3/23/2023

Greetings.

It is now 6:39 AM EST for me.

Here’s the study plan: Instead of starting to explain idea ‘Strength’ today, I am going to explain the idea I was attempting to explain last week. I am going to look for it’s illustration reference now. I should be able to explain that idea today. If I finish explaining it with time to spare, I’ll add other ideas with the extra time available today. Next Saturday, I mean next Thursday, I will finally explain idea ‘Strength’, unless I yet again change my mind. I’ll also prepare the music video and trailer for this list before I begin typing later today. So, if you are there later today, I’ll see you then.

—

It is now 9:42 AM EST for me.

Competition:

If you used the idea in WISHLIST #1363, in other words, if you watched the music video ‘Secret’ by Orchestral Manoeuvres In The Dark many times because of how you used the idea in Wishlist #1363, then I have selected 2 music videos for you to watch to help you ‘snap out of’ that experience. Here’s the reason I am offering you why I would think that would work for you: a certain amount of years ago, when I watched the music videos ‘Remember December’ by Demi Lovato and ‘Naturally’ by Selena Gomez & The Scene, based on watching those 2 music videos, I thought they were competing with each other. Yesterday, for the 1st time in a certain amount of years, I watched again the music video ‘Naturally’ by Selena Gomez & The Scene, and I felt better, since I was also watching the music video ‘Secret’ recently more times that I would care to admit to myself, not as much as I believe YOU have watched it, but as it relates to my expectations, I did watch the music video ‘Secret’ a lot of times. So, here’s how I’m setting it up: to help you ‘snap out of it’ from watching the music video ‘Secret’ many times, I recommend that you watch those 2 music videos ‘Remember December’ and ‘Naturally’ as if both Demi Lovato and Selena Gomez are competing. Watch both music videos using your flat screen tv. Download the Youtube app and watch both those music videos using with your headphones connected to your tv. You just have to watch the music video ‘Remember December’ once. Since I felt better watching the music video ‘Naturally’, the winner obviously is Selena Gomez. While you are watching the music video ‘Naturally’ using the recommended competition context, I believe that you should feel better, since I felt better watching it. Watch the music video ‘Naturally’ several times or more if you choose to. That should help you feel better from watching the music video ‘Secret’ many times. Just to make sure, you should notice that both Demi Lovato and Selena Gomez are using a lot of assertive competing associated body language in their music video performances.

To watch music video ‘Remember December’, search in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘remember december’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with 43M views! It was published 13 years ago by publisher ‘HollywoodRecordsVEVO’.

To watch music video ‘Naturally’, search in www.youtube.com for phrase ‘selena naturally’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with 361M views! It was published 13 years ago by publisher Selena Gomez.

—

It is now 10:23 AM EST for me.

The movie trailer that I watched for the 1st time earlier today and recommend for this advice is called ‘Dog Days Trailer #1 (2018)’. I found it from www.youtube.com, select publisher ‘Rotten Tomatoes Indie’, select ‘PLAYLISTS’, select ‘Indie Dramas’. The movie trailer ‘Dog Days’ is #1352 out of 1642 videos. It took me a little while to find it. I just kept going further down and down that list using my laptop. It has 933K views and was published 4 years ago.

I think that kids who have dogs as pets would like to see adults interact with their dogs, and how having dogs as pets may cause other adults to communicate with them. Here’s a quote from one of the Comments:

‘ I’m DEFINITELY gonna see this movie! (Not just because of Finn or Vanessa) but because this movie lookes like a good movie and I like dogs a lot:) ‘

—

It is now 10:31 AM EST for me.

Before I start with the advice, there is a caveat/caution that I want to give you in advance. The advice by intent is going to allow you to imagine interacting with things that other people will find to be personal, so therefore with this imagined idea, one obvious caution is to not bring to their attention something that they did not give you permission to bring to their attention. Here is a story I read from a Braude or Bruder book a certain amount of years ago, just a quick quote: A man was given favorable reviews by those that reviewed him. He brought these people who gave him good reviews to a place that he had arranged in advance, knowing that he would be given favorable reviews, like a pre-arranged party. During this party, he said things to them that were presumptuous to bring to their attention, even if such things are true. When he went to the place he was told to go to the next day, there was no one there.

The point that I created for that story is that that man did exactly what I am warning you to not do, to at least consider to not do. Even if you know of certain things about a person, if you bring such things that are personal to their attention, that person may believe that bringing such things up could be inappropriate/rude/offensive to do so. Doing so could result in a slap on the face by a woman, or like that man in that story, those that gave you favorable reviews may then choose to not give you the job.

—

It is now 10:52 AM EST for me.

