1/15/2018
Greetings! It is now 11:32 AM for me. To go to the recent posts not shown on the www.ionicbreeze1.com front page, go to the ‘search’ section and type the number of the list that you think is recent and is not shown. For example, if you think the latest recent post shown is not the recent list, just type the numbers ahead of it in the ‘search’ section. I’m telling you this in case I don’t get the problem fixed. So, if the ‘Recent Posts’ section shows Wishlist #1107, but you don’t think that’s the recent list, go to the ‘search’ section and search for number 1108. The blog should show you Wishlist #1108. And, of course, check for additional numbers if you think there is more.
So, 1st, here’s the music video. The music video is from the song ‘All Star’ by American rock band Smash Mouth. According to www.wikipedia.org, it was released May 4, 1999, and it peaked at No. 4 on the Billboard Hot 100. Here’s a quote about the music video from wikipedia:
‘The music video features cameos by William H. Macy, Ben Stiller, Hank Azaria, Diane Rehm, Paul Reubens, Kel Mitchell, Janeane Garofalo, Doug Jones, and Dane Cook.’
The song ‘All Star’ has a catch phrase that you may like to think about:
Hey now, you’re an all-star, get your game on, go play
Hey now, you’re a rock star, get the show on, get paid
There are some scenes of peril and violence in the music video ‘All Star’. In it’s context, I believe those scenes are not shown seriously. Still, I recommend that you remove them if you find them inappropriate. After all, I’m recommending you music video ‘All Star’ for both it’s video and it’s music. If you choose to watch and think about music video ‘All Star’, what you’ll probably give an active use from the music video is it’s catch phrase:
Hey now, you’re an all-star, get your game on, go play
Hey now, you’re a rock star, get the show on, get paid
To watch the music video ‘All Star’, search for phrase ‘smash mouth all star’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the top selections offered, with over 145 million views. I recommend that you start watching it 54 seconds into the video. That’s when the lead singer, according to wikipedia the lead singer is Steve Harwell, that’s when he jumps up and starts singing the lyrics starting with-‘Well the years start coming and they don’t stop coming…’
Here’s a quote from Wishlist #1107:
‘Here’s an overview of what I plan to explain in this blog: 1st, I plan to explain the 2 separate definitions of ‘Not work’. I will explain the 1st definition of ‘Not work’ in this list, and the 2nd separate definition of ‘Not work’ in the 2nd list. After that, idea ‘Recalibration’ in the next list, then ideas ‘Contribute’, ‘Prepare’, and ‘Defend’ in the next list. Then idea ‘Say’ in a separate list, idea ‘Attitude’ in a separate list, then finally idea ‘Confront’ and ‘Prolong’ on a separate list.’
I want to introduce to you 3 illustrations before I begin explaining to you what I’m about to do. The 1st illustration is from episode 4.19 ‘Shattered Mirror’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1996)’. Captain Sisko(Avery Brooks) and Smiley O’Brien(Colm Meaney) are talking. If you have Amazon Prime, watching the episode is included with your membership, no additional charge. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 10 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:
Sisko:-‘If you want to build another Defiant, why do you need my help?’
Smiley:-‘We’ve already built it. The problem is, when we power up it’s engines, the whole ship damn near shakes itself apart.’
Sisko:-‘We had the same problem. It’s a powerful ship.’
Smiley:-‘Well, right now, it’s a little too powerful for it’s own good. How did you solve it?’
Sisko:-‘We had to overhaul the structural integrity field grids.’
[The 2nd illustration is from episode 1.7 ‘Third Aunt from the Sun’ from fantasy tv show ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch(1996)’. If you have Amazon Prime, the ‘Sabrina’ episodes are also available with no additional charge. According to Amazon Video, the illustration begins 9 minutes and 27 seconds into the episode, when Vesta(Raquel Welch), Sabrina’s(Melissa Joan Hart) aunt, shows her what’s behind another door. Here is a quote:
Aunt Vesta:-‘Open this one. It’s one of my personal faves.’
Sabrina:-‘What is it?’
Aunt Vesta:-‘The Hall of Gratuitous Praise.’ (When Aunt Vesta opens the door, a bunch of adults are praising them, saying things like ‘You’re fabulous!’, ‘We love you!’, ‘You’re georgous!’, and ‘You’re beautiful!’
