10/13/2024

Salutations.

It is now 9:49PM EST for me.

As I said in the last list, I planned to start typing around 7:00PM EST. I’m almost 3 hours late. The ‘good news’ though is that I ordered by UberEats food early, insuring? that the food that I ordered was available. If you order too close to the store’s closing, they may call you and tell you that certain foods are not available. I have almost my entire order. Another ‘good news’ is that I have more available time today, since I chose to not work Columbus Day.

I plan to type in 2 ideas, 1)’In character’, and 2)’Embellishment’. Metaphorically speaking, and only the talking part, I plan to be a massive ‘Chatty Cathy'(definition of ‘Chatty Cathy’ in wikipedia.org) when explaining idea ‘Embellishment’. It’s going to be a lot easier to explain than to explain idea ‘In character’, but I look forward to explaining it nonetheless.

I plan to stop explaining idea ‘In character’ around midnight EST, prepare my laundry, and go grocery shopping. I don’t think there’s going to be a problem with the supermarket being open on Columbus Day. And after I come back from that, after I finish with the groceries, then I plan to finish explaining idea ‘In character’. I’ll probably start typing again maybe around 10:00AM EST tomorrow morning. Since it should be very easy for me to explain idea ‘Embellishment’, I’m not worried about explaining it. The explanation should be soon after explaining idea ‘In character’, let’s say within a day or two after.

Because of last week’s list, I’ve decided to give you an idea that involves some crying. You don”t have to use it, but in my opinion, if you allow yourself to use the idea, you’re going to cry. Yes, I’m aware that kids may be reading this blog, since it’s a public list. I used the idea myself. I think it’s going to be a refreshing change of pace compared to that last idea.

Since I have already selected the music video, and for this list I don’t want to recommend 2 music videos, all I have to look for is a trailer for this list. That shouldn’t take too long. After I prepare that trailer, I’ll give you that ‘crying’ idea 1st, something to use before I finish explaining the idea.

I just looked at my recent Amazon.com purchases, and I did buy something that I think may be useful to you. One of the doors that I use was squeaking again, and so I bought this lubricant recently, used it, and the door no longer squeaks:

Squeaks Gone, 2oz, Fix Any Squeak, All-Purpose Lubricant, Hinges, Doors, Drawers, Fans, Long Lasting, Non-Toxic, Non-Hazardous, Odorless, Safe, It Works (2oz | Sprayer Top)

—

It’s only about $14. I think I have something else, but I have to organize the rooms more in order to find it. So instead of looking for it, I just bought another lubricant from Amazon.com, and I placed the lubricant nearby. So, if you already have some sort of lubricant for squeaking doors, and one or more of your doors are squeaking but you don’t know where the lubricant is, I recommend that you just buy another lubricant. They’re cheap, and your door(s) should stop squeaking. Leave it somewhere where you can easily find it, and the cost was almost nothing to stop your door(s) from squeaking.

It is now 10:17PM EST for me. I am going to look for that trailer now. I’ll see you soon.

—

It is now 11:13PM EST for me.

Because of the time, instead of stopping my typing at midnight, I’ll continue for another hour and stop around 1:00AM EST.

The tv series trailer that I watched for the 1st time earlier today and recommend for this advice is called ‘Elsbeth Season 2’. As an incentive to watch it, here’s a quote from link collider.com saying who the guests of season 2 will be:

Who Are ‘Elsbeth’ Season 2 Guest Stars?

‘ In addition to Bayer and Bucatinsky, other guest stars in Elsbeth Season 2 include Nathan Lane, Daniel Davis, Vanessa Williams, Pamela Adlon, Rob Riggle, and Brittany O’Grady. Returning series regulars are Wendell Pierce and Carra Patterson, while Aisha Tyler from Criminal Minds: Evolution will join as a director for one episode this season. ‘

—

It’s been a while since I looked at my Google News links from my smartphone. After looking at a few usual links to find a trailer and I could not find one, I decided to look at Google News. I went to ‘Google News’, ‘Following’, ‘Saved searches’, and from that I searched for phrase ‘rotten tomatoes october 2024’, I then selected link ‘TV Premiere Dates 2024’ published Sep 24, 2024, scrolled down, and for category ‘Thursday, October 17’, it indicated that ‘Elsbeth: Season 2’ will show. I then searched in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘elsbeth season 2 trailer’, and I selected link ‘Elsbeth Season 2’ published 1 month ago by CBS.

