1/19/2019

Salutations.

It is now 9:54 AM EST for me. Before I begin the music video introduction, I want to recommend watching certain tv shows from a certain cable tv channel you may not be aware of. To be clear, I am not obligating you to watch it. This is just something I think many of you may be interested in watching. I am not evaluating your quality of tv watching. This is just a recommendation.

The cable tv channel is called ‘NHKHD’, ‘NHK High Definition’. It’s a tv show for high definition cable tv boxes that basically addresses Japanese events. I think most people in America about now who were using the older cable tv boxes have now upgraded to the high definition cable tv boxes, so channel ‘NHKHD’ may be available for you to watch. I’m recommending that you watch certain tv shows from ‘NHKHD’ because all of the tv shows are custom made to be watched in English, and in my opinion, makes more available to you more quality programming that you may not be able to find from normally available American channels. Of course, technically speaking, ‘NHKHD’ is an available American channel. I’m speaking from experience, since I think it’s just been a few weeks since I have begun exploring the use of a high definition cable tv box, and exploring channel ‘NHKHD’. If you are not made aware to it, then how do you know it’s available? If you choose to watch channel ‘NHKHD’, to find the channel from your HD cable tv box, click ‘SEARCH’ from your remote control, and search for letters ‘NHK’. The search results should tell you what channel NHKHD is available in your area.

Here are the tv shows I recommend you consider looking at when beginning to use ‘NHKHD’, if you choose to look at that channel. Since it’s only been a few weeks for me watching regularly channel NHKHD, these tv shows I still have in the cable box, and even I haven’t watched them yet. I looked at a minute or more from each show, and have chosen to later watch the entire episode. These are the tv shows: ‘Document 72 Hours’, ‘Hometown Stories’, ‘BOSAI: An Educational Journey’, ‘Rising’, ‘3-Day Dare*Devils’, ‘Design Talks Plus’, and ‘Her Story’.

As I have said before, you are not obligated by me to watch those shows. I am just recommending that you choose to watch them. They’re very English friendly, even though it’s about Japan. For example, either the host of the show is speaking English, or the show is being narrated in English.

[I’m going to buy some food right now. I’ll start again maybe around 12:00 in the afternoon, hopefully earlier. If you are there, I’ll see you then.

It is now 11:38 AM for me. I want to give you a quick description of those NHKHD tv shows I recommended. I didn’t watch those episodes in it’s entirety, so the explanation is based on the impression I have for those shows: ‘Document 72 Hours’ reviews the lives of certain people within a 72 hour time frame. When I watched a few minutes of it, individuals were being interviewed about what their job entails in a casual setting, a diner. ‘Hometown Stories’ reviewed individuals in their daily lives while in a non-major city setting. In ‘BOSAI: An Educational Journey’, the episode I looked at talked about how the Japanese people would prepare for earthquakes. I’ve never been to Japan, but according to that episode, certain areas of Japan experiences a certain frequency of earthquakes. I kept the episode because It was going to teach me how to make sandals from newspaper, since during an earthquake, you may have to leave the house you are in, and you want to do it wearing something for your feet. In ‘Rising’, I saw a bus driver using some sort of special technology to interact with his/her passengers. In ‘3-Day Dare*Devils’, it described a journey of workers who were supplying machine dispenser beverages to people who regularly visited a certain mountain. To me, it’s entertaining to see how vending machines are restocked in different circumstances. Tv show ‘Design Talks Plus’ addressed what some of you may do when you become old enough to get jobs(I’m assuming that it’s possible that kids are reading this stuff). It illustrates possible unique and practical casual environments for employees. And in ‘Her Story’, the show highlights a Japanese woman going through some sort of strife.

When programming your high definition cable tv box to watch these shows, just go to ‘SEARCH’ to find those episodes. Just program record that one episode once a week, since the channel does a lot of repeats of the same episode, and it does not seem to indicate whether the episode is new or not. Also, if you choose to continue using channel NHKHD, and you decide to look at the programs individually, keep in mind that there are also tv show episodes that are only a few minutes long, which can make it rather tedious as you are looking through the shows. It will take you a lot longer to look through a week’s work of NHKHD programming than I’m assuming you’re typical tv show programming. If you are looking at the NHKHD programs individually and you just want to record a specific tv episode one a week, I recommend that you look at the episode’s description. Not to sound rude, but if the episode’ description changes, then you can use that as an indicator whether or not to record that show. For example, if a specific episode has 3 different desciptions, then there may be 3 different episodes for that tv show. If the episode description only changes once, then the 2nd description may be the episode you may want to record.

The reason I introduced channel NHKHD is because of the music video I found in episode 3.56 of ‘TRL’. I copied this episode of TRL 12/16/2018, about a month ago. I thought the music video was new, since it was shown in a relatively new episode of TRL, but it’s been out almost 5 years. The music video is from song ‘Rather Be’ by the English electronic group Clean Bandit. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ The track was released on 17 January 2014… ‘

‘ The song debuted at number one on the UK Singles Chart and was the third fastest-selling single of 2014… ‘

‘ In the United States, the song peaked at number ten on the Billboard Hot 100. The song was placed at number four on Billboard‘s 10 Best Songs of 2014 list. ‘

‘ “Rather Be” has also become an international hit in part due to the song’s video becoming a viral hit on YouTube. Featuring Haruka Abe, it has over 510 million views. It won the Best Dance Recording category at the 2015 Grammy Awards in the United States. ‘

“The video is about a Japanese fan of the band who becomes delirious and has hallucinations of band members and our logo appearing unexpectedly in her daily life as a chef. Filming in Tokyo was an amazing experience: we spent almost a week there and everyone was so helpful. We made it ourselves as always, which was quite scary as we’ve never produced anything so far away before.”

And here is a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Rather Be’:

If you gave me a chance I would take it
It’s a shot in the dark but I’ll make it
Know with all of your heart, you can’t shake me
When I am with you, there’s no place I’d rather be
N-n-no, no, no, no place I’d rather be
N-n-no, no, no, no place I’d rather be
N-n-no, no, no, no place I’d rather be

To watch music video ‘Rather Be’ for free, search for phrase ‘clean bandit rather be’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 516 million views. The music video was published on Dec 5, 2013.

That is the reason I chose to recommend Japanese channel NHKHD to you, because of the music video I was going to recommend to you, music video ‘Rather Be’. If you start watching those NHKHD tv shows, music video ‘Rather Be’ is like a music video for channel NHKHD. The tv shows in NHKHD in my opinion are more informative, but the music video ‘Rather Be’ did receive over 516 million views as of now, giving it some sort of credibility on it’s own.

Even though I found music video ‘Rather Be’ from a TRL episode, the show only provided 30 seconds or so of the music video. I watched the entire music video for the 1st time earlier today.

I want to say one more thing about NHKHD. It’s just variety. If you feel like you want to try something new to watch, then certain tv shows from NHKHD may be what you’re looking for. If you make it into something that is useful to you, then that’s your choice. In my opinion, if you haven’t seen the shows from channel NHKHD, then it could be like a ‘shiny new penny’ to you, something new to watch, that’s all. Also, keep in mind that the tv shows are custom made for American English users to watch them. All you have to do is watch it, just like your usual American tv shows.(I was born and spend almost my entire life in America. That’s just how I explain it.)

Establish bring up:

It is now 12:41 PM EST for me. After typing all of that, here’s the new idea that follows Wishlist #1157’s idea, that ‘Not approve collaborate’ idea. 1st, I’m going to explain to you a generalistic starting point, and then I’m going to start over, so to speak. Here is the definition of word ‘establish’ from www.dictionary.com: ‘to found, institute, build, or bring into being on a firm or stable basis’, and here’s it’s example: ‘to establish a university; to establish a medical practice’. It’s not the exact definition I was looking for, at least the example www.dictionary.com gives.

Before I start explaining idea ‘Establish bring up’, let me give you the best single illustration example, called ‘Jurors will disregard’. I got this idea from a few various law tv shows. I don’t remember which ones. I typed ‘jurors will disregard’ in search engine www.google.com, and came across this 1988 New York Times article called ‘Jurors Will Disregard’ Is Often Not Regarded’, and here’s a quote from that article:

‘ It is common for judges to instruct jurors to disregard information in deciding a case, such as telling them to ignore what they have read in newspapers, or, in the case of medical malpractice lawsuits, to ignore the disastrous conditions that provoked the suits, Professor Casper said. ‘

So, idea ‘Establish bring up’ is similar to when judges instruct jurors to disregard certain information in deciding a case. Idea ‘Establish bring up’ is when an instigator gives the impression that you brought to your own attention an impression of an active sense of contemplation that you originally did not choose to use as an active sense of contemplation.

To help explain idea ‘Establish bring up’, here’s a quote from the movie ‘Bright’, from Wishlist #1146:

‘ …the Netflix movie ‘Bright(2017)’, starring Will Smith as Daryl Ward, and Ike Barinholtz as Pollard.’

‘ So, according to Netflix, the scene starts 14 minutes and 10 seconds into the movie, Ward and Pollard are talking to each other in the locker room. Here is the quote:

Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.

Pollard: ‘That’s good. That’s good. Noted.’

16 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie:

Sergeant Ching(Margaret Cho): ‘No.’

Ward: ‘Yes. Put him in another car.’

So, the point is that, even though Ward informed Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, Pollard still continued to impress upon Ward his advice, and later, Ward requested to Sergeant Ching that he wanted another partner in his car. Ward still used Pollard’s advice, even though Ward clearly indicated to Pollard that he did not ask for his advice. ‘

To quote from movie ‘Bright’ again:

Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.’

Pollard: ‘That’s good. That’s good. Noted.’

Using idea ‘Establish bring up’, when Pollard was giving Ward advice he did not ask for, Ward could have said this to Pollard:

Ward: ‘I listened to what you had to say, but I did not agree to discuss it.’

