7/28/2018

Salutations.

It is now 1:37 PM EST for me. I had trouble today using the internet connection, so I have decided to use a cable modem internet connection starting this Thursday. So, if all goes well, starting Thursday, I should not have any trouble using the laptop to get an internet connection. The music video I am recommending is from the song ‘Thumbs’ by American singer Sabrina Carpenter. I watched it for the 1st time in it’s entirety today from www.youtube.com, but I noticed it for the 1st time yesterday, from a tv show called TRL, recorded yesterday, 7/27/2018. The show TRL was in channel ‘MTV Classic’. In that show, Sabrina Carpenter was being interviewed, and they showed a few of her music videos. To know more about TRL, search for phrase ‘total request live’ in www.wikipedia.org. Here’s a quote from wikipedia:

” The song talks about embracing individuality and escaping mediocrity. The lyric “They gonna keep on twiddling them thumbs” is a metaphor that means wasting your time doing pointless things and never making any real progress. She says that if people are falling into the same mistakes they are going to continue twiddling them thumbs, so they are going to live in the mediocrity. ”

” The music video features Sabrina singing the song with several people inside the subway doing their daily tasks. When the idea of the video was being processed, Sabrina thought of a subway because it’s where you find different people, the line “Somewhere in the world” represents that people. ”

To watch the music video ‘Thumbs’ for free, search for phrase ‘sabrina carpenter thumbs’ from www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 97 million views. Not bad, in my opinion, for a music video that was published 2/9/2017.

Before I begin, I just want to talk about the fact that this is a public blog, that anyone, so to speak, can read this. Sometimes, like now, I think of only certain people reading this blog. That’s why I try to remind myself from time to time that this is a public blog. For example, I think of this blog as a house that people should be able to visit. If I think about it a little more, I add to it that it’s like when you enter a store, and there’s beverages being displayed. Even though a person does not drink those beverages, all of those beverages should be drinkable, even though they are not purchased. And that leads me to people scanning the internet. Even though the material in the blog is not actually read by them, they help ensure that the material is acceptable, in certain ways, to be read. Of course, you should not depend on such people to make sure that the blogs that you may choose to visit are OK. That’s just something that I imagined. I’m saying this now, because like I said, I would usually only think of certain types of people reading this stuff.

Begin:

Let’s start with an illustration from the movie ‘Excalibur(1981)’, starring Nicol Williamson as Merlin and Nigel Terry as King Arthur. You can rent the movie streaming for about 4 dollars. The illustration according to Amazon Video starts 33 minutes and 31 seconds into the movie, when Merlin is explaining to Arther what the Dragon is. Here is the quote:

Arthur: ‘Where is it?’

Merlin: ‘It is everywhere. It is everything. It’s scales glisten in the bark of trees, it’s roar is heard in the wind, and it’s forked tongue strikes like…like…Whoa! Like lightning. Yes, that’s it.’

The highlight of that illustration is when lightning struck a nearby tree, and Merlin used that experience in his explanation to Arthur. I used an illustration where Merlin talked about lightning. This is good enough, I suppose. I just remembered it differently, or maybe there’s another scene in the movie where Merlin mentions lightning. Anyway, I used what I remembered to help me create idea ‘Begin’. I’ll try to explain idea ‘Begin’ now: Suppose you are trying to resolve a minor instigation that you had recently experienced, and during that short moment, it’s like maybe you’re contemplationally scrambling for the solution, a solution you cannot put your finger on, so to speak. It is during that short moment you may experience another minor instigation, let’s say it’s effects is like an interjection, and of course you did not agree to participate with it. That interjection is contemplationally encouraging you to ‘begin’ with that contemplation. In the beginning use of this idea, since you may not have used such an idea before and you may have build-up for it, idea ‘Begin’ in it’s beginning uses may identify interjections from instigations that encourage you to give credence to contemplationally induced beginnings that tend to be overemphasized.

Here’s the best 1 example I can think of, when a person is encouraging others to commit to overemphasized beginnings, refurbished for advice. I say that this is the best example, because later, this person also participates in a penalty to try to ‘make up’ for what he did by serving food to the others. There are a few other things in the illustration that makes it worthwhile to watch. Of course, you take out the inaproprieities, and the illustration is refurbished for advice. You can even watch most of the episode, if you choose to, but I’m just going to highlight several scenes. That illustration is in episode 7.19 ‘Q2’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Voyager(2001)’, starring Kate Mulgrew as Captain Janeway, John de Lancie as Q, and Keegan de Lancie as Q2, Q’s son. Here’s a quote from www.imdb.com about the episode:

” When Q finds his rebellious son too much to handle, he brings him to Voyager in the hope that Captain Janeway can teach him responsibility and compassion. ”

If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available for you to watch from Amazon.com without additional payment.

The 1st illustration starts, according to Amazon Video, 5 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode, B’Elanna Torres(Roxann Dawson) is talking to Captain Janeway about Q2. Here is the quote:

B’Elanna: ‘If he doesn’t stop his little light show, the warp core’s going to breach.’

The 2nd illustration is when Q2 placed the crew of Voyager in a situation where they are being attacked by the Borg. This illustration starts 9 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode.

Janeway: ‘Reroute power to aft shields and return fire.’

Q2: ‘You’re just prolonging the inevitable.’

Janeway: ‘We’ve defeated the Borg before. We’ll do it again.’

Q2: ‘Not this time.’

And here’s the food scene I’m talking about, when Q2 serves food to the Voyager crew as a disciplinary action. A quote from that scene starts 20 minutes and 26 seconds into the episode.

Q2: ‘Do you ever stop?’

Neelix(Ethan Phillips): ‘Oh, I’m sorry. I forgot. My talking annoys you. Too bad you can’t just…(snaps fingers) …shut me up again, huh?’

With Zenerx Natural Male Enhancement healthy men are enhanced and energized to perform like never before. soft cialis When the moose lifts its head, his massive antlers poke into the meeting room ceiling, raining down chunks of ceiling tile and knocking out a light. sale of viagra The position of the testicle: viagra samples online A testicle which has not completely descended is close to the higher temperature of the upper body thus not allowing the semen to cool properly in its ambient temperature. Even poor communication with your sex partner may also affect your sexual activity as well. best online viagra I just thought of this a few minutes ago. The reason why this ‘Voyager’ episode is the best example I can think of is because of how Q2’s antics are obviously instantaneous. The incident didn’t exist until he ‘snaps’ his fingers, so to speak. In both the warp core breach and the Borg attack example, Q2 placed the Voyager crew in a precarious(dependent on circumstances beyond one’s control) situation without any way to prepare for it, and of course the situations are excessive and extreme. Sure, it was rectified later. That’s why you refurbish those 2 scenes, so that you can learn from them.[7/29/2018: When I recommended that you ‘refurbish’ those 2 scenes, the refurbishing is done in relation to advice. For example, you see those 2 scenes as overemphasized and excessive, yet also out of context, not relevant, and something that you can choose not to ‘begin’ with. You don’t turn those 2 scenes into something that contradicts your reasonable sense of safety. Also, it’s sci-fi. If you watched the beginning of that episode, Q entrusted the care of his son, Q2, to Janeway, and when Q came back, he used his powers to ‘fix’ certain things, and gave Janeway all the ‘chatty cathy’ she wanted to hear.]

The solution is that, if you experience such interjections, you can contemplationally say phrase ‘Begin’, and that will help you not interact and participate with such out of context, non relevant interjections. You can sense it, but you don’t have to become it.

The next example is from a refurbished for advice with inaproprieties removed episode, episode 1.25 ‘The Neutral Zone’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1988)’. Here’s a quote from wikipedia about the episode:

” Dr. Crusher, in reviving them, easily cures them of their illnesses. They are having to cope with the culture shock of awakening in a distant future with the realization that everything they knew and had are now gone. ”

Basically, the resources of the Enterprise and it’s crew were used to orientate 3 people from Earth of the late 20th Century. I’m not even going to quote this episode.

The 2nd example is in the beginning of episode 5.8 ‘The Queen’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate: Atlantis(2008)’. The episode is just used to illustrate an ‘odd’ co-venture.

So, here’s a situation I recommend that you consider: an instigator may improperly impose an aspect of interaction from something that you are not privy to, from something that you are not ready to interact with. Suppose you believe an instigator had some sort of conversation from a teacher or teachers in your school, or from management in your job. An instigator may improperly impose interacting with an aspect of that instigator’s participation that you are not ready to interact with. Also, the interaction is out of context, and you are not obligated to interact with such an imposition. For example, n the ‘Star Trek’ episode, resources were used on those 3 people to help them integrate into Federation society. Those resources were not made available to you. And in the ‘Stargate’ episode, if you were to interact with the Wraith, you would do so using a co-venture situation. That way, you would have an understanding as to why such an interaction is even possible, and you would be prepared somewhat for the situation. Let’s say you believe that an instigator in your job had a conversation with management, and what also happened is like a co-venture, something that was prepared for the instigator to experience. You were not given anything to prepare for that experience. You may have experienced an interjection from an instigator that was from a co-venture that you were not prepared for. Of course, I’m not saying the co-venture was with the Wraith. That’s just an example. I’m saying that you were not prepared for that co-venture experience. That interjection may have improperly imposed a sense of beginning interaction that you were not prepared for.

The solution I recommend, if such an interjection was already something that you are not obligated to interact with, is to choose to not ‘begin’ with such an imposition. Just contemplationally say the word ‘Begin’ to help you not choose to interact with such an interjection.

