10/1/2022

Salutations.

It is now 7:07 AM EST for me.

All right. It starts now. What I’m going to do 1st is give you the idea whose intent is to give you something to use when you have idea ‘Self’. If you choose to use it, I just want to make sure you have money in the bank, so to speak, your bank of course.(The expression is ‘money in the bank’, that’s why I said it that way.) Now, this explanation may take 2 lists, but if it doesn’t, the next list, next Saturday, that will be idea ‘Self’. It is the intent that idea ‘Self’ will at least give you the feeling that you can make many ideas from it, which is one of the main reasons why I am explaining it to you before introducing you to other ideas. I believe that it is useful to you that you have that feeling that you can make many ideas from it, and based on my experience using idea ‘Self’ and ideas similar to it, it is my belief that such a feeling could be valid for you.

Now, before I begin the explanation of that idea whose intent is to give you something to do when using idea ‘Self’, I want to add a clarification idea, and here it is: The ‘starting point’ when learning these ideas, in relation to advice said, is not this advice, it is the fact that you are not supposed to be experiencing instigation in the 1st place, whether it is at work or at school. Sure, it is my belief that there are adult jobs that have some instigation involved, but in general it is also my belief that instigation should not exist in American schools(for example, when schools declare that this is a ‘bully free’ zone), and that instigation could cause a person to get expelled from school, fired from his/her job, and even go to jail.

Also, even if a person is doing something publicly, such as putting instigation advice in a public blog or public website, do not assume that such a person is obligated to use that advice in school or work.

Here is a story that I imagined whose intent is to illustrate to you a person who does not use instigation to interact with other employees. In fact, this person has a job where no one instigates anyone when communicating with each other. Before I begin, I learned from youtube.com that Stargate SG-1 is now available streaming from Amazon.com. If you search for phrase in www.youtube.com ‘stargate is back’, one of the first selections offered is:

Stargate is BACK On Amazon Prime Video (U.S.)

—

It was published as of now 6 days ago by publisher Gateworld, and according to my youtube history, I watched it this past Monday, September 26, 2022. The 3 ‘Stargate’s’ are back according to that youtube video clip, Stargate SG-1, Stargate Atlantis, and Stargate Universe are now available streaming, and I think it’s available without additional payment if you have Prime Video. Since I have Prime shipping, I’m assuming that includes Prime Video.(I don’t want to verify it.) I’m using 2 illustrations from Stargate SG-1 for this story. The 1st one is in episode 5.14 ’48 Hours’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Stargate SG-1’. That is the episode Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping) making a mistake with her 1st interaction with Dr. Rodney McKay(David Hewlett). She knows that Dr. McKay was making objective evaluations about the situation, and she used a conduct that was unbecoming of her authority upon him. And that eventually created what I call the ‘Guilt trip’ effect. I got the phrase ‘guilt trip’ from 2 sources, 1)the movie ‘The Guilt Trip(2012)’, just the name of the movie, not required to watch it, starring Seth Rogen and Barbra Streisand, and 2)episode 6.19 ‘Guilty!’ from fantasy tv series ‘Sabrina, The Teenage Witch(2002)’, episode available streaming from Amazon.com. Here is the plot quote:

‘ Meanwhile Sabrina is wracked with guilt and ends up stuck on an Other Realm guilt trip until she can work through her issues. ‘

—

Here is a quote verifying that Carter made a mistake from episode ’48 Hours’, starting 39 minutes and 54 seconds into the episode:

Dr. McKay(David Hewlett): ‘I am not going to Russia. You know what the food is like in Russia? Besides, I’m a civilian. I don’t have to do what you say.’

Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping): ‘Well, as long as you’re on the Air Force payroll, you… ‘

—

Soon after that incident, because of her ‘guilt trip’, she became friends with Rodney McKay, and if Rodney McKay pursued a relationship with her, she would feel obligated to at least try. That didn’t happen, but they did become close friends.

And that leads to the 2nd illustration reference for the story, the main one, episode 10.13 ‘The Road Not Taken’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Stargate SG-1’, the very minor accident Lt. Colonel Cameron Mitchell(Ben Browder) had with Samantha Carter’s project. That scene starts, according to Amazon Video, at the beginning of the episode, 9 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Mitchell: ‘Hey, Sam. How’s… ‘

Carter: ‘Wait!’

