10/26/2019

Salutations.

It is now 11:46 AM EST for me. Before I begin, I want to give a quote in order to address something quickly. The quote is in episode 2.1 ‘The War to End All Wars’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Timeless(2018)’. In that scene, Lucy Preston(Abigail Spencer) and Irene Curie(Melissa Farman) are talking. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 17 minutes and 55 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Lucy Preston: ‘You’re… You’re Irene Curie?’

Irene Curie: ‘Who are you?’

Lucy Preston: ‘You’re English is excellent.’

Irene Curie: ‘Your French is terrible. What do you want?’

—

Acceptable appearance of use:

I don’t have a bookmark name for this idea, so I’ll just explain it. I’m single, and am not in any relationship, so it’s easy for me to think about this. If I meet an attractive woman, and she is also available, but she speaks terrible English, from my perspective, as long as the English she is aware of is good enough for us to be in a relationship, then her ‘terrible’ English is good enough for me. In that ‘Timeless’ scene, from my perspective, Lucy Preston speaks fluent French, but from the perspective of certain people who speak French as a primary language, such as Irene Curie, Lucy Preston’s use of French is terrible. You see? My point is that you may learn many things that you believe are useful to you, and you have the ability to use those many things that you have learned to understand what you perceive. And you may contemplationally criticize youself for being ‘terrible’ at it’s use, or something like that. If I met an attractive woman that speaks terrible English, but we still want to be in a relationship together, then I would probably? accept her for who she is, and that includes her terrible use of English. Of course, if she was using that terrible English to communicate to other Americans, many of them may believe that her use of English is terrible. Do you see what I’m getting at? When that woman speaks to me using her English, she may see a man that accepts her wholeheartedly. The point I am trying to make is that the things that you believe that you have learned that are useful to you may not always have a consistently acceptable appearance of use. I’ll use that as the name of this idea: ‘Acceptable appearance of use’. I made that bookmark around 12: 05 PM EST.

—

Before I begin, I want to explain my new study plan. I invented what I believe for many expectations to be my best idea yet this past Thursday, 10/24/2019. I call the idea ‘Expire lack’. I could explain it today in a context that may be useful to you. However, the idea uses a lot of idea ‘Expire’, an idea I did not explain to you yet. And so, what I am going to do today is explain ideas ‘Already see’ and ‘Pertain’ in this list. And if I still have time, I will explain idea ‘Expire’ on a separate list. If I don’t, I will explain idea ‘Expire’ next Saturday. After I explain idea ‘Expire’, I would be able to explain idea ‘Expire lack’, but what I will do is explain ideas ‘Admit’, ‘Anticipate’, and maybe 2 more ideas before I finally explain idea ‘Expire lack’. In my opinion, this study plan looks promising. So, I will offer you the music video I found earlier today, and then explain ideas ‘Already see’ and ‘Pertain’ on this list.

—

The music video I watch earlier today for the 1st time is from song ‘We Were’ by Keith Urban. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org:

‘ “We Were” is a song written by Eric Church, Ryan Tyndell, and Jeff Hyde and recorded by Australian country music artist Keith Urban. ‘

‘ The song uses “vivid imagery” and “earnest nostalgia” to tell of “romances that we all know won’t last”. ‘

—

Here is a quote from the lyrics of song ‘We Were’:

And we were leather jackets, hangin’ on to a Harley, two heartbeats in the moonlight
We were, both feet hanging out over the edge of the water tower skyline
At least there’s a little bit of sweet in the bitter, though a part of me is always gonna miss it
I am who I am, I just miss who I was when we were

—

I found the music video ‘We Were’ in www.youtube.com, category ‘Top 100 Songs Of The Week – October 26, 2019 (Billboard Hot 100)’ from publisher ‘TopMusicMafia’. It gives you a few seconds of preview for the music videos associated with those songs. In those previews, music video ‘We Were’ was shown 40 seconds into those previews. It is listed as #97. To watch the music video for free, search for phrase ‘we were keith urban’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 2.4 million views. It was published Aug 2, 2019, almost 3 months ago.

If you like country music, you may find watching music video ‘We Were’ relaxing. In youtube, it is called a ‘One Shot Video’. I think that means that, when you watch it, the video always follows Keith Urban as he sings and performs that song in the video. There are no interruptions, no change in camera angles, in Keith Urban’s performance. It’s all done in ‘one shot’. If you choose to watch it, I recommend you use ‘Theater mode’. The 1st time you watch it, I recommend you use the ‘cc’ mode(closed captions), so that you can look at the lyrics as Keith Urban sings them. That way, if you watch it a 2nd time, you can better enjoy watching it. Also, start 14 seconds into the music video. The beginning is kind of boring.

