3/10/2018
Greetings. It is now 11:53 AM EST for me. Since the advice I plan to give you today contains 2 music videos, I wanted to offer you an introduction video that was ‘light’. The video I have chosen to offer you is from pop song ‘Rush Hour’ by American musician Jane Wiedlin. ‘Rush Hour’ was Wiedlin’s most successful single, reaching No. 9 in the US Billboard Hot 100. Here’s a quote about the music video from www.wikipedia.org:
‘The music video which accompanied the single eschewed the traffic metaphor of the song for a lighter concept; a simple “performance” clip interspersed with footage of Wiedlin swimming with dolphins. The song was featured in the 1988 comedy film License to Drive.’
To watch the music video ‘Rush Hour’ for free, search for phrase ‘rush hour jane wiedlin’ in www.youtube.com. It should be the 1st selection offered, with over 2.2 million views. The picture quality is not so good, but it’s still watchable.
Imagination:
To start this advice off, I’m going to present a quote about imagination from the Nobel Prize winning physicist Albert Einstein. I found the quote by searching for phrase ‘albert einstein quote about imagination’ in www.google.com. There was another phrase that I think Albert Einstein said about imagination, but this will do. The quote used here is meant to address the topic of imagination. It is not used as an absolute. Here is the quote:
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution.”
To make it easier for me to explain it, an idea I have never explained before, I want to start with 3 illustrations. The 1st illustration is from the movie ‘Mrs. Winterbourne(1996)’, starring Brendan Fraser as Bill Winterbourne, Shirley MacLaine as Grace Winterbourne, and Peter Gerety as Father Brian Kilraine. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and the streaming rental is about 3 dollars Standard Definition. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 38 minutes and 16 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:
Bill:-‘A banker’s daughter? My ass! Sorry, Father.’
Grace:-‘No, “ass” is fine. Right, Father?’
Father Brian:-‘Well, in Judges chapter 15, Samson smote the Philistines with the jawbone of an ass?. I think that was ass in a different…’
Grace and Father Brian then said simultaneously(at the same time):-‘”Ass” is fine.’
The 2nd illustration is in episode 5.11 ‘The 7th is Made Up of Phantoms’ from sci-fi tv show ‘The Twilight Zone(1963)’ starring Greg Morris as Lt. Woodard and Robert Bray as Capt. Dennett. (Their character names are on their shirts in the illustration). If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available from Amazon.com without additional payment. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 23 minutes and 40 seconds into the episode. Near the end of the episode. Lt. Woodard and Capt. Dennett are having a conversation. And, of course, the illustration is refurbished with inaproprieities removed for the advice. Here is the quote:
Lt. Woodard:-‘Kind of a coincidence, sir?’
Capt. Dennett:-‘Quite a coincidence. Too bad they couldn’t have brought the tank up. It would have helped.’
Lt. Woodard:-‘Beg pardon, sir?’
Capt. Dennett:-‘Nothing, lieutenant. I didn’t say anything.’
The 3rd illustration is from the movie ‘Geostorm(2017)’ starring Andy Garcia as President Andrew Palma. Even though the movie is available for streaming rental from Amazon.com, you don’t have to watch it. You can just use www.imdb.com to reference it. I’m using the movie as a sci-fi reference in general for this idea.
OK! So, here is the idea that I imagined. Before I begin, I am not saying that there is anything wrong with the way you imagine now. For example, at home, school, at work, from books, movies, and smart phones, illustrations are introduced to us that stimulates the use of our imaginations. I just believe that our use of imagination can be improved upon for a specific context. For example, it is easy for most of use to imagine many concepts that are introduced to us, such as when those concepts are introduced to us from tv shows and movies. But when most? of us try to use concepts on our own, such concepts have limited use based on how we perceive to be the reality of it’s resource availability. In the 1st illustration from the movie ‘Mrs. Winterboune’, not to be taken literally, of course, Father Brian has to access his reality of resource availability when asked by Grace if the use of the word ‘ass’ was acceptable to use. In the 2nd ‘Twilight Zone’ illustration, Lt. Woodard had obvious difficulty evaluating what Capt. Dennett said, quote-‘Quite a coincidence. Too bad they couldn’t have brought the tank up. It would have helped.’ So, when you would use your imaginations to ‘shuffle’ the ideas that you make to help you more tenably experience certain instigations, most of you also use your reality of resource availability for how you use your imaginations. The purpose of this list is to help you, if you choose to, to help you use more of your resource availability as it relates to your imagination use.
So, let’s start with the sci-fi movie ‘Geostorm’. Here’s a quote from www.imdb.com about the movie:
‘When the network of satellites designed to control the global climate starts to attack Earth, it’s a race against the clock for its creator to uncover the real threat before a worldwide Geostorm wipes out everything and everyone.’
If you watched the movie, I’m assuming that you give the movie a certain entertainment credibility, that there’s a network of satellites designed to control the global climate, that actor Andy Garcia is portraying the President of the United States, and so on. I believe that it’s a fairly entertaining sci-fi movie. That movie, in my opinion, illustrates how easy it is for us to use our imaginations for resource availability that may only exist in our imaginations, not in our awareness of reality.
Now, since my lifestyle identity is not in business, like the movie ‘The Business of Strangers’ starring Stockard Channing as Julie Styron, I’m using an imagined house that is for sale in America. I am imagining that many managerial expectations can be created for that house. So, using imagined managerial expectations, I believe that, even though the house may not look valuable, it would benefit you if you were able to contemplationally describe that the house is valuable, and that the house is not valuable. Each description should be able to be contemplationally described as being true, based on separate, specific managerial expectations. In other words, you should be able to describe that a particular house being sold in America is valuable, and you should be able to describe that that same house, for different reasons, is not valuable. I believe that most people in America are and will be non managerial employees as their chosen lifestyle careers. That is why many of them don’t even imagine that houses could have 2 contradicting and true value assessments. So, the exercise I am recommending for you to do is have the ability to imagine that houses can have 2 contradicting and true value assessments, well within managerial expectations.
This 3rd exercise I recently made the deduction that it helped me make the ‘Not effective. Not my effectiveness’ idea that I introduced to you in Wishlist #1116. I invented this idea I think several months ago. I can check the tivo? player I use. I still look at the video from time to time. So, here’s the idea: Using the music video I selected, this exercise helps you make more of a specific, active choice as to how to imagine projecting effort of usefulness. The music video is from the song ‘Ladyfingers’ by alternative rock group ‘Luscious Jackson’. The song ‘Ladyfingers’ is from the album ‘Electric Honey’. According to www.wikipedia.org, it peaked at number 102 on the Billboard 200 chart. So, here’s how it works: 1st, for the boys, teenage males, and men, to make it easier for you to recall the music and video, I recommend you change the word ‘ladyfingers’ to ‘sticky fingers’. So, here’s a quote from the song:
I’ve got ladyfingers baby
I got kid gloves
Baby, I’ve got heart
So, instead of “I’ve got ladyfingers baby”, you instead use “I’ve got sticky fingers baby”. Here’s the new quote:
I’ve got sticky fingers baby
I got kid gloves
Baby, I’ve got heart
All right! So, when you watch the music video ‘Ladyfingers’, you use the effort of effectiveness that you experience when watching the music video to be the main effort that you would use to imagine certain aspects of what is in the music video to be imaginitively portrayed somewhere outside where you live. For example, if you live with other houses across the street, then you may want to project certain things from the music video to be imaginitively portrayed across the street from where you live. So, when you watch the music video ‘Ladyfingers’, you’re using the effort of effectiveness that you sense from watching that music video to imagine that the rock group called ‘Luscious Jackson’ that is in the music video, as well as the dancers that are dancing in the bus portrayed in that music video, are now imagined to be dancing across the street from where you live. They’re not in the bus, but they’re imagined by you to be dancing on the sidewalk across the street from where you live. Before I used this idea, I used to imagine certain aspects of certain music videos performing across the street from where I live, but the effort of effectiveness was mostly coming from me. Now, instead of me creating an effort of effectiveness to imaginitively project a performance across the street, I instead use the effort of effectiveness that I sense from the music video itself. I believe that is an effort of effectiveness improvement.