In my opinion, if you watched season 2, I think you’ll enjoy the new guest stars interactions.

—

Before I continue, I don’t know if you will actually cry. The certainty in words that you will cry is based on me crying. And so, I assumed that, if you choose to allow yourself to cry, that you will very likely cry yourself. I don’t actually know for certain that you will cry if you use the idea.

—

It is now 11:52PM EST for me.

Because the 1st reference quote is coming from an episode of ‘Star Trek: Voyager’, and that episode may not be available from Amazon.com, but instead from streaming service Paramount Plus, and ‘Elsbeth: Season 2’ I think is available to Paramount Plus, I have decided to re-enroll to Paramount Plus, ‘Paramount+ with SHOWTIME’. One reason is because it has ‘No ads except live TV & a few shows’. It’s going to take me a few minutes to enroll, so that I could quote that ‘Star Trek: Voyager’ episode.

—

In character:

It is now 12:10AM EST for me.

To prepare you for idea ‘In character’, and it’s a part of the idea, I’m presenting an exercise based on the tv series ‘Star Trek: Voyager’. You don’t have to watch the entire series. I found a quote for you to use. According to Paramount Plus streaming service, the quote is in episode 7.19 ‘Q2’ from tv series ‘Star Trek: Voyager(2001)’. The scene starts about 15 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode:

Q(John de Lancie): ‘Just look how quickly you housebroke that Borg drone.’

Capt. Kathryn Janeway(Kate Mulgrew): ‘It’s taken years… for Seven to become an individual. You’re asking me to change your son in one week?’

—

Here’s how I did it, and then, if you choose to, you can follow my lead: I imagined using the power of Q to do just one thing: to be in that room/rooms where Seven of Nine(Jeri Ryan) and Janeway would have their regular scheduled meetings to talk. If you choose to extrapolate from that provided quote, Q will study how Janeway trained/helped Seven to become an individual. Since I am only imagining it, I decided to focus my learning experience to just those meeting that Seven and Janeway would regularly have. Using the power of Q, I would go into that room with a portable backpack mattress(whatever that’s called), and just sleep there when that would happen. Adjust the room temperature to your liking, and of course they don’t know that you’re there, just as they don’t know that many? Q were also there. The conversations would be ‘lined up’ accordingly. Once one ended, the next meeting would automatically play. It shouldn’t take that long, from season 1 to season 7, and you’re just imagining sleeping there while they would talk. One usefulness that I imagined for that imagined experience, if you are a kid, is that it may help you compromise more effectively when you become adults and have a job, chosen compromises of course. If you watched ‘Star Trek: Voyager’, if memory serves, Seven in the beginning tried to take over Voyager, but Kes with her newfound powers stopped her. And, according to that quote, the meetings as well as other experiences ‘paid off’. Here’s that quote again:

‘ Q(John de Lancie): ‘Just look how quickly you housebroke that Borg drone.’ ‘

—

So, to be clear, if you choose to, just imagine using the power of Q to sleep in those rooms where Janeway and Seven would talk, and that may benefit you.

—

It is now 12:43AM EST for me.

I’m going to extend this typing for another hour, so at most 2:00AM EST, and then I stop typing and continue, probably still around 10:00AM EST later today.

I know it’s rather short notice to offer you that ‘sleep while Janeway and Seven talk’ story, but what can you do.

The illustration reference that I used to make the idea is in episode 2.7 ‘Monsters’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Star Trek: Picard(2022)’. The episode is available streaming on both Paramount Plus and Amazon.com. Since I just subscribed to Paramount Plus, I’ll use that as a reference. The scene starts 39 minutes and 7 seconds into the episode:

Guinan(Ito Aghayere): ‘You can’t really want me to summon a Q?’

Guinan: ‘A long time ago, after a long cold war, my people and the denizens of the Q Continuum struck a truce.’

—

You can watch more of that explanation from the episode, if you choose to.

