8/3/2016

I wanted to add some sort of song to this idea, to get the idea started, but I don’t want to add just any song, and since I don’t know that many songs, the one I eventually chose is called ‘Top of the World’, a song made, according to the wikipedia web site, in 1972 by Richard Carpenter and John Bettis. For background, I recommend that you look the song ‘Top of the World’ up in the www.wikipedia.org web site. I’m referring to the version sung by Karen Carpenter. And if you’re not too familiar with the song, I recommend that you just listen to it 1st, and not watch the free music video 1st from www.youtube.com . I recommend that you appreciate the song 1st before you see it’s 1972? music video.

Time loop:

The idea I want to type in next is what I call a ‘Time loop’ resolving idea, and to show you what that means as quickly as reasonable, I recommend that you go to www.comixology.com and get an account there to buy comic book ‘Superman/Batman #80’, ‘World’s Finest’ part 2. The comic book is less than 2 dollars. If you choose to do it, just type in ‘superman batman’ in comixology.com’s search engine, in the ‘Series’ category, click the ‘Superman/Batman’ option, click ‘5’ to search ahead, and ‘Superman/Batman #80’ should be there. It’s the one with the red ‘S’ on the top middle of the cover, Batman is holding a rope to the right, and Superman is flying to the left. After you purchase that comic book, click ‘My Books’, which is at the upper right of your comixology screen, select it for reading, click ‘Browse Pages’, and when it shows you a selection of comic book pages, click page 10. When you get there, click ‘Guided View’, then press the arrow that moves the pages, and go to the page where the Superman of the future tells the Batman of the future that they’re in a time loop. And, of course, refurbishing Batman’s words for this advice, Batman says quote:

Batman:-‘It’s a time loop.’

As long as the word’s ‘time loop’ is said by Batman, you can create other variations of what he said. I’ll describe the relevance of the use of ‘Time loop’ later.

Now, here is the ‘time loop resolving’ idea I just invented this past Sunday, just a few days ago, while I was at work: 1st, I’ll describe the instigation part, then I’ll give you the solution I invented for it. And so, here is the instigation part: Imagine that you have anticipated what an instigator will do to you next from your job or school, and you have prepared yourself contemplationally for it. However, even though you have braced yourself, so to speak, for that instigation, and you are very sure of what the instigator will do next, the instigator still imposes an instigation upon you that you were not ready for, causing you to look for a solution from your preferred perspective, but you are not able to think of one. [The best example I can think of right now, and of course I am not aware of the many examples that are out there, is a scene from episode 1.4 ‘Ether’ from series ‘Stingray(1986)’. When I checked the Amazon.com web site, it may have the episode available if you subscribe to another service. So I checked www.youtube.com, and the episode is available for free! When you go to the youtube web site, if you choose to use it, just type in ‘stingray tv series ether’, and there is an option that has 49 minutes and 37 seconds of video. Select that, and the illustration starts 29 minutes and 28 seconds into the episode, when Dr. Cornell(Carolyn Ann Clark) 1st proved that Stingray(Nick Mancuso) is not a doctor, but when Stingray was explaining to Dr. John Whitaker(Ray Wise) a diagnosis he was giving to a patient, Dr. Cornell was experiencing the effects of the instigation I was trying to describe to you. The ‘Stingray’ tv show even zooms in on Dr. Cornell’s face as she is trying to understand how Stingray is able to talk in such a way, since she already believes he is not a doctor!

So, here is my solution, and keep in mind that I also am not a doctor, and I just imagined this solution while I was at work: My contention(point asserted in argument) is that, when you experience such an instigation, at least for you, there is no preferred perspective for the bothersome effects of such an instigation, at least not from the preferred perspective that you want to use. Going back to the ‘Stingray’ episode, look at Dr. Cornell’s face as she tries to find a preferred perspective solution for what she is witnessing, but she could not find one at that moment. If you watched the illustration before that moment, you can tell that she is feeling somewhat confused and perplexed(bewildered; puzzled) for what Stingray is doing. Of course, when the instigator does something like that to you, generalistically speaking, I don’t think your facial expression will be that obvious. However, you may still feel somewhat confused and perplexed, in a private context, of course.

The solution is that you use your intent to create a balance in perspective, but that balance in perspective does not have a preferred perspective identity.

Here is a question for the advice:-‘What is he talking about?’

I believe you are capable of doing such a thing if you have used Wishlist #1043 in this blog, more specifically, the ‘Rosetta Stone’ idea that was part of the ‘Surprise understand’ idea I have already offered to you in this blog. If you have chosen to use the ‘Rosetta Stone’ idea, otherwise probably known as the ‘Saturday Night Live’ idea, then you are probably now able to be more objective with instigation induced interjections that try to influence your contemplation use that is associated with the instigation. So, if you did choose to learn Wishlist #1043, you can simply sense the fact that such an instigation does not have a preferred perspective solution, so instead you can use your intent to perceive that non preferred perspective as part of the solution, but without a preferred perspective as part of it’s solution. I know that it may feel a little weird at first to do that, but I believe that you can do it, if you used the ‘Rosetta Stone’ idea I offered you.
Though get viagra australia some few side issues may be a reason for the penile malfunction and the cause of erectile dysfunction or male impotence. Even though, this medicament discards the hell-like pathetic effect of erectile dysfunction and brings feelings like heaven for men as levitra uk well as other penile health complications. 3. Vitamin deficiencies can cause one to be lethargic, anemic, depressed, and viagra generic cheap even cause someone to lose their sex drive. It will treasure your existence with more navigate to these guys cialis sale fun.
All right. Here is an example that I imagined yesterday. Let’s say that American women in general have these private beliefs that, when introduced to men, men will have a certain predictable response to those beliefs, and it’s because of those predictable responses that women don’t reveal to men such beliefs. I’m talking about beliefs that are possible to introduce to men, such as in a social situation, but the use of such beliefs will be misinterpreted by the men, which is why women don’t introduce such beliefs to men. So, what I did was imagine a bunch of these beliefs in the form of what looks like yellow Christmas lights, and while I was on my bed, I would just allow those lights to be around my body. Of course, I just imagined it, but such a conceptualization represents to me that I am able to objectively be aware of such ideas, with the help of this idea. And since I said earlier that this was a ‘time lapse resolving’ idea, once you feel that you have a working solution in your mind and you choose to use it, you can use that ‘Batman/Superman’ reference, and say to yourself contemplationally quote-‘It’s a time loop’, or something like that, as if you were able to get out of some sort of problem that has been affecting you for some time. Personally, I have been using that ‘Time loop’ idea from time to time, and I think that you will probably find it useful as well. I just recommend that you try to not use the ‘Time loop’ idea too much, or what might happen is that, after a lot of use, you may be bothered by it, which would cause you to discontinue it’s use temporarily until you are interested in using it again.

New idea(I’m saying this to introduce to you a new bookmark. ‘New idea’ is not a bookmark):

1st, I want to introduce to you the definition of a word, and then the word itself. According to www.dictionary.com, the definition is ‘to punch, especially with a short, quick blow’. As a reminder, these ideas are for mild to moderate instigations. I know that people are probably using these ideas for other stuff, but that is the primary purpose of these ideas. For example, the person who is instigating you could be a complete stranger, and that person doesn’t even have to touch you in order for the instigation to affect you. Now, to explain further the definition of the word I am about to recommend to you, it’s purpose is to describe an experience from a mild to moderate instigation that causes you not only to acknowledge it, but for it to also push against you. For example, if a stranger is mildly rude to you, and causes you to acknowledge that rude behavior, that could be an example of such a word. That being said, if you choose to use this word, the word is ‘Jab’. And now, I can continue with it’s use here.

Jab accumulate:

I have introduced you to the word ‘Jab’. Bookmark ‘Accumulate’ comes from Wishlist #1045 already in this blog. Put them together, and for this idea, it becomes ‘Jab accumulate’, which is the strongest bookmark that I have invented for this blog that addresses interjections that cause you to experience non preferred perspectives that you don’t have a preferred perspective for. In other words, ‘Jab accumulate’ is a brunt bookmark for this new idea I am offering you. Here is an example: You experience an instigation from a stranger, something that is rude, and the effect of that instigation pushes against you, and has a short term accumulating effect. You then use bookmark ‘Jab accumulate’, so that you can more tenably give involvement and purpose to it.

The only illustration example I can think of right now to offer you for ‘Jab accumulate’ is in episode 4.20 ‘The Yoko Factor’ from series ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer(2000)’. The illustration, available from Amazon Video, starts 38 minutes and 28 seconds into the episode. However, even though I would normally give you video illustrations, the best complimentary illustration comes from the description of the episode of ‘The Yoko Factor’ from www.wikipedia.org . Here is a quote from wikipedia about episode ‘The Yoko Factor’. It is the last paragraph from it’s ‘Plot synopsis’:

‘The damage that Spike has done to the gang becomes clear when their meeting at Giles’s home turns into a fight. While Tara and Anya hide in the bathroom, Buffy scolds Xander for telling Riley details about her and Angel’s relationship and argues that she is going to take on Adam alone. Giles is drunk and makes funny comments in the background. Xander complains that his friends don’t need him and Willow complains that Buffy doesn’t accept Tara, revealing their relationship, for the first time, to Xander and Giles. While Giles goes to sleep the alcohol off, Buffy leaves, telling her friends that she doesn’t need them as she has someone else she can depend on.’

According to www.imdb.com concerning episode ‘The Yoko Factor’, quote:-‘…Spike drives a wedge between Buffy and her friends.’ In that scene, there seems to be a lot of ‘Jab accumulate’ involved, refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice.

[Since it’s already 7:09 PM EST for me, I don’t have time to type in another idea. However, after I proofread this one, this idea is completed.

Some reading discretion for comic book ‘Superman/Batman #80’, violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Stingray’ and sci-fi tv show ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Time loop’ and ‘Jab accumulate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.