Wishlist #1035

1/27/2016

Here is where I finally begin addressing the ‘Use’ bookmarks. However, instead on starting from the beginning, which is to shuffle the 4 ‘Use’ bookmarks, I have decided to address the ‘brunt’ bookmarks that I have created from those 4 bookmarks first. Once I am done with that, then I will go back to the beginning and shuffle those ‘Use’ bookmarks. So, basically, I am giving you this explanation backwards.

Approach

According to dictionary.com, the noun definition of ‘approach’ is-‘the act of drawing near’. The example from dictionary.com is-‘The approach of a train’. Now, I tried contemplationally to give an explanation as to how this instigation is experienced without giving the answer, but I wasn’t able to. So what I am going to do instead is give you the answer. That means that the positive effect of this advice should be very quick. If I was able to give you the explained experience with the answer first, you would have an obvious ‘before and after’ comparison, but I am not able to casually do that. So, here is the answer: Now, if you have experienced this instigation before, my guess is many of you probably have, and you haven’t experienced or you haven’t invented some sort of solution for that, then you probably have some build-up for it. Here is an example: As your body is in a state of rest and calm, an instigator imposes upon you the impression that you are adversely approaching an evaluation experience, when in reality you are not choosing to contemplationally approach such an adverse sense of evaluation experience. So, what may be happening is that an instigator is causing you to contemplationally experience something that you are avoiding to experience, but no matter what you reasonably do, the impression that you are approaching an adverse evaluation is still unavoidable to you.

The solution, so to speak, is that when you use bookmark ‘Approach’, it is recommended that you identify such an instigation in a more manageable context, that the instigation is giving you the impression that you are choosing to approach an adverse sense of contemplation evaluation, but that impression is not what you are doing. You see, before this advice, when you would experience such an approaching instigation, as you would try to avoid it’s experience, since your efforts were not producing results the way that you would want them to, the experience may have caused you to somewhat squirm and cringe. Now, if you choose to use this advice, you can identify such an instigation as a false impression of you approaching an adverse sense of evaluation. If this advice works for you, you are now more objectively able to identify instigations that have different amount of ‘approaching’ in them.

The only illustrating example, refurbished for advice, of course, that I have for bookmark ‘Approach’ is from episode 1.2 ‘The Main Attraction’ from series ‘Amazing Stories(1985)’. Although it is not available from Amazon Video, you can buy the DVD from Amazon. When I checked the price, it was under 23 dollars, and it is available from Amazon Prime shipping. I also checked www.youtube.com, and the episode is available to watch from youtube for free! Just go to www.youtube.com, type in ‘amazing stories season 1’ in youtube’s search engine, search for it, and the episode is available under category ‘Amazing Stories Season 1 Full Episodes’. The episode is called ‘Amazing Stories Season 1 Epidose 3’. The episode as it is used by this advice is basically about Brad Bender(John Scott Clough), a high school student, being turned into a human magnet. Now, when I recalled the episode, I pictured him being circulated throughout town. Basically, Brad was being pulled around to be amongst all of the high school students, and anyone else who wanted to notice him, an experience he did not choose to have. So, basically, the illustration is about a man who is experiencing a sense of approaching that he does not want to experience, an illustration that I believe may be useful to your ‘Approach’ problem. And, of course, the ‘Amazing Stories’ reference is not meant to insult you, especially if you refurbish the illustration to be useful to you. You don’t have to watch the whole episode. I just recommend the parts when he becomes a human magnet. And, of course, those parts you can edit as well.

Using bookmark ‘Approach’, I have invented 4 variations for it. The basic meaning of the variations is that an instigator may improperly impose upon you to experience a discomfort that you are avoiding to experience. All 4 variations have the word ‘Approach’, but I believe that, since you know what ‘Approach’ means already, you may not need to say it in your mind again. The 1st bookmark I am going to explain is called ‘Sore throat swallow (Approach)’:

Sore throat swallow:

The phrase ‘Sore throat swallow’ comes from an old Chloraseptic commercial. Just go to www.youtube.com, type ‘chloraseptic it will hurt if i swallow’, search for it, and that commercial should be the 1st one youtube shows you. Basically, there is a girl who has a sore throat, and the commercial is illustrating to you that she is thinking to herself quote-‘It will hurt if I swallow.’ For several moments, she is trying not to swallow, because if she does, she believes she will experience some mild discomfort. Finally, she swallows, experiences her sore throat, and then calls out for her mom to help her.

The point of the Chloraseptic commercial, refurbished for advice, of course, is to give you an illustration that helps you understand that an instigator may improperly impose a discomfort for you to experience that you are avoiding to experience. Since many separate expectations can have it’s own separate ‘trophy’, so to speak, it is my opinion that, in it’s own category, bookmark ‘Sore throat swallow’ can be very useful to you if an instigation is causing you to experience discomfort that you are trying to avoid. Now, here is an idea that I think I can explain to you what it was like before you may choose to use this ‘Sore throat swallow’ idea. Using the ‘before and after’ concept, here is what your ‘before’ may have been like: Before this idea, when you experienced a certain instigation that is causing you to experience discomfort that you are avoiding to experience, your sense of ethics and morality integrity is causing to be reserved with such an experience. A sense of ethics and morality ambiance is also there. There may also be some mild vertigo involved. You are basically trying to do the right thing, as a certain discomfort that you are avoiding to experience is imposed upon you to experience. Now, I recommend that you imagine a certain discomfort associated with certain contemplations that you may have that you would normally try to avoid having. I speculate that you would avoid sensing such a discomfort contemplationally. That is what an instigator may be exploiting, your private contemplation efforts to avoid certain discomforts associated with certain contemplations. OK, that was ‘before’.

Now, here is what may happen when you choose to use this advice. Here is an example of ‘after’: When you use bookmark ‘Sore throat swallow’ to identify instigations that are trying to impose upon you to experience discomfort that you are avoiding to experience, you are now able to more objectively manage such instigations better. If you are an adult, and you have been experiencing such discomfort inducing instigations for years, and you weren’t able to invent or experience a certain adequate solution or routine for it, and you are new at using this idea, you probably will experience a sense of obvious relief. Even better, the phrase ‘Sore throat swallow’ comes from what I believe to be a very effective commercial illustration. After all, I am assuming that most of us have experienced such a sore throat discomfort when we were kids, so therefore you have your own personal experience to reference for this idea, if you choose to.

Normally, I would just give you the bookmark, but for ‘Sore throat swallow’, here is an explanation as to how to use it. The phrase ‘Sore throat’ represents an indicator, not necessarily to be taken literally, for the discomfort that you are trying to avoid. Now, the phrase ‘Swallow’ represents an indicator, not necessarily to be taken literally, for mild to moderate instigations in relation to advice, of course, for the discomfort that the instigator is trying to make you experience. Here, let me give you an example: Let’s say a woman is recalling a conversation she had with another woman where she works less than 2 years ago, and that woman was innocent while she was having a conversation with that other woman. However, that other woman, for whatever reason, chose during her conversation with the innocent woman, to cause her to contemplationally experience a certain discomfort that the innocent woman was trying to contemplationally avoid. For a while, that woman was mildly bothered by such an event. However, with the help of this advice, when she recalls that incident again, she contemplationally uses the phrase ‘Sore throat swallow’, and now she feels a lot better! She can now even identify the exact moment when she believes the instigator is trying to get her to ‘swallow’ the discomfort.