Here’s a quote from link memory-alpha.fandom.com:

‘ In the distant past, the El-Aurians engaged in a long cold war with the Q Continuum, which was ended with a truce struck over a bottle of liquor. The moment of the truce was captured within the bottle, which could subsequently be used to summon a Q. The bottle was in Guinan’s possession as of 2024. ‘

—

I didn’t literally use the events described in that ‘Star Trek: Picard’ episode. This is the idea that I used: Before the El-Aurians decided to go to war with the Q Continuum, I witnessed an imagined depiction of the El-Aurians reviewing what the Q was doing to certain other sentient species. That witnessing further validated a declaration of war with the Q continuum. Eventually, the El-Aurians won against the Q Continuum. If you watched that ‘victory’ presented in a ‘Star Trek’ episode based on how I imagined it, you wouldn’t understand it. I thought it was boring to watch, and that I would need a 2 hour conversation to explain how the El-Aurians won against the Q Continuum. Keep in mind that much of our understanding of war, let’s say based on what we learned in school, it’s still based on human expectations. El-Aurians are not human, and in my opinion, they’re more obviously intelligent and have more abilities than humans. They just don’t brag about it. My point is that, based on how I imagined it, if you haven’t been given a conversation about what war is to them, if you watched a ‘Star Trek’ depiction of the El-Aurians winning against the Q Continuum without that conversation, you may find that victory, like I did, somewhat boring to watch.(Not everyone is a cultural anthropologist or a diplomat.)

As for the crying part, I refurbished a music video to represent the El-Aurians reviewing Q’s actions for validation to declare a war with them, the El-Aurians actually fighting the Q Continuum, and the El-Aurians winning against the Q Continuum. After the victory, you even see the Q Continuum watching the El-Aurians, and even helping them. The music video is only about 4 minutes long, but all of that, if you choose to, is inaccurately condensed in that time. The El-Aurians is represented by the lead singer, and the Q Continuum is represented by the obvious man antagonist that everyone seems to be losing to. When watching the recommended music video, watch it using the context when it was released, since it’s kind of old. For example, if it was made in 1985, watch the people in the context of it during 1985, since they’re probably kind of old as of now, and they’re attitudes may change since then.

The music video that I am about to recommend to you refurbished for this advice to represent the war between the El-Aurians and the Q Continuum, a war that the El-Aurians won, that music video is ‘The Warrior (Video) ft. Patty Smyth’ by Scandal. In the beginning of the music video, don’t use that thing when the Q Continuum did something to her clothes. Don’t resolve that, and just refurbish it based on the recommendation.

Here is a quote from wikipedia.org:

‘ “The Warrior” is a song by American rock band Scandal featuring Patty Smyth, from their debut and sole studio album, Warrior, written by Holly Knight and Nick Gilder. The song went to number seven in the United States and number one in Canada, as well as number one on the US Rock Top Tracks chart, and won a BMI Airplay Award in 1984. It was also a hit in Australia, where it peaked at number six, and in New Zealand and South Africa, peaking at number 11 in both countries. The music video for the song was directed by David Hahn.

The song was used as the opening theme to both the 2017–2019 Netflix television series GLOW, and the 2024 Sonic the Hedgehog spin-off television series Knuckles. ‘

—

Here’s age verification of Patty Smyth from wikipedia.org:

Patricia Smyth
Born June 26, 1957 (age 67)
New York City, U.S

—

To watch the music video, search in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘scandal the warrior’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with 28M views! It was published 10 years ago by publisher ‘ScandalVEVO’.

According to my youtube history, the earliest I watched the music video ‘The Warrior’ was this past Wednesday. However, listening to the song, it has been out for years, and I believe I did hear it from the radio years ago, which led me to search for the music video in the 1st place. Since this past Wednesday, I only watched it a few times, and each time I watched it using the context that I tried to explain to you, at least an impression of that context, I cried every single time. I am assuming that if you use the context that I typed in to watch the music video ‘The Warrior’, you may also cry.

—

It is now 1:36AM EST for me.

I am going to get my laundry ready now for the laundromat. I should start typing again around 10:00AM EST later today. If you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

It is now 10:40AM EST for me.

Just want you to know, so to speak, that I changed my mind, and instead of typing around 10:00AM, I’m going to type again around 8:00PM EST later today. I wanted to just do that, type later, but since I told you I was going to type around 10:00AM, I felt that I should let you know that I changed my mind. It is my belief that the entire explanation for idea ‘In character’ should be useful to you, and that should take only several more hours to complete it. I’m not going to look for yet another music video and trailer. I’ll just give you the rest of the explanation, and then close it. So, if you are there later today EST, I’ll see you then.

