8/10/2023

Salutations.

It is now 6:05AM EST for me.

This morning, around 3:20AM EST for me, a few hours ago, I felt a unique sense of epiphany involving a management of instigation associated retaining of liability. I believe the effect is the result of ‘The Samantha Carter transfusion’ I created in a recent list, Wishlist #1394, and/or the recent ideas that I have invented, more specifically, an idea that can manage better instigation associated retainings of liability. For me to explain that, it is in your interest that I explain 1st ideas ‘Disappoint’, and ‘Do something’. Idea ‘Lie liability’, one of the names I gave it, is a variation of idea ‘Do something’, and that’s going to take a few Thursdays to get to that variation. In the meantime, I will explain today idea ‘Disappoint’.

I’m typing now because I just started watching the season finale episode of ‘Strange New Worlds season 2’. Since I think it was made available streaming around 3:00AM earlier this morning, I’m just able to see it now. I want to be able to type something before 7AM EST, so therefore I should type something in now, allowing me to watch that episode uninterrupted. I’ll continue typing around 8:40AM later today, less than 3 hours from now, so if you are there, I’ll see you then.

For a ‘head start’ for idea ‘Lie liability’, I recommend that you watch movie ‘The Portable Door(2023)’ starring Christoph Waltz as Humphrey Wells. Not only, in my opinion, that it illustrates well that a job defines your perspective, as illustrated by how the 2 main characters interact in the movie as it relates to a job defining your perspective, Paul Carpenter(Patrick Gibson) and Sophie Pettingel(Sophie Wilde), but it also illustrates mood/emotion swings as it relates to interacting with certain forms of liability. The movie ‘The Portable Door’ is now available streaming from Amazon.com.

Anyway, like I said, if you are there around 8:40AM later today, I’ll see you then. I’ll watch that streaming episode now.

—

It is now 9:03AM EST for me.

This past Tuesday, 8/8/2023, I invented the idea that, for the men that I encouraged to buy oversized jeans and they are now wearing those jeans, that it is possible that the metal? part of your belt that goes in the hole of the belt, that that could break. For example, if you are at work, and because you are wearing oversized jeans that depend more on your belt, if you need to pick something up from the floor or need to work on the floor for a certain amount of time, after some of that exposure that part of your belt that goes into the hole of your belt may break. If that happens, you may have to loop your belt around the jean straps to keep your pants on. If that doesn’t work, you may have to go home and replace your belt.

Over a certain amount of time, if you choose to use the same belt regularly and you need to work on the floor, for example, something that requires bending down to move things on the floor from time to time, then that part of your belt that goes into the hole may eventually break. The solution that I created is to purchase 2 more belts: one belt to keep in your backpack/storage area in order to replace the broken belt, and a 3rd belt to maintain that balance, that you would always have a spare belt. If you haven’t done so already, I recommend that you get a hole puncher to prepare your 3 belts. Make holes to anticipate both weight gain and weight loss. Here is the hole puncher that I recommend:

Professional Leather Hole Puncher – Leather Punch Tool for Belts, Watch Bands, Handbag Straps and More – Precision Multi-Size Fabric & Leather Hole Puncher for Crafts & Easy DIY Belt Holes

—

If you can find a better one, of course get that one. That one is available from Amazon.com for about $20 with Prime shipping available.

If you want a recommendation for a belt, Amazon.com also has belts that go up to size 56:

Timberland Men’s Classic Leather Jean Belt 1.4 Inches Wide (Big & Tall Available)

—

That belt is available in 4 different styles, is also about $20, and also has Prime shipping available.

—

I’m going to look for that music video and trailer now. After I prepare them, I’ll recommend them in this blog later today. I’ll see you then.

—

It is now 10:33AM EST for me.