[I’ve been at this for a few hours already. I’m going to stop now, and I plan to finish the variations for bookmark ‘Approach’ next week. See you then!

2/3/2016

Calm diversity:

Before I continue with the ‘Approach’ explanation, I sense that there may be some resolve waning occurring, some sort of complaining involving the interest that should be used to continue reading these ideas. The complaining is basically from kids, that I imagined. Since this is standard demographic advice by intent, I tried to think of something that would resolve that waning interest. Before I give my attempted solution, I want to say that there are many aspects to another person’s efforts to reading these ideas that are ‘none of my business’. I am just trying to offer advice to you that you may find useful regarding unavoidably experienced instigation and it’s related inadvertencies.

The idea that I have created comes from an idea that I have 1st mentioned in Amazon.com called ‘Calm diversity’. Basically, it is a beginning idea that helps me create goals made of calm diversity. And so, the solution I have tried to think up for those kids with a waning interest to read these ideas is to use your sense of ad libbing to invent a separate notion that is just imagined to blame instigators for improperly imposing an excessive sense of calm diversity. This idea is based on my belief that instigators are exploiting your sense of trying to cope with their instigations. For example, when you would use your technique regularly over the years to cope with uninvited instigation, that routine may be exploited without your knowledge of it being exploited. I have thought of several ideas to address that, but I don’t have the time to explain those ideas right now. Instead, I offer you this ‘Calm diversity’ idea in the hopes that it’s use will offer you something useful, until I am able to explain those other ideas.

So, here is the basic power from the use of ‘Calm diversity’ for this idea: If you choose to use this idea, imagine that one use of ‘Calm diversity’ is derived from a person acquiring not just steady employment, but a job that person actually prefers to have. Think of a person that has a job that fortifies his/her goals. ‘Calm diversity’ is not having that job itself. What it is is that sense of employment that is used to create that person’s sense of calm diversity. Here are 2 illustrated examples: In the movie ‘About Time(2013)’, here is a quote from imdb.com from it’s synopsis of the movie:

‘After the summer, Tim moves to London to pursue his career as a lawyer. He moves in with a family friend named Harry Chapman ( Tom Hollander), a grouchy playwright. He then starts work at a law firm and makes friends with a young man named Rory (Joshua McGuire), who spends a lot of time close to Tim as he continues his search for a girlfriend.’

Basically, this idea offers you the illustrations from Tim(Domhnall Gleeson) and Rory as it pertains to the pursuit of their lawyer careers. Since I am assuming I am giving advice to Americans(This advice is not exclusive to just Americans. I am just assuming that the reasonable use of this blog is in the U.S.), I imagined as a convenient contemplation reference Tim and Rory photographed, happy of course, and wearing their barrister wigs and uniforms.(For more information about barristers, I recommend web site www.wikipedia.com). The reason for that image is that, according to what I have read in the internet, lawyers in London are called barristers, and they wear those white wigs. Since I am not a lawyer myself, I don’t believe that lawyers in America are required to wear white wigs when in a courtroom. It’s the distinction that may interest you. So, when you imagine those 2 lawyers from London, you use that as a reference to imagine that instigators are imposing upon you too much ‘calm diversity’ for you to contemplationally interact with in a certain context. So, to provide a certain balance in your awareness, you use a sense of acknowledgement that is more reasonable to think about. Of course, you are not negating their use of calm diversity. After all, people will believe what they want. Instead, you are just trying to reasonably acknowledge that sense of calm diversity in your mind.

It is by way cialis uk no prescription of intimate intercourse that human race is still present up to this time. It cialis discount generic http://djpaulkom.tv/da-mafia-6ixs-watch-what-u-wish-album-is-complete-and-coming-your-way-soon/ is known to provide an excellent cure for diabetes. Thus, sildenafil prevents the destruction of cGMP and allows you to achieve a firm and long lasting erection which is achieved viagra tablet http://djpaulkom.tv/dj-paul-and-yo-gotti-declare-its-a-new-day-in-memphis/ after 15 to 20 minutes of popping this pill. Compare prices and products with other websites to get a genuine product at the lowest price tadalafil lower price. The 2nd example is based on the celebrity actor Peter Wingfield. According to wikipedia.com, he is ‘ internationally best known for his role as the 5000-year-old Immortal Methos in the hit syndicated series ‘Highlander: The Series’. Another quote from wikipedia.com talks about Mr. Wingfield’s medical career: ‘Starting in 2011, Wingfield significantly reduced his acting career responsibilities. Returning full circle to his earlier interest in a career in medicine, he entered College of Medicine at the University of Vermont as part of the Class of 2015.’ So, if you go to www.google.com and type in ‘peter wingfield university of vermont match day’, the 1st link google may show you is ‘UVM medical student signing through school as high…’ If you click that, it may bring you to web site www.wptz.com, where there is a video clip of Mr. Wingfield being accepted for a residency program at UC San Diego. Mr. Wingfield’s video illustration begins 50 seconds into the video clip. You will see him wearing the green glasses announcing to a crowd that he is going to UC San Diego. [So basically, with this 2nd example, you do the same thing like you did with the 1st example. You use that as a reference for excessive calm diversity from an instigator that you are making more tenable in your mind to recognize. Personally, I think you only need the 1st example. The 2nd example is offered to you for variety.

[And that’s it for today. I didn’t have much free time today. One reason is that I went to H & R Block to have my taxes done. And another reason is because I sensed a waning interest from some kids that caused me to offer you this ‘Calm diversity’ idea, time I could have used instead to finish explaining the ‘Approach’ idea, an idea I already planned to give to you. Well anyway, if you are still here for next week, then I plan to offer you something to read next week. See you then!

2/10/2016

Strength:

Here’s a quote from last week’s paragraph that I want to address:

‘And another reason is because I sensed a waning interest from some kids that caused me to offer you this ‘Calm diversity’ idea, time I could have used instead to finish explaining the ‘Approach’ idea, an idea I already planned to give to you.’