Now, let’s say after you tried doing that the 1st time, you can now just project all of the music video, so to speak, across the street from where you live. For example, when you see the lead singer playing her guitar with that Springtime like ambiance, you can use the effort of effectiveness from what you sense from the music video, and just imagine what you perceive from the music video, that whole Springtime montage, imaginitively occurring across the street from where you live. I recommend that you reasonably practice this idea by watching the music video ‘Ladyfingers’ several times now and then. After that, you can use the same technique reasonably for other music videos that you like. To watch the music video for free, search for phrase ‘ladyfingers luscious jackson’ at www.youtube.com. It should be the 1st selection offered, with over 274 thousand views. I also recommend that you watch the music video using headphones or earphones on. I checked the tivo? player for the cable tv service I use, and the music video ‘Ladyfingers’ is from a tv show called ’90s Nation’ from channel ‘MTV Classic’, and it was recorded 11/3 of last year.
[It’s almost 5:00 PM EST for me right now, and I am going to stop and continue explaining this idea next week. So, if you’re going to be there this coming Friday or Saturday, then I’ll see you then.
3/17/2018
Lara Croft!
(said as a greeting. As an intentionally belated(late, delayed, or detained) message, movie ‘Tomb Raider(2018) starring Alicia Vikander as Lara Croft, is scheduled to be in theaters 3/16/2018. If you choose to, just imagine someone’s friend visiting and offering a belated gift to that someone. That someone says ‘You’re late.’, but still invites that friend with the belated gift in.)
It is now 9:53 AM EST for me. I invented a new idea this past Thursday(3/15/2018) and yesterday(3/16/2018) that I believe is very important to explain now. Yes, I can finish this ‘imagination’ idea 1st, but I believe this idea could be very useful to you, it can help you with situations that involve giving certain tasks priority, but you would have to postpone certain tasks that are ongoing in order to inititate such tasks now. Postponing those ongoing tasks could be bothersome to you. So, for example, after I explain this new idea, I may not need to interrupt an idea already being explained, since I am using this new idea I am about to explain. Since I try not to delete ideas already typed in, what I’ll do with this ‘Imagination’ idea is simply copy and paste it to the next list. Also, I believe I was able to create this new idea because I was typing in the ‘Imagination’ idea.
So, the music video for this new idea I copied from the cable service I am using from a tv show called ‘House of Pop’ on 3/11/2018, less than a week ago. The channel is called ‘MTV Classic’. The music video is from the song ‘Gotta Get Thru This’ by British singer Daniel Bedingfield. Here is a quote about the song from www.wikipedia.org:
‘Outside the United Kingdom, the single peaked within the top ten of the charts in Australia, Canada and the United States. In the latter country, it received a Grammy Award nomination for Best Dance Recording. The single became Britain’s sixteenth biggest-selling single of 2001 and has since been certified Platinum.’
To watch the music video for free, search for phrase ‘daniel bedingfield i gotta get through this us’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered, with over 23 thousand views. The selection is from Robert Laverick. Keep in mind that this music video is the US version, not the UK version. I recommend that you skip the 1st 44 seconds of that music video, because the 1st 44 seconds is boring. I checked the lyrics in www.google.com, and it looks OK. Here’s a quote from the song:
I gotta get through this
I gotta get through this
I gotta make it, gonna make, gonna make it through
Said I’m gonna get through this
I’m gonna get through this
I gotta take, gotta take my mind off you
If you haven’t done this before, I recommend that, after you watch the music video once, that you go to google and type in phrase ‘gotta get through this daniel bedingfield lyrics’, then click to see the entire lyrics of that song. Then make a separate window to play that music video, then go to the lyrics window. If you just use one window at at time, notice that you can still hear the music, but you can’t see the music video. As you hear the music, read the lyrics that correspond to that music. That way, you know what the words are as you follow the music video, since you have already watched the music video once.
So, the beginning of this new idea starts with an upgrade for idea ‘Not effective. Not my use of effectiveness.’, the idea I typed in Wishlist #1116, the previous list. So, if you haven’t yet, I recommend that you read Wishlist #1116 1st before reading this idea. I want to start this new idea with an illustration. Since I don’t watch soap operas, this is the best illustration I can think of as of now. The illustration is near end of movie ‘The Nanny Diaries(2007)’ starring Scarlett Johansson as Annie Braddock and Laura Linney as Mrs. X. The movie is available for purchase streaming for about 7 dollars from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 1 hour, 26 seconds, and 44 seconds into the movie, Mrs. X is talking to Annie Braddock. Of course, the illustration is refurbished for advice. Here is a quote:
Mrs. X:-‘It’s really for your own good. He’s a little out of your league, don’t you think? It couldn’t possibly end well. Clearly, this isn’t working out. Mr. X has arranged for a taxi to take you to the ferry and then for a car to pick you up on the other end.’
Annie Braddock:-‘Please don’t–please don’t do this. Not–not for me, but for Grayer. Not until you and your husband work your problems out.’
Mrs. X:-‘Don’t you dare. You stupid–you stupid girl. As if you know anything about my life. As if you know anything about the real world.’
The point of that illustration is to show how Annie Braddock evaluates the effort of effectiveness that she experiences from Mrs. X. I highly recommend that you watch that ‘Nanny Diaries’ illustration. For quick availability, it’s available to be watch from Amazon.com streaming.
So, here’s the upgraded explanation for ‘Not effective. Not my use of effectiveness.’: It’s like you’re playing against the market, so to speak. What you may choose to do is choose a reasonable effort of effectiveness to evaluate the effort of effectiveness that an instigation causes you to experience. For example, refurbished for advice, when Mrs. X said to Annie Braddock quote:
Mrs. X:-‘Don’t you dare. You stupid–you stupid girl. As if you know anything about my life. As if you know anything about the real world.’
Mrs. X caused Annie Braddock to experience an effort of effectiveness that was poignant(keenly distressing to the feelings) to Annie. Annie could not resolve such a poignant sense of effort of effectiveness. You can tell by the way Annie looked at Mrs. X as Mrs. X said those words to her. That caused Annie to experience obvious distress as she left to go to her room to pack her things.
I just remembered a few seconds ago a better illustration.
12:50 PM
It’s now 12:50 PM EST for me. I just took a food break. I ordered and ate some chinese food. Before I continue, I want you to know that I’m the only one making the ideas in this blog. I’m not talking to anyone about it. I also imagine to know that you are using the music videos I offer you your way. So, if you choose to, I recommend that you create another expectation to use music video ‘Gotta Get Thru This’. When you think of the lyrics and the music:
When your love is pouring like the rain
I close my eyes and it’s gone again
When will I get the chance to say I love you
I pretend that you’re already mine
Then my heart ain’t breaking every time
I look into your eyes
When you think of those words, I recommend that you use the pace of how those words are used to help you process the new idea I am trying to explain to you. When I listen to those words, to me, it feels like it has a fast pace that, with this advice, can help you process certain instigation induced experiences. Of course, I also recommend that you refurbish the music video, including it’s music and lyrics, to a context that is acceptable for you to use. So, I’m going to try to help you with that. [3/31/2018: I gave you this advice because I believed many of you who watched the music video ‘Gotta Get Thru This’ were choosing to not use that music video because the woman who was with Daniel Bedingfield was being too forward with how she presented herself to him. That’s why I offered the 2 ‘avatar’ stories, so that you may choose to change your mind, and continue/start to use that music video.]
