10/4/2017
Hola! It’s 9:25 PM for me now. I just want to type in the ‘music video’ I have for this advice. It is the ‘Stargate Origins’ trailer. According to youtube.com, the trailer has over 1 million views in just 2 months. To watch the ‘Stargate Origins’ trailer, just search for phrase ‘stargate origins trailer’, and it should be the 1st selection offered. For more information about ‘Stargate Origins’, you can go to this link:
According to that link, ‘Stargate Origins’ is the official fourth live-action ‘Stargate’ series. However, the episodes are only available online at the new ‘Stargate Command’ web site,
https://www.stargatecommand.co/home
and the episodes are only 10 minutes long. According to the article, they may release the episodes either December or January. Still, if you haven’t seen the ‘Stargate Origins’ trailer yet and you like the ‘Stargate’ series, even though the trailer is only about 30 seconds, you may find it refreshing to watch.
[So, that’s it. I will type more in tomorrow. See you then.
10/5/2017
Aloha! It’s now 1:07 EST for me. I still want this list to finish Wishlist #1096, but I also want the people(kids mostly) to have some attention span involved in the explanation. So, what I’ll do is explain a new idea I invented yesterday while I was waiting for the bus at the bus stop. The idea’s understanding identity is called ‘Dissuade’, but it’s active use is called ‘Back ache not keep up’. I’ll start explanation ‘Dissuade’ with 2 illustrations. After I finish explaining ‘Dissuade’, at least there will be a little attention span there for the rest of Wishlist #1096. At least there will be something.
I forgot to mention that I believe you can learn idea ‘Dissuade’ because of the ‘Defy’ idea you may have read in Wishlist #1096, and the ideas you have read in Wishlist #1097, such as idea ‘Weaknesses’ and idea ‘Draw a foul’. Those 2 lists I believe allow you to have more ‘room’, so to speak, to understand idea ‘Dissuade’.
Dissuade:
The 1st illustration is from episode 2.16 ‘The One Percent Solution’ from tv show ‘Elementary(2014)’. I looked for older episodes of ‘Elementary’ in the www.cbs.com all access web site, but I could not find any. CBS All Access probably has a lot of full episodes of other tv shows, but I could not find the older ‘Elementary’ episodes from that web site. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 10 minutes and 29 seconds into the episode, when Joan Watson(Lucy Liu) and Sherlock Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller) are talking about Lestrade(Sean Pertwee), Sherlock’s former Scotland Yard colleague. Here is a quote:
Watson:-‘Lestrade treated you like crap, he took credit for your work. He uses your words in his interviews. If it bothers you, you should say something to him.’
Sherlock:-‘To what end? The man has chosen vanity and the pursuit of the spotlight. Nothing I say is going to change that.’
According to www.dictionary.com, the definition of dissuade is-‘to deter by advice or persuasion; persuade not to do something’. Extrapolated from what Watson said, and the popular information about Sherlock Holmes from books, when Sherlock was working with Lestrade for Scotland Yard, he did not discourage Lestrade from taking all the credit for their work, as it is interpreted by the public. Also, according to Sherlock’s quote, ‘the man has chosen vanity and the pursuit of the spotlight. Nothing I say is going to change that.’ So, based on that, the dissuading created from working with Lestrade for Scotland Yard is not an issue worth addressing. However, from the perspective of Watson, the dissuading working with Lestrade could be an obvious issue to Sherlock, which is why she is bringing it to Sherlock’s attention.
The point is that, in my opinion, Sherlock is using some sort of logical continuity to work with Lestrade in the past that is probably not available to the imaginations of many of us to be aware of and even understand, if not given an explanation to understand. However, even if that were true, since it’s just my opinion about a fictitious character, how can I be certain? His example working with Lestrade in my opinion can still be useful to you in regards with the interaction of being dissuaded by other people, especially by being dissuaded by instigators.
The 2nd illustration is from episode 1.1 ‘The Vulcan Hello’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Discovery(2017)’. The quote is from web site CBS All Access at www.cbs.com, since I don’t know where else that episode is offered. The good news is that their web site is offering a week for free to use it. If you want to, you can subscribe to CBS All Access for just the 1 week trial period, and then cancel. If you want to use it on a month to month basis, it’s only about 6 dollars a month with commercials for it’s new shows, or about 10 dollars a month with commercials removed. So, if you just want to see the illustration only, just remember to cancel your membership before your 1 week trial period is over. If you don’t want to forget, I recommend you cancel your membership soon after you see the illustration. I am guessing that, even though you cancelled very early, you still may be able to use their services until your 1 week trial period is over.
Anyway, the illustration according to CBS All Access starts 10 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:
Michael Burnham(Sonequa Martin-Green):-‘Some king of scattering field is confounding the ship’s ability to translate the image.’
Saru(Doug Jones):-‘As science officer, I can provide a far more concrete and in-depth analysis than simply reading data off a monitor.’
To help understand the usefulness of the illustration, here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about Saru:
‘…the first Kelpien to enter Starfleet. Kelpiens, a new species created for Discovery, were hunted as prey on their home planet…They have a reputation for cowardice.’
