3/14/2020

Salutations.

It is now 10:31 AM EST for me. In case you want to know, I have spent an embarrassing amount of time looking for the music video and trailer yet again. I started earlier today, looking 1st at the youtube home page. I thought I found a few, but after I actually looked at them, I dismissed them. Yesterday, I closed Wishlist #s 1220 and 1221 because, surprising to myself, I actually invented a better idea this past Thursday, 3/12/20. I didn’t think that was going to happen, and yet it still happened. That means that for many expectations, the idea I will explain in this list will be the best idea that I have ever invented.

The music video I finally chose for this list is called ‘Rumors’ by Sabrina Claudio. I found it in www.youtube.com, publisher ‘Vevo’. When in the ‘Vevo’ home page, click ‘Specialty Playlists’. When in ‘Specialty Playlists’, click ‘Pop-Teen!’. According to Vevo, ‘Pop-Teen!’ has 115 videos, and it’s description is ‘Videos from the young voices of now.’ As of now, Music video ‘Rumors’ is #45.

Sabrina Claudio has a wikipedia page, if you want to know more about her. Here is a quote from the song ‘Rumors’:

All these rumors spreading around
And I kinda like the way they sound
All these rumors ’bout you and me
How can we make this a reality, oh?

—

To watch music video ‘Rumors’ for free, in www.youtube.com, search for phrase ‘sabrina claudio rumors’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 2.6 million views. It was published Oct 15, 2019, about 5 months ago.

—

When I watched it earlier today for the 1st time, it had a futuristic vibe to it, since you see space ship cars flying around. Even though my thoughts were a little occupied with what I was about to type in as I watched the music video, what I also felt was that the music video was being made to be a part of this advice. In my opinion, that’s because of how the music video was made, it’s special effects. It’s interesting to watch, in my opinion. Also, today I think is the 1st time I’ve heard of Sabrina Claudio. I’ve heard of Zayn, but not of her.

—

The movie trailer I watched for the 1st time earlier today is called ‘The Nutcracker and the Four Realms’. I found that from www.youtube.com, publisher ‘Movieclips Trailers’. From it’s homepage, scroll down to category ‘Trailers by Genre’, then click ‘VIEW FULL PLAYLIST’ for category ‘Family & Animation Trailers Spotlight’. In that category, there are 351 videos. ‘The Nutcracker and the Four Realms’ is #187.

Soon after I watched that ‘Nutcracker’ trailer, from the DVD/Blu-ray mail service that I use, I requested a Blu-ray copy of that movie. I intend to watch it. I like the way that trailer feels as I watched it. It stars Morgan Freeman as Drosselmeyer, and Mackenzie Foy as Clara. I’m surprised I haven’t heard of this movie until today. Even though I’m only recommending that you watch it’s movie trailer, I am also watching the movie for myself.

—

Pragmatic luxury hotel(revisited):

To start this idea off, I recommend using idea ‘Pragmatic luxury hotel’, mentioned in Wishlist #1148. Here is a quote:

‘ It’s also from the ‘Arachnids in the UK’ episode, The Doctor(Jodie Whittaker) talking to Jack Robertson(Chris Noth). That scene according to Amazon Video starts 34 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode, and of course it’s refurbished for advice. Here is the quote:

The Doctor: ‘You filled up disused mines with landfill waste and built a luxury hotel on top.’

Refurbished for advice, ‘filled up disused mines with landfill waste’ represents the instigations that you experienced that use pragmatism, and ‘built a luxury hotel on top’ represents the pragmatism used to reasonably inform you for various matters. ‘

—

Solve disqualify:

I think it was this past Thursday, 3/12/2020, that I invented idea ‘Solve disqualify’. I used idea ‘Pragmatic luxury hotel’ to invent it at the time. According to www.dictionary.com, ‘disqualify’ means ‘to deprive of legal, official, or other rights or privileges; declare ineligible or unqualified.’

