1/5/2019

Salutations.

It is now 9:53 AM EST for me. I still can’t find any new TRL episodes from the cable service I’m using, so instead it’s from TopMusicMafia in www.youtube.com. Here’s the selection title: ‘ Top 40 Songs of The Week – September 22, 2018 (UK BBC CHART) ‘ The selection is a preview of 40 songs. I used the bottom horizontal bar to quickly look at the images in the selection, and I chose #23. The music video is from song ‘Don’t Leave Me Alone’ featuring English singer Anne-Marie. The reason I chose a few minutes ago why you may be interested in looking at that music video is because Valentine’s Day(Thursday, February 14, 2019) is right around the corner, and after I looked at the lyrics to this song, I believe this song will be very popular in America in the month of February. Here’s a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Don’t Leave Me Alone’:

Don’t you ever leave me, don’t you ever go
I’ve seen it on TV, I know how it goes
Even when you’re angry, even when I’m cold
Don’t you ever leave me, don’t leave me alone

Another reason why I believe the song will be popular in February is because it’s still relatively new. According to www.youtube.com, the music video of the song was published on Aug 20, 2018, and it has over 107 million views. Here’s a review of the song from www.wikipeida.org:

‘ Writing for Grammy.com, Philip Merrill gave the song a positive review: “Touching and simple, this dance-jam prayer to stick together has a strong, independent outlook. ‘

Now, if you choose to watch the music video with the chosen mindset that it probably will be a very popular song in February because of Valentine’s Day, and you know that many stores in America will probably also be promoting Valentine’s Day, that may allow you to find the music video to be interesting to watch. 10 minutes ago or so, I watch the music video ‘Don’t Leave Me Alone’ for the 1st time, and it does have some nice spontaneous visuals. It uses the premise of virtual reality to show you different visual environments. I think it’s important to keep in mind that the vantage point is her apartment as you see those different visual environments.

To watch music video ‘Don’t Leave Me Alone’ for free, search for phrase ‘don’t leave me alone’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 107 million views.

5000 uses:

I made this idea up while I was in the public laundromat yesterday, and I want to offer it here to make the advice that I’m about to type in a little lively. Here’s the imagined situation: let’s say a person offers another person some sort of generalistic accomodation, and there’s no obligation for it’s use. Now, one of the possible results of that accomodation, and there’s no obligation, is that, even when that person is privately using such an accomodation, that person with make it useful in a context that such a person who offered the accomodation is very likely to think that such a result will occur, even though the person he/she offered the accomodation to will not tell him/her that it happened. Now, using that ‘5000’ idea I offered you in Wishlist #1144, I recommend that you imagine that you offered some sort of generalistic accomodation to other students in your school, or other employees in your job, and you are reasonably speculating that the people you offered the accomodation to made 5000 uses for it. Imagine that each person in your school or job used the accomodation for 5000 things, but you are using your sense of reservation to not bring it to their attention because there was no obligation when you offered such an accomodation to them.

I believe that this idea I imagined yesterday may be useful to you because it is my belief that the instigations you may be experiencing, if you are experiencing instigations, may cause you to have petty inclinations. This idea should help you manage those petty inclinations better, inclinations that are possibly induced by the instigations you may be experiencing.

[I’m going to stop now because the food I want to order is coming from a restaurant that will open at 11:00 AM. I’m going to watch a little pre-recorded tv before I go get the food. I should start again around 12:00 in the afternoon or so. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

It’s 12:04 PM EST for me. I’ve eaten an entire plain small pie, plus I have more food on standby. Food is not a problem for me today. To make that ‘5000’ uses idea more tenable for you to use, imagine a rich businessman using one of his rooms to put objects on that shelf that involve a certain recreational use. He can give it to civilians to use, but such objects require that he give them an explanation in order for civilians to use it. Also, he has to maintain a certain minor level of accomodation for those objects to work for other people. The ‘5000’ uses idea comes from an accomodation that is a lot simpler than that. For example, when the person explained to the other person who will use it what the accomodation was, whatever that accomodation was, that other person easily had an understanding as to how to use it. Keep in mind that the purpose of that ‘5000’ uses idea is to help you manage better possible petty inclinations that instigations may cause you to experience. It’s now your idea, of course, if you choose to use it. I’m just recommending that you initially see it that way to help you avoid some unnecessary worry.

