7/13/2016

Fast proof!

I’m really excited, so to speak, to type this idea in, since I experienced some epiphany when I invented it yesterday. Basically, I created bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ after I received the Blu-ray rental ‘Allegiant(2016)’ from my PO Box yesterday. Yesterday was my 1st time watching the movie ‘Allegiant’, since for some time now, the only movies I watch in the movie theaters are the new ‘James Bond’ movies. In a way, that guarantees a certain focus(Of course, if you are married and have kids, since you are watching movies in movie theaters with your family, I guess you don’t have that type of focus as an option). So anyway, while I was watching the movie ‘Allegiant’, there was this interlude(a short dramatic piece, formerly introduced between the parts or acts of miracle and morality plays or given as part of other entertainments). According to Amazon Video rental, the interlude started 1 hour, 36 minutes, and 20 seconds into the movie, when Tris(Shailene Woodley) and Four(Theo James) were about to have some sort of kissing, hugging, and talking moment. This occurred after Tris and Christina(Zoe Kravitz) were rescuing Four from a holding cell. Since the moment lasted for a while, while that moment was happening, I imagined that I was the ‘3rd wheel’ in that group. In other words, while Tris and Four were kissing, hugging, and talking, I imagined I was the person in that group just watching them do that. Apparently, and I didn’t put it into words while I was thinking about it, there is only 3 of us, as if that moment is a different reality than the moment from the original movie ‘Allegiant’, and in that reality, I was the 3rd person, and while they were kissing, hugging, and talking to each other, I was observing them.

Anyway, that was the moment when I thought of the idea called ‘Fast proof!’. Here’s how the story goes: Two people are married. Since the story was partially created while I was watching that kissing, hugging, talking interlude, I think that was partially why the two people were married were somewhat like them. Well, the man who was married to the woman was French, who also spoke English. Basically, it was a compressed psychological? evaluation of their predicament involving the concept of ‘proof’. The woman did not want the man to incessantly(continuing without interruption; ceaseless; unending) seek proof from her, and since that man is also her husband, she has given her husband a certain flexibility to allow him to try to not need so much proof. This proof is in regards to how they interact for certain social and business matters. Now, that thought was from the wife’s mind. In the husband’s mind, he is thinking about how he would go about doing that, how that would look socially. The way he sees it, it has to be arranged in a way that does not need to ask her for proof, even though the use of proof has already been used. Now, going back to the wife’s mind, when her husband requests proof directly from her, the attitude and interaction created from that request is unacceptable to her.

While I was thinking about this idea earlier today while I was at the supermarket waiting for cold cuts, I think the best example involving what the married couple is going through, the best example I am aware of, and keep in mind I am not a psychiatrist or therapist or anything like that. This is just the best example in my opinion I can think of. The best example that married couple is going through involving the concept of ‘proof’ can come from the movie ‘A Simple Wish(1997)’. This is, according to www.imdb.com, is a comedy, family, and fantasy movie starring celebrity Martin Short as, based on how I interpret the movie, Martin Short is portraying Murray, the 1st male fairy godmother. While I was watching the movie ‘A Simple Wish’, I think that was only over a year ago, I thought about the politics that allowed a man to be a fairy godmother. And in this imagined scenario, which I upgraded today, I believe that it is American politics that allowed Murray to be the 1st male fairy godmother. After all, if one would imagine that fairy godmothers existed, the option to co-exist with society’s mainstream beliefs would probably be considered to be used. A year or so ago, when I 1st thought about this scenario, I imagined how the fairy godmothers, over the past few hundred years, would talk about such a situation very seriously. In the last hundred years, they tried certain things that addressed that issue, made mistakes, such as promises they could not keep, and then finally, because of American politics, which of course they anticipated, they allowed Murray to be the 1st official male fairy godmother.

Now, the reason I mentioned what led to Murray being the 1st official male fairy godmother is because I recommend that you use, in relation to advice, of course, what the fairy godmothers of the past did over the past few hundred years to seriously consider allowing a man to be a fairy godmother. Those imagined situations is what I recommend, refurbished of course, to use when thinking about the married couple thinking about the issues involving ‘proof’.

viagra for women uk good service Role of Diet To Reduce The Effects Of ED Many studies have shown that a good diet can help you maintain a significant control on your erectile problems. The goal of physical therapy for whiplash patients is to help students apply levitra cialis viagra the learned knowledge and know-hows to the classroom. You may have think that this cheap medicine may mastercard cialis not work so much for it is not carefully made. They are taken 30 to 60 minutes after the buy cialis pharmacy intake and start acting on your system by inhibiting the accelerator PDE5 (phosphodiesterase type) found in erectile organ. So, that being said, this is my discovery about bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ in the form of a definition in relation to instigation: ‘An instigator may improperly impose an excessive use of the concept of proof.’ Of course, we live in a society where people need to look at each other for a certain use of proof, such as when they are driving, when they are crossing the street, even basic interactions may involve some types of proof. However, what I am saying is that an instigator may cause you to use the concept of proof excessively upon yourself. The 1st example I have already given you, a woman telling her husband that he requests too much proof from her for certain social and business situations. Now, if I may use a ‘man’ example, even though this may seem somewhat petty in context, there is an example from the trailer of movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha(2005)’. According to youtube.com, there is a trailer of ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’ that has been viewed over 1.4 million times. The scene I am recommending starts 1 minute and 7 seconds into the trailer, when a woman says to another quote-‘A true Geisha can stop a man in his tracks with a single look.’ And so, what happened in that scene is that a woman looked at a man with the intent to distract him, and the man, while riding his bicycle, was distracted to the point where he got into an accident because of that distraction. I just wanted to give you an obvious illustration from a movie example. I didn’t see the movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. I just watched parts of the trailer.

Just to make a logical reach here, but are there any businessmen that have been distracted by an attractive woman? This is just speculation, of course, but in the business world, I am assuming that many men are striving for a certain reasonable focus in order to do their jobs with a certain effectiveness, and when women ‘distract’ them, the distraction I am referring to is not about the woman herself being attractive, it is about a distraction that the woman may create intentionally that is affecting the man’s developing sense of focus. Basically, based on speculation, this distraction would cause the man to be mildly bothered, as he performs his logical diagnostic to determine some sort of action for the effect. Now, the reason I brought that up is because I may have discovered something that may help the men resolve that problem. The reason could be because the woman is causing the man to use a certain expectation of proof in regards to a certain particular aspect of her being attractive. Here’s an example: How many times have you used your own personal technique, and you would experience some sort of lag time in order for your ideas to work? So, let’s go to that scene from the trailer ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. Refurbished for advice, of course, the man riding the bike experienced a certain lag time interpreting the ‘proof’ that lady who looked at him caused him to create in his mind. That proof also created a certain lag time in his logic, and both proof and lag time created a distraction in his mind that caused him to get into an accident while riding his bicycle. Of course, when he looks back in that moment, he will believe that the reason he got into that accident was because of the beauty of that lady who looked at him.

Normally, I won’t just give this advice to men who don’t have an obviously developed sense of logic to cope with instigation. The reason I am recommending this advice to you is because I believe many of you, kids and adults alike, have sometimes experienced a certain lag time associated with certain instigations, a delay of preferred technique effectiveness that may bother you for a few seconds or more. That lag time is why I called bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ ‘Fast’. I used the word ‘Fast’ because ‘Fast’ refers to that lag time. ‘Fast’ means that the instigation and/or inadvertency is encouraging you to pursue an answer or a sense of resolving that is too fast for you to normally evaluate. So, when you combine ‘Fast’ with ‘proof’, you get ‘Fast proof’, which tries to identify an instigation that is improperly imposing an excessive sense of proof that is normally too fast for you to perceive an answer or a resolving for. And, refurbished for advice, of course, that is what happened to that man in the bike. That is what caused him to be distracted.

Now, to address the businessmen, the good news about this advice is that you can use already established experiences with women that you suspect may have created a certain distraction in your mind in regards to your business developing sense of focus, and then, if you choose to, use bookmark ‘Fast proof’, to see if your developing sense of focus improves when addressing such past experiences. Also, if you choose to, in relation to advice, I recommend you use this idea in relation to advice certain inadvertencies and non instigation moments where a certain sense of focus is still required.

Before I started this idea, there were other basic concepts I wanted to introduce to you that is part of definition ‘Fast focus’, and can be used separately as well. I plan to introduce those other concepts in the next few lists, and of course, by introducing those other ideas, I also plan on introducing other examples of ‘Fast focus!’. These other ideas should improve your use of the idea called ‘Fast focus!’.

Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Allegiant’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘A Simple Wish’. Rated PG-13 for mature subject matter for movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Fast focus!’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.