6/29/2019

Salutations!

It is now 8:27 AM EST for me. In the last list, I forgot to mention how I did with the gel I used on my heel, as prescribed by the sports medicine doctor. I stopped using it several weeks ago, and the heel of my right foot feels a lot better than how it felt for several months before that treatment. I don’t know if that problem with my heel would come back, so I’m keeping the gel just in case. If it does come back, I plan to use the gel only before I go to work, and not before I go to sleep. I believe that, last time, I used too much of it. So, basically, if you see a sports medicine doctor for a pain you may be experiencing coming from the heel of your foot, I recommend that you just put one application on your heel area only before you go to work, and do not put any before you go to sleep. Based on my experience, that stuff is powerful! Keep in mind that, based on my experience, it’s medication that’s designed to only be used for maybe a few weeks, and after that, the heel of your foot should feel a lot better, and then you stop using it. I recommend that, if you feel like 90%+ better, that you stop using it. Don’t keep using it for a complete recovery in the beginning. Use it for a few weeks, enjoy the fact that the heel of you foot feels mostly recovered, then stop using it. After a while, let’s say a month or so, if you want to treat that 10% that still bothers you, then do so sparingly. Just apply a dose of it during the day, and then after a week, stop using it again. I don’t believe that medication is designed for regular use. Of course, consult with your sports medicine doctor about how to use it. And to be clear, I don’t believe you should use that medication regularly. In the beginning, only use it for a few weeks, and then after a month, for the 10% that may still bother your heel, use it for only a week. It’s not like the stuff you may see in the commercials, stuff that you can just apply to your skin. You’re supposed to use it for only a short period of time, then stop using it.

I decided yesterday to not proofread Wishlist #1178 today. I plan to proofread #1178 and today’s list next week, if I finish it today.

—

The music video that took me over an hour to finally select is from song ‘Never Really Over’ by American singer Katy Perry. I’m recommending that you only watch certain selections of the music video, not the entire music video. As usual, the song is popular, so the selections address the music video itself. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the music video:

‘ Sal Cinquemani of Slant Magazine praised the style and cinematography of the music video. He called it “a playful and imaginative portrayal of love’s intoxicating spell and the lengths some of us will go to exorcise ourselves of it.”

The video has been noted for its cultural references to hippie era and artistic similarities to New Age symbolism. Suzy Byrne of Yahoo! noted the video’s spiritual themes and called Perry a “New Age goddess”. She praised the concept and claimed that it was a “well-choreographed video”. ‘

And here is a quote from the lyrics to song ‘Never Really Over’:

Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over
And if I think it over, maybe you’ll be coming over again
And I’ll have to get over you all over again
Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over
And if I think it over, maybe you’ll be coming over again
And I’ll have to get over you all over again

—

Although I considered the music video once earlier today from a different category, I finally decided to use it from another category. The category is from www.youtube.com. I 1st selected the publisher, ‘DSC Top music charts’, and from the publisher’s link, I selected category ‘UK Top 40 Singles Chart, 28 June 2019…’, and from a preview selection of 40 music videos, Katy Perry’s ‘Never Really Over’ was #12. I then typed in ‘katy perry never really over’, and it was one of the 1st selections offered, with over 64 million views. That’s amazing to me, since the music video was published May 30, 2019, only about a month ago!

So, here’s how I recommend you watch music video ‘Never Really Over: Basically, just watch the scenes when Katy Perry sings the words:

Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over
And if I think it over, maybe you’ll be coming over again
And I’ll have to get over you all over again
Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over
And if I think it over, maybe you’ll be coming over again
And I’ll have to get over you all over again

You can also watch the ending of the music video for closure.

I chose music video ‘Never Really Over’ because it’s new, and I didn’t want to spend too much time looking for a music video for this blog. I think the song is great, but I originally don’t like the music video because I thought it was boring to watch from start to finish. However, if you only watch certain moments of it, then you may find it entertaining, in my opinion. So, here are the scenes I recommend that you watch: I recommend that you watch it in ‘Theater mode’. The 1st ‘Just because it’s over’ lyrics start 58 seconds into the music video, then you stop watching it 1 minute and 17 seconds into it. The 2nd ‘Just because it’s over’ scene starts 2 minutes and 6 seconds into the music video. The 3rd ‘Just because it’s over’ scene starts 3 minutes and 4 seconds into the music video. These are the scenes where Katy Perry and the dancers seem more motivated. You can then watch the few seconds at the end of the music video.

—

Represent reply:

Before I begin explaining the new ideas to you, I want to show you what you’re going to get yourself into. I want to present to you a proposal. If you like the proposal, then that’s when I’ll begin explaining the idea. If you read Wishlist #1178, the ‘Not notify’ idea, (if you want to, you may also call it ‘The Orville’ idea), then I believe you may be able to understand this next idea. So, here’s the proposal. It begins with an illustration: The illustration is from a recent episode of crime drama mystery tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’ starring Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock Holmes, and Lucy Liu as Dr. Joan Watson. Before I begin, I want to explain to you how I came about choosing that illustration. Friday morning, as I would prepare my clothes for the laundromat, I would watch a pre-recorded episode of ‘Elementary’. Now, since I’m trying to do both prepare my clothes and watch that episode, certain scenes from that episode would catch my attention, and I would stop preparing my clothes to watch that scene. I think I’ve been doing something like that for years every time I would prepare my clothes for the laundromat. As far as I know, I’ve watched every episode of ‘Elementary’.

So, here’s the scene for idea ‘Represent reply’ used as a proposal: That scene is from episode ‘Command: Delete’ from tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’. In that scene, NSA Agent McNally(Tim Guinee) is blackmailing Sherlock into not getting into Odin Reichenbach’s(James Frain) way. That scene, of course, is edited for this advice. It begins 40 minutes and 34 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Agent McNally: ‘This is everything I’ve put together on you over the past couple of years. Open it up. You’ll see a lot of familiar names. Captain Thomas Gregson, his daughter Hannah, his wife Paige, Detective Marcus Bell, his girlfriend Chantal, Kitty Winter, her son Archie. Let’s see, there’s someone I’m forgetting, isn’t there?’

Sherlock: ‘Is there?’

Agent McNally: ‘Yeah. Dr. Joan Watson.’

The next scene starts 41 minutes and 11 seconds into the episode:

Agent McNally: ‘Our friend doesn’t want to hurt any of you….Don’t get in his way.’

—

The definition of ‘represent’ I am using for this advice from www.dictionary.com is ‘to stand or act in place of, as a substitute, proxy, or agent does’, and the example is ‘He represents the company in Boston.’ Another definition I am also using is ‘to exhibit the characteristics of’, and the example is ‘Romanticism in music is represented by Beethoven.’ Here is the scene I am specifically using from ‘Elementary’:

Agent McNally: ‘Let’s see, there’s someone I’m forgetting, isn’t there?’

Sherlock: ‘Is there?’

More specifically, when Sherlock said:

Sherlock: ‘Is there?’

—

Based on my interpretation of that scene, Agent McNally caused Sherlock to have a committed sense of reply to a specific sense of representing. In at least almost all of the episodes of ‘Elementary’, Sherlock is always interacting with people that are not telling the truth to him, whether it be the criminals avoiding jail, or other people not telling the truth for other reasons. That is why Sherlock is professionally familiar with people presenting false representations of themselves, and some of those people also encourage Sherlock to reply to a certain commitment of representing. This is the best example I am aware of of a person committing to a sense of reply to a specific representing. I recommend that you look at that scene. Look at Sherlock’s face when he said ‘Is there?’ That face represents a man who has experience with false representings, and yet, even he chooses to reply to a certain representing.

If you choose to learn idea ‘Represent reply’, then you can be a little like Sherlock. You can manage better when an instigator improperly presents to you an inclination to commit to a sense of reply that is coming from you that encourages you to make a commitment to a certain sense of representing. That is the definition of ‘Represent reply’. This is just a proposal. Even though I’ve given you the definition of ‘Represent reply’, there are a few ideas that will give such an idea more effectiveness. So, if you want to learn idea ‘Represent reply’, I shall begin explaining it next.

Various studies have been conducted, and tadalafil sales there is still a no-no as it can lead to tooth decay. With super cheap viagra homeopathy, all of the ingredients are always natural substances diluted many times over. Patients with severe kidney infections may require hospitalization with treatment with intravenous fluids and antibiotics. order generic levitra deeprootsmag.org Why did he not quit sooner? The threat of death was not upon him and thus denial reduced the tension order viagra prescription enough so “habit” had its way.

—

Not my sense of knowing: Not knowing:

It’s now 1:00 PM EST for me. I took a break and ordered pizza. To explain idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’, I’m using 2 illustrations from movie ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens(2015)’, starring Harrison Ford as Han Solo, John Boyega as Finn, and Lupita Nyong’o as Maz Kanata. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the 1st illustration starts 54 minutes and 59 seconds into the movie, Finn and Han Solo are talking to each other. Here is the quote:

Finn: ‘Hey, Solo, I’m not sure what we’re walking into here…’

Han Solo: ‘Did you just call me Solo?’

Finn: ‘Sorry. Han. Mr. Solo. You should know…I’m a big deal in the Resistance. Which puts a real target on my back. Are there any conspirators here? Like, First Order sympathizers?’

Han Solo: ‘Listen, Big Deal. You got another problem. Women always figure out the truth. Always.’

—

The 2nd illustration starts about 5 minutes later, 1 hour and 55 minutes into the movie. Solo and Finn are talking to each other, and Maz Kanata and Finn are talking to each other. Here is the quote:

Finn: ‘What’s this? What are you doing? Solo, what is she doing?’

Han Solo: ‘I don’t know. But it ain’t good.’

Maz Kanata: ‘If you live long enough…you see the same eyes in different people. I’m looking at the eyes of a man who wants to run.’

Finn: ‘You don’t know a thing about me.’

—

In the 1st illustration, Finn was confiding with Han Solo. They don’t know each other, which is why Han Solo said quote: ‘Did you just call me Solo?’ So, using the 1st example, I believe that, whether it’s at school or at work, part of communication can involve some impressions of being personal. For example, people talk about each other’s families in school or at work, even though they don’t know each other. It’s an impression of dialog that is part of communication, sounding like you know the person when in reality you do not. Of course, if you agreed to the conversation, another person happily showing another his/her family pictures is not unusual. Even if you are talking to someone that you work with, a mild sense of knowing you in casual conversation is not unheard of.

In the 2nd illustration, based on my understanding of that scene, when Maz Kanata was being too forward with Finn, Finn felt like Maz’s approach was inappropriate, which is why Finn said ‘You don’t know a thing about me.’ And that is the problem. Finn does not want to accept the impression of knowing that Maz is presenting to him in conversation. And that is when I believe innocent people tend to clarify in their minds acceptable and unacceptable impressions of how people know them. And if you experience adverse, false impressions of knowing from an instigator, it makes it even more difficult. And that is why I invented idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’. Using idea ‘Not notify’ from Wishlist #1178, you can choose to not use adverse impressions of knowing imposed by instigators. All right. I gave you the basic idea for ‘Not knowing’ a week ago, and I feel sure that the kids that read and used it upgraded it. So, I’m going to say something, and it’s not intended to cause the kids to ‘freak out’. I just made the idea on my own. After all, I did invent the idea. And of course, if I’m overreacting, I apologize.(So many different schools of thought.) Anyway, to help you use idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’, using the ‘Not notify’ idea, using the aspects of complaining that identify the instigations that should not be there, you are able to remove probably many forms of instigations, as well as the efforts of complaining that you have made, and you have created from that a preferred perspective. I’m assuming that many of you have created more than one variation of preferred perspective. I used idea ‘Not notify’ yesterday while I was in the supermarket. I imagined a girl showing me a neon white or a neon green colored towel, and that neon color represents a preferred perspective. So, within reason, imagine a girl showing you a really clean towel. You see her face, of course, and her hands are holding the more narrow top end of it. It looks like she is showing you a vertical rectangle. And when you see that, that perspective does not have those impressions of knowing from instigators and inadvertencies that you deem inappropriate.

Gripe knowing:

According to www.dictionary.com, the word ‘gripe’ means ‘to complain naggingly or constantly; grumble’. I’ve offered you the idea ‘Pragmatic luxury hotel’ in Wishlist #1148. The purpose was to allow you to imagine/think about instigators talking to management and those with authority concerning your situation with more quality, more control in your favor. If you choose to use idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’ and ‘Not knowing’, and if instigators improperly imposed a sense of gripe upon you that, if you brought that gripe to the attention of management and those with authority, you believe that they would give you a verdict in your favor, then you don’t have to obligate yourself to interacting with such gripes. Suppose an instigator imposes a seemingly casual instigation upon you, something that has an obvious gripe connotation, but not something that you have to tell your boss about. Let’s say that was intentional, because the actual purpose of that gripe was to create yet again another variation of notification in your mind, a notification that would try to maintain the effectiveness of certain instigations.

Now that you have idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’ and ‘Not knowing’, you can choose to not commit to the interaction and use of such gripes. You are not even obligated to ‘know’ what those gripes are. After all, a favorable verdict will be given to you by management and those with authority if such gripes were brought to their attention. So, to help you use this idea, contemplationally say ‘Gripe knowing’, so that you don’t even have to use the associated knowing to those gripes. Here’s a rule of thumb(a general rule based on experience or practice) that I use to determine if you don’t have to even know the gripe. If an instigator tries to engage in a conversation with you about a gripe that you already know is inappropriate, you don’t have to talk about it. You’re not ignoring the instigator, but you’re not obligated to talk about it either. You can say to that instigator ‘I don’t want to talk about it.’ after they try to bring that up. Also, if an instigator tries to improperly impose upon you a gripe using some sort of unacceptable form of surprise, you can reasonably say to that instigator ‘You surprised me.’ That way, instead of just? experiencing the gripe surprise, you have more control over how you experience it. If you imagine the instigator doing such things with their gripes, and you say those statements and results of those statement reassure you about the effect of such gripes, then you have more of an ability to say ‘Gripe knowing’, so that you don’t even have to know what those gripes are, even though the instigator makes such gripes absurdly obvious to you.

Represent reply:

And that brings us to idea ‘Represent reply’. You can now use an unacceptable sense of knowing an unacceptable gripes as a possible unacceptable sense of replying to an unacceptable sense of representing. You can always change the order of the words. You can call it ‘Reply represent’ instead of ‘Represent reply’. Here is another illustration for idea ‘Represent reply’. It’s not an instigation, but you can easily refurbish it to represent an instigation. It is in episode 6.14 ‘Through the Fog(2018)’ again from tv show ‘Elementary’. Here is a partial description of the episode from wikipedia:

‘ Holmes and Watson race to help Detective Bell when he becomes a victim of a bio-terrorism attack at the precinct and the station is quarantined. ‘

The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 34 minutes and 41 seconds into the episode. Dr. Bridget Tanaka(Suzy Nakamura) and Captain Gregson(Aidan Quinn) are talking to each other. Here is the quote:

Dr. Tanaka: ‘What you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. How could anyone from our agency be responsible for an attack that happened 30 minutes before we showed up?’

Captain Gregson: ‘Somebody walked out of here with all our servers. They were wearing a CDC suit, and they were carrying a CDC I.D. card. They were also pretty familiar with bioterrorism protocols. Call me crazy, but look at it from my side of the desk.’