Personal:

To start explaining idea ‘Personal’, here’s a reference from episode 3.2 ‘The Powers That Be’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Shadowhunters: The Mortal Instruments(2018)’. The episode is available for purchase Standard Definition streaming for about 2 dollars from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, Luke(Isaiah Mustafa) and Isabelle Lightwood(Emeraude Toubia) are talking. The reference starts 15 minutes and 47 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Luke: ‘I pulled some surveillance footage off the NYPD server of our nurse who got possessed.

Isabelle: ‘Tim Dempsey.’

Luke: ‘I got a feeling his possession isn’t just a crime.(Edited for advice.) Three crimes in 48 hours, all suspects good, decent folk suddenly becoming unhinged.’

Isabelle: ‘I’ll search the footage for the exact moment of Tim’s possession. It might take all night, but it’s worth a shot.’

Luke: ‘All right, take out on me.'(I’m assuming Luke is offering Isabelle all the food she wants to eat while doing that research.)

Keep in mind that when actually watching that scene, that the tv show ‘Shadowhunters’ is sci-fi fantasy. For one thing, they investigate and fight demons and monsters.

The reason I am talking about idea ‘Personal’ is because this is standard demographic advice. That means you shouldn’t need a special skill in order to use this advice. For example, it’s possible that one of the readers is a kid or a non-managerial employee. Idea ‘Personal’ is just based on what I believe to be true, but I do not have proof. It is my belief that it’s very possible that the instigations you experience are encouraging you to evaluate and resolve the instigations that you experienced using a personal mentality.

For example, I used the ‘Shadowhunters’ reference to show you how someone is relying on the resources of another to help resolve a crime. If you are a non-managerial employee experiencing instigation and you think about how instigators in your job are talked to by management, I believe it is safe to assume that management in general have other resources at their disposal to help resolve instigation related situations.

Here’s a situation that I imagined: An instigation case is brought to the attention to someone in management. Now, that person has the ability to try to evaluate and resolve the situation, but to do so involves getting more involved with the case, getting more personal with it. When that person talked to another person in management, he/she was advised to use standard investigating procedure, and not to get personal with the case. It’s safer that way.

So, even though it’s imagined, based on that story, there are those in management that have the resources to avoid an investigation that involves personal evaluations. However, since you may be a student or a non-managerial employee, you may feel inclined to resolve your experienced instigations using personal evaluations. You see, based on my imagined story, management in general has the ability to try to resolve an instigation related situation without getting personally involved, whereas you are inclined to resolve your own instigation experiences using personal evaluations. I believe that is something you should have the option to not need to do, because by using more personal evaluations, it is my belief that you will also commit to a more accelerated pace of evaluation, manipulated by the instigations that you experienced. For example, when you resolve minor situations that are not instigation related, the pace of evaluation involved for many non instigation related minor situations will be slower and more manageable than when resolving instigation related situations, which may tend to be faster and more erratic. The purpose of the advice I will type in will hopefully help you choose to use less personal evaluations when resolving instigation.

Inform:

Here’s a copy of idea ‘Inform’ from Wishlist #1146:

Inform:

Here’s the definition of ‘inform’ from www.dictionary.com that is used for idea ‘Inform’: ‘to give or impart knowledge of a fact or circumstance to’, and here is the sentence example: ‘He informed them of his arrival’. The only illustration example I can think of right now for idea ‘Inform’ is from the Netflix movie ‘Bright(2017)’, starring Will Smith as Daryl Ward, and Ike Barinholtz as Pollard. The scene is refurbished for advice with inaproprieities removed. Unfortunately, I am only aware of the movie being available for streaming from Netflix, and the streaming service is about 8 dollars a month. So, if you don’t want to use that Netflix service, I’ll try to explain it to you so that you don’t have to. The explanation, of course, will not replace the convenience of watching the illustration from a streaming service, but I’ll still try, like it’s part of my routine to just do it. So, according to Netflix, the scene starts 14 minutes and 10 seconds into the movie, Ward and Pollard are talking to each other in the locker room. Here is the quote:

Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.

Pollard: ‘That’s good. That’s good. Noted.’