I should have added an exclamation point(!) at the end of that paragraph. Anyway, if you read Wishlist #1017 in this blog(9/30/2015), you probably used the ‘Argue’ part of the idea many times. For the point I am trying to make, that means that, by now, you have developed a ‘sense’ for the meaning that is not dependant on just the appearance of the words. For example, if you have read and used Wishlist #1017, have you noticed that the explanation appearance in words for ‘Argue’ may not match how you sense the meaning for ‘Argue’? I believe that you, ‘you’ meaning the kids that read this blog, have probably used that experience to evaluate the quote that I have given you. When I said in the quote that ‘time I could have used instead to finish explaining the ‘Approach’ idea, an idea I already planned to give to you.’, you may have sensed that I was being a little testy.(I gave you the definition of ‘testy’ in Wishlist #1015, towards the end of that list, at 9/16/2015). I know that I encourage kids to be skeptical, and that it is none of my business. That being said, because of how I imagine many of the kids responding to that mildly testy statement, I want to explain an idea called ‘Strength’. Of course, you can still decide whether or not you choose to use that idea. I’ll start the explanation of ‘Strength’ in the next paragraph:

Here is a quote from episode 4.14 ‘Meet John Doe’ from series ‘Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman(1997)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene is located 17 minutes and 4 seconds into the episode:

John Doe(Lane Davies):-‘Rising in the poles everywhere except these small pocket communities. Why is that?’

Randolph(Richard Cody):-‘Mr. Doe, those would be, um, Amish communities, sir.

John Doe:-‘So? Have you done your ‘get out the vote’ phone drive?’

Randolph:-‘The Amish don’t have telephones, sir.’

John Doe:-‘No telephones?’

Randolph:-‘No, sir.’

According to imdb.com, Tempus is using a subliminal device to win the election using certain public forms of technology. Based on my impression from this tv show and the movie ‘Witness(1985)’ starring Harrison Ford as Det. John Book, the Amish are Americans that do not use certain obvious forms of technology, such as computers and cell phones. Based on my memory of that ‘Lois & Clark’ episode, even though you may not obviously see any Amish in that episode, I believe that short scene that I quoted is the best reference I can think of for this advice. Since it is the intent of this advice to be ‘standard demographic’ advice, I am using what I imagine the Amish to be to be a reference point, extrapolated, of course, for certain schools of thought. Now, I am assuming that many of the kids that are reading these ideas probably have their own computers, at least. I am using the Amish in this idea as an example of a people that do not have certain obvious beliefs that mainstream? Americans do have. So, when you interact with someone that is Amish, and you are an American that uses obvious forms of technology, such as a cell phone, and you participate in American politics somewhat, if you interact with someone who is Amish, there are certain beliefs of yours, beliefs involving strength, that may interpret certain interactions with that Amish person as somewhat lacking in reciprocation to those beliefs involving strength, and since, for example, this particular American imaginatively used as an example is not a mindreader, that lack of reciprocation may instead be interpreted as a weakness. For example, since the Amish person is trying to learn to relate to other Americans, that effort to relate to another person’s belief involving strength, a belief that such an Amish person does not subscribe to, that lack of belief participation may not be so easily recognizable to the other American who is not Amish. So instead, the Amish’s ability to try to communicate with another American coupled with the other American, who is not Amish, sensing a lack of reciprocation to a use of strength, that may cause the other American who is not Amish to belief that the Amish is ‘weak’ for not responding to his/her strength.

So, do you see what type of advice I am trying to give other people? There are schools of thought that may not recognize the strengths that you, as kids, are trying to articulate to others regarding the use of this advice, simply because those other schools of thought do not subscribe to certain beliefs that you may have and publicly use. Of course, I am assuming that many of the people that are reading these ideas are Americans, but Americans also practice many different schools of thought. That is why I chose the Amish as an example; I believe it is easy for kids to imagine that their school of thought, certain aspects of it, not all of it, is different than their own, for the obvious reason that they avoid certain obvious uses of technology, technology that I believe many kids in America expect to be available to them. So, I am anticipating that one popular diagnostic phrase a kid might use after reading this advice may be ‘Are you Amish?’ I am not encouraging a discriminating use of that phrase. It is just a phrase I think many? kids may use after reading this advice.

[I know that I haven’t said much recently. I plan to try to finish this ‘Approach’ explanation next week, and type in more, of course.

2/15/2016

1st, I’d like to ask your permission to use the ‘good news, bad news’ explanation. I’m not planning to stop giving advice. The ‘good news, bad news’ format is just a way for me to convey a meaning to you. Well anyway, here it goes: The ‘good news’ is that I recently invented an idea, this past Saturday, just a few days ago, that I believe may be useful to you. I sense some attention span in the new bookmark phrases alone. The ‘bad news’ is that, if I am to explain this new idea to you, I would have to discontinue explaining this ‘Approach’ idea. If I have time and if I choose to, I will simply ‘copy and paste’ what I need from this list concerning the ‘Approach’ idea and create a new list for it. So, what I plan to do now is read this list over, make some basic changes where needed, and add a disclaimer at the end of it. Tomorrow, I plan to offer you the new idea I recently invented. I want to read and finish this list now so that I can start the new idea fresh, without hindrance from the ideas in this list.

Some viewer discretion for series ‘Amazing Stories’. Rated R viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘About Time’. Rated PG discretion for sci-fi series ‘Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman’. Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Witness’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Approach’ and ‘Sore throat swallow’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

Wishlist #1034

1/26/2016

The Fortified Notion Game:

This is not part of the ‘shuffling’ that I had said I would do. This is an idea that I want to offer the kids that, for whatever reason I am unaware of in relation to advice said, this is for the kids that have declared that these ideas have some sort of value to other kids that are not family related, such as kids from school, and these kids are hoping that the next ideas that I plan to type in will ‘prove them right’. The only reason I believe I am able to type such a concern is because of that ‘Argue’ idea I typed in Wishlist #1017 on September 30, 2015. I believe it’s popularity(even though I am only imagining it’s popularity, I don’t actually have proof that such a popularity actually exists) gives me some credibility to work with. I want to type this idea in before I start the ‘Use’ bookmarks.

I want to begin this explanation with the illustrated reference first. There are several illustrated examples in episode 7.1 ‘Bond’ from series ‘The Good Wife(2015)’. According to Amazon Video, here are their locations:(Technically, I also may get the quotes from web site www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk . It has a lot of tv show and movie scripts. That way, I just copy and paste the words from the ‘springfield…’ site to this blog. Of course, the words should coincide with the tv show or movie I am recommending to you. The web site is free to use.) The 1st quote begins, according to Amazon Video, 20 minutes and 2 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Dr. Ian Caine(Danny Burstein):-‘Dr. Ian Caine, adhesive expert at Solvent and Curables Lab.’

Judge Farley(Jane Curtin):-‘You’re what?’

Dr. Ian Caine:-‘An adhesive expert.’

Judge Farley:-‘Really…That’s a job?’

Dr. Ian Caine:-‘Yes, it is, Your Honor.’

In general, erectile dysfunction is classified according to whether it is a pop-up or pop-under viagra on line pharmacy ad. It can be controlled with herbal treatment but it generic viagra wholesale will makeyou healthier & stronger in your every day life. In order to minimise the risk of penile odor due to the presence of low magnesium levels may hamper the functioning of male organ.Kamagra Polo is cheap viagra from canada a chewable tablet and no water is required for swallowing it. There are more than a handful of issues when you http://robertrobb.com/category/ballotmeasures/ cialis properien add another year in your life. The 2nd reference begins 27 minutes and 32 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Dr. Nigel Buggy(David Cale):-‘Dr. Nigel Buggy. I’m an industrial suction expert with Ames Institute.

