Salutations.
It is now 12:34 PM EST for me. 1st, here’s the music video for this advice. The name of the music video is from the song ‘Body’ by American duo ‘Loud Luxury’ featuring ‘Brando’. Here’s a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the song:
…released as a single on October 27, 2017… It was called the duo’s “breakthrough hit”, and reached the top five in Canada, Denmark and the UK, as well as the top 10 in Australia, Austria, Germany and New Zealand.
Nothing I can find in wikipedia talks about the music video for the song ‘Body’. Since I can’t find any new TRL episodes from the cable service I am using, I decided to look at previous music videos from the UK in www.youtube.com. My search eventually led me to a preview selection of 40 music videos called ‘Top 40 Songs of The Week – August 18, 2018 (UK BBC CHART)’, published by TopMusicMafia. The music video for song ‘Body’ is an official lyric video, and in that preview selection, it is #8. To watch that official lyric video for free, search for phrase ‘loud luxury’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 90 million views. It was published on Oct. 27, 2017. Here’s a quote from the lyrics to song ‘Body’:
Body on my, losin’ all my innocence, yeah
Body on my, grindin’ on my innocence, yeah
Body on my, losin’ all my innocence, yeah
Body on my, grindin’ on my innocence, yeah
Keep in mind that the use of the song and music video for ‘Body’ is refurbished for advice. If you choose to watch the music video, since wikipedia doesn’t talk about it, to me it looks like a young lady walking around her neighborhood as she sings and listens to the song ‘Body’. In my opinion, the music video when watched encourages you to be relaxed and entertained by her enthusiasm. After all, I am assuming that most people, including kids and teenagers, walk around where they live from time to time. I watched the music video earlier today for the 1st time.
Pep talk:
Because of how Christmas and New Year’s affects people, I am going to type a sort of ‘Pep talk’ advice. According to www.dictionary.com, a ‘pep talk’ is ‘a vigorous, emotional talk, as to a person or group, intended to arouse enthusiasm, increase determination to succeed, etc.’ Instead of ‘vigorous, emotional talk’, I’m focusing on the ‘pep talk’ being an ‘effective talk’. So, I’m going to start this ‘pep talk’ with the illustration: The illustration, refurbished for advice of course, is in movie ‘Battleship(2012)’ starring Taylor Kitsch as Lieutenant Alex Hopper, and Tadanobu Asano as Captain Yugi Nagata. The movie is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 49 minutes, and 44 seconds into the movie, Lieutenant Hopper and Captain Nagata are talking. Here is the quote:
Captain Nagata: ‘I can’t believe that worked!’
Lieutenant Hopper: ‘Yeah, ‘Art of War’. Fight the enemy where they aren’t. After all these years, that finally just clicked.’
Captain Nagata: ‘But that’s not what it means.’
Lieutenant Hopper: ‘Really?’
Captain Nagata: ‘Not even close.’
So, addressing mild expectations that I can reasonably address as your expectations approached and experienced Christmas, some of you probably made some? expectations that may have not been met in a preferred context. So, using how teachers in your school allowed you to interact with your expectations, I believe that teachers encourage all of their students to have some sort of continuity and progress with the use of their school expectations. For example, refurbished for advice, Captain Nagata said ‘I can’t believe that worked!’ According to the movie, he said that AFTER allowing Lieutenant Hopper to initiate his plan, because Captain Nagata knew that, if he said that during Lieutenant Hopper’s plan, that may cause Lieutenant Harper’s use of focus to falter. After all, that scene is from a sci-fi movie where people are once again fighting aliens in order to save the Earth. Not that a teacher would, but I believe that all teachers for grammar school students are capable of faltering the focus of a student’s efforts. For example, after Lieutenant Hopper’s plan worked, Captain Nagata informed Lieutenant Hopper that his interpretation of the book ‘Art of War’ is wrong. Here is the quote again:
Lieutenant Hopper: ‘Yeah, ‘Art of War’. Fight the enemy where they aren’t. After all these years, that finally just clicked.’
