7/4/2019
Salutations!
It is now 6:19 PM EST for me. I am going to try an all-nighter and finish this new list today, without the proofreading. I want to do something tomorrow. I will probably still have some free time tomorrow, but still I want to finish this idea today. I can still continue Saturday, but I still want to finish this idea today. I know I said I will proofread the previous lists today. What I did today was my laundry, and some supermarket shopping. I then tried to look through all the stuff I copied in the cable box. So, I did do a lot today, and I still think that, in the next few days, I’ll proofread these 3 lists. It will just be done in a different order. Actually, now that I think about it, I’ll just type in a few hour’s worth today, and then try to finish this list tomorrow, when I get back home.
The music video I chose an hour or so today is from song ‘Hope’ by The Chainsmokers. Here is a quote from wikipedia about the song and music video:
‘ Dancing Astronaut described the song as having “rhythm and light synth patterns that create a tropical house feel, adding a soothing background for its verses of combined vocal contributions.”…
The song was described as being about “the desire of someone to be loved”. ‘
‘ The lyric video of the song was released on December 14, 2018. It features the Chainsmokers and Winona Oak “laying on the floor covered in colorful flashing lights”. Oak, being “the main focus of the video”, appears wearing a “tan trench coat and red flannel shirt”. ‘
Here is a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Hope’:
I only wanted you ’cause I couldn’t have you
Now that I know
That wasn’t love, that wasn’t love, that was just hope
That wasn’t love, that wasn’t love, that was just hope
—
I found the music video from publisher ‘DSC top music charts’, category ‘Romanian Top 100 Airplay 03 March 29 #99’. The music video ‘Hope’ was listed as #21. To watch the music video in www.youtube.com, search for phrase ‘hope chainsmokers’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 101 million views. I recommend that you watch the music video ‘full screen’, and that you stop watching it 2 minutes and 53 seconds into it. The end of that music video clip is not part of the song. It shows you what I think is called ‘post production’. The clip shows you a few seconds of what the singers and production crew do that is not shown during a music video. Also, if you skip that post-production, it helps you give more credence to the music video. Based on my experience watching the music video, I recommend that you watch it twice, and don’t look at the words at the bottom of the screen. Since they’re pretty much on the floor during the whole music video, if you read the words, you may miss some of the special effects the music video is showing. In my opinion, the music sounds OK. The appeal is that the singers do the whole music video on their backs.
—
Not do:
I want to introduce to you 2 illustrations before explaining idea ‘Not do’. The 1st illustration is in episode 11.2 ‘The Ghost Monument’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2018)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the 1st part of that illustration starts 4 minutes and 18 seconds into the episode, The Doctor(Jodie Whittaker) is talking to Epzo(Shaun Dooley). Here is the quote:
The Doctor: ‘I can get us into the atmosphere. If we jettison the rear section.’
The 2nd part starts 5 minutes and 4 seconds into the episode:
The Doctor: ‘Jettisoning.’
The Doctor looks like she pulls apart something, and you see the rear of the spacehip separated from the rest of the ship through the spaceship window. If you want to, you can imagine Isaac, that robot from the tv show ‘The Orville’, being in that other part of that spaceship. You can imagine seeing Isaac’s face in that other part of the ship that is separated. Since Isaac is a robot, for the purposes of imagining it, it shouldn’t bother him.
—
The 2nd illustration is in movie ‘Cruel Intentions 2’, starring Barry Flatman as Headmaster Sherman, Keri Lynn Pratt as Cherie Claymon, and Amy Adams as Kathryn Merteuil. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 14 minutes and 16 seconds into the movie, Kathryn Merteuil is giving a speech. It is during that speech that Cherie Claymon is having the hiccups. Here is the quote:
Kathryn: ‘With that said, I feel it is our responsibility…’
Cherie: (hiccupping)
Kathryn: ‘…to reach out and accept all new students…’
Cherie: (hiccupping)
Kathryn: ‘as members of…and accept all new students as…’
Cherie: (hiccupping)
14 minutes and 30 seconds into the movie, that is when it seemed like all of the other students attending were laughing because of Cherie’s hiccupping interrupting Kathryn’s speech. That is when Headmaster Sherman said to the students quote:
Headmaster Sherman: ‘Settle down, people.’