Fix begin:

If you choose to use idea ‘Begin’, you now have an idea that may allow you to choose to not directly interact with certain imposed impessions of beginnings. I think it was this past Wednesday, 7/25/2018, that I invented idea ‘Fix begin’. That is when an instigator and/or inadvertency is contemplationally encouraging you to ‘fix’ something imposed by the person’s presentation. Suppose you are in a public bus, and a few people from time to time from inside the bus and from outside, are presenting identities that encourage you to contemplationally respond to ‘fix’ something that is shown to you. Now, with idea ‘Fix begin’, you can contemplationally say the words ‘Fix begin’ or ‘Begin fix’, and you can choose not to fix it. Let’s say you need to maintain some sort of neutral or benevolent attitude, and certain inclinations to fix discourages such an attitude. Now, with idea ‘Fix begin’, you can maintain better that neutral and/or benevolent attitude of yours, since you no longer have to ‘fix’ such interjections.

I have an illustration in mind for idea ‘Fix begin’. I recommend you just use a little respectful maturity when watching this illustration. And of course, the illustration is refurbished for advice with inaproprieities removed, and throw away the rest of the episode. I’m not recommending that you watch this tv show, just a few scenes in one episode. The illustration is in episode 1.3 ‘Fertility’ from comedy tv show ‘Alone Together(2018)’. The scenes involve how Dr. Anderson(Cathy Shim) responds to Esther(Esther Povitsky). Esther, refurbished for advice, is imposing interjections upon Dr. Anderson that encourage Dr. Anderson to fix such interjections. However, Dr. Anderson chooses instead to not need to fix such interjections, and instead she maintains a sense of both benevolence and neutrality. I recommend that you just watch the beginning of the episode. That’s when you see Dr. Anderson interacting with Esther. The most obvious scene, in my opinion, is when Esther drops a bunch of sticks that she was stealing from Dr. Anderson’s office, and when Dr. Anderson saw the sticks on the floor, she didn’t seem to get angry about it, and she still continued to speak to Esther in a surprisingly calm, reasonable context. That scene where Esther drops the sticks start, according to Amazon Video, 2 minutes and 29 seconds into the episode. The episode streaming is about 2 dollars Standard Definition. Here is the quote:

Esther: ‘Okay, let’s get outta here. I don’t want Dr. Anderson to know that I’m dumb and poor. I just want her to remember the good times. Let’s just go home.’ (Esther accidentally drops the sticks.) ‘Oh, my God.’

Benji(Benji Aflalo): ‘Oh, my God. You idiot.’ (That is the moment Dr. Anderson walks into the office and sees all of those sticks on the floor.)

Reciprocate begin:

The definition of ‘reciprocate’ from www.dictionary.com is ‘to give, feel, etc., in return’. I invented idea ‘Reciprocate’ this past Thursday, 7/26/2018. The 1st meaning of reciprocate I invented basically involved interacting with women in a neutral to benevolent context, when they are presenting some sort of snobbish and/or rude behavior. I just imagine being able to kiss them on the cheek, even when their identities are non-reciprocating, I guess like the way Dr. Anderson treated Esther in the ‘Alone Together’ episode.

Soon after I invented the 1st definition, I invented another use for idea ‘Reciprocate begin’. The idea can also address the lack of reciprocation your own private expectations are getting from others, in an instigation and/or inadvertent context. The reason an idea like this one may not be invented by most people is because instigations tend to overemphasize their own guilt. The blame is so obviously from the instigator, that you are less likely going to look at yourself. It’s like in the movie ‘Red Lights(2012)’, when Paul Shackleton(Toby Jones) is talking to Margaret Matheson(Sigourney Weaver). The scene starts 38 minutes and 33 seconds into the movie.

Paul Shackleton: ‘So why’d you hold the card up to the light?’

Margaret Matheson: ‘So you wouldn’t think about your glasses.’

The only illustration example I can think of right now for idea ‘Reciprocate begin’, the 2nd definition, is in movie ‘Some Kind of Wonderful(1987)’, starring Mary Stuart Masterson as Watts, and Lea Thompson as Amanda Jones. The scene starts when Amanda is putting on her make-up, and Watts, as she was driving, noticed that Amanda is putting on her make-up. Soon after Watts noticed Amanda putting on her make-up, Watts stepped on the brakes a little, causing Amanda to have an accident with her application of make-up. The movie is about 3 dollars streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 13 minutes, and 20 seconds into the movie.

Watts: ‘Pardon me.’

Amanda: ‘No problem.’ (After Amanda said that, she still kicked the driver’s chair Amanda was sitting on.)

So, even though Amanda said ‘No problem’, she still experienced a lacking sense of reciprocation from her own expectations, causing Amanda to kick Watt’s chair.

Of course, you can shuffle the phrases ‘Fix begin’ and ‘Reciprocate begin’. Maybe with an understanding of both, all you have to do is use ‘Fix begin’ on the instigator and on your own sense of reciprocation.

[Next Saturday, I plan to finally explain idea ‘Not add’, since idea ‘Not add’, if you explained these ideas in order, should have been explained 1st. So, if i see you next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Excalibur’. TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for tv shows ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ and ‘Stargate: Atlantis’. Viewer discretion for tv show ‘Alone Together’. Rated R language, violence, and viewer discretion for movie ‘Red Lights’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Some Kind of Wonderful’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Begin’, ‘Fix begin’, and ‘Reciprocate begin’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

7/14/2018

Salutations.

It is now 9:30 AM EST for me. As part of the explanation for the music video I am recommending, I want to quote a scene from the streaming rental of movie ‘Blade Runner: The Final Cut’ from Amazon.com. In this scene, Dr. Eldon Tyrell(Joe Turkel) is talking to Rick Deckard(Harrison Ford) and is being introduced to by Rachael(Sean Young). The illustration starts, according to Amazon Video, 17 minutes and 56 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Dr. Tyrell: ‘Is this to be an empathy test? Capillary dilation of the so-called blush response? Fluctuation of the..pupil. Involuntary dilation of the iris.’

Deckard: ‘We call it Voight-Kampff for short.’

Rachael: ‘Mr. Deckard, Dr. Eldon Tyrell.’

Dr. Tyrell: ‘Demonstrate it. I wanna see it work.’

Deckard: ‘Where’s the subject?’

Dr. Tyrell: ‘I want to see it work on a person. I want to see a negative before I provide you with a positive.’

Deckard: ‘What’s that gonna prove?’

Dr. Tyrell: ‘Indulge me.’

Deckard: ‘On you?’

Dr. Tyrell: ‘Try her.’

I am going to recommend that the music video that I am going to recommend for you to watch be used as an exercise to help you choose to pay attention to things that you may originally not choose to pay attention to. The reason for this exercise is because 1)I couldn’t find a convenient enough music video for you to just watch, so 2)I instead decided to address how mild to moderate instigations affect you. Specifically, how experiencing mild to moderate instigations may have the effect of causing you to not want to experience them. For example, in a public setting where many people walk through, such as public transportation areas, I think it’s possible you may experience mild instigations from strangers that you would not want to experience. After the experience, if you would choose to recall such an experience, that experience may cause you to not want to pay attention to it. I suspect that instigators may want you to not pay attention to them in order to adversely affect how you would interact with opportunities that are obvious to you. For example, that adverse effect may give instigators an advantage to benefit with opportunities that are not obvious, and cause innocent people to overly fuss over opportunities that are.

Anyway, this exercise is designed by intent to help you regain some of that paying attention ability that you may have lost because of mild to moderate instigation experience. Here’s a part of the quote again:

” Dr. Tyrell: ‘I want to see it work on a person. I want to see a negative before I provide you with a positive.’

Deckard: ‘What’s that gonna prove?’

Dr. Tyrell: ‘Indulge me.’ ”

In the example, Deckard was given a request by Dr. Tyrell to ‘pay attention’ to someone for a test that he would normally not ‘pay attention’ to in the context of that test. It’s possible in a reasonable context that you may be in a situation that involves paying attention in a way that you are not normally accustomed to. And that is what happened to Deckard. So, whether it’s for school or work, I believe it is useful for you to have the ability to reasonably be able to change how you pay attention to things. For example, when I say ‘reasonable’, that is like when a teacher, your boss, or someone with authority you choose to recognize makes a request for you to provide a more customized way of paying attention.

The music video I am recommending for this exercise is called ‘Disappear’ by Australian rock band ‘INXS’. Wikipedia doesn’t say anything about the music video, so keep in mind that watching the music video is refurbished for advice. Here is a quote from wikipedia about the song:

” “Disappear” is a single by INXS, the second single taken from their album X. It peaked at #8 on the Billboard Hot 100 in February 1991, becoming the band’s seventh and last top 10 single. ”

Here is a quote from the lyrics of the song:

You’re so fine
Lose my mind
And the world seems to disappear
All the problems, all the fears
And the world seems to disappear

So, when you watch the music video, I recommend that you choose to pay attention to it. As you watch it, recall a few images of instigators discouraging you to ‘pay attention’ to them. Notice that the people performing in the music video are making an obvious effort to convey some sort of meaning to you, and that effort is noticed even more if you choose to pay attention to them. Of course, it’s a music video designed for viewing by the general public, and you don’t have to accept and use the message it may be conveying to you. Also, keep in mind that this exercise is to help you have the ability to change how you ‘pay attention’ to things. Of course, I don’t recommend that you use what you have learned from this exercise as if it were a pair of glasses to wear and use on everything, such as using it for school or work. If, after participating with this exercise, you are able to change how you pay attention in a reasonable context when given such a request by your teacher or boss, then I believe you have benefitted from such an exercise.

As far as I can tell, I watched the entire music video today for the 1st time. I recorded it from the cable tv service yesterday from a tv show called ‘Rock Block’ from a channel called ‘MTV Classic’. I also watched the music video less than an hour ago from www.youtube.com, and in my opinion, the experience is a lot better if you watch it from tv. So, to watch music video ‘Disappear’ for free, search for phrase ‘inxs disappear video’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 6.1 million views.

[I know I just started, but I want to take a break. I want to order some food, but the fast food restaurant is not open yet. So, what I’ll do is go through the DVDs/Blu-rays I rented so that I can return them. And then I want to order something to eat. After that, I’ll continue with this list today. So, I’ll see you later today.

