4/27/2019
Salutations!
It is now 3:28 PM EST for me. The music video I’m recommending for this list is from song ‘Baby Who’ from American alternative band ‘The Aces’. Here is a quote from wikipedia about them:
‘ The band comprises of four members: guitarist Katie Henderson, bassist McKenna Petty, and sisters- drummer Alisa Ramirez, and lead vocalist and guitarist Cristal Ramirez. ‘
According to wikipedia, the music video ‘Baby Who’ was released July 27, 2017. I wasn’t able to find a new music video, so I used one of the 4 TRL tv shows I still have in the cable box. The TRL episode used was from episode 3.38 . I recorded it December of last year from channel MTVLH. This is the episode description: ‘TRL celebrates Halloween with Charlie Cox and The Aces’. The episode is hosted by Sway Calloway. To watch the episode for free, search for phrase ‘the aces baby who’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 197 thousand views. The music video was published by Red Bull Records, and it has a description of what the music video is about:
‘ This video is an intimate look at our lifelong friendship. The four of us spent the majority of our lives running around the neighborhood where this was filmed. We want you all to be able to experience the surroundings that shaped us as friends, as people, and a band. Directed by Al and produced by all 4 of us, here is the music video for ‘Baby Who’. ‘
Even though I still have the TRL episode, the episode only provides a partial recording of music video ‘Baby Who’. I watched the entire music video from youtube for the 1st time today. Here is a quote from the lyrics to song ‘Baby Who’:
I don’t need ya now
I don’t need ya now
Baby who?
Now you want me bad
But I don’t want you back
Baby who?
Cause I ain’t good with names
If you don’t feel the same
Baby who
Cause I don’t need ya now
I don’t need ya now
Baby who?
I believe for certain expectations this is going to be the best idea I’ve ever typed in. I believe it will set a new standard for those who choose to read this blog. However, since I also anticipate that people will use this specific Wishlist very seriously, it will probably ‘hit a nerve’, so to speak. So, the only thing I can think of now to help with that is a recommendation: Do you believe that there are people on Earth, not just America, that quit their jobs because of the instigations they experienced from certain co-workers? If the answer is ‘yes’, then that is where I recommend you get your continuity from. After all, I don’t think it’s possible that I can give advice to every school of thought out there. I still persevere, of course.
Before I begin, I want to give you an expectation sense of what I’m trying to achieve in this list from a movie reference. The comedy romance drama movie is ‘Boomerang(1992)’, starring Eddie Murphy as Marcus Graham, Geoffrey Holder as Nelson, and Robin Givens as Jacqueline Broyer. If you have Amazon Prime, the movie is available streaming from Amazon.com without additional payment. I’m going to use 2 scenes from the movie, and then refurbish it for this advice. The 1st scene according to Amazon Video starts about 1 hour, 12 minutes, and 4 seconds into the movie, Marcus and Nelson are having a conversation. Here is a quote:
Nelson: ‘Marcus. Excuse me. I need the storyboard for the Strange spots. I’m shooting next week.’
Marcus: ‘Shoot whatever you want to shoot.’
Nelson: ‘Whatever I want to shoot?’
Marcus: ‘It’s your show.’
Nelson: (laughs) ‘I have complete autonomy?’
Marcus: ‘You da man.’
Nelson: (laughs) ‘Thank you. Bless you. Bye.’
The 2nd scene starts 1 hour, 15 minutes, and 22 seconds into the movie, Jacqueline and Marcus are now talking. Here is the quote:
Jacqueline: ‘Well, the board wanted me to let you go. I convinced them to give you another chance.’
Marcus: ‘Well, as an employee, I thank you for saving my job, and I thank you for ruining my life.’ (Keep in mind that it’s refurbished in order to be used for this advice.)
Jacqueline: ‘Oh, come on, Marcus, I didn’t ruin your life. You ruined your life. I said this was gonna happen. I was just hoping it didn’t happen with you. (sighs) The only think I can suggest is perhaps you should take a few weeks off.’
Marcus: ‘Okay.’
So, based on my understanding of the movie ‘Boomerang’, Marcus made the mistake of giving full control of a project campaign to Nelson, something he would never choose to do under normal circumstances. However, since he was made more emotionally vulnerable, causing his judgment to be impaired, he gave Nelson full control. And when Nelson presented the proposal, that’s the 1st time Marcus realized what he had done. Because the proposal was insulting to the board of directors, they recommended that Marcus should get fired. However, Jacqueline vouched for Marcus, allowing him to still have his job.
So, the part that I recommend you imagine occurs before Marcus became emotionally distraught, when Nelson wanted to have more control of the ‘Strange’ project, and Marcus would continuously contemplanationally say ‘No’ to that. When I invented this part of the idea, that was when I realized that managerial employees involved with certain non managerial decisions have normal experience saying ‘no’ to non managerial employees for certain issues. It is that experience, saying ‘No’ a lot, that I believe allows managerial employees to manage instigations that they may experience from other employees better. I also imagined the possibility of allowing non managerial employees who have decided to quit, as a last option, to have a little managerial experience, the part where they are able to say ‘no’ to other employees, in order to allow them to possibly not choose to quit their jobs. I thought that may be relevant for you to know. I also imagined a number, 20%, that’s the amount of employees that such a possible program would allow such people who are going to quit to change their minds and choose to not quit, since such an experience may allow them to more tenably cope with instigation exposure. [5/11/2019: For the record, I wanted to delete that ‘20%’ idea, but at the time I typed it in, I thought it was a good idea, so I’ll leave it there. 5/11/2019]
So, here’s the situation from the movie ‘Boomerang’ that is between Marcus and Nelson that I imagined that I recommend that you sense: Nelson is presenting a ‘sense’ that he absolutely believes about the ‘Strange’ project that he wants Marcus to approve, let”s say that Nelson is always contemplationally saying ‘Yes’, but Marcus contemplationally says ‘No’ to that sense Nelson is presenting. In other words, Nelson is always saying ‘Yes’, and Marcus is always saying ‘No’. For example, practice contemplationally saying ‘No’ to certain mild notions that instigators seems to say ‘Yes’. And that’s it. Now, this is not the ‘answer’. This ‘Boomerang’ reference is designed to start you off. For example, you can think of this now, and then add the other ideas I plan to type in, and that will improve your contemplation ability to say ‘No’ to impressions of causality, for example, that you did not agree to bring up.