—

The highlight of that ‘Elementary’ episode is when Captain Gregson said quote:

Captain Gregson: ‘…and they were carrying a CDC I.D. card.’

If you look at the composures of the people wearing the CDC suits, all of them experienced an adverse, unavoidable representing reply. It’s wasn’t an instigation, but like Captain Gregson said: ‘Call me crazy, but look at it from my side of the desk.’ To be clear, Captain Gregson was accusing the CDC people of stealing the computers. If you watched the episode, they didn’t steal it. But even though that was true, they still experienced an adverse, unavoidable representing reply caused by the accusation.

So, here’s the point I am now trying to make if you choose to use idea ‘Represent reply’ or ‘Reply represent’: Let’s say you experienced an instigation that has an obvious identity identified by idea ‘Represent reply’. Even though you experienced a sort of reflex action of replying for a certain representing, you now have a chosen sense of preferred perspective to compare that contemplation to. Using idea ‘Not notify’, ‘Not my sense of knowing’, and ‘Gripe knowing’, even though you experienced the false replying, you don’t have to become it. Before this idea, as an example only, you may have contested it. Now, with idea ‘Represent reply’, even though you experienced it, you don’t even have to know it. It’s not something you have to use, address, or even resolve. If you want more examples, you can choose from Amazon.com a random episode of ‘Elementary’. Sherlock is very likely questioning someone who is guilty, and as that person is maintaining his/her innocence, the maintaining may involve inclinations upon Sherlock to reply to a certain representing. Sherlock not only addresses those replies, he also dismisses them with the discovered facts. Of course, those examples are refurbished for advice.

[It is now 4:07 PM EST for me. I am going to stop now, and I am going to proofread both Wishlist #1178 and this list, #1179 on 7/4/2019, on a Thursday, since I plan to take off from work for the holiday. Even though I don’t know specifically what idea I will give you next, I will type one in next Saturday. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

7/13/2019

TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for crime tv show ‘Elementary’. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not my sense of knowing’ and ‘Gripe knowing’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

6/22/2019

Salutations!

It is now 12:29 PM EST for me. As usual, I spent over an hour looking for the music video to recommend to you. The reason why it takes me so long is because I want to offer you a music video that is relatively new. Anyway, the one I found is for song ‘DIABLO’ by Iliria and Juan Magan. I looked in www.youtube.com under publisher ‘#RedMusic’, and I chose category ‘New Songs 2019 – Best Music Releases This Month (Latest English Songs 2019)’. That category has a selection of 120 music videos. I looked at a few of them, and then I chose #85, the ‘DIABLO’ music video. Wikipedia says very little about it. The music video was published May 31, 2019, a few weeks ago. If you choose to watch it, I recommend Theater mode. It has over 800 thousand views. I looked at the lyrics, and it’s my opinion that the best part of the music video was when Juan Magan would personally sing in it. However, he sings his part in Spanish. So, what I did for the 1st time was in www.google.com, I typed phrase ‘translate spanish to english’, and I used ‘Google Translate’ by copying the Spanish part and pasting it in the box, so that the Spanish part would be translated into English, and the translation doesn’t look terrible to me. Here’s a quote from Ilira’s English singing for song ‘DIABLO’:

Careless, the way you act
Helpless, we made a pact
Feeding me recycled lines
Fingers crossed behind your back
When you say you’re forever mine (forever mine)

—

Keep in mind that, if you choose to watch the music video ‘DIABLO’, it’s refurbished for this advice. I believe the music video is well made, and it’s new. If you think there’s something about it that’s inapropriate, just remove that. A lot of these music videos already are originally made for relationships. The short moment of Juan Magan’s part in the music video starts 1 minute and 4 seconds into the music video. It’s a song related emotional performance, and I recommend that you watch it.

1st Wall:

Before I begin the main idea called ‘Not notify’, I want to explain idea called ‘1st Wall’. I believe it may help you prepare to use idea ‘Not notify’. So, the illustration I recommend that you watch before you read story ‘1st Wall’ is actually most of episode 3.17 ‘E My Sports’ from animated tv show ‘The Simpsons(2019)’. The episode 1st aired March 17, 2019, just about 3 months ago. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org:

After Homer gets him a new gaming computer, Bart begins to excel at eSports.

—

The story is about companies navigating big robots, and I believe that episode helps you imagine that. Just watch the scenes that pertain to Bart and the other kids learning and competing with their game avatars.

So, here’s the story: A company decided to join other companies who are participating in what looks like big robot building and robot competitions. This company has already made long term plans with what they consider initially a hobby. The project is not part of it’s mainstream income, but they have big plans for it’s use. This company built a big robot to participate, but when they tried to meet their expectations as well as the expectations the other companies created, the robot could not physically move! This is the 1st part of the story called ‘1st Wall’ that is important to imagine. Just imagine a robot just standing there, and it cannot move like the other robots can. That is important to understand, because the robot is doing nothing wrong. It’s like the movie ‘The Quest(1996)’. If memory serves, the movie collects fighters who already have a legitimate standing from their prospective countries, and they are encouraged to fight each other. The fighters are already established, and so is that company whose robot cannot move.

Of course, the company anticipated that their robot cannot move. It is, after all, their 1st time participating with the other companies. So, after the company allowed the data to be collected from that experience, they chose volunteers, some engineers, mechanics, etc. to work on that project full time. The company wants those employees to have a robot that works with the expectations created by those other companies, and they want that to happen in a relatively short amount of time. The ‘good news’ is that those companies who have already been playing that game for years have established a system that allows other companies to easily purchase a selection of robots that they have already invented. It even has a workshop to maintain those robots, and teachers to teach others to run and maintain those robots. Those teachers will teach you anything and everything you need to know about using and maintaining those robots. The thing is, about 90% of the newly participating company’s 1st expectations will not be met if they use those resources, but that company has already anticipated that, and in time, the company and those employee volunteers will contribute in adding some of those expectations with the new robot(s) that they will purchase, but it’s not possible to add all of those expectations back.

So, here’s the situation: the volunteers from that company will eventually buy a new robot from the other companies, and be trained to use it. It is beyond my imagination to know specifically what that company is going to do with that robot project, but what is also interesting is what those volunteers will learn as they participate in that robot project. I suspect that they will learn to establish and maintain other project participations better, like how I imagine venture capitalists do it. Here is a partial quote from episode 2.8 ‘The Magpie’ from comedy tv show ‘Casual’, Jordan Anderson’s(Vincent Kartheiser) conversation with Alex Cole(Tommy Dewey). The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that partial quote starts 22 minutes and 32 seconds into the episode:

Jordan Anderson: ‘I’m downsizing, streamlining, launching new products, penetrating markets. Anything I can to turn red to black.’

If someone is capable of doing that, then that person is capable of establishing and maintaining certain expectations.

Now, the reason why I call this story ‘1st Wall’ is from the perspective of the volunteers of the employees who choose to participate with that robot project. From their perspective, about 90% of it’s original expectations have already been lost, and it’s part of their job to reinstate as much of those expectations as possible. Now, keep in mind that those volunteers also have the resources of the company to work with, and it is the 1st time the company is doing something like this. And that is where I imagine certain instigators come in. I imagined that certain instigators are some of those volunteers, and they use the frustrations created trying to bring back those expectations as an excuse to instigate you. The scary part of this story, so to speak, is that they are using company knowhow and resources to instigate other employees. One of the things that they do is discourage other employees to surpass that ‘1st Wall’ that they are clearly surpassing with the help of the company. That’s a terrible thing to do. It’s like one division of a company bullying another using the strength that division has that the other division doesn’t have.

Not notify:

Since I encourage kids to be skeptical when considering using these ideas, I invented idea ‘Not notify’ this past Monday, 6/17/2019, less than a week ago. Ever since then, I’ve been upgrading it. To help you understand it, I recommend that you watch episode 2.14 ‘The Road Not Taken’ from sci-fi tv show ‘The Orville(2019)’. It 1st aired Apr 25, 2019, about 2 months ago. Of course, take the inaproprieities out. And according to wikipedia, Fox renewed The Orville for a third season. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition.

To find the definition of word ‘notify’, I typed in phrase ‘notify definition’ in www.google.com, and used the Google dictionary. The definition of ‘notify’ that I am using is ‘give notice of or report(something) formally or officially. And the example is ‘If he does not notify the occurrences, he may be guilty of nondisclosure.’

And so, here is the meaning of idea ‘Notify’: I created a postulate(from dictionary.com, ‘a proposition that requires no proof…and that is used in the proof of other propositions’): In order for instigators to maintain the effectiveness of certain instigations they have established in an innocent person’s mind, they would have to periodically maintain a sense of notification to that innocent person.

And so, the solution I invented was to stop those notifications from maintaining such an effectiveness. The 1st example I recommend is how you feel after you have at least partially organized where you live. For example, for the kids, after you have done your choirs, let’s say that involves bringing out the garbage, and a few other things, how do you feel after those things are done? Let’s say for the sake of example that there’s a feeling of improved solace and continuity.

Complain notify:

The 2nd example is from the episode of ‘The Orville’ that I recommended that you watch, ‘The Road Not Taken’. Basically, certain people from the altered timeline are trying to change the timeline back to what it is supposed to be. They made a lot of effort, a lot of sacrifice, and they succeeded. That altered timeline no longer exists, and the original timeline now exists.

That brings me to the definition of idea ‘Complain notify’: An instigator may improperly cause you to complain in order to allow the complaining contemplation created in your mind to maintain the existence of a contemplation that adversely affects your school/job performance.

So, as a comparison, imagine how you sense your involvement of complaining for instigations experienced, refurbished with inaproprieities removed of course, imagine your complaining involvement to be an adverse alternate timeline, like in that ‘The Road Not Taken’ episode. So, in order to bring back your preferred perspective, you use your complaining as an indicator to remove those adverse alternate timelines. That also includes your complaining efforts. Then you may perceive your preferred perspective as if that instigation incident had never existed. Of course, it existed, but it’s no longer included as part of the preferred perspective you believe you should be able to use. You see, before this advice, you may have interacted with such instigations that involve your complaining as if it is a part of your required job related perspective. Now, I recommend that you interpret your complaining as if it is an indicator of things that does not belong in your school/job related perspective.(I should have began with that.) For example, the main reason you initially complained about the instigation is because that instigation does not belong with the school/job perspective. Let’s say that the instigator forced you into a situation to complain about something that does not belong in that circumstance.

When using that ‘Orville’ episode, I recommend that you recall that scene near the end of that episode, 46 minutes and 55 seconds into the episode, when Dr. Claire Finn(Penny Johnson Jerald) disappears. That moment represents a removal of the altered timeline, and a restoration of the original timeline. In the episode, Dr. Claire Finn disappearing lasts for less than 1 second, but how you will recall that moment of course will last a lot longer. It’s just something imagined to help you ‘remove the altered timeline’ in order to ‘restore the original one’. Once you are able to maintain a more reasonable, more preferred sense of perspective, less hindered by your own complaints being used against you, you should also be able to more objectively identify future attempts of instigations that try to adversely impose notifications that try to use your own complaints against you.

Since this is the 1st time I’ve offered you idea ‘Complain notify’, I’m using my ‘standard demographic’ rules to offer that idea as if you have never been given such an idea before. That means, once you start using idea ‘Complain notify’, if you are an adult, you should be experiencing a lot of epiphany, since you may have a lot of build-up, allocating those instigation influenced complaints. Speaking of build-up, that reminds me of the beginning of episode 11.4 ‘Baby’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Supernatural(2015)’. In that scene, Dean(Jensen Ackles) tells Sam(Jared Padalecki) while they are washing a car in the bunker, that Dean already washed every car in the bunker twice. That episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 2 minutes and 20 seconds into the episode:

Dean: ‘I don’t know about you, but…I’ve got some serious cabin fever. I’ve washed every car in here twice.’

Based on my experience using that idea refurbished for standard demographic use, that feeling of epiphany won’t last. So, enjoy it while you can, and remember it.

—

The medication is intended for short term use only and you tadalafil cheap india take the medicine only when the situation goes out of hand. Several fake online service providers are trying to spoil the image of original medicine manufacturers by offering the customer duplicate and useless drugs. prescription viagra cost It has been medically proven buying generic cialis that history of illnesses, nutritional deficiency, trauma, surgical operations, or medications can hamper your penis’ ability to get a sustained erection. So now I hope buy levitra discount you are clear about what are kamagra tablets? Kamagra tablets are the ways to resolve male sexual problems like erectile dysfunction.

Not want (to have) notify:

Idea ‘Not want notify’ is when an instigator wants you to experience some sort of adverse advice that you don’t want to have. For example, let’s say that an instigator agreed to talked to management and/or those with authority about certain instigations they have caused you to experience. That means it’s possible that, from their perspective, they agreed to listen to advice that they don’t want to have. It’s advice that they agreed to listen to, but it’s still advice that they feel like they don’t want to have. So, because of that experience, even though such an instigator agreed to certain conditions by management, afterwards, he/she still caused you to experience something that you, too, don’t want to have.

You can use idea ‘Not want notify’ to choose to not give credence to such an effect. Keep in mind that, so to speak, you are the person that got your arm punched. You are not the person that punched you in the arm. In other words, you are not obligated to give credence to what that instigator was told by management or those with authority. You are the victim, not the instigator that instigated you.

—

Broke notify:

According to www.dictionary.com, ‘broken’ means ‘to damage or become damaged so as to be inoperative’, and the example is ‘My radio is broken.’ 1st, here is an illustration for idea ‘Broke notify’. It is from movie ‘Draft Day(2014)’ starring Kevin Costner as Sonny Weaver Jr., and Jennifer Garner as Ali Parker. In that illustration, Sonny is having a conversation with Ali Parker. The movie ‘Draft Day’ is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 7 minutes, and 37 seconds into the episode:

Sonny: ‘You know what, everyone always gives me grief for firing my father.’

Ali: ‘Well, you did. I was here that day.’

Sonny: ‘It was my mother.’

Ali: ‘What?’

Sonny: ‘It was my mother. Look, don’t get me wrong. I’m the one who fired him. But it was my mother who asked me to do it.’

—

Idea ‘Broke notify’ is when the results of the use of your private technique seem to be ‘broke’. A few days ago, I was thinking of giving you various examples that you would think about, then decide that you are not supposed to use such a contemplation, like considering picking up something, or proceeding with an action. All those examples would specifically indicate to you, based on some imagined previous experience, that you should not use such an evaluation, because the results are ‘broken’. I wasn’t able to make such examples. But if you had such example, the purpose is that it should be easy for you to have some sort of knack to not use evaluations from your technique that are ‘broken’, especially when those evaluations are adversely influenced by instigation.

The one example I have provided is one variation for idea ‘Broke notify’. In that example, employees of Sonny from time to time are giving him grief that he fired his father, but Sonny believes that evaluation is broken, that he fired his father because his mother insisted upon it. The answer is that, if people are imposing a broken contemplation for you to ponder, then don’t use that broken contemplation. Contemplationally say to yourself ‘Broke notify’, and then choose not to use it.

—

Another example of ‘Broke notify’ is when another person asks you a question that you are not prepared to answer. If you don’t have to answer that question, then you can also discontinue the further pondering of such a question by contemplationally saying ‘Broke notify’.

