10/21/2017

Where have you been?(said as a greeting). It is now 7:52 PM EST for me. There has been a change of plans. I have found an excuse to give you an upgrade for idea ‘Language’, an idea I introduced to you in Wishlist #1084. When I typed in Wishlist #1099, there were a few things I forgot to type in, and one of those things was the 2nd definition of ‘Not move’. I’m not going to get into it now, because it’s already 8:03 PM for me. The priority now is to introduce to you the music videos. I’ll continue explaining tomorrow. I’ll just say that there are 2 definitions I have discovered for ‘Not move’. The 1st definition, which I have already given you, is when you are contemplationally trying to move something, but you have difficulty doing so. The 2nd definition is when you are trying to contemplationally ‘not move’ something, for example, when a person says ‘I’m not going to touch that with a 10 foot pole’. I speculate that, when people experience the 1st definition of ‘not move’, they are less likely to use the 2nd definition. Anyway, I’ll get into that later. It is that 2nd definition that allows me to upgrade the ‘Language’ idea.

What I’ll do now is offer you the 2 music videos. The 1st music video is from the animated detective tv show called ‘Gosick’. Here is a quote for ‘Gosick’ from www.wikipedia.org:

‘There he meets Victorique, a mysterious yet beautiful and brilliant girl who never comes to class and spends her days reading the entire contents of the library or solving mysteries that even detectives can not solve.’

The dvd and Blu-ray for ‘Gosick’ was made available Sept. 5, 2017, and the entire series is available streaming from www.funimation.com. I’m only recommending that you watch the trailer. Just search for phrase ‘gosick trailer’, and it should be the 1st selection offered. It’s title phrase is: ‘Gosick – The Complete Series – Part 1 – Coming Soon’, and it has 23 thousand views. The reason I am recommending for you to watch the ‘Gosick’ trailer is because the trailer gives you in my opinion a useful illustration of a genius girl detective intentionally participating in the solving of mysteries that have dire elements in it. The idea I will hopefully be able to explain to you tomorrow, which involves the upgrade for idea ‘Language’, may be able to help you remove adverse dire indicators that are out of context and inappropriate for you to interact with. The plan is that ‘Gosick’ may help you learn such an idea by giving you a more tenable sense of feeling dire in relation to out of context, inappropriate instigations of dire indicators. Like I said earlier, I’ll get into explaining the idea tomorrow.

The 2nd music video is from the refurbished with inapproprieities removed trailer of movie ‘Geostorm(2017)’, starring Gerard Butler as Jake Lawson. To watch the trailer, just search for phrase ‘geostorm trailer 2’ from www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered, with over 6.7 million views. When you watch it, you don’t use the special effects violence. The purpose of watching it is to get a ‘movie’ sense of dire from the actors and actresses that is conducive for you to watch. For example, in the trailer, there are a few conversations that involve humor, even though the people articulating the humor are in a dire situation. The purpose of this exercise is to avoid being adversely influenced by dire indicators from out of context and inappropropriate instigations. In other words, the dire indicators from instigations are probably worse than the dire indicators from a sci-fi movie starring Gerard Butler, a sci-fi movie that has the inapproprieities removed.

[I’ll continue explaining tomorrow. See you then.

10/22/2017

Welcome! It is now 2:58 PM EST for me. 1st, I’ll start by explaining a little more about the 2nd definition of ‘Not move’. 2nd, I’ll start upgrading idea ‘Language’, which will be called ‘Indicate’. Finally, I’ll put the 1st and 2nd definition together to create a new idea. The purpose for that new idea is to allow you to decide involvement and purpose for out of context instigation and inadvertent indicators, an idea I believe should be very useful to you.

Not move:

1st, I’m just going to copy and paste the definition of ‘Lack not move’ from Wishlist #1099:

Lack not move:

‘When I invented idea ‘Lack not move’, it was fairly close to when I saw this illustration. The illustration is from episode 7.2 ‘A Pirate’s Life’ from fantasy tv show ‘Once Upon a Time(2017)’. I think I watched it a day after I copied it, which was Oct. 14, this past Saturday. I half fast forward through the episode, except for key scenes, such as scenes containing Mr. Gold(Robert Carlyle). So far, that is the main reason why I am even still watching the show, to see what Mr. Gold is up to. The illustration where some of the idea started, according to Amazon Video SD, starts 7 minutes and 51 seconds into the episode, when Mr. Gold is talking to the detective he chose to work with, Killian ‘Hook’ Jones(Colin O’Donoghue). Here is a quote:

Mr. Gold:-‘First day as my partner…and you’re late.’

Killian:-‘But my shift doesn’t start for another hour.’

Mr. Gold:-‘Do you know why you were partnered with me?’

Killian:-‘Because I work hard and I paid my dues.’

Mr. Gold:-‘Because I chose you. Some of the boys said ‘He can’t do the job–not with that fake hand of his,’ but I picked you anyway.’

Killian:-‘I don’t even know you. Why would you pick me?’

Mr. Gold:-‘That’s the real question, isn’t it? Maybe someday, when you learn how to become a real detective, you can answer it for yourself. Now, get in. Big day ahead of us. New guy drives.’

One obvious moment when I thought of idea ‘Lack not move’ was when I was looking at Killian’s face when Mr. Gold said ‘New guy drives’ to him. Keep in mind that, when I saw that scene, I pretty much was just fast forwarding through many of the scenes before that moment, but I did see that conversation between Mr. Gold and Killian, and when Mr. Gold said ‘New guy drives.’ to Killian, I imagined Killian trying to remove that lacking sense created by Mr. Gold, but he wasn’t able to. I imagined that Killian believes he had done nothing wrong, he was even an hour early, and yet Mr. Gold made him feel as if his actions has created something lacking, something that was not acceptable, and when Killian was trying to justifyably remove that sense of lacking, he could not.’

That was the 1st definition of ‘Not move’, when a person is trying to remove a contemplation induced sense of lacking, but that person is finding it difficult to do so, like Killian did with Mr. Gold.

