8/25/2018

Greetings.

It is now 9:32 AM EST for me. The music video I am recommending, and I am only recommending the 1st 48 seconds of this music video, is from the song ‘Dura’ by Puerto Rican rapper Daddy Yankee. Even though the song is in Spanish, in my opinion, the song sounds really good, and the primary focus is the music video itself, not just it’s associated song. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the song and it’s music video:

‘ The single has been described as an uptempo reggaeton track with reggae influences and lyrics about a good looking woman. Commercially, the song topped the charts of 14 countries and reached the top 10 of five others. In the United States, “Dura” peaked at number 43 on the Billboard Hot 100 and at number two on the Hot Latin Songs chart. ‘

‘ The visual premiered through Daddy Yankee’s YouTube account on January 18, 2018, where it has over 1 billion views. ‘

‘ According to a press release by Spanish news agency EFE, the clip “tries to project over the top fashion images, an individualistic dance style and beautiful and sincere personalities.” EFE stated that, as the video progresses, it “becomes a wake-up call for women to reclaim their space on the dance floor and within society itself. ‘

Less than 20 minutes ago, I watched the entire music video ‘Dura’. It’s the 1st 48 seconds of the music video that I want to contribute to this blog. Here’s a quote from wikipedia that I think addresses it:

” …the clip “tries to project over the top fashion images, an individualistic dance style and beautiful and sincere personalities.” ”

After the 1st 48 seconds, the music video changes. Based on how I interpreted the music video, it progresses into something else. Here’s a quote from wikipedia about what it turns into later:

“..as the video progresses, it “becomes a wake-up call for women to reclaim their space on the dance floor and within society itself. ”

To watch music video ‘Dura’ for free, search for phrase ‘daddy yankee dura’ in www.youtube, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 1 billion views. I found the music video in www.youtube.com from ‘TopMusicWorld’ from a video clip called ‘Top Songs of January 2018’. If you use your cursor, you can visually review the music videos that video clip is showing. That video clip rated 75 music videos, showing small video clips of each music video. ‘Dura’ was rated #75 in that video clip. I recommend that when you watch the 1st 48 seconds of music video ‘Dura’, that you press the pause button for different moments of that music video so that you can appreciate more certain images that you may like. There’s detail in it that you will probably miss unless you use the pause button. Also, the momentum of the music video won’t stop at 48+ seconds. I’m only recommending that you only use the 1st 48 seconds for this advice.

[8/25/2018: I thought I watched the entire music video ‘Dura’ earlier today. I was wrong. I just recently watched the entire music video of ‘Dura’, and I realized that before I must have stopped watching it towards the end. Now, I am sure I watched the entire music video of ‘Dura’, the one offered in youtube.]

Vulnerable not available:

According to www.dictionary.com, the word ‘vulnerable’ means ‘capable of or susceptible to being wounded or hurt’. An instigator may improperly impose an instigation that causes you to experience an interaction that you are vulnerable to that should not be available for you to interact with. Let’s start with using the streaming movie ‘Nancy Drew(2007)’, starring Emma Roberts as Nancy Drew. I’m renting the streaming movie now, since according to Amazon.com, renting it is only about a dollar. The illustration started 1 hour, 4 minutes, and 50 seconds into the episode. One of the girls told Nancy that Trish(Kelly Vitz) was choking. Here’s a quote starting at 1 hour, 5 minutes, and 7 seconds:

Nancy Drew: ‘Does she have any food allergies?’

Inga(Daniella Monet): ‘Ug, she is insanely allergic to peanuts, but she didn’t eat anything.’

So, refurbished for advice, since Trish was allergic to peanuts, even though there were peanuts offered at Nancy Drew’s party, Trish chose not to eat those peanuts, since the peanuts were ‘not available’ for Trish to eat. Based on my discovery this past Thursday, the same can be said for certain kinds of instigations. An instigator may improperly impose upon you an instigation for you to experience that exploits a sense of your vulnerability that should not be available for you to interact with. Suppose you experience an unavoidable instigation, and it’s associated interjection causes you to interact with a sense of vulnerability that you have. Even though you believe that such an instigation should not be available, whether it’s school or at work, the instigator may still cause you to interact with what is still not supposed to be available for you to interact with. Just because a certain experience is not supposed to be available where you are, let’s say it’s your job, that doesn’t necessarily mean that such an experience will not occur to you, just because you choose to not participate with such an experience.

Since I introduced to you idea ‘Begin’ in Wishlist #1133, you should be developing an ability to not participate with certain experiences. So, idea ‘Vulnerable not available’ may work for you. Here’s an illustration example, so you can use idea ‘Vulnerable not available’: There is a scene in the streaming sci-fi movie ‘Star Trek VII: Generations’ from Amazon.com. You can rent the streaming movie for about 3 dollars. Just search for phrase ‘star trek vii generations’ in www.amazon.com. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 22 minutes and 25 seconds into the movie, Picard(Patrick Stewart) and Will Riker(Jonathan Frakes) are in the hologram room. Here is the quote:

Picard: ‘Will.’

(pipe blowing)

Picard(talking to Will): ‘Just imagine what it was like–no engines, no computers, just the wind and the sea and the stars to guide you.’

Will: ‘Bad food, brutal discipline, no women.’

[I’m going to order food now and take a break. I should start typing again in 2 hours. I’ll see you then.]

12:39 PM

It is now 12:39 PM for me. After you watched that ‘Star Trek: Generations’ scene, take that quote that Will Riker said:

Will: ‘Bad food, brutal discipline, no women.’

refurbish it to represent notions ‘not available’ for work or school, imagine people that you select and perceive to be associated with those notions, and just imagine those people to not have available such notions. For example, when I invented this idea this past Thursday, I imagined certain people that I perceived at work have an association with what Will Riker said. I didn’t have to remember specifially what he said. I just refurbished what he said to represent notions that are ‘not available’ to those people I selected. I then chose for those notions to not be available to those people.

To offer you a reason why this idea should work, since I am not a managerial employee, I imagined what certain managerial employees must go through, let’s say managerial employees who work for a company with a few hundred or more employees. Let’s say this company has different divisions in it, and new employees are always coming into the company. When those managerial employees perceive certain employees, there may be uncertainty involved as to what division and level of training certain people have. Therefore those managerial employees have to not make available certain interactions with those employees. In the ‘Star Trek: Generations’ example, you can imagine what Picard imagined:

Picard: ‘Just imagine what it was like–no engines, no computers, just the wind and the sea and the stars to guide you.’

you may imagine that represents the ‘acceptable’ notions, and what Will imagined:

Will: ‘Bad food, brutal discipline, no women.’

without needing to know specifically what Will said, that represents notions that are ‘not available’ to other people. The notions presented by Picard and Will are easily discernable. That’s what matters for the idea to work, not what they specifically said.

So, when you choose to imagine certain people in your school or work to ‘not have available’ certain notions, then you should have more of an ability to imagine vulnerabilities for yourself that are not available to you when you are in school or work.

Explode:

OK, I invented a use of a word that not only describes a certain sense of expansion, but also a word that can be used to associate with an instigator’s adverse appearance that improperly imposes a sense of expansion. That word that I chose, refurbished for this advice of course, is ‘explode’. Here are 2 illustrations to help you choose to use the word ‘explode’: In episode 6.7 ‘Once More, with Feeling’ from action tv show ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer(2001)’, Willow(Alyson Hannigan) and Tara(Amber Benson) get permission from Giles(Anthony Head) to leave the store in order to get books from home. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 8 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Tara: ‘There’s just a few volumes…back at the house that deal with mystical chants, bacchanals. Might be relevant.’

Willow: ‘Yeah, we could, um–‘

Giles: ‘I’m a hairsbreadth from investigating bunnies at the moment, so I’m open to anything.’

Willow: ‘Great. We’ll, um, check it out, and, um, we’ll give you a call.’

Tara: ‘Yeah. This could blow the whole thing wide open.’

There are several causes due to which this happens viagra rx to him. It is studied through medical investigators that every 9 out of 10 men have some degree of ED, three out of 10 men and nearly half of men above the age of 40 will experience ED. purchase cheap levitra Continue to online tadalafil keep an eye on and train your child drivers even after licensure. It boosts online viagra overnight https://unica-web.com/HONORARY-MEDALS/intro.html energy levels and cure PE. Once they’re outside, Willow explained to Tara that they lied so that they could enjoy a walk on a nice day. So, even though they lied, it’s what Tara said to Giles that makes this illustration important:

Tara: ‘Yeah. This could blow the whole thing wide open.’

This is the 1st illustration of the use of the word ‘Explode’:

‘ This could blow the whole thing wide open. ‘

How Tara said those words is recommended to be seen for further understanding.

The 2nd illustration for using the word ‘explode’ comes from the use of a pinata. According to www.wikipedia.org, a piñata is a container often made of papier-mache, pottery, or cloth; it is decorated, and filled with small toys or candy, or both, and then broken as part of a ceremony or celebration. So, for the use of this idea, a person causes a pinata to explode, and the toys and candy inside is taken by the kids. An illustration of this, and because the illustration is in a rated R movie, that illustration only is used, is refurbished for advice, and the rest of the movie is thrown away/not used for this advice. The illustration is in movie ‘Home Sweet Hell(2015)’, starring Katherine Heigl as Mona Champagne, Aiden Flowers as Andrew Champagne, and Madison Wolfe as Allison Champagne. The movie is available as a streaming rental Standard Definition for about 3 dollars from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that illustration starts 1 hour and 28 minutes into the movie, Mona is telling her son, Andrew, to hit the pinata. Here is the quote:

Mona: ‘Hit it, Andrew. Hit it, Andrew!’