So, this is how I invented this idea, pretty much. I don’t think I can type all of the details in, but I believe I can explain enough in a form that may be useful to you. Here it is: Um, I don’t have a collection of music that I may choose to listen to. So, what I did recently was listen to 3 songs from my ‘Watch later’ list in www.youtube.com: ‘Magic’, ‘A Little More Love’, and ‘Make A Move On Me’, all 3 from publisher ‘Olivia Newton-John’. I’m not a big music listener, in spite of all of those music videos that I have recommended in this blog. I would watch them wearing the headphones connected to the tv using the youtube app. When I would listen to the song ‘Magic’, I would see from the tv screen what looks like a ‘XANADU’ record sleeve. When I would listen to the song ‘Make A Move On Me’, I would see on the tv screen what looks like Olivia Newton-John wearing a sweatband with a beachfront ocean background. And when I would listen to the song ‘A Little More Love’, I would see what looks like a younger Olivia Newton-John wearing black make-up, a black leather jacket, black pants, and high heels. I would shuffle amongst the 3 of them. The idea was made while I was listening to the song ‘A Little More Love’, and while I was also looking at Olivia Newton-John wearing those clothes. I imagined being in a relationship with a woman that was created from that image, and while I was in that relationship, I learned that there was a place that she finds herself attractive, but that she doesn’t want me to be in that place. She doesn’t want to take me there, to present herself in that context of being attractive.

To help understand that, and I thought of this while I made that idea, I recalled a recent comic book from Valiant for the hero ‘X-O Manowar’. I bought the digital comic book from Amazon.com and read it using Kindle. In that comic book, Aric’s X-O Manowar suit’s computer? AI, the name is like Shankara, Shankara chose to be presented as a woman, and I imagined communicating with her. Shankara presented several things to me, not specifically conceptual, that she was preparing to give to certain people/companies/corporations as per their requests. She showed me what they were, and she explained to me that those people will still customize it’s use in spite of it’s obvious purpose. That was the 1st time I consulted Shankara. The 2nd time was for this idea, an idea that I invented a few weeks ago. I requested to see a few examples of public places that women may use as a reference for being attractive, popular, acceptable places for me to be aware of. Again, not directly, not conceptually, she showed me these places.

What I am going to recommend next is to conceptually have many variations of places that women find themselves attractive, more specific reasons of looking attractive, but they don’t want to reveal those identities of being attractive to men in general, for whatever reason, let’s say for example for personal reasons. I’m going to use an illustration example refurbished from episode 3.5 ‘Imposters’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Star Trek: Picard’. I used ‘Paramount Plus’ as a Prime Video Channel from Amazon.com. I watched the episode from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 48 minutes and 19 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Will Riker(Jonathan Frakes): ‘Look. Old-school spycraft. It’s a data chip. But what are we looking at?

Jean-Luc Picard(Patrick Stewart): ‘Her entire investigation.’

—

All of those computer screens refurbished represent individual situations that women perceive themselves to be attractive, but they do not want men in general to know about them. They would not present themselves in such a way to men directly, even men they know.

Now, what I am going to do next is give you an illustration example of a woman presenting an identity of being attractive to you. It’s refurbished from a recent episode of ‘Fantasy Island’. In the original episode, the woman who is presenting an identity of being attractive to someone, that someone, a man, she has chosen to eventually marry. If you choose to use this idea, you are not using it that way. Instead, the woman, using the Quantum Leap rule, suppose you are 20 years old, you won’t need to think of them all, they’re just available to individually think about, they would be adult women from your birth to the now, even though they may be married at the time, let’s say 18+ years old, they are individually presenting themselves to be single, like in that ‘Fantasy Island’ episode, you are only imagining it. After all, even in the episode, those 2 are also just portraying a character, the woman is presenting to you, and you are choosing for it to be useful to you, if it were actually happening, it would be useful to you, but as of now, you don’t know what it actually is, how it is specifically useful to you, she is presenting to you that identity of being attractive, and it is refurbished, you are not in a relationship with her, but she is presenting to you a useful identity of being attractive, but to say again you don’t know specifically as of now what that usefulness is to you. (Your use of logical precision is a challenge to me, if that is what you are doing.)

The scene, according to Amazon Video, is in episode 2.3 ‘Paymer vs. Paymer’ from fantasy tv series ‘Fantasy Island(2023)’, and it starts about 30 minutes and 59 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Elena Roarke(Roselyn Sanchez): ‘I’ve been making a list.

Javier(John Gabriel Rodriquez): ‘Okay.’

Elena Roarke: ‘It’s a list of things that you need to understand. First, I bite my nails sometimes.

Javier: ‘I know you do.’

Elena Roarke: ‘Okay, no, wait. Because this is serious. Look, I’m biting my nails, right? (edited) No, it’s gonna look like I’m bored, but really I’m anxious. So you need to not call me on it. And I also–I hum when I drive long distances, you know, the same little tune over and over and over again. And it’s gonna seem like I’m trying to make you crazy, but actually, I don’t even hear it. That one you should call me on.’

