4/29/2025

Salutations.

It is now 11:32PM EST for me.

Tolerance variety:

Less than a minute ago, at 11:34PM EST for me, I was thinking about the difficulty that I would experience as I would try to type in this blog. Also, I was thinking about the difficulty you may be experiencing as readers to this blog, such as kids, teenagers, and adults. To be blunt, I don’t talk about this blog to anyone. If I have to get this blog fixed, which rarely happens, in fact, out of all of the years I have been using this blog, talking to Ipage and WordPress representatives only happened a few times. Otherwise, I don’t talk to anyone about this blog. However, just because I don’t talk about it, that doesn’t mean that certain? readers are not experiencing some difficulties reading it. Therefore, I’ll give you an idea called ‘Tolerance variety’ to help you with that, and then in this blog I’ll give you the impression of the ‘strategy ideas’ that I am actively, currently using. There is still one more idea I want to explain called ‘Guilty’, but after that, I’ll give you the actual impression idea. I should be able to do all of that within this list, and in 4 hours or so.

For idea ‘Tolerance variety’, let’s start with a quote from the previous list, Wishlist #1498, published 4/21/2025:

One particular symbiote was created to be a baby girl. When she grew up with the other humans from the future to be 8+ years old, somehow she was transported to the year 2022+. Because of the lack of technological advancement from the future, she is not able to exist in her human form, but because she is also a symbiote, what she can do is join with another human. That’s how I met her. She explained to me her situation, and I agreed to allow her to join with me. When she chooses to, she shows me what her original human form looks like, but I am the only one that can see that. And sometimes, she leads me to Venom, the one that started it all, and she talks to him?.

So, imagined, you talk to the girl symbiote, you agree to let her join you based on your stipulations, and you decide when to use this idea. You can turn it ‘on and off’ like a light switch. It’s up to you. She’ll help you evaluate and experience certain things without contemplationally ‘saying’ anything.

—

Keep in mind that I just imagined this. I don’t want the kids to ‘freak out’:

I imagined a girl who is reading this blog asking in her ‘study group’ “I want the girl symbiote to talk.” She is referring to the girl symbiote that I imagined to help me to not say anything contemplationally if I experience an inclination to blame.

—

I’ll use for my 1st illustration example, and you don’t have to watch any of those episodes. I’m assuming that the illustration example is common enough in the tv series. The tv show character that the illustration example is used from is Marilyn Munster from the tv series ‘The Munsters(1964-1966)’. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org about the character Marilyn Munster:

‘ Like the rest of her family, she believes that the Munsters’ appearance and lifestyle are normal, although Marilyn is actually the only family member whose appearance does not shock or disturb people outside the family. She is considered attractive by outsiders, but by the aesthetic standards of her family she is distressingly unattractive. Marilyn laments that she keeps scaring away potential boyfriends, not realizing that the young men are frightened away by her family. ‘

—

In a manner of speaking, that says it all.

‘ Marilyn laments that she keeps scaring away potential boyfriends, not realizing that the young men are frightened away by her family. ‘

—

I just watched a few of the re-runs. If memory serves, as a man was in the process of dating Marilyn Munster, the man is very obviously attracted to her, but as soon as he meets one of her family members, he leaves the relationship in shock.

In my opinion, just evaluating those moments when Marilyn Munster’s boyfriends would practically be in love with her, and then abruptly leave the relationship when meeting one of her family members, the few scenes that I actually watched, if those men were able to compartmentalize more their use of tolerance, they wouldn’t just rely on their experiences to tolerate her family. They would be able to use a different tolerance to evaluate her family that is not the same as the tolerance used to evaluate Marilyn Munster. Just imagined, if those men were able to give more variety to their use of tolerance, then maybe at least one of those men would have been able to continue with the relationship, and then finally they would eventually get married.