16 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie:

Sergeant Ching(Margaret Cho): ‘No.’

Ward: ‘Yes. Put him in another car.’

So, the point is that, even though Ward informed Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, Pollard still continued to impress upon Ward his advice, and later, Ward requested to Sergeant Ching that he wanted another partner in his car. Ward still used Pollard’s advice, even though Ward clearly indicated to Pollard that he did not ask for his advice.

Now, what I discovered over a month ago is that an instigator may improperly impose upon you an adverse, confused interaction with your use of informing the instigator of an instigation that he/she wants you to experience. For example, an instigator is imposing upon you a participation that you did not want to experience, and you choose to inform that person that you are not participating. So, what the instigator may do is impose an adverse experience of informing upon you, for example, make it look and feel like you are interacting with the adverse participation, even though it is just your intent to inform the instigator that you are not participating. In the illustration example, Ward was informing Pollard that he did not want Pollard’s advice, and yet Ward eventually used it. Let’s say you’re a kid, and you already had some unacceptable experiences with another kid, and so when that kid introduces to that innocent kid another adverse participation, the innocent kid informs that kid that he/she does not want to participate. However, the kid with the unacceptable participation knows this, and compensates by imposing upon that innocent kid an adverse sense of informing, so even though that innocent kid is just informing that kid that he/she is not participating, the kid with the adverse participation still causes that innocent kid to experience an adverse somewhat confused sense of informing. You see, the effort used to inform becomes part of the instigation. It’s like what Ward said to Pollard. Refurbished for advice to avoid ambiguity, let’s say that Ward already knows the ‘bad’ advice Pollard usually gives, and that’s why Ward said this to Pollard:

Ward: ‘Did I…Did I ask you for advice? ‘Cause I’ll probably wait till I’m on my, like, ninth divorce, then you’re advice will come in really handy.

However, even though Pollard’s advice is trouble, Ward still uses it.

Part of the solution is that, if an instigator is improperly imposing upon you a participation that may cause you to inform that instigator that you do not want to participate, keep in mind that you are ‘just’ informing that instigator, and that you are not participating, even though you may sense that the informing itself may be a little precarious.

1/5/2019:

Interject inform:

Now, this is a new use of idea ‘Inform’. If you use this idea, ‘Inform’ means that certain instigations that you experienced may be interpreted as false impressions of informing that you did not agree to commit to. For example, idea ‘Punish inform’ identifies an instigation that is imposing an uninvited, out of context sense of punishment upon you, even though you did not do anything wrong. So, if you experience an interjection of punishment that is unwarranted, and you did not even agree to talk to that instigator, you may contemplationally say ‘Interject inform, I did not agree to use such a sense of informing.’, or just contemplationally say ‘Interject inform’, or just contemplationally say ‘I did not agree to use such a sense of informing.’

Although, it is a powerful medication for the treatment of Erectile dysfunction in males is Kamagra 100mg Tablets.Whether erectile dysfunction is caused by psychological problem or physical issues, in both conditions the Kamagra tablets help. buy sildenafil no prescription Otherwise, discount levitra it will invite lots of complications in the future. It improves length and girth of tadalafil online canada the male organ. Oral medications have also been of great help levitra professional samples to the patients regarding kidney disease then take an appointment of Dr.

Interject attention:

I’m using 2 references to explain idea ‘Interject attention’: The 1st reference is near the movie ‘Finding Forrester’. It’s from the reaction of Prof. Robert Crawford(F. Murray Abraham) near the end of the movie, as he tries to calm down the students. The movie is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that reference starts 2 hours, 2 minutes, and 24 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

William Forrester(Sean Connery): ‘Those words that I read today, I didn’t write them. Jamal Wallace did.’

(The students soon applauded.)

Prof. Robert Crawford: ‘Quiet. Shh. Shh. Quiet! Quiet, please! Be still. Shush, shush, shush! Quiet, please.’

Of course, you may watch more of that scene and more of the movie ‘Finding Forrester’ in relation to advice for further understanding. When I imagined Prof. Crawford saying it before I checked what the streaming movie said, I imagined quote:

Prof. Crawford: ‘Your attention, please!’

For this advice, I recommend you use ‘Your attention, please!’ instead of ‘Quiet, please!’

