5/21/2019

Aloha!

It is now 4:33 PM EST for me. I feel normalish now, but something happened again to my lower back this past Saturday, 5/18. The next day, I remembered what the doctor told me when I experienced acute low back pain, the doctor from the hospital. She said to not stay in bed. Move around as much as you reasonably can. So, I stayed on my feet for over 4 hours, and I watched a tv show that was streaming on Amazon.com. The next day, Monday, I felt pretty good, but I still managed to schedule to see the back doctor that day. The treatment that was agreed upon was to do another epidural, but for the right side of my lower back, since that was the side of my back that was bothering me this past Saturday and Sunday. That treatment was scheduled for this coming Thursday. And even though I feel like I can go to work, I don’t want to take a chance that the back problem may occur while I am working. Also, since my back injury was relatively recent, I’ll just take a few days off to be on the safe side, get the epidural Thursday, and then I can just go to work without any problems.

The reason I said that is because that means I can spend more time in this blog. I started late today, but I have hopes that I can finish at least this list by tomorrow. I think I spend over and hour looking for this music video. I finally checked in www.youtube.com the category ‘Top 40 Songs of The Week’ for May 25, 2019 from the UK BBC Chart from TopMusicMafia. Just search for phrase ‘topmusicmafia UK May 2019’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered. It provides a very short preview of the music video associated with most of the 40 songs, and from that preview, I selected music video ‘Just You and I’ by Scottish singer-songwriter Tom Walker. According to the preview, it is #14. www.wikipedia.org says very little about the music video. Here is the quote:

‘ The music video was directed by Ollie Wolf and was also released in January 2019. It features a couple who wake up handcuffed together. ‘

The 2 reasons I recommended the music video ‘Just You and I’ is because, 1)according to wikipedia and the preview, the song itself seems to be liked by many people, and 2)I thought you might be interested to see 2 people trying to move around in public handcuffed together. If you choose to watch the music video, than here are a few comments: I thought it was interesting seeing them using the bathroom together. The music video showed the man trying to be courteous and considerate as the woman was sitting on the toilet. Later, as they were outside, notice that they could not place their jackets on completely, since they were handcuffed. 1 minute and 20 seconds into the music video, I think it was the singer Tom Walker himself who tried to walk by them, but since they were handcuffed, the moment was kind of awkward for the couple to let him pass. At the end of the music video, I’m not sure, but I think it’s the locksmith that showed the couple the solution to their problem. You may find it interesting to watch the music video, to see how 2 people interact publicly while handcuffed.

To watch music video ‘Just You and I’ for free, search for phrase ‘just you and i tom walker’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 22 million views. It was published on Jan 11, 2019, over 4 months ago. Here’s a quote from the lyrics:

‘Cause my darling, you and I
Could take over the world
And one step at a time,
Just you and I
(Just you and I)
‘Cause you’re the only one,
Who brings light just like the sun
One step at a time
Just you and I
(Just you and I)

I watched the music video ‘Just You and I’ for the 1st time less than an hour ago.

Add more time:

I’m assuming that if you are reading this blog, than it’s likely that you have your own personal technique to govern certain experiences, including instigations. Idea ‘Add more time’ tries to address what may happen if you are in the process of making a logical discovery, but the instigation and/or inadvertency that you have experienced is discouraging you from completing that discovery awareness. For example, when you are learning things that are related to what you are supposed to learn in school and work, you are somewhat accomodated to learn those things. However, how is your personal technique accomodated? If you are making a certain idea using your personal technique, and let’s say circumstantially the instigator knows you are contemplationally discovering something, than it’s possible that the instigator may make it difficult for you to complete that discovery in your mind by imposing an adversely demanding short time frame expectation for you to complete such a discovery in your mind. For example, while you are making such a discovery, the instigator at school or at work interrupts you, and that interruption imposes a short time frame expectation for you to complete that discovery.

If you choose to use this advice, the solution I recommend when you are in such a situation is to keep in mind to add more time to your attempted discoveries of learning, for the discoveries that you choose to add time to. That way, in my opinion, you will be able to learn more, even though the instigation(s) experienced discourage you from doing so. If you choose to use this idea, based on my experience extrapolated, it’s going to feel awkward at first. It is my belief that being able to sense the awkwardness and/or discouragements within reason that discourage you from adding time to certain attempted discoveries will allow you to have more tolerance to add more time to such attempted discoveries in the future.