[The 3rd illustration is from movie ‘My Cousin Vinny(1992)’ starring Joe Pesci as Vinny Gambini and Marisa Tomei as Mona Lisa Vito. It costs about a dollar to SD rent this movie from Amazon.com. There are 2 scenes from this movie. According to Amazon Video, the 1st scene is when Vinny fell asleep in court. That scene is more obvious when Judge Haller(Fred Gwynne) said to Vinny quote ‘Counselor, do you wish to make an opening statement?’, and Vinny didn’t respond because he was asleep. That scene begins 1 hour, 15 minutes, and 6 seconds into the episode.
The 2nd scene starts 1 hour, 24 minutes, and 15 seconds into the movie, when Vinny is going to jail for a day. Here is a quote:
Mona:-‘Don’t worry. I’ll find a way to bail you out.’
Vinny:-‘No, don’t. I’m gonna stay in prison tonight. Maybe I’ll finally get some sleep.’ (Later, while Vinny is in jail, there was a prison riot. Since Vinny was very tired, he was able to sleep through it.)
[So, here is what I’m going to try to do in this list: I’m going to explain bookmarks ‘Address’, ‘Say’, and ‘Attitude’. ‘Address’ is from the idea ‘Not agree to address’. These 3 bookmarks are like what Sisko said in that ‘Deep Space Nine’ illustration:
Sisko:-‘We had to overhaul the structural integrity field grids.’
It’s purpose is to allow you, if you choose to, to maintain the structural integrity of the ideas you choose to use. I’ll try to give you an explanation now as to why that could be important for you to do: For adults, let’s start this explanation with your job break area. Now, I’ll add the illustration of Aunt Vesta from the ‘Sabrina’ illustration having the ability to ‘open a door’ to create ‘The Hall of Gratuitous Praise.’ Aunt Vesta’s ability reminds me of people who also have the ability to ‘open the door’ to certain fortified notions that can create a similar effect. Now, let’s say that many fortified possibilities can happen in your job break area. People can sleep there, there can have office parties there, and it’s also a designated place to eat your lunch. That is why, when you enter such a job break area, common sense should give you the ability to know what possibilities should be used, like a door that is open, and what possibilities should not be used, like a door that should be closed. That is where ideas ‘Address’, ‘Say’, and ‘Attitude’ are used. When you are exposed to different possibilities, you should of course be aware of your lifestyle identity, and also regulate how such possibilities affect you. For example, and this example is exaggerated, I imagine a lady who enters such a job break area in order to take a nap. Now, since there are other people there already doing other things, what she does is try to sleep while leaning on a man who is there for a business meeting. They both know each other, and the man doesn’t mind. After all, it is the ‘job break area’.
Now, the 3rd example from movie ‘My Cousin Vinny’, when Vinny was able to sleep during a prison riot, my imagined point was that Vinny was only able to sleep during a prison riot because he was very tired. He would not be able to sleep if he already experienced normal sleep before he was placed in prison. His intent alone to sleep during a prison riot, if Vinny was already experiencing normal sleep, may not have been enough to allow his physical body to also sleep. In other words, It is the purpose of ideas ‘Address’, ‘Say’, and ‘Attitude’ to make it more likely for your ideas to be more effective. These 3 ideas, so to speak, should allow you to have more of an ability to be in that ‘job break area’ of yours.
Not address:
Here’s a quote from Wishlist #1081 for idea ‘Not agree to address’. That quote was made 3/18/2017 (I recommend that you have the option to date the stuff that you type in your blog/web site/along those lines. The dates makes it easier to reference):
‘So, if you have seen the recent movies depicting Captain America by celebrity Chris Evans, the shield is also used to protect Captain America from being physically hit by his enemies. So, I did not think of this before, but later I imagined kids, mostly boys, imagining a person that they are familiar with in school having an uncomfortable look on his or her face. Let’s say that person is on the right side of the screen. When you move the screen a little to the left, you see Kevin from the ‘Ghostbusters’ movie smiling and holding Captain America’s shield. What happened was that the person with the uncomfortable face punched Captain America’s shield. According to the internet, the shield is made of vibranium, and that person of course did not damage the shield’s structural integrity indicated by the uncomfortable face that person is showing. And then when you look to the left, you can see Kevin smiling, showing to the kid that the ‘Not agree to address’ idea works.
Just a few days ago, I imagined Kevin smiling as he is holding that shield. Near Kevin, I imagined one of the co-workers showing me an uncomfortable face. That helped me sense that the ‘Not agree to address’ that I used for that moment worked. I think it’s possible for many kids who read Wishlist #1081, as well as the other ideas, that it’s possible that they’re still using Kevin and the shield to validate in their minds that the ‘not agree to address’ idea still works. I stipulate to the possible fact that it’s still being used, even after almost 10 months of use.
