7/19/2016

I want to create a conducive ambiance for this idea, and so, for that ambiance, I recommend that you use the old Commodore 64 musical intro from several of their 80’s commercials. The one I specifically recommend for you to use, according to youtube.com, is a 32 second Commodore 64 commercial that originally aired on tv in 1984. If you choose to watch that commercial, it’s located in web site www.youtube.com . Just go there, search the phrase ‘commodore 64 commercial how old would you be’, and youtube should give you that video as it’s 1st selection. If you choose to use the music from that commercial for this advice, just think about it from time to time as you read and learn the ideas from this specific list. Of course, I’m not recommending to you that you keep thinking about it. I just want you to get in the mood to learn these ideas.

Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction:

Before I introduce to you the idea I believe have some epiphany for you, called ‘Smack hasty proof’, I want to introduce to you the concept that your private thoughts are not the same as your obvious interactions. The bookmark name for that is ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’. I want to begin this idea with the illustration 1st. Unfortunately, the best illustration example I can think of right now has some bad language involved. Of course, if you can, use the illustration with the inapproprieities removed. That includes the bad language. However, if kids are going to watch the reference anyway, let’s say directly from the Blu-ray or streaming, they’ll still unavoidably notice some of that bad language. Now, it is my opinion that, since the illustration is coming from a movie that is a comedy, and I also watched the reference myself, it is my opinion that the bad language, when used, is not used in a matter that is, let’s say, done with malicious intent, as if an instigator wants to provoke you with such language. In other words, if you watched how the situation started, you know that the scene is from a comedy. That being said, the illustration is only a recommendation, and you can choose not to use it(I’m saying this because I try to take into consideration that kids could be reading these ideas). The illustration, according to Amazon Video rental, starts 1 hour, 31 minutes, and 37 seconds into movie ‘This is 40(2012)’, the R rated version, not the unrated version. The scene is when Debbie(Leslie Mann) and Pete(Paul Rudd) are defending themselves against accusations from parent Catherine(Melissa McCarthy) with Vice Principal Laviati(Joanne Baron) as the arbitrator. Now, when I say the use of that illustration is refubished for advice, that is to clarify how it is used for this advice. I still think my interpretation of what happened in that scene is accurate enough. Well, in case I am wrong, my interpretation is also refurbished for advice.

Anyway, this is what I think happened in that scene: Basically, what Catherine said to Vice Principal Laviati was true, but because Debbie and Pete didn’t want to get into any trouble, they made Catherine contemplationally feel like a nervous wreck, and when that happened, she used her thoughts that were made unstable by Debbie and Pete to present an obvious interaction that completely undermined her own accusations as to what Debbie and Pete did to her son.

Now, here’s an imagined example of what many? of you are going through in regards to your private thought interactions and obvious interactions as it relates to certain experienced instigations: Let’s say an instigator at school or work causes you to experience a minor instigation. It’s not something that the instigator would get in trouble for. However, since the instigator won’t get in trouble for it, that instigator from time to time imposes certain types of minor instigations upon you. I speculate that the instigator chose you to instigate because to instigate another instigator is like instigating a clone of themselves. In other words, you’re ‘fresh meat’ to them, so to speak. I also speculate that you’re the type of person that avoids declaring himself/herself to be offended, so, when you experience such an instigation, your obvious presentation of interaction avoids overreacting to the experienced instigation. However, repeated exposure to minor instigations, let’s say from various types of instigators, has given your private thought interactions sort of a mildly disparaged sense of identity.

