Salutations.
It is now 10:51 AM EST for me. Before I continue, I want to address something I said in Wishlist #1203, Nov 23, 2019. Here is the quote:
‘ Here’s a story I created that explains why he wasn’t able to extrapolate the answers that he believed that he needed from the other students and teachers at Annapolis: Imagine a business gathering that happens 5 days a week in this big room, and the answers that Jake Huard needs are represented by the footprints that everyone leaves in that big room. However, and the end of the business day, the janitors/custodians clean that floor, and it’s adjacent rooms. By doing so, they remove the footprints that people leave behind while using that room. Therefore, wasn’t able to recognize those answers, since those answers are always removed at the end of business day. ‘
—
It was just a few days ago, I think it was Wed, 3/4/2020, that I realized that the kids that read that may think that I lied to them. If I made that unintentional mistake, it’s possible that some? of the kids may have thought about it for about 3 months. So, this is my excuse: When I made that story, I didn’t want the kids to unnecessarily ponder why Jake Huard couldn’t initially discover the ideas that he needed in order to graduate from Annapolis. He talked to his friends, other teachers, etc. in Annapolis, and he was also about to be expelled. That’s why I thought it was possible that the kids who chose to read Wishlist #1203 may wonder why Jake couldn’t find those answers. I thought that such an effort was not needed for the advice. So, to help avoid what I believe to be an unnecessary mental expenditure that kids may make, I gave the kids that story for them to think about. And since I am the only one that is making this blog, and no one else is helping me, I experienced a sense of being giddy that my idea probably worked. And that sense of being giddy, so to speak, didn’t wear off, not until a few days ago. And that’s when I realized that some? of the kids may have interpreted that story as a lie. When I typed it in, it was not my intent to give them a lie. So, if you believed it was a lie, then I admit that I made a mistake presenting you that story in that context. It was not my intent to lie to you, but I admit that I made a mistake. If I could do that again, so to speak, I would add this addendum to Wishlist #1203, to help avoid that story to be interpreted as a lie. I apologize for such a mistake to be presented to you.
The ‘good news’ is that I believe you can learn from such a mistake. In case in the future you type something in that may make you feel giddy, if you choose to use this mistake as a reference, you may want to add a clarification as to why you typed that in, to avoid a misunderstanding that may occur.
—
It is now 12:23 PM EST for me. My ubereats food arrived very quickly, and I ate some of it. For what I said earlier, you don’t have to process it very quickly. Take your time deciding what to do with it. After all, this is just advice to me. If you choose to, you can postpone thinking about it, and then continue thinking about it later. That way, you can continue reading the rest of this advice.
The music video I recommend is called ‘No Reason’ by Kylie Cantrall. I found it on the fully loaded home page of www.youtube.com. I couldn’t find her on wikipedia, but I did check publisher ‘Disney Channel Voices’ on www.youtube.com, and her music video is #31 out of 31 music videos. I also couldn’t find the lyrics to that song in www.azlyrics.com. So, my entire recommened validation is that it does exist with publisher ‘Disney Channel Voices’. To watch music video ‘No Reason’ for free, search in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘kylie cantrall no reason’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 73 thousand views.
The 3 main reasons why I chose music video ‘No Reason’ is because 1)it’ very new. It was just published yesterday, Mar 6, 2020, 2)it’s a Disney related music video, and 3)it presents in my opinion spontaneous interjection that is seemingly acceptable in a music video context. It’s meant to give you a more acceptable example of spontaneous/surprisingly presented interjections, instead of just? having such spontaneous interjections from mild to moderate instigations. For example, if you have ever been surprised by a minor form of instigation by an instigator, it’s like seeing that instigator present that form of surprise, but in a Disney related music video context. When I watched music video ‘No reason’, it seems to me that, when the people who are portraying students in a library are dancing, they are synchronized using spontaneous interjections in their dancing. That’s why I thought such a music video would be useful for you to watch.
—
The tv series trailer, refurbished with inaproprieities removed and keeping in mind that it’s science fiction, is from Netflix tv series ‘Raising Dion’. Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the series:
Raising Dion is an American superhero drama web television series that premiered October 4, 2019 on Netflix. It is based on the 2015 comic book and short film of the same name by Dennis Liu. In January 2020, Netflix renewed the series for a second season.