To start explaining idea ‘Solve disqualify’, I want to give you an interpretation that I made from the end of the movie ‘Duplicity(2009)’, starring Clive Owen as Ray Koval, and Julia Roberts as Claire Stenwick. Here is a quote from wikipedia about the end of that movie:

‘ Claire and Ray rendezvous at the Zurich Airport, each with a copy of the formula that they plan to sell to a Swiss company for $35 million. ‘

‘ The formula, the Swiss announce to Ray and Claire, is not what they think, just a harmless lotion. They in turn are disappointed, but impressed by how completely they were manipulated. They have only each other now, and a thank you bottle of champagne from Tully. ‘

—

The movie Duplicity is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 56 minutes, and 43 seconds into the movie. When Ray and Claire were sitting in that dining room, I imagined an employee walking through that room. That employee looked like character Dr. Daniel Jackson, portrayed by Michael Shanks, from sci-fi tv series ‘Stargate SG-1’. In this refurbished scene, let’s call him Daniel Jackson, that employee was using his resourcefulness to see if Ray and Claire were OK. Even though they were discovered to be spies by the company Ray and Claire used to work for, Daniel Jackson still had concern for them. After all, he considered them friends, even though he will probably never see them again. He wanted to make sure that the company didn’t mistreat them, even though they betrayed the company. Daniel Jackson didn’t actually walk through that room. That’s just an imagined representation to illustrate that he was checking on them using his know-how and resourcefulness.

To continue from here, I recommend using ideas from Wishlist #1220, ‘Keep identity of blame’, ‘Cold turkey’, and ‘Comprise’, and ideas from Wishlist #1221, ‘Acknowledgements’, and ‘Starve refrain’.

When Daniel Jackson walked through that room, so to speak, in the movie ‘Duplicity’, that is in reference to adults who have been working for the same job/company for several years or more in regards as to how you evaluate employees that you work with that have instigated you, and how they interact with management and those with authority because of such behavior. Even though you may not have talked to management about such conversations, you still used your own know-how to evaluate how such conversations occurred.

So, here is the situation I am using for idea ‘Solve disqualify’ for such adults who worked for the same job/company for several years or more: Let’s say this situation happened many times to you: An employee that you worked with instigated you, and you believe that that employee was talked to by management, and that employee admitted that he/she made a mistake. Neither management nor that employee informed you that such a conversation occurred, but you still believe that that employee admitted to management that he/she made a mistake. So, you took it upon yourself to evaluate that experienced instigation as a mistake on the instigator’s part, even though that employee and management never officially informed you that it was a mistake. Using ideas ‘Keep identity of blame’, ‘Cold turkey’, ‘Comprise’, ‘Acknowledgements’, and ‘Starve refrain’, you have learned to be more objective about such forced experiences. For example, since it was a mistake, you’re able to reprioritize more how to interact with it. And that is where idea ‘Not qualify’ comes in:

It is overnight generic viagra owing to the rise in cases of obesity and overweight: Number of reasons play a great role in assessing sexual health issues through education, counseling and care. People of today are becoming smarter and making optimum use viagra 20mg india of their sexual part. Check with your doctor to see what your healthy waist measurement should be. icks.org viagra prescription Well, it is merely a medical condition, if a man cialis 100mg canada does not gain erection for more than 4 hours.

Not qualify:

You have learned? that you no longer have to actively interact with such mistakes. You call that ‘Not qualify’.

Solve disqualify:

The only illustration example I can think of right now for idea ‘Solve disqualify’, refurbished of course, is in movie ‘Unfinished Business(2015)’, starring Sienna Miller as Chuck Portnoy, and Vince Vaughn as Dan Trunkman. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 22 minutes and 34 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Dan: ‘Chuck, what are you doing? Here? Now? Chuck?’

Chuck: ‘Well, did you guys shake hands already… or was I misled about the deal being done?’

Dan: ‘I am here to shake hands.’

Chuck: ‘Oh. So am I.’

—

That is when Chuck winked at Dan, slapped his butt, and then whistled as she walked away.

Keep in mind that the main goal I try to help you with with this advice is to help you more tenably experience unavoidable instigation, if you have instigation problems. So, on Thursday, 3/12/2020, I made the discovery that an instigator may improperly impose an active, resolving sense of disqualification for you to unavoidably experience. For example, at least refurbished, in the movie ‘Unfinished Business’, Chuck winked at Dan, slapped his butt, then whistled as she walked away. Let’s say for the sake of the idea, that such an experience was an active, resolving sense of disqualification for Dan. Now, this may not sound like it’s much, but this may be new information for you. When you experience an active, resolving sense of disqualification, you didn’t put it there. It’s something that the instigator where you work wants you to think about. It could be literally like part of the identity of what the instigator is showing you at the time.

Now, even though a certain contemplation identity may be unavoidable to experience, I still believe you can manage it better, at least better than what you were doing, for example, if you did not have a technique at all for instigation. Here’s an illustration example: Episode 1.5 ’12 Hours’ from tv series ‘Transporter: The Series(2012)’ is available streaming from Amazon.com. It involves Dieter(Charly Hubner), Giles(Josh Blacker), and Frank(Chris Vance). The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 45 minutes and 16 seconds into the episode. Of course, remove the bad language and inaproprieities from that scene. The main scene starts 46 minutes and 39 seconds into the episode, when Giles is talking to Frank, who is pretending to be Dieter. Here is the quote, edited of course:

Giles: ‘You’re not such a bad person after all, Dieter.’

That’s when the actual Dieter who kept denying/lying that he is Dieter, said to Giles:

Dieter: ‘Thanks.’

And that is when Giles turned around and looked at the actual Dieter. The actual Dieter, realizing that he just admitted that he is Dieter, rolled his eyes up. That is because Dieter doesn’t actually have a developed technique to deal with instigation. For example, if he experiences certain things, he becomes it. Here’s an example to help you manage better having an active sense of disqualification caused by instigation:

Lack disquantify:

Instead of ‘not qualify’, you can instead use ‘not quantify’ as the phrase to contemplationally say, but it’s actually a variation of ‘not qualify’. For example, an instigator causes you to experience a lacking, a sense of inadequacy, in the form of contemplation quantification, but that quantification is disqualified/’not qualified’ by you. You would then contemplationally say ‘Lack disquantify’ to help you allocate the experience better. One example that I can recall is in the movie ‘Die Another Day(2002)’, starring Pierce Brosnan as James Bond, and Rosamund Pike as Miranda Frost. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 59 minutes and 49 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

James Bond: ‘Can I expect the pleasure of you in Iceland?’

Miranda Frost: ‘I’m afraid you’ll never have that pleasure, Mr. Bond.’

James Bond: (reacting to himself) ‘Ouch.’

—

James Bond experienced a certain lacking, a rejection, and he allowed himself to feel that rejection a certain way. In your situation, if you experienced a certain lacking from another person, and you did not agree to participate with such an interaction, for example, you did not want to even talk about such a thing with such a person, you may instead contemplationally say ‘Lack disquantify’ or ‘Lack quantify’, and you would disqualify that sense of lacking quantification.

—

Spontaneous spasm disquantify:

The word ‘spontaneous’ was created using episode 2.2 ‘Jane Seymour’ from reality-tv series ‘Hi-Jinks(2006)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 16 minutes and 50 seconds into the episode. Basically, the host Leila Sbitani with the help of the show and the kids parents, will be causing kids to believe they’re looking at a certain painting in an art exhibition, and then someone wearing a costume will literally ‘pop out’ of the painting, causing the kids to back away and react. For example, the girls would usually scream when that happens.

The words ‘spasm’ and ‘spastic’ are sort of ‘wildcard’ words. If you are contemplationally shuffling, you may be looking for words that will work on experienced instigations. I thought the words ‘spasm’ and ‘spastic’ may be useful to you. According to www.dictionary.com, ‘spasm’ means ‘a sudden, abnormal, involuntary muscular contraction, consisting of a continued muscular contraction (tonic spasm) or of a series of alternating muscular contractions and relaxations (clonic spasm) ‘.

All right. In case you didn’t know, DC comics are using more alternate reality characters in their normal DC storyline. For example, a regularly recurring character is called ‘The Batman Who Laughs’. He is Bruce Wayne from another reality using some sort of Dark Metal, and he is evil. Years ago, I imagined a Joker who is also from another reality, but he is a Joker who is trying to live a normal life, so to speak. He is being criticized by others because of what the other Jokers from other realities are doing. For example, I would imagine some sort of criticism for what he was doing, and he would explain that he was not doing anything wrong. So, I recommend that you just imagine that ‘good joker’ experiencing a certain criticism, and then he would explain outloud, as if he was having a conversation with another person, what he was actually doing. That exercise should help you with contemplationally disqualifying certain instigation induced notions.

—

It is now 3:54 PM EST for me. I am going to close this list now. Next week, I probably will just type in a new idea, since that’s what I usually do anyway, but since I have no idea what that new idea will be, if I don’t make a new idea that is acceptable enough to type in, I will just plan to explain further idea ‘Disqualify’. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

[TV-PG sci-fi violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Doctor Who(2005+)’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Duplicity’. Rated R mature themes and viewer discretion for movie ‘Unfinished Business’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Transporter: The Series’. Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘Hi-Jinks’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Pragmatic luxury hotel’, ‘Not qualify’, ‘Solve disqualify’, ‘Lack disquantify’, ‘Spontaneous spasm disquantify’, ‘Spontaneous disquantify’, and ‘Spasm disquantify’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.