Monthly Archives: February 2018

Wishlist #1115

2/24/2018

I am Grey. I stand between the candle and the star. We are Grey. We stand between the darkness and the light.

(Grey Council greeting from sci-fi tv show ‘Babylon 5’ said as a greeting).

It is now 10:40 AM EST for me. I invented an idea 2/21/2018, just a few days ago. I think that many of you will use it. However, if you are experiencing consistent mild to moderate instigation, and you use the idea a lot, then I have to give you this idea first to help you with the possible feedback/recoil you may experience from the instigations you may be experiencing. The recoil from such instigations may cause you to lose some sleep, and this idea is designed to help you recover from such a recoil. But before I start explaining the idea, earlier today I was trying to decide what music video I was going to recommend to you that could help you with losing some sleep because of instigation. I have decided to recommend to you 2 music videos. Recently, I went over their lyrics and what www.wikipedia.gov said about them. So, the idea is that, if you are having trouble sleeping because of some mild to moderate instigation you recently experienced, then, along with using the advice in this list, you would choose which song to think about. Since I am offering you 2 to use, it may feel like the 2 songs are competing in your mind as to which song you should think about. I believe that is a good thing, because you want something to help you ‘snap out of it’, so that you can go back to sleep.

The 1st music video is from song ‘Let Me Go’ by American rock band ‘3 Doors Down’. The single was released in February 2005, and reached number 14 on the Billboard Hot 100 and Modern Rock Tracks  charts. It was originally intended for the film Spider-Man 2 but withheld. Here is a quote about www.wikipedia.org about the music video:

‘…but her secret night job as a stripper shows a different side. Her boyfriend, upon witnessing her secret life, acts coldly and eventually breaks up with her. The rest of the video shows them both showing remorse over this hasty decision.’

Keep in mind that I am recommending that you watch music video ‘Let Me Go’ to help you to not lose too much sleep because of an instigation. So, when you use it, including it’s song, the 2 actors that are portraying 2 teenagers that broke up from their relationship, Jodi Lyn O’Keefe(Nash Bridges) and Jesse Metcalfe, when you watch the music video, refurbished for advice of course, they’re acting like 2 people that are choosing to interact with too much excessive validations, when the validations are in regards as to how they interact with each other. To watch music video ‘Let Me Go’ for free, search for phrase ‘let me go 3 doors down’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered, the one with over 30 million views. Oh, I forgot to mention that, even though the music video is not explicit(described or shown in realistic detail), it still shows the teenage girl portrayed by Jodi Lyn O’Keefe dancing in a strip club. That is the reason why her ex-boyfriend chose to break up with her. Here’s what I think is the memorable quote from the song ‘Let Me Go’:

‘You love me but you don’t know who I am
I’m torn between this life I lead and where I stand
And you love me but you don’t know who I am
So let me go
Let me go’

I forgot to mention that I got the music video ‘Let Me Go’ from tv show ‘Total Request Playlist’ on 1/23/2018. The cable tv channel was called ‘MTV Classic’, and it was the 1st time I saw that music video.

The 2nd music video is from song ‘Big Girls Don’t Cry’ by American singer and rapper Fergie. I recorded the music video from tv show ‘Lunch Break’ from cable tv channel ‘MTV Classic’ on 2/21/2018, and it was also the 1st time that I can recall ever watching such a music video. After 12 weeks of fluctuating in the top five, the song reached the summit of the Hot 100 on the week of September 8, 2007. Here is what I think the memorable quote is from the song:

‘I hope you know, I hope you know
That this has nothing to do with you
It’s personal, myself and I
We’ve got some straightenin’ out to do’

Again, refurbished for advice, the music video and song is used to help you go back to sleep. So, when you would recall it, I recommend you listen to it as a woman who seems to be doing a lot of complaining, complaining in a context that is reasonably compatible to your difficulty to sleep situation. (What’s wrong with making the music video and song useful?) When Fergie sings the lyrics-

‘I hope you know, I hope you know
That this has nothing to do with you
It’s personal, myself and I
We’ve got some straightenin’ out to do’

she seems to be very focused and catchy about it, focused and catchy in a context that may be useful to you.

So, to reiterate, when you choose to use those 2 songs and music videos, it may feel like they are competing to get your attention, to see which one you will choose to recall.

To watch the music video, if you have cable tv, you could try looking for it from channel ‘MTV Classic’. You can also search for phrase ‘big girls don’t cry fergie’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, the one with over 139 million views.

OK! Before I describe the meaning of this bookmark, I will 1st describe one of it’s elements, the ‘excessive validation’ part. I invented this idea from one of the music videos I was fast forwarding through that I copied from the cable tv service I am using. The music video is from the song ‘Be With You’ by Spanish singer Enrique Iglesias. I am not recommending that you watch music video ‘Be With You’. I didn’t watch the entire video. I did, however, look at the lyrics and it’s www.wikipedia.org article. I got the video from tv show ‘Lunch Break’ on 2/22/2018, and I fast forward through it I think yesterday on 2/23/2018. To use the music video as a reference, search for phrase ‘be with you enrique iglesias video’ on www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered, with over 2 million views.

Today, most of the ED sufferers prefer to buy kamagra rather levitra properien you can try these out than other sildenafil pill. One needs to be careful while ordering via buy tadalafil canada online drugstores. For best results, one should also follow a healthy lifestyle and should include vegetables and fruits with a wide http://robertrobb.com/2019/09/page/2/ cheap cialis variety of produce, as some may say. If we talk about alternative treatment for male erectile problems by naturally improving the penile capability by dilating the arteries, which amends erection quality and proper blood flow avoids heart problems. http://robertrobb.com/keep-the-justices-junk-the-retention-election-system/ viagra without prescription online The scene where I got the ‘excessive validation’ idea is when Enrique Iglesias is in the Nightclub, and according to the youtube selection, the scene starts 2 minutes and 20 seconds into the music video, when the song is using the lyrics repeatedly ‘I got to be with you somehow’, and he is reaching out to one of the women in the club. To build up for it, I think it’s when the music video starts repeatedly using the words ‘I got to be with you somehow’. I think that starts 2 minutes and 2 seconds into the music video. It was while I was looking at that scene when I thought of this idea: Without using too many obvious words(I did not use that many obvious words when I was contemplationally making the idea), I thought of certain instigations improperly imposing adverse, excessive validations in a context that would cause an innocent person to make validations to use, but in an excessive context, sort of like a teenager trying to ‘fit in’ with some sort of faster than he/she is used to pace of crowd. And that’s when I imagined a woman talking about Enrique Iglesias to another woman, as if Enrique Iglesias was either a man she was in a relationship with, or he was close friends with her. She was pointing out to the other woman that, even though Enrique was not able to keep up with certain faster paced interactions, for the more sedentary participations, like being in that music video, he does very well in such situations. And since the music video was illustrating Enrique Iglesias reaching out to that woman several times, while watching the video, I used that reach to demonstrate to myself that Enrique Iglesias was able to do very well with that specific validation, even though it is sedentary, and not excessively hasty.

