Wishlist #1026

12/2/2015

Pinch manage overcommit:

In the context of standard demographic advice, this idea, when I finish explaining the 1st part of it, may look like what I imagine a grammar school Physics problem may look like. So, to try and correct that, what I will do is make 2 lists. The 1st list will have 3 new concepts that I have discovered, and the 2nd list will contain it’s extrapolation. I plan to clarify further the understanding of this idea in the 2nd list. Also, another benefit of this technique is that, for those of you who want to make your own ideas without my solution, you may just look at the 1st list that I will make, the one that has the 3 ideas, and choose not to read the 2nd list. I am also typing this idea in this format in order for you to have this idea, if you choose to, before Christmas of this year. There is a better way of explaining it. I could explain ‘Pinch manage overcommit’ like I explained Wishlist #1015(The beginnings of bookmark use), but that would make me feel too cumbersomed/fatigued if I did so. In other words, the better way would cause me to explain the idea ‘from the beginning’ in order to avoid that Physics problem complexity, but I would feel too cumbersomed/fatigued if I did so. If I discovered this idea without Christmas being some sort of unofficial time limitation, I may have chosen to instead to start the explanation ‘from the beginning’.

Pinch manage overcommit:

1st, I’d like to start by explaining how I plan to explain this idea. I will try to describe these ideas in the form that I have originally discovered them, without adding what I have already discovered after completing the idea in my mind. That way, you may see how one idea leads into another.

Manage:

The 1st idea, which is the main idea, I will call ‘Manage’. I have discovered that an instigator may improperly impose upon you a sense of ‘task management’ interaction, even though you may have chosen to not interact with such an instigation. The best illustration example I can think of, although it may seem unrealistic, and of course it is refurbished for advice, starts according to Amazon Video, 1 hour 50 minutes and 33 seconds near end of movie ‘Spy(2015)’, when Aldo(Peter Serafinowicz) was explaining his real identity to Susan Cooper(Melissa McCarthy). The obvious highlight of the illustration is when Aldo tried to kiss Miss Cooper in a context that Miss Cooper did not like, and she pushed Aldo away. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour, 51 minutes, and 3 seconds into movie. So, the point of the ‘Spy(2015)’ reference is that, even though she did not want to kiss Aldo in such a manner, she still interacted with an adversely altered sense of task management that was caused by Aldo’s uninvited attempted kiss. For example, Miss Cooper still pushed Aldo away, and still left the conversation feeling disgusted. So, to help you see the instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’, think of some mild to moderate instigations that you have experienced, the ones that you did not choose to interact with. Even though you chose not to participate in such instigations, you still may have been affected by the instigation’s imposed interaction of task management. Refurbished for advice, of course, using the movie ‘Spy(2015)’, you still pushed it away and left the situation feeling bothered somewhat. And so, while I was thinking about this instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’, I invented 2 more ideas to be a solution for it. The 2 ideas are called 1)’Strive’ and 2)’Equate’.

Strive:

What I am about to type in now is something that I just imagined to help you use idea ‘Strive’. Since I do not want to change your school of thought, I’m clarifying now that this is just an idea. You don’t have to subscribe to it, but maybe you may find it useful in order to use the ‘Strive’ idea. And so, here is the idea: I think it was a year or so ago that I imagined some companies allowing their employees, because of the nature of what they do, to have and participate in what I call an ‘instigation room’, where they can instigate each other, but in a context that is meant to be job related, and the instigations are not meant to have actual harmful consequences. And so, when I 1st imagined such an instigation room, I didn’t just imagined it’s existence. I remember passing through such a room, moving amongst the people practicing instigation, but using Tai chi. I wasn’t talking to any of them. I was just passing through.(To defend myself, I think I got this idea from episode 1.2 ‘A Leaf in the Wind’ from series ‘The Legend of Korra(2012)’. According to Amazon Video, the episode 1st aired on tv April 4, 2012. and according to Amazon Video, the reference starts 2 minutes and 20 seconds into the episode. In the reference, Jinora explains to Korra that the goal of the exercise is to weave her way through the gates and make it to the other side without touching them). Anyway, I probably thought of that idea sometime after watching that ‘Legend of Korra’ episode, which was probably over 2 years ago. When I was thinking about that ‘instigation room’, I imagined how the people in that room would make themselves aware of new people or people who would warrant an obvious change in their attitudes. It was a casual atmosphere, so when new people would walk in, they would just have a conversation about it. The point is that, based on that change in attitude, and of course I am just imagining this, I have recently made the logical deduction with a little extrapolation that instigators have the capability to cause innocent people to make mistakes. Now, I’m only addressing mistakes that are mild to moderate. For example, let’s say that a co-worker who could be an instigator wanted to make a point to another co-worker. The co-worker for some reason instigates the other co-worker, causing the co-worker to make a contemplation mistake that favors the point of the co-worker instigator.