—
Idea ‘Not do’ is a clarification that the instigation you unavoidably experienced, you did ‘not do’. When you experience certain instigations, they may cause you to experience a certain reply that may discourage the effectiveness of your objectivity. So, even though you did not do that which you have experienced, when you would recall the experience, your objectivity may not be as effective as you would want it to be. The reason I am introducing this idea to you now is because you may have used idea ‘Not notify’, from Wishlist #1178. That means you may have the ability to clarify more in your mind that you did not do those instigations that you have experienced. To help you separate yourself from that experienced instigation, I recommend that you watch that ‘Doctor Who’ scene that I typed in earlier, when The Doctor separated the rear part of the ship. I believe that sense of separation may help you separate from the experienced instigation more.
I recommended the ‘Cruel Intentions 2’ scene to help you sense what I am talking about. In that scene, Headmaster Sherman said quote:
Headmaster Sherman: ‘Settle down, people.’
If you choose to think about it this way, almost all of the students attending were laughing. Headmaster Sherman had an understanding of why the students were laughing, but he did not laugh with them. Instead, he said to the students quote: ‘Settle down, people.’ If you choose to use the finished explanation of this idea, I believe your sense of objectivity will improve in regards to certain instigations. You will be able to sense somewhat an instigation, but choose to not interact with it in an obvious sense. So, refurbished, Headmaster Sherman did not laugh with the students, as he was trying to help them ‘settle down’.
—
Inform:
I believe I invented idea ‘Not do’ 7/1/2019, just a few days ago, on a Monday. To create an active use of the idea, I imagined that the instigations that I had experienced involved a sense of informing on my part. If I would think of a certain minor instigation, I would clarify to myself that I was just informing the instigator about the unacceptable presentation he/she was showing me. I did not have anything to do with that instigation. By imagining that all you did was inform the instigator, I believe that may help you contemplationally sense that you had nothing to do with that instigation.
Contradict rationalize:
The word ‘rationalize’ is from Wishlist #1176, from idea ‘False active rationalize’, that idea with comedian actor Tom Arnold. Here is a quote:
‘ Once you add those basic beliefs to the evaluations of that instigator, you now may be able to remove that bothersome rationalizing the instigator is associated with as well. You don’t have to commit to certain rationalizings an instigator has caused you to think about. And that is why I call this idea ‘False active rationalize’. Even though an instigator presents a certain instigation related rationalizing, you don’t have to commit to it’s use. You can remove it. ‘
—
I invented idea ‘Contradict rationalize’ while I was in the laundromat earlier today. Idea ‘Contradict rationalize’ is a variation for idea ‘Not do’. Idea ‘Contradict’ means that you are experiencing an instigation that is causing you to experience a contemplation that contradicts your chosen sense of intent. It is like an instigator imposing a false accusation for you to ponder. By definition, it is a false accusation, but the instigator caused you to have a contemplation for it. So, when you put together idea ‘Contradict’ with idea ‘Rationalize’, you get ‘Contradict rationalize’, an imposed sense of rationalization that contradicts your chosen sense of intent.
—
[It is now 8:10 PM EST for me. Wow. It looks like I should think about this idea more, to make it easier for me to explain it. I know what the idea means, and I believe I can explain it. I’ll just explain it tomorrow, when I am more prepared to explain it. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.
—
7/5/2019
Salutations!
It is now 5:03 PM EST for me. The good news is that I succeeded in my project. My project was to make myself aware of a new public transportation route. I’ve been thinking about it ‘on and off’ for years, but I never got around to it, not until today. Instead of just looking at it on some map from the internet, I used it, enough of it, at least. The not so good news is that I was kind of lazy going about it. It’s now 5:08 PM, and there were probably a few? people checking on this blog, wondering when I will type something in.
