11/10/2018
Salutations.
It is now 10:58 AM EST for me. The music video I am recommending for this list is from the song ‘Someone’ by Anna of the North. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org about her:
Anna Lotterud (born 17 June 1989), better known by her stage name Anna of the North, is an Oslo-based Norwegian singer-songwriter from Gjovik. Her music has been regarded as “soft, soul-baring electro-pop”.
I chose music video ‘Someone’ based on a recent episode of TRL that I recorded on 11/8/2018 on channel ‘MTV Classic’. It’s episode 3.44 hosted by Kevin Kenney and Jamilia Mustafa. Even though I just fast forward through the episode, I did notice that Anna of the North herself was interviewed in that episode. According to a TRL word insert during the music video ‘Someone’ played on TRL, Anna wrote the lyrics to the song ‘Someone’ after going through a relationship break up. I thought that you may find that music video interesting, since according to the internet, the divorce rate in the U.S. in 2018 is between 42% and 45%. According to this web site, www.divorcelawyersformen.com:
You’re less likely to get divorced if:
- You’re very religious
- You have a college degree
- You live in a blue state (good news for those in Washington!)
- You had happily married parents
- You marry after age 25
- You watch romantic movies with your spouse
The shock which this device generates had a negative impact on my enter career and family life for I started to get short tempered and cialis without prescriptions moody. Physical viagra cialis generic therapists also advise patients to adopt correct postures while sitting, lifting weights, walking, driving and performing other activities. Bark and seed kennel are used viagra viagra buy in herbal preparations for bed wetting in children. The major motive of the study was to aim and analyze the statistics of males with viagra sans prescription hypertension and erectile dysfunction as cause of their weak relation can go with ED medicine for their treatment.
I found the website after searching for phrase ‘divorce rate us 2018’ in www.google.com.
So, since www.wikipedia.org didn’t talk about music video ‘Someone’ specifically, this is the recommended interpretation for this advice: Since TRL said that Anna made the lyrics after a relationship break up, (I just realized that I haven’t watched the entire music video ‘Someone’ yet. I did, however, look at it’s lyrics. I’m going to watch it now. It is now 11:20 AM.) I just watched it for the 1st time. In my opinion, throughout most of the music video, Anna is projecting a woman who, let’s say over a month ago, broke up with her previous boyfriend. Now, she is thinking to herself and presenting in the music video that she is looking for someone that understands her, that is willing to at least accept her more than her previous boyfriend did. I am not blaming her for how the relationship ended. I’m just explaining how she may be thinking to herself, and of course such thinking is not accomodating others, even though it is projected in a music video.
The reason I mentioned the U.S. divorce rate is because, even though I’m no expert, I’m using it to present how transient American dating may be. My point is that, if the U.S. divorce rate is about 45%, then I’m assuming that U.S. relationships probably have a much higher number. Since I am American, I believe I can say something about this, even though I may be completely wrong about it’s accuracy. Using men as a starting point, I believe that men in general believe that they can be in relationships with many women before ‘settling down’ with one. That means that many American men use the concept of marriage as a reference point when in relationships with women. In other words, ‘It’s all right to be in many relationships with women, as long as I am not married.’ No wonder the divorce rate is about 45%! Well, anyway, that’s just my opinion.
Anyway, here’s a quote from the lyrics to song ‘Someone’:
I’m only human, baby
Sometimes I act a little crazy
I’m only human, baby
Need someone to come and save me
(Someone)
(Someone)
(To come and save me)
(Someone)
Of course, I don’t believe the advice about less likely getting a divorce is absolute. For example, I believe that there are people that get married after high school, and are still married. And of course your unique school of thought could have a different interpretation of marriage that such advice does not take into consideration, even though such advice was created with legitimate data. It’s like getting a doctor that is able to legally substantiate your unique medical condition, (and of course ‘medical condition’ is just used to make the example,) something that the creators of such advice did not take into consideration.
To watch music video ‘Someone’ for free, search for phrase ‘anna of the north someone’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 478 thousand views. The music video was published on Jul 19, 2017, over a year ago.
I recommend that you watch music video ‘Someone’ because it may be relaxing for you to watch and listen to. And of course you don’t have to watch it. It’s only a recommendation.