—

Already see:

It is now 1:53 PM EST for me. Let’s start by using the illustrations for idea ‘Already see’: The 1st illustration is from the 1988 article from ‘The New York Times’ called ”Jurors Will Disregard’ Is Often Not Regarded’. Just search in www.google.com for phrase ‘jurors will disregard’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered. Click that, and in that article, if you see the words ‘This is your one article preview.’, click the ‘x’, or click ‘Continue to your one article’., and you can look at the entire article, if you want to. Here is a quote from that article:

‘ It is common for judges to instruct jurors to disregard information in deciding a case, such as telling them to ignore what they have read in newspapers, or, in the case of medical malpractice lawsuits, to ignore the disastrous conditions that provoked the suits, Professor Casper said. ‘

‘ Albert Alschuler, a University of Chicago law professor, said the notion that jurors can disregard what they have heard was regarded as ”unmitigated fiction” as long as 50 years ago by Justice Robert H. Jackson of the United States Supreme Court.

”But what’s the alternative?” Professor Alschuler said, adding that it would be impossible to start every trial over when inappropriate evidence emerges. ‘

—

The 2nd illustration is from the movie ‘Never Say Never Again(1983)’, starring Sean Connery as James Bond, and Bernie Casey as Felix Leiter. In that scene, James Bond and Leiter are talking. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 29 minutes, and 34 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Felix Leiter: ‘Good show, James. Q actually came through, didn’t he?’

James Bond: ‘How long have you been here?’

Felix Leiter: ‘Long enough.’

James Bond: ‘Long enough for what?’

Felix Leiter: ‘To see how you handled the lady. You did rather well.’

—

The 3rd reference is in episode 3.17 ‘Kansas’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Seven Days(2001)’, starring Jonathan LaPaglia as Frank Parker. The episode is not available streaming from Amazon.com, but Amazon does sell the DVD for it. The episode is available streaming for free from www.youtube.com. Just search for phrase ‘seven days 3.17 kansas’, and there’s a selection with 41 minutes and 57 seconds, probably the whole episode. Here is a quote from www.imdb.com about the episode:

‘ A freak accident during some tests on the sphere, accidentally sends Parker into an alternate universe where the government is authoritarian and the NNL base is commanded with deadly force. ‘

And here is a quote from wikipedia.org about the episode:

‘ To ease the ride for their backup chrononaut, Donovan, the team tests out new sphere software designed to make the ride less painful. During testing, a power loss accidentally launches the sphere. When Parker lands, NNL has changed dramatically; everybody on the base is a drastically different person than before: an Admiral Donovan is Parker’s ruthless nemesis and Talmadge rules NNL with an iron fist, while Ramsey is an incompetent hippie whose uncle keeps him employed at NNL. With the help of Svetlana Vukavitch (Stephanie Romanov) and a convinced Owsley, Parker launches the sphere again, landing back in his original reality. ‘

—

The 4th illustration is from comic book ‘DCeased(2019) #4. It’s available from www.comixology.com as a digital comic book, and it’s about 4 dollars. I recommend that, if you can, look at that recommended scene in that comic book. The 1st 3 illustrations are great, but this one in my opinion gives this idea some juice. If you go to comixology and purchase it, go to page 7. Here is the quote:

Green Lantern: ‘We can’t have you back out there. You’re too great a threat. If you saw a screen… ‘

Superman: ‘I won’t.’

Green Lantern: ‘How can you possibly know that?’

It should be taken at least an hour before you go for viagra cheap usa sexual intercourse. If you are searching for a good Apple repair shop that is within Scottsdale, you should get in touch with the doctor so that if any inconvenience occurs then you could have an instant help from their side. prescription du canada viagra Take some warm purchase tadalafil water in a glass and then add half teaspoon of turmeric in it. The cheap viagra pfizer fee also depends upon the kind of conditions provided.

Superman: ‘Because I’ve been using my x-ray vision… from the nanosecond I worked out what was causing this.’

—

Idea ‘Already see’ is to help you allocate certain interpretations, contemplations, notions, etc. that you may believe, for example, is discouraging you from perceiving in a reasonable context. To give idea ‘Already see’ some legitimacy, I offered you the article
”Jurors Will Disregard’ Is Often Not Regarded’ ‘. Again, here is a quote:

‘ It is common for judges to instruct jurors to disregard information in deciding a case, such as telling them to ignore what they have read in newspapers, or, in the case of medical malpractice lawsuits, to ignore the disastrous conditions that provoked the suits, Professor Casper said. ‘

—

For example, if you choose to use this idea, I recommend that you practice using this idea while you are sitting in a moving school or public bus, or while you are waiting in a bus terminal while it is busy.

[11/8/2019: I chose to delete the example that was here.It took me a few weeks to finally delete it because of the priority I gave in order to type idea ‘Exist’. 11/8/2019]

Idea ‘Already see’ helps you allocate evaluations from a person’s presented identity, evaluations that may affect how you objectively evaluate such a person. You can still see them, of course, but with idea ‘Already see’, you may be able to omit certain evaluations that they present to you as ‘not relevant’, or ‘not needed to be given a certain credence’.

Let’s look at the 2nd illustration from movie ‘Never Say Never Again’:

Felix Leiter: ‘Good show, James. Q actually came through, didn’t he?’

James Bond: ‘How long have you been here?’

Felix Leiter: ‘Long enough.’

James Bond: ‘Long enough for what?’

Felix Leiter: ‘To see how you handled the lady. You did rather well.’