I just upgraded to the latest version of WordPress. Based on the preview that I glanced, it looks impressive. I’m assuming there’s a lot of features that will make it a lot easier for users to use WordPress, but in a manner of speaking, I have no idea what those features are. What I do have is experience using this blog for a certain amount of years, and I think that means something. I suppose I can read it and look it over. It’s good to have.

The music video that I considered in the past, and I watched again earlier today, is called ‘Larme (Official Video)’ by Alessandro Martire. Before I tell you how I found it, here is a quote from an article that I found in www.google.com searching with phrase ‘Alessandro Martire – Larme music video reviews’. The article is from link www.esteri.it:

‘ …during the evening, the video clip of “Larme”, an unpublished piece by Alessandro Martire to celebrate the friendship between Italy and Kazakhstan, was launched here as a world premiere. As a result of a public-private partnership between the Embassy and the Italian company Technogym, a world leader in the wellness sector, the video, unique in its style, was filmed in the Charyn Canyon, one of the most beautiful naturalist theatres in Central Asia and a destination for tourists from all over the world. A white piano is at the centre of a particularly evocative natural setting. The music, at times powerful, at times nostalgic, recalls the value of dialogue among peoples as the foundation for international relations and the need to recover “harmony” with nature.

Ambassador Alberti said: “Both the concert and the Larme video clip reflect an idea of cooperation based on three principles. First, doing things together: Martire did not play alone, but with the Kazakh State Symphony Orchestra. Second, to suggest innovative initiatives to enhance their impact and bring partners together: we decided to accompany the concert with a unique and extraordinary video, recorded in the Charyn Canyon, which will then be shared on social media and seen by many people, here and in other Countries. Finally, enhancing the integrated, yet sustainable, component of promotion: culture and business, public and private, Embassy and Kazakh Tourism, multiplying the value for each one. Presenting the initiative during the days of COP27 in Sharm El-Sheik also reinforces the idea of culture as an expression of a new relationship between human beings and the environment.”

The concert is also sold out in Bishkek, where Martire is expected on 10 November, once again with the support of the Embassy, for a second concert in Central Asia, as part of the celebrations for the 30th anniversary of bilateral relations between Italy and Kyrgyzstan. ‘

—

As always, you’re not obligated by me to watch the recommended music video. That article quote, though, does look impressive.

I found it by selecting in www.youtube.com publisher ‘Vevo’, scroll to the bottom of the page and select ‘Featured Channels’, select ‘Vevo UK’, select ‘MOOD Playlists’, select ‘Deep Focus Playlist – Concentration Music For Work | Vevo Playlist’, and ‘Alessandro Martire – Larme (Official Video)’ is #21 out of 114 music videos.

To watch music video ‘Larme’, search in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘martire larme’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with 2.5K views. It was published 8 months ago by publisher ‘Alessandro Martire’.

My main concern when watching this video is when, at the beginning of the video, Alessandro Martire seems to be standing kind of close to an area of a cliff with no safety barriers. I’m just saying not to do anything reckless or dangerous that you feel a scene may encourage you to do so. Alessandro Martire stands there as part of a music video watching experience, but don’t do something like that in real life. It’s dangerous. Other than that, in my opinion, I recommend watching the music video. In my opinion, it’s relaxing to watch.

—

The movie trailer, with inapproprieities removed, that I watched in it’s entirety for the 1st time earlier today, but I did consider it in the past, is called ‘Amanda’. Since I couldn’t find it initially, but I did consider it before, I went to youtube’s history library to find it. I went to www.youtube.com via ‘signed-in’, selected ‘Library’, selected ‘History’, and since I was fairly certain I watched it from publisher ‘Rotten Tomatoes Indie’, for ‘Search watch history’, I eventually searched for phrase ‘indie’, and according to youtube, I watched it June 1 of this year.

If you search in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘amanda trailer’, there is one trailer available from publisher ‘Rotten Tomatoes Indie’ with 19K views. That’s the one I originally watched according to youtube.com, even though it says it was published 2 months ago. There’s another one with 426K views published by Curzon, and a few others that have a few hundred thousand views.