So, if you extrapolate from that thought I had with the 2 women talking, you may be able to make a possible deduction, that such a thought can be used to help people realize that certain instigations may cause you to adversely pursue hasty, excessive validations, when in reality, you can create reasonable validations, even though such possibly sedentary validations do not meet the approval of the hasty, excessive validations that instigators may improperly impose upon you to commit to. I also just a few minutes ago thought of that ‘I got to be with you somehow’ to be a little like that scene near the end of sci-fi horror movie ‘Altered States(1980)’, when Dr. Edward Jessup(William Hurt) was fighting the transformation he was going through.

All right! Now, before I give you the actual name of the idea, I want to 1st describe to you the 3 illustrations associated with that idea. That way, the transition may still be a little rough, but I believe that it’s still an acceptable idea to be used in a standard demographic context. It’s just that I have never taught such an idea before. It’s particular newness may surprise you somewhat. And of course, as always, you don’t have to use the idea if you don’t want to. You are not obligated by me to use it. You decide whether or not to use such an idea. The 1st illustration is from episode 9.24 ‘Lost Our Lisa’ from animated tv show ‘The Simpsons(1998)’. The episode is available for purchase for about 2 dollars Standard Definition from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 12 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Lisa:-‘Oh. I didn’t know Springfield had a Russian district. (Lisa approaches a man playing chess.) Excuse me. Can you tell me how to get to the museum?’

Man playing chess:-(I’m assuming the man is seemingly talking back in another language, even though the question given to the man was in English) ‘My pleasure. It’s six blocks that way. (Lisa runs away.) Hey, she went the wrong way.’

Of course, one obvious interpretation of that illustration is that Lisa misunderstood what that man said, since the episode translates to us what the man actually said to Lisa. However, the translation, refurbished for advice of course, I am trying to offer you is what Lisa believed that man was doing. Lisa believed that she was being contemplationally attacked by that man, which is why she yelled and ran away from him.

The 2nd illustration is from the comedy movie ‘This is 40’ starring Leslie Mann as Debbie and Ryan Lee as Joseph. Before I continue, I want to say that you use this idea when you are having trouble sleeping because of mild to moderate instigation. That means that this 2nd illustration may easily be made fun of, but when you are in an actual situation that you are having trouble sleeping, then this illustration may come in handy. This 2nd illustration is also from a comedy movie, so you may have to refurbish it a bit in order to more seriously use it. The streaming Standard definition rental for movie ‘This is 40’ is about 3 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 1 hour, 8 minutes, and 40 seconds into the movie, and of course the illustration is refurbished with inapproprieities removed. Of course, you can use, refurbished, more of the illustration that is available in the movie. I just want to offer you a quote that may last a little longer when exposed to certain criticisms. In this illustration, Debbie is talking to 13 year old Joseph. Here is the quote:

Debbie:-‘I will come down here and I will hurt you.’

Joseph:-(Sobs) ‘Okay, I’m sorry.’

Debbie:-‘Wait a minute. Hey, hey, hey! Wait, You’re not…Are you crying?’

Joseph:-‘Just let me go.’

Debbie:-‘Oh, my…’

So, in this 2nd illustration, Debbie was contemplationally attacking Joseph, for example, when Debbie said to Joseph quote-‘I will come down here and I will hurt you’, causing Joseph to cry.

The 3rd illustration is also from the same movie ‘This is 40’. In the illustration, Debbie and her husband Pete(Paul Rudd) are responding to a grievance made by Catherine(Melissa McCarthy), who is Joseph’s mom. All 3 are talking to Vice Principal Laviati(Joanne Baron). You can use the entire scene. Just take out the bad language and refurbish it in relation to advice. I’m just going to quote one part of it. That illustration, refurbished, starts 1 hour, 32 minutes, and 58 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Catherine:-‘Maybe if I looked more like this fake couple. Looks like they’re in a bank commercial. That’s what you look like. Like you’re a bank commercial couple.’

Vice Principal Laviati:-‘None of this talk is productive.’

According to my understanding of the movie, even though Joseph did do something to Debbie’s daughter’s Facebook page, Debbie and Pete also clearly overreacted about it. They’re not going to admit to Vice Principal Laviati that they overreacted, because that would mean that some sort of penalty would occur. And so, what they chose to do instead was to completely lie about the inappropriate actions they imposed upon Joseph and Catherine. And when Catherine sensed that Joseph and Catherine were not admitting to their indiscretions, she felt like she was being contemplationally attacked, and had to defend herself. Unfortunately, Catherine was not prepared to defend herself in a context that would give her better results, and her efforts to defend herself caused her to lose the grievance against Debbie and Pete.

And now, I am going to combine the 3 illustrations with the ‘excessive validation’ idea created from that Enrique Iglesias music video ‘Be With You’ to offer you a new idea, and here is the new idea’s meaning: An instigator may improperly contemplationally attack you in a context that causes you to depend upon an excessively hasty sense of validation. Such an effect may cause you to have difficulty sleeping. I call this instigation ‘Attack too much validate’. There are other names you may try, like ‘Attack excessive validate’, ‘Fight too much validate’, or ‘Fight excessive validate’. For example, you may contemplationally use the phrase ‘Attack too much validate’ to help you identify the cause as to why you are having difficulty sleeping because of a particular instigation. Also, around the same time, and I am assuming you are on your bed as this is happening, you may also choose to recall the music ‘Let Me Go’ and ‘Big Girls Don’t Cry’.

Attack too much validate:

So, if you choose to think about the 3 illustrations mentioned, it is illustrated that 3 people were contemplationally attacked. One reason why I thought you may have a little difficulty using such an idea is because of the use of the word ‘attack’. It is possible that you may not have used such a word in this context before, since you are presumed to be the innocent person experiencing the instigation. And that is one reason why the instigation caused you to have difficulty sleeping: Since the instigator suspects? that you believe that you are innocent, how you evaluate your innocence may cause you to be vulnerable to a contemplation induced attack, and you may have difficulty identifying such an attack because of how you evaluate your innocence. Well anyway, I hope this idea helps. Oh, and in regards as to using the word ‘fight’, have you ever heard of the phrase ‘Don’t fight me on this one.’ ?  The word ‘fight’ in this list is used the same as the word ‘attack’: either it may be said that the instigator is ‘attacking’ you, or it may be said that the instigator is ‘fighting’ you. I thought the variety may help you invent your own extrapolated meaning.

[After I proofread and finish this idea, I’m going to take a break. I’m going to start the next part of this idea next week, maybe this coming Friday, but more likely next Saturday. So, if you are there, then I’ll see you then.

Rated R violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Altered States’. Sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Babylon 5’. Some viewer discretion for music video ‘Let Me Go’. TV-14 viewer discretion for animated tv series ‘The Simpsons’. Rated R crude humor mature themes viewer discretion for movie ‘This is 40’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Attack too much validate’, ‘Attack excessive validate’, ‘Attack exceed validate’, ‘Fight too much validate’, ‘Fight excessive validate’, and ‘Fight exceed validate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

Wishlist #1114

Quote

2/17/2018

Lara Croft!

(Used as a greeting. Action movie ‘Tomb Raider’ starring Alicia Vikander as Lara Croft, according to www.imdb.com, is in theaters March 16.)

