8/17/2019
Here we go!
(said as a greeting. It’s a refurbished quote from episode 11.2 ‘The Ghost Monument’ from sci-fi tv show (Doctor Who(2018)’. According to Amazon Video, the quote begins 8 minutes and 48 seconds into the episode, said by Angstrom(Susan Lynch).)
It is now 10:25 AM EST for me. 1st, here’s the music video I found earlier today that I’m recklessly? using for this advice. The music video is from song ‘Tu Manera’ by Romanian singer Inna. To be clear, I looked for new music videos from category ‘Music’, category ‘New Music This Week’ from www.youtube.com, and I did not choose one from that category. I think I only looked at a few of them, and the rest I just looked at their small image preview. Today is the 1st time I became aware of Inna. She has a few pages in wikipedia. Here is a short quote about her from wikipedia:
‘ Her YouTube channel surpassed three billion total views as of May 2019. 19 of her singles have reached the top ten in Romania… With global album sales of four million copies from her first three studio albums, Inna is the best-selling Romanian artist. ‘
—
I found music video ‘Tu Manera’ by searching publisher ‘Top 40 Music Charts’ from www.youtube.com. Click that, and then search for phrase ‘Romania April 2019’. Then click ‘Romania Top 40 Songs This Week | 16 April 2019 | Music Chart’. Music video ‘Tu Manera’ is listed as #25.
I watched the music video twice earlier today. It’s not in English, and normally non English speaking music videos I don’t choose, but when I watched ‘Tu Manera’, in my opinion, it didn’t have anything that said to me that only adults should watch this. Of course, it’s still a relationship music video, like most American music videos seem to be. Based on how I watched it, it’s basically Romanian singer Inna with the same clothes on, a yellow shirt, red shorts, and sneakers, dancing around seemingly outside a country like neighborhood singing her song ‘Tu Manera’. The music video is clearly made, and I think it’s entertaining to watch. Here’s a quote from the song ‘Tu Manera’ translated into English:
Tu Manera(Your Way):
There is no other equal like you, you have something that there is not
I can’t contain myself, I want to confess to you already
—
It is now 11:04 AM for me. I recently watched music video ‘Tu Manera’ for the 3rd time today, and I noticed something. To the kids, if you choose to watch music video ‘Tu Manera’, don’t sit on the hood/top of any car in general, like the way Inna does in the movie, or else your weight may put a dent on that car. I don’t want your parents blaming me for any dents that you may accidentally create on cars by standing or sitting on them.
According to wikipedia, music video ‘Tu Manera’ published by ‘INNA’ has over 26 million views, and it was just released on Mar 8, 2019, about 5 months ago!
—
Participation:
Before I begin explaining idea ‘I can speak for myself’, I want to explain idea ‘Participate’. It is my belief that it is possible that certain instigators that are reading this blog may have caused innocent people to have a discouraging sense of participation, because of the ideas that I will probably type in soon. So, I’ll explain idea ‘Participate’, to help compensate for that discouragement.
[It is now 11:19 AM for me. I’m going to look for take out food to buy. After I take care of the food thing, I’ll begin typing again. I’ll probably continue typing as I wait for the food to be delivered. So, this food situation should be resolved in 2 hours. See you then.
—
Participation:
It is now 1:08 PM EST for me. To be clear, I do not know for certain that some instigators, or even any instigator, has done some sort of instigation identified by idea ‘Participate’. It’s just something that I believe may have happened if kids, teenagers, and college students are reading this blog. Also, after 2 or so more Saturdays, I plan to explain idea ‘Participate not expect’. The ‘Participate’ part will use the definition of ‘Participate’ that I am explaining now. Therefore, I am trying to prepare you for an idea that I will type in by explaining a part of it now.
The purpose of idea ‘Participate’ is to help recover somewhat the basic participation efforts that you use in your school/job participations, if certain instigations and/or related inadvertencies have discouraged such efforts somewhat. For example, I’m not encouraging you to join ‘The Peace Corp’, so to speak. Have you heard that slogan, “The Peace Corp: The toughest job you’ll ever love.” The purpose is not to obligate you to use your participation efforts for other endeavors. If you choose to do so anyway, that’s up to you.
