2/16/2016

Before I start, I’d like to create some sort of beginning ambiance for this explanation. I’d like to introduce a quote from movie ‘Star Trek: Nemesis(2002)’. According to the rental from Amazon Video, 23 minutes and 8 seconds into the movie, during a meeting with his crew, Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart) says quote:

Picard:-‘Well, it seems as though we are truly sailing into the unknown.’

The quote is used in it’s refurbished context. In other words, you use the ambiance of that Star Trek movie scene without the information from what you may find from watching the rest of the movie, both before and after that scene. You only use the refurbished attitute that they have during that meeting, and of course, the refurbished for advice mentality that Picard presents when he says that quote, that they are sailing into the unknown. Basically, I would like to proceed with this explanation using those specific words from Picard. The rest of that movie, of course, is removed and not used for this advice.

Earn:

The word ‘Earn’ comes from a bookmark that I explained in a previous list that I typed in Amazon.com, that ‘a person should not need to be receptive for certain entitlements’. Certain experienced instigations may cause you to forget or not normally sense certain things that the instigator in question is entitled to have by causing you to believe that the instigator needs to earn such things. Basically, this idea is designed to give more balance to how you recall and real time experience certain instigations. For example, if you choose to, let’s use as a reference one of the mild to moderate instigations that you have already experienced, an experience that still bothers you when you recall it.

Here is a conceptualized illustration example for you to imagine the use of this idea: Let’s start by changing the particulars of the recalled experience for the sake of this advice.  Let’s say that, when you were instigated, the instigator had some sort of wall as a background and is either standing or sitting. When you see that instigator as if he/she was talking to you, you see that wall, and that wall is covered with optical fibers(You can check the definition of ‘Optical fiber’ from the Wikipedia web site). One main reference that I got the use of optical fibers was when I attended one of those ‘Six Flags’ amusement parks. I remember the kids and adults wearing those glow in the dark necklaces at night. Now, for the sake of illustration, all of those optical fibers are now, as you imagine it, protruding from the walls. According to wikipedia.com, ‘an optical fiber (or optical fibre) is a flexible, transparent fiber made by drawing glass (silica) or plastic to a diameter slightly thicker than that of a human hair.’ If you just glanced at the wikipedia article, so to speak, you can see that optical fibers have many uses. The recommended use  for this advice is that you can use it to present an intensity and variety of light of your choosing. For illustration, I have chosen to use the color of neon green, like the color of green that the customers who went to a ‘Six Flags’ amusement park may have worn as glow in the dark bracelets. (You can re-define/change the colors of the wall and optical fiber lights if you want to). You can then, if you choose to, make an imagined hand and arm that can stretch to feel those optical fibers. Those optical fibers represent, within reason, of course, what that instigator is entitled to have, and does not need to earn.

Here’s an example: Although I try to take into consideration that kids could be reading these ideas, I think this time I should be more obvious as to how adults may use this idea. 1st, even though I believe that the idea itself is important, that doesn’t mean I want adults to turn many of their experiences into a video game. I am not obligating you to use your imagination for this idea. However, when you feel inclined to, what about while you are in a supermarket? It’s not the school you may be attending, it’s not the job you work in, and there are obvious moments when such an idea may be used, such as when you are waiting in line to purchase your groceries. Based on my experience to use this idea, you probably won’t need to conceptualize it’s use much anyway. Of course, if you use public transportation, such as sitting in a subway train or bus, than there are a lot of moments when you may use such an idea. [Anyway, here’s an example of using it. Let’s say you experienced a minor instigation while waiting in line in a supermarket. Since there are no other pressing matters involved, you may imagine using one of your imaginary hands to grab some of the optical fibers that are coming from the wall. You can then call upon a color of light, let’s say the color of neon green, to fill the identity of those optical fibers, like the light was being controlled by a dimmer switch. Your imagined hand could also feel a little colder as the neon green light becomes stronger. [So, basically, if the situation is right for you, grabbing those optical fibers could involve some acceptable short term epiphany for you.

Now, if you recall that instigation again, you can take into consideration those ‘hairs’ that the instigator is entitled to have. For example, before, there was distress when you would recall that moment. Now, you can accept the ‘hairs’ that are also there without needing to accept the instigation. There should be more continuity with the recall now. [Well anyway, this is only one bookmark that I plan to introduce to you. This idea is meant to be used with other ideas, not just to be interpreted individually.

Reply:

To remember the word ‘Reply’, I recommend thinking about the ‘Reply’ option that you may have when you would read your e-mails. [This idea may seem like it’s asking too much from you, but if you read the composure idea(Wishlist #1003-1008) that I introduced to you, starting in April 2, 2015, that means you may have had about 10 months worth of practicing using that idea. If you actually used the composure idea, that means for the 1st few months of it’s use, you were probably practicing your use of blinking. You have a lot of experience using your sense of composure.