Judge Farley:-‘Okay, now you’re just making these jobs up.’

Basically, the references are about how Judge Farley is responding to the various experts that are brought to her attention. Refurbished for advice, of course, you may also watch the rest of the scenes that has Judge Farley involved for further background.

So anyway, my concern is that if my ideas are not acceptable enough for the other kids that were told about these ideas, then the possible non approvals from those kids may cause the kids who have placed some sort of ‘faith’, so to speak, in these ideas, to dismiss, so to speak, the use of what these kids with the faith have already built with them. Of course, it’s none of my business.

The warning I want to offer these kids with the faith in these ideas is from, refurbished for advice, that ‘Good Wife’ episode that I have quoted. I call the warning ‘The Fortified Notion Game’. In the ‘Good Wife’ episode, since both sides are allowed to, they both bring in expert witnesses to support their opposing claims. Now, for the kids with the faith in these ideas, what you may be doing is depending upon the opinions of other kids to validate your claim, that the advice is indeed useful. Now, if those other kids give you an unacceptable response, you may choose to abandon somewhat what you have already created and invented with these ideas.

Although my expectations for this ‘Fortified Notion Game’ warning don’t expect to see results until, for example, sometime before you may attend college, it is also my hope that, if you get an unacceptable response while you are still kids, that you may consider that what you have already created and invented was, up until then, useful to you. Here is the concern I am trying to say to you: If you have a certain belief that requires a certain acceptable response from others, then what would happen if they present to you a response that is more fortified than your own presented belief? Notice that, in the ‘Good Wife’ episode, when one side has the advantage, the other side would try to present something that would give them the advantage. It is my belief that many people don’t have such a casually fortified experience, and if they were exposed to people who do, than the person without such experience may be easily swayed by their fortified presentations.

My point is that you’re kids, and you’re learning. It is my opinion that it would be a shame if you threw away some of what you have learned simply because of the disapprovals of other kids. Of course, it is also none of my business, and these ideas may also be very expendable to you.(For example, you may choose to just throw some of it away.) I just think that you should be informed of such a concern.

Some viewer discretion for series ‘The Good Wife’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and series.

Wishlist #1033

1/20/2016

Before I begin describing the variations of ‘Use’, I want to say that, even though I have already upgraded those 4 bookmarks, what I am going to do is explain those 4 bookmarks in the context that I have originally invented them. It was only a few weeks ago that I have invented those phrases. That way, when I try to explain the ‘shuffling’ process to you/when I shuffle those 4 bookmarks, it will make more sense to you how the new ideas are created from those 4 ‘Use’ bookmarks. [On a separate note, I imagined that some of you(the kids) may have complained that the recent descriptions may have been intentionally held back by me. The reason you may have sensed that is because, like I am about to do now, I want you to have it’s original meaning as a priority so that the shuffling I plan to do soon and the new ideas I created from the shuffling would make more sense to you. As far as I can tell, I am giving you the best explanation I can within reason. [Also, it’s none of my business to know of such things. For example, you are not obligated by me to use the ideas in certain ways. In one moment, you may give the advice a certain importance; in another moment, you may change your mind and just throw the advice away. I don’t know what your school of thought and circumstance is, and it’s none of my business. After all, to me, I am just offering you advice.(I say this for the sake of the kids.).

Right now, because of the recent holiday which caused the post office to be closed 1 day, I have to go to the post office today and pick up the DVDs and Blu-rays that I have rented. After I return them today, I will begin explaining this idea today.

It is now 7:52 PM EST for me, and I am starting a few hours later than I planned to start today. That means I only have about an hour of free time to type this stuff, so I guess I’d better get started!

Time lapse use: Understand use:

In the beginning of this explanation, before I start shuffling the 4 ‘Use’ bookmarks, ‘Time lapse use’ and ‘Understand use’ are essentially the same. However, when you start shuffling those 4 bookmarks, and those 4 bookmarks are ‘Time lapse use’, ‘Understand use’, ‘Resist use’, and ‘Distract use’, the bookmarks ‘Time lapse use’ and ‘Understand use’ become 2 separate bookmarks. Anyway, here is the explanation for ‘Time lapse use’ and ‘Understand use’: For certain casually experienced instigations, if you experienced such instigations, it is my belief that many innocent people, whether it’s from a stranger while using public transportation, or maybe from someone where you work, that many innocent people experience instigations that encourages you to respond to the instigator’s instigations, and these instigations have an unusually fast and/or demanding time lapse and understanding identity. So, when you try to casually(or seriously) resolve such instigations in your mind, you are experiencing an inclination from the instigator’s identity that, for example, is encouraging you to also use an unusually fast and/or demanding time lapse and understanding identity to solve the instigation. In other words, have you ever heard of the phrase ‘Don’t rush me!’? Well, when you experience such a casual instigation, the instigation causes you not only to feel rushed when trying to resolve such an experience, but to also actually ‘rush’ to resolve it. [After a few minutes of trying to think of an example, I have concluded that I cannot recall a tv show or movie example right now for that contradicting ‘Don’t rush me!’ instigation.

Resist use:

In Wishlist #1025, I have offered you 2 examples of ‘Resistance’: one with Superman blocking a beam of energy with his hand, and the other is Conan pulling a rope, and up to 5 businesspeople wearing suits are pulling the other side of the rope. Of course, in relation to advice said, you can also use those 2 examples as ‘Resist’ examples. The use of ‘Resist’ is not just about Superman blocking a beam of energy, or Conan pulling a rope. An instigator may also use a sense of ‘resist’ as a false accusation. The best example I can think of does not specifically demonstrate what ‘Resist’ means, but I believe it’s use in it’s refurbished for advice context illustrates very well a use of ‘Resist’ that can help you understand bookmark ‘Resist use’. The reference is in movie ‘Mission: Impossible-Rogue Nation(2015)’. According to an Amazon Video standard definition rental, the scene begins 1 hour, 28 minutes, and 7 seconds into the movie, when Lane(Sean Harris) says to Ilsa Faust(Rebecca Ferguson) quote-‘Why do you continue to resist?’ I know that the reference is like ‘splitting hairs’. It’s close to obvious interpretations from the movie that is supposed to be removed, to not be used for this advice. If you can imagine refurbishing the whole ‘Mission: Impossible’ movie with the inapproprieities removed, you may still see how Faust’s statement, ‘Why do you continue to resist?’, may help you understand bookmark ‘Resist use’.

[I want to stop explainng ‘Resist use’ for now and begin next week. For me, at least the hardest part is over, and that hardest part is to start this explanation, which I have. The explanation for ‘Resist use’ is not finished yet, but I plan to finish it and the rest of this idea next week.