Response:
Idea ‘Response’ is based on the premise that nobody knows everything. So, when used in the context of advice for innocent people experiencing instigation, even if an innocent person is ‘in the right’, that doesn’t necessarily mean that your sense of innocence alone will be enough to resolve certain instigations that you may experience. So, what I will do is recommend 5 illustrations 1st, then I’ll explain those illustrations. Since I believe that kids may be reading this blog, although I don’t have proof that they are, but of course this is a public blog and a lack of proof may not matter, well, going back to saying ‘since I believe that kids may be reading this blog’, I imagined that such kids may be thinking about the illustrations many times. Therefore, the 1st 3 illustrations will be the illustrations I recommend that kids could easily think about, and the last 2 will be for ‘extra material’ contemplation, to further your own personal research. The last 2 illustrations won’t be as easy to think about as the 1st 3 illustrations.
The 1st illustration is in episode 4.13 ‘Devil’s Due’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1991)’. (I want to say that this episode was shown on tv for the 1st time over 28 years ago.) If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available streaming without additional payment. Here’s an episode description from Amazon.com:
‘ Picard fights to save a terrorized planet from a powerful woman who claims to be the devil. ‘
In the scene used for this advice, Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart) is in a court of law with Lt. Data(Brent Spiner) being the judge to try to prove that the woman claiming to be Ardra(Marta Dubois) is presenting a false identity. The scene according to Amazon Video starts 33 minutes and 18 seconds into the episode, Picard is talking to Data. Here is the quote:
Picard: ‘Your Honor, nothing in this testament proves that Ardra had the power to affect the lives of the Ventaxians. My opponent has failed to prove her case and I move that her claim be summarily dismissed.’
Data: ‘I find no cause to invalidate the contract at this time. The arbitration will continue.’
Ardra: ‘Your Honor, Captain Picard, as a new visitor to my planet, has been a consistent doubter of my abilities. I would like to ask him a few questions, if I may.’
Data: ‘It is highly irregular to question the opposing advocate but I see no reason to deny it. Proceed.’
Ardra: ‘Please do not take any offense to these questions, Captain. You know how fond I am of you.’
Picard: ‘Objection.’
Data: ‘Sustained. The advocate will refrain from expressing personal affections for her opponent.’
Ardra: ‘You do not believe my powers are real, do you?’
Picard: ‘No, I don’t.’
Ardra: ‘Then, sir, may I ask you to explain this?’ (the planet rumbles)
Data: ‘You are out of order.’
Ardra: ‘Or this?’ (Picard disappears)
Data: ‘The advocate will refrain from making her opponent disappear.’
(Picard reappears.)
Ardra: ‘Or this?’ (The woman saying that she’s Ardra then seemingly changes her appearance to look like what I guess the tv show is portraying to be some sort of familiar appearance of what the devil may look like) ‘Can you explain it, Picard?’
Data: ‘Any more disruptions and I will rule you in contempt of court. Is that understood?’
Ardra: (the devil appearance then seemingly changes back to the lady appearance portrayed by actress Marta Dubois) ‘I am sorry Your Honor, but can you explain it, Picard?’ (Ardra then uses her left hand and points as emphasis) ‘Yes or no?’
Picard: ‘No.’
Ardra: ‘I rest my case, Your Honor.’ (laughs)
[I know I started late, but it’s now 6:13 PM for me. I’ll try to continue this idea this coming Friday. If not, by next Saturday. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then. In case you want to know, there are moments when I believe that it is a lot easier for me to make the ideas contemplationally than to explain them in a reasonably learning context for others in the form of words in a public blog.
5/4/2019
Aloha.
(According to the www.google.com search engine, the Hawaiian word ‘aloha’ can be used as a greeting. The word ‘aloha’ is used as a greeting here.) It is now 10:00 AM EST for me. I have been trying to look for a mellow music video for over an hour and a half today, something that is relaxing. When I finally found a new one, I remembered the music video I considered for something else last year, and it seems to be both relaxing and supportive. That music video, which I am recommending for this list, is from the song ‘SOS’ by singer Cher. According to www.youtube.com, that music video was released Sep 18, 2018. To watch music video ‘SOS’ for free, search for phrase ‘sos cher’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 4 million views. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the music video:
” The video features a slew of women like actress Rumer Willis, singer Betty Who, Transparent star Trace Lysette, comedian Sabrina Jalees, Elena of Avalor voice cast Aimee Carrero and Crazy Ex-Girlfriend cast member Vella Lovell, styled by fashion director William Graper in a similar style to the original ABBA video.
SOS was also listed as the 18th best music video of 2018 by Paper. Roytel Montero said that “in a studied homage to the original ABBA classic from 1975, [the] interpretation of the video renders it a poignant call to female solidarity. “
Here is a quote from the lyrics of song ‘SOS’:
So when you’re near me, darling can’t you hear me
S. O. S.
The love you gave me, nothing else can save me
S. O. S.
When you’re gone
How can I even try to go on?
When you’re gone
Though I try how can I carry on?