The previous idea that I typed in last week that explained idea ‘Question’ I plan to delete. Before, I imagined how certain kids would react using such an idea, and I didn’t see a problem with what I imagined. However, I did not project how kids in the future would process such an idea. For example, right now, the latest Star Wars movie, ‘Star Wars: The Last Jedi’, was just released 12/15/2017, and the Blu-ray release should come out a few months from now.[2/19/2018: I’m not sure the ‘Star Wars’ Blu-ray will come out in a few months. That’s just something I read from a search engine. Popular movies, I believe, are trending to come out on Blu-ray and DVD early.] The kids that have chosen to use the ‘Question’ idea probably watched that movie in theaters. My point is that there will be a lot of moments in the future when a new ‘Star Wars’ movie will not be out in theaters, and that means those kids in the future who would have read such an idea in my opinion will have more of a difficult time learning the ‘Question’ idea that I explained. So, as a courtesy, for those of you who used last week’s Wishlist #1114 idea, I plan to delete that Wishlist next Saturday, giving you a week to prepare. I will probably explain again the ‘Question’ idea soon. It just won’t have that ‘Star Wars’ illustration in it, and it will be a different explanation.

Because of the nature of the idea I will type in this list, I think some people would take it the wrong way if I introduce a music video. However, that is how I present these ideas. The music videos, especially it’s music, may help you learn these ideas. So, I’ll try to offer you a music video that you may still choose to use with the idea in this list.

I found this music video from a music video tv show called ‘Total Request Playlist’ that I copied from the cable tv service on 2/15/2018, just a few days ago. I don’t believe I’ve seen this music video in it’s entirety before, or heard it’s song before. The tv show came from channel ‘MTV Classic’. If you choose to watch this music video on your tv, you may be able to find it from channel ‘MTV Classic’, if you have that channel available to you. Anyway, the song is called ‘Standing Still’ by female American artist Jewel. According to www.wikipedia.org, recorded in 2001, the single charted best in New Zealand, where it reached number seven. It also charted in the United States at number 25. I chose music video ‘Standing Still’ because, according to www.wikipedia.org, Jewel was one of the roasters in the tv show ‘Comedy Central Roasts’, the one that broadcasted 9/5/2016, the one where Rob Lowe was the roastee. Since Jewel was a roaster, it’s my opinion that she would be more allowable for certain expectations to allow her music videos to have certain contradictory interpretations. Of course, choosing to use Jewel’s music video in such a manner is still up to you.

Have to go:

So, here is the idea. I started talking about this idea in Wishlist #1045 on 5/18/2016. Of course, I’ve upgraded the idea since then. You can also call this a new, separate idea, if you want to. The premise of this idea is that an instigator may improperly impose upon you a sense of composure and contemplation based accumulation for you to dismiss as not from you. This is the 1st illustration I have for this idea. The illustration is in episode 3.17 ‘Debasement Tapes’ from mystery tv show ‘Veronica Mars(2007)’. Logan Echolls(Jason Dohring) is giving a class presentation, and the teacher for that class is Professor Corrigan(Norman Large). The episode is available from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 39 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode, when the students start laughing at the presentation. The highlight of the illustration is the reaction from Professor Corrigan. I think it’s kind of obvious from the illustration, but just in case, the illustration is refurbished for this advice. I believe that Logan wants to cause Professor Corrigan to experience a sense of composure and contemplation accumulation that Professor Corrigan would try to dismiss from his mind. When the students started laughing, notice how Professor Corrigan is reacting to their laughter. At 39 minutes and 44 seconds into the episode, Professor Corrigan finally stops the presentation from occurring. Here is a quote:

Professor Corrigan:-‘All right, Mr. Echolls. Thank you. We’ve seen quite enough.’

Logan:-‘No, I’m not screwing around, sir. It has income streams…’

Professor Corrigan:-‘That’ll do. You can sit down now.’

Of course, to see that Logan is causing Professor Corrigan to experience a sense of accumulation, I highly recommend that you watch that ‘Veronica Mars’ illustration.

I have other examples in my mind, but I believe this next illustration is the best example I can think of as of now. To officially declare the name of this idea, I call it ‘Have to go’. It is my belief that there are probably tv shows available that specialize in causing people to experience a sense of accumulation. I speculate that the game show ‘Fear Factor’ is one of them. Wikipedia talks about the show. I haven’t actually seen such shows. I did, however, DVD mail order rent a drama movie called ‘Sweet Bean’ starring Masatoshi Nagase as Sentaro, and Kyara Uchida as Wakana. It’s not as convenient as horror movies or tv shows like ‘Fear Factor’, but I believe the illustration in that movie is more believable, and you may be able to relate to it more. It’s a short illustration. I originally watched the movie from the DVD/Blu-ray mail rental service I am using. According to that service, I returned that movie on 2/2/2017. You can see that movie streaming from Amazon.com. You can rent it for about 4 dollars Standard Definition, or buy the movie for about 9 dollars Standard Definition. I recently purchased the movie streaming in Standard Definition format for about 9 dollars. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 15 minutes and 54 seconds into the movie. This interpretation of the movie is based on my interpretation of what happened. I could have interpreted it wrong from it’s original content, but this is how I am presenting it to you. The way I see it, Wakana is entering a restaurant she normally goes to. As she looks into the restaurant, Sentaro surprises her from behind as he, too, is about to enter that restaurant. Wakana did not expect Sentaro to be in that restaurant the same time that she chose to be there. I highly recommend that you see that illustration, to see how Wakana reacted to Sentaro’s presence. Here is a quote:

Sentaro:-‘Excuse me.’ (Wakana is obviously surprised that Sentaro was behind her).

Sentaro:-‘Are you coming in?’ (Since Sentaro is obviously aware that he surprised her, while she is still taken aback from the experience, Sentaro asked Wakana if she was coming into the restaurant).

Now, in this 3rd illustration, this illustrates my belief that there are a lot of people out there that don’t have an obviously self developed technique to react to instigation. Even though I think this illustration is also very funny, it can also be useful to you. It gives you illustrations of 3 people that conveniently show you how such an accumulating instigation affects 3 people simultaneously. The illustration is in episode 1.5 ’12 Hours’ from action tv show ‘Transporter: The Series(2012)’. The episode is available from Amazon.com. Here are the 3 people involved in the illustration: Giles(Josh Blacker) is the man imposing the accumulating sense of instigation. Dieter(Charly Hubner) is the man who does not have an obvious technique to experience instigation. I guess you can call Dieter the roastee. The 3rd man in the illustration is Frank Martin(Chris Vance), the general hero of the show. You may find it useful to interpret how all 3 people interact with such an inducing of accumulation. There are a few inappropriate words in the illustration. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 45 minutes and 13 seconds into the episode. Giles enters the garage soon and asks where Dieter is. You can tell that, during the conversation that Giles is having with Dieter, even though Dieter is telling Giles that quote-‘Dieter is not here’, Giles does not believe Dieter, and instead imposes a sense of contemplation and composure accumulation upon Dieter that Dieter does not want to experience. I highly recommend that you watch the illustration in order to evaluate how all 3 men react to Giles’ instigation upon Dieter. Here is a quote:

Giles:-‘You Dieter?’

Dieter:-‘Uh, Dieter is not here.’

Giles:-‘Is he coming back? Or did he go to his Ayrton Senna fan club meeting?’ Dieter’s got good taste. (Giles is touching one of the car’s in Dieter’s garage.) Can’t wait to talk to him. So…you a Senna fan as well as your boss? (Inappropriate language removed) You hear me, Dieter?’