Carter: ‘Oh. Sorry.’

Mitchell: ‘What the heck(edited) was that?’

Carter: ‘Force shield. Didn’t you see my sign?’

Mitchell: ‘No!’

Mitchell: ‘Yes. You mean this sign?’

Carter: ‘That was supposed to be on the…’

Mitchell: ‘Yeah. I got that.’

—

So, here’s the story that I imagined: Samantha Carter realized that she has a vulnerability, that if someone causes her to have a ‘guilt trip’, and that someone is a man, then she will change considerably in order to interact with that man, like she did with Rodney. And since she has such an important job, she wants to at least try to resolve that ‘guilt trip’ vulnerability that she has. And so, she created that accident for Mitchell to have, to see if she’ll ‘guilt trip’ into his good graces. It’s a completely controlled accident, and if anyone asks, she will tell them the truth about it, and of course apologize to Mitchell accordingly.(Since it’s a ‘Stargate’ situation, that might happen.)

—

And that’s what happened. Mitchell bumps into the invisible force shield, and even humorously presents the sign that is supposed to be at the entrance to Samantha. Samantha was only going to do that once, and the memory of Mitchell presenting to her that sign will help make sure in her mind that she’ll only do that once.

—

The purpose of that imagined story is to give you an illustration example of a person not instigating anyone when communicating, and of a job situation, even if it’s sci-fi, of people that do not instigate each other when communicating with each other. Yes, Samantha Carter caused that accident, but you should also be able to extrapolate from that imagined story that instigation is also not a practiced form of communication by Samantha Carter, or anyone else involved in that unusual job of theirs.

—

It is now 8:24 AM EST for me. I am now going to look for that music video and trailer. Soon after I prepare them, I’ll start typing again later today. I’ll see you then.

—

It is now 11:23 AM EST for me.

Innocent:

Since the music video recommended will also be used for idea ‘Innocent’, I will explain idea ‘Innocent’ 1st. I wanted to offer you an idea that is ‘money in the bank’ for you, meaning that instead of just hoping that you would make the ideas useful, I would offer you an idea to practice to ensure that it is useful to you, at least that is the intent of it. I think I invented this idea this past Sunday, 9/25/2022, at least it was within the past week that I invented idea ‘Innocent’. Basically, when you experience certain mild to moderate instigations that cause you to blame, that blame interaction may inhibit somewhat your ability to contemplationally articulate/express your own innocence. The purpose of idea ‘Innocent’ is to help you manage such experiences better. For example, if you experience an instigation that inhibits somewhat your ability to contemplationally articulate your own innocence, you would contemplationally say the word ‘Innocent’, and using idea ‘Innocent’ would help you regain your ability to contemplationally articulate your own innocence, even while experiencing such an instigation. The plan is to give you 3 illustration examples to help you identify such discouragements to your ability to articulate your innocence, and then 2 examples that help you actually express your innocence. The music video that I’m about to recommend to you is for the advice generalistically, and is also specifically meant for 1 of those 2 examples.

I will now start recommending the music video and trailer that I found earlier today. The music video that I watched earlier today for the 1st time and recommend for this list is called ‘Esther Abrami, Iyad Sughayer – Satie Variation (Arr. for Violin & Piano)’. I found it from a saved list from my ‘signed-in’ youtube home page. For you to find it, I recommend in www.youtube.com search for phrase ‘vevo’ and select publisher ‘Vevo’. Scroll to the bottom, select ‘Featured Channels’, select ‘Vevo UK’, scroll down to ‘MOOD Playlists’, select that, then for category ‘Deep Focus Playlist – Concentration Music For Work’, select ‘VIEW FULL PLAYLIST’. It currently has 95 videos. Here’s the description for the music video collection:

‘ Focus your mind with electronica and modern classical music videos. ‘

—

‘Satie Variation’ is #16 out of 95. Here’s the description quote from www.youtube.com:

‘ Esther Abrami presents her official music video for “Satie Variation” – a new arrangement based on “Gymnopédie No. 1” by Erik Satie. ‘

—

So, when I watched it, I see a woman I’m assuming is Esther Abrami playing a violin in a room with several cats in it. It’s relaxing to watch and listen to. It’s not like a music video that is from a popular song you would hear from a radio station that would normally play pop music, so I’m not even going to check for reviews for that piano and violin performance. Also, I don’t know how to look for reviews for such a performance.