Woman1: ‘There you go. You got this.’

Woman2: ‘Great job, Andrew. That’s right. Come on.’

Man: ‘Come on, buddy.’

Andrew tries several times to hit the pinata, but the pinata won’t explode. Andrew’s mom, Mona, then gestures her daughter, Allison, to take the stick from Andrew and cause the pinata to explode.

Mona: ‘Hit it harder! Yes! Yes! Yay! Yay! You did it!’

Allison causes the pinata to explode, and the rest of the kids pick up the candy that came from the pinata.

Keep in mind that the movie ‘Home Sweet Hell’ is a comedy, so the mom Mona depicted in that scene also emotionally ‘explodes’ a few times. The exploding pinata, for this advice, is what is used. Mona emotionally exploding is something, just not the main part of the illustration. To clarify Mona’s emotional exploding, you can also use an earlier scene, when Mona was talking to Les(Jim Belushi), but don’t use the movie’s surrounding scenes. That scene starts 1 hour, 27 minutes, and 21 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Mona(to Les): ‘Your kid is a cheater! And you’re an alcoholic. I can smell the booze seeping out of your fat pores right now.’

Abby(Brandi Nicole Wilson): ‘You can’t talk to him like that!’

So, now you have 2 illustrations for the use of the word ‘Explode’.

Explode murky:

Here are 2 definitions for the word ‘murky’ used for this blog from www.dictionary.com: 1)’dark, gloomy, and cheerless, and 2)’obscure or thick with mist, haze, etc. as the air.

The illustration is in episode 2.15 ‘Reprise’ from action tv show ‘Angel(2001)’. The episode is available from Amazon.com. In the ‘search’ section, click the word ‘All’, then scroll down and select ‘Prime Video’. Using ‘Prime Video’ to search from, search for phrase ‘angel season 2’. Click the magnifying glass, and ‘Angel Season 2’ for streaming should be the 1st selection offered. Click that, and episode ‘Reprise’ should be available for purchase. The illustration according to Amazon Video starts 13 minutes and 48 seconds into the episode, Angel(David Boreanaz) is talking to Lorne(Andy Hallett), the empathy demon that reads people’s futures by their singing. Here is the quote:

Angel: ‘But getting to these senior partners? – That’s my destiny.’

Lorne: ‘Is it? Because I haven’t actually featured a destiny with you in it lately. It’s all kind of murky.’

Here’s something that you may not have used before. Before this advice, an adverse, contemplation sense of murkyness induced by instigation may have been an experience that you would have tried to avoid. It’s something an instigator may improperly impose upon you to think about in order to avoid it’s interpretation. Now, with this idea, when an instigator interjects such an experience upon you, you may choose to more objectively identify such an experience as ‘exploding’ contemplationally upon you, and you choose not to make such an explosion, such a volatile expansion, available to yourself. I call that experience ‘Explode murky not available’. You can shuffle the words around. You may eventually call it ‘Explode murky’. Instead of using the word ‘murky’, you may also use ‘hazy, blurry, and fuzzy’. So, your options are ‘hazy, fuzzy, murky, and blurry’.

Explode not effective:

When you start using idea ‘Vulnerable not available’, an instigator may improperly impose a contradiction of effectiveness based on a contemplation effort to resolve for you to experience. So, what you are trying to do is quantify the ineffectiveness of how you are using the idea, and choosing to not use that ineffectiveness, to ‘not make that available’ for you to use. It’s like a mildly volatile sense of expansion of ineffectiveness that uses the identity of a contemplation effort to resolve. The only illustration example I can think of right now for idea ‘Explode not effective’ is in the movie ‘Superman Returns(2006)’, starring Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor, and Parker Posey as Kitty Kowalski. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 1 hour, 25 minutes, and 47 seconds into the movie, Lex Luther and Kitty Kowalski are talking. Here is the quote:

Lex Luther: ‘Kitty, what did my father used to say to me?’

Kitty: ‘You’re losing your hair.’

Lex Luther: ‘Before that.’

Kitty: ‘Get out?’

Kitty wanted to be insulting to Lex Luther, so she gave answers to Lex Luther’s questions that intentionally did not have any positive effectiveness to the obvious answer that Lex Luther wanted to hear. So, what an instigator may do is cause you to feel an adversely imposed upon ineffectiveness for the technique that you are trying to use.

The solution I invented for such an instigation is to allow yourself somewhat to experience the ineffectiveness of your own technique, but to also choose not to use such an effectiveness in such a context, and allow yourself instead to use the intent of your idea’s use, an intent that is not necessarily dependant upon conceptualization and feeling. In the movie ‘Superman Returns’, when Kitty gave Lex Luther those answers, Lex Luther still knew what the answer actually was, even though Kitty was not presenting it.

[It’s 4:29 PM for me now. I’m going to proofread and close this idea. I’ll probably upgrade my ability to explain idea ‘Explode not effective (not available) over time. After all, my benefit is your benefit, so to speak. Next Saturday, I plan to finally explain idea ‘Not add’. After that, I don’t know for certain what idea to offer you. So, if you’re there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

[8/26/2018: It’s 9:39 PM EST for me now. I want to say something about the use of idea ‘Explode’. I believe that experiencing instigation in general may discourage you from contemplationally using the word ‘explode’. I believe that is true because the instigations you may have experienced, the mild to moderate ones I am addressing that I can address in a reasonable context, may have given you bad impressions associated with the use of the word ‘explode’. Using the word ‘explode’ should not be just limited and quantified by the adverse mild to moderate instigations that you have experienced. Like the 2 illustrations I gave you in this list, the meaning of the word ‘explode’ can also refer to things in a reasonable context. What about the 4th of July fireworks?

When you use the word ‘explode’ contemplationally, you’re specifically using it to identify an instigation induced adverse contemplation expansion. You’re not using it to identify specifically what the instigator is adversely trying to make you think about, to make you experience. Here’s what I did earlier today with idea ‘Explode murky not available’: When an instigation and/or chosen inadvertency causes you to think about something prevalent and obvious, instead of giving that contemplation some sort of acknowledgement, you can instead identify the obvious contemplation as a contemplation that you did not choose to acknowledge as obvious. Instead, you chose to see it as a murky contemplation that is exploding. Even though the contemplation is obvious and feels like you specifically made it, you can still interpret that obvious, specific contemplation as being murky. With a little practice, even though you may experience interjections that cause adverse, obvious, and specific contemplations, you can still choose to perceive such contemplations as being murky, instead of being obvious and specific.

Here’s an idea I think I invented a week ago. I think it started in Wishlist #1116. Here is a quote:

‘ I imagined a woman in a dating situation in a restaurant, and she is avoiding to tell that man certain struggles that she is experiencing in her life, because if she does, that man would get the wrong idea about her. ‘

Extrapolated from my belief that women in their 30s and up who are still single and dating men have notions that men would get the wrong idea if those notions are revealed to them. So, extrapolate from that, and you can imagine anyone, kids, teenagers, and adults, having notions that are reserved from being revealed to you because you would get the ‘wrong idea’. So, whether it’s happening in the now, or the instigation happened in your past, if something about it’s contemplation is bothering you, you can imagine the instigator saying in some sort of narration why such an instigation is not being revealed to you, because if the instigation was revealed to you, you would get the ‘wrong idea’. Of course, that instigation was revealed to you. So, what you do with that imagined narration is mix it with how you evaluate the instigation you experienced. That way, you are not just evaluating the instigation as it is presented to you. You are also evaluating the instigation with the instigator’s imagined culpability involved. It’s like thinking to yourself that the instigation is like coffee, but the coffee is made too strong. The ‘wrong idea’ addition is like adding something to the coffee to make it more drinkable, like adding sugar, cream, or milk to it. If you want an example of a narration made by the instigator about that experienced instigation, if presented, would be interpreted as the ‘wrong idea’, you can buy an episode of ‘Neverwhere’ from Amazon.com. Each episode near the beginning has a character from the fantasy tv show give a generalistic narration. Of course, the narrations are refurbished with inaproprieities removed. I’m just recommending one of those ‘Neverwhere’ episodes to be watched to help you imagine an instigator present a narration about not giving other people the ‘wrong idea’ about certain instigations.

Based on how I used idea ‘Explode’, once you have gotten used to it, you will simply use another idea. It is my belief that you’re not going to keep thinking to yourself ‘Explode murky not available’ or ‘Explode murky’. I predict that you will learn the idea, get used to it, then move on to other ideas, like usual.

So, that’s it for now. I hope that helps. I still plan on giving you idea ‘Not add’ this coming Saturday. So, whether or not you choose to use idea ‘Explode’, I hope to see you Saturday. [8/26/2018]

Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Nancy Drew’. Rated PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Trek: Generations’. Rated TV-14 monster violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’. Rated R mature themes, violence, and viewer discretion for movie ‘Home Sweet Hell’. Rated TV-14 monster violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Angel’. Rated PG-13 action violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Superman Returns’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Vulnerable not available’, ‘Explode’, ‘Explode murky’, and ‘Explode not effective’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/18/2018

Salutations.

It is now 9:34 AM EST for me. The music video I am recommending for this advice is from the song ‘You Deserve Better’ by British singer James Arthur. I just saw the entire music video for the 1st time about half an hour ago. Here’s a quote from wikipedia:

‘ The lyrics of the song tell of a man who believes that his lover would be better off without him. ‘

To watch the music video ‘You Deserve Better’ for free, search for phrase ‘james arthur you deserve better’ from www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 4.8 million views. The music video was made available on youtube on 7/12/2018, just over a month ago.