—

All right. It’s the only illustration reference I can think of right now for the story I’m about to type in. Just refurbish it. The illustration reference shows a man and his woman assistant ‘breaking up’ with 3 women using conference. The story I will type in is about a man who has a work assistant who is like the woman assistant in the movie, and he already ‘broke up’ with one woman, and then I explain that story. Going back to the illustration reference, it is from movie ‘Ghosts of Girlfriends Past(2009)’ starring Matthew McConaughey as Connor Mead, and Noureen DeWulf as Melanie. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 4 minutes and 5 seconds into the movie:

Connor Mead:’I am a touch busy, so if you could take care of those calls for me, I’d appreciate it.’

Melanie: ‘No. No way. I am not breaking up with girls for you, Connor. That’s where I draw the line. I believe in karma.’

Connor: ‘Okay. Conference them.’

Melanie: ‘Conference them?’

Connor: ‘Conference them.’

—

Here’s the story: A man and a woman recently broke up from their relationship. The man has a woman assistant for his job that also helps the women in his relationships prepare for social events they choose to attend with him, dinner events, etc. at his expense. Of course, this is when he is in a relationship with a woman individually, not what Connor did. Within reason, of course, I imagined that that woman misses interacting with that man’s ‘woman assistant’. She really gets along with her, and she believes that they became friends while she was in a relationship with that man.

—

It is my belief that more than one truth can exist simultaneously. For example, let’s say that that woman who broke up with that man continued her friendship with that man’s ‘woman assistant’. Sure, if that man’s ‘woman assistant’ agrees to it, they’re both adults. They can both still continue their friendship, and do things together.

Here’s another possibility, that the reason she likes interacting with that man’s ‘woman assistant’ is because of the arrangements that that man created for his ‘woman assistant’ to be involved with his women relationships.

—

It is now 1:18AM EST for me.

I found it, an illustration reference for idea ‘Tolerance variety’. Let’s look at this story again:

Here’s the story: A man and a woman recently broke up from their relationship. The man has a woman assistant for his job that also helps the women in his relationships prepare for social events they choose to attend with him, dinner events, etc. at his expense. Of course, this is when he is in a relationship with a woman individually, not what Connor did. Within reason, of course, I imagined that that woman misses interacting with that man’s ‘woman assistant’. She really gets along with her, and she believes that they became friends while she was in a relationship with that man.

—

Now, if you choose to, add tolerance variety to the man and the woman that was recently in a relationship with him, but they both recently broke up, a separate, imagined tolerance variety for each of them. Now, here’s a refurbished for advice scene from episode 4.2 ‘The Gang Tries to Serve a Subpoena’ from tv series ‘The Good Fight(2020)’, starring Cush Jumbo as Lucca Quinn, and Zach Grenier as David Lee. No more sitting on the ‘naughty step’ for me!(for this idea, hopefully) The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 39 minutes and 3 seconds into the episode:

Lucca Quinn: ‘Bianca? Yes, I told her. She’s better off moving on from her husband and not having you bilk her for a couple more months of billable hours.’

David Lee: ‘And does this settlement include monthly alimony?’

Lucca Quinn: ‘You know it did. That’s standard.’

David Lee: ‘And under the latest tax law, she can’t deduct alimony, so she’s paying ten million dollars more in taxes. Meanwhile, Brad pays no tax on the alimony. You just made him rich. Congratulations. That’s why I was stretching out the depos, not so that I could add to the billable hours, but so that I could delay the tax bill until next year.’

—

To be blunt, Lucca Quinn made a mistake ‘in the name of friendship’.

In that story, if you choose to, here is another possibility to consider: that that man fortified his ‘woman assistant’ to interact with his at the time woman he was in a relationship with. He would help her prepare for agreed upon social and casual events, even pay for her new attire, via the ‘woman assistant’. So much of how that woman assistant presented herself to the woman he was in a relationship with, he made that happen. So, when they ‘broke up’, depending upon your use of tolerance variety, does it matter if any of that fortifying carries over to the continuation of their friendship?

Here’s what I recommend: Sure, it’s possible for those 2 women to have a continued friendship, but if you can, also allow that man to have some sort of casual/social involvement. For example, if the 2 women attend a social event, for only a few events a year, arrange for that man to also attend, an attendance of 3. That way, at least something from the previous relationship may ‘carry over’ to the current friendship. After all, the ‘woman assistant”s boss is still that man, even though the relationship ended. For example, considering this as an option depends upon the ‘tolerance variety’ used by the woman who used to be in a relationship with that man. I believe it’s something worth considering as an option that, of course, you don’t have to use.