What I’m recommending is that we create another option of usefulness for ‘Not agree to address’, to also allow it to ‘overhaul the structural integrity field grids’, so to speak, to allow it’s use to maintain the effectiveness of your ideas. For example, we can give ‘Address’ another name, ‘Not address’, and use idea ‘Not address’ to address interjections and notions that you did not agree to address. For example, when you are in that ‘job break area’ situation, there are no walls that separate you from noticing what other people are doing. It would help considerably if you were better able to regulate how you manage interjections and notions that other people are presenting to each other. A few of those interjections and notions may be directed for you to notice, but you are not in that ‘job break area’ for that participation. Using idea ‘Not address’ for such interjections and notions allows you to prioritize better how such interjections and notions should be evaluated.
So, for example, if you are in that ‘job break area’ of yours to simply rest because you are on some sort of job break, or you are there simply to relax before you go home, and a few other people in that ‘job break area’ cause you to unavoidably experience certain interjections and notions, and of course you did not agree and you are not having any discussions with them, then it’s possible that such interjections and notions may be so distracting, that you may actually ‘forget’ that you are there to relax. Using idea ‘Not address’ may help you to remember why you are in that ‘job break area’, that for example you are there to relax, to allow your body and mind to relax, and you are not there to feel unnecessarily distracted by nonsense and/or out of context interjections and notions.
This idea for ‘Not address’ may not be very effective now, but it should get more effective as I give you more ideas that you may actually choose to use. You simply use idea ‘Not address’ to not actively interact with aspects of instigations that you clearly did not choose to address. For example, if an instigator causes you to experience a petty insult, you did not agree to address such an insult.
Say:
[I’m going to stop now and finish this idea this coming Friday or Saturday. In the last list, I forgot to tell you that I chose to not work today for the holiday. So, if you are there Friday or Saturday, then I’ll see you then.
1/20/2018
Lara Croft! (said as a greeting. The movie ‘Tomb Raider’ is coming out March 16.) It is now 10:34 AM EST. The 1st thing I want to do is introduce to you the ‘music video’ illustration, so to speak. The illustration is from movie ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice(2016)’, starring Henry Cavill as Superman. Since in my area the movie is playing regularly on cable tv, I am assuming that this may also be true for you. The ‘Batman v Superman’ movie has been out for almost 2 years, allowing cable tv to broadcast the movie many times. Therefore, just program your tivo? to watch it, since you may already have cable tv. If not, renting the movie streaming is available from Amazon.com. To rent it SD(standard definition), it only costs about 3 dollars. So, according to Amazon Video, the ‘music video’ illustration starts 44 minutes and 54 seconds into the movie, when Superman is shown interceding during 3 perilous situations, and in 1 illustration I think he is dragging a cruiser to his Fortress of Solitude. I noticed that the cruiser looked old, so he’s probably adding that ship to his collection. The illustration stops 47 minutes and 37 seconds into the movie. The point of the illustration is to get you in the mood to learn the idea ‘Say’. When you watch that illustration, in my opinion, the illustration gives you a different sense of peril(exposure to injury, loss, or destruction) because of the solemn(causing serious thoughts or a grave mood) music, coupled with some sort of discussion overlapping the illustrations. The illustration, in my opinion, gives you a unique sense of peril that may help you find useful the idea ‘Say’ that I’m about to explain.
I have made 3 key upgrades to idea ‘Say’. The 1st upgrade was in Jan. 17, this past Wednesday, while I was at work. The 2nd upgrade was yesterday, while I was in the laundromat, and the 3rd upgrade was also yesterday, but while I was in the supermarket. The upgrade was an application of the 2nd upgrade. Anyway, because of these upgrades, after I finish explaining idea ‘Say’ and it’s upgrades, I am going to close this list and start a new list. I plan to explain idea ‘Attention’ in the 3rd list. I don’t want too much information to be in this list.
Say:
I want to start explanation ‘Say’ with it’s illustration. The way I sense it, although it’s not entirely accurate, this illustration is where the idea ‘Say’ comes from. The more I explain idea ‘Say’, the less it becomes dependant from this illustration. However, you may find this illustration very useful, even with the additional upgrades. The illustration is in episode 5.20 ‘Chaos and the Stillness of It’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Andromeda(2005)’. According to Amazon.com, the streaming release date for this particular episode is April 28, 2017. Of course, the DVDs were available to be purchased for years. The SD(standard definition) purchase of this episode is about 2 dollars. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 17 minutes and 50 seconds into the episode, when Captain Dylan Hunt(Kevin Sorbo) is asking Telemachus Rhade(Steve Bacic) which door to use. Here is the quote:
Hunt:-‘So, what do you think?’