Here’s a copy of part of the lyrics of song ‘You Deserve Better’:

You deserve better, better, better than me
Might be what you want, but I’m not what you need
You’re better, better than you even realize

You deserve better, better, better than me
Might be what you want, but I want you to see
You’re better off without me in your life

This is the explanation I recommend that you use to evaluate music video ‘You Deserve Better’, if you choose to watch it. Although I have no proof, it is my belief that adult women who are dating learned the hard way that there are things that should not be said to men, at least in the beginning of the relationship, because they will get the ‘wrong idea’ interpreting such notions. As a refurbished illustration example, here is a quote from movie ‘The Wedding Ringer(2015)’ starring Kaley Cuoco as Gretchen Palmer, and Kevin Hart as Jimmy Callahan. You can streaming rent the movie from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour, 26 minutes, and 41 seconds into the movie. Jimmy Callahan and Gretchen Palmer are talking. Here is the quote:

Jimmy Callahan: ‘But at least you have Doug. True love conquers all.’

Gretchen Palmer: ‘True love? (scoffs) Please. I’m just sick of dating jerks. Doug is a good guy, he’s good family material. What can I say? I’m a girl that’s used to a certain kind of lifestyle, and Doug can give me that kind of lifestyle.’

Of course, that scene is from a comedy movie. It’s not real. But I believe you can still refurbish it to convey a certain meaning. So, refurbished for advice, I can make a story using that scene, and here it is: Gretchen just said something to Jimmy Callahan that she has believed in for many years, and yet neither Jimmy nor Doug(Josh Gad) has no preferred understanding as to what Gretchen meant. And so, both Jimmy and Doug both got the ‘wrong idea’ as to what she meant when she said those words to Jimmy. So, this is how I recommend you use the music video ‘You Deserve Better’: Imagine 2 people are dating. You don’t have to be specific about it. Let’s say one is a man and one is a woman. They’re both young adults. Now, you know(imagined) that the woman has many notions in her mind that she is not revealing to that man because he would get the ‘wrong idea’, notions that are not terrible to think about, but if the man were to know about just a few of those notions, he would respond like the lyrics to the song ‘You Deserve Better’. For at least a short moment, he would think that he is not good enough for her, and that she would be better off without him. It’s that type of thinking that caused the woman to not reveal such notions to that man, because she believes the man she is dating would get the ‘wrong idea’. It is my belief that more and more people in America are learning to continue participating with certain situations, even though they are exposed to certain disappointments associated with such situations. However, even though that may be true, by definition, if a man is introduced to a notion that a woman believes such a man would get the ‘wrong idea’, at least contemplationally for a short moment, it is likely that man would still get the ‘wrong idea’.

To be clear, based on my interpretation of the movie ‘The Wedding Ringer’, those words Gretchen said to Jimmy caused Doug to cancel the wedding.

Angry: [8/18/2018(Anger):]

To create some sort of contemplation circulation for this advice, I recommend that you use the refurbished ‘Plot summary’ from www.wikipedia.com for the movie ‘Pacific Heights(1990)’, starring Michael Keaton as Carter Hayes, and the unmarried couple Drake Goodman(Matthew Modine) and Patty Palmer(Melanie Griffith). Here are the refurbished quotes for advice from the ‘Plot summary’ from the movie ‘Pacific Heights’ from www.wikipedia.com:

‘ Carter Hayes (Michael Keaton) is in bed with a woman, Ann Miller (Beverly D’Angelo), when he is suddenly verbally attacked by two men. After the men have left, Hayes calmly tells Ann, “The worst is over”. ‘

‘ The heavy stress takes its toll on the couple; Drake drinks heavily and Patty suffers. Hayes visits the couple to offer his condolences, but an infuriated Drake attacks him and is arrested by the police, whom Hayes had already called to the scene in anticipation of an assault. ‘

And so, here is my explanation about idea ‘Angry’ with those 2 refurbished for advice references: To be clear, even though I am not a psychiatrist, it is my belief that expressing anger is not just speaking loudly at someone, like 2 people might do who have a grievance with each other. A person can express anger, and also not be violent with such an expression. That being said, for the adults, when you attended school, maybe some of you experienced corporal punishment(according to wikipedia.org, it is most often practiced on minors, especially in home and school settings.) Of course, it is my belief that corporal punishment is generalistically no longer legal and permitted in American schools. Still, it is my belief that students still experience some sort of disciplinary action when they are caught doing something wrong, such as detention, or something uniquely specific to the schools such students are attending. For example, when I attended school, one of the students said something in class that some of us laughed about, but the teacher was openly offended and angry about that statement.

In a job related setting, for the adults, a boss may non violently express anger about something that an employee did, and that employee may respond to that anger by rectifying(to make, put, or set right; remedy; correct) what the employee did.

[I want to buy food early, and I chose ‘Pizza Hut’ for food today. According to the website, it opens 11:00 AM, so I’m going to order now. That way, I will be more prepared to finish this list today, and not allow my hunger for food to interrupt me from typing. So, I plan to start again in 2 hours. The pizza should arrive by then, and I’ll be ready to continue. So, I’ll see you in 2 hours.]

It is now 12:32 PM EST for me. The point I am trying to make is that, in both the school and work situation, the student and the employee are trying to reciprocate(to give, feel, etc., in return) and requite(to make payment or return for) the anger he/she was presented. So, when such a student and employee who reciprocates and requites within reason anger presented to him/her, when such a person articulates anger to an instigator caused by that instigator’s instigation, it makes sense to me that such a person would also expect his/her anger to be reciprocated and requited, even if that reciprocation and requiting is expected to come from the instigator who instigated him/her. And that’s where the refurbished ‘Plot summary’ from movie ‘Pacific Heights’ comes in. Here’s the 1st refurbished quote from the ‘Plot summary’:

‘ Carter Hayes (Michael Keaton) is in bed with a woman, Ann Miller (Beverly D’Angelo), when he is suddenly verbally attacked by two men. After the men have left, Hayes calmly tells Ann, “The worst is over”. ‘

I looked at Amazon.com, and the movie ‘Pacific Heights’ is not available for streaming. I think it’s been years since I saw the movie myself, so I stipulate to the possible fact that Carter Hayes was beaten up by two men. However, you don’t need that literal interpretation to use the verbal quote from wikipedia. Refurbished, you can just imagine that Carter Hayes was verbally assaulted by two men for this idea. My interpretation of the movie is that Carter Hayes for money unethically, maliciously, and intentionally depreciates the value of the house that he temporarily lives in in order in order to acquire something about it. One obvious way Mr. Hayes goes about doing that is improperly imposing a non-reciprocating and non-requiting response to the anger to the actual owners of the house. In the 1st quote, the two men verbally assaulted him. You can just imagine what he did to the original owner of that house. The original owner expressed anger at him, but whatever responses Mr. Hayes gave that original owner, it eventually caused the original owner of that house to send two men to verbally assault him.

Now, here’s the 2nd refurbished quote:

‘ The heavy stress takes its toll on the couple; Drake drinks heavily and Patty suffers. Hayes visits the couple to offer his condolences, but an infuriated Drake attacks him and is arrested by the police, whom Hayes had already called to the scene in anticipation of an assault. ‘

When Mr. Hayes visited the couple to offer his condolences, he did so insincerely, wanting that couple to again respond in anger, an anger that will not again get considerate reciprocation and requiting. According to the quote, Mr. Hayes prepared the police for a situation that Mr. Hayes was going to be attacked by Drake, and when the police witnessed such an attack, Drake was arrested. For an actual similar illustration that is available streaming from Amazon.com, I recommend episode 1.9 ‘The Snow Job’ from crime tv show ‘Leverage(2009)’. Here’s a quote from wikipedia.org about the episode:

‘ Nate has an emotional connection to the case of a National Guardsman whose home was foreclosed by a crooked contractor. ‘

The illustration starts, according to Amazon Video, 20 seconds into the episode, when Wayne Scott(Russell B. McKenzie) is talking to Sheriff Delahoussaye(Kirk Bovill) about contractor Henry Retzing(Sam Anderson). Here is the quote:

Wayne Scott(to Sheriff Delahoussaye): ‘Don’t do this, please. Not in front of my family.’

Sheriff Delahoussaye: ‘The bank sold off the note. This isn’t your house anymore.’

Wayne Scott: ‘Sold it off? To who?’ (the Sheriff motions towards Henry Retzing) My contractor? I hired them to fix my house, and they stole it from me?’

Sheriff Delahoussaye: (shrugs his shoulders) ‘Sorry.’

Henry Retzing: ‘Wish it hadn’t come to this, son.’

Well anyway, the illustration is similar to the refurbished quote from movie ‘Pacific Heights’. Since the sheriff was there, he witnessed the assault, and arrested Wayne Scott.

So, talking to the kids, teenagers, and adults, when you present anger to the instigator that improperly imposed an instigation for you to experience, it’s very likely in my opinion that the response you will get from that instigator will not be reasonably reciprocated and requited. Instead, that response will probably cause you to be somewhat perplexed, confounded, and bewildered. The examples from the ‘Plot summary’ of movie ‘Pacific Heights’ and tv show ‘Leverage’ demonstrate that a person’s use of anger may be not be reciprocated and requited by an instigator, and may even be used against them. Now, as for the ‘perplexed, confounded, and bewildered’ reaction, you can go to the quote that Henry Retzing gave to Sheriff Delahoussaye:

Wayne Scott: ‘My contractor? I hired them to fix my house, and they stole it from me?’