Now, the reason I gave you the illustration from movie ‘This is 40’ is to offer you a refurbishedly toned down identity of Catherine as an example for you to use. Let’s say this changed identity of Catherine is not there because of her son. She is instead just complaining about the mistreatment she is experiencing from Debbie and Pete to Vice Principal Laviati. So, the illustated example of Catherine is not as serious as it is originally portrayed in the movie, and it involves a woman’s private thought interactions made to look to be a nervous wreck. Now, in your situation, although in the example your private thought interactions do not look like a nervous wreck, you may be tricked by the instigator to believe that your private thought interactions are the same as your obvious interactions. This part of the advice is here to recommend to you to not treat your private thought interactions as if they were the same as your obvious interactions. Here, let me give you an example. Let’s say, just as an example, it didn’t actually happen, that you gave me to see 100 situations where you were instigated, and in all of those situations, you did not declare yourself to be offended, because you did not want to overreact to such minor instigations. I observed those situations, and I am letting you know right now that you didn’t do anything wrong, and it’s a shame that those instigators would treat you in such a way. And then you tell me that, even though you did nothing wrong, your private thought interactions still felt like your obvious interactions, and then, after you told me that, I reassured you that they are not the same, and that, if you just looked at what happened based on what was actually occurring, then it would be clear that the instigator is ‘in the wrong’, and that you are ‘in the right’! I just thought of this now, in the ‘Catherine’ refurbished illustration, all of the inapproprieities are removed. You use the acceptable version of Catherine that suits you.

[Tomorrow, I plan to start and finish explanation ‘Smack hasty proof’, the idea I originally wanted to explain to you. Bookmark ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’ was just a prerequisite(required beforehand).

7/20/2016

I’m sorry, but I don’t think I have reasonable enough time to continue with an explanation today. The mail order blu-ray rentals were anticipated by me a day late because of how they deliver tv show seasons, and even though I thought I compensated for it, I ended up actually watching some of those episodes more than I thought I would. In case you are interested to know, I rented season 4 of ‘House of Cards’ today, I returned them today minus the 1st Blu-ray rental. The issue with the mailing of the Blu-rays was that if the 1st Blu-ray of the season selected is unavailable, then the other Blu-rays will not automatically deliver, unless you jumble the order of the Blu-rays and give them priority. For example, if disc 1 is not available, but disc 2, 3, and 4 are, then you make as a priority request discs 2, 3, and 4 in a jumbled sequence, and you put disc 1 in a lower priority. So, let’s say you request as a priority discs 4, 3, and 2, and then after those 3, you make a request for disc 1, since disc 1 is not available, or you put disc 1 in an even lower priority. If you show that in your request list, at least the 3 discs that are available will be delivered to you.

Well, anyway, even though I believe bookmark ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’, for kids at least, can be a monumental achievement for you to use, it is still only a partial explanation that I wanted to offer you today. So, therefore, next week, I will try to complete this explanation, AND give you another idea! See you then!

7/27/2016

More latitude:

I want to begin with a new idea. This should count as a complete, new idea, as per my obligation. After I complete this idea, I will start a new list and continue with the epiphany idea I was trying to explain.

I invented this idea a few days ago, after I imagined 2 days later(7/21) that some people may complain about this phrase. Here is a quote:

‘I speculate that the instigator chose you to instigate because to instigate another instigator is like instigating a clone of themselves. In other words, you’re ‘fresh meat’ to them, so to speak.’

The reason I believe I typed that in was because of the number 100. Even though I didn’t actually imagine 100 situations of minor instigation a kid may experience, I still related to it, and it was like I was giving a kid an answer to a question I believed that kid should know, even though I didn’t think of the question specifically. 2 days later, I realized I may have made a mistake, but it wasn’t a mistake that, in my opinion, needed to be deleted. I really try to not think of deleting these words as an option, but of course, if I have to, I will.
Side effects include: Constipation, depression, dizziness, dry mouth, drowsiness, fatigue, headache, impotence, impaired order viagra online view that store now thinking, and weight gain. The area of performance has innovative considerably since order generic viagra http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/2018-4.pdf was presented and now there are so many iss8ues which a man faces throughout his life would like to get affected from such humiliating and depressing health condition. Baum optimal occupational therapy that is started at the right time decreases the cost of healthcare by reducing the incidence click to find out more cheap cialis 5mg of organic dysfunction and disabilities. Which pills should you consume that are safe and effective? Kamagra- These pills are amongst the potential drugs to increase blood circulation in super viagra online penile region and rejuvenates reproductive organs through enhanced blood supply.
Bookmark ‘More latitude’ is added here because I encourage kids to be skeptical when they read these ideas. After all, I think it is a correct assumption that the kids pretty much don’t know who I am. So, since the kids are still learning to be skeptical, I believe that having the option to reasonably add more latitude to what you are learning can also benefit them. Here is an example that I have been thinking about on and off for a few days, refurbished for advice, of a person adding latitude to his work. The example is from episode 1.1 ‘The Last Enemy(2008)’. The premise is that Stephen Ezard(Benedict Cumberbatch) has recently returned from China to be in the UK, and he is talking to Yasim Anwar(Anamaria Marinca) about what it was like in China. According to Amazon Video, the illustration is located 17 minutes and 17 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote(I turned the captions ‘on’ from Amazon Video to give you the quote):

