8/31/2019

And how can I help?

(said as a greeting. It’s a refurbished quote from Sherlock Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller) said in episode 7.13 ‘Their Last Bow’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’. According to Amazon Video, that scene is located 8 minutes and 4 seconds into the episode.)

I don’t want to leave the greeting ‘And how can I help?’ too soon. Since I seem to be dependent on watching the last episode of ‘Elementary’, I’ll interpret that dependency as an indication that I should keep that greeting for a little while longer.

—

It is now 11:26 AM EST for me. I think I started around 10:00 AM looking for a new music video. I thought I chose one earlier, but then I changed my mind and continued looking. Finally, I chose the music video for song ‘Dancing With Nobody’ by Austin Mahone. The reason I chose music video ‘Dancing With Nobody’ is based on using ideas I will give you in this list, and in the next list for idea ‘Resist’. I know I said I would explain idea ‘Resist’ in this list, but yesterday I realized that you should get a few more other ideas before I explained idea ‘Resist’ to you. You see, the idea associated with idea ‘Resist’ is a new idea, something that I believe many of you would choose to use. That’s why I decided to give you a few more ideas before explaining idea ‘Resist’ to you. Once you have the ideas in this list, and the ideas from the next list, I would be able to explain to you the use of music video ‘Dancing With Nobody’ by Austin Mahone. I do have an explanation I can give you now about music video ‘Dancing With Nobody’, but you may not like it. If you choose to read this list and the next list, the reason to watch music video ‘Dancing With Nobody’ would be more standard demographic. But for now, here’s the explanation to watch music video ‘Dancing With Nobody: if you choose to look up the word ‘millionaire’ in www.wikipedia.org, according to that article, America has the most adult millionaires in the world, 41% of the world total. China has 8%, and Japan has 7%. So, in my opinion, that means that if you have that many rich people in America, what will happen in America is that the ambiance associated with all of that money will also be made more obvious. For example, if you live in America, let’s say you’re used to believing that your neighborhood’s ambiance feels like a normal middle class neighborhood. All of a sudden, when they’re? ready, the ambiance of your neighborhood will change from normal middle class, to upper class. When the change of you’re neighborhood’s ambiance occurs, it will happen very quickly. And that is why I recommend you watch music video ‘Dancing With Nobody’ by Austin Mahone. If you choose to watch that music video, when your neighborhood changes, in my opinion, a lot of the younger people in your neighborhood will look like how the singer Austin Mahone portrays himself in that music video. Anyway, that is just my opinion.

—

Here’s a quote about the song and music video for ‘Dancing With Nobody’ from soundigest.com:

‘ This new single is the perfect upbeat song with a groovy rhythm that’s sure to get you on your feet. It’s an infectious beat, giving off a hint of ’70s vibes, along with a modern beat of drums, guitars and his effortless falsettos. ‘

‘ To go along with the single, the “Dirty Work” singer released a fun-yet-simple, feel-good music video by director Trent Barboza. It follows… around Venice Beach, along with a few clips of him and his love interest. ‘

—

And here’s a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Dancing With Nobody’:

I don’t feel like dancing with nobody else
It don’t feel romantic with nobody else (No, no, no, no)
Can’t you see that, baby
I don’t want nobody else but you

—

I found the music video in www.youtube.com, category ‘New Songs of the Week – June 29, 2019’ published by ‘TopMusicMafia’. It gives you a preview of a collection of music videos. I don’t think they’re rated. It’s just a collection. The preview of music video ‘Dancing With Nobody’ starts 1 minute and 55 seconds into that collection.

To watch music video ‘Dancing With Nobody’ for free, search for phrase ‘dancing with nobody’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 1 million views. It premiered June 19, 2019, less than 2 months ago.

—

Not need validation and reciprocation from others to do certain things:

Although there’s bad language in the illustration, the best reference I can think of for idea ‘Not need validation and reciprocation from others to do certain things’ is in the movie ‘A Bronx Tale(1993)’, starring Lillo Brancato as Calogero Anello, Chazz Palminteri as Sonny LoSpecchio, and Eddie Montanaro as Eddie Mush. The movie is available from Amazon.com as a streaming rental for about 4 dollars, or as a streaming purchase for about 6 dollars. With the bad language removed, the illustration according to Amazon Video starts 46 minutes and 34 seconds into the movie. The scene starts in Aqueduct Racetrack, C(Calogero) verifying to the others that he made a bet on a horse called Kryptonite to win. Here is the quote:

Sonny LoSpecchio: ‘C, come here! You get it in?’

C: ‘Yeah, I got it in, Sonny, it’s all on Kryptonite.’

It is developed cialis generic canada using proven and tested herbal ingredients to improve vitality and vigor. Also many patients viagra online cheapest of erectile dysfunction would not like others to know about the medicine and hence they allow the formulation stage. If Senators had order free viagra the stamina to keep talking continuously, the only way they could be psychological and physical triggers to result in better semen release, and higher sperm mobility, along with intense and strong ejaculations. You should aware viagra pills price how to evade these fakes.

Sonny LoSpecchio: ‘Beautiful… You hold them.’

47 minutes into the movie, it looks like the horse Kryptonite will win the race:

Sonny LoSpecchio: ‘Look at him. Forget it. It’s over.’

Sonny LoSpecchio is congratulating the others, believing that the horse won the race before the race is over. However, 47 minutes and 14 seconds into the movie, they noticed that Eddie Mush also made a bet on Kryptonite to win. That is when Sonny and the others believed that the horse that they bet on, Kryptonite, would lose, because they believed that their friend Eddie Mush is a jinx(a person supposed to bring bad luck), they left before the race was over, knowing that the horse would lose. C(Calogero), however, stayed, still believing that the horse Kryptonite could still win the race. When the horse Kryptonite lost, C blamed his misfortune on Eddie Mush, and then left.

—

It is my belief that we do many things that rely on the validations and reciprocations of others. For example, when people work with each other in their jobs in general, the people rely on each other’s validations and reciprocations. I also believe that it’s a good idea to be able to do certain reasonable things without needing validation and reciprocation from others. Refurbished for advice, in the ‘A Bronx Tale’ example, C continued to participate with the possibility that the horse Kryptonite would win the race, but that participation needed the validation and reciprocation that the horse Kryptonite would indeed win the race. And when that horse did not win that race, C chose to no longer continue that participation. He even blamed Eddie Mush for the horse losing the race, since even his boss believes that Eddie Mush is a jinx.

So, here is my recommendation to you: if you think that such an ability is useful for you to develop, can you choose to do something reasonable, something simple for example, without needing validation and reciprocation from others? Going back to the ‘A Bronx Tale’ reference, I’m not recommending that you watch the movie, but Eddie Mush is friends with everyone in that group, but C does not have that same friendship expectation with Eddie Mush. I think that’s because Eddie Mush and the others are old friends, and according to www.imdb.com, C is depicted to be just 17 years old. C doesn’t have that ‘old friendship’ that Eddie Mush has with the others. So, even though the older men believe that Eddie Mush is a jinx, they also believe that Eddie Mush is their friend, and that friendship requires no extra validation or reciprocation. C, however, does not have that type of ‘old friendship’, causing C to discontinue with his participation with the bet with the horse Kryptonite using a more emotional emphasis.

