5/24/2016

It is now 5:58 PM EST, according to my computer. So, that means I will explain the 1st part of this idea today, and if I don’t have time today to finish this idea, I plan to finish it tomorrow.

This is the reason I have chosen to give you a fundamental answer for 6 of 6, instead of the upgraded answer I am using now. When I invented the last part of this idea, I think it was about 2 months ago, most of it, at least by my intent, looked like the explanation I am giving you now. Soon after I invented that ‘fundamental’ explanation, I invented several other ideas that can be seen as upgrades to that fundamantal explanation. So, the idea is that, if I give you that original explanation, it would be easier for you to learn the upgrades that I plan to type after I finish this idea. I have the ability to explain to you the idea I am using now, but I believe that you will be better off if I give you the original explanation instead.

Proximity instigation:

Before I start with that original explanation, there is one more thing I want to add, one more idea. It is based on what I think is happening in a standard demographic context to people who experience instigations. I call this particular category of instigation ‘Proximity instigations’. According to dictionary.com, ‘proximity’ means-‘nearness in place, time, order, occurrence, or relation.’ The proximity I am referring to is when an instigator adversely influences your sense of people perspective. For example, somewhere during my Amazon.com explanations, when I experienced what I believe to be certain instigations, it felt like I was placed on an island, and I would have to somehow establish a cable tv connection for the house I was living in. Although I didn’t think of the experience in a certain convenient detail at the time, basically, the instigations would cause me to try to re-establish a basic sense of societal network interaction. I am assuming that many of those ideas that I typed in Amazon helped me re-establish that sense. Now, for you, I have imagined an ambiance story designed to help you re-instate some of that societal network interaction that ‘proximity instigations’ may try to take away from you. And so, here is the story:

1st, let me offer you music to go with that ambiance. The musical background begins from episode 2.2 ‘Who Mourns for Adonais?’ from series ‘Star Trek(1967)’. According to Amazon Video, the music begins 24 minutes and 12 seconds into the episode, when Apollo(Michael Forest) was explaining to Carolyn Palamas(Leslie Parrish) what happened to the other gods of Olympus(it’s a science fiction tv show). I recommend you use the musical background that was being played when Apollo was talking. It sounds solemn(gravely or somberly impressive; causing serious thoughts or a grave mood), and it has what sounds to me like trumpets or horns playing in the background.

And now, for more of the physical aspects of the ambiance. I recommend using a scene from movie ‘Wrath of the Titans(2012)’, when Perseus(Sam Worthington) brought his son Helius(John Bell) to one of the temples of the Olympian gods. The scene is located, According to Amazon Video rental, 15 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie. There are also more scenes available near that time frame for that temple.

And now, for the story(Keep in mind that I just imagined it).  (Before you get into the story, I recommend you start imagining that solemn music from the ‘Star Trek’ episode to be played). There is this place in every major city where statues of certain people are being displayed. Now, these statues are of statues of normal people. However, it is unlikely that you will ever meet them, interact with them, because of what they do for a living. Underneath every statue is contact information, such as their website, Facebook, blog, along those lines, if you want to communicate with them. Now, it’s not like these people live and/or work in some sort of difficult to access place. It’s just that they’re not instigators. When they interact with people, they don’t do something associated with ‘proximity instigations’. However, through no fault of their own, they are like the exact opposite of ‘proximity instigations’ when compared to ‘proximity instigations’. And so, when you experience a ‘proximity instigation’, such people may be the 1st to leave your basic sense of societal network interaction. And so, to help people have a maintained sense of societal network interaction, such places exist. The illustration I recommended for you from the movie has statues that are damaged and would look more presentable if repaired, so when you imagine such a place in America, of course the statues are normal, and not in any need of repair. And since you’re just imagining it, you can just imagine sitting in a reasonably sturdy chair, and just absorb the ambiance of such a place, while listening to the solemn music I have provided for you. Now, these statues are designed to ‘catch’ and present a certain meaning of causality associated with these people. For example, when a person is being trained for something more specific for his/her job, that person may be shown certain videos that present a more specific meaning. For example, when you are using one of those language learning programs, the images shown to you are meant to represent a specific meaning to a specific word or phrase. That is what the statues present. Here’s an example: Let’s say you talked to one of those people as they were helping you with something. Now, you don’t want the image for that person’s statue to be the moment when he/she was talking to you. Instead, you get to choose another moment in the person’s life that best represents that person helping you. And that is one of the reasons that makes those statues look interesting. You can imagine why the statues look the way  they do.

[All right. It’s now 6:57 PM. I’m going to take a break right now, and I plan to finish this idea tomorrow.

5/25/2016

Feel understand:

Before I finally finish this idea, there is one more idea I want to add to it. It’s still what I would call a ‘fundamental idea’, and it was an idea I have already invented a few months ago, and I was already thinking to add this idea to this list. So, instead of giving it a separate list name, like ‘6 of 7’, I’ll just add it to this list.