Yasim:-‘So why China?’

Stephen:-‘That’s where I work best.’

Yasim:-‘…Because?’

Stephen:-‘It’s peaceful. It’s very…foreign. I haven’t got a clue what’s going on. The world doesn’t intrude. I can concentrate. I’m not distracted by the minutiae(small or trifling matters) of other people’s lives.’

So, basically, while Stephen is in China, he is using what I call ‘Solitude latitude’. He is putting more latitude into his work by adding solitude to it. For an illustration, I created a surreal(having the hallucinatory quality of a dream; unreal; fantastic) example of what it was like when Stephen is using ‘solitude latitude’ in his mathematics work. I imagine Stephen sitting on his lounge chair, the background has curtains that still allow much of the sunlight to enter the room. When you are looking at him, he is sitting to the right of his computer and desk. During that moment, it is a nice afternoon day. He is drinking tea, and the crumpets(a round soft unsweetened bread resembling a muffin, cooked on a griddle or the like, and often toasted) are at the side of his work desk. Now, for the surreal effect, while you are looking at that image, since I am not a big music follower, the best surreal song I can think of is ‘Bachelorette’ by Bjork. I’ve seen small amounts of the music video in www.youtube.com, at it looks surreal to me. Also, here’s some of the lyrics to the song:

Drink me, make me feel real
Wet your beak in the stream
Game we’re playing is life
Love is a two way dream

I have no idea what that means, but I think it’s a popular song. Anyway, you’re hearing that song when you see Stephen drink his tea. Also, I’ve taken some of the surreal elements from episode 6.20 ‘The Man Who Would Be King’ from series ‘Supernatural(2011)’. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 17 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode. It’s basically Raphael’s(Demore Barnes) interpretation of the room that both Raphael and Castiel(Misha Collins) are talking in. I’m using the imagined surreal characteristics that the room is showing to place in Stephen’s ‘solitude latitude’ example, refurbished for advice, of course.

And there you have it! With the help of that example, you may be able to imagine that Stephen, when he is doing his mathematics work, is adding ‘solitude latitude’ to his work. The solitude latitude is not made obviously available for Stephen to use. The mathematics work Stephen does does not offer him as an option ‘solitude latitude’ for him to use. What Stephen does is add the ‘solitude latitude’ to his mathematics work. That not only allows him to enjoy his work, but it also allows him to create exceptional work for his employers.

I’m not recommending that you use ‘solitary latitude’ as an option for adding more latitude to what you are learning. That is just the best example I can think of right now for adding latitude.

Also, this is not about giving instigation a ‘free pass’. This idea is not made to forgive an instigation sleight(a trick used to deceive). This is what I mean: I imagine someone in a company learning something job related, and that person is using what he/she perceives the project is offering him to help him learn. Now, of course, I am not saying I am an expert at adding more latitude to what I am learning, when I choose to. I am saying that it can be useful to you if you have the option to add more latitude to what you are learning. Of course, there are limitations in regards as to what type and how much latitude you should use. However, if you don’t have such an option, you may be completely beholden(obligated; indebted) to what you believe the project involved is offering you to help you learn. Here’s 2 examples to help get the ball rolling, so to speak. There’s episode 4.2 ‘Dream a Little Dreama Me’ from episode ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch(1999)’. The episode is available from Amazon Video. That is when Sabrina has to mentor a witch student named Dreama.