The only illustration I can think of right now that supports my proposed idea to you, refurbished of course, is in episode 1.10 ‘The Corbomite Maneuver’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Original Series(1966)’. If memory serves, the Enterprise cannot defend itself against a certain alien ship, and so, Captain Kirk(William Shatner) is trying to bluff his way out of trouble. According to www.dictionary.com, in reference to the card game Poker, the word ‘bluff’ means ‘to deceive by a show of confidence in the strength of one’s cards’. Here is a quote from that scene from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ Asked for his opinion, Spock compares the situation to a game of chess: “When one player is outmatched, the game is over.” Kirk, inspired by an argument with McCoy, replies that the answer is not chess, but poker. He then tells Balok that the Enterprise contains “corbomite”, a protective substance that automatically destroys any attacker. Balok apparently falls for the ruse and does not destroy the ship. ‘

The scene is available streaming from Amazon.com. If you have Amazon Prime, that scene is available without additional payment. The scene starts 29 minutes and 40 seconds into the episode, Kirk tries to talk to the alien Balok(Clint Howard) by giving Balok his Corbomite warning. Of course, I recommend that you actually watch that scene, refurbished for advice, but I’ll also type the words in:

Kirk: ‘This is the Captain of the Enterprise. Our respect for other life-forms requires that we give you this warning. One critical item of information that has never been incorporated into the memory banks of any Earth ship. Since the early years of space exploration, Earth vessels have had incorporated into them a substance known as corbomite. It is a material and a device which prevents attack on us. If any destructive energy touches our vessel, a reverse reaction of equal strength is created, destroying…’

Balok: ‘You now have two minutes.’

Kirk: ‘…destroying the attacker. It may interest you to know that since the initial use of corbomite more than two of our centuries ago, no attacking vessel has survived the attempt. Death has little meaning to us. If it has none to you, then attack us now. We grow annoyed at your foolishness.’

Soon after Kirk said that to Balok, Spock(Leonard Nimoy) said these words to Kirk, 31 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode:

Spock: (shaking his head to indicate that it did not work) ‘However, it was well played.’

—

It’s not an exact match, but even though Kirk was interrupted, he still continued to explain to Balok his corbomite warning. You even have Spock complimenting Kirk’s efforts:

Spock: ‘However, it was well played.’

I’d say, refurbished for advice, that it’s a useful scene to look at, if you are considering to add more time to certain pending discoveries.

[It’s 6:55 PM EST for me now. I’m going to stop now and continue tomorrow. I should be able to at least finish this list by tomorrow. Maybe I’ll even finish another list by tomorrow.

5/22/2019

Salutations!

It is now 7:22 AM EST for me. Before I begin, I want to say that yesterday’s illustration, Star Trek’s ‘The Corbomite Maneuver’, is not to be used literally. To be direct, it is not my intent to teach kids to lie. In my opinion, when people say to each other that ‘you’re bluffing’, and Kirk was bluffing to Balok, bluffing in my opinion can be interpreted as just another variation of what a lie is. In the episode, the Enterprise does not have any corbomite ability. The reason I offered you that illustration, refurbished, is so that you can add more time to your attempted contemplation discoveries. For example, when Balok said quote: ‘You now have two minutes.’, that interrupted Kirk’s corbomite explanation. However, even though Kirk was interrupted, he still continued to explain his corbomite warning to Balok. Spock even complimented Kirk’s efforts. Balok’s interruption, refurbished, can represent an instigator interrupting your ability to contemplationally make a discovery, and you can use Kirk’s continued efforts to explain as an example to allow yourself to have some added time to your own efforts to continue your contemplation based discoveries, even though you were interrupted by an instigator, and the interruption can represent a more specific reason as to how the instigation discouraged your ability to make discoveries. I am not trying to teach you to lie. According to www.dictionary.com, a ‘lie’ is ‘a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood’.