The 2nd definition of ‘Not move’ I created with 2 illustrations, the 1st illustration is from movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan(1982)’, when Spock(Leonard Nimoy) said to Kirk(William Shatner) quote-‘There are two possibilities. They are unable to respond. They are unwilling to respond.’ If you have Amazon Prime, the movie is available for you to watch without additional charge. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 41 minutes and 56 seconds into the movie. The 2nd illustration is just someone saying the phrase ‘I ain’t touching that one with a 10-foot pole.’ Of course, that phrase is refurbished to be used for this advice. That illustration is located in movie ‘Drew Peterson: Untouchable’ starring Rob Lowe as Drew Peterson and Kaley Cuoco as Stacy Peterson. The illustration, according to Amazon Video, is located 34 minutes and 3 seconds into the movie, when Drew Peterson is talking about his wife to another cop while in a police car watching Mrs. Peterson mowing the lawn. The movie ‘Drew Peterson: Untouchable’ is not available from Amazon for rental, so I chose to purchase the streaming movie for $9.99 plus tax. If you don’t need to see the illustration, then I recommend that you don’t have to buy it.

I used the quote ‘There are two possibilities. They are unable to respond. They are unwilling to respond.’ to distinguish between the 2 different meanings of ‘Not move’, and I used what I believe to be the popular phrase ‘I’m not touching that with a 10-foot pole’ to represent the 2nd definition of ‘Not move’. Basically, the 2nd definition of ‘Not move’ means something you don’t want to contemplationally interact with. For example, an instigator may improperly impose some sort of contemplation insisting of interaction, but it’s not something you chose to contemplationally interact with. Seconds ago, I just changed my mind as to how to use that quote from movie ‘Drew Peterson: Untouchable’. With that illustration, the cop Drew Peterson was talking to chose not to contemplationally interact with talking about Drew Peterson’s wife in a certain context, even though Drew Peterson brought the context up. That is why that cop said ‘I ain’t touching that one with a 10-foot pole.’ For the teenagers and adults, you may find useful the analogy of when you needed one of your teeth extracted by a dentist, for those that did. You may have tried to move that bothersome tooth with your fingers, to see if that provided you with some sort of relief.

Language:

Idea ‘Language’ I tried to explain in Wishlist #1084. My efforts to explain idea ‘Language’ is like, refurbished of course, how Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart) tried to communicate with Captain Dathon(Paul Winfield) in episode 5.2 ‘Darmok’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1991)’. For example, according to Amazon Video, the illustration begins 24 minutes and 6 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Captain Dathon:-‘Darmok and Jalad…’

Captain Picard:-‘At Tanagra. I remember the words, but I don’t understand.’

In this episode, Picard must learn to communicate with a race that speaks in metaphor under a difficult set of circumstances. When I explained ‘Language’ in Wishlist #1084, I had an idea what ‘Language’ meant, but it was like I was saying those metaphorical phrases from that ‘Star Trek’ episode. I was having difficulty explaining idea ‘Language’ in a context that was more compatible for these ideas. Now, I believe I can explain it better. If you choose to, you can go back to Wishlist #1084. That beginning explanation I’m still going to use. It was the other aspects of idea ‘Language’ I had difficulty explaining. That is what I’ll try to explain now:

I’m going to start explaining idea ‘Language’ by using an illustration as a vantage point for explanation. The illustration I am using is just the reference of Autobot Blurr(John Moschitta, Jr.) from the animated ‘The Transformers: The Movie(1986)’. You can verify the reference of Blurr in www.wikipedia.org and www.imdb.com. There is no streaming version of ‘The Transformers: The Movie’ from www.amazon.com, but you can buy the DVD and Blu-ray version from Amazon. Besides, I’m just using the existence of Blurr, that the Autobot was in that movie. If you still want to have access to a streaming version of ‘The Transformers: The Movie’, you can find it in web site www.watchanimemovie.com . I used that web site to watch ‘Psycho-Pass’ the movie without any appreciation problems. However, based on my experience, you may not enjoy watching every animation movie you can think of from there. I tried watching a few other things from there, and I didn’t like it. So, if you plan to watch an animated movie from www.watchanimemovie.com , just try it to see if you’ll like it. In case you don’t know,  www.watchanimemovie.com provides streaming animated movies for free, mostly japanese animation.

Here is a short quote about Blurr from www.wikipedia.org:

‘Blurr was also portrayed having extremely fast speaking mannerisms…’

Here is a story I made for the ‘Blurr’ example: I imagined 2 women interacting with Blurr. The 1st woman was originally startled when she 1st met Blurr, because, as indicated by the Autobot’s name, he moves around so quickly, he looks like a blur, and the Autobot also talks very quickly. The lady is not able to keep up with Blurr’s speed when communicating with him. However, Blurr is trying to be considerate to humans when communicating with them, even though he talks and moves very fast. So, with a little time and effort, the 1st woman got used to reasonably communicating with Blurr. Soon after that, the 2nd woman, an acquaintance of the 1st woman, as she was getting re-acquainted with the 1st woman, was exposed to Blurr for the 1st time, and was also startled, like the 1st woman was, but the 1st woman tried to give the 2nd woman words of solace, saying that she will get used to it.

So, the idea for the ‘Blurr’ example is that the 1st woman soon learned to use a reasonable language to interact with Blurr, not the unusually fast language that Blurr was giving her the impression of using. For example, the 1st lady is not trying to talk very fast and move very fast in order to communicate with Blurr. She is using what she believes to be a reasonable language to communicate with Blurr. Keep in mind that this is just an example to help you use idea ‘Language’, not an absolute.

This explanation of ‘Language’ also uses an illustration as a vantage point for explanation. The illustration is from episode 3.2 ‘Smith and Jones’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2007)’. If you have Amazon Prime, there is no additional fee for watching the episode. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 2 minutes and 49 seconds into the episode, when Mr. Stoker(Roy Marsden) is asking several medical students what they think is wrong with the patient. The reason for this illustration, refurbished for advice, is to show that the medical students are learning to treat patients. Their ability to interact with patients is being defined by their teacher, Mr. Stoker. If you choose to watch that illustration, imagine that there are other patients in that room. Those medical students are not able to treat those patients, since they are still students, but they are learning so that they may eventually have the ability to directly care for patients. That is the language those medical students are using. Those students are not yet able to treat patients as their caring perspective is being defined by their teacher, Mr. Stoker. Also, addressing Mr. Stoker’s solution, under normal circumstances, your main concern should be to watch your salt intake, since salt is usually already added to many of the foods that people tend to choose to eat. In other words, don’t add too much salt to your food. Watch your salt intake.