To be clear, I’m not comparing anyone to Saru. The illustration’s purpose is to show you the character development of Saru as it relates to the use of dissuading. The logical conclusion I am introducing to you is based on Saru’s quote, and the illustration from the episode Star Trek: Discovery:-‘As science officer, I can provide a far more concrete and in-depth analysis than simply reading data off a monitor.’ When Saru said that, keep in mind that Saru has been working with Michael Burnham for 7 years, and it is my opinion that, within those 7 years, Saru has been learning and developing his ability to decide what issues to bring to the attention to Captain Phillipa Georgiou(Michelle Yeoh) and 1st officer Michael Burnham. Of couse, Starfleet allows Saru to be who he is. As an example, here is a quote, which begins 12 minutes and 18 seconds into the episode:
Captain Georgiou:-‘And you, Mr. Saru? Are you equally happy not to be put at risk?’
Saru:-‘Oh, on any occasion, Captain.’
It is my opinion that, based on Saru’s quote as it is illustrated in the ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ episode, that Saru has improved a great deal as to how and what issues he should present to the Captain and the 1st officer, and that improvement was created because of Saru’s efforts adapting to interacting with Michael Burnham. I recommend that you just imagine Saru constantly learning and changing over the course of 7 years how he should present certain issues, should such an issue he is thinking of even be an issue, along those lines.
All right! 1st, I’m going to use the idea ‘Dissuade’ on myself, to make it easier for me to type this idea. I am saying contemplationally to myself ‘Not back ache’ and ‘Not dissuade’.
OK! So, I’ll start with how I imagine students, grammar school and high school students, in a certain context of course, how students imagine how other students who get into trouble are talked to by adults with authority. One obvious identifier that students use when imagining those other students being talked to in regards as to the reasons they are in trouble, when talked to those in authority, such as teachers and possibly the principal, is that those students are experiencing some sort of dissuading. I concede to the fact that I believe that imagining students who got caught doing something wrong and were talked to by teachers, that imagining them responding using a certain sense of being dissuaded is a normal thing to imagine. How else with they be talked to if they are being disciplined?
In a job related situation, I also concede that I believe that adults also imagine dissuading being involved when other employees are being talked to regarding a possible disciplinary action, or even a warning. I believe that such an imagined evaluation is normal for many situations. In fact, in my opinion, such an imagined dissuading can be very similar to how the adults imagined dissuading when they were teenagers in high school.
With the new ideas I offered you in Wishlist #1096 and Wishlist #1097, and with what I have already typed in this list, I believe you now may be able to notice more objectively that many mild to moderate instigations that you may have experienced, if you experienced instigation in your pasts, may use an obvious sense identity and an obvious appearance of dissuading. I propose to you that an instigator may improperly impose a sense of dissuading for you to actively interact with and commit to.
Now here is where the issue of dissuading becomes sadly ominous. It is my opinion that an instigator may improperly impose a sense of dissuading for you to actively interact with and commit to in order to adversely affect your ability to learn and discover. I imagine that, before this advice, when you would think about dissuading as it relates to certain ideas or discoveries that you have chosen to think about, metaphorically, it is like a heavy object you have chosen to put in your backpack and carry around from class to class. It’s something that you try to deal with as it relates to certain ideas or discoveries that you have chosen to think about. To illustrate, let me use the ‘Elementary’ illustration, quoting Sherlock:-”To what end? The man has chosen vanity and the pursuit of the spotlight. Nothing I say is going to change that.’ Not only was the dissuading created by Lestrade working with Sherlock not an issue to Sherlock, but it is my opinion that Sherlock learned a great deal working with Lestrade for Scotland Yard. For one thing, when Sherlock would make discoveries with Lestrade, dissuading was not a heavy object for Sherlock to metaphorically carry in his backpack. Sherlock also did not want to be in the spotlight. Sherlock also learned to allow others to have limitations, to not need to make an issue about all of the limitations others have, especially if those others are people that he is working with. In fact, it is my opinion that Sherlock working with Lestrade eventually allow Sherlock to work as an investigator for the NYPD. If you can work with a Lestrade with all of his obvious limitations, you can do many things![10/12/2017: quote ‘you can do many things! was a ‘making an idea’ statement, not a declaration of action.
Have you ever thought about working like Lestrade, but in an acceptable context? Suppose a man joined a company, and is allowed to exercise certain limitations as if they were strengths. Now, the other people that he works with do not see those limitations as strengths, and they tell him from time to time that certain aspects of his actions are ‘not enough’, for example, his actions are not enough to maintain a certain acceptable pace of activity. However, this man is allowed to ‘work at his own pace’, even though that pace is not acceptable to the other workers from time to time. The dissuading is from the other co-workers that find certain aspects of his pace of actions not enough.
[I am going to get something to eat now. Tomorrow, I’m starting my physical therapy for maybe 1 week for my lower back. Also, I’m going to do my laundry tomorrow. If I don’t finish this list tomorrow, then I’ll probably finish it Saturday.
10/6/2017
Aloha! It’s now 7:19 PM EST for me. 1st, I want to introduce to you a movie trailer. I know it’s not a music video, but I consider both in the same category. Also, I wasn’t able to think of a music video to use. I think you may find this movie trailer useful, even though it’s not a music video. The movie trailer is for movie ‘Tomb Raider(2018)’ starring Alicia Vikander as Lara Croft. The reason I’m recommending this movie trailer is because, when I watched the trailer, Alicia Vikander’s portrayal and the movie’s portrayal of Lara Croft reminds me of the ‘Indiana Jones’ movies portrayed by Harrison Ford, except now the archaeologist is a young British lady. So, if you like archaeologist adventure movies, you might enjoy watching the ‘Tomb Raider’ movie trailer. So, to watch it for free, just search for phrase ‘tomb raider 2018’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered. The trailer has been made available to youtube for only 2 weeks, and it already has over 1.1 million views.