When you experience an instigation identified by idea ‘Establish bring up’, even though you may have experienced an interjection that gives you the impression that you brought to your own attention some sort of active contemplation, you don’t have to treat that impression of active contemplation as if it were an active contemplation. Even though you sense something that resembles an active contemplation, you don’t have to establish it, solve it, or even use it. For example, when Ward was talking to Pollard from the movie ‘Bright’, Ward certainly heard Pollard giving him advice, but Ward does not want to interact with the advice Pollard was giving him. Ward also did not request advice from Pollard. So, Ward was certainly at least trying to not establish, solve, and even use Pollard’s advice. I offered you the ‘Jurors Will Disregard’ idea to give you a legitimate, real illustration where disregarding information already presented to you is warranted. I realize that idea ‘Establish bring up’ may not be enough of an explanation. This is just the foundation idea. I’m going to build upon it next.

Receive:

Less than a week ago, I experienced something that involved a minor embarrassment on my way to work. I was afraid that other people would notice it, and that’s when I invented idea ‘Receive’. It felt like I was receiving some sort of acknowledgement involved with the mildly embarrassing accident. Now, have you ever heard of the phrase ‘Misery loves company?’ Well, I was looking for a gag reel from the ‘Lethal Weapon’ movies, and the narrator for that gag reel was Mel Gibson portraying character Martin Riggs. If memory serves, Martin Riggs in that gag reel would regularly say something like ‘I hope nobody saw that.’ or ‘I hope nobody sees me this way.’ after making some sort of embarrassing mistake. I also remember someone, a dancer, portraying himself to be the character Roger Murtaugh dancing. I looked in youtube, but I can’t seem to find that gag reel. So, even though I couldn’t find that gag reel, I’m still trying to use it as a reference, something to associate with my embarrassing moment, and to support idea ‘Receive’. So, when you use idea ‘Receive’, you use it with idea ‘Establish bring up’. For example, you can call that ‘Establish receive’ to represent some sort of embarrassment you experienced, but you don’t want to establish, solve, and/or use such an experience. It could be an experience that should not be relevant, that should be disregarded circumstantially.

Debase:

Idea ‘Debase’ is not a new idea, but I believe I should make you aware of it so that you may use it, in the context of this advice, of course. According to www.dictionary.com, ‘debase’ means ‘to lower in rank, dignity, or significance’, and the sentence example is ‘He wouldn’t debase himself by doing manual labor.’ An instigator may improperly cause you to feel like your sense of dignity or significance is lowered. That’s why I call this idea ‘Debase’. It’s definition is practically the same as the meaning in the dictionary.

Although I think the idea’s use is very common, I still invented it’s use with the help of movie ‘Mission: Impossible – Fallout(2018)’ based on how I believed August Walker(Henry Cavill) encouraged others to debase him. It’s not the same as an innocent person experiencing an instigation designed to debase that innocent person, but I still think it’s a good illustration example. Here are the 2 examples in the movie ‘Mission: Impossible – Fallout’ where I believe August Walker caused others to debase him. The illustration is provided by Amazon.com. You may rent Standard Definition for about 4 dollars, or maybe you already have your own copy of the movie. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 34 minutes and 57 seconds into the movie, shortly after Ethan Hunt(Tom Cruise) leaves the bathroom. The conversation is between August Walker(Henry Cavill) and Ilsa Faust(Rebecca Ferguson). Walker is introducing himself to Miss Faust:

August Walker: ‘The name’s Walker.’

Ilsa Faust: ‘Yeah? You’re welcome.’

The 2nd illustration is 1 hour, 3 minutes, and 44 seconds into the movie, Walker is introducing himself to Benji Dunn(Simon Pegg) while in the getaway car. Here is the quote:

Walker: ‘The name’s Walker, by the way.’

Benji: ‘Was the little car your idea?’

The next illustration is from a japanese animated tv show. The show’s characters have names that be misinterpreted, so I’ll try to clear it up again. According to the show, aliens from another planet who have easily misinterpreted names arrive at Japan to live there. The name of the show is ‘The Devil Is a Part-Timer!’. Here is an explanation of the show from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ Satan Jacob is the Demon Lord from Ente Isla. Due to the actions of the Hero Emilia Justina and her companions, he was transported to modern day Japan with Ashiya and changed into human form. To survive in Japan, he adopts a Japanese name similar to his original name, Sadao Maou, and works part-time at a MgRonald franchise… ‘

This is another ‘Debase’ illustration, but the person involved I believe is encouraging the guests to debase him in order to partially atone, since he did lose the fight against Sadau. The illustration is in episode 1.8 ‘The Hero Enters the Fray’ from tv show ‘The Devil Is a Part-Timer!(2013)’. The episode is available as a streaming purchase for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 5 minutes and 14 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Hanzo Urushihara(Lucifer): ‘You know where to find this fashion stuff, right Yusa?’

Emi Yusa(Emilia Justina): ‘Hey, no touch! I don’t want your slacker germs all over my stuff!’

Hanzo: ‘Jeez, chill!’

Chiho Sasaki: ‘I’ve never met a person who had less shame than you, Mr. Urushihara.’

Hanzo: ‘What the heck? Why is everyone always such a jerk to me?’

Therefore, the official(for this blog) catch phrase for idea ‘Debase’ is quote:

‘Why is everyone always such a jerk to me?’

Of course, since Hanzo is causing others to debase him, it’s not the same as an instigator causing you to feel debased. However, I believe the illustration may be useful to you.

[It’s 4:07 PM for me. I’m going to stop now and continue explaining these ideas associated with idea ‘Establish bring up’ next Saturday. I won’t proofread this now, since I plan to continue in this list. Of course, I’ll think of another music video to recommend to you for next Saturday. So, if you are there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

1/26/2019

Salutations.

It is now 12:05 PM EST for me. 20 minutes or so ago, I watched for the 1st time the music video I found from www.youtube.com. I couldn’t find any new TRL episodes from my cable service, so instead I looked through www.youtube.com, and this is the music video I found today and will recommend to you. The music video is from song ‘Good Time’. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org:

“Good Time” is a song by American electronica project Owl City and Canadian singer Carly Rae Jepsen.

The following are some of the ways on how brand cialis canada to achieve optimum health nowadays, there are still some that could either be less effective or perhaps could pose some great threat in the long run. Glutathione can activate the thiol enzymes of the human body The bark has viagra no doctor anti-aging effect and has antioxidant properties at a cellular level Prove to be harmful. When Vata gets imbalanced it imbalances its 5 subtypes (Vyana, Udana, Samana, sildenafil price in india Prana, Apaana ). You can trust Suhagra tablets, which contain FDA, approved ingredients meant to cure ED within http://deeprootsmag.org/tag/juggy-gayles/ non prescription viagra a span of few weeks.

The song received generally positive reviews from music critics, with critics describing it as a “summer anthem”.

“Good Time” attained commercial success worldwide, reaching No. 1 in Canada, New Zealand, and South Korea, while peaking inside the top ten in the United States, Japan, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and other countries.

The song was released on iTunes on June 26, 2012.

The music video begins with Jepsen waiting by her Fiat 500 in front of an apartment when her friends then come out and join her. They then drive away from the haze of New York City. As they drive away, the video alternates between shots of Jepsen and Young with his own group in a Mercury Cougar as they drive down a forest road. They eventually meet up at a small cabin-like building and start drinking slushies. As Jepsen’s verse starts, she is shown walking through the forest with other shots of the rest of the group walking and coming to a campground. Once the hook and chorus begin, Young is seen by a lake, along with other shots of Jepsen and the rest of the group. As the sky darkens, they start dancing around a bonfire. The video concludes with shots of the group dancing and partying through the night.

In www.youtube.com for the music video ‘Good Time’, there are over 110 thousand comments. Here is a recent quote from one comment:

‘ Simpler times. No flashy and nude stuff to depict good times, just spending quality time with your friends. ‘

And here is a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Good Time’:

Woah-oh-oh-oh Woah-oh-oh-oh
It’s always a good time
Woah-oh-oh-oh Woah-oh-oh-oh
We don’t even have to try, it’s always a good time.

To watch music video ‘Good Time’ for free, search for phrase ‘good time carly’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 319 million views. It was published on Jul 24, 2012.

I know it’s not a new music video, but it was the 1st time I watched it, and it is my opinion that a good reason for watching music video ‘Good Time’ is that it helps people to at least consider using some sort of initiative to participate in certain recreational activities that other people from school and/or work may encourage you to participate in, reasonable sensible activities of course. Watching the music video ‘Good Time’ may help you cultivate a sense of recreational initiative, in my opinion, especially if you haven’t seen it before.

To add some doodling/writing activity in a book, so to speak, I’d like to add that music video ‘Good Time’ is so clean, you can use it to wash your dishes.

Reinstate:

Reinstate not reference:

Interject not reference:

Here is the definition of word ‘reinstate’ from www.dictionary.com: ‘to put back or establish again, as if in a former position or state’, and the example is ‘to reinstate the ousted chairman’. I invented and discovered idea ‘Reinstate’ about a week or so ago, probably because of idea ‘Not approve collaborate’ from Wishlist #1157. Soon after inventing idea ‘Reinstate’, I invented a few variations to go with it, to improve it’s effectiveness. When I started using idea ‘Reinstate not reference’ less than a week ago, the experience reminded me of episode 4.11 ‘Variations on a Theme Park’ from comedy family tv show ‘Dinosaurs(1994)’, refurbished of course. The episode is available for purchase streaming from www.amazon.com for about 1 dollar, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration refurbished starts 4 minutes into the episode. Here is the quote:

TV announcer: ‘We now interrupt your dinner to bring you this DNN special report.’

News reporter: ‘In a bold move to stem the tide of exhausted guys in the workplace, the government announced that starting today, all employees will be entitled to take off from work for a period of time to be known as…a vacation. All workers who feel exhausted and put upon by the excessive demands of their employers may take two full weeks to rest and recuperate. Ooh! Great! See ya. (The news reporter then leaves to take his two weeks vacation.)

I recalled that ‘Dinosaurs’ scene when I used idea ‘Reinstate not reference’ while I was in a bus less than a week ago, and I felt relaxed. If memory serves, I kept contemplationally repeating the phrase ‘Reinstate not reference’ while I was a bus passenger many times using the ‘Stargate: Atlantis’ theme music.