That being said, you may find the ‘Reply’ idea useful to you. Basically, ‘Reply’ is a word I use to identify how certain instigations encourage you to interact with it’s evaluation. For example, an out of context instigation would impose a question upon you that would give you the inclination to give that question an answer. Now, if you experienced such an instigation in the past, when you would recall in memory such an instigation, you would still ‘reply’ to such an instigation, even though such an instigation already occurred. Here is one possible trick the instigator may have placed in a past instigation: it is like you have to contemplationally clap your hands together in order to actually clap your hands together.

The ‘Reply’ solution is to check whether or not you need to contemplationally ‘Reply’ to a recalled experience.

Clarify:

Now, this is an idea I just invented today, this morning today while I was in the supermarket I would normally shop in. While I was in that supermarket, I believe I noticed a few overclarifying interjections from a few of the men that shop there, interjections that may be distasteful to experience by other men. And so, what I did was try to invent a solution to how I respond to those overclarifying interjections. And that’s when I imagined in so many words and thoughts why an instigator may improperly impose such overclarifying interjections. Let’s say a man would experience an out of context, overclarifying interjection from another man. Since the experience was adverse and distasteful, what the man may do is avoid such an experience contemplationally, and instead think about something that does not overclarify in an adverse and distasteful manner. Then the man remembers the ‘Elementary’ episode, episode 2.7 ‘The Marchioness’. The man does not remember the name of the episode, but he remembers, refurbished for advice, of course, that there was an attractive woman that dated both Sherlock(Jonny Lee Miller) and some time ago his brother Mycroft(Rhys Ifans). After checking imdb.com, the attractive woman’s name in the episode is identified as Nigella Mason(Olivia d’Abo). When the man checked Amazon Video, he discovered that the scene he recalled started 3 minutes and 47 seconds into the episode. In that scene, Nigella says to Sherlock quote:

Nigella:-‘Sherlock Holmes, you look dashing as ever(Nigella, in the form of a greeting, kisses Sherlock). Do let me know when you decide to start aging, won’t you?’

The man doesn’t remember what Nigella said to Sherlock, but instead remembers the gist of why he recalled that extrapolated scene. It is an example, refurbished of course, of a woman who has made her interactions, her demeanor, comfortable for 2 men in separate situations to experience in a friendly dating situation. And so, what that man did was compare his adverse, distasteful, overclarifying interjections that he had experienced in a supermarket with other men to Nigella Mason, a character in an ‘Elementary’ episode, and that man made a startling? logical conclusion: that such an instigation discourages innocent people from fortifying evaluations contemplationally. For example, when you think of the overclarifying interjections, they overclarify using an absurdly adverse and distasteful context, something that involves fortifying a certain experience, but the notion is still imposed upon you in a context that you would want to avoid thinking about. Now, when a man in this example would think about Nigella, there is no extra fortifying needed. A man in this example after experiencing such an adverse instigation would think about Nigella to basically ‘feel better’. However, the problem with that line of thinking is that it discourages you from developing further your ability to fortify evaluations. For example, although I never had kids of my own, I speculate that when parents raise their kids, they’re always fortifying some sort of evaluation contemplationally for the sake of their kids. So, it’s all well and good if you have parental experience, but not everyone has parental experience.

So, the solution I am recommending to you when you experience an out of context, non relevant, overclarifying interjection instigation is to keep in mind that such an instigation may be trying to inhibit your sense of fortifying other evaluations, with the rest of this ‘Clarify’ advice used. To avoid a certain ambiguity, only use that scene when Nigella greets Sherlock for this advice. Throw away the rest of that episode.

Subside:
This is particularly important in our era of male and cialis brand 20mg and other medications for sexual dysfunction. One of the most popular tadalafil 20mg generic impotence remedies is the use of oral medication. cheap brand levitra Every one of the pointed out medications have been established in NYC over the last decade. The powerful sexual inhibitor works extremely reliable in curing buy viagra without consultation impotence within minutes.
[Well, as much as I’d like to finish these ideas today, I don’t have enough free time. Instead, I’ll just try to finish them tomorrow.

2/17/2016

Subside:

According to my computer, it is now 7:32 PM eastern standard time. That means that I know I am starting this explanation late. I am going to give myself about 2 hours starting now to explain to you 2 bookmarks. I won’t have enough time to read over these ideas, but at least you may have 2 more ideas to think about until next week.