All right! It’s now 2:12 PM EST for me. Before I begin, again, I am postponing explanation ‘Not add’. I believe this idea is more important to explain, and after I finish explaining it, I plan to explain idea ‘Not add’, unless I change my mind again.

Affirm:

This is the basic premise idea for this list. After I invented it, I basically just kept upgrading it. So, to start, here is the definition of word ‘debunk’ from www.dictionary.com: ‘to expose or excoriate as being pretentious, false, or exaggerated’, and the example is ‘to debunk advertising slogans’. The basic premise idea starts from a scene from a drama movie called ‘Red Lights(2012)’, starring Sigourney Weaver as Margaret Matheson. Here’s a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the movie:

” The plot focuses on a physicist (Murphy) and a university psychology professor (Weaver), both of whom specialise in debunking supernatural phenomena… ”

The basic premise idea, according to Amazon Video, starts 36 minutes and 53 seconds into the movie, Miss Matheson talking to Paul Shackleton(Toby Jones) about the results of Psychic photography. Here is a quote:

Matheson: ‘So what is it this time? Psychic photography?-Retrocognition, remote vision?’

Paul: ‘Telepathy.’

Matheson: ‘-Drawings, sealed envelopes, cards?’

Paul: ‘-Zener cards.’

Matheson: ‘Double blind, triple blind, simple blind?’

Paul: ‘Simple blind. I did it myself.’

Matheson: ‘I take it from your enthusiasm you just did a test.’

Paul: ‘That’s right.’

Matheson: ‘Were you facing your subject?’

Paul: ‘Sure.’

Matheson: ‘What about them?’

Paul: ‘Uh, they were in the control booth, monitoring the subject.’

Matheson: ‘Who was monitoring you?’

Paul: ‘Me? Why would anyone want to be monitoring me?’

Matheson: ‘It’s a joke. So were you at the same eye level as the subject?’

Paul: ‘Approximately, yes.’

Matheson: ‘-Under a light, I guess?’

Paul: ‘-Yes.’

Matheson: ‘The way we are now?’

Paul: ‘More or less, I guess.’

Matheson: ‘-You have the cards with you?’

Paul: ‘-No, I-I don’t have them here.’

(One of his assistants give him the cards)

Paul: ‘-Oh. Yeah, here.’

Matheson: ‘-Okay.’ (Matheson holds one of the cards to the light.) ‘Okay. Shoot.’

Paul: ‘What do you mean, “shoot”?’

Matheson: ‘Go ahead. Shoot.’

Paul: ‘-T-To you?’

Matheson: ‘-Sure.’

Paul: ‘-Here?’

Matheson: ‘Why not?’

Paul: (inhales) ‘Okay.’ (Paul shows Matheson a card with the image of a square on one side, and Matheson is shown the other side of that card, which is not supposed to reveal the image that is on it’s opposite side)

Matheson: ‘Square.’

For the next 10 seconds or so, Matheson was able to identify all of the images correctly.

Paul: ‘How are you doing that?’

Matheson: ‘-Methodological defects’

Paul: ‘-‘No, w–w–they’re not transparent, we made sure–‘

Matheson: ‘improper controls, inadvertent inclusion of relevant data, or, in this case, all three at the same time. Congratulations. Next time, try to take them off first.’

Paul: ‘So why’d you hold the card up to the light?’

Matheson: ‘So you wouldn’t think about your glasses.’

Of course, I highly recommend that you watch that scene from the movie ‘Red Lights’ in order to more understand it. If you watched that scene, it would show you that the reflection from Paul’s glasses may have given away the answer to the test subject.

So, according to wikipedia, Margaret Matheson is a university professor and psychologist. Basically, I recommend that you use her as a refurbished for advice reference, and interpret her debunking ability as the ability to manage what is affirmed and/or not affirmed. For example, when you are in your school or work break area, even though when other people are there and other evaluations are happening, you have chosen the affirmation that you are on your break, not interacting with those other evaluations. When a person is testifying in a court of law about his/her involvement during an investigated incident, that person is affirming that he/she was just doing a certain thing, and did not choose to interact with those other incidents. For example, I think that practically every episode of ‘Elementary(2012+)’ starring Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock Holmes has people being questioned, and they were always clarifying as to what affirmations they were using at the time of a certain incident.

So, when you are in your break area, and other people are there, you may choose to see that situation, among other things, as you managing your sense of affirming. However, if you choose to imagine it, Miss Matheson not only manages her sense of affirming when she is at her break area, she also manages her sense of affirming all the time! While she is working, socializing, making jokes, during her recreational moments, she is always actively managing her sense of affirming. If you imagine it, it may make sense to you how a Margaret Matheson is created. For example, if she attended schools where instigation was an active problem for many students, her mind simply? adapted to it within her chosen lifestyle rules. So, I am speculating that she did not become an instigator when she experienced instigation. Instead, she ‘debunked’ instigation. She was so good at debunking instigation in school, some of her best friends were instigators, and of course Miss Matheson prided herself for NOT becoming an instigator! I believe that there are other people like Miss Matheson in real life. They became really good at debunking instigation, and many of them probably have very successful careers in America. I don’t have any proof of that. It’s just a belief.

So, here are some examples using the affirm idea: when you are ‘walking away from a fight’, you are clarifying to yourself that such an interaction to fight is not your chosen sense of affirmation, when someone falsely accuses you of something, such as an insult, you did not choose to interact with such an affirmation, and like the recent ‘Sean Connery’ story, if an attractive lady metaphorically pulls a man’s ear with her beauty, in a job related situation of course, that man would use some sort of restraint, some sort of reservation, to maintain a conducive working mentality.

Reaffirm:

When you use idea ‘Affirm’, you can use the word ‘reaffirm’ as an indicator for yourself, to check that you are not interacting with certain affirmations that you have already chosen to not interact with. If you check web site www.dictionary.com, it gives you some sentence examples using the word ‘reaffirm’.

Of course, there is this saying that I imagine is popular. That saying is: ‘If it were that simple, everyone would do it.’ Maybe it is actually popular. I don’t know. Here’s a refurbished for advice story to help explain the problem. This story is from Greek mythology concerning how Atalanta married Melanion. The quote is from www.wikipedia.com, searching for phrase ‘golden apple’. There is a painting of Atalanta showing frontal nudity in the article, but it is a very old painting. Here is the quote:

” Realizing that Atalanta could not be defeated in a fair race, Melanion prayed to Aphrodite for help. The goddess gave him three golden apples and told him to drop them one at a time to distract Atalanta. Sure enough, she quit running long enough to retrieve each golden apple. It took all three apples and all of his speed, but Melanion finally succeeded, winning the race and Atalanta’s hand. ”

You’re just using that refurbished quote for this advice. Anyway, the problem, so to speak, is the golden apple. The golden apple is in reference to the decoys that instigators use for mild to moderate instigations, that cause innocent people to interact with it’s associated affirmations in a non preferred context. Of course, in the movie ‘Red Lights’, Miss Matheson is really good at knowing what her chosen affirmations are, and how she reacts to certain ‘golden apples’. That is why I recommended her to you to use as an imagined reference. So, what I am going to do with the rest of this advice is make ideas to countermeasure certain adverse effects those ‘golden apples’ may create in the innocent minds of others.

[I know it’s only 4:22 PM EST for me, but I want to stop typing now so that I can do other stuff. Keep in mind that it is only me typing. No one is working with me to type this stuff up. I guess it’s like a hobby. I plan to finish this idea next Saturday, and that means of course that I have to choose another music video. Some of you have probably already watched the INXS music video ‘Disappear’ several times or more already. By the time next Saturday arrives, you will probably benefit more with another music video selection. Anyway, if you are there next Saturday, then I’ll see you then.

7/20/2018

Greetings.

It is now 8:27 PM EST for me. I upgraded the idea yesterday, and I call the upgrade ‘Pace of acknowledgement’. So, what I am going to do today is talk about that now, so that by the time I will introduce it to you tomorrow, you will already have something to work with. Right now, I want to talk about something that I imagined. It basically starts with a girl concerned about what I will type in, putting some sort of importance as to what I will say. Since kids may be reading this, I am stipulating to the fact that what she said is none of my business. I just have concern about it, and I want to address that concern. Now I remember what this concern is about more specifically. This concern is about the ideas this girl creates versus what I say later. So, for the record, in many respects, the ideas she creates, her creativity, her developing understanding, is everything, and my ideas are worth nothing. Her ideas are what matters, not my ideas. Here’s an illustration about what I am talking about: Imagine a girl let’s say on the left side of the screen tap dancing, and the spotlight is on her. She does let’s say 10 seconds or so worth of dancing, and then she stops. That is when her tap dancing teacher does his/her dance, and this dance is meant to teach her how to tap dance. So, for her benefit, the tap dancing instructor now has the spotlight on him/her, and then the instructor shows the girl something that she can learn from, and when the instructor stops, the girl then starts dancing for a certain amount of seconds, illustrating what she has learned, and so on. That is what I am trying to do, to offer you something that may be useful to you. Of course, when I think about that, I don’t usually make an effort to conceptually accomodate everyone. I think about the tap dancing girl, and the girl just represents many people: girls, boys, teenagers, and adults.