Captain Nagata: ‘But that’s not what it means.’
Lieutenant Hopper: ‘Really?’
Captain Nagata: ‘Not even close.’
Based on that scene in the movie ‘Battleship’, even though as you approached and experienced Christmas, certain expectations I can reasonably addressed were not met in a preferred context. In another context, they are still useful, for example, based on the efforts you put into it, such as your use of logic and creativity. However, since they were created for those specific expectations and those expectations weren’t met, those efforts were discarded. Isn’t that also true when you experience certain mild to moderate instigations? When you are in school or at work, you experience some minor instigation, even though the instigation may have caused you to feel sad and disappointed, you still did nothing wrong, and of course you are still attending your school or you are still an employee at your job. So, what I recommend is that, refurbished for your needs of course, you imagine that scene in the movie ‘Battleship’. Use some of those expectations that were not met, but before such expectations were evaluated by you as not succeeding in their purpose. Say to someone those words:
‘Yeah, ‘Art of War’. Fight the enemy where they aren’t. After all these years, that finally just clicked.’
While you were using such expectations, whoever you chose Captain Nagata to be allowed you to use such expectations. While you used such expectations, you used your logic, your creativity, it is clearly useful to you. And Captain Nagata did not say anything to impede your ability to use such expectations, even though Captain Nagata has the ability to say something that would impede it’s use.
As a quick example, a few seconds ago, I imagined that I was dating an attractive Asian lady, and she showed me a bunch of model airplanes on the table. She told me that she wanted them to fly, but the airplanes are not able to fly. Using this idea, that she used expectations that are important for her to use, I am still thinking of something appropriate to say back to her that would not discourage such a use of her expectations. I still don’t know what to say to her now, but I think the story may still be useful for you to refurbish.
More than one consideration:
Short fuse consider: 12/29/2018]
All right. This part of the idea I call ‘More than one consideration’ is based on one of the public financial problems American celebrity actress Kim Basinger experienced, according to www.wikipedia.org. Here is the quote:
‘ Basinger’s financial difficulties were exasterbated when she pulled out of the controversial film Boxing Helena(1993), resulting in the studio’s winning an $8.1 million judgment against her. Basinger filed for bankruptcy and appealed the jury’s decision to a higher court, which ruled in her favor. She and the studio settled for $3.8 million instead. ‘
For example, when people in general are given a job promotion opportunity, I think it is done so in a focused context. If a person who is offered such an opportunity declines such an opportunity, that person may regret later making such a decision. So, what I am trying to address is how people interact with their sense of consideration as it is exploited by the instigation experienced. For example, an instigator may cause an innocent person to have a ‘hothead’ by causing that innocent person to interact with a short fused sense of consideration. To help with your use of consideration as it relates to instigation and it’s related inadvertencies, I recommend that you imagine how celebrity actors interact with consideration as it relates to the movie roles they are offered. You don’t have to use my example. I just believe I should offer you an example. I recommend that you use the situation where Kim Basinger pulled out of the controversial film ‘Boxing Helena’. Let’s say just for the sake of example that Kim Basinger made a mistake. Even though she made a mistake, one may imagine that all celebrity actors and actresses have a lot of latitude to interact with being considered for movie roles. For example, one may think that many actors have agents that help them get the movie roles that they want. On top of that, celebrity actors and actresses, one may imagine, are given a lot of perks just to be considered, especially if they already have an established business relationship with those that are offering them the movie roles.
So, even though Kim Basinger may have made a mistake, I think it is safe to assume that she use a lot of experienced consideration before she made the commitment to accept that movie role for movie ‘Boxing Helena’. If you choose to imagine how celebrities use their associated considerations for certain movie roles, than maybe that imagined consideration interaction may help you more tenably experience certain mild to moderate forms of instigation.
