12/30/2015

I don’t have enough time today to type something in because this past Sunday, the cord from my headphones somehow got caught to my leg and foot, and as I walked away from the laptop, the cord pulled the laptop to the ground, causing the screen to break. The following day, Monday, I purchased a new laptop, but the store I bought it from won’t have the new laptop until 3 pm the next day, but I wasn’t able to personally get the computer until today. And so, it took me some time today to get the new laptop set up. I made the internet cord connected to my laptop shorter, so in case the laptop falls again, it is unlikely to hit the ground.

So, what I’ll do is add a new idea this Friday, Jan. 1, since I chose to have a day off that day, and the once a week idea schedule will be back on track. Hopefully, my new computer excuse is good enough for you.

See you this Friday!

1/1/2016

Again, I started late, and again, I am choosing to postpone the explanation. I don’t think this is a major setback, based on an obligation of 1 idea per week. All I have to do is type in twice the amount of work next week. I could type in something now, but it’s already 5:44 pm where I am at. At least this new laptop is working normally. I also purchased with this laptop a mouse, and the mouse seems to be working acceptably. Before using a mouse, according to the Amazon web site, I purchased on October 13, 2013 gloves that have silver tips. The glove is called a Dragonpad Smart Glove Touch Glove. The silver tips on the gloves allow you to use touchscreen devices. I used the glove on my right hand to move the cursor on the laptop screen. That means that, according to Amazon, since October of 2013, I have been typing on a laptop wearing a glove on my right hand! Well, with this new laptop, I am now using a computer mouse to move the computer cursor, which means I am now able to type without needing to wear a glove on my right hand. I mentioned in the Amazon lists that I have purchased these gloves to help me use the touchpad on the laptop I was using. Well anyway, all this happened because I accidentally broke the previous laptop’s computer screen. Unless something else happens, I don’t see any more delays occurring. I’ll start typing ideas this coming Wednesday, January 6. If I can, I may also type in ideas sooner than that.

1/5/2016

The Great Wall:

I want to explain this idea now before the next new idea, because if I explain this idea after the next new idea, this question may occur. I imagined celebrity Tina Fey saying this question in an episode of ‘Saturday Night Live’. This imagined event is based on Tina Fey’s recent performance in tv show ‘Saturday Night Live’, when she co-hosted with Amy Poehler less than a few weeks ago. I imagined Tina Fey saying in a ‘Saturday Night Live’ episode quote:-‘Oh, that is because of the idea before it!’ She is referring to bookmark ‘The Great Wall’, if I explained it after the next idea is explained. In other words, I anticipate that the next idea fully explained will probably improve your sense of continuity, and if I explain bookmark ‘The Great Wall’ after the next new idea, then many of you may believe that much of it’s sense of benefit comes from the new idea that was just explained before it. And so, to avoid that, I have decided to explain bookmark ‘The Great Wall’ now.
It helps to dilate the blood vessels of cialis order the penis can be relaxed. This allows achieving a stronger erection levitra prescription cost for a longer period.There are several causes for ED, it may be physiological or psychological. Do not get attracted with lucrative offer some fake pharmacies dealing in fake sildenafil citrate medicines for erectile dysfunction and other kind pfizer viagra australia of sexual difficulties in men. First of all, you charge to accept that one of the most usual sorts of joint free levitra disease.
I believe the idea started from episode 4.14 ‘Journey’s End’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2008)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene occurred 32 minutes and 49 seconds into the episode, when The Doctor(David Tennant) said to Davros(Julian Beach) quote-‘They’re trying to help.’ Of course, I refurbished that scene in my mind to be used for something useful. (Keep in mind that this idea was created in year 2008, before I started this blog.) Basically, somewhere in the beginning when I used this idea, I imagined people using a certain expectation can be conceptualized as having ‘walls’, evaluation obstacles that, when I would contemplationally say the words ‘They’re trying to help.’, those evaluation obstacles would reveal themselves to me. I would use such an idea to make more ideas, and to cope.(I say ‘cope’ in a context that was used for private thinking, not in a context that I believe many people would just reveal to each other in casual conversation.) Anyway, I eventually upgraded the use of the idea to create the bookmark that is now called ‘The Great Wall’. The name comes from the movie ‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier’, when Sybok used The Enterprise to get through the barrier that is located at the center of the galaxy.

I called the barrier from the ‘Star Trek V’ movie ‘The Great Wall’, and then I imagined the original ‘Star Trek’ series(1966-1969) to consist mostly of The Enterprise crew interacting will aliens that have a better knowhow of the universe than The Enterprise crew has. On several of these imagined episodes, some of the aliens that The Enterprise crew have encountered would talk about what The Enterprise crew believed ‘The Great Wall’ was. The aliens already knew that ‘The Great Wall’ was part of a prison for a certain alien, but the aliens did not say anything to The Enterprise crew at the time, since the aliens were also learning from The Enterprise crew.

The point I am trying to make with how I imagined most of the aliens interacting with The Enterprise crew is that, even though most of the aliens that encountered The Enterprise crew in this imagined situation had a much more developed, more advanced knowhow of what the universe is, what the sci-fi show of this imagined situation would mostly illustrate that there is also a benefit for those aliens to learn from The Enterprise crew, even though such aliens have a more advanced knowhow of what the universe is. [Now, the point I am trying to make as it relates to you is that certain mild to moderate instigations that you may have already experienced may have caused you firmly reject interjections and notions identified by your own sense of knowhow. Here is a question for the advice: ‘How is that a bad thing?’ For example, what if you were presented with a job opportunity, and when you were allowed to participate with that job opportunity before making a commitment to it, the reason you rejected committing to such a job opportunity is because there were many details about the job that your knowhow could easily refute. Now, what if the attitude that you used to refute certain characteristics of job opportunities were adversely influenced by instigations and related inadvertencies? To test the integrity of this idea, I recommend that you recall certain mild to moderate instigations that you have already experienced, and ask yourself this question: ‘Does such an experience adversely influence how I  reject certain characteristics of job opportunities?’

Let me try to say this another way: The aliens in the Star Trek situation I imagined allowed themselves to learn from The Enterprise crew, even though their knowledge of the universe is vastly more developed than those from The Federation and The Enterprise crew. The aliens were still able to learn and participate with The Enterprise crew, even though their own sense of knowhow can easily reject certain characteristics presented by The Enterprise crew. Now, if the instigations you have experienced have caused you to avoid certain opportunistic participations simply because your own knowhow can reject certain characteristics of such opportunistic participations, let’s say you can still reasonably participate, but how you reject those characteristics cause you to not participate, then what type of opportunities will you participate in? You see, in my opinion, all an instigator has to do to cause you to choose not to participate in a certain opportunity is simply to add to that opportunity something that your knowhow can easily refute.

