8/25/2018
Greetings.
It is now 9:32 AM EST for me. The music video I am recommending, and I am only recommending the 1st 48 seconds of this music video, is from the song ‘Dura’ by Puerto Rican rapper Daddy Yankee. Even though the song is in Spanish, in my opinion, the song sounds really good, and the primary focus is the music video itself, not just it’s associated song. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the song and it’s music video:
‘ The single has been described as an uptempo reggaeton track with reggae influences and lyrics about a good looking woman. Commercially, the song topped the charts of 14 countries and reached the top 10 of five others. In the United States, “Dura” peaked at number 43 on the Billboard Hot 100 and at number two on the Hot Latin Songs chart. ‘
‘ The visual premiered through Daddy Yankee’s YouTube account on January 18, 2018, where it has over 1 billion views. ‘
‘ According to a press release by Spanish news agency EFE, the clip “tries to project over the top fashion images, an individualistic dance style and beautiful and sincere personalities.” EFE stated that, as the video progresses, it “becomes a wake-up call for women to reclaim their space on the dance floor and within society itself. ‘
Less than 20 minutes ago, I watched the entire music video ‘Dura’. It’s the 1st 48 seconds of the music video that I want to contribute to this blog. Here’s a quote from wikipedia that I think addresses it:
” …the clip “tries to project over the top fashion images, an individualistic dance style and beautiful and sincere personalities.” ”
After the 1st 48 seconds, the music video changes. Based on how I interpreted the music video, it progresses into something else. Here’s a quote from wikipedia about what it turns into later:
“..as the video progresses, it “becomes a wake-up call for women to reclaim their space on the dance floor and within society itself. ”
To watch music video ‘Dura’ for free, search for phrase ‘daddy yankee dura’ in www.youtube, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 1 billion views. I found the music video in www.youtube.com from ‘TopMusicWorld’ from a video clip called ‘Top Songs of January 2018’. If you use your cursor, you can visually review the music videos that video clip is showing. That video clip rated 75 music videos, showing small video clips of each music video. ‘Dura’ was rated #75 in that video clip. I recommend that when you watch the 1st 48 seconds of music video ‘Dura’, that you press the pause button for different moments of that music video so that you can appreciate more certain images that you may like. There’s detail in it that you will probably miss unless you use the pause button. Also, the momentum of the music video won’t stop at 48+ seconds. I’m only recommending that you only use the 1st 48 seconds for this advice.
[8/25/2018: I thought I watched the entire music video ‘Dura’ earlier today. I was wrong. I just recently watched the entire music video of ‘Dura’, and I realized that before I must have stopped watching it towards the end. Now, I am sure I watched the entire music video of ‘Dura’, the one offered in youtube.]
Vulnerable not available:
According to www.dictionary.com, the word ‘vulnerable’ means ‘capable of or susceptible to being wounded or hurt’. An instigator may improperly impose an instigation that causes you to experience an interaction that you are vulnerable to that should not be available for you to interact with. Let’s start with using the streaming movie ‘Nancy Drew(2007)’, starring Emma Roberts as Nancy Drew. I’m renting the streaming movie now, since according to Amazon.com, renting it is only about a dollar. The illustration started 1 hour, 4 minutes, and 50 seconds into the episode. One of the girls told Nancy that Trish(Kelly Vitz) was choking. Here’s a quote starting at 1 hour, 5 minutes, and 7 seconds:
Nancy Drew: ‘Does she have any food allergies?’
Inga(Daniella Monet): ‘Ug, she is insanely allergic to peanuts, but she didn’t eat anything.’
So, refurbished for advice, since Trish was allergic to peanuts, even though there were peanuts offered at Nancy Drew’s party, Trish chose not to eat those peanuts, since the peanuts were ‘not available’ for Trish to eat. Based on my discovery this past Thursday, the same can be said for certain kinds of instigations. An instigator may improperly impose upon you an instigation for you to experience that exploits a sense of your vulnerability that should not be available for you to interact with. Suppose you experience an unavoidable instigation, and it’s associated interjection causes you to interact with a sense of vulnerability that you have. Even though you believe that such an instigation should not be available, whether it’s school or at work, the instigator may still cause you to interact with what is still not supposed to be available for you to interact with. Just because a certain experience is not supposed to be available where you are, let’s say it’s your job, that doesn’t necessarily mean that such an experience will not occur to you, just because you choose to not participate with such an experience.
Since I introduced to you idea ‘Begin’ in Wishlist #1133, you should be developing an ability to not participate with certain experiences. So, idea ‘Vulnerable not available’ may work for you. Here’s an illustration example, so you can use idea ‘Vulnerable not available’: There is a scene in the streaming sci-fi movie ‘Star Trek VII: Generations’ from Amazon.com. You can rent the streaming movie for about 3 dollars. Just search for phrase ‘star trek vii generations’ in www.amazon.com. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 22 minutes and 25 seconds into the movie, Picard(Patrick Stewart) and Will Riker(Jonathan Frakes) are in the hologram room. Here is the quote:
Picard: ‘Will.’