An example of perks offered to celebrity actors just to be considered for a movie role, maybe a celebrity is offered a free personalized consultant to be with them for several days to a week, to answer any and all questions regarding that movie role. Another imagined idea is that, as that celebrity is just being considered, that celebrity is given unlimited limousine access to go to any restaurant of their choosing, so as to think about the movie role. Also, many of those ‘free’ perks are transferrable to others the celebrity may wish to be infomed in such a manner. That person could even be ‘a friend of a friend’, so to speak. And of course, just imagined, such perks are probably standardly offered to other celebrities when they are also offered certain movie roles. I’m just giving you an idea of what type of perks celebrities may be offered. So, here’s a quick question: What does an instigation offer you when he/she instigates you in the context of consideration use?
Different versions of cheap kamagra tablets unica-web.com generic tadalafil cipla require different ingestion method. Used to treat a host of ailments including erectile dysfunction in men as well as your partner. viagra buy germany It can keep them away from Urinary Incontinence and other problems like erectile dysfunction (Problem in attaining the erection).Regular exercises can keep you away from generic cialis online unica-web.com the difficulties. Lack of side effect is a main levitra line cause of impotence problems.[12/29/2018: I now call this idea ‘Short fuse consider’.
Not use involve:
To be clear, I’m using both the ‘Pep talk’ idea and the ‘Short fuse consider’ idea to make idea ‘Not use involve’ work. That’s what I thought was one of the obvious reasons why I gave you ideas ‘Pep talk’ and ‘Short fuse consider’ in that order. Even though you may find ideas ‘Pep talk’ and ‘Short fuse consider’ useful individually, it is my intent that idea ‘Not use involve’ will be very important for you to use, as it relates to the next list I plan to give you. To make it easier for me to explain, 1st I’ll give you the refurbished for advice description of the illustration that is to be used for idea ‘Not use involve’. Idea ‘Not use involve’ is pretty much based on this illustration. Amazon.com does not offer streaming the use of such an illustration. It says something about some sort of special service, but I did not check that. Amazon.com does offer the entire series for purchase for about 22 dollars using Prime shipping. Of course, if you want to watch the illustration streaming now, it is offered for free from www.youtube.com. The illustration is from episode 1.2 ‘Ether’ from crime mystery tv show ‘Stingray(1986)’. But 1st, here’s a general quote description about the show ‘Stingray’ and it’s main character, Ray, portrayed by actor Nick Mancuso from www.wikipedia.org:
‘ Ray…is excellent at covering his tracks and hiding his real identity. On several occasions, clients and government authorities believe that they have discovered who he really is, but in the end they always find that they are mistaken. ‘
To watch episode ‘Ether’ from tv show ‘Stingray’ for free, search for phrase ‘stingray ether’ from web site www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with almost 10 thousand views. That selection was published on Mar 20, 2015, but the actual episode was on tv Mar 25, 1986.
OK. You don’t have to watch the entire episode ‘Ether’, which is about 48 minutes long. I’ll just recommend watching 3 scenes from the entire episode, refurbished for advice of course. If you want more character development, with inaproprieities removed, you may watch more of that episode. In the 1st scene, near the beginning of that youtube episode, 6 minutes and 40 seconds into the episode, Dr. Joel Forrester(James Laurenson) meets for the 1st time Ray. According to Dr. Forrester, some sort of crime is being committed in his hospital, and he wants Ray to resolve the issue.
In the 2nd scene, 21 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode, Ray in the context of the tv show gets an actual doctor to portray him and administer surgery, a Dr. Alex Freeman(Joel Colodner). This scene is important to watch because, during that surgery, even Dr. Forrester believed Ray was the one who was actually performing the surgery. As Dr. Forrester witnessed the surgery, many of his misgivings about Ray, which includes the fact that he does not know Ray’s actual identity, Dr. Forrester worried about. When the surgery was over, Dr. Forrester confronted who he thought was Ray about what he had done. That scene begins 22 minutes and 31 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Dr. Forrester: ‘What the heck do you think you were doing and…’
Ray: (revealing to Dr. Forrester that an actual doctor performed the surgery, in a tv show context, not himself, and is introducing the actual doctor) ‘Dr. Alex Freeman, Dr. Hal Forrester.’