1st, I’ll say that it’s none of my business how you imagine. I’m just going to offer you an idea. You can choose to use it or not to use it. So, here’s the idea: Let’s start with the men: Let’s say that a college student, a man, is using an avatar, let’s say a man that looks like him, and his avatar is copying what British singer Daniel Bedingfield did in the music video: The male college student is allowing that woman to appear and disappear while his avatar is reading something. The man finds it unacceptable. So, to help that man, I imagine like I was some music video manager, and I go into that room and I talk to that avatar. I say to him that it’s just a music video, and you’re not supposed to even notice that the woman is in that room. (If you watched the music video, Daniel Bedingfield is acting as if he is not even aware that the woman is near him.) And so, the man (hopefully) calms down more, and after thinking about it more, allows the imagination to continue with the woman that looks like the woman from the music video, the woman is appearing and disappearing, and the man’s avatar is now more able to experience that.
For the women, the explanation is going to be more ‘in depth’, but I’ll give it a try: Similar to the situation with the man, a woman imagines an avatar that looks like her in a college dorm room, and the woman that looks like the woman in the music video is also appearing and disappearing in that dorm room, and she finds that a little unnerving and unacceptable. So, like a music video manager, I go into that imagined dorm room and I talk to that avatar: ‘Have you watched that commercial starring Mindy Kaling(The Mindy Project), where she thinks she is invisible? The commercial shows her doing a few things to prove to herself that she is invisible, until she walks into a restaurant and tries to kiss celebrity Matt Damon. (To see this commercial, go to www.youtube.com and search for phrase ‘mindy kaling matt damon’. Of course, use commercial refurbished in relation to advice). Matt Damon, of course, noticed that she is trying to kiss him, and since she is a stranger to him, he tries to respectfully decline the kiss from Mindy Kaling. The point is, if a person believes that other people cannot see him/her, what might that person do? (Refurbishing music video for advice): That is what that lady was doing in that music video. She believes that Daniel Bedingfield in that music video cannot see her. That is why she is acting that way. So, in your situation, you CAN see her, and that is why you are reacting in such a way. So, even though you can see her, just imagine that you cannot see her, a little like the way Daniel Bedingfield also imagines that he cannot see her.’ And then I leave the imagined room, and allow the woman who created that room to decide what to do next.
I hope that helps you choose to continue using the music video ‘Gotta Get Thru This’.
All right! So, here’s the illustration I thought of recently that is now, in my opinion, the best illustration I can think of right now. The 2 illustration examples I am going to recommend is from episode 7.6 ‘Inside Man’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Voyager(2000)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon Video, and if you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available for you to watch without additional payment. (If you don’t have Amazon Prime, I’m assuming that the episode is available to purchase Standard Definition for about 2 dollars). Keep in mind that you are to refurbish the illustrations to be used for this advice. The illustrations are not to be used literally. Both illustrations involve conversations with the Barclay hologram(Dwight Schultz) and The Doctor(Robert Picardo), who is also a hologram. The 1st illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 14 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:
The Doctor:-‘I’ve been going over the instructions from Starfleet Medical. As far as I can tell, their ‘new’ inoculations aren’t much different from run-of-the-mill radiogenic vaccines. I don’t think they’ll protect the crew.’
Barclay:-‘Did you try incorporating a synthetic antigen?’
The Doctor:-‘Yes, but it only improved the resistance by 10 percent.’
Barclay:-‘That should be enough.’
The Doctor:-(sighs): ‘We can’t afford to be cavalier, Reg. If these treatments don’t work, the crew will wind up “getting sick”.’
Barclay:-‘You’re forgetting that the inoculations aren’t designed to work alone. They were intended to work in combination with the shield modifications. It’s the medicinal ‘ying’ to the shields’ ‘yang’.’
The Doctor:-‘And what if the ‘yang’ doesn’t work?’
Barclay:-‘That’s not going to happen. Now, listen, Lieutenant Barclay has a special affinity for this crew. So do I. I promise you, we won’t let them down.’
The 2nd illustration in the same episode starts 24 minutes and 40 seconds into the episode, The Doctor and Barclay are in another conversation. Here is a quote:
The Doctor:-‘My point is that board games aren’t exactly crucial to your mission.’
Barclay:-(grabbing in anger one of the golf clubs) ‘And I suppose golf is?’
So, in the 1st illustration, you should be able to sense that Barclay’s use of effort of effectiveness is mild and calm, whereas(while on the contrary) The Doctor’s use of effort of effectiveness is using worry and hesitation. Here is a quote:
Barclay:-‘You’re forgetting that the inoculations aren’t designed to work alone. They were intended to work in combination with the shield modifications. It’s the medicinal ‘ying’ to the shields’ ‘yang’.’
If you watch the illustration, you can sense a difference in effort of effectiveness use. It is as if Barclay’s effort of effectiveness use, mild and calm, is actually enough to interact and even resolve The Doctor’s effort of effectiveness use, which seems to use obvious worry and hesitation.
The 2nd illustration is used as a caution example. When Barclay grabbed the golf club in anger, that effort of effectiveness was meant to be unresolvable by The Doctor’s use of effort of effectiveness.
So, using the ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ illustrations, when an. instigator improperly imposes an effort of effectiveness that you believe is inappropriate or excessive, you can choose an effort of effectiveness that addresses the effort of effectiveness from the instigator in a reasonable context, like in the 1st illustration, when Barclay was using a mild and calm sense of effort of effectiveness to address The Doctor’s worry and hesitation use of effectiveness. So, using that logic, if you choose a mild and calm sense of effectiveness, you can use a mild and calm sense of effectiveness to choose not to address what you believe to be an inappropriate sense of effectiveness that an instigation may improperly impose upon you. This doesn’t mean that you are ignoring that instigator. For example, let’s use an idea from Wishlist #1116, the one called ‘Take out’. Let’s say that an instigator imposes a minor, false insult upon you that you are not obligated to talk about. Let’ say that such an insult is associated with a bothersome sense of effort of effectiveness. You can use your calm and mild use of effort of effectiveness as a solution to it: You don’t have to address that bothersome sense of effort of effectiveness, and you don’t have to interact with it. So, even though such an effort of effectiveness seems to be contemplationally bothersome and adamant(utterly unyielding in attude or opinion) to you, the solution IS your mild and calm effort of effectiveness use.
One obvious problem with using this ‘effort of effectiveness’ idea is how your chosen mild and calm effort of effectiveness can be easily overwhelmed or seem ineffective when being used on an impression of effort of effectiveness from an instigation that is intentionally rude and/or overwhelming by design. For example, here is a quote from the movie ‘The Nanny Diaries’, Mrs. X talking to Annie Braddock:
Mrs. X:-‘Don’t you dare. You stupid–you stupid girl. As if you know anything about my life. As if you know anything about the real world.’
Mrs. X clearly used an effort of effectiveness upon Annie Braddock that she believed Annie Braddock could not resolve in her mind in such a short period of time after hearing Mrs. X say that to her. And in the ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ episode, here is a quote from Barlay:
Barclay:-(grabbing in anger one of the golf clubs) ‘And I suppose golf is?’