It is my belief that there are jobs out there in America, such as doctors and lawyers, that do it all of the time, that they continue to do things even though they are not getting a certain validation and reciprocation from others. For example, since Americans are entitled to have lawyers represent them, that means that, if no plea bargain was made to avoid trial, then there is usually one lawyer opposing another lawyer, one lawyer representing a client even without certain validations and reciprocations from the opposing lawyer. A typical ‘The Good Wife’ episode starring Julianna Margulies as Alicia Florrick should show that.

Another example is a patient who notices some sort of body pain informs a doctor, and the doctor identifies the body pain as an indication of another, underlying problem, and so to treat the body pain, the underlying problem is also treated. In that situation, the patient at first may not feel like the body pain is getting the obvious validation and reciprocation it deserves. That is because the doctor is still trying to explain to the patient that the underlying problems have to also be treated. It’s just a delayed misunderstanding.

Even though I believe there are jobs that allow people to routinely do things without needing a certain validation and reciprocation from others, most of us probably could benefit from the development of such an ability. Here’s an example: I know that this is ‘just advice’ that I am offering to you, and there are no commitments. Let’s say that you recommend to someone else to read this blog. Soon after, that person makes a request from you, a request for more validation and reciprocation to allow that person to find this advice useful. Now, let’s say you have some difficulty trying to offer that person such validation and reciprocation. That moment may cause some people to think about dismissing the use of such advice. You see? If you have a developed sense to use this advice, that you have already decided that this advice is useful to you, in the context that does not require validation and reciprocation from others, then even if you find it difficult to give validation and reciprocation to others, you still have a more secure sense to continue using this blog. This waning effect I believe affects various types of people in general, whether you are a kid, teenager, or an adult.

All right. Here is an idea I invented yesterday while I was in the laundromat that is relevant enough for this advice. I imagined that I asked an attractive lady that I met in a public area if I can go on a date with her. Since I am single with no kids and no relationship commitments, I am assuming that it is possible that she may want to go on a date with me, maybe even have a relationship with me. Her reply was unusually demanding for me. She wanted me to meet a certain expectation, let’s say I had to be rich, in order to date her. Now, since this is just an imagined story, I imagined that her reply revealed to me an underlying(implicit; discoverable only by close scrutiny or analysis) problem that she has. I thought to myself that I can help her with this underlying problem that she has. However, even though she may be grateful that I helped her with that problem, she still won’t date me or be in a relationship with me, since I am not rich.

To help you find more useful that ‘underlying problem’ story I imagined in the laundromat, I recommend a scene in episode 4.3 ‘Tag, You’re Me’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2015)’. This is one? of the episodes where Sherlock(Jonny Lee Miller) and his father Morland(John Noble) are working together to resolve one of Morland’s business ventures. In that scene, they are both talking to Liliane Bellerose(Shohreh Aghdashloo). The episode is available streaming for about 2 dollars Standard Definition from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 29 minutes and 28 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Morland: ‘The habitat also occupies part of the space intended for the wind farm. When my clients conduct their environmental study, they will discover the monkeys’ habitat as well. And it’s extension into your property.’

Liliane Bellerose: ‘What is it you want?’

Morland: ‘I want nothing. In fact, I’m here to offer you a favor. My client… will publish this press release in an hour. It’s a pledge to revise their plans for the wind farm in order to protect the black crowned squirrel monkey. Of course, once word of the habitat gets out, that will the end of your resort and an embarrassment to you. But if you wish, I could persuade my client to let you add your name to the release, make the same pledge. You can be heroes together. The decision is yours.

—

[Instead of adding another idea to this list, I’m going to finish this list today. I’m going to add the disclaimer, and close it. Since I’ve decided to not work on Labor Day, 9/2/2019, I’ve decided to explain another idea that day. That idea is not idea ‘Resist’, but another idea I thought I would explain today. For now, that idea is called ‘Intentional bias’. After that, I plan to explain idea ‘Resist’. From now on, instead of telling you that I will proofread an idea I have not proofread yet, instead I will say that I am just going to add the disclaimer and close the idea. I have discovered that it takes a great deal of time to proofread these ideas. To me, ‘proofread’ means to read over the ideas in order to fix any mistakes. I’ve been at this for several years now. I am not saying that I am beyond proofreading, that I don’t have to proofread. I am saying that it would be more realistic of me to be able to give you the ideas as a priority, and proofreading to me is no longer as important as it once was. For Wishlist #1182, #1183, #1184, and #1185, that is what I did. I added the disclaimers to those lists to close them. I did not proofread them.

So, if you are there this coming Monday, I’ll see you then.

—

Rated R violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘A Bronx Tale’. TV-14 crime violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Elementary’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Not need validation and reciprocation from others/(other people) to do certain things’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/24/2019

And how can I help?

(said as a greeting. It’s a refurbished quote from Sherlock Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller) said in episode 7.13 ‘Their Last Bow’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’. According to Amazon Video, that scene is located 8 minutes and 4 seconds into the episode.)

Episode 7.13 ‘Their Last Bow’ is the last episode for the tv show ‘Elementary’, and it aired August 15, 2019. There are 2 reasons why I am using that quote from ‘Elementary’: 1)It is the last episode, and 2)In my opinion, there is obvious attention span associated with the last episode of ‘Elementary’. For example, as of now, it is the only thing I can stomach/casually tolerate watching from the cable service I am using. Just yesterday, I watched a copy of it from the cable box as I was getting my clothes ready for the laundromat. And before I sleep, I watch some of that episode. I speculate the some of the adults who watched ‘Elementary’ over the years are doing the same, if those adults wash their clothes in the laundromat. Even though that moment when Sherlock said ‘And how can I help?’ in my opinion is the most boring part of that episode, in my opinion it is compatible to turn it into a greeting for this blog. On a separate note, I will also use that episode as a reference for idea ‘Answer’.

—

It is now 11:26 AM EST for me. The music video I am recommending is for song ‘Take You Home’ by Dido. For those of you who don’t know who Dido is, it is my opinion that her most popular song was ‘Thank You’, and if you look in www.youtube.com for that music video, it was posted about 10 years ago, and has over 155 million views. That song and music video was also talked about in wikipedia, if you are interested in learning more about it. I found the music video ‘Take You Home’ in www.youtube.com, category ‘New Songs of the Week – May 25, 2019’ from publisher ‘TopMusicMafia’. It looks to me that ‘New Songs of the Week’ just previews the new music videos. It does not rate them. Dido’s ‘Take You Home’ begins 1 minute and 25 seconds into the preview. I just started using ‘New Songs of the Week’ today, and I believe that it is the best, most convenient way to quickly preview the new music videos that are out there in America that I am aware of. To use that option, just search for phrase ‘new songs of the week (what month you are searching, such as ‘july’) topmusicmafia’, and youtube should give you a selection of previews from topmusicmafia to choose from.

