1/27/2016

Here is where I finally begin addressing the ‘Use’ bookmarks. However, instead on starting from the beginning, which is to shuffle the 4 ‘Use’ bookmarks, I have decided to address the ‘brunt’ bookmarks that I have created from those 4 bookmarks first. Once I am done with that, then I will go back to the beginning and shuffle those ‘Use’ bookmarks. So, basically, I am giving you this explanation backwards.

Approach

According to dictionary.com, the noun definition of ‘approach’ is-‘the act of drawing near’. The example from dictionary.com is-‘The approach of a train’. Now, I tried contemplationally to give an explanation as to how this instigation is experienced without giving the answer, but I wasn’t able to. So what I am going to do instead is give you the answer. That means that the positive effect of this advice should be very quick. If I was able to give you the explained experience with the answer first, you would have an obvious ‘before and after’ comparison, but I am not able to casually do that. So, here is the answer: Now, if you have experienced this instigation before, my guess is many of you probably have, and you haven’t experienced or you haven’t invented some sort of solution for that, then you probably have some build-up for it. Here is an example: As your body is in a state of rest and calm, an instigator imposes upon you the impression that you are adversely approaching an evaluation experience, when in reality you are not choosing to contemplationally approach such an adverse sense of evaluation experience. So, what may be happening is that an instigator is causing you to contemplationally experience something that you are avoiding to experience, but no matter what you reasonably do, the impression that you are approaching an adverse evaluation is still unavoidable to you.

The solution, so to speak, is that when you use bookmark ‘Approach’, it is recommended that you identify such an instigation in a more manageable context, that the instigation is giving you the impression that you are choosing to approach an adverse sense of contemplation evaluation, but that impression is not what you are doing. You see, before this advice, when you would experience such an approaching instigation, as you would try to avoid it’s experience, since your efforts were not producing results the way that you would want them to, the experience may have caused you to somewhat squirm and cringe. Now, if you choose to use this advice, you can identify such an instigation as a false impression of you approaching an adverse sense of evaluation. If this advice works for you, you are now more objectively able to identify instigations that have different amount of ‘approaching’ in them.

The only illustrating example, refurbished for advice, of course, that I have for bookmark ‘Approach’ is from episode 1.2 ‘The Main Attraction’ from series ‘Amazing Stories(1985)’. Although it is not available from Amazon Video, you can buy the DVD from Amazon. When I checked the price, it was under 23 dollars, and it is available from Amazon Prime shipping. I also checked www.youtube.com, and the episode is available to watch from youtube for free! Just go to www.youtube.com, type in ‘amazing stories season 1’ in youtube’s search engine, search for it, and the episode is available under category ‘Amazing Stories Season 1 Full Episodes’. The episode is called ‘Amazing Stories Season 1 Epidose 3’. The episode as it is used by this advice is basically about Brad Bender(John Scott Clough), a high school student, being turned into a human magnet. Now, when I recalled the episode, I pictured him being circulated throughout town. Basically, Brad was being pulled around to be amongst all of the high school students, and anyone else who wanted to notice him, an experience he did not choose to have. So, basically, the illustration is about a man who is experiencing a sense of approaching that he does not want to experience, an illustration that I believe may be useful to your ‘Approach’ problem. And, of course, the ‘Amazing Stories’ reference is not meant to insult you, especially if you refurbish the illustration to be useful to you. You don’t have to watch the whole episode. I just recommend the parts when he becomes a human magnet. And, of course, those parts you can edit as well.

Using bookmark ‘Approach’, I have invented 4 variations for it. The basic meaning of the variations is that an instigator may improperly impose upon you to experience a discomfort that you are avoiding to experience. All 4 variations have the word ‘Approach’, but I believe that, since you know what ‘Approach’ means already, you may not need to say it in your mind again. The 1st bookmark I am going to explain is called ‘Sore throat swallow (Approach)’:

Sore throat swallow:

The phrase ‘Sore throat swallow’ comes from an old Chloraseptic commercial. Just go to www.youtube.com, type ‘chloraseptic it will hurt if i swallow’, search for it, and that commercial should be the 1st one youtube shows you. Basically, there is a girl who has a sore throat, and the commercial is illustrating to you that she is thinking to herself quote-‘It will hurt if I swallow.’ For several moments, she is trying not to swallow, because if she does, she believes she will experience some mild discomfort. Finally, she swallows, experiences her sore throat, and then calls out for her mom to help her.