Like I said before, Barclay used such an effort of effectiveness knowing that The Doctor’s use of effort of effectiveness could not address it in an immediate sense. As a reply to that problem, I believe that this ‘use of effectiveness’ idea is VERY effective on mild instigations. Since it is your mind, you can contemplationally use, for example, a mild and calm effort of effectiveness, and that can still be the solution, even though such instigations have somewhat bothersome uses of effort of effectiveness. Now, when you get to the more adamant uses of effort of effectiveness, I made some more ideas to help you with that, and these ideas I plan to type in now. Also, I want to say that this idea is not just possibly new to you, it’s also new to me as well, so we’re both learning something new together, so to speak.
Whine:
The definition of ‘whine’ according to www.dictionary.com is ‘to snivel or complain in a peevish, self-pitying way’. Before I begin explaining the definition of ‘Whine’, I want to address an old ‘Captain America’ cartoon. I didn’t see it when it 1st came out on tv. I saw a rerun of it, and it was about Captain America and Bucky stopping robots the Red Skull built called ‘Sleepers’. When I looked at www.wikipedia.org, according to ‘The Marvel Super Heroes’ article, the episode could be ‘Episode 11: The Sleeper Shall Awake, Where Walks the Sleeper, The Final Sleep’. You can watch the episode for free if you search in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘captain america the sleeper shall awake’. I don’t know for certain if that is the episode. Anyway, the episode I did watch reminds me of the instigation identified by the words ‘Whine’ or ‘Whining’. I created a new definition for the word ‘whine’ that is not the same as the definition you may find in a dictionary. The definition I created, ‘whine’, means-‘an instigation that imposes a sense of juvenile complaining that you may believe to be normally impossible for an adult(for example) to impose upon you, but it’s juvenile impossibility is designed to dismiss the effectiveness of your chosen use of effectiveness.’ In other words, it’s a certain form of juvenile complaining that you may experience from an instigation that I believe the words ‘Whine’ and ‘Whining’ identify very well. For example, and of course I am only recommending this scene and another related scene from the movie, and the rest of the movie is to be thrown away, this illustration is in the movie ‘Rambo(2008)’ starring Sylvester Stallone as John Rambo and Graham McTavish as Lewis. The movie has an available streaming rental for about 3 dollars. To my surprise, according to Amazon, I already purchased the movie in the past. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 39 minutes and 42 seconds into the movie, Lewis is talking to Rambo. Here is a quote:
Rambo:-(looking at Lewis)
Lewis:-‘Oh, dear. You really are an uptight bastard, aren’t you? You can drop that 1,000-yard stare. I’ve seen it all before, and I’m not impressed.’
Soon after that illustration, 41 minutes and 8 seconds into the movie, you see Rambo staring at Lewis, but at night.
So, here’s the situation: For some reason, another co-worker is giving you some sort of stare, but you don’t believe you have done anything wrong, and you don’t believe you should even need to talk to that other employee about it. However, the stare is in association to some sort of juvenile complaint that co-worker made recently. That ‘stare’ may be identified by you as a ‘Whine’ or ‘Whining’ instigation, designed to dismiss or inhibit somewhat your ability to use a reasonable effort of effectiveness to evaluate instigations and inadvertencies. And, of course, all of you have unique schools of thought. Idea ‘Whine’ can be used by your unique school of thought to identify juvenile complaints as they are interpreted by your unique schools of thought.
[According to what I typed in earlier, I started typing at 9:53 AM EST, and it’s now 4:03 PM EST. I am going to stop now, and finish this idea probably next Saturday. I think this idea could be very useful to you, especially after I finish explaining it to you. So, if you are there next Saturday, then I’ll see you then.
3/24/2018
Lara Croft!
(said as a greeting. It is intentionally belated(late, delayed, or detained)).
It is now 9:24 AM EST for me. Because I believe most of you responded to the American version of the music video for song ‘Gotta Get Thru This’ by British singer Daniel Bedingfield(I don’t want to make a big discussion as to why that happened), the music video I am offering you today is from song ‘As I Lay Me Down’ by singer-songwriter Sophie B. Hawkins. Here are a few quotes from www.wikipedia.org:
‘The song is one of her two biggest hits, reaching number six on the Billboard Hot 100 and number one on the Adult Contemporary chart for six weeks during its year of release, 1995.’
‘The song is a ballad in which the singer reminisces about a faraway loved one as she goes to bed and hopes to see them again.’
‘The music video depicts Hawkins singing while sitting on stairs outside an apartment building in New York City. It flashes to Hawkins in a forest swinging on a swing, lying on a tree branch, sitting in a boat, and sitting on a bench. It also shows a little girl running through the forest representing Hawkins as a child.’
Here’s also a quote from the song’s lyrics:
As I lay me down to sleep
This I pray
That you will hold me dear
Though I’m far away
I’ll whisper your name into the sky
And I will wake up happy
Before I make a comment on the music video ‘As I Lay Me Down’, I want to recommend that you are in a certain mindset. To be in that mindset, if you choose to, I recommend that you use a quote from episode 10.1 ‘The Pilot’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2017)’ starring Peter Capaldi as The Doctor, Pearl Mackie as Bill Potts, and Matt Lucas as Nardole. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is included in your Amazon Prime membership without additional payment. Otherwise, the episode is available for purchase for about 2 dollars Standard Definition. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 35 minutes and 12 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Bill Potts:-(said to The Doctor) ‘What is sky made of?’
The Doctor:-‘Lemon drops.’
levitra wholesale Just like other muscles in the body, correct routine exercise always helps in augmenting muscle sizes. Creativity is simply at the bay when buy sildenafil india appalachianmagazine.com you go for different colors and the shades. Check out the two and compare the rates. viagra tablets online It arises mostly in the overage people who online viagra canada practice the habit of excessive smoking. Bill Potts:-(chuckles) ‘Really?’
The Doctor:-‘No, but wouldn’t that be nice?’
Nardole:-‘You can be very silly sometimes. Do you know that?’
So, the purpose of that ‘Doctor Who’ quote is that I encourage kids to be skeptical. Even though I may not have actually said it, that includes the ability to ‘blurt out’ certain thoughts that may be taken too literally by other people, like when The Doctor said ‘Lemon drops.’ Of course, I’m talking about thoughts not actually said to other people. Now, the comment I am about to say, unfortunately for me, is in my opinion, is that the comment is like those thoughts, but I am going to actually say it to you, meaning that it’s susceptible to a frenzy of criticism.
Anyway, here is the comment: ‘The music video ‘As I Lay Me Down’, to me, it is like Sophie B. Hawkins is articulating her thoughts by singing them in the form of a music video.’
I recommend that, if you choose to watch music video ‘As I Lay Me Down’, just relax when you watch it, and just imagine that an older teenage girl(thinking of another teenage boy her age) or a lady for some reason decided to ‘sing’ her thoughts in the form of a music video, and you were given permission to listen. It is, after all, coming from a publicly offered to watch music video. To watch the music video for free, just search for phrase ‘sophie b hawkins as i lay me down’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered, with over 1.2 million views. I don’t know why, but the google browser I am normally using is not able to go to www.youtube.com, so I switched to the Microsoft browser to see that video. I’m letting you know this in case your normally used browser isn’t able to go to www.youtube.com. [3/31/2018: The google browser I would normally use seems to be working now.]
