6/29/2019

Salutations!

It is now 8:27 AM EST for me. In the last list, I forgot to mention how I did with the gel I used on my heel, as prescribed by the sports medicine doctor. I stopped using it several weeks ago, and the heel of my right foot feels a lot better than how it felt for several months before that treatment. I don’t know if that problem with my heel would come back, so I’m keeping the gel just in case. If it does come back, I plan to use the gel only before I go to work, and not before I go to sleep. I believe that, last time, I used too much of it. So, basically, if you see a sports medicine doctor for a pain you may be experiencing coming from the heel of your foot, I recommend that you just put one application on your heel area only before you go to work, and do not put any before you go to sleep. Based on my experience, that stuff is powerful! Keep in mind that, based on my experience, it’s medication that’s designed to only be used for maybe a few weeks, and after that, the heel of your foot should feel a lot better, and then you stop using it. I recommend that, if you feel like 90%+ better, that you stop using it. Don’t keep using it for a complete recovery in the beginning. Use it for a few weeks, enjoy the fact that the heel of you foot feels mostly recovered, then stop using it. After a while, let’s say a month or so, if you want to treat that 10% that still bothers you, then do so sparingly. Just apply a dose of it during the day, and then after a week, stop using it again. I don’t believe that medication is designed for regular use. Of course, consult with your sports medicine doctor about how to use it. And to be clear, I don’t believe you should use that medication regularly. In the beginning, only use it for a few weeks, and then after a month, for the 10% that may still bother your heel, use it for only a week. It’s not like the stuff you may see in the commercials, stuff that you can just apply to your skin. You’re supposed to use it for only a short period of time, then stop using it.

I decided yesterday to not proofread Wishlist #1178 today. I plan to proofread #1178 and today’s list next week, if I finish it today.

—

The music video that took me over an hour to finally select is from song ‘Never Really Over’ by American singer Katy Perry. I’m recommending that you only watch certain selections of the music video, not the entire music video. As usual, the song is popular, so the selections address the music video itself. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the music video:

‘ Sal Cinquemani of Slant Magazine praised the style and cinematography of the music video. He called it “a playful and imaginative portrayal of love’s intoxicating spell and the lengths some of us will go to exorcise ourselves of it.”

The video has been noted for its cultural references to hippie era and artistic similarities to New Age symbolism. Suzy Byrne of Yahoo! noted the video’s spiritual themes and called Perry a “New Age goddess”. She praised the concept and claimed that it was a “well-choreographed video”. ‘

And here is a quote from the lyrics to song ‘Never Really Over’:

Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over
And if I think it over, maybe you’ll be coming over again
And I’ll have to get over you all over again
Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over
And if I think it over, maybe you’ll be coming over again
And I’ll have to get over you all over again

—

Although I considered the music video once earlier today from a different category, I finally decided to use it from another category. The category is from www.youtube.com. I 1st selected the publisher, ‘DSC Top music charts’, and from the publisher’s link, I selected category ‘UK Top 40 Singles Chart, 28 June 2019…’, and from a preview selection of 40 music videos, Katy Perry’s ‘Never Really Over’ was #12. I then typed in ‘katy perry never really over’, and it was one of the 1st selections offered, with over 64 million views. That’s amazing to me, since the music video was published May 30, 2019, only about a month ago!

So, here’s how I recommend you watch music video ‘Never Really Over: Basically, just watch the scenes when Katy Perry sings the words:

Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over
And if I think it over, maybe you’ll be coming over again
And I’ll have to get over you all over again
Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over
And if I think it over, maybe you’ll be coming over again
And I’ll have to get over you all over again

You can also watch the ending of the music video for closure.

I chose music video ‘Never Really Over’ because it’s new, and I didn’t want to spend too much time looking for a music video for this blog. I think the song is great, but I originally don’t like the music video because I thought it was boring to watch from start to finish. However, if you only watch certain moments of it, then you may find it entertaining, in my opinion. So, here are the scenes I recommend that you watch: I recommend that you watch it in ‘Theater mode’. The 1st ‘Just because it’s over’ lyrics start 58 seconds into the music video, then you stop watching it 1 minute and 17 seconds into it. The 2nd ‘Just because it’s over’ scene starts 2 minutes and 6 seconds into the music video. The 3rd ‘Just because it’s over’ scene starts 3 minutes and 4 seconds into the music video. These are the scenes where Katy Perry and the dancers seem more motivated. You can then watch the few seconds at the end of the music video.