1/24/2016

Sadly, there is this meaning of ‘Resist’ that I have been thinking about explaining, but it’s elusive for me to think about. Sometimes the explanation is there, sometimes it isn’t. Right now, it’s not there. However, even though it’s not there, ‘not there’ just means that it’s not in a form that I can recall in a preferred context for me to put into words. So, I’m still going to try to explain it anyway, since it is part of this explanation. I consider this new meaning of ‘Resist’ an epiphany explanation, because after I invented it, the use of it allowed me to continue making more ideas.

Here is the best example that is part of the definition of ‘Resist’ that I can think of right now. It is in episode 4.13 ‘The Stolen Earth’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2008)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 24 minutes and 56 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Men sildenafil tablets india often don’t realize that they are making mistakes in bed which turns off their partner. Stay calm daily, take sufficient breaks from your busy schedule since you samples viagra can take the class on your own time, signing in from anywhere, and signing in and out as much as you want. In an unlikely event of a boat 5mg generic cialis dysfunction participants slowly sail down to the water wearing a life jacket. The lifestyle which is followed by many people of the world consider tongkat ali to be Malaysia’s natural form of viagra pills in canada. The Doctor(David Tennant):-‘I came here when I was just a kid, 90 years old(keep in mind The Doctor is not human, in reference to his age). It was the centre of a rift in time and space.’

Donna Noble(Catherine Tate):-‘So, where are the 27 planets?’

The Doctor:-‘Nowhere. The Tandocca trail stops dead. End of the line.’

(I highly recommend actually watching that scene, instead of just using the quote.) Refurbished for advice, of course, I’m using the phrase ‘End of the line’ from that reference. The meaning I am trying to describe is also like the word ‘impasse’, which means-‘a road or way that has no outlet’. According to dictionary.com, synonyms for ‘impasse’ are: stalemate, standstill, standoff, and dead end. Basically, the experience is like when you would create a solution for a problem, but a few moments later, you would recall some sort of impasse from that problem. I identified that impasse using the word ‘Resist’, since the impasse is resisting the effectiveness of the solution. This use of ‘Resist’ is a separate meaning from the definition of ‘Resist’ that I have already given you.

The solution I have used for that sense of impasse identified by bookmark ‘Resist’ started from Wishlist #1020(October 13, 2015). It is the reference from Wishlist #1020 about association. Here is a quote from that list:

“And now, back to the ‘Acclimate argue’ idea. The solution for experiencing certain mild to moderate interjections from instigations that you have difficulty acclimating to is to not need to resolve such acclimations in such a short period of time, but instead you turn that acclimation into an association to what you are supposed to be doing for that moment. For example, in the ‘Libby’ story, if you see her from a distance, or you are near her, instead of just trying to resolve that acclimation interjection of her being in a clown outfit, you make an association to that acclimation interjection to something that you are supposed to be doing for that moment. For example, certain basic courtesies are supposed to be there, or maybe you are talking to someone else at the time, or maybe it’s just simply to mind your own business. The reasonable association is up to you and your chosen circumstance. It is like allowing a person to have an intentional mystery in his/her identity. In the instigator’s identity, you have something that cannot acclimate in a short period of time, so what you do is use that identity as an association to something else. It is my belief that, if you have never tried such an idea before, it’s sense of epiphany can feel like a champagne cork being popped out of it’s bottle.”

If you have already read that list, than using this ‘association’ idea should be more developed for you to use by now. Basically, what you do is associate the impasse with the solution you have created. To clarify with an illustration of what that may feel like the 1st time, I recommend the illustration, refurbished for advice, of course, near end of episode 3.7 ‘Day of the Dove’ from series ‘Star Trek(1968)’. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 48 minutes and 22 seconds into the episode, when Spock(Leonard Nimoy) says to Kirk(William Shatner) quote-‘The cessation of violence appears to have weakened it, captain. I suggest that good spirits might make an effective weapon.’ And, according to wikipedia.com’s description of this ‘Day of the Dove’ episode, ‘…the Klingons and Enterprise crew begin to laugh and shout and act friendly to each other. This finally drives the weakened alien life force from the ship.’ [So, when you make the impasse into an association for the solution you have invented, the experience may feel like, refurbished, how the Klingons and Enterprise crew have felt at that moment, ‘in good spirits’. [Well anyway, the plan is that the ideas I introduce to you should get more interesting as I explain the ‘shuffling process’ to you, which requires me to shuffle these 4 bookmarks first. It hopefully should get more interesting both during and after I shuffle these 4 bookmarks.

[I’m going to take a break now to buy some food. I plan to continue, either today or tomorrow, by explaining bookmark ‘Distract use’.

Distract use:

This definition of ‘Distract use’ may sound somewhat lacking, but when I shuffle it and upgrade it with the other bookmarks, it’s presence will make more sense. Let’s try what I call a ‘reverse discrimination’ example. Let’s say a person who used to be a rampant(in full sway; prevailing or unchecked) instigator in his/her job for some reason has decided to change and promote a non-instigation like environment. Now,even though that person has changed, that person has offended many people where he/she works, and so, during that person’s break, just to choose a specific moment, this reformed person has decided to sit in a break area where many of the people he/she has offended also use. So, while this reformed person is minding his/her own business in the break area, many of the people in the break area decided to take turns getting his/her attention with stories of how they were offended by a certain person, but without addressing that person directly. So, while that reformed person is trying to have a relaxed composure, those that he/she has offended are trying to distract him/her with stories of how they were offended by him/her. [So, that’s it! The point of the example is that, while you are trying to have a relaxed composure, the instigator is trying to distract you.

[I want to finish this list now, and continue the shuffling and the upgrade of the 4 bookmarks in the next list. That way, I’ll have a fresh, new page to type on.(This blog is a lot easier than making those Amazon lists!)

Violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘Mission: Impossible-Rogue Nation’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi series ‘Doctor Who’ and ‘Star Trek’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Time lapse use’, ‘Understand use’, ‘Resist use’ and ‘Distract use’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

Wishlist #1032

1/13/2016

For those of you who tried to access this blog, according to my iPage account, there was some trouble with this blog, and they? turned it off temporarily at 1/7/2016. I did not know the blog was turned off, not until yesterday. With the help of iPage customer support, I used the SiteLock service, and then with the help of WordPress customer support, it seems like I am now able to continue using this blog. A few seconds ago, I just checked the ionicbreeze1.com public access, and it seems accessible. This hiccup(to experience a temporary decline, setback, interruption,etc.) helped me realize that, if you think this advice is valuable to you, I recommend that you make some sort of copy of these lists, just in case this blog is no longer available in the future. I can understand why you may have had trouble making copies of the lists I made in Amazon.com. However, these lists from this blog seem much easier to copy. Although I haven’t made a copy for myself, I at least have these ideas in my head somewhere. I am open to making some sort of copy for my own use, but I don’t see myself doing so unless I somehow find an absurdly easy way to do it, and I haven’t really given this copy thing much effort and thought. Well, the blog seems to be online now, so maybe you can talk to your available computer customer support and ask them how to make a copy of just the text of another blog. There’s probably some sort of easy way of doing that. I just don’t know what that easy way is. The only way I know of to copy this text is to just go to this blog, select which lists you like individually, highlight the text from that list, copy the highlighted words using your cursor, and then paste those words on your word processor. It is my hope that you can find a better way to copy these ideas than that.(At least the ‘copy and paste’ idea is better than just printing them out! Of course, printing them out is better than not having them at all.)