Basically, I discovered that certain instigations you may be experiencing uses a contemplation inclination to reinstate as bait to encourage you to interact with some sort of adverse and/or bothersome sense of notion. The best way to demonstrate that is how I invented idea ‘Reinstate not reference’, and so here’s the explanation: While I was at work, I experienced an interjection from another co-worker, and I was not able to find a contemplation reference for that experienced interjection. For example, before using idea ‘Reinstate not reference’, if a kid who has been reading this blog for a while experiences a minor instigation, maybe that kid may try to think of some sort of reference to help him/her find a solution, or some sort of mitigating information in order to resolve or mitigate such an experience. If the kid cannot immediately find a preferred solution, that kid may still continue to reinstate, but not in a preferred context. That use of reinstatement may be adversely influenced by the instigation experienced by the kid. The best example I can think of, but it’s not an instigation, is in episode 4.3 ‘P4X’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Lexx(2001)’. You can streaming watch the episode from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars, but one of the Amazon channels may allow you to watch it without additional payment. However, you may have to allow a 90 second commercial to play before you see that scene. I’m using the Amazon channel provided, since you may also use it. I just turned off the volume from my laptop until the commercial was over. Anyway, the scene starts 32 minutes and 2 seconds into the episode, Kai(Michael McManus) is retrieving a newspaper. Here is the quote:

Kai: ‘Could you read this for me, please?’ (Kai hands the newspaper to a boy)

Boy: ‘What part?’

Kai: ‘Any part.’

Boy: (The boy then reads a common part of the newspaper.)

Kai: ‘Thank you. That’s all I need. I can read the rest myself now.’

Boy: ‘You’re weird, mister.’

If you watched the show ‘Lexx’, Kai is an alien with powers and abilities that enable him to fight well. For example, I’m assuming that Kai learned how to read English seemingly just based on how the boy read that part from the newspaper.

To explain what happened to the boy, refurbished for advice, of course, when Kai said to the boy quote:

‘Thank you. That’s all I need. I can read the rest myself now.’

When Kai said that, the boy could not find a preferred contemplation reference for what he had said to him, so what the boy did was try to reinstate with what he believes the stranger called Kai presented for him to reinstate from, and since such impressions of references from Kai’s demeanor and identity were strange to the boy, the boy said to Kai quote:

‘You’re weird, mister.’

And that is what I think certain instigations and inadvertencies are doing to you, extrapolated of course. For example, the instigation experienced by you may not have a preferred contemplation reference, and so you try to reinstate yourself using the presented references from the instigator, and those impressions of references may be bothersome for you to reinstate from.

Before I give you the answer I invented for idea ‘Reinstate not reference’, I recommend that you look at a scene in movie ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part II’, starring Kristen Stewart as Bella Swan, Robert Pattinson as Edward Cullen, and Casey LaBow as Kate. Since I believe this may be an important reference for you that you may want to have at least access to many times, I recommend that you buy the streaming movie from Amazon.com. It’s about 10 dollars for it’s streaming version. You can rent it’s streaming version for about 4 dollars. The difference is only 6 dollars. Of course, if you already have the Blu-ray/DVD version of the movie, or some other source, then you may not have to buy it. I’m just saying that, for 10 dollars, it’s a bargain, since I believe you may like idea ‘Reinstate not reference’. Anyway, the scene according to Amazon Video starts 56 minutes and 1 second into the movie. Here is the quote:

[2/2/2019: When using the ‘Twilight’ reference, for example, when recalling the scene when Edward would say quote: ‘It’s painful, but it’s bearable.’, keep in mind that it’s in the context of allowing yourself to feel some discomfort when you are choosing to not contemplationally reinstate to certain forms of mild to moderate instigation. Since I am assuming that you may have never done such a thing before in such an active and obviously aware sense, based on my extrapolated experience, you would probably feel a sense of ‘sour face’ and some discomfort. Of course, the ‘Twilight’ reference is refurbished with inaproprieties removed. I am not encouraging you to do anything reckless or dangerous with the reference. For example, you are not to use the reference to allow yourself to experience any actual shock, even from static electricity.]

Kate: ‘All right. This one’s on full power.’

(Bella then projects an energy shield on Edward to give him some protection against Kate’s shock exposure.)

Edward: (grunts softly) (Kate stops exposing Edward to her shock power) ‘It’s painful, but it’s bearable.’

So, here’s the solution I invented: When an instigator imposes an adverse sense of reinstating, you simply? choose not to use such an adverse sense of reinstatement as it associates itself with a non preferred sense of notion. If you don’t use that sense of reinstating, you can also be more objective to choose to not use it’s associated adverse sense of reference interaction as well. Now, since this may be the 1st time you would do something like this in such an obvious manner, you may feel some discomfort trying. That is why, refurbished, I recommended that you use that scene from the movie ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2’. I also recommend that you use that ‘Sour face’ idea from Wishlist #1038.(When I reference these older ideas, like the ‘Sour face’ idea, I don’t have their locations memorized. I just go to the front page of the blog, and I type the phrase that I am looking for in the ‘Search …’ section, and the list of options offered by the blog helps me find which list it’s in.)

Here is an example of a person who already has an idea what references to use on a specific person, but she also knows what references to not use on a specific person, and that there is also some mystery associated with that person. I’m not in the military, but to me that’s one form of obvious proof as to why this person has authority in the military, even though of course it’s from a tv show. That scene is in episode 3.8 ‘Messages from Earth’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Babylon 5(1996)’. In that scene, Cmdr. Susan Ivanova(Claudia Christian) is having a conversation with Marcus(Jason Carter). The scene is available without additional payment if you have Amazon Prime from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 29 minutes and 7 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Cmdr. Susan Ivanova: ‘What I’d prefer is for you to–‘

Marcus: ‘To what?’

Cmdr. Susan Ivanova: ‘I don’t know. I don’t know how to relate to you, how you fit into anything here. I mean, where are you in the ranks? Above? Below?’

Marcus: ‘Left, right, in a box by the door. Doesn’t matter. That’s not really the problem, is it?’

Now, idea ‘Interject not reference’ is something to help you use idea ‘Reinstate not reference’. When you experience such an instigation identified by idea ‘Reinstate not reference’, you also may choose to use idea ‘Interject not reference’. You experience an adverse reinstatement to a notion that does not have an acceptable reference, so you choose not not interact/use the reinstatement by sensing it as an interjection that you choose not to use. You also choose not to use it’s associated unacceptable encouragement of reference. Here are a few more variations to go with idea ‘Reinstate not reference’:

Reinstate not relate: Reinstate relate:

Interject not relate: Interject relate:

Idea ‘Reinstate not relate’ may not have acceptable effectiveness when you contemplationally say the phrase to address certain instigations, but what it does is helps you find a preferred solution or mitigation for the experienced instigation. It helps clarify for certain instigations that you may not have to obligate to certain instigations that impose a sense of understanding or resolving, etc., that you may believe that such things are unwarranted, not relevant, out of context, etc. You may choose to identify such interjections as something that you choose not not relate to, so therefore you choose to not use it’s associated contemplation reinstatements. You may also want to use ‘Reinstate relate’ or Interject relate’.

Reinstate not indecision: Reinstate indecision:

Interject not indecision: Interject indecision:

According to www.dictionary.com, ‘indecision’ means ‘inability to decide’. Idea ‘Reinstate not indecision’ I invented while I was in the public laundromat yesterday. That is when an instigator improperly imposes an interjection that creates a contemplation induced indecision. For example, when you are contemplationally trying to decide where to go, and that causes you to stop walking in order to decide where you want to go. If you experience an interjection from an instigation in that moment, that may create a sense of instigation adversely influenced by an interjection from an instigation.

You may use idea ‘Reinstate not indecision’ to contemplationally choose to not reinstate to that sense of indecision so that you can more tenably choose to not interact with that adversely influenced separate language sense of indecision as well. You may also want to contemplationally use ‘Reinstate indecision’ or ‘Interject indecision’.

Reinstate not capable:

Interject not capable:

Idea ‘Reinstate not capable’ identifies instigations that encourage you to commit and respond to reinstatements that may be excessive and overwhelming for you to interact with. You would have to choose to not reinstate to such interjections of not being capable. This reminds me of a story I made up several years ago involving the character Julie Styron portrayed by actress Stockard Channing from the movie ‘The Business of Strangers(2001)’. In the story, Julie Styron got hired to work for a certain company several months ago. Because of her acquiring that new job, her friends and family would regularly send invitations to her to attend some sort of party. And on top of that, her job is also placing her in situations where many job related party gatherings are offered for her to attend. I imagined her, while going into her high rise apartment, every door that she would see would represent a party invitation. She was having trouble acclimating to all those party invitations. The solution she eventually was made more aware of was that her job eventually helped her become comfortably objective to all of those party invitations. She eventually learned to manage such an exposure better.

So, basically, extrapolated, Julie Styron was being overwhelmed by all of those party invitations because of her new job position. Eventually, she learned to manage the exposure better. With idea ‘Reinstate not capable’, I helped you become aware of the possible problem you may be experiencing. With that awareness, you may now be able to practice to ‘not reinstate’ to such a sense of not being capable.

Reinstate not value: Reinstate devalue:

According to www.dictionary.com, ‘devalue’ means ‘to deprive of value; reduce the value of’. An illustration of idea ‘Reinstate devalue’ is in episode 1.1 ‘Encounter at Farpoint’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1987)’. The episode is available streaming without additional payment if you have Amazon Prime from Amazon.com. In that scene, Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart) is talking to Q(John de Lancie). That scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 1 hour, 23 minutes, and 12 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Captain Picard: ‘If you’d earned that uniform you’re wearing, you’d know that the unknown is what brings us out here.’

Idea ‘Reinstate devalue’ helps you manage better interjections that impose a sense of devalue. So, if a sense of devalue is improperly imposed upon you by an instigation, then you may choose to not reinstate to it’s interjection. Notice that, when Picard said to Q ‘If you’d earned that uniform you’re wearing…’, Picard was able to more tolerantly identify Q’s use of wearing a Starfleet uniform, even though such a use of uniform is worn in a devaluing context.

Reinstate not strive: Reinstate strive:

Interject not strive: Interject strive:

Interject reinstate:

According to www.dictionary.com, ‘strive’ means ‘to make strenuous efforts toward any goal’, and the example is ‘to strive for success’. I created a story for idea ‘Interject reinstate’ earlier today: A woman is striving, struggling, and persevering to maintain the expectations of her job obligations. She thought about pursuing other goals that relate to her job, but she cannot maintain the striving, struggling, and persevering that she thinks is required, based on striving, struggling, and persevering she has committed to with her own job. She was eventually told that certain goals that she thought of, she may pursue on her own without such expectations.