Here is how I recommend you watch the music video ‘SOS’ by Cher: watch the entire music video once, then go back and start 43 seconds into the music video, and then you will see 4 women looking up sing the words: ‘So when you’re near me, darling can’t you hear me S. O. S.’ If you start watching the music video from there, the women in the music video present themselves with the music in a very supportive manner. You can just sit back and allow you mind to be supported by them.
As I said last week, I want to recommend to you 5 illustrations. I have already typed in last week the 1st one. The 2nd illustration is in the sci-fi movie ‘Starship Troopers(1997)’ starring Clancy Brown as Sgt. Zim, and Jake Busey as Ace Levy. I’m not sure, but I think he’s the one in the scene that was laughing. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com as a rental and a purchase, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 23 minutes and 48 seconds into the movie. Sgt. Zim is giving a speech to the new recruits. The quote is slightly refurbished for the advice. Here is the quote:
Sgt. Zim: ‘Most of you will not last in the Mobile Infantry. The trouble is, you are not good enough the way you are.’
Sgt. Zim: ‘Hands at your side! Chin up. I am your senior drill instructor, career Sergeant. Zim! Suck in that gut! Feet together! (groaning) To think this had to happen to me. What a bunch of apes. No! Strike that! You don’t rate that good. Never in my life have I seen…’
Ace Levy: (laughing)
Sgt. Zim: ‘Do you think I’m funny? Do I make you laugh? Do you think I’m a comedian, son?’
Ace Levy: ‘I’m sorry.’
Sgt. Zim: ‘The first words and the last words out of your stinking holes will be “Sir”! Do you get me?’
New recruits: ‘Sir, yes, sir!’
Sgt Zim: (while grabbing Ace Levy’s shirt) ‘You see that armoury? Run around it.’
Ace Levy: (moans)
Sgt Zim: ‘Run, I said! Run, run, run! Bronski, keep pace!’
Corporal Bronski(Teo): ‘Move, move!’
[It’s now 10:54 AM for me. I’m just going to look at the menu and order some food. I’m going to go out and pick the food up. So after I order, I plan to come back and type some more.
[It’s now 11:24 AM for me. I have ordered the food to be delivered. It should arrive within the hour.
The 3rd illustration is in episode 5.14 ’48 Hours’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate SG-1(2002)’. The episode is available for purchase streaming from Amazon.com. In the illustration, Major Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping) and Dr. Rodney McKay(David Hewlett) are talking. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 25 minutes and 35 seconds into the episode, Dr. McKay and Major Carter are talking in the cafeteria. Here is the quote:
Dr. McKay: ‘There’s no switch. The crystals are wiped clean by an unstable vortex of a forming wormhole, hmm? Do you have any idea how much excess energy one of those blasts gives off?’
Major Carter: ‘As a matter of fact, I do. Now, what we need to do is find a way to establish an event horizon without the vortex.’
Dr. McKay: ‘That’s impossible.’
Major Carter: ‘I’ve seen it done before.’
Dr. McKay: ‘What? By magical fairy beings? Is there lemon on the chicken?’
Food server(Ken Phelan): ‘It’s lemon chicken.’
Dr. McKay: ‘So it is. I am mortally allergic to citrus. One drop of lemon, and I will get very sick. I’ll have whatever that is. I have to be very careful.’
Dr. McKay: (sitting down with Major Carter) ‘So. What would this, uh, fictional event horizon be connected to?’
Major Carter: ‘Hungry?’
Dr. McKay: ‘Starving. Shockingly, this is even worse than it looks, but it beats a hypoglycemic reaction.’
Major Carter: ‘The event horizon is what dematerializes you and sends you into the wormhole. Now, maybe we don’t need to connect to a wormhole in order to form an event horizon.’
Dr. McKay: ‘Maybe, somehow, some way.’
Major Carter: ‘All we need to do is get the rematerialization process to work.’
Dr. McKay: ‘Major, even if you managed to create a viable event horizon without connecting to a wormhole, you’d never get the gate to reintegrate Teal’c.’
Major Carter: ‘Why not?’
Dr. McKay: ‘The crystals that retain the energy pattern before reintegration, they’re not like magnetic hard drives.’
Major Carter: ‘I know. They’re crystals.’
Dr. McKay: ‘Well, you can’t just ignore the laws of Thermodynamics. Entropy dictates that the crystals won’t retain their energy patterns permanently. I’ve measured it. It’s what’s called quantitative evidence.’
Major Carter: ‘I think the energy itself is unimportant past it’s initial imprint on the crystals.’
Dr. McKay: ‘And this fantasy is based on?’
Major Carter: I suspect the gate is storing it’s ones and zeroes on a subatomic level within the structure of the crystals, so even though the energy is dissipating, the most recent pattern still exists.’
Dr. McKay: ‘You suspect?’
Major Carter: ‘We’re dealing with a level of quantum physics here that is way beyond us.’
Dr. McKay: ‘More than a third of the energy pattern that the gate requires to reintegrate Teal’c, it’s already gone.’
Major Carter: ‘I don’t think so.’
Dr. McKay: ‘You’re guessing wildly like you always do. Maybe you could find a way to fool the gate into reintegrating whatever it has stored in memory, but I say, you won’t like what comes out.’
Major Carter: ‘Well, we’ll see.’
Dr. McKay: ‘Major, Teal’c is dead, and this argument is a waste of time because the Pentagon is gonna order Hammond to resume operations in what, like, 16 hours?’
Major Carter: ‘That’s how they came up with the 48-hour deadline, isn’t it? You told them Teal’c would already be dead.’
Dr. McKay: ‘That’s why it’s called a deadline.’
Major Carter: ‘God, you’re a jerk.’