Dieter:-‘Dieter? Uh, Dieter is not here.’

Frank:-‘You gonna introduce me?’

Giles:-‘Who the heck(inappropriate language removed) are you?’

Frank:-‘Dieter. Dieter Haussman.’

Giles:-‘What?’

Frank:-‘I apologize for what I said on the radio.’

Well anyway, I recommend you see that entire illustration, with the inappropriate language removed, of course.(Just don’t use it.) The illustration starts 45 minutes and 13 seconds into the episode, and ends 47 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode.

OK, so this is what I think is happening with this ‘Have to go’ instigation. According to my imagined discovery, the instigator is improperly imposing an adverse sense of contemplation and composure based accumulation in order to use such a sense of accumulation as bait in order to cause an innocent person to evaluate the notion associated with that imposed accumulation.

So, this is where idea ‘Have to go’ comes in: For example, if you are an adult, you already have years of experience with a contemplation and composure based sense of accumulation. That experience is when you sense that you have to go to the bathroom. For example, for the adults, when you attended grammar school and high school, while attending class, either you would sometimes personally made a request to your teacher that you had to go to the bathroom, and/or you know of other students who made requests to their teachers that they had to go to the bathroom. That is one of the reasons why this idea is called ‘Have to go’. It refers to your contemplation and composure experience to ‘have to go’ to the bathroom, NOT when you are actually using the bathroom. Another reason why I call the idea ‘Have to go’ is because I tried other phrases, and based on my word knowhow, ‘Have to go’ seems like an effective phrase to use. I tested words like ‘Accumulate’, ‘Compile’, and ‘Pile up’. Of course, you can make your own phrase. To me, the phrase ‘Have to go’ seems to be the best way to teach you this idea.

Based on this imagined idea, if you are an adult, of course the instigator knows that you have years of experience with ‘having to go’ to the bathroom. Therefore, what the instigator may do to cause you to not use that experience to help you more tenably experience such a ‘have to go’ instigation is to cause you to believe that the adversely imposed sense of accumulation is not from you, and that you would use your sense of justification to dismiss such a sense of adverse accumulation. And to make that stick, as one possible example, the instigator may impose an obvious identity of the instigation, whether it’s something from their obvious appearance, or something that they cause you to experience, that would have such an obvious self blame from the instigator’s identity, that you may believe that all of that adverse sense of accumulation is coming completely from that adverse blame of identity. For example, has an instigator ever caught you by surprise? Let’s say, for example, for the adults, while you are at work washing your hands in the bathroom, another employee actually surprises you with the excuse that the employee is making a request to you, that such an employee is waiting to wash his/her hands.(Let’s say that, normally, it would only take you 5 seconds to wash your hands. Why couldn’t the instigator wait a few seconds?) You see, such an experience may cause you to put all of that accumulation blame on that employee, since he/she is the one that caused you to be surprised just to wash his/her hands. [2/19/2018: You can use idea ‘Reply casual’ to not use such a reply.] The experience is like that illustration from the movie ‘Sweet Bean’, except you’re just washing your hands. Here is a quote:

Sentaro:-‘Excuse me.’ (Wakana is obviously surprised that Sentaro was behind her).

Sentaro:-‘Are you coming in?’ (Since Sentaro is obviously aware that he surprised her, while she is still taken aback from the experience, Sentaro asked Wakana if she was coming into the restaurant).

Based on the idea, I think that an adverse accumulation used as bait to associate with other notions is a very popular instigation in America. It’s popular because, once the instigation is established in the mind of the innocent person, all an instigator has to do, so to speak, is impose again an obvious adverse sense of accumulation, and in their identity of instigation, make an association to that adverse sense of accumulation to a notion that instigator chooses.

The solution I recommend is to more objectively identify such an adverse sense of accumulation by using your years of experience ‘having to go’ to the bathroom, not actually going to the bathroom, and to separate the association the instigator is trying to make with that adverse sense of accumulation to that instigator’s yet again adverse sense of notion. Let’s start with a variation of idea ‘Have to go’ that I call ‘From have to go’.

From have to go:

Idea ‘From have to go’ is just one variation from several variations I am going to type in. So, after you read all of them, you can then ‘shuffle’ them to decide which ones you want to use. Of course, as you are using these ideas, if you are using them in the context that I am presenting to you, I am assuming that you will upgrade these ideas as you are using them. Idea ‘From have to go’ is when you allow that sense of adverse accumulation to be contemplationally identified as coming from your sense of accumulation. That sense of ‘from’ is reinterpreted by you as not coming from you, but within reason, with the mild adverse identity of it’s contemplation and composure. It is my belief that, sometimes, not all of the time, that is something that the instigator does not want you to do. The instigator instead wants you to try to dismiss that adverse sense of accumulation as not coming from you at all, and it is within that attempt of dismissing that, based on the notion imposed with the accumulation, that a certain specific sense of dismissing will be used against you. To avoid that trap, you just have to be able within reason to objectively identify the adverse accumulation with your ‘have to go’ experience, but even though it’s identified with it’s false accusation, you interpret that sense as ‘not from you’. In other words, you allow yourself to feel it’s false accusation of accumulation, but you interpret that as a feeling that is ‘not from you’, that you are not using such a feeling of accumulation in it’s false impression of identity. One example is like feeling a minor emotion, but not becoming that emotion.

Give have to go:

Way back in the Amazon.com lists, I typed an idea that was created, refurbished for advice, using how the Hare Krishnas, based on my awareness of their reputation, would offer to give away things at airports. If memory serves, I made an idea that says ‘If no one introduces trust, then how will trust be established?’ I would imagine holding a white flower, and then I would imagine either having a teleported hand and arm, or just have an arm that could stretch to other people, and then I would offer that white flower to that person, and then say the phrase ‘If no one introduces trust, then how will trust be established?’ If you want to know more about the Hare Krishnas, www.wikipedia.org has an article about them, read the article refurbished for advice, of course.

However, they need cautious ordine cialis on line http://djpaulkom.tv/crakd-see-what-was-found-in-this-old-vegas-mob-house/ amount improvements by an professional physician. What viagra buying online do Snoop Dogg and Sylvester Stallone have in common? Unfortunately it’s not a hot new musical collaboration. The potential causes leading to erectile dysfunction are many and varied, ranging from stress, depression and relationship concerns to physical health conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular sildenafil in canada disease and blood pressure problems. Natural treatment of varicose veins Vein Protex from Calivita, a natural food viagra online no prescriptions supplement with hesperidine, is a very effective natural treatment of varicose veins, swollen or heavy legs. Now, using that ‘Hare Krishna’ idea, I made a new idea called ‘Give’. Here is a story I invented to explain idea ‘Give’. The main character of the story is Dr. Daniel Jackson portrayed by actor Michael Shanks. In the story, Daniel Jackson is working for a job service that gives work opportunity to people with no work experience required. Now, based on his experience, many people would go to him and request such work, and he would do his job and accomodate their entry level job participations. However, most of them would quit soon after starting the job. So, even though most of those participants would quit early, he still maintains his effort to allow them to participate in the program.