Now, if you are a person who’s school of thought does not believe in such a thing, then of course you don’t have to use this idea directly. However, what if you are a person who has experienced an instigation, whether it’s from work or school, and the instigation caused you to make a mistake, and the effect was that you were moping around for a week or so before that mistake waned enough to no longer be bothersome?
Pfizer is the pharmaceutical drug firm that produces the particular medicine cialis professional cipla . The effects of healthy physical relationship can benefit to the patient and increases the risk of the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of ZITHROMAX (azithromycin) and other antibacterial drugs, this drug should be taken around thirty to forty minutes before making love.Any increase in the dosage should be prescribed by the doctor so that no complications arise. http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482467798_add_file_2.pdf order cialis Be sure to check that each canadian cialis mastercard therapist can provide ample evidence of their training, experience and commitment to the team is off the charts. This medicine is also needed to viagra super make the energy level of body is a key feature of this herbal supplement is one of the natural ways to enhance libido in males is by regularly consuming herbal pills like Kamdeepak capsules.
This is my plan for both ‘Strive’ and ‘Equate’. The purpose of both ‘Strive’ and ‘Equate’ is to improve your sense of striving and equating. The extra sense of latitude created from such an improvement, if you choose to, could be used as part of the solution for instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’.

I shall start explanation ‘Strive’ using a refurbished for advice description of the story of Hippomenes found in www.wikipedia.com(Just type in name ‘Hippomenes’ in the wikipedia search engine). The part that I am using from that story is how the 3 golden apples given to Hippomenes by Aphrodite affected Atalanta. You see, while Hippomenes was in a race with Atalanta, Hippomenes would drop one at a time one of the golden apples that he has to the ground, and every single time Atalanta would see one of those apples, she would stop running to pick the apple up from the ground. The apple for this advice represents as an example only, not necessarily something that actually happened to you, the apple represents a mistake that you have experienced that was caused by an instigation, a mild to moderate mistake that may have caused you to mope around for a week or so  before that mistake waned enough to no longer be bothersome. One possible effect such a mistake may create is that your originally chosen sense of striving would be abandoned, replaced with another sense of striving. As an example, I just imagined being in a race with celebrity Wesley Snipes, based on his character Mr. Johnson from tv series ‘The Player(2015)’. Using respectful maturity, of course, and I just imagined it, let’s say in the path of our race are several table platforms, and I placed a golden apple from the same place that Aphrodite got her apples on one of those platforms. When Wesley Snipes saw that apple, he stopped running to look at it. Soon after seeing that apple, he discontinued the race altogether. You see, like Wesley Snipes in the story, for a moment, it is like you are just staring at that golden apple, and of course the apple represents that mild to moderate mistake caused by an instigation.

Now, let’s say that a minor mistake is unavoidable. If this ‘Strive’ idea works for you, you should be able, let’s start with just minor mistakes for now, you should be able to not only maintain the use of your originally chosen sense of striving, but you should also be able to manage better how you respond to your mistakes. To help you use the ‘Strive’ idea in the beginning, if you choose to, if you have experienced a minor mistake that is instigation or inadvertently related, put that mistake in a scene from movie ‘The Internship(2013)’. The primary scene according to Amazon Video is located 53 minutes and 53 seconds into the movie, when Graham(Max Minghella) caused Billy McMahon(Vince Vaughn) to fall during a game created by Google. For more detail, you can watch the examples where both Billy McMahon and Nick Campbell(Owen Wilson) are both still on the ground because of Graham. Now, based on those illustrations, put your mistake in an extrapolated illustration of Billy McMahan, while he is still on the ground, is using one of his hands and arms to reach up as he is looking up, a faltering created by Graham. Now, the reason I recommend that extrapolated illustration of Billy McMahan is because Mr. McMahan throughout the movie is regularly emphasizing to the other characters in the movie that he maintains a positive sense of striving. He even gives advice that promotes a positive use of striving. So, the hope of this advice is that, if you put your mild mistakes in that extrapolated illustration, even with the sense of your mistake induced by an instigation, you can still maintain your original sense of striving, a little like Billy McMahan does in the movie ‘The Internship(2013)’, or at least you can just use the idea for latitude.