The point is that an instigator may improperly impose a sense of striving that may disparage your own sense of striving. You may contemplationally say phrase ‘Interject reinstate’ so that you don’t have to commit to such an interjecting sense of reinstatement.

[I’m finished with this list. Next Saturday, maybe this coming Friday, I plan to proofread this and close it, and then give you another idea next Saturday. I might even add more information to this list later. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then. It is now 5: 05 PM EST for me.

2/2/2019

TV-MA violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Bright’. PG-13 peril violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Mission: Impossible – Fallout’. Animated violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Devil Is a Part-Timer!’. TV-PG Some viewer discretion for comedy tv show ‘Dinosaurs’. Rated R sci-fi violence, mature themes, and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Lexx’. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part II’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Babylon 5’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, tv show, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Jurors will disregard’, ‘Establish bring up’, ‘Receive’, ‘Debase’, ‘Reinstate not reference’, ‘Reinstate not relate’, ‘Reinstate not indecision’, ‘Reinstate not capable’, ‘Reinstate not value’, ‘Reinstate devalue’, and ‘Reinstate not strive’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

1/12/2019

Salutations.

It is now 12:31 PM EST for me. I know it’s not a new music video, but because of the advice I will type in for this list, the music video I recommend is from song ‘Leave(Get Out)’ by American singer JoJo. According to www.wikipedia.org, the song ‘Leave(Get Out’) was released on Feb 24, 2004. I’m not going to talk much about it, since I already recommended this music video in a past list. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the music video:

The music video… takes place in a high school in California. JoJo is seen with friends in the yard, corridor and girls’ bathroom. She is also seen dancing with cheerleading girlfriends, including pictures hanging on the walls with her alleged ex-boyfriend. It received heavy rotation on MTV, Black Entertainment Television, VH1, Disney Channel, Nickelodeon and The N (which was where this video premiered; specifically on April 16, 2004 at 6:51 p.m. eastern). The video was nominated for Best New Artist at the 2004 MTV Video Music Awards, which made JoJo become the youngest MTV Video Music Award nominee. The video also retired on MTV’s Total Request Live after spending 50 days on the countdown, including two days at No. 1, making her the youngest artist to both have a video retired and reach the summit of the chart.

Get out (leave) right now
It’s the end of you and me
It’s too late (now) and I can’t wait
For you to be gone ’cause I know
About her (who?) and I wonder (why?)
How I bought all the lies
You said that you would treat me right
But you was just a waste of time (waste of time)

During Sessions@AOL, JoJo said, “‘Leave (Get Out)’ is basically a song for all girls just to declare their independence because, as I’m sure all females can relate to, boys will be boys at any age and they don’t always act right. I’m not hating on the guys, but they just need to be kept in line every once in a while.”

To watch music video ‘Leave(Get Out) for free, search for phrase ‘jojo leave’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 76 million views. According to www.youtube.com, the music video was published on Sep 2, 2010, and it has over 21 thousand comments.

Anyway, the reason music video ‘Leave(Get Out) is used for this advice is to give you an illustration example, refurbished for this advice, of course, of a person showing an impression of a contemplation and physical use of disapproval. JoJo’s music video ‘Leave(Get Out)’ is the best music video I am aware of that does that, refurbished, for standard demographic advice. So, according JoJo’s own words to describe her own music video, ‘ I’m not hating on the guys, but they just need to be kept in line every once in a while. ‘

Disapprove:

Not approve:

1st, I want to start with an illustration. The illustration is from beginning of episode 1.3 ‘Sisterhood’ from action sci-fi tv show ‘Bionic Woman(2007)’. The episode is available for streaming purchase for about 2 dollars from Amazon.com. In the illustration, Jaime Sommers(Michelle Ryan) is training with fighting instructor Jae Kim(Will Yun Lee). According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 minute and 13 seconds, near the beginning of the episode. Here is the quote:

Jaime: ‘I guess I’m not used to thinking of myself as artificially intelligent.’

Jae Kim: ‘That’s not what I said. I said part of your programming includes artificial intelligence, the ability to learn. More importantly, to unlearn.’

Jae Kim: (After using the same fighting approach 3 times) ‘You see how you always defend the same way every time? You can’t be too predictable, Jaime. You can circumvent the programming, go way beyond what it intended.’

Jaime: ‘You’re telling me I can hack into myself, change the information?’

Jae Kim: ‘All it takes is practice.’

To be blunt and described in an oversimplified manner, it is my belief that many instigators improperly impose what I call a ‘default’ use of contemplation related disapproval. According to www.wikipedia.org, default values are standard values that are universal to all instances of the device or model and intended to make the device as accessible as possible “out of the box” without necessitating a lengthy configuration process prior to use. The user only has to modify the default settings according to their personal preferences. In many devices, the user has the option to restore these default settings for one or all options.

One illustration example is what Jaime Sommers is trying to do in that ‘Bionic Woman’ illustration provided. With the help of Jae Kim, she is trying to change the default responses given to her with her bionics, to change certain ‘default responses’ in her favor. Now, for this idea, although I am not a psychiatrist(a physician who practices psychiatry), it is my belief that it is very likely that when you experience certain mild to moderate instigations, the instigator wants you to commit to a certain intensity use of disapproval, as it is associated with the instigation experienced.

Here is an illustration example of a man who changed another person’s interaction with disapproval for the better. The illustration is in episode 2.15 ‘Seizure’ from sci-fi tv show ‘SGU Stargate Universe(2011)’. The episode is available streaming purchase for about 2 dollars, and in that illustration, Dr. Rodney McKay(David Hewlett) is talking to a worker(Jackie Blackmore). Soon after that conversation, Colonel David Telford(celebrity Lou Diamond Phillips) changes how that worker would later evaluate her conversation with Dr. Mckay, to change it for the better. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 29 minutes and 2 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Worker: ‘How can you possibly control the power flow from so small a device?’

Dr. McKay: ‘Because, technically speaking, as far as you’re concerned, I’m from the future.’

And now, to help prepare yourself if you choose to use it, this is the moment when Colonel David Telford portrayed by CELEBRITY Lou Diamond Phillips talks to the worker, to help her avoid an unnecessarily embittering experience thinking about what Dr. McKay said to her for the next 2 weeks of her life. That scene starts 29 minutes and 9 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Colonel Telford: (Talking to the worker) ‘Dr. McKay appreciates your help.’

Colonel Telford: (Now talking to Dr. McKay) ‘What is it with genius and social skills?’

Another example I belief is proof that instigators are actually improperly imposing a consistent, adverse use of contemplation related disapproval is in the very definition of the word ‘grudge’. According to www.dictionary.com, ‘grudge’ means ‘a feeling of ill will or resentment’. The definition example is ‘to hold a grudge against a former opponent’. Also, there’s actually a movie called ‘The Grudge(2004)’ starring Sarah Michelle Gellar. I’m referencing just the name of the movie, not watching the movie itself. And although I don’t give conversations I overhear the same credibility that I would give conversations I actually choose to be involved in, I did overhear a conversation while I was in a public bus. I overheard a lady saying that she talked to another lady about an instigation she imposed upon that lady some time ago, and that other lady still harbors a grudge against that lady. My point is that, when instigators want to cause another person to have a grudge, they really make it work in that other person’s mind. I believe that one obvious effect involved in having such a grudge is an adversely consistent and excessive contemplation use of disapproval.

So, let me try to explain again the instigation identified by phrase ‘Disapprove’ and ‘Not approve’: An instigator may improperly impose an excessive, contemplation commitment use of disapproval. When you would experience such an instigation, the contemplation sense of disapproval would probably be excessive, such as an unusually adverse intense and consistent contemplation use of disapproval when you would recall and reference such an instigation. For example, when you would recall such an instigation, it’s very likely that even it’s identity in recall would contain an excessively intense identity for you to interact with. Instigations designed to induce grudges are one of the obvious examples, but technically any other instigation, not just grudges, accurately identified by idea ‘Disappove’ and ‘Not approve’ may also apply.

The solution I invented I think it was last week was to allow yourself to have the option to identify such possible instigations as a false collaboration. That way, once you can quantify such an instigation as a false collaboration, you can then more tenably allocate such an instigation. According to www.dictionary.com, the definition of ‘collaborate’ is ‘to work, one with another; cooperate, as on a literary work: And the definition example is ‘They collaborated on a novel.'(of course, not just limited to literary work use)

Not approve collaborate:

And so, I invented a bookmark to help you more tenably allocate such an adverse use of disapproval as it relates to false collaboration. I call the idea ‘Not approve collaborate’. You may interpret the adverse sense of disapproval as a separate language that you do not want to commit to using, since you may not need so much intensity in order to already know that disapproval is involved. That reminds me of either something I read or something I watched in the past, when football players would begin training. They would take salt pills during the beginning of the 1st month of their training. However, you are not supposed to continue taking those salt pills. A few of those football players would get sick because they would continue taking those salt pills, something they should have discontinued the use of during the 1st month.

I have selected 4 illustrations to help you develop a sense of managing, allocating, and outright removing adverse commitments to the use of contemplation disapprovals. Of course, I have thought of more than 4 illustrations. The reason I am only recommending 4 for now is because I expect the kids who may be reading this blog would go over those 4 examples many times in their minds. And although I’m not a psychiatrist, caseworker, etc., I am using my experience giving advice in this blog and in the Amazon lists I made to offer those 4 examples.

The 1st illustration example, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, and in relation to this advice, is in the action crime movie ’48 Hrs(1982)’, starring Eddie Murphy as Reggie Hammond and Nick Nolte as Jack Cates. This is the scene where Jack Cates clarifies to Reggie Hammond exactly what type of collaboration he expects from Mr. Hammond. Although I believe there are other tv shows and movies out there up to the year 1982 available to the public concerning instigation induced false collaborations, based on my knowhow, for the year 1982, that scene in the movie ’48 Hrs(1982)’ could be the 1st example that was made aware to the general public. For example, the movie ’48 Hrs’ I suspect probably was promoted heavily by the movie industry for the general public at the time to watch. And to be blunt, American movies, especially American movies made in the now, are still heavily mainstreamed promotions for the American people to watch. That being said, the movie is available streaming rental and streaming purchase from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, refurbished of course, that scene starts 29 minutes and 1 second into the movie, Jack Cates is releasing Reggie Hammond from jail to help him for 48 hours. Here is the quote:

Reggie Hammond: ‘Ain’t no way to start a partnership.’