(pipe blowing)
Picard(talking to Will): ‘Just imagine what it was like–no engines, no computers, just the wind and the sea and the stars to guide you.’
Will: ‘Bad food, brutal discipline, no women.’
[I’m going to order food now and take a break. I should start typing again in 2 hours. I’ll see you then.]
12:39 PM
It is now 12:39 PM for me. After you watched that ‘Star Trek: Generations’ scene, take that quote that Will Riker said:
Will: ‘Bad food, brutal discipline, no women.’
refurbish it to represent notions ‘not available’ for work or school, imagine people that you select and perceive to be associated with those notions, and just imagine those people to not have available such notions. For example, when I invented this idea this past Thursday, I imagined certain people that I perceived at work have an association with what Will Riker said. I didn’t have to remember specifially what he said. I just refurbished what he said to represent notions that are ‘not available’ to those people I selected. I then chose for those notions to not be available to those people.
To offer you a reason why this idea should work, since I am not a managerial employee, I imagined what certain managerial employees must go through, let’s say managerial employees who work for a company with a few hundred or more employees. Let’s say this company has different divisions in it, and new employees are always coming into the company. When those managerial employees perceive certain employees, there may be uncertainty involved as to what division and level of training certain people have. Therefore those managerial employees have to not make available certain interactions with those employees. In the ‘Star Trek: Generations’ example, you can imagine what Picard imagined:
Picard: ‘Just imagine what it was like–no engines, no computers, just the wind and the sea and the stars to guide you.’
you may imagine that represents the ‘acceptable’ notions, and what Will imagined:
Will: ‘Bad food, brutal discipline, no women.’
without needing to know specifically what Will said, that represents notions that are ‘not available’ to other people. The notions presented by Picard and Will are easily discernable. That’s what matters for the idea to work, not what they specifically said.
So, when you choose to imagine certain people in your school or work to ‘not have available’ certain notions, then you should have more of an ability to imagine vulnerabilities for yourself that are not available to you when you are in school or work.
Explode:
OK, I invented a use of a word that not only describes a certain sense of expansion, but also a word that can be used to associate with an instigator’s adverse appearance that improperly imposes a sense of expansion. That word that I chose, refurbished for this advice of course, is ‘explode’. Here are 2 illustrations to help you choose to use the word ‘explode’: In episode 6.7 ‘Once More, with Feeling’ from action tv show ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer(2001)’, Willow(Alyson Hannigan) and Tara(Amber Benson) get permission from Giles(Anthony Head) to leave the store in order to get books from home. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 8 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Tara: ‘There’s just a few volumes…back at the house that deal with mystical chants, bacchanals. Might be relevant.’
Willow: ‘Yeah, we could, um–‘
Giles: ‘I’m a hairsbreadth from investigating bunnies at the moment, so I’m open to anything.’
Willow: ‘Great. We’ll, um, check it out, and, um, we’ll give you a call.’
Tara: ‘Yeah. This could blow the whole thing wide open.’
There are several causes due to which this happens viagra rx to him. It is studied through medical investigators that every 9 out of 10 men have some degree of ED, three out of 10 men and nearly half of men above the age of 40 will experience ED. purchase cheap levitra Continue to online tadalafil keep an eye on and train your child drivers even after licensure. It boosts online viagra overnight https://unica-web.com/HONORARY-MEDALS/intro.html energy levels and cure PE. Once they’re outside, Willow explained to Tara that they lied so that they could enjoy a walk on a nice day. So, even though they lied, it’s what Tara said to Giles that makes this illustration important:
Tara: ‘Yeah. This could blow the whole thing wide open.’
This is the 1st illustration of the use of the word ‘Explode’:
‘ This could blow the whole thing wide open. ‘
How Tara said those words is recommended to be seen for further understanding.
The 2nd illustration for using the word ‘explode’ comes from the use of a pinata. According to www.wikipedia.org, a piñata is a container often made of papier-mache, pottery, or cloth; it is decorated, and filled with small toys or candy, or both, and then broken as part of a ceremony or celebration. So, for the use of this idea, a person causes a pinata to explode, and the toys and candy inside is taken by the kids. An illustration of this, and because the illustration is in a rated R movie, that illustration only is used, is refurbished for advice, and the rest of the movie is thrown away/not used for this advice. The illustration is in movie ‘Home Sweet Hell(2015)’, starring Katherine Heigl as Mona Champagne, Aiden Flowers as Andrew Champagne, and Madison Wolfe as Allison Champagne. The movie is available as a streaming rental Standard Definition for about 3 dollars from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that illustration starts 1 hour and 28 minutes into the movie, Mona is telling her son, Andrew, to hit the pinata. Here is the quote:
Mona: ‘Hit it, Andrew. Hit it, Andrew!’
