Salutations.
It is now 8:12 PM EST for me. I’m in a rush, since I want to type something in now, before I begin the main explanation tomorrow. I’m going to give you 2 music videos, 1 for today’s words, and 1 for tomorrow’s words. The music video for today, refurbished for advice, is from the American alternative all women band ‘The Aces’ called ‘Physical’. I found it in an episode of ‘TRL’. The music video was published in www.youtube.com April 19, 2017, and has over 390 thousand views. I recommend that you just focus on how the music video looks, not the lyrics. The music video is OK, in my opinion. If you experienced some minor instigation at school or at work recently, bobbing your head slightly up and down while watching the music video ‘Physical’ may help you feel better. Keep in mind that it’s the refurbished for advice music video and how the music sounds that is used here, not the actual interpretation of it’s lyrics. That being said, here’s a quote from it’s lyrics:
Baby, you say that you know me, you don’t
You don’t
And lately you’ve told me you love me, you don’t
You don’t
Baby, you say that you know me, you don’t
You don’t
And lately you’ve told me you love me, you don’t
You don’t
Even though I’m in a rush to give you this music video, in my opinion, I find that the music video is entertaining to watch.
Material pursuits:
All right. While I was watching the last episode of the sci-fi series ‘Timeless’ from the cable box earlier today called ‘The Miracle of Christmas Part I/II’, it originally aired 12/20/2018 yesterday, that is when I thought of this idea: I imagined that certain mild to moderate forms of instigation may discourage you from achieving a certain preferred sense of possible career related sense of focus. That focus is based on how sci fi character Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart) and the other main characters of the ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’ crew interact with certain other humanoid civilizations from other planets. Suppose that an innocent person was given the ability to evaluate another civilization without knowing what their material pursuits are. Because of how the instigations that innocent person experienced is encouraging him to be aware of what those material pursuits are, that innocent person used the resources at his disposal to determine what those pursuits are.
Now, the way Picard and his crew evaluate and interact with other civilizations, they usually don’t even need to know what those material pursuits are. That means that, when the aliens from those civilizations realize that Picard does not even want to know what their material pursuits are, I am assuming that they interpret such an evaluation use as a strength. However, when that innocent person interacts and evaluates such aliens, knowing what their material pursuits are, that may create an evaluation distraction, a distraction that certain job related opportunities may not want their employees to have. Of course, if you were trained properly, you may still use the ability to know what the material pursuits of aliens from other civilizations are, but you would have more control as to how that evaluation is used. For example, you may not use such an evaluation actively when interacting with other aliens.
So, if you are an adult with some years in your job, is it possible that previously experienced instigations may have caused you to excessively evaluate and interact with the material pursuits of others? I believe that this is a popular instigation in America, to cause an innocent person to be misled into evaluating the material pursuits of others in order to cause that innocent person to not have certain promotion opportunities available to him/her. I just made a name for this idea. I call it ‘Material pursuits’.
So, when you experience a mild to moderate instigation, is the experienced instigation causing you to know what the material pursuits of others are? Keep in mind that the instigation causes you to be misled in it’s evaluation use. An instigator may have the ability to use the evaluation of knowing what the material pursuits of others are, but in a more conducive and acceptable context, not in the misled way that the instigator may be encouraging an innocent person to use such an evaluation.
That’s it for now. Tomorrow, I’ll start the new ideas. I’ll see you then.
12/22/2018
Salutations.
It is now 12:23 PM EST for me. The music video I’m recommending for these ideas is from the song ‘Wonderful’ by American dancer, singer, actress and model Mackenzie Ziegler. This is the 1st time I’ve heard of Miss Ziegler. I found her music video from an episode of TRL I copied recently, and I chose to use her music video earlier today from an episode of TRL. The episode was recorded 12/16/2018. The episode of TRL is from channel ‘MTV Live’. It doesn’t say what specific episode number it is, only that it’s (S3). Here is the text on the music video ‘Wonderful’ during that TRL episode:
‘ Ziegler premiered this song as a part of her recent performance on “Dancing With The Stars”. ‘
I glanced at what www.wikipedia.org said about Miss Ziegler. Not much was said in wikipedia about her music video ‘Wonderful’. Here’s a quote:
‘ In 2018 Ziegler released her second album, Phases. She premiered the lead single from the album, “Wonderful”, written by Sia, on Dancing with the Stars. ‘
I didn’t watch that TRL episode. I pretty much just fast forward through it in order to select that music video. Here’s a quote from the lyrics ‘Wonderful’:
Everyday, everyday, everyday
Is better than yesterday
Everyday, everyday, everyday
I’m closer to wonderfuuul
Everyday, everyday, everyday
I love to be meaningfuuul
Everyday, everyday, everyday
I’m closer to wonderfuuul
If you choose to watch the music video ‘Wonderful’, if you watched episodes of ‘Dancing With The Stars’, it’s like that, but with some special effects. I watched the entire music video once.