Jack Cates: ‘Now, get this. We ain’t partners, we ain’t brothers, and we ain’t friends! I’m putting you down and keeping you down until Ganz is locked up. And if Ganz gets away, you’re gonna be sorry you ever met me!

Reggie Hammond: ‘I’m already sorry.’

You can see that scene when Jack Cates clarifies his collaboration for free from the trailer of ’48 Hrs’ available on www.youtube.com, but that trailer only has that scene, and therefore it lacks content. But if you only want to see that scene, then just watch the ’48 Hrs’ trailer from www.youtube.com. Just search for phrase ’48 hrs trailer’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered.

Ideally, a person should maintain levitra pills a healthy ratio of good and bad cholesterol to stay healthy. If this happens, the chemical released occurs when you become excited and your brain cannot properly send the right signals to ask you penis muscle to relax. cialis 5mg generika It purchase cialis online has some outstanding features can enhance your sex life. As this is an online course, find order 50mg viagra out when the faculty members will be online and when can you speak to them about the issues that you may be encountered with, i.e. impotency, premature ejaculation, erectile dysfunction or ED is basically the insufficient erection of the penile region during the acts of intercourse.

The 2nd illustration is from the action thriller James Bond movie ‘Quantum of Solace(2008)’, when James Bond(Daniel Craig) is having a conversation with Camille(Olga Kurylenko) while Bond is flying an airplane. According to Amazon.com, I purchased the streaming movie in 2017. It only shows me that the movie is available as a streaming purchase. Since it’s an old enough movie, if you have cable tv, it may be already available from your cable tv service to watch ‘on demand’ without additional payment, or you can just program your cable box to record the next time it will play, or you may be able to just rent it from your cable service. Anyway, according to Amazon Video, refurbished, the illustration starts 1 hour, 6 minutes, and 15 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Camille: ‘So what’s your interest in Greene?’

Bond: ‘Amongst other things, he tried to hurt a friend of mine.’

Camille: ‘A woman?’

Bond: ‘Yes. But it’s not what you think.’

Camille: ‘Your mother?’

Bond: ‘She likes to think so.’

I’m assuming that Bond is talking about his boss, M(Judi Dench). Since the collaboration between Bond and his boss M was strictly professional, so to speak, if you choose to, you can substitute M with any instigator and for any instigation from any person in your school, job, etc. M can represent a man, woman, boy, girl, etc. For example, when Bond said ‘She likes to think so.’, you can use that as a reference that Bond obviously took that contemplation collaboration out of the collaboration he uses when interacting with his boss M. You can also use this example to ‘take out’ excessive disapprovals that the instigator may improperly want you to commit to.

I chose this James Bond example because, if you watched the movies, Mr. Bond does seem to have certain aspects of his attitude very conveniently illustrated that you may choose to emulate or be inspired by.

To be clear, when using the James Bond example, to help you manage, allocate, and/or remove certain contemplation disapprovals as if they were languages you don’t want to use, since you already know that disapproval is involved, and you don’t have to articulate it with so much intensity, for example, just imagine any instigator you choose to be in a similar situation to James Bond, that he/she likes to think he/she is your mother, and then like James Bond, allocate that collaboration out of your participations with that instigator. You see, another person wanting you to think he/she is your mother could simply be an excessive authority strategy. Regardless, this is just an example to help you allocate excessive contemplation disapprovals. That’s how it’s used. To be clear, you’re just imagining it. Just imagined, the instigators you choose think he/she is your mother, and refurbished like James Bond did, you take that out. That simple.

The 3rd illustration is from episode 4.2 ‘The Fires of Pompeii’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2008)’. To avoid some confusion, according to www.imdb.com, this is actor Peter Capaldi’s 1st appearance in the tv show ‘Doctor Who’ before he became The Doctor. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available from Amazon.com without additional payment. And according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 10 minutes and 5 seconds into the episode, Caecilius(Peter Capaldi) is having a conversation with The Doctor(David Tennant) and Donna Noble(Catherine Tate). Here is the quote:

Caecilius: ‘I’m afraid business is closed for the day. I’m expecting a visitor.’

The Doctor: ‘Well, that’s me, I’m a visitor. Hello!’

Caecilius: ‘Who are you?’

The Doctor: ‘I am…Spartacus.’

Donna Noble: ‘And so am I.’

Caecilius: ‘Mr. And Mrs. Spartacus?’

The Doctor: ‘Oh, no, no, no. We’re not married.’

Donna Noble: ‘Not together.’

Caecilius: ‘Oh, brother and sister? Yes, of course! You look very much alike!

Both The Doctor and Donna Noble: ‘Really?’

To be clear, it’s when both The Doctor and Donna Noble saying ‘Really?’, that’s the illustration example. Use that moment to manage/allocate, remove excessive contemplation disapproval collaborations.

The 4th illustration example is near beginning of episode 2.3 ‘The Reichenbach Fall’ from crime mystery ‘Sherlock(2012)’. In that scene, Sherlock Holmes(Benedict Cumberbatch) is talking to Dr. John Watson(Martin Freeman). The episode is available streaming for about 7 dollars from Amazon.com. I think this is the most expensive tv show episode so far that I have encountered. Usually, tv show episodes are about 2 dollars Standard Definition. Anyway, if you choose to use this illustration from Amazon.com, according to Amazon Video, that scene starts near the beginning of the episode, 3 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Sherlock Holmes: ‘What do you mean, more careful?’

Dr. Watson: ‘I mean, this isn’t a deerstalker now. It’s a Sherlock Holmes hat. I mean that you’re not exactly a private detective any more. You’re this far from famous.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘Oh, it’ll pass.’

Dr. Watson: ‘It better pass. The press will turn, Sherlock. They always turn. And they’ll turn on you.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘It really bothers you.’

Dr. Watson: ‘What?’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘What people say.’

Dr. Watson: ‘Yes.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘About me. I don’t understand. Why would it upset you?’

To be clear, the illustration reference used is the quote:

‘About me. I don’t understand. Why would it upset you?’

As of today, I used idea ‘Not approve collaborate’ to invent a new idea. So, what I’ll do is close this list, and next Saturday, I’ll continue explaining idea ‘Not approve collaborate’, and use it to introduce to you the new idea I invented today. I also may introduce a new idea, so let’s see what happens. I’m going to start proofreading this idea now. So, if you are there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

Sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Bionic Woman(2007)’ and ‘SGU Stargate Universe’. Rated R violence and viewer discretion for movie ’48 Hrs.’ Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Quantum of Solace’. TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Sherlock’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Disapprove’, ‘Not approve’, and ‘Not approve collaborate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed. (It is now 4:38 PM EST for me.)

1/5/2019

Salutations.

It is now 9:53 AM EST for me. I still can’t find any new TRL episodes from the cable service I’m using, so instead it’s from TopMusicMafia in www.youtube.com. Here’s the selection title: ‘ Top 40 Songs of The Week – September 22, 2018 (UK BBC CHART) ‘ The selection is a preview of 40 songs. I used the bottom horizontal bar to quickly look at the images in the selection, and I chose #23. The music video is from song ‘Don’t Leave Me Alone’ featuring English singer Anne-Marie. The reason I chose a few minutes ago why you may be interested in looking at that music video is because Valentine’s Day(Thursday, February 14, 2019) is right around the corner, and after I looked at the lyrics to this song, I believe this song will be very popular in America in the month of February. Here’s a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Don’t Leave Me Alone’:

Don’t you ever leave me, don’t you ever go
I’ve seen it on TV, I know how it goes
Even when you’re angry, even when I’m cold
Don’t you ever leave me, don’t leave me alone

Another reason why I believe the song will be popular in February is because it’s still relatively new. According to www.youtube.com, the music video of the song was published on Aug 20, 2018, and it has over 107 million views. Here’s a review of the song from www.wikipeida.org:

‘ Writing for Grammy.com, Philip Merrill gave the song a positive review: “Touching and simple, this dance-jam prayer to stick together has a strong, independent outlook. ‘

Now, if you choose to watch the music video with the chosen mindset that it probably will be a very popular song in February because of Valentine’s Day, and you know that many stores in America will probably also be promoting Valentine’s Day, that may allow you to find the music video to be interesting to watch. 10 minutes ago or so, I watch the music video ‘Don’t Leave Me Alone’ for the 1st time, and it does have some nice spontaneous visuals. It uses the premise of virtual reality to show you different visual environments. I think it’s important to keep in mind that the vantage point is her apartment as you see those different visual environments.

To watch music video ‘Don’t Leave Me Alone’ for free, search for phrase ‘don’t leave me alone’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 107 million views.

5000 uses:

I made this idea up while I was in the public laundromat yesterday, and I want to offer it here to make the advice that I’m about to type in a little lively. Here’s the imagined situation: let’s say a person offers another person some sort of generalistic accomodation, and there’s no obligation for it’s use. Now, one of the possible results of that accomodation, and there’s no obligation, is that, even when that person is privately using such an accomodation, that person with make it useful in a context that such a person who offered the accomodation is very likely to think that such a result will occur, even though the person he/she offered the accomodation to will not tell him/her that it happened. Now, using that ‘5000’ idea I offered you in Wishlist #1144, I recommend that you imagine that you offered some sort of generalistic accomodation to other students in your school, or other employees in your job, and you are reasonably speculating that the people you offered the accomodation to made 5000 uses for it. Imagine that each person in your school or job used the accomodation for 5000 things, but you are using your sense of reservation to not bring it to their attention because there was no obligation when you offered such an accomodation to them.

I believe that this idea I imagined yesterday may be useful to you because it is my belief that the instigations you may be experiencing, if you are experiencing instigations, may cause you to have petty inclinations. This idea should help you manage those petty inclinations better, inclinations that are possibly induced by the instigations you may be experiencing.