The story’s purpose is meant to give you a sense of school and job related giving. Whether you are at school or at work, you should have the ability to interact with others, in a reasonable capacity, of course, and/or you should have some sort of school/job related sense of giving. So, when you combine idea ‘Give’ with idea ‘Have to go’, you get idea ‘Give have to go’, which identifies ‘Have to go’ instigations that discourage your sense of school/job related sense of giving. For example, if you experienced a mild to moderate sense of instigation that uses a contemplation and composure related sense of accumulation that also encourages you to stop giving, you can use this idea to allow yourself to replenish your sense of giving, during a real time and soon after experience of instigation. Of course, just because you are able to maintain a sense of giving, doesn’t mean you have to use it in an obvious context. The point is that, if an instigator disparages a sense of giving that is relevant to have for your school or job use, then that disparagement may adversely affect your school or job performance.

[I don’t foresee any problems with this idea, so what I’ll do is stop now and continue Monday, February 19, since I chose to take a day off during that day, which is President’s Day. I’ll use the day off from work to finish this idea, and to continue with the next idea. So, if you are reading this blog during President’s Day, then I’ll see you then, so to speak.

2/19/2018

Lara Croft! (said as a greeting) It is now 10:39 AM EST for me. I know I’m still talking about ‘Have to go’, but I believe the next music video I recommend to you shouldn’t matter, in the context of how you are using it. If you want to think of a music video that helps you get into the mindset to learn these ideas, then your intent of use should allow you to use the music video, even though the music video is using an idea about having to go to the bathroom. So, if that is how you intend to use it, then it doesn’t have to be an issue. Of course, I learned this after using the music video ‘Standing Still’ by Jewel. The music video I am recommending now is for the song ‘Capital Letters’ by American singer Hailee Steinfeld. What you might find interesting about the music video is that, even though it is very romantic and lively, the song is being used for the movie ‘Fifty Shades Freed(2018)’, a rated R adult movie. Of course, I am only recommending the music video, not the movie. You can watch the music video for free from www.youtube.com. To watch it, search for phrase ‘capital letters’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 2nd selection offered, with over 10.6 million views. According to youtube, the music video was published 1/31/2018, just about 2 weeks ago.

Casual:

According to www.dictionary.com, casual means-‘without definite or serious intention’. I discovered this idea yesterday while I was at work. It was while I was thinking of a scene in the movie ‘A Bad Moms Christmas(2017)’ starring Kristen Bell as Kiki and Cheryl Hines as Sandy, Kiki’s mom. I got the Blu-ray from the Blu-ray mail rental service I use, and I fast forward and watched the movie for the 1st time on Saturday, 2/17/2018, and I placed it in the mailbox yesterday. So, while I was at work yesterday, I thought of that scene in the movie where Sandy is showing her daughter Kiki her pajamas that has images of Kiki all over it. If you want to see that scene, it’s available from Amazon.com as a streaming rental. So, according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 28 minutes, and 9 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:

Sandy:-‘Merry Christmas, Kiki.’

Kiki:-‘Merry Christmas, mom.’

Sandy:-‘Do you like my Kiki-head pajamas?’

Kiki:-‘Sort of.’

Sandy:-‘Thank you.’

When I thought of that scene in the movie yesterday, I quickly wanted to imagine what it would be like if I was in a relationship situation with Sandy that eventually allowed Sandy to introduce to me something to wear that had images of Kiki on it. That was easy for me to imagine, since I am single. I didn’t put any of the other details involving relationships in the imagined scenario. I just wanted to imagine me being introduced to wear clothing that had images of Kiki on it. And so, to be clear, in this imagined situation, me and Sandy are in a relationship, and this is the 1st time that Sandy introduces me to wear something that has images of Kiki on it. Now, since I was just imagining it for myself to think about, it was pretty much the same pajamas that Sandy wore to show Kiki. If the situation was more plausible, I’m assuming the clothing would be more compatible, more appropriate for me to wear. Anyway, I thought about making some sort of fuss about it to Sandy, to make the situation more appropriate for me to wear the clothing, but when I thought about what Sandy was thinking about, all she wanted me to do was to casually put the pajamas on. And then I thought to myself ‘I can do that.’, just put the pajamas on without making any fuss about it. And it was around that moment that I thought of a new idea about instigation.

When I imagined Sandy from the movie ‘A Bad Moms Christmas’ wanting me to casually put the pajamas on, soon after I made the logical conclusion that certain instigations may intentionally discourage you from having, using, and sensing casual contemplations and casual interactions with other people. For example, when you sometimes experience a minor instigation, and I’m speculating of course, that may cause you to contemplationally comment on it, maybe privately complain about it, maybe even make some joke about it. All these responses may be interpreted by an instigator as responses that ‘wind you up’, responses that can be used by them to discourage you from having, using, and sensing casual contemplations and casual interactions with yourself, such as reading a newspaper in your job break area, and with other people.

And so, I invented the idea ‘Casual’ to help people maintain a sense of casual contemplation and interaction. Here are 3 variations of idea ‘Casual’ that may help you retain a sense of casual contemplation and interaction: 1)’Extract casual’, 2)’Reply casual’, and 3)’Use casual’. Before I begin explaining those variations, I recommend that you watch an illustration of a man who in my opinion uses casual contemplations and casual interactions as part of his very demeanor(conduct; behavior; deportment). The reason it shows so much on this man is because he’s portrayed in the movie as a government agent trying to create controversy. The illustration is from movie ‘Salting the Battlefield(2014)’, and the actor who is portraying that man is Bill Nighy as Johnny Worricker, and in that illustration, he is having a conversation with a reporter portrayed by Olivia Williams as Belinda Kay. What makes this conversation even more interesting is that he is using that casual demeanor of his without telling Belinda Kay his name. If you have Amazon Prime, the movie is included with your Amazon Prime membership without need for additional payment. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 40 minutes into the movie. Watching the illustration is highly recommended. That way, you can see Johnny Worricker’s use of casual demeanor. The illustration ends 50 minutes and 25 seconds into the movie. I suspect that if an instigator or instigators were trying to deprive you from having a sense of casual demeanor, than watching this illustration may be refreshing and rejuvenating for you to experience. After you watch that scene, several times if you want to, you can read the 3 variations of ‘Casual’ I am offering you. Just use the scenes where Johnny Worricker is talking to Belinda Kay. There are a few other scenes during that time frame that address another part of that movie that you can take out. To get you started, here is a beginning quote from that scene:

Worricker:-‘Ah, you must be Belinda Kay.’

Belinda:-‘Yes, I am.’

Worricker:-‘How kind of you to see me. How are you?’

Belinda:-‘And who are you?’

Worricker:-‘I’m the man who telephoned.’

Belinda:-‘Yes, of course you are.’

Worricker:-(Carrying 2 cases of wine) ’24 bottles of wine.’

Belinda:-‘Thank you. How thoughtful. Because I’m a journalist I must be alcoholic? You’ve come from abroad?’

Worricker:-‘Um, I hope you like Bourgeuil.’

Belinda:-‘Well, aren’t you the welcome guest? (Worricker smiles as he carries the 2 cases of wine and follows Belinda to her house).’