There’s been a change of plans. Instead of finishing Wishlist #1096 here, I’ve invented an idea earlier today that I want to type in here. It’s a continuation of idea ‘Dissuade’. After I type that idea in, I will finish this list, and the next list I will use to finish Wishlist #1096. I’ll just give the next list another ‘attention span’ idea.
Back ache guilty:
This idea assumes that you are using the ideas provided by Wishlists #1096, 1097, and what I have already typed here in Wishlist #1098. OK, let me try to explain this from the imagined perspective of an older girl who is using these ideas. Suppose this older girl experiences an instigation, not something that involves any conversation, but it’s a presentation that bothers her. Based on what I have already typed in this blog, she is able to recover from the minor discomfort caused by such an instigation, yet still choose not to contribute to that discomfort. However, the instigator(let’s say the instigator is another older girl) believes that this innocent girl is using justification when evaluating her presented instigation, and so what the older girl does with the instigation she is presenting to this innocent girl is adding to her instigation something that the innocent girl would try to resolve, but cannot resolve. This older instigator girl believes that such an addition would cause the innocent girl to try harder, but the experience of not being able to resolve such an addition to the instigation has created a feeling that she does not like. And so, since she did not resolve it when she experienced it, she thinks about it from time to time, trying to resolve that feeling created from something about that instigation she cannot resolve.
And so, here is my solution for that innocent older girl: Since you believe that you are ‘in the right’, you believe that your ideas should work on such an instigation. So, what I’ll do is offer you an illustration of another person that believes that he/she is also ‘in the right’, and yet this person also experienced the inability to resolve something about his/her situation. Before I type what the illustration is, I want to say in advance that the illustration is from a sci-fi show, and is refurbished for advice. The illustration is in episode 4.13 ‘Devil’s Due’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1991)’. In the illustration, a con artist who calls herself Ardra(Marta DuBois) is in a court of law with Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart), where Picard is trying to prove that Ardra is really a con artist. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available to you without additional cost to watch, and the episode is also available at CBS All Access. According to Amazon Video, the illustration begins 34 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:
Ardra:-‘You do not believe my powers are real, do you?’
Picard:-‘No, I don’t.’
That is when Ardra presented several situations that Picard could not explain. The next illustration starts 34 minutes and 54 seconds:
Ardra:-‘I am sorry, your honor, but can you explain it, Picard? Yes or no?’
Picard:-‘No.’
Ardra:-‘I rest my case, your honor.’
If you watch the rest of the episode, if memory serves, with the help of Geordi(LeVar Burton), Picard was eventually able to prove that Ardra is actually a con artist. The point of that illustration is that, even though Picard believed he was ‘in the right’, he still wasn’t able to resolve certain things that Ardra presented to him.
Not an issue:
So, here is what I suspect is happening: In such a situation, instigators are encouraging innocent people to experience instigation as an issue. I think I figured that out with the help from that quote from sci-fi show ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ that I made earlier in this list from Saru(Doug Jones):-‘As science officer, I can provide a far more concrete and in-depth analysis than simply reading data off a monitor.’ Of course, looking at that illustration is recommended. As I recommended earlier, I also imagined Saru learning many things from his interactions with Michael Burnham. For example, if you look at this Wishlist’s name, it’s called ‘Wishlist #1098’. That means I have made almost 1100 Wishlists so far. Of course, you are only obligated to read the ones in this blog, and this blog has almost 100 lists. Since I have invented all of those lists, I can tell you that there have been key changes to my use of ideas. I can sense(sort of, if I think about it enough) that I have learned things since the beginning of making these lists. So, based on that experience, I believe Saru can also sense that he has learned many things with his interactions with 1st officer Michael Burnham. And like I said earlier, one of the obvious things Saru has learned and is still learning from 1st officer Michael Burnham is to know if something that is speculated contemplationally to be an issue should actually be an issue. And that imagined learned lesson from the mind of Saru is what I think allowed me to invent this ‘issue’ idea. I speculate that instigators may use your use of being ‘in the right’ to cause you to feel awkward when you cannot resolve certain aspects of such an instigation that you choose to try to resolve. This unresolved awkwardness may cause you to turn such an experienced instigation into something that is a chosen issue in your mind.
The solution I am trying to give you is to have the option to not treat such an experienced instigation as an issue. One possible reason why such an unresolved aspect of instigation may be causing you to feel awkward is because you don’t want the evaluation to feel as if it has anything to do with the self evaluation of being guilty, because it is obvious to you that you are ‘in the right’. So, what you can do is contemplationally take it apart, and clarify to yourself that you do not have to contribute to those parts. Let’s start with it’s possible discomfort. You can identify the discomfort with the phrase ‘Back ache’ or ‘Immerse’, to help you recover from such a discomfort, yet not contribute to it. Next, let’s identify the non resolved awkward aspects of the instigation. You can identify that as an awkward evaluation sense that wants to give you the impression of false guilt, so you can simply use phrase ‘Immerse guilty’, meaning that such an awkward, unresolved sense is trying to immerse you into a sense of guilt that you also do not want to contribute to. As an illustration for immersing, you can use the scene from the ‘Seaquest’ season 1 intro available from youtube. If you search for phrase ‘seaquest intro’, it should be the 1st selection offered. It is the scene when the divers immerse themselves into the water. That scene, according to youtube, starts 34 seconds into that intro. I recommend that you start from the beginning of that Seaquest intro to get a more effective effect of divers immersing themselves into the water.