Inform:
Here’s the definition of ‘inform’ from www.dictionary.com that is used for idea ‘Inform’: ‘to give or impart knowledge of a fact or circumstance to’, and here is the sentence example: ‘He informed them of his arrival’. The only illustration example I can think of right now for idea ‘Inform’ is from the Netflix movie ‘Bright(2017)’, starring Will Smith as Daryl Ward, and Ike Barinholtz as Pollard. The scene is refurbished for advice with inaproprieities removed. Unfortunately, I am only aware of the movie being available for streaming from Netflix, and the streaming service is about 8 dollars a month. So, if you don’t want to use that Netflix service, I’ll try to explain it to you so that you don’t have to. The explanation, of course, will not replace the convenience of watching the illustration from a streaming service, but I’ll still try, like it’s part of my routine to just do it. So, according to Netflix, the scene starts 14 minutes and 10 seconds into the movie, Ward and Pollard are talking to each other in the locker room. Here is the quote:
Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.
Pollard: ‘That’s good. That’s good. Noted.’
16 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie:
Sergeant Ching(Margaret Cho): ‘No.’
Ward: ‘Yes. Put him in another car.’
So, the point is that, even though Ward informed Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, Pollard still continued to impress upon Ward his advice, and later, Ward requested to Sergeant Ching that he wanted another partner in his car. Ward still used Pollard’s advice, even though Ward clearly indicated to Pollard that he did not ask for his advice.
Now, what I discovered over a month ago is that an instigator may improperly impose upon you an adverse, confused interaction with your use of informing the instigator of an instigation that he/she wants you to experience. For example, an instigator is imposing upon you a participation that you did not want to experience, and you choose to inform that person that you are not participating. So, what the instigator may do is impose an adverse experience of informing upon you, for example, make it look and feel like you are interacting with the adverse participation, even though it is just your intent to inform the instigator that you are not participating. In the illustration example, Ward was informing Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, and yet Ward eventually used it. Let’s say you’re a kid, and you already had some unacceptable experiences with another kid, and so when that kid introduces to that innocent kid another adverse participation, the innocent kid informs that kid that he/she does not want to participate. However, the kid with the unacceptable participation knows this, and compensates by imposing upon that innocent kid an adverse sense of informing, so even though that innocent kid is just informing that kid that he/she is not participating, the kid with the adverse participation still causes that innocent kid to experience an adverse somewhat confused sense of informing. You see, the effort used to inform becomes part of the instigation. It’s like what Ward said to Pollard. Refurbished for advice to avoid ambiguity, let’s say that Ward already knows the ‘bad’ advice Pollard usually gives, and that’s why Ward said this to Pollard:
Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.
However, even though Pollard’s advice is trouble, Ward still uses it.
Part of the solution is that, if an instigator is improperly imposing upon you a participation that may cause you to inform that instigator that you do not want to participate, keep in mind that you are ‘just’ informing that instigator, and that you are not participating, even though you may sense that the informing itself may be a little precarious.
Recoil resolve:
Another solution is something I finished inventing while I was doing my laundry in the laundromat yesterday. It’s made of 4 separate ideas: 1)’Recoil’, 2)’Contemplation effort to resolve’, 3)’Recover’, and 4)comes from a scene from animated episode 1.1 ‘Precious Place’ from tv show ‘The Disappearance of Nagato Yuki-Chan’. The streaming episode is available Standard Definition from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars. So, what I’ll do is explain them all separately, then put them together to form idea ‘Recoil resolve’.
Recoil:
1st, I want to say that nobody knows everything. When you learn something new, and you look at your past actions maybe with a little disappointment because you did not do such a thing until you recently learned about it, in those past moments using mild to moderate examples, you used what was available at the time. Like those 2 kids in the movie ‘Click(2006)’, Ben and Samantha, they each drew a house, with one room made of pizza, and another made of pickles. Their intent was sincere, but clearly they do not have the resource awareness their father, Michael Newman, has. In the past, you probably were not even aware of certain obvious resource identities as you used your intent to deal with certain issues, as you made due with what was available. That being said, if you read Wishlist #1038, the ‘Sour face’ idea, starting 4/5/2016, then you’ve had already over 2 years worth of ‘recoil’ experiences. The ‘Sour face’ idea is the story with the host and the boy sitting by himself (for a short moment) by a table because he didn’t have a ‘sour face’ experience in his mind, since his parents didn’t believe he needed it based on their unique schools of thought. If you started from the beginning of this blog, it is my opinion that the ‘Sour face’ idea is also the idea that may have created the longest epiphany effect for kids. Even though I don’t know for sure, I believe based on speculation that the epiphany effect easily lasted over 2 months! The kids who read it probably know that ‘Sour face’ story forwards and backwards, so to speak.