Dr. McKay: ‘I wish I didn’t find you so attractive. I always had a real weakness for dumb blonds.’
Major Carter: ‘Go suck a lemon.’
Dr. McKay: ‘Very sexy. Very, very sexy.’
As part of the 3rd illustration, I recommend a scene in episode 10.11 ‘The Quest: Part 2’ from tv series ‘Stargate SG-1(2007)’. In that scene, Lt. Col. Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping) is asking Ba’al(Cliff Simon) for help. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 32 minutes and 48 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Lt. Col. Samantha Carter: (clears throat)
Ba’al: ‘What do you want?’
Lt. Col. Samantha Carter: ‘I need your help. Look, I still think I’m right about the obelisk, but I can’t make heads or tails of it’s programming.’
Ba’al: ‘Well, that’s hardly surprising. I mean, I know where you come from you’re considered relatively intelligent, but by galactic standards, that’s not really saying much. Wouldn’t you agree?’
Lt. Col. Samantha Carter: (punches Ba’al in the face)
How many of you remember your favorite song, only because it was associated with the passion and emotion buy viagra in uk of your first love? Affirmation showers are extremely effective, but you need a group that showers you with a continual bombardment of positive, affirming statements about your wonderful self. Tadalafil, the discount order viagra primary ingredient of this medication, acts as a PDE-5 inhibitor. The in-depth information about what you wish check this store sildenafil cheapest to do. High level of testosterone in the body always means better and harder erection for men cialis 40 mg in the bedroom.The 4th and 5th illustrations just represent generalistic illustrations to think about. If you choose to, you can think about them specifically, but I’m not obligating you to do that. The 4th illustration is basically about the character Courtney Woods(Ellis George) portrayed in the Doctor Who(2014) tv series. I’m recommending only references from episode 8.6 ‘The Caretaker’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2014)’, which is available streaming from Amazon.com, and if you have Amazon Prime, there is no additional payment required. However, the character Courtney Woods also has a link in www.wikipedia.org, and I am going to offer you a quote from that link:
‘ According to Courtney’s character profile, she is billed as “She’s cheeky, opinionated and a disruptive influence…” and it was also said “She can be a nightmare and when Clara first joined the school’s teaching staff, Courtney delighted in giving her a hard time.
On Clara’s first day as a teacher, she threatened to kick all of the students out of school. Courtney challenged her threat, replying with, “Go on, do it.” Clara was inspired to use the same tactic against the Half-Face Man when he threatened to kill her.
Courtney teased the secretary in the school about her flirtations with Danny.
She once told Clara she couldn’t focus on her work because Clara’s face was “too wide”. Clara related this story to Danny on their first date. ‘
The 1st quote starts 36 minutes and 14 seconds into the episode, when Danny Pink(Samuel Anderson) talks to Courtney’s parents, Mr. Woods(Winston Ellis) and Mrs. Woods(Gracy Goldman). Here is the quote:
Danny Pink: ‘I would say yes, I’m afraid Courtney is a disruptive influence.’
Mr. Woods: ‘Yeah, but last year you said she was a very disruptive influence.’
Mrs. Woods: ‘So I suppose that counts as an improvement.’
The next quote starts 10 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode, Courtney Woods and Clara Oswald(Jenna Coleman) are talking. Here is the quote:
Courtney Woods: ‘Miss Oswald, Katie Sharps says I pulled her hair in biology.’
Clara Oswald: ‘Courtney, you are big enough to look after yourself. Next class. Jog on. I need to talk to Mr. Pink.’
Courtney Woods: ‘Ozzie loves the squaddie!’
Clara Oswald: ‘What was that?’
Courtney Woods: ‘Nothing.’
In this 3rd quote, The Doctor(Peter Capaldi) meets Courtney Woods, and Courtney Woods says something again to Clara Oswald. That scene starts 15 minutes and 32 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Courtney Woods: ‘You’re weird.’
The Doctor: ‘Yes, I am. What about you?’
Courtney Woods: ‘I’m a disruptive influence.’
The Doctor: ‘Good to meet you.’
Courtney Woods: ‘And you.’
The Doctor: ‘Now get lost.’
Courtney Woods: ‘OK.’
Courtney Woods: (greeting Clara) Hello, Miss, love to the squaddie.’
Clara Oswald: ‘Sorry, what did you say?’
The 5th illustration, refurbished with inaproprieities removed, is basically Jimmy’s(Jeremy Sisto) antics in the movie ‘Break Point(2014)’. Here’s a quote about Jimmy’s character from a review from web site www.rogerebert.com:
‘ Jimmy (Sisto) is a 35-year-old tennis player who can’t find anyone to partner with him anymore because he’s undisciplined, aggressive, and a self-destructive party animal.
Jimmy, who has alienated everyone else in tennis, approaches his brother to partner with him for the pre-qualifying tournaments for the Open. Darren is wary but succumbs, not before making Jimmy promise to get his act together, stop drinking, and shape up. Jimmy moans and whines, throws massive John McEnroe-ish tantrums on the court. ‘
Verify:
Before I start, I want to say that, when I usually would make these ideas, I would give them a priority use in my mind. It would have a ’15 minutes of fame’ situation. Soon afterwards, though, I would invent another idea that would soon replace the current idea. I started this list with an idea I invented 2 to 3 weeks ago called ‘Verify’. Basically, it is my belief that certain instigations may encourage you to contemplationally verify certain identities of the instigation presented to you. I guess the definition of ‘verify’ I am using from www.dictionary.com is ‘to point the truth of, as by evidence or testimony; confirm; substantiate’, and the example is ‘Evidence verified his prediction.’ Here’s an example I just imagined less than a minute ago. In Wishlist #1153, I offered you the idea called ‘Material pursuits’. Basically, the meaning of ‘Material pursuits’ used here is that you are not supposed to know the material pursuits for certain job related participations. Otherwise, such an awareness may inhibit somewhat your ability to do your job. Let’s say that you’ve been working with such a job for about 6 months, and you don’t know the material pursuits of the others that are in such a project. Now, for some reason, someone instigated an awareness of some sort of material pursuit that you are not supposed to be aware of. Therefore, what you choose to do, since you are not supposed to know the material pursuits of others in that project, you chose to not verify in your mind such a contemplation interjection, and to continue working with such people without knowing what their material pursuits are.