Equate:

The original definition of ‘Equate’ that I had imagined was to maintain a chosen latitude allowance use for certain instigations that trouble you. I give that original definition credit for ‘starting the ball rolling’ so to speak. However, it’s effectiveness lasted I think it was only a few days for me. So, eventually, I upgraded it’s use to the definition of ‘remembering what your originally chosen intent and resolve was at the time of instigation, with elements of latitude allowance reference. Here’s an illustrated example, refurbished for advice, with the use of the solution in it. The example is in episode 2.26 ‘Assignment: Earth’ from series ‘Star Trek(1968)’. According to Amazon Video, the example is located 17 minutes and 18 seconds into the episode, when Gary Seven(Robert Lansing) asked Roberta Lincoln(Teri Garr) for a typed report for the past 3 days. The reason that the typed report is a possible solution is found in how people recall events. For example, and I don’t know if this is true for you, it’s just an example, when a person recalls an experience involving another person, when that person interprets such an experience, that person may use conceptualizations, contemplation articulations, basically evaluations for their own personal use. However, when a person has to type a report of that recalled experience, that person has to now take into consideration that another person will be reading that report. It’s not just something that they think to themselves privately. It’s now a depiction for another person to evaluate. When that person makes such a report, for that moment, that person may remember details of that experience that was not taken into consideration when that person was evaluating such an experience privately. Notice that, even though Miss Lincoln did not actually type in any words, her intent to type a report revealed to Gary Seven that he misunderstood Miss Lincoln’s true identity.

O.K., so that’s the sci-fi example. Here’s an example that I’ll try to offer to you to use directly. Let’s see if I can use only a little spark of light instead of a spotlight as a reference point. The only illustrated example I can think of is only available on DVD from Amazon that I know of. I don’t know where such an episode is available streaming. The reference is from episode 6.22 ‘Let’s Dance’ from series ‘Northern Exposure(1995)’. If memory serves, Marilyn Whirlwind(Elaine Miles) described to the others that her mother, Mrs. Whirlwind(Armenia Miles) was offended by Dr. Phil Capra’s(Paul Provenza) lack of manners during dinner. Of course, she also realized that Dr. Phil Capra does not know cotillion, and therefore did not know any better. Cotillion is a cultural knowhow used specifically in Cicely, Alaska. For further reference into ‘Let’s Dance’, I recommend web site

http://www.moosechick.com/mcnotes.html

The moosechick web site describes all of the ‘Northern Exposure’ episodes. Now, here’s an example, just an example, for you. Suppose while at work you were having some sort of situation rectified with another employee. Later, as you are reinterpreting the experience, you find yourself mildly offended by how that person rectified the situation with you. Let’s say it had some sort of imposed task management involved. Since you did not have the ‘Equate’ idea, you were still bothered by the experience. [Now, in the 2nd example, suppose the same situation occurred, but this time you now have available the ‘Equate’ idea. So, what happens is that, although you were offended by the experience, you eventually realized that, with the help of the ‘Equate’ idea, you can now remember that the situation was rectified while you were at work, and the offense wasn’t addressed until after you arrived home. As an example, not something that actually happened, you may say to yourself-‘How is the 2nd example different from the 1st?’ The difference is that, when you remember your intent and resolve at the time of the instigation or inadvertency, if there are any reinterpretations that may occur afterwards, your ability to know what latitude allowance you have given the situation could help you decide the relevance of those ‘after the fact’ reinterpretations. In the example I have given you, you resolved that situation in the job. That is what happened, and that helps remind you what latitude allowance you have given that situation. Later, when you were at home, you may have noticed something else, but you did not agree to knowingly include that reinterpretation when you originally interacted with that co-worker. Is it relevant? That is up to you to decide. However, in this example, once you realized that the reinterpretation was not in the original moment that happened in the job, you then chose to no longer pursue the contemplation in a serious context. You see? You are still in full control. I am not trying to change your school of thought, and with this new idea ‘Equate’, you may now better manage reinterpretations that instigations and inadvertencies may impose upon you.

Violence, rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Spy(2015)’, violence and viewer discretion for TV animated series ‘The Legend of Korra’, reading discretion for Greek mythology references, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Player(2015)’, violence and rated PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek(1966+)’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie.(For example, in movie ‘The Internship’, don’t use the fight scene involving the man in the wheelchair, and that scene when Billy and Nick decided to take everyone out to go to a party, that whole party scene, don’t use that, too. Those scenes, although they may be entertaining for many adults to watch, are not needed for the advice). [Use mental bookmarks ‘Manage’, ‘Strive’, and ‘Equate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.