Not able to see:
I invented idea ‘Not able to see’ a day after I introduced the music video from song ‘Gotta Get Thru This’, the US version, by British singer Daniel Bedingfield, at 3/18/2018. When I originally introduced music video ‘Gotta Get Thru This’ to you, it was for the fast lyrics. A day later, I turned a certain use of the music video into a bookmark based on the idea that ‘the lady believes that the man cannot see her’. That is why the lady looks unusually forward(presumptuous, impertinent, or bold). So, based on using music video ‘Gotta Get Thru This’, idea ‘Not able to see’ means that an instigator is improperly imposing a presumptuous effort of effectiveness that tries to dictate what you are not able to see. The instigator may improperly impose excessive and/or uninvited particulars in that effort of effectiveness. The instigation identified by phrase ‘Not able to see’ is basically taking advantage as to how you try to understand what another person is trying to emphasize for you to understand. I recommend that you give this idea a few days. The 1st day you use it, you may have a lot of build up for it, since this is the 1st time I offered this idea to you. After a few days of using it, you should have more control as to how you use it. Just contemplationally say the phrase ‘Not able to see’, to check if another person is trying to adversely cause you to interact with something that you are supposedly ‘not able to see’ too clearly. Of course, you are not to use it to ignore someone. This idea is to help you regulate how you respond to instigations identified by idea ‘Not able to see’.
Innocent synchronize:
Now, this idea I invented just a few days ago, on 3/22/18, while I was at work. So, here’s an imagined situation at least the adults who experience mild to moderate instigation may be able to relate with: Suppose you are at work, and you anticipate that someone who is about to arrive may improperly impose upon you yet another mild to moderate instigation upon you. You have a technique that you have developed, and you are using that technique. However, when you experience the mild instigation, you’re STILL bothered by the experience, like when you were younger, and one of your parents were driving, and you left the car window partially open, and one of those bugs that flew into your car somehow got into your mouth, and you unintentionally ate it, and the bug tasted terrible!
The solution I invented for such an experience is that the instigator was intentionally targeting notions that you believe are innocent, and since instigators tend to make people feel a sense of justification, an innocent person who experiences instigation over time may give a certain high, practiced regard over what notions they have that are innocent. I’m not saying that there’s anything wrong with that. However, just because you have notions that are innocent, doesn’t mean that such innocent notions are not affected by instigations. So, since an instigator may believe that how your innocent notions may be affected by instigation may be the last place that you would look, so to speak, the instigator may misleadingly and improperly impose some sort of acclimation to be involved with the instigation and certain innocent notions that you have. I identify such an instigation using the phrase ‘Innocent synchronize’.
The best illustration example for idea ‘Innocent synchronize’ happens to be from a movie that I just watched for the 1st time this past Thursday night, on 3/22/2018. The movie is a Blu-ray mail order rental that arrived in my PO Box 3/20/2018, and I picked it up Wednesday morning on 3/21/2018. I wasn’t able to see it until Thursday night, on 3/22/2018. I’m assuming that many of the kids in America already saw this movie in theaters before it was made available on Blu-ray, but 3/22/2018 was the 1st time that I watched it. The name of the movie is ‘Justice League(2017)’ starring Ben Affleck as Batman/Bruce Wayne, Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman/Diana, and Ezra Miller as The Flash/Barry Allen. The movie is available streaming for about 5 dollars Standard Definition rental. Of course, if you have already bought the movie, you can use that as a reference. According to Amazon Video rental, the illustration starts, refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice, 1 hour, 4 minutes, and 48 seconds into the movie, Diana and Bruce are talking to each other. Here is the quote:
Diana:-‘At some point, even you have to learn to move on.’
Bruce:-‘Steve Trevor tell you that?’
Diana:-(in anger, Diana pushes Bruce against several boxes)
Bruce:-(Bruce clears throat) ‘Superman was a beacon to the world. Why aren’t you? You’re an inspiration, Diana. You don’t just save people, you make them see their better selves. And yet, I’d never heard of you until Luthor lured you out by stealing a picture of your boyfriend. You shut yourself down for a century, so let’s not talk about me moving on.’
Barry Allen:-‘You know that if she removes you from the group, we’ll cover for her.’
Now, when you were ‘bothered’ by an instigation at work, it felt like you were eating that bad tasting bug again. But in the ‘Justice League’ example, when Bruce adversely interacted with Diana’s innocence, that interaction caused her to experience anger, and she reacted to that anger by pushing Bruce back in anger. Even though it’s a movie and not real, in a movie watching context, I’m sure that, soon after she pushed Bruce back, as she was collecting herself, she also couldn’t believe that she reacted in such a way to a colleague. I also quoted Barry Allen saying ‘You know that if she removes you from the group, we’ll cover for her.’ to show that the others watching that conversation had their own understanding as to what Bruce did to Diana.
The 2nd illustration is from the comedy drama movie ‘The Breakfast Club(1985)’. Keep in mind that the illustration from this movie is refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice. Also, you don’t use the illustrations that are immediately near where this illustration comes from. There are mature themes used in the movie that are not used in this blog. In the illustration, Claire Standish(Molly Ringwald) is talking to Allison Reynolds(Ally Sheedy). The illustration is availabe from Amazon.com streaming as a rental for about 3 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 1 hour, 10 minutes, and 57 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:
Claire:-‘I can’t believe you. You’re so weird. You don’t say anything all day, and then when you open your mouth, you unload all these tremendous lies all over me.’
Now, in ‘The Breakfast Club’ illustration, I imagined that Claire, like most? people, since Claire portrays a teenager, when she talks to people in school, such as her friends, teachers, and other classmates, she assumes that they are all using in conversation some sort of reasonable truth. Those are the innocent notions she is referring to in her complaint to Allison, that the innocent notions that Claire is using expect other people that talk to her to use some sort of reasonably expected truth in their conversations with her. So, here is a general question for the teenagers and adults: When you later find out that someone was lying to you, how does that make you feel?
The solution I invented for instigations identified by idea ‘Innocent synchronize’ is to have the ability to choose to not use such an interacting sense that is associated with such instigations. That doesn’t mean to not have and use your innocent notions. That just means that, with the help of the idea ‘Innocent synchronize’, you can choose to not adversely interact with such instigations. That also includes instigations and inadvertencies that discourage you from having such innocent notions. For example, now that you know more what the instigator was doing to you, or will do to you, you can choose to interact with such an adverse, out of context, non invited form of instigation by 1st contemplationally saying the phrase ‘Innocent synchronize’, then use your ‘Blinking’ and/or ‘Not agree to address’ ideas that you have learned from this blog.
Involve synchronize:
Now, this is where it gets interesting, so to speak. This is an idea that I believe many kids, teenagers, and adults will actually choose to use as part of their active routine of technique. So, to help re-direct the energy I am feeling right now, I’m going to use that energy on something I recently imagined a few minutes ago, and here’s the story: I’m with a group of people, and we’re trying to escape. Among other things, the person that is chasing us is Duncan MacLeod portrayed by Adrian Paul when he was younger, based on the tv series ‘Highlander(1992-1998)’. Of course, it’s a misunderstanding, but MacLeod doesn’t know that. And so, to allow the others to escape, I tell the others to keep going, and that I will hold MacLeod off. Let’s say for the sake of story continuity, I closed a door that requires my handprint to open the door again, and Duncan MacLeod needs to open that door in order to ‘catch’ the others. And so, what happens, and this is just imagined, is that me and MacLeod are going to hand-to-hand fight for as long as I can. Since MacLeod knows that I’m not like him, for example, I don’t have any special healing capabilities, he chooses to fight me in that context. Let’s say I can last for about an hour before he knocks me out, drags/carries my body to the door, and puts my hand on the lock to open it. So, before that happens, I stop fighting him and leave the imagined situation. I just wanted to use my extra energy in that situation.