Exposure:
If you are an innocent person experiencing mild to moderate forms of instigation, it is my belief that such instigations probably have caused you to interact with adverse exposures. So, what I’m going to try to do with the next ideas is to help you develop how you choose to interact with and not interact with certain instigation induced contemplation exposures. I plan to take off from work Christmas Day(12/25), and during that time, I plan to continue with this list, so keep in mind that I’ve added an extra day to give you this advice, if you find that useful to know.
Language:
I want to go over idea ‘Language’ again before I continue. Here’s a quote from Wishlist #1116:
The 1st illustration is from episode 9.24 ‘Lost Our Lisa’ from animated tv show ‘The Simpsons(1998)’. The episode is available for purchase for about 2 dollars Standard Definition from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 12 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:
Lisa:-‘Oh. I didn’t know Springfield had a Russian district. (Lisa approaches a man playing chess.) Excuse me. Can you tell me how to get to the museum?’
Man playing chess:-(I’m assuming the man is seemingly talking back in another language, even though the question given to the man was in English) ‘My pleasure. It’s six blocks that way. (Lisa runs away.) Hey, she went the wrong way.’
Of course, one obvious interpretation of that illustration is that Lisa misunderstood what that man said, since the episode translates to us what the man actually said to Lisa. However, the translation, refurbished for advice of course, I am trying to offer you is what Lisa believed that man was doing. Lisa believed that she was being contemplationally attacked by that man, which is why she yelled and ran away from him.
The purpose of this advice is to help you discern and more tenably allocate emphasis use. For example, not to fix Lisa’s situation, but to use it to discern emphasis use, from the vantage point of how Lisa perceives the situation, the man yelling at her, that emphasis introduced, did not come from Lisa, but from that man. When she ran away, I think she was a little hysterical(uncontrollably emotional) because she wasn’t prepared to experience such an emphasis, and she may have felt, even though it was obvious to her that it was not true, she still may have felt that such an unprepared emphasis was also partly coming from her. It is my intent that, as you learn from this list, you will be more aware what your chosen emphasis is, and you will be more able to choose what emphasis to give more credence to, whether such emphasis was experienced, and emphasis you want to give credence to, even though such emphasis was not experienced.
The 2nd illustration is in movie ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice(2016)’. The movie is available for rental streaming for about 3 dollars standard definition. The illustration is near the end of Lex Luthor’s(Jesse Eisenberg) speech to his guests. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 41 minutes and 12 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:
Lex Luthor:-‘Books are knowledge, and knowledge is power, and I am…(Laughs) No. Uh, um…No. What am I? I…What was I saying? No…The bittersweet pain among men is having knowledge with no power, because…because that is ‘paradoxical’! And, um…(Laughs) Thank you for coming. (clears throat) (scattered applause) Please drink. Drink.
Notice that, during and after Lex Luthor’s speech, the guests were experiencing an unavoidable emphasis response to a speech that the host was giving. Now, that’s saying something because the unavoidable emphasis responses from the guests are responses that they are all trying not to experience, and not to show to other people. After Lex Luthor’s speech, the guests gave a ‘scattered applause’, since they were all trying to recover their normal sense of composure. One guest, a woman, even shook her head after Luthor’s speech. I recommend that you look at the guest’s responses both during and after Luthor’s end speech, so that you can see that the guests experienced unavoidable emphasis responses.
Now, the point of the 2nd illustration is to show you, refurbished for advice, that an instigator may also improperly impose upon you unavoidable emphasis responses. What I am going to try to do with this advice is to allow you to more tenably experience and allocate such emphasis responses.
From the 1st illustration, episode 9.24 ‘Lost Our Lisa’ from animated tv show ‘The Simpsons(1998)’, Lisa ran away from the men that tried to answer her question. This is the best example I can think of right now that shows you that you may choose to identify certain mild to moderate instigations as a language you don’t have to directly interact with. Lisa was not able to make a language distinction from the language used by the man who was trying to answer her question. And since she thought she was being threatened by that man, she ran away. The more you learn from these ideas in my opinion, the more you will be able to interpret certain mild to moderate instigations as a separate language that you don’t have to interact with directly.