After you have allocated the discomfort and the misleading unresolved awkwardness, you can now decide more clearly, if you choose to, to not allow that experience to become an issue in your mind. As an example, let’s reverse the polarity and say that the instigator’s instigation has also given you the opportunity to make it an issue that you can actually address to the instigator. Even if that were true, you should still be able to decide how to contribute to the discomfort and the unresolved awkwardness. Going back to the original assessment, the reason I want you to have the option to not turn such an experience into an issue is because of how I speculate the way you used to treat such instigations before this advice. Based on the speculation, how the unresolved aspects of such an instigation causing you to feel awkward alone would cause you from time to time to think about such instigations, to try to resolve such instigations, and in many of those moments, and I am just speculating here, you would make that experienced instigation into an issue in your mind. With this idea, you may be able to nip that problem in the bud, so to speak, and not allow such an experience to be an issue.
Of course, when I recommend to you to not allow such instigations to be an issue in your mind, that doesn’t mean I am also recommending that you become a ‘crash dummy’ or to give away free passes when you experience such instigations. You still have concern. If you choose to, you can still complain about the experience to other people. I believe the difficulty you may still have is that, by not turning the experience into an issue, the experience then lacks a certain amount of proof. One possible answer to that is that the instigator already knows that, for example, the instigator is already presenting himself/herself inappropriately to you. You don’t need to provide further proof, since the instigator is already aware that he/she is instigating you. The burden of proof is not on you, so to speak. And, of course, you don’t have to use this idea. I just recommend to you that you have the option to use this idea. Also, after the fact, when the moment is over, let’s say a day or so later, it may not even be relevant for you to think of such an experience as an issue, since you’re doing something else, like spending time with your friends.
[I think I’ve typed in more than enough to allow you to find a use for this list. Tomorrow, I plan to proofread this list, and then finally finish Wishlist #1096 with the next list. See you then.
10/9/2017
Salutations! It is now 6:54 PM EST for me. I looked for several hours today trying to find a music video or movie trailer, but I could not find one to post. So, I’ll just continue without it. Before I close this list, I want to help out the people(probably mostly kids) who chose to use the ‘not turn it into an issue’ part of this advice. None of my business, of course, but I imagine that some of them are saying to their parents ‘Not an issue!’ when referring to a certain minor instigation that they experienced in the past. If you choose to pursue trying to perceive certain instigations as ‘not an issue’, then I imagined that what an instigator may do to discourage the effectiveness of that objectivity is to adversely influence how you respond ‘real time’ to the instigations you did not agree to perceive. I managed to find 2 illustrations to show you how another person is adversely influencing another person’s response to a presented instigation, refurbished for advice, of course. I believe there are probably a lot of illustrations out there in the form of illustrations in tv shows and movies. I just don’t know where they are.
The 1st illustration, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, is in movie ‘The Breakfast Club(1985)’ starring Molly Ringwald as Claire Standish and Ally Sheedy as Allison Reynolds. According to Amazon Video SD rental, the illustration starts 1 hour, 10 minutes, and 56 seconds into the movie, Claire is talking to Allison. Here is a quote:
Claire:-‘I can’t believe you. You’re so weird. You don’t say anything all day, and then when you open your mouth, you unload all these tremendous lies all over me.’
So basically, the way the illustration is presented to you, Claire’s point is that, when she talks to and listens to other people, the information processed by her assumes a reasonably truthful interaction. But when when she talks to and listens to Allison, she says so many lies to Claire, she is not able to comfortably acclimate to that type of interaction. That causes Claire to have a justified response to Allison’s conversations. So, even though Claire seems to have identified the problem, her responses to Allison’s conversations are still adversely influenced by Allison.
The 2nd illustration is from the trailer ‘A Series of Unfortunate Events’, and trailer is from the tv show offered streaming by Netflix, starring Neil Patrick Harris as Count Olaf and Malina Weissman as Violet Baudelaire. To see the trailer for free, just search for phrase ‘series of unfortunate netflix’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered, with over 3.8 million views. The illustration from the trailer starts 1 minute and 46 seconds into the trailer, Count Olaf seems to be talking to Malina. Here is a quote:
Count Olaf in disguise:-‘Wherever you go, I will hunt you down.’
Malina:-‘Why do you hate us so much?’
Count Olaf in disguise:-‘Because it’s fun..!’
According to wikipedia.org, one season of this show has already been completed, and 2 more seasons are approved. I have no plans on watching the show myself, but it does look like there’s going to be a lot of examples where Malina and her younger brother Klaus(Louis Hynes) will experience a lot of responses that will be adversely influenced by Count Olaf, examples that you may find useful for this advice, if you choose to use them. Of course, the tv show is science fiction, and made in a context that is supposed to be entertaining to watch. It’s still rated PG, and the show I am recommending to you has the inapproprieities removed.
Refrain:
According to www.dictionary.com, here is the definition of ‘refrain’:-‘to hold oneself back; forbear from doing something: refrained from swearing.’ I discovered I think it was earlier today that one of the most popular adverse influences that an instigator may use on an innocent person’s responses is to cause the innocent person to have a response that the innocent person would want to contemplationally refrain from. Here is the only illustration example I can think of right now that involves refraining from a contemplation response, sort of. The illustration is from the ‘Chloraseptic’ commercial from the 80s where a girl has a sore throat, and the commercial is illustrating that the girl is thinking that it will ‘hurt if she swallows’, and when she finally swallows, she experiences the discomfort, and then calls out to her mom. You may have experienced some sort of instigation in your past that you have used the ideas you have learned here to try to not sense it as an issue, but it has some sort of refraining involved. I forgot to mention earlier where to get the Chloraseptic commercial. Just search for phrase ‘chloraseptic it will hurt if i swallow’ from www.youtube.com, and the commercial should be the 1st selection offered. With the rest of these ideas from Wishlist #1096 to now, just use phrase ‘Exert refrain’ to allow yourself to not contribute to that exerting sense of refraining that such an instigation is encouraging you to experience.