This explanation of ‘Language’ also uses an illustration as a vantage point for explanation. The illustration is from episode 9.24 ‘Lost Our Lisa’ from animated show ‘The Simpsons(1998)’. According to Amazon Video SD, the illustration starts 12 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode, when Lisa Simpson(Yeardley Smith) was asking instructions in order to find her way home. Here is a quote:

Lisa:-‘Excuse me. Can you tell me how to get to the museum?’

Man playing chess:-(from the perspective of Lisa, the man giving her instructions in a foreign language seemed to be yelling at her):’My pleasure. It’s six blocks that way.’

When Lisa believed that the man was yelling at her, her response was that she was scared, and she ran away.

[I’m going to stop now. I’m going to take a shower, then get ready to watch a new episode of ‘Star Trek: Discovery’. It might be available early, like last week. I’ll probably try to finish this tomorrow. See you then.

10/24/2017

Aloha! It is now 1:03 PM EST for me. I have decided to finish list #1100 by adding 3 more ideas, and I want to finish this list today. The 1st idea is called ‘Accumulate dire’, the 2nd idea is ‘Carry dissuade’, and the 3rd is ‘Carry mistake’. After I finish explaining those ideas, I will close this list and will finally explain 2 basic concept ideas that will allow me to explain idea ‘Not work’. Since idea ‘Accumulate dire’ is the 1st idea I want to explain, I want to offer you a tv show trailer, the intent of watching the trailer is to help you learn the idea. The tv show trailer is for episode 4.5 ‘The Poison Sky’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2008)’. You can watch the trailer for free by searching for phrase ‘doctor who the poison sky next time’ from www.youtube.com. It is from ‘DWFanForever’, and it has a run time of 32 seconds. I chose that selection because, based on what I found, it has the best resolution for ‘The Poison Sky’ episode, the trailer has a countdown, and 7 seconds into the trailer, you get to see Donna Noble(Catherine Tate) flick her hair in sync when the #8 in the countdown is said.

Accumulate dire:

Let me start explanation ‘Accumulate dire’ with the tv show intro from the tv show ‘Quincy M.E.(1976+)’. It’s a crime show about a coroner called Quincy(Jack Klugman) who is like the character Dr. Joan Watson(Lucy Liu) from the tv show ‘Elementary(2012+)’. You don’t have to know much about Quincy. To watch the illustration, just search for phrase ‘quincy tv intro’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered, with over 209 thousand views. The illustration starts 15 seconds into the episode. To the left of the illustration, 6 police officers are standing to watch some sort of surgical procedure. Quincy says something to them, and one by one, the police officers pass out. However, if you look at the beginning of that illustration, there are 2 people with white coats on that didn’t pass out. I’m assuming they’re hospital employees. The illustration’s purpose is that people have perspective limitations, but those limitations can be improved upon with some training and experience. For example, even though those police officers passed out, the 2 hospital employees that were also there did not pass out, since they were trained to do their jobs.

Another purpose for that ‘Quincy’ illustration is that, even though you think you know what your perspective limitations are, but you are not an instigator or at least you don’t see yourself as an instigator, an instigator can easily exploit what your perspective limitations are. For example, and it’s not an instigation example, if I refurbished that ‘Quincy’ illustration, I can say that none of those police officers believed they would ‘pass out’ just for seeing a surgical procedure. However, as they were observing it, all of them eventually passed out, in spite of their beliefs that such a thing would not happen.

So, here’s the reason why I recommended you watch the trailers for animated tv show ‘Gosick’, the Gerard Butler movie ‘Geostorm’, and tv show ‘The Poison Sky’. I wanted you to have a tv show and movie sense of what a dire situation was that you can observe and learn from, to help you quantify adverse induced indicators of a sense of dire from instigations. Idea ‘Accumulate dire’ or ‘Compound dire’ is designed to help you more tenably react/respond to a sense of dire induced by instigation. Here is an illustration from a movie, refurbished for advice, of a lady who, when she was a teenager, experienced an instigation at school, and even though she was not in a dire situation, how she reacted to the instigation over time caused her to believe that she was in a dire situation. The illustration is from movie ‘Mistress America(2015)’. The lady who experienced the instigation is Anna Wheeler(Rebecca Henderson) having a conversation with Brooke(Greta Gerwig). The conversation has a few inappropriate words used, so just take them out. Also, the movie is available streaming from Amazon, but only for purchase. I purchased the movie earlier today for $13.99 plus tax. If you don’t want to purchase the movie just to see that illustration, you can use what I type in as a reference. If you choose to purchase the movie, the movie is a comedy drama. The illustration, refurbished for advice with inapproprieities removed, according to Amazon Video, starts 29 minutes and 3 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:

Anna:-‘I just wanted to tell you because I never had the courage to do it when I was actually in high school: You really hurt my feelings.’

Brooke:-(chuckes)’What?’

Anna:-‘You don’t remember?’

Brooke:-‘What did I do?’

Anna:-‘That thing? ‘Yep, bitter.’

Brooke:-‘I don’t know what the heck you are talking about. I always liked you.’

Anna:-‘You and your friend Abe?’

Brooke:-‘Abe!’

Anna:-‘You guys used to do this thing where you would walk up to me, touch my skin, and then like taste it and think for a minute, and then say ‘Yep, bitter.’, and then laugh.’

Brooke:-‘Right! We did do that, didn’t we? We were weird.’

Anna:-‘I was standing right there, every single time you did it. It was really mean. The way you treated me really messed me up for a long time.’

Brooke:-‘Everyone is a jerk in high school!’

Anna:-‘You made a lot of people feel bad, not just me.’

After that, I skipped a few scenes and continued 30 minutes and 7 seconds into the movie:

Brooke:-‘You’re the one that hung onto this grudge for so long! I didn’t even recognize you when you walked up. I don’t say that to be mean, that’s the way it should be.

Anna:-‘You’re the same. Malevolent.’

Brooke:-‘You were bitter. That’s probably why it hurt so much. Because it was true.(Soon after, Brooke covers her face. She looks like she is about to cry as she walks away.)

This ‘Mistress America’ illustration is used as a refurbished example for both school and job related situations where instigation is officially not accepted to exist. So, let’s refurbish that ‘Mistress America’ illustration for school related situations. This is what I imagined happened to Anna after experiencing that instigation from Brooke. For example, Anna said to Brooke quote-‘The way you treated me really messed me up for a long time.’ I imagined Anna trying to resolve what Brooke did to her contemplationally, but she wasn’t able to. Several years after graduating from college, she eventually saw a psychiatrist. Soon after that, she met her soon to be husband.