Use:

Let’s start the explanation of ‘Use’ with explaining the phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced.’, and here’s an example I just rented from Amazon Video. The scene starts pretty much at the beginning of movie ‘Mr. Holmes(2015)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 minute and 30 seconds into the movie. As a boy, his mother, and Mr. Holmes(that famous detective) is sharing the same train compartment, the boy is looking at a wasp that is outside of the train window. Sherlock Holmes notices that, and says to the boy quote-‘You shouldn’t do that…tap the glass.’ The boy responds-‘How did you know I was going to?’ [The point of that ‘Mr. Holmes’ reference is to give you an example of a person’t thoughts not introduced to anyone else, and yet another person is giving the impression that such a person’s thoughts were introduced, but in reality those thoughts were private, and not introduced to anyone! The boy’s question was very clear. He asked the man quote-‘How did you know I was going to?’

Now, that ‘Mr. Holmes’ example is there just to offer you some allowability to use this idea. The reference I use myself, and that I recommend for you to use reasonably, in school or at work, for phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced’, is in episode 3.19 ‘Blue Ribbon Panel’ from series ‘The Good Wife(2012)’. (If you have Amazon Prime for your shipping, ‘The Good Wife’ series is offered with your Amazon Prime.) The scene starts 18 minutes and 57 seconds into the episode, when Eli Gold(Alan Cumming) proposes to Julius Cain(Michael Boatman) that they ‘flip a coin’ to decide something. The primary scene that you use to conceptualize, if you choose to do so, starts 39 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode, when David Lee(Zach Grenier) said to Julius Cain quote-‘Oh, come on. You flipped a coin or something.’ Now, when I 1st imagined it, I imagined Eli Gold being surprised when Julius Cain said that. Of course, when you watch the episode from Amazon Video, it is Julius Cain who looks surprised. Anyway, when you use this ‘Good Wife’ reference in regards to phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced’, I recommend you imagine David Lee saying something like quote-‘You flipped a coin or something.’ The specifics I will explain later.

So, here is the gist(the main or essential part of a matter) of what I am trying to say about phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced’. Using the quote from the boy from movie ‘Mr. Holmes’, the boy quote-‘How did you know I was going to?’, and using David Lee’s quote from tv series ‘The Good Wife’, David Lee quote-‘Oh, come on. You flipped a coin or something.’, I offer you this logical conclusion, that even though instigators in an improper context may give you the impression that they know certain particulars of your private thoughts, that does not mean that you have agreed to introduce your private thoughts to them. In the context of an experienced instigation or inadvertency, even though an instigator may give you the impression that they know something about what you are thinking, that does not automatically mean that you introduced your private thoughts to them. Here’s an illustrated example that may help you have more strength/affirmation that your private thoughts are not introduced to instigators and related inadvertencies. Of course, the example is refurbished with inapproprieities removed in relation to advice. The scene occurs in movie ‘The Chronicles of Riddick(2004)’. According to Amazon Video, the rented PG-13 version, the scene happens after Riddick(Vin Diesel) is captured by the mercenaries. After their ship uses a decoy to avoid being followed, one of the mercenaries, I think he is portrayed by actor Ty Olsson, said to another mercenary quote-‘…Unsuspected and undetected!’ The scene is located 40 minutes and 9 seconds into the movie. The enthusiasm used by that mercenary portrayed by actor Ty Olsson is meant to improve your sense of strength and affirmation when you think that your sense of ‘private thoughts not introduced’ needs it.

Before I type in how bookmark ‘Use’ relates to phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced’, let me give you an example using bookmark ‘reverse polarity’ of how a person from a tv show is using ‘Private thoughts not introduced’. Refurbished for advice, the reference is from episode 3.20 ‘A Stitch in Time’ from series ‘Elementary(2015)’. Although the conversation starts 29 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode, the highlight of the reference starts 31 minutes into the episode,

Collin Eisely(Eric Bogosian) quote-‘By court order, every dollar I have in stocks is in a blind trust. You can look it up.’

Sherlock Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller)-‘Well, perhaps you’re selling the information for a price.’

Collin Eisely-‘And keep the proceeds where? In my mattress? The Feds audit all my accounts. I can’t win at bingo without them taking notice. Gentlemen, I have more important things to do with my day. You’re fishing; I’m not biting.’

Now, what I’ve done with that reference using bookmark ‘Reverse polarity’ and refurbished it with inapproprieities removed is to use Collin Eisely’s conversation with Detective Bell(Jon Michael Hill) and Sherlock as if Collin Eisely is innocent! If you see Collin Eisely’s conversation that way, you may notice that, even though he is not introducing his private thoughts to them, he also believes he is reasonably cooperating with their investigation.

Now, this is what I have discovered, the meaning of this discovery is identified by bookmark ‘Use’: Let’s go back to the quote made by the boy from movie ‘Mr. Holmes’, the boy quote-‘How did you know I was going to?’ That response was made while his mother was with him by an old man whom his mother is giving the impression that he is acceptable to share a train compartment with. Now, if you extrapolate from that example, in situations involving instigation, kids, teenagers and many adults would probably find instigations that give the impressions that their private thoughts were introduced, even though that impression isn’t true, that such an experience would probably be mildly disconcerting and bothersome. And so, once I have established in my mind that my own private thoughts were not introduced to anyone, once I have established a certain continuity using my private thoughts as not introduced to anyone, soon after that, I discovered that you can blame instigations and related inadvertencies that bother you, that they are trying to use your private thoughts as if they are introduced to them, when in fact those private thoughts were not introduced to any instigator. Of course, this blame is a diagnostic, not an actual blame, to clarify that your own private thoughts are indeed not introduced to any instigator. The diagnostic is like a metal detector used before boarding airplanes. Even though you don’t have any metal on you, you still get checked. The reason I am recommending to you to ‘blame’people for trying to use your private thoughts as if those thoughts are introduced to them, and of course those thoughts were not introduced to them, is because such a blame/diagnostic may be able to contemplationally quantify what is bothering you from the experience. Here’s an example: Let’s say an adult woman who is using the rest of this advice encountered while using public transportation another woman who imposed some sort of instigation upon her that gives her the impression that her private thoughts were introduced to that instigator, even though in reality her private thoughts were not introduced to her. When she blames that impression, not only does she feel that more confidently that her private thoughts are not introduced to that lady, but she also feels that she can quantify that experience more tenably! In other words, she is no longer bothered by the experience, or she is bothered noticeably less by that experience. So therefore, if you choose to use the particulars of this advice in it’s obvious context, bookmark ‘Use’ means that you are blaming the instigation for giving you the impression that your private thoughts are being used by that instigator or inadvertency, for the purposes of giving you more confidence and strength with your own sense of private thought use.