I may not have mentioned it before, but even though I don’t have proof, I suspect that certain material pursuits of others may inhibit somewhat the job performance of those who are not prepared to reasonably evaluate such pursuits. That is why the company/business/etc. may not want you to be aware and interact with such pursuits, simply because it would take you too long to acclimate to just thinking about such material pursuits. I don’t want to give any specific examples, because I only speculated such a concept to begin with. And to be clear, I am not talking about not knowing the material pursuits of anyone completely. This is in regards to jobs that don’t want you to know the material pursuits of those involved because you would probably not be able to reasonably acclimate to such a knowhow. And idea ‘Material pursuits’ is just one example for idea ‘Verify’.
Response:
Some time after I invented idea ‘Verify’, maybe a day later, I invented idea ‘Response’. Idea ‘Response’ was originally a category for idea ‘Verify’. Idea ‘Response’ is when you are not able to create an acceptable solution response for a certain instigation and/or inadvertency, and the inability to not have an acceptable solution response for such an instigation has troubled you from time to time. That is what the 5 illustrations are for, for idea ‘Response’. So, I’ll explain them one by one:
For the 1st illustration, episode 4.13 ‘Devil’s Due’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1991)’, the idea was to show you a person who absolutely believes in a certain conviction, but his belief was not enough to create a preferred solution response to a certain dilemma. In this case, even Jean-Luc Picard, a Starfleet Captain, was not able to give an acceptable solution response to the lady pretending to be Ardra. It’s been years since I watched this episode, but if memory serves, the Enterprise crew eventually was able to prove that the lady was not Ardra, but a woman that was part of a big con. Her and the others she worked with exploited certain beliefs of certain civilizations. After they would take what they could within a certain period of time, they would move on to the next civilization that they could exploit. However, I think that discovery happened later in the episode. What’s important for this illustration is that Picard could not give an acceptable solution to the dilemma presented by the lady that calls herself Ardra. Here is the quote again:
Ardra: (the devil appearance then seemingly changes back to the lady appearance portrayed by actress Marta Dubois) ‘I am sorry Your Honor, but can you explain it, Picard?’ (Ardra then uses her left hand and points as emphasis) ‘Yes or no?’
Picard: ‘No.’
Ardra: ‘I rest my case, Your Honor.’ (laughs)
So, when you recall the 1st illustration, I recommend that you think of Picard saying the words:
Picard: ‘No, I cannot explain it.’
The 2nd illustration is in the sci-fi movie ‘Starship Troopers(1997)’ starring Clancy Brown as Sgt. Zim, and Jake Busey as Ace Levy. I said this story before in a previous list, about what happened when Ace Levy could not stop laughing. So, here it is again: this is in regards to when Sgt. Zim said this statement:
‘ To think this had to happen to me. What a bunch of apes. No! Strike that! You don’t rate that good. Never in my life have I seen…’
When the new recruits heard what Sgt. Zim said, they all felt like laughing. All of the new recruits also knew they were not supposed to laugh. So, when Ace Levy could not stop laughing, the rest of the new recruits contemplationally leaned on Ace Levy, to allow themselves to not laugh, since none of them have enough military experience to allocate that sense of laughing that they all feel. They used what they had learned when they were in their home towns to stop laughing. If I were to choose just one example to represent idea ‘Response’, this ‘Starship Troopers’ example would be it, since none of the new recruits were supposed to laugh, even though they all feel like laughing. They don’t have enough military experience to more tenably not laugh, causing them to not have an acceptable solution response for their dilemma.
When you contemplationally reference this ‘Starship Troopers’ illustration, I recommend imagining one of the main characters laughing. You may choose the character Ace Levy laughing, for example.
[It is now 3:55 PM for me. I am going to stop now, and continue this list either this coming Friday, or next Saturday. I feel a little rushed typing this in now. I’ll probably finish this idea next week. I think the hardest part explaining this idea is over, which is typing those 5 illustrations. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.
5/11/2019
Aloha!
It is now 8:11 AM EST for me. 1st, here’s the music video I recommend. It is from the song ‘Out Of Love’ by Canadian singer and songwriter Alessia Cara. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the song and music video:
‘ The song was inspired by a friend of Cara’s who had a breakup. It is an “airy, slow and personally deep” song, which was created after a friend asked Cara to write a song about “somebody falling out of love with you”. ‘
‘ The music video was released in April 2019. ‘
‘ Cara performed “Out of Love” on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon on December 4, 2018. ‘
And here’s a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Out Of Love’ from www.azlyrics.com:
There’s not a thing I could say
Not a song I could sing
For your mind to change
Nothing can fill up the space
Won’t ask you to stay
But let me ask you one thing
Oh, when did you fall out of love, out of love?
Oh, when did you fall out of love with me?
I chose the music video ‘Out Of Love’ because I wanted a music video that was relaxing to watch, something to slow the pace down. Sure, it’s about someone ‘falling out of love’ with someone, but the music video and music itself can be refurbished in a context that can also be relaxing to watch. Isn’t that what ballads are commonly used for, music that is relaxing to listen to? I also recommend that you watch music video ‘Out Of Love’ to help you relax, not to take literally.