The 2nd reference is from episode 5.14 ’48 Hours’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate SG-1(2002)’. According to www.imdb.com, this episode contains the 1st appearance of Dr. Rodney McKay(David Hewlett). The reference involves a conversation between McKay and Major Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping) while they’re in the cafeteria. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and requires no additional payment if you have Amazon Prime. That reference starts 27 minutes and 49 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

McKay: ‘More than a third of the energy pattern that the gate requires to reintegrate Teal’c, it’s already gone.’

Samantha Carter: ‘I don’t think so.’

McKay: ‘You’re guessing wildly, like you always do.’

McKay: ‘Maybe you could find a way to fool the gate into reintegrating whatever it has stored in memory, but I say you won’t like what comes out.’

Carter: ‘Well, we’ll see.’

McKay: ‘Major, Teal’c is dead, and this argument is a waste of time because the Pentagon is gonna order Hammond to resume operations in what, like, 16 hours?’

Carter: ‘That’s how they came up with the 48-hour deadline, isn’t it? You told them Teal’c would already be dead.’

McKay: ‘That’s why it’s called a deadline.’

Carter: ‘God, you’re a jerk.’

Here’s a 3rd reference related to episode ’48 Hours’. It’s episode 10.11 ‘The Quest: Part 2’ also from ‘Stargate SG-1’. Samantha Carter is having a conversation with Ba’al(Cliff Simon). The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 32 minutes and 58 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Carter: ‘Look, I still think I’m right about the obelisk, but I can’t make heads or tails of it’s programming.’

Ba’al: ‘Well, that’s hardly surprising. I mean, I know where you come from you’re considered relatively intelligent, but by galactic standards, that’s not saying much. Wouldn’t you agree?’

Carter: (Punches Ba’al in the face)

I think that an obvious amount of mild to moderate instigations may be remedied by idea ‘Interject attention’. Idea ‘Attention’ identifies the identity of instigations that not only cause you to flinch, but also causes you to feel a certain repelling from the evaluation. According to www.dictionary.com ‘flinch’ means ‘to draw back or shrink, as from what is dangerous, difficult, or unpleasant.’ I got the word ‘attention’ from the phrase ‘I did not bring that up’, which also means ‘I did not bring that to my own attention’. So, when an instigator induces an instigation identified by phrase ‘Interject attention’, the instigation’s identity may cause you to flinch and also cause you to feel repelled by the experience. When you think of this idea’s references, it starts when Prof. Crawford from the movie ‘Finding Forrester’ says the words ‘Your attention, please!’ to the students. Next, you think of Samantha Carter talking to McKay in that ’48 Hours’ episode, when McKay says quote ‘You’re guessing wildly, like you always do.’ You then recall Samantha Carter’s reaction to McKay’s words.

So, basically, Samantha Carter’s reaction to what McKay said to her is a refurbished example of how a person reacts to an instigation identified by idea ‘Interject attention.’ You can also call it ‘Interject attention, I did not agree to commit to such a sense of informing.’ The 3rd illustration from episode ‘The Quest: Part 2’ is proof why Samantha Carter is a possible example for idea ‘Interject attention’. You see, I believe I watched all of the episodes of ‘Stargate SG-1’ that were publicly aired on tv, and according to at least 2 episodes that I watched, it is indicated that Samantha Carter has in the past punched men in the face when they harassed her. Episode ‘The Quest: Part 2’ gives you an obvious illustration of Samantha Carter hitting a man in the face. So, the question I am presenting to you is ‘Why didn’t Samantha Carter hit Dr. Rodney McKay in episode ’48 Hours’? What I think the answer is is that Dr. McKay is a civilian, and in the past, I think she would only hit other military male personnel. However, in my opinion, that’s what makes it worse for Samantha Carter, since her chosen restraint to not hit McKay also causes her to feel more discomfort and distress. Later Stargate episodes shows that Samantha Carter chooses to be friends with McKay, which also indicates that she regretted the way she treated McKay in episode ’48 Hours’, even though she didn’t actually hit McKay during that episode.

You may imagine someone pulling a bowstring so that you can associate that pulling of the bow, that tension, to the repelling you may feel when experiencing an instigation accurately identified by idea ‘Interject attention’.