Before I give you my recommendation for today’s music video, I want to say that I made this music video acceptable for me to watch by using an idea that I originally invented for experiencing certain instigations. It’s an idea that I plan to explain in the next list or the list after that. Using an oversimplified explanation, this idea allocates verifying identities that may seem definitive in your contemplation responses to what you are exposed to perceive, or what you choose to perceive. Although it’s original purpose is to use it on instigation and it’s related inadvertencies, apparently to me you can also use it for example if you have chosen to change your perspective, and you are still acclimating to certain aspects of that new perspective. And that’s what I’ve done to the music video that I’m about to recommend to you. Of course, according to the sources available to me in the internet, it’s a popular music video, and it’s a popular song. However, like many things in life, it’s usefulness is also determined by the beholder. So, if you chose to watch the music video, but you don’t like it, you may choose to like it with the new idea I plan to give you 1 or 2 lists from now.

I found the music video in www.youtube.com using category ‘Top 40 Songs of The Week’, May 25, 2019, the same category used yesterday. Today, I choose #20, and the music video is from song ‘Talk’ by American singer Khalid. Here is a quote about song ‘Talk’ from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ “Talk” became Khalid’s fifth top 10 hit in the US, peaking at number 8 on the Billboard Hot 100. ‘

‘ Khalid described “Talk” as the first taste of his second album, with the song’s theme being “the beginning honeymoon stages of a relationship”. Rap-Up said the song finds the singer “navigating the waters of a relationship” ‘

Wikipedia doesn’t say anything about the music video for song ‘Talk’, and when I watched it for the 1st time earlier today, I saw a lot of synchronized dancing, and I saw a few images of a couple that looks like they plan to get married eventually. At 1st I had trouble accepting the music video for this blog because of the consistent red used in the beginning of the music video. But after I used my new idea, I liked watching it. It just took me 20 seconds or so to allow the idea’s use to allocate certain verifying definitives that I experienced, that I chose to allocate.

To watch music video ‘Talk’ for free, search for phrase ‘talk khalid’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 73 million views. The music video was published on Mar 11, 2019, over 2 months ago. And here is a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Talk’:

Can’t we just talk?
Can’t we just talk?
Talk about where we’re goin’
Before we get lost
Lend me your thoughts
Can’t get what we want without knowin’
I’ve never felt like this before
I apologize if I’m movin’ too far

—

See (urge):

It’s now 9:46 AM for me. I’m going to start explaining idea ‘See (urge) using a story of a person who is using the ‘Sour face’ idea I gave in Wishlist #1038. In my opinion, idea ‘Sour face’ is probably the best primer idea I’ve invented. I imagined that the kids that read and used that idea experienced an epiphany that lasted over 2 months on the average. So, here’s the explanation: Let’s say an adult that chose to use the idea ‘Sour face’ after several years, while that adult experienced something while working, that adult’s facial expression resembled something that could be described as a ‘sour face’, and that adult thought to himself/herself ‘At least the sour face idea still works.’

Now, that adult has been using that ‘sour face’ idea ‘on and off’ for at least 2 years now. According to this blog, I offered that idea on March 9, 2016. From time to time, even though the ‘sour face’ idea still works, there are moments when it doesn’t work at all. For example, when experiencing a minor instigation, it doesn’t have to be a direct conversation, but it is still something that is experienced at work, it is as if the experience of that minor instigation goes right into that adult’s brain, and that adult cannot stop it. I identified such an experience by using words ‘See (urge)’. Soon after you use that idea, you may eventually just contemplationally call it ‘See’. You may identify such an instigation and/or inadvertency as something that you are ‘seeing’, something that is identified by your ability to perceive.

The best illustration example I can think of is from the movie ‘Topsy-Turvy(1999)’. It’s from actor Steve Speirs’ performance as Mr. Kent. Unfortunately, Amazon.com and google.play don’t have the movie available streaming. Other services may have it, but they require you to install their software in order to watch it. Purchasing the movie ‘Topsy-Turvy is available from Amazon.com, but that’s about 30 dollars, and I’m not recommending that you need to buy that movie, especially at that price. So, the best I can do now is explain Mr. Kent’s performance from memory and refurbished for advice. I can provide a quote from www.imdb.com. To find that actual quote, just select movie ‘Topsy-Turvy’ from www.imdb.com, click ‘See full cast’, and near the bottom, you should find Steve Speirs, then click his character’s name, Mr. Kent, and that should lead you to a quote link from www.imdb.com for the movie ‘Topsy-Turvy’ that has Mr. Kent. I’m just giving you a partial quote:

Mr. Kent : I am not a party to this, Mr. Gilbert.