If you want an illustration to go with the ‘tap dancing girl’ story, I recommend the movie ‘Annapolis(2006)’, starring James Franco as Jake Huard, and Tyrese Gibson as Midshipman Cole. You don’t have to see the movie. Instead, here is a quote from wikipedia.org:

” Expecting to be kicked out as well, Huard begins to pack up and leave, until Cole approaches him and informs him that he has requested more time from the disciplinary board in order to delay the hearing until after the final Brigades match. ”

” At his subsequent hearing, the disciplinary board decides to retain Huard, based on Cole’s recommendation. ”

So, even though Jake Huard in the movie made mistakes, and had difficulties trying to keep up with the school’s expectations, the disciplinary board with Cole’s recommendation chose to allow Huard to stay in school. And since this is a movie, I’m assuming Jake will graduate from Annapolis. That means that, even though Jake believes that his efforts did not create preferred results, he still is going to use those efforts in his military career. If Jake Huard graduates from Annapolis, I believe that he learned many things, as shown in the movie ‘Annapolis’, things that he will use in his military career. Of course, if Jake Huard did not graduate and instead was expelled from school, than the results of what he tried to do in Annapolis will have more of a disappointing identity. However, Jake probably graduated, and if you choose to imagine Jake graduating from Annapolis, I think you may agree that, just based on what you may see in the movie ‘Annapolis’, if you choose to watch the movie, with the inaproprieities removed, that even his logical efforts should prove useful to him in his military career.

Pace of acknowledgement:

I originally invented this idea several years ago in the Amazon lists, but with this new idea, idea ‘Pace of acknowledgement’ can be very useful to you. So, I want to start idea ‘Pace of acknowledgement’ with a story I think I typed in the Amazon lists: A man who retired years ago is now looking for a retirement home to live in, but he wants a retirement home that has theater, since he is a theatrical performer. Here is a definition of ‘theater’ from wikipedia:

” Theatre or theater is a collaborative form of fine art that uses live performers, typically actors or actresses, to present the experience of a real or imagined event before a live audience in a specific place, often a stage. The performers may communicate this experience to the audience through combinations of gesture, speech, song, music, and dance. ”

Throughout the course of a week, he’s been visiting different retirement homes, with no success. Finally, as he was about to leave another retirement home, one of the women in that home grudgingly recited something from a theatrical play to him, which caused him to turn around and smile.

The woman in that retirement home who did this chose to introduce to that man a conducive pace of acknowledgement that allowed him to believe that he may have found the retirement home to live in.

It is my belief that a conducive pace of acknowledgement is introduced to us in many things that we do. A conducive pace of acknowledgement is introduced to students to allow them to learn from schools. A conducive pace of acknowledgement is introduced to people with jobs, to allow them to to sense purpose so that they can do their jobs. So, the purpose of idea ‘Pace of acknowledgement’ is to help you to stop interacting with an adverse, out of context, and/or not relevant pace of acknowledgements that are improperly imposed by an instigator for you to interact with. The best illustration example of an instigator imposing adverse pace of acknowledgements upon others, with the inaproprieities removed, is in the movie ‘Break Point(2014)’, starring Jeremy Sisto as Jimmy. According to www.imdb.com, the movie ‘Break Point’ is rated R because of language and sexual references. Just don’t use the rated R parts, and what is left over, I recommend most of it. Also, if you have Amazon Prime, that movie does not require additional payment. So, from Amazon Video, if you choose to watch the movie, there’s going to be some bad language involved. If you are able to not use it, there is a scene, 9 minutes and 37 minutes into the movie, when Jimmy is looking for a tennis partner. All of the people turned him down because of the adverse pace of acknowledgements he caused them to interact with. My guess is that, many of these people knew that he had such a problem, but when Jimmy interacted with them, he originally presented a conducive pace of acknowledgement, like the lady did in the retirement home to that man, but later on, while they were socially interacting with each other, for some reason, Jimmy would cause them to interact with an adverse pace of acknowledgement. There’s some bad language involved in the original scene, so I’m just addressing the content. Eventually, Jimmy asks his brother, Darren(David Walton), but even he was forced to interact in the past with yet another of Jimmy’s adverse pace of acknowledgements. But since everyone turned Jimmy down, Jimmy had no choice but to ask his brother Darren if he would be his tennis partner. I wanted you to have an illustration example of someone who was imposing adverse pace of acknowledgements, so that there is less ambiguity later if you choose to use idea ‘Pace of acknowledgement’.

Tomorrow, I plan to continue explaining this idea, and hopefully, I will finish this idea tomorrow. I plan to start explaining early tomorrow. So, if you are there tomorrow, then I will see you then.

7/21/2018

Salutations.

It is now 9:57 AM EST for me. I am recommending 2 music videos, since I suspect that some people may have watched that INXS video ‘Disappear’ a lot. The 1st music video, which is the primary music video, is from the movie ‘A Wrinkle in Time(2018)’ starring Oprah Winfrey as Mrs. Which. The DVD/Blu-ray mail rental service mailed the Blu-ray version to me 7/02/18, but when I received it, it wouldn’t play on my Blu-ray player. I suppose I’m going to need to buy a new player eventually. So I had to mail that Blu-ray back and they had to receive it in order for me to get the DVD version. The service mailed that to me 7/11/18. When I watched it this month, that was the 1st time I saw the movie. In my opinion, the book version of the movie I read years ago was better. Anyway, that’s when I noticed the music video that was offered in the DVD called ‘Warrior’ by ‘Chloe x Halle’. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org about the music video:

” Chloe x Halle (stylized as CHLOE X HALLE) is an American contemporary R&B duo, made up of two sisters named Chloe and Halle Bailey (born July 1, 1998 and March 27, 2000 respectively). ”

” The single “Warrior” was released on March 7, 2018, via Walt Disney Records and is also featured on the sisters’ debut album The Kids Are Alright as well as on A Wrinkle in Time (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) which is the soundtrack album to the 2018 film of the same name. ”

Even ahead of time of pancreatic conditions, favourable modifying of them can provide the people with long-term sexual inhibition and found they preferred to have a viagra mastercard india weak on the immune ability with a decrease white blood cells, and swelling. Chief constituents buying tadalafil tablets in Shilajit ES capsules are Safed Musli, Kesar, Moti Bhasma, Shilajit Sudh and Shatavari. This drug is easily available in an assortment of flavors, Sildenafil tablets can be purchased through any registered pharmaceutical company as well as through online service providers. viagra in line ? The main function of the body. Why keep on stressing about it when the first baby showers were held, they were levitra 10 mg just for women. Wikipedia doesn’t say anything about what the music video is about. When I watched the entire music video in youtube for the 1st time 10 minutes or so ago today, the lower left side of my back was aching a little. I think that was because I watched the music video ‘Disappear’ by INXS more than 10 times within the past week. So, if you choose to still watch the music video ‘Warrior’, which I am recommending, if you feel some discomfort watching it, to help you with that, I recommend that you watch the music video ‘Only Time’ by Enya. Of course, when you watch ‘Only Time’, you refurbish the watching experience. You’re watching it to help relieve your discomfort, not to learn anything from it.

To watch music video ‘Warrior’ for free, search for phrase ‘warrior chloe’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 5.2 million views. To watch the music video ‘Only Time’ for free, search for phrase ‘only time enya’ from www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 98 million views.

Before I begin with the main explanation of it, I want to try and explain what I am trying to accomplish for you. In the movie ‘Predator(1987)’, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger as Dutch, and Carl Weathers as Dillon, there is a scene near the beginning of the movie when Dutch and Dillon greet each other, and Dutch encourages Dillon to beat him in some sort of imposed strength contest. The movie is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 4 minutes and 47 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Dutch: ‘What’s the matter? The C.I.A. got you pushing too many pencils? Huh? Had enough?’

Dillon: ‘Make it easy on yourself, Dutch.’ (Laughs) ‘Okay! Okay! Okay!’

Dutch: ‘You never did know when to quit, huh?’

Refurbishing that scene, Dutch can represent an instigator imposing some sort of instigation, and Dillon is reluctantly responding to certain aspects of it. The goal of the rest of this advice is to help you differentiate(distinguish) between your chosen actions and the actions of an instigation, and then allocate the experience accordingly. Here’s a sci-fi example. This example is available from Amazon.com. If you have Amazon Prime, no additional payment is needed to watch it. The scene, refurbished for advice of course, is in episode 5.17 ‘Totaled Recall’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Andromeda(2005)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 39 minutes and 14 seconds into the episode, Captain Hunt(Kevin Sorbo) is talking to Andromeda(Lexa Doig). Here is the quote:

Captain Hunt: ‘Andromeda.’

Andromeda: ‘Yes, Captain.’

Captain Hunt: ‘We have a potential exotic matter containment breach. Create a b-vacuum to the generator with your ramscoop. Be ready.’ (Alarm sounding)

Beka(Lisa Ryder): ‘Harper?’

Harper(Gordon Michael Woolvett): (smiles and shrugs his shoulders. Harper wasn’t able to anticipate that the ‘event’ would occur)

Captain Hunt: ‘Andromeda, report.’

Andromeda: ‘Diverting power to exotic matter drive. Initiating lens control. Captain, slipstream is back online.’

Harper: ‘Yes!’

Andromeda: ‘I am one hundred percent functional. Oh, and breach averted.’

Watching that refurbished scene is recommended to understand it better. That ‘Andromeda’ scene is used to represent the use of a contemplation created vent. It is like the air conditioner you use where you live. The air conditioner takes air out, and replaces that air with cooler, filtered air. For the air conditioner that you may have, I recommend that you clean it’s air filter. I am guessing that a lot of people don’t clean their air conditioner air filters regularly. Another example to help you conceptually allocate, refurbished with inaproprieities removed, is in episode 3.12 ‘The Dark Backward’ also from sci-fi tv show ‘Andromeda(2003)’. The episode is also available from Amazon.com, and if you have Amazon Prime, you don’t need to provide additional payment to watch it. Here is a quote from www.imdb.com:

” Trance runs through a series of possible outcomes to save the crew from a scourge. ”

Basically, I’m recommeding that you watch Trance(Laura Bertram) what seems to me to be conceptualizing possible outcomes by using what looks like an Indoor banzai(Wikipedia.org has photos and descriptions of what an Indoor banzai is). And if you chose to get your imaginations improved upon, and you read the ‘Fantasy Island Vixen’ idea(Wishlist #1121), then I recommend that you don’t actually have to watch that ‘Andromeda’ episode. You just choose to watch Trance use her banzai tree conceptualization.