Understand use:
At times these injections can cause tissue necrosis or hamatoma too. ordine cialis on line Take canadian pharmacy for viagra an hour before making love with your partner. The risks of using a phony medicine are levitra 20 mg visit to find out more simply awful and unwanted. After this short span you become sexually able to satisfy his female partners. cialis online
Now, this is where I begin explaining the 4 variations of bookmark ‘Use’. ‘Understand use’, ‘Time lapse use’, ‘Resist use’, and ‘Distract use’.(In Wishlist #1031, I said ‘Divert use’. I made a mistake. It was supposed to be ‘Distract use’).

[Because of the time I have used to try to get this blog online, I am not able to explain more than what I originally planned to. So, I’ll stop explaining now, and I plan to continue next week.

1/19/2016

Think tank:

Before I start explaining the 4 variations of bookmark ‘Use’, I want to do 2 things: 1)I want to explain the variations in a new list. To me, when I ‘break up’ an idea that can possibly be explained in 1 list into several lists, the partitioning gives me clarification and more energy to explain that one idea. In other words, I plan to explain the variations of ‘Use’ in the next list. 2)The 2nd thing I want to do is to offer you another reason to use bookmark ‘Private thoughts not introduced’. I call this other reason ‘Think tank’. [And so, before I finish this list and begin another one, I will now explain and offer to you bookmark ‘Think tank’.

I took the phrase ‘Think tank’ from episode 5.19 ‘Think Tank’ from series ‘Star Trek: Voyager(1999)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 16 minutes into the episode. For the most part, the alien known as Kurros(Jason Alexander) is showing Captain Janeway(Kate Mulgrew) and Seven(Jeri Ryan) who the members of their ‘think tank’ are.(When I would use this episode, I would pretty much just think about the space whale that is in Kurros’s ‘think tank’. It was only a few minutes ago that I looked over again that scene). Without using the definition of ‘think tank’ from a dictionary, I pretty much thought of a ‘think tank’ as a group of people making certain ideas. For the kids, when you become adults and work for companies and corporations that have more than 250? people in them, then such a company probably has a ‘think tank’. Of course, this is something that I just imagined. I don’t know for sure if companies have ‘think tanks’. Now, the ‘think tank’ that I am referring to is not directly job related. They address oddities, such as issues that people take for granted, whether or not such issues have an obvious familiarity. Anyway, if you work for a company, corporation, or business that has more than 250? people, than you probably have a ‘think tank’, and the influence of such a ‘think tank’ is like having the neutral, with inapproprieities removed, a neutral influence of ‘The Dragon’s Breath’ from movie ‘Excalibur(1981)’, or it is like having the reasonable presence of ‘The Force’ from the ‘Star Wars’ movies. For example, when you use something that you actually find interesting that is from ‘word of mouth’ from the co-workers that you work with, it is very likely that such information came from your company’s ‘think tank’.

Now, after giving you that background of what a ‘think tank’ is for this advice, here is a story that I imagined that I have been using for several years already, and the story’s name is ‘Think tank’: Basically, I imagined that I overheard from other co-workers from where I work that a government agent was going to circulate amongst us, to talk to us. I was given a few details, such as the government agent was going to be a woman, what her favorite champagne is, and a few other oddities. When I started talking to her, she looked like celebrity Naomi Watts, and in our conversation somewhere, I mentioned at least 2 of those things that were told to me by other co-workers about her. When I told her those 2 things, 1 of those things was just identifying what her favorite champagne is, she had this mild shock look coming from her face, and then she quickly left the building! Later(keep in mind that I just imagined this whole story), I realized that she told no one about those facts! [In the story, what her favorite champagne is, and the other things I was told about from other co-workers, the source of such information came from the imagined ‘think tank’ where I work. My point, if you decide to give some sort of extrapolated credibility to the story I had imagined, is that if you are aware that your own private thoughts are not introduced to anyone, than you may have a more controlled reaction, in case someone temporarily introduces in your thoughts the temporary impression that you did indeed introduce your private thoughts to someone, one caution example is like that government agent lady may have believed when I ‘imagined’ telling her about certain things that she believes, at least at the time of the incident, that she believes that only she knows such things.

To end this ‘Private thoughts not introduced’ advice, here is an example, used with inapproprieities removed, of course, of Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller) and Watson(Lucy Liu) openly determining why 20 people are in a police holding cell using their experience as investigators. According to Amazon Video, the reference begins right in the beginning of episode 2.6 ‘An Unnatural Arrangement’ from series ‘Elementary(2013)’. Here is a quote:

Holmes:-‘Each one of these men, whether they realize it or not, is telling you the story of how he came to be here. It’s written in their bearing, on their clothing.’

Watson:-‘So, look at the guy and then tell you what they did.’

When Watson started making her verbal assessments, none of the people in the holding cell were panicking. In fact, one of the men in the holding cell who was obviously noticing what they were doing said quote-‘Hey, can you do me next?’ I hope that example helps.

Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Mr. Holmes’. Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Good Wife’. Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘The Chronicles of Riddick’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Elementary’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek: Voyager’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Excalibur’ and the ‘Star Wars’ movies. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Private thoughts not introduced.’ and ‘Unsuspected and undetected!’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

Wishlist #1031

1/6/2016

OK, here’s the study plan for this new idea I imagined: For this list, I plan to explain bookmarks ‘Composure response’ and ‘Strive’, but in a context specifically made for this idea. In the next list, I plan to explain bookmark ‘Use’ with it’s variations. These are the variations for use: ‘Time lapse use’, ‘Resist use’, ‘Divert use’, and ‘Understand use’. After the 4 variations are explained, I will use the ‘Shuffling bookmarks’ technique to show you more of it’s usefulness.This study plan may not look like much now, but once I’m done explaining the 4 variations, and if you choose to use the idea, I believe your sense of continuity may noticeably improve.

Composure response:

To start, here is a copy of a part of Wishlist #1020. According to the blog, this was typed in by me at 10/13/2015, and it’s located in category ‘composure’ from that list:

‘My point is that, when you experience mild to moderate instigations, you should be able to choose to not dismiss the composure response itself, since the composure response is coming from you, and is not necessarily obligated to the instigation that has caused the composure response. For example, in a mild context, when you do not look forward to some sort of instigation that you think will occur soon, of course you don’t look forward to the experience, but you keep the composure response associated with what you think may occur, because the composure response is coming from you, not from the instigation. Basically, the instigator may be causing you to dismiss too much of the composure response that is from you, since it is associated with an instigation you do not want to experience. Of course, you don’t always have to use this idea literally, and all of the time. With a little practice, you may develop your own sense of what and how to regulate your composure responses as it relates to instigations and inadvertencies.’