Anyway, enough with the nostalgia. If you read and used the ‘Sour face’ idea, you have already over 2 years worth of experiences, on and off of course, of having the ‘sour face’ effect. Now, since the idea was made over 2 years ago, and it is kind of very generalistic, I’ve upgraded it using a scene from the movie ‘Justice League(2017)’ using illustrations and a conversation associated with Superman(Henry Cavill) talking to Cyborg(Ray Fisher). The movie ‘Justice League’ is available streaming for purchase from Amazon.com, but I believe many people already purchased the Blu-ray. Anyway, according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour, 41 minutes, and 54 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:
Cyborg: ‘We gotta pull these things apart. A couple more seconds, you’ll see your opening.’
Superman: ‘Any blowback?’
Cyborg: ‘Big time. But I think we can take it.’
Superman. ‘Good. ‘Cause I really like being alive.’
Cyborg: ‘So do I.’
Of course, what happened after that, the ‘blowback’, is refurbishedly toned down in order for you to relate to it’s use. The illustration for what the ‘blowback’ was in the movie ‘Justice League’ is very convenient for idea ‘Recoil’. I tried to use the word ‘Blowback’ to reference what a recoil was, but eventually ‘Recoil’ based on my experience should be used as a replacement instead of using the word ‘Blowback’. So basically, the word ‘Recoil’ refers to your experiences making a ‘sour face’ with your face, and to the refurbished ‘blowback’ Superman experienced with Cyborg.
Contemplation effort to resolve:
Let’s say that, when you are talking to your friends in school, when you are listening to your teacher giving a lecture, and all sorts of other school related activities, the contemplation efforts to resolve that you experience are normal, that you don’t usually need to complain about it to others. So, idea ‘Contemplation effort to resolve’ refers to contemplation efforts to resolve induced/created by instigations and inadvertencies. For example, interruptions in your train of thought caused by instigations may induce an impression of a contemplation effort to resolve that you may want to pursue. For this idea, ‘Contemplation effort to resolve’ refers to inclinations to resolve a certain sense of contemplation effort caused by adversely affecting your sense of informing, and an adverse sense of being informed that you did not choose to commit to. The only illustration I can think of right now of not choosing to commit to a sense of being informed is in episode 3.3 ‘Fair Game’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate SG-1(1999)’. The episode is available for streaming purchase from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars. Here is a partial synopsis about episode ‘Fair Game’ given by web site:
https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Fair_Game
Colonel Jack O’Neill is beamed out of the middle of the ceremony and aboard a ship belonging to Thor of the Asgard. Thor tells him that he will host a negotiation between the Tau’ri and System Lords Cronus, Nirrti and Yu.
The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 20 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Thor: ‘The Asguard High Council wishes you all greetings and thanks for this opportunity to negotiate for peace.’
Yu(Vince Crestejo): ‘The Gua’uld System Lords are prepared to hear the Asguard proposal.’
Nirrti(Jacqueline Samuda): ‘Onak Arek Kree.’
Cronus(Ron Halder): ‘Kore’ka asemo.’
Yu: ‘Ko’na Kree! Ke’no asguard.’
Colonel O’Neill: ‘I thought we were all going to speak the same language here.’
Cronus: ‘Go’nak!’
(All 3 of the System Lords stand up and leave the room.)
O’Neill: ‘What? What’d I say?’
Thor: ‘You insulted them.’
O’Neill: ‘I insulted them?’
Thor: ‘By speaking out of turn.’
Recover:
The explanation of idea ‘Recover’ starts with a scene from episode 1.5 ’12 Hours’ from tv show ‘The Transporter(2012)’ starring Chris Vance as Frank Martin, Charly Hubner as Dieter Hausmann, and Josh Blacker as Giles. The episode is available for streaming purchase from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 46 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode. Giles is supposedly talking to the man that says he is Dieter Hausmann, who is actually Frank Martin. Here is the quote, refurbished for advice:
Giles: ‘You’re not such a bad man after all, Dieter.’
Dieter: ‘Thanks.’