The 1st bookmark that I want to explain to you is the bookmark that I have discovered this past Saturday, a few days ago. This idea is the reason that I have postponed the previous explanation and started this explanation. In other words, I believe it’s important to know. The bookmark name I give it is ‘Subside’. According to web site www.dictionary.com and according to the definition I choose to use for this advice, the word ‘subside’ means-‘to become quiet, less active, or less violent; abate’. The sentence example is ‘The laughter subsided.’ Basically, I discovered that an instigator improperly exploits the possibility that you wait for certain aspects of your experienced instigation to subside. It is my opinion that most people in America that are innocent who experience such an instigation will actually wait for a certain feeling imposed by that instigation to subside. Now, here is a question for the advice: ‘That’s like saying that ‘the water is wet’ and ‘the sky is up’!’ Doesn’t everybody do it?’ [Well, if you have been reading these ideas in this blog, I believe it is possible for me to give you advice that helps you more objectively see such inclinations of subsiding. I recommend that you consider this: What if the inclination imposed upon you by an instigator is also out of context and not relevant? I believe that if an innocent person with no developed technique experienced such an instigation, even though the inclination to subside is obviously out of context and not relevant, for example, and is clearly allowed by you to dismiss such an experience, the innocent person won’t be able to because when that innocent person experiences such an imposed subsiding, that person has to wait for the inclination to subside. And since, according to my memory, this is the 1st time I have offered you such an advice, I believe that, before I have offered you this idea, you, too, may likely would have to wait for the inclination to subside, even though that wait may only be 10 seconds or so. Also, that wait that you have chosen to experience may be proof enough for you that your past experiences with instigation may have elements of inclinations to wait as part of it’s identity.

The solution that I have invented is that, once you are able to more objectively identify that an instigation is imposing an inclination to subside upon you, if the experience is mild and tolerant enough, and of course it is also out of context, you may be able to choose to not need to subside with it in it’s imposed out of context acclimation and circumstance. For example, before this advice, if you experienced such an instigation, even though the use of these ideas are giving you a ‘sense’ buffer, you still experience from an instigation sometimes the inclination to subside. And so, what you would do is wait for the experience to subside, in a multi-tasking context, of course. Now, if you choose to use this idea, you have a choice. If it’s an out of context sense of subsiding, you may choose not to actively wait with the subsiding. Let’s say that the subsiding is from an improperly imposed notion that you did not choose to experience, and you are choosing not to directly address it. Even though the subsiding identity is obvious to you, even though your composure response still senses it, you still have the choice to not address it, and to not directly participate with it’s sense of acclimation.

Examples:

Up until today, the only example I can think of for ‘Subside’, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, is near end of episode 1.9 ‘The Dirty Joke’ from series ‘Ally McBeal(1997)’. I couldn’t find that episode streaming from Amazon, but it is available streaming from www.hulu.com. Hulu is allowing people to try it for free for 1 week. I am using the 1 week trial period to use that episode right now. Next time, of course, I would have to pay their one month fee at least, so in case you are interested, it’s available from hulu. I checked youtube.com yesterday, and that episode wasn’t available from youtube. Anyway, according to Hulu, when you watch the Ally McBeal episode, the screen tells you how much time you have left. The scene I am recommending to you, refurbished for advice, of course, starts 6 minutes and 55 seconds remaining into the episode, when Caroline Poop(Sandra Bernhard) gives Georgia Thomas(Courtney Thorne-Smith) a look that Georgia feels uncomfortable with. Here is a quote, after Caroline gives Georgia that ‘look’:

Georgia:-‘Hey!(Georgia then grabs Caroline by the arm to stop her from walking.) I know what these looks are about, and I don’t like them.’

Caroline:-‘What looks?’

Georgia:-‘These looks! Like – Let’s get together and watch ‘Ellen’ sometime.’

Caroline gives Georgia that ‘look’ at least one more time in the episode, and, if memory serves, Georgia also talks about that ‘look’ to another in the show. Anyway, the point of the Ally McBeal reference is to give you an example of a person waiting for a certain experience to subside, and that person is Georgia.(Now I am going to cancel my free membership to Hulu, or else the program will automatically charge me after my week is over.)

For this 2nd example, I just thought about using it for the past few hours today. It’s one of those things you may consider using in your blog or web site the last few hours before you actually type something in. Of course, the reference is refurbished with inapproprieities removed. The episode is available from Amazon Video. It starts in the beginning of episode 41.8 ‘Chris Hemsworth’ from series ‘Saturday Night Live(2015)’. In it, refurbished(although it does seem to be what he is doing), Chris is pretty much exploiting the Saturday Night Live actor’s use of subsiding. Of course, I’m assuming it’s just an act. I’m not recommending you to do what Chris is doing to the SNL actors. The point of the reference is to offer you an illustration of what it is like when a person has to wait for a certain experience to subside, and none of the SNL actors seem to have the ability to ‘let it go’. In his monologue, which starts 2 minutes and 36 seconds into the HD episode I purchased from Amazon Video, Chris uses the excuse that he is treating the other actors as if they were his family. If you see that scene in my recommended context, you might find that scene entertaining to watch.

Lag:

[OK, I have changed my mind about the 2 hours thing, and I have decided to stop now. I plan to start explaining bookmark ‘Lag’, and to finish explaining this list next week. See you then!

2/23/2016

I have decided to read over and close this list now, and make more ideas in the next list. Bookmark ‘Lag’ is still an idea I plan to explain soon.

Violence, viewer discretion in movie ‘Star Trek: Nemesis’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Elementary’. Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘Ally McBeal’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Saturday Night Live’. Use refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Earn’, ‘Reply’, ‘Clarify’, and ‘Subside’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.