Turn off:
According to www.merriam-webster.com, the definition of ‘turn off’ is:-‘to cause to lose interest :bore: economics turns me off. also :to evoke a negative feeling in’
When an instigator is adversely influencing you to have a refraining response, the instigator could also cause you to have a ‘turn off’ response.
Susan Sarfati, CEO of G.W.S.A.E., said “we need to create ‘safe harbors,’ places that encourage courageous, open, and generic cialis 40mg honest exchanges where people can regain knowledge regarding this problem. Mast Mood capsules are now getting referred by the experts and these capsules are being highly enriched with powerful herbs that can stop the you can try these out viagra sans prescription brain from releasing those hormones and neurotransmitters which management different capacities. To receive http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/polar-bear-peeking-in/ purchase generic cialis the medicine, at your doorstep, you can make right choice by choosing Fildena as your savior. Males, who intend to perform better in bed. cialis from india [I’m going to stop now. I’m pretty certain I am going to finish this list tomorrow, so that I can finally finish Wishlist #1096. See you then.
10/10/2017
Lara Croft! (I’m using the main character’s name as a greeting from the movie ‘Tomb Raider(2018)’ starring Alicia Vikander as Lara Croft. Also, if you watch the beginning of the ‘Tomb Raider’ trailer, the receptionist makes Lara Croft’s name a ‘big deal’.) It is now 2:50 PM EST for me. I didn’t even bother looking for a music video or movie trailer. I just want to finally finish this list.
Since I am clearly encouraging people to have the option to choose to think of and sense certain instigation experiences as being ‘not an issue’, I want to finish this list with ideas that is designed to help them achieve that goal. And so, what I am going to do is combine bookmarks ‘Turn off’ and ‘Refrain’ to create idea ‘Turn off refrain’, and give several examples of idea ‘Turn off refrain’. The basic definition of ‘Turn off refrain’ is that the idea helps you recover from the discomfort created by aspects of instigation experience that not only turns you off, but also causes you to refrain from such an experience. I know this may sound a little hokey(according to www.collinsdictionary.com, the British word hokey means-‘corny, contrived, phoney’), but for the 1st 2 examples of ‘Turn off refrain’, I recommend using the background music from the ‘Tomb Raider’ trailer. In my opinion, using the background music is like using a keyboard to operate your computer.
Imagining/listening to the background music from the ‘Tomb Raider’ trailer starts if you choose to continue reading:
The 1st example of ‘Turn off refrain’ is directed towards men. Since I am a man, I believe I have some credibility to give advice to other men. This advice addresses when a man gets the impression of being rejected for making some sort of overture(a formal or informal proposal or offer) to a woman, but the man did not present such an overture to the woman! To the men, if you never experienced such a thing, then good for you. To the men that did, your response to such an experience could still involve awkwardness, confusion, and an embarrassing amount of time thinking about such an experience, even though you did not make such an overture. The solution I recommend is to contemplationally say the phrase ‘Turn off refrain’ to help you identify such an experience, and of course use the advice I offered from Wishlists #1096-now, such as allow yourself to recover from the discomfort created from such an experience, choose not to contribute to it, or at least choose to contribute less to it, and that should improve your ability to ‘not make it an issue’ when you think about such an experience again.
The 2nd example is when an instigator imposes an adverse experience upon you while the instigator is with a group of other people, and none of the other people in the group seem to have noticed it. The only illustration I can think of right now is in the ‘characters’ description of the Netflix tv show ‘A Series of Unfortunate Events(2017)’ from www.wikipedia.org. The quote is located in Count Olaf’s character description:
‘While the Baudelaire children are always able to see through his disguises and intentions, the adults around them remain completely oblivious to the villain…’
The solution is similar to the previous example. Recover from the discomfort, contribute less to it, and that should help you ‘not make it an issue’ as to how you respond to such an odd occurrence.
OK, you can stop using the ‘Tomb Raider’ background music. The next example is meant to offer you a variety of words to help you address different intensities of refraining than an instigator may improperly impose upon your sense of responses:
Immerse refrain:
The use of word ‘Immerse’ for idea ‘Immerse refrain’ is from the ‘Seaquest intro’ I mentioned earlier in this list. It is meant to identify a sense of accumulation of refraining that an instigator may want you to experience. So, for example, when you sense a certain immersing of refraining, you can use idea ‘Immerse refrain’ to choose to not contribute to such a manipulation of response.
Reach refrain:
‘Reach refrain’ identifies an instigation that encourages you to ‘reach’ for another use of idea as you are already using an idea. This may not need to be an issue, since the ideas you are using are being used privately, and are not introduced to anyone. In other words, the instigation wants you to ‘change your mind’ and use another idea by adversely imposing an obvious inclination to change to another idea. That obvious inclination is what I call a ‘reach’.