The 2nd example is from episode 6.6 ‘True Q’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1992)’, the positive lessons that Amanda Rogers(Olivia d’Abo) has learned from using her Q powers, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course. The episode is available from Amazon Video.

Well anyway, I have to stop now, in order to begin the next idea. Like I said earlier, I only invented this idea a few days ago. The idea is that if I offer you this idea now and you choose to use it, in time, you will improve upon it.

Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘This is 40’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Last Enemy’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Supernatural’ and ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’.(TV series ‘House of Cards’ was not recommended at all to be watched. I just thought you wanted to know what I was watching for the reasons specified). Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’ and ‘More latitude’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[Since it’s already 7:13 PM EST according to my computer, I have decided to continue the idea next week. I guess that means I still owe you one extra idea.

7/13/2016

Fast proof!

I’m really excited, so to speak, to type this idea in, since I experienced some epiphany when I invented it yesterday. Basically, I created bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ after I received the Blu-ray rental ‘Allegiant(2016)’ from my PO Box yesterday. Yesterday was my 1st time watching the movie ‘Allegiant’, since for some time now, the only movies I watch in the movie theaters are the new ‘James Bond’ movies. In a way, that guarantees a certain focus(Of course, if you are married and have kids, since you are watching movies in movie theaters with your family, I guess you don’t have that type of focus as an option). So anyway, while I was watching the movie ‘Allegiant’, there was this interlude(a short dramatic piece, formerly introduced between the parts or acts of miracle and morality plays or given as part of other entertainments). According to Amazon Video rental, the interlude started 1 hour, 36 minutes, and 20 seconds into the movie, when Tris(Shailene Woodley) and Four(Theo James) were about to have some sort of kissing, hugging, and talking moment. This occurred after Tris and Christina(Zoe Kravitz) were rescuing Four from a holding cell. Since the moment lasted for a while, while that moment was happening, I imagined that I was the ‘3rd wheel’ in that group. In other words, while Tris and Four were kissing, hugging, and talking, I imagined I was the person in that group just watching them do that. Apparently, and I didn’t put it into words while I was thinking about it, there is only 3 of us, as if that moment is a different reality than the moment from the original movie ‘Allegiant’, and in that reality, I was the 3rd person, and while they were kissing, hugging, and talking to each other, I was observing them.

Anyway, that was the moment when I thought of the idea called ‘Fast proof!’. Here’s how the story goes: Two people are married. Since the story was partially created while I was watching that kissing, hugging, talking interlude, I think that was partially why the two people were married were somewhat like them. Well, the man who was married to the woman was French, who also spoke English. Basically, it was a compressed psychological? evaluation of their predicament involving the concept of ‘proof’. The woman did not want the man to incessantly(continuing without interruption; ceaseless; unending) seek proof from her, and since that man is also her husband, she has given her husband a certain flexibility to allow him to try to not need so much proof. This proof is in regards to how they interact for certain social and business matters. Now, that thought was from the wife’s mind. In the husband’s mind, he is thinking about how he would go about doing that, how that would look socially. The way he sees it, it has to be arranged in a way that does not need to ask her for proof, even though the use of proof has already been used. Now, going back to the wife’s mind, when her husband requests proof directly from her, the attitude and interaction created from that request is unacceptable to her.