Extract casual:

Idea ‘Extract casual’ is when an instigation tries to contemplationally ‘extract’ the sense of casual contemplation and casual interaction that you may be trying to maintain in your mind. Refurbished for advice, of course, ‘extract’ uses the example of a dentist extracting a tooth from a person’s mouth. I believe that a lot of people in America have experience getting a few teeth extracted from their mouths, making the use of ‘extract’ something that people can relate to when their sense of casual demeanor is being extracted from them by mild to moderate instigation. Just contemplationally use phrase ‘Extract casual’ or ‘Casual extract’ when you think such an instigation is occurring to you, so that you can maintain your chosen sense of casual contemplation and interaction.

Reply casual:

Based on the idea ‘Not work’ explained on Wishlist #1108, I said that you should not let the instigation work in your mind. And so, idea ‘Reply casual’ is one of those ideas that helps you not allow certain instigations to work in your mind, or at least it may help mitigate some of it’s adverse effects. Idea ‘Reply casual’ helps you manage reply identities improperly imposed upon you to experience from instigators, to help you identify replies that you did not commit to, that you did not agree to interact with, even though such replies may give you the impression that you are obligated to them. You can get such replies in many places, whether you are at school or at work, even when using public transportation, or at public restaurants. When contemplationally using ‘Reply casual’, you may be using it to identify an instigation and/or inadvertency that is trying to adversely dictate how your casual contemplations and casual interactions are to be used, manipulated by misleading impressions of replies that you did not commit to, that you did not even agree to address or think about.

The only illustration I can think of right now, and it’s not an exact match, is in episode 3.7 ‘Executive Order 13224’ from tv show ‘The Good Wife(2011)’. In the illustration, Alicia Florrick(Julianna Margulies) is having a conversation with Gordon Higgs(Bob Balaban). If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available from Amazon.com without additional payment. The illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 22 minutes and 26 seconds into the episode. If you want to, in relation to advice, you can watch more of the episode. I’m just typing the gist of it. Here is a quote:

Alicia:-‘Is it my right to consult a lawyer?’

Higgs:-‘It is always your right. But I wouldn’t advise it.’

Alicia:-‘I want to consult with a lawyer.’

The illustration is useful because it shows the possible use of self affirmation a person may have, even when talking to someone that may be somewhat intimidating.

Use casual:

This is something I learned while I was in a public bus yesterday. When people in a public situation are consistently talking in a context that you believe is inappropriate and you still want to maintain a sense of casual demeanor, what I recommend is that you maintain a sense of casual contemplation using contemplation phrase ‘Use casual’, meaning that you are not using the inappropriate discussions in your chosen casual context. You are maintaining a sense of casual contemplation and clarifying that such a maintaining of sense is not associated with the inappropriate discussions that is unavoidably noticed by you.

Rated TV-14 viewer discretion for tv show ‘Veronica Mars’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for action tv show ‘Transporter: The Series’. Rated R language and viewer discretion for comedy movie ‘A Bad Moms Christmas’. Rated PG violence? and viewer discretion for movie ‘Salting the Battlefield’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Good Wife’. Use refurbished for advice references only. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Have to go’, ‘From have to go’, ‘Give have to go’, ‘Casual’, ‘Extract casual’, ‘Reply casual’, and ‘Use casual’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

Wishlist #1113

2/2/2018

Hi! It is now 5:52 PM EST for me. Before you continue reading further, this is not the usual advice giving list. This is about the Neutrogena T/Sal scalp build-up control I recommended severaI times earlier. If you are using the shampoo because of my recommendation, then it’s urgent for your health that you should continue reading. If you have not used the T/Sal, but have either taken the ‘triple point injection’ for your lower back, or you may choose to use it in the future, then I also recommend that you continue to read this.

Over a week ago, I experienced a short yet sharp pain in my right foot, around the area where my small toe is. The short, sharp pain only happened several times in one day, but it’s not something I would want to experience again. So, once I noticed that it happened, I stopped taking the Neutrogena T/Sal and the Lotrimin foot spray I would normally routinely use. Soon after I stopped using those 2 things, the short, sharp pain reduced considerably. Yesterday, I saw a podiatrist(a person qualified to diagnose and treat foot disorders) about it, and now, the discomfort I would feel, if any, is no longer like the original short, sharp pain I experienced that 1st day, the area it would occur is significantly reduced, and it still only occurs a few times in one day, and it’s still a short experience.

So, because of that experience, since I want to continue recommending the use of the ‘triple point injection’ for your lower back, I am no longer recommending the use of the Neutrogena T/Sal scalp build-up control shampoo. Even though I am not a doctor, it is my personal belief, and no doctor has told me this, that once you start using the ‘triple point injection’ for your lower back, and I highly recommend that you consider using such an option administered by a doctor, of course, if you have lower back problems, your routine use of the T/Sal shampoo and Lotrimin foot spray may have to be reduced. According to the Lotrimin foot spray I was using, I was supposed to change my shoes at least once a day, and I wasn’t doing that. So, here’s a question for you: When you use foot spray, do you change your shoes once a day?

So, based on my experience with the short, sharp pains on my right foot, if you have taken the ‘triple point injection’ and are using foot spray and/or the T/Sal shampoo, I recommend that you stop using the T/Sal shampoo and foot spray for 1 month. Even though you have experienced no adverse symptoms, the idea is to reasonably avoid experiencing adverse symptoms. After 1 month, ask yourself ‘Do I need to continue using the T/Sal shampoo and foot spray?’ I think I may have been using too much foot spray simply because I would just spray a little of it on after I would take a shower, even though I don’t believe I have any obvious ‘foot spray’ problems. I thought it was something I could do routinely. And as for the T/Sal shampoo, I also used it on a daily basis. So, when you stop using both the T/Sal shampoo and the foot spray you are using for a month, what I recommend that would do for you is help you re-evaluate how much T/Sal shampoo and foot spray you really need to use in a given month. I recommend that, for the teenage boys and men who are about to get the triple point injection and have gotten the triple point injection for their lower backs, even though you have not experienced any adverse symptoms, I recommend that you only use the product once a week for your groin area, if you choose to, and your scalp. Just apply it and let it stay there for let’s say 3 minutes before rinsing it off. Before, I recommended 15 minutes, but since I’m now talking about the triple point injection, only 3 minutes. And, of course, if you don’t have ‘foot spray’ problems, then don’t use the foot spray in a routine context. Only use the foot spray if you need to, and like the foot spray words said, change your shoes at least once a day when you use the foot spray. It is my opinion that many people who use foot spray don’t change the shoes that they use. For example, you still use the same pairs of shoes to go to work. You don’t have 7 pairs of shoes a week, and I am assuming you would have to clean those shoes before you use them again. Who does that, just to use foot spray? According to the foot spray words, you need to keep your feet well ventilated when using foot spray, and that was something I wasn’t doing.

I am going to make a note on previous lists urgently advising to stop using Neutrogena T/Sal shampoo and foot spray for 1 month, and after that, significantly reduce the use of both, if one is going to get or already has received the triple point injection. If, in the future, you start experiencing adverse symptoms to your feet, and I am assuming you only use foot spray when you need to, not every day, then stop using the T/Sal shampoo completely and consult a podiatrist.