Before I explain idea ‘Contradict rationalize’, I thought of 2 ideas recently I believe should be typed in before explaining ‘Contradict rationalize. The 1st idea is called ‘Sustaining motivation’, and I don’t have a name yet for the 2nd idea. After that, I will explain idea ‘Contradict rationalize’ in this list.
Sustaining motivation:
Here’s the illustration I chose for idea ‘Sustaining motivation’. It is in episode 3.22 ‘Explorers’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1995)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com. If you have Amazon Prime, there is no additional payment necessary. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 15 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode, Commander Sisko(Avery Brooks) is having a conversation with Gul Dukat(Marc Alaimo) using video teleconferencing. Before I begin that quote, here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about that scene:
‘ A brief exchange with Gul Dukat(Marc Alaimo) reveals political undertones to the adventure: a success would mean accepting accomplishments of the ancient Bajorans that the Cardassians have dismissed as “fairy tales”. ‘
Now, here is the quote:
Gul Dukat: ‘Commander, I contacted you out of concern for your safety, but you seem to be intimating that I’ve made some sort of threat.’
Sisko: ‘Ah, then I’m glad I was wrong. For a moment there, I thought that you had been put in charge of the Cardassiann Ministry for the Refutation of Bajoran Fairy Tales.’
Gul Dukat: ‘Since I don’t seem to be able to dissuade you from undertaking this little voyage of yours, I’ll wish you luck instead. Let’s hope you don’t need it.’
—
Here is the idea I made: many instigators have the ability to cause an innocent person to experience an adverse change in motivation use. For example, when you experience a minor instigation at school or work, that may temporarily wane/deconstruct your sense of motivation to attend school or to work. The ‘Explorers’ example I offered you show 2 men who both have a sustained sense of motivation to talk about Sisko’s situation. I just thought of this less than 30 seconds ago. The illustration is in episode 2.14 ‘Five Easy Pieces of Libby’ from fantasy tv show ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch(1998)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 8 minutes and 40 seconds into the episode. If memory serves, as some sort of punishment, Sabrina(Melissa Joan Hart) has to work in close proximity with Libby(Jenna Leigh Green). However, since Libby’s insults are dismissing Sabrina’s efforts to have a sustained sense of motivation, Sabrina tries to discontinue her close proximity work with Libby. Here is the quote:
Libby: ‘Why have you decided to become my shadow all of a sudden?’
Sabrina: ‘Well, I figured since we’re going to be working together, you know, maybe we could find a common ground.’
Libby: ‘Any ground I found with you would, indeed, be common.’
Sabrina: (chuckles) ‘You know, um, wait. I-I-I’m just trying to get to know you better.’
Libby: ‘Well, I’m popular, confident, nonfreakish–everything you’re not. And if you insist on traipsing after me, could you at least wear a higher quality perfume?’
Sabrina: ‘Okay, enough. Nothing is worth this. I don’t care what happens to me.’
And that is when Sabrina physically separates her close proximity work with Libby.
—
Another instigation that is also identified by idea ‘Sustaining motivation’ is when a typical instigation causes you to feel a sense of euphoria when engaging in conversations that you prefer. I guess it’s like that classic saying, ‘Feed a cold, starve a fever.’ The problem with that situation, is that, even though you are unaware that you are using it, or it doesn’t matter since you are doing nothing wrong anyway, it’s still a sense of euphoria/eagerness that is partially dependant on instigation. And what happens with long term exposure for such an effect? The answer/solution I invented for this situation and for the ‘Sabrina’ situation is to cultivate your own sustained sense of motivation. That way, if one runs out, you will have another to work with. In the ‘Explorers’ example, when Sisko was having a conversation with Gul Dukat, Sisko was planning to have that trip with his son Jake(Cirroc Lofton). So, Sisko does have an obvious sustained sense of motivation when talking to Gul Dukat. The motivation doesn’t have to bee cheery and optimistic, like the previous examples show. I just recommend that you are able to have a sustained sense of motivation for certain things that you choose to do. That way, let’s say if the ongoing use of motivation falters, or if an instigation causes you to have a dismissing sense of motivation, then maybe you may have other forms of motivation that may allow you to continue.