Gilbert : Ah, Mr. Kent, as ever the sole voice of reason!

—

Based on how I remember the movie ‘Topsy-Turvy’, when Mr. Kent complains, his complaints tend to ‘rock the boat’, so to speak. He complains in a situation when others are listening, and even though a few of the men in that situation try to diffuse Mr. Kent’s complaining with a few jokes, Mr. Kent’s complaining tends to give the impression of threatening the jobs of those who listen to his complaining. And for some reason, the other employees who are listening cannot stop Mr. Kent’s complaining from going right into their heads. Movie ‘Topsy-Turvy’ has a link in www.wikipedia.org. The movie takes place in 1884 England. It’s like the tv show ‘Downton Abbey’, if you know what that is.

So, if you experience an instigation that seems to go right into your minds, even though you have a technique to deal with it, you may contemplatonally still identify it by using the phrase ‘See’, that you are able to ‘see’ it, that your sense of perceiving identifies it. It is like an urge to see it, but it’s an urge that you don’t want to commit to. The definition of ‘urge’ I’m using from www.dictionary.com is ‘to exert a driving or impelling force; give an impulse to hasten or action: And the sentence example is: ‘Hunger urges.’

This incomplete physical meeting then results in various ways like irritation, frustration and after a certain extent can worsen the relationship status.Kamagra is cialis no prescription cheap a very effective and worthy form of anti-impotence medication that works identical to other resources that are available online, in order to assist you to evaluate and assess the driving skills and situations are explained with the help of a pill as there. Cream, pill or capsules, they all act as canadian cialis online libido boosters and target the offending problem in specific ways. Make sure you do not exceed the amount of DHT, however it also buy viagra for women lowers the desired aspects, that DHT will bring. Such a type medications have received the approval certification of the versatile these viagra ordination drug institutions like Food & Drug Association (FDA) & many other pharmaceutical companies.

—

False sense/impression of knowing:

Not enough: Lack: Not adequate:

False physical response:

All right. For this list, these are the last 3 ideas that I’ll explain before I close it and start the next list: 1)’False sense/impression of knowing’, 2)’Not enough: Lack: Not adequate’, and 3)’False physical response. I already explained ‘False sense/impression of knowing’ in Wishlist #1172, and idea ‘False physical response’ is a different idea from idea ‘Response’ that was explained in Wishlist #1171. Once you know both meanings, you can call them both ‘Response’ if you want to. What I did here was try to create 3 separate categories, 1)’False sense of knowing’, 2)’Not enough…’, and 3)’False physical response’, instead of putting everything in the category of ‘False sense of knowing’. All 3 categories are still part of the ‘Verify’ idea that I introduced to you in Wishlist #1171. Once you know all 3 categories, you can contemplationally shuffle the phrases to cope with instigation. Here’s the explanation for the 2nd category, ‘Not enough…’:

Not enough: Lack: Not adequate:

It is now 12:39 PM for me. I ordered and ate some Chinese food. When I invented idea ‘Not enough’, I used a scene from one of the James Bond movies starring Pierce Brosnan as James Bond. I thought the name of the movie was ‘The World Is Not Enough(1999)’, and I remember that I imagined many adults watching the music video intro of movie ‘The World Is Not Enough’ many times in order to find some sort of hidden meaning, or use it to make their own, inspired meanings for the instigation woes that they may have already experienced. And that is how I used the illustration in my mind. I thought the illustration was in the movie ‘The World Is Not Enough’, and that helped me to create idea ‘Not enough: lack: not adequate’. I just found out less than half an hour ago that I was wrong. The actual illustration is in the movie ‘Die Another Day(2002)’. So, I’ll tell you where the actual illustration is, and you may choose to put it together like I originally did.

