7/19/2016

I want to create a conducive ambiance for this idea, and so, for that ambiance, I recommend that you use the old Commodore 64 musical intro from several of their 80’s commercials. The one I specifically recommend for you to use, according to youtube.com, is a 32 second Commodore 64 commercial that originally aired on tv in 1984. If you choose to watch that commercial, it’s located in web site www.youtube.com . Just go there, search the phrase ‘commodore 64 commercial how old would you be’, and youtube should give you that video as it’s 1st selection. If you choose to use the music from that commercial for this advice, just think about it from time to time as you read and learn the ideas from this specific list. Of course, I’m not recommending to you that you keep thinking about it. I just want you to get in the mood to learn these ideas.

Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction:

Before I introduce to you the idea I believe have some epiphany for you, called ‘Smack hasty proof’, I want to introduce to you the concept that your private thoughts are not the same as your obvious interactions. The bookmark name for that is ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’. I want to begin this idea with the illustration 1st. Unfortunately, the best illustration example I can think of right now has some bad language involved. Of course, if you can, use the illustration with the inapproprieities removed. That includes the bad language. However, if kids are going to watch the reference anyway, let’s say directly from the Blu-ray or streaming, they’ll still unavoidably notice some of that bad language. Now, it is my opinion that, since the illustration is coming from a movie that is a comedy, and I also watched the reference myself, it is my opinion that the bad language, when used, is not used in a matter that is, let’s say, done with malicious intent, as if an instigator wants to provoke you with such language. In other words, if you watched how the situation started, you know that the scene is from a comedy. That being said, the illustration is only a recommendation, and you can choose not to use it(I’m saying this because I try to take into consideration that kids could be reading these ideas). The illustration, according to Amazon Video rental, starts 1 hour, 31 minutes, and 37 seconds into movie ‘This is 40(2012)’, the R rated version, not the unrated version. The scene is when Debbie(Leslie Mann) and Pete(Paul Rudd) are defending themselves against accusations from parent Catherine(Melissa McCarthy) with Vice Principal Laviati(Joanne Baron) as the arbitrator. Now, when I say the use of that illustration is refubished for advice, that is to clarify how it is used for this advice. I still think my interpretation of what happened in that scene is accurate enough. Well, in case I am wrong, my interpretation is also refurbished for advice.

Anyway, this is what I think happened in that scene: Basically, what Catherine said to Vice Principal Laviati was true, but because Debbie and Pete didn’t want to get into any trouble, they made Catherine contemplationally feel like a nervous wreck, and when that happened, she used her thoughts that were made unstable by Debbie and Pete to present an obvious interaction that completely undermined her own accusations as to what Debbie and Pete did to her son.

Now, here’s an imagined example of what many? of you are going through in regards to your private thought interactions and obvious interactions as it relates to certain experienced instigations: Let’s say an instigator at school or work causes you to experience a minor instigation. It’s not something that the instigator would get in trouble for. However, since the instigator won’t get in trouble for it, that instigator from time to time imposes certain types of minor instigations upon you. I speculate that the instigator chose you to instigate because to instigate another instigator is like instigating a clone of themselves. In other words, you’re ‘fresh meat’ to them, so to speak. I also speculate that you’re the type of person that avoids declaring himself/herself to be offended, so, when you experience such an instigation, your obvious presentation of interaction avoids overreacting to the experienced instigation. However, repeated exposure to minor instigations, let’s say from various types of instigators, has given your private thought interactions sort of a mildly disparaged sense of identity.

Now, the reason I gave you the illustration from movie ‘This is 40’ is to offer you a refurbishedly toned down identity of Catherine as an example for you to use. Let’s say this changed identity of Catherine is not there because of her son. She is instead just complaining about the mistreatment she is experiencing from Debbie and Pete to Vice Principal Laviati. So, the illustated example of Catherine is not as serious as it is originally portrayed in the movie, and it involves a woman’s private thought interactions made to look to be a nervous wreck. Now, in your situation, although in the example your private thought interactions do not look like a nervous wreck, you may be tricked by the instigator to believe that your private thought interactions are the same as your obvious interactions. This part of the advice is here to recommend to you to not treat your private thought interactions as if they were the same as your obvious interactions. Here, let me give you an example. Let’s say, just as an example, it didn’t actually happen, that you gave me to see 100 situations where you were instigated, and in all of those situations, you did not declare yourself to be offended, because you did not want to overreact to such minor instigations. I observed those situations, and I am letting you know right now that you didn’t do anything wrong, and it’s a shame that those instigators would treat you in such a way. And then you tell me that, even though you did nothing wrong, your private thought interactions still felt like your obvious interactions, and then, after you told me that, I reassured you that they are not the same, and that, if you just looked at what happened based on what was actually occurring, then it would be clear that the instigator is ‘in the wrong’, and that you are ‘in the right’! I just thought of this now, in the ‘Catherine’ refurbished illustration, all of the inapproprieities are removed. You use the acceptable version of Catherine that suits you.

[Tomorrow, I plan to start and finish explanation ‘Smack hasty proof’, the idea I originally wanted to explain to you. Bookmark ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’ was just a prerequisite(required beforehand).

7/20/2016

I’m sorry, but I don’t think I have reasonable enough time to continue with an explanation today. The mail order blu-ray rentals were anticipated by me a day late because of how they deliver tv show seasons, and even though I thought I compensated for it, I ended up actually watching some of those episodes more than I thought I would. In case you are interested to know, I rented season 4 of ‘House of Cards’ today, I returned them today minus the 1st Blu-ray rental. The issue with the mailing of the Blu-rays was that if the 1st Blu-ray of the season selected is unavailable, then the other Blu-rays will not automatically deliver, unless you jumble the order of the Blu-rays and give them priority. For example, if disc 1 is not available, but disc 2, 3, and 4 are, then you make as a priority request discs 2, 3, and 4 in a jumbled sequence, and you put disc 1 in a lower priority. So, let’s say you request as a priority discs 4, 3, and 2, and then after those 3, you make a request for disc 1, since disc 1 is not available, or you put disc 1 in an even lower priority. If you show that in your request list, at least the 3 discs that are available will be delivered to you.

Well, anyway, even though I believe bookmark ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’, for kids at least, can be a monumental achievement for you to use, it is still only a partial explanation that I wanted to offer you today. So, therefore, next week, I will try to complete this explanation, AND give you another idea! See you then!

7/27/2016

More latitude:

I want to begin with a new idea. This should count as a complete, new idea, as per my obligation. After I complete this idea, I will start a new list and continue with the epiphany idea I was trying to explain.

I invented this idea a few days ago, after I imagined 2 days later(7/21) that some people may complain about this phrase. Here is a quote:

‘I speculate that the instigator chose you to instigate because to instigate another instigator is like instigating a clone of themselves. In other words, you’re ‘fresh meat’ to them, so to speak.’

The reason I believe I typed that in was because of the number 100. Even though I didn’t actually imagine 100 situations of minor instigation a kid may experience, I still related to it, and it was like I was giving a kid an answer to a question I believed that kid should know, even though I didn’t think of the question specifically. 2 days later, I realized I may have made a mistake, but it wasn’t a mistake that, in my opinion, needed to be deleted. I really try to not think of deleting these words as an option, but of course, if I have to, I will.
Side effects include: Constipation, depression, dizziness, dry mouth, drowsiness, fatigue, headache, impotence, impaired order viagra online view that store now thinking, and weight gain. The area of performance has innovative considerably since order generic viagra http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/2018-4.pdf was presented and now there are so many iss8ues which a man faces throughout his life would like to get affected from such humiliating and depressing health condition. Baum optimal occupational therapy that is started at the right time decreases the cost of healthcare by reducing the incidence click to find out more cheap cialis 5mg of organic dysfunction and disabilities. Which pills should you consume that are safe and effective? Kamagra- These pills are amongst the potential drugs to increase blood circulation in super viagra online penile region and rejuvenates reproductive organs through enhanced blood supply.
Bookmark ‘More latitude’ is added here because I encourage kids to be skeptical when they read these ideas. After all, I think it is a correct assumption that the kids pretty much don’t know who I am. So, since the kids are still learning to be skeptical, I believe that having the option to reasonably add more latitude to what you are learning can also benefit them. Here is an example that I have been thinking about on and off for a few days, refurbished for advice, of a person adding latitude to his work. The example is from episode 1.1 ‘The Last Enemy(2008)’. The premise is that Stephen Ezard(Benedict Cumberbatch) has recently returned from China to be in the UK, and he is talking to Yasim Anwar(Anamaria Marinca) about what it was like in China. According to Amazon Video, the illustration is located 17 minutes and 17 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote(I turned the captions ‘on’ from Amazon Video to give you the quote):

Yasim:-‘So why China?’

Stephen:-‘That’s where I work best.’

Yasim:-‘…Because?’

Stephen:-‘It’s peaceful. It’s very…foreign. I haven’t got a clue what’s going on. The world doesn’t intrude. I can concentrate. I’m not distracted by the minutiae(small or trifling matters) of other people’s lives.’

So, basically, while Stephen is in China, he is using what I call ‘Solitude latitude’. He is putting more latitude into his work by adding solitude to it. For an illustration, I created a surreal(having the hallucinatory quality of a dream; unreal; fantastic) example of what it was like when Stephen is using ‘solitude latitude’ in his mathematics work. I imagine Stephen sitting on his lounge chair, the background has curtains that still allow much of the sunlight to enter the room. When you are looking at him, he is sitting to the right of his computer and desk. During that moment, it is a nice afternoon day. He is drinking tea, and the crumpets(a round soft unsweetened bread resembling a muffin, cooked on a griddle or the like, and often toasted) are at the side of his work desk. Now, for the surreal effect, while you are looking at that image, since I am not a big music follower, the best surreal song I can think of is ‘Bachelorette’ by Bjork. I’ve seen small amounts of the music video in www.youtube.com, at it looks surreal to me. Also, here’s some of the lyrics to the song:

Drink me, make me feel real
Wet your beak in the stream
Game we’re playing is life
Love is a two way dream

I have no idea what that means, but I think it’s a popular song. Anyway, you’re hearing that song when you see Stephen drink his tea. Also, I’ve taken some of the surreal elements from episode 6.20 ‘The Man Who Would Be King’ from series ‘Supernatural(2011)’. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 17 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode. It’s basically Raphael’s(Demore Barnes) interpretation of the room that both Raphael and Castiel(Misha Collins) are talking in. I’m using the imagined surreal characteristics that the room is showing to place in Stephen’s ‘solitude latitude’ example, refurbished for advice, of course.

And there you have it! With the help of that example, you may be able to imagine that Stephen, when he is doing his mathematics work, is adding ‘solitude latitude’ to his work. The solitude latitude is not made obviously available for Stephen to use. The mathematics work Stephen does does not offer him as an option ‘solitude latitude’ for him to use. What Stephen does is add the ‘solitude latitude’ to his mathematics work. That not only allows him to enjoy his work, but it also allows him to create exceptional work for his employers.

I’m not recommending that you use ‘solitary latitude’ as an option for adding more latitude to what you are learning. That is just the best example I can think of right now for adding latitude.

Also, this is not about giving instigation a ‘free pass’. This idea is not made to forgive an instigation sleight(a trick used to deceive). This is what I mean: I imagine someone in a company learning something job related, and that person is using what he/she perceives the project is offering him to help him learn. Now, of course, I am not saying I am an expert at adding more latitude to what I am learning, when I choose to. I am saying that it can be useful to you if you have the option to add more latitude to what you are learning. Of course, there are limitations in regards as to what type and how much latitude you should use. However, if you don’t have such an option, you may be completely beholden(obligated; indebted) to what you believe the project involved is offering you to help you learn. Here’s 2 examples to help get the ball rolling, so to speak. There’s episode 4.2 ‘Dream a Little Dreama Me’ from episode ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch(1999)’. The episode is available from Amazon Video. That is when Sabrina has to mentor a witch student named Dreama.

The 2nd example is from episode 6.6 ‘True Q’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1992)’, the positive lessons that Amanda Rogers(Olivia d’Abo) has learned from using her Q powers, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course. The episode is available from Amazon Video.

Well anyway, I have to stop now, in order to begin the next idea. Like I said earlier, I only invented this idea a few days ago. The idea is that if I offer you this idea now and you choose to use it, in time, you will improve upon it.

Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘This is 40’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Last Enemy’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Supernatural’ and ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’.(TV series ‘House of Cards’ was not recommended at all to be watched. I just thought you wanted to know what I was watching for the reasons specified). Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’ and ‘More latitude’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[Since it’s already 7:13 PM EST according to my computer, I have decided to continue the idea next week. I guess that means I still owe you one extra idea.