Here’s an explanation I’ve made about participation involving cruise ships. Many Americans probably know of someone at work, or someone from their social circles, who has attended a cruise ship vacation. I think I have also read something in the internet, or saw something on tv, that there are big cruise ships primarily designed to have people that actually live in it, and they use those cruise ships as a permenant address. That means such cruise ships probably have teachers for their grammar school and high school kids. Those cruise ships, in my opinion, is a little like the Starship Enterprise from tv show ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’, in the context that they have school accomodations for the children of their parents, and since such cruise ships move from place to place, country to country, such movement offers their kids a unique education variety.
Now, the ‘participation’ part is what I just suspect is happening for the kids and teenagers who live on such cruise ships. Since such cruise ships probably also accomodate passengers who are just there on vacation, such cruise ships have seasonal moments that also turns them into luxury cruise ships for people who are on vacation, which give the kids and teenagers who live on such cruise ships another unique opportunity. If the kids and teenagers choose to work during those seasonal moments, they will be offered more luxury related opportunities than the vacation passengers will be offered. For example, scheduling the vacation passengers limits their ability to participate with many of the social events. The kids and teenagers that choose to work for the cruise ship for those seasonal events, however, have less of a scheduling restriction. And there are also ‘on the job’ learning opportunities that are made obvious to the kids and teenagers who live on those cruise ships, if they choose to consider working during those seasonal moments.
So, just using that ‘Cruise ship’ example, you may see that participation has it’s advantages. Those kids and teenagers in that story are offered the use of many of the resources that cruise ship situation has to offer, and all they have to do is work during those seasonal moments.
So, what does this have to do with participation efforts possibly being discouraged? It is my belief, not a proven fact, that some/certain instigators may have instigated certain innocent people who are reading this blog, because they anticipate that I will soon? explain a certain idea that will benefit them. And so, based on this anticipation, which in my opinion, is probably a certainty in many of their minds, they caused certain innocent people to experience an instigation that discouraged their sense of school/and or job related participation.
For example, the adults who experienced such an instigation at work, as you recall such an instigation and you try to resolve it, one of the results cause you to have a discouraged sense of job related participation. So, here’s a scenario that I invented to help give some sort of partial recovery for your discouraged sense of participation: I recommend that you think of a minor goal that you have yet to achieve, or think of a minor goal that is compatible to the explanation I am about to give you. Let’s say that at least a percentage of that minor goal, let’s say 20-30% of that goal, can be achieved by participating in it’s job related circumstance, like the cruise ship example. If you participate in a situation that involves that goal, at least an obvious percentage of that goal will be achieved. An obvious conceptualized example I thought of earlier today involved a man who finally decided to participate in a situation that involved one of those goals. The conceptualized goal being achieved that I imagined involved that man performing on stage with one of the music bands that he admires. Before that event, before he participated, he was experiencing a discouraged sense of participation. When he chose to participate in that event and eventually performed with that music band, obviously he no longer had such a discouraged sense of participation. So, in my opinion, you don’t want to dismiss in general participation itself, even if an instigator has somehow managed to cause you to have a discouraged sense of participation.
—
I can speak for myself:
To start explanation ‘I can speak for myself’, I’ll type the 3 references 1st, then I’ll explain it.
The 1st reference, which is meant to be a partial joke but is relevant, is in episode 4.25 ‘Broken Link’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1996)’. Here is a quote from wikipedia about that scene:
‘ Once on the surface, on a small island in a large sea, they finally realize how many Changelings there are; the planet-enveloping sea is actually Changelings in their liquid form. Odo and the Female Changeling then walk into the sea, leaving Bashir and Sisko to wait for them. ‘
‘ Back on the surface, time goes slowly and Bashir in his boredom nearly throws a stone into the Great Link, but is stopped just in time by Sisko. ‘
So, the partial joke was that Bashir(Alexander Siddig) thought that the Great Link was an ocean, and was about to throw a stone at it. Sisko(Avery Brooks) reminded Bashir that that was not an ocean, but many Changelings in liquid form. Amazon.com has episode 4.25 ‘Broken Link’ available streaming. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available without additional payment. According to Amazon Video, that scene starts 33 minutes and 44 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:
Bashir: ‘How long has it been?’