My point is that, her efforts trying to resolve those experiences of instigation created by Brooke caused her to believe that she was in a dire situation. I don’t think Anna believed she was in a dire situation while she was in high school, since other high school girls were also experiencing problems from Brooke. However, over the course of years, her inability to resolve such an experience caused her to believe that she was, indeed, in a dire situation. Here’s the reality I believe exists in practically every legitimately available grammar school in America. All students are in a learning situation where, in it’s context, no active dire situation should even exist. For example, when you are sitting in class, playing sports, even walking around the school, there should not be any inappropriately dire situations to interact with. Here’s a contemplation test to prove that I am right, since I encourage you to be skeptical: For those of you who are still grammar school and high school students, when something that happens to you that gives you some sort of mild to moderate impression of a dire situation, let’s say that impression is from an obviously mild out of context instigation, I recommend that you imagine talking to one of the teachers in your school about it. Generalistically speaking, all the teachers probably have some sort of office hours reserved for the possiblity that other students may need to talk to them, and even if they were busy during those hours, they’ll probably say something to you, and ask that you talk to them during a time when they are available. So, as a student, if you imagine talking to them, I think you already have the answer. The impression of feeling that you are in a dire situation, even if it was from an instigation, should not exist, because during that moment there are not supposed to be any dire situations to interact with. (This is the point of the advice that I make a logical conclusion, but keep in mind that I am not a doctor. However, I have typed in about 1100 of these lists). And that is when the logic paradox(an opinion that conflicts with common belief) occurs: You experienced an interaction with an impression of feeling that you were in a dire situation, even if it was for a short amount of time, in a situation(attending school as a student) where such a dire situation impression is not allowed to exist. If you imagined bringing such an experience to the attention of one of your teachers, you have probably made the logical conclusion that such an impression of feeling you were in a dire situation is not accepted to be in school.

Compound throbbing ache:

So, let’s go to the formula created from Wishlist #1096-1099. Try to recover from it’s discomfort, contribute less to it, and in this case, consider the option that it’s less of an issue after using this advice than before using this advice, instead of outright thinking that it’s not an issue at all. Based on the way Anna from the movie ‘Mistress America’ reacted to the instigation she experienced, discomfort is probably the worst part of it. So, what I’ll do is refurbish what I experienced for less than two weeks, when I experienced my lower back injury on Aug. 22, before I received my triple point injection. During that time, for over a week, I had difficulty standing and walking for short periods of time. It was an effort for me just to take a shower every day. The worst part of that experience was trying to sleep. I experienced this throbbing, persistent discomfort from the middle to the right side of my lower back area that prevented me from sleeping. I would toss and turn for hours trying to sleep. Eventually, I would fall asleep, but I have no idea how that happened. It is my belief that the throbbing was the worst pain experience involving discomfort in my life that I can recall. It was the throbbing persistence that created the pain, not an actual sense of pain itself. Eventually, I was able to get what is called a ‘triple point injection’, and the throbbing stopped and I was able to go to sleep normally again.

A levitra prices super drug by definition should be a drug that would create unforgettable sexual moment in a couple’s mind and the passionate in sex continuous for the maximum period of 6 hours. You’ll practically cheap canadian viagra smoke any where if you own electronic cigarettes. A number of other herbs such as L-arginine, ginseng, ginkgo, damiana and 14 essential vitamins and minerals are known viagra vs cialis to increase sexual desire and can only create erection. Did you know that there were many websites where you could buy on the internet inexpensive The red pill and even inexpensive prescription free tadalafil . From that experience from my lower back refurbished, I recently created a phrase called ‘Compound throbbing ache’ for you to use involving the discomfort you have experienced, whether it was from the school or the job. Just recall the mild to moderate experience you had with the instigation that induced the discomfort that caused you to believe you were in a dire situation, even though such a situation also declares that inappropriate dire situations are not allowed, the paradox, just recall that discomfort and use phrase ‘Compound throbbing ache’, or phrase ‘Accumulate throbbing ache’, or just phrase ‘Compound ache’, and allow that discomfort, and the illustration you probably created to identify such a discomfort, to be identified by one of those phrases, let’s say its phrase ‘Compound throbbing ache’. Say the phrase several times for the mild to moderate instigation discomfort you are allowing yourself to contemplationally experience again. Keep in mind what I said earlier using that ‘Quincy’ illustration, that instigators may choose to exploit your sense of limitations perspective. Notice that, after experiencing that minor discomfort a few times, but with using the ‘Compound throbbing ache’ idea, you should now be more able to more tenably reference such a changed discomfort sense again. At this point, ‘Throbbing ache’ or ‘Compound ache’ may work better. Give yourself 1 day to make a final judgment on the use of this idea.

Now, as for phrase ‘Accumulate dire’ or ‘Compound dire’, those are phrases I recommend you use in the beginning generalistically, since people don’t have the same limitations perspective. For example, in the ‘Quincy’ illustration, there were 2 hospital employees in the video that did not pass out, since they were trained to work in a hospital. The police officers, on the other hand, passed out because they received no training before Quincy showed them the surgical procedure. The phrase ‘Compound dire’s purpose is to remind you what situation you are supposed to perceive, what situation you committed to. Let’s say that, before this advice, the paradox created from a situation that instigation is not allowed, let’s say it’s the job, caused an adult to have a ‘zero tolerance’ for experiences instigation related. Now, with this advice, sure, the instigation recalled induced a discomfort that created a belief of a dire situation where such a situation is not allowed, but you can now more objectively and more tenably identify such a situation. You can notice it, and think to yourself ‘Compound dire’, ‘Compound ache’, or ‘Throbbing ache’. Sure, it’s still a paradox, but you can now more tenably react to it. You may even choose not to ‘keep up’ with it, since it’s not something that should be there in the 1st place, and you may choose to use phrase ‘Throbbing keep up’ instead.