—

Represent reply:

Before I begin explaining the new ideas to you, I want to show you what you’re going to get yourself into. I want to present to you a proposal. If you like the proposal, then that’s when I’ll begin explaining the idea. If you read Wishlist #1178, the ‘Not notify’ idea, (if you want to, you may also call it ‘The Orville’ idea), then I believe you may be able to understand this next idea. So, here’s the proposal. It begins with an illustration: The illustration is from a recent episode of crime drama mystery tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’ starring Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock Holmes, and Lucy Liu as Dr. Joan Watson. Before I begin, I want to explain to you how I came about choosing that illustration. Friday morning, as I would prepare my clothes for the laundromat, I would watch a pre-recorded episode of ‘Elementary’. Now, since I’m trying to do both prepare my clothes and watch that episode, certain scenes from that episode would catch my attention, and I would stop preparing my clothes to watch that scene. I think I’ve been doing something like that for years every time I would prepare my clothes for the laundromat. As far as I know, I’ve watched every episode of ‘Elementary’.

So, here’s the scene for idea ‘Represent reply’ used as a proposal: That scene is from episode ‘Command: Delete’ from tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’. In that scene, NSA Agent McNally(Tim Guinee) is blackmailing Sherlock into not getting into Odin Reichenbach’s(James Frain) way. That scene, of course, is edited for this advice. It begins 40 minutes and 34 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Agent McNally: ‘This is everything I’ve put together on you over the past couple of years. Open it up. You’ll see a lot of familiar names. Captain Thomas Gregson, his daughter Hannah, his wife Paige, Detective Marcus Bell, his girlfriend Chantal, Kitty Winter, her son Archie. Let’s see, there’s someone I’m forgetting, isn’t there?’

Sherlock: ‘Is there?’

Agent McNally: ‘Yeah. Dr. Joan Watson.’

The next scene starts 41 minutes and 11 seconds into the episode:

Agent McNally: ‘Our friend doesn’t want to hurt any of you….Don’t get in his way.’

—

The definition of ‘represent’ I am using for this advice from www.dictionary.com is ‘to stand or act in place of, as a substitute, proxy, or agent does’, and the example is ‘He represents the company in Boston.’ Another definition I am also using is ‘to exhibit the characteristics of’, and the example is ‘Romanticism in music is represented by Beethoven.’ Here is the scene I am specifically using from ‘Elementary’:

Agent McNally: ‘Let’s see, there’s someone I’m forgetting, isn’t there?’

Sherlock: ‘Is there?’

More specifically, when Sherlock said:

Sherlock: ‘Is there?’

—

Based on my interpretation of that scene, Agent McNally caused Sherlock to have a committed sense of reply to a specific sense of representing. In at least almost all of the episodes of ‘Elementary’, Sherlock is always interacting with people that are not telling the truth to him, whether it be the criminals avoiding jail, or other people not telling the truth for other reasons. That is why Sherlock is professionally familiar with people presenting false representations of themselves, and some of those people also encourage Sherlock to reply to a certain commitment of representing. This is the best example I am aware of of a person committing to a sense of reply to a specific representing. I recommend that you look at that scene. Look at Sherlock’s face when he said ‘Is there?’ That face represents a man who has experience with false representings, and yet, even he chooses to reply to a certain representing.

If you choose to learn idea ‘Represent reply’, then you can be a little like Sherlock. You can manage better when an instigator improperly presents to you an inclination to commit to a sense of reply that is coming from you that encourages you to make a commitment to a certain sense of representing. That is the definition of ‘Represent reply’. This is just a proposal. Even though I’ve given you the definition of ‘Represent reply’, there are a few ideas that will give such an idea more effectiveness. So, if you want to learn idea ‘Represent reply’, I shall begin explaining it next.

Various studies have been conducted, and tadalafil sales there is still a no-no as it can lead to tooth decay. With super cheap viagra homeopathy, all of the ingredients are always natural substances diluted many times over. Patients with severe kidney infections may require hospitalization with treatment with intravenous fluids and antibiotics. order generic levitra deeprootsmag.org Why did he not quit sooner? The threat of death was not upon him and thus denial reduced the tension order viagra prescription enough so “habit” had its way.