Woman1: ‘There you go. You got this.’
Woman2: ‘Great job, Andrew. That’s right. Come on.’
Man: ‘Come on, buddy.’
Andrew tries several times to hit the pinata, but the pinata won’t explode. Andrew’s mom, Mona, then gestures her daughter, Allison, to take the stick from Andrew and cause the pinata to explode.
Mona: ‘Hit it harder! Yes! Yes! Yay! Yay! You did it!’
Allison causes the pinata to explode, and the rest of the kids pick up the candy that came from the pinata.
Keep in mind that the movie ‘Home Sweet Hell’ is a comedy, so the mom Mona depicted in that scene also emotionally ‘explodes’ a few times. The exploding pinata, for this advice, is what is used. Mona emotionally exploding is something, just not the main part of the illustration. To clarify Mona’s emotional exploding, you can also use an earlier scene, when Mona was talking to Les(Jim Belushi), but don’t use the movie’s surrounding scenes. That scene starts 1 hour, 27 minutes, and 21 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:
Mona(to Les): ‘Your kid is a cheater! And you’re an alcoholic. I can smell the booze seeping out of your fat pores right now.’
Abby(Brandi Nicole Wilson): ‘You can’t talk to him like that!’
So, now you have 2 illustrations for the use of the word ‘Explode’.
Explode murky:
Here are 2 definitions for the word ‘murky’ used for this blog from www.dictionary.com: 1)’dark, gloomy, and cheerless, and 2)’obscure or thick with mist, haze, etc. as the air.
The illustration is in episode 2.15 ‘Reprise’ from action tv show ‘Angel(2001)’. The episode is available from Amazon.com. In the ‘search’ section, click the word ‘All’, then scroll down and select ‘Prime Video’. Using ‘Prime Video’ to search from, search for phrase ‘angel season 2’. Click the magnifying glass, and ‘Angel Season 2’ for streaming should be the 1st selection offered. Click that, and episode ‘Reprise’ should be available for purchase. The illustration according to Amazon Video starts 13 minutes and 48 seconds into the episode, Angel(David Boreanaz) is talking to Lorne(Andy Hallett), the empathy demon that reads people’s futures by their singing. Here is the quote:
Angel: ‘But getting to these senior partners? – That’s my destiny.’
Lorne: ‘Is it? Because I haven’t actually featured a destiny with you in it lately. It’s all kind of murky.’
Here’s something that you may not have used before. Before this advice, an adverse, contemplation sense of murkyness induced by instigation may have been an experience that you would have tried to avoid. It’s something an instigator may improperly impose upon you to think about in order to avoid it’s interpretation. Now, with this idea, when an instigator interjects such an experience upon you, you may choose to more objectively identify such an experience as ‘exploding’ contemplationally upon you, and you choose not to make such an explosion, such a volatile expansion, available to yourself. I call that experience ‘Explode murky not available’. You can shuffle the words around. You may eventually call it ‘Explode murky’. Instead of using the word ‘murky’, you may also use ‘hazy, blurry, and fuzzy’. So, your options are ‘hazy, fuzzy, murky, and blurry’.
Explode not effective:
When you start using idea ‘Vulnerable not available’, an instigator may improperly impose a contradiction of effectiveness based on a contemplation effort to resolve for you to experience. So, what you are trying to do is quantify the ineffectiveness of how you are using the idea, and choosing to not use that ineffectiveness, to ‘not make that available’ for you to use. It’s like a mildly volatile sense of expansion of ineffectiveness that uses the identity of a contemplation effort to resolve. The only illustration example I can think of right now for idea ‘Explode not effective’ is in the movie ‘Superman Returns(2006)’, starring Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor, and Parker Posey as Kitty Kowalski. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 1 hour, 25 minutes, and 47 seconds into the movie, Lex Luther and Kitty Kowalski are talking. Here is the quote:
Lex Luther: ‘Kitty, what did my father used to say to me?’
Kitty: ‘You’re losing your hair.’
Lex Luther: ‘Before that.’
Kitty: ‘Get out?’
Kitty wanted to be insulting to Lex Luther, so she gave answers to Lex Luther’s questions that intentionally did not have any positive effectiveness to the obvious answer that Lex Luther wanted to hear. So, what an instigator may do is cause you to feel an adversely imposed upon ineffectiveness for the technique that you are trying to use.