Carry dissuade:

I’ve copied this quote from Wishlist #1098:

‘The 1st illustration is from episode 2.16 ‘The One Percent Solution’ from tv show ‘Elementary(2014)’. I looked for older episodes of ‘Elementary’ in the www.cbs.com all access web site, but I could not find any. CBS All Access probably has a lot of full episodes of other tv shows, but I could not find the older ‘Elementary’ episodes from that web site. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 10 minutes and 29 seconds into the episode, when Joan Watson(Lucy Liu) and Sherlock Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller) are talking about Lestrade(Sean Pertwee), Sherlock’s former Scotland Yard colleague. Here is a quote:

Watson:-‘Lestrade treated you like crap, he took credit for your work. He uses your words in his interviews. If it bothers you, you should say something to him.’

Sherlock:-‘To what end? The man has chosen vanity and the pursuit of the spotlight. Nothing I say is going to change that.’

According to www.dictionary.com, the definition of dissuade is-‘to deter by advice or persuasion; persuade not to do something’. Extrapolated from what Watson said, and the popular information about Sherlock Holmes from books, when Sherlock was working with Lestrade for Scotland Yard, he did not discourage Lestrade from taking all the credit for their work, as it is interpreted by the public. Also, according to Sherlock’s quote, ‘the man has chosen vanity and the pursuit of the spotlight. Nothing I say is going to change that.’ So, based on that, the dissuading created from working with Lestrade for Scotland Yard is not an issue worth addressing. However, from the perspective of Watson, the dissuading working with Lestrade could be an obvious issue to Sherlock, which is why she is bringing it to Sherlock’s attention.

The point is that, in my opinion, Sherlock is using some sort of logical continuity to work with Lestrade in the past that is probably not available to the imaginations of many of us to be aware of and even understand, if not given an explanation to understand. However, even if that were true, since it’s just my opinion about a fictitious character, how can I be certain? His example working with Lestrade in my opinion can still be useful to you in regards with the interaction of being dissuaded by other people, especially by being dissuaded by instigators.

Now here is where the issue of dissuading becomes sadly ominous. It is my opinion that an instigator may improperly impose a sense of dissuading for you to actively interact with and commit to in order to adversely affect your ability to learn and discover. I imagine that, before this advice, when you would think about dissuading as it relates to certain ideas or discoveries that you have chosen to think about, metaphorically, it is like a heavy object you have chosen to put in your backpack and carry around from class to class. It’s something that you try to deal with as it relates to certain ideas or discoveries that you have chosen to think about. To illustrate, let me use the ‘Elementary’ illustration, quoting Sherlock:-”To what end? The man has chosen vanity and the pursuit of the spotlight. Nothing I say is going to change that.’ Not only was the dissuading created by Lestrade working with Sherlock not an issue to Sherlock, but it is my opinion that Sherlock learned a great deal working with Lestrade for Scotland Yard. For one thing, when Sherlock would make discoveries with Lestrade, dissuading was not a heavy object for Sherlock to metaphorically carry in his backpack. Sherlock also did not want to be in the spotlight. Sherlock also learned to allow others to have limitations, to not need to make an issue about all of the limitations others have, especially if those others are people that he is working with. In fact, it is my opinion that Sherlock working with Lestrade eventually allow Sherlock to work as an investigator for the NYPD. If you can work with a Lestrade with all of his obvious limitations, you can do many things![10/12/2017: quote ‘you can do many things! was a ‘making an idea’ statement, not a declaration of action.

Have you ever thought about working like Lestrade, but in an acceptable context? Suppose a man joined a company, and is allowed to exercise certain limitations as if they were strengths. Now, the other people that he works with do not see those limitations as strengths, and they tell him from time to time that certain aspects of his actions are ‘not enough’, for example, his actions are not enough to maintain a certain acceptable pace of activity. However, this man is allowed to ‘work at his own pace’, even though that pace is not acceptable to the other workers from time to time. The dissuading is from the other co-workers that find certain aspects of his pace of actions not enough.’

Carry dissuade:

Anyway, that was already said in Wishlist #1098. Idea ‘Carry dissuade’ helps you to identify if certain instigations and inadvertencies are encouraging you to carry a sense of dissuading. With the use of ‘Carry dissuade’, you can choose not to carry such a sense of dissuading. When I invented ‘Carry dissuade’, I also invented another idea. I discovered using imagination that instigators may inappropriately discourage an innocent person from using any sense of dissuading, simply because of an adverse sense of dissuading imposed by an instigation. So, if such an innocent person avoids many senses of dissuading because of the ‘zero tolerance’ caused by instigation examples of dissuading, that person may intentionally avoid and/or prefer interactions that have less to no impressions of adverse dissuading. I believe that committing to a sense of ‘zero tolerance’ for adverse dissuading is understandable, since the experience that innocent person had with instigation related dissuading was adverse. I stipulate to that belief.

So, here is the new idea I invented using the concept of dissuading: What if a person contemplationally used a perspective scale for dissuading that measures depreciation? You can always use idea ‘Carry dissuade’ if a certain sense of dissuading gets to be too much, you can choose to not carry that sense of dissuading. And of course there is the example of Sherlock benefitting from Lestrade’s identity of dissuading. Sherlock did not let Lestrade’s identity of dissuading adversely affect how he works with Lestrade when solving crime, an ability that I believe allowed Sherlock to work with the police in NY. Let’s make an illustration example of it: Let’s say 2 tourists arrive at the Manhattan NY area. Of course, there are other things to do in NY if you have an appreciation for it. However, these 2 tourists are just walking around the Manhattan NY area for awhile. There are areas that have kiosks(a small structure having one or more sides open, used as a newsstand, refreshment stand, bandstand, etc.). The 1st tourist described doesn’t use a dissuading scale. That tourist is doing nothing wrong, so to speak. He/she just isn’t using a dissuading scale. And so, when the 1st tourist looked at a few of the kiosks as he/she was walking past, that tourist experienced some dissuading from the people operating those kiosks. Therefore, since he/she had a limited amount of time to be there, that tourist simply did not visit those kiosks.

The 2nd tourist did have a dissuading scale, and when that tourist walked by those kiosks, he/she considered browsing those kiosks to see what they had. The 2nd tourist didn’t even notice any dissuading, since he/she had been using that dissuading scale for years. However, since the 2nd tourist also had a limited amount of time to observe those kiosks, that tourist also had to walk past those kiosks.