Keep up refrain:
‘Keep up refrain’ is when an instigator improperly imposes an inclination to ‘keep up’ with a certain resolving of instigation. This reminds me of the movie ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind(1977)’. Near the last part of the movie, when the scientists were using sound to communicate with the aliens, the scientists eventually allowed their computers to communicate with the aliens instead of communicating with the aliens manually. So, when an instigation encourages an absurd maintaining of pace for you to resolve it, you can use idea ‘Keep up refrain’ to choose to no longer contribute to such a pace of resolving. If the instigation is obviously out of context, it should be easy to simply choose to no longer ‘keep up’ with it. If there is some sort of relevance attached to it, you can simply continue the evaluation, but using a reasonable pace of resolving, not the adverse pace encouraged by the instigation.
Figure out refrain:
‘Figure out refrain’ identifies contemplations that instigators want you to ‘figure out’, but you don’t have to. It is like an instigator wants you to address something that has adverse, out of context inclinations to ‘figure out’, but you don’t have to address those adverse inclinations.
Not understand refrain:
‘Not understand refrain’ is an instigation that improperly imposes an adverse causality of identity, such as being mildly bothered, insulted, or offended, but the involvement and purpose for such an experience does not have to be given the credibility of something that you have actually chosen as understanding it. You can choose instead to ‘not understand’ such a mildly bothersome, mildly insulting, and/or mildly offensive experience. Here is the difficulty using idea ‘Not understand refrain’: When you experience such a causality, you ‘feel’ the evaluation involving you being bothered, insulted, or offended, and that feeling may cause you to believe that you choose to experience such a causality as something you understand. It is my opinion that feeling an evaluation of being bothered, insulted, or offended is very convincing to most people, that they choose to understand the evaluation as it relates to the feeling of being bothered, insulted, or offended, and when they choose to understand it in such a manner, they BECOME it. Idea ‘Not understand refrain’ is a bit ambitious to use, I know, but if you read all of the ideas in this blog, then I believe you deserve to get a better pay grade, so to speak. If you choose to use this idea, use it at your own pace. I’m not rushing you to use it.
[Well, I believe I have given more than enough information to make this list useful to you. I’m going to stop now, proofread this list, close it, then finally start Wishlist #1099, which is a continuation of Wishlist #1096.
10/11/2017
Hi! It 7:40 PM EST for me. Before I type in the upgrade I invented for this idea yesterday, I want to do something that will give me some energy to do it. I want to illustrate how I imagine talking to Stacey Sutton(Tanya Roberts) as James Bond, when Bond met her for the 1st time in the movie ‘A View to a Kill(1985)’. The illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 34 minutes and 17 seconds into the movie, when James Bond(Roger Moore) greets Miss Sutton. Here is a quote:
Bond:-‘Hello. I thought you might like to join the party. By the way, the name is James St. John Smythe. I’m English.’
Stacey Sutton:-‘I never would have guessed.’
Bond:-‘Really?’
So, the gist of it is that, when Bond said ‘I’m English.’ and Miss Sutton said ‘I never would have guessed.’, my interpretation is that Miss Sutton was being sarcastically definitive. But when Bond said ‘Really?’, Bond presented a sincere posturing response to the ‘face value’ of her sarcastically definitive words. I think there’s a lot of potential in that moment, and so I imagine portraying Bond for that short scene. For example, earlier today, I looked at a few women as I was walking outside, and I imagined doing that scene with them. Of course, I would get to the gist of the scene and say to them ‘I’m English.’, and I would imagine her say ‘I never would have guessed.’, and then I would give my sincere ‘face value’ posturing response,-‘Really?’ That should give me some energy to type some more words in.
I didn’t even bother looking for a music video or a movie trailer. I’m just going to type this idea in. This is an idea that I invented yesterday, after I typed the 10/11/2017 ideas in. If I knew about this idea earlier, this entire list would probably have an entirely different structure. Before I continue with the advice, I want to talk about the ‘Bed Prism Spectacles’ I mentioned earlier. I bought ‘Bed Prism Spectacles’ by Skywill from Amazon. I bought it from another seller from Amazon who offered Amazon Prime shipping. According to Amazon, I received it Oct. 4, and I think I’m used to it now. When I used the 1st pair I bought called ‘Evelots Prism Bed Specs’ from Amazon, I experienced an obvious headache. The spectacles from Skywill allows me to watch an entire movie or tv show without any headache incident. In case you don’t know what ‘Bed Prism Spectacles’ are, they are glasses that allow you to watch tv while lying flat on your back. I bought those glasses because of my lower back pain incident. Also as a result of my lower back pain incident, I am now typing on my laptop while using a laptop table while sitting on the couch, not while sitting on a chair. This allows me to type a lot more in this blog without needing to ‘take a break’ because of general fatigue I may experience when typing for long periods of time on a chair. My legs are not in between the legs of the laptop table. Instead, the legs of the laptop table are on top of my legs as I use it while sitting on the couch. Since I used velcro to stick the laptop to the laptop table, it feels fairly secure while I type. All I have to do is put the laptop table on the couch if I want to leave the couch. Another result of my lower back pain incident is that I purchased a new bed, and it should be delivered tomorrow.
Not doing anything wrong:
The idea I invented yesterday is called ‘Not doing anything wrong’. Basically, there may be mild to moderate instigations that still bother you when you think about them, and according to this idea I invented, that can cause you to forget that you have done nothing wrong. This idea is based on one of the ideas I typed in yesterday called ‘Reach refrain’. Here’s a quote:
‘In other words, the instigation wants you to ‘change your mind’ and use another idea by adversely imposing an obvious inclination to change to another idea. That obvious inclination is what I call a ‘reach’.’