—

Idea ‘Broke notify’ has other uses, but I don’t want to get into it right now.

—

Pain carry:

Since I would rather not type anything in for another week, it’s possible that an instigator may impose some sort of instigation during that week that I believe I should try to help you with. An instigator may improperly impose a sense of notifying that, of course by then you may contemplationally choose not to use use, but the experience may contemplationally encourage you to carry it’s discomfort. For example, when you think about it, instead of just leaving it alone, allow your composure response to carry it’s discomfort for a short moment, as if it was coming from you, and you chose to experience it, but you didn’t. What may be happening is that the instigation has something that you don’t want to experience, but the instigator suspects that to be true, therefore when you would think about that instigated experience sometimes, the presentation from that instigator would try to cause you to contemplationally carry a sense of discomfort. I call that phenomena ‘Pain carry’. The solution I invented, for mild to moderate instigations, is that for only a short moment, just composure wise, not it’s specific meaning, you try to carry it, so that the experience will stop bothering you. The reason that may work for you is that you’re allowing yourself to recover from such an experience, instead of partly leaving it alone, since it wants to nag you a little.

If you want an illustration for idea ‘Pain carry’, even though the quality of that illustration is not ‘great’, but it may be better than not having an illustration at all, there is that scene from the movie ‘Stir Crazy(1980)’, starring Gene Wilder as Skip Donahue. In that scene, Skip got into trouble in jail, and was place in a holding cell chained. (He’s probably chained because it’s a movie.) What Skip did while he was in that holding cell was give Deputy Ward Wilson(Craig T. Nelson) the impression that such an experience actually benefitted him. At 1st, Skip whistled, and when he was released, he commented that his back now feels better because of the chains. The movie is available streaming as a rental and a purchase. I just rented it. That scene starts 1 hour and 23 minutes into the movie. I’m not going to quote it. [7/13/2019: To avoid some ambiguity concerning what I mean by ‘Pain carry’, here is a reference from the movie ‘The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe(2005)’, starring Georgie Henley as Lucy Pevensie, and Skandar Keynes as Edmund Pevensie. The movie is available for rental and purchase streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 35 minutes and 20 seconds into the movie. That is when Edmund lied to Lucy and to his other sister and brother. The clarification is how Lucy emotionally reacted to Edmund’s lie. In case you don’t know, it’s quite the ‘sour face’ experience. Here is the quote:

Lucy: ‘Well, he didn’t actually go there with me. He…What were you doing, Edmund?’

Edmund: ‘I was just playing along. I’m sorry, Peter. I shouldn’t have encouraged her, but you know what little children are like these days. They just don’t know when to stop pretending.’

Lucy: (sobbing) 7/13/2019]

—

[It’s now 5:43 PM EST for me. I’m going to stop now, but I plan to add more advice to this ‘Not notify’ idea next Saturday, and maybe even start a new idea. I have no idea what that new idea is. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

7/13/2019

TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for animated tv show ‘The Simpsons’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for action movie ‘The Quest’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Orville’. TV-MA mature themes and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Casual’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Supernatural’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Draft Day’. Rated R mature themes and viewer discretion for movie ‘Stir Crazy’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, tv show, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not notify’, ‘Broke notify’, and ‘Pain carry’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

6/15/2019

Salutations!

It is now 9:21 AM EST for me. To start, I complained to the sports medicine doctor I go to who performed the epidurals on my back about heel pain I have been experiencing for several months. The heel lies at the bottom rear part of each foot. To see what the heel looks like, just type phrase ‘heel pictures’ in www.google.com. The sports medicine doctor prescribed some sort of gel to be placed on that portion of the foot, and to use a shoe insert that uses gel as a cushion. I didn’t use the foot insert yet, but I bought one from the supermarket today. I started using the medication on 6/4/2019, on a Tuesday, and the right heel of my foot feels a lot better now. He said that, in a few weeks, my foot should feel OK. So, if you feel heel pain, I recommend that you see a sports medicine doctor, so that you can get some sort of treatment for it. In general, if you have any body pain, complain to your doctor about it. Let’s say that you do complain to the doctors that you see. I’m saying that, if you experience heel pain, in my opinion, sports medicine doctors specifically treat sports related pain, and heel pain in my opinion can certainly be associated with sports related pain. To find a sports medicine doctor, just search for phrase ‘sports medicine’ in a search engine, such as www.google.com, and include in that search your preferred city and state, and that search engine should give you a list of doctors that specialize in sports medicine. The sports medicine doctor I found was part of a group that has their own web site.

If you go to a sports medicine doctor, and that doctor prescribes to you a gel to put on your heel, just put it on your heel. Don’t put that stuff on the entire surface of your foot. You only need it on your heel. And only use it on your heel. I’m telling you this because I have no idea how it will affect any other part of your body other than your heel. If you have other body pains, then tell that sports medicine doctor about it, and he/she will prescribe to you the correct treatment. Don’t just use that gel on other body aches simply because it works on your heel. Also, don’t use too much of it on your heel. Based on my experience, I only use a little of it before I go to work, and before I go to sleep. If you feel like the prescription recommendation is too much, you can always talk to your sports medicine doctor about it. After all, it’s just a gel that you apply to your heel.

I forgot to mention that I plan to proofread Wishlist #1176 later, probably after I explain this list.

All right! Before I tell you what the music video is, I’m only recommending that you watch the last 25 seconds of it. The music video I recommend is from the song ‘High Hopes’ by American band ‘Panic! at the Disco’. Here’s a quote about the music video from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ The video features lead vocalist Brendon Urie walking through LA as passersby bump into him. Eventually, he sizes up a skyscraper with a glass exterior. Determined, he presses a foot to the glass, flips horizontally, and begins walking up the outside of the wall. People flock to the base of the building, recording Urie and watching with awe. He waves to the people below and inside the building, and finally gets to the roof as the crowd below applauds. As the sun sets, he joins the rest of the band on the roof and continues to sing the final chorus of the song. ‘

‘ Paste magazine described it as having “a blaring brass section” and “crisp vocals”. Rolling Stone described it as “upbeat” and having “punchy horns”. ‘

I found the music video from publisher ‘TopMusicMafia’. in www.youtube.com. I clicked the publisher’s name, and chose category ‘Top 40 Songs of The Week – June 15, 2019 (UK BBC CHART)’. That gives you a horizontal bar that allows you to preview a few seconds of most of the 75 songs it rated. Music video ‘High Hopes’ is #71. I’m only recommending that you watch the last 25 seconds of that music video. According to youtube, ‘High Hopes’ was published on Aug 27, 2018, and it has over 312 million views. According to that music video, that scene starts 2 minutes and 49 seconds into that music video. I chose that scene based on how my back feels. The mid range part of my back still bothers me a little, but when the lead singer started singing ‘high, high, hopes for a living…’, my back felt better. Here’s a quote of the last verse of song ‘High Hopes’:

Had to have high, high hopes for a living
Didn’t know how but I always had a feeling
I was gonna be that one in a million
Always had high, high hopes
(High, high hopes)

The reason I did not choose music video ‘High Hopes’ before was because the last verse part of the music video was the only part of the music video that I liked. I like the song itself, but I thought that most of the music video was boring. In the past, I wasn’t just going to recommend to you the last part of the music video. To be clear, I never watched the entire music video before, and I’m only recommending the last 25 seconds of it for this advice.

—

There are 2 examples I want to give you before beginning the explanation of the next idea. The 1st example is from a ‘Silver Surfer’ comic that I read. I tried to look for it on www.google.com, but I could not find it. Basically, in that comic book, the Silver Surfer is attacked by balls of energy that prevent him from restoring his strength from the starlight in the universe. The ball would be big enough to place him inside of it. When the Silver Surfer is inside such a ball, he would feel weaker. After he escaped, when the Silver Surfer was attacked again by such balls of energy, he learned to avoid them. The example gives you a ‘before and after’ that you may find useful. Before, you may imagine the Silver Surfer feeling weak. That represents certain instigations you may have experienced in the past. The ‘after’, you may imagine one of those balls, now a lot smaller, and the Silver Surfer is sticking his hand out. The ball is now just floating over one of the Silver Surfer’s outstretched hands, the palm of his hand is facing up. That ‘after’ represents the positive effects that some of these ideas may have given you in regards to certain instigations you may have experienced. When you imagine the Silver Surfer with a ball hovering over one of his hands, that represents the Silver Silver being more objective and more in control about it.

The 2nd example is in the movie ‘Justice League(2017)’, starring Jason Momoa as Aquaman. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 59 minutes and 49 seconds into the movie, when Aquaman was traveling in the water that’s being directed at the other members of the Justice League. He springs out of the water in front of it’s path, and with the help of his powers using his trident, he temporarily stops the obvious path of the flow of the water, allowing the rest of the Justice League to escape. The point of that explanation is that Aquaman was obviously exposed to the water, and is even still wet and covered with water as he temporarily re-directs the path of that water. This ‘Aquaman wet’ example represents one possible approach as to how to cope with instigation. If the water represents instigation, then a person’s ability to temporarily re-route instigation still involves some? exposure to instigation.

Both examples are just examples I recommend that you consider. They are not absolutes, and do not apply to all forms of instigation. They are just examples to think about, that I believe may be useful to you.

Not from:

[6/15/2019: I forgot to tell you that I invented idea ‘Not from’ this past Thursday, 6/13/2019, just 2 days ago. Therefore, I’m guessing that you are feeling some sort of epiphany from using it. In my opinion, and I am just imagining this, I don’t know for sure, that is usually the case, since it is a new idea, even for me. 6/15/2019]

Here’s the 1st example for idea ‘Not from’. It is an illustration, refurbished for advice of course, from episode 3.7 ‘Sacred Ground’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Voyager(1996)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and if you have Amazon Prime, no additional payment is required. Here is a partial quote from www.wikipedia.org from that episode’s plot about the meaning of the scene I am trying to convey:

‘ Janeway expects the course to consist of tests of physical endurance, mental discipline…’

‘ Janeway goes through the first series of tests; her guide warns that they are meaningless…’

The actual scene starts 36 minutes into the episode, Captain Janeway(Kate Mulgrew) is talking to what looks like 3 elders in the room waiting, an Old Woman(Estelle Harris), Old Man #1(Parley Baer), and Old Man #2(Keene Curtis). Here is the quote:

Old Man #1: ‘So, your little adventure didn’t quite work out the way you’d planned it. You put yourself through a lot of trouble and for nothing, didn’t you?’

Old Man #2: ‘Don’t feel bad. You wouldn’t believe some of the things people have done to themselves…’

Janeway: ‘So there’s no real ritual after all.’

Old Man #2: ‘ ‘Real’ is such a relative term. Most of the challenges in life are the ones we create for ourselves. ‘

Old Woman: ‘And you are particularly hard on yourself, aren’t you?’

Janeway: ‘I’ve always been driven to succeed.’

Old Man #1: ‘Stubborn, I’d say.’

—

An instigator may improperly impose a sense of preparing that is associated with the instigation. The purpose of this imposing is to cause you to evaluate and interact with it, usually in a context that may bother you. According to www.dictionary.com, the word ‘prepare’ means ‘to make ready or suitable in advance for a particular purpose or for some use, event, etc.’, and it’s example is ‘to prepare a meal’ and ‘to prepare to go’. The ‘Sacred Ground’ example is a ‘prepare’ example, to show you a person committing to a sense of preparing. Here’s a quote from that scene:

Old Man #1: ‘So, your little adventure didn’t quite work out the way you’d planned it. You put yourself through a lot of trouble and for nothing, didn’t you?’

Old Man #2: ‘Don’t feel bad. You wouldn’t believe some of the things people have done to themselves…’

—

That reminds me of that song ‘I’d Wait A Million Years’ by ‘The Grass Roots’. Here is a quote from www.azlyrics:

And I’d wait a million years
Walk a million miles
Cry a million tears
I’d swim the deepest sea
Climb the highest hill
Just to have you near me

—

I call this idea ‘Not from’ to help you to choose to not use such an unacceptable sense of preparing that is imposed by an instigation. If you choose to use idea ‘Not from’, you would contemplationally say ‘Not from’, and that would help you realize that such an imposed sense of preparing from the identity of the instigation is not from you, and you are choosing to not use it, not participate with it, and not address it. For example, if the lyrics from song ‘I’d Wait A Million Years’ was a sense of preparing from an instigation that was out of context and unacceptable for you to evaluate and interact with, then ‘I’d wait a million years, walk a million miles, cry a million tears, I’d swim the deepest sea, climb the highest hill, just to have you near me’, all of that preparing, you would choose to believe that it’s not from you, and you may also choose to not address it.

To be clear, this idea was made possible from the previous list, Wishlist #1176, the ‘Weak, Losing, Inept, Mistakes’ ideas. Once you chose to use that idea, it is my belief that you were then able to even remove certain preparings imposed by certain instigations.

The 2nd idea for ‘Not from’ is near end of episode 1.2 ‘Broken Bow: Part II’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Enterprise(2001)’. I checked Amazon.com, and as of now, that one particular episode doesn’t seem to be available now. So, I purchased ‘Part II’ from google play. And according to google play, that scene starts 39 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode, when one of the Klingon High Council members said something to Captain Archer(Scott Bakula). After that, Archer asked his translater, Ensign Sato(Linda Park), what he

[I’m going to take a break now and get some take out food. I’ll start again in an hour or so. It is now 1:12 PM for me.

—

It is now 2:42 PM EST for me. To continue, after that, Archer asked his translator, Ensign Sato, what he said. Here is the quote:

Archer: ‘I’ll take that as a ‘thank you.’ ‘

Ensign Sato: ‘I don’t think they have a word for ‘thank you’. ‘

Archer: ‘What did he say?’

Ensign Sato: ‘You don’t want to know.’

—

In the ‘Broken Bow’ example, Ensign Sato did not want to introduce Captain Archer to a use of preparing that would not be appropriate for him to use. If you choose to think about it, linguists like Ensign Sato, even if you just imagine it, have the ability to decide whether or not one obvious translation from one person should be given to another. So, just imagined, if a linguist would experience an instigation that depended upon the victim to respond to an adverse sense of preparing, and the linguist was able to allocate out such a sense of preparing, then the linguist would easily contemplationally diffuse such an instigation. In fact, such a linguist may even wonder why a stranger would impose such a contemplation, since the linguist does not even know that person.

Casual:

Before I continue giving you information I have not given you before for idea ‘Not from’, if you are now using the advice, then I can say this to you: before using this advice, if an instigator imposed upon you a bothersome sense of preparing for you to commit to, most of it is probably in a non-casual context. I believe the popular expression is that they’re ‘winding you up’. So, if you are an adult, and you already experienced a lot of non-casual varieties of preparing from past instigations, then I believe it’s a good idea that you start becoming more aware to cultivate preparings that are in a more casual context. The best example I can think of for now for idea ‘Casual’ is in episode 1.10 ‘The Garden of Zinn’ from animated tv show ‘Dungeons & Dragons(1983)’. It’s not available streaming from Amazon.com and Google Play, but it is available for free from www.youtube.com. To watch that episode for free, just search for phrase ‘dungeons and dragons the garden of zinn’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 83 thousand views. The publisher is called ‘Dungeons & Dragons TV’. Here’s a partial explanation from www.wikipedia.org about the episode:

‘ …the foot of a yellow dragon – in the mysterious Garden of Zinn. To save Bobby, will Eric become a king in the realm he hates so much? ‘

According to that selection in www.youtube.com, the scene starts 15 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Diana: ‘But what about Bobby?’