Here’s an example where composure response is used for education. The example is in episode 20.18 ‘Father Knows Worst’ from animated tv series ‘The Simpsons(2009)’. According to Amazon Video, the example begins 7 minutes and 51 seconds into the episode, when Homer is shown by a mother whose son is named Noah an example of what the show calls ‘helicopter parenting’. According to the episode, when the mother claps her hands, that is an indication for her son to say the state capitals in alphabetical order individually for each clap. In the ‘Simpsons’ example, Noah agreed to be taught by his mom the ‘helicopter parenting’ technique. Basically, when you experience an instigation using your own sense of composure response, an instigator would improperly cause some sort of composure response from you, but with the intent to show you that the composure response ‘belongs’ to the instigation, that your composure response is defined by the instigation that you experienced. Like I said from Wishlist #1020, ‘the instigator may be causing you to dismiss too much of the composure response that is from you, since it is associated with an instigation you do not want to experience.’ Even though the composure response is caused by the instigation, the composure response is still from you, not from the instigator. So, therefore, I recommend as a diagnostic question to ask yourself, ‘Is there anything wrong with my composure response?’

Again quoting from Wishlist #1020, ‘Of course, you don’t always have to use this idea literally, and all of the time. With a little practice, you may develop your own sense of what and how to regulate your composure responses as it relates to instigations and inadvertencies.’ [You may experience mild to moderate instigations that you don’t want your composure response to have any association with. Sure! I don’t use this idea all of the time myself. However, at least most of the time, when you are at school, work, or using public transportation, we are after all living in a civilized society. The mild to moderate instigations that you may be experiencing is probably trying to adversely affect how you give credibility to your composure response as it relates to what you have experienced.

Even when out of the norm sale spikes do occur they seem to be due to tadalafil price celebration. Nettle main is yet another traditionally cheapest price for sildenafil click for source now used health supplement employed to end hair thinning. Side Effects : Get emergency medical help if you have any probe cialis generika of these signs of an allergic reaction to sildenafil products must stop using it immediately and quickly inform the doctor. When you attend a racing school, purchase viagra online discover description you will enjoy the adrenaline rush like you never experienced before in your life, as well as make new, lifelong friends. Strive:

I’d like to start this explanation of ‘Strive’ with this example. The example is from near end of movie ‘Disclosure(1994)’. According to Amazon Video, the example is near end of movie, 1 hour, 59 minutes, and 34 seconds into the movie, when someone asks Tom Sanders(Michael Douglas) quote-‘Can you build the darn thing or not?’, and Sanders says quote-‘Yes, sir. We can.’ Refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, the idea is that Tom Sanders has a sense of striving that no one else in that room filled with employees and shareholders has, and that sense of striving allowed Sanders to explain to everyone in that room that their company can build the product in question. Also, Mr. Sanders’ use of striving was also able to continue, even with the criticisms coming from Meredith Johnson(Demi Moore). Miss Johnson’s criticism example is also located during that shareholder’s meeting, starting at 1 hour, 58 minutes, and 22 seconds into the movie.

This is the explanation as to how striving is used in relation to instigation. Let’s say, as an example, that many of the kids, when they experience instigation, use some sort of technique, such as contemplationally saying a bookmark when the instigation occurs. Now, what might happen when the kid’s perspective is already affected as he/she uses his/her bookmarks? Let’s say a kid has already experienced some sort of mild, bothersome perspective. Seconds later, the kid uses a bookmark. However, when that happens, it is like applying contemplation pressure upon an already affected perspective. The instigation is already there as the kid applies contemplation pressure upon that sense. The contemplation pressure used is like pressing one of those pens with the button at the end of it using your thumb. When a kid does that, the kid is tricked into accepting that sense of perspective, to a point, accepting it’s existence, as the kid tries to make it more tenable in his/her mind with the kid’s technique. [Now, what I recommend with this ‘Strive’ idea is that, when you do experience such an instigation where your sense of perspective is already affected, that, along with your use of bookmarks, you also choose a sense of striving that is more reasonable to use, and not just automatically use the adversely affected sense of perspective that you are trying to make more tenable. Going back to the ‘Disclosure’ example, if you watched that scene again when Mr. Sanders is informing the employees and shareholders of the company, notice that Mr. Sanders has already selected a sense of striving that is able to reasonably respond to Meredith Johnson’s accusations and explain to the employees and shareholders of the company that their product can be manufactured.(Isn’t that a sense of striving you would want to have available to you?)

Here’s another example. In movie ‘The Internship(2013)’, according to Amazon Video, the example starts 54 minutes and 32 seconds into the movie. Even though Billy McMahon’s(Vince Vaughn) team lost that Google promoted sport, Mr. McMahon said to the rest of his team quote-‘That’s the 1st time you all came together as a team.’ In other words, Billy McMahon helped the team to not just exist in their disappointments in losing that game. Instead, he helped the team use a sense of striving that is more conducive towards their primary goals.

Let me put it another way. Before using this idea, when you would experience an instigation that has already, and very quickly, adersely affected your sense of perspective, when you would use your bookmark, you were using it upon a perspective that has already been adversely affected. You were applying contemplation pressure upon a perspective that you have accepted, in a way, even though, of course, you did not agree to experience it. Now, if you choose to use this idea, instead on working upon an adversely affected perspective directly, you can now instead choose to have as your starting point a pre-selected sense of striving chosen by your intent. Now, this does not necessarily mean that your adversely affected sense of perspective is just going to go away. What this could mean is that you can now work with a sense of striving that can more reasonably tolerate more to have an adverse sense of perspective. However, having the adverse perspective is not the goal. The goal is determined by your intent, more specifically, by the sense of striving that you have chosen to use. For example, using the ‘Disclosure’ movie, even though Tom Sanders used what I believe to be an inspirational sense of striving, Meredith Johnson still openly criticized him. In ‘The Internship’ movie, even though Billy McMahon gave a clarifying speech to the team, they still lost the game. You see? The adversely affected perspective could still be there, but with this ‘Strive’ idea, you may be able to manage it more reasonably. I predict that, with a little practice, you may learn to realize that there could be many opportunities out there that may have some adverse familiarities in the beginning, and that with the use of bookmark ‘Strive’, such an idea may be very logically practical for you to use. Also, with a little more practice, the use of bookmark ‘Strive’ may also help you change to a different perspective entirely, both in a casual and in a serious context. If you don’t mind a little slime in your example, near the end of the movie ‘Disclosure’, according to Amazon Video, 2 hours and 30 seconds into the movie, Meredith Johnson was explaining to Tom Sanders that it was not her fault, but instead blamed 2 others in the company, and that even though it was their fault, she gets fired. That may be construed as an example of changing your sense of striving to create a different perspective.

As I have said in the beginning of this list, the next list will now explain bookmark ‘Use’ and it’s 4 variations. What I didn’t say in the beginning of this list is that bookmarks ‘Composure response’ and ‘Strive’ helps give more depth to those 4 variations.

Some viewer discretion for animated tv series ‘The Simpsons’. Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Disclosure’. Rated PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Composure response’ and ‘Strive’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.