—
In depth:
I got the idea I now call ‘In depth’ from episode 7.5 ‘Into the Woods’ from crime mystery tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’. The episode recently aired on June 20, 2019. In that scene, Joan Watson(Lucy Liu) is having a conversation with Sherlock(Jonny Lee Miller). The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 12 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Joan: ‘I’m thinking about our work. I mean, the guy is sitting on the most extensive trove of private user data in the world. I mean, you don’t think that would be a nice resource for a couple of detectives?’
Sherlock: (sighs) ‘How do you suggest we proceed?’
—
When I watched Sherlock sigh, whether it was the 1st time, or the few times I saw that scene again(I would watch again certain scenes), I thought that Sherlock was privately disappointed in the way Joan talked to him. He’s not blaming her for that. If you watched an episode of ‘Elementary’, you may notice that Sherlock tends to give solutions that are ‘in depth’, that have a certain entertaining identity of substance. From time to time, when Sherlock has conversations with Joan, even though they are plutonically more than friends, he gets privately disappointed in the way Joan talks to him. I think it’s just an occupational hazard for Sherlock. Joan is not doing anything wrong.
My point is that, based on that ‘Elementary’ example, the kids that are reading this blog may expect answers from me that are ‘in depth’. I’m not saying that there’s anything wrong with that. After all, you want answers that work, and I am trying to give you answers that are useful to you. My concern is that, it is my belief that when Sherlock was disappointed in Joan, from that perspective vantage point, I believe that most people in America talk like Joan. When we have conversations with each other, we don’t normally blurt out ‘in depth’ statements to each other. I want the kids to know that. That way, you can continue having conversations with other kids and adults without being too dependant upon ‘in depth’ statements being in those conversations. It is also my belief that certain instigators encourage innocent people to be too dependant to respond to ‘in depth’ statements by improperly imposing upon them instigations that have ‘in depth’ interpretations. One reason why I think they do that is so that innocent people may end up in relationships with instigators, since it is my belief that many instigators can provide ‘in depth’ statements for innocent people to respond to, when they choose not to instigate.
[It’s now 7:06 PM EST for me. Tomorrow, I will finally finish explaining idea ‘Contradict rationalize’, and then hopefully finish proofreading all 3 ideas. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.
—
7/6/2019
Salutations!
If you are a proud owner of a beautiful home and the cost of viagra wish to have a hard wearing and absolutely stunning new lawn for your place, then you can consider going for a provider of a wide variety of lawns that meet your specifications. sildenafil online india Before you approach a driving school, be sure that they are free from the issue while making love. Almost 50 percent men in the world suffer from this disease but In the USA 30 to 40 minutes to come into response. viagra canadian You should never consume alcohol, grapefruits and fatty food, because these stuffs hamper the drug assimilation process. female viagra samplesIt is now 8:49 AM EST for me. I think this is the fastest time that I’ve ever found a new music video. I think it was under 5 minutes. I found this music video from www.youtube.com. It’s in category ‘Music’, sub-category ‘New Music This Week’. It was in the 1st place I looked today. Category ‘New Music This Week’ has 99 music videos, and it’s #82. The music video is from song ‘Twang’ by Mason Ramsey. Here is a short quote from www.wikipedia.org:
‘ Mason Ramsey (born November 16, 2006) is an American singer. After gaining Internet fame from a viral video of him yodeling Hank Williams’ “Lovesick Blues” in a Walmart, Ramsey was signed to Big Loud Records in 2018. ‘
So, according to wikipedia, Mason Ramsey is 12 years old. If you choose to, since Mason Ramsey is presenting himself to be a country singer, you can evaluate him as one of the many dialects that exist in America. I believe that most Americans, including myself, are not familiar with the many different dialects that exist in America. For example, if you don’t have actual experience interacting with someone that has an obvious Texas dialect, then here’s an example: imagine an asian lady, such as Chinese or Korean, wearing a Texas hat like Mason wore in his music video ‘Twang’, and she says to you ‘Howdy!’ Since I believe that most states in America is a ‘melting pot’ of different cultures and beliefs, what is also happening is that the people were were born in those states that have different nationalities assimilate the dialect traits from those states. There was this one movie I watched, I don’t remember it’s name, when someone was talking to a hispanic lady, wondering why she doesn’t speak Spanish. She said to the person something like quote ‘I’m American born, poppy!’ So, people with different nationalities, such as hispanic, Korean, Chinese, being born in America and adopting the dialects associated with where they were born.