This becomes a major issue in many relationships and one needs to find a solution instantly. levitra on line appalachianmagazine.com The rays offer a lot of radiation to treat the affected area with the help of low intensity super generic viagra and ensure safety of the healthy brain tissue. So you also should choose Kamagra online purchase cheap cialis look at this now Australia option. So it has uk viagra online kinds of treatments.

Eric: ‘Oh yeah. Listen, Queen. I’ll be your king. But first, tell my friends where to find the Yellow Dragon.’

Diana: ‘Our friend is sick. We need to slay the dragon and get it’s foot for the cure.’

Queen Zinn: ‘Slay the dragon?’ (laughs) ‘Follow me into the Garden.’ (Queen Zinn shows the others a plant) ‘Behold the Yellow Dragon, and this is it’s foot.’

So, the others believed that they had to slay a dragon and get it’s foot for the cure. That’s what they were prepared to do in order to save Bobby’s life. Instead, Queen Zinn explained to them that the Yellow Dragon was actually a plant, and the roots of such a plant just looked like a dragon’s foot.

—

Here’s another example based on a movie where the students are probably making an effort to not impose a sense of overbearing on another student. That movie is called ‘Finding Forrester(2000)’, and the student is Jamal Wallace(Rob Brown). Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the movie:

‘ Forrester knows that a representative from Mailor-Callow, a prestigious private school, offered Jamal a full academic scholarship, partly for his skill on the basketball court and partly for his test scores. ‘

So, just imagine that the teenagers who are from rich parents, knowing that Jamal is poor and is there using a full academic scholarship, imagine that, at first, they made an effort to not impose a sense of overbearing, that they are rich and he is poor, upon him. It’s an obvious concern that many students probably just thought about. After all, he is their best basketball player.

The concern those students used to not be overbearing to Jamal I believe is a good 1st example to help you cultivate a casual sense of preparing.

—

Composure response:

The next idea I will explain is to improve your sense of composure response recovery as it relates to instigation. It is my belief that certain instigations may cause you to dismiss and avoid certain composure response recoveries by trying to define that composure response to a meaning that is obviously discouraging. The solution I invented is to allow your composure responses to recover, when you need to, and not commit to that adverse sense of preparing that is associated to that composure response. Of course this example is from a movie, and I’ve given it to you before, but in that example, a young girl was expose to jokes that made her feel sick, and it felt like she spent a lot of time in the bathroom. She obviously had trouble recovering her composure response, since those girls who said those jokes to her in school were making an obvious effort to associate an adverse meaning to her composure response. That quote is from movie ‘Unfinished Business(2015)’, Bess Trunkman(Ella Anderson) is saying that to her father, Dan Trunkman(Vince Vaughn). The scene is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 9 minutes and 50 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Bess Trunkman: ‘Can I ask you a question before you go?’

Dan Trunkman: ‘Oh honey, my plane’s gonna– Is it a little question?’

Bess Trunkman: ‘Kind of.’

Dan Trunkman: ‘Okay, yeah. What is your little question?’

Bess Trunkman: ‘When I go to school, I don’t like to go to school at all. It makes my stomach hurt. The jokes hurt my feelings. I cry in the bathroom, and pretend to poop for…I don’t know, two hours.’

—

[All right. It’s now 4:46 PM EST for me. The good news is that ‘the ball is now rolling’, idea ‘Not from’ is now moving. So, I think it’s safe to say that it’s only a matter of time before I finish it. I’m going to finish it even when I’m not finished with it, but the point is that at least it has started. I’m going to stop now, and I plan to continue next Saturday, so if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

6/21/2019

Aloha!

It is now 3:31 PM EST for me. I feel great because I plan to finish this list today, so that I can offer you an idea with the new list I plan to type in tomorrow. I also feel great because I finally made time on a Friday so that I can type in a new list on a Saturday. I don’t usually have time on a Friday to add more advice. Anyway, the music video I found recently today is for song ‘Shame on You’ by Claire Richards. I can’t find out anything about the song in www.google.com or on wikipedia, but the singer does have a page on wikipedia. Here is a quote:

‘ Claire Richards (born 17 August 1977) is an English singer-songwriter, dancer and singer in the pop group Steps from 1997 until she left the band in 2001. The group reformed in 2011. ‘

Here is a quote from the lyrics to her song ‘Shame on You’:

You’d be a fool, a fool to lose me
At least I know it wasn’t all that

—

I found the music video in www.youtube.com by 1st looking at the publisher’s web site, ‘#RedMusic’, and then I selected category ‘New Songs 2019: Best New Hits Playlist’. That category has 413 music videos, and music video ‘Shame on You’ was #387. If you are interested to know, here’s how I chose to watch the music video ‘Shame on You’. It’s based on a quote from movie ‘The World Is Not Enough(1999)’, starring Pierce Brosnan as James Bond, Claude-Oliver Rudolph as Colonel Akakievich, and Denise Richards as Dr. Christmas Jones. You don’t have to purchase the movie just to watch the quote. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 57 minutes and 53 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Colonel Akakievich: (talking to James Bond) ‘Look, our I.D.A. Physicist. Don’t bother. Not interested in that. Take my word for it. This year, we decommissioned four test sites, not even a glimmer.

Christmas Jones: (talking to James Bond) ‘Are you here for a reason, or are you just hoping for a glimmer?’

—

Based on what Colonel Akakievich said in movie ‘The World Is Not Enough’, and keep in mind that there are many different schools of thought in the world, I made the conclusion that many women believe that there are certain courtesies that they would want available from men, but those courtesies are only available to them when the men are dating them or are in a relationship with them. For example, based on my interpretation of the movie, when men pursue women, the women can sense those courtesies that they would want access to from the men. However, when the women reject their advances, the men no longer provide such courtesies to those women. So, I when I watched the music video ‘Shame on You’ for the 1st time earlier today, I imagined making such courtesies available to the singer, Claire Richards, and it looks like as she’s moving around in the music video, that she enjoys the use of those courtesies. The point is that I made those courtesies available to her, and we’re not even dating, or in a relationship! I just made those courtesies available to her, and she seems to enjoy using them.

—

According to www.youtube.com, the music video ‘Shame on You was published on Jan 4, 2019, over 5 months ago, and it has over 163 thousand views.

—

So, here’s the quote I’m going to try to answer from 6/15/2019:

Bess Trunkman: ‘When I go to school, I don’t like to go to school at all. It makes my stomach hurt. The jokes hurt my feelings. I cry in the bathroom, and pretend to poop for…I don’t know, two hours.’

I won’t be able to explain idea ‘Composure response’ completely, but I will try to give you an explanation today, and then close this list. Let’s start with an illustration from movie ‘Ready Player One(2018)’, starring Tye Sheridan as Parzival, and Ben Mendelsohn as Sorrento. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 48 minutes, and 57 seconds into the movie, when Parzival and Sorrento are fighting. Here is the quote:

Parzival: ‘Yeah, I felt those. But this is my world, Sorrento. Hadouken!’

1 hour, 49 minutes, and 19 seconds into the movie, in the Oasis fight, Parzival kicks Sorrento in the groin area.

Sorrento: (groans and falls to the ground after being kicked in the groin area by Parzival)

—

The point of that illustration is that, even though that Oasis fight between Parzival and Sorrento is not real, they still try to recover in reality from the hits they believed they received in that virtual fight. You should have some sort of ability to allow yourself to recover from mild to moderate forms of instigation that adversely affect the composure responses you experienced from such instigations. If you experience an instigation that is obviously trying to adversely define the composure response that you are experiencing from such an instigation, don’t use that impression the instigation is giving your composure response. Just allow your composure response to recover. Here’s that quote again from Bess Trunkman:

Bess Trunkman: ‘When I go to school, I don’t like to go to school at all. It makes my stomach hurt. The jokes hurt my feelings. I cry in the bathroom, and pretend to poop for…I don’t know, two hours.’

More specifically:

Bess Trunkman: ‘The jokes hurt my feelings.’

Based on my evaluation of that statement, a few kids in the school that she attends are saying jokes to her that hurt her feelings. She is having trouble allowing her composure response to heal, because those kids who told her those jokes defined her composure response to be associated with those jokes, and she is having difficulty recovering the composure response that is defined by those jokes. The partial solution is to not use that impression of composure response defined by those jokes. Instead, allow your composure response to recover in your normal way. Let’s make a neutral example without specifics. Let’s say a woman insults another woman, and that insult tries to adversely define the other woman’s composure response. Using this advice, that innocent woman does not use that composure response that is being adversely defined by the insult. Instead, that innocent woman tries to allow her composure response to recover in a reasonable manner.

Spoil:

All right. Here’s a more advanced example of an instigator causing you to experience some sort of adverse composure response so that you may choose to not recover with that adverse sense of composure response. It’s based on how you use milk. I’m guessing that many of you who buy milk regularly, before you use that milk at home, you smell it to see if the milk spoiled or not. So, you have experience using your sense of smell to check to see if certain foods have spoiled, to determine if you can eat/drink it or not. So, here is the consideration: an instigator causes you to experience an adverse composure response that feels like spoiling is involved, and you are discouraged to recover that composure response, because of that sense of spoiling.

The solution is that, you still do not use the adverse impression interpretation that instigation caused you to experience as it associates itself to the composure response that feels like it has spoiling involved. You don’t use that meaning. After you do that, you allow that composure response to heal, and for this example, that composure response also happens to be the one that feels like spoiling is involved! What may be happening at that moment is that, since you tend to avoid a sense of spoiling, if you smell something that is spoiling, you dont eat/drink it, that sense of spoiling associated with a certain composure response you are also avoiding. But if you are not using the instigation impression of what that composure response is, that should allow you to recover that composure response, even with that sense of spoiling. If that sense of spoiling is the composure response that needs to recover, then you flex your body muscles towards that sense of spoiling. That should help you recover.

[It’s 5:22 PM for me. I plan to proofread the previous list today, Wishlist #1176, and if I have time, proofread this list today. That way, I’ll be ready to give you a new idea tomorrow. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

Violence and some discretion for ‘Silver Surfer’ comic book. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Justice League’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv shows ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ and ‘Star Trek: Enterprise’. TV-Y7 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for animated tv show ‘Dungeons & Dragons’. Rated R mature themes and viewer discretion for movie ‘Unfinished Business’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘The World Is Not Enough’. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Ready Player One’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not from’, ‘Casual’, Composure response’, and ‘Spoil’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

6/1/2019

Aloha!

It is now 11:13 AM EST for me. I’m starting this blog late today because I had to go to the supermarket earlier today because I wasn’t able to go yesterday. I decided yesterday that, instead of looking for a new music video today, I will instead offer you a music video I already offered you in the past. That music video is from the movie ‘Kim Possible’ starring Sadie Stanley as Kim Possible. To watch the music video for free, search for phrase ‘kim possible’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 8.4 million views. It was published on Jan. 25, 2019. In a personal context said, although I absolutely did not see the movie ‘Kim Possible’, since I don’t have kids and I am an adult, when I watched the music video again earlier today, I found it surprisingly tolerable since the last time I watched it, and I noticed details in the music video that I did not notice before.

Since I already recommended that music video in the past, I chose yesterday to also recommend to you a tv show trailer to watch. It is a new mystery drama tv show I am assuming is supposed to appeal to younger teenage viewers. That tv show is called ‘Nancy Drew(2019)’, starring Kennedy McMann as Nancy Drew. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ After 18-year-old Nancy Drew’s college plans are put on hold, she finds herself involved in a ghostly mystery when she and her four friends are witnesses (and suspects) to a fellow high school student’s murder, and team up to find the person responsible. ‘

‘ On May 16, 2019, The CW released the first official trailer for the series. ‘

I’m assuming it’s like the tv show ‘Elementary’ starring Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock Holmes, except it’s target audience is young teenagers. So, to be clear, it’s about a young lady called Nancy Drew who likes to investigate murder mysteries. In the trailer, a crime is depicted, and Nancy Drew chooses to investigate and resolve that crime. To watch the trailer ‘Nancy Drew’ for free, search for phrase ‘nancy drew trailer 2019’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 680 thousand views. According to www.youtube.com, it was published on May 16, 2019 by The CW Network.

—

Before I begin this advice, I want to talk about the progress with my back treatment. Within the past few days, based on my personal discovery, not a professional discovery, that the stuff I have been spraying on my jackets, not on myself, could have been the cause of my recent back problems. For example, when I had a problem with the lower left side of my back, I had an epidural done on it, and the problem went away. When you get treated with an epidural, based on my experience, you’re not supposed to use any fragrance on your body before the procedure, and you’re not supposed to take a shower 24 hours after the procedure. My guess is that the effects of the medication is possibly affected by the fragrances you may use on your body, such as perfume or cologne. Some time after that, the right side of my lower back had a problem, and I had an epidural done on my right side. And then recently, I sensed a problem accruing at my upper back, and that has never happened before. That is when I discovered the possible problem. I was spraying on the jackets that I would wear to work something to make them more pleasant. Within the past few days, I stopped using that spray, and my back feels better now!

I’m telling you this, in case you decide to have an epidural, or some sort of medication placed for your back pain by a doctor. If you are putting some sort of fragrance on the jacket or sweater that you wear outside, and you had some sort of medication placed by a doctor on your back muscles, or you had an epidural done, that fragrance may be the cause of your back muscles experiencing more problems. Like I said before, I believe it may have something to do with how the medication for your back reacts to that fragrance.

—

The absolute factor:

According to www.dictionary.com, the word ‘absolute’ means ‘free from restriction or limitation; not limited in any way’. and the phrase examples are ‘absolute command; absolute freedom’.

The illustration example I want to use is from the sci-fi tv show ‘Farscape(1999-2003)’. The good news is that, recently, if you have Amazon Prime, tv show ‘Farscape’ is now available streaming in Amazon.com. I just discovered this today. Here is a quote from www.gateworld.net about that:

‘ The Jim Henson Company announced today that Farscape will arrive on the Amazon Prime streaming service in time for the show’s twentieth anniversary — Tuesday, March 19.

Starting tomorrow the show will be available to stream on Amazon Prime Video in the U.S., United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Nordics, and several other countries around the world.

Along with the four seasons Amazon will have the Emmy®-nominated mini-series finale, Farscape: The Peacekeeper Wars. The 4-hour mini-series will also be newly remastered in high definition.

Though episodes have been available for sale via iTunes, this marks the show’s return to a streaming subscription service since it departed Netflix. In recent years the only viable way to binge-watch the show was to invest in a library of DVDs. ‘

—

So, to start explaining idea ‘The absolute factor’, I want to use a very short scene in episode 3.20 ‘Into the Lion’s Den: Part I – Lambs to the Slaughter’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Farscape’, which is available streaming from Amazon.com, without additional payment if you have Amazon Prime. The scene involves Scorpius(Wayne Pygam) talking to Commandant Mele-On Grayza(Rebecca Riggs). To let you know in advance, I’m assuming that Commandant Grayza tends to regularly wear a revealing dress. Keep in mind that this is a science fiction tv show. She is supposed to represent an alien. So, according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 28 minutes and 40 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Scorpius: ‘What have you done? This Gammak Project is under my authority.’