To watch music video ‘Out Of Love’ for free, search for phrase ‘alessia cara out of love’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 5 million views. The music video premiered Apr 4, 2019. Wow. Over 5 million views in about 1 month.
Before I continue, I want to address that concert performance of Carly Rae Jepsen that I recommended that you watch in Wishlist #1170, specifically, certain lyrics from the song ‘Run Away With Me’:
I’ll be your sinner in secret
When the lights go out
1st, I want to say that I made a mistake. I’m not going to sugar coat it.
2nd, I was so into the effect that my idea created, I did not even sense that such lyrics may bother some people in the near future. It wasn’t until I think within a week ago that I sensed that some? people would realize that the lyrics ‘ I’ll be your sinner in secret When the lights go out ‘ is inappropriate to use. So, to reiterate, I admit that I made a mistake, that I did not take that into consideration. That being said, if you are bothered by those lyrics, I recommend that you let me help you make those lyrics more tenable for you. We can start by keeping in mind that it is a song originally made to be about relationships, and it is sung by Carly Rae Jepsen. Also, people tend to refurbish music to suit their own lifestyles. For example, here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about song ‘Every Breath You Take’ written by Sting:
‘ Sting later said he was disconcerted by how many people think the song is more positive than it is. He insists it is about the obsession with a lost lover, and the jealousy and surveillance that follow. “One couple told me ‘Oh we love that song; it was the main song played at our wedding!’ I thought, ‘Well, good luck.’ ‘
And of course, even though I made a mistake, it was my intent that the concert performance for song ‘Run Away With Me’ by Carly Rae Jepsen were to be used for this advice.
It is my belief that the ideas I may type in in the near future may help you allocate experiences better. If you continue to read this blog, you may be able to allocate certain elements of this advice to suit your needs better, if you choose to. For example, if I make another obvious mistake, if you choose to, you may choose to remove it on your own using what you will soon learn. I already believe that people who use English as a 2nd language already ‘take apart’ these ideas right in the beginning. It is not something new to them to remove things from the advice in this blog, since they already take the whole advice apart to begin with. They probably also consider it’s original form, but they probably get more out of it when they take it apart.
It is my belief that, if kids are reading this blog, than many of them are probably Catholic school kids. I read somewhere that the Catholic religion is the most popularly practiced religion in America. So, I attended Catholic grammar school and high school, and based on my experience, attending Catholic school, among other things, is like living with and using many rules that you don’t even think about. That’s probably why I sensed that some? of the kids would eventually find those lyrics inappropriate, some time after it’s obvious effect wears off. And so, to help mitigate the experience, if you decide to continue watching the concert performance of song ‘Run Away With Me’ by Carly Rae Jepsen, I recommend that you use that line Jupiter Jones(Mila Kunis) used, refurbished of course, in sci-fi movie ‘Jupiter Ascending(2015)’. The movie is available as a streaming rental and purchase from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 22 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:
Jupiter Jones: ‘My clothes?’
Caine Wise(Channing Tatum): ‘Um, you were still in the paper clinic gown.’
Jupiter Jones: ‘Eh, (shakes her head) can’t really think about that right now.’
Of course, when you think about using that phrase, it is done without Jupiter Jones holding the sci-fi space gun. The reason why I’m recommending that you use that phrase is that you may choose to feel Jupiter Jones contemplationally ‘push back’ the fact that Caine Wise changed her clothes while she was unconscious. Of course, it was done in some sort of movie created special circumstance. Still, Jupiter Jones does not accept fully what Caine Wise did, which is why she chose not to address what happened at that moment. You can refurbish Jupiter Jones’ ‘push back’ to be used on that phrase:
I’ll be your sinner in secret
When the lights go out
If you choose to still watch that song performance, you can think about what Jupiter Jones said to Caine Wise, refurbish her ‘push back’ to ‘push back those song lyrics, and wait for more advice to show up in this blog that I believe with help you allocate better interpretations that you deem unacceptable. It’s like a temporary band-aid, until better advice shows up. And of course, if I had known in advance that this would? happen, I would have said something about it before you watched that concert performance, and it would not be as much of a problem, since you would have compensated for it in the beginning.
Since I have already admitted that I have made a mistake, I would like to say in my defense that I recommend that you see my intent for recommending to you to watch that concert performance. For example, when people are learning, and they’re new employees, one may think that intent is a priority to perceive new employees, since it may take a while, maybe even a few years, before they have learned to cultivate a certain acceptable level of job performance. And so, even though I have made a mistake, maybe you should evaluate me more based on my intent of action, and the mistake that I have made may not be as bothersome. Also, keep in mind that when you interact with other blogs, web sites, etc., such venues of information may not be as considerate as I am trying to be, and that lack? of consideration could be normal for them. In other words, I don’t want you to expect that sense of consideration you get here in other normally acceptable places that do not present such consideration. And of course I believe there are also other places that present even better consideration than the consideration used in this blog. I believe within reason it can be useful to you to have a variety of experiences regarding information you reasonably use from the internet.