The 2nd illustration, ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice(2016)’, is similar to the ‘Simpsons’ illustration. Towards the end of Lex Luthor’s speech, he presented an interaction that was a little erratic and disconcerting for the guests to follow. Those guests were unable to separate themselves from that effect. Watching that scene is highly recommended, so that you can see that the guests were a little confused from that effect.
I did not do that:
I did not make that:
So, let’s see how you are when you choose to recall past experiences with instigation and related inadvertencies. For example, for the adults, you experienced an instigation as an example let’s say 5 years ago, and it distracts you to think about it. It involves an incident that is no longer a part of your life. In fact, you stopped participating in such a thing soon after you experienced it. So, let’s say these 2 statements are true ‘in the now’: 1)’I am not doing that.’, and 2)’I did not do that.’ To clarify, the meaning of statement #2, ‘I did not do that.’, refers to soon after that incident occurred. That’s almost 5 years that ‘you did not do that’. However, you contemplationally say the phrase ‘I did not do that’, you would recall that incident that occurred 5 years ago, and it feels like the statement that you had just thought about, the statement ‘I did not do that.’, was a lie, that it was not true. It is my belief that it’s possible that the instigators that placed that experience in your mind wanted that adverse logic effect to exist there. That’s one of the reasons that you are having problems recalling such an instigation from your past. You are having trouble discerning the fact that ‘you did not do that’ for 5 years. Of course, you are not doing that now, but what’s vexing you is your ability to sense the truth, that ‘you did not do that’ for the 5 years since that event. As I give you more ideas, I recommend that you practice the use of this idea. Just say contemplationally the bookmark/phrase ‘I did not do that.’, but since you are learning to use this idea, use the point of origin of seconds instead of years. For example, you did not do that as of 5 seconds ago. You should be able to easily sense that. Of course, you did not do that for almost 5 years, but that is a sense of awareness that will improve over time.
Capable:
In Wishlist #1081, I introduced to you this idea:
‘ Just because a person is capable of doing something, doesn’t mean that (such a) person is guilty for just having that capability. ‘
It is my belief that an instigator may improperly impose an adverse, escalating sense of capability acknowledgement that may adversely influence what sense of capability you may choose to commit to. In other words, an instigator may use an adverse sense of capability to ‘wind you up’.
It’s now 2:50 PM EST for me. I just made an idea a few minutes ago for idea ‘Capable’. Basically, what I am going to try to do is manifest an instigator’s attempt to try to cause you to commit to an excessive, escalating sense of capability. If you choose to do this, it’s going to involve the use of your imagination. It involves a refurbished with inaproprieities removed for advice use of a scene in episode 4.11 ‘Soulless’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Angel(2003)’. Basically, there’s a scene where the vampire Angel(David Boreanaz) reverted to his previous vampire personality called Angelus. Angel was basically an evil vampire many years ago called Angelus before he learned to become the vampire hero called Angel. His original teammates captured him, and he is being interrogated by Wesley(Alexis Denisof), a former Watcher. So, what I’m recommending is to just imagine that you are able to manifest an instigator’s attempt to try to cause you to commit to an excessive, escalating sense of capability, and that attempt is represented by an image of that instigator, not the actual instigator of course, in a similar cage, like the tv show shows, and you may choose to interrogate that manifestation like Wesley is doing. You don’t have to imagine the whole thing. The purpose of this idea is to help you become more able to more tenably allocate such an adverse sense of capability involvement. In my opinion, it also may be somewhat funny to do, if you choose to think of it that way. And once you are able to more tenably allocate it, such an instigation should be less of a problem for you to experience.
The episode ‘Soulless’ is available for purchase streaming from Amazon.com, and and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 5 minutes and 40 seconds into the episode, Wesley is interrogating Angel. Here is a quote:
Wesley: ‘I’ve imagined this moment many times. Years of study, research. I’ve read everything ever written about you.’
Angelus: ‘Stop. I’m blushing.’
Wesley: ‘To be one-on-one with the legendary Angelus. As a former Watcher, it’s a high point.’
Angelus: ‘Buttering me up, getting me all relaxed. Not the most innovative interrogation technique, but…okay, I’ll play.’
Keep in mind that the image of the person you’re imagining interrogating is an attempted manifestation of the instigator and/or instigators trying to cause you to commit to an excessive and/or inapropriate and unacceptable sense of being capable. Knowing instigators the way I imagine I do, that image is probably not entirely accurate. For example, if you watched the movie ‘Mission: Impossible – Fallout(2018)’, starring Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt, in the beginning of the movie, many people did not know the actual identity of John Lark. To make the movie more interesting, Ethan Hunt assumed the identity of John Lark. My point is, even though you don’t know who John Lark really is, you can still try to more reasonably allocate the adverse, escalating sense of being capable that the instigation is trying to cause you to commit to, and also still blame those you think are also responsible. So, just contemplationally say the phrase ‘Capable’, imagine that ‘Soulless’ episode, and that may help you allocate that instigation induced experience.