Commandant Grayza: ‘Your authority is not absolute, Scorpius.’

In a non instigation context, I’ve imagined women who believe that certain men find them attractive, for example, if the men see them at work or in a public situation, I’ve imagined the women privately testing the men’s resolve, to see how absolute it is.

Without using another example, let’s say that some? people in America have been known to quit their jobs because of certain instigations they have experienced by certain employees. Now, let’s say at least most of the instigations that you have experienced have been pretty definitive, easily quantifiable, that you have no doubt that such experiences bothered you. And that’s where idea ‘The absolute factor’ comes in. The idea is that, even though you experienced instigations in the past that are easily quantifiable, that doesn’t mean that nothing unfair will occur to you. You can still experience disagreements with other employees, even though you are in the right, and it’s still possible that you can get temporarily suspended or worse(along the lines of disciplinary action). The reason I’m giving you this idea is so that you can manage better how you evaluate and react to situations where absurdly easily quantifiable instigation experiences may make you more susceptible to. For example, in that ‘Farscape’ illustration, when Scorpius was told by Grayza that his authority was not absolute, he didn’t look too good. Scorpius presented a composure response that was disappointed and not prepared with what Grayza said to him.

—

Outburst overbear:

According to www.dictionary.com, the word ‘overbearing’ means ‘of overwhelming or critical importance’. I am going to offer you 2 illustration examples, then I’ll compare the 2, to show you what I mean by ‘overbearing’ for this advice. The 1st illustration is in movie ‘Casino Royale(2006)’, when Vesper Lynd(Eva Green) was talking to Bond(Daniel Craig) in the train. The scene is available streaming from Amazon.com as a rental and a purchase, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour and 30 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Vesper Lynd: ‘All right. By the cut of your suit, you went to Oxford, or wherever, and actually think human being dress like that. But you wear it with such disdain, my guess is you didn’t come from money, and your school friends never let you forget it. Which means you were at that school by the grace of someone else’s charity, hence the chip on your shoulder. And since your first thought about me ran to orphan, that’s what I’d say you are.’

The 2nd illustration is in movie ‘Finding Forrester(2000)’, starring Rob Brown as Jamal Wallace, Anna Paquin as Claire Spence, Matthew Noah Word as John Hartwell, and F. Murray Abraham as Prof. Robert Crawford. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 39 minutes and 51 seconds into the movie:

(basketball player pushes Jamal Wallace to the ground)

John Hartwell:(talking to Jamal Wallace while he’s still on the ground) ‘That’s how we play it down here, man.’

other basketball players: ‘That’s right.’

40 minutes into the movie, Claire is talking to Jamal in the cafeteria, explaining John Hartwell’s actions:

Claire: ‘John Hartwell’s just a rich kid who wants as much of the spotlight as he can get his senior year. That’s all it is. They take things serious here.’

Jamal Wallace: ‘They take things serious around here.’

Claire: ‘Well, it’s a serious place. Serious enough that I usually end up here getting lunch on my books most days.’

—

Before I continue, I want to say that those 2 illustrations from movies ‘Casino Royale’ and ‘Finding Forrester’, are just that. They are movies primarily made to entertain you. They’re not real. For example, the people in the movies are actors and actresses portraying characters. Because of the instigation involved, I’m telling you this now so that there’s less misunderstanding in it’s use.

So, this is how I imagined the comparison between the movies ‘Casino Royale’ and ‘Finding Forrester’ as it relates to the use of ‘overbearing’: Here’s a partial quote, what Vesper said to Bond:

Vesper: ‘..But you wear it with such disdain, my guess is you didn’t come from money, and your school friends never let you forget it. Which means you were at that school by the grace of someone else’s charity, hence the chip on your shoulder. ‘

When James Bond was a kid, since he attended a school where at least most of the other kids were from rich families, even his friends would remind him many times that he is poor and they are rich, by causing him to feel a sense of overbearing. Since he was a kid experiencing such overbearing, he learned to live with it. However, when you compare the Daniel Craig version of James Bond to the Roger Moore version of James Bond, you may imagine how such overbearing exposure really mentally messed up the Daniel Craig’s version of James Bond. The Daniel Craig version of James Bond really uses that sense of overbearing exposure that he acquired as a kid on others.

Now, in the movie ‘Finding Forrester’, Jamal Wallace is similar to James Bond in the context that Jamal Wallace is also poor, and is in that school using a scholarship, and practically all of the other students are also from rich families. Here’s a partial quote from Claire talking to Jamal after Jamal was pushed to the ground while playing basketball:

Claire: ‘John Hartwell’s just a rich kid who wants as much of the spotlight as he can get his senior year. ‘

Now, the ‘good news’ in Jamal’ situation, and this statement is not accurate, I’m just trying to make a point, is that only 2 people in that school from Jamal’s perspective are imposing a sense of overbearing attitude for Jamal to experience: 1)John Hartwell, and 2)Prof. Robert Crawford. That is because, in the movie ‘Finding Forrester’, with the help of Claire talking to Jamal, that school Jamal is attending is like Catholic school. A certain code of conduct is even within the foundations of their school attending perspective. If you watched the movie ‘Finding Forrester’, even though Jamal Wallace is poor, with the possible exception of John Hartwell, none of the students are making it an issue, that they are rich, and he is poor. Since the movie ‘Finding Forrester’ of course doesn’t show everything, I recently imagined Jamal eventually developing a comradery with all of the basketball players. For example, one of the rich basketball players, when he has time, normally eats in a high class restaurant that is nearby. He’s been eating there since he was a kid. His parents would take him there regularly, and he even was introduced to the owner several times when his parents gave him his birthday party there several times. One day, that rich student mentioned to Jamal that he normally eats in that high class restaurant, Jamal asked what that restaurant was like, and that rich student invited Jamal to eat with him. While Jamal was there, they talked about other students in that school, made some jokes, the usual. You see? There is no ‘overbearing’ in that school.

So, this is the trick that I imagined instigators use when causing you to experience a sense of overbearing: Because of the comparison, it is my belief that an instigator causing an innocent person to experience overbearing is probably the most common instigation in America. When you as an innocent person would experience an instigation that causes you to be overbearing, since the experience is mild, you believe that the experience is resolvable, and you try to resolve it regularly. That is the instigation, that within it’s context, you would always try to resolve that sense of being overbearing. And when an instigator knows that you will very predictably try to resolve a sense of being overbearing, then that instigator may contemplationally put something else there that will exploit your predictability.

The solution I invented for instigations identified by phrase ‘Outburst overbear’ is to have and possibly use the option to not need, not use, not commit to resolving such a sense of overbearing. For example, just contemplationally say phrase ‘Outburst overwhelm’, so that you may choose to not resolve such a sense of of overbearing.

To help you more objectively identify when an instigator is causing you to experience a sense of overbearing, here’s 2 illustrations. The 1st illustration is near beginning of movie ‘The Upside(2017)’. I’ll just copy that quote from Wishlist #1174:

‘ The 1st illustration starts near the beginning of movie ‘The Upside(2017)’, starring Kevin Hart as Dell Scott. According to the dvd/Blu-ray mail service I am using, Blu-ray movie ‘The Upside’ was mailed to me 5/20/19. I watched it for the 1st time on 5/23/19, and I mailed it back yesterday. I’m going to quote several scenes from the beginning of the movie. The movie is available as a streaming rental and streaming purchase from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the 1st quote starts 5 minutes and 20 seconds into the movie, Dell Scott is talking to his parole officer, Pamela Davis(Kimberly S. Fairbanks).

Parole officer: ‘Where are the signatures?’

Dell Scott: ‘I’ve been looking. Trust me.’

Parole officer: ‘I’m not paid to trust you. Do you want to go back to prison?’

Dell Scott: ‘I didn’t belong in prison.’

Parole officer: ‘You need to prove you’re looking for work.’

Dell Scott: ‘I am. It’s just that the leads the computer keeps choosing for me, they’re not for me. The computer don’t know me. You don’t know me.’

Parole officer: ‘Well, I know you, Mr. Scott, and you need 3 signatures by tomorrow, or you can tell it to the judge.’

5 minutes and 54 seconds into the movie, Dell Scott goes for his 1st job. His original goal is to just get the signatures. However, the idea is that you’re supposed to try to get the job. If you can’t get the job, then they will give Dell Scott his signature. Here is the quote:

(There are no subtitles available for me for this movie from Amazon.com, so I’m just doing it by what I’m able to hear.)

Fast food manager(Tatiana St. Phard): ‘What does great? customer service mean to you?’

Dell Scott: ‘Doing the right thing, I don’t know.’

Fast food manager: ‘Tell me about a time when you worked hard to solve a problem.’

Dell Scott: ‘This morning. Getting up.’

Fast food manager: ‘Do you even want to work here?’

Dell Scott: ‘I just need a signature.’

Fast food manager: (gives him a signature)

6 minutes 13 seconds into the movie, Dell Scott applies for his 2nd job:

Data processing supervisor(Rachel Alana Handler): ‘Don’t give up.’ (Later, she gives him a signature) ‘

—

So, based on those 2 scenes from the movie ‘The Upside’, when you feel a sense of overbearing caused by an instigator, it is like you are giving that instigator a signature. To be more direct, it is like mind control! The instigator wants you to experience a sense of overbearing, but the instigator wants that sense of overbearing to come from you. For example, in the movie, the people that will give Dell Scott(Kevin Hart) his signatures are not just going to give him a signature. They are going to try to give him his signature based on his ability to do the job. And once that person has made his/her assessment as to Dell Scott’s competency, then that person will give Dell Scott a signature. In other words, that signature has to come from that person. I recommend that you watch that scene, so that when you experience such an instigation, it will help you more objectively manage such an experience. Since the idea is relatively new to me, I’ve already imagined a few times giving other people a folder with my signature on it. Sometimes, it’s not that I experienced an instigation. I was just practicing the use of the idea. I don’t want the idea to be influenced too much by just using it for such an instigation.

The 2nd illustration is from episode 1.5 ’12 Hours’ from tv show ‘Transporter: The Series(2012)’. Here is a quote from Wishlist #1146 about it:

‘ The explanation of idea ‘Recover’ starts with a scene from episode 1.5 ’12 Hours’ from tv show ‘The Transporter(2012)’ starring Chris Vance as Frank Martin, Charly Hubner as Dieter Hausmann, and Josh Blacker as Giles. The episode is available for streaming purchase from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 46 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode. Giles is supposedly talking to the man that says he is Dieter Hausmann, who is actually Frank Martin. Here is the quote, refurbished for advice:

Giles: ‘You’re not such a bad man after all, Dieter.’

Dieter: ‘Thanks.’

That is the moment when Giles turns around and looks at the man who kept saying he was not Dieter Hausmann, and after he said ‘Thanks’, that man verbally admitted that he indeed is Dieter Hausmann. The scene that is highlighted is how the actual Dieter Hausmann’s face looks when Giles looked at him. Using that scene, I made the logical conclusion that, even though instigators present themselves in a context that the guilt, the blame, is on them, their real ‘target’ is to cause you to feel a sense of over acknowledgement. I already explained idea ‘Over acknowledge’ in Wishlist #1123. Now, with idea ‘Over acknowledge’, the ‘target’ is to adversely affect how your composure feels, more specifically, how your face feels in relation to the instigation. You see, if the instigation worked, you would be looking at the instigation coming from the instigator, but the real ‘target’ is how your face feels in relation to the instigation. I identified that ‘target’ feeling as adverse and/or bothersome interjections of recovery.

—

For idea ‘Outburst overbear’, the scene starts 45 minutes and 16 seconds into the episode:

Giles: ‘You Dieter?’

It is my belief that Dieter’s character represents the many people on Earth who don’t have a developed technique to manage experiencing instigation. That’s why he had difficulty talking to Giles, since Dieter believed that those overbearings he was experiencing were coming from him, even though Dieter was clearly responsible for creating them.

—

[It is now 4:45 PM EST for me. I plan to add a few more ideas in this list: ‘False special treatment’, ‘Want solve’, and ‘False active rationalize’. After that, the next list is to address more basic concepts. Based on past performance, I’ll probably make more ideas before next Saturday, and I may even change my mind again. However, this is what I plan to do now. I plan to do this next Saturday. However, I did make an appointment with the doctor this Tuesday to talk about my back again, and so I might type something in this coming Tuesday. The main plan, though, is to add something next Saturday. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

6/5/2019

Snap!

(Snapping your fingers, but considerately presented as a greeting, not the way a minor instigation would do it.)

It is now 10:53 AM EST for me. I’m not at work today because I’m going to get my upper back treated tomorrow. My lower back was treated, and it feels normal. However, and this has never happened before, the mid range region of my back seems to be bothering me. I’m assuming that if I waited long enough, that area of my back would feel better. I’m not a doctor, but that’s just something that I think may happen. Instead, I’ve agreed to have it treated with injections, and based on past results, I should be able to go back to work the day after the treatment.The good news is that I get to explain an idea I invented 2 days ago, Monday, June 3, 2019. This is the best idea that I have ever invented that I am actually typing in. Even though I invented it Monday, I postponed explaining it’s basic concept because I always thought it could use some improvement. And then I reminded myself today about the 2 main characters in sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate: Atlantis’, John Sheppard(Joe Flanigan) and Dr. McKay(David Hewlett), of course, in the context of making and giving advice. In practically every episode of ‘Stargate: Atlantis’, Dr. McKay always has to present some sort of plan to Sheppard, and it’s usually during a circumstance that is not preferred. Dr. McKay does it all the time, so to speak, and, within reason of course, I am trying to incorporate his ability to present ideas in non-preferred situations into my own strategy to give advice.

The music video I have selected earlier today, and have watched for the 1st time today, is for the song ‘Be the One’ by English singer Dua Lipa. The reason I chose this music video is because I have from my High Definition cable tv box a recording of one of Dua Lipa’s private performances.(It’s not an open concert, just a room filled with her fans and a stage for her live performance.) I haven’t watched the whole thing yet, but I like watching a few minutes of it from time to time. That recording encouraged me to select one of her older music videos, and that’s how I found ‘Be the One’. It is yet again another relationship song, but I find the lyrics to be acceptable for this blog. Another reason why I chose ‘Be the One’ is because Dua Lipa’s performance in the music video involves some minor emotional expression, something I believe the girls to adult women may want to use as validation. In other words, even though I don’t have kids of my own, it is my belief that the females of our species, girls to adult women, are encouraged to articulate some sort of emotional expression as they are learning to acclimate to certain situations. For example, a man is talking to a few adults about a situation that is young daughter who is 8 years old is aware of, and his daughter is encouraged to contribute to that conversation, and that contribution involves an emotional expression, since his daughter is still acclimating and learning about that situation. I believe that watching the music video ‘Be the One’ gives girls to women some sort of affirmation in regards to their emotion expression efforts. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about song ‘Be the One’:

‘ “Be the One” is a synth-pop song. In an interview with Nylon magazine, Lipa stated that the song is about “self belief, perseverance, and fighting for what you want […] In this instance, it’s about a relationship but really, this is an attitude I try to bring into everything in my life.” ‘

And here is a quote from the lyrics:

Oh baby, come on, let me get to know you
Just another chance so that I can show
That I won’t let you down and run
No, I won’t let you down and run
Cause I could be the one
I could be the one
I could be the one
I could be the one

—

Of course, to clarify, when watching music video ‘Be The One’, that’s it’s presented to you to be in context with this advice. After all, the song and music video is originally meant to be a relationship music video. To watch music video ‘Be The One’ for free, search for phrase ‘dua lipa be the one’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 373 million views. According to www.youtube.com, the music video was published on Oct 29, 2015.