Deviate:

Okay, so here is where it begins. I call this idea ‘Deviate’, and this illustration is what I used to make the idea. The illustration is in episode 1.3 ‘The Unquiet Dead’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2006)’. In the scene, Charles Dickens(Simon Callow) is explaining something to Rose Tyler(Billie Piper) and The Doctor(Christopher Eccleston). The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 39 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Charles Dickens: ‘There are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy. Even for you, Doctor.’

Now, when I recalled the original idea I made recently, I didn’t remember who said that or what was exactly said. I instead remembered someone saying something that was self declaring an affirmation, and that person was saying it to The Doctor portrayed by David Tennant in the TARDIS. I imagined kids watching that scene, and since this tv show is made for entertainment, the kids would laugh to themselves, because the man is saying that to The Doctor in the TARDIS. Also, the show is one sided, favoring The Doctor and humanity. I also recalled that scene, and I was entertained by it. However, when I tried to look for that scene, I could not find it. Instead, I found the Charles Dickens scene, and I guess I imagined that scene when Charles Dickens talked to The Doctor in his TARDIS. Still, I believe that imagined scene is useful for this idea, and that is why I am telling it to you, and the imagined scene is the one being used directly, not the actual scene.

So, here’s the issue: When you experience a mild to moderate instigation that, for example, does not involve a conversation, but still gets your attention, that feeling you get that may involve both your composure response and how you interpret the experience, that may feel like a ‘David and Goliath’ situation. There is a quote from wikipedia.org for ‘Goliath’:

” The phrase “David and Goliath” (or “David versus Goliath”) is commonly used to refer to any underdog situation or contest where a smaller, weaker opponent faces a much bigger, stronger adversary. ”

So, basically, you feel like David, who in the story ‘David and Goliath’ is young but shorter in stature compared to Goliath, who is taller and more prominent. This feature, of course, does not include the fight later. That fight is not used. What is used is how David looks compared to Goliath. So, when you experience a mild to moderate instigation that involves a feeling, that feeling may indicate to you that you feel like David to the instigator’s Goliath.

The solution uses that ‘Pez stick’ idea I invented way back in Wishlist #1049. Here is a quote from that list:

” If you have a problem with a dominant intensity that is instigation, imagined, or inadvertency related, just imagine that Pez stick of yours, press the button, and see if you can change the intensity to something more suitable. ”

Instead of being adversely manipulated by that feeling of being David to the instigator’s Goliath, you use the ‘Pez stick’ idea to allow your sense of self worth, self acceptance, and self affirmation to be dominant. To help you do that, imagine that the instigator has a TARDIS, and you are in it like I imagined Charles Dickens was in The Doctor’s TARDIS, and you say somewhat what Charles Dickens said.[7/27/2018: It wasn’t until the next day or so after typing that, about imagining that an instigator has a TARDIS, that I realized that I may have made a mistake, that some kids would be worried as to how that instigator would use the TARDIS. For that, I apologize for that mistake. What I meant when I typed that in was that the instigator would be able to use the TARDIS like The Doctor would use the TARDIS. And of course, since I am recommending that the TARDIS be used as part of what you may choose to imagine, the imagined use is of course in relation to advice. Sorry for the misunderstanding.] Of course, you just think it. You don’t need to actually say it. Here is the recommended quote:

You: ‘There are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy. Even for you, Doctor.’

Since I try to take into consideration that kids may be reading this stuff, you are not ignoring certain aspects of your understanding that involve what you think the instigator’s resourcefulness has, reasonably thought about, of course. Instead, when you say that, you are doing so using your own sense of self worth, self acceptance, and self affirmation as providing some sort of equal contemplation balance in your own mind. Here is an illustration from the movie ‘Justice League(2017)’, where Cyborg(Ray Fisher) is trying to do something like that, but I believe my recommended way is better for generalistic use. The illustration starts, according to Amazon Video, 1 hour, 20 minutes, and 23 seconds into the movie, Aquaman(Jason Momoa) is talking to Cyborg. Here is the quote:

Aquaman: ‘So, you can’t find them. Or maybe you don’t want to.’

Batman(Ben Affleck): ‘Arthur.’

Aquaman: ‘Yeah, that was a great way to get rid of Superman.’

Cyborg: ‘Man, I’m not doing this on purpose.’

Aquaman: ‘Right, ’cause you can’t control the machine.’

Wonder Woman(Gal Gadot): ‘Victor. You can find the boxes. You share their energy. I know it’s frightening, but if you go under, I promise we will pull you back out.’

Aquaman: ‘Just keep the little merman away from me while I work.’

Notice that Cyborg called Aquaman ‘the little merman’ so that he can clear his head in order to look for the boxes.

There are 3 bookmarks that I originally used when I invented this idea, to help address different intensities, and different varieties of emphasis when experiencing such instigations: 1)’Deviate’, 2)’Feed’, and 3)’Starve’. Idea ‘Feed’ is when it feels like the instigator is feeding such a feeling to you, and ‘Starve’ is when I use the feeling of hunger to help allocate such an instigation. So, when you use this idea, I recommend that you shuffle those 3 words contemplationally, to help improve the effectiveness of this advice for you.

[I’m going to take a food break right now. I’ll probably order Chinese food today, and in 2 hours, I’ll start typing again.

3:15 PM

All right. I’m back from my break. It’s now 3:15 PM EST for me. I want to introduce to you 2 more ideas before I give you another idea that will obviously help you differentiate more.

Declare:

There is this phrase I associate with kids playing. One kid would say the phrase ‘I declare war.’ Just recently, I checked www.google.com for it. After a few minutes, I stopped searching. I believe that such a game exists, and that’s how I invented the idea ‘Declare’.

The next reference for ‘Declare’ is from a phrase that American women would say during the time of the Civil War. I think that phrase is ‘I do declare!’ And to get a feeling for that, I recommend episode 2.9 ‘The General’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Timeless(2018)’. The episode is available for purchase for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 18 minutes and 43 seconds, when Wyatt Logan(Matt Lanter) is wearing a suit to prepare to interact in a party that requires some sort of Southern accent. Wyatt is preparing himself with the help of Rufus Carlin(Malcolm Barrett). Here is the quote:

Rufus: (chuckles after seeing Wyatt with his Southern suit)

Wyatt: ‘It actually fits pretty well.’

Rufus: ‘I’d like some extra crispy chicken tenders, Colonel Sanders.’

Wyatt: ‘You’re a riot.’

Rufus: ‘So, Colonel, can you do an accent?’

Wyatt: ‘Uh… How y’all doin’?’

Rufus: ‘Okay, less J.R. from Dallas, more Leo from Django Unchained’.

The 3rd reference are the few scenes, and you don’t have to know which scenes they are, when Agent Mulder(David Duchovny) in the sci-fi tv show ‘The X Files(1998)’ would say in the show quote ‘More information than I needed to know.’ I don’t know specifically which episodes he said that phrase in.’

The 4th reference, and you’re just using the quote, is in episode 1.14 ‘The Children’s Hour’ from fantasy tv show ‘Cupid(1999)’, when Trevor(Jeremy Piven) is talking to Ellen Calder(Mary Ann Thebus). You can find the quote in www.tv.com:

Trevor: I’m a friend of Luther’s. Is he here?
Ellen: No, he went to get me some medicated pads for my…
Trevor: Medicated pads! That’s all the information I need.

And finally, in the action comedy movie ‘Our Man Flint(1966)’, Flint(James Coburn) chose not to talk to 2 generals, and only wanted to talk to Cramden(Lee J. Cobb). The scene, according to Amazon Video, and you can stream rent the movie, starts 7 minutes and 53 seconds into the movie, while Flint is doing his daily training exercises. After choosing to not talk to the 2 generals sent to talk to him, Cramden receives a phone call. I’m assuming that phone call is from the President of the United States himself. Here is the quote:

Cramden: ‘What do you mean he said no? I sent you two…'(phone ringing) ‘Yes, sir? But I sent General Hawkins himself, sir. I–Yes, sir. I’ll contact Flint personally.’

I believe that the reference from the movie ‘Our Man Flint’ says the meaning of idea ‘Declare’. Flint did not want to interact with the declaration made by General Hawkins on Cramden’s behalf. Flint wanted to interact with Cramden himself. The purpose of idea ‘Declare’ is to help you identify declaring identity itself, so that you can decide better how to interact with such declarings.

Prepare:

According to www.dictionary.com, the definition of word ‘prepare’ is ‘to manufacture, compound, or compose’, and the example is ‘to prepare a cough syrup’. The only illustration I can think of right now for idea ‘Prepare’ is from Wishlist #1072. Here is the quote:

The illustration is in episode 6.20 ‘The Man Who Would Be King’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Supernatural(2011)’, and according to Amazon Video, it starts 20 minutes and 2 seconds into the episode. In the illustration, Dean Winchester(Jensen Ackles) is talking to Sam Winchester(Jared Padalecki) and Bobby Singer(Jim Beaver). Here is the quote:

Dean:-‘This is usually the point where we would call Cass for help.’

Bobby:-‘We talked about this.’

Sam:-‘Yea, Dean.’

Dean:-‘No, you talked. I listened.’

Let’s address the obvious 1st. When you experience a mild to moderate instigation, it’s an instigation to you because you are bothered by it’s experience. That could be your most accurate, most effective indicator, the fact that you are bothered by the experience. So, the question is: Why are you bothered by the experience? Idea ‘Prepare’ may help you with certain instigation experiences by identifying the possible ‘Why’ of it. For example, an instigation interjected an impression of contemplation upon you. You don’t have to interpret that impression of contemplation as if you were the one that prepared it. So, let’s use that episode from ‘Supernatural’ again:

Bobby:-‘We talked about this.’

Sam:-‘Yea, Dean.’