[I’m going to stop now because the food I want to order is coming from a restaurant that will open at 11:00 AM. I’m going to watch a little pre-recorded tv before I go get the food. I should start again around 12:00 in the afternoon or so. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

It’s 12:04 PM EST for me. I’ve eaten an entire plain small pie, plus I have more food on standby. Food is not a problem for me today. To make that ‘5000’ uses idea more tenable for you to use, imagine a rich businessman using one of his rooms to put objects on that shelf that involve a certain recreational use. He can give it to civilians to use, but such objects require that he give them an explanation in order for civilians to use it. Also, he has to maintain a certain minor level of accomodation for those objects to work for other people. The ‘5000’ uses idea comes from an accomodation that is a lot simpler than that. For example, when the person explained to the other person who will use it what the accomodation was, whatever that accomodation was, that other person easily had an understanding as to how to use it. Keep in mind that the purpose of that ‘5000’ uses idea is to help you manage better possible petty inclinations that instigations may cause you to experience. It’s now your idea, of course, if you choose to use it. I’m just recommending that you initially see it that way to help you avoid some unnecessary worry.

Personal:

To start explaining idea ‘Personal’, here’s a reference from episode 3.2 ‘The Powers That Be’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Shadowhunters: The Mortal Instruments(2018)’. The episode is available for purchase Standard Definition streaming for about 2 dollars from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, Luke(Isaiah Mustafa) and Isabelle Lightwood(Emeraude Toubia) are talking. The reference starts 15 minutes and 47 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Luke: ‘I pulled some surveillance footage off the NYPD server of our nurse who got possessed.

Isabelle: ‘Tim Dempsey.’

Luke: ‘I got a feeling his possession isn’t just a crime.(Edited for advice.) Three crimes in 48 hours, all suspects good, decent folk suddenly becoming unhinged.’

Isabelle: ‘I’ll search the footage for the exact moment of Tim’s possession. It might take all night, but it’s worth a shot.’

Luke: ‘All right, take out on me.'(I’m assuming Luke is offering Isabelle all the food she wants to eat while doing that research.)

Keep in mind that when actually watching that scene, that the tv show ‘Shadowhunters’ is sci-fi fantasy. For one thing, they investigate and fight demons and monsters.

The reason I am talking about idea ‘Personal’ is because this is standard demographic advice. That means you shouldn’t need a special skill in order to use this advice. For example, it’s possible that one of the readers is a kid or a non-managerial employee. Idea ‘Personal’ is just based on what I believe to be true, but I do not have proof. It is my belief that it’s very possible that the instigations you experience are encouraging you to evaluate and resolve the instigations that you experienced using a personal mentality.

For example, I used the ‘Shadowhunters’ reference to show you how someone is relying on the resources of another to help resolve a crime. If you are a non-managerial employee experiencing instigation and you think about how instigators in your job are talked to by management, I believe it is safe to assume that management in general have other resources at their disposal to help resolve instigation related situations.

Here’s a situation that I imagined: An instigation case is brought to the attention to someone in management. Now, that person has the ability to try to evaluate and resolve the situation, but to do so involves getting more involved with the case, getting more personal with it. When that person talked to another person in management, he/she was advised to use standard investigating procedure, and not to get personal with the case. It’s safer that way.

So, even though it’s imagined, based on that story, there are those in management that have the resources to avoid an investigation that involves personal evaluations. However, since you may be a student or a non-managerial employee, you may feel inclined to resolve your experienced instigations using personal evaluations. You see, based on my imagined story, management in general has the ability to try to resolve an instigation related situation without getting personally involved, whereas you are inclined to resolve your own instigation experiences using personal evaluations. I believe that is something you should have the option to not need to do, because by using more personal evaluations, it is my belief that you will also commit to a more accelerated pace of evaluation, manipulated by the instigations that you experienced. For example, when you resolve minor situations that are not instigation related, the pace of evaluation involved for many non instigation related minor situations will be slower and more manageable than when resolving instigation related situations, which may tend to be faster and more erratic. The purpose of the advice I will type in will hopefully help you choose to use less personal evaluations when resolving instigation.

Inform:

Here’s a copy of idea ‘Inform’ from Wishlist #1146:

Inform:

Here’s the definition of ‘inform’ from www.dictionary.com that is used for idea ‘Inform’: ‘to give or impart knowledge of a fact or circumstance to’, and here is the sentence example: ‘He informed them of his arrival’. The only illustration example I can think of right now for idea ‘Inform’ is from the Netflix movie ‘Bright(2017)’, starring Will Smith as Daryl Ward, and Ike Barinholtz as Pollard. The scene is refurbished for advice with inaproprieities removed. Unfortunately, I am only aware of the movie being available for streaming from Netflix, and the streaming service is about 8 dollars a month. So, if you don’t want to use that Netflix service, I’ll try to explain it to you so that you don’t have to. The explanation, of course, will not replace the convenience of watching the illustration from a streaming service, but I’ll still try, like it’s part of my routine to just do it. So, according to Netflix, the scene starts 14 minutes and 10 seconds into the movie, Ward and Pollard are talking to each other in the locker room. Here is the quote:

Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.

Pollard: ‘That’s good. That’s good. Noted.’

16 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie:

Sergeant Ching(Margaret Cho): ‘No.’

Ward: ‘Yes. Put him in another car.’

So, the point is that, even though Ward informed Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, Pollard still continued to impress upon Ward his advice, and later, Ward requested to Sergeant Ching that he wanted another partner in his car. Ward still used Pollard’s advice, even though Ward clearly indicated to Pollard that he did not ask for his advice.

Now, what I discovered over a month ago is that an instigator may improperly impose upon you an adverse, confused interaction with your use of informing the instigator of an instigation that he/she wants you to experience. For example, an instigator is imposing upon you a participation that you did not want to experience, and you choose to inform that person that you are not participating. So, what the instigator may do is impose an adverse experience of informing upon you, for example, make it look and feel like you are interacting with the adverse participation, even though it is just your intent to inform the instigator that you are not participating. In the illustration example, Ward was informing Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, and yet Ward eventually used it. Let’s say you’re a kid, and you already had some unacceptable experiences with another kid, and so when that kid introduces to that innocent kid another adverse participation, the innocent kid informs that kid that he/she does not want to participate. However, the kid with the unacceptable participation knows this, and compensates by imposing upon that innocent kid an adverse sense of informing, so even though that innocent kid is just informing that kid that he/she is not participating, the kid with the adverse participation still causes that innocent kid to experience an adverse somewhat confused sense of informing. You see, the effort used to inform becomes part of the instigation. It’s like what Ward said to Pollard. Refurbished for advice to avoid ambiguity, let’s say that Ward already knows the ‘bad’ advice Pollard usually gives, and that’s why Ward said this to Pollard:

Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.

However, even though Pollard’s advice is trouble, Ward still uses it.

Part of the solution is that, if an instigator is improperly imposing upon you a participation that may cause you to inform that instigator that you do not want to participate, keep in mind that you are ‘just’ informing that instigator, and that you are not participating, even though you may sense that the informing itself may be a little precarious.

1/5/2019:

Interject inform:

Now, this is a new use of idea ‘Inform’. If you use this idea, ‘Inform’ means that certain instigations that you experienced may be interpreted as false impressions of informing that you did not agree to commit to. For example, idea ‘Punish inform’ identifies an instigation that is imposing an uninvited, out of context sense of punishment upon you, even though you did not do anything wrong. So, if you experience an interjection of punishment that is unwarranted, and you did not even agree to talk to that instigator, you may contemplationally say ‘Interject inform, I did not agree to use such a sense of informing.’, or just contemplationally say ‘Interject inform’, or just contemplationally say ‘I did not agree to use such a sense of informing.’

Although, it is a powerful medication for the treatment of Erectile dysfunction in males is Kamagra 100mg Tablets.Whether erectile dysfunction is caused by psychological problem or physical issues, in both conditions the Kamagra tablets help. buy sildenafil no prescription Otherwise, discount levitra it will invite lots of complications in the future. It improves length and girth of tadalafil online canada the male organ. Oral medications have also been of great help levitra professional samples to the patients regarding kidney disease then take an appointment of Dr.

Interject attention:

I’m using 2 references to explain idea ‘Interject attention’: The 1st reference is near the movie ‘Finding Forrester’. It’s from the reaction of Prof. Robert Crawford(F. Murray Abraham) near the end of the movie, as he tries to calm down the students. The movie is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that reference starts 2 hours, 2 minutes, and 24 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

William Forrester(Sean Connery): ‘Those words that I read today, I didn’t write them. Jamal Wallace did.’

(The students soon applauded.)

Prof. Robert Crawford: ‘Quiet. Shh. Shh. Quiet! Quiet, please! Be still. Shush, shush, shush! Quiet, please.’

Of course, you may watch more of that scene and more of the movie ‘Finding Forrester’ in relation to advice for further understanding. When I imagined Prof. Crawford saying it before I checked what the streaming movie said, I imagined quote:

Prof. Crawford: ‘Your attention, please!’

For this advice, I recommend you use ‘Your attention, please!’ instead of ‘Quiet, please!’

The 2nd reference is from episode 5.14 ’48 Hours’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate SG-1(2002)’. According to www.imdb.com, this episode contains the 1st appearance of Dr. Rodney McKay(David Hewlett). The reference involves a conversation between McKay and Major Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping) while they’re in the cafeteria. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and requires no additional payment if you have Amazon Prime. That reference starts 27 minutes and 49 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

McKay: ‘More than a third of the energy pattern that the gate requires to reintegrate Teal’c, it’s already gone.’

Samantha Carter: ‘I don’t think so.’

McKay: ‘You’re guessing wildly, like you always do.’

McKay: ‘Maybe you could find a way to fool the gate into reintegrating whatever it has stored in memory, but I say you won’t like what comes out.’

Carter: ‘Well, we’ll see.’

McKay: ‘Major, Teal’c is dead, and this argument is a waste of time because the Pentagon is gonna order Hammond to resume operations in what, like, 16 hours?’

Carter: ‘That’s how they came up with the 48-hour deadline, isn’t it? You told them Teal’c would already be dead.’

McKay: ‘That’s why it’s called a deadline.’

Carter: ‘God, you’re a jerk.’