Exist inform:

Now idea ‘Exist inform’ I think I created the idea either yesterday or today. It had to be after I was in the public laundromat yesterday. Before I tell you which episode specifically I was watching when I invented idea ‘Exist inform’, I want to say that, if you choose to use this idea, do not use the scene when Epzo(Shaun Dooley) is talking about his childhood. Keep in mind that, if you choose to watch that episode, Epzo is an alien, and you don’t really know what his chosen school of thought is. Of course, not really knowing what another person’s school of thought is is probably very common on Earth as well, but what Epzo said about his childhood I believe is inappropriate to know about for kids who choose to just watch a science fiction tv show. If the kids have supervision and have permission and a reasonable explanation associated to watching that scene, than many things are possible. However, without supervision, I believe a child might feel confused if he/she somehow ends up watching that scene. I just believe it’s unnecessary to watch for this advice, so therefore I recommend that you don’t watch the scene where Epzo talks about his childhood. That’s the scene when they are all on the boat. When they leave the boat transportation, then you can continue watching in the usual fashion.

That being said, the episode I watched as I invented idea ‘Exist inform’ is episode 11.2 ‘The Ghost Monument’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2018)’. The episode is available for purchase streaming for about 2 dollars Standard Definition from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 9 minutes and 27 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

The Doctor(Jodie Whittaker): ‘Do you two know what that is?’

Epzo: ‘It’s a tent.’

The Doctor: ‘Obviously, it’s a tent. I meant…Oh, never mind.’

When I watched that scene, I already watched episode ‘The Ghost Monument’ several times, going on to many times. I recorded that episode for future watchings. The key scene started 14 minutes and 9 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Ilin(Art Malik): ‘This entire planet has been made cruel.’

The Doctor: ‘Made cruel how? And by whom?’

Ilin did not answer The Doctor’s question. It looked like Ilin ignored The Doctor. And to verify that Ilin ignored The Doctor, the next scene starts 14 minutes and 35 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Ilin: ‘Your route trackers are over there. Good luck.’

The Doctor: ‘I know you prefer to ignore me, but what is it? This Ghost Monument?’

So, in an oversimplified context, while I was watching the episode ‘The Ghost Monument’, as the episode was leading to the main characters meeting with Ilin in the tent, I was thinking about what individuals give importance to, when they congregate. And as the main characters were talking to Ilin, I noticed that Ilin had a lot of self reliance and self importance about his own actions. Of course, this is made more obvious since he is in a ‘Doctor Who’ sci-fi episode. Also, Ilin did create and has full control of that contest, and the contest is probably being watched by others, giving Ilin some sort of reservation in his actions. So, before The Doctor was ignored yet again by Ilin, since I did already watch the episode several times, that was when I invented idea ‘Exist inform’, and here is it’s explanation: It is my belief that certain instigations may improperly impose a false commitment to your sense of thinking, a commitment that demands that your sense of thinking itself is required to allow a certain contemplation induced interjection to exist by the use of your sense of thinking itself. In other words, ‘I think, therefore I am’, but used as part of an inappropriate identity of an experienced instigation.

OK, here’s an example of ‘Exist involve’: How about a preceding reputation? Let’s say in high school or in the job, certain instigators want to establish in your mind a preceding reputation, so soon before and during, your sense of anticipation notices a preceding identity. With idea ‘Exist involve’, you may choose to mitigate that effect somewhat by identifying such a sense of preceding and such a use of anticipation as something your thinking does not have to validate in order to allow such a notion to exist. You may also say contemplationally ‘I did not agree to commit to such a sense of informing.’

It’s 4:08 PM EST for me now. I am going to stop now, proofread this idea, and close it. I believe it’s likely that you have something to work with now, even though of course if I put more time into it, I can improve it’s use to you. I plan to add another idea next Saturday, even though I have no idea as to what that idea will be. It could be a new idea I may invent the day before Saturday, or it could be an idea I am already aware of. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Shadowhunters: The Mortal Instruments’. TV-MA sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Bright’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Finding Forrester’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Stargate SG-1’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Doctor Who’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Interject inform’, ‘Interject attention’, and ‘Exist inform’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.(Of course, you can shuffle the words. For example, ‘Exist inform’ can be called ‘Invade aware’. I’ll make more ideas next week.)