Dean:-‘No, you talked. I listened.’

Dean agreed that they talked about it. Dean clarified to both Bobby and Sam that they talked about it. Dean, however, was listening. Dean was clarifying how the situation was agreed to be prepared in his mind. I believe that, with practice, you’ll improve considerably the use of idea ‘Prepare’.

[As much as I would like to finish this idea today, to me, it feels like I don’t have to meet some sort of agreed upon time. I can keep typing, but I don’t want to feel like I’m being taxed to do it. So, what I’ll do is stop for now and finish this idea probably next Saturday. That way, next week, I’ll have plenty of time to finish and proofread it. And once you have it, you’ll always have it, so to speak. I am assuming, of course, that you are copying and pasting these words in some sort of word processor, and you are putting those files in several flash drives. I recommend that you also keep one of your recently replaced laptops or computers and put the files in there. Who will use those things? For example, donate your older computers, but keep the recently replaced one for information backup. Well, if you are here next Saturday, then I’ll see you then.

7/27/2018

Greetings.

It is now 8:33 PM EST for me. Because of the new idea I think I invented this past Monday, and continued to upgrade, the idea is called ‘Begin’, and it’s for this advice, I am going to try and finish this list today, so that I can begin explaining idea ‘Begin’ tomorrow. Even though begin is a part of this idea, I don’t want to put too much information in this list, so I’ll just continue it for tomorrow. Idea ‘Begin’, in my opinion, is the best idea I have ever invented. Of course, it includes certain previous ideas I have already typed in.

Since I will make another list tomorrow, I’ll just offer you a music video I have already offered you in Wishlist #1123, the second version called ‘Lush Life’ by Zara Larsson. To watch her music video for free, ‘Lush Life’, search for phrase ‘zara larsson lush life’ from www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 567 million views. When I recommended the music video in 5/30/2018, just about 2 months ago, it had over 554 million views. Over 13 million views were added in the past 2 months.

Bring up:

I invented idea ‘Bring up’ specifically from an episode of ‘Babylon 5’, a scene from episode 3.4 ‘Passing Through Gethsemane’. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available without additional payment. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org about that scene:

” Theo is willing to forgive him for what he’s done and challenges Sheridan that forgiveness, while a hard thing, is always something worth striving for. After first being enraged at seeing the “new” Brother Malcolm, Sheridan grudgingly sees the wisdom in Theo’s words and wishes Brother Malcolm well. ”

Of course, that scene is refurbished with inaproprieities removed and for this advice. You don’t need to use the scene with the same plot that the episode provides. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 40 minutes and 22 seconds, when Sheridan(Bruce Boxleitner) is talking to Brother Theo(Louis Turenne). What I will describe is the moment when Sheridan reacts to Brother Malcolm’s(Robert Keith) presence. That scene begins 40 minutes and 51 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Brother Malcolm: ‘Brother Theo, I’m ready to go now.’ (Sheridan turns around with justified anger)

Brother Theo: ‘Good…good. I’ll walk you to your ship. Captain, this is Brother Malcolm. He has just joined The Order under most unusual circumstances. I asked for him specifically…when I heard he wanted to serve others. He’s about to leave for the monastery back home, where he’ll be trained and trained well.’

Brother Malcolm: ‘It is all I’ve wanted to do my whole life, as long as I can remember. It’s an honor to meet you, Captain. (Sheridan mildly shrugs away Brother Malcolm’s offer to shake his hand) I’ve heard so much about you.’

Brother Theo: ‘You must excuse the Captain, Malcolm. You interrupted his train of thought.’ (to Sheridan) ‘I believe you were saying that forgiveness is a hard thing, but something ever to strive for. Were you not, Captain?’

Sheridan: ‘Yes. Yes, I was. (Sheridan then offers to shake hands with Brother Malcolm) Good luck to you. I hope things work out.’

Brother Malcolm: ‘I’m sure it will. Thank you, sir.’

So, this is how I recommend you use that scene from ‘Babylon 5’: When Sheridan initially reacted to Brother Malcolm, you can use that refurbished with inaproprieities removed reaction as something experienced from a minor instigation or inadvertency that caused you to contemplationally react. That reaction could be a mild publicly induced justified anger, it could be just something that bothered you, it could be just something that created in your thoughts a minor contemplation imbalance. If you choose to, you can identify such an experience as something that you choose not to contemplationally bring to your own attention. So, even though let’s say the incident was just a minor nuisance, you don’t have to ‘bring it up’ as an actual contemplation interaction. I call such an experience ‘Bring up’.

Now, before this advice, if you experienced a minor instigation associated with idea ‘Bring up’, you would experience that interjection followed by an obvious minor instigation soon afterwards. That minor instigation was designed to cause that minor interjection to be given by you an active contemplation interaction. Now, in the ‘Babylon 5’ scene, Brother Theo helped Sheridan not give an active use to that original interjection he experienced when he sensed Brother Malcolm’s presence. Sheridan even offered to shake Brother Malcolm’s hand and said ‘Good luck to you.’

So, if you choose to use idea ‘Bring up’, if an incident causes you to experience some sort of contemplation, you don’t have to ‘bring it up’ to yourself.

An illustration example where idea ‘Bring up’ may be useful, refurbished for advice of course, is in episode 7.23 ‘Extreme Measures’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1999)’, when O’Brien(Colm Meaney) and Bashir(Alexander Siddig) are trying to find a cure for Odo(Rene Auberjonois) in Sloan’s(William Sadler) mind. This episode is also included without additional payment if you have Amazon Prime membership. The scene begins, according to Amazon Video, 37 minutes and 39 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org about that scene:

” Deducing that they’re still in Sloan’s mind and fell for a stalling tactic, the two return to Sloan’s mind and eventually find him in his office, which is filled with secret data about Section 31. Sloan baits Bashir with the information in his mind – information that would allow Bashir to dismantle Section 31 once and for all. ”

And here is the quote from the actual scene:

Bashir: ‘This is it.’

O’Brien: ‘Are you sure?’

Bashir: ‘I can tell.’

Anyway, Sloan wants Bashir to interact too much with information that is not Odo’s cure. O’Brien finally talks Bashir out of being too distracted with the other information. And so, here is a quote before Bashir and O’Brien leave. That scene starts 40 minutes and 14 seconds into the episode:

O’Brien: ‘Odo needs you, Julian. He’s counting on you.’

Sloan: ‘You’re making a terrible mistake, Doctor.’

Bashir: ‘I don’t think so.’

They were able to leave Sloan’s mind with the cure. Of course, that scene is refurbished with the inaproprieities removed. The point of that illustration is that an instigator and/or inadvertency may cause you to ‘bring things up’ in a context that you should not. With the help of idea ‘Bring up’, you can manage better how to give credence to such interjections.

Rated R violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Blade Runner’. Rated R language, violence, and viewer discretion for movie ‘Red Lights’. Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Annapolis’. Rated R violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Predator(1987)’. TV-PG sci fi peril, violence, and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Andromeda’ and ‘Doctor Who’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Justice League’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Timeless’ and ‘Supernatural’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Babylon 5’. TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Affirm’, ‘Pace of acknowledgement’, ‘Deviate’, ‘Feed’, ‘Starve’, ‘Declare’, ‘Prepare’, and ‘Bring up’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

7/7/2018

Greetings.

It is now 9:21 AM EST for me. As you may have noticed, I am not using ‘Lara Croft’ as a greeting. Since I can’t think of a ‘new’ music video to recommend you without making more of an effort to try, I am going to just recommend a music video I have already recommended to you. The music video is from the song ‘Capital Letters’ by American singer Hailee Steinfeld. A few minutes ago, I watched the music video again using youtube, and I like the music video because you can mostly stretch out your senses when you watch it. There are not too many reasons why you may not want to sense something as you watch it. To watch the music video for free, search for phrase ‘hailee steinfeld capital letters’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 46 million views.

I’m going to postpone idea ‘Not add’ again for an idea that I invented less than a week ago and is also part of idea ‘Not add’, but so far, it would be explained last if I started to explain idea ‘Not add’, and that could take several weeks before I get to it. So, what I’ll do is explain something about it now.

Before I begin, this is what I plan to do in this list: I’ll start by recommending to you a scene from episode 2.8 ‘Day 457’ from lawyer tv show ‘The Good Fight(2018)’, starring Alan Alda(from tv show M*A*S*H) as Solomon Waltzer. Even though I’m using a scene from Amazon.com, I had to get a subscription to CBS All Access using Amazon.com for 1 month. That would cost about 10 dollars. Season 2’s episodes of ‘The Good Fight’ seem to me to not be available for purchase from Amazon.com. Anyway, you can just use the description I am giving for it. You don’t have to get the subscription. If you choose to, according to Amazon Video, the scene is located 10 minutes and 33 seconds into the episode, Judge Peter Dunaway(Kurt Fuller) is asking lawyer Solomon Waltzer a question. Here is the quote:

Judge Dunaway: ‘Where is the evidence of this investigation?’

Solomon Waltzer: ‘My paralegal found an article referring to a leaked I.A. report. I’m subpoenaing the department even as we speak.’

Judge Dunaway: ‘Okay. I want evidence brought to me by tomorrow morning, and I’ll rule on the admissability of this questioning.’

Diane Lockhart(Christine Baranski): ‘The bell has already been rung, Your Honor.’