So, let’s start with an illustration example, so that I have something to work with to explain idea ‘Involve synchronize’. The best illustration example I can think of right now is in the movie ‘Rambo(2008)’, starring Sylvester Stallone as John Rambo, and Graham McTavish as Lewis. Of course, the illustration is refurbished with the inapproprieities removed for the advice. The point of the illustration is to show how Lewis gets everyone on the boat contemplationally involved. He then uses that involvement against Rambo by imposing an adverse involvement reaction that Lewis believes Rambo would not be able to ‘not contemplationally address’ such an involvement, causing Rambo to flinch and stare at Lewis. The movie ‘Rambo’ is available streaming rental from Amazon.com for about 3 dollars. I recommend that, if you use movie streaming a lot, that you buy the Standard Definition movie version for about 8 dollars. According to Amazon.com, I bought the streaming version of ‘Rambo’ for about 5 dollars on 12/18/2009. That means that, every time I keep using the streaming movie of ‘Rambo’, I don’t have to keep paying any extra fees. And since this movie is the best illustration I can think of for idea ‘Involve synchronize’, and if you choose to actively use idea ‘Involve synchronize’, then the logical conclusion I made is that you, too, may use the streaming movie a lot. I think 8 dollars to purchase the streaming movie ‘Rambo’ is cheap short and long term.
Anyway, according to Amazon Video, the illustration of Lewis talking starts 38 minutes and 42 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:
Lewis:-‘Is it me…or does the air this time of year smell like a wet dog? I could swim faster than this! Am I right?’
Reese(Jake La Botz):-‘Heard that.’
Lewis:-‘Come on, chop chop! The quicker we get there, the quicker we get back. Now it’s God squatters. They come over here spouting all that, and they expect the whole world to work like their neighborhood. Well, it doesn’t.’
Well anyway, he uses all of that involvement, and then insults Rambo with it. So, here’s the basic idea of ‘Involve synchronize’: While you are contemplationally thinking of something that is, of course, private, and is not meant to be presented to anyone else, especially an instigator, what an instigator may do is impose some sort of mild to moderate instigation that causes such thoughts/contemplations/questions to have an adverse impression of involvement with the instigation. This past Tuesday, 3/20/2018, while I was at work, I made the discovery that certain effort of effectiveness identities experienced by certain instigations were unavoidable to experience. In other words, you can’t just ‘Blink’ it out of the way. So, what I did since then was learn(I don’t encourage other people to instigate me) to experience those unavoidable effort of effectiveness identities, to make bookmarks for them, so that I can experience such unavoidable effort of effectiveness identities more tenably. Since then, I learned that it was possible to sort of ‘Blink’ certain ones out of the way, and to allocate many of the other mild effort of effectiveness identities, but you would need other ideas to help change how you perceive such effort of effectiveness identities. And that is why idea ‘Involve synchronize’ is so important. Once you are able to more objectively sense that you did not choose to allow your private thoughts, your private contemplations, to get involved with effort of effectiveness interjections from instigations that give the impression identity of such thoughts and contemplations actually being involved, once you know the difference between private thoughts that are your own, and false involvement of such thoughts being synchronized, then you can sense and develop a separation between the two. And that’s what I am going to do next in this list, give you a few more ideas that help you more develop that separation between your chosen private thoughts, and the false synchronized involvement of such thoughts.
Prove:
I made this idea called ‘The burden of proof is not on me’ way back in the Amazon lists. I call this idea ‘Burden of proof’ or ‘Prove’. I made idea ‘Prove’ from episode 3.12 ‘Alienation of Affection’ from lawyer tv show ‘The Good Wife(2012)’. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available without additional payment from Amazon.com. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com. In the illustration, Alicia(Julianna Margulies) and Diane(Christine Baranski) are talking. You can watch more of the episode for content, in relation to advice with inaproprieities removed. I’m just giving you the gist of the illustration. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 33 minutes and 15 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Diane:-‘But…you’re not sure?’
Alicia:-‘Am I sure that this rider is something David Lee slipped to me to sign? No. I just… I think there were six pages in my children’s trust that I signed, and now there are five.’
Diane:-‘But you’re not certain?’
Alicia:-‘100% certain? No.’
Diane:-‘Then I think you have to commit to your best memory of events.’
Alicia:-‘I don’t understand.’
Diane:-‘You remember seeing this rider being signed two years ago?’
Alicia:-‘Yes.’
Diane:-‘You’re sure of that?’
Alicia:-‘Yes.’
Diane:-‘And you’re not sure whether this rider page is different?’
Alicia:-‘That’s correct.’
Diane:-‘Testimony is about your best memory. You go with your best memory.’
Alicia:-‘What if it’s wrong?’
Diane:-‘Testimony isn’t about right or wrong, Alicia. It’s about the facts as established by your best memory of events. Your memory is this: You saw the rider being signed. Then that’s the fact. It’s not up to me to do my opponent’s job for him. It’s up to Mr. Preston to poke holes in your testimony. You do not poke holes in your own. Do you understand?
Alicia:-‘I do. Thank you.’
The point of that ‘Good Wife’ illustration is that an instigator, as you experience a mild to moderate instigation, may cause you to think about some sort of related burden of proof involved with the instigation. If you did not agree to address such an out of context instigation, then the burden of proof is not on you. Refurbished for advice, of course, like Diane said, ‘It’s not up to me to do my opponent’s job for him.’ When I use this idea, I usually would contemplationally reference it as ‘Prove’, but for clarification, I also call it ‘Burden of proof’. I also use ‘Prove synchronize’.
Now synchronize:
Explaining this idea to you is a bit of a reach for me. I imagine sensing that you should easily make the other ideas useful to you if you choose to, but this idea I am not so sure of. Still, I’ll give it to you. Basically, idea ‘Now’ or ‘Now synchronize’ identifies an instigation that improperly imposes a committed use of an evaluation that focuses on particulars that interact with a sense of ‘Now’, like adversely wanting something done in the ‘now’. So, even though the instigation is clearly out of context, it’s very identity imposes an adverse sense of wanting an evaluation made of it in the ‘now’. Such an instigation may also demand that a lot of effort be used to identify it in the ‘now’. I call such an addressed identity ‘Now synchronize’. If you experience such an instigation, just contemplationally use phrase ‘Now synchronize’, and if it’s an out of context, non relevant aspect, allow yourself to sense that you are not required to identify such an aspect of an instigation in the ‘now’ in such a manner.
[It’s 4:46 PM EST for me. I’m going to stop now and continue and finish hopefully by this coming Friday, so that I can begin a new idea by next Saturday. I still have a few more ideas to type in this blog. I might even make some more ideas to type in this blog before Friday and Saturday show up. So, if you are there, then I’ll see you then.
3/30/2018
Lara Croft!
(said as a greeting. It is intentionally belated(late, delayed, or detained)).
It is 8:37 PM EST for me. I am going to try the impossible, so to speak, and finish this list today. I’m just going to add one more music video and one more new idea. I’ll proofread this idea tomorrow morning, and hopefully, I’ll also finish the ‘Imagination’ idea tomorrow as well. Just to say it officially, of course you can continue developing the ideas I typed in this list, in relation to advice said. I want to introduce you to other ideas, and I can’t do that if I keep typing about these ideas. If I was working with other people, ‘we’ can probably do a lot more. Since it’s just me, I have to move on to other ideas. The music video, which is of course refurbished for this advice, is for the song ‘I Wanna Be Down’ by American recording artist Brandy Norwood. Here is a quote about the song from www.wikipedia.org:
‘…it was released on September 6, 1994.’ ‘…it reached number six on the Billboard Hot 100.’ Lyrically, “I Wanna Be Down” describes a flirt with a boy, who Norwood tries to convince of her charms. It features Norwood in her tomboy image, dancing in front of a jeep near a forest, flanked by several dancers.’