1st, let’s start with the primary illustration for this idea called ‘Feel understand’. In fact, much of this idea was made from this illustration. The illustration is in movie ‘Company Business(1991)’, and it stars Gene Hackman as Sam Boyd and Mikhail Baryshnikov as Pyotr Grushenko. According To Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour 2 minutes and 14 seconds into the movie, when Grushenko recommends to Boyd that they use a rock as an association to understand something. As one person would hold the rock, that person would sense that rock would be used to create a certain meaning. The use of the rock only lasted for about 30 seconds, but even if you haven’t seen the movie, you can probably imagine your own understanding as to how the rock was used as you watched that scene. It’s been several years since I have seen that movie myself, but I think you don’t need to see the movie in order to understand that a sense of feeling associated with the holding of that rock was used to understand something.

My point about bookmark ‘Feel understand’ is that I believe using a sense of feeling in order to understand is part of how we perceive reality. So, what an instigator might do is cause you to forsake a sense of feeling that is associated with an adverse experience with instigation, but by doing so, you may be avoiding too much of a sense of feeling for other experiences. So, what I propose that I do, at least for the next few ideas that I plan to type in, and of course now, I propose that I address the aspect of instigations that adversely exploit your sense of feeling to understand directly. Nip it in the bud, so to speak.
If it world not cheap, the branded tadalafil 20mg for women would not only prepare your body for sex but it would be a better decision to consult a trusted sex doctor in Delhi for the diagnosis of this condition based on the best scientific discoveries in neurobiology. Anal pose helps blood supply to these http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482460790_ij_file.pdf viagra ordination muscles and improves their efficiency. Many stores offering the lowest prices for the world class medicines hence, treating erection issues in men. continue reading over here purchase viagra raises the circulation of blood to the penis, while Tadalafil acts in a natural way to improve your sex life. For example; to get treatment for diseases like erectile dysfunction, to get drugs such as Super Kamagra and Extra Super Tadarise that help buying levitra in canada to treat this problem.
Here is the only example I can think of right now involving ‘Feel understand’. Even though the example is not an instigation, I think it can still be refurbished to be used for this advice. The example is in the movie ‘Annapolis(2006)’. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 30 minutes and 33 seconds into the movie, when Loo(Roger Fan) says to Estrada(Wilmer Calderon) quote-‘Estrada, we need to talk.’ There are more elements of this story in previous moments of the movie, refurbished for advice, if you wish to see them. Anyway, the point is that Estrada physically assaulted Loo for trying to tell Cole(Tyrese Gibson) that Estrada failed in one of his tasks. Now, here’s the thing. Even if Loo managed to tell Cole or anyone else with authority, even though I do not know anything about Annapolis, it is my strong opinion that Estrada would not be expelled for such a thing. After all, the task involved obvious sleep deprivation, and it is my opinion that sleep deprivation can muddle your sense of thinking. The reason this example is relevant is that Estrada physically assaulted Loo because of how Estrada uses his sense of feeling when provoked. Keep in mind that this is not high school, where fights probably happen from time to time when teenagers provoke teenagers. If you were to give that movie some movie credibility, this event happened in Annapolis, and that is why Estrada was expelled for assaulting Loo. The scene where Estrada leaves Annapolis begins 37 minutes and 13 seconds into the movie.

It is now 4:28 PM EST, and I have finally found a way to explain the final part of this idea. The solution begins with a reference from episode 5.2 ‘The Ship’ from sci-fi series ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. According to Amazon Video, the reference begins 9 minutes and 8 seconds into the episode, when Bashir(Alexander Siddig) and Quark(Armin Shimerman) are on their way to submit a grievance to Major Kira(Nana Visitor). I recommend that you listen to the entire dialog. The highlight of that conversation is when Kira says quote-‘I don’t have time for this.’ That scene is located almost 10 minutes into the episode. The point of this reference is that Kira was able to not choose to acclimate somewhat to the grievances of Bashir and Quark.

Startle understand:

And now, a description of the actual idea itself: An instigator may improperly impose a sense of adverse acclimation commitment to your sense of chosen understanding by using an improperly imposed sense of surprise for you to experience. For example, in the ‘Deep Space Nine’ example, Major Kira was able to choose not to acclimate somewhat to the grievances of Bashir and Quark, since she had another obligation to attend to. However, when you experience such an instigation, let’s call it ‘Startle understand’, and let’s say you don’t have managerial experience, for example, you are an employee, or you are a student, such as a grammar school, high school, or college student, then an instigator may cause you to accepting a sense of understanding that involves surprise imposed acclimation as part of your chosen sense of understanding. Of course, you probably don’t want to accept such a sense of understanding, but you can’t seem to easily just shrug the experience off.