Sisko: ‘I’ve lost track.’
Bashir: ‘So have I.’
Sisko: (Sisko notices that Bashir is about to throw a stone at what Sisko believes to be an ocean.) ‘Doctor…’
But the trick is to find a viagra cialis prix good, ethical and reputed supplier and manufacturers. Chronic medical conditions are usually not treatable or cheap viagra from uk reversible. Since the bodies of all 65 year old people do not react in the same way, the dose may be increased to a maximum recommended dose amerikabulteni.com cipla generic viagra of 100 ,g, or decreased to 25 mg. ask your health care provider and collect sufficient information about the ailment. These centers provide modernized classrooms and curriculum augmented by effective online sale viagra practical training.Bashir: ‘Oh… oh… right.’ (Bashir puts the stone down and sighs.)
—
The 2nd reference is in episode 7.3 ‘The Price of Admission’ from crime tv show ‘Elementary(2019)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, that scene refurbished starts 22 minutes and 37 seconds into the episode, Joan(Lucy Liu) and Bell(Jon Michael Hill) are talking to suspects Aura Swenson(Kate Middleton) and her lawyer(Kate Levy). Here is the quote:
Bell: ‘So you’re admitting to everything your appraiser told us? That several of these items are missing the paperwork needed to bring them legally into the U.S.?’
Joan: ‘You realize you’re confessing to a federal crime…’
fast forwarding to 23 minutes and 9 seconds into the episode:
Aura Swenson: ‘The fact is, I let you in here to prove that I wasn’t committing any crime. And since that’s the case, there’s nothing that I could be blackmailed over, either.’
Joan: ‘I’m confused. How could your father have been susceptible to blackmail, but not you? You just said that the looted items are still here.’
Aura’s Lawyer: ‘Because we finalized a deal with the Ethiopian government this morning that obviates any crimes on Ms. Swenson’s part.’
Bell: ‘Care to explain how a deal with a foreign country saves you from facing charges on U.S. soil?’
—
The 3rd reference, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, is in spy fantasy episode 1.6 ‘The Rook(2019)’. The episode is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com via STARZ subscription. The subscription is about 9 dollars a month. So, if you want to watch it from Amazon.com, I recommend that you get the STARZ subscription, and then cancel the STARZ subscription right after you made it. The subscription will remain active for an entire month, and then cancel. That way, you won’t have to worry about forgetting that you have a STARZ subscription. If you still have the 7 day trial available to you, then you can do the same, and the trial subscription will still last for 7 days.
According to Amazon Video via STARZ subscription, the scene starts 33 minutes and 52 seconds into the episode, Monica Reed(Olivia Munn) is talking to her then boyfriend Marcus Kevler(Luke Roberts) in a bar. Here is a quote:
Monica Reed: ‘We didn’t ask for the check.’
Woman bartender: ‘Oh. I’m sorry.’
Marcus Kevler: ‘No, no.’
Woman bartender: ‘My mistake.’
Marcus Kevler: ‘Fine, we’ll take it anyway. Thank you.’
—
Soon after, the tv show shows Monica Reed re-thinking that event, and this time, she is interpreting it with what she believes to be a relevant discovery. That scene starts 34 minutes and 8 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Monica Reed: ‘You know what, we didn’t ask for the check.’
Woman bartender: ‘Oh, I’m sorry. My mistake.’
Now, I’m not certain, but I think that was the moment that Monica Reed finally noticed that the woman bartender was Bronwyn Thomas(Tamsin Topolski), Myfanwy Thomas'(Emma Greenwell) sister, and that the bill also contained a message that was not meant for Monica Reed to read. (Of course, don’t use that scene when Monica Reed emotionally breaks the glass she was holding.)