Refurbished for advice, I’m recommending that, for this advice, you interpret this song as a reminder that women use a lot of effort to present themselves acceptably to men, such as how they look, and emotionally. Of course, based on the lyrics and the music video, Brandy is flirting with a boy. But when I listen to the song, it also reminds me of how women in general present themselves to men. For example, for the women who are single and dating, how such women during a date are watching what they say to men, so that the men don’t get the ‘wrong idea’. And of course, there is also how women present themselves acceptably at work. Maybe you disagree as to how I describe it. But if you watch the music video in my recommended context, then you may still realize that there’s something useful to what I said. Plus, you may find watching the music video relaxing, in spite of what I said about it. Here’s a quote from the lyrics:
If all you need is my time that I got plenty of
I’ll dedicate all my love until you call me baby
I wanna stay by your side, be there to cool you out
And let you know everything will be all right
[3/31/2018 Relevant proofread correction notation: According to the tivo? player I use for cable tv, I recorded music video ‘I Wanna Be Down’ on 3/21/2018 from tv show ‘House of Pop’ on channel ‘MTV Classic’. Even though the music video has been out for years, yesterday was the 1st time I watched the music video in it’s entirety. To watch the music video ‘I Wanna Be Down’ for free, search for phrase ‘brandy i wanna be down’ in www.youtube.com. It should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 11 million views. The selection recommended is from Atlantic Records.
Awkwardness:
I invented idea ‘Awkwardness’ I think around Wishlist #950+ from the Amazon lists. I typed the word ‘Awkwardness’ in the Amazon lists, but I wasn’t able to explain it back then. I may have explained idea ‘Awkwardness’ in this blog, but I don’t remember doing so. I checked the ‘search’ engine, but I don’t think I mentioned it as an explained bookmark. And so, I’ll explain it now. The idea is based on the possibility that an instigator may improperly impose a notion and/or contemplation that I believe is inappropriate to address. For example, according to the movie ‘Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason’ starring Colin Firth as Mark Darcy and Renee Zellweger as Bridget Jones, Mark said to Bridget quote:
Mark:-‘I won’t dignify that question with an answer.’
Of course, the statement is refurbished for advice. The quote is available to be seen as a streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the quote is located 45 minutes and 59 seconds into the movie, when Bridget talked about Rebecca with Mark.
Idea ‘Awkwardness’ helps me not directly address notions and interjections from instigations that I don’t believe is appropriate to address. So, instead of thinking and interacting with the specifics of an instigation I believe is inappropriate to think about, I would instead think of such a notion or interjection as embarrassing or awkward. That is how I would try to contemplationally address it, as something that is awkward, embarrassing, and/or inappropriate to address. It was like a failsafe(something designed to work or function automatically to prevent breakdown of a mechanism, system, or the like.) I suppose one of the reasons I wasn’t able to explain idea ‘Awkwardness’ earlier was because it wasn’t easy to teach at the time. All I seemed to do when I invented the idea was just choose to use it. Now, hopefully, with these new ideas I introduced to you, the idea may be more available for you to use.
Exact:
I invented idea ‘Exact’ I think this past Monday, 3/26/2018. Basically, to the adults, if you’re not a professional, such as a psychiatrist, and you invented some sort of idea like ‘Awkwardness’, I discovered that an instigator may be able to bypass somewhat such a failsafe if the instigation was poignantly specific just to experience. That way, even though you choose not to address certain aspects of the instigation, the specifics of the experiece may somewhat still cause you to address it.
The solution I created was to use a separate? effort of experience identity of idea to identify the experience as something you did not agree/choose to contemplationally talk about. So, if you would experience something poignantly specific, for understanding, I would use the phrase ‘Not talk about it.’ or ‘Not talk about that.’, and as a bookmark, I would use the phrase ‘Exact’ or ‘Exact talk.’ I believe the word ‘Exact’ helps identify the aspects of the instigation that are poignantly specific that you choose not to address. The reason why thinking that you did not agree/choose to talk about it may work for you is because of the effort of effectiveness associated with such an instigation experience. The effort of experience alone from the instigation may eventually be interpreted by you to be a contemplation, or even an obvious question, and when that happens, you will? eventually interpret that ‘effort of experience’ as if you are addressing it.
Look, I don’t want this to be just a ‘me’ blog. I believe ideas ‘Awkwardness’ and ‘Exact’ can be useful ideas to you. However, there are other ideas I want to type in that should be useful to you, as well as make my job of typing in ideas easier. So, I’m going to stop now, proofread these ideas tomorrow morning, and hopefully finish the ‘Imagination’ idea tomorrow. So, if you are there tomorrow, then I’ll see you then.
3/31/2018
Lara Croft!
(said as a greeting. It is intentionally belated(late, delayed, or detained)).
It is now 9:48 AM EST for me. Yesterday, I forgot to mention certain details about idea ‘Exact’, so what I’ll do is add more explanation to it, and then finally finish this list.
Exact:
When you experience the poignantly specific instigation trying to get past your ‘failsafe’ idea(if you have one), when you use the idea ‘I did not agree to talk about that.’, ‘I did not agree to talk about it.’, ‘I did not choose to talk about that.’, ‘I did not choose to talk about it.’, ‘Not talk about that.’, and/or ‘Not talk about it.’, and I realize I haven’t said this to you yesterday, you do so in a generalistic context. The idea behind ‘Exact’ is that you choose not to address the poignantly specific details of the experienced instigation, because for example you believe it’s inappropriate to do so, for example, what Mark said to Bridget in the movie ‘Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason’:
Mark:-‘I won’t dignify that question with an answer.’
What I also did not ‘say’ yesterday is that you can use idea ‘Exact’ as a delimiter, something just to regulate how you think. I’ll get into that later in this list. So, as an example, let’s say you actually experience such an instigation identified by you by bookmark ‘Exact’: When you think to yourself ‘I did not agree to talk about that.’, of course the experienced instigation is using some sort of effort of effectiveness that, when sensed, may eventually give you the impression that you are already addressing it. So, when you think to yourself ‘I did not agree to talk about that.’, you are contemplationally clarifying to yourself from the vantage point that you are generalistically not addressing it’s specifics. Just as an illustration, think of using this idea as if you are intentionally wearing one of those black eye patches that you may have imagined pirates wear when you were a kid. You are thinking from a generalistic sense, without specifics, that you are not ‘talking’ about that specifically. That way, even when you temporarily sense the instigation’s adverse specifics identified by the bookmark ‘Exact’, you are contemplationally evaluating it from a generalistic use of the idea ‘Not talk about it/that.’
The best illustration example for idea ‘Exact’, and of course the illustration is refurbished for this advice, is in episode 5.10 ‘A Tragedy of Telepaths’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Babylon 5(1998)’. 1st, here’s a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the episode:
‘Londo gets Na’Toth onto a transport ship by dressing her as a veiled Centauri lady, and escorting her whilst pretending to be raucously drunk so no one will pay attention to them, as everyone at the royal court is trained to ignore any inappropriate behavior.’