Here’s an illustrated example for ‘the 2 tourists’ story. It is from the www.imdb.com and www.wikipedia.com description of episode 7.6 ‘The Soup Nazi’ from tv show ‘Seinfeld(1995)’. Here’s a description from www.imdb.com regarding the episode: ‘A soup stand owner obsesses about his customers’ ordering procedure, but his soup is so good that people line up down the block for it anyway.’ And here’s a description about the ‘Seinfeld’ episode from www.wikipedia.com: ‘The term “Nazi” is used as an exaggeration of the excessively strict regimentation he constantly demands of his patrons.’ Since I can’t find the ‘Seinfeld’ episodes in Amazon.com, it doesn’t matter. You don’t have to see it. Basically, there is this man who sells soup that is so good, a lot of people wait in line, even though he has an obviously dissuading attitude.’ And of course, it is my belief that instigators from how their instigations interact for their chosen circumstances, they already learned how to interact with dissuading identities. If a person has been an instigator for many years, they may have learned that certain dissuading identities are no longer treated as dissuading to them.

Carry mistake:

OK. This is an idea I learned on Oct. 18 less than a week ago while I was using the subway. I’m somewhat hesitant to type this idea in, because to me, it is embarrassing to explain. However, if you choose to use this idea, I believe it is highly likely that you will notice an improvement in your technique. I’d say that, for many of the kids and teenagers learning from this blog, if there are people learning from this blog, it’s highly likely. Anyway, this is what happened. The quicker I type this idea in, the better. As I was sitting down in the subway, I was using a few of my ideas. There were 2 people sitting in front of me, 2 men that wanted to get my attention, in a context of an instigation, and so I used my ideas. Of course, the ideas were privately used in my mind. I wasn’t broadcasting them to anyone. Anyway, I didn’t bother moving to another part of the subway train. I wasn’t doing anything wrong. So, what happened was that I was ‘stuck’ with the ideas I was using, and while that was happening, I was experiencing an instigation that exploited my inability to make a more conducive idea in my mind. Basically, I was being innuendoly(an indirect intimation about a person or thing, especially of a disparaging or a derogatory nature) insulted. So, basically, the situation is me sitting down while one of the 2 people sitting in front of me are giving the impression of insulting me for the use of an idea in my mind that I originally used in response to the man’s behavior, and I am ‘stuck’ using such an idea as he insults me several more times. Of course, it’s a private idea, and I did not present such an idea to anyone. That created a sense of ridicule for the idea I was using.

The solution I created for that experience while I was still in that subway was to allow myself to have an evaluation identity of making a mistake, especially if that mistake identity was somewhat rude and insulting. Just make sure that your vantage point(the perspective you have chosen to use your ideas) is reasonable. That vantage point would be what you would use to reinstate yourself. Also, keep in mind that your ideas are privately used, and are not meant to be used by other people. Soon after that instigation experience, I invented idea ‘Carry mistake’ so that you don’t have to experience so much of that innuendo of ridicule. You simply just don’t have to carry that sense of mistake an instigator unusually wants you to experience. For example, if something similar happens to me again, I would contemplationally use ‘Carry mistake’, so that I don’t have to carry that sense of mistake, and I’ll also still allow myself to have mistake identities for my ideas. In a standard demographic context, I don’t expect you to use idea ‘Carry mistake’ in a preferred context within just a week after reading this idea. However, I think that it is important for me to offer this idea to you.

[I’m going to proofread this idea tomorrow. I’ve been typing in this list ‘on and off’ since 1:03 PM. So, I’m going to take a shower, see what’s on the tivo, and then go to sleep. I can type more, but I believe it’s going to take you some time to acclimate to what I have already typed in. Also, I want to begin explaining those 2 basic ideas so that I can finally explain idea ‘Not work’. So, I’ll see you tomorrow.

10/26/2017

Aloha! It is now 11:30 AM EST for me. 1st, I want to give advice for people who don’t have cell phones, but for some reason, need to use one, and they are about to do research over the internet to purchase one. Of course, you don’t have to read this recommendation. I did this research yesterday, and I concluded that you should purchase the Verizon 4G LTE Moto Luge by Motorola Prepaid Smartphone, if Verizon offers you acceptable phone reception in your area. It is offered in Amazon for $114.95. It is available to be delivered by Amazon Prime. And when you get the phone, I recommend you get Verizon’s $40 dollar prepaid plan, since, according to what I’ve read in web site www.whistleout.com,Verizon is America’s largest 4G LTE network. Its network covers over 97% of Americans, and the Motorola Luge is a 4G LTE cell phone made compatible for Verizon’s prepaid plans.

Why prepaid? Since you haven’t used a cell phone in a while, or maybe you’ve never owned a cell phone before, Verizon’s $40 prepaid plan has unlimited talk and text in the U.S. And since it’s a prepaid plan, there’s no annual contract, no fees and no monthly bills. For example, after you would get your cell phone by mail, you can set it up online. You can also call Verizon’s customer support. Just search for phrase ‘verizon wireless customer support’ in www.google.com, and you should find their toll free number. You can then select what prepaid phone service you want from verizon. And since this could be your 1st Smartphone, I recommend Verizon’s $40 prepaid plan. Here’s how prepaid works. You pay the $40 in advance for 1 month’s service, and this service gives you, among other things, unlimited talk and text. After the month is over, and you don’t pay, the service is discontinued. After the 2nd month of not paying, it’s disconnected, and there’s no penalty for that! So, for example, if you’re only going to use that smartphone during a 2 month period in a year, then you’re only spending $80 dollars to use it for that year. If you want to get familiar with your smartphone, then you can decide which month you choose to do that in, and you only pay for that month’s use. If you need to use that phone again, just go to verizon’s web site to enroll again in the $40 a month prepaid plan. You just have to start over with a new number. I made this conclusion from an article I found using google.com, and from talking with Verizon Wireless customer service. The article is almost 3 years old, but I found it useful. Here is the link:

www.techforluddites.com/how-prepaid-cellphone-plans-work-and-how-they-can-save-you-money/

And here’s the link from www.whistleout.com addressing the $40 prepaid Smartphone plan:

https://www.whistleout.com/CellPhones/Carriers/Verizon-Wireless/Personal/Verizon-Wireless-40-Prepaid-Smartphone-Plan?contract=0

I also chose to recommend the Motorola Luge because of it’s 4.3″ edge to edge screen. I’m assuming you want a smartphone that is portable, that you can easily? put in your pocket, as it is compared to other smartphones that have a bigger screen size. You can always change your mind later as to what type of cell phone you want. I just believe that the $40 prepaid plan option gives you a lot of safety room to decide what type of cell phone you may want later. I also casually noticed yesterday that Verizon is also offering family prepaid plan options, but I think you would have to get a Verizon prepaid cell phone for that to work. For families that use cell phones and smartphones from Verizon, they can probably save a lot of money switching to that service. I think it’s something worth looking into, if you can handle paying your bill in advance. Of course, before you commit to getting new smartphones for the prepaid service, check to see if you get good prepaid service reception where you use it. The service reception you are used to may not be the same as prepaid service reception. Well anyway, this advice is mostly for people who may need a cell phone for maybe only a short period of time, and they don’t want any long term commitments to go with their short use of a cell phone.