Of course, in that illustration, soon after saying that, Wayne Scott assaulted contractor Henry Retzing and was arrested. Now, in your situation, said to kids, teenagers, and adults, what an instigator may do to your expectations of anger is cause you to be somewhat perplexed, confounded, and bewildered, without a fight actually occurring. So, in that context without the fighting, just use that ‘Leverage’ scene but with the fighting part removed. To help you more tenably sense being perplexed, confounded, and bewildered, I recommend refurbished for advice that you use episode ‘Planet of the Dead’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2009)’. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available streaming from Amazon.com without additional payment. Just search for phrase ‘david tennant specials’ in web site www.amazon.com, and one of the selections should be ‘Doctor Who: The David Tennant Specials’. Select that, then play episode ‘Planet of the Dead’. The illustration recommended to be seen starts 33 minutes and 58 seconds into the episode, The Doctor(David Tennant) is talking to Christina(Michelle Ryan). Here is the quote:

The Doctor: ‘Because they need to be? No, that’s bonkers.’

So, in that scene, the Doctor was somewhat perplexed, confounded, and bewildered, indicated by phrase ‘Because they need to be?’ Just refurbish that scene for your use.

That ‘Because they need to be?’ is not all the advice I am offering. Idea ‘Angry’ is introduced to you first to help you have some sort of contemplation circulation for this advice. I am now going to start giving you the rest of this advice, which is designed to incrementally help you. In other words, I have another ‘Iron Man’ suit, not just idea ‘Angry’ to offer you.

[8/18/2018: I forgot to mention that you can also use the word ‘Anger’ instead of ‘Angry’.]

[8/18/2018: I also forgot to mention that the anger that is not reciprocated and not requited may also occur later. In the ‘Leverage’ episode, Wayne Scott experienced the anger pretty much around the same time he was arrested. However, in your situation, since you have other expectations in your mind, for a specific expectation, you will 1st experience being perplexed, confounded, and bewilderment, but later after the incident you may experience anger that is being perplexed, confounded, and bewildered. Keep in mind that, since you may not be an instigator, you may not at 1st identify such a trick.]

All right. I sensed that the music video ‘You Deserve Better’ already ran out of gas. So, I’m recommending another music video. I don’t like it myself, not in the usual ‘watch to be entertained’ sense. However, what I do ‘like’ about it is it’s impression of initiative to ‘try’ to be entertaining for you to watch. I watched the entire music video for the 1st time just a few minutes ago. In the beginning of watching it, I didn’t like it, but I still gave it a chance. I noticed that, if you choose to pay attention to it, the performer’s efforts to sing and dance in an entertaining context to try to win you over. In my opinion, their efforts didn’t work. I still don’t like the music video. However, I do ‘like’ their efforts to try to be entertaining, and the experience during and towards the end of the music video is not as bad as watching the beginning of that music video. That is why I think this music video may be useful to you. The music video I recommend for you to watch is called ‘Don’t Go Breaking My Heart’ by American vocal group ‘Backstreet Boys’. Here’s a quote about the song from wikipedia.org:

‘ The song was released on May 17, 2018 as the lead single to their upcoming ninth album (eighth in the US). The single has so far peaked at number 63 on the Billboard Hot 100… ‘

To watch music video ‘Don’t Go Breaking My Heart’ for free, search for phrase ‘don’t go breaking my heart’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 27 million views. Here are some quotes from people from www.youtube.com for that music video:

‘ After all these years, they still have that 90’s dance and theme but mixed in with today’s beat and music and they have come up with an awesome song that makes you wanna dance and sing along, they still got it! ‘

‘ When i was 11 this was my group and now i’m 33 and they are still awesome! ‘

cialis in spain Lovemaking act requires both mental relaxation and physical activity. Problem is an viagra best price inseparable part of life. Just like cialis tadalafil 20mg other disease, prostatitis should be treated as soon as a man notices himself getting difficulty to maintain an erection till the completion of sexual act, even if he is leading a stressful life or has been a victim of certain other illnesses that can accelerate the hair damage in a gradual process to lead baldness. It’s said to be more powerful than any skin care product. cialis tadalafil online ‘ Very catchy for bsb man there still doing it even after 25 years gotta give them credit I mean even nsyc and 1 direction didnt last ‘

And here’s a quote from the lyrics of the song ‘Don’t Go Breaking My Heart’:

Baby, don’t go breaking my heart, breaking my heart
Baby, don’t go breaking my heart, breaking my heart
Cause that’s the only one I got
Cause that’s the only one I got

—

Not contribute to such a recognizing:

The1st illustration for this idea, of course, is refurbishedly toned down for the advice. It is at the end of thriller movie ‘Red Dragon(2002)’, starring Edward Norton as Will Graham, and Anthony Hopkins as Dr. Hannibal Lecter. The scene is available from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour, 59 minutes, and 37 seconds into the movie. In that scene, while Will Graham is on his boat, he is reading a letter from Dr. Hannibal Lecter. The benefit of this scene is when Will Graham crumbles the letter in his hand, and then throws the letter into the ocean. To rent this streaming rental Standard Definition is about 3 dollars. To buy it Standard Definition is about 8 dollars. If you later decide to use more idea ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’, I recommend that you buy the movie. That will allow you to watch that scene many times without paying additional fees, since you own the streaming movie. Of course, renting and buying streaming movies are based on your circumstance. I am just recommending.

Here is a refurbished for advice explanation for the movie ‘Red Dragon’ from www.imdb.com:

‘ A retired F.B.I. Agent with psychological gifts is assigned to help track down “The Tooth Fairy”, a mysterious criminal. Aiding him is imprisoned forensic psychiatrist Dr. Hannibal Lecter. ‘

Of course, it’s a rated R thriller movie. I’m just clarifying how that movie is to be used for this advice.

The 2nd illustration is near the beginning of the movie ‘As Good As It Gets’, starring Jack Nicholson as Melvin Udall, and Helen Hunt as Carol Connelly. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 11 minutes and 48 seconds into the movie. It’s how the waitresses react to Melvin Udall’s presence and interjections. The most obvious moment starts 12 minutes into the movie, when Carol Connelly was talking to Mr. Udall. Here is the quote:

Carol Connelly: ‘This once, you can sit at someone else’s station.’

When Carol Connelly said that, all of the other waitresses looked at Miss Connelly at the same time with disapproval.

Carol Connelly: ‘Or you can wait your turn.’

Again, if you choose to commit more to the use of movie ‘As Good As It Gets’, I recommend that you buy the streaming movie instead of just renting it. As of now, renting the streaming movie Standard Definition is about 3 dollars, and buying the movie Standard Definition is about 10 dollars. Based on the movies I am aware of, movie ‘As Good As It Gets’ so far is the most popular movie that illustrates an instigator, if you think Mr. Udall can easily be refurbished to represent an instigator. And like I said before, renting or buying is dependant upon your circumstance. I am just recommending.

OK. I think I invented idea ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’ about 2 weeks ago, so this idea is also relatively new for me to use. I’ll try to explain it from the vantage point of those waitresses who responded to Mr. Udall from the movie ‘As Good As It Gets’: Years ago, when Mr. Udall used to eat at any table in that restaurant, he caused all of the other waitresses, except Carol Connelly, to experience some sort of adverse interjection that the waitresses interpreted as instigation. Those waitress, of course, did not choose to participate with such adverse interjections. However, when those waitresses are not working, and they are at their homes, let’s say organizing their houses, sometimes, for seemingly no reason at all, they would burst into some sort of contemplation induced anger about what Mr. Udall caused them to experience. They would then contemplationally say something insulting about Mr. Udall. That insult at their own homes soon was seen as uncharacteristic behavior, even though they just thought about it, and that action would eventually make those women justifyably hate and be angry at Mr. Udall for making them think in such a way. Later, the women would create a support group amongst themselves concerning Mr. Udall, which also led to them choosing to no longer serve Mr. Udall at work. Of course, the only woman who chooses to serve Mr. Udall food is Carol Connelly. I don’t know how that works, the relationship between Mr. Udall and Carol.

So, my point is that, it is my imagined discovery that when people experience certain adverse interjections from instigators, they experience such interjections using an objectivity that is actually available to them, which is not always the preferred objectivity defined by their intent. That is what happened to those waitresses. They used a preferred objectivity defined by their intent. So, when that preferred objectivity wasn’t enough, what happens is that the contemplation created may feel like an adverse sense of contributing to the adverse interjection experienced, and that adverse sense of contributing is also a part of how those waitresses recognize that instigator. Let’s look at that scene again from the movie ‘As Good As It Gets’, except this time let’s use another phrase from Mr. Udall. This scene starts 11 minutes and 55 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Mr. Udall: ‘I’ve got Jews at my table.’

Now, notice that when Mr. Udall said that, that created an adverse reaction from the waitresses. It is my interpretation that their adverse reaction is an indicator that the waitresses recognize that his statement’s identity was adverse for them to experience. I highly recommend that you watch that scene for further understanding.

[I’m going to stop explaining now. The good news is that I started explaining idea ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’. That idea, in my opinion, could be a major idea for you in terms of potential effectiveness. An hour or so ago, I got a headache, I think it’s because of explaining idea ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’. I took something over the counter for it, but I still have something very minor from the headache. When I start explaining again next Saturday, it should be a lot easier for me to give you the rest of this advice, since the hardest part, in my opinion, has already been typed in. So, if you are there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

8/24/2018

Welcome.