—

It is now 10:58PM EST for me.

To inform you, I am already using some of the extra time to explain ideas ‘In character’ and ‘Embellishment’. At least by intent, I have already made commitments to these 2 ideas, to explain them, so that I don’t drift using other expectations. Having extra time available doesn’t happen too often, and I don’t want to squander that extra time.

Let’s continue with a definition of ‘in character’ that I will use in this blog from link www.collinsdictionary.com, and then I will explain it’s meaning:

‘ If someone’s actions are in character, they are doing what you would expect them to do, knowing what kind of person they are. If their actions are out of character, they are not doing what you would expect them to do.
It was entirely in character for Rachel to put her baby first. [+ for]
What else could make him behave so out of character? ‘

—

I am using idea ‘In character’ as an indicator for an opportunity option. Even though elements of being ‘in character’ can be seen in many participations, being ‘in character’ can also be used to differentiate one participation from another. Here is a quick illustration example of a person using ‘in character’ to differentiate one participation from another. (Oh, and of course, I imagined this idea. I’m not professionally giving advice. My hope is that you find this advice useful.) This illustration example is not exact, so I recommend that, when you choose to use it, just refurbish it yourself to make it conform to the meaning, if you choose to, of course. It is in episode 1.2 ‘Pilot’, the pilot/1st episode of tv series ‘Elsbeth’. The episode is available streaming from Paramount Plus, and the scene starts 40 minutes and 34 seconds into the episode:

Alex Modarian(Stephen Moyer): ‘What was it that gave me away?’

Elsbeth Tascioni(Carrie Preston): ‘Acting.’

Alex: ‘You weren’t convinced by my acting?’

Elsbeth: ‘Oh, no. I was. People in life don’t act.’

—

That comment Elsbeth made:

‘People in life don’t act.’

—

That is based on the lifestyle Elsbeth chose, to be a lawyer, and to solve crimes. However, I don’t have proof, but I believe that there are many? jobs out there, even ways of interacting, that involve the use of being ‘in character’, and there are jobs that are obviously not real, but if you do work in such a job, you are to participate using a sense of being ‘in character’. For example, and I just imagined this, I just made it up, if you are not familiar with such jobs, and let’s say while you were in college, you were introduced to a few of them, you may find them humorous/funny, and not take them seriously. After all from your perspective, they’re not real. You might think like Elsbeth does:

‘People in life don’t act.’

—

But since I’m just imagining this, if you choose to try to relate to people with such jobs, here is a story, one illustration example that I made up, for that:

In this story, I’m using celebrity Tom Arnold as the main character, but the setting is 2024, and using him when he was 18+, Tom Arnold is an 18+ in this story. I used Tom Arnold as an example in a few of my previous ideas. Here is a quote from wikipedia about the celebrity:

‘ Thomas Duane Arnold (born March 6, 1959) is an American actor and comedian. He is best known for playing Arnie Thomas on Roseanne, which starred his ex-wife Roseanne Barr. ‘

—

I liked his performance in the movie ‘True Lies(1994)’ as Albert Gibson, a ‘like’ used for this advice.

In this story, Tom Arnold as a college student is introducing other college students, a mix of his friends and college student enthusiasts, to a participation that involves being ‘in character’ to allow new participants to participate. They all love it! All of those college students who are ‘in character’ are enthusiastically participating, and talking to each other about the possibilities of participating ‘in character’ for many possible aspects of such a project, everyone is expressing enthusiasm except for Tom Arnold. What Tom Arnold is doing is calmly introducing those college students to a project that encourages the use of being ‘in character’ for beginner participants. In this story, Tom Arnold has experience participating ‘in character’ for various projects ever since he was 13 years old. And since he is introducing the concept of being ‘in character’ to other people, he chose to do so without needing to express enthusiasms like the other college students are doing. Instead, he chose to introduce being ‘in character’ in a calm manner, like a tour guide, I suppose.

So, you see, from Tom Arnold’s example as an 18+ year old college student, if you choose to, being ‘in character’ has it’s uses, including the possibility of seeing it as an opportunity option.

For the kids, as a possibility, when you get old enough to have career jobs, and you are taught certain aspects of your job while you are at work, it’s possible that the person teaching you something about the job can also be ‘in character’, doing such a thing, but is instead teaching you to do it. That teacher, let’s say that teacher is a man, could be represented as Tom Arnold from that story, someone who has ‘in character’ experience for years, but is instead using that ‘in character’ experience to teach something to you, since he already has commitments to do something else in the company/job.