Anyway, here is a quote from web site www.vulture.com, a review for song ‘Twang’:
‘ The Yodeling Prince Mason Ramsey is back. The 12-year-old viral sensation returned this week with a new song called “Twang,” along with a music video. The so-called “motion picture,” according to his Instagram, features Ramsey using his cowboy charms in school to woo a girl twice his height. He sings about how she loves him for his “twang” and “reminds her of a little Hank.” He stands on top of tables with his fashionable boots and finds a rose to give her before he’s quickly dragged away (by just his tiny arm) into the principal’s office. ‘
Here’s a quote from the lyrics to song ‘Twang’:
She loves me for my twang
Reminds her of a little Hank
When she hears me on the radio
She knows that it’s me by the way I sing
—
Music video ‘Twang’ premiered Jun 14, 2019, less than a month ago, and it has almost 3 million views. Earlier today, I watched it once.
—
Before I continue explaining, I want to add an illustration to speed things up here a little. It is from comic book ‘Batman/Superman (2013-2016) #3. It’s available digital from www.comixology.com, and it’s about 3 dollars plus tax. To purchase it, go to www.comixology.com, search for phrase ‘batman superman’, scroll down to ‘Series’, and click the one where Superman’s left arm is stretched out, or the one from (2013-2016). Scroll down, and it’s #3. Here’s it’s explanation:
‘ It’s a showdown that could shatter two worlds when Batman and Superman battle the Superman and Batman of Earth 2. ‘
So, basically, a much younger Superman and Batman who meet each other for the 1st time meet a much older Superman and Batman from an alternate reality called ‘Earth 2’. In the scene I will quote, the older Batman proves to the younger Batman and Superman that he has the capability to be the worst, most dangerous instigator on Earth! If you choose to purchase it, click ‘Read’, then go to page 20. The quote is from pages 20-21:
Older Batman: ‘I’m sorry, Clark. I had to stop you before you reached them. They could actually kill you. But I promise you, I didn’t know about the big crystal. I didn’t learn what they were up to until—‘
Older Superman: ‘It’s all right. Let’s just…’
That’s the moment when the older Batman stretched out his hand so that the older Superman could help him.
Younger Superman and younger Batman: ‘Don’t trust him!’
Page 21:
Older Superman: (talking to the younger Batman and the younger Supeman) ‘Ha. This has all been strange and kind of fun, hasn’t it? But now it’s time to be serious. We grew up on different worlds in different ways. But I know you, Bruce. And I definitely know you, Clark. You’re wearing those capes because you want to help people. And that’s exactly what we’re going to do. Now that shard is the most dangerous thing on this planet. Who’s going to help me destroy it? We’re wasting time. Let’s do this.’
Younger Superman: (talking to younger Batman) ‘You first.’
Younger Batman: ‘Psh.’
—
Before I continue explaining, just a reminder that it is my belief that an experienced instigation may cause an innocent person to get expelled from school, get fired from his/her job, and even cause an innocent person(at least innocent before experiencing such an instigation) to go to jail. One obvious purpose for these ideas is to help innocent people avoid such things from happening to them. Of course, you probably go to school with certain instigators, even work with some of them. You can even be friends with them, and maybe if you choose to, when you are old enough to, even marry them. And for the record, I don’t believe I am an instigator.
—
Contradict rationalize:
Let’s start by revisiting idea ‘Not notify’, from Wishlist #1178. For the sake of the kids reading this(it’s my belief that not every kid will be in a study group reading this stuff), here’s another illustration, refurbished for advice. It’s not used to teach you how to invest. The scene is in drama movie ‘Wall Street(1987)’, starring Charlie Sheen as Bud Fox, and Terence Stamp as Sir Larry Wildman. The movie is available streaming to rent and to buy from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 44 seconds into the movie. Bud Fox is talking to the union representatives.