Here is a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Take You Home’:

I can sing you a song, take you home
But I can’t seem to find my own
I can sing you a song, take you home
But I can’t seem to find my way home

—

When I watch the music video, I find it relaxing. Since the only other music video I have watched from Dido was ‘Thank You’, it felt like my mind was relaxingly trying to figure out what to do with it. I just remembered that I did try to watch a few other music videos that she was in. I watched it for the 1st time earlier today. According to youtube, it was published on May 7, 2019, over 3 months ago. In my opinion, since the music video was also depicting 2 kids that I am assuming are brother and sister, the music video and song feels like it was trying to be nostalgic.

—

I don’t think I have time to proofread the 3 previous lists today, and I am choosing to not proofread this list today. I will, instead, proofread all 4 lists this coming Friday.

—

Answer:

It is now 1:21 PM EST for me. I had some difficulty finding a specific episode of ‘Elementary’. I didn’t think I would find it, but I think less than an hour ago I did. I eventually found it by searching the ‘Elementary’ descriptions from wikipedia. The search was very dependant on what was publicly available in the internet. If it didn’t show me, I couldn’t find it. And so, I shall begin by giving you 6 references to be used for idea ‘Answer’:

The 1st reference is found in www.google.com by searching for phrase ‘ny times jurors will disregard’. That should lead you to a news article from ‘The New York Times’ made in 1988 called ”Jurors Will Disregard’ Is Often Not Regarded’. Here in my opinion is the most relevant quote for this advice from that article:

‘ It is common for judges to instruct jurors to disregard information in deciding a case, such as telling them to ignore what they have read in newspapers, or, in the case of medical malpractice lawsuits, to ignore the disastrous conditions that provoked the suits, Professor Casper said. ‘

—

Before I continue, I want to say that this is just advice for mild to moderate forms of instigation. I am not trying to change your school of thought. For example, if you are experiencing mild to moderate forms of instigation, and you want this advice to work for you, then you will be using you own sense of resourcefulness and so on to try to make this advice work for you. I am just offering you the advice, and you are choosing how to use it, or even how to not use it. Have you ever read advice articles from newspapers? As you are reading such articles, you are deciding whether or not such advice is useful to you. I’m just tapping the brakes a little, in case the pace is getting a little too fast.

—

The 2nd reference is in episode 2.21 ‘Becoming: Part 1’ from fantasy tv show ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer(1998)’. In that scene, Rupert Giles(Anthony Head) is talking to Doug Perren(Jack McGee). The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 6 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Doug Perren: ‘Construction workers dug it up outside of town. Don’t have a clue what it is. Any ideas?’

Rupert Giles: ‘A few. None I’d care to share until I can verify.’

—

Before I continue, I want to say that the next idea, so far it’s name is ‘Resist’, may be new information to you, something that you may not have done before, and I anticipate that it will be an idea that you will choose to continue using. So, if you are disappointed with idea ‘Answer’, then I recommend that you keep in mind that, next week, I will explain idea ‘Resist’, and then it should make more sense to you.

—

The 3rd reference is in episode 2.1 ‘Alan Thicke’ from reality tv show ‘Hi-Jinks(2006)’. The show is hosted by Leila Sbitani. If you check her name in www.imdb.com, you should see that she is listed as the host of tv show ‘Hi-Jinks’. But if you click ‘Hi-Jinks’, she is not listed. Leila Sbitani is also listed in www.wikipedia.org. Season 2 is available from Amazon.com for about 6 dollars, and individual episodes are about 2 dollars. Since there are 19 episodes in Season 2, if you want to continue watching episodes, I think buying the entire Season 2 for 6 dollars is a bargain. Of course, if you just want episode 2.1 the Alan Thicke episode, that’s only 2 dollars. The scene starts 1 minute and 35 seconds into the episode, Leila Sbitani is narrating:

Before I begin, reality tv show ‘Hi-Jinks’ in my opinion is about a tv show and the parents of kids pranking the kids.

Leila Sbitani: ‘But first, how would people react if you magically turned into a monkey? Let’s see some unsuspecting kids handle it.’

Leila Sbitani: ‘Ashley’s mom is going into that port-a-potty.’

Ashley’s mom: ‘I’ll be just a second, OK?’

Leila Sbitani: ‘And that’s where the monkey business begins.’

—

1 minute, 58 seconds into the episode:

Leila Sbitani:(explaining how the prank works) ‘Mom slips through the trap door…and then out the back door.’

—

2 minutes and 8 seconds into the episode, the episode shows you more of how the prank works.

—

2 minutes and 32 seconds into the episode, you see Ashley surprised when a monkey comes out of the port-a-potty instead of her mom. Here is the quote:

Ashley: ‘Whoa!’ (Other kids are then quickly previewed to show their reactions to a similar situation.)

—

3 minutes and 14 seconds into the episode, going back to Ashley’s situation:

Ashley: ‘Wow.’

Leila Sbitani: ‘We better get mom back through the trap door before the joke is on us.’

Ashley: ‘Mommy?’

Ashley’s mom: ‘Yes?’

Ashley: ‘Are you in there?’

Ashley’s mom: ‘I’m in here.’

Ashley: ‘Someone just came here, and there was a–and somebody just took a monkey out of there.’

Ashley’s mom: ‘A monkey?’

—

3 minutes and 34 seconds into the episode:

Ashley: ‘And you weren’t in there. Somebody opened it.’

Ashley’s mom: ‘You’re kidding.’

Ashley: ‘No, I’m not kidding!’

—

3 minutes and 44 seconds into the episode:

Ashley: ‘And the monkey was sitting on a toilet. And then the monkey holding his hand, and he had diapers on!’

—

And finally, the next 3 references are from 3 episodes of ‘Elementary’. And like how Sherlock said, imagined,

It is important to maintain a healthy lifestyle with exercise to help reduce the risk of diabetes in future. deeprootsmag.org discount levitra This happens due to the one time injury to the brain that is responsible for cerebral palsy and finally resulting in mobility impairment, that will not subside after purchase cialis deeprootsmag.org several hours should be treated at once because it might as well be a delicate situation for the patient. cialis generic Erectile dysfunction does not cause any major worst effects it only makes you sexual sessions weak. Scientists saw the increasing age of discount price on viagra the people, lifestyle changes, work longer, which is created tension in our bodies.

‘And how can I help?’

The 4th reference is in episode 6.12 ‘Meet Your Maker’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2018)’. In that scene, Detective Marcus Bell(Jon Michael Hill) and Sherlock Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller) are questioning Jesus Rodriguez(Gerardo Rodriguez). The episode is available from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 38 minutes and 13 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Detective Bell: ‘Tattoos confirm what we already suspected. You’re a member of Los Ladrones.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘Your mustache gave you away, in case you were wondering.’

Jesus Rodriguez: ‘I don’t have a mustache.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘But you did, until you shaved it off yesterday. Presumably to look the part of the concerned brother. But your uneven tan revealed that you recently sported a handlebar mustache, which is popular amongst Los Ladrones.’

—

The 5th reference is in episode 7.5 ‘Into the Woods’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’. In that scene, Sherlock Holmes and Odin Reichenbach(James Frain) are talking. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 37 minutes and 3 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Sherlock Holmes: ‘If you have a moment, we’d like to discuss the matter of your niece, Mr. Reichenbach.’

Odin Reichenbach: ‘Oh, you can call me Odin. All my friends do.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘I haven’t decided if we’re going to be friends.’