The point of the Chloraseptic commercial, refurbished for advice, of course, is to give you an illustration that helps you understand that an instigator may improperly impose a discomfort for you to experience that you are avoiding to experience. Since many separate expectations can have it’s own separate ‘trophy’, so to speak, it is my opinion that, in it’s own category, bookmark ‘Sore throat swallow’ can be very useful to you if an instigation is causing you to experience discomfort that you are trying to avoid. Now, here is an idea that I think I can explain to you what it was like before you may choose to use this ‘Sore throat swallow’ idea. Using the ‘before and after’ concept, here is what your ‘before’ may have been like: Before this idea, when you experienced a certain instigation that is causing you to experience discomfort that you are avoiding to experience, your sense of ethics and morality integrity is causing to be reserved with such an experience. A sense of ethics and morality ambiance is also there. There may also be some mild vertigo involved. You are basically trying to do the right thing, as a certain discomfort that you are avoiding to experience is imposed upon you to experience. Now, I recommend that you imagine a certain discomfort associated with certain contemplations that you may have that you would normally try to avoid having. I speculate that you would avoid sensing such a discomfort contemplationally. That is what an instigator may be exploiting, your private contemplation efforts to avoid certain discomforts associated with certain contemplations. OK, that was ‘before’.

Now, here is what may happen when you choose to use this advice. Here is an example of ‘after’: When you use bookmark ‘Sore throat swallow’ to identify instigations that are trying to impose upon you to experience discomfort that you are avoiding to experience, you are now able to more objectively manage such instigations better. If you are an adult, and you have been experiencing such discomfort inducing instigations for years, and you weren’t able to invent or experience a certain adequate solution or routine for it, and you are new at using this idea, you probably will experience a sense of obvious relief. Even better, the phrase ‘Sore throat swallow’ comes from what I believe to be a very effective commercial illustration. After all, I am assuming that most of us have experienced such a sore throat discomfort when we were kids, so therefore you have your own personal experience to reference for this idea, if you choose to.

Normally, I would just give you the bookmark, but for ‘Sore throat swallow’, here is an explanation as to how to use it. The phrase ‘Sore throat’ represents an indicator, not necessarily to be taken literally, for the discomfort that you are trying to avoid. Now, the phrase ‘Swallow’ represents an indicator, not necessarily to be taken literally, for mild to moderate instigations in relation to advice, of course, for the discomfort that the instigator is trying to make you experience. Here, let me give you an example: Let’s say a woman is recalling a conversation she had with another woman where she works less than 2 years ago, and that woman was innocent while she was having a conversation with that other woman. However, that other woman, for whatever reason, chose during her conversation with the innocent woman, to cause her to contemplationally experience a certain discomfort that the innocent woman was trying to contemplationally avoid. For a while, that woman was mildly bothered by such an event. However, with the help of this advice, when she recalls that incident again, she contemplationally uses the phrase ‘Sore throat swallow’, and now she feels a lot better! She can now even identify the exact moment when she believes the instigator is trying to get her to ‘swallow’ the discomfort.

[I’ve been at this for a few hours already. I’m going to stop now, and I plan to finish the variations for bookmark ‘Approach’ next week. See you then!

2/3/2016

Calm diversity:

Before I continue with the ‘Approach’ explanation, I sense that there may be some resolve waning occurring, some sort of complaining involving the interest that should be used to continue reading these ideas. The complaining is basically from kids, that I imagined. Since this is standard demographic advice by intent, I tried to think of something that would resolve that waning interest. Before I give my attempted solution, I want to say that there are many aspects to another person’s efforts to reading these ideas that are ‘none of my business’. I am just trying to offer advice to you that you may find useful regarding unavoidably experienced instigation and it’s related inadvertencies.

The idea that I have created comes from an idea that I have 1st mentioned in Amazon.com called ‘Calm diversity’. Basically, it is a beginning idea that helps me create goals made of calm diversity. And so, the solution I have tried to think up for those kids with a waning interest to read these ideas is to use your sense of ad libbing to invent a separate notion that is just imagined to blame instigators for improperly imposing an excessive sense of calm diversity. This idea is based on my belief that instigators are exploiting your sense of trying to cope with their instigations. For example, when you would use your technique regularly over the years to cope with uninvited instigation, that routine may be exploited without your knowledge of it being exploited. I have thought of several ideas to address that, but I don’t have the time to explain those ideas right now. Instead, I offer you this ‘Calm diversity’ idea in the hopes that it’s use will offer you something useful, until I am able to explain those other ideas.

So, here is the basic power from the use of ‘Calm diversity’ for this idea: If you choose to use this idea, imagine that one use of ‘Calm diversity’ is derived from a person acquiring not just steady employment, but a job that person actually prefers to have. Think of a person that has a job that fortifies his/her goals. ‘Calm diversity’ is not having that job itself. What it is is that sense of employment that is used to create that person’s sense of calm diversity. Here are 2 illustrated examples: In the movie ‘About Time(2013)’, here is a quote from imdb.com from it’s synopsis of the movie:

‘After the summer, Tim moves to London to pursue his career as a lawyer. He moves in with a family friend named Harry Chapman ( Tom Hollander), a grouchy playwright. He then starts work at a law firm and makes friends with a young man named Rory (Joshua McGuire), who spends a lot of time close to Tim as he continues his search for a girlfriend.’