If you are a male, boys to men, I recommend for you to watch music video ‘Be The One’ so that you can encourage the females, girls to women, to use their emotional expressions. For example, for the boys, if you don’t have sisters, you can imagine having a sister, and you’re encouraging her to use her emotional expressions in a learning context. [6/21/2019: It is not my intent to make it difficult for the boys to use the music video ‘Be The One’. To help the boys use it, if they choose to, and this is just a belief, I have no proof, if you encourage girls to use their emotional expressions, then I believe it’s very likely that those girls will encourage others to use their emotional expressions as well. So, if a boy encouraged a girl to use her emotional expressions, then it should be understandable why that girl may encourage a boy to use his emotional expressions. So, girls encouraging boys to use their emotional expressions I believe is a good example for the boys to use music video ‘Be The One’, if they choose to. 6/21/2019]

—

Before I give you the idea, I want to give you a proposal for the idea 1st. That way, you can decide whether or not you would want to learn such an idea. I’ll start by giving you 2 illustrations, then an explanation of what the idea is using those 2 illustrations. The 1st illustration is in episode 2.14 ‘The Fair Folk’ from fantasy tv show ‘Shadowhunters(2017)’. The 1st part of the 1st illustration is a conversation with Jace Wayland(Dominic Sherwood), Clary Fray(Katherine McNamara), and Simon Lewis(Alberto Rosende). The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 6 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode, Clary and Simon are preparing to talk to Jace. Here is the quote:

Clary: ‘Just be prepared, ’cause Jace is not going to be happy you’re here.’

Simon: (scoffing) ‘When is he ever happy to see me?’

Clary: ‘Well, that’s true, but…’

Jace: ‘What is he doing here?’

Simon: ‘Hello to you. I’m joining the mission.’

Jace: ‘No, you’re not. You weren’t invited.’

Clary: ‘I already told him that.’

Simon: ‘But then I pointed out that you can never have too much backup. You’ve seen my fighting skills firsthand.’

Jace: ‘There will be no fighting. If you hurt anyone in the Queen’s realm, she has every right to hurt you. This is a sensitive political mission. It takes a certain charm.’

—

In the 2nd part of the illustration, Jace, Simon, and Clary present themselves to the Seelie Queen(Lola Flanery). The scene starts 15 minutes and 51 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Seelie Queen: ‘Why is the vampire here? He was not invited.’

Clary: ‘He’s with me.’

Jace: ‘My lady, Simon has proven himself a worthy warrior and a loyal friend. We insisted he be here with us. Anything you have to say to us, you can say to him.’

Queen: ‘Very well. The vampire can stay.’

—

The 2nd illustration is in episode 1.13 ‘Valerie Does Another Classic Leno’ from comedy tv show ‘The Comeback(2005)’. The illustration involves statements made by Paulie G.(Lance Barber) and Valerie Cherish(Lisa Kudrow). The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and if you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available without additional payment. The scene starts 14 minutes and 47 seconds into the episode, Paulie G.’s pre-recorded statement is being shown.

Paulie G.: ‘What do I think of Valerie Cherish?’

Valerie: ‘Uh-oh. Here it comes. Well, children and those who are weak at heart, you might want to run for the exits! Not my biggest fan here. Don’t worry. I’m ready for this. I am.’

Paulie G.: ‘She’s a terrific comedic actress. She’s always very professional. We’re lucky to have her on ‘Room & Bored’. ‘

After saying that 15 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode, Valerie’s pre-recorded statement was then made:

Valerie: ‘Paulie G. has got it out for me. From the first minute he saw me he has been nothing but hurtful. He is abusive. He is threatening. He’s a monster.’

Keep in mind that the illustration used from episode ‘The Comeback’ is refurbished with inaproprieities removed for this advice.

—

So, here is the idea: It is my belief that instigators have the ability to manage the presentation of certain actions in a way that presents adverse results to their actions. It is like an instigator when instigating is presenting something that is one piece, like presenting a golf club. Both the action and the result associated with that action are exclusive to each other. That is where the mild bewilderment comes from. In illustration 1, when Jace said quote:

Jace: ‘My lady, Simon has proven himself a worthy warrior and a loyal friend. We insisted he be here with us. Anything you have to say to us, you can say to him.’

When Jace said that, both Simon and Clary reacted with mild bewilderment, because both believe that, based on past events, Jace does not seem to get along with Simon. Here is a quote attesting to that:

Clary: ‘Just be prepared, ’cause Jace is not going to be happy you’re here.’

Simon: (scoffing) ‘When is he ever happy to see me?’

—

And in ‘The Comeback’ illustration, Valerie expected an abusive response from Paulie G., but instead, Paulie G. gave praise. Here is the quote:

Paulie G.: ‘She’s a terrific comedic actress. She’s always very professional. We’re lucky to have her on ‘Room & Bored’. ‘

Also notice that, in that scene, Valerie also expressed a bewildering response. My proposal is that, if you choose to use this advice, you will at least have an improved ability to choose to not use certain results presented to you by certain instigations. When you use this idea, you are recommended to contemplationally say phrase ‘Not result not do’, meaning that you are not using a certain result, and you did not do that. I know that I’m giving you this idea early, meaning that you would be better prepared if I gave you more ideas, but what may also occur, since this is just instigation advice, is that if I give it to you now, in a context that is still reasonable of course, you will have more time to develop it’s use, even though I am giving you the idea somewhat earlier than preferred.

So, if you want to learn idea ‘Not result not do’, than that’s what I’m offering. What I am typing next will be the actual idea.

Not result not do:

To repeat, I invented and made active idea ‘Not result not do’ this past Monday, 6/3/2019, just 2 days ago. Here is an illustration I found earlier today that involves a clarification of action and result, something I thought you may find useful. That scene is in episode 1.4 ‘The Man in the Bear’ from crime tv show ‘Bones(2005)’. It involves a conversation with Jack Hodgins(T.J. Thyne), Angela Montenegro(Michaela Conlin), and Zack Addy(Eric Millegan). The scene is available streaming from Amazon.com, and if you have Amazon Prime, it’s available without additional payment. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 29 minutes and 11 seconds into the episode, and of course, you throw away the rest of the episode. Here is the quote:

Hodgins: ‘I found boring dust.’

Angela: ‘Is there any other kind?’

Hodgins: ‘Boring dust is produced by beetles. Which means the tree the truffle grew on was infested.’

Zack: ‘That’s not going to impress Toni.’

Hodgins: ‘That’s not why I did it. I did it to serve justice and capture a murderous cannibal.’

—

What I am going to do now is introduce to you a few concepts that you may not know about.

Results are not the only indicator:

I remember typing idea ‘Results are not the only indicator’ a while back, but when I did a search in this blog, I could not find it. I may have typed it in the Amazon lists. I just remember typing it. Anyway, this idea is a variation from the original idea ‘Results are not the only indicator’, and it has the same name. The main part of this idea is to still just contemplationally say ‘Not result not do’. Here is the idea: when you experience an instigation that tries to dictate that a certain action has to associate with a certain result, in my opinion, one adverse effect of such an experience is that a certain result in the mind of the innocent person experiencing such an instigation may always be a requirement with it’s associated action. That reminds me of a quote from movie ‘Ready Player One(2018)’, a conversation between Parzival(Tye Sheridan) and Art3mis(Olivia Cooke). The movie is available streamind from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 18 minutes and 57 seconds into the movie. Parzival and Art3mis are in Aech’s(Lena Waithe) virtual garage. Here is the quote:

Art3mis: ‘What would you do? If you won. The whole contest, I mean.’

Parzival: ‘Oh! I mean, I’ve got tons of plans in the real world. I’d…I’d move into a huge mansion, buy a bunch of cool stuff, not be poor.’

Art3mis: ‘Now I know why you stopped short.’

Parzival: ‘I stopped because of Kong. No one ever makes it past Kong. That… That’s… That’s, like, a rule.’

And that is the quote I am looking for to present to you:

Parzival: ‘I stopped because of Kong. No one ever makes it past Kong. That… That’s… That’s, like, a rule.’

That is one example based on the belief of Parzival that a certain result is a requirement with a certain action. Like Parzival said: ‘No one ever makes it past Kong. That’s, like, a rule.’

So, what I’ll do is introduce to you an idea that you have an option to use that helps you break from that idea, that helps you to not participate with such a causality, if you choose to use such an idea, and here is the idea: imagine that there are certain participations that do not need results as an indicator. For example, for the students, and this example may feel kind of stupid at first, so I’m warning you now, there are probably adult employees in your school that are not obligated to participate in student activities, so when you compare the adult employees’ responsibilities to those of the students, you should notice obvious examples of participations that do not need results as an indicator, since students are not adult employees, and adult employees are not students. So, in a generalistic context, imagine that, for certain participations, you have the ability to do certain things without needing results, without needing certain expectations as a requirement for certain actions.

Now, this probably happened to you, recall a past instigation that adversely imposed an action with a seemingly required result. When you think about that, you can contemplationally say to yourself ‘Not result’, meaning that it is not a result created by you. You see, even though it’s not created from you, not from you, you still may experience something that has 2 names that I’m aware of: 1)blowback, and 2)recoil. The use of the word ‘blowback’ for this blog comes from near end of movie ‘Justice League(2017)’, a conversation between Superman(Henry Cavill) and Cyborg(Ray Fisher). The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 41 minutes, and 53 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Cyborg: ‘We gotta pull these things apart. A couple more seconds, you’ll see your opening.’

Superman: ‘Any blowback?’

Cyborg: ‘Big time. But I think we can take it.’

So, when you think about that obviously bothersome instigation, contemplationally say ‘Not result’ and take into consideration any blowback, any recoil effect it may have on you. Think that it’s not a result that is from you, even it’s recoil/blowback.

Stop solving!

The 2nd concept is something that I created recently from idea ‘Stop solving!’, an idea that is in Wishlist #1168. In idea ‘Stop solving!’, Jace Wayland(Dominic Sherwood) is catching Rubik’s Cubes and putting them in a basket. That represents Jace choosing to not resolve the Rubik’s Cubes. So, from that idea, I imagined Jace holding a basket filled with unresolved Rubik’s Cubes, and the basket is so full, you can see some of the Rubik’s Cubes outside of the basket, an indicator that the basket is already more than full. Now and then, when you choose to, and it’s reasonable to do so, you can imagine Jace holding that overfilled bucket of Rubik’s Cubes, and you are either causing him to catch another Rubik’s Cube, or you are placing another Rubik’s Cube on top of that basket. That imagined illustration represents you not choosing to solve an instigation and/or inadvertency you experienced using idea ‘Not result not solve’.

All right. I just recently realized that this part of the idea is the most difficult part to explain. I think I’m experiencing some blowback/recoil. I believe I can explain it today. And so, I’m going to help you prepare for it. I recommend that you ‘sleep it off’ for at least 3 days in a row before you give it a final judgment. Also, keep in mind that you will upgrade it’s use over time, and that I still plan to give you more ideas to help you upgrade it’s use. I also recommend that you shake your body before continuing using what I’m about to type in, to help you acclimate to it’s use. And to be clear, when you use this idea, you still contemplationally say ‘Not result not do’, meaning that it is still a result that is not from you, that you did not do. It’s just that, as of now, and I’m not a psychiatrist, therapist, I’m not someone who gives advice professionally, but based on my discoveries and knowhow, for standard demographic advice, this is the most effective instigation I am aware of that instigators use on innocent people, even when such innocent people have developed their own personal technique over the years.

All right. I am going to offer you 4 examples. The 1st one you can use right away to help you prepare for the advice. The other 3 I’ll explain after I type in those 4 examples. The 1st one, to help you prepare, is in episode 1.2 ‘The Man in the SUV’ from crime tv show ‘Bones(2005)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene, refurbished for advice with inaproprieities removed, starts 19 minutes and 52 seconds into the episode. In the beginning, Hodgins(T.J. Thyne) and Temperance Brennan are talking , and then later, Hodgins and Zack(Eric Milligan) are talking. Here is the quote:

Hodgins: ‘I don’t get it. How does his medical condition figure into the murder?’

Brennan: ‘Now it’s a murder. Before, it was terrorism, because we didn’t have all the facts. You don’t overlook anything when you’re looking for the truth. Do you have enough tissue?’

Hodgins: ‘Yeah, I can manage it.’

Brennan: ‘If those come back negative, … I’ll get the brother’s medicals.’

There are many other drugs, which are better than their cheaper cialis online sales counterparts. It is a delicious dark berry packed with natural antioxidants, including vitamin C, vitamin E and special phytonutrients called anthocyanin. online viagra australia This viagra without prescription free is as cheap as the 15 times lower cost than that of viagra. The cheap viagra in usa consumer must monitor the chances occurring in his body to figure out if there was a way that she could allow her team to be more effective and therefore impress her own boss with how effective she was as a manager.

Hodgins: (sighs) (talking to Zack) ‘I graduated top of my class, Rhodes scholar, the youngest member inducted into the Academy of Physical Sciences, but she still makes me feel like a cretin.’

—

The idea for the ‘Bones’ episode is that, for that moment, Hodgins feels like a cretin when interacting with Temperance Brennan’s intelligence, a legitimate, work related interaction, of course, according to the show. When Hodgins referred to himself as a cretin, at least for this advice, he was essentially allowing himself to feel humiliated. So, to be clear, there is nothing wrong with the way Hodgins chooses to feel, when he called himself a cretin, in reference to interacting with Brennan. Brennan did not instigate Hodgins. I’m giving you an example of someone feeling humiliated intentionally, and the other person did not do anything wrong to make him feel that way. I believe this example will help you prepare for the idea I will soon explain.

—

[I’m going to take a break for 10 or so minutes. I’ll be back. It is now 5:03 PM EST for me.

—

False active rationalize:

It is now 5:56 PM EST for me. While I was on my bed trying to relax, I realized that you’re going to need one of the ideas I said I was going to explain to you that I mentioned in this list, idea ‘False active rationalize’. I will explain that now, stop typing for today, and try to finish this list tomorrow. The definition I’m using for word ‘rationalize’ from www.dictionary.com is ‘to treat or explain in a rational or rationalistic manner’. I invented idea ‘False active rationalize’ a few weeks ago using episode 3.25 ‘Worst Case Scenario’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Voyager(1997)’. Here is a partial explanation from www.imdb.com concerning that episode:

‘ Members of the Voyager crew clandestinely participate in a hidden holodeck program where the ship’s Maquis members stage an insurrection. ‘

The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and requires no additional payment if you have Amazon Prime. That scene according to Amazon Video starts 16 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode. I think what is happening during that scene is that Lieutenant Tom Paris(Robert Duncan McNeill) is currently the only one in that hologram program, and he is talking to the hologram version of Tuvok(Tim Russ). According to the program, Tom Paris was captured and placed in a holding cell. Here is the quote:

Not effort not do:

[6/5/2019: As of 6:30 PM EST, I forgot to mention that, since I am using idea ‘False active rationalize’, this idea is now called ‘Not effort not do’. I will explain later. 6/5/2019]

Tom Paris: ‘Sir, we have to do something.’