While I was thinking about this idea earlier today while I was at the supermarket waiting for cold cuts, I think the best example involving what the married couple is going through, the best example I am aware of, and keep in mind I am not a psychiatrist or therapist or anything like that. This is just the best example in my opinion I can think of. The best example that married couple is going through involving the concept of ‘proof’ can come from the movie ‘A Simple Wish(1997)’. This is, according to www.imdb.com, is a comedy, family, and fantasy movie starring celebrity Martin Short as, based on how I interpret the movie, Martin Short is portraying Murray, the 1st male fairy godmother. While I was watching the movie ‘A Simple Wish’, I think that was only over a year ago, I thought about the politics that allowed a man to be a fairy godmother. And in this imagined scenario, which I upgraded today, I believe that it is American politics that allowed Murray to be the 1st male fairy godmother. After all, if one would imagine that fairy godmothers existed, the option to co-exist with society’s mainstream beliefs would probably be considered to be used. A year or so ago, when I 1st thought about this scenario, I imagined how the fairy godmothers, over the past few hundred years, would talk about such a situation very seriously. In the last hundred years, they tried certain things that addressed that issue, made mistakes, such as promises they could not keep, and then finally, because of American politics, which of course they anticipated, they allowed Murray to be the 1st official male fairy godmother.

Now, the reason I mentioned what led to Murray being the 1st official male fairy godmother is because I recommend that you use, in relation to advice, of course, what the fairy godmothers of the past did over the past few hundred years to seriously consider allowing a man to be a fairy godmother. Those imagined situations is what I recommend, refurbished of course, to use when thinking about the married couple thinking about the issues involving ‘proof’.

viagra for women uk good service Role of Diet To Reduce The Effects Of ED Many studies have shown that a good diet can help you maintain a significant control on your erectile problems. The goal of physical therapy for whiplash patients is to help students apply levitra cialis viagra the learned knowledge and know-hows to the classroom. You may have think that this cheap medicine may mastercard cialis not work so much for it is not carefully made. They are taken 30 to 60 minutes after the buy cialis pharmacy intake and start acting on your system by inhibiting the accelerator PDE5 (phosphodiesterase type) found in erectile organ. So, that being said, this is my discovery about bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ in the form of a definition in relation to instigation: ‘An instigator may improperly impose an excessive use of the concept of proof.’ Of course, we live in a society where people need to look at each other for a certain use of proof, such as when they are driving, when they are crossing the street, even basic interactions may involve some types of proof. However, what I am saying is that an instigator may cause you to use the concept of proof excessively upon yourself. The 1st example I have already given you, a woman telling her husband that he requests too much proof from her for certain social and business situations. Now, if I may use a ‘man’ example, even though this may seem somewhat petty in context, there is an example from the trailer of movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha(2005)’. According to youtube.com, there is a trailer of ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’ that has been viewed over 1.4 million times. The scene I am recommending starts 1 minute and 7 seconds into the trailer, when a woman says to another quote-‘A true Geisha can stop a man in his tracks with a single look.’ And so, what happened in that scene is that a woman looked at a man with the intent to distract him, and the man, while riding his bicycle, was distracted to the point where he got into an accident because of that distraction. I just wanted to give you an obvious illustration from a movie example. I didn’t see the movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. I just watched parts of the trailer.

Just to make a logical reach here, but are there any businessmen that have been distracted by an attractive woman? This is just speculation, of course, but in the business world, I am assuming that many men are striving for a certain reasonable focus in order to do their jobs with a certain effectiveness, and when women ‘distract’ them, the distraction I am referring to is not about the woman herself being attractive, it is about a distraction that the woman may create intentionally that is affecting the man’s developing sense of focus. Basically, based on speculation, this distraction would cause the man to be mildly bothered, as he performs his logical diagnostic to determine some sort of action for the effect. Now, the reason I brought that up is because I may have discovered something that may help the men resolve that problem. The reason could be because the woman is causing the man to use a certain expectation of proof in regards to a certain particular aspect of her being attractive. Here’s an example: How many times have you used your own personal technique, and you would experience some sort of lag time in order for your ideas to work? So, let’s go to that scene from the trailer ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. Refurbished for advice, of course, the man riding the bike experienced a certain lag time interpreting the ‘proof’ that lady who looked at him caused him to create in his mind. That proof also created a certain lag time in his logic, and both proof and lag time created a distraction in his mind that caused him to get into an accident while riding his bicycle. Of course, when he looks back in that moment, he will believe that the reason he got into that accident was because of the beauty of that lady who looked at him.

