‘Maybe we should think about upping our game here a little bit.’ from the ‘Riddick’ movie is used to identify that the instigator could make the instigation worse, which is why that ‘brace’ idea was only the 1st part of this explanation.

[I can continue typing for an hour or so, but I have some tv shows in the Tivo? player I would want to go through. Plus, even though I have an idea of what ‘Jittery understand’ means, since I did invent it, I think another week to think about it may give me a better explanation. In case you want to know, I invented ‘Jittery understand’ relatively recently, a week or so ago. After I explain ‘Jittery understand’, the 3rd bookmark that I plan to explain that is part of this idea is called ‘Justify subside’, and the 4th bookmark is called ‘Reciprocate argue’. So, as of now, this list when finished will have 4 bookmarks: 1)’Brace’, 2)’Jittery understand’, 3)’Justify subside’, and 4)’Reciprocate argue’. I plan to finish explaining this idea next week.
The bigger the order greater will be the better usually in stock cheap cialis solution of it. https://www.unica-web.com/archive/2011/jeunesse2011.html levitra on line But it is not a cheap medicine. It truly is a strategy for men that are harrowed by erection dysfunction by which they super viagra uk can share with colleagues around the world. Take in of generic viagra cipla http://www.unica-web.com/2014-images/GA-2014-report-of-auditors.pdf should be regarded only with the talk to of a doctor or health reputable.
11/11/2015

Sour subside:

I planned today to explain bookmark ‘Jittery understand’, but if I did so, to me, so to speak,> the effort may drain the living attention span out of me, so to speak(I’m trying to indicate that ‘so to speak’ is for the phrase ‘the effort may drain the living attention span out of me’). And so, what I plan to do to finish this list is just obligate myself to explain bookmark ‘Justify subside’, and if I choose to do more, I’ll try to do it in the next list or a future list.

I invented bookmark ‘Justify subside’ from episode 7.4 ‘Taxed’ from series ‘The Good Wife(2015)’, from the examples of Maia Sachs(Marsha Stephanie Blake). For example, according to Amazon Video, this reference starts 11 minutes and 14 seconds into the episode, when Alicia(Julianna Margulies) is making a plea recommendation to Maia, and here’s the quote:

Alicia-‘The prosecution is willing to take it down to six months probation, but you’ll need to plead guilty.’

Maia-‘But all I did was return a sweater. This is…I’m not admitting to anything.’

The generalistic moment for this advice is Maia’s declarations of being innocent, and that she will not plea as if she was guilty. There are several examples of that in the episode. However, the highlighted moment was during the quote I offered you, soon after Maia said ‘This is…’ It is her articulation of body language that is declaring her defiance, that she will not take a guilty plea because she believes she is innocent, a highly recommended reference for this advice.

And so, here is the definition of the instigation: An instigator may improperly impose a justified, declaring, resisting identity of justification as the identity of the instigation the instigator would want you to experience. [Maia’s example is the best example I can think of that illustrates a person experiencing a justified, declaring, resisting identity. Now, if I extrapolate Maia’s situation into a context of a mild to moderate instigation, I see another person who experienced an instigation, and the instigation’s identity is being maintained by the innocent person’s sense of justification use! The innocent person experienced an instigation that is resisting, declaring, and defiant, just like the characteristics Maia is using, except that the person is not showing such characteristics in an obvious sense, but rather is using such characteristics contemplationally to interpret the instigator’s imposition. So, for example, let’s say that innocent person is a woman, and that woman experienced such an instigation. Even though the woman won’t be obvious like Maia, that woman will still use contemplation characteristics of declaring, resisting, and defiance in a justified sense. The identity of the instigation would be mildly bothersome in that woman’s mind.

The solution I have originally invented for instigation identifed by bookmark ‘Justify subside’ is to allow your sense of justified identity to subside from the experience. This is not about changing your school of thought. Once you identifed the instigation, you know or you feel that you have been treated unacceptably. From there, instead of maintaining such a declaring, resisting, and defying identity, like the instigator wants you to , if that is the instigation you are experiencing, you can still have the justified identity, but if you choose to use this advice, you don’t need to maintain it’s interactive angst(a feeling of dread, anxiety, or anguish) when you think about it. Since you already know what it is, you can instead subside from it.

As I invented this idea, I treated the subsiding of such an experience as the answer. However, soon after using this idea, I discovered that, instead of just subsiding as a possible solution, you can instead change the actual subsiding that you are using when experiencing such an instigation. Here is an example I believe adults who have had kids have experience with, the meaning, not the exact content: The reference is in movie ‘Price Check(2012)’. According to Amazon Video, refurbished for advice, of course, the scene starts 1 hour, 13 minutes, and 5 seconds into the episode, when Henry Cozy(Finn Donoghue), who was only a few years old according to imdb.com, woke up Susan Felders(Parker Posey) while she was sleeping on the couch. Henry looked like he yelled a groul sound at her. She woke up, said a phrase induced by being startled(a phrase you can change), and then she calmly placed her hand on young Henry’s shoulder and said calmly quote-‘Don’t do that.’ So, is that an example of a person changing her use of subsiding, or what? So, when you reasonably extrapolate from the ‘Price Check’ example, if you experience an instigation identified by bookmark ‘Justify subside’, instead of the subsiding improperly encouraged by the instigation, it may be possible to choose a different sense of subsiding altogether. For example, even though Susan Felders from the ‘Price Check’ example didn’t directly interact with the subsiding introduced by young Henry, she clearly did not ignore it. She responded to it, used a different subsiding, and calmly interacted with Henry’s subsiding. The ‘Price Check’ reference is highly recommended.

‘Justify subside’ is an understanding bookmark. For your convenience, I want you to have a form of the bookmark that you could actually use more, so a variation of ‘Justify subside’ I recommend for you to use is called ‘Sour subside’. The word ‘Sour’ is used to help you quantify such an experience using intensity and taste. The only example I have time to give you right now for the use of bookmark ‘Sour subside’ is from movie ‘Another Cinderella Story(2008)’. According to Amazon Video, the example starts 47 minutes and 51 seconds into the movie, when Mary Santiago’s(Selena Gomez) step sisters played a short video where Mary when she was younger made a video of herself for Joey Parker(Drew Seeley) to see, and they played the video during a party, many of the people in the party laughed at it, and Mary said quote-‘This can’t be happening!’ to emphasize her embarrassment, and then she left the party. To be clear, I believe the video induced a sour experience for Mary Santiago to experience. The great thing about this example is that it is highly illustrated. Fans of celebrity Selena Gomez will probably easily relate to the reference in the movie’s context.

[Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi series ‘Sliders’, violence and viewer discretion for movies ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’ and ‘The Chronicles of Riddick’, rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Another Cinderella Story’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Brace’ and ‘Sour subside’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.