Raising Dion follows the story of a woman named Nicole who raises her son Dion…
The normal dramas of raising a son as a single mom are amplified when Dion starts to manifest several magical, superhero-like abilities. Nicole must now keep her son’s gifts secret with the help of Mark’s best friend Pat, and protect Dion from people out to exploit him while figuring out the origin of his abilities.
—
The only misgiving I have about the tv series trailer is when Dion teleported away from the car and into his mother’s arms. I’m not complaining that he is safe, away from danger. It’s just that the boy Dion was already standing in the middle of the street in obvious daylight. Not in highways, of course, and not while driving fast, but I’ve seen situations where cars would stop and wait for certain bigger birds to walk across the street. I’m just saying that it doesn’t seem realistic that a driver would have such an accident. And on top of that, the driver didn’t even stop! Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad that the boy is safe, and I know it’s just a science fiction tv series. I’m saying this for the sake of the kids who choose to watch such a trailer.
To watch tv series ‘Raising Dion’ for free, search in www.youtube.ccom for phrase ‘raising dion trailer’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 1.5 million views. It premiered Sep 18, 2019, almost 6 months ago.
I found tv series ‘Raising Dion’ in www.youtube.com, from publisher ‘Movieclips Trailers’. Go to the home page of ‘Movieclips Trailers’, scroll down, then click ‘New TV Trailers’. That has 840 videos. As of earlier today, ‘Raising Dion’ is #538. I noticed it because Dion’s hands were glowing with some kind of energy. I was able to upload the entire page using a direct connection with the cable modem. I wasn’t using the wifi, I was using a direct connection to the cable modem. After I uploaded it, I started from the end, #840, and then worked my way up to #538, in case you want to know.
Keep in mind that I’m just recommending for you to watch the trailer ‘Raiding Dion’, not the tv series. I like the trailer because it has a fundamental yet sci-fi extrapolated acknowledgement of a parent caring for her child. Here’s a quote from one of the comments:
‘ Netflix has a thing for mothers frantically looking for their sons ‘
—
Acknowledgements:
It is now 1:37 PM EST for me. I don’t think I will explain this entire idea today, but I will try to. I invented it earlier today, and it’s my opinion that it’s my best idea yet, at least for certain expectations. Earlier today, I was thinking about celebrity Don Johnson in the sci-fi tv series ‘Watchmen(2019)’. In the series, according to www.imdb.com, he portrayed Judd Crawford. Many of the scenes in that tv series was boring to me, so I fast forward through much of it, including scenes of Judd Crawford. However, I did think about the process that the entertainment industry uses to keep these actors in the public’s attention. Sort of, I imagined in an extrapolated context celebrity Don Johnson being interviewed for the part of Judd Crawford for the tv series ‘Watchmen’. The basic gist of it is that the entertainment industry wants to give a certain acknowledgement to Don Johnson if he chooses to portray Judd Crawford for the tv series ‘Watchmen’. And then I thought about how instigations may discourage you from interacting with certain acknowledgements that may discourage your career goal developments. Keep in mind that I’m thinking about students and non-managerial employees in general.
Here’s an illustration example of what I’m talking about, using the character portrayal of Hunt Stevenson by celebrity Michael Keaton from the movie ‘Gung Ho(1986)’, refurbished and extrapolated. Here’s a quote from www.imdb.com and wikipedia about Hunt Stevenson:
‘ When a Japanese car company buys an American plant, the American liaison must mediate the clash of work attitudes between the foreign management and native labor. ‘
‘ The local auto plant in fictional Hadleyville,Pennsylvania, which supplied most of the town’s jobs, has been closed for nine months. The former foreman Hunt Stevenson goes to Tokyo to try to convince the Assan Motors Corporation to reopen the plant. ‘
—
Now, this comparison is directed towards students and non-managerial employees in America. If you experienced mild to moderate forms of instigation at school or at work, then those impressions of instigations may give you a misleading sense of expectation if you choose to pursue other career goals. For example, if you watched the movie ‘Gung Ho’, you may extrapolate that when Hunt Stevenson was given his job as foreman, and when he went to Tokyo to convince a corporation to reopen the plant, the people that gave him that authority, who are probably the employees of that plant, they probably don’t even want to know what he does with that authority, as long as he gets their jobs back. In other words, if you were given such a job, as you imagine such a job as a non-managerial employee, you probably wouldn’t be using almost any of those expectations that instigations that you have experienced in the past has caused you to have. You see? All of those employees don’t even care what resources your new authority gives you. They just want their jobs back. If you choose to imagine having such a job during the 1st week, you may notice that it doesn’t even make sense to use those instigation created expectations on any of them.