Here’s a review quote that I found searching in www.google.com for phrase ‘amanda movie reviews’, the link is ‘www.nytimes.com’:

‘ When Amanda’s mother (Monica Nappo) suggests she seek out Rebecca (Galatéa Bellugi), the misanthropic daughter of another moneyed family — and technically an old friend (as in, the girls went on play dates when they were toddlers) — Amanda throws herself into the relationship like a running back in the last quarter. An agoraphobic who refuses to leave her room, Rebecca wears armor of her own, though when she and Amanda finally warm up to each other, the blending of their distinct cocktails of neuroses produces something like a chemical explosion.

The snappy script pokes fun at the friends’ delusions, connecting them to a listlessness born of extreme privilege. Beyond style for its own sake, the color-blocked quirkiness of the set-pieces feels justified, and somehow more effectively funny, within the context of such gratuitous wealth and the infinite yet empty sense of time it creates for those who wield it. That’s why Cavalli’s character study feels so rich. Amanda is absurd and abrasive, but also sympathetic thanks to Porcaroli’s performance. She’s a flaming narcissist with a gooey core of vulnerability, a being forged by the fear of making herself known. ‘

—

Just don’t use the scenes that you deem inappropriate. Here is the scene that I remember from a few months ago. It starts about 53 seconds into the trailer:

Person1: ‘Does Rebecca ever come out?’

Person2: ‘What if I told you she hasn’t left her room for a whole year?’

—

When I saw the trailer in it’s entirety for the 1st time earlier today, when the 2 women/teenagers would explain themselves, I thought that I could add to their explanations, making it more tenable, more understandable.

—

It is now 11:22AM EST for me.

Disappoint:

I’m going to prepare the references a little. I’ll start typing again soon.

The definition of ‘Disappoint’ comes in 2 parts. Both parts use the characters from the tv series ‘Platonic(2023)’. Here’s a quote from wikipedia.org:

‘ Platonic is an American comedy television series created by Francesca Delbanco and Nicholas Stoller that premiered on Apple TV+ on May 24, 2023. ‘

—

To understand more idea ‘Disappoint’, the idea uses the episodes, with inapproprieities removed, from the tv series ‘Platonic’, and that is available streaming on Apple TV+. According to www.google.com, a subscription to Apple TV+ is about $7 a month. The tv series ‘Platonic’ is 10 episodes long. So, if you don’t have Apple TV+, you can just pay the $7 for 1 month, and then cancel the subscription after you viewed the episodes of ‘Platonic’ that you may choose to view.

Here’s a quote from www.imdb.com about the show:

‘ Former childhood best friends reconnect as adults and try to get past the rift that led to their falling out. ‘

—

1st, for the 1st part of the explanation, which comes in 2 parts, I’m going to explain idea ‘Disappoint’ as it relates to the refurbished for advice tv series ‘Platonic’, and then I’ll try to give references from the tv show. After that, I’ll try to finish explaining the 2nd part.

I want to say that, as usual, I’ve never explained this idea before. It is usually the 1st time that I have explained it. There is no ‘other variation’ of these ideas that I give elsewhere, only the variation that I type in this blog.

So, here’s the 1st explanation: Let’s start by the definition of the word ‘disappoint’. I’ll use both definitions from www.dictionary.com:

to fail to fulfill the expectations or wishes of:
His gross ingratitude disappointed us.

to defeat the fulfillment of (hopes, plans, etc.); thwart; frustrate:
to be disappointed in love.

—

They both can be used for idea ‘Disappoint’.

So, here’s the explanation for the 1st idea: Keep in mind that I refurbished the tv series ‘Platonic’ to make this idea. It is, after all, a comedy tv series, actors portraying characters. In a manner of speaking, none of it is real. Of course, they’re real people, but it’s a tv show.