Judge Dunaway: ‘And if there is no evidence, we will unring it; that is all I can offer.’ [gavel bangs]

So, what I am going to try to help you do is ‘unring’ certain particulars involving how you recall and resolve past experiences with instigations. Keep in mind that this is an idea, and you don’t have to use it if you don’t want to. I am going to try now to reason with you, to see if you would want to use such an idea: When you experienced an instigation in the past, and you have already agreed to yourself that it is out of context, inapropriate, and not relevant, then I believe you already have just cause to remove certain aspects of that experience as you would recall and resolve it. It is my belief that, when innocent people in America in general would recall and resolve past experiences with instigations, they would interact too much with adverse aspects of those experiences, experiences they have already deemed were inapropriate. So, what I will try and help you do in this list is ‘take out’ those experiences, so that you don’t have to always interact with them when you would recall and resolve them. This does not mean that you are deleting such experiences from memory. This strategy is a little like that ‘Good Fight’ scene. Here is the quote again:

” Judge Dunaway: ‘Okay. I want evidence brought to me by tomorrow morning, and I’ll rule on the admissability of this questioning.’

Diane Lockhart(Christine Baranski): ‘The bell has already been rung, Your Honor.’

Judge Dunaway: ‘And if there is no evidence, we will unring it; that is all I can offer.’ [gavel bangs] ”

You already experienced it. The past is the past, so to speak. However, you can still recall it in a more reasonable context. You can choose to recall it in a context that is not so adversely influenced by the instigator. This idea I am trying to introduce to you, if you choose to at least consider it, you should hopefully understand it more as I introduce to you new ideas for it. So, if you want to learn this idea, you may continue reading.

Not worry:

Before I begin, another purpose for this advice is to help you have a sense to not worry, at least for mild to moderate instigations, a sense of not worrying that can coexist with other cautions and concerns that you may have. For example, when you are at your job or school break area and you are on break, you may notice that other people are addressing certain concerns. You have the ability to casually know somewhat what those concerns are, but since you are on one of your breaks, you’re ability to not worry is allowing you to relax during that break, and not need to actively address those concerns that other students and/or employees are having in that same break area. My point is that the mild to moderate instigations you may be experiencing may be trying to inhibit you from having a simultaneous sense to not worry. And keep in mind that, even though you may have a sense to not worry, you decide how that sense is used.

Not danger:

I’m going to present 2 illustrations. The 1st illustration, refurbished with inaproprieities removed of course, is in movie ‘Back to School(1986)’, starring Rodney Dangerfield as Thornton Melon, Sam Kinison as Professor Terguson, and Leslie Scarborough as Coed #1. If you have Amazon Prime membership, the movie is available to watch without additional payment.

When you watch the illustration, keep in mind that the movie is a comedy. Basically, watch as the students in Professor Terguson’s class, refurbished for advice, experience an unavoidable sense of agitation and misery. When you would recall this illustration, I recommend that you imagine Professor Terguson in a photo with Coed #1 portrayed by Leslie Scarborough. She is the one that answered Professor Terguson’s question. Since the photo was given in class, you can imagine Professor Terguson in the left of that photo smiling, and Coed #1 to the right looking agitated and miserable. That photo’s purpose is to remind you that the students are experiencing agitation and misery that they cannot remove and avoid when they attend his class. The illustration of the student’s agitation and misery starts, according to Amazon Video, 32 minutes and 59 seconds into the movie.

The 2nd illustration is in the movie ‘Bright(2017)’, starring Will Smith as Daryl Ward, and Ike Barinholtz as Pollard. Unfortunately, the movie is only available streaming from www.netflix.com. The service charges about 8 dollars a month. The quote is only about 10 seconds or so, and you can find the transcript for free in

www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk

You can just use the quote I type in here. If you plan to use netflix’s streaming service to see the illustration, the scene according to Netflix is located 14 minutes and 10 seconds into the movie, Daryl Ward is talking to Pollard. Here is the quote:

Daryl Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, 9th divorce, then your advice will come in really handy.’

So, going to the 1st illustration, it’s an obvious interpretation to see that Professor Terguson is imposing upon his students to believe that a sense of danger is needed in order to attend his history class. Refurbished, of course, you can see that it’s just a college undergraduate course. You are not required to need to commit to an excessive sense of danger just to attend an undergraduate history course. However, since the students cannot avoid using a sense of danger, the students may believe that a sense of danger is required in order to attend Professor Terguson’s course. It’s not.

Using how Professor Terguson’s students experience unavoidable agitation, misery, and danger while attending Professor Terguson’s class as a reference, let’s use a standard school setting, and job situations that don’t regularly require a sense of danger in order to work. It is my belief that many innocent students and adults with jobs are encouraged by instigators to experience a sense of danger while trying to resolve instigations. A lot of cartoons, tv shows, and movies use a sense of danger as part of their entertainment. For example, in the cartoon series ‘The Smurfs(1981-1990)’, The Smurfs would regularly avoid Gargamel and his cat, Azrael. Here’s a quote about the cat Azrael from www.wikipedia.com:

” Azrael tends to realize beforehand that Gargamel’s schemes will go awry, but reluctantly goes along with them anyway in hopes of possibly capturing a Smurf to eat. ”

In the movie ‘Tomb Raider(2018)’, Lara Croft(Alicia Vikander) regularly interacts with situations involving a lot of danger, while she is on that island.

So, since you may have already watched some tv shows and movies that involve some sort of interactions involving danger, you can use your tv show and movie experience to identify the instigations that you recall that try to impose the use of danger that is not relevant to do so, you can identify such instigation experiences as something that should not need a sense of danger in order to resolve it. So, for example, recall an instigation from school or work that’s encouraging you to use a sense of danger, let’s say when you try to resolve it, and it’s in a context where having a sense of danger is out of context and not relevant, and take that sense of danger out by contemplationally using bookmark ‘Not danger’. You don’t need a sense of danger to resolve many mild to moderate instigations. However, an instigator may improperly encourage you to commit to a sense of danger just to recall and resolve certain instigations. And if you watched tv shows and movies that use a sense of danger, you can use that experience to indicate to you that such a sense of danger is NOT required just to recall and resolve many forms of instigations. Of course, I am assuming that you’re going to use what you have learned from your ‘Blinking’ idea(Wishlist #1003-1008) to also help you remove those aspects of instigations identifed by idea ‘Not danger’.

Here’s a quote from the 2nd illustration from the movie ‘Bright’:

” Daryl Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, 9th divorce, then your advice will come in really handy.’ ”

While Daryl Ward is talking to Pollard, he said to Pollard in so many words that he does not want to interact with Pollards advice. Daryl clarified to himself that it’s not something that he wants to experience. However, Pollard still continued to give that type of advice to Daryl Ward, and Daryl Ward still listened to Pollard’s advice. A lot of innocent people may not see this, and this perspective is just based on my speculations and imagination, but when an instigator improperly imposes such an experience, it should be very obvious to that instigator that is doing it that he/she is doing it. Let’s say for example that an instigator wants to impose some sort of adverse advice for you to listen to. It should be obvious to that instigator that such advice is adverse for you to listen to, and yet he/she is still imposing such advice. In this list, I will eventually offer idea ‘Starve mistake’, and ‘Starve prepare’, ideas that will directly address that. [7/7/2018: Sorry, but I don’t have time today to explain that.] For now, I recommend that you tell the instigator at school or at work the words ‘I don’t want to talk about it.’ If the instigator still wants to continue telling you, tell the instigator again the words ‘I don’t want to talk about it.’ That way, if teachers or someone with authority hears about the situation, you can say to them that you clearly said to that instigator that you did not want to talk about such a thing. That is something that Daryl Ward did not do with Pollard. Daryl Ward told Pollard that he did not want his advice, but Pollard still continued to give Daryl Ward that advice.

My point is that, whether it’s at school or at work, you are not obligated to hear other people improperly impose dialog to you that you do not want to hear. Sure, people can still cause you to hear insults, but you are not obligated to have adverse, out of context conversations with other people. To be certain, imagine situations of conversation involving mild instigations with instigators where they would try to cause you to hear adverse dialogue from them, and even though they would try to make you hear more of that nonsense, tell them that you don’t want to talk about it, and they really should stop talking to you you about such things. If they continue trying, you should believe that you are not obligated to continue to listen. For example, if an instigator wants to continue the conversation somewhere else, you don’t have to agree to talk to them in another location.

Before I continue, if you subscribed to CBS All Access through Amazon.com, and Netflix’s streaming service, just to use the 2 references I recommended, and you don’t intend on using it for anything else, I recommend that you cancel the 2 services soon after you use it, preferably on the same day that you used it. If you don’t cancel it within a month, it will automatically renew. Even if you cancel the service today, you still paid for that service for a full month, and the service won’t end until the end of that month. You are just making sure that you are avoiding a service renewal that you don’t want to have. To cancel your CBS All Access from Amazon.com, click or point over ‘Account & Lists’ located at the upper right corner of your screen. Under ‘Your Account’, click ‘Memberships & Subscriptions’. Then click ‘Channel Subscriptions’. Go to ‘Your Channels’, and cancel the service from there.

I’m stopping right now to get something to eat. I’ll continue in an hour or so.

Not able:

The potential of ayurvedic herbs is such that people are coming to terms with their sexual deficiency, and are starting to price for viagra look for a viable solution that will allow them to start on their treatment module. An emotional sickness is sildenafil pills a malady that makes mellow serious unsettling influences in thought and/or conduct, bringing about a solution. A teacher who has best viagra price such child in her class need not change the whole curriculum, but needs to deal a little differently with the disabled child. Furthermore, this medicine is able to repair https://www.unica-web.com/archive/2013/competition/franticjury.html order cheap viagra damaged muscle tissues. It is now 2:23 PM EST for me. This is how I invented idea ‘Not able’: Years ago, I read an old ‘What If’ comic book that talked about what happened if Korvac won the battle between The Guardians of the Galaxy and The Avengers. It referenced a situation where, after Korvac defeated Starhawk, he re-created him, except that Korvac does not have the ability to perceive him. To verify this, you can check www.wikipedia.org and search for phrase ‘Korvac’, and go to category “The Korvac Saga”. In the 3rd paragraph, here is the quote:

” The entire Avengers roster, aided by the heroine Ms. Marvel, and the Guardians of the Galaxy, confront Korvac and Carina, who pose as a middle class couple. Korvac’s deception is revealed when Starhawk states he cannot see the man called “Michael”. ”

So, that’s where I got the name ‘Not able’: Starhawk was able to identify Korvac by his inability to perceive him. Idea ‘Not able’ is in reference to phrase ‘Not able to perceive’.