—

Not my sense of knowing: Not knowing:

It’s now 1:00 PM EST for me. I took a break and ordered pizza. To explain idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’, I’m using 2 illustrations from movie ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens(2015)’, starring Harrison Ford as Han Solo, John Boyega as Finn, and Lupita Nyong’o as Maz Kanata. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the 1st illustration starts 54 minutes and 59 seconds into the movie, Finn and Han Solo are talking to each other. Here is the quote:

Finn: ‘Hey, Solo, I’m not sure what we’re walking into here…’

Han Solo: ‘Did you just call me Solo?’

Finn: ‘Sorry. Han. Mr. Solo. You should know…I’m a big deal in the Resistance. Which puts a real target on my back. Are there any conspirators here? Like, First Order sympathizers?’

Han Solo: ‘Listen, Big Deal. You got another problem. Women always figure out the truth. Always.’

—

The 2nd illustration starts about 5 minutes later, 1 hour and 55 minutes into the movie. Solo and Finn are talking to each other, and Maz Kanata and Finn are talking to each other. Here is the quote:

Finn: ‘What’s this? What are you doing? Solo, what is she doing?’

Han Solo: ‘I don’t know. But it ain’t good.’

Maz Kanata: ‘If you live long enough…you see the same eyes in different people. I’m looking at the eyes of a man who wants to run.’

Finn: ‘You don’t know a thing about me.’

—

In the 1st illustration, Finn was confiding with Han Solo. They don’t know each other, which is why Han Solo said quote: ‘Did you just call me Solo?’ So, using the 1st example, I believe that, whether it’s at school or at work, part of communication can involve some impressions of being personal. For example, people talk about each other’s families in school or at work, even though they don’t know each other. It’s an impression of dialog that is part of communication, sounding like you know the person when in reality you do not. Of course, if you agreed to the conversation, another person happily showing another his/her family pictures is not unusual. Even if you are talking to someone that you work with, a mild sense of knowing you in casual conversation is not unheard of.

In the 2nd illustration, based on my understanding of that scene, when Maz Kanata was being too forward with Finn, Finn felt like Maz’s approach was inappropriate, which is why Finn said ‘You don’t know a thing about me.’ And that is the problem. Finn does not want to accept the impression of knowing that Maz is presenting to him in conversation. And that is when I believe innocent people tend to clarify in their minds acceptable and unacceptable impressions of how people know them. And if you experience adverse, false impressions of knowing from an instigator, it makes it even more difficult. And that is why I invented idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’. Using idea ‘Not notify’ from Wishlist #1178, you can choose to not use adverse impressions of knowing imposed by instigators. All right. I gave you the basic idea for ‘Not knowing’ a week ago, and I feel sure that the kids that read and used it upgraded it. So, I’m going to say something, and it’s not intended to cause the kids to ‘freak out’. I just made the idea on my own. After all, I did invent the idea. And of course, if I’m overreacting, I apologize.(So many different schools of thought.) Anyway, to help you use idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’, using the ‘Not notify’ idea, using the aspects of complaining that identify the instigations that should not be there, you are able to remove probably many forms of instigations, as well as the efforts of complaining that you have made, and you have created from that a preferred perspective. I’m assuming that many of you have created more than one variation of preferred perspective. I used idea ‘Not notify’ yesterday while I was in the supermarket. I imagined a girl showing me a neon white or a neon green colored towel, and that neon color represents a preferred perspective. So, within reason, imagine a girl showing you a really clean towel. You see her face, of course, and her hands are holding the more narrow top end of it. It looks like she is showing you a vertical rectangle. And when you see that, that perspective does not have those impressions of knowing from instigators and inadvertencies that you deem inappropriate.

Gripe knowing:

According to www.dictionary.com, the word ‘gripe’ means ‘to complain naggingly or constantly; grumble’. I’ve offered you the idea ‘Pragmatic luxury hotel’ in Wishlist #1148. The purpose was to allow you to imagine/think about instigators talking to management and those with authority concerning your situation with more quality, more control in your favor. If you choose to use idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’ and ‘Not knowing’, and if instigators improperly imposed a sense of gripe upon you that, if you brought that gripe to the attention of management and those with authority, you believe that they would give you a verdict in your favor, then you don’t have to obligate yourself to interacting with such gripes. Suppose an instigator imposes a seemingly casual instigation upon you, something that has an obvious gripe connotation, but not something that you have to tell your boss about. Let’s say that was intentional, because the actual purpose of that gripe was to create yet again another variation of notification in your mind, a notification that would try to maintain the effectiveness of certain instigations.