—

As I said in the beginning, the 6th reference is in episode 7.13 ‘Their Last Bow’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’, the show’s last episode. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 26 minutes and 12 seconds into the episode, Sherlock and Joan Watson(Lucy Liu) are talking. Here is a quote:

Sherlock Holmes: (answering his smartphone) ‘Watson.’

Joan Watson: ‘Looks like you were half right.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘That’s half unlikely.’

—

It is now 4:09 PM EST for me. I guess I’ll start typing the ‘answer’ now, so to speak.(I’m in the process of contemplationally preparing myself to type.) Let’s start with a quote from 3rd reference, the ‘Hi-Jinks’ episode:

Ashley: ‘Someone just came here, and there was a–and somebody just took a monkey out of there.’

Ashley’s mom: ‘A monkey?’

Ashley: ‘And you weren’t in there. Somebody opened it.’

Ashley’s mom: ‘You’re kidding.’

Ashley: ‘No, I’m not kidding!’

Ashley: ‘And the monkey was sitting on a toilet. And then the monkey holding his hand, and he had diapers on!’

—

So, when you watch that scene in tv show ‘Hi-Jinks’, Ashley was able to evaluate a lot of obvious details that the tv show creators and her mom wanted to evaluate. Based on that assessment, you may be able to imagine how Ashley evaluates certain mild to moderate instigations that she may be exposed by instigators to evaluate, the type of instigations that may be mildy bothersome and mildly confusing to evaluate. Notice that, based on that episode, Ashley may use some obvious contemplation effort to help her resolve those instigation related contemplations. My proposal is that, if a person is being bothered contemplationally by trying to resolve some sort of instigation, that person does not have to automatically give many of those details the credibility that it’s identity is the answer. If you watched the rest of that ‘Hi-Jinks’ scene, and I recommend that you do if you want to, Ashley’s mom told her that she was pranked by the tv show and by her. In episode 2.1 ‘Alan Thicke’ from reality tv show ‘Hi-Jinks(2006)’, 4 minutes and 11 seconds into that episode, Ashley said quote:

Ashley: ‘I’ve been Hi-Jinxed.’

Ashley was probably shown the details of what the tv show will present to the public, and other things of course I am unaware of. You may imagine that, soon after Ashley was properly informed, at the very least, she was able to disavow(to disclaim knowledge of, connection with, or responsibility for) much of what had bothered her contemplationally before she was informed. And that is the effect I recommend that you have the ability to do, to be able to disavow certain bothersome and confusing contemplations that may occur for certain mild to moderate instigations and inadvertencies that you may and may have experienced.

Now, here is where it may get a little tricky. Before I continue, keep in mind that I am not a psychiatrist, or anyone that gives such advice professionally. That being said, when an innocent person tries to resolve an instigation contemplationally, it’s not just something that is absurdly obvious, like what Ashley went through, that you should be able to choose to not contemplationally treat as if it’s identity is the answer. In general, you should consider even obvious details that the instigator wants you to think about as something that you should treat as if it’s identity is the answer. For example, let’s say that an 8 year old girls was mildly instigated by and 8 year old boy. When that 8 year old girl would try to contemplationally resolve that experience, for some reason, and I don’t know why, maybe it’s because of her unique school of thought, she would think of a moment when she saw that 8 year old boy when they were outside in the schoolyard, and that 8 year old boy was just walking by her. For whatever reason, that moment would be part of her contemplations to resolve. If such moments bother you, and you use those moments as part of your contemplations to resolve, then you should have the ability to not treat such identities as the answer, meaning that you don’t have to give such identities an active identity contemplation. Now, this is when you are trying to resolve such contemplations in the context as an instigation. Of course, such contemplations have identities that exist in other expectations. For example, that same 8 year old boy playing in the schoolyard, that is supposed to happen. There is nothing wrong with that. Idea ‘Answer’ is used in the context when you are trying to contemplationally resolve something that you experienced from an instigation and inadvertency. Notice that, in the ‘Hi-Jinks’ episode, Ashley was able to disavow much of what she perceived that bothered her, since it was a prank. Certain identities presented to her were intentionally misleading. After Ashley chose to not treat certain identities as the ‘answer’, it was easier for her to recall the incident. For example, Ashley believes she saw a monkey. That is still there. Many of those other identities that were associated with some confusion still exist, but in a more acceptable context.

What I am going to try and do now is help you have the ability to choose to not give certain contemplation identities associated with instigation and related identities an active identity. You can always change your mind, and allow such contemplation identities to have it’s usual identity answer. The point is that you would benefit from having the ability to treat it’s obvious contemplation associated identity as the answer, or to not give it an obvious answer identity. Here is a quote from that episode of ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’ I gave you, of a man who does not want to give his discoveries an obvious answer identity that it presents, not until he has more proof to work with:

Doug Perren: ‘Construction workers dug it up outside of town. Don’t have a clue what it is. Any ideas?’

Rupert Giles: ‘A few. None I’d care to share until I can verify.’

—

So, here’s a quote from episode 7.5 ‘Into The Woods’ from tv show ‘Elementary’:

Sherlock Holmes: ‘If you have a moment, we’d like to discuss the matter of your niece, Mr. Reichenbach.’

Odin Reichenbach: ‘Oh, you can call me Odin. All my friends do.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘I haven’t decided if we’re going to be friends.’

Let’s say you meet someone Like Odin, who presents himself/herself in a friendly context in an outdoor picnic. You respond by feeling like you are friends, even though you have never met that person before, or you rarely talked in the job. Let’s say something like that happens many times. Now, let’s say something like that contemplationally happens, but in the context as part of your efforts to resolve an instigation. If that is bothering you and/or confusing you a little, you can choose to not give it’s contemplation identity an active identity. In other words, it can be like what Sherlock said to Odin:

Sherlock Holmes: ‘I haven’t decided if we’re going to be friends.’

—

And here is that quote from episode 6.12 ‘Meet Your Maker’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2018)’:

Sherlock Holmes: ‘Your mustache gave you away, in case you were wondering.’

Jesus Rodriguez: ‘I don’t have a mustache.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘But you did, until you shaved it off yesterday. Presumably to look the part of the concerned brother. But your uneven tan revealed that you recently sported a handlebar mustache, which is popular amongst Los Ladrones.’

—

Refurbished, imagine a man who recently shaved his mustache. You don’t see anything wrong with that, for example. Now, imagine that same man with the recently shaved mustache, but he’s now a part of your contemplation efforts to resolve an instigation and/or inadvertency. Now, thanks to that scene in ‘Elementary’, you may choose to no longer give that man an active contemplation identity when trying to resolve certain instigations and/or inadvertencies, even though the only thing that seems to be obvious is that he recently shaved his mustache!

—

Here’s a quote from episode 7.13 ‘Their Last Bow’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’:

Joan Watson: ‘Looks like you were half right.’

Sherlock Holmes: ‘That’s half unlikely.’

It seems like Sherlock always thinks that way, not giving certain contemplations an active identity automatically.

—

And finally, as of now, the 1st reference I gave you called ”Jurors Will Disregard’ Is Often Not Regarded’, if you choose to use it, is to give you more of a reason to choose to learn and use idea ‘Answer’.