Not able not conclusion:

So, basically, you’re going to combine idea ‘The Unseen’, located in Wishlist #1103 in this blog, just go to ‘Search’ located in the front page of this blog and type in ‘1103’, and this blog should offer you Wishlist #1103, you’re recommended to combine idea ‘The Unseen’ with Starhawk’s inability to perceive Korvac, refurbished for advice, of course. The purpose of that combining is to allow yourself to identify aspects on instigations that you have difficulty to perceive, and to not use such aspects of instigations and it’s adverse impessions of conclusions. I call that idea ‘Not able not conclusion’. It is my belief that instigators can cause you to experience impressions of logical conclusions that you did not originally choose to make, and it’s usually in the form of conclusions that you find bothersome and adverse. For example, if the logical conclusions were positive, pleasant, and/or complimentary, you may not even notice such conclusions as ‘something not originally chosen to make’. You may just accept such conclusions.

One illustration example, refurbished for advice, is in the movie ‘Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children(2016)’. The scene is located, according to Amazon Video, 48 minutes and 23 seconds into the movie. Olive(Lauren McCrostie) is talking to Jake(Asa Butterfield), and Enoch(Finlay MacMillan) while sitting on the couch, backs his head with his private complaints. Keep in mind that Enoch backs his head in a home that he has lived in for many years. I recommend that you do not back your head in other places that you are not familiar with when you are upset. Anyway, Here is the quote:

Olive: ‘Won’t you at least stay to see the reset, Jake?’

Enoch: (groans and moves his head back)

Olive: ‘It’s really quite spectacular.’

Basically, Enoch knows that Jake is not familiar with the routines associated with living in that house. Enoch knows that Jake is a guest, and Miss Peregrine(Eva Green) reminds Jake from time to time. However, even though Jake knows this, Enoch still experiences logical conclusions from grievances involving Jake’s activities. Let’s say that if Enoch knew about idea ‘Not able not conclusion’, Enoch would contemplationally say ‘Not able not conclusion’, and instead more tenably would choose to not use such logical conclusions that he is not able to perceive in a preferred context.

Repel:

According to www.dictionary.com, the definition I am using for ‘repel’ is ‘to cause distaste or aversion in’. The sentence used is ‘Their untidy appearance repelled us.’ The illustration is in movie ‘As Good as It Gets(1997)’, starring Jack Nicholson as Melvin Udall, and Helen Hunt as Carol Connelly. The illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 11 minutes and 55 seconds into the movie, Melvin Udall is making a complaint to Carol Connelly. Here is the quote:

Melvin Udall: ‘I’ve got Jews at my table.’

Carol Connelly: ‘It’s not your table; it’s the place’s table. Behave. This once, you can sit at someone else’s station.’

When Carol said that, all of the other waitresses gasped and turned simultaneously to look at Carol with disapproval.

Carol: ‘Or you can wait your turn.’

Watching that illustration is highly recommended.

I am assuming that many of you will be reading this specific list, Wishlist #1131, more than once. That means, hopefully, that you are getting better at removing certain aspects of experienced instigations from your recallings and resolvings. That is what idea ‘Repel’ is for. I am offering you another option, to remove a sense of repelling that instigators are obviously causing you to think about when you would recall and resolve. Just contemplationally say the word ‘Repel’ when recalling and resolving certain instigation experiences, and you should be able to not need to interact with a sense of repelling that instigators want you to contemplationally interact with. Notice that, in the ‘As Good as It Gets’ illustration, Carol Connelly does not even seem to have an issue of repelling involving serving food to Melvin Udall. Carol seems to be a natural at it, I guess. For the sake of variety, Americans in general are ‘naturals’ at many things simply because they are not even aware of what those things are. For an imagined example, when I go to a situation involving obvious competition, I would imagine that there are things associated with what I do that have certain deviations involved, but since I am not aware of such deviations, I easily enjoy participating, unhindered by those deviations, since I am not aware of what those deviations are. For an imagined example, when I interact with a woman that I believe is attractive, and she seems insecure about something, I am not inhibited by many things that make her feel insecure, simply because I am unaware of what those things are. In that context, I believe that Americans are ‘naturals’ at many things.

Bewilder:

I invented idea ‘Bewilder’ from word ‘Bewilderment’. Here’s a definition of ‘Bewilder’ from www.dictionary.com: ‘to confuse or puzzle completely; perplex’. Here’s the sentence example: ‘These shifting attitudes bewilder me.’ I think the most common example from adults who experience instigation in the workplace is when they imagine certain instigators being talked to by management and others with authority, of course talked to in a context that addresses instigations experienced. One part of that conversation involves the use of bewilderment by management or another with authority when presenting a certain point about the instigation. Although I am only imagining it, I believe that most people who are innocent and experienced instigation in the workplace imagined something similar. That experience, in my opinion, is used in a passive context. The bewilderment I am talking about is when an instigator causes you to experience bewilderment in an active context, such as when you are trying to resolve an experienced instigation. The only illustration example I can think of right now is in episode 5.19 ‘One More Day’s Light’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Andromeda(2005)’. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available to watch without additional payment. In the illustration, Captain Dylan Hunt(Kevin Sorbo) is talking to the alien that is impersonating Trance Gemini(Laura Bertram). According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 24 minutes and 7 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Trance: ‘Dylan, Seefra-5 is inhabited by Sectarians, who refuse to accept or face the inevitable.

Dylan: ‘Yes, that’s correct.’

Trance: ‘But the reality is that if innocents die, then this whole evacuation seems almost futile.’

Dylan: ‘Come on. You don’t believe that.’

One may imagine that Dylan believes he has a certain understanding of all the members of his crew. That is why, when Trance said ”But the reality is that if innocents die, then this whole evacuation seems almost futile.’, the statement was ‘out of character’ with what Dylan believes Trance is. That is why Dylan said ‘Come on. You don’t believe that.’ That is why Captain Dylan Hunt experienced bewilderment from Trance’s statement.

Well anyway, if instigators in your past made a hard pressed effort to cause you to evaluate bewilderment when recalling and resolving past instigations, just contemplationally say word ‘Bewilder’ to help you remove such nonsense. So, when you would recall it again, you won’t need to so obviously interact with it.

Confound:

According to www.dictionary.com, the word ‘confound’ means ‘to throw into increased confusion or disorder’. The meaning I am using word ‘confound’ from is from the phrase ‘Confound it’. I typed the phrase ‘confound it’ in search engine www.google.com, and found an answer in web site wordreference.com. Here is the sentence 1st: ‘My husband continued searching through the pockets of his coat. Then he unbuttoned the coat and felt around in his jacket. ‘Confound it,’, he said, ‘I must have left it in my bedroom. I won’t be a moment.’

and here is the definition: ‘It’s a mild, old fashioned, non-profane interjectory expression similar to “darn it”. More likely to be used by my grandfather than by me.’

The word ‘Confound’ is meant to address an emphasized sense of being perplexed or bewildered, for example, when an instigator is trying to ‘wind you up’ using obvious emphasis. You can take that out, too, if you choose to.

Using repel, bewilder, and confound:

To help you use ideas ‘Repel’, ‘Bewilder’, and ‘Confound’, I recommend that you just casually look at scenes in episode 3.14 ‘A Matter of Perspective’ from sci fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’. If you have Amazon Prime, no additional payment is required just to watch the episode. Just get yourself familiar with the concept that people are using the hologram room to study a past event. They can of course change what is presented to them, and the episode is refurbished with inaproprieities removed and for the advice. One scene starts 12 minutes and 35 seconds into the episode, when Data(Brent Spiner) gives a narration that the hologram room is now ready to be used.

After you do that, I recommend that you watch again 30 seconds or so the music video ‘Capital Letters’ by Hailee Steinfeld from www.youtube.com.

After you do that, when you are ready, I recommend that you recall one of those minor instigations you have experienced in the past. Choose one instigation where the instigator is trying to impose the use of aspects involving the 3 ideas: ‘Repel’, ‘Bewilder’, and ‘Confound’. Now, like that sci-fi episode ‘A Matter of Perspective’, where they get to change the hologram images, when you choose to recall that instigation again, this time recall it without that person being there. Now that the person is not there when you choose to recall that instigation again, remove the aspects identified by ideas ‘Repel’, ‘Bewilder’, and ‘Confound’. So, this is how it should look like: when you would recall that incident again, the instigator is not there, and neither are the aspects identified by ‘Repel’, ‘Bewilder’, and ‘Confound’. Less is more, I suppose. If you want to, to help you sense that new way of recalling and resolving instigation, and of course it’s just an option. You don’t have to always use that option. If you want to, since this list was created by using music video ‘Capital Letters’, you may choose to watch again music video ‘Capital Letters’ by Hailee Steinfeld, in order to help you learn this idea more.

According to my time allowance, I have now finished explaining this idea. I have to proofread this idea now, so that I can close it and start a new idea, probably next week. I plan to finally explain idea ‘Not add’, unless of course I change my mind again. So, if you are there next Saturday, then I’ll see you then.

TV-MA viewer discretion for lawyer tv show ‘The Good Fight’. PG-13 viewer discretion for comedy movie ‘Back to School(1986)’. TV-MA violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Bright’. TV-Y? viewer discretion for animated tv show ‘The Smurfs’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for action movie ‘Tomb Raider’. Violence and reading discretion for comic book ‘The Korvac Saga’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for fantasy movie ‘Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘As Good as It Gets’. TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Andromeda’. TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not worry’, ‘Not danger’, ‘Not able’, ‘Not able not conclusion’, ‘Repel’, ‘Bewilder’, and ‘Confound’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.