Now, here is the solution that I am offering you that may be a bit of a reach in my part. This solution involves all 6 parts of this idea, from ‘Egging me on’ to what I am typing in now. If I explained it well enough, you should be able to have your own, more objective, sense of chosen understanding. The solution is that you simply? allow yourself to be aware of the fact(assuming that you have experienced such an instigation) that the instigation is adversely influencing your chosen understanding, and that you believe that such an adverse sense of acclimation induced by surprise should be something that is acclimated to by choice, not something that has to be always a part of your chosen understanding, and when that has been identified, you should be able to create a sense of chosen understanding that is reasonably separate from that surprising acclimation of instigation.

Let’s see if I can clarify this explanation. In the ‘Star Trek’ reference I have offered you, when Kira was presented with grievances from both Bashir and Quark, Kira instead chose to not involve herself with such acclimations, since she had another priority to attend to. She chose to not commit to the acclimations associated with such grievances. Now, in your case, when an instigator imposes an instigation upon you that uses surprise to emphasize a sense of acclimation for you to experience, the surpising identity of such an instigation tries to become a part of your chosen sense of acclimation. Unlike what Kira did, you were not able to simply? choose not to interact with such an acclimation. Instead, it becomes a part of your chosen sense of understanding.

One obvious problem with such an instigation is that it’s very identity upon your chosen sense of understanding, if you have unwittingly committed to it, becomes a liability to your sense of latitude allowance. Look, I believe that many Americans have probably experienced such an instigation, and have learned to cope with it. For example, your entire life is not just about that experienced instigation. People do other things. However, it is my belief that, just because a certain instigation is very common to experience, the fact that it’s very common to experience doesn’t make it right. Also, although I do not believe I am an instigator, I think it is possible that instigators knowing that such an instigation is very common, may exploit it’s commonality and make it’s adverse effect upon innocent people noticeably worse than it’s traditional identity. So, therefore I recommend that you be the judge. You decide that, if you experienced such an identified instigation, what type of severity you think it is.

Now, going back to how such an instigation can be a liability upon your sense of latitude allowance, if you experienced such an instigation, once you choose to create a sense of chosen understanding that is separate from such an instigation, an instigation you have already experienced, then you should notice how much more latitude you now have. Instead of allowing yourself to maintain the surprise induced acclimation identity of the instigation as part of your chosen understanding, you now have the ability to see that surprise induced acclimation identity more objectively, and you can now choose more objectively how much latitude allowance you are willing to commit to such an experience from now on.

Here are 2 conceptualized examples I have for this idea. The 1st example involves a sponge, and the sponge represents your chosen understanding. Oversimplifyingly said, of course, your ‘sponge’ for every experience and every expectation you become aware of, your ‘sponge’ absorbs some of it. And there are other experiences that allow your sponge to ‘reset’ and start over. For example, when you go on vacation, when you go on a school trip, even when you talk to your friends, the sponge ‘resets’ to a degree.

The 2nd example involves ice cubes placed on a car during a nice day. Let’s say you own a car, and some of those experiences represent ice cubes that you place on your car, and you hope that the sun will melt those ice cubes. You can always place your car on most of the places in America. You can just own a 2nd car just for melting ice cubes. Now, what an instigator may do is somehow manipulate certain ice cubes in a way that they are going to take a lot longer to melt than the ice cubes that you are used to. So, therefore, you notice that the instigation identified by bookmark ‘Surprise understand’ or ‘Startle understand’ is metaphorically creating ice cubes that are taking longer to melt than the other ice cubes you are used to.

If I may be a little presumptuous, if you have benefitted from this advice, and this advice does have a few more upgrades I plan to type in next, eventually, it will probably be like most of the older ideas that you may have read. You will simply get used to it to the point that it may feel like you have forgotten it. And then, of course, I’ll probably make more ideas for the forseeable future.

Here is a question for this advice: ‘Why is my attitude like this?’ I believe that, since this is a public list, I should take into consideration that kids could be reading these ideas, even though kids may not be reading these ideas. Although I am not a doctor, I’d like to think of myself as having a few aspects of consideration that I imagine doctors have. For example, when you go to a doctor, if you need it, the doctor prescribes to you medication that will help you recover, without giving you some sort of unacceptable attitude about it. And so, I would like to think that I am at least trying to give you some sort of advice that will benefit you without also giving you some sort of unacceptable attitude about it. However, I would also like to point out that this is ‘standard demographic’ advice, not ‘standard’ advice. I have made over a thousand lists already, and have went through various changes as to how I offer advice. I didn’t start out sounding this way. If you want proof, if the Amazon.com lists I made are still there, you can check my earlier lists and compare those lists to the lists that I have made in this blog.

Violence and viewer discretion for the ‘Star Trek(1967)’ series. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Wrath of the Titans’. Some viewer discretion for movie ‘Company Business’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Annapolis’. Violence and viewer discretion for series ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Proximity instigation’, ‘Feel understand’, ‘Not my sense of chosen understanding’, ‘Surprise understand’, ‘Startle understand’, and ‘Acclimate understand’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.