Prolong ongoing:
Here’s an idea I invented recently, I think within a week ago. I’m going to try to explain idea ‘Prolong ongoing’ with a story I invented I think several months ago, and here’s the story: I imagined myself as a rich man, and I was trying to establish some sort of participation with an attractive lady. We’re not in any serious relationship. However, since I was rich, I was trying to give her an awareness of a participation with me that I believe is acceptable, but has a certain depth, something that of course she has agreed to participate in. One day, I experienced a less than favorable business venture, and I was angry about it. I also scheduled some sort of participation with that lady. And for some reason, a little of that anger spilled upon her, and she wanted that participation to end.
Now, since I was rich, I wanted to fix what I had done, and I offered her $5,000.00 dollars, so that my minor burst of anger would be forgiven. She explained to me that she does not see how $5,000.00 dollars would be acceptable for her to take. That is when I explained to her the imagined idea of what an ‘ongoing project participation’ is. One way the monetary amount of $5,000.00 is acceptable to take is if the money is from an ongoing business venture. If she agrees to participate in such a business venture, the money would be given to her in an ongoing business venture context. Of course, the purpose is for her to just receive the money, but with also just a little active participation, the ongoing business venture would allow her to have such money, and it would make logical sense to get that much money.
It’s now 4:12 PM for me. Anyway, how that $5,000.00 payoff story relates to instigation: Here’s a basic premise I think many innocent people in the workplace are experiencing from certain consistent instigations: Let’s say as an innocent person, you would experience a minor instigation in the past, and let’s say that instigator who instigated you allowed you to see him/her talk to other people, giving you the impression that he/she was being talked to about his/her instigation actions. So, that show gives you the impression that his/her actions were resolved. However, you later realized that, even though one instigation may have been resolved, that instigator seems to be doing something to you again and again, and then you imagined that the solution the instigator may have created for him/herself involving imposing instigations upon you was to simply? cause you to experience a new instigation every single time. That reminded me of what Garak(Andrew Robinson) said to Bashir(Alexander Siddig) said in a ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’ episode. I looked it up in www.google.com, and I found where the actual quote was from. It is in episode 3.20 ‘Improbable Cause’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1995)’. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available streaming from Amazon.com with no additional payment. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 9 minutes and 53 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Bashir: ‘But the point is, if you lie all the time, nobody’s going to believe you, even when you’re telling the truth.’
Garak: ‘Are you sure that’s the point, Doctor?’
Bashir: ‘Of course. What else could it be?’
Garak: ‘That you should never tell the same lie twice.’
So, to be clear, the quote I am looking for is:
‘That you should never tell the same lie twice.’
And that is what I think your consistent instigator is doing to you. That person is instigating you over the years, but making sure that the instigation is different every single time. That way, whenever that instigator is confronted by someone else at work about certain instigations, he/she can always use the same explanation, that is was something that he/she had never done before, and so on and so forth.
The solution that I have invented, so to speak, to help you quantify and allocate such an experience, is to identify such instigations as being intentionally prolonged and ongoing. Just imagine that instigator regularly punching you in the arm. Sure, talking to others in the job delays the arm punch for a while, but eventually that instigator would punch you in that same spot all over again. So, what you would do is contemplationally use bookmark ‘Prolong ongoing’, and that may help you more tenably allocate such an experience. For the sake of the kids reading this advice, the explanation that you have already chose to read should have already helped you allocate such an experience. Also, I plan to type in more ideas in this list this coming Tuesday, 12/25. This list is not finished yet.
[All right. It is now 4:41 PM for me. I’m going to stop typing now, and I plan to continue adding more ideas this coming Tuesday, with another music video. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.
12/25/2018
Salutations.
The moment I started typing this, it was 8:00 AM EST for me. I just watched the entire music video that I am about to recommend to you for the 1st time, and if you haven’t listened to this song before and watched it’s music video before, it is my belief that it has a lot of spirit in it. My definition of ‘spirit’ for this advice is when the articulation of a meaning surpasses your physical body to convey. Also, if you already like this song, the reason you will get a lot out of what I will type in with this song will be because of the song and music video I will recommend to you, if you choose to watch and use it.