Bud Fox: ‘When it hits 23, you guys to Gekko and you lower the boom. When he learns he has no union concessions, he’ll jump ship and sell everything he’s got.
Toni Carpenter(Jean De Baer): ‘Yeah, but who’s gonna buy then, and what’s to prevent some other shark from coming along and devouring us?’
And that leads to the scene with Sir Larry Wildman, which starts 1 hour, 46 minutes, and 3 seconds into the movie.
Bud Fox: ‘Sir Lawrence— or can I call you Larry? What would you say to owning Bluestar Airlines with union concessions at $18 a share?’
Sir Larry Wildman: ‘I might be very interested. Why you, mate? What’s a bloke like you doing mixed up with Gekko?’
Bud Fox: ‘Let’s just say that me and Mr. Gekko have a serious conflict of interest. But we all want to see this airline work. These figures show that it can.’
Sir Larry Wildman: ‘You’re prepared to take these large salary cuts?’
Duncan Wilmore(William G. Knight): ‘We are, but we want a contract agreement that’s ironclad. So if you buy it, you can’t break it up.’
Sir Larry Wildman: ‘I’m still listening.’
And finally, 1 hour, 52 minutes, and 43 seconds into the movie, as Gekko(Michael Douglas) is watching the news, a follow up as to what Sir Larry Wildman did:
tv news: ‘But then tonight amidst all the scuttlebutt, another rumble shook the street. According to many sources, raider Sir Lawrence Wildman has stepped in and bought a substantial block of Bluestar, and is going to announce a deal tomorrow at 18(stock price) that includes the support of the unions.’
—
So, idea ‘Not notify’ is a little like what Sir Lawrence Wildman did for the stock price of Bluestar. He stabilized it. When you think of using idea ‘Not notify’, it’s very likely to me that you think of a normal perspective, whether it’s for school or work, and that is the normal perspective that you sustain and maintain. So, I’ll give you some examples as to how to use that normal perspective of yours:
1)…Let’s say that, because you were complaining to an instigator, that led you to talk to your teacher or boss. According to your normal perspective, you don’t normally talk to your teacher or boss because of a complaint you made with an instigator. Therefore, you take that out. You ‘Sir Lawrence Wildman’ your normal perspective without that incident. According to your normal perspective, talking to your teacher or boss about a complaint you made with an instigator is not a normal occurrence, and should not be thought of as a normal occurrence.
Isolated incident:
2) Have you ever heard of the term ‘isolated incident’? I just did a search using www.google.com, and used a link from web site www.idoceonline.com, and here is the definition I am using for ‘isolated incident’: ‘an isolated action, event, example, etc happens only once, and is not likely to happen again’, and the example is ‘Police say that last week’s protest was an isolated incident.’ So, if you experience what you believe to be an isolated incident at school or at work, take that out, too, in reference to your normal perspective created by idea ‘Not notify’.
Pragmatic luxury hotel:
3) In Wishlist #1148, I introduced you to idea ‘Pragmatic luxury hotel’. Here’s a recommended illustration for that. It is in episode 2.3 ‘Prisoners’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Stargate SG-1(1998)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 8 minutes and 2 seconds into the episode, Colonel O’Neill(Richard Dean Anderson) is talking to Teal’c(Christopher Judge). Here is the quote:
O’Neill: ‘Teal’c, look scary and take point.’
8 minutes and 19 seconds into the episode, Teal’c walks past 2 men, but the men would not let the others pass.
O’Neill: ‘Uh, we’re with him.’
O’Neill points to Teal’c, and the 2 men let the others pass.