—

[4/30/2025: It is now 8:21AM EST for me.

To avoid misunderstandings that could get me into any trouble, let me add explanation to 3 of the examples that I already typed in: In all 3 examples, 1)’The Munsters’ example, 2)’Ghosts of Girlfriends Past’ example, and 3)the example that I invented, all 3 examples involved a ‘break up’. The men running away in shock based on how they were reacting to Marilyn’s family, that’s one indication that their relationship is over. In the movie ‘Ghosts of Girlfriends Past’, Connor Mead was ‘breaking up’ with 3 women that I can see from the movie at the same time with the help of his ‘woman assistant’ Melanie, and in the 3rd example, the story begins after a man and a woman ‘broke up’. All 3 examples involve adults(I assumed Marilyn from ‘The Munsters’ was an adult. Here’s a quote from wikipedia.org about Marilyn:

‘ Marilyn is Lily’s niece, although her surname is Munster. She attends Westbury College in Mockingbird Heights, the city where the Munsters live. ‘

—

Without overthinking it, it is a tv show, so it’s assumed that Marilyn and the men she was in relationships with were at least 18+ years old.

All 3 examples involve relationship ‘break ups’ with adults. The ‘break-ups’ were just used as part of the explanation for idea ‘Tolerance variety’.

Here is the statement that I typed in earlier that might have misunderstanding involved:

‘ I imagined a girl who is reading this blog asking in her ‘study group’ “I want the girl symbiote to talk.” She is referring to the girl symbiote that I imagined to help me to not say anything contemplationally if I experience an inclination to blame. ‘

—

The solution is to add ‘Tolerance variety’ to her request to want the girl symbiote to talk. I know I did not type this in before, but I was under the ‘imagined’ impression that the girl wanted just the girl symbiote to talk, an impression that indicates a separation from me and the girl symbiote. If you add idea ‘Tolerance variety’ to that want? to separate me from the girl symbiote, the experience, by definition, may be given another ‘tolerance variety’ to work with, which may mitigate/lesson the want to separate me from the girl symbiote that I just ‘imagined’. I know I didn’t say that before, but I’m saying it now.

Hopefully, this extra explanation will allow the avoiding of misunderstandings that could get me into trouble. This is, after all, a public blog.

The reason why I didn’t type this in until recently is because I recently took a shower. I’ve mentioned this phenomena in a few past lists. I thought that the ideas that I typed in allowed me to no longer be bothered by this phenomena. Here’s the explanation that I invented: when you take a shower, your body becomes more relaxed. But by being more relaxed, you become more susceptible to certain experienced mild to moderate forms of instigation.

So, when my body was more relaxed while I was taking a shower, that’s when I realized the possible misunderstanding interpretation. I was upset about the discovery because, in a manner of speaking, I was ‘in the middle of a shower’ when I made that interpretation discovery. I chose to finish taking a shower before typing in this blog again. It is now 8:53AM EST for me. 4/30/2025]

—

It is now 1:45AM EST for me.

I am going to take a break, and when I start typing again soon, I will start explaining idea ‘Guilty’. I’ll see you soon, maybe in an hour.

—

It is now 2:23AM EST for me.

Change of plans: I am going to look for a music video and trailer for the sake of routine, type in those recommendations, then close this list. I will try to type in the next list this coming Monday, 5/5/2025, about 7:00PM EST. If not, then the next day, this coming Tuesday, 5/6/2025, also about 7:00PM EST. The mistake that I made for this list is that I started over 4 hours late. If I started on time, I would have more likely finished this list. It may not make much sense, looking for a music video and trailer when I’m not going to type an idea afterwards, but I’m doing so for routine’s sake. So, in 2 hours, I’ll recommend them. If you are still interested in knowing what they are, I’ll see you then.

—

It is now 3:12AM EST for me.

Since I’m in a rush, I found the trailer based on what I read from the Google News app while using my smartphone less than a week or so ago. The tv series trailer that I watched for the 1st time less than an hour ago is called ‘The Sandman: Season 2 | Date Announcement | Netflix’. It’s published by Nexflix 12 days ago with 685K views. I searched in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘sandman season 2’ to find it.