—
The definition of idea ‘I can speak for myself’ comes in 2 parts. The 1st part identifies a situation that causes you to feel contemplationally confused based on what the instigation and inadvertency is causing you to see and experience. When you think of phrase ‘I can speak for myself’, it’s a clarification of what your intent was when that confusing event occurs. You see, one of the side effects of the confusion is to cause you to forget somewhat what your intent was as you experience that confusing event occurs. So, if you contemplationally say the phrase ‘I can speak for myself’, it’s purpose is to help you remember what your actions are, what your use of intent is, as what the instigator/s are causing you to see and experience may cause you to feel confused. Now, this is not an exact match reference, but Joan Watson does use the word ‘confused’ in the 2nd reference, episode 7.3 ‘The Price of Admission’. Here is the quote:
Joan: ‘I’m confused. How could your father have been susceptible to blackmail, but not you? You just said that the looted items are still here.’
Aura’s Lawyer: ‘Because we finalized a deal with the Ethiopian government this morning that obviates any crimes on Ms. Swenson’s part.’
You see, the confusion that the instigation is causing you to see and experience, one of it’s side effects is to cause you to forget what your use of intent was during that moment. Just contemplationally say the phrase ‘I can speak for myself’, and it’s purpose is to help you remember what your intent was, even when you recall such an obviously confusing creating moment.
I forgot to mention that I chose ‘I can speak for myself’ because I thought it was an already established in use phrase. I did not verify that it was. I just thought that it was. You can use another phrase if you choose to. If you choose to take this idea, it’s yours to change around, in relation to advice said.
—
The 2nd part of idea ‘I can speak for myself’ is in how you re-evaluate already experienced instigations. In the 3rd reference, episode 1.6 ‘The Rook’, Monica Reed has been thinking about that conversation she had with her then boyfriend Marcus Kevler many times. According to the show, Monica Reed is supposed to be a trained government agent. Also keep in mind that it’s a tv show made for the general public to possibly watch. Put those together, and you may have a smart woman recalling something that bothers her many times. It is a belief that a lot of people probably re-think certain experiences in order to resolve them or make them more tenable. And that is what happened in the episode, in a way. Monica Reed did find something relevant, something that she was looking for, but the discovery also made her upset.
For the 2nd part of idea ‘I can speak for myself’, let’s say that it’s a job related situation. You made a complaint to an instigator for instigating you, and if it comes down to it, you can explain the situation to management for whatever reason. Now, that explains the original moment that such an event happened. However, when you re-think that moment, other evaluations reveal themselves to you, but in a confusing context. The 2nd part of idea ‘I can speak for myself’ is to clarify what your original intent of action was. That way, if confusing re-evaluations occur, those re-evaluations won’t diminish the awareness of what your original intent of action was. For example, if you bring up such a situation to management, what your original intent of action was, even though while re-thinking that moment, other confusing evaluations are discovered, see if you can imagine that not only will management understand what you went through, but also consider the possibility that management can even make a case in your favor. Don’t underestimate the capabilities of management, and those with authority!
The purpose of the 2nd part of idea ‘I can speak for myself’ is to change the evaluation context of re-evaluations, if such discoveries confuse you. For example, you can remember what your original intent of action was, and also use a more tenable re-evaluation if such re-evaluations become confusing to you. Just contemplationally say the phrase ‘I can speak for myself’, to check if certain re-evaluations are trying to confuse you.
[It is now 5:48 PM EST for me. I’m going to stop explaining ‘I can speak for myself’ for this list. This coming Friday, I plan to proofread the previous 2 lists, and this list, Wishlist #1184. That way, I can start a new list to explain idea ‘Answer’ and it’s variations the following day. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.
—
8/30/2019
TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for crime tv show ‘Elementary’. Violence, mature themes, and viewer discretion for tv show ‘The Rook’. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Participate’, ‘Participation’, and ‘I can speak for myself’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.