Concerning the Verizon Luge prepaid smartphone, here is a quote from one of the reviews from Amazon:

‘Not only does the phone work for calls quite literally everywhere I go, it also finds a 4G signal where other networks in the area can’t even pretend to (almost everywhere I have gone – even up into the mountains), and it locates me and displays a map with navigation faster than any of my friend’s phones do, has great sound through headphones, plays great videos, and does everything else you could possibly want from a low to mid-level device.’

Good news! I found a movie trailer that has a sense of emotional escalation in it that you may find useful with these dire addressing ideas. So, along with the 3 trailers I already recommended to you, I also recommend the trailer from movie ‘Some Kind Of Wonderful(1987)’ starring Eric Stoltz as Keith Nelson and Mary Stewart Masterson as Watts. In the movie trailer, there are 2 uses of the word ‘sex’, but it’s not explicit. To see the trailer, search for phrase ‘some kind of wonderful trailer’, and it should be the 1st selection offered, with over 43 thousand views. The trailer has a run time of 1 minute and 52 seconds. Although the ’emotional escalation’ effect begins 1 minute and 19 seconds into the video, I recommend that you watch the trailer starting from the beginning. Watching it from the beginning allows you to sense the trailer creating the emotional escalation when it happens.

Carry understand:

I introduced to you the ‘Throbbing ache’ idea 2 days ago, on 10/24/2017. Yesterday, to the adults who used that idea, you probably experienced something new when you recalled such instigation, an inclination to understand using discomfort. Well, since you tried to recover from the discomfort, contributed less to it, now see it as less of an issue based on your improvement of experience, and you used the ‘Throbbing ache’ idea and allowed yourself 1 day to judge it, you should now be able to choose to not contribute more to that inclination to understand, and that inclination to understand is created from a sense of discomfort from how you now recall that instigation. So, here’s what I’m trying to say. You are experiencing a new feeling in the form of an inclination to understand how you recall that instigation you addressed in 10/24. You can choose to use idea ‘Carry understand’, which means you choose not to carry such a sense of understanding. Sure, it’s new, and if you want to, you can revisit how you recall such an experience, but with ‘Carry understand’, you can have more of a sense of closure. For example, after using ‘Carry understand’, a day after using it, you should be able to recall such an instigation with more objectivity and control.

I forgot to mention that, if you choose to buy your Motorola Luge from Amazon, find out when the shipping order time changes. Whenever you are buying something using Amazon Prime, the web site tells you your guaranteed delivery date if you order within a certain time frame. I just checked Amazon, and if I ordered a Motorola Luge before 8:00 PM EST, I am guaranteed to receive it by 10/30, and even sooner if I choose 1 day shipping. Knowing what your time frame is to order may just allow you to receive your order 1 day early, but if you are planning to order something the same day you are considering ordering it, ordering within that time frame may be something that you would want to do. So, if you are planning to buy something from Amazon on that day, knowing what your time frame is I believe may be useful to you.

Repel/repress/commit attention:

1st, here’s a quote from idea ‘Carry mistake’, that I typed in 10/24:

‘Basically, I was being innuendoly(an indirect intimation about a person or thing, especially of a disparaging or a derogatory nature) insulted. So, basically, the situation is me sitting down while one of the 2 people sitting in front of me are giving the impression of insulting me for the use of an idea in my mind that I originally used in response to the man’s behavior, and I am ‘stuck’ using such an idea as he insults me several more times. Of course, it’s a private idea, and I did not present such an idea to anyone. That created a sense of ridicule for the idea I was using.’

This is an example of a man who used a sense of attention for me to experience, but that sense of attention was adverse and unwanted to experience. Yesterday, after my physical therapy session, I discovered that I can more objectively choose to not interact with adverse forms of attention, more specifically, attention involving repelling, repressing, and committing. So, if I were to use these variations of attention in the form of a phrase, I would call them ‘Repel attention’, ‘Repress attention’, and ‘Commit attention’. One example of ‘Repel attention is from the movie ‘The Layover’. Here is a quote from Wishlist #1098:

‘The illustration is in movie ‘The Layover(2017)’ starring Kate Upton as Meg and Matt Jones as Craig. The conversation is from Meg and Craig. According to Amazon Video SD rental, the illustration starts 53 minutes and 9 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:

Craig:-‘Gassed up and ready to roll.’

Meg:-‘Good for you.’

Craig:-‘Where’s Kate? We should hit it.(The car is ready)’

Meg:-‘Calm down.’

Craig:-‘I am calm. I just thought we were trying to make it to a wedding. That’s why I have been speeding the whole time.’

Meg:-’67? That’s your idea of speeding?’

Craig:-‘Traditionally, when someone does you a favor, you say ‘thank you’.’

Meg:-‘Well, I’m a rebel.’

Meg in the movie is causing Craig to interact with a sense of repelling attention. I recommend that you use those 3 ideas, ‘Repel attention’, ‘Repress attention’, and ‘Commit attention’ to choose not to interact with or regulate adverse attention identities instigators want you to unavoidably experience. When you start doing that, I recommend that you become more aware as to how you regulate those adverse attentions as you interact with those imposing such adverse attentions. I believe that, if you have already experienced instigations involving adverse, unavoidable attentions from instigators, then such examples have already misled you as to how you should regulate such adverse attention identities. For example, you may have experienced such an instigation like I did in the subway, a sense of adverse attention that was insulting to you. If such an instigation was from a stranger, than it’s unlikely that you talked to such a person. However, if let’s say someone where you work exhibits a minor sense of adverse attention that is part of their normal attitude, and you talk to this person from time to time, then if you use this idea to make more manageable how you respond to their adverse attention, just be more aware as to how you present yourself.