Tuvok: ‘What do you have in mind, Ensign?’

Paris: ‘Escape, retake the ship.’

Tuvok: ‘We will indeed attempt to do so, when the time is right.’

Paris: ‘What about trying it now?’

Tuvok: ‘Such a foolhardy proposal suggests a lack of proper training. Need I remind you that we are confined behind an electrostatic force field?

Paris: ‘We can’t just sit here and do nothing.’

Tuvok: ‘We are hardly doing nothing. We are observing the enemy, watching for any discernable patterns in their procedures, looking for any weakness in their defenses.’

Paris: ‘How long is this observing business going to take? It’s been over an hour already. I’m getting bored.’

Tuvok: ‘I am not concerned with your amusement, Ensign. We are in a crisis situation and we will follow procedure, and procedure dictates that we wait for the right opportunity to attempt an escape, whether it takes an hour or a week.

Ensign Paris: (to Tuvok) ‘A week?!’ (said outloud) ‘Who wrote this stuff?’

—

So, here’s the story I made up: There were other people in the conference room, but I imagined in one part of the conference room, everyone in that are would choose to remain standing for the scheduled analyst report that someone would give them. They all work for the same company, attending this analyst report. The report is like the one Maxwell Smart(Steve Carell) would give in the movie ‘Get Smart(2008)’. The focus of this story are 3 people in the standing are of the conference room, a man portrayed by comedian actor Tom Arnold(True Lies(1994)), and for simplicity, the 2 main characters from the ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ reference, Ensign Paris and Tuvok. As the 3 are talking, waiting for the analyst to show up, Tom Arnold(for simplicity, let’s call him Tom Arnold) is making a few jokes, and encouraging casual conversation to exist amongst the 3 of them. The analyst shows up, and he is portrayed by actor John Billingsley(Dr. Phlox from ‘Star Trek: Enterpise’). That is when Tom Arnold says to the other 2 something like ‘we could just leave right now. John doesn’t make it an issue if we leave early.’ That is when Tuvok says to the other 2 about the importance of listening to that analyst report, like the way Tuvok talked to Ensign Paris in the ‘Star Trek’ episode. Soon after that speech, Tom leaves, and seconds later, Ensign Paris leaves. That leaves Tuvok remaining, listening to the analyst report. However, half an hour into the report, Tuvok remembers something that requires his attention. So, grudgingly, Tuvok uses the same excuse the other 2 used, and leaves the conference room.

—

So, the point I am trying to make using that ‘Analyst report’ story is that all 3 of them share the beliefs that Tuvok expressed. After all, they did attend the meeting. When you see Tom Arnold make those jokes, and when opportunity presents itself, he leaves, in a story context of course, you may believe that he doesn’t have the beliefs that Tuvok expressed, but the point is that all 3 have those beliefs, not just Tuvok. All 3 have been working for the same company for some years already, and they’ve developed their own unique mannerisms. I guess if you saw them when they 1st started, their presentations would be more obvious, their obligations more noticeably met just by looking at them.

[It’s now 7:26 PM EST for me. I’m going to stop now and prepare for the back treatment I’m supposed to get tomorrow. I’m not supposed to eat or drink after midnight, plus I want to take a shower. I plan to finish this list tomorrow, so if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

6/6/2019

Salutations!

It is now 4:53 PM EST for me. I came back from the back treatment several hours ago, and I feel better than before. Since I can’t take a shower until tomorrow, I’m going to try to at least add some more words to this list. I’ll probably just use a hand towel to clean myself up a little, since I can’t take a shower. The music video I chose for today is for song ‘Don’t Worry Bout Me’ by Zara Larsson. I found the music video in www.youtube.com under category ‘Top Songs Of The Week June 1, 2019’, published by ‘TopMusicWorld’. From a list of 75, music video ‘Don’t Worry Bout Me’ was #7. To watch the music video for free, search for phrase ‘zara larsson don’t worry about me’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 10 million views. I don’t particularly like the music video, but it does have some nice special effects in the beginning. For example, it merges the ability to represent seeing another person’s body heat, and it rotates that perspective with a normal music video’s perspective. You basically see her doing a lot of solo dancing. Here’s a quote from it’s lyrics:

Don’t worry ’bout me
You should worry ’bout you
Yeah, that’s your problem, so fix it
‘Cause I ain’t none of your business

—

False active rationalize:

I am going to add 2 illustrations for idea ‘False active rationalize’. The 1st illustration is in episode 11.4 ‘Arachnids in the UK’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2018)’. Robertson(Chris Noth) is talking to Yasmin(Mandip Gill) and Najia(Shobna Gulati). The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 17 minutes and 51 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Robertson: ‘Your mother isn’t supposed to be here. I told the staff to take two days off.’

Najia: ‘I came in to do extra preparation before we opened.’

Robertson: ‘Well, I really don’t care, because if I hadn’t fired you then, I would have fired you 10 minutes ago when I saw the rooms. Disgraceful!’

—

The 2nd illustration is in episode 4.6 ‘The Poison Sky’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2008)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and if you have Amazon Prime, that episode is available without additional payment. In that scene, The Doctor(David Tennant) and General Staal(Christopher Ryan) are talking. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 9 minutes and 12 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

General Staal: ‘Doctor, you impugn my honour!’ (I’m assuming that, according to www.dictionary.com, ‘impugn’ means ‘to attack physically’. Even if I am wrong, based on it’s use by General Staal, it is clearly used to indicate that he was insulted.)

The Doctor: ‘Yeah, I’m really glad you didn’t say ‘belittle’, ’cause then I’d have a field day.’

—

Back in Wishlist #1148, I gave you the ideas ‘Pragmatic garbage’ and ‘Pragmatic luxury hotel’. So, it’s possible that, if you used that idea, you have imagined what instigators may go through when they are talking to management and those with authority concerning the instigations you experienced from those instigators. So, it’s possible that, ever since then, even though you were using such an idea, an instigator or instigators may have still exposed you to certain instigations. So, for certain instigations, you may have continued to imagine those instigators talking to management and/or those with authority concerning those certain instigations. So, for focus, let me quote those 2 illustrations.

Robertson: ‘Well, I really don’t care, because if I hadn’t fired you then, I would have fired you 10 minutes ago when I saw the rooms. Disgraceful!’

The focused quote is when Robertson said:

Robertson: ‘Disgraceful!’

The 2nd illustration is when General Staal said:

General Staal: ‘Doctor, you impugn my honour!’

And the focused word is:

General Staal: ‘…impugn…!’

So, you got 2 words for idea ‘False active rationalize’: 1)’Disgraceful!’, and ‘…impugn…!’. When you experience certain instigations, you may imagine management and those with authority, refurbished for advice, react like Robertson and General Staal did. That means, the more certain instigators in your job continue to instigate you a certain way, the more they’ll have certain aspects of such instigations as part of their identities, and such an identity may discourage you from perceiving them in a more objective, more reasonable context. And that is where idea ‘False active rationalize’ may help you. You can use that idea to remove such adverse impressions of rationalizing from their identities. For example, when you imagined a certain instigator talking to management, and they have contemplationally established that ‘disgraceful’ and ‘impugn’ effect, they probably look like they’re not obligating certain job related beliefs that they are supposed to obligate. Just use that story given earlier: even though Tom Arnold and Ensign Paris left the analyst presentation early, they still are using the beliefs that Tuvok stated to them. They just may look like they aren’t, since they left the presentation early. So, think of that instigator again, and if you choose to, consider the possibility that such a person, even though he/she may cause you to feel insulted, that he/she is also using the basic beliefs of working in your job. That person just doesn’t look it because of how management is reacting to how such an instigator is explaining himself/herself. Once you add those basic beliefs to the evaluations of that instigator, you now may be able to remove that bothersome rationalizing the instigator is associated with as well. You don’t have to commit to certain rationalizings an instigator has caused you to think about. And that is why I call this idea ‘False active rationalize’. Even though an instigator presents a certain instigation related rationalizing, you don’t have to commit to it’s use. You can remove it.

Of course, I’m not finished explaining this idea yet. But with idea ‘False active rationalize’, I now have something to work with that may not only allow you to use this idea when it’s completed, but it may also allow you to upgrade it’s use as well.

[It’s now 7:09 PM EST for me. I plan to continue and finish this idea tomorrow. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

6/8/2019

Greetings!

It is now 8:26 AM EST for me. I wasn’t able to type anything yesterday because it was already late by the time I was available to type something in. Anyway, it took me over an hour today, but I finally found a music video to recommend to you. The music video is for song ‘Can I’ by Kiana Lede. I found the music video in www.youtube.com in category ‘Music’, sub-category ‘R&B Wave’. I couldn’t find anything in www.wikipedia.org, so instead I used the search engine www.google.com, and found a quote about her music video in web site www.onestowatch.com. Here’s the quote:

‘ The songstress also released a gorgeous video that’s enchanting viewers with its stunning visuals and audio. The video stays true to the meaning of the song, featuring Ledé holding herself back, gazing out a window at her potential mans, staring into space as she fidgets with a coffee mug, and pacing around – killing time and waiting for that text back has never looked better. The visuals are hypnotizing, with hazy camera shots and fluid motions, drawing viewers in and making it hard not to hit replay. ‘

According to www.youtube.com, the music video has almost 800 thousand views, and it was published on May 31, 2019, just over a week ago. Here is a quote from it’s lyrics:

I would like to see you, can I?

—

If you choose to watch the music video, it may start getting your interest 49 seconds into it, when they show 2 perspectives of her in the same room. One perspective is sitting down next to a coffee mug, and the other is using speed motion filming, showing her pace around that room holding that mug. According to the review, she is waiting for a phone text from someone.

The lyrics obviously shows that it’s a relationship song. However, I’m recommending that you watch the music video because I believe that watching the music video may help you relax.

—

The next idea I will explain I anticipate will involve a lot of that ‘Sour face’ idea I recommended in Wishlist #1038, almost 3 years ago. In my opinion, it’s probably the best idea I’ve ever invented, and if you choose to use it, you will probably easily upgrade it’s use. So, because of it’s expected ‘Sour face’ use in your mind, I’m going to give you another story I think I invented yesterday. 1st, I invented the story, and then I thought of an illustration that is really great to help you relate to it better. That illustration is in episode 1.2 ‘A Second Self’ from action mystery tv show ‘Street Hawk(1985)’. The reason it’s so useful is because it has a 1985 version of celebrity George Clooney portraying Kevin Stark, one of Jesse Mach’s(Rex Smith) best friends. Here is a quote from Amazon Video, 9 minutes and 35 seconds into the episode:

Jesse Mach: ‘Starker! I don’t believe it! Hey! Hey, Norman Tuttle(Joe Regalbuto), Kevin Stark, old buddy of mine from the motocross circuit. Man, we did everything together. The man is family.’

—

The story’s purpose is to show you a person’s interaction with another person that does not have obvious actions associated with exclusive results, like certain instigations that you may have experienced. If you watched the recommended ‘Street Hawk’ episode, celebrity actor George Clooney also portrayed Bruce Wayne in movie ‘Batman & Robin(1997)’. So, in the story, the main character will be called Bruce Wayne, but he won’t be the Bruce Wayne that becomes Batman. I just need someone that you can relate to, at least in imagination, that is rich. [6/21/2019: It’s not my intent to say that everyone who reads this blog is poor. Choosing Bruce Wayne is what I call a ‘standard demographic’ decision. I believed that, based on my ability to teach, since I believe that Bruce Wayne is a very popular character in America, then that is why I chose him. Sorry for the misunderstanding. 6/21/2019] When you imagine using this story refurbished, Bruce Wayne is meant to be you. You’ll see what I’m talking about after I finish explaining the story. And for the 1st few times you imagine using it, I recommend that you think of the song ‘Be The One’ by Dua Lipa, based on how I originally explained it to you in this list. Keep in mind that, even though I don’t have kids of my own, I absolutely believe that most? parents on Earth encourage their girls to use emotional responses when articulating meaning, especially when they are encouraged to contribute to a topic that they are familiar with. That is why I think the song ‘Be The One’ is generalistic enough for men/women, and boys/girls to imagine. Here’s a copy of the lyrics to song ‘Be The One’:

Oh baby, come on, let me get to know you
Just another chance so that I can show
That I won’t let you down and run
No, I won’t let you down and run
Cause I could be the one
I could be the one
I could be the one
I could be the one

—

So, here’s the story. 2 rich men from presitigious families have been best friends since high school. The main character’s name is Bruce Wayne. They would cause each other to attend social functions that their families would set up. And since both of them are also good at motorcyle competition, both families worked together to accomodate their hobby, which involves sponsored motorcyle events. Now, there’s a problem Bruce Wayne has with his friend’s family. He doesn’t understand well enough their imposed courtesies and rituals for certain participations. There was one time when he was a teenager he was massively berated by his friend’s parents as he tried to participate with his friend in one of their award ceremonies. So, to avoid such results, when he would participate with his friend with certain events that involves his friend’s family, the reason he would participate would be the friendship he has with his friend, not because of the other events that are associated with the participation.

So, let’s say this event I’m about to explain happened this year. They’re now both in their 30s, and they’re both professionally good at motorcycle related competitions. In fact, in almost all of the events they would participate in that their families would sponsor, either Bruce Wayne would win, or his friend would. (So, you can imagine that motorcyle competition while listening to the song ‘Be The One’.) In that competition, Bruce Wayne won. However, he didn’t claim the prize, because he wants to avoid another incident with his friend’s family, since they are the ones that would give the prize to him, and that would very likely involve more berating and more disappointments expressed by them.

Soon after that incident, when Bruce’s friend talked to him again, he said something along the lines of ‘Grow up!’, and his friend complained to him about the other times he did that before. His friend was basically angry with him, and Bruce experienced some ‘sour face’ because of his friend’s anger.

So, to be clear, what Bruce Wayne did since he was a teenager was not allow many of the actions associated with participating with his friend to have certain obvious exclusive associations with it’s results. He attended social functions and events with his friend because of his friendship, not because of those social functions and events. His strategy allowed him to participate with his friend for many years. Of course, such a strategy could be improved upon. And to be clear, even though Bruce Wayne experienced some berating by his friend’s parents, they also consider him part of their family. And his friend’s parents do get along with his parents. After all, their parents do work together to sponsor and arrange certain motorcycle competitions for the sake of their sons.

Anyway, when you use this ‘Bruce Wayne motorcycle’ story, use that ‘5000’ idea in Wishlist #1144 and, when reasonably convenient and when you choose to, imagine the people in your school, work, even in public areas like supermarkets, imagine that everyone has 5000 separate and fortified participations, that of course are almost nothing, but still, 5000 participations that are acceptable to you, and the actions for all of those participations do not have exclusive results, like Bruce Wayne did with his friend. So, for example, each person you see has 5000 participations. Those participations are just imagined and are almost nothing, but such imagined participations should help you mitigate actions you may have experienced in the past that have adverse, exclusive results, like certain instigations you may have already experienced.