Normally, I won’t just give this advice to men who don’t have an obviously developed sense of logic to cope with instigation. The reason I am recommending this advice to you is because I believe many of you, kids and adults alike, have sometimes experienced a certain lag time associated with certain instigations, a delay of preferred technique effectiveness that may bother you for a few seconds or more. That lag time is why I called bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ ‘Fast’. I used the word ‘Fast’ because ‘Fast’ refers to that lag time. ‘Fast’ means that the instigation and/or inadvertency is encouraging you to pursue an answer or a sense of resolving that is too fast for you to normally evaluate. So, when you combine ‘Fast’ with ‘proof’, you get ‘Fast proof’, which tries to identify an instigation that is improperly imposing an excessive sense of proof that is normally too fast for you to perceive an answer or a resolving for. And, refurbished for advice, of course, that is what happened to that man in the bike. That is what caused him to be distracted.

Now, to address the businessmen, the good news about this advice is that you can use already established experiences with women that you suspect may have created a certain distraction in your mind in regards to your business developing sense of focus, and then, if you choose to, use bookmark ‘Fast proof’, to see if your developing sense of focus improves when addressing such past experiences. Also, if you choose to, in relation to advice, I recommend you use this idea in relation to advice certain inadvertencies and non instigation moments where a certain sense of focus is still required.

Before I started this idea, there were other basic concepts I wanted to introduce to you that is part of definition ‘Fast focus’, and can be used separately as well. I plan to introduce those other concepts in the next few lists, and of course, by introducing those other ideas, I also plan on introducing other examples of ‘Fast focus!’. These other ideas should improve your use of the idea called ‘Fast focus!’.

Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Allegiant’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘A Simple Wish’. Rated PG-13 for mature subject matter for movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Fast focus!’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

7/5/2016

To get people ‘in the mood’ for reading this stuff, I want to begin with an illustration from episode 7.10 ‘Hide’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2013)’. According to Amazon Video, the episode is located at ‘Season 702’, episode 4. The illustration starts, according to Amazon Video, 5 minutes and 24 seconds into the episode, when Clara(Jenna Coleman) is talking to Alec Palmer(Dougray Scott) about the alleged ‘haunted’ house that he purchased. Here is the quote:

Clara:-‘You went to the bank, and said, ‘You know that gigantic old house on the moors? The one that dossers(?) are too scared to doss in, the one that birds are too scared to fly over? And then you said, ‘I’d like to buy it, please, with my money?”

Alec Palmer:-‘Yes, I did, actually.’

Clara:-‘That’s incredibly brave.’

(For the words, I used Amazon’s option to turn the caption on, so that I can just copy the words displayed by Amazon to type in this blog. To turn the captions on, the ‘Options’ selection is located on the upper right hand side of your Amazon Video screen when your cursor is moved to be on the video screen. You can move your cursor to go to ‘Options’ and select for options to be on, when you find such an option useful to you).

I think that maybe you might find Clara’s rambling about Alec Palmer buying such a house to be useful to you.

Available:

OK, it’s now 3:55 PM EST, and I just took a nap. This bookmark I am about to introduce to you, called ‘Available’, if memory serves, was the 1st active bookmark that I invented, soon after I finished inventing the ‘Surprise understand’ bookmark, the bookmark that is made of 6 lists and took me 1 and a half months to complete in explanation. I think this happened several months ago. This bookmark is important because, in my opinion, it is the 1st active bookmark that can be called a ‘ventilation’ bookmark, meaning that you may be able to use this bookmark to allocate certain perspectives. In order for that to possibly happen, I would have to re-introduce to you the concept of ‘Striving perspective’. And so, just a few hours ago, I discovered an illustration from a Dyson commercial that can, after being refurbished, may show you what I am talking about. So, if you choose to, the Dyson commercial I am referring to can be found in www.youtube.com . In youtube’s search engine, just type in ‘dyson commercial jensen twins’, and in one of the 1st shown commercials, you may see a commercial whose length is 31 seconds. When I do the search, I see 2 commercials that qualify. It describes that the Jensen twins are in the Dyson cordless vacuum commercial. Now, if you choose to watch that commercial, you see both twins illustrating the use of a vacuum cleaner, one of the twins is using an older model, and the other twin is using the Dyson cordless vacuum.