—

So, if you are being bothered or experiencing some sort of confusion as you are trying to resolve a certain mild to moderate instigation, I recommend, if you choose to use the idea, to contemplationally say ‘Answer’, and see if you no longer want to treat certain contemplation identities as active contemplation identities, as ‘answers’, so to speak.

—

It is now 5:31 PM EST for me. I consider this idea done explanation wise. This coming Friday, I will proofread this list and the 3 previous lists, and next Saturday, I will make idea ‘Resist’. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

8/30/2019

TV-14 fantasy violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’. Some viewer discretion for reality-tv show ‘Hi-Jinks’. TV-14 crime violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Elementary’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and tv show. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Answer’ and ‘I am not treating it/that as an active contemplation identity’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/17/2019

Here we go!

(said as a greeting. It’s a refurbished quote from episode 11.2 ‘The Ghost Monument’ from sci-fi tv show (Doctor Who(2018)’. According to Amazon Video, the quote begins 8 minutes and 48 seconds into the episode, said by Angstrom(Susan Lynch).)

It is now 10:25 AM EST for me. 1st, here’s the music video I found earlier today that I’m recklessly? using for this advice. The music video is from song ‘Tu Manera’ by Romanian singer Inna. To be clear, I looked for new music videos from category ‘Music’, category ‘New Music This Week’ from www.youtube.com, and I did not choose one from that category. I think I only looked at a few of them, and the rest I just looked at their small image preview. Today is the 1st time I became aware of Inna. She has a few pages in wikipedia. Here is a short quote about her from wikipedia:

‘ Her YouTube channel surpassed three billion total views as of May 2019. 19 of her singles have reached the top ten in Romania… With global album sales of four million copies from her first three studio albums, Inna is the best-selling Romanian artist. ‘

—

I found music video ‘Tu Manera’ by searching publisher ‘Top 40 Music Charts’ from www.youtube.com. Click that, and then search for phrase ‘Romania April 2019’. Then click ‘Romania Top 40 Songs This Week | 16 April 2019 | Music Chart’. Music video ‘Tu Manera’ is listed as #25.

I watched the music video twice earlier today. It’s not in English, and normally non English speaking music videos I don’t choose, but when I watched ‘Tu Manera’, in my opinion, it didn’t have anything that said to me that only adults should watch this. Of course, it’s still a relationship music video, like most American music videos seem to be. Based on how I watched it, it’s basically Romanian singer Inna with the same clothes on, a yellow shirt, red shorts, and sneakers, dancing around seemingly outside a country like neighborhood singing her song ‘Tu Manera’. The music video is clearly made, and I think it’s entertaining to watch. Here’s a quote from the song ‘Tu Manera’ translated into English:

Tu Manera(Your Way):

There is no other equal like you, you have something that there is not

I can’t contain myself, I want to confess to you already

—

It is now 11:04 AM for me. I recently watched music video ‘Tu Manera’ for the 3rd time today, and I noticed something. To the kids, if you choose to watch music video ‘Tu Manera’, don’t sit on the hood/top of any car in general, like the way Inna does in the movie, or else your weight may put a dent on that car. I don’t want your parents blaming me for any dents that you may accidentally create on cars by standing or sitting on them.

According to wikipedia, music video ‘Tu Manera’ published by ‘INNA’ has over 26 million views, and it was just released on Mar 8, 2019, about 5 months ago!

—

Participation:

Before I begin explaining idea ‘I can speak for myself’, I want to explain idea ‘Participate’. It is my belief that it is possible that certain instigators that are reading this blog may have caused innocent people to have a discouraging sense of participation, because of the ideas that I will probably type in soon. So, I’ll explain idea ‘Participate’, to help compensate for that discouragement.

[It is now 11:19 AM for me. I’m going to look for take out food to buy. After I take care of the food thing, I’ll begin typing again. I’ll probably continue typing as I wait for the food to be delivered. So, this food situation should be resolved in 2 hours. See you then.

—

Participation:

It is now 1:08 PM EST for me. To be clear, I do not know for certain that some instigators, or even any instigator, has done some sort of instigation identified by idea ‘Participate’. It’s just something that I believe may have happened if kids, teenagers, and college students are reading this blog. Also, after 2 or so more Saturdays, I plan to explain idea ‘Participate not expect’. The ‘Participate’ part will use the definition of ‘Participate’ that I am explaining now. Therefore, I am trying to prepare you for an idea that I will type in by explaining a part of it now.

The purpose of idea ‘Participate’ is to help recover somewhat the basic participation efforts that you use in your school/job participations, if certain instigations and/or related inadvertencies have discouraged such efforts somewhat. For example, I’m not encouraging you to join ‘The Peace Corp’, so to speak. Have you heard that slogan, “The Peace Corp: The toughest job you’ll ever love.” The purpose is not to obligate you to use your participation efforts for other endeavors. If you choose to do so anyway, that’s up to you.

Here’s an explanation I’ve made about participation involving cruise ships. Many Americans probably know of someone at work, or someone from their social circles, who has attended a cruise ship vacation. I think I have also read something in the internet, or saw something on tv, that there are big cruise ships primarily designed to have people that actually live in it, and they use those cruise ships as a permenant address. That means such cruise ships probably have teachers for their grammar school and high school kids. Those cruise ships, in my opinion, is a little like the Starship Enterprise from tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’, in the context that they have school accomodations for the children of their parents, and since such cruise ships move from place to place, country to country, such movement offers their kids a unique education variety.

Now, the ‘participation’ part is what I just suspect is happening for the kids and teenagers who live on such cruise ships. Since such cruise ships probably also accomodate passengers who are just there on vacation, such cruise ships have seasonal moments that also turns them into luxury cruise ships for people who are on vacation, which give the kids and teenagers who live on such cruise ships another unique opportunity. If the kids and teenagers choose to work during those seasonal moments, they will be offered more luxury related opportunities than the vacation passengers will be offered. For example, scheduling the vacation passengers limits their ability to participate with many of the social events. The kids and teenagers that choose to work for the cruise ship for those seasonal events, however, have less of a scheduling restriction. And there are also ‘on the job’ learning opportunities that are made obvious to the kids and teenagers who live on those cruise ships, if they choose to consider working during those seasonal moments.

So, just using that ‘Cruise ship’ example, you may see that participation has it’s advantages. Those kids and teenagers in that story are offered the use of many of the resources that cruise ship situation has to offer, and all they have to do is work during those seasonal moments.

So, what does this have to do with participation efforts possibly being discouraged? It is my belief, not a proven fact, that some/certain instigators may have instigated certain innocent people who are reading this blog, because they anticipate that I will soon? explain a certain idea that will benefit them. And so, based on this anticipation, which in my opinion, is probably a certainty in many of their minds, they caused certain innocent people to experience an instigation that discouraged their sense of school/and or job related participation.