Here’s a 3rd reference related to episode ’48 Hours’. It’s episode 10.11 ‘The Quest: Part 2’ also from ‘Stargate SG-1’. Samantha Carter is having a conversation with Ba’al(Cliff Simon). The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 32 minutes and 58 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Carter: ‘Look, I still think I’m right about the obelisk, but I can’t make heads or tails of it’s programming.’

Ba’al: ‘Well, that’s hardly surprising. I mean, I know where you come from you’re considered relatively intelligent, but by galactic standards, that’s not saying much. Wouldn’t you agree?’

Carter: (Punches Ba’al in the face)

I think that an obvious amount of mild to moderate instigations may be remedied by idea ‘Interject attention’. Idea ‘Attention’ identifies the identity of instigations that not only cause you to flinch, but also causes you to feel a certain repelling from the evaluation. According to www.dictionary.com ‘flinch’ means ‘to draw back or shrink, as from what is dangerous, difficult, or unpleasant.’ I got the word ‘attention’ from the phrase ‘I did not bring that up’, which also means ‘I did not bring that to my own attention’. So, when an instigator induces an instigation identified by phrase ‘Interject attention’, the instigation’s identity may cause you to flinch and also cause you to feel repelled by the experience. When you think of this idea’s references, it starts when Prof. Crawford from the movie ‘Finding Forrester’ says the words ‘Your attention, please!’ to the students. Next, you think of Samantha Carter talking to McKay in that ’48 Hours’ episode, when McKay says quote ‘You’re guessing wildly, like you always do.’ You then recall Samantha Carter’s reaction to McKay’s words.

So, basically, Samantha Carter’s reaction to what McKay said to her is a refurbished example of how a person reacts to an instigation identified by idea ‘Interject attention.’ You can also call it ‘Interject attention, I did not agree to commit to such a sense of informing.’ The 3rd illustration from episode ‘The Quest: Part 2’ is proof why Samantha Carter is a possible example for idea ‘Interject attention’. You see, I believe I watched all of the episodes of ‘Stargate SG-1’ that were publicly aired on tv, and according to at least 2 episodes that I watched, it is indicated that Samantha Carter has in the past punched men in the face when they harassed her. Episode ‘The Quest: Part 2’ gives you an obvious illustration of Samantha Carter hitting a man in the face. So, the question I am presenting to you is ‘Why didn’t Samantha Carter hit Dr. Rodney McKay in episode ’48 Hours’? What I think the answer is is that Dr. McKay is a civilian, and in the past, I think she would only hit other military male personnel. However, in my opinion, that’s what makes it worse for Samantha Carter, since her chosen restraint to not hit McKay also causes her to feel more discomfort and distress. Later Stargate episodes shows that Samantha Carter chooses to be friends with McKay, which also indicates that she regretted the way she treated McKay in episode ’48 Hours’, even though she didn’t actually hit McKay during that episode.

You may imagine someone pulling a bowstring so that you can associate that pulling of the bow, that tension, to the repelling you may feel when experiencing an instigation accurately identified by idea ‘Interject attention’.

Exist inform:

Now idea ‘Exist inform’ I think I created the idea either yesterday or today. It had to be after I was in the public laundromat yesterday. Before I tell you which episode specifically I was watching when I invented idea ‘Exist inform’, I want to say that, if you choose to use this idea, do not use the scene when Epzo(Shaun Dooley) is talking about his childhood. Keep in mind that, if you choose to watch that episode, Epzo is an alien, and you don’t really know what his chosen school of thought is. Of course, not really knowing what another person’s school of thought is is probably very common on Earth as well, but what Epzo said about his childhood I believe is inappropriate to know about for kids who choose to just watch a science fiction tv show. If the kids have supervision and have permission and a reasonable explanation associated to watching that scene, than many things are possible. However, without supervision, I believe a child might feel confused if he/she somehow ends up watching that scene. I just believe it’s unnecessary to watch for this advice, so therefore I recommend that you don’t watch the scene where Epzo talks about his childhood. That’s the scene when they are all on the boat. When they leave the boat transportation, then you can continue watching in the usual fashion.

That being said, the episode I watched as I invented idea ‘Exist inform’ is episode 11.2 ‘The Ghost Monument’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2018)’. The episode is available for purchase streaming for about 2 dollars Standard Definition from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 9 minutes and 27 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

The Doctor(Jodie Whittaker): ‘Do you two know what that is?’

Epzo: ‘It’s a tent.’

The Doctor: ‘Obviously, it’s a tent. I meant…Oh, never mind.’

When I watched that scene, I already watched episode ‘The Ghost Monument’ several times, going on to many times. I recorded that episode for future watchings. The key scene started 14 minutes and 9 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Ilin(Art Malik): ‘This entire planet has been made cruel.’

The Doctor: ‘Made cruel how? And by whom?’

Ilin did not answer The Doctor’s question. It looked like Ilin ignored The Doctor. And to verify that Ilin ignored The Doctor, the next scene starts 14 minutes and 35 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Ilin: ‘Your route trackers are over there. Good luck.’

The Doctor: ‘I know you prefer to ignore me, but what is it? This Ghost Monument?’

So, in an oversimplified context, while I was watching the episode ‘The Ghost Monument’, as the episode was leading to the main characters meeting with Ilin in the tent, I was thinking about what individuals give importance to, when they congregate. And as the main characters were talking to Ilin, I noticed that Ilin had a lot of self reliance and self importance about his own actions. Of course, this is made more obvious since he is in a ‘Doctor Who’ sci-fi episode. Also, Ilin did create and has full control of that contest, and the contest is probably being watched by others, giving Ilin some sort of reservation in his actions. So, before The Doctor was ignored yet again by Ilin, since I did already watch the episode several times, that was when I invented idea ‘Exist inform’, and here is it’s explanation: It is my belief that certain instigations may improperly impose a false commitment to your sense of thinking, a commitment that demands that your sense of thinking itself is required to allow a certain contemplation induced interjection to exist by the use of your sense of thinking itself. In other words, ‘I think, therefore I am’, but used as part of an inappropriate identity of an experienced instigation.

OK, here’s an example of ‘Exist involve’: How about a preceding reputation? Let’s say in high school or in the job, certain instigators want to establish in your mind a preceding reputation, so soon before and during, your sense of anticipation notices a preceding identity. With idea ‘Exist involve’, you may choose to mitigate that effect somewhat by identifying such a sense of preceding and such a use of anticipation as something your thinking does not have to validate in order to allow such a notion to exist. You may also say contemplationally ‘I did not agree to commit to such a sense of informing.’

It’s 4:08 PM EST for me now. I am going to stop now, proofread this idea, and close it. I believe it’s likely that you have something to work with now, even though of course if I put more time into it, I can improve it’s use to you. I plan to add another idea next Saturday, even though I have no idea as to what that idea will be. It could be a new idea I may invent the day before Saturday, or it could be an idea I am already aware of. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Shadowhunters: The Mortal Instruments’. TV-MA sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Bright’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Finding Forrester’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Stargate SG-1’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Doctor Who’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Interject inform’, ‘Interject attention’, and ‘Exist inform’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.(Of course, you can shuffle the words. For example, ‘Exist inform’ can be called ‘Invade aware’. I’ll make more ideas next week.)

1/1/2019

Salutations.

It is now 1:29 PM EST for me. I couldn’t find a new music video, and there are no new TRL music videos from the cable service I am using. So, I chose a music video I previously used. The music video is from the song ‘Boom Clap’ by English singer and songwriter Charli XCX. The music video is also from the 2014 American romantic tragedy film ‘The Fault in Our Stars’, starring Shailene Woodley as Hazel Grace Lancaster. I don’t want to talk about it too much, since I already recommended it for a previous idea. If you choose to watch the music video, it has scenes from the movie ‘The Fault in Our Stars’ inside of it.

To watch music video ‘Boom Clap’ for free, search for phrase ‘boom clap’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 350 million views. The music video was published on June 2, 2014.

Control:

Realize:

This is the idea idea ‘Not use involve’ was made for. I invented it from a character portrayed from the sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate SG-1’ called ‘Ba’al'(Cliff Simon). I remember Ba’al saying the word ‘Control’. [1/4/2019: I fast forward through at least most of the streaming episodes from Amazon.com Ba’al was in in the ‘Stargate SG-1’ series, and I could not find him saying the word ‘control’, but I do remember him saying it. According to www.imdb.com, Ba’al was only in 15 episodes of ‘Stargate SG-1’. I know that ‘Stargate SG-1’ easily portrays Ba’al as being evil, but I imagined one of ‘Ba’al’s clones joining ‘Stargate SG-1’ in another ‘alternate’ reality, and that made Ba’al acceptable to use as a reference in my mind, refurbished of course. It is also my belief that not everything that was shown on tv may have been transferred to it’s streaming counterpart in Amazon.com, which is why I couldn’t find Ba’al saying the word ‘control’ from the streaming episodes available in Amazon.com. If you choose to imagine Ba’al as part of the ‘SG-1’ team, I recommend that you give yourself some time to process that imagined situation, if you haven’t imagined it before.] So, this is how I invented idea ‘Control’: While I was in a public bus I think it was less than 2 weeks ago, it felt like a few of the other bus passengers were being a little discriminatory against me. I think I got that feeling from a recent episode of ‘Doctor Who’, episode 11.3 ‘Rosa’ that aired Oct 21, 2018, a few months ago. That episode addressed the incident when Rosa Parks chose not to sit in the back of the bus. Like I said, it felt like it, but to me it was only a feeling. I wasn’t accusing anyone in the bus of anything. Anyway, that’s when I invented idea ‘Control’. It is my belief that an instigation can adversely influence your chosen sense and use of contemplation control. For example, I also recently invented an idea called ‘Realize’. According to www.dictionary.com, ‘realize’ means ‘to grasp or understand clearly’. Have you ever heard of the statement ‘By the time you realize it, it may already be too late.’? When I invented idea ‘Realize’, I made the discovery that certain instigations play against how and how long it takes you to realize certain experiences.

The best example I can think of right now for idea ‘Realize’ is from a tv show that I do not recommend to be watched for this blog. Since I am an adult, I have the ability to choose to watch it, and I chose to watch it, and I found it funny and entertaining. However, for this blog, I don’t recommend it to be watched. There are certain themes that this show presents that may be unsettling for others to watch. It also has a TV-MA rating. I’m saying this because it’s possible you may start watching the show simply because I recommended a scene to be watched. I am only recommending that scene refurbished to be watched, not anything else from the show. And even though I find the show entertaining to watch generalistically, there are still some scenes that I do not approve of even for myself. Of course, since I discovered those inappropriate scenes as I was watching it, it’s too late for me to avoid watching such scenes.