Now that I got that ‘in character’ definition out of the way, here are a few illustration examples that I imagined/invented:

—

Princess Irulan:

I’m using 2 characters for this ‘In character’ example called ‘Princess Irulan’, 1)Princess Irulan(Florence Pugh) from the movie ‘Dune: Part Two(2024)’, and Liam Kincaid(Robert Leeshock) from the tv series ‘Earth: Final Conflict’. I will be in the story, but I have chosen as my avatar character Liam Kincaid, as he was when the tv series 1st aired, and it will occur in another job/company/corporation, as long as it’s not where I actually work. Now, the ‘effect’ of this idea is based on something that I just imagined, but I believe it’s true, but I’m not able to prove that it’s true, ergo it’s just imagined, and here is the ‘effect’: that American men in general are susceptible to a certain exposure to status, to stature. For example, years ago, I read in an article, an interview with celebrity Don Johnson, it could have been an article that has been out for years before I read it, that when he met a celebrity when he was young, that he was dumbfounded/speechless from the experience. Obviously, he wasn’t prepared for the experience of meeting a celebrity that he recognized. You can use that as a reference that it’s possible that American men in general would not be ready when meeting women who have a certain social status, if they don’t already have such an experience. And so, within reason, why not meeting someone like Princess Irulan from the movie ‘Dune: Part Two’, but she’s a person that you are familiar with from work, but you didn’t know that she is also Princess Irulan.

So, different nationalities, I choose 1, and here’s the situation, the prequel: a group of African American women are talking to an African American woman, all of them working in the same job, and this African American woman is also Princess Irulan. Let’s call her Princess Irulan for simplicity. Princess Irulan is walking ‘back and forth’ as the other women are talking to her. All of those women are expressing their reservations, that American men in general are not used to her social status, that she is Princess Irulan, and they are expressing the reservations that Princess Irulan should use when interacting with the men, that she should not just outright introduce herself as Princess Irulan, will she introduce herself as Princess Irulan to any of the men at work, etc.

One day, as she is talking to Liam(me) at work, like a tv show/movie plot, a circumstance presents itself where Liam agrees to experience something from Princess Irulan. Liam has never interacted with women with a certain social status before, and she doesn’t know that the woman is also Princess Irulan, so soon after their agreed upon conversation preps Liam up, Princess Irulan all of a sudden, wearing clothing similar to what character Princess Irulan was wearing in the ‘Dune: Part Two’ movie was wearing, she presents herself as Princess Irulan. It’s the change in words and demeanor mostly that has a profound effect on Liam, causing him to create tears coming down his face.

—

(I recommend using idea ‘Princess Irulan’ as a caution for men, that certain instigator women may use a certain social status men aren’t used to as something they may consider exposing certain men to, in the context of an experienced instigation.)

—

Now, that’s an ‘In character’ example where a man doesn’t even have to try, referring to when he was crying. That effect was, for lack of a better term, given to him to experience. The next ‘In character’ example, based on how I will explain it, requires some effort to allow idea ‘In character’ to work. Here’s the story: Halloween, October 31, is approaching. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org:

‘ Halloween or Hallowe’en[7][8] (less commonly known as Allhalloween,[9] All Hallows’ Eve,[10] or All Saints’ Eve)[11] is a celebration observed in many countries on 31 October, the eve of the Western Christian feast of All Hallows’ Day. ‘

—

In America, a lot of people are going to go ‘trick or treating’ to their neighbor’s houses, asking for candy/Halloween related stuff. What also happens is that teenagers and adults will have Halloween parties, people dressed up wearing costumes.

In one of these parties, I meet a woman dressed up as Moondragon. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org:

‘ Moondragon is a character appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics. Created by Bill Everett, Mike Friedrich, and George Tuska, the character first appeared in Iron Man #54 (January 1973). She has achieved her extraordinary talents strictly through extreme degrees of personal regimen, unlike most Marvel characters who have gained their paranormal abilities through birth or accident. She is one of the most powerful telepaths on earth. Her abilities also include telekinesis and the power to transform into a dragon. Heather Douglas is known under the codename Moondragon. ‘

—

Even though it’s Halloween, I had to make an effort to give the woman presenting herself as Moondragon ‘In character’ credence.