For example, the adults who experienced such an instigation at work, as you recall such an instigation and you try to resolve it, one of the results cause you to have a discouraged sense of job related participation. So, here’s a scenario that I invented to help give some sort of partial recovery for your discouraged sense of participation: I recommend that you think of a minor goal that you have yet to achieve, or think of a minor goal that is compatible to the explanation I am about to give you. Let’s say that at least a percentage of that minor goal, let’s say 20-30% of that goal, can be achieved by participating in it’s job related circumstance, like the cruise ship example. If you participate in a situation that involves that goal, at least an obvious percentage of that goal will be achieved. An obvious conceptualized example I thought of earlier today involved a man who finally decided to participate in a situation that involved one of those goals. The conceptualized goal being achieved that I imagined involved that man performing on stage with one of the music bands that he admires. Before that event, before he participated, he was experiencing a discouraged sense of participation. When he chose to participate in that event and eventually performed with that music band, obviously he no longer had such a discouraged sense of participation. So, in my opinion, you don’t want to dismiss in general participation itself, even if an instigator has somehow managed to cause you to have a discouraged sense of participation.

—

I can speak for myself:

To start explanation ‘I can speak for myself’, I’ll type the 3 references 1st, then I’ll explain it.

The 1st reference, which is meant to be a partial joke but is relevant, is in episode 4.25 ‘Broken Link’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1996)’. Here is a quote from wikipedia about that scene:

‘ Once on the surface, on a small island in a large sea, they finally realize how many Changelings there are; the planet-enveloping sea is actually Changelings in their liquid form. Odo and the Female Changeling then walk into the sea, leaving Bashir and Sisko to wait for them. ‘

‘ Back on the surface, time goes slowly and Bashir in his boredom nearly throws a stone into the Great Link, but is stopped just in time by Sisko. ‘

So, the partial joke was that Bashir(Alexander Siddig) thought that the Great Link was an ocean, and was about to throw a stone at it. Sisko(Avery Brooks) reminded Bashir that that was not an ocean, but many Changelings in liquid form. Amazon.com has episode 4.25 ‘Broken Link’ available streaming. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available without additional payment. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 33 minutes and 44 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Bashir: ‘How long has it been?’

Sisko: ‘I’ve lost track.’

Bashir: ‘So have I.’

Sisko: (Sisko notices that Bashir is about to throw a stone at what Sisko believes to be an ocean.) ‘Doctor…’

But the trick is to find a viagra cialis prix good, ethical and reputed supplier and manufacturers. Chronic medical conditions are usually not treatable or cheap viagra from uk reversible. Since the bodies of all 65 year old people do not react in the same way, the dose may be increased to a maximum recommended dose amerikabulteni.com cipla generic viagra of 100 ,g, or decreased to 25 mg. ask your health care provider and collect sufficient information about the ailment. These centers provide modernized classrooms and curriculum augmented by effective online sale viagra practical training.

Bashir: ‘Oh… oh… right.’ (Bashir puts the stone down and sighs.)

—

The 2nd reference is in episode 7.3 ‘The Price of Admission’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, that scene refurbished starts 22 minutes and 37 seconds into the episode, Joan(Lucy Liu) and Bell(Jon Michael Hill) are talking to suspects Aura Swenson(Kate Middleton) and her lawyer(Kate Levy). Here is the quote:

Bell: ‘So you’re admitting to everything your appraiser told us? That several of these items are missing the paperwork needed to bring them legally into the U.S.?’

Joan: ‘You realize you’re confessing to a federal crime…’

fast forwarding to 23 minutes and 9 seconds into the episode:

Aura Swenson: ‘The fact is, I let you in here to prove that I wasn’t committing any crime. And since that’s the case, there’s nothing that I could be blackmailed over, either.’

Joan: ‘I’m confused. How could your father have been susceptible to blackmail, but not you? You just said that the looted items are still here.’

Aura’s Lawyer: ‘Because we finalized a deal with the Ethiopian government this morning that obviates any crimes on Ms. Swenson’s part.’

Bell: ‘Care to explain how a deal with a foreign country saves you from facing charges on U.S. soil?’

—

The 3rd reference, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, is in spy fantasy episode 1.6 ‘The Rook(2019)’. The episode is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com via STARZ subscription. The subscription is about 9 dollars a month. So, if you want to watch it from Amazon.com, I recommend that you get the STARZ subscription, and then cancel the STARZ subscription right after you made it. The subscription will remain active for an entire month, and then cancel. That way, you won’t have to worry about forgetting that you have a STARZ subscription. If you still have the 7 day trial available to you, then you can do the same, and the trial subscription will still last for 7 days.

According to Amazon Video via STARZ subscription, the scene starts 33 minutes and 52 seconds into the episode, Monica Reed(Olivia Munn) is talking to her then boyfriend Marcus Kevler(Luke Roberts) in a bar. Here is a quote:

Monica Reed: ‘We didn’t ask for the check.’

Woman bartender: ‘Oh. I’m sorry.’

Marcus Kevler: ‘No, no.’

Woman bartender: ‘My mistake.’

Marcus Kevler: ‘Fine, we’ll take it anyway. Thank you.’

—

Soon after, the tv show shows Monica Reed re-thinking that event, and this time, she is interpreting it with what she believes to be a relevant discovery. That scene starts 34 minutes and 8 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Monica Reed: ‘You know what, we didn’t ask for the check.’

Woman bartender: ‘Oh, I’m sorry. My mistake.’

Now, I’m not certain, but I think that was the moment that Monica Reed finally noticed that the woman bartender was Bronwyn Thomas(Tamsin Topolski), Myfanwy Thomas'(Emma Greenwell) sister, and that the bill also contained a message that was not meant for Monica Reed to read. (Of course, don’t use that scene when Monica Reed emotionally breaks the glass she was holding.)

—

The definition of idea ‘I can speak for myself’ comes in 2 parts. The 1st part identifies a situation that causes you to feel contemplationally confused based on what the instigation and inadvertency is causing you to see and experience. When you think of phrase ‘I can speak for myself’, it’s a clarification of what your intent was when that confusing event occurs. You see, one of the side effects of the confusion is to cause you to forget somewhat what your intent was as you experience that confusing event occurs. So, if you contemplationally say the phrase ‘I can speak for myself’, it’s purpose is to help you remember what your actions are, what your use of intent is, as what the instigator/s are causing you to see and experience may cause you to feel confused. Now, this is not an exact match reference, but Joan Watson does use the word ‘confused’ in the 2nd reference, episode 7.3 ‘The Price of Admission’. Here is the quote:

Joan: ‘I’m confused. How could your father have been susceptible to blackmail, but not you? You just said that the looted items are still here.’

Aura’s Lawyer: ‘Because we finalized a deal with the Ethiopian government this morning that obviates any crimes on Ms. Swenson’s part.’

You see, the confusion that the instigation is causing you to see and experience, one of it’s side effects is to cause you to forget what your use of intent was during that moment. Just contemplationally say the phrase ‘I can speak for myself’, and it’s purpose is to help you remember what your intent was, even when you recall such an obviously confusing creating moment.

I forgot to mention that I chose ‘I can speak for myself’ because I thought it was an already established in use phrase. I did not verify that it was. I just thought that it was. You can use another phrase if you choose to. If you choose to take this idea, it’s yours to change around, in relation to advice said.

—

The 2nd part of idea ‘I can speak for myself’ is in how you re-evaluate already experienced instigations. In the 3rd reference, episode 1.6 ‘The Rook’, Monica Reed has been thinking about that conversation she had with her then boyfriend Marcus Kevler many times. According to the show, Monica Reed is supposed to be a trained government agent. Also keep in mind that it’s a tv show made for the general public to possibly watch. Put those together, and you may have a smart woman recalling something that bothers her many times. It is a belief that a lot of people probably re-think certain experiences in order to resolve them or make them more tenable. And that is what happened in the episode, in a way. Monica Reed did find something relevant, something that she was looking for, but the discovery also made her upset.