The scene is in episode 3.8 ‘The Tom/Brady’ from sci-fi fantasy tv show ‘Preacher(2018)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 32 minutes and 50 seconds into the episode, Tulip(Ruth Negga) is having a conversation with Lara(Julie Ann Emery) while in an airplane. Here is the quote:

Lara: ‘Look, I know we get on each other’s nerves sometimes but…nice job. Seriously. I’m a fan.’

Tulip: ‘Thanks. Appreciate that.’

Lara: ‘I was joking.’

Tulip: (With a disapproving look on her face)’So was I.’

Of course they’re both actresses in a tv show, but if you give them tv show credibility, after Lara said ‘I was joking.’ to Tulip, Tulip realized that it was already too late to fix what she had said to her. I highly recommend you watch that scene to understand more what happened to Tulip.

To be clear, in a tv show context, I don’t believe Tulip did anything wrong. It is my belief that people in general interact based on impressions. I don’t believe people in general are mindreaders. However, when Lara said that she was joking to Tulip, that was when Lara was manipulating Tulip’s sense of contemplation control. Lara was fairly certain that Tulip was going to try to contemplationally correct that mistake. If you watched that scene, you can see from Tulip’s facial expression that she tried but could not fix the mistake Lara created for her to experience.

I believe that idea ‘Control’ may be important for you to know because it helps you become aware that even your contemplation efforts to try to control how you experience and evaluate certain things may also be manipulated by an instigation, even though you may believe that choosing how to contemplationally control such experiences is coming from you.

The solution I invented for idea ‘Control’ is to contemplationally say the word ‘Control’, to help you become more objective in order to see how an instigation may be adversely influencing how you try to contemplationally control your experiences.

Use not effective:

I invented idea ‘Use not effective’ yesterday, 12/31/2018. 1st, let me start with the illustration examples. The best illustration examples that I am aware of(and I’m not in the movie making industry) for idea ‘Use not effective’ in my opinion comes from movie ‘Annapolis(2006)’, starring James Franco as Jake Huard, Tyrese Gibson as Midshipman Lieutenant Matthew Cole, and Donnie Wahlberg as Lieutenant Commander Burton. The movie ‘Annapolis’ is available streaming from Amazon.com. There are 4 scenes from the movie that I will explain in advance, and then I will use those explanations to explain idea ‘Use not effective’.

In the 1st scene, Huard is given a question during a meal by Whitaker(McCaleb Burnett). That scene starts 27 minutes and 57 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Whitaker: ‘I’ll give you an easy one, rivet. The Triton Light has water from how many different seas?’

Huard: ‘Sir, eight, sir.’

Whitaker: ‘Are you sure? Cause you look like you’re guessing, Huard.’

Huard: ‘Sir, I’m sure, sir.’

Whitaker: ‘So you wouldn’t have a problem betting your companymates’ dinner on your answer?’

Huard: ‘Sir, no, sir.’

In the 2nd scene, Huard and Cole are boxing. During the boxing match, Cole verbally provokes Huard, which causes Huard to respond in an unacceptable manner. That scene starts 36 minutes and 5 seconds into the movie, according to Amazon Video. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org concerning that incident:

‘ After Huard angers the boxing instructor with some unsportsmanlike conduct toward Cole in the ring, he is forced to train by himself. ‘

In the 3rd scene, Huard is boxing with Lieutenant Burton. That scene starts 54 minutes and 34 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Lieutenant Burton: ‘You know, most of the boxers in the Brigades are nationally ranked amateurs, right? You think you’re gonna beat ’em by coming in here, hitting the bag for a couple of hours?

This is a rare side effect cheap online viagra but a very serious risk for young men, especially those who want to have children. Not just schedule buster, this issue can cialis tadalafil generic even lead to high level of cholesterol. But one needs to avoid alcohol while taking this medicine as alcohol temporarily adversely effects in the erection of the penile region & thus, this is the trade name of another drug for men’s health named verdenafil. generika viagra cialis Hope you will follow them and keep yourself Hydrated Water is the most essential liquid for human body as it tries to reply to the changes aging brings he wins the fight against aging. professional cialis hop over to these guys

Huard: ‘I’ll do what I have to.’

Lieutenant Burton: ‘Really? Without anyone training you? What do you think, Huard? You think you’re gonna be the first plebe to get through here without anyone’s help?’

Huard: ‘I don’t need anyone’s help. No one thinks I’ll make it anyway.’

Lieutenant Burton: ‘Who do you think convinced the board to take a chance on you?’

The 4th scene starts 1 hour and 8 minutes into the movie. The new recruits are doing push-ups in the rain. Here is the quote:

Lieutenant Cole: ‘All right. Everybody on your feet. Everyone but Huard is dismissed. How about some more up-downs, Huard?’

From a distance, the new recruits that were dismissed were looking at Huard doing push-ups alone with Cole, and then they all came back to do push-ups.

Loo(Roger Fan):(Explaining to Huard why he came back to do push-ups with him) ‘What? I’m a plebe. I love rolling on the ground and freezing my ass off.’

And here is the explanation. According to www.dictionary.com, the definition of ‘ineffective’ is ‘not effective; not producing results’.

Idea ‘Use not effective’ means that the interjection/notion that you are experiencing caused by the instigation induced interjection/notion causes you to feel/sense a self contemplation use that is ineffective. In the 1st scene, When Huard answered the question ‘The Triton Light has water from how many different seas?’, he said quote ‘Sir, I’m sure, sir.’, and he agreed to bet on his companymates’ dinner. When he discovered that he was wrong, he experienced an ineffective sense of use that he couldn’t just shake off, so to speak. This scene reminds me of an old Spider Man cartoon. According to www.wikipedia.org, it’s episode 2.16 ‘Thunder Rumble’ from cartoon ‘Spider-Man(1968)’. Here’s a quote from wikipedia.org about it:

‘ Spider-Man fights Bolton, a Martian warrior who can form and hurl lightning bolts and plans to take Earth’s gold… Spider-Man tricks Volton into sending himself into space again using one of his lightning bolts…’

To watch cartoon ‘Thunder Rumble’ for free, search for phrase ‘spider man thunder rumble’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered. Here is a quote from cartoon ‘Thunder Rumble’:

Bolton: (Bolton holding a lightning bolt) ‘This one’s indestructible! Not even I can control it! It will blast you clear to infinity!’

Spider-Man then tricks the lightning bolt to go back to Bolton, which then takes Bolton back into space.

Huard made a verbal promise he could not easily correct. I believe that a lot of innocent people in America while they are in a learning situation(for example, a few times in a 20 year period. It may only happen a few times, but in my opinion it may take a few years to get over it in a preferred context, and that is assuming you are not intentionally causing it to happen) are caused by instigators to be in a similar situation to what Huard went through. They are caused to make an instigation influenced justified action that is soon discovered to be a mistake, and such a mistake is not easy to shrug off, an ineffective sense of use.

In the 2nd scene when Huard and Cole are boxing, Huard was verbally provoked. Not only did the provocation from Cole create an ineffective sense of use in Huard’s mind, it also caused Huard to lose his temper, causing Huard to punch Cole in an unacceptable manner.

In the 3rd scene, Huard said to Cole quote:

Huard: ‘I don’t need anyone’s help. No one thinks I’ll make it anyway.’

That means that Huard is experiencing a lot of interjections/notions of ineffective use from others in his belief. However, this is one of the turning points in the movie, when Lieutenant Burton said quote:

Lieutenant Burton: ‘Who do you think convinced the board to take a chance on you?’

The 4th scene, in my opinion, is proof that all of the new recruits in Huard’s class is not only able to objectively identify certain mild to moderate interjections/notions of ineffective use, but they are also able to not use such interjections, and even dismiss certain ones. The proof is shown when those new recruits were ordered to stop doing push-ups and leave, and they chose to go back and continue doing push-ups with Huard. When they went back, that’s the proof.

If you choose to use those 4 examples, you may now have the ability to more objectively identify and allocate certain mild to moderate interjection and notion experiences that induce a sense of ineffective use identified by idea ‘Use not effective’. If you think you are experiencing such an instigation, contemplationally say ‘Use not effective’ to check, and to help yourself more tenably allocate such an experience.

Impatient not effective:

I already invented a few variations for idea ‘Use not effective’. I don’t have time to explain them today. However, I will explain a variation for idea ‘Use not effective’ that I just invented earlier today. I call it ‘Impatient not effective’. For example, when you are waiting for something, like allowing a person to pass, or you are waiting in line, an instigator may improperly impose a sense of ineffectiveness that makes you feel impatient while you are waiting. According to www.dictionary.com, ‘impatient’ means ‘not accepting, delay, opposition, etc., without calm or patience.

The solution for instigations identified by idea ‘Impatient not effective’, partly, is knowing that you are actually experiencing such an instigation. If it’s just minorly bothersome, you may allow yourself to experience it, just don’t become it. Just contemplationally say ‘Impatient not effective’ to allow yourself, for example, to remain calm, or at least to not commit to the adverse control imposed by such an instigation.

I don’t want to use the rest of my day off proofreading this idea, so I’ll proofread this idea this coming Saturday, [1/4/2019: I chose to proofread this idea Friday instead of Saturday, so that i’ll have more focus for the next idea.] and I plan to give you another list this coming Saturday. I don’t know what I’ll give you, but I’ll think of something.[1/4/2019: When I said ‘but I’ll think of something’, I already invented a few? ideas, but I’ll probably create and type a newly created idea before Saturday. Otherwise, if I don’t think of a new idea, I’ll just type one of the older ideas I haven’t typed in yet.] So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

1/4/2019

TV-PG sci fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Doctor Who’. TV-MA violence, mature themes, viewer discretion for tv show ‘Preacher'(Keep in mind I’m only recommending for you to watch one scene from one episode.). PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Annapolis’. Animated violence viewer discretion for tv show ‘Spider-Man’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Control’, ‘Realize’, and ‘Use not effective’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.