The goal of such an instigation is that the instigation wants you to ‘reach’ for a solution that you may not be able to resolve, causing you to feel frustrated and miserable. So, the ultimate goal of instigation identified by ‘Not doing anything wrong’ is to cause you to feel miserable to the point that you ‘forget’ that you were not doing anything wrong to begin with. Here’s an illustration of a man that has done nothing wrong, but after a short conversation with a woman, he felt somewhat miserable. The lady created the effect using instigation identified by idea ‘Not understand refrain’, by causing the man to understand the evaluation of being bothered, insulted, or offended. Of course, it’s a movie, and they’re actors, but I think it’s still a useful illustration for this advice. The illustration is in movie ‘The Layover(2017)’ starring Kate Upton as Meg and Matt Jones as Craig. The conversation is from Meg and Craig. According to Amazon Video SD rental, the illustration starts 53 minutes and 9 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:
Craig:-‘Gassed up and ready to roll.’
Meg:-‘Good for you.’
Craig:-‘Where’s Kate? We should hit it.(The car is ready)’
Meg:-‘Calm down.’
Craig:-‘I am calm. I just thought we were trying to make it to a wedding. That’s why I have been speeding the whole time.’
Meg:-’67? That’s your idea of speeding?’
Craig:-‘Traditionally, when someone does you a favor, you say ‘thank you’.’
Meg:-‘Well, I’m a rebel.’
So, when Meg said ‘Well, I’m a rebel’, even though it already happened, that made sure that Craig understood the evaluation of being bothered, insulted, or offended. And, according to idea ‘Not understand refrain’, once Craig chose to understand such an evaluation, he then turned into it.
To help you get into the mood of considering using idea ‘Not doing anything wrong’, I recommend watching music video ‘Torn’ sung by Australian singer Natalie Imbruglia. According to www.wikipedia.org, ‘As of 2011, “Torn” holds the record for most played song on Australian radio since 1990, played more than 300,500 times since its 1998 release, an average of 75 times a day’. Here is a quote from the song:
I’m all out of faith
This is how I feel, I’m cold and I am shamed
Lying naked on the floor
Illusion never changed
Into something real
Wide awake and I can see the perfect sky is torn
I am speculating that from a layman’s perspective, if a layman(a person who is not a member of a given profession, as law or medicine) read those lyrics, that person may interpret those lyrics as someone who is somewhat feeling miserable. I think that, in that context, you may find the music video ‘Torn’ useful.
All right! Let’s say as an example a lady is experiencing some sort of instigation from another lady that is causing her to not sense that she has done nothing wrong as she recalls such an instigation. Let’s ‘take apart’ her instigation in order to create a solution for her. Using idea ‘Reach refrain’, “In other words, the instigation wants you to ‘change your mind’ and use another idea by adversely imposing an obvious inclination to change to another idea. That obvious inclination is what I call a ‘reach’.” When she recalls the instigation, she is experiencing a ‘reach’ to change her mind, an adversely obvious inclination. The solution is to use a more tenable method to respond to such an adversely obvious inclination/reach. When you recall such an adversely obvious inclination to change your mind, keep in mind that your sense of reasoning is private. You did not agree to broadcast your private thoughts to the instigator that’s bothering you. And so, allow yourself to not need to acclimate so much that sense of reach that has the identity of encouraging you to change your mind. That should help you remember the fact that you are not doing anything wrong as you experience such an instigation, and in it’s context, as you are just recalling such an instigation.
So, let’s use what we’ve learned from Wishlist #1096 to now how to react to it more tenably. So, as an example, recall such a mild to moderate instigation that seems to be still vexing you. Allow yourself to recover from the discomfort that it is causing you. Now, allow yourself to not contribute so much to it. As an option, consider that you may want to eventually interpret such an experience in your mind as ‘not an issue’. Let’s say you did all of those things. What you can still have in the beginning use of this idea is that you still sense a lingering obnoxious inclination to change your mind. However, hopefully, it’s not as bad as it used to be. That is now the new target, to more tenably respond to such a lingering, obnoxious inclination to change your mind. With your newfound awareness that the instigator wants you to feel miserable by causing you to feel an obnoxious inclination to change your mind, but you now have a newfound awareness that you are doing nothing wrong, you should now be able to more objectively sense such an obnoxious inclination to change your mind, what I call a reach, and since that ‘reach’ no longer is the problem it once was, you should be able to sense it without the problems you had before with it.
So, just think about these lyrics from the song/music video ‘Torn’, let’s say for a few days only, with your newfound awareness that you are doing nothing wrong as you experience such a reach, and you should feel better. Here is that quote again from the lyrics of ‘Torn’:
I’m all out of faith
This is how I feel, I’m cold and I am shamed
Lying naked on the floor
Illusion never changed
Into something real
Wide awake and I can see the perfect sky is torn
A very popular song in Australia!
[Since I’m getting the bed delivered tomorrow, I’m going to try and proofread and close this list today.
[I changed my mind. I’m going to proofread this tomorrow. Also, you don’t have to use any of these bookmarks all of the time. For example, once you think you have an understanding for the ‘Refrain’ ideas, you don’t have to contemplationally say ‘Refrain’. You can use your own phrases to represent the ideas that you have learned. Once you understand idea ‘Not doing anything wrong’, for example, you can use another phrase, like ‘keep up figure out’. I use that phrase to represent an idea that identifies notions coming from my own expectations of idea use that I don’t have to ‘keep up’ with or ‘figure out’ using the ‘Language’ idea I created earlier. Well anyway, I’ll see you tomorrow.