I plan to add something in Wishlist #1170 about this, for the future kids. I’ll do that later. [5/11/2019: I plan to do that next week. It’s already 5:57 PM for me. 5/11/2019]
Emphasize:
Before I continue, I want to give you some prospects, something to encourage you to read this list, that it may be useful for you to read. I chose to explain somewhat idea ‘Emphasize’ to you, an idea I invented yesterday, and it’s the most up to date use of idea ‘Verify’ that I have invented. Idea ‘Emphasize’ is an idea that I am actively using now. Basically, idea ‘Emphasize’ identifies what people contemplationally emphasize when pursuing the acquisition and use of certain opportunities. It is my belief that certain instigations adversely affect how an innocent person emphasizes the pursuit of his/her opportunities. For example, an innocent person may pursue the acquisition of certain opportunites, with the belief that he/she must also confront and manage better certain instigations that he/she believes is associated with such pursuits of such opportunities. And so, to help people have a more healthy, more reasonable use of of emphasis use, I invented an idea that uses the movie ‘The Big Year(2011)’, the character Stu Preissler portrayed by celebrity Steve Martin. The idea is based on a refurbished purpose of what a CEO(Chief executive officer) does, more specifically, on what Stu Preissler does. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about Stu Preissler from the movie ‘The Big Year’:
‘ Stu is the founder and CEO of an enormous Manhattan-based chemical conglomerate which he built from the ground up, starting in his garage. After decades of corporate success, he is ready to retire to Colorado with his architect wife. Fear of an empty schedule led him to come back from a previous retirement, but now he wants to leave his company in the hands of his two lieutenants (Kevin Pollak and Joel McHale). The company is in the middle of complicated negotiations to merge with a competitor, so his two anointed successors keep calling him back to New York for important meetings; ‘
And so, yesterday, this is how I imagined CEO Stu Preissler for idea ‘Emphasize’: As Mr. Preissler is running his company, there are other opportunities that are created by it’s association with his company, that continue to build up and prosper, but he doesn’t use such opportunities. In fact, he does not even contemplationally participate with the emphasizing of such opportunities. Some of those opportunities involve some of his employees, other opportunities are only perceived by other CEO’s of other companies. Such opportunities are normally associated with company growth. However, even though Stu Preissler does not use such opportunities, he still does his job very consistently. For example, here is a quote from the streaming movie ‘The Big Year’ from Amazon Video. The scene starts 38 minutes and 7 seconds into the movie, Barry Loomis(Joel McHale) is talking to his boss, Stu Preissler:
Barry Loomis: ‘Look, you gave these people their jobs. If you don’t do something, they’re gonna lose them. And that means a heck of a lot more than some birds.’
Based on my imagination, when CEO’s retire and sell their companies, their companies are in a form that is tranferrable, that other companies can use. What is also true is that those retiring CEOs are the only people that can use their former companies a certain way. CEO’s develop both their unique use of their companies, and they maintain and improve it’s transferability. And in the movie ‘The Big Year’, Stu used his unique knowledge of his company to allow those people to keep their jobs for another 4 years. Without stretching the imagination any further, Stu Preissler was the only man that was capable of allowing those employees to keep those jobs, since no one knows his company more than he uniquely does.
So, even though Stu Preissler does not use such accumulating in growth opportunities associated with his company, his CEO job still does a lot of contributing for his company.
[I am going to stop right now and order some Chinese food. I plan to be back typing in 2 hours. I’ll see you then. It is now 11: 04 AM EST for me.
It is now 12:33 PM for me. Going back to the ‘Emphasize’ idea, imagine that Stu Preissler automatically does not use contemplationally the emphasis associated with certain opportunities associated with his company. In a manner of speaking, Stu just does his job. Now, in your situation, whether you are a kid, teenager, or an adult, instigations may improperly impose a sense of emphasis in it’s identity. Let’s say, of course, you choose not to commit to the instigation that also has an adverse sense of emphasis. It could be how you identify such an experience that is exploited by the instigator. Let’s say that innocent people do not know how instigation works in their minds. So, even though you choose by intent to not commit to certain instigations, certain instigations still contemplationally bother you, and as you pursue the use of certain emphasizings in order to acquire and achieve certain opportunities, certain instigations seem to contemplationally be associated with such emphasizings. That is why I offered you the ‘Stu Preissler’ example, so that you may get an idea as to how to not give credence to such adverse emphasizings imposed by certain instigations you may have experienced.
Idea ‘Emphasize’ is also meant to be associated with other ideas. It may take me a month to give you a more preferred explanation of idea ‘Emphasize’. Until then, you can use idea ‘Emphasize’ now, so that you will be more prepared with a more developed answer of ‘Emphasize’ that I plan to give you incrementally.
One more thing about idea ‘Emphasize’: I am imagining that, if you were actually a CEO, you wouldn’t need such an obvious contemplation technique in order to not give credence to certain emphasizings. You simply? would just do your job, and it would happen automatically.
I’m now going back to the 3rd illustration, episode 5.14 ’48 Hours’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate SG-1(2002)’. I think it is in this scene that Major Samantha Carter made her 1st major contemplation effort to more tenably interact with Dr. Rodney McKay. The problem with that possible truth is that, for Major Carter, her 1st efforts are not enough to create an acceptable solution response. I recommend that you watch that scene to notice how Major Carter is reacting to Rodney. I’m not obligating you to, but if you watch(ed) the future episodes where Major Carter interacts with Rodney McKay, they eventually become friends. It is my opinion that a lot of that effort comes from Major Carter. Until then, that ’48 Hours’ scene is an example of Major Carter not being able to make an acceptable solution response.
It’s lemon chicken:
[5/17/2019: So, if you choose to contemplationally use phrase ‘It’s lemon chicken’, you are recommended to use it to recall the ’48 Hours’ Stargate SG-1 tv show scene. I changed the original phrase chosen to ‘It’s lemon chicken’ because I imagined that some kids had trouble contemplationally/thinking about it. Besides, the phrase ‘It’s lemon chicken’ was also used in that ‘Stargate’ scene, and in my opinion, it’s a lot easier to think about. 5/17/2019]
I’m recommending phrase ‘It’s lemon chicken’ to use so that you can contemplationally reference the ’48 Hours’ scene. The scene where that phrase comes from starts 26 minutes into the episode, Rodney is talking to the food server(Ken Phelan). Here is the quote:
Rodney: ‘Is there lemon on the chicken?’