The great thing about that commercial is that it may help you understand what bookmark  ‘Available’ may do for you in regards to your chosen use of striving perspective. The objective, once I finish describing what bookmark ‘Available’ is, is to allow you to have a use of striving perspective that can be partitioned. According to www.dictionary.com, ‘Partition’ means-‘a division into or distribution in portions or shares’. So, when you look at the Dyson commercial, the Jensen twin using the older model vacuum represents a striving perspective that does not partition, and the Jensen twin that is using the Dyson vacuum represents a striving perspective that is able to partition. Basically, the vacuum cleaner that can partition does not need to be plugged in when in use, and can change it’s shape to better suit the needs of it’s user. The older vacuum cleaner cannot do these things. Now, before I continue, I am not saying that one vacuum cleaner is better in every way than the other. In other words, I do not compare Wonder Woman to Lois Lane(In some of the comic books, you see Superman in love with Wonder Woman, in other comic books, you see Superman in love with Lois Lane. Obviously, Lois Lane does not have any super powers, when compared to Wonder Woman). I am merely offering you an idea that I believe can be useful to you in regards as to experiencing unavoidable instigation.

So, to begin explaining what ‘Striving perspective’ means, let’s go to the movie ‘The Internship(2013)’. According to Amazon Video rental, the reference begins 54 minutes and 26 seconds into the movie, when Billy McMahon(Vince Vaughn) said to Yo-Yo Santos(Tobit Raphael) quote ‘Don’t start that, Yo-Yo. You did your best out there today. That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’ When you look at that scene, it’s not just Yo-Yo Santos(Tobit Raphael) who is distraught for losing. The other team members, Lyle(Josh Brener), Stuart(Dylan O’Brien), and Neha(Tiya Sircar) are also feeling miserable. when you reference what Billy said to Yo-Yo, that ‘‘Don’t start that, Yo-Yo. You did your best out there today. That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’ quote, you use that quote to compare Billy and Nick Campbell(Owen Wilson) to the rest of the team. What I am saying is that, for the purposes of this advice, Billy and Nick have a striving perspective, and the other team members, Yo-Yo, Lyle, Stuart, and Neha, do not. Billy and Nick are able to partition their experiences with Graham(Max Minghella) in order to give the other team members a more optimistic and productive perspective from their experiences playing Quidditch.
Furthermore, sex is associated with better health, better nutrition, and sildenafil tablets without prescription — everything that we can use in order to make the best of the erections required for the satisfactory love-making session.viagra has now been so famous that not only men, but even women are now familiar with its effect. PDE5 is the enzyme which obstructs this flow of blood passing through the arteries to the penile region. generic cialis This is the method of the most powerful and safest that boost penis dimensions, and increase sexual functionality. canadian viagra sales In 30 million men levitra samples unica-web.com in America who are experiencing erectile dysfunctions, only 10% of this total will actually seek help.
Here is another way of explaining ‘Striving perspective’. It is like giving more time and credence(belief as to the truth of something) to certain aspects of the perspective that you have chosen to use, chosen by your intent. I am not recommending to you that you turn yourself into a ‘doormat’ for instigation. The idea called ‘Striving perspective’ can simply give yourself more latitude when experiencing instigation and certain inadvertencies, latitude that is already a part of your intent. If you choose this idea, it will be a use of latitude that is already a part of your chosen intent, not something, for example, that you may find unacceptable and/or too compromising to use. Here’s an example that I just thought of: Suppose that, after a few weeks of using ‘Striving perspective’, you realize that certain notions that you have chosen to learn from may need more time in order to acclimate into a form that is acceptable for you to use. Now, when you experience instigation from certain people in certain circumstances, a few of those notions are brought to your attention, and when they are, you have the option created from your use of ‘Striving perspective’ to give those notions some more time to acclimate in your mind, since you have already made the logical conclusion that such notions just need more time to acclimate.