—

For this next ‘In character’ idea, I’ll have to explain it incrementally, but at least I can make an attempt to explain it. I think it will work. I’ll start with a quote from the movie ‘Dune: Part Two’, the streaming version from Amazon.com. The scene starts about 32 minutes and 45 seconds into the movie:

Chani(Zendaya): ‘You have to break up your rhythm. Like this.’

Paul Atreides(Timothée Chalamet): ‘Now, that’s interesting because in the filmbooks I’ve studied, the anthropologists say, in order to properly sandwalk, you actually have — ‘

—

(Chani reacts to what Paul is saying to her.)

—

Paul: ‘Never mind. Please keep going.’

—

In a previous list, I imagined being married to a woman represented by a comic book character called Mercy, one of Lex Luthor’s priority employees. In real life, she looks like the character Sophie Pettingel(Sophie Wilde) from the movie ‘The Portable Door(2023)’. In this imagined situation, she expressed a fondness, an approval, of what I had done, and soon after she expressed that fondness, I corrected her, saying that other people were responsible for that interpretation. Soon after I said that, she looked disappointed in me, like the way Chani looked at Paul as he was giving her that explanation:

Paul Atreides(Timothée Chalamet): ‘Now, that’s interesting because in the filmbooks I’ve studied, the anthropologists say, in order to properly sandwalk, you actually have — ‘

—

Using that imagined experience with my imagined wife, I made the deduction, let’s start the explanation this way, that men do things that they believe are the reasons why the women that they married love them, but when presented those reasons, some? women may say to their husbands that those are not the reasons that they love them. However, those women allow their husbands to be ‘in character’ with those reasons, even though those actions are not the reasons why they are in love with their husbands. That reminds me of a scene from the movie ‘Battleship(2012)’. I searched for the word ‘battleship’ on ionicbreeze1.com’s homepage, and I selected link ‘Wishlist #1154’. Here’s a quote from that link:

The illustration, refurbished for advice of course, is in movie ‘Battleship(2012)’ starring Taylor Kitsch as Lieutenant Alex Hopper, and Tadanobu Asano as Captain Yugi Nagata. The movie is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 49 minutes, and 44 seconds into the movie, Lieutenant Hopper and Captain Nagata are talking. Here is the quote:

Captain Nagata: ‘I can’t believe that worked!’

Lieutenant Hopper: ‘Yeah, ‘Art of War’. Fight the enemy where they aren’t. After all these years, that finally just clicked.’

Captain Nagata: ‘But that’s not what it means.’

Lieutenant Hopper: ‘Really?’

Captain Nagata: ‘Not even close.’

—

Conversely, I recommend that men allow their wives to maintain the integrity of certain beliefs by not criticizing and correcting those beliefs. The only person in my opinion that has the unfortunate ability to destabilize certain beliefs that certain women have are their husbands, and I recommend that you allow your wives to remain ‘in character’ for those beliefs. After all, your wives are allowing you to remain ‘in character’ for certain beliefs that are also not entirely accurate. It is my belief that certain possible experienced instigations encourage too much precision expectations with certain interactions.

—

One more thing about idea ‘In character’, well, one more thing that I have the chosen time to type in: I am recommending that you have the option to participate using idea ‘In character’. Let’s say, for one example, there exists an option to participate using ‘in character’ for beginner participants. However, if you do, you will experience disappointments and unrequited aspirings from a few participants who have experience in that project. Even though there are discouragements, it’s still could be construed as a possible participation option, and who knows? Maybe with other people, those initial discouragements could easily change. Maybe you may still use such an option, even with such discouragements. I mean, it’s not like you’re going to do something entirely distasteful or unacceptable. In my opinion, it could be useful to have such options, even though you will probably never actively use such options.

—

It is now 3:15AM EST for me.

I am still considering whether or not to start explaining idea ‘Embellishment’. Regardless, I am closing this list now. I will make a new list Monday, 10/21/2024, about 7:00PM EST, unless I change my mind again. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

—

Rated TV-PG mature themes, sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek: Voyager’. Rated TV-14 violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Elsbeth’. Rated R mature themes, violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘True Lies’. Rated PG-13 mature themes, sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘Dune: Part Two’. Rated PG-13 mature themes, sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘Battleship’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘In character’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.