The solution I invented for such an instigation is to allow yourself somewhat to experience the ineffectiveness of your own technique, but to also choose not to use such an effectiveness in such a context, and allow yourself instead to use the intent of your idea’s use, an intent that is not necessarily dependant upon conceptualization and feeling. In the movie ‘Superman Returns’, when Kitty gave Lex Luther those answers, Lex Luther still knew what the answer actually was, even though Kitty was not presenting it.
[It’s 4:29 PM for me now. I’m going to proofread and close this idea. I’ll probably upgrade my ability to explain idea ‘Explode not effective (not available) over time. After all, my benefit is your benefit, so to speak. Next Saturday, I plan to finally explain idea ‘Not add’. After that, I don’t know for certain what idea to offer you. So, if you’re there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.
[8/26/2018: It’s 9:39 PM EST for me now. I want to say something about the use of idea ‘Explode’. I believe that experiencing instigation in general may discourage you from contemplationally using the word ‘explode’. I believe that is true because the instigations you may have experienced, the mild to moderate ones I am addressing that I can address in a reasonable context, may have given you bad impressions associated with the use of the word ‘explode’. Using the word ‘explode’ should not be just limited and quantified by the adverse mild to moderate instigations that you have experienced. Like the 2 illustrations I gave you in this list, the meaning of the word ‘explode’ can also refer to things in a reasonable context. What about the 4th of July fireworks?
When you use the word ‘explode’ contemplationally, you’re specifically using it to identify an instigation induced adverse contemplation expansion. You’re not using it to identify specifically what the instigator is adversely trying to make you think about, to make you experience. Here’s what I did earlier today with idea ‘Explode murky not available’: When an instigation and/or chosen inadvertency causes you to think about something prevalent and obvious, instead of giving that contemplation some sort of acknowledgement, you can instead identify the obvious contemplation as a contemplation that you did not choose to acknowledge as obvious. Instead, you chose to see it as a murky contemplation that is exploding. Even though the contemplation is obvious and feels like you specifically made it, you can still interpret that obvious, specific contemplation as being murky. With a little practice, even though you may experience interjections that cause adverse, obvious, and specific contemplations, you can still choose to perceive such contemplations as being murky, instead of being obvious and specific.
Here’s an idea I think I invented a week ago. I think it started in Wishlist #1116. Here is a quote:
‘ I imagined a woman in a dating situation in a restaurant, and she is avoiding to tell that man certain struggles that she is experiencing in her life, because if she does, that man would get the wrong idea about her. ‘
Extrapolated from my belief that women in their 30s and up who are still single and dating men have notions that men would get the wrong idea if those notions are revealed to them. So, extrapolate from that, and you can imagine anyone, kids, teenagers, and adults, having notions that are reserved from being revealed to you because you would get the ‘wrong idea’. So, whether it’s happening in the now, or the instigation happened in your past, if something about it’s contemplation is bothering you, you can imagine the instigator saying in some sort of narration why such an instigation is not being revealed to you, because if the instigation was revealed to you, you would get the ‘wrong idea’. Of course, that instigation was revealed to you. So, what you do with that imagined narration is mix it with how you evaluate the instigation you experienced. That way, you are not just evaluating the instigation as it is presented to you. You are also evaluating the instigation with the instigator’s imagined culpability involved. It’s like thinking to yourself that the instigation is like coffee, but the coffee is made too strong. The ‘wrong idea’ addition is like adding something to the coffee to make it more drinkable, like adding sugar, cream, or milk to it. If you want an example of a narration made by the instigator about that experienced instigation, if presented, would be interpreted as the ‘wrong idea’, you can buy an episode of ‘Neverwhere’ from Amazon.com. Each episode near the beginning has a character from the fantasy tv show give a generalistic narration. Of course, the narrations are refurbished with inaproprieities removed. I’m just recommending one of those ‘Neverwhere’ episodes to be watched to help you imagine an instigator present a narration about not giving other people the ‘wrong idea’ about certain instigations.
Based on how I used idea ‘Explode’, once you have gotten used to it, you will simply use another idea. It is my belief that you’re not going to keep thinking to yourself ‘Explode murky not available’ or ‘Explode murky’. I predict that you will learn the idea, get used to it, then move on to other ideas, like usual.
So, that’s it for now. I hope that helps. I still plan on giving you idea ‘Not add’ this coming Saturday. So, whether or not you choose to use idea ‘Explode’, I hope to see you Saturday. [8/26/2018]
Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Nancy Drew’. Rated PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Trek: Generations’. Rated TV-14 monster violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’. Rated R mature themes, violence, and viewer discretion for movie ‘Home Sweet Hell’. Rated TV-14 monster violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Angel’. Rated PG-13 action violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Superman Returns’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Vulnerable not available’, ‘Explode’, ‘Explode murky’, and ‘Explode not effective’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.