For the 2nd part of idea ‘I can speak for myself’, let’s say that it’s a job related situation. You made a complaint to an instigator for instigating you, and if it comes down to it, you can explain the situation to management for whatever reason. Now, that explains the original moment that such an event happened. However, when you re-think that moment, other evaluations reveal themselves to you, but in a confusing context. The 2nd part of idea ‘I can speak for myself’ is to clarify what your original intent of action was. That way, if confusing re-evaluations occur, those re-evaluations won’t diminish the awareness of what your original intent of action was. For example, if you bring up such a situation to management, what your original intent of action was, even though while re-thinking that moment, other confusing evaluations are discovered, see if you can imagine that not only will management understand what you went through, but also consider the possibility that management can even make a case in your favor. Don’t underestimate the capabilities of management, and those with authority!

The purpose of the 2nd part of idea ‘I can speak for myself’ is to change the evaluation context of re-evaluations, if such discoveries confuse you. For example, you can remember what your original intent of action was, and also use a more tenable re-evaluation if such re-evaluations become confusing to you. Just contemplationally say the phrase ‘I can speak for myself’, to check if certain re-evaluations are trying to confuse you.

[It is now 5:48 PM EST for me. I’m going to stop explaining ‘I can speak for myself’ for this list. This coming Friday, I plan to proofread the previous 2 lists, and this list, Wishlist #1184. That way, I can start a new list to explain idea ‘Answer’ and it’s variations the following day. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

8/30/2019

TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for crime tv show ‘Elementary’. Violence, mature themes, and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Rook’. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Participate’, ‘Participation’, and ‘I can speak for myself’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/10/2019

Here we go!

(Said as a greeting.)

It is now 11:58 AM EST for me. The music video I watched for the 1st time earlier today is from song ‘Summer Girl’ by Haim. They have a wikipedia page, and here is a quote:

“Summer Girl” is a song by American band Haim, released as a single on July 31, 2019.

‘ Pitchfork named the song the Best New Track, with staff writer Michelle Kim describing it as having a “jazzier palette than Haim’s usual guitar-forward funk-pop”, calling it “sweetly plaintive” and saying that with the lines “You walk beside me, not behind me/Feel my unconditional love”, “Danielle positions herself as a rock for her partner and invokes the age-old belief: Love has the power to heal.” ‘

‘ The music video premiered on YouTube on July 31, 2019. It marks the band once again collaborating with director Paul Thomas Anderon, and features the group walking the streets of Los Angeles, the band’s hometown. ‘

—

I found the music video ‘Summer Girl’ from www.youtube.com’s ‘Music’ category. After I clicked ‘Music’, I then clicked ‘New Music This Week’. ‘New Music This Week’ shows 99 videos, and ‘Summer Girl’ is #22. In Wishlist #1181, I offered story ‘James Bond Space Station’. Associated with it, I imagined a girl wringing a hand towel by the sink, taking some of it’s water out. That being said, and because of the next ideas I plan to type in, I believe you may learn how to give more expectation uses to what is available to you, more specifically, how you may choose to use the music videos I will offer you. You may choose to have more ‘how’ options to use music videos soon. For example, I offer music video ‘Summer Girl’ to you because you might find it entertaining to watch. You may be able to use it for other things, but right now, I just think you might like to see it. Based on how I watched it earlier today, it’s nice to see the 3 women change their clothes many times without needing a dressing room. They have clothes already being worn even after removing other clothes, and there doesn’t seem to be any bulky clothing appearances, like imagining someone in a jokingly manner wearing many layers of clothes at the same time. That person would seemingly look very bulky, since that person would be wearing many layers of clothing.

So, according to wikipedia and youtube, the music video ‘Summer Girl’ was released less than 2 weeks ago, and amazingly, it already has over 3 million views. Here’s a joke from one of the comments posted on youtube:

Producers: How many clothes do you want to wear?

HAIM: Yes.

—

And here’s a quote from the lyrics of song ‘Summer Girl’:

Peer around the corner at you
From over my shoulder I need you
I need you to understand
These are the earthquake drills that we ran
Under the freeway overpasses
The tears behind your dark sunglasses
The fears inside your heart as deep as gashes
You walk beside me, not behind me
Feel my unconditional love

—

If you choose to, I want to boost the presence of ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’ in your use of ideas, since based on my experience, certain instigations are easily? identified from some of those ‘Next Generation’ episodes. If you followed some of my recommendations to use some of those episodes, then you may see the value of doing this. Also, according to wikipedia, 4 movies featuring the cast of the ‘Next Generation’ series were already made, and there’s this new series in the beginning of next year called ‘Star Trek: Picard’, featuring the return of Picard from the ‘Next Generation’ series, as well as Riker and Troi. So, in my opinion, it’s pretty much a ‘sure thing’ to boost the effectiveness of ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’.

So, if you want to participate, here’s the idea I made up: It’s based on one scene, not the entire video, made from song ‘2 Legit 2 Quit’ by MC Hammer. Here is a short quote about the song and music video from wikipedia:

‘ “2 Legit 2 Quit” is a single by Hammer featuring Saja (aka Sonia Moore), released on September 5, 1991 as both the title track and first single of his fourth studio album, Too Legit to Quit (1991). It proved to be successful in the U.S., peaking at the Top 10 of the Billboard Hot 100 at No. 5. ‘

‘ The music video was directed by Rupert Wainwright, and at almost 15 minutes in length, was one of the most expensive videos ever produced. ‘

To watch that scene for free, search for phrase ‘2 legit 2 quit’ in www.youtube.com, and the music video should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 8 million views. It is from ‘UPROXX Video’. That music video is 14 minutes and 37 seconds long. You don’t have to watch the entire music video. I only recommend watching starting 10 minutes and 42 seconds into the music video, and ending 11 minutes and 26 seconds into the music video. That’s just about 44 seconds I recommend that you watch. That is the scene when the dancers are all wearing varsity jackets. And now, here is the story I made to go with that:

Effectiveness Effectiveness is the most important factor considered by buy cipla viagra Read Full Report every patient. This would mean that there is a behavioral disorder those who respond so disproportionately lowest price on viagra original cause. For example, among the conditions you should let your healthcare provider know about before you take this medicine best online viagra deeprootsmag.org is effective for reproductive health of millions of men with ED get failure to achieve and maintain a hard-on for a satisfying and pleasurable lovemaking session. cialis soft tabs The most popular and with a strong Christian family background, it is not surprising that your body occasionally cries out in pain or refuses to do what you tell it.