If you choose to, once you become aware of that, what you do notice if you watched the movie ‘Gung HO’ is that what Hunt Stevenson is doing is recommending and presenting acknowledgements to the corporation in Tokyo, as well as trying to receive and earn other acknowledgements. To illustrate Hunt Stevenson interacting, presenting, and trying to earn certain acknowledgements from the Japanese corporation, Amazon.com has the movie available streaming, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 7 minutes and 52 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:
Hunt Stevenson: ‘I’m like, crazy for your country. I love it. …Did you decorate this place yourselves?’
—
Anyway, Hunt Stevenson is clearly illustrating that he believes that acknowledgments are important in order for the employees who gave him his job to continue to have jobs.
—
This kind of medicine is of almost the similar in comparison to cost low viagra why not find out more. Hellolyf is an online platform where you can consult the doctor, make sure that Kamagra is good for you given your medical effects of cialis condition and find cheap Kamagra online. Just avoid products which free cialis no prescription Discover More Here have phoney components. We are on a continuous pursuit generic overnight viagra of developing our physical and emotional wellbeing.Now, I’m not saying that every possible career goal opportunity is like Hunt Stevenson’s job. For example, I remember an episode of ‘Bones’ where Seeley Booth(David Boreanaz) was involved in some sort of budget assessment, and he was making some of the people he was managing feel miserable in regards to their supposed mismanagement of resources. He then gave Camille Saroyan(Tamara Taylor) the authority to give the final report, and the auditors loved her!(I think I only watched 5 seasons worth of tv series ‘Bones’.) My guess is, if Seeley was instigated when he was in school, he really used that experience in an extrapolated sense, of course. And there are probably arbitration jobs that would benefit the person if he/she had some mild exposure to instigation. The point is, if you believe that there are a lot of jobs that can be extrapolated from Hunt Stevenson’s job, then from those examples, the mild to moderate instigations that you have experienced may have been discouraging you from the pursuit of certain acknowledgements, and Hunt Stevenson is certainly using acknowledgements in order to get those employees their jobs back.
—
Starve refrain:
According to www.dictionary.com, ‘refrain’ means ‘to abstain from an impulse to say or do something’ and the dictionary example is ‘I refrained from telling him what I thought’. The word ‘Starve’ comes from the movie ‘Ocean’s Eight(2018)’, Keri’s(Talia Cuomo) performance, Tammy’s(Sarah Paulson) daughter. To be clear, the use of the meaning ‘Starve’ extrapolated from Tammy’s daughter is in reference to her hunger, not her age. Also, since this idea is going to reference an experience or experiences you may choose to contemplationally not resolve(explained later), a sense of starving extrapolated from the performance of a girl in a movie should be more acceptable. And, of course, later, you may also change that definition of ‘Starve’, but if you are just using it to reference her performance of being hungry, but just the hunger, you may also add to the definition of ‘Starve’ if you need to. What I am saying is, if there are instigations you don’t even want to address, for example, then a sense of starving associated with an awkward meaning you may also choose to not address, since you are not addressing the instigation to begin with. Anyway, if you choose to ‘check the idea out’, you can always take the idea apart and rebuild it.
The scene, according to Amazon Video, starts 29 minutes and 31 seconds into the movie, Keri and her mom Tammy are talking. Here is a quote:
Keri: ‘Mommy, when’s dinner ready?’
Tammy: ‘Uh, sweetheart, I will be right there. I’m…I’m so sorry. Mommy will be right there.’
Keri: ‘But I’m hungry!’
Tammy: ‘I know, sweetheart, I promise, I will be right there.’
—
So, the word ‘Starve’ is using the reference when Keri said the word ‘hungry!’:
Keri: ‘But I’m hungry!’