I forgot to mention that, when I stopped using the T/Sal shampoo and foot spray, I also stopped using the usual shoes and used a new pair of shoes that I had on standby. I believe that using a new pair of shoes also helped considerably to reduce the discomfort. I recommend that, if you can, either buy new pairs of shoes to wear, or clean the shoes that you already have, so that your feet can have a fresh, new start. I don’t know how you would go about cleaning the shoes that you already have. I don’t think you can just wash them all in the laundromat. I recommend that you go to a nearby alterations store and ask them how to go about cleaning shoes, or search for it in a search engine, such as www.google.com.

Well, while I’m here, there are 2 things that I want to mention now that I did not mention before because those 2 things were extremely embarrassing for me to mention before. The 1st thing is related to the use of the T/Sal shampoo. If you don’t want to read about it, then you can stop now. This is not something that is urgent, so to speak, to read about. However, for those who will continue using the T/Sal shampoo, even in a reduced capacity, then you may find this useful. Let me start with an illustration. The illustration is in movie ‘Spy(2015)’ starring Melissa McCarthy as Susan Cooper. You can use the streaming version of movie ‘Spy’ from Amazon.com, the standard definition version, for about 3 dollars. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 55 minutes and 59 seconds into the movie, when Susan Cooper is about to enter the Italian casino. Here is a quote:

Susan:-‘Well, buongiorno, boys! If I’m not out in 10 minutes, it’s because I won the place.’

Susan:-(She looks at a man with a shaved head.) ‘Let me just rub that for luck. Oh, that’s an oily scalp.’ (As she says that, she rubs her fingers together to feel the oil that is on her fingers, the oil that came from that man’s scalp.)

That illustration was to show you that people can have oily scalps. So, here is the embarrassing part: Based on my experience using the T/Sal shampoo, after you use it, whether it’s used on your scalp or, for men, your groin area, even after you shower/rinse it off, there is still a build up there. You will probably try to use your regular shampoo and soap to remove some of that build up. People make due with what is available. However, if you looked at the illustration, Susan rubbed a man’s head that had an obvious, oily scalp. Let’s just say as a consideration, since the illustration is from a movie, that the man did use shampoo on his scalp, and still his scalp was oily. Like I said, people make due with what is available. The only thing I know of and use myself to remove that oily build up, and I am not a hair stylist or have more of a reasonable knowhow to treat such a problem, is a diluted with water use of Dawn Ultra Dishwashing Liquid Dish Soap Original Scent(the blue color). You just get one of those Dawn containers you already used for washing dishes, you get another Dawn container that has Dawn dishwashing liquid already in it, and you only put let’s say 1/4 dishwashing liquid into the empty one. You then add 1/4 sink water to the 1/4 dishwashing liquid. For every part of dishwashing liquid you use, you dilute it with one part of water. And if you have an oily residue issue for your scalp and/or groin area, you use the diluted with water dishwashing liquid to shower/rinse it off, if you choose to.

I recommend that, for the teenage boys and men, if you are still using the T/Sal shampoo for your scalp and groin area, and you believe that you have a problem with oily build up, even after using soap and shampoo, that you consider using a diluted Dawn dishwashing liquid on your scalp and/or groin area once a week, for example, while you are taking a shower. I recommend that you use the Dawn dish foam dispenser. When you use the diluted Dawn dishwashing liquid with that dispenser, it turns the dishwashing liquid into a foam. You pump the foam out a few times while taking a shower, for example, and then you apply that to your hair and/or groin area, then rinse it out. You just do that once a week, and in my opinion, it will remove all noticeable traces of your oily build up, or at least it will be an obvious improvement. Of course, use less of it if you feel that it’s removing too much, and discontinue it’s use if you believe your scalp and/or groin area is too dry after using it. I am only recommending that you use it if you believe you have an oily build up problem, and the shampoos and soaps that you are using only help a little. And for the record, I have never asked a dermatologist about what to buy to remove excessive oily build up for the scalp. If you choose to, you can do that.

[I am going to finish this list tomorrow, and start a new list tomorrow. If you are there, I’ll see you then.

2/3/2018

Salutations! It is now 10:29 AM EST for me. Before I give more advice, I feel like I can now offer you a music video for this list. The reason I didn’t offer you one in the beginning is because I didn’t think it would be appropriate, since it was and still is serious advice involving your health. And for those looking at the time I offered this advice to you, I saw a podiatrist this past Thursday, Feb. 1, and then I started typing in the advice the very next day after getting examined by the podiatrist. Yes, the episode occurred I think about a week ago, less than 2 weeks ago to be  more certain, and yes, I encourage kids to be skeptical. I just want you to make a more informed decision. I know that I am encouraging you to be skeptical.

Well, anyway, the music video is from the song ‘Karma’ by American singer and songwriter Alicia Keys. Here’s a quote about the song from www.wikipedia.org:

As the disorder is increasing day by day even viagra cheap prices the medication is been made and so the pills are also available at internet pharmacies, making them greatly accessible. Smoking and consumption of alcohol appalachianmagazine.com online levitra are other lifestyle hazards that cause great harm to the female reproductive system. Communicate More Not everything click this link order viagra online has to take place in the bedroom. This is only the cialis for cheap beginning and many people now complimenting this process by meditating and getting to know thyself. ‘…the track takes influence from hip hop and classical music, and was released as the album’s fourth and final single in November 2004, peaking at number twenty on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100 and number seventeen on the U.S.Billboard Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart…’

The reason I am recommending that you watch music video ‘Karma’ is not for it’s lyrics. I looked at the lyrics, and I don’t see anything obviously inappropriate. However, don’t use the lyrics literally for this advice. I’m recommending that you watch the music video for it’s presented sense of defiance, which is entertainingly escalated by the stunt performance of the 2 men wearing red jump suits. For the purposes of this advice, just focus on the performance of the people in the music video, including the stunt performance of the 2 men, while they are in the New York subways. Even at the end of the video, when the music video is over, they’re walking while they are in a New York subway, still presenting a sense of defiance. A few months ago, I was in New York using their New York subways, and even though there are other subway cars, several people still manage to do some sort of subway performance in the subway car that I was in. According to the tivo? player, I recorded a show called ‘House of Pop’ from channel ‘MTV Classic’ on 1/30, a few days ago. I just saw the music video for the 1st time recently that I can recall, even though the music video was released in 2004. After I watched that music video, the stunt performance of the 2 men wearing red jump suits gave me a comparison to interpret performers in New York subways. In other words, the music video ‘Karma’ gave the subway performers a ‘run for their money’, so to speak. In my opinion, the comparison allowed the New York subway performers to be more tolerable as they do their performance in the subway car you are in.

To watch music video ‘Karma’ for free, search for phrase ‘alicia keys karma’ in www.youtube.com. It should be the 1st selection offered, with over 28 million views. As a disclaimer for watching the music video ‘Karma’, don’t try to do those stunts that the 2 subway stunt performers did(if you are not trained to do so). For example, according to the www.youtube.com selection, 3 minutes and 7 seconds into the music video, one of the stunt performers is physically spinning on top of the other stunt performer’s head! Don’t try to do that. You may get hurt if you do.

So, when you watch the music video ‘Karma’, it’s the sense of defiance that is coming from the performers in the music video that you are choosing to perceive, and that sense of defiance is being escalated by the 2 stunt men performing in the New York subways. I hope you enjoy watching it! Oh, I forgot to mention that the New York subway performers, in my opinion, would be more tolerable to notice if you watch the music video ‘Karma’, but in a context that you would be able to focus, not on their performance, but on something else instead, like if you were looking at your smartphone for some reason, talking to someone else in the subway with you, or you just want to think about something else. To put it bluntly, you can ignore them better. However, if you choose to, you can still choose to watch them perform. That’s up to you.