So, here’s the explanation: Will(Seth Rogen) is a man that believes that active use with certain disappointments should occur. When Will met Audrey(Alisha Wainwright), he met her with his friend Sylvia(Rose Byrne), who has a Law degree but wasn’t practicing law. When Audrey would watch Will and Sylvia talk, it was like magic, that Will’s expression of disappointments are actually acceptable to interact with, as demonstrated by how Sylvia interacts with them. Soon after Audrey absorbed their interactions, she fell in love with Will, and I suppose since Audrey is a beautiful woman, Will already fell in love with Audrey. Sylvia recommended to Will to not marry Audrey, but Will still chose to marry her. It is that relationship, that expression of friendship that Will and Sylvia display to the public, that allowed the other people in Will’s life to accept his perpetual philosophy to express disappointments. Here’s a quote from wikipedia from ‘Cast and characters’:

Rose Byrne as Sylvia, a stay-at-home mother of three and wife who reconnects with her former best friend, Will
Seth Rogen as Will, Sylvia’s former best friend who is recently divorced
Luke Macfarlane as Charlie, Sylvia’s husband who is an attorney
Tre Hale as Andy, Will’s friend and business partner
Andrew Lopez as Reggie, the main investor of Will’s brewery and the stepbrother of his ex-wife, Audrey
Carla Gallo as Katie, Sylvia’s best friend who is also a mother

—

Sylvia’s disagreement with Will’s marriage with Audrey caused Sylvia’s and Will’s friendship to end. Soon after they discontinued their friendship, Will and Audrey got a divorce. Also, Will’s other relationships were experiencing some sort of distress with the years of disappointments that Will presented to them. Will’s ex wife Audrey still loves him, Andy is still his friend, and his boss still respects him businesswise. However, without that Rosetta Stone, without that schematic/solution that is Will’s and Sylvia’s public and personal expressions of friendship, they can no longer reasonably tolerate Will’s use of disappointments. According to how the show is made, none of the characters know this to be true, that they need Will’s and Sylvia’s expressions of friendship to sustain what they were building. Not even Will and Sylvia knew that.

Will’s and Sylvia’s expressions of friendship would be great for short term project goals, something that I believe(in the context of story) many companies, businesses, and corporations practice with their very many projects. If Will and Sylvia would choose to directly work together for business projects, they would be able to achieve many things. The problem with the relationships established by Will is that they are not companies and corporations, but individuals. They are not able to reasonably interact with Will’s disappointments based on their use of expectations. It makes sense, at least in a plausible to consider way, why Will’s disappointments work with Sylvia, since she does have a law degree. Will and Sylvia remind me of the 2 Marvel characters Cloak and Dagger. I think it’s Dagger that creates the light that Cloak safely absorbs, giving them a sort of symbiotic relationship, like Ramoras are to sharks.

—

That’s the 1st part, the 1st story. What’s the point of the 1st story? To illustrate for idea ‘Disappoint’ that people tend to exercise the option to tolerate and surpass certain disappointments. According to idea ‘Disappoint’, that is what most of the people that Will interacted with tried to do, and they couldn’t continue interacting with such disappointments. Audrey wasn’t able to continue interacting with Will’s use of disappointments, and she responded by causing will to make a mistake in their marriage, which caused both Will and Audrey to get a divorce. Will’s business partners, which included his friend Andy, were not revealing to Will other business ventures that they were creating and participating in because of those Will’s use of disappointments. Just like Will’s divorce, that eventually caused Will to leave the company that he helped create with his friend Andy.

When Will and Sylvia chose to re-establish their friendship, things started to come back to life again. Soon after that reunion, Andy chose to marry Katie(Carla Gallo), Sylvia’s best friend, and everyone tried to give Will another chance. However, what happened instead, was that another option was chosen to be used instead, and that option was to use their newfound reunion of friendship as validation that Will’s use of disappointments were not meant to be used by them, and they all tried to salvage their lives, blaming Will for whatever unfairness they believe that Will’s use of disappointments created.