Basically, this idea offers you the illustrations from Tim(Domhnall Gleeson) and Rory as it pertains to the pursuit of their lawyer careers. Since I am assuming I am giving advice to Americans(This advice is not exclusive to just Americans. I am just assuming that the reasonable use of this blog is in the U.S.), I imagined as a convenient contemplation reference Tim and Rory photographed, happy of course, and wearing their barrister wigs and uniforms.(For more information about barristers, I recommend web site www.wikipedia.com). The reason for that image is that, according to what I have read in the internet, lawyers in London are called barristers, and they wear those white wigs. Since I am not a lawyer myself, I don’t believe that lawyers in America are required to wear white wigs when in a courtroom. It’s the distinction that may interest you. So, when you imagine those 2 lawyers from London, you use that as a reference to imagine that instigators are imposing upon you too much ‘calm diversity’ for you to contemplationally interact with in a certain context. So, to provide a certain balance in your awareness, you use a sense of acknowledgement that is more reasonable to think about. Of course, you are not negating their use of calm diversity. After all, people will believe what they want. Instead, you are just trying to reasonably acknowledge that sense of calm diversity in your mind.

It is by way cialis uk no prescription of intimate intercourse that human race is still present up to this time. It cialis discount generic http://djpaulkom.tv/da-mafia-6ixs-watch-what-u-wish-album-is-complete-and-coming-your-way-soon/ is known to provide an excellent cure for diabetes. Thus, sildenafil prevents the destruction of cGMP and allows you to achieve a firm and long lasting erection which is achieved viagra tablet http://djpaulkom.tv/dj-paul-and-yo-gotti-declare-its-a-new-day-in-memphis/ after 15 to 20 minutes of popping this pill. Compare prices and products with other websites to get a genuine product at the lowest price tadalafil lower price. The 2nd example is based on the celebrity actor Peter Wingfield. According to wikipedia.com, he is ‘ internationally best known for his role as the 5000-year-old Immortal Methos in the hit syndicated series ‘Highlander: The Series’. Another quote from wikipedia.com talks about Mr. Wingfield’s medical career: ‘Starting in 2011, Wingfield significantly reduced his acting career responsibilities. Returning full circle to his earlier interest in a career in medicine, he entered College of Medicine at the University of Vermont as part of the Class of 2015.’ So, if you go to www.google.com and type in ‘peter wingfield university of vermont match day’, the 1st link google may show you is ‘UVM medical student signing through school as high…’ If you click that, it may bring you to web site www.wptz.com, where there is a video clip of Mr. Wingfield being accepted for a residency program at UC San Diego. Mr. Wingfield’s video illustration begins 50 seconds into the video clip. You will see him wearing the green glasses announcing to a crowd that he is going to UC San Diego. [So basically, with this 2nd example, you do the same thing like you did with the 1st example. You use that as a reference for excessive calm diversity from an instigator that you are making more tenable in your mind to recognize. Personally, I think you only need the 1st example. The 2nd example is offered to you for variety.

[And that’s it for today. I didn’t have much free time today. One reason is that I went to H & R Block to have my taxes done. And another reason is because I sensed a waning interest from some kids that caused me to offer you this ‘Calm diversity’ idea, time I could have used instead to finish explaining the ‘Approach’ idea, an idea I already planned to give to you. Well anyway, if you are still here for next week, then I plan to offer you something to read next week. See you then!

2/10/2016

Strength:

Here’s a quote from last week’s paragraph that I want to address:

‘And another reason is because I sensed a waning interest from some kids that caused me to offer you this ‘Calm diversity’ idea, time I could have used instead to finish explaining the ‘Approach’ idea, an idea I already planned to give to you.’

I should have added an exclamation point(!) at the end of that paragraph. Anyway, if you read Wishlist #1017 in this blog(9/30/2015), you probably used the ‘Argue’ part of the idea many times. For the point I am trying to make, that means that, by now, you have developed a ‘sense’ for the meaning that is not dependant on just the appearance of the words. For example, if you have read and used Wishlist #1017, have you noticed that the explanation appearance in words for ‘Argue’ may not match how you sense the meaning for ‘Argue’? I believe that you, ‘you’ meaning the kids that read this blog, have probably used that experience to evaluate the quote that I have given you. When I said in the quote that ‘time I could have used instead to finish explaining the ‘Approach’ idea, an idea I already planned to give to you.’, you may have sensed that I was being a little testy.(I gave you the definition of ‘testy’ in Wishlist #1015, towards the end of that list, at 9/16/2015). I know that I encourage kids to be skeptical, and that it is none of my business. That being said, because of how I imagine many of the kids responding to that mildly testy statement, I want to explain an idea called ‘Strength’. Of course, you can still decide whether or not you choose to use that idea. I’ll start the explanation of ‘Strength’ in the next paragraph:

Here is a quote from episode 4.14 ‘Meet John Doe’ from series ‘Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman(1997)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene is located 17 minutes and 4 seconds into the episode:

John Doe(Lane Davies):-‘Rising in the poles everywhere except these small pocket communities. Why is that?’