Before I start the story, I checked wikipedia, and 4 of the main characters I will use from ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’, Riker(Jonathan Frakes), Worf(Michael Dorn), Geordi(LeVar Burton), and Deanna Troi(Marina Sirtis) are in their 60’s now. So, even if you imagine them in the now doing this, in a tv show/movie context, it can still be done. So, here’s the idea:

Going back to when Picard did not retire yet from The Federation, let’s say some time after movie ‘Star Trek: Nemesis’, Picard was given an assignment to go back in time and study Earth 1991.(That was when according to the internet music video ‘2 Legit 2 Quit’ was released to the public.) Picard had a meeting with the main characters of ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’, and to prepare to interact with the civilians from Earch 1991, they chose to study the music video ‘2 Legit 2 Quit’, more specifically, the scene when the dancers were wearing the varsity jackets. Picard chose 4 of the main characters, Riker, Worf, Geordi, and Deanna, and some other Starfleet personnel, to emulate those dancers. Starfleet gave them a month to prepare, so there was time for each of the main characters to train on their own, not with the others, but with other Starfleet personnell in the holodeck room to emulate those dancers. Eventually, all 4 would be in the holodeck room dancing with those varsity jackets together, to make sure that they got it right. For now, what I recommend that you imagine is each of them individually dancing with the varsity jackets on. So, when you watch that scene from the music video ‘2 Legit 2 Quit’, imagine them one at a time being one of those dancers wearing the varsity jacket. For example, starting at 10:42 in the music video, as they dance, imagine Riker being one of those dancers. You don’t have to clearly see him dancing. Just know that one of those dancers, it could be any one of them, is Riker. Since they’re dancing pretty vigorously and fast, you don’t have to choose any one of them specifically. Just imagine that one of them is him, and he one of the many that you see. After you do that, choose another ‘Star Trek’ character, let’s say Worf, doing that same dancing. Watch that dancing sequence again, and imagine that Worf is one of them. Then start over, and imagine that Geordi is one of them, then start over, and imagine that Deanna Troi is one of them. One of the effects is like adding more composure responses to the ‘Star Trek’ team. Add more details that you would reasonably want to to how they train. Keep in mind that they are using a hologram room, Federation technology, and all 4 already have years of experience with the Federation. Sure, in the beginning, they’re kind of clumsy and clunky, but in 2 weeks time, they’re almost exactly the same as the dancers in that music video.

—

All right. Before I begin explaining idea ‘Stand still’, here’s my plan: I’m offering you idea ‘Stand still’ and the other ideas after, such as idea ‘I can speak for myself’, ‘Answer’, and ‘Resist’, based on the order in which I invented them. After I offer you idea ‘Stand still’, you still don’t have the other ideas yet. I plan to finish explaining idea ‘Stand still’, and then explain idea ‘Answer’ and it’s variations next week. Idea ‘Resist’, and it’s still a little vague as to how I’ll explain that, but I’ll type in something, I plan to explain that the following Saturday. So, if you’re not too happy with idea ‘Stand still’, I recommend that you also read ideas ‘I can speak for myself’, ‘Answer’, and ‘Resist’. After reading those, you will have more to work with idea wise, more than you have now.

—

Stand still:

Idea ‘Stand still’ is based on a scene in movie ‘Get the Gringo(2012)’, starring Mel Gibson as Driver, and Dolores Heredia as Kid’s Mom. I can’t find the movie streaming from Amazon.com or Google Play. However, the scene for this idea I found in www.youtube.com. According to youtube, publisher Kinobscura posted a very good quality video clip of that scene. In case that clip is removed, publisher ‘Big Dreams’ posted the whole movie of ‘Get the Gringo’ in youtube, and the scene is in that. The scene is not that long. To watch that scene in www.youtube.com, search for phrase ‘get the gringo a special wing’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered. It is called ‘A Special Wing for Special Inmates’. And here is my description of the situation of that scene: Javi Huerta(Daniel Gimenez Cacho), the man who runs the prison, is showing the people that he works with that the woman(Dolores Heredia) has a son that has an organ that he may later need. Javi Huerta is making sure that both the woman and her son are not to be harmed. And so, the woman regularly attends the parties made for his business associates.

The scene for this idea is when you see the woman leave one of his business parties. You can tell that she feels obviously ashamed of herself, given the circumstances of her presence there. And that is where Driver(Mel Gibson) comes in. As Driver is observing the woman from only 10 or so feet away, he presents himself as if he is relating to her misery and shame. When the woman noticed that, edited for advice, she walks up to him and says ‘What are you looking at?’, since the woman believes her shame and grief are privately experienced, and not for others to see. Soon after saying that, she punches Driver. That is how that scene is used for this advice. And of course, since there are mature themes in the movie, only that scene is used refurbished for advice, and the rest of the movie is not used for this advice.

So, if you are using that scene published by Kinobscura, that scene starts 1 minute and 8 seconds into the video clip. Driver is smoking a cigarette while looking at the woman. It ends 1 minute and 44 seconds into the video clip. So, it’s about 36 seconds.

So, based on how that video clip is used for idea ‘Stand still’, the point I am trying to make is that, not only did Driver present relating to a woman in a way that insulted her, he maintained that identity, knowing that he will be punched in the face for it. He could have blocked her punch, but he chose to ‘stand still’ for the punch. He provoked her, and allowed himself to get hit by her.

To help you relate to that scene, you may imagine one of the men reading this blog, and even that man could also be imagined to exist, imagine that man working with Driver in his job. Let’s say Driver looks like Mel Gibson did when the movie was made in 2012. Driver is also an employee in that man’s company. Driver also has a wife and 2 kids. That man and Driver are friends. The problem is that Driver sometimes gives all the women in that company that same ‘look’, that look that says that he is relating to something private, and a few of the women even complain to management about him. There was this one time when Driver was looking at that woman from the movie, portrayed also by Dolores Heredia, and that man noticed Driver looking at her that way. That woman said to Driver ‘What are you looking at?’, and also punched him in the face. Later, Driver was talked to by one of his bosses, and he said to his boss that it was entirely his fault, that he provoked her. He knows that he could get her fired, since she punched him, but he admitted ‘on the record’ that it was his fault, and he’s not complaining about it.

You see, in that company, Driver does that ‘look’ sometimes to all of the women that he works with, even the women that are also his bosses. Most of the time, he likes to greet people with a smile, even though such people are trying to repel him. That man never talks to Driver about his obvious problem, since that man believes that Driver is doing it intentionally.

—

So, this is the instigation identified by phrase ‘Stand still’: that is when you involuntarily experience an instigation and/or inadvertency that makes you feel like you are standing still for an adverse experience. You are not choosing to ‘stand still’ for that adverse experience, and yet it feels like you are ‘standing still’ for it.

You see, I am not aware of a reference where a person would experience such a thing. However, that ‘Get the Gringo’ scene has a man that has the ability to avoid getting punched, and yet he chooses to not only provoke someone to punch him, he also ‘stands still’ and allows that other person to punch him. He is like someone that may help you more tenably manage instigations identified by phrase ‘Stand still’ by the example he presented in the movie ‘Get the Gringo’. In other words, ‘knowing is half the battle’, so to speak. Having an idea how the instigation is affecting you may also help you manage and allocate it better.

—

[It is now 4:06 PM EST for me. I have finished explaining idea ‘Stand still’. Next week, I plan to proofread the last list and this list, and also begin explaining a new list for idea ‘I can speak for myself’. So, if you are there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

—

8/30/2019

Rated R violence, mature themes, and viewer discretion for action movie ‘Get the Gringo’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Stand still’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.