Javier: ‘Noted.’

Elena Roarke: ‘Also if I want you to eat something that I don’t want you to eat, it’s because I generally like generally feel that it’s gonna make you happier, but I’ll stop if I want you to–capiche?’

Javier: ‘Okay.’

—

You can keep using that episode for more material. So, here’s my example: Suppose you work for a company with many employees. I’m imagining working in your company, I use the Quantum Leap rule, and I imagine considering all of the women as described, and I will also add the asterisk(*) in case I want to omit/not consider anyone, for my chosen reasons, since I’m just imagining it. Anyway, you can omit(*) anyone. It’s your idea, if you choose to have it. In relation to advice said, omit anyone you want to. So, choose a woman from that company that you are not personally attracted to, but of course that woman has many virtues, and many identities of attractiveness whether she knows about them or not, and have her in that imagined context, presenting herself as single, only imagined, presenting herself as Elena Roarke, presenting a useful identity of being attractive to you, but you currently don’t know what that usefulness is.

So, there’s your one illustration example: if you are an adult working from your job for a few years or more, imagine another adult woman presenting herself as single in imagination, presenting herself as Elena Roarke, which represent an identity of being attractive, but you currently don’t know what that useful identity of being attractive is. And if you are a kid/teenager, just reasonably extrapolate for your own circumstances. And, of course, you can change the idea if you want to. You don’t have to use it exactly as I have typed it in.

—

It is my belief, although I don’t have proof, that for certain identities of attractiveness, various women from all over America present certain identities of being attractive to a select bunch of people. In a reasonable context, you may think of a few examples. And what is also happening, and I just imagined it, I don’t have proof, is that there are many identities of being attractive that many women have that they don’t want to bring to the attention of certain men. They are both happening.

I forgot to mention that, even though there are various places that women will not reveal their identities of being attractive, it is still possible for people to create such places. It’s like a loophole. You can at least imagine of such places, and offer such places to women, and still respect their privacy, that they don’t want to bring to your attention certain identities of being attractive. And after inventing this idea, that is when I discovered/invented an idea that I call ‘Resist’:

—

Resist:

It is now 12:14 PM EST for me.

Here is the definition of resist that I am using for idea ‘Resist’ from dictionary.com:

‘ to make a stand or make efforts in opposition; act in opposition; offer resistance. ‘

—

If you are an adult that has been working for your job for a few years or more, and you experience mild to moderate instigations from time to time, then you may have experienced instigations that should not happen where you work. I am imagining that, when you would experience such instigations, you would choose to dismiss/not use such experiences, since they are out of context, and does not belong in the workplace. Now, I don’t believe that I am an instigator, but the instigator would probably anticipate your actions, and cause you to dismiss something excessively, and it is my belief based on what I imagined that one of those something’s is a sense of resistance. If you watch ‘Star Trek’, they have food replicators. Let’s say you were to make a sandwich, but you order your ‘Star Trek’ food replicator to take out all of the salt possible, and replicate a sandwich without all of that salt. According to the computer via food replicator, although you can eat such a sandwich, you will not like the taste of it, because if you were to remove all of the salt, it would also change the taste identity of that sandwich. You get the computer to make that sandwich without salt anyway, and when you try to eat it, you spit it out because it does not taste like a normal sanwich. Sure, it’s replicated to look like a normal sandwich, but you don’t like how it tastes. Too much salt was removed.

And that is what I think certain experienced instigations are trying to cause innocent people throughout America to do, take too much resistance out of their efforts to make ideas to more tenably experience mild to moderate forms of instigation.

—

It is now 12:25 PM EST for me. I am going to close this list now. In relation to advice said, the rest of the explanation for idea ‘Resist’ is kind of involved, so I’ll just have to finish explaining idea ‘Resist’ next week. I think I can explain the rest of it in maybe an hour, I just don’t want to do it today. I’ll just explain it next week. So, after I finish explaining idea ‘Resist’ next Thursday, I’ll finally begin explaining idea ‘Strength’. In fact, I may explain the rest of idea ‘Resist’ this coming Wednesday, and then next Thursday I’ll explain idea ‘Strength’, unless I change my mind again and type in something else. So, if you are there this coming Wednesday or next Thursday, I’ll see you then.

—

Rated PG for rude and suggestive content, and for language for movie ‘Dog Days’. Mature themes, comic book violence, reading/viewer discretion for ‘X-O Manowar’ comic books. TV-MA mature themes, sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek: Picard’. TV-14 mature themes, violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Fantasy Island’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Do not use rest of episode, series, movie, and comic book. [Use mental bookmark ‘Competition’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.