It is now 6:12 PM EST for me. Yesterday, I invented an idea called ‘Vulnerable not available’. In my opinion, this is yet again the best idea I have ever invented. Of course, this idea was created with certain ideas I have already introduced in this blog. I plan to explain this idea tomorrow, with the usual music video to go with it. I plan to start early tomorrow, since I want to finish explaining that idea tomorrow. So, that means I have to finish this idea today. I’ll type as much as I reasonably can today, proofread it, and close it today, to get ready to explain idea ‘Vulnerable not available’ tomorrow. This idea is still part of the ‘Begin’ idea I explained previously, and after I explain ‘Vulnerable not available’ tomorrow, I plan to finally explain idea ‘Not add’ afterwards. Idea ‘Vulnerable not add’ is just the ‘understanding bookmark’. I plan to add variations to it to allow you to more actively use such an idea, such as when you are at school or work.

Not contribute to such a recognizing:

I am now continuing the explanation for idea ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’: For this idea, I recommend that you watch the music video ‘Interjections!’ by ‘Schoolhouse Rock!’. ‘Schoolhouse Rock’ is explained in www.wikipedia.org, and according to wikipedia, ‘Interjections’ was 1st aired February 23, 1974. To watch music video ‘Interjections!’ for free, search for phrase ‘schoolhouse rock interjections’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 3.5 million views. Here is a quote from the lyrics:

Interjections (Hey!) show excitement (Yow!) or emotion (Ouch!).
They’re generally set apart from a sentence by an exclamation point,
Or by a comma when the feeling’s not as strong.

Now, this is when ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’ comes in: An instigator may improperly impose a contemplation commitment with an excessive sense of emphasis in order to evaluate a certain identity. The purpose of idea ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’ is to help you incrementally regulate contemplation emphasis. If you watched the music video ‘Interjections’, I believe that such a music video may help you identify and regulate contemplation emphasis. Here is an illustration example of a person who is not only able to regulate contemplation emphasis, but is also able to regulate how he/she presents a certain variety of emphasis. That person is character Nathan Ford(Timothy Hutton), and the illustration is in episode 5.11 ‘The Low Low Price Job’ from crime tv show ‘Leverage(2012)’. The episode is available to be purchased streaming from Amazon.com. Here is an explanation of that episode from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ Eliot takes a personal interest in the threat posed to a small town by a new mega-store. The crew tries a variety of approaches to foil the plans of an ambitious corporate representative and keep the store from opening. ‘

According to Amazon Video, the 1st illustration scene begins 4 minutes and 56 seconds into the episode. Nathan Ford, the leader of the team, is explaining to the others how to go about closing down a new mega-store. Here is the quote:

Nathan Ford: ‘Look, Value!More, what they earn in a year–it trumps the GDP of most 1st-World Nations.’

Sophie(Gina Bellman): ‘And they’re gonna have an army of executives.’

Nathan: ‘Exactly. So there’s no single weak spot to target. I mean, you can’t just take down an entire company.’

Eliot: ‘All right, then one store. This store.’

Nathan: ‘You’d…you’d have to…you’d have to nip it in the bud, though. I mean, you know, you’d have to close the store before it even opened. And when is it opening?’

Eliot: ‘Tomorrow.’

Nathan: ‘Tomorrow? Okay. Better move fast.’

I highly recommend you watch that scene for further understanding. Based on my refurbished for advice interpretation of that scene, Nathan is able to manage information processed using his expertise, information that many people may initially imagine as overwhelming and containing a lot of excessive contemplation emphasis. Based on his ability, he could see it that way, but he is not limited to just see it that way, like the way people would try to imagine such information. Notice that, when he explained to the rest of the team what Eliot wants to do, how to accomplish such a thing, he doesn’t fill their heads with excessive interjections. He gives them a proposed solution that all of them can listen to and reasonably interpret. Later in the episode, Nathan even ‘nutshells’ the 3 possible reasons how to close down that particular mega-store. That scene starts 22 minutes and 31 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Eliot: ‘Listen, you said three stores have closed down–one for toxic land, the other for The Union. -What was the third?’

Nathan: ‘Just a string of bad luck, a bunch of little things that added up to taking down their profits.’

You can watch the entire episode, if you choose to. If you choose to watch it for this advice, just keep in mind that what you watch is refurbished with inaproprieities removed and for this advice. If you want to watch it for other reasons not related to this blog, that’s another thing. I’m just recommending if you want to watch that episode for this blog.

So, if you watch that ‘Leverage’ episode, it should be easy for you to imagine how Nathan Ford is able to easily manage certain excessive interjections of contemplation emphasis. However, it’s in a context based on his expertise, and most people in my opinion if they would try to, may instead at least at first experience certain excessive contemplation interjections. Using basic common sense, of course, Nathan does not present what he knows using excessive contemplation interjections. Instead, Nathan presents the team with reasonable explanations to interact with. The episode says it all, so to speak.

So, for example, when you experience a mild to moderate excessive contemplation interjection from an instigation that you already believe is out of context, and not relevant, you can ask yourself ‘Is this interjection improperly encouraging me to commit to a contributing of an excessive interjection identity?’ That is why I named the idea ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’. The name is also a diagnostic. When you experience an excessive interjection, you can contemplationally say to yourself ‘Not contribute to such a recognizing’, an that should help you not evaluate such an interjection just based on it’s impression of recommended use.

As a reminder, if you chose to use The Phonetic System, an idea that I recommended to you in Wishlist #1104, you can make associations with the ideas I have given you. So, when you finally have an idea that you really like, for example, you can make an association with all of the ideas learned from the beginning to where your new idea is. For example, you should be able to recall idea ‘Begin’, and all of the ideas after that leading to you new favorite idea. Let’s say you don’t have a favorite idea yet. Well, when you do finally have a favorite idea, you should be ready to associate your favorite idea to other ideas that you have chosen to associate your favorite idea with.

Not address stay:

Soon after inventing idea ‘Not contribute to a certain recognizing’, for a short moment, I experienced a sense of extra objectivity. That was when I invented idea ‘Not address stay’. That means I chose to not address certain characteristics of certain instigations that had an obvious adverse instability identity. If I believed that characteristic was out of context, and even the instigator who presented it would deny it was even presented to me, then I may choose to contemplationally ‘not address’ such a characteristic’s adverse sense of instability. The idea only worked for one thing that I had experienced, and I wasn’t able to use the idea again to create that preferred effect. However, even though it worked only once, so to speak, I believe that it helped me create idea ‘Vulnerable not available’, an idea I plan to type in tomorrow.

For you to use idea ‘Not address stable’, just contemplationally say ‘Not address stable’ to not address out of context and non relevant aspects of adverse instability.

It’s already 7:55 PM EST for me now, so I’m going to stop now, proofread it, and close it. So, if you’re there tomorrow, I’ll see you then.

Rated R language and viewer discretion for movie ‘The Wedding Ringer’. Rated R violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Pacific Heights’. Rated TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Leverage’. Rated TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2005+)’. Rated R violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Red Dragon’. Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘As Good As It Gets’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, tv show, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Angry’, ‘Not contribute to a certain recognizing’, and ‘Not address stay’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/4/2018

Welcome.

It is now 7:19 PM EST for me. Because it is too late for me to start typing the ideas I invented from idea ‘Begin’, I’m just going to give you a music video and a recommendation to see a scene from a movie. That way, you may choose to have something to do until next Saturday. Also, I did give you Wishlist #1134 today, even though it was an easy one for me to explain. The music video is from song ‘Medicina’ by Brazilian singer Anitta. Less than an hour ago, I found it in www.youtube.com and watched it for the 1st time. Here is a quote about the music video from www.wikipedia.org:

” Directed by 36 Grados, the accompanying music video premiered on Vevo the same day of the single release. The video was shot during July, 2018, in a total of six different countries – Columbia, Hong Kong, India, United States, South Africa and Brazil – and features children from each country dancing to the song Anitta shot her scenes in Colombia on July 2, 2018, and then the rest of the crew traveled to the other countries in order to shot the rest of the scenes. The final cut of the video was completed two days before official release.

Upon its release, the video gathered 10 million views on its first day. ”

I looked over the lyrics as it was translated into English. The important thing about the music video is that the kids and young teenagers all seem very enthusiastic as they performed and danced in it.

To watch music video ‘Medicina’ for free, search for phrase ‘anitta medicina’ in www.youtube, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 40 million views. What I find incredible about this music video is that it acquired over 40 million views in just 2 weeks!

When I introduce you to the next idea, probably next Saturday, I’ll offer you another music video. This is just something.

The scene I am recommending for you to watch is in the beginning of sci-fi movie ‘Ready Player One(2018)’. Here is a quote from the movie using Amazon.com’s streaming service. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 10 minutes and 7 seconds into the movie:

Wade(Tye Sheridan): ‘The challenge is to find three keys, but in five years, no one has even gotten one key.’

Wade: (10 minutes, 23 seconds into the movie): ‘But the challenge to win the first key was a race designed by Halliday that was so hard, no one had ever finished it.’

According to the DVD/Blu-ray mail rental service I am using, I returned movie ‘Ready Player One’ on 7/30/18. So, soon before that date was the 1st time I watched movie ‘Ready Player One’. When I 1st watched it, I thought that the race designed by Halliday was going on for five years! Based on the quotes I typed in, I may have misunderstood that. Anyway, that’s what I’m recommending. I am recommending that you watch that race scene in the movie ‘Ready Player One’, but in the context that the race has been going on for five years. There’s sci-fi violence in that race, but since it’s a virtual situation, no one is really getting hurt. I believe that imagining that there are participants that have been in that race for 5 years actually may help you with your memory. It’s just a hunch. Of course, you can remove moments in that race if you believe it’s inapropriate for you.