The solution, in my opinion, if you have already experienced such instigations, is to simply allow yourself to gradually accept interacting with certain characteristics of opportunities that your knowhow can easily reject, (and of course you can also reasonably participate), and those characteristics don’t have to be instigation related.

Now, going back to the experience of such an instigation, an instigation does not have to specifically ‘say’ that it’s trying to adversely affect how your knowhow evaluates certain characteristics. It can instead just cause you to have a certain adverse effect upon you, and that adverse effect, even though it does not seem specifically related to affecting your use of knowhow, the effect itself may be causing you to have such a use of knowhow.

Now, the problem I have giving you an illustrated example, whether it’s from a tv show or a movie, is that the example, when explained into words, has a certain personal effect upon the innocent person that has been wronged that maybe my ability to put into words cannot explain, and if the explanation is not adequate, one result if that innocent person could comment upon those words would be to add something to the words to help emphasize it’s meaning, and unfortunately according to my imagination, if someone tries to add such words, those words may dilute the original meaning of those words. Basically, I cannot think of any tv show or movie example that can articulate someone’s original experience of such an instigation. Such tv shows and movies may exist, I just don’t know any of them.

Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘Saturday Night Live’. Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Doctor Who’ and ‘Star Trek(1966+)’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier(1989)’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘The Great Wall’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

12/25/2015

Time lapse:

First, I’d like to say that, even though it’s Christmas, I believe that many of you who are reading this(if anyone is reading this at all), are a lot like me, in the context that we’re not really doing anything compared to the sense that Christmas gives us. That being said, I still would like to say ‘Merry Christmas’ to you anyway.

And now, the advice. The definition of ‘Time lapse’ comes from a ‘Chia Pet’ commercial that I watched from youtube.com. If you choose to see the commercial, just go to web site www.youtube.com, type ‘chia pet commercial’ in the search engine, search for it, and the commercial I used was the one that was viewed over 747,000 times, and was made available over 9 years ago, according to youtube. When you watch the commercial, you will see illustrations of the ‘Chia Pet’ seeds grow very quickly. The illustration would state that full? growth would take 1-2 weeks. Now, what I will do with this ‘Time lapse’ definition is give you several examples as it relates to instigation.

Here is the 1st example: I believe that many of the casual instigations that innocent people experience, such as when they are using public transportation when commuting to and from work, are imposed upon them to experience in a brief, quick, manner, and that all of those brief, quick interjections of instigations may give innocent people a false and misleading sense of time lapse, as it relates to the interpretation of other notions. [Unfortunately, I don’ t have a specific example to give you. I do have an example for myself, of course, but even though it wouldn’t be entirely inappropriate for me to type such an example in, the level of embarrassment that it would cause me to experience makes the example unacceptable for me to type in. So therefore, I don’t have an example to give you. However, I do have a ‘pending’ example for this idea, ‘pending’ meaning an example I recommend to use to try to discover the answer. The ‘pending’ example is in episode 6.2 ‘Day of the Moon’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2011)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference begins 10 minutes and 32 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

The Doctor(Matt Smith):-‘Take a good long look.'(Everyone is looking at a hologram. The Doctor then turns off the hologram). You just saw an image of one of the creatures we’re fighting. Describe it to me.

This is said to be a perfect product for the treatment of erectile buy online viagra dysfunction or as it is famously known as impotence. Usually pain is caused due to poor lubrication or conditions like vaginismus. appalachianmagazine.com purchase viagra online Some of the medicine that are of generic medicine is cheaper than all branded medicine and it is as cheap as 15 times less than the overnight cialis soft. It just requires cialis pills canada appalachianmagazine.com sexual stimulation to work flawlessly. Canton Delaware(Mark Sheppard):-‘I can’t’.

The Doctor:-‘No. Neither can I.’

Of course, for that example, I represent The Doctor, you represent the other people in the Tardis, and none of us can explain what we have just seen. However, since I represent The Doctor, I think I am a little ahead of the race here, since I am the one that is leading the explanation. You may watch a little more of that scene, both before and after the quote, in relation to advice, if you want more background about it.

The next ‘Time lapse’ example starts using episode 2.8 ‘I, Mudd’ from series ‘Star Trek(1967)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 36 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode, when Captain Kirk(William Shatner) says quote-‘Next we take the Alices on a trip through Wonderland.’ Refurbished for advice, of course, the emphasis of the ‘Star Trek’ reference is when the androids are deactivated by the misleading portrayals of the Enterprise crew. Their deactivation, refurbished for advice, of course, is an example of how your own sense of self appearance is targeted by the ‘Time lapse’ instigation that is being explained. I call this bookmark ‘Time lapse, self appearance’. When you experience such an instigation, you may try to figure it out using what you are perceiving as a reference point, when in fact the instigator’s target is your own sense of self appearance. While you are looking for a solution based on what you are perceiving, with the influence of such an instigation, you have left your guard down somewhat your own sense of self appearance. Notice the refurbished similarities from the ‘Star Trek’ episode. While the androids are trying to resolve what they are perceiving, their own sense of self appearance is being manipulated by the Enterprise crew. So far, this ‘Star Trek’ reference is the only example I can think of right now that may help you understand such an instigation phenomena. [The solution, with the rest of this advice, is to contemplationally use the bookmark, ‘Time lapse, self appearance’, when needed. The use of the bookmark is to help you identify how such an instigation is trying to influence your sense of self appearance. Of course, if you have also read Wishlists #1003-1008, which is provided for you in this blog, you may also choose to use your experience with blinking to resolve the ‘self appearance’ issue.

I guess I could type in more, but I don’t want to spend too much time today in front of the computer. See you next week!

Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi series ‘Doctor Who’ and ‘Star Trek’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and series. [Use mental bookarks ‘Time lapse’ and ‘Time lapse, self appearance’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

12/23/2015

reverse polarity(revisited):

1st, I’d like to say that I lost track of time because I was buying clothes for myself online. I guess I was in the imagined ‘Christmas rush’ mood to buy things at the last minute, except that I was using that rush to buy things for myself. 2nd, since I am taking off from work for Christmas Day, I will be able to spend more non scheduled time with these lists. So, since I am late, but I have some extra time in Christmas Day, I have decided to give you an upgrade for an idea that I have given you over 4 months ago. That idea is called ‘Reverse polarity’. I have given you the idea in Wishlist #1015. The gist(the main or essential part) of it was in 8/12/2015 of that list, when I said quote:

‘And so, at this point, I decided to try something different. I imagined 2 instigators, 1 instigator to my left holding my arm, and one instigator to my right holding my right arm, forcing me to go into one of those airplanes. However, even though they have forced me to be in one of those airplanes, in the context of the idea, that is where I wanted to be! Basically, I have reversed the polarity of certain instigations to be in my favor, instigations that, for the purposes of explanation, would not occur at all in reality, simply because such instigations benefit the innocent person unusually well, in the context for the innocent person to learn and build his/her ideas for instigation.’

If you have read Wishlist #1015, and have chosen to use the idea of ‘reverse polarity’, then I offer you an upgrade for that idea, in the context of standard demographic advice, of course. The idea I’m about to type in is created from 100% imagination, but even though it is, I believe this idea may be useful to you. So, I’d like to start with episode 1.12 ‘Seeds’ from series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2014)’. According to Amazon Video, one of the references from that episode start 3 minutes and 3 seconds into the episode, when Grant(Brett Dalton), Skye(Chloe Bennett), Jemma(Elizabeth Henstridge), and Fitz(Iain De Caestecker) talk about S.H.I.E.L.D. Academy. With the inapproprieities removed, of course, the other references are from the episode that addresses other interactions in S.H.I.E.L.D. Academy. With the help of this ‘Seeds’ episode, you may be able to imagine, if you choose to, that there are learning institutions from the U.S. government, one illustration is S.H.I.E.L.D. Academy, that are classified(confidential or secret) from the general public. So, what I did with these classified learning institutions is to imagine using the idea of ‘reverse polarity’ to allow me to experience from them instigations that would be in my favor, and in the context of an idea that I was developing. I am assuming that many civilians don’t know of any government agents personally, so starting from that assumed perspective, I imagined the possibility of knowing somewhat government agent Phil Coulson(Clark Gregg) from the ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2013)’ series. If you give this imagined idea some imagined credibility, it is possible for a civilian to know Phil Coulson. After all, he does live in America, and he does interact with the general public from time to time. Therefore, I imagined an American civilian who was able to talk Coulson into getting some sort of resourceful reciprocation for that civilian’s use of ‘reverse polarity’. In this idea, Coulson brought this civilian to one of the classified learning institutions that is not from S.H.I.E.L.D.(that is how I imagined it), and he had a talk with that civilian with one of their faculty members. Coulson explained to that faculty member what that civilian wanted, in a context that is mixed in with Coulson’s knowhow, and although that faculty member agreed with Coulson, that faculty member also stated that they do not have any active resources that can accomodate such a request. So, what Coulson did was verify with that faculty member that such a request does have validity, and Coulson, with the help from that faculty member, used Coulson’s own resourcefulness to accomodate that civilian’s request. [With that in mind, and with the imagined help of Coulson, I imagined that, with the help of at least most of the classified learning institutions from America, starting from the year 1985(because of the movie ’42(2013)’ starring Chadwick Boseman as baseball player Jackie Robinson, I figured that the year 1985 is a relatively safe year to start imagining the use of most classified learning institutions, since I imagined that certain issues of discrimination were no longer a problem), I would imagine that, using the idea of ‘reverse polarity’, that these learning institutions would allow me to experience instigations that were in my favor and in the context of the idea that I was developing. To clarify, here is an example of what I am talking about: In the movie ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory(2005)’, according to Amazon Video, the example starts 22 minutes and 23 seconds into the movie. It illustrates Violet Beauregarde’s(AnnaSophia Robb) familiarity with a certain martial arts. It is my impression that she is participating in some sort of martial arts practice. The highlight of this reference is when the 2 men she was sparring with are shown to be on the ground. For the use of this advice, I have interpreted her sparring session as follows: the 2 men on the floor are her instructors, and since she has executed her movements correctly, the men chose to present one of the results of her efforts by being on the ground as part of how both instructors wanted to teach her, and of course in a manner of speaking, Violet agreed to be taught in such a manner. So, if you imagine the mechanics of thinking involved in Violet’s sparring lesson, you may imagine the 2 men not specifically representing instigators, but rather the 2 men are representing experiencing some sort of instigation that is from those classified learning institutions, with the help of Coulson, and of course the instigation is in your favor, meaning that you are not one of those 2 men that are on the floor.(Of course, you can change this idea within reason. This is just part of the explanation.). [This idea is not designed to hurt you. It is designed to help you develop the ideas that you are reasonably working on using the idea of ‘reverse polarity’. For example, when I use this particular idea with some sort of idea that I am developing, I would think ‘1985+’, which would represent at least most of the classified learning institutions from 1985 to now that are allowing me to experience some sort of instigation that is in my favor, with the help of Coulson, and of course within reason. However, when I would think of such an idea, I would get almost nothing. There is no specific anything for many expectations that I would experience when I would use such an idea. However, I still believe that the idea is useful to me. It is like a specific generalistic sense of inspiration that you would create for yourself. Also, if you are a civilian and not a government agent, one would assume that most civilians do not even know if such classified learning institutions even exist, so therefore, for certain expectations, why would you think of something specific, if you are not even sure they exist in the 1st place? Also, even if you do believe that such learning institutions do exist in America, as a civilian, you are probably not aware from personal experience how such an experience would be given to you, since you are not aware of the specific techniques that such classified learning institutions are using. You see? You use this idea to help you develop your own ideas, even though the idea is created from imagination.
This indicates that http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/01/25/africa-home-captivating-look-captivating-woman/ cialis uk age is not the same. lowest cost cialis If you are looking to get rid of all sexual ailments. It promotes physical wellbeing by generic viagra generic making the courses smooth and adaptable. Amatory affair is the exciting sexual love between the two partners to satisfy their sexual accomplices. viagra stores
If you attended college, than this idea may more likely work for you. It is my believe that experiencing instigation in general may wear down the resolve that you had developed when you attended college, a college specific resolve. So, when you use this idea, when you use that ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ reference, that may help re-invigorate some of that sense of college specific resolve that you have lost because of experiencing instigation in general. Of course, you can use other moments in that ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ episode that illustrates interactions in their S.H.I.E.L.D. Academy, with inapproprieities removed, of course.