I found this music video from an episode of TRL that I copied 12/16/2018 from channel MTVLH(MTV Live High Definition). It’s episode 3.47, and the episode of TRL is hosted by Kevan Kenney and Jamila Mustafa. The music video is from song ‘What’s My Name’ by Barbadian singer Rihanna. Here’s a quote of Kevan and Jamila introducing the music video:
Kevan: ‘Now, uh, let’s get into this one, bit of a throwback from 2010. It’s her with Drake, ‘What’s My Name’, on TRL.
Jamila: ‘I love that one.'(sings and dances a little to the song) ‘Oh na na, what’s my name? Oh na na, what’s my name?’
And here’s a text added to the music video ‘What’s My Name’ on TRL:
‘ In the third week of this song’s release, it peaked at number-one, becoming Rihanna’s eigth number-one single on the chart and Drake’s first. ‘
Here’s a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the music video:
With Arginine’s ability as a growth hormone releaser, such levitra professional benefits are further enhanced. This is why both in theory and in practice the two work better together, as my clinical experience at the same time, but one cheapest viagra canada thing is sure, the aspiring driver has to go for a drivers ed course. The process is fast, friendly and cheapest viagra canada very discreet. You can last http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/11/15/title-tells-tale/ tadalafil discount longer by controlling PE and satisfy her with enhanced sexual pleasure.
Rihanna shot the music video for the song on September 26, 2010 in the Lower East Side of New York City and also a small scene in India, Mumbai with Raam Kapoor and director Philip Angelman. Parts of the video shot with Drake were filmed on October 27, 2010. The music video premiered on November 12, 2010 on Rihanna’s Vevo channel on YouTube.
When Rihanna’s verse starts, she is shown walking on the street and dancing. Views of people holding instruments and walking on the street are shown…
And here’s a quote from the lyrics:
Hey boy, I really wanna see if you can go downtown with a girl like me
Hey boy, I really wanna be with you ’cause you just my type
Oh na na na na
I need a boy to take it over
Looking for a guy to put you work up
Oh, oh
To reiterate, I believe that this song has a lot of spirit. Just imagine a variety of women singing this song in their minds and outloud when it came out in 2010. Also, if you choose to watch the music video, Rihanna walking around New York City in my opinion gave the city a more lively appearance. [12/25/2018: I forgot to mention that, when you watch the music video ‘What’s My Name’ by Rihanna, skip the verse that Drake says in the beginning, no offense to Drake, of course.
And, as always, the song and music video is refurbished for this advice with inaproprieities removed.
To watch music video ‘What’s My Name?’ for free, search for phrase ‘rihanna what’s my name’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 733 million views. The music video was published on Nov. 12, 2010.
I did not do that(revisited):
Here’s an upgrade for idea ‘I did not do that’ that I typed in earlier. A part of the upgrade is based on how I think an inkjet printer cleans it’s inkjet cartridge. If the inkjet printer has trouble printing, one possible problem could be that the inkjet heads where the ink comes out of is clogged. You may then use the program that forces more ink to come out of that inkjet head. The printer would also print something on paper to expel the extra ink. That’s what I am going to try to do with ‘The Phonetic System’. Here’s the idea: In Wishlist #1104, you are given 100 memory locations. Turn those 100 memory locations into a 10×10 memory grid. For an illustration of what a 10×10 grid looks like, just search for it on www.google.com using phrase ’10×10 grid’. Now, imagine that the 1st 30 locations, horizontally, the top 3 rows, are being used. It is like yellow Christmas lights are being turned on from left to right, until the 1st 3 horizontal rows are lit up, representing 30 locations are being used. You can also imagine that at the same time, the number ’30’ is on top of that grid, indicating to you that 30 memory locations are being used. You can also add your own accumulation sound to it when it happens. If you can’t think of one, I recommend that you use the one from beginning of movie ‘Ready Player One(2018)’, when Parzival(Tye Sheridan) would collect coins from crashed cars to refuel his car. Here is a quote about it from the movie. According from Amazon Video, that scene starts 11 minutes and 36 seconds into the movie, Parzival is talking to his best friend Aech(Lena Waithe):
Parzival: ‘I gotta go to the back.’
Aech: ‘Ugh. So you can skim coins from crashed cars? That’s just sad, man.’
Parzival: ‘Fuel’s low.’
Parzival collects the coins during the race, and when it happens, the process involves a sound and a visual illustration. It’s quite convenient.