Randolph(Richard Cody):-‘Mr. Doe, those would be, um, Amish communities, sir.

John Doe:-‘So? Have you done your ‘get out the vote’ phone drive?’

Randolph:-‘The Amish don’t have telephones, sir.’

John Doe:-‘No telephones?’

Randolph:-‘No, sir.’

According to imdb.com, Tempus is using a subliminal device to win the election using certain public forms of technology. Based on my impression from this tv show and the movie ‘Witness(1985)’ starring Harrison Ford as Det. John Book, the Amish are Americans that do not use certain obvious forms of technology, such as computers and cell phones. Based on my memory of that ‘Lois & Clark’ episode, even though you may not obviously see any Amish in that episode, I believe that short scene that I quoted is the best reference I can think of for this advice. Since it is the intent of this advice to be ‘standard demographic’ advice, I am using what I imagine the Amish to be to be a reference point, extrapolated, of course, for certain schools of thought. Now, I am assuming that many of the kids that are reading these ideas probably have their own computers, at least. I am using the Amish in this idea as an example of a people that do not have certain obvious beliefs that mainstream? Americans do have. So, when you interact with someone that is Amish, and you are an American that uses obvious forms of technology, such as a cell phone, and you participate in American politics somewhat, if you interact with someone who is Amish, there are certain beliefs of yours, beliefs involving strength, that may interpret certain interactions with that Amish person as somewhat lacking in reciprocation to those beliefs involving strength, and since, for example, this particular American imaginatively used as an example is not a mindreader, that lack of reciprocation may instead be interpreted as a weakness. For example, since the Amish person is trying to learn to relate to other Americans, that effort to relate to another person’s belief involving strength, a belief that such an Amish person does not subscribe to, that lack of belief participation may not be so easily recognizable to the other American who is not Amish. So instead, the Amish’s ability to try to communicate with another American coupled with the other American, who is not Amish, sensing a lack of reciprocation to a use of strength, that may cause the other American who is not Amish to belief that the Amish is ‘weak’ for not responding to his/her strength.

So, do you see what type of advice I am trying to give other people? There are schools of thought that may not recognize the strengths that you, as kids, are trying to articulate to others regarding the use of this advice, simply because those other schools of thought do not subscribe to certain beliefs that you may have and publicly use. Of course, I am assuming that many of the people that are reading these ideas are Americans, but Americans also practice many different schools of thought. That is why I chose the Amish as an example; I believe it is easy for kids to imagine that their school of thought, certain aspects of it, not all of it, is different than their own, for the obvious reason that they avoid certain obvious uses of technology, technology that I believe many kids in America expect to be available to them. So, I am anticipating that one popular diagnostic phrase a kid might use after reading this advice may be ‘Are you Amish?’ I am not encouraging a discriminating use of that phrase. It is just a phrase I think many? kids may use after reading this advice.

[I know that I haven’t said much recently. I plan to try to finish this ‘Approach’ explanation next week, and type in more, of course.

2/15/2016

1st, I’d like to ask your permission to use the ‘good news, bad news’ explanation. I’m not planning to stop giving advice. The ‘good news, bad news’ format is just a way for me to convey a meaning to you. Well anyway, here it goes: The ‘good news’ is that I recently invented an idea, this past Saturday, just a few days ago, that I believe may be useful to you. I sense some attention span in the new bookmark phrases alone. The ‘bad news’ is that, if I am to explain this new idea to you, I would have to discontinue explaining this ‘Approach’ idea. If I have time and if I choose to, I will simply ‘copy and paste’ what I need from this list concerning the ‘Approach’ idea and create a new list for it. So, what I plan to do now is read this list over, make some basic changes where needed, and add a disclaimer at the end of it. Tomorrow, I plan to offer you the new idea I recently invented. I want to read and finish this list now so that I can start the new idea fresh, without hindrance from the ideas in this list.

Some viewer discretion for series ‘Amazing Stories’. Rated R viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘About Time’. Rated PG discretion for sci-fi series ‘Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman’. Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Witness’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Approach’ and ‘Sore throat swallow’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.