And to complement your imagination in reference to classified learning institutions, you may want to check the illustrations regarding the ‘Unseen University’ from the science fiction movie ‘Hogfather(2006)’, with inapproprieities removed, of course.

I have also used in imagination celebrity Tom Cruise as IMF agent Ethan Hunt in his ‘Mission: Impossible’ movies. I believe that, in the context of movies, of course, since he is very good at networking, he gives some normal civilians the ability to participate in certain network created agendas. Basically, I believe he may be very easy to imagine giving other people a certain civilian related ‘piece of the action’, so to speak, but the problem with Ethan Hunt is that he just does movies. Since the character Phil Coulson does tv shows, I believe that the tv shows give you more to work with.

Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ’42’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory(2005)’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Hogfather(2006)’. Violence and viewer discretion for the ‘Mission: Impossible’ movies. Use only refurbished for advice references mentioned. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Reverse polarity’ and ‘1985+’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

12/9/2015

Because I think these ideas may be kind of serious at times, I want to introduce to you a song that I have just been made aware of a few days ago. While using my(not actually my service, but I think you can say it that way) cable tv service, I looked at one of it’s music channels, where they would give photos and information about the band that has created the music that is being played. I did this only a few days ago, and it was the 1st time I can recall hearing that song. The band playing that song is called ‘Walk the Moon’ and the song is called ‘Shut Up and Dance’. The intent of the use of this song is to change the mood of these ideas for the better. If you choose to listen to this song, and it is your 1st time doing so, I recommend that you look at the lyrics. I am no music expert, but the 1st verse of the song, which starts as ‘Oh don’t you dare look back’ is not that interesting. It’s not until the words in that verse repeats in the 4th verse that you can hear the difference. Based on my experience, it is like the song is teaching you to appreciate it. I hope that this change of pace benefits you. If you choose to, there’s more information about the band ‘Walk the Moon’ and their song ‘Shut Up and Dance’ at web site www.wikipedia.com. Just type ‘walk the moon’ in wikipedia’s search engine, and search for it. It should bring you right to the information. According to wikipedia, song ‘Walk the Moon’ was digitally released on September 10, 2014.

Since for me it is already 4:08 PM EST, and I admit that I should have started earlier, I only have time to give you the idea that I have recently invented. I was planning to give you an explanation that started ‘from the beginning’, using bookmarks ‘Manage’, ‘Strive’, and ‘Equate’, the 3 bookmarks I introduced to you from Wishlist #1026, the previous list, but that would take way too long to explain. And so, the best course of action I believe is available is to just give you the explanation for my most recent bookmark, a bookmark that was created from bookmarks ‘Manage’, ‘Strive’, and ‘Equate’.

I believe that the best way to explain this idea is to explain the 2 references that I have given it. Basically, I am not as prepared to explain this idea as I am explaining previous ideas. However, based on my speculation and imagination, I believe that many of you have ‘said’ that the references that I have given for previous ideas are the ones that allowed the ideas to be acceptable to you in the 1st place. So, what I will try to do is give you this idea by using the 2 references that I have selected for this idea as the answer. If that doesn’t work, I still think that the advice that I have tried to give to you may still be useful to you.

The 1st reference is what I use as a ‘fun’ reference, because of it’s obvious, blunt way of demonstrating. The reference is in episode 5.4 ‘The Daedalus Variations’ from series ‘Stargate:Atlantis(2008)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 5 minutes and 20 seconds into the episode, when the lights in the spaceship Daedalus seem to mysteriously go on, according to Sheppard(Joe Flanigan). Here’s the quote:

Sheppard:-‘McKay, is that you?'(In reference to the spaceship’s power being turned back on)

Rodney McKay(David Hewlett):-‘Of course it was me. Who else would it be? Do you think we’ve got a ghost on board or something?’

And, if you look closely at what Ronon(Jason Momoa) did at that moment when Rodney was startled, it is my belief that Ronon intentionally created a ruckus sound to startle Rodney temporarily, a sound that is supposed to coincide with Rodney’s statement about ghosts being on board the Daedalus. When Rodney turned around to tell Ronon to watch what he is doing, Ronon gave the impression that the sound created by him was accidental, when in reality that sound was intentional.

[The 2nd reference is in episode 3.13 ‘The Arrow That Is Not Aimed’ from series ‘Magnum, P.I.(1983)’. Amazon offers season 3 on DVD. The DVD/Blu-ray mail service I use also offers season 3 DVDs to be rented. However, the quickest way I know of if you don’t have the DVD available is to watch the episode from www.youtube.com. Just type in ‘the arrow that is not aimed’ in youtube’s search engine, search for that phrase, and it should show you an option to watch it’s full episode. According to a selection that I have made in youtube, I’m using an option that has an episode run time of 45 minutes and 58 seconds, and according to that youtube reference, the reference begins 23 minutes and 15 seconds into the episode, when Higgins(John Hillerman) opens the door to find Thomas Magnum(Tom Selleck) sleeping off a hangover he acquired from drinking sake(Japanese rice wine) the night before. Now, this ‘Magnum, P.I.’ reference is the primary reference to use when you experience the instigation that this advice is trying to describe.

[I am choosing to stop right now. To explain myself, I think I was recovering from some sort of flu that started a few days ago, and even though I feel OK right now, based on results, my energy levels to type such advice do not seem to be the same as before. I plan to try to finish this format of explanation next week, and of course, the 2 references used are refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice. Throw away the rest of the episodes that are not used for this advice.

12/15/2015

Here’s a quote from what I said last week:

‘So, what I will try to do is give you this idea by using the 2 references that I have selected for this idea as the answer.’

I have decided that I can’t do that. However, of course I will use the 2 references in the answer that I plan to give you. It’s just that I won’t be able to use the 2 references as if they were the answer.