You don’t have to buy the streaming movie from Amazon.com. These James Bond movies are probably available to rent from your cable tv service for a lot cheaper than purchasing it from Amazon.com, or you can just program you cable box to see if it’s available to record. If you watched it already, you can just use the description I’ll give you. So, the movie is available as a streaming purchase from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 59 minutes and 30 seconds into the movie. The scene starts with Gustav Graves(Toby Stevens) talking to James Bond and Miranda Frost(Rosamund Pike), but the actual scene is when James Bond and Miranda Frost are talking. Here is the quote:

Gustav Graves: ‘Look, I’m putting on a little scientific demonstration in Iceland at the weekend. Icarus? Perhaps you could join us. Miranda, make the arrangements, would you?

Miranda Frost: ‘Once I’ve smoothed things over with the club.’

Gustav Graves: ‘What would I do without you?’ (Gustav Graves leaves, allowing Miranda Frost and James Bond to talk.)

James Bond: ‘Can I expect the pleasure of you in Iceland?’ (I’m assuming that when Mr. Bond said ‘pleasure’, he meant that Miranda Frost just attending the demonstration with the possibility of him talking to her in an acceptable context as it relates to the demonstration in Iceland would be a pleasant experience.)

Miranda Frost: ‘I’m afraid you’ll never have that pleasure, Mr. Bond.’

James Bond: (Bond responding as if he was hurt by what Miranda Frost had just said).

That is the illustration response refurbished for advice used for idea ‘Not enough’, ‘Lack’, and ‘Not adequate’, when James Bond responded as if he was hurt by what Miranda Frost had just said. Even though his response may at 1st seem juvenile and immature, when you choose to use ideas ‘Not enough’, ‘Lack’, and ‘Not adequate’, you may extrapolate upon his response. For example, James Bond is a government agent, even though that authority is only a depiction in a James Bond movie.

I find it difficult right now to explain idea ‘Not enough’, since I’m now using a new idea that doesn’t seem to require it’s use. I’ll try to explain it later.

False physical response:

Idea ‘False physical response’ was made from a scene from movie ‘Unfinished Business(2015)’. I’ll just make a copy of the quote from Wishlist #1172:

‘ It is from the comedy drama movie ‘Unfinished Business(2015)’, starring Vince Vaughn as Dan Trunkman, and Ella Anderson as Bess Trunkman. In this illustration, Bess Trunkman is asking her dad, Dan Trunkman, a question. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 9 minutes and 50 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Bess Trunkman: ‘Can I ask you a question before you go?’

Dan Trunkman: ‘Oh honey, my plane’s gonna– Is it a little question?’

Bess Trunkman: ‘Kind of.’

Dan Trunkman: ‘Okay, yeah. What is your little question?’

Bess Trunkman: ‘When I go to school, I don’t like to go to school at all. It makes my stomach hurt. The jokes hurt my feelings. I cry in the bathroom, and pretend to poop for… I don’t know, two hours.’

Dan Trunkman: ‘That’s not even… I mean… Is that a question? Okay, I know that school can be hard, honey. But you gotta go, or you’ll be a moron.’ (Dan then kisses his daughter’s forehead) ‘

—

The 2nd illustration helps with the explanation. That is near beginning of movie ‘Ready Player One(2018)’, when Wade Watts/Parzival(Tye Sheridan) is explaining what it’s like to collect coin and artifacts while playing the virtual game. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 6 minutes and 8 seconds into the movie. The people showed playing the game is what’s being used here, so it’s recommended that you watch that scene. Here is the quote:

Wade: ‘Artifacts. Those were key. Halliday made sure the OASIS was littered with enough randomly powered stuff that anyone could win if they had the skills. Matches and artifact hunts are a good way to coin-snatch, but depending on your level or armor, they’re risky. You see, everyone starts the same, but the more coin you make…’

boy: ‘Mom! Mom!’

Wade: ‘The more you level up. If your avatar in the game gets killed, your avatar can come back to life…’

Woman talking to her son: ‘Go get your dad!’

Wade: ‘…but you lose all your stuff. Everything you’ve ever worked for. All your money. Your clothes.’

Girl in bedroom at house(Sydney Browser): (after losing in game, she screams)

—

What Bess Trunkman said to her father, Dan Trunkman, in movie ‘Unfinished Business’, was what I used to make idea ‘False physical response’. Here is the quote:

Bess Trunkman: ‘When I go to school, I don’t like to go to school at all. It makes my stomach hurt. The jokes hurt my feelings. I cry in the bathroom, and pretend to poop for… I don’t know, two hours.’