—
Here’s a revised use of the word ‘Starve’: Just extrapolate what Keri said. Sure, she’s a girl, so just use her hunger, and then extrapolate that hunger, just the hunger, for other forms of hunger, of starving. I mean, how many times is the use of the word ‘Starve’ going to be awkward? Even as an adult, I suppose that the many variations of instigations I have addressed are not all awkward, when in the context of having some sort of aspect of it being referenced by a girl. And like I said, you are only referencing generalistically her hunger, not the fact that the hunger is coming from a girl specifically.
—
Before I continue, keep in mind that this is the 1st time that I’m typing this explanation in. I don’t have it written anywhere else, this specific explanation: It is my belief that certain mild to moderate forms of instigations discourage you from having a reasonable sense of what your original intent of sense was at the time you interacted with such instigations. One purpose of such instigation is to cause you to forget somewhat your original use of intent sense as such instigations encourage you to respond to them. The purpose of idea ‘Starve refrain’ is to help you fortify a separate perspective that allows you to remember somewhat your original intent sense, not as you experience such instigations, but for later evaluation use, such as a minute later, an hour later, a week later, etc., as it relates to the acknowledgements that such instigations may cause you to evaluate and interact with.
Here’s an example of idea ‘Starve refrain’ that does not involve instigation, and is not an exact example, but it may help you understand idea ‘Starve refrain’. It is from episode 7.3 ‘The Price of Admission’ from mystery tv series ‘Elementary(2019)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video ,that scene starts 23 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:
Aura Swenson(Kate Middleton): ‘The fact is, I let you in here to prove that I wasn’t committing any crime. And since that’s the case, there’s nothing that I could be blackmailed over, either.’
Joan Watson(Lucy Liu): ‘I’m confused. How could your father have been susceptible to blackmail, but not you? You just said that the looted items are still here.’
Aura’s lawyer(Kate Levy): ‘Because we finalized a deal with the Ethiopian government this morning that obviates any crimes on Ms. Swenson’s part.
Detective Bell(Jon Michael Hill): ‘Care to explain how a deal with a foreign country saves you from facing charges on U.S. soil?’
Aura: ‘A few months ago, the U.N. brokered a peace deal between Ethiopia and Eritrea, ending a lengthy conflict. With the fighting over, Ethiopia now has a chance to repair it’s infrastructure.’
Joan Watson: ‘Which just happens to be your family’s line of work.’
Aura’s lawyer: ‘In exchange for Swenson Construction’s generous assistance building new housing, parks, and power plants, Ethiopia has agreed to donate any and all items that might have been looted to the Swenson’s museum. And since none of the items in here have left the foreign trade zone…’
Joan Watson: ‘Technically, none of these items have been smuggled into the country illegally. So this deal makes it legal?’
Aura’s lawyer: ‘And since this deal has been in the works for weeks, Ms. Swenson had no motive.’
—
So, to explain the use of that ‘Elementary’ quote, Aura Swenson believed that the police detectives needed an explanation, and since she didn’t want to eventually get arrested, she talked to their detectives with a lawyer, who helped explained to the detectives that she was innocent. Notice that both Joan and Marcus Bell were a little confused at first, but they eventually let them go without needing to go to the police precinct for further questioning.
—
[It is now 4:25 PM EST for me. I believe that this is my best idea. However, even after I explain it, there are still one other idea I forgot to add to this idea. It’s called ‘Know-how’, more specifically, a false commitment to know-how, and I will also explain that later. I know that I said in the previous list that I would explain idea ‘Outlast’. I changed my mind because I believe idea ‘Starve refrain’ is more important to explain. If I am able to explain an idea while I still sense it’s associated epiphany, I believe I am able to explain the idea better. Next Saturday, I will continue and hopefully finish explaining my original goal for idea ‘Starve refrain’, unless I change my mind again. Right now, I don’t see how that is possible, since idea ‘Starve refrain’ is the best idea I have ever invented(for certain expectations, at least). So, if you are there Saturday, I’ll see you then.
—
3/13/2020
Sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Raising Dion’. TV-MA mature themes, sci-violence, and viewer discretion for tv mini-series ‘Watchmen’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Gung Ho’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Ocean’s Eight’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Bones’ and ‘Elementary’. Use only refurbished for references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Acknowledgements’ and ‘Starve refrain’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.