—
I think this is with at least most high schools in America. Other students notify each other if a certain student gets into trouble, and the students think about what is happening to that student. For example, the student is sent to the principal’s office, and the students wonder what the principal will say to that student. So, I think it’s a common thing for high school students and adult to think about what is happening to other students or employees who get into trouble. And that is what I am addressing, the ‘thinking’ part. I don’t have proof, but I believe it is very likely that instigators try to manipulate how you think about them getting into trouble. The point I am trying to make is that, when you are just thinking about it, let’s say you imagine an instigator or instigators talking to management and those with authority, you are not accomodated to actually be there, not by the instigator(s), and not by management and those with authority. You are just thinking about it. Therefore, if that is true, take all of that out from your normal perspective created by idea ‘Not notify’. I’m not saying don’t think about it anymore. I’m saying that for your chosen normal perspective created with idea ‘Not notify’, let’s say just certain notions that you find bothersome, you were not actually accomodated to interact with them. Of course, you are just? thinking about it. The problem is that the instigations you may experience may influence how you think about it. And that is why I offered you that ‘Stargate’ example. In that scene, the rest of that team depended upon Teal’c’s warrior experience to allow them to walk around that prison world. There is no shame or many other things involved. I believe it may be useful to see because they depended upon how the other prisoners perceived Teal’c. I offered you that example out of concern as to how you evaluate the capabilities of others. Now, this is based on how you think about instigators getting talked to: just because a person has a capability doesn’t necessarily have to mean anything. For example, a police officer has the capability to arrest people. That doesn’t mean that, if I talk to a police officer, I will get arrested, simply because that police officer has the capability to arrest me. It’s how you think about the capabilities of instigators when they are talked to by management and those with authority that concerns me.
The solution is that, since you were not accomodated to be there, take all of that out from your chosen normal perspective created by idea ‘Not notify’. If you want to keep thinking about that, sure. Just don’t use it as part of your chosen normal perspective. In my opinion, you’re just doing some of their dirty work for them.
—
Actual expect:
4) I just invented idea ‘Actual expect’ I think it was 1:43 PM EST, just a few minutes ago. It is now 1:52 PM. Here is a quote from where this idea came from. It is from part of the idea called ‘1st Wall’, in Wishlist #1178. Here is the quote:
‘ From their perspective, about 90% of it’s original expectations have already been lost, and it’s part of their job to reinstate as much of those expectations as possible. Now, keep in mind that those volunteers also have the resources of the company to work with, and it is the 1st time the company is doing something like this. And that is where I imagine certain instigators come in. I imagined that certain instigators are some of those volunteers, and they use the frustrations created trying to bring back those expectations as an excuse to instigate you. ‘
—
It is my belief that instigators like irony. For example, if they’re doing something at work that is knowingly hurting others, they may also want innocent people to partially, adversely respond to some? of the expectations as to why they are hurting others. So, here is where idea ‘Actual expect’ comes from:
‘ And that is where I imagine certain instigators come in. I imagined that certain instigators are some of those volunteers, and they use the frustrations created trying to bring back those expectations as an excuse to instigate you. ‘
Basically, an instigator may also instigate you in order to adversely encourage you to experience a certain frustration from an eagerness to bring back certain expectations that are not being met by the instigation. So, for example, if an instigator causes you to experience an instigation, and you complain to that instigator, it’s possible that the instigator is trying to cause you to eagerly want to bring back certain expectations lost from that experienced instigation, but in a context that addresses some of their own frustrations that cause them to hurt others. I call that phenomena ‘Actual expect’, when an instigator is causing you to commit to an actual sense of expectation that involves somes sort of adverse ironic gripe that they have.
If that is the problem, now that you know what it may be, the solution I recommend is that you take out that ‘Actual expect’ nonsense from your chosen normal perspective created by idea ‘Not notify’.
—
Contradict rationalize:
If you read those 4 ideas, I now think you are better able to find useful idea ‘Contradict rationalize’. I’ve been giving it some thought recently, and the best example I can think of for idea ‘Contradict rationalize’ is in movie ‘Freejack(1992)’, starring Mick Jagger as Vacendak, and Esai Morales as Ripper. The movie is available streaming for rental and purchase from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts, refurbished for advice of course, 21 minutes and 42 seconds into the movie, Vacendak is having a conversation with Ripper. Here is the quote:
Vacendak: ‘Know anyone indulging in a little commerce on the side, Ripper?’
Ripper: (sighs) ‘I don’t, but it’s worth checking.’