Dr. Freeman: ‘Sorry if I gave you a few moments in there.’
The 3rd illustration is to give you a refurbished comparison between how 2 people are reacting after Ray left the hospital. The comparison is between Dr. Forrester and Dr. Cornell(Carolyn Ann Clark). 1st, I’ll type in the actual words used, and then I’ll type in the imagined refurbished extrapolation. The scene starts near the end of the episode, 46 minutes and 33 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Dr. Cornell: ‘Have…have you heard anything’
Dr. Forrester: ‘From Dr. Rastelli(Ray’s false identity)’, no.’
Dr. Cornell: ‘You know, he never did tell me his name.’
Dr. Forrester: ‘Well, that makes two of us. Um, for what it’s worth, this was the number I have to contact him. I thought you might want it.’
Dr. Cornell: ‘Thanks.’
Dr. Cornell: (Later, while talking in a pay phone)
secretary: ‘Hello?’
Dr. Cornell: ‘Yes. Hello. This is Dr. Cornell at Coleman General. I’m trying to reach Rastelli.’
secretary: ‘Who?’
Dr. Cornell: ‘Michael Rastelli.’
secretary: ‘There’s no one here by that name.’
Dr. Cornell: ‘Wait, are you sure? Is this (Dr. Cornell says the phone number)?’
secretary: ‘Yes, but there’s no Dr. Rastelli here. This is the German embassy.’
Now, here’s the idea. I’m recommending that you imagine the change Dr. Forrester is going through after Ray left the hospital. For example, when Dr. Forrester believed that Ray was performing surgery, and Dr. Forrester knows for certain that Ray is not qualified to legitimately perform surgery. Many of his considered misgivings about Ray helping him became real, causing him to confront Ray about that. Of course, that is when Ray explained to Dr. Forrester that it was not him that performed the surgery, but an actual doctor that pretended to be him that actually performed the surgery. Near the end of the episode, after Ray solved the case, that is when you look at Dr. Forrester talk to Dr. Cornell, and you may choose to imagine that Dr. Forrester is still allowing himself to more tenably accept Ray’s participation, especially the misgiving/qualm that he still has about not knowing Ray’s actual identity. You can tell that he is more tolerant about not knowing Ray’s actual identity based on how he is calmly talking to Dr. Cornell about it. That is why Dr. Forrester gave Dr. Cornell the number he used to originally contact Ray, because he sensed that Dr. Cornell is still having some problems with not knowing Ray’s actual identity.
The main purpose why I typed all of this will be revealed if you choose to use the next list idea I plan to type in. But for now, I recommend you use the contemplation of Dr. Forrester that I provided as an example of a person who made a more tenable change to the involvement of a previous misgiving/grievance.
If you choose to, you can use Dr. Forrester’s example to allow yourself to change the contemplation involvements you currently have of previously experienced instigations. For example, I imagined a generalistically conceptualized intentually identified woman that I find attractive, is single, and available, and she still holds a grudge for certain mild to mildly moderate incidents she experienced with other women in her past. Of course, I believe having a grudge is very popular in America. What I am also addressing is the ability to at least allow less the instigator to dictate how that grudge is being used in that innocent person’s mind.
Well, anyway, it’s 4:41 PM for me now, and I’m going to proofread this idea. The good news for you is that, on Tuesday, 1/1/2019, I plan to start explaining the next idea, which will make idea ‘Not use involve’ more apparent in importance. I also took a day off from work that day, giving me more time to possibly finish that idea. So, if you are there this coming Tuesday, I’ll see you then.
PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Battleship’. Violence and viewer discretion for crime mystery tv show ‘Stingray’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Short fuse consider’ and ‘Not use involve’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.