All right! Going back to the examination the podiatrist gave me this past Thursday on Feb. 1, to avoid ambiguity, he did not tell me to stop using the T/Sal shampoo or foot spray for one month. That is something I chose to do on my own. When I described to him the short term pain I felt on my right foot, around the area of my small toe, and I told him that I recently switched to wearing new shoes, he discovered that I had extra skin formed on my small toe, that and the fact that I was wearing new shoes could have caused the pain that I was feeling sometimes. The podiatrist also said that, if the problem continued, to see the podiatrist again so that other things can be done. So, from that, my feet were soaked in a whirlpool, and among other things, the extra skin from my right small toe was removed, and my feet felt better!

On a separate note, since I am talking about a podiatrist, if you have an ingrown toenail, probably created from a job that involves a lot of standing, a podiatrist can remove a small vertical portion of your toenail permanently(long-lasting or nonfading). If you choose to do the procedure, what happens is that the podiatrist removes that portion of your toenail that is growing into the skin of your toe causing you discomfort, and then he/she adds a chemical to that area where the toenail was removed, and that chemical causes that small part of your toenail that was removed to stop growing. If it does grow back, the procedure can simply be repeated. Make sure that, if you choose to go see a podiatrist, and you believe you have an ingrown toenail, that you specifically request that you want the ingrowing part of your toenail to be permanently removed. That way, you’ll have one less problem to worry about. To find a podiatrist that is covered by your insurance, just go to the web site of your health insurance, and I’m assuming you search for the word ‘podiatrist’, and your health insurance web site should tell you what podiatrists in your area are available. Of course, if you have such a job, you can ask the people where you work for recommendations.

For the record, as of today, my right foot did not exhibit any discomfort. No episode of short term mild pain occurred. There were a few incidents yesterday, but there are no incidents today. I believe my right foot is recovering.

All right! The 2nd embarrassing thing I’ve been avoiding to type in is in regards as to how you trim your hair, more specifically, for boys, teenage boys, and adult men, how you trim your hair for your underarms, groin area, and anus area. Let’s say, for example, you have a few skin tags in your underarms and/or groin area. Here’s a quote about skin tags in the category ‘Treatment’ from www.wikipedia.org:

‘Because tags are benign, treatment is unnecessary unless the tags become frequently irritated or present a cosmetic concern. If removal is desired or warranted, then a dermatologist, general practitioner, or similarly trained professional may use cauterisation, cryosurgery, excision, or surgical ligation to remove the acrochorda.’

If you have skin tags and you want them removed, do a search in a search engine, such as www.google.com. There should be facilities in your area that specialize in the cosmetic removal of such things, if you want minimal scarring. If minor scarring is not an issue, then I recommend you see a dermatologist to have them removed. Now, if you still have a few skin tags in the underarms and groin area, and for some reason you want the hair there to be removed, then I don’t recommend you use a razor to remove hair in that area, since the razor might accidentally cut the skin tag. If you choose to remove hair in your underarm and groin area, the safest way I am aware of that doesn’t harm skin tags is the Wahl Ear, Nose and Brow Trimmer, #5545-400. As of now, you can purchase it from Amazon.com with Prime shipping for about 10 dollars. If you look at the photos Amazon.com provides, the part of the device that you will use, if you choose to use it, is called the ‘detail head’. It looks like an angled toothbrush head. According to the photo, it’s original purpose is ‘Great for necklines, sideburns, eyebrows, and ear trimming.’ If you choose to purchase the item, test it on your underarms. Without adding anything to your underarms, you can use the ‘detail head’ to remove the hair from your underarms. Notice that, as the detail head of the Wahl trimmer is used on your underarms, it does not harm the surrounding skin. If you have a few skin tags in your underarms, before using the Wahl detail head trimmer, you would have to be careful using what you were using, so that you can avoid cutting those skin tags. Now, you will apply the use of the Wahl detail head slowly to the skin tags area, and you will notice that the skin tags are not being damaged by the detail head, and you can freely remove the hair from your underarms without being overly concerned about your skin tags.

Because of the advice I have given you so far, you may think that I tinker too much with things that have a different purpose for what they are recommended to be used in this blog. To address that, for those of you who have shaved your underarms before and you used a razor, imagine looking at that razor. The blades stick out.(Photos of a razor are available at www.wikipedia.org) I think it’s safe to say that most of you would not even consider, so to speak, to use a razor in an area that you have skin tags. There are probably a lot of other ways you can trim the hair from your underarms that are a lot safer than using an obvious razor. Now, the Wahl detail head is already designed to trim hair from various areas of your face, areas that you would not use a razor. So, to be clear, I recommend that you do not use a razor to remove hair that you have skin tags in, because you might accidentally cut the skin tags with the blades from the razor.

Now, for the groin area, if you want the hair there to be removed safely, let’s say safer than using a razor, then I recommend that, before using the Wahl detail head, apply shaving cream to your groin area, then use the Wahl detail head to remove the hair there. Just feel around the area you want the hair to be removed with the shaving cream, and allow that sense to guide your Wahl detail head to remove the hair. Males eventually trim the hairs from their groin area, and this is the best, safest way I am aware of to trim those hairs.

Now, as for the hairs that are near your anus, in Wishlist #1101, I recommended that, if you believe you have an anal fissure, that you have a colon and rectal doctor examine you. If you are in that category, that means you probably were using pain medication let’s say at least half the time after you would poop. You would apply the pain medication to one of your fingers, and after you would poop, you would insert that finger with the medication rectally. Well, if you need to add medication in such a manner, then it’s possible that the hairs around your anus may be getting in the way. Some of those hairs may be taking some of that pain medication from your finger as you would try to insert it rectally.

The solution I recommend is to use the Wahl detail head to remove the surrounding hairs that may block that pain medication from being inserted rectally. Just add shaving cream to the area, then allow the Wahl detail head to remove those hairs that may be in the way of using your pain medication. I’m assuming that you only have to do this once every few months, since the hairs may take several months to grow back. Also, it’s the safest way I am aware of to remove hairs in that area of your body, much safer than using a razor.

Those were the 2 most embarrassing forms of advice I did not give in the past because of it’s embarrassing nature.

If you choose to buy new shoes based on my recommendation, then to help your new shoes ‘break in’ quicker for your small toe, I recommend buying the Footfitter Cast Iron Ball & Ring Bunion Shoe Stretcher Spot Stretching Device. According to Amazon.com, I purchased the item on August 25, 2014. Although I only have one of those things, I plan to buy another one today. According to Amazon.com, with Prime shipping, it costs about 45 dollars. What it does is allow a small ball to protrude outward from your shoe, creating more room for your small toe. You leave it on before you sleep, and when you take it out, it looks like a small lump is on your shoe. That appearance disappears, and what you have is more room for your small toe, so that you can avoid unnecessary discomfort as you adjust to wearing your new shoe. I recommend that you buy 2 of them, so that you can apply one device for each shoe before you go to sleep. There are picture illustrations, product details, and reviews provided in Amazon.com’s web site.