Precaution before taking levitra cheap online Few important precaution need to be taken to avoid some serious side effects such as prolonged erection. Still others impose conditions for a replacement wholesale generic cialis driver, similar to restricted hours of driving, driving with an adult over twenty five. So prostate has to congest and becomes deeprootsmag.org commander levitra swelling. The duration of male erection issues can take place generic viagra without prescriptions sometimes in every adult man.
Rhade:-‘This way.’
Hunt:-‘I think it’s this way.’
Rhade:-‘No, no, no. We are listening to me for a change. This way.’ (When Rhade opens the door, there is obvious danger behind it, and Rhade allows the door to be closed.)
Rhade:-‘Not a word.’
Hunt:-‘I wasn’t going to say anything.’
The illustration of Captain Hunt saying to Rhade ‘I wasn’t going to say anything.’ as Hunt is looking at Rhade while they proceed with Hunt’s choice of door is stupid funny, in my opinion. Something to keep in mind about Hunt and Rhade: as they physically fight their enemies, from time to time, they instigate and make a lot of jokes at their enemy’s expense. So, in my opinion, Rhade feared that Hunt might make a similar joke at his expense. That is why Rhade said ‘Not a word.’ to Hunt, because Rhade doesn’t want to experience that type of humor from Hunt.
Before I continue, I want to address a notion that I have been thinking about from time to time, more times than I would want to admit in this blog. The notion addresses the question ‘Why learn from this blog?’ I imagined kids in study groups in various? schools also addressing such a question. If there are people/companies/organizations that can give better advice than the advice in this blog, than why are we learning from this blog?
The answer I imagined is based on availability. For example, I am going to use a bed as an analogy for this imagined answer: I believe that there are other beds that are ‘better’ than the bed I use. Celebrities have nice beds. There are some places in the big cities in America that have nice beds that I would like to sleep in. However, even though there are nice, more preferred beds out there, I use what is available. I sleep on the bed where I live.
So, based on that bed story, you use what is available. If the blog is what is available to you, then that is what you are using. Here is a question for you(Of course, I am not obligating you to do it. After all, I also haven’t done it): ‘Have you ever asked a psychiatrist to make a blog so that others can use it?’ It is my belief that most people who are reading this blog have not. So, one answer to that question, ‘Why learn from this blog?’, is because of availability. Of course, there is probably better advice out there. After all, it is my belief that instigation has existed for thousands of years. People, companies, and corporations that need to interact with other people as their main source of income are probably well aware of what instigation is.
There are probably other reasons that you can think of as to why you are choosing to learn from this blog. I just wanted to address the question a little.
Also, keep in mind that home computer use is relatively young. Before the 90s, modem speeds for American civilians were very slow. Even now, phone lines are still being upgraded to allow civilians to have high speed internet access. So, let’s say that reasonable home internet access wasn’t really practical until 1995. That means that practical computer use was made available to the general public for only 23 years! So, for example, if you are a kid in a study group participating in the question ‘Why learn from this blog?’, you are using a computer system that is still relatively new in America. The reason you may not notice the difference is because you are still very young. For example, you weren’t personally aware of what happened in the 80s to notice the changes in internet speed availability.
Another answer for the question ‘Why learn from this blog?’ is because WordPress, according to www.wikipedia.org, was just released May 27, 2003, and I wasn’t aware of the existence of what a blog was, not until I watched the movie ‘Ask Me Anything(2014)’ starring Britt Robertson as Katie Kampenfelt. Here’s a description of the movie from www.imdb.com:
‘A confused teenager writes a blog revealing her daily activities and secrets, advised to do so by her high school guidance counselor in lieu of moving onto her first year in college.’
So, if you ask me, so to speak, using this blog may not be the best information available in America, but availability itself, not advice quality, is still relatively new. For example, the movie ‘Ask Me Anything’ came out December 19, 2014. I don’t think that the movie is an official declaration of the existence of using a blog in America, but that was how I was made aware of it.
All right! To avoid some ambiguity, idea ‘Say’ is also an idea for the 2nd definition of ‘Not work’, Wishlist #1108. Here is a brief quote from Wishlist #1108:
‘Innocent people are allowing aspects of instigation interaction to work contemplationally, even though they were told that such instigations were ‘not allowed’ at school or at work.’
Before I begin explaining idea ‘Say’, I want to explain how I imagined the kids interpreted Wishlist #1108. I stipulate to the fact that it’s none of my business, and if I used this type of attitude while applying for a job, I may get fired.(How do I get fired if I’m still just applying for the job?) I’m typing this in for the benefