8/30/2016
Reference point:
Before I begin explaining ‘Jab stubborn’, I want to recommend to you to establish a reference point using resolve. I thought of the idea while I was watching episode 3.13 ‘Parting Shot’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2016)’ for the 1st time, a recording made from the tivo? player. However, before I watched that episode, I watched it’s preview. After every episode, they would usually present a preview for the next episode. You can find the preview on youtube.com. In the youtube search engine, type in ‘agents of shield parting shot promo’, and it should be the 1st selection that has over 108 thousand views. Anyway, while I was watching the ‘Parting Shot’ episode, the idea sort of like blurted out of me while I was watching that shadow creature(it’s science fiction) fight Daisy(Chloe Bennett) and Bobbi(Adrianne Palicki). That’s when I imagined Melinda May(Ming-Na Wen) in some sort of ‘training others to fight’ and ‘non managerial employee’ combination. May was working for both S.H.I.E.L.D. and a typical American company, and I used these words, both coming from May, and the words also described her fighting/normal employee combination. It is like May was describing something to another woman, from S.H.I.E.L.D. and her normal job. Here are the words:
May:-‘People come, and people go. Some even prove to themselves (and to me) that they have surpassed me with a display from their resolve. Yet I still remain.’
Keep in mind that such an idea occurred to me while the S.H.I.E.L.D. team was fighting the shadow creature. So, if you use the episode as a reference, just use the preview from youtube, and only the relevant fighting scenes. According to Amazon Video, the fighting scene starts 27 minutes and 45 seconds into the video. For additional background, you can use previous parts of that episode before that fighting scene starts, with inapproprieities removed. When they started to fight the shadow creature, it also felt like an episode interlude to me.
Now, to explain what May said, according to the idea I imagined, May was talking about how she would train the new employees, and after a while, most of the employees she trained would leave that particular division of the company. Some of them would come back to visit May to impress upon her a use of resolve meant to display that those employees who were trained by her have surpassed her. Some of the new employees would present to her that they have already surpassed her, even though their training has not been completed, but that attitude is sort of expected. When May said ‘Yet I still remain’, that was meant to describe her awareness of chosen point of origin. She has already accepted the job that she is doing, in spite of some of the other employees trying to test her resolve.
One of the reasons I probably imagined May making that speech is because, out of all of the main characters of the show, the show gives May a lot of screen time to address the resolves of other main characters, based on how I perceive the show. Here’s an illustration example of May addressing another person’s resolve. The example is in episode 3.12 ‘The Inside Man’ from series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2016)’, when May was talking to Lance Hunter(Nick Blood). The illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 14 minutes and 12 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote(I used Amazon Video’s ‘Captions On’ settings to type the quote. Of course, use only the illustration recommended, and ‘throw away’ the rest, including throwing away the inapproprieities:
May:-‘You’re here for Bobbi–Nothing more. She’s the only reason why you call yourself an agent and why you couldn’t care less about the mission.
Lance:-‘Are you saying you’d rather have that guy covering you than me?’
May:-‘Honestly, not so sure.’
Lance:-‘Well, that’s no way to treat a friend who’s just trying to watch your back.’
May:-‘We’re not friends.’
Lance:-‘I’ll carry on watching your back, regardless.'(Since it’s just a tv show, I interpreted Lance’s last statement as a joke).
So, it is of the same genre of viagra online mastercard. Psychological or emotional problems should be treated within the partners themselves. soft generic viagra Goji Berries are resident to the Tibetan Himalayas but the fruit lowest price tadalafil grows in northern China as well. After menopause, when the hormone levels are low, you may experience, among other things, a diminished sex drive, low energy levels, increased fat in http://appalachianmagazine.com/2019/02/03/6-tips-for-anyone-who-may-be-moving-to-appalachia/ on line levitra the stomach and chest area, poor concentration and memory, and an overall decrease in your overall well-being is erectile dysfunction.
Now, in my opinion, the great thing about May’s active ability to address resolve is that, if you watch the show, you absorb such conversations easily, making your problems with resolve involving school, job, or public transportation use more tenable.
[I’m going to the post office now to pick up the Blu-rays and DVD that I rented. I plan to finish this idea today, since it’s easy enough to explain, and then I plan to start explaining ‘Jab stubborn’ either today or tomorrow.
[I checked my mail, and I just received a tv show that I ordered that I have been looking for years to watch. So, I’ll just finish this list tomorrow and start the next one tomorrow. Just letting you know.
8/31/2016
According to my computer, it’s now 3:51 PM. I think I can safely say that I have enough time to finish this idea.
When I was thinking about this idea yesterday, I realized to myself, which is an imagined speculation if given to you, that many? people have some difficulty imagining other examples of resolving. The reason such people would try to think of such resolving examples is because of imposed resolving that they would experience from a few co-workers. The problem is that those examples of resolving involve their actual jobs, and they have difficulty interacting with imagined examples of resolving that involve adding liability to job related situations. And so, after thinking about that, I thought that more and more people in America are participating in situations that involve an active sense of resolving that does not affect their priority investments, such as their actual jobs. Since such resolve interacting participations are ‘guilt free’, so to speak, they can put more of themselves into such participations, and of course use such a learning experience for certain priority investments, such as their obvious jobs.
To help you imagine what that is like, I made a story several years ago, with a little refurbishing, so that it can be used for this idea. The story uses the refurbished for advice premise of episode 6.15 ‘Tapestry’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1993)’. This is how the story starts: The timeline is about the same as the Star Trek ‘Tapestry’ episode, but the story is different. The Enterprise is docked at a spacestation, the Enterprise crew has no assignments at the moment, so what the crew is doing is taking a recreational break. Because of the hazards and uncertainties of space travel, and because they are all Starfleet trained, many of the crew when there is a recreational break, and all of the crewmembers are supposed to leave the Enterprise during that break, they created a ‘false’ participation in the Enterprise. Those who choose to participate would continue to stay in the Enterprise, but with a different authority. Such a participation is not official, but since the Enterprise is not doing anything, nothing majorly inappropriate is being done. Also, most of the people who are participating just accidentally found out about it. For example, when Riker(Jonathan Frakes) discovered it’s existence, he was relaxed when his participation was seamless(smoothly continuous or uniform in quality).
Now, since Picard(Patrick Stewart) is such a stickler(a person who insists on something unyieldingly) for the rules, he didn’t notice that such a participation was going on in the Enterprise. That is where the ‘Tapestry’ episode comes in. Q(John de Lancie), Picard’s seemingly very powerful friend, notices what is going on, and decides to use that situation to introduce Picard to another possibility. He allows the crew to know that ‘Lieutenant’ Picard is going to participate, and the crew decided to ‘go along’ with it. Picard’s understanding of what Q is doing is understood by Picard to be temporary, and so Picard decides to give such a participation some serious credibility. So, basically, after the refurbishing, the only relevant scene recommended for this idea from the ‘Tapestry’ episode is when Lieutenant Picard is talking to Commander Riker and Deanna Troi(Marina Sirtis). According to Amazon Video, that scene begins 35 minutes and 27 seconds into the episode. That conversation is when you see a use of resolve given serious credibility, without Picard’s major investments being affected. In other words, Picard is still Captain of the Enterprise, but he is still allowing himself to participate in yet another one of Q’s events. Now, if you want more background, with inapproprieities removed, you can watch most of the ‘Tapestry’ episode. Just keep in mind if you decide to watch the rest of that ‘Tapestry’ episode, most of it has been either removed or refurbished for this story.
Here’s a question to help clarify the use of this advice: ‘How does that ‘Star Trek’ story give us an example of resolving?’
If more and more people are participating in the use of resolving that does not affect their major investments, I speculate that many of these participations were created using imagination first, and the resolving example I recommended to you was created by my imagination. I thought that such an example would be helpful to you.
Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ and ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and tv show. [Use mental bookmark ‘Resolve’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.
[Again, I overestimated(to estimate at too high a value, amount, rate, or the like) how much free time I had for these ideas. I plan to start the explanation of bookmark ‘Jab stubborn’ next week, probably this coming Tuesday, or Wednesday. See you then!