Here’s a quote from link polygon.com:

‘ The two-part final season promises (as so many Sandman stories do) some cosmic stakes, starting with a miserable family reunion: all of the Endless, sitting down together. Joining Dream (Tom Sturridge) at the table are the siblings we know of from season 1 — Death (Kirby), Desire (Mason Alexander Park), Despair (Donna Preston) — as well as some newcomers: Destiny (Adrian Lester), Delirium (The Legend of Vox Machina’s Esmé Creed-Miles), and a character known as “The Prodigal” (Barry Sloane), a name that will be familiar for those who read the comics. Should the show be following the comics, the sibs will eventually be on a road trip.

But that’s not the only arc being covered by the season. As the trailer teases (and past casting announcements have confirmed) we’ll also be getting a host of new faces playing familiar characters: Clive Russell, Laurence O’Fuarain, and Freddie Fox will play the Norse gods Odin, Thor, and Loki, respectively. Meanwhile Jack Gleeson, Ann Skelly, and Douglas Booth will check in as A Midsummer Night’s Dream’s faerie characters, Puck, Nuala, and Cluracan. ‘

—

And here is the announcement from the youtube video clip link:

‘ The Dream King returns. The Sandman: Season 2. Volume 1 – July 3rd. Volume 2 – July 24th. ‘

—

Yesterday, I looked in www.youtube.com link ‘200 Songs 2000s Teens in North America Grew Up With’ published 8 days ago by publisher ‘Some random guy’. 13 minutes and 17 seconds into the video clip collection, the video clip ‘Gwen Stefani – The Sweet Escape ft. Akon’ played. Based on that, I selected that music video. The music video that I watched for the 1st time less than an hour ago is called ‘Gwen Stefani – The Sweet Escape ft. Akon’, published 15 years ago by publisher ‘Gwen Stefani’ with 222M views. Here is a quote about the music video from wikipedia.org:

‘ The music video premiered on January 10, 2007, on LAUNCHcast.[42] The video opens with scenes of Stefani and the Harajuku Girls in a golden jail. After obtaining the key from a dog, they escape. Stefani is then shown in a penthouse two hours later. She lets down two long braids, allowing the Harajuku Girls to scale the building and cut off the braids. They meet Akon at a convenience store parking lot, and Stefani drives off with him. They are pursued by two of the Harajuku Girls as police officers, and the video closes with Stefani back in jail after two hours of chasing. The video is intercut with sequences of Stefani and Akon in front of a letter G in lights.

Stefani performing “The Sweet Escape” inside a gold cage on The Sweet Escape Tour
The video was filmed in December 2006, several days before Christmas.[43] It was directed by Joseph Kahn and produced by Maryann Tenado of H.S.I. Productions.[44] The jail and penthouse scenes in the video are symbolic of “being jailed by love”. Stefani being unable to escape her metaphoric prisons represents how one cannot escape from oneself. The penthouse scene is an allusion to the 19th-century fairy tale “Rapunzel”.[43] The video features product placement for two General Motors vehicles, the Chevrolet Tahoe, and the Buick Lucerne. ‘

—

And here is a quote from the lyrics:

If I could escape (Escape)
And recreate a place that’s my own world (Own world)
And I could be your favorite girl (Forever), perfectly together
And tell me boy, now wouldn’t that be sweet? (Sweet escape)
If I could be sweet (Be sweet)
I know I’ve been a real bad girl (I’ll try to change)
I didn’t mean for you to get hurt (Whatsoever)
We can make it better
And tell me, boy, now, wouldn’t that be sweet? (Sweet escape, sweet escape)

—

It is now 3:29AM EST for me.

I am going to close this list now. If you are there this coming Monday or Tuesday night, I’ll see you then.

—

Rated PG-13 mature themes, viewer discretion for movie ‘Ghosts of Girlfriends Past’. Rated TV-MA mature themes, violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Good Fight’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie and series. [Use mental bookmark ‘Tolerance variety’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.