Since I try to take into consideration that kids could be reading this, there is an example I would like to offer you from the movie ‘Willow(1988)’. In it, Madmartigan(Val Kilmer) for a long period of time would call Willow(Warwick Davis) a ‘Peck’.(I don’t know what that means). My point is that many of the kids I imagine would like to articulate a certain thought, in relation to advice said, of course, in regards to me not being able to use those 2 references as the answer. So, what I did, and I think I started this idea around 1:50 PM EST(Eastern Standard Time) yesterday, which means I already planned this idea out yesterday, was that I conceptualized a room of leisure that has a ball of light that represents within reason your associated thought that you believe should be there with the fact that I wasn’t able to give you the 2 references as the answer. The room of leisure looks like a library room, a typical library room that many? rich people may have in their homes, a library room that they would allow children to use, let’s say for their homework. However, for this advice, I treat an imagined copy of their library rooms as a sort of living room and dining room. I eat there and read leisure magazines. In episode 3.1 ‘The Troll Farmer’ from series ‘The Blacklist(2015)’, according to Amazon Video, the scene is located 6 minutes and 37 seconds into the episode, when Reddington(James Spader) says to Elizabeth Keen(Megan Boone) quote:

Gulp the pills at once never ever over intake the drugs in cialis canada any manner as it may bring worst side-effects. Focus on your body’s natural ability cheap sildenafil india to get rid from toxins. Buying a medicine with sildenafil buy viagra online Visit This Link citrate has enabled millions of men to avail a high quality medication without paying much. Today, when erectile dysfunction has become a common problem, which is particularly among older men and it might cheapest tadalafil india be linked to total health in various ways than you can even imagine. Reddington:-‘Actually, a week may be nice. I’ll finally get the time to catch up on some back issues of ‘Bassmaster’.’

So, using the refurbished for advice from that ‘Blacklist’ episode, when I am in that library room, I imagine myself sometimes reading back issues of Bassmaster. After all, Reddington was looking forward to reading ‘Bassmaster magazine’ for an entire week. So, basically, what’s in this room is ball of light, like the size of a light bulb, somewhere in the library room, and sometimes I am reading ‘Bassmaster magazine’ when I am in that room, and that ball of light represents a certain thought kids (and adults, I guess) expect to be there in reference to me not being able to present the 2 references as an answer.

Here’s a question for this advice: ‘So, what is this thought?’ One example is from the movie ‘Willow(1988)’, when Madmartigan would call Willow a ‘Peck’ for a long period of time. You see, the difficulty for me to acknowledge that such a thought should be there is that it is only just one thought. I don’t think people have normal conversations consisting of just one thought. I imagined a mix of the character Dr. Joan Watson portrayed by celebrity Lucy Liu and Lucy Liu herself being an avatar, someone who represents me, to be in that library room talking to a lady, and this lady was just talking about that one thought with her the whole time! Lucy Liu would listen to her and talk back to her, but such a dialogue just didn’t seem right. I also imagined myself in that library room reading a copy of ‘Bassmaster’, the magazine is in front of my face, and when I would move the magazine to the right, for one situation, I would see a boy smiling at me, of course the boy was articulating that one thought. I imagined a similar boy being there the 2nd time I moved the magazine, and this time the boy was just staring at me. Soon after that, I realized that it’s just practical to have a ball of light representing that one thought that should be there to represent all of them. As for the girls, I imagined one girl just visiting to check if her one thought is there, and then she would leave. Of course, since it’s purpose is to make better ideas, that ball of light is always in that room, whether or not the kids are aware of it.

The 1st point I wanted to bring up because I wasn’t able to make those 2 references into the answer was that ‘ball of light’ idea. The 2nd point starts with a scene from episode 1.1 ‘Josh Just Happens to Live Here!’ from series ‘Crazy Ex-Girlfriend(2015)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 6 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode, when Josh(Vincent Rodriguez III) was explaining to Rebecca(Rachel Bloom) why he was leaving New York. Here’s the quote:

Josh:-‘Yeah, I’ve been trying to make it work here in the Big Apple, and one day I realized, why get stuck in a rat race? I mean, what’s the point, right?’

To make a long story short, when Josh from the show ‘Crazy Ex-Girlfiend’ decided in his mind that he was going to leave New York, it is my opinion that he had ‘forgotten’ much of what he did when he was trying to make a life for himself in New York. Now, even though I have tried to provide for you in imagination a place for your thoughts to be allowed to exist somewhere, it is still my concern that, when you make such a decision, let’s say those thoughts resemble a certain specific criticism towards me, which, within reason, I have allowed, that you might have ‘forgotten’ some of the things that you have learned as I tried to give you the answer that I have said that I will try to give you. You see, when I make these ideas, I try to make useful as much as I reasonably can. That includes my efforts to try to make an idea work, and the obvious realizations that I cannot meet certain expectations that I have set out to accomplish. So, for example, as a recommendation, if you can try to remember the efforts of your strivings, as well as the obvious realizations that certain expectations that you have chosen cannot be met, I believe that such a recall can benefit you.

Going back to the ‘Josh’ example, when he said that quote, I imagined certain moments in his New York life that he had ‘fogotten’, once he had decided to leave New York. I remember the job related social events that he had attended. I remember his colleagues both ridiculing him and speaking fondly of him. I remember the moments when Josh would talk to some of the employees in the company that he worked for, and such conversations reveal to me that many of the people that he worked with accepted him with open arms, and they see a promising, continuity of future with him and the company. All those things Josh seemed to have ‘forgotten’ once he decided to leave New York, once he decided that New York was too much of a ‘rat race’ for him.

[I am going to take a break right now. I may continue this later today, and I plan to finish this by tomorrow.

12/16/2015

Argue anticipate:

This is what I am going to do, since I have only given myself 2 hours to do it. I am going to combine bookmark ‘Argue’ from Wishlist #1017, which was created at 10/1/2015, and combine that with bookmark ‘Anticipate’, a bookmark that I will introduce to you soon.(Of course, even though you may just use bookmark ‘Argue’, ‘Argue’ was created from the 4 other bookmarks from Wishlist #1017. I don’t think you need to keep that in mind, but I also don’t think you can separate the definition of ‘Argue’ and use it effectively when it is not just used from your thoughts. For example, when you type in the definition of ‘Argue’ only and give that definition to others. That definition of ‘Argue’ alone may not work, unless you also give them the rest of Wishlist #1017). And so, here is the explanation: Basically, this explanation begins with episode 3.13 ‘The Arrow That Is Not Aimed’ from series ‘Magnum P.I.(1983)’. According to youtube.com, a web site that allows you to watch the reference streaming for free, the reference that I am using now from youtube has a run time of 45 minutes and 58 seconds. To find that reference, just type in ‘magnum pi the arrow that is not aimed’ in youtube’s search engine, and it should? offer it to you.(I don’t know how reliable youtube is in regards as to offering tv shows for the public to watch). Of course, you also have the option of buying the DVD from Amazon, or renting the DVD from a DVD rental service that offers it. Anyway, in that tv show, the reference is located 23 minutes and 15 seconds into the episode, when Higgins(John Hillerman) is communicating with Thomas(Tom Selleck) using notes, since Higgins knows that Mr. Magnum is experiencing some sort of hangover from drinking sake(Japanese rice wine) the night before. Now, the point of the reference is to offer you an illustration that may help you relate with this particular instigation that I am trying to explain to you, if you experienced such an instigation before. It is when an instigator improperly imposes some sort of taxed effort upon your sedentary, calm chosen use of composure in such a way that it overemphasizes an out of context sense. I call this misdirection a mistake that overemphasizes another mistake. So, using the ‘Magnum P.I.’ reference again, the scene when Higgins rings the big bell. That scene in youtube starts 24 minutes and 24 seconds into the episode. Let’s say that big bell ringing represents a mistake that overemphasizes an out of context notion response in your mind, and it’s because it’s ‘out of context’, for the purposes of this advice, that is why the ‘out of context’ notion is called a mistake. So, the big bell ringing is the ‘mistake’ that is overemphasizing the ‘out of context’ notion that you have been following, the other ‘mistake’. If you have been experiencing such an instigation in the past, one possible reason you are being troubled by such an instigation is that the ‘mistake’ is misdirecting you to give credence to a composure response that is out of context, and this particular instigation only happens when you choose to have a sedentary, calm composure. That is why I chose ‘The Arrow That Is Not Aimed’ reference for you to consider, because Mr. Magnum’s composure is chosen by Magnum to be VERY sedentary and calm. Of course, I am not saying that you have some sort of sake hangover when the instigation happens. It’s just that this is the best reference I can think of that represents a person choosing to have a sedentary, calm composure as he/she experiences some sort of event, and of course the event is refurbished for advice to represent an instigation.

‘Anticipate’ comes from the Chloraseptic commercial that you may find in youtube.com. Just type in ‘chloraseptic it will hurt if i swallow’ in the youtube.com search engine, search for it, and it has a 31 second commercial with a girl who has a sore throat. The commercial illustrates the girl’s specific thoughts that pertain to her sore throat by the girl’s words saying ‘It will hurt if I swallow…’ several times, and when she does swallow, she experiences discomfort, and calls for her mom. The point of ‘Anticipate’ is that the instigator imposes upon you some sort of anticipated event that an instigation that you have already experienced from that instigator will and is happening again. So, in other words, even after you have addressed and made more tenable a certain instigation in the past or recent past, the instigator is still able to re-introduce that instigation. The anticipation, when it happens, may be very obvious. [The solution is to choose not to subscribe to that instigation, now that you know what it is. And to help with the ‘brunt’ of such an instigation, I recommend that you combine the use of bookmark ‘Argue’ from Wishlist #1017 with bookmark ‘Anticipate’, making it ‘Argue anticipate’. [Now that I have introduced to you ‘Argue anticipate’, I can now introduce to you another bookmark that more accurately explains this instigation effect. It’s called ‘Tolerate anticipate’. That is when an instigator impropely imposes upon you a false obligated sense to have a tolerance for such an anticipation. Let’s say we use the Chloraseptic commercial again, and the anticipation of ‘it will hurt if I swallow’ is introduced to you, except this time, when you use bookmark ‘Tolerate anticipate’, you choose instead to not need to tolerate such an experience. In other words, even though such an adversely misleading sense of composure response is introduced to you, you choose not to interact with the response in such a direct manner. You instead use a more acceptable, a more reasonable composure response.

[Well anyway, since I have to read over this entire list before it is finished, I have to stop typing now. Although this is something that you may expect, I’m presenting you this as a reassurance, that I plan to type in more ideas, the usual once a week. See you then!

Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Stargate: Atlantis’ and ‘Magnum, P.I.’, violence and rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Willow’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Blacklist’ and ‘Elementary’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Mistake overemphasizing mistake’, ‘Argue anticipate’, and ‘Tolerate anticipate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[I forgot to mention that, when I believed I got sick with the flu last week, I took the medicine ‘Theraflu’. The flu in America is very common, and if you didn’t get your flu shot, or you don’t plan on getting any flu shots, I recommend that you have some ‘Theraflu’ handy in case you catch the flu. I’m not a doctor. I’m just giving you a description because I believe the flu is very common in America, and you can just buy ‘Theraflu’ without needing a prescription from your doctor. Going back to the ‘Theraflu’, it’s in the form of a powder that comes in packs. Here is a question for this ‘Theraflu’ advice: ‘Why should I have ‘Theraflu’? Because, if you don’t get your yearly flu shot, and I am assuming that you can reasonably take a flu shot, and you catch the flu, there is a possibility that the experience won’t be just a minor nuisance. When I caught what I believed to be the flu several years ago, I could not sleep at all. That particular experience of the flu induced some sort of restless, insomnia like effect upon me, and my entire body felt like it was aching. Luckily, I finally was able to take the ‘Theraflu’ that night, and soon after, I was able to get some sleep. Now, when you use ‘Theraflu’, you just add 8 oz of hot water to one packet, and drink the result within 10-15 minutes. According to the box, you can take one dose every 4 hours. When I was sick with what I believed to be the flu, I think I only took 2 doses. [I recommend you buy the ‘Nighttime Severe Cold & Cough’ Theraflu. That is the one that will help you sleep better, if you caught the flu, and you’re staying at home to recover. I bought the ‘Theraflu’ from Amazon. And I think it’s every 2 years you are supposed to replace the ‘Theraflu’ you purchased with a new one. Check the expiration date on the ‘Theraflu’ box, if you decide to get the medicine.

12/2/2015

Pinch manage overcommit:

In the context of standard demographic advice, this idea, when I finish explaining the 1st part of it, may look like what I imagine a grammar school Physics problem may look like. So, to try and correct that, what I will do is make 2 lists. The 1st list will have 3 new concepts that I have discovered, and the 2nd list will contain it’s extrapolation. I plan to clarify further the understanding of this idea in the 2nd list. Also, another benefit of this technique is that, for those of you who want to make your own ideas without my solution, you may just look at the 1st list that I will make, the one that has the 3 ideas, and choose not to read the 2nd list. I am also typing this idea in this format in order for you to have this idea, if you choose to, before Christmas of this year. There is a better way of explaining it. I could explain ‘Pinch manage overcommit’ like I explained Wishlist #1015(The beginnings of bookmark use), but that would make me feel too cumbersomed/fatigued if I did so. In other words, the better way would cause me to explain the idea ‘from the beginning’ in order to avoid that Physics problem complexity, but I would feel too cumbersomed/fatigued if I did so. If I discovered this idea without Christmas being some sort of unofficial time limitation, I may have chosen to instead to start the explanation ‘from the beginning’.