I believe that a more productive way to explain ‘Striving perspective’ now, based on my ability to explain, is to finally start explaining bookmark ‘Available’. Then I can introduce bookmark ‘Available’ to your possible use of ‘Striving perspective’.

It’s now 5:51 PM, and I am going to explain bookmark ‘Available’ using a refurbished reference. The reference is from near the end of episode 1.11 ‘A Great Personality’ from series ‘Cupid(1999)’ starring Jeremy Piven as Trevor Hale, the man in the tv show that thinks he’s Cupid. According to the internet, Cupid the series wasn’t officially released on DVD/Blu-ray yet, even though it has been over 16 years since it was broadcasted on tv. It’s also not available for streaming to your computer that I know of. So, what I’ll do is offer you the transcript to that episode. I found the transcript on web site http://www.simplyscripts.com/tv_cd.html . From there, you are led to web site http://leethomson.myzen.co.uk/Cupid/ . And from there, the specific web site to the transcripted episode is offered in pdf format. Your computer should automatically use a program to show you that pdf format, and that web site is

http://leethomson.myzen.co.uk/Cupid/Cupid_1x11_-_A_Great_Personality.pdf

Anyway, here is the quote I am using, and it is located near the end of that transcript. This is when Lance(Joe Petcka) is talking to his girlfriend Yvonne(Christine Taylor). Here is the quote from Lance:

Lance:-‘But I told Jimmy, ‘Hey, that’s acquisition’s problem! Don’t come in here and expect us to bail you out.”

So anyway, based on what Lance said to Yvonne, refurbished for advice, Lance was having a problem with one of the employees from another division. Even though Lance did not believe he did anything wrong, Jimmy still imposed a sense of grievance upon Lance that bothered him to the point that he had to talk to his girlfriend Yvonne about it. So, this is where the bookmark ‘Available’ is used. Let’s say you also had some sort of issue with another co-worker, and even though you did nothing wrong, even though you believe you are ‘in the right’ with the issue discussed, the other co-worker still imposed upon you some sort of grievance associated with the issue. What bookmark ‘Available’ does for you is give you the option to identify that sense of grievance that may be accumulating for you to experience as something that should not be ‘available’ for you to experience, meaning that such a sense of grievance, because of it’s imposition, may be used by you in a context that you believe that it is available for you to use, but in reality, you have already made the logical conclusion that you are ‘in the right’ in regards to that issue. However, since the grievance is imposing, and maybe even accumulating upon you to experience, that persistence may cause you to use such an experience as if it was actually available for you to experience. Going back to that conversation with Lance and Yvonne, notice that Lance felt he would feel better if he talked about the grievance he experienced with Jimmy with Yvonne, since he already used such an imposition of grievance as if it were available for him to use.

Let me try to explain that again. Suppose one of your co-workers imposed upon you a sense of grievance, even though you believed you are ‘in the right’. Soon after that experience, you experience a sense of accumulation from that grievance. Even though you have already established to yourself that you are ‘in the right’, what you do with that sense of grievance is accept it as if that sense of grievance were available for you to use. Now, that is what you may have done before bookmark ‘Available’. If you choose to use bookmark ‘Available’, and you experience such a situation again, you can contemplationally say the word ‘Available’ or ‘Not available’ to identify that sense of grievance as ‘not available’ for you to use, instead of what you did before, which was committing to a sense of grievance which should not have been yours to commit to.

So, basically, bookmark ‘Available’ can help you control how you respond to contemplation accumulations that you have already identified as something that is not from you to begin with. Of course, for mild to moderate situations, whatever it was that you have agreed to do for such an issue, that still continues. However, with this idea, how you respond to such a situation again you may now have more of a productive control than before, if you use this idea. Also, bookmark ‘Available’ may be a useful starting point when choosing to learn ‘Striving perspective’.

Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Doctor Who’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Striving perspective’, ‘Available’, and ‘Not available’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.