So, if you are there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

8/11/2018

Hi diddly ho!

(Ned Flanders greeting from ‘The Simpsons’)

It is now 9:44 AM EST for me. For the music video I’m recommending to you, I found it from the song played from a music playing show from the cable tv service I am using called ‘Music Choice Hit List’. Here’s a description for that show:

‘ A commercial free block of brand new music from today’s most popular up and coming artists. ‘

Each show lasts 2 hours, and those shows always repeat. I copied 2 of those shows on 7/24/2018, and yesterday I fast forward through those 2 shows, and wrote down the songs I liked. Less than an hour ago, I looked in www.youtube.com at the corresponding song’s music videos, and at 9:32 AM today, less than 20 minutes ago, I watched the entire music video for song ‘Shower’ by American singer Becky G. Here is a quote about the song and music video from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ Musically, “Shower” is a teen pop and melodic rap song. ‘

‘ Gomez explained the concept: “We wanted to capture moments of feeling good, and me personally when I feel good is when I’m hanging out with friends or that special person. It’s a party basically…” ‘

‘ It was released on April 23, 2014… “Shower” debuted at number 88 on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart before peaking at number 16 on the charts… ‘

BuzzFeed…said that it is “kind of awful and you’ll love it”. Maximum Pop!… described it as “a bubbly future pop hit.” Time said the song “is such a seasonally appropriate sugar rush that it’s borderline preposterous the song hasn’t been a more serious contender for Song of the Summer.”

To watch music video ‘Shower’ for free, search for phrase ‘becky g shower’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 336 million views.

Here’s some of the lyrics for ‘Shower’:

You light me up inside
Like the 4th of July
Whenever you’re around
I always seem to smile
And people ask me how
Well you’re the reason why
I’m dancing in the mirror n’ singing in the shower

If you choose to watch music video ‘Shower’ and Becky G sings those lyrics, it feels like a ‘teen pop build-up’.

Stabilize:

Idea ‘Stabilize’ is the main idea I invented from idea ‘Begin’ from Wishlist #1133. I call this idea the battery for the ideas that I will create from it. If you choose to learn idea ‘Stabilize’ and the few ideas I created for it, when those new ideas lose a certain effectiveness in your mind, I anticipate that you will go back to your experiences with idea ‘Stabilize’.

The only illustration example I am choosing to type in right now for idea ‘Stabilize’ is in the movie ‘Passengers(2016)’, starring Jennifer Lawrence as Aurora Lane, Chris Pratt as Jim Preston, and Laurence Fishburne as Gus Mancuso. The illustration is from the perspectives of Aurora and Jim regarding Jim’s decision to revive Aurora from cryogenic suspension, how they expressed such a grievance to Gus. Of course, how they expressed their grievances is refurbishedly toned down for this advice. The illustrations are from the movie in streaming form from www.amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the 1st scene starts 1 hour 14 minutes and 29 seconds into the movie, Gus is assigning Aurora and Jim tasks. Here is a quote:

Gus: ‘There are 16 of these tech stations on every deck. Dock your slate. Data syncs automatically. Got it? Okay. (to Aurora) You take decks one and two. (to Jim) You take decks three and four. I’m going down to the hibernation bay, check our pods.’

Aurora: (to Jim) ‘Well, that should be interesting.’

The reason I am recommending sci-fi movie ‘Passengers’ is because of it’s popularity on cable tv. I believe that many Americans probably watched it, and it’s played regularly on cable tv. So, the illustrations I’m recommending to you is how clearly understood the grievances are when Aurora and Jim are articulating those grievances to Gus. In the minds of Aurora and Jim, Gus quite possibly will be the only other person they can talk to for about 88 years. That is why when they both choose to individually talk to Gus, their conversations with Gus are circumstantially easy to understand, kind of needy. The 1st person to talk to Gus is Jim. That scene starts 1 hour 14 minutes and 56 seconds into the movie, but I’m just going to the highlights. That scene starts 1 hour 15 minutes and 22 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Gus: ‘But Aurora’s pod…You did this.’

Jim: ‘Yeah.’

Gus: ‘All this time, I’m thinking you’re one lucky man to get stuck with Aurora. It wasn’t luck, was it?’

Jim: ‘No.’

Gus: ‘She knows.’

Jim: ‘She knows.’

This scene is when Aurora talked to Gus. This scene starts 1 hour 16 minutes and 28 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Aurora: ‘You saw the hibernation pods?’

Gus: ‘I saw them.’

Aurora: ‘So you know what Jim did.’

I never cease to be amazed at how some individuals continue to play a certain role with family and friends against better judgment, simply because that’s the way it’s always been done or because of bondage sample viagra for free to what people think, most men visit sex workers after they start living with their girlfriend or wife. Soon these yak gazers viagra without prescription usa started giving them to these yaks regularly. A highly potent drug that helps in providing harder erection during the process.Once the product is consumed, the user when stimulates the mood with thoughts, the brain easily processes and sends the viagra prescription find over here signal to the nerves around the phallus to enhance the blood circulation and flow into the male organ and facilitate the tablets throughout the world. Because of this fact, some states (including Texas) actually require adults from age 18 to 24 to get a driver’s license in this commander viagra test. Gus: ‘Yeah.’

Aurora: ‘And?’

Gus: ‘It’s not my…’

Aurora: ‘He woke me up. He took away my life.’

Gus: ‘I know, I’m sorry, but there’s work I’d…’

Of course, those scenes are refurbished with inaproprieities removed and for advice. I also highly recommend that you watch those scenes for further understanding.

I just thought of another scene from the movie ‘As Good as It Gets(1997)’ starring Jack Nicholson as Melvin Udall and Helen Hunt as Carol Connelly. The scene is how the waitresses react to Melvin Udall. Again, I highly recommend that you watch that scene for further understanding. The scene available as a streaming video starts according to Amazon Video about 11 minutes and 49 seconds into the movie. Melvin Udall is complaining to the waitresses that a couple is sitting at his usual table. Here is a quote:

Melvin Udall: (said to the waitresses) ‘I’ve got Jews at my table.’

Carol: ‘It’s not your table; it’s the place’s table. Behave. This once, you can sit at someone else’s station.’

When Carol said that, all of the waitresses present looked at Carol at the same time with disapproval.

Carol: ‘Or you can wait your turn.’

OK, if you chose to use idea ‘Begin’ from Wishlist #1133, you now have the ability somewhat to choose to not to ‘begin’ with certain out of context overemphasized interjections the instigator caused you to be aware of. This is how idea ‘Stabilize’ works: Let me start with another movie illustration. This illustration is from movie ‘Justice League(2017)’ starring Ben Affleck as Bruce Wayne, and Gal Gadot as Diana. The illustration starts, according to Amazon Video, 1 hour, 4 minutes, and 36 seconds into the movie. Bruce and Diana are talking to each other. Here is the quote:

Bruce: ‘Is it a risk? Yes. But it’s necessary.’

Diana: ‘Why, because of your guilt? (sighs) Bruce, I was there. At some point, even you have to learn to move on.’

Bruce: ‘Steve Trevor tell you that?’

After Bruce said that to Diana, Diana pushed Bruce into a few large containers. Looking at Diana trying to collect herself after pushing Bruce is highly recommended.

Here’s one more illustration. It is from episode 2.15 ‘Seizure’ from sci fi tv show ‘Stargate Universe(2011)’, when a worker(Jackie Blackmore) asked Dr. McKay(David Hewlett) a question. That scene, according to Amazon Video, starts 29 minutes and 3 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Worker: ‘How can you possibly control the power flow from so small a device?’

Dr. McKay: ‘Because, technically speaking, as far as you’re concerned, I’m from the future.’

Col. David Telford(Lou Diamond Phillips): (talking to the worker) ‘Dr. McKay appreciates your help. (now talking to McKay) What is it with genius and social skills?’

One more illustration, and the illustration’s inaproprieities are removed and the illustration is refurbished for advice, is in the movie ‘The Breakfast Club(1985)’, Claire Standish(Molly Ringwald) is talking to Allison Reynolds(Ally Sheedy). The scene starts, according to streaming Amazon Video, 1 hour, 10 minutes, and 56 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Claire: ‘I can’t believe you. You’re so weird. You don’t say anything all day, and then when you open your mouth you unload all these tremendous lies all over me.’

OK, so here’s how idea ‘Stabilize’ works: Keep in mind that I am not a psychiatrist or someone that professionally gives advice. I just made this idea up about 2 weeks ago: So, here’s the idea: If you’re an innocent person experiencing instigation, if the instigation bothers you, what you may do to resolve the experience contemplationally is to stabilize it. According to www.dictionary.com, here’s a definition of ‘stabilize’: ‘to maintain at a given or unfluctuating level or quantity’, and the sentence example is ‘The government will try to stabilize the cost of living.’ I believe that this is a very popular instigation in America. Since the instigator knows you will very likely try to stabilize the instigation in your mind, what the instigator may do is impose an instigation that will be difficult for you to be able to contemplationally stabilize the experienced instigation in a preferred context.

The solution I invented uses the ‘Begin’ idea: If you choose to use idea ‘Begin’, that means you can choose not to ‘begin’ with certain overemphasized out of context interjections from instigations. For idea ‘Stabilize’, with idea ‘Begin’, you can choose to not actively interact with the adverse stabilizing inclinations that an instigation may impose upon you to interact and resolve. That doesn’t mean you choose not to stabilize at all. That means you can choose to not try to stabilize an interjection of stabilizing that you believe is excessive, unreasonable to stabilize, or for other reasons, such as it exceeds your daily stabilizing allowance, and so on. The point is that, before this idea, if an instigator imposed an instigation that exploited your ability to stabilize an experience in your mind, that is what you would do. Now, with this idea, you have more of a choice whether or not you should stabilize such an experience in such a context.