Here’s an example that has a handicap(a race or other contest in which certain disadvantages or advantages of weight, distance, time, etc., are placed upon competitors to equalize their chances of winning) added to it. For the adults, here’s the scenario: Imagine a single, available, and attractive lady where you work who normally would use adverse attention identities when she communicates with others. If you watched that ‘Some Kind of Wonderful’ trailer I recommended, you can then imagine celebrity Eric Stoltz also working in that job, and he is using that ‘Repel/repress/commit attention’ idea to communicate with that lady. He is just being normally courteous to her, talking about the job. So, when you imagine it, make sure that there are less misunderstandings between Eric Stoltz and that lady when they are talking. This should help you be more aware as to how you use idea ‘Repel/repress/commit attention’ when talking to others who outright impose adverse attention identities to others.

[I’m going to take a break now for let’s say 40 minutes. When I come back, I plan to add one more idea called ‘Keep up attention’, and then I plan to proofread and close this idea today.

Keep up attention:

It is now 6:31 PM EST for me. 1st, I’ll begin with the illustration example for ‘Keep up attention’. The illustration is from episode 3.10 ‘Sabrina and the Beast’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch(1998)’. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available for you to watch without additional charge. The 1st illustration from that episode begins 6 minutes and 58 seconds into the episode, when Cousin Susie(Sonje Fortag) enters the house holding presents. Soon after entering, Sabrina(Melissa Joan Hart) says to Cousin Susie quote:

Sabrina:-‘Cousin Susie, I’ve heard so much…’

And then, Sabrina sees Cousin Susie’s face for the 1st time, and says in a surprised manner, quote:

Sabrina:-‘WHOA!’

The 2nd illustration begins 8 minutes and 16 seconds into the episode, when Cousin Susie is talking to Sabrina in her room.

Cousin Susie:-‘Sabrina, do you have a problem with the way I look?’

Sabrina:-‘No, you’re a very nice wart…woman!’

Cousin Susie:-‘Beauty is very important to you, isn’t it?’

Sabrina:-‘No, I’m just not looking at you because I’m…being coy.’

So, idea ‘Keep up attention’ basically means that even though you have a certain intent of obligation, of commitment, of attitude, as it relates to attention, your senses, your resourcefulness, may not be able to ‘keep up’ with such an obligated sense of intent. For example, in the ‘Sabrina’ episode, of course Sabrina is trying to maintain a certain intent of obligation concerning Cousin Susie. After all, Cousin Susie is family. However, her expectations of sense did not agree with the way Cousin Susie looked. In the 1st illustration, Sabrina literally said ‘WHOA!’ when she 1st saw Cousin Susie for the 1st time. The 2nd illustration showed that she is trying to honor a certain intent of obligation, but her use of senses were making it difficult to do so.

The solution I have created, which of course includes the rest of Wishlist #1100, is to simply choose to not ‘keep up’ with such a sense of attention. You can acknowledge to yourself that, of course, it is your intent to honor a certain obligation, and you intend to. You’re just not able to ‘keep up’ with a certain identity of attention, like Sabrina was with Cousin Susie.

Spend attention:

I just invented ‘Spend attention’ during my break earlier, less than 2 hours ago. Idea ‘Spend attention’ involves an impression of attention an instigator wants you to experience that involves an obvious sense of expenditure(the act of expending something, especially funds; disbursement; consumption). For example, an instigator may exploit how you contemplationally anticipate. As an illustration, I recommend you look at the Chloraseptic commercial from the 80s, when the girl who has the sore throat is illustrated in a commercial way to think to herself quote-‘It will hurt if I swallow’. To see that commercial, go to www.youtube.com, and search for phrase ‘chloraseptic it will hurt if i swallow’. It is the 1st and 2nd selection offered. So, whether you are a kid, teenager, or adult, for example, let’s say you’re in a supermarket, subway, or some other public place in relation to advice said where a lot of people congregate, and you contemplationally anticipate something that may happen that involves a little refraining, but what the instigator does instead is give you more of an adverse impression of what you privately, contemplationally, anticipated.

The solution I invented is to use idea ‘Spend attention’ to clarify to yourself that you did not choose to ‘spend’ such an attention use for such a specific private use of anticipation. Of course, there are other examples for ‘Spend attention’, but I think you can make your own ideas with what I have already offered for you to use. Also, keep in mind that when you are using idea ‘Spend attention’, to take into consideration how you react as well as the appearance and presentation of the instigation. I speculate that people often try to take into consideration the obvious appearance and presentation of the instigation. However, what I speculate to be often overlooked and/or not considered enough is how the innocent person reacts to such an instigation. Also, keep in mind that the instigation is probably trying to establish an adverse ‘status quo’ for the way you use your ideas to cope with such instigations. For example, the ‘Eric Stoltz’ example was designed to help you use the idea reasonably, to be less swayed by how instigations may be encouraging you to use your ability to cope in an adverse manner.

[All right. I don’t want to spend too much time proofreading this, so I’m stopping now. I want to finish proofreading this idea and I want to close this idea today so that I can finally begin explaining the 2 basic ideas that is designed to help you understand idea ‘Not work’. I plan to begin that tomorrow. See you then.

In case you want to know, and this does not involve giving advice, after I finish this list, I plan to see the Tivo? recorded new episodes of ‘Supernatural’, ‘The Orville’, and ‘Arrow’ that are scheduled to be recorded later today.

Violence and viewer discretion for animated mystery tv show ‘Gosick’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Geostorm’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who’. Some viewer discretion for movie ‘Some Kind of Wonderful’. Violence and viewer discretion for fantasy tv show ‘Once Upon A Time’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’. TV-14 viewer discretion for movie ‘Drew Peterson: Untouchable’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Violence and viewer discretion for animated ‘The Transformers: The Movie’. Violence and viewer discretion for animated show ‘The Simpsons’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Quincy M.E.’ Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Mistress America’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Elementary’. PG viewer discretion for tv show ‘Seinfeld’. Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘The Layover’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Language’, ‘Not move’, ‘Lack not move’, ‘Accumulate dire’, ‘Compound throbbing ache’, ‘Throbbing keep up’, ‘Carry dissuade’, ‘Carry mistake’, ‘Carry understand’, ‘Repel attention’, ‘Repress attention’, ‘Commit attention’, ‘Keep up attention’, and ‘Spend attention’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.