2/17/2018
Lara Croft!
(Used as a greeting. Action movie ‘Tomb Raider’ starring Alicia Vikander as Lara Croft, according to www.imdb.com, is in theaters March 16.)
The previous idea that I typed in last week that explained idea ‘Question’ I plan to delete. Before, I imagined how certain kids would react using such an idea, and I didn’t see a problem with what I imagined. However, I did not project how kids in the future would process such an idea. For example, right now, the latest Star Wars movie, ‘Star Wars: The Last Jedi’, was just released 12/15/2017, and the Blu-ray release should come out a few months from now.[2/19/2018: I’m not sure the ‘Star Wars’ Blu-ray will come out in a few months. That’s just something I read from a search engine. Popular movies, I believe, are trending to come out on Blu-ray and DVD early.] The kids that have chosen to use the ‘Question’ idea probably watched that movie in theaters. My point is that there will be a lot of moments in the future when a new ‘Star Wars’ movie will not be out in theaters, and that means those kids in the future who would have read such an idea in my opinion will have more of a difficult time learning the ‘Question’ idea that I explained. So, as a courtesy, for those of you who used last week’s Wishlist #1114 idea, I plan to delete that Wishlist next Saturday, giving you a week to prepare. I will probably explain again the ‘Question’ idea soon. It just won’t have that ‘Star Wars’ illustration in it, and it will be a different explanation.
Because of the nature of the idea I will type in this list, I think some people would take it the wrong way if I introduce a music video. However, that is how I present these ideas. The music videos, especially it’s music, may help you learn these ideas. So, I’ll try to offer you a music video that you may still choose to use with the idea in this list.
I found this music video from a music video tv show called ‘Total Request Playlist’ that I copied from the cable tv service on 2/15/2018, just a few days ago. I don’t believe I’ve seen this music video in it’s entirety before, or heard it’s song before. The tv show came from channel ‘MTV Classic’. If you choose to watch this music video on your tv, you may be able to find it from channel ‘MTV Classic’, if you have that channel available to you. Anyway, the song is called ‘Standing Still’ by female American artist Jewel. According to www.wikipedia.org, recorded in 2001, the single charted best in New Zealand, where it reached number seven. It also charted in the United States at number 25. I chose music video ‘Standing Still’ because, according to www.wikipedia.org, Jewel was one of the roasters in the tv show ‘Comedy Central Roasts’, the one that broadcasted 9/5/2016, the one where Rob Lowe was the roastee. Since Jewel was a roaster, it’s my opinion that she would be more allowable for certain expectations to allow her music videos to have certain contradictory interpretations. Of course, choosing to use Jewel’s music video in such a manner is still up to you.
Have to go:
So, here is the idea. I started talking about this idea in Wishlist #1045 on 5/18/2016. Of course, I’ve upgraded the idea since then. You can also call this a new, separate idea, if you want to. The premise of this idea is that an instigator may improperly impose upon you a sense of composure and contemplation based accumulation for you to dismiss as not from you. This is the 1st illustration I have for this idea. The illustration is in episode 3.17 ‘Debasement Tapes’ from mystery tv show ‘Veronica Mars(2007)’. Logan Echolls(Jason Dohring) is giving a class presentation, and the teacher for that class is Professor Corrigan(Norman Large). The episode is available from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 39 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode, when the students start laughing at the presentation. The highlight of the illustration is the reaction from Professor Corrigan. I think it’s kind of obvious from the illustration, but just in case, the illustration is refurbished for this advice. I believe that Logan wants to cause Professor Corrigan to experience a sense of composure and contemplation accumulation that Professor Corrigan would try to dismiss from his mind. When the students started laughing, notice how Professor Corrigan is reacting to their laughter. At 39 minutes and 44 seconds into the episode, Professor Corrigan finally stops the presentation from occurring. Here is a quote:
Professor Corrigan:-‘All right, Mr. Echolls. Thank you. We’ve seen quite enough.’
Logan:-‘No, I’m not screwing around, sir. It has income streams…’
Professor Corrigan:-‘That’ll do. You can sit down now.’
Of course, to see that Logan is causing Professor Corrigan to experience a sense of accumulation, I highly recommend that you watch that ‘Veronica Mars’ illustration.
I have other examples in my mind, but I believe this next illustration is the best example I can think of as of now. To officially declare the name of this idea, I call it ‘Have to go’. It is my belief that there are probably tv shows available that specialize in causing people to experience a sense of accumulation. I speculate that the game show ‘Fear Factor’ is one of them. Wikipedia talks about the show. I haven’t actually seen such shows. I did, however, DVD mail order rent a drama movie called ‘Sweet Bean’ starring Masatoshi Nagase as Sentaro, and Kyara Uchida as Wakana. It’s not as convenient as horror movies or tv shows like ‘Fear Factor’, but I believe the illustration in that movie is more believable, and you may be able to relate to it more. It’s a short illustration. I originally watched the movie from the DVD/Blu-ray mail rental service I am using. According to that service, I returned that movie on 2/2/2017. You can see that movie streaming from Amazon.com. You can rent it for about 4 dollars Standard Definition, or buy the movie for about 9 dollars Standard Definition. I recently purchased the movie streaming in Standard Definition format for about 9 dollars. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 15 minutes and 54 seconds into the movie. This interpretation of the movie is based on my interpretation of what happened. I could have interpreted it wrong from it’s original content, but this is how I am presenting it to you. The way I see it, Wakana is entering a restaurant she normally goes to. As she looks into the restaurant, Sentaro surprises her from behind as he, too, is about to enter that restaurant. Wakana did not expect Sentaro to be in that restaurant the same time that she chose to be there. I highly recommend that you see that illustration, to see how Wakana reacted to Sentaro’s presence. Here is a quote:
Sentaro:-‘Excuse me.’ (Wakana is obviously surprised that Sentaro was behind her).
Sentaro:-‘Are you coming in?’ (Since Sentaro is obviously aware that he surprised her, while she is still taken aback from the experience, Sentaro asked Wakana if she was coming into the restaurant).
Now, in this 3rd illustration, this illustrates my belief that there are a lot of people out there that don’t have an obviously self developed technique to react to instigation. Even though I think this illustration is also very funny, it can also be useful to you. It gives you illustrations of 3 people that conveniently show you how such an accumulating instigation affects 3 people simultaneously. The illustration is in episode 1.5 ’12 Hours’ from action tv show ‘Transporter: The Series(2012)’. The episode is available from Amazon.com. Here are the 3 people involved in the illustration: Giles(Josh Blacker) is the man imposing the accumulating sense of instigation. Dieter(Charly Hubner) is the man who does not have an obvious technique to experience instigation. I guess you can call Dieter the roastee. The 3rd man in the illustration is Frank Martin(Chris Vance), the general hero of the show. You may find it useful to interpret how all 3 people interact with such an inducing of accumulation. There are a few inappropriate words in the illustration. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 45 minutes and 13 seconds into the episode. Giles enters the garage soon and asks where Dieter is. You can tell that, during the conversation that Giles is having with Dieter, even though Dieter is telling Giles that quote-‘Dieter is not here’, Giles does not believe Dieter, and instead imposes a sense of contemplation and composure accumulation upon Dieter that Dieter does not want to experience. I highly recommend that you watch the illustration in order to evaluate how all 3 men react to Giles’ instigation upon Dieter. Here is a quote:
Giles:-‘You Dieter?’
Dieter:-‘Uh, Dieter is not here.’
Giles:-‘Is he coming back? Or did he go to his Ayrton Senna fan club meeting?’ Dieter’s got good taste. (Giles is touching one of the car’s in Dieter’s garage.) Can’t wait to talk to him. So…you a Senna fan as well as your boss? (Inappropriate language removed) You hear me, Dieter?’
Dieter:-‘Dieter? Uh, Dieter is not here.’
Frank:-‘You gonna introduce me?’
Giles:-‘Who the heck(inappropriate language removed) are you?’
Frank:-‘Dieter. Dieter Haussman.’
Giles:-‘What?’
Frank:-‘I apologize for what I said on the radio.’
Well anyway, I recommend you see that entire illustration, with the inappropriate language removed, of course.(Just don’t use it.) The illustration starts 45 minutes and 13 seconds into the episode, and ends 47 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode.
OK, so this is what I think is happening with this ‘Have to go’ instigation. According to my imagined discovery, the instigator is improperly imposing an adverse sense of contemplation and composure based accumulation in order to use such a sense of accumulation as bait in order to cause an innocent person to evaluate the notion associated with that imposed accumulation.
So, this is where idea ‘Have to go’ comes in: For example, if you are an adult, you already have years of experience with a contemplation and composure based sense of accumulation. That experience is when you sense that you have to go to the bathroom. For example, for the adults, when you attended grammar school and high school, while attending class, either you would sometimes personally made a request to your teacher that you had to go to the bathroom, and/or you know of other students who made requests to their teachers that they had to go to the bathroom. That is one of the reasons why this idea is called ‘Have to go’. It refers to your contemplation and composure experience to ‘have to go’ to the bathroom, NOT when you are actually using the bathroom. Another reason why I call the idea ‘Have to go’ is because I tried other phrases, and based on my word knowhow, ‘Have to go’ seems like an effective phrase to use. I tested words like ‘Accumulate’, ‘Compile’, and ‘Pile up’. Of course, you can make your own phrase. To me, the phrase ‘Have to go’ seems to be the best way to teach you this idea.
Based on this imagined idea, if you are an adult, of course the instigator knows that you have years of experience with ‘having to go’ to the bathroom. Therefore, what the instigator may do to cause you to not use that experience to help you more tenably experience such a ‘have to go’ instigation is to cause you to believe that the adversely imposed sense of accumulation is not from you, and that you would use your sense of justification to dismiss such a sense of adverse accumulation. And to make that stick, as one possible example, the instigator may impose an obvious identity of the instigation, whether it’s something from their obvious appearance, or something that they cause you to experience, that would have such an obvious self blame from the instigator’s identity, that you may believe that all of that adverse sense of accumulation is coming completely from that adverse blame of identity. For example, has an instigator ever caught you by surprise? Let’s say, for example, for the adults, while you are at work washing your hands in the bathroom, another employee actually surprises you with the excuse that the employee is making a request to you, that such an employee is waiting to wash his/her hands.(Let’s say that, normally, it would only take you 5 seconds to wash your hands. Why couldn’t the instigator wait a few seconds?) You see, such an experience may cause you to put all of that accumulation blame on that employee, since he/she is the one that caused you to be surprised just to wash his/her hands. [2/19/2018: You can use idea ‘Reply casual’ to not use such a reply.] The experience is like that illustration from the movie ‘Sweet Bean’, except you’re just washing your hands. Here is a quote:
Sentaro:-‘Excuse me.’ (Wakana is obviously surprised that Sentaro was behind her).
Sentaro:-‘Are you coming in?’ (Since Sentaro is obviously aware that he surprised her, while she is still taken aback from the experience, Sentaro asked Wakana if she was coming into the restaurant).
Based on the idea, I think that an adverse accumulation used as bait to associate with other notions is a very popular instigation in America. It’s popular because, once the instigation is established in the mind of the innocent person, all an instigator has to do, so to speak, is impose again an obvious adverse sense of accumulation, and in their identity of instigation, make an association to that adverse sense of accumulation to a notion that instigator chooses.
The solution I recommend is to more objectively identify such an adverse sense of accumulation by using your years of experience ‘having to go’ to the bathroom, not actually going to the bathroom, and to separate the association the instigator is trying to make with that adverse sense of accumulation to that instigator’s yet again adverse sense of notion. Let’s start with a variation of idea ‘Have to go’ that I call ‘From have to go’.
From have to go:
Idea ‘From have to go’ is just one variation from several variations I am going to type in. So, after you read all of them, you can then ‘shuffle’ them to decide which ones you want to use. Of course, as you are using these ideas, if you are using them in the context that I am presenting to you, I am assuming that you will upgrade these ideas as you are using them. Idea ‘From have to go’ is when you allow that sense of adverse accumulation to be contemplationally identified as coming from your sense of accumulation. That sense of ‘from’ is reinterpreted by you as not coming from you, but within reason, with the mild adverse identity of it’s contemplation and composure. It is my belief that, sometimes, not all of the time, that is something that the instigator does not want you to do. The instigator instead wants you to try to dismiss that adverse sense of accumulation as not coming from you at all, and it is within that attempt of dismissing that, based on the notion imposed with the accumulation, that a certain specific sense of dismissing will be used against you. To avoid that trap, you just have to be able within reason to objectively identify the adverse accumulation with your ‘have to go’ experience, but even though it’s identified with it’s false accusation, you interpret that sense as ‘not from you’. In other words, you allow yourself to feel it’s false accusation of accumulation, but you interpret that as a feeling that is ‘not from you’, that you are not using such a feeling of accumulation in it’s false impression of identity. One example is like feeling a minor emotion, but not becoming that emotion.
Give have to go:
Way back in the Amazon.com lists, I typed an idea that was created, refurbished for advice, using how the Hare Krishnas, based on my awareness of their reputation, would offer to give away things at airports. If memory serves, I made an idea that says ‘If no one introduces trust, then how will trust be established?’ I would imagine holding a white flower, and then I would imagine either having a teleported hand and arm, or just have an arm that could stretch to other people, and then I would offer that white flower to that person, and then say the phrase ‘If no one introduces trust, then how will trust be established?’ If you want to know more about the Hare Krishnas, www.wikipedia.org has an article about them, read the article refurbished for advice, of course.
However, they need cautious ordine cialis on line http://djpaulkom.tv/crakd-see-what-was-found-in-this-old-vegas-mob-house/ amount improvements by an professional physician. What viagra buying online do Snoop Dogg and Sylvester Stallone have in common? Unfortunately it’s not a hot new musical collaboration. The potential causes leading to erectile dysfunction are many and varied, ranging from stress, depression and relationship concerns to physical health conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular sildenafil in canada disease and blood pressure problems. Natural treatment of varicose veins Vein Protex from Calivita, a natural food viagra online no prescriptions supplement with hesperidine, is a very effective natural treatment of varicose veins, swollen or heavy legs. Now, using that ‘Hare Krishna’ idea, I made a new idea called ‘Give’. Here is a story I invented to explain idea ‘Give’. The main character of the story is Dr. Daniel Jackson portrayed by actor Michael Shanks. In the story, Daniel Jackson is working for a job service that gives work opportunity to people with no work experience required. Now, based on his experience, many people would go to him and request such work, and he would do his job and accomodate their entry level job participations. However, most of them would quit soon after starting the job. So, even though most of those participants would quit early, he still maintains his effort to allow them to participate in the program.
The story’s purpose is meant to give you a sense of school and job related giving. Whether you are at school or at work, you should have the ability to interact with others, in a reasonable capacity, of course, and/or you should have some sort of school/job related sense of giving. So, when you combine idea ‘Give’ with idea ‘Have to go’, you get idea ‘Give have to go’, which identifies ‘Have to go’ instigations that discourage your sense of school/job related sense of giving. For example, if you experienced a mild to moderate sense of instigation that uses a contemplation and composure related sense of accumulation that also encourages you to stop giving, you can use this idea to allow yourself to replenish your sense of giving, during a real time and soon after experience of instigation. Of course, just because you are able to maintain a sense of giving, doesn’t mean you have to use it in an obvious context. The point is that, if an instigator disparages a sense of giving that is relevant to have for your school or job use, then that disparagement may adversely affect your school or job performance.
[I don’t foresee any problems with this idea, so what I’ll do is stop now and continue Monday, February 19, since I chose to take a day off during that day, which is President’s Day. I’ll use the day off from work to finish this idea, and to continue with the next idea. So, if you are reading this blog during President’s Day, then I’ll see you then, so to speak.
2/19/2018
Lara Croft! (said as a greeting) It is now 10:39 AM EST for me. I know I’m still talking about ‘Have to go’, but I believe the next music video I recommend to you shouldn’t matter, in the context of how you are using it. If you want to think of a music video that helps you get into the mindset to learn these ideas, then your intent of use should allow you to use the music video, even though the music video is using an idea about having to go to the bathroom. So, if that is how you intend to use it, then it doesn’t have to be an issue. Of course, I learned this after using the music video ‘Standing Still’ by Jewel. The music video I am recommending now is for the song ‘Capital Letters’ by American singer Hailee Steinfeld. What you might find interesting about the music video is that, even though it is very romantic and lively, the song is being used for the movie ‘Fifty Shades Freed(2018)’, a rated R adult movie. Of course, I am only recommending the music video, not the movie. You can watch the music video for free from www.youtube.com. To watch it, search for phrase ‘capital letters’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 2nd selection offered, with over 10.6 million views. According to youtube, the music video was published 1/31/2018, just about 2 weeks ago.
Casual:
According to www.dictionary.com, casual means-‘without definite or serious intention’. I discovered this idea yesterday while I was at work. It was while I was thinking of a scene in the movie ‘A Bad Moms Christmas(2017)’ starring Kristen Bell as Kiki and Cheryl Hines as Sandy, Kiki’s mom. I got the Blu-ray from the Blu-ray mail rental service I use, and I fast forward and watched the movie for the 1st time on Saturday, 2/17/2018, and I placed it in the mailbox yesterday. So, while I was at work yesterday, I thought of that scene in the movie where Sandy is showing her daughter Kiki her pajamas that has images of Kiki all over it. If you want to see that scene, it’s available from Amazon.com as a streaming rental. So, according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 28 minutes, and 9 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:
Sandy:-‘Merry Christmas, Kiki.’
Kiki:-‘Merry Christmas, mom.’
Sandy:-‘Do you like my Kiki-head pajamas?’
Kiki:-‘Sort of.’
Sandy:-‘Thank you.’
When I thought of that scene in the movie yesterday, I quickly wanted to imagine what it would be like if I was in a relationship situation with Sandy that eventually allowed Sandy to introduce to me something to wear that had images of Kiki on it. That was easy for me to imagine, since I am single. I didn’t put any of the other details involving relationships in the imagined scenario. I just wanted to imagine me being introduced to wear clothing that had images of Kiki on it. And so, to be clear, in this imagined situation, me and Sandy are in a relationship, and this is the 1st time that Sandy introduces me to wear something that has images of Kiki on it. Now, since I was just imagining it for myself to think about, it was pretty much the same pajamas that Sandy wore to show Kiki. If the situation was more plausible, I’m assuming the clothing would be more compatible, more appropriate for me to wear. Anyway, I thought about making some sort of fuss about it to Sandy, to make the situation more appropriate for me to wear the clothing, but when I thought about what Sandy was thinking about, all she wanted me to do was to casually put the pajamas on. And then I thought to myself ‘I can do that.’, just put the pajamas on without making any fuss about it. And it was around that moment that I thought of a new idea about instigation.
When I imagined Sandy from the movie ‘A Bad Moms Christmas’ wanting me to casually put the pajamas on, soon after I made the logical conclusion that certain instigations may intentionally discourage you from having, using, and sensing casual contemplations and casual interactions with other people. For example, when you sometimes experience a minor instigation, and I’m speculating of course, that may cause you to contemplationally comment on it, maybe privately complain about it, maybe even make some joke about it. All these responses may be interpreted by an instigator as responses that ‘wind you up’, responses that can be used by them to discourage you from having, using, and sensing casual contemplations and casual interactions with yourself, such as reading a newspaper in your job break area, and with other people.
And so, I invented the idea ‘Casual’ to help people maintain a sense of casual contemplation and interaction. Here are 3 variations of idea ‘Casual’ that may help you retain a sense of casual contemplation and interaction: 1)’Extract casual’, 2)’Reply casual’, and 3)’Use casual’. Before I begin explaining those variations, I recommend that you watch an illustration of a man who in my opinion uses casual contemplations and casual interactions as part of his very demeanor(conduct; behavior; deportment). The reason it shows so much on this man is because he’s portrayed in the movie as a government agent trying to create controversy. The illustration is from movie ‘Salting the Battlefield(2014)’, and the actor who is portraying that man is Bill Nighy as Johnny Worricker, and in that illustration, he is having a conversation with a reporter portrayed by Olivia Williams as Belinda Kay. What makes this conversation even more interesting is that he is using that casual demeanor of his without telling Belinda Kay his name. If you have Amazon Prime, the movie is included with your Amazon Prime membership without need for additional payment. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 40 minutes into the movie. Watching the illustration is highly recommended. That way, you can see Johnny Worricker’s use of casual demeanor. The illustration ends 50 minutes and 25 seconds into the movie. I suspect that if an instigator or instigators were trying to deprive you from having a sense of casual demeanor, than watching this illustration may be refreshing and rejuvenating for you to experience. After you watch that scene, several times if you want to, you can read the 3 variations of ‘Casual’ I am offering you. Just use the scenes where Johnny Worricker is talking to Belinda Kay. There are a few other scenes during that time frame that address another part of that movie that you can take out. To get you started, here is a beginning quote from that scene:
Worricker:-‘Ah, you must be Belinda Kay.’
Belinda:-‘Yes, I am.’
Worricker:-‘How kind of you to see me. How are you?’
Belinda:-‘And who are you?’
Worricker:-‘I’m the man who telephoned.’
Belinda:-‘Yes, of course you are.’
Worricker:-(Carrying 2 cases of wine) ’24 bottles of wine.’
Belinda:-‘Thank you. How thoughtful. Because I’m a journalist I must be alcoholic? You’ve come from abroad?’
Worricker:-‘Um, I hope you like Bourgeuil.’
Belinda:-‘Well, aren’t you the welcome guest? (Worricker smiles as he carries the 2 cases of wine and follows Belinda to her house).’
Extract casual:
Idea ‘Extract casual’ is when an instigation tries to contemplationally ‘extract’ the sense of casual contemplation and casual interaction that you may be trying to maintain in your mind. Refurbished for advice, of course, ‘extract’ uses the example of a dentist extracting a tooth from a person’s mouth. I believe that a lot of people in America have experience getting a few teeth extracted from their mouths, making the use of ‘extract’ something that people can relate to when their sense of casual demeanor is being extracted from them by mild to moderate instigation. Just contemplationally use phrase ‘Extract casual’ or ‘Casual extract’ when you think such an instigation is occurring to you, so that you can maintain your chosen sense of casual contemplation and interaction.
Reply casual:
Based on the idea ‘Not work’ explained on Wishlist #1108, I said that you should not let the instigation work in your mind. And so, idea ‘Reply casual’ is one of those ideas that helps you not allow certain instigations to work in your mind, or at least it may help mitigate some of it’s adverse effects. Idea ‘Reply casual’ helps you manage reply identities improperly imposed upon you to experience from instigators, to help you identify replies that you did not commit to, that you did not agree to interact with, even though such replies may give you the impression that you are obligated to them. You can get such replies in many places, whether you are at school or at work, even when using public transportation, or at public restaurants. When contemplationally using ‘Reply casual’, you may be using it to identify an instigation and/or inadvertency that is trying to adversely dictate how your casual contemplations and casual interactions are to be used, manipulated by misleading impressions of replies that you did not commit to, that you did not even agree to address or think about.
The only illustration I can think of right now, and it’s not an exact match, is in episode 3.7 ‘Executive Order 13224’ from tv show ‘The Good Wife(2011)’. In the illustration, Alicia Florrick(Julianna Margulies) is having a conversation with Gordon Higgs(Bob Balaban). If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available from Amazon.com without additional payment. The illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 22 minutes and 26 seconds into the episode. If you want to, in relation to advice, you can watch more of the episode. I’m just typing the gist of it. Here is a quote:
Alicia:-‘Is it my right to consult a lawyer?’
Higgs:-‘It is always your right. But I wouldn’t advise it.’
Alicia:-‘I want to consult with a lawyer.’
The illustration is useful because it shows the possible use of self affirmation a person may have, even when talking to someone that may be somewhat intimidating.
Use casual:
This is something I learned while I was in a public bus yesterday. When people in a public situation are consistently talking in a context that you believe is inappropriate and you still want to maintain a sense of casual demeanor, what I recommend is that you maintain a sense of casual contemplation using contemplation phrase ‘Use casual’, meaning that you are not using the inappropriate discussions in your chosen casual context. You are maintaining a sense of casual contemplation and clarifying that such a maintaining of sense is not associated with the inappropriate discussions that is unavoidably noticed by you.
Rated TV-14 viewer discretion for tv show ‘Veronica Mars’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for action tv show ‘Transporter: The Series’. Rated R language and viewer discretion for comedy movie ‘A Bad Moms Christmas’. Rated PG violence? and viewer discretion for movie ‘Salting the Battlefield’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Good Wife’. Use refurbished for advice references only. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Have to go’, ‘From have to go’, ‘Give have to go’, ‘Casual’, ‘Extract casual’, ‘Reply casual’, and ‘Use casual’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.