—

Of course, something happened before that. It’s a James Bond movie. There’s violence in it. Just don’t use that part for this advice, and refurbish the illustration use for this advice. For example, Felix Leiter was already there when James Bond was in trouble, but all he seemingly did was watch. The point is that James Bond did not get into a fight with Felix Leiter for just watching. He could have used Felix Leiter’s help. Instead, James Bond did express obvious concern about what Felix Leiter did. That ‘Never Say Never Again’ example represents an ‘Already see’ example, and some sort of imagined government agent managing of it’s use.

—

The 3rd example, 3.17 ‘Kansas’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Seven Days(2001)’, you may not have seen before. Here is a quote:

When Parker lands, NNL has changed dramatically; everybody on the base is a drastically different person than before: an Admiral Donovan is Parker’s ruthless nemesis and Talmadge rules NNL with an iron fist, while Ramsey is an incompetent hippie whose uncle keeps him employed at NNL.

—

If you decide to watch that episode from youtube, notice that, when the sphere brought him to that place, Frank Parker initially had difficulty determining why the people around him were acting so differently. Something happened 13 minutes and 34 seconds into that youtube episode, when Frank Parker started to talk to Dr. Bradley Talmadge(Alan Scarfe). Here is the quote:

Frank Parker: ‘Bradley, what the heck is going on here?’

Dr. Bradley Talmadge: ‘Frank, Admiral Donovan claims you’ve been damaged in a test. Is that right?’

Frank Parker: ‘Well, uh…’

Dr. Bradley Talmadge: ‘Is anything wrong?’

Frank Parker: ‘Oh, definitely, but it ain’t me, sir.’

Dr. Bradley Talmadge: ‘Can’t you and Donovan ever get along?’

Frank Parker: ‘Yeah, I guess not.’

—

Although the example is a bit sci-fi, Frank Parker is demonstrating that he is changing how he is evaluating the people around him. At the end of the episode, based on my refurbishing assessment, even though he believes that what just happened was the result of some sort of government division something, he looks at the American flag, and his assessment of it gives him solace and continuity.

—

And in the 4th illustration from comic book ‘DCeased(2019) #4’, here is the quote:

Superman: ‘Because I’ve been using my x-ray vision… from the nanosecond I worked out what was causing this.’

If you choose to look at that scene from page 7, you get an illustration of seeing through Superman’s eyes. He is using his x-ray vision to perceive, which allows him to avoid Darkseid’s accidentally created technology virus. If you look at that, based on my experience, it feels as if idea ‘Already see’ is humbly being made more aware to you.

—

So, if you choose to use idea ‘Already see’, to start you off, while you are in a bus terminal in a crowded day, or while you are sitting in a moving bus, while using this advice, contemplationally say ‘Already see’, to see if what certain people are showing you may be bothering you. Maybe you can allocate some of those evaluations from their presented identities that they want you to ‘already see’. Of course, you can still see them. The idea of ‘Already see’ is to make more tenable how you evaluate such people.

—

Pertain:

According to www.dictionary.com, ‘pertain’ means ‘to have reference or relation; relate’, and the dictionary example is ‘documents pertaining to the lawsuit’. Here is the main example I invented for idea ‘Pertain’: Suppose a teenage boy or adult man is waiting in a bus terminal during a crowded morning. That boy or adult man sees an attractive woman walking by let’s say 25 feet away, and she is presenting a sense of rejection. When that teenage boy or adult man sees that rejection, they contemplationally make a comment to themselves about that impression of rejection.

So, here’s my interpretation of that situation using idea ‘Pertain’: The teenage boy and adult man did not agree to have a conversation with that attractive woman walking by 25 feet away. Therefore, that impression of being rejected is moot(of little or no practical value, meaning, or relevance). However, they interpreted that impression of rejection as if it was an actual conversation that they agreed to have with that attractive woman. In other words, in the context of an agreed upon conversation, that impression of rejection should not pertain to them.

Certain details of mild to moderate instigations that you may experience may be allocated, simply because they should not pertain to you. For example, you did not agree to address it, interact with it, evaluate it, etc.

The actual purpose of idea ‘Pertain’ is to give certain chosen contemplations more depth, like filling a balloon with more air. I invented idea ‘Pertain’ maybe a month or so ago, and that was the best idea I can think of at the time for such a meaning. So, even though pertain says ‘Hey, that rejection is not an actual conversation!’, it’s purpose is to try to give more depth to certain chosen notions. For example, when a person says ‘As opposed to what?’, you can also say ‘As it pertains to what?’ In other words, if you choose to use idea ‘Pertain’ to add more depth, you’re trying to use one thing for another, like a ‘MacGyver’ episode.

—

It’s now 3:38 PM EST for me. I’m going to close this list. Next Saturday, I will finally explain idea ‘Resist’, so that I can eventually explain idea ‘Expire lack’, an idea I am actively using now. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Timeless’. Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Never Say Never Again’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Seven Days’. Comic book gory violence and viewer discretion for comic book ‘DCeased(2019) #4’. Use refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Already see’ and ‘Pertain’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.