—

The trailer that I watched for the 1st time earlier today and recommend for this advice is called ‘Shadow and Bone | Season 2 Sneak Peek | Netflix’. I found it from my ‘signed-in’ youtube homepage. To watch it, just search in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘shadow and bone season 2’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 620 thousand views. It was published September 24, 2022, 6 days ago.

If you watched ‘Shadow and Bone Season 1’, it’s just a fairly certain verification that there’s a season 2. Even though it has a run time of 54 seconds, there is only 27 seconds of actual video footage, ending at 27 seconds into the video clip. 31 seconds into the video clip, it says ‘COMING 2023’.

—

All right. It is now 12:14 PM EST for me. I’m going to quote the 1st illustration example, refurbished for advice. The scene is near end of movie ‘Dirty Rotten Scoundrels(1988)’ starring Michael Caine as Lawrence Jamieson, and Steve Martin as Freddy Benson. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts near end of movie, 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 30 seconds into the movie. You can watch more of the movie with inaproprieities removed, for more understanding:

Janet Colgate(Glenne Headly): ‘Aren’t you gonna say anything?’

Chips O’Toole: (Australian accent) ‘G’day, Nikos. How’s it going, sport?’

—

1 hour, 46 minutes into the movie:

Janet Colgate: ‘I almost forgot somebody. Mr. Junior Partner. The man Chips can’t do without. The whiz kid, Randy Bentwick. Unfortunately, Randy is a mute.(silent; refraining from speech or utterance) ‘

—

So, refurbished for advice of course, when Janet Colgate said:

‘Aren’t you gonna say anything?’

refurbished for advice, that represents your ability to contemplationally articulate your innocence. The 2 men were speechless for a moment. They were unable to talk.

This scene refurbished is useful because it illustrates 2 people for a moment unable to talk, and then it illustrates one of those people being able to articulate his/her innocence, as well as a person who is still unable to articulate contemplationally his/her innocence.

—

The 2nd illustration example is in episode 3.9 ‘The One Where the Sun Comes Out’ from lawyer tv series ‘The Good Fight(2019)’. You can watch it streaming from Amazon Channel Paramount Plus, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts about 2 minutes and 5 seconds into the episode. Again, you can watch more of that episode with inaproprieities removed for more understanding. Here is the quote:

Roland Blum(Michael Sheen): ‘Put that down. Let’s go.’

Maia Rindell(Rose Leslie): ‘Excuse me?’

Roland Blum: ‘Put down the headset, come on. This place gives me the creeps.’

Maia Rindell: ‘What do you want, Blum?’

Roland Blum: ‘I want you to come with me. Did I not make that clear? I got a job.’

Maia Rindell: ‘You got me fired.’

Roland Blum: ‘Yes, and that was five weeks ago. Now I want to give you a job. Keep up.’

Maia Rindell: ‘What job?’

Lili Brenner(Rachel Wenitsky): ‘What does it matter?’

Roland Blum: ‘Exactly. My job is not in this place.(edited)’

Roland Blum: ‘I’m counting to three.’

Lili Brenner: ‘I’ll take it.’

Lili Brenner: ‘I’ll take it.’

—

Like in the 1st example, refurbished, someone is speechless, unable to articulate his/her innocence, but soon after, that person is able to articulate his/her innocence. To be clear, even though this ‘lawyer’ illustration is useful to idea ‘Innocent’, it’s unrealistic, since the 2 people that responded very quickly were lawyers. It is my belief that people in general are not lawyers. And of course, the example is refurbished so that you can still use it.

—

Now, the 3rd illustration example is like how I imagine(d) various people from various companies and corporations getting the entertainment industry to get actors to portray things that these various people would think to be impossible to portray, and yet sure enough, these various people would see the paid video clip of actors portraying such a thing, and it would amaze them that such a thing could be portrayed. That is how I also evaluate this illustration example. It is in episode 2.10 ‘I Know Who Did It’ from tv series ‘Only Murders in the Building(2022)’. The scene as far as I am aware of is only available from the streaming service Hulu, and according to Hulu, that scene starts 9 minutes and 56 seconds into the video clip.