Food Server: ‘It’s lemon chicken.’
Rodney: (laughs) ‘So it is. I am mortally allergic to citrus. One drop of lemon, and I could get very sick. I’ll have whatever that is.’
So, the quote is from the Food Server.
Food Server: ‘It’s lemon chicken.’
Before I continue, I want to explain that when Major Carter said to Rodney the phrase quote:
‘Go suck a lemon.’
I thought she just wanted Rodney to experience something sour, a minor insult. That’s what I thought she meant for years. It wasn’t until less than a week ago that I realized that Major Carter could have been referring to what Rodney said earlier. Here is the quote:
‘I am mortally allergic to citrus. One drop of lemon, and I will get very sick. I’ll have whatever that is. I have to be very careful.’
‘ …Shockingly, this is even worse than it looks, but it beats a hypoglycemic reaction. ‘
So, when I started explaining that scene, I thought the phrase
‘Go suck a lemon.’
was just used for Samantha Carter to be insulting, not to reference his allergy to lemons.
To be fair, even though Dr. Rodney McKay was being obnoxiously inconsiderate towards talking to Major Samantha Carter, they are the 2 most resourceful scientists that the Stargate program has actively available. They are the only 2 that can even remotely criticize each other’s work using a certain expectation of expertise, and if something happens to one of them, then the other one may be the only possible back-up. That is why Major Samantha Carter is making a massive effort to talk to Dr. Rodney McKay. She knows this to be true, and so she is allowing herself to receive constructive criticism from Rodney. However, what she also wants to do is punch Rodney in the face, which is why I also offered episode 10.11 ‘The Quest: Part 2’ from tv series ‘Stargate SG-1(2007)’, when Samantha Carter punched Ba’al in the face. You see, it’s part of Samantha Carter’s personality. If you insult her in a certain predictable manner and you are a man, she may actually punch you in the face. Samantha Carter knows that Dr. Rodney McKay is a civilian, and does not have any combat experience. In fact, I don’t think anyone in the Stargate program has ever punched Rodney. However, a lot of them, including other scientists, do find interacting with his personality rather annoying and bothersome.
The 4th illustration is basically about the character Courtney Woods(Ellis George) portrayed in the Doctor Who(2014) tv series. I’m recommending only references from episode 8.6 ‘The Caretaker’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2014)’ I wanted to give you an illustration example of a person saying something to another person, and that other person could not give that person a preferred solution response. Since what Courtney Woods said to Clara Oswald is kind of wonky(is that a word?) and incoherent, I didn’t want you to make an excessive effort to memorize what she said. Here are the 2 examples where Courtney said something to Clara, and Clara could not give her a preferred response:
Courtney Woods: ‘Ozzie loves the squaddie!’
Clara Oswald: ‘What was that?’
Courtney Woods: ‘Nothing.’
And here’s the 2nd example:
Courtney Woods: (greeting Clara) Hello, Miss, love to the squaddie.’
Clara Oswald: ‘Sorry, what did you say?’
It’s now 4:18 PM for me. Because there’s so much information in this list, I’ve decided to finish this list and make a new one. I’ll just continue what I am typing here in the next one. So, here’s the solution using the 5 illustrations for idea ‘Response’. From kids to adults, you may have experienced a certain few instigations that you don’t have a preferred solution response for. That is why I offered you those 5 illustrations. In all 5 illustrations, people have experienced situations that they have no preferred solution response for. The 1st 3 illustrations were selected because of it’s convenient way to think about them. In the 1st illustration, you may contemplationally think about Picard saying ‘No.’, or ‘No, I cannot explain it.’ In the 2nd illustration, you may think of one of the new recruits laughing uncontrollably. And in the 3rd illustration, you may think of Major Samantha Carter saying ‘Go suck a lemon.’
The solution for idea ‘Response’ is is to choose to stop using those few instigation related dilemmas that you do not have a preferred solution response for. One possible reason that you are bothered by those few dilemmas is because they may be designed to cause you to sense a specific bothersome familiarity that normal? instigation from school or work does not provide. For example, if you would recall again such few instigations that have no preferred solution response from you, notice that it’s out of context and not relevant as it pertains to what should be in school or work. For example, the situation reminds me of Star Trek Ferenghi money called gold-press latinum. The material called latinum is what’s valuable. The gold only suspends/holds the latinum. The instigator/s that wanted you to experience such an instigation wanted such an experience to be suspended in you mind. So, just contemplationally say the word ‘Response’, and choose to no longer use/resolve such an out of context experience, since you have made the logical conclusion that you do not have a response for it. Just stop interacting with it.
Based on my experience, you should have a positive response for maybe 2 or 3 past instigations that have an odd out of context identity to be bothered by. I recommend that you use idea ‘Verify’ as something that provides incremental benefit. Each new idea I recommend to you may provide incremental progress for you.
I have already made more ideas that are for idea ‘Verify’. If you don’t think the idea worked for you, this is not the entire idea. It started with idea ‘Verify’, continued with idea ‘Response’, and then I made other ideas. So, I recommend that you read the other ideas 1st that I plan to type in before you make a final decision on the quality of idea ‘Response’.
Rated R mature themes and language for comedy drama romance movie ‘Boomerang’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Rated R graphic sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Starship Troopers’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Stargate SG-1’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Doctor Who’. Rated R language and viewer discretion for movie ‘Break Point’. Rated PG language and viewer discretion for movie ‘The Big Year’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Verify’, ‘Response’, ‘No, I cannot explain it.’, ‘It’s lemon chicken.’, and ‘Can’t really think about that right now.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.