And if you are a girl/teenage girl/woman, instead of Bruce Wayne, you can imagine another, woman name to replace Bruce Wayne, and the friend could be a woman instead of a man. [6/21/2019: If you choose to use the idea, it’s yours. You can change it around, take it apart. 6/21/2019]

—

I’ll start explaining the idea by 1st presenting 3 of it’s illustrations. Then I’ll address each illustration reference separately. If you are using the streaming references from Amazon, I recommend that, if reasonably possible, you buy those illustrations, if you choose to use this idea. You may want to reference those illustrations again in the future. If you rent them, you’ll always pay the rental fee. If you buy it outright, you can watch it many times without paying additional fees.

The 1st illustration is in movie ‘Predator(1987)’, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger as Dutch, and Carl Weathers as Dillon. The movie is available for purchase for about 8 dollars from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 4 minutes and 47 seconds into the episode, Dutch is turning his greeting with Dillon into an arm wrestling competition. Here is the quote:

Dutch: ‘What’s the matter? The C.I.A. got you pushing too many pencils?’

Dillon: ‘Huh?’

Dutch: ‘Had enough?’

Dillon: ‘Make it easy on yourself, Dutch.’

Dillon: (laughs) ‘Okay, okay, okay!’

Dutch: ‘You never did know when to quit, huh?’

—

The 2nd illustration is from a digital comic book. You can go to www.comixology.com for that. And of course, it’s refurbished with inaproprieities removed. That illustration is in comic book ‘Superman/Batman’ #26. The comic book is only about 2 dollars. On the cover, you see Superboy and Robin. Basically, Batman and Superman send Superboy and Robin to talk to Hiro. Based on my understanding of Hiro, since Superman and Hiro communicate regularly as it is, Superman and Batman decided that Hiro should interact with someone more Hiro’s age, so they sent Superboy and Robin to talk to him. Basically, you just need pages 19 and 20. Robin made the deduction that they were just playing a game that would not harm them, and that they would both had to lose in the game in order to talk to Hiro. So, in page 19, they lost, and in page 20, Robin explained how he figured it out, that it was just a harmless? game created by Hiro.

—

The 3rd movie is in movie ‘Absolon(2003)’, starring Ron Perlman as Murchison, and Lou Diamond Phillips as Agent Walters. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and if you have Amazon Prime, the movie is available without additional payment. If you don’t have Amazon Prime, the movie is available as a streaming purchase for about 8 dollars. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 28 minutes and 21 seconds into the movie, Murchison and Agent Walters are talking. Here is the quote:

Murchison: ‘I send you out to do a simple thing. A simple thing, by definition, should not be difficult to accomplish. You have taken that simple thing and allowed it to become a complex thing.’

Agent Walters: ‘He was lucky this morning, sir.’

Murchison: ‘I don’t believe in luck, Mr. Walters. I believe we create our own destinies and you, through your ineptitude, have opened the door for Norman Scot to create his.’

—

Not discuss:

I’m going to start this explanation using idea ‘Not discuss’ as a reference point. Suppose you are having a conversation with someone. If that person blurts something out, like address a notion you did not agree to discuss, you may say to that person ‘I did not agree to discuss that.’ However, someone presenting a notion that you did not agree to discuss can just happen from people that are just walking by you as you are walking on the sidewalk, for example. Therefore, I recommend that you try to learn to not discuss notions with others, even though those other people would ‘bring it up’. For example, suppose a person causes you to have a conversation with that person, and that person brings something up, a notion, and you did not agree to address such a notion. Make an effort to not discuss that notion. It may not be practical for you to say ‘I did not agree to discuss that.’, so just don’t discuss that notion, even though that person verbally brought it to your attention. If that person tells others that he/she talked about such a notion, if you have to or if you choose to, you can tell other people that you did not agree to discuss such a notion. That other person simply brought it up. To make that work, as far as I know, you would have to already be prepared to not discuss such notions, even though other people would bring it to your attention in conversation.

I recently realized that I have to explain idea ‘Intensity’ 1st:

Intensity:

Here’s a quote from Wishlist #1144:

Rate:

I invented idea ‘Rate’ from what I said in Wishlist #1141. Here is a quote from Wishlist #1141:

‘ I’m saying this now because H.G. Wells portrayed by Rod Taylor escaped danger with it. If you choose to see that scene again, keep in mind that you are seeing events in an impossibly accelerated rate of time. ‘

Now, here’s a quote from that scene in the movie ‘The Time Machine(1960)’, starring Rod Taylor as H.G. Wells. Because it may be a popular reference for you to use, you could rent it, but if you plan to see it again, I recommend that you buy it’s streaming version for about 9 dollars. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 43 minutes and 42 seconds into the movie. To escape danger, H.G. Wells pushed the time machine lever to forward maximum. He then covered his head and eyes, because the events surrounding him would be shown to him at an ‘impossibly accelerated rate’. He then narrated his progress, until he was able to stop the time machine. Idea ‘Rate’ is designed by intent to help you quantify and allocate impressions of rate imposed by instigations and inadvertencies. When you watch that scene from the movie ‘The Time Machine’, I think the 1st example of ‘rate’ is an unusually fast rate, not the same that H.G. Wells experienced, but if you use that illustration, a rate you experienced that still bothers you that may be unusually fast for you to evaluate and experience.

Here’s the part I am trying to reference:

‘ To escape danger, H.G. Wells pushed the time machine lever to forward maximum. He then covered his head and eyes, because the events surrounding him would be shown to him at an ‘impossibly accelerated rate’. ‘

Suppose you are in a cafeteria, and one particular group are emphasizing aspects in their conversation that have a certain obvious intensity, even though you did not agree to have such a discussion with them. Since you are not having a discussion with them, then you are not obligated to interpret those intensities as if you are having a discussion with them. In the movie ‘The Time Machine’, starring Rod Taylor as H.G. Wells, when he accelerated the time machine, he covered his eyes because he anticipated that what he would perceive may overwhelm his senses. So, when you are in a situation when one or more people around you are presenting certain aspects of intensities, but those intensities are from a discussion that you did not agree to participate in, then you may contemplationally treat such intensities as moot. (According to www.dictionary.com, ‘moot’ means ‘of little or no practical value, meaning, or relevance’. And the example is ‘In practical terms, the issue of her application is moot because the deadline has passed.’) The next 4 examples should help you do that.

—

Contemplation effort to resolve:

Weak:

The 1st illustration is in movie ‘Predator(1987)’, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger as Dutch, and Carl Weathers as Dillon. In that scene, Dutch is causing Dillion to have an arm wrestling contest. Dillon gave up eventually. Here is a quote:

Dillon: (laughs) ‘Okay, okay, okay!’

Dutch: ‘You never did know when to quit, huh?’

—

An instigator may improperly induce a composure response that you will very quickly associate with feeling weak. Now, that ‘Predator’ example is not a great example for it, but it does show Dillon trying to avoid feeling weak when competing with Dutch. Since it’s just a friendly competition, here is what Dillon said to avoid feeling weak:

Dillon: ‘Make it easy on yourself, Dutch.’

Dillon was losing in that competition, feeling weak, but to avoid feeling weak, he said something in the spirit of friendly competition that he thought would help him avoid feeling weak. But on a more serious note, if an instigator wanted you to feel weak, it’s possible that instigator is capable of causing you to experience an instigation that will cause you to feel weak right from your composure response. You see, that is the ‘bait’ that will cause you to interact with such an interjection. Without a technique, you may probably do something like resist feeling weak. After all, Dillon also resisted feeling weak when he believed he was losing in that competition. I believe it’s very common option people in general use, to resist feeling weak when you do not believe you should feel weak.

The solution, or if you want to call it, ‘a better way’ to evaluate a sense of feeling weak imposed by an instigation, is to not use that context of interaction at all. For example, you may evaluate a sense of feeling weak as a specific contemplation effort to resolve. That feeling to be weak may be reinterpreted as a taxing recommendation to resolve something. So, instead of trying to commit to resolving such a taxing effort to resolve, you can choose instead to not use such a recommendation. (In case you haven’t noticed, this is the 1st time I’m explaining such a concept. I’m going to try to explain the next illustration, and maybe I’ll get better at it.)

—

Losing:

I’m not trying to change your chosen school of thought when using idea ‘Losing’. One definition for the word ‘lost’ from www.dictionary.com is ‘to suffer defeat or fail to win’. The only illustration I can think of right now is from comic book
‘Superman/Batman’ #26. Robin and Superboy used losing as a means to end the game that they are playing, and to finally talk to Hiro. And then, in the next page, Robin super-bragged as to how he discovered that what they were doing was just a game, and that Hiro was the cause of it.

Idea ‘Losing’ is used as an indicator to help you to decide to not use such a notion/contemplation. If you experienced a sense of losing induced by an instigation, you don’t have to use it’s associated notion, you don’t have to resolve it. For example, before reading this idea, you may have been contemplationally vulnerable to trying to resolve a sense of losing imposed by an instigation and/or inadvertency, even though it was out of context for you to do so. Now, you may sense that you have the ability to choose to not use/resolve certain impositions of losing.

—

Inept:

According to www.dictionary.com, ‘inept’ means ‘not suitable, appropriate, or fitting’. I got the idea from the movie ‘Absolon(2003)’, starring Ron Perlman as Murchison, and Lou Diamond Phillips as Agent Walters. And this is where I got the word ‘Inept’ from:

Murchison: ‘I don’t believe in luck, Mr. Walters. I believe we create our own destinies and you, through your ineptitude, have opened the door for Norman Scot to create his.’

It is when Murchison said the word:

Murchison: ‘ineptitude’

Said to the adults in a standard demographic context, and I’m assuming you’re not professionally able to evaluate instigations, when you experience instigations identified by words like ‘ineptitude’, ‘inept’, ‘disgraceful’, impugn, even the common word ‘insulting’, you may be experiencing a sense of obviously being guilty that may be very overblown and extreme. And you would use that overblown, extreme identity of an instigator being guilty to contemplationally complain to yourself about it. Now, although I don’t believe I am an instigator, I do believe that instigators in general more than believe that is what most innocent people do when confronted with such guilty actions. And so, what most instigators may do is use that to their advantage. For example, an instigator may use an instigation to impose a sense of ineptitude upon you, but in a context as to the effectiveness of your own technique! If you are an adult, you may have spent years pondering over the obvious, yet excessive, interjections instigators have imposed upon you to think about, and that experience can be used by an instigator to cause you to feel inept from the effectiveness of your own technique. So, even though that inept feeling of ineffectiveness was caused by an instigation, such an experience may still cause you to feel bothered, distraught, etc.

The solution I invented, with the rest of that advice, is to choose not to use such an interaction. You don’t have to commit to such a self evaluation.

—

Mistakes:

This is the last one. There are 4 ideas. Idea ‘Mistake’ uses the 3 illustrations I gave you in Wishlist #1171. If you are using the ideas in Wishlist #1171, then the 3 key phrases are ‘No.’ or ‘No, I cannot explain it.’, ‘(someone laughing from that illustration), and ‘It’s lemon chicken.’ Here’s a quote from the 1st illustration from Wishlist #1171:

‘ For the 1st illustration for idea, episode 4.13 ‘Devil’s Due’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1991)’, the idea was to show you a person who absolutely believes in a certain conviction, but his belief was not enough to create a preferred solution response to a certain dilemma. In this case, even Jean-Luc Picard, a Starfleet Captain, was not able to give an acceptable solution response to the lady pretending to be Ardra. ‘

‘ Ardra: (the devil appearance then seemingly changes back to the lady appearance portrayed by actress Marta Dubois) ‘I am sorry Your Honor, but can you explain it, Picard?’ (Ardra then uses her left hand and points as emphasis) ‘Yes or no?’

Picard: ‘No.’

Ardra: ‘I rest my case, Your Honor.’ (laughs)

So, when you recall the 1st illustration, I recommend that you think of Picard saying the words:

Picard: ‘No, I cannot explain it.’ ‘

—

The 3rd illustration for idea ‘Mistake’ is in episode 5.14 ’48 Hours’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate SG-1(2002)’. The episode is available for purchase streaming from Amazon.com. In the illustration, Major Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping) and Dr. Rodney McKay(David Hewlett) are talking. Here’s a quote:

‘ Major Carter: ‘That’s how they came up with the 48-hour deadline, isn’t it? You told them Teal’c would already be dead.’

Dr. McKay: ‘That’s why it’s called a deadline.’

Major Carter: ‘God, you’re a jerk.’

Dr. McKay: ‘I wish I didn’t find you so attractive. I always had a real weakness for dumb blonds.’

Major Carter: ‘Go suck a lemon.’ ‘

If it wasn’t for the fact that Major Carter said to Rodney quote:

Major Carter: ‘Go suck a lemon.’

it would be easy to show Rodney that he made several mistakes talking to Major Carter.

So, with the help of the ‘Star Trek’ reference and the ‘Stargate’ reference, I propose that an instigator can cause you to feel that you have made mistakes, but are those mistakes from notions/contemplations that you even agreed to participate in? In the 1st illustration, even a Starfleet Captain does not know everything, and in the 3rd illustration, both Rodney and Major Carter made mistakes in their discussion with each other. However, if you watch the ‘Stargate’ show, Rodney doesn’t really change. However, Major Carter realized that she made several mistakes talking to Rodney, and as she tried to resolve those mistakes, she eventually became friends with Rodney. The issue, however, is that she made mistakes talking to Rodney, and it’s sort of implied that she admitted it to herself later in the show. My point is that an instigator may be able to cause you to feel that you have made some mistakes, but if you can reasonably choose to not use such notions, if you know already that you did not choose to interact with such notions, then those mistakes may be moot to begin with.

—

Now, if you combine those 4 ideas for idea ‘Not discuss’, you have ‘Weak’, ‘Losing’, ‘Inept’, and ‘Mistakes’. All 4 ideas are evaluated as imposed by an instigation, and they feel like they’re coming from you. However, the instigations identified by those 4 ideas, even though they feel like they’re coming from you, you can choose to not use such notions. For example, 1)they’re out of context, or 2)you did not agree to discuss it, since it was just brought to your attention.

—

Mistake rationalize:

This is an idea that is a separate upgrade. An instigator can rattle you/shake you up a little by simply? presenting to you an obvious mistake.

[It’s 5:13 PM EST for me. As far as I’m concerned, I finished this list. This coming Friday or next Saturday, I’m going to proofread and close this list. Afterwards, I’ll probably type in a new idea. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

6/21/2019

Violence and viewer discretion for mystery tv show ‘Nancy Drew’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Farscape’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for action movie ‘Casino Royale’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Finding Forrester’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Upside’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Transporter: The Series’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Shadowhunters’. TV-MA mature themes and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Comeback’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Bones’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: Voyager’. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Ready Player One’. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Justice League’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Doctor Who’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Street Hawk’. Rated R sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Predator’. Rated R sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Absolon’. Some comic book discretion for ‘Superman/Batman’ #26. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Stargate SG-1’. Use only refurbished for advice references Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘The absolute factor’, ‘Outburst overbear’, ‘Stop solving!’, ‘False active rationalize’, and ‘Weak, Losing, Inept, Mistakes’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.