Vacendak: ‘It sure is.’ (the movie then zooms into Vacendak’s face) ‘Step up.’
Ripper: (chuckles) ‘Come on, Victor.’ (Ripper then places his hand on the lie detector test) ‘I never have, nor will I ever divulge information outside of this organization to anyone. And frankly, I’m surprised you would even test me.’
Vacendak: ‘I’m not testing you, Ripper. I’m testing the machine.’
The machine: ‘CLEAR’
Vacendak: ‘And it works.’
—
I feel a little sick recommending this, but without quoting it, I recommend watching episode 6.18 ‘Starship Mine’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’, and episode 3.19 ‘Through The Looking Glass’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. Both episodes are available from Amazon.com, and if you have Amazon Prime, there is no additional payment. I am recommending them to watch because in ‘The Next Generation’, Picard is portraying another personality that is not his own, and in ‘Deep Space Nine’, Sisko is also portraying another character that is not his own. I believe that can help you find more useful idea ‘Contradict rationalize’.
Here’s the idea for ‘Contradict rationalize’: if you made your own technique, and it’s not legitimately trained for you to have, such as being a psychiatrist or a government agent, and you have been using such a technique for several years or more, you would have developed a sense of confidence of justification, a certain consistent identity that you are ‘in the right’. And that feeling to be ‘in the right’ is encouraged by instigations that are easily identified by you as being unacceptable. So, according to idea ‘Contradict rationalize’, you can still experience a contradicting sense of your chosen rationalization, even though you have a technique that allows you to feel ‘in the right’ consistently. If you are an adult, in the past, instigators may have imposed instigations upon you that were false accusations. That was then. Now, with several years of using your technique, your feeling to be ‘in the right’ seems to be secure. That is why I offered you that ‘Freejack’ illustration. If you watch that scene, notice that even though Ripper believes himself to be innocent, he still experienced a contradicting sense of his own rationalization use as he was about to take the lie detector test. Here is a quote:
Ripper: (chuckles) ‘Come on, Victor.’
Ripper still is distraught and conflicted, even though he passed the test. And that is what I may think may happen to you, but in a context of an instigation. You experience such an instigation, whether you are at school or at work, and all of a sudden, you are experiencing a contradictory sense of rationalization. The good news is, with idea ‘Not notify’ and the 4 ideas I typed in this list, idea ‘Contradict rationalize’ can help you more tenably allocate such contradictions of rationalization. Think of the situation innocent people are generally in. They have what is called ‘Preferred objectivity’, and ‘Actual available objectivity’. With a little practice, you can create your own distinctions as to what those 2 phrases mean. Using idea ‘Not notify’, with a little practice, you can experience more objectively instigations that may cause you to have a contradicting sense of rationalization, but you do’t have to use it. In other words, instead of going through all of that frustration and conflict Ripper went through in the movie ‘Freejack’, you can instead choose to not use such a contradicting sense of rationalization.
[It’s 3:44 PM EST. It looks like I wasn’t able to finish this list, and of course I wasn’t able to proofread these 3 lists. The good news is that I think I offered you ideas that you may find useful. Next Saturday, even though I probably won’t, I will finish this list, and I will proofread these 3 lists. What may probably happen instead is that I will make another idea or ideas that I believe will be useful to you, and I will type that in instead. What I will hopefully do is finish proofreading the last 2 ideas this coming Friday, and then finally finish this list and proofread it next Saturday. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.
—
7/13/2019
TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Doctor Who’. Rated R mature themes and viewer discretion for movie ‘Cruel Intentions 2’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. Some viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for mystery tv show ‘Elementary’. Some discretion for comic book ‘Batman/Superman #3’. Rated R mature themes and viewer discretion for movie ‘Wall Street’. TV-14 sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Stargate SG-1’. Rated R violence and viewer discretion in movie ‘Freejack’. TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv shows ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’ and ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not do’, ‘Inform’, ‘Contradict rationalize’, ‘Sustaining motivation’, ‘In depth’, ‘Isolated incident’, ‘Pragmatic luxury hotel’, ‘Actual expect’, and ‘In depth’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.