[I have to take a break right now and order something to eat. I keep eating these chocolate Hershey’s miniatures to sustain me as I type, and I don’t think that’s a good idea to keep doing. So, what I’ll do is order actual food, and then I’ll continue to type today. I estimate that I’ll start typing again 2 hours from now. So, I’ll see you then.

8/11/2018

It is now 1:47 PM EST for me. I ordered Domino’s pizza and plain wings. I ate a few slices of pizza and 9 or so plain wings. This is the 1st time that I noticed that, even though I was very hungry, I only ate a few slices of pizza, and that made me feel full. I also ordered 2 liters of Diet Coke. I am now snacking on one of those small bags of variety cereal. The one I am eating now is a small bag(31g) of Frosted Cheerios. The point is that I am no longer hungry like before, and I still have plenty of pizza for when I do get hungry later. I ordered today their thickest pizzas. Next time I order from Domino’s, I’ll order pizza that is not as thick. Looking at their website, the next pizza will probably be their ‘Brooklyn style’ pizza.

All right! Back to the explanation. Here’s another illustration. According to streaming Amazon Video, near end of episode 1.5 ’12 Hours’ from action tv show ‘Transporter: The Series(2012)’, 46 minutes and 39 seconds into the episode, Giles(Josh Blacker) tells Frank Martin(Chris Vance) who is pretending to be Dieter Hausmann(Charly Hubner) refurbished for advice with inaproprieities quote: ‘You’re not such a bad person after all, Dieter.’ The real Dieter who is pretending not to be Dieter then says quote ‘Thanks.’ That’s when Giles turns around with a look of surprise to the man that said he was not Dieter. That look of surprise, among other things, caused the actual Dieter to roll his eyes up.

My point is that, when the actual Dieter rolled his eyes up, that look can be used as an indicator for something that I call ‘Over acknowledgement’. You can use that scene as an indicator to check if the ‘over acknowledgement’, so to speak, is coming from you. In Dieter Hausmann’s case, since he is probably portraying a man who has no obvious technique to experience mild to moderate instigations, when Dieter experienced that ‘over acknowledgement’, he became that over acknowledgement, since Dieter believes that such a response came from him. With some experience, you don’t have to become the mild to moderate over acknowledgements that you believe mild to moderate instigations may create for you to experience. If you watched that ‘Transporter: The Series’ scene, you should be able to tell that Giles caused Dieter to experience such an over acknowledgement.

Using that ‘Transporter: The Series’ scene as a reference, and some practice, you can notice that you are now more objective with certain over acknowledgements that you may have experienced in the past, and you don’t have to commit to such over acknowledgements like you used to. For example, when you used to think of a joke, but you believe that the joke is circumstantially inapropriate, you would try to contemplationally clarify to yourself that you are not using such a joke, even though for some reason you are thinking about it.

So, this is how idea ‘Stabilize’ works: The best example I can think of right now for what I am about to recommend, refurbished with inaproprieities removed, is in episode 13.7 ‘War of the Worlds’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Supernatural(2017)’, when Castiel(Misha Collins) and Lucifer(Mark Pellegrino) are talking in a bar. According to streaming Amazon Video, that scene starts 27 minutes and 50 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Castiel: ‘Okay, if this Michael comes–‘

Lucifer: ‘Not if. When. When. The guy’s on a mission.’

Castiel: ‘Well, you would seem to be the weak link on this team.’

Lucifer: ‘Okay, that hurt. That…was unnecessary. I’m gonna let it go. Yes, my Grace is a little bit depleted, but give me time, man.’

Keep in mind that I am not recommending that you watch that entire episode of ‘Supernatural’, just the scene I quoted. Of course, if you choose to watch that episode, that’s one thing. I’m just saying that I’m only using that scene I quoted for this advice.

So, this is how idea ‘Stabilize’ works: When you encounter an adverse sense of stabilizing, if you choose to, you choose to not actively commit to interacting with such a sense of stabilizing. For example, when Castiel in that ‘Supernatural’ episode said to Lucifer quote ‘Well, you would seem to be the weak link on this team.’, Lucifer said quote ‘Okay, that hurt. That…was unnecessary. I’m gonna let it go.’ The idea is similar to what Lucifer said. You will still experience somewhat that mild to moderate instigation’s sense of adverse stabilizing, but you will choose not to use, not to interact such an adverse sense of stabilizing. Now, this is one of the main reasons why I call ‘Stabilize’ a ‘battery’ idea. The minor discomfort that you may feel for certain instigations, to choose not to use a sense of adverse stabilizing associated with that instigation, is an experience that you will want to recall and use again, because it is a discomfort that you will choose to experience. The only illustration example I can think of right now of a person choosing to experience minor discomfort, well, it’s refurbished for advice to be minor discomfort, is in the movie ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2(2012)’, when Bella Swan(Kristen Stewart) is using her powers as a shield to protect Edward Cullen(Robert Pattinson) from Kate’s(Casey LaBow) energy attack. I highly recommend that you watch the scene so that you can notice that Edward is indeed experiencing something that is somewhat uncomfortable by looking at how his face is reacting to the experience. If you have Amazon Prime, that movie is available from Amazon.com without additional payment. That scene, according to streaming Amazon Video, starts 56 minutes and 1 second into the movie. Here is the quote:

Kate: ‘All right. This one’s on full power.’

Soon after saying that, Kate touches Edward’s arm, and you can see that Edward is indeed encountering some sort of discomfort. The good news is that, based on the reactions of the other vampires witnessing his discomfort, Edward’s discomfort is actually an improvement.

Now, you’re not recommended to rely on actual instigation from your work or school to learn how to use idea ‘Stabilize’. Since I use bus public transportation, what I do is use my imagination and I practice on the many people that walk back and forth in a public bus terminal. I also use my imagination to practice the idea with the people in the bus with me, and the people I see from the outside as I am in the bus looking out. For example, you can imagine someone experiencing some sort of slight(insult) from you. When I am waiting for the bus in the bus terminal, there seems to be a lot of people walking back and forth. When I would look from a safe, respectful distance certain women that I find attractive, it is easy to imagine for me that they are experiencing some sort of slight(insult) from me, and that would cause me to feel some sort of mild adverse sense of stabilizing. So, when practicing the use of idea ‘Stabilize’, I would choose not to use such an adverse sense of stabilizing from the imagined experience of insult that the women were imagined to experience. However, even though I would not use such a sense of stabilizing, I would still from time to time some sort of unique sense of minor discomfort.

For the men, it’s not just feeling some sort of rejection from women you find attractive that you practice not interacting with a certain associated sense of stabilizing. For people in general, it is my opinion that practicing not to use an adverse sense of stabilizing is very easy, simply because, if you are an adult already with years of experience of being instigated, then you already have an idea the varieties of adverse stabilizings an instigator may impose upon a person, since instigators have already imposed such an experience upon you many times in the past. You already have years of experience to extrapolate with when you imagine other people trying to impose adverse stabilizings upon you again.

1)’Stay’: 2)’Bill’: 3’Eyes’

So, going back to the actual experience of the instigation identified by phrase ‘Stabilize’, when you actually experience an adverse sense of stabilizing, and you choose not to commit to it, instead of contemplationally using the word ‘Stabilize’, I recommend that you turn the word ‘Stabilize’ into 3 parts: 1)’Stay'(such as from the song ‘Stay’ by Zedd and Alessia Cara. You can also use the Pepsi commercial using the song ‘Stay’. Just search for phrase ‘stay pepsi commercial’ in www.youtube.com), 2)’Bill’, such as a reference to money, and 3)’Eyes’. So, when you think you experienced an adverse inclination to stabilize, contemplationally use the word ‘Stay’ to represent the word ‘Stabilize’. The reason is because an adverse sense of stabilizing, based on my experience, is meant to discourage you from ‘staying’ with it. When you use the word ‘Stay’, the use of the word ‘Stay’ should be discouraged by the instigation for you to use it. The instigation does not want you to ‘stay’ with not using such an adverse sense of stabilizing. I’m guessing it’s resilience is one of the main reasons why innocent people find it difficult to make ideas that allow them to have reasonable, acceptable to them positive and preferred results to stabilize from such an experienced instigation.

Now, even though I believe idea ‘Stay’ is a battery idea, there is also time to consider. Therefore, just practice using idea ‘Stay’ for 2 days. That should give you enough experience to continue with using the next few ideas I plan to introduce to you next. The goal during those 2 days is to allow yourself to have and remember the ‘Edward Cullen’ effect from the ‘Twilight’movie, which is a mild, adverse sense of discomfort that you choose to experience. Such minor encounters, in my opinion, will be very useful to you when using the next few ideas I plan to give you. Just look at how Edward Cullen reacts in that ‘Twilight’ movie as an indicator. Of course, that scene is refurbished with inaproprieities removed, and is refurbishedly toned down for this advice.

[I’m going to stop now, proofread and finish this list now, and the next list will have the few ideas I plan to give you to go with idea ‘Stay’. I plan to start making the next list next Saturday. If you want to experience some more enthusiasm to use idea ‘Stay’, for example, something that sustains you a little until next Saturday, I recommend that you watch again music video ‘Shower’ by American singer Becky G and allow yourself to experience that teen pop build-up again.

Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Ready Player One’ and ‘Passengers’. PG-13 violence, strong language, and viewer discretion for movie ‘As Good as It Gets’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Justice League’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘SGU Stargate Universe’. Rated R strong language, violence, and viewer discretion for movie ‘The Breakfast Club’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for action tv show ‘Transporter: The Series’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Supernatural’.  PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for sci- fi movie ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Stabilize’, ‘Stay’, and ” 1)’Stay’: 2)’Bill’: 3)’Eyes’ ” for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/4/2018

Salutations.

It is now 8:11 AM EST for me. The music video I’m recommending for this advice is the song ‘The Middle’ by American singer Maren Morris. www.wikipedia.org doesn’t say much about the music video, but here’s a quote from wikipedia about the song:

” The song was released commercially for digital download  on 23 January 2018 by Interscope Records. It has reached the top ten of the charts in the US, the UK, and several other countries. ”

Here’s a copy of some of the lyrics for song ‘The Middle’:

Oh baby
Why don’t you just meet me in the middle
I’m losing my mind just a little
So why don’t you just meet me in the middle
In the middle

I chose music video ‘The Middle’ because it highlights older kids and teenagers dancing. Their self expressions are positive and are highlighted in the music video. This type of music video is what I am looking for, since it is my belief that more and more kids will probably be reading this blog.

To watch music video ‘The Middle’ for free, search for phrase ‘the middle maren’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 55 million views.

Originally, I planned to give you the few ideas I made with the previous idea, idea ‘Begin’, but in the past few days, I invented an idea that I believe you should have before I type in the new ideas for idea ‘Begin’. I don’t think this explanation will take long. I’ll probably finish it in a few hours, which will allow me to start explaining the new ideas for idea ‘Begin’ today.

[8/4/2018: I forgot to mention about the new cable modem and phone service from the cable company I had installed this past Thursday. Both are working well. Based on my experience, there are no problems with the cable modem, as it is compared to the internet service from the phone company I was using. I would usually need to reset the internet phone modem several times in order for it to work, and I would also had to use the programs the internet phone service gave me. Before I finally decided to change to a cable modem, I was resetting the phone modem many times, and it still wasn’t working. So, instead of replacing the phone modem with it’s newer version, I decided to try using a cable modem instead. And since that cable modem was from the same cable company for the tv service I was already using, the switch was easy. Even the cable modem’s wifi seems to have improved the reception for my smartphone. All that basically means that I should be able to type more advice for you, since the cable modem service I am now using doesn’t seem to have any problems.]

Alienate overwhelm:

1st, here’s the illustration, refurbished for advice of course, that I recommend you look at 1st, to help you understand idea ‘Alienate overwhelm’. The illustration is from a scene in episode 1.13 ‘Each Night I Dream of Home’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Crusade(1999)’. In the scene, Dr. Stephen Franklin(Richard Biggs) is talking to Captain Matthew Gideon(Gary Cole). The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 18 minutes and 34 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Dr. Franklin: ‘Captain, before we can stop the virus left behind on Earth by the Drakh, we first have to identify it. Now that means tracing a course of infection from the moment of contamination to see how it spreads throughout the system. But the virus, once it was released into Earth’s atmosphere, it quickly spread to every air-breathing creature. Now, once inside the host’s body, the virus mutates quickly, and we can’t find it again. We need a baseline study to monitor the transmission of the virus,…’

In a marriage, the couple is supposed to shell out their time being devoted to their companion, having said that, when one particular spouse has an addiction, it can take away from the ED treatment: * Expensive Drug – No doubt, buying tadalafil http://appalachianmagazine.com/2018/10/17/if-the-world-could-just-snap-green-beans-with-granny-again/ is an effective drug to treat men’s erectile dysfunction. General predictable symptoms are cialis australia mastercard – Lack of enthusiasm Lack of interest in social activities Anxiety Irritation High level of homocysteine in the blood. A number of problems may levitra store be affect the cervix, making it tough for sperm to achieve the happiness and satisfaction in your sexual relation. appalachianmagazine.com prescription de viagra It enlarges the arterial wall to reduce arterial resistance and pressure. So, what I am doing with what I typed in that Dr. Franklin said, the rest of the episode not used, is to try to help you identify the instigation identified by idea ‘Alienate overwhelm’ in a more recognizable form. So, it’s like what Dr. Franklin said quote: ‘We need a baseline study to monitor the transmission of the virus,…’ I’m trying to give you a ‘baseline’ recognition of the instigation begin explained.

I plan to start with a story that I ‘made up’. The main character in the story, you if you choose to use it, is the character Quark from sci fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. For an illustration of Quark, you can look at episode 3.1 ‘The Search: Part I’ from that tv show of ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1994)’. If you have Amazon Prime, you can watch that scene from Amazon.com without additional payment. The scene shows Commander Sisko(Avery Brooks) presenting ‘The scepter of the Grand Nagus’ to Quark(Armin Shimerman). That scene starts 15 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode. If you want to watch additional scenes from the episode, in relation to advice said, you can do that. I just want to give you the gist of it.

So, here is the story: You are working for Quark as his ‘everything that is human’ representative. When he needs certain human guests, human customers, and human business people accomodated, Quark will give you all the resources at his disposal to make that happen. However, that preferred use of accomodation only happens a few times a year. Quark also expects you to accomodate all of the humans that are introduced to you that are relevant to his business, but with far less resourcefulness than when it is preferred to do so. So, basically, for the humans that are not preferred, in the beginning, it may seem like you are supposed to do the impossible.

Keep in mind that you are not working in a hospital with this story, where a certain maintaining of resource use has to occur. In this story, you are working for a private alien businessperson. So, when you experience certain disappointment, a certain setback, those setbacks are not absolute. They are not ‘deal breakers’, so to speak. You will still have to interact with Quark’s customers, even though you don’t have the preferred resources available to accomodate them.

This reminds me of an imagined situation as to how the character Kirby Carlisle(Jim Turner) was made useful by many of the celebrities repesented by sports agent Arliss Michaels(Robert Wuhl) in the tv show ‘Arli$$(1996+)’. I imagined that many of the celebrity clients of Arliss talked to each other over the phone and networked a use for Kirby Carlisle. Many who participated in the network added something, ideas and resource use to allow Kirby to be useful to them. So, with that also in mind, imagine that you have been working for Quark for a year, and you have learned to ‘stretch out’ certain resources that you had to invent an allowable use for, like the way those celebrities learned to ‘invent’ a use for Kirby. Now, imagine that you are participating in a school project, but the other students are already 2 years ahead of you, and all of you are starting from the beginning. It looks like you have nothing available to you, but to the other students, their 2 years of experience, allows them to easily continue with the project, but since you perceive you have nothing available to you, you cannot continue like the other students. Now, with that school experience, you can imagine what you recently did before this idea: that is, the disappointments you may have experienced may have seemed like a setback, something that you could not continue with. In that same school experience, you may imagine that, now, you have that ‘Quark’ story: even though there may seem to be setbacks, you may still be able to continue with the participation. And with that same imagined school experience, you may imagine how you would have more to work with, like what you learned when you imagined working for Quark for a year, and when you imagined how Kirby was made useful from that ‘Arli$$’ show.

Now, I can explain what idea ‘Alienate overwhelm’ means: That is when an instigator improperly imposes an instigation that causes you to contemplationally have an alienating, overwhelming sense of compiling, a contemplation that you did not choose to have.

The only illustration I can think of right now for idea ‘Alienate overwhelm’ is in the movie ‘Annapolis(2006)’, when Jake Huard(James Franco) was talking to Lt. Burton(Donnie Wahlberg) while boxing. The scene, according to Amazon Video, starts 55 minutes and 5 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Jake Huard: ‘No one thinks I’ll make it anyway.’

Lt. Burton: ‘Who do you think convinced the board to take a chance on you?’

The illustration is highly recommended for you to watch. So, in Jake Huard’s situation, he also experienced an overwhelming sense of being alienated, because he believed that the disappoinments he experienced were absolute. If he could not resolve those disappointments, he could not continue being a student in Annapolis. To be fair, since ‘Annapolis’ is just a movie, it is my understanding in a movie context that many of the students in Annapolis participated in the Junior ROTC program in their schools. (Wikipedia explains what a Junior ROTC program is.) Jake Huard did not. That means those students who did participate in that program already know much of the routine required in Annapolis, and they probably chose to look over the reading material offered in ‘Annapolis’ before choosing to actually attend that school. Jake Huard did none of those things. And on top of all that, Jake Huard started late in that school’s semester. So, yes, I believe Jake Huard experienced a problem that can be identified by idea ‘Alienate overwhelm’, but several situations contributed to that problem. That is why, when he talked to the students in his class, they were all already ahead of him, since he started school late, and many of those other students participated in their Junior ROTC programs in school.

[8/4/2018: Here is a quote from imdb.com about Jake Huard’s performance in the movie ‘Annapolis’:

” Thanks to tenaciously bugging a Congressman he’s selected, despite dubious grades. Once inside Jake soon proves sub-standard academically. Constantly challenged to his limits, repeatedly made the ‘over-cocky’ reason for the entire class to suffer, Jake nearly quits, but after facing his utterly unsupportive father’s gloating returns just in time. “]

So, if you believe you are experiencing an instigation identified by idea ‘Alienate overwhelm’, contemplationally say ‘Alienate overwhelm’, to check if the instigation is trying to cause you to have an unreasonable interaction with the imposed contemplation of disappointments induced by that instigation. It feels like a contemplation compiling that you did not choose to have.

You may also use idea ‘Alienate overwhelm’ for inadvertencies that are not instigation related, reasonably refurbished by you, of course.

Violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Crusade’. Rated TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Annapolis’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, tv show, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Alienate overwhelm’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.