Use indicator:
Now, based on idea ‘I did not do that.’, there may be certain instigations you have experienced in your past that may be interfering with how you evaluate in the now. I recently created this idea that helps you have a consistent resource use as it relates to the now and to your selected previously experienced moments in the past. And here’s the idea: Suppose you made a resource commitment in the now. Let’s say it’s something your job introduced you to. That resource commitment is not supposed to be used in certain other ways. You can then make an imagined association of that resource commitment to those certain instigations that bother you in the past, and contemplationally say to yourself ‘I did not do that.’ I selected what I call a ‘Use indicator’ from episode 1.5 ‘Malivore’ from tv show ‘Legacies(2018)’. It’s that ball that Hope(Danielle Rose Russell) is using on Landon(Aria Shahghasemi). For the purposes of this idea, that ball is refurbished to be a ‘use indicator’, not a lie detector. When it glows blue, like the tv show illustration, it indicates to you that your pre-selected expectations of resource use is acceptable. When it glows red, that indicates that some of your resource use is being used elsewhere. That ‘ball’ scene begins, according to Amazon Video, 12 minutes and 46 seconds into the episode.
So, to help prepare you to use idea ‘I did not do that’, you have the grid with the number ’30’ on top of it, and now you have that ball that glows blue or red. Choose one of those past instigations that still bother you, then say the phrase ‘I did not do that.’, and sense if the resource use that you imagined committing to from your job is not being used on that past instigation experience.
Since kids may be reading this blog, I’ll try to explain further. However, I don’t want to spend all day on this one idea. With respect said(by intent at least), I have other ideas I want to type in today. Let’s imagine one of those instigations that still bother you, but in the context of resource use for this advice. You obviously used the resource use differently in the past than what you imagined obligating to from your job. The past is the past. So, what I recommend that you do now is focus on the resource use that you obligated to from your job. That’s the job’s resource use, not your own. In the past, you used a different resource use. Now, you imagined making a commitment from your job with a different resource use that is not your own. So, when you recall that past instigation experience that still bothers you, you are clarifying to yourself that you are not using that resource use in such a way that such a previous instigation experience is still making you believe you are. When you change the identity of that past instigation experience, you are not changing what already happened, so to speak. You are clarifying to yourself that the resource use you are using now is not used the way that past instigation experience is making you believe.
Well, anyway, if that idea helps, that’s what matters. If you experienced an improvement, then that is what matters.
Inform(revisited):
Here’s a copy of idea ‘Inform’ from Wishlist #1146:
Here’s the definition of ‘inform’ from www.dictionary.com that is used for idea ‘Inform’: ‘to give or impart knowledge of a fact or circumstance to’, and here is the sentence example: ‘He informed them of his arrival’. The only illustration example I can think of right now for idea ‘Inform’ is from the Netflix movie ‘Bright(2017)’, starring Will Smith as Daryl Ward, and Ike Barinholtz as Pollard. The scene is refurbished for advice with inaproprieities removed. Unfortunately, I am only aware of the movie being available for streaming from Netflix, and the streaming service is about 8 dollars a month. So, if you don’t want to use that Netflix service, I’ll try to explain it to you so that you don’t have to. The explanation, of course, will not replace the convenience of watching the illustration from a streaming service, but I’ll still try, like it’s part of my routine to just do it. So, according to Netflix, the scene starts 14 minutes and 10 seconds into the movie, Ward and Pollard are talking to each other in the locker room. Here is the quote:
Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.
Pollard: ‘That’s good. That’s good. Noted.’
16 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie:
Sergeant Ching(Margaret Cho): ‘No.’
Ward: ‘Yes. Put him in another car.’
So, the point is that, even though Ward informed Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, Pollard still continued to impress upon Ward his advice, and later, Ward requested to Sergeant Ching that he wanted another partner in his car. Ward still used Pollard’s advice, even though Ward clearly indicated to Pollard that he did not ask for his advice.
Now, what I discovered over a month ago is that an instigator may improperly impose upon you an adverse, confused interaction with your use of informing the instigator of an instigation that he/she wants you to experience. For example, an instigator is imposing upon you a participation that you did not want to experience, and you choose to inform that person that you are not participating. So, what the instigator may do is impose an adverse experience of informing upon you, for example, make it look and feel like you are interacting with the adverse participation, even though it is just your intent to inform the instigator that you are not participating. In the illustration example, Ward was informing Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, and yet Ward eventually used it. Let’s say you’re a kid, and you already had some unacceptable experiences with another kid, and so when that kid introduces to that innocent kid another adverse participation, the innocent kid informs that kid that he/she does not want to participate. However, the kid with the unacceptable participation knows this, and compensates by imposing upon that innocent kid an adverse sense of informing, so even though that innocent kid is just informing that kid that he/she is not participating, the kid with the adverse participation still causes that innocent kid to experience an adverse somewhat confused sense of informing. You see, the effort used to inform becomes part of the instigation. It’s like what Ward said to Pollard. Refurbished for advice to avoid ambiguity, let’s say that Ward already knows the ‘bad’ advice Pollard usually gives, and that’s why Ward said this to Pollard:
Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.