That is the moment when Giles turns around and looks at the man who kept saying he was not Dieter Hausmann, and after he said ‘Thanks’, that man verbally admitted that he indeed is Dieter Hausmann. The scene that is highlighted is how the actual Dieter Hausmann’s face looks when Giles looked at him. Using that scene, I made the logical conclusion that, even though instigators present themselves in a context that the guilt, the blame, is on them, their real ‘target’ is to cause you to feel a sense of over acknowledgement. I already explained idea ‘Over acknowledge’ in Wishlist #1123. Now, with idea ‘Over acknowledge’, the ‘target’ is to adversely affect how your composure feels, more specifically, how your face feels in relation to the instigation. You see, if the instigation worked, you would be looking at the instigation coming from the instigator, but the real ‘target’ is how your face feels in relation to the instigation. I identified that ‘target’ feeling as adverse and/or bothersome interjections of recovery. As a solution, I used idea ‘Expose’ from Wishlist #1139 to practice removing that sense of recovery from my face. That’s what I invented in the laundromat yesterday. To practice using idea ‘Expose’, you imagine that other people around you are individually causing you to experience a sense of exposing that relates to the imagined recovery interjections associated with your face, and using your ‘Blinking’ idea(Wishlists #1003-1008), you ‘blink’ those recovery interjections off of your face. When you sense that other people are imposing upon you a sense of ‘Exposing’, it’s imagined to be in your favor, something that helps you practice using idea ‘Recover’, not something that an instigator gives you an adverse impression of using. When you sense the imagined exposings, to change it’s intensity, imagine it is like raising or lowering the volume on your tv. If you want to sense the imagined intensity of the exposing, just raise it incrementally. With this example, you can apply it to all sorts of different ideas. Just imagine a mild to moderate instigation to practice on, and use that imagined sense of exposing to associate with recovery interjections associated with how your face feels, and remove those interjections of exposing with your ‘Blinking’ idea.
The 4th idea:
The scene used for the 4th idea comes from animated episode 1.1 ‘Precious Place’ from tv show ‘The Disappearance of Nagato Yuki-Chan(2015)’. While the main characters Kyon and Nagato are walking together, they meet Asakura, and that is when the scene occurs. The episode ‘Precious Place’ is available for streaming purchase from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition. To find it, in Amazon.com’s home page, search for phrase ‘the disappearance of nagato’, and the series should be a few selections down, the English version, not the Japanese version. Click that, and ‘Precious Place’ is the 1st episode offered. I only watched this episode in it’s entirety from the series. I lost interest while watching the 2nd episode I think. Anyway, according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 5 minutes and 58 seconds into the episode, Kyon and Asakura are talking to each other. Here is the quote:
Kyon: ‘So, Asakura, how’d you do at the sale?’
Asakura: ‘A good haul. I may have gone overboard. My hands hurt. Will you carry these for me?’
Kyon: ‘Hand ’em over.’
Asakura: ‘Thanks!’ (Watch this part carefully.)
Kyon: ‘These are heavy! You did buy a lot!’
Asakura: ‘Ow, ow, ow! So cold and sore. My poor hands. I hate this time of year, don’t you?’ (That is the moment Asakura runs towards Kyon and places her cold hands on Asakura’s face)
Kyon: ‘They’re like ice cubes!’
Asakura: ‘There! Much warmer! Now, now, stop thrashing. You don’t wanna break the eggs.’
Kyon: ‘You tricked me! I call foul!’
In that short moment, Kyon chose not to drop the bags, even though he was caught by surprise by Asakura with her cold hands on his face, because if he did, some of those eggs will very likely break. You can use Kyon’s experience refurbished in your favor. If you experience an interjecting sense of recovery upon your face, you can imagine Kyon’s cold hands on your face, and then use that ‘Blinking’ idea to remove that sense of recovery. Holding the bags represents your sincere use of intent being maintained, and you can use that ‘Cone’ idea of yours learned from Wishlist #1144 and #1145.
So, now that you have all 4 ideas, let’s see if I can get idea ‘Recoil resolve’ to work for you. Let’s say that 2 forms of informing occurred to you: 1)you made a declaration of informing that is made adverse to experience, and 2)an impression of informing is imposed upon you, and you did not agree to it. So, let’s use idea ‘Recoil resolve’: You sense an adverse recoil of contemplation effort to resolve, one from your use of informing, and one from an impression of informing that you did not agree to commit to. So, you feel those impressions of recovery on your face, and you remove it using your ‘Blinking’ idea and the ‘Cold hands’ idea. Of course, as you are learning the new ideas, you can shuffle the use of the words. Idea ‘Recoil resolve’ is only a recommendation. For example, ‘Expose recover’ may work instead of ‘Recoil resolve’.
I’m going to start proofreading this idea now. Since I choose to not work on Veteran’s Day tomorrow, I’ll probably explain idea ‘Serious’ tomorrow. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.
TV-MA violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Bright’. PG-13 for language, crude humor, and viewer discretion for movie ‘Click’. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Justice League’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Stargate SG-1’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Transporter: The Series’. TV-14 viewer discretion for animated tv show ‘The Disappearance of Nagato Yuki-Chan’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Inform’, ‘Recoil’, ‘Contemplation effort to resolve’, ‘Recover’, ‘Over acknowledge’, ‘Expose’, ‘Cold hands’, ‘Recoil resolve’, and ‘Expose recover’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.