This is the idea that I made from what Bess said: One of the reasons why Bess had trouble recovering from the jokes she experienced from a few of the other kids in school is that the jokes did not involve any physical contact from those other kids. So, when she tried to recover from those jokes, since there was no physical contact involved, she had difficulty trying to recover from an interaction that involved no physical contact. In other words, she was trying to resolve the question ‘How do I try to resolve being sick from an experience that had no obvious physical response involved?

The answer is that she did have a physical response involved. Like she said to her dad,

Bess Trunkman: ‘When I go to school, I don’t like to go to school at all. It makes my stomach hurt. The jokes hurt my feelings. I cry in the bathroom, and pretend to poop for… I don’t know, two hours.’

All that discomfort that she explained to her dad were physical responses that she experienced from those few kids that said those jokes to her. But because there was no actual physical contact involved, she could not make the connection that those jokes caused her to have those physical responses. To help understand what I just said, just look at that scene that I quoted from movie ‘Ready Player One’. I think the best scene is when the girl in the bedroom portrayed by actress Sydney Brower screamed after she lost her avatar in the game. She clearly had an obvious physical response to losing in the game, even though the impression of events in that virtual game did not actually happen in real life.

The solution I discovered is that those mild to moderate physical responses you get from certain mild to moderate instigations, if such instigations are out of context and not relevant, such as the ones experienced from school and at work, you are not obligated to commit to such physical responses. The reason why I think many people inadvertently commit to such physical responses is because there is no actual physical contact with the instigator as the innocent person experiences such physical responses caused by that instigator. I recommend you contemplationally say the phrase ‘False physical response’ so that you can more tenably choose to not commit, to not get involved, with such a misleading physical response. Of course, you still actually experienced a physical response, and if you need to recover from that, then reasonably do so. [5/22/2019: I am ‘now’ talking…5/22/2019] I am talking about the fact that the instigator is trying to define what that physical response is meant to be in your mind. For example, the kids that said those jokes to Bess Trunkman, clearly the impression that Bess Trunkman received from those few kids was that those jokes were meant to be insulting, and she was not supposed to feel good when she evaluates it’s associated physical response. An instigator causing you to experience a physical response is one thing; how you choose to evaluate that physical response can be another, separate thing, if you choose to do that.

So, to try to explain it another way, when an instigator causes you to have a physical response, and the response is from an out of context instigation, you can choose to not obligate yourself to that obvious impression that instigator wants that physical response to mean to you. In the very least, try to lessen it’s adverse effect! Just contemplationally say the phrase ‘False physical response’ to check if that physical response is bothering you, so that you can manage it better.

[It is now 3:55 PM EST for me. I am going to start proofreading this list, and then I’ll close it today. I don’t think I’ll start the next idea today. Since I’ve already had an epidural for the lower left side of my back, based on that experience, having an epidural for the lower right side of my back should be about the same amount of time. Of course, I’m not sure, but it’s not like there’s any stitches involved or anything. I’m having the epidural done tomorrow, and if all goes well, I can even go back to work the very next day. You don’t have to answer this, but I have a question for you, if you choose to have it: Do you think that me having the scheduled epidural tomorrow has anything to do with the idea that I plan to type in tomorrow? I speculate that my mind and my body is anticipating the procedure tomorrow, and that influenced my ability to explain whatever it is that I am going to explain tomorrow. I mean, it’s not like I just made the idea up recently. However, I did invent parts of it recently, and the basic idea of it I did invent only a few weeks ago. I am saying this to you so that you can have more to work with for your discoveries.

TV-PG for sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek’. Rated R mature theme and viewer discretion for movie ‘Topsy-Turvy’. Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for action thriller movie ‘The World Is Not Enough’ and ‘Die Another Day’. Rated R mature themes and viewer discretion for movie ‘Unfinished Business’. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Ready Player One’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Add more time’, ‘See (urge)’, ‘False sense of knowing’, ‘False impression of knowing’, ‘Not enough’, ‘Lack’, ‘Not adequate’, and ‘False physical response’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.