Now that you have idea ‘Not my sense of knowing’ and ‘Not knowing’, you can choose to not commit to the interaction and use of such gripes. You are not even obligated to ‘know’ what those gripes are. After all, a favorable verdict will be given to you by management and those with authority if such gripes were brought to their attention. So, to help you use this idea, contemplationally say ‘Gripe knowing’, so that you don’t even have to use the associated knowing to those gripes. Here’s a rule of thumb(a general rule based on experience or practice) that I use to determine if you don’t have to even know the gripe. If an instigator tries to engage in a conversation with you about a gripe that you already know is inappropriate, you don’t have to talk about it. You’re not ignoring the instigator, but you’re not obligated to talk about it either. You can say to that instigator ‘I don’t want to talk about it.’ after they try to bring that up. Also, if an instigator tries to improperly impose upon you a gripe using some sort of unacceptable form of surprise, you can reasonably say to that instigator ‘You surprised me.’ That way, instead of just? experiencing the gripe surprise, you have more control over how you experience it. If you imagine the instigator doing such things with their gripes, and you say those statements and results of those statement reassure you about the effect of such gripes, then you have more of an ability to say ‘Gripe knowing’, so that you don’t even have to know what those gripes are, even though the instigator makes such gripes absurdly obvious to you.

Represent reply:

And that brings us to idea ‘Represent reply’. You can now use an unacceptable sense of knowing an unacceptable gripes as a possible unacceptable sense of replying to an unacceptable sense of representing. You can always change the order of the words. You can call it ‘Reply represent’ instead of ‘Represent reply’. Here is another illustration for idea ‘Represent reply’. It’s not an instigation, but you can easily refurbish it to represent an instigation. It is in episode 6.14 ‘Through the Fog(2018)’ again from tv show ‘Elementary’. Here is a partial description of the episode from wikipedia:

‘ Holmes and Watson race to help Detective Bell when he becomes a victim of a bio-terrorism attack at the precinct and the station is quarantined. ‘

The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 34 minutes and 41 seconds into the episode. Dr. Bridget Tanaka(Suzy Nakamura) and Captain Gregson(Aidan Quinn) are talking to each other. Here is the quote:

Dr. Tanaka: ‘What you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. How could anyone from our agency be responsible for an attack that happened 30 minutes before we showed up?’

Captain Gregson: ‘Somebody walked out of here with all our servers. They were wearing a CDC suit, and they were carrying a CDC I.D. card. They were also pretty familiar with bioterrorism protocols. Call me crazy, but look at it from my side of the desk.’

—

The highlight of that ‘Elementary’ episode is when Captain Gregson said quote:

Captain Gregson: ‘…and they were carrying a CDC I.D. card.’

If you look at the composures of the people wearing the CDC suits, all of them experienced an adverse, unavoidable representing reply. It’s wasn’t an instigation, but like Captain Gregson said: ‘Call me crazy, but look at it from my side of the desk.’ To be clear, Captain Gregson was accusing the CDC people of stealing the computers. If you watched the episode, they didn’t steal it. But even though that was true, they still experienced an adverse, unavoidable representing reply caused by the accusation.

So, here’s the point I am now trying to make if you choose to use idea ‘Represent reply’ or ‘Reply represent’: Let’s say you experienced an instigation that has an obvious identity identified by idea ‘Represent reply’. Even though you experienced a sort of reflex action of replying for a certain representing, you now have a chosen sense of preferred perspective to compare that contemplation to. Using idea ‘Not notify’, ‘Not my sense of knowing’, and ‘Gripe knowing’, even though you experienced the false replying, you don’t have to become it. Before this idea, as an example only, you may have contested it. Now, with idea ‘Represent reply’, even though you experienced it, you don’t even have to know it. It’s not something you have to use, address, or even resolve. If you want more examples, you can choose from Amazon.com a random episode of ‘Elementary’. Sherlock is very likely questioning someone who is guilty, and as that person is maintaining his/her innocence, the maintaining may involve inclinations upon Sherlock to reply to a certain representing. Sherlock not only addresses those replies, he also dismisses them with the discovered facts. Of course, those examples are refurbished for advice.

[It is now 4:07 PM EST for me. I am going to stop now, and I am going to proofread both Wishlist #1178 and this list, #1179 on 7/4/2019, on a Thursday, since I plan to take off from work for the holiday. Even though I don’t know specifically what idea I will give you next, I will type one in next Saturday. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

7/13/2019

TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for crime tv show ‘Elementary’. PG-13 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not my sense of knowing’ and ‘Gripe knowing’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.