In case anyone wants to know, I saw the Blu-ray mail rental version of ‘The Mummy(2017)’ starring Tom Cruise as Nick Morton. Under normal circumstances, near the end of the movie, I think that what Nick Morton did to get that power was a bad idea. However, since it’s a movie made for entertainment anyway, in a movie watching context, I think that Nick was probably symbiotically linked to Ahmanet(Sofia Boutella), and that’s how Nick figured out that such power can be used by him. Anyway, based on the ending of the movie, I look forward to the sequel, if there is one. See you next week.
10/12/2017
Greetings! It is now 6:31 PM EST for me. The new bed I purchased arrived earlier today. It seems to be better than the previous one. Because of my lower back issues, I purchased the firmest mattress the store had on the floor, with a shorter box spring. I plan to sit more on the corners of the mattress, to avoid denting the mattress in the center, since the center of the mattress is needed for my lower back. That was the problem with the replaced mattress, the center of it was dented because I would usually sit at it’s center.
So, that’s it! I don’t see any more delays. I invented another upgrade for this ‘Not an issue’ list earlier today. This is the last upgrade I want to type in before I finally finish this list. I spent over 2 hours looking for some sort of movie or tv trailer, but I wasn’t able to find anything. The 2 ‘music videos’ I recommended, ‘Stargate Origins’ and ‘Tomb Raider’, are hard to add to.
Pain not move:
I think the best way I can describe this idea is to imagine a man being instigated in such a way that the man is encouraged to avoid an adverse sense to not move. I believe this is a particularly bad experience if the innocent person experiencing such an experience experiences it many times, let’s say over the course of several years in his/her job, and the innocent person does not know how to respond in a way that allows him/her to at least partially recover from it. For example, the innocent person is just standing while doing his/her job, and the instigator would regularly adversely impose an adverse sense upon that innocent person to ‘not move’. The paradox(any person, thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature) is that the innocent person is supposed to be standing as part of his/her job. And so, when that innocent, standing person is experiencing an adverse sense to not move, over time, those instigations could cause that innocent person to get some sort of physical injury.
The only illustration I can think of right now, and it’s not an exact match, is near the end of the tv show intro for ‘Magnum, P.I.’ To watch it, just search for phrase ‘magnum pi intro’ in www.youtube.com, and it should give you several selections that are about 1 minute in length. Just choose one. The illustration is near the end, when Thomas Magnum would unintentionally? scare his friends Rick and T.C. as they are digging a hole in the ground. Both of their composures demonstrated that they were very surprised to see Thomas, even though they are friends with him.
So, if you experienced a mild to moderate instigation in your past that imposed an adverse sense for you to not move, and the experience bothers you when you think about it, my solution is that, again, you use the ideas from Wishlist #1096-now. Allow yourself to recover from the discomfort, contribute less to it, have the option to contemplationally sense it as ‘not an issue’. However, for this particular instigation, if you have never used such an idea before, before making a final judgement as to how you use this advice on such a past experience, I highly recommend that you wait 1 day before you sense the results again. When you use this advice for the 1st time, it may be like you are martial arts sparring with someone on a padded floor, and your sparring partner caused you to fall on that padded floor. That may be the moment you may choose to make some sort of final judgement as to how this idea works for you. Your final judgement evaluation is made while you are on the ground. If you wait 1 day after that metaphorical experience, you should be able to sense more of a preferred result. So, contemplationally use bookmark ‘Pain not move’ to identify the experience, then use the steps explained to allow yourself to better experience that instigation.
Instead of calling it ‘Pain not move’, you can give it other names. I used a variety of words earlier today before I settled with the phrase ‘Pain not move’. For example, I tried ‘Compound not move’, to identify such an adverse sense to not move as a compounding, collecting experience. I also tried ‘Heavy not move’, to identify such an experience in the context of a burden. I also tried ‘Burden not move’. Just a few seconds ago, I tried ‘Refrain not move’. Let’s say you tried 10 or so of your own words as it relates to not moving. When you think about that actual experience in your past, you may notice that, although the identity of exploiting your sense of not moving may not be obvious to you in the manner I described, you still may have noticed that such an instigation is very obvious to try to encourage you to experience some sort of discomfort. So, you have learned from all of those words that you have used for ‘not move’, and still use ‘Pain not move’ to identify such an instigation, since the instigator wanted you to experience an obvious sense of discomfort. That’s why, so to speak, I recommend you use the phrase ‘Pain not move’ initially. After a few days, once you are familiar with the idea, you can always use other words to associate or work with that meaning in a way that does not require you to contemplationally say ‘Pain not move’ anymore.
OK! After I take a shower soon today, I’m going to proofread these ideas, today. I want to finish this list today so that I don’t have to worry about upgrading it again, not in this list. After I finish this list, I will start on Wishlist #1099, a continuation of Wishlist #1096. I’ll probably do that tomorrow. See you then!
Violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Elementary’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Discovery’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Tomb Raider’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘The Breakfast Club’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘A Series of Unfortunate Events’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘A View to a Kill’. Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘The Layover’. Movie ‘The Mummy(2017)’ just casually addressed, not used as part of advice. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Dissuade’, ‘Back ache not keep up’, ‘Back ache guilty’, ‘Immerse guilty’, ‘Refrain’, ‘Turn off’, ‘Turn off refrain’, ‘Immerse refrain’, ‘Reach refrain’, ‘Keep up refrain’, ‘Figure out refrain’, ‘Not understand refrain’, ‘Not doing anything wrong’, and ‘Pain not move’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.