Pinch manage overcommit:

1st, I’d like to start by explaining how I plan to explain this idea. I will try to describe these ideas in the form that I have originally discovered them, without adding what I have already discovered after completing the idea in my mind. That way, you may see how one idea leads into another.

Manage:

The 1st idea, which is the main idea, I will call ‘Manage’. I have discovered that an instigator may improperly impose upon you a sense of ‘task management’ interaction, even though you may have chosen to not interact with such an instigation. The best illustration example I can think of, although it may seem unrealistic, and of course it is refurbished for advice, starts according to Amazon Video, 1 hour 50 minutes and 33 seconds near end of movie ‘Spy(2015)’, when Aldo(Peter Serafinowicz) was explaining his real identity to Susan Cooper(Melissa McCarthy). The obvious highlight of the illustration is when Aldo tried to kiss Miss Cooper in a context that Miss Cooper did not like, and she pushed Aldo away. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour, 51 minutes, and 3 seconds into movie. So, the point of the ‘Spy(2015)’ reference is that, even though she did not want to kiss Aldo in such a manner, she still interacted with an adversely altered sense of task management that was caused by Aldo’s uninvited attempted kiss. For example, Miss Cooper still pushed Aldo away, and still left the conversation feeling disgusted. So, to help you see the instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’, think of some mild to moderate instigations that you have experienced, the ones that you did not choose to interact with. Even though you chose not to participate in such instigations, you still may have been affected by the instigation’s imposed interaction of task management. Refurbished for advice, of course, using the movie ‘Spy(2015)’, you still pushed it away and left the situation feeling bothered somewhat. And so, while I was thinking about this instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’, I invented 2 more ideas to be a solution for it. The 2 ideas are called 1)’Strive’ and 2)’Equate’.

Strive:

What I am about to type in now is something that I just imagined to help you use idea ‘Strive’. Since I do not want to change your school of thought, I’m clarifying now that this is just an idea. You don’t have to subscribe to it, but maybe you may find it useful in order to use the ‘Strive’ idea. And so, here is the idea: I think it was a year or so ago that I imagined some companies allowing their employees, because of the nature of what they do, to have and participate in what I call an ‘instigation room’, where they can instigate each other, but in a context that is meant to be job related, and the instigations are not meant to have actual harmful consequences. And so, when I 1st imagined such an instigation room, I didn’t just imagined it’s existence. I remember passing through such a room, moving amongst the people practicing instigation, but using Tai chi. I wasn’t talking to any of them. I was just passing through.(To defend myself, I think I got this idea from episode 1.2 ‘A Leaf in the Wind’ from series ‘The Legend of Korra(2012)’. According to Amazon Video, the episode 1st aired on tv April 4, 2012. and according to Amazon Video, the reference starts 2 minutes and 20 seconds into the episode. In the reference, Jinora explains to Korra that the goal of the exercise is to weave her way through the gates and make it to the other side without touching them). Anyway, I probably thought of that idea sometime after watching that ‘Legend of Korra’ episode, which was probably over 2 years ago. When I was thinking about that ‘instigation room’, I imagined how the people in that room would make themselves aware of new people or people who would warrant an obvious change in their attitudes. It was a casual atmosphere, so when new people would walk in, they would just have a conversation about it. The point is that, based on that change in attitude, and of course I am just imagining this, I have recently made the logical deduction with a little extrapolation that instigators have the capability to cause innocent people to make mistakes. Now, I’m only addressing mistakes that are mild to moderate. For example, let’s say that a co-worker who could be an instigator wanted to make a point to another co-worker. The co-worker for some reason instigates the other co-worker, causing the co-worker to make a contemplation mistake that favors the point of the co-worker instigator.

Now, if you are a person who’s school of thought does not believe in such a thing, then of course you don’t have to use this idea directly. However, what if you are a person who has experienced an instigation, whether it’s from work or school, and the instigation caused you to make a mistake, and the effect was that you were moping around for a week or so before that mistake waned enough to no longer be bothersome?
Pfizer is the pharmaceutical drug firm that produces the particular medicine cialis professional cipla . The effects of healthy physical relationship can benefit to the patient and increases the risk of the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of ZITHROMAX (azithromycin) and other antibacterial drugs, this drug should be taken around thirty to forty minutes before making love.Any increase in the dosage should be prescribed by the doctor so that no complications arise. http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482467798_add_file_2.pdf order cialis Be sure to check that each canadian cialis mastercard therapist can provide ample evidence of their training, experience and commitment to the team is off the charts. This medicine is also needed to viagra super make the energy level of body is a key feature of this herbal supplement is one of the natural ways to enhance libido in males is by regularly consuming herbal pills like Kamdeepak capsules.
This is my plan for both ‘Strive’ and ‘Equate’. The purpose of both ‘Strive’ and ‘Equate’ is to improve your sense of striving and equating. The extra sense of latitude created from such an improvement, if you choose to, could be used as part of the solution for instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’.

I shall start explanation ‘Strive’ using a refurbished for advice description of the story of Hippomenes found in www.wikipedia.com(Just type in name ‘Hippomenes’ in the wikipedia search engine). The part that I am using from that story is how the 3 golden apples given to Hippomenes by Aphrodite affected Atalanta. You see, while Hippomenes was in a race with Atalanta, Hippomenes would drop one at a time one of the golden apples that he has to the ground, and every single time Atalanta would see one of those apples, she would stop running to pick the apple up from the ground. The apple for this advice represents as an example only, not necessarily something that actually happened to you, the apple represents a mistake that you have experienced that was caused by an instigation, a mild to moderate mistake that may have caused you to mope around for a week or so  before that mistake waned enough to no longer be bothersome. One possible effect such a mistake may create is that your originally chosen sense of striving would be abandoned, replaced with another sense of striving. As an example, I just imagined being in a race with celebrity Wesley Snipes, based on his character Mr. Johnson from tv series ‘The Player(2015)’. Using respectful maturity, of course, and I just imagined it, let’s say in the path of our race are several table platforms, and I placed a golden apple from the same place that Aphrodite got her apples on one of those platforms. When Wesley Snipes saw that apple, he stopped running to look at it. Soon after seeing that apple, he discontinued the race altogether. You see, like Wesley Snipes in the story, for a moment, it is like you are just staring at that golden apple, and of course the apple represents that mild to moderate mistake caused by an instigation.