Charles-Haden Savage(Steve Martin): ‘You must know things that upset her, that make her feel vulnerable.’

—

10 minutes and 5 seconds into the video:

Charles-Haden Savage: ‘Are there things that disturb her, that might break down her defenses?’

Poppy White(Adina Verson): ‘She does not like the inside of a tomato?’

—

Anyway, 19 minutes and 4 seconds into the video, they start doing those things that they discussed with Poppy, causing Cinda Canning(Tina Fey), refurbished for advice, to not be able to contemplationally articulate her innocence, like moving in slow motion, and looking at the inside of a tomato.(in a manner of speaking, I can’t believe that I just typed that in.) Of course, remove the inapproprieities in relation to advice.

—

All right. It is now 1:20 PM EST for me. Now that you have the 3 illustration examples, you may now have a better understanding as to how idea ‘Innocent’ works. As a recommendation, this is how you practice using it: From time to time, in a safe context, you just contemplationally explain your innocence, as it relates to situations that you believe experienced instigation is involved inhibiting somewhat your ability to contemplationally articulate your innocence. If you noticed from those 3 illustration examples, refurbished of course, an experienced instigation may cause you to commit some of your contemplation time to contemplationally complain about the instigation, to ‘blame’ it, if you will, and that contemplation blame is what may cause you to have an inhibited ability to be able to more acceptably contemplationally articulate your innocence.

For starters, when you contemplationally explain your innocence, I recommend that you imagine someone, you can imagine someone else, saying their innocence in a court of law. I just thought of it a few seconds ago, 1:26 PM EST, I watched some lawyer tv shows where people would testify in court, but there is episode 1.12 ‘Trial By Fury’ from tv series ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch(1997)’, where a teacher gets to testify in court as to how he teaches. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com. Here is a quote:

‘ A rude and condescending math teacher punishes Sabrina for asking a question by giving the whole class a difficult test. When Sabrina does poorly, both Hilda and Zelda try to reason with him–and fail. They become equally annoyed and use their powers to conjure up an Other Realm judge to punish him for his nastiness. ‘

—

So, if you watch a scene from that episode, the teacher actually believes that his teaching strategy is beneficial to his students, and he even testifies to that in court.

So, for example, an adult experiences a minor instigation at work from another employee. The instigation causes that adult to contemplationally blame that instigator adult, but idea ‘Innocent’ allows that innocent adult to instead contemplationally state his innocence. So, that might go something like:

Adult worker contemplationally stating innocence:

‘I was working, treating everyone with standard respect and courtesy.’

—

And that’s it! Notice that the explanation doesn’t even mention the blame one might give to the instigator who instigated that innocent person.

—

It is now 1:37 PM EST for me. I was going to type in 2 more illustration example, one for the girls and one for the boys, but the illustration example for the girls would take too long to explain, since it’s already late in the day for me. I’ll just stop now and close this list. Next Saturday, I’ll finally explain idea ‘Self’, unless I change my mind again. So, if you are there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

To be clear, if I had more time, I would have explained those 2 examples, and more. My intent was there, I just didn’t have enough time today to continue. The ‘good news’, if you want to see it that way, is that the idea is in my mind, and my benefit is your benefit, meaning that certain ideas that I invented will be used to make more ideas for your benefit. I hope that helps.

It is now 1:45 PM EST for me. I just remembered that I haven’t finished yet explaining this part of the idea. There are 3 rules that I was going to introduce to you before introducing idea ‘Self’, so next Saturday, I’ll have to continue explaining this idea, and then the following Saturday I’ll explain idea ‘Self’, unless I change my mind. So, what I’ll do now is close this list, and next Saturday I will continue with this advice, unless I change my mind.

—

Sci-fi viewer discretion for tv series ‘Sabrina the Teenage Witch’. TV-14 sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Stargate SG-1’. Rated PG mature themes, viewer discretion for movie ‘Dirty Rotten Scoundrels’. Rated TV-MA mature themes, violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Good Fight’ and ‘Only Murders in the Building’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Innocent’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.