However, even though Pollard’s advice is trouble, Ward still uses it.
Part of the solution is that, if an instigator is improperly imposing upon you a participation that may cause you to inform that instigator that you do not want to participate, keep in mind that you are ‘just’ informing that instigator, and that you are not participating, even though you may sense that the informing itself may be a little precarious.
So basically, here’s the situation: When you are exposed to an instigation, and the instigator is encouraging you to respond, and you are informing the instigator that you are not participating, what may happen in such an experience is that the instigator may improperly mislead you into committing to an adverse sense of contemplation exposure. That’s what the next few ideas are about, to help you identify and allocate misleading and out of context contemplation exposures induced by instigation and related inadvertencies.
Exceed not agree:
[12/25/2018: I forgot to mention that I invented these new ideas this past Sunday and Monday, just a few days ago, starting with idea ‘Exceed not agree’.
All right. Let me begin with the illustration example for idea ‘Exceed not agree’. I don’t think it’s the best example out there in a tv show or movie, but it’s the only one I think I am aware of right now. The example is in ‘Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans(2009)’ starring Nicolas Cage as Terence McDonagh and Sean Boyd as Lt. Stoyer. If you have Amazon Prime, the movie is available without additional payment for Amazon.com. According to Amazon Video, that example starts 37 minutes and 16 seconds into the movie, Lt. McDonagh is having a conversation with Lt. Stoyer. Here is the quote:
Lt. McDonagh: ‘Hello. Hello! I’m Lieutenant McDonagh, New Orleans Homicide.’
Lt. Stoyer: ‘What can I do for you?’
Lt. McDonagh: ‘A friend of mine’s daughter got written up for speeding. She was doing 75 on the way to the hospital to visit her grandmother. Has a couple of minor, minor moving violations in the past. And she’s in danger of losing her license.’
Lt. Stoyer: ‘What do you want me to do?’
Lt. McDonagh: ‘I’d like you to take care of it for me.’
Lt. Stoyer: ‘You come out to the scene of an accident to ask me that?’
Lt. McDonagh: ‘There shouldn’t be a problem.’
Lt. Stoyer: ‘Are you asking me to break the law? Is that what you’re doing here? Are you asking me to break the law?’
Lt. McDonagh: ‘I’m asking you one cop to another to do me a favor.’
Lt. Stoyer: ‘The answer is ‘no’.’
Lt. McDonagh: ‘Just like that.’
Lt. Stoyer: ‘Just like that.’
Well anyway, the point is that, if you experience mild to moderate casual instigations where you work, go to school, or in public places, you may experience from time to time interjections that exceed your reasonable tolerance to contemplationally not agree to something. In the ‘Bad Lieutenant’ example, Lt. Stoyer was experiencing an excessive sense to not agree. For casual interjections from instigators, an actual conversation does not have to occur. For example, an instigator would just show it to you. Let’s say you have been experiencing such instigations for years. You probably built up some sort of tolerance for it. However, it’s still not an experience you may not want to have.
The solution I invented recently was to identify such instigations using bookmark ‘Exceed not agree’, meaning that an instigator, without words for example, wants you to commit to an interaction involving an excessive sense to not agree. When you contemplationally use phrase ‘Exceed not agree’, you are choosing to not interact to such an interjection that you are clearly not obligated to interact with.
Exceed stabilize:
I invented idea ‘Stabilize’ from something that is not stable, that is erratic, like erratic behavior, or for example from something that is shaking. An example of erratic behavior can be found in the movie ‘The Abyss(1989)’, Lieutenant Hiram Coffey’s(Michael Biehn) performance. Lieutenant Coffey’s hands were shaking a lot, and then he presented a lot of erratic behavior. I then remembered something that I may have learned from the medical tv show ‘ER(1994-2009)’. For example, let’s say that one of the doctors in the emergency room says to one of the nurses ‘Let’s stabilize the patient.’ So, the phrase ‘Exceed stabilize’ basically identifies instigations that encourage you to commit to an excessive, specific sense of stabilizing. When you choose to contemplationally say the phrase ‘Exceed stabilize’, you choose to not commit to such an excessive inclination to stabilize.
One example of a person choosing to not commit to what that person believes to be an excessive sense of stabilizing is in episode 7.12 ‘The Pegasus’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1994)’. The episode is available streaming without additional payment from Amazon.com if you have Amazon Prime, and according to Amazon Video, that example starts 37 minutes and 52 seconds into the episode, Admiral Pressman(Terry O’Quinn) is ordering Lieutenant Worf(Michael Dorn) to arrest Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart). Here is the quote:
Pressman: ‘I’m taking control of this vessel. Mr. Worf, escort the Captain to his quarters.’