Now, let’s say that a minor mistake is unavoidable. If this ‘Strive’ idea works for you, you should be able, let’s start with just minor mistakes for now, you should be able to not only maintain the use of your originally chosen sense of striving, but you should also be able to manage better how you respond to your mistakes. To help you use the ‘Strive’ idea in the beginning, if you choose to, if you have experienced a minor mistake that is instigation or inadvertently related, put that mistake in a scene from movie ‘The Internship(2013)’. The primary scene according to Amazon Video is located 53 minutes and 53 seconds into the movie, when Graham(Max Minghella) caused Billy McMahon(Vince Vaughn) to fall during a game created by Google. For more detail, you can watch the examples where both Billy McMahon and Nick Campbell(Owen Wilson) are both still on the ground because of Graham. Now, based on those illustrations, put your mistake in an extrapolated illustration of Billy McMahan, while he is still on the ground, is using one of his hands and arms to reach up as he is looking up, a faltering created by Graham. Now, the reason I recommend that extrapolated illustration of Billy McMahan is because Mr. McMahan throughout the movie is regularly emphasizing to the other characters in the movie that he maintains a positive sense of striving. He even gives advice that promotes a positive use of striving. So, the hope of this advice is that, if you put your mild mistakes in that extrapolated illustration, even with the sense of your mistake induced by an instigation, you can still maintain your original sense of striving, a little like Billy McMahan does in the movie ‘The Internship(2013)’, or at least you can just use the idea for latitude.

Equate:

The original definition of ‘Equate’ that I had imagined was to maintain a chosen latitude allowance use for certain instigations that trouble you. I give that original definition credit for ‘starting the ball rolling’ so to speak. However, it’s effectiveness lasted I think it was only a few days for me. So, eventually, I upgraded it’s use to the definition of ‘remembering what your originally chosen intent and resolve was at the time of instigation, with elements of latitude allowance reference. Here’s an illustrated example, refurbished for advice, with the use of the solution in it. The example is in episode 2.26 ‘Assignment: Earth’ from series ‘Star Trek(1968)’. According to Amazon Video, the example is located 17 minutes and 18 seconds into the episode, when Gary Seven(Robert Lansing) asked Roberta Lincoln(Teri Garr) for a typed report for the past 3 days. The reason that the typed report is a possible solution is found in how people recall events. For example, and I don’t know if this is true for you, it’s just an example, when a person recalls an experience involving another person, when that person interprets such an experience, that person may use conceptualizations, contemplation articulations, basically evaluations for their own personal use. However, when a person has to type a report of that recalled experience, that person has to now take into consideration that another person will be reading that report. It’s not just something that they think to themselves privately. It’s now a depiction for another person to evaluate. When that person makes such a report, for that moment, that person may remember details of that experience that was not taken into consideration when that person was evaluating such an experience privately. Notice that, even though Miss Lincoln did not actually type in any words, her intent to type a report revealed to Gary Seven that he misunderstood Miss Lincoln’s true identity.

O.K., so that’s the sci-fi example. Here’s an example that I’ll try to offer to you to use directly. Let’s see if I can use only a little spark of light instead of a spotlight as a reference point. The only illustrated example I can think of is only available on DVD from Amazon that I know of. I don’t know where such an episode is available streaming. The reference is from episode 6.22 ‘Let’s Dance’ from series ‘Northern Exposure(1995)’. If memory serves, Marilyn Whirlwind(Elaine Miles) described to the others that her mother, Mrs. Whirlwind(Armenia Miles) was offended by Dr. Phil Capra’s(Paul Provenza) lack of manners during dinner. Of course, she also realized that Dr. Phil Capra does not know cotillion, and therefore did not know any better. Cotillion is a cultural knowhow used specifically in Cicely, Alaska. For further reference into ‘Let’s Dance’, I recommend web site

http://www.moosechick.com/mcnotes.html

The moosechick web site describes all of the ‘Northern Exposure’ episodes. Now, here’s an example, just an example, for you. Suppose while at work you were having some sort of situation rectified with another employee. Later, as you are reinterpreting the experience, you find yourself mildly offended by how that person rectified the situation with you. Let’s say it had some sort of imposed task management involved. Since you did not have the ‘Equate’ idea, you were still bothered by the experience. [Now, in the 2nd example, suppose the same situation occurred, but this time you now have available the ‘Equate’ idea. So, what happens is that, although you were offended by the experience, you eventually realized that, with the help of the ‘Equate’ idea, you can now remember that the situation was rectified while you were at work, and the offense wasn’t addressed until after you arrived home. As an example, not something that actually happened, you may say to yourself-‘How is the 2nd example different from the 1st?’ The difference is that, when you remember your intent and resolve at the time of the instigation or inadvertency, if there are any reinterpretations that may occur afterwards, your ability to know what latitude allowance you have given the situation could help you decide the relevance of those ‘after the fact’ reinterpretations. In the example I have given you, you resolved that situation in the job. That is what happened, and that helps remind you what latitude allowance you have given that situation. Later, when you were at home, you may have noticed something else, but you did not agree to knowingly include that reinterpretation when you originally interacted with that co-worker. Is it relevant? That is up to you to decide. However, in this example, once you realized that the reinterpretation was not in the original moment that happened in the job, you then chose to no longer pursue the contemplation in a serious context. You see? You are still in full control. I am not trying to change your school of thought, and with this new idea ‘Equate’, you may now better manage reinterpretations that instigations and inadvertencies may impose upon you.

Violence, rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Spy(2015)’, violence and viewer discretion for TV animated series ‘The Legend of Korra’, reading discretion for Greek mythology references, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Player(2015)’, violence and rated PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek(1966+)’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie.(For example, in movie ‘The Internship’, don’t use the fight scene involving the man in the wheelchair, and that scene when Billy and Nick decided to take everyone out to go to a party, that whole party scene, don’t use that, too. Those scenes, although they may be entertaining for many adults to watch, are not needed for the advice). [Use mental bookmarks ‘Manage’, ‘Strive’, and ‘Equate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.