—

And what is the purpose in general for idea ‘Disappoint’?

The purpose for using idea ‘Disappoint’ is to help you more tenably experience mild to moderate forms of experienced instigations. If you believe that you experienced an instigation, contemplationally say ‘Disappoint’, and the idea’s intent is to help you manage the suspected experienced instigation better. I try to realize that life is complicated, and I’m not saying that the characters did anything wrong. After all, most of us are not trying to run a business. But what you can do with the refurbished for advice use of ‘Platonic’, if you choose to, is to use it to make more tenable your experienced instigations. It’s like watching an episode of ‘MacGyver’. Like MacGyver does all of the time, he takes one thing/many things and uses it for something else.

—

It is now 12:33PM EST for me.

I am going to try to quote 3 illustration references from the tv series ‘Platonic’, and then explain them. And then, after that, explain the 2nd story.

I’m going to use only 1 quote, episode 1.3 ‘Partner’s Retreat’ from comedy tv series ‘Platonic(2023)’. According to Apple TV+, the scene starts 21 minutes and 39 seconds into the episode:

Will: ‘Yo. Hey.’

Sylvia: ‘Hey.’

Sylvia: ‘You okay?’

Will: ‘Yeah, it’s fine. It’s just work stuff.(edited) That’s our normal everyday dynamic. And I think it’s quite healthy actually.’

Sylvia: ‘I’ve never seen anything like that. That’s, like, the biggest argument I’ve ever seen. Wow.’

Will: ‘I’m proud of where we’ve gotten, to be honest. It used to be much worse.’

—

There’s a lot of bad language coming from the main character Will, which is why you should not use the inappropriate parts of the show.

I can’t believe I am going to type this in. There is this scene that is not used for this advice, just don’t use it, don’t watch it. It’s inappropriate for kids to watch as well. It is when Will, Sylvia, and a few of the others choose to use drugs in the bathroom. Obviously, don’t use it for this advice. I’ll quote the scene before that scene shows, so that you know where to avoid it. It is in episode 1.4 ‘Divorce Party’ from comedy tv series ‘Platonic(2023)’, and the scene before it starts 22 minutes and 6 seconds into the episode:

Will: ‘Please hang out, okay?’

Sylvia: ‘All right. Well– What are we gonna do?

—

In the scene before that, about 19 minutes into the episode, the men propose that they all go to a strip club.

—

[8/10/2023: It is now 1:25PM EST for me.

Also, do not use the scene where Will and Sylvia tried to fix a painting that Sylvia accidentally damaged, and the painting was re-painted by Lord Rotero(Leonard Robinson). Also, do not use the scene where the painting is being displayed again in the office, causing Sylvia to get fired. The 1st scene starts about 24 minutes and 48 seconds into the episode:

Lord Rotero: ‘So, yeah. A lot of those ideas we were talking about were pretty derivative takes on capitalism.’

—

Don’t use the scene that follows that.

Soon after that scene, Sylvia actually chose to put that altered painting back into the office. Sylvia later confessed to accidentally damaging that painting, and was fired. Don’t use that scene for this advice. Keep in mind that it is a comedy to begin with, but based on how the show is used for this advice, kids don’t need to see that, which is why the warning is given. There’s nothing wrong with the show, so to speak, just recommending that you don’t use certain content for this advice. 8/10/2023]

—

It is now 1:16PM EST for me.

I am going to start and finish the 2nd part of this explanation next Thursday. I am going to close this list now, and just start a new list next Thursday, which would be a continuation of this idea, unless I change my mind again. So, if you are there next Thursday, I’ll see you then.

—

Sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘The Portable Door’. Some bad language, viewer discretion, for movie ‘Amanda’. TV-MA mature themes, violence, language, viewer discretion for comedy tv series ‘Platonic’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Disappoint’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.