Worf: (Mr. Worf crosses his arms in front of his chest, to indicate that he is not arresting Picard.)
Commander Riker(Jonathan Frakes): ‘I don’t think anyone’s going to come to your defense this time.’
To be clear, it’s when Worf crossed his arms in front of his chest that is the example of a person not committing to a sense of stabilizing.
Exceed remove:
Now, this idea may be a little tricky to use. An instigator may improperly impose a contemplation interjection that encourages you to remove such a contemplation interjection. When I use this idea, I basically just allow the contemplation interjection to just stay there, since I already have a certain sense of objectivity. Also, if you identify such a mild to moderate instigation contemplationally, I am assuming that your mind will still make the contemplation interjection more tenable for such a thing to be noticed. Of course, idea ‘Exceed remove’ may not be a preferred idea to be used on certain experiences. Sorry, but I can’t think of an illustration for this idea.
Interject urgent:
Now, idea ‘Interject urgent’ was an idea I invented yesterday. I think that idea ‘Interject urgent’ created the most epiphany experience for me at the time of me creating it. Suppose you have been experiencing mild instigations for several years, whether it was at school or at work. I discovered that many instigations that instigators want to show you from a distance and that don’t involve actual agreed upon conversation may be trying to cause you to commit to use an adverse sense of urgency to try to resolve such interjection instigations. Usually, such instigations ‘from a distance’ are odd, perplexing, may catch you by surprise, intentionally mildly erratic, basically characteristics that try to induce an adverse sense of urgency for you to commit to. This reminds me of the Nemean lion from Greek mythology.(www.wikipedia.org recommended to verify) Basically, refurbished for advice, only the lion’s own teeth and claws can pierce it’s skin. Instigations identified by idea ‘Interject urgent’ try to mislead you into using an adverse sense of urgency coming from you.
So, the solution is that when you think of such instigations in your past, and such instigations are probably very vivid and easy to recall, contemplationally say the phrase ‘Interject urgent’, and when you evaluate such an instigation, try not to use the urgency such an instigation is encouraging you to evaluate the instigation with.
Commit enthusiastic:
After I invented idea ‘Interject urgent’, I invented idea ‘Commit enthusiastic’. That is when an instigator encourages you to commit to a sense of pace of acknowledgement from the instigation and/or inadvertency. I chose to use the word ‘enthusiastic’ because of examples like ‘I don’t share your enthusiasm.’, basically, basic sentences that uses the word ‘enthusiasm’ and ‘enthusiastic’. As of now, for me, idea ‘Commit enthusiastic’ is the most actively used idea I am using now, because I believe that I am now more objective concerning the pace of acknowledgements identified by phrase ‘Commit enthusiastic’ that instigators want me to notice and interact with in the context of instigation.
Here’s an example why idea ‘Commit enthusiastic’ may be useful to you: Before idea ‘Commit enthusiastic’, let’s say as an example you would confront outright aspects of an instigation presented to you. Now, with the use of idea ‘Commit enthusiastic’, you can choose to not even directly interact with such a sense of enthusiasm.
I’m not able to think of an example for idea ‘Commit enthusiastic’ right now.
[12/25/2018: Keep in mind that these phrases, such as ‘Exceed not agree’, are just recommendations. You can still shuffle new phrases and take them apart. You don’t have to just use them ‘as is’.
That’s it for this list. I’m going to proofread it sometime today, and I plan to give you another idea this coming Saturday. So, if you are there this Saturday, I’ll see you then. (Apparently, even though the music video ‘What’s My Name’ by Rihanna encouraged me to type, and I even imagined some? of the women who were reading this list earlier today eventually laugh, but not for any obvious reason I indicated in this list, I still ran out of gas/energy, so to speak.) It is now 1:08PM EST for me.
TV PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. TV-PG animated violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Simpsons’. PG-13 sci fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Angel’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for action movie ‘Mission: Impossible – Fallout’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. PG-13 sci fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Ready Player One’. TV-MA violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Bright’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Legacies’. Rated R violence, language, and viewer discretion for movie ‘Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘The Abyss’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Material pursuits’, ‘Exposure’, ‘Language’, ‘I did not do that’, ‘Capable’, ‘Prolong ongoing’, ‘Inform’, ‘Exceed not agree’, ‘Exceed stabilize’, ‘Exceed remove’, ‘Interject urgent’, and ‘Commit enthusiastic’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.