Now, here’s a quote from the episode. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com for about 1 dollar, and according to Amazon Video, Mollari(Peter Jurasik) is explaining to Na’Toth(Julie Caitlin Brown). The illustration starts 31 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Na’Toth:-‘How do we avoid being noticed?’
Mollari:-‘We don’t. We do everything we can to be noticed, and thus become invisible.’
Na’Toth:-‘I don’t understand.’
Mollari:-‘The Royal Court has been trained not to see what is inappropriate.’
Of course, if you watch that scene where Mollari escorts Na’Toth out, how the people react, and what Mollari says is of course refurbished for this advice. Like what Mollari said to Na’Toth, the Royal Court will not officially talk about what Mollari did, an example when refurbished, should help you understand how to use the explanation ‘I did not agree/choose to talk about it/that.’
Exact exceed:
Idea ‘Exceed’ addresses instigations that try to get you to use an excessive resource availability as it pertains to effort of effectiveness. I combined idea ‘Exact’ with idea ‘Exceed’ and called it ‘Exact exceed’, which identifies instigations identified by idea ‘Exact’ that are also causing you to use an excessive resource availability, identified by idea ‘Exceed’. Instead of the word ‘Exceed’, you can also use words ‘Excessive’, and ‘Too much’.
As an imagined example, let’s say that when management, such as teachers from school or actual managerial employees from jobs, addresses more serious cases involving school/job related instigation, they pool their resources together to try to resolve the problem. Now, when you try to resolve a mild to moderate instigation, let’s say you’re a student or a non managerial employee, you don’t have the resources that management has. So, what the instigator may cause you to do is contemplationally cause you to overextend your resource availability as you try to resolve the mild to moderate instigations imposed upon you to experience. The main example I am offering for idea ‘Exact exceed’ is your sense of involvement. The instigator may cause you to use an excessive sense of interaction to resolve the imposed involvement the instigation you experienced is designed to cause you to think about.
The solution for instigations identifed by idea ‘Exact exceed’ is to 1st contemplationally use bookmark ‘Exact exceed’ to identify such instigations. 2nd, when you choose to evaluate and resolve such instigations, use reasonable resource availability contemplations. Don’t let the instigator dupe you into using excessive involvements in order to resolve the instigation. I plan to give you more ideas later that may help you develop this idea.
Exact Exceed Make:
Now, for this idea, I feel a sort of excess energy I want to re-direct, but I’m just going to try to explain it, since I want to finish this idea today. Idea ‘Make’ uses idea ‘Not work’ from Wishlist #1108, when Walter Whitney from the movie ‘Carbon Copy(1981)’ lunged(any sudden forward movement; plunged) upon a co-worker that was consistently instigating him. Even though he did not contribute to the instigation, he was inadvertently allowing certain aspects of the instigation to ‘work’ in his mind. And so, the advice from idea ‘Not work’ was to basically not allow the instigation to ‘work’ in your mind. Idea ‘Make’ is from the phrase ‘Make me’, meaning that you sense an instigation trying to ‘make you’ contemplationally interact with certain notions. The best illustration I can think of right now where people are trying not to interact with a certain contemplation, the situation in the illustration is of course refurbished for this advice, is in sci-fi movie ‘Starship Troopers(1997)’
…I forgot to mention that, for idea ‘Make’, I recommend that you use idea ‘Taste’ from Wishlist #1039. The gist of ‘Taste’ as used here is that the idea helps you interact with other evaluations, as long as you are also aware of your own evaluation commitments. And as a bonus, to help you with the misleading involvements that instigators may improperly impose upon you to use, since the main characters of sci-fi tv show ‘Shadowhunters: The Mortal Instruments(2016+) are in the ‘Taste’ idea, I recommend that you watch an episode of ‘Shadowhunters’. The sci-fi particulars may help you find instigation induced involvements less distracting.
The best illustration I can think of right now where people are trying not to interact with a certain contemplation, the situation in the illustration is of course refurbished for this advice, is in sci-fi movie ‘Starship Troopers(1997)’, starring Clancy Brown as Sgt. Zim. The movie is available for streaming rental from Amazon.com for about 3 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 24 minutes and 8 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:
Sgt. Zim:-‘To think this had to happen to me. What a bunch of apes. No! Strike that! You don’t rate that good. Never in my life have I seen…’
At that point, one of the recruits laughs uncontrollably.
The point of that ‘Starship Troopers’ illustration is that, when I refurbished it, when Sgt. Zim said quote:
‘To think this had to happen to me. What a bunch of apes. No! Strike that! You don’t rate that good.’
When Sgt. Zim said that, all of the recruits wanted to laugh. However, they all know that they’re not supposed to laugh, and so, they’re all trying not to laugh. So when one of the recruits uncontrollably laughed, even at that moment as he uncontrollably laughed, he is trying not to laugh. So, with a little practice, you should develop your own understanding when an instigation may try to ‘make you’ interact with certain contemplations, but with the help of idea ‘Make’, you should be able to more tenably choose not to interact with such contemplations, in a reasonable context, of course.
To help you contemplationally use idea ‘Make’, here’s the illustration where I got the phrase ‘Make me’. The illustration is in sci-fi movie ‘Alien: Resurrection(1997)’ starring Sigourney Weaver as the Ellen Ripley clone, and Winona Ryder as Annalee Call. The illustration is available from Amazon.com as a streaming rental for about 3 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 1 hour, 16 minutes, and 30 seconds into the movie, Ripley is talking to Annalee. Here is the quote:
Annalee Call:-‘Don’t make me do this.’
Ripley:-‘Don’t make me make you.’
[All right, so I’m finally done. I’m going to proofread this, close it, and hopefully finish the ‘Imagination’ idea today.
Of course, you don’t have to use the bookmarks in that form only. You can also shuffle them, add and remove other words to them. For example, instead of phrase ‘Exact exceed make’, you may use ‘Exceed make’, ‘Exact exceed’, ‘Exceed exact’, or some other variation with other words.
[I ordered some Italian food, so, after I get the food and eat some of it, I’ll begin proofreading this list. It is now 1:07 PM EST for me.
PG-13 viewer discretion for comedy movie ‘Mrs. Winterbourne’. TV-PG viewer discretion for mystery tv show ‘The Twilight Zone’. PG-13 viewer discretion for action sci-fi movie ‘Geostorm’. PG-13 viewer discretion for comedy romance movie ‘The Nanny Diaries’. Some viewer discretion for the Mindy Kaling – Matt Damon commercial. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Voyager’. Violence and viewer discretion for the 1966 animated tv show ‘The Marvel Super Heroes: ‘Episode 11: The Sleeper Shall Awake…’, Rated R strong graphic violence and viewer discretion for action thriller war movie ‘Rambo’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Justice League’. Rated R language use and viewer discretion for comedy drama ‘The Breakfast Club’. TV-14 viewer discretion for lawyer tv show ‘The Good Wife’. Rated R language and viewer discretion for comedy drama movie ‘Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Babylon 5’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Carbon Copy’. Rated R violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Starship Troopers’. Rated R violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Alien: Resurrection’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and commercial. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Whine’, ‘Not able to see’, ‘Innocent synchronize’, ‘Involve synchronize’, ‘Prove’, ‘Now synchronize’, ‘Awkwardness’, ‘Not agree/choose to talk about that/it’, ‘Not talk about that/it’, ‘Exact’, ‘Exact exceed’, and ‘Exact exceed make’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.
[3/31/2018: I almost completed proofreading this list. Since it’s now 5:05 PM EST for me, I plan to finish the ‘Imagination’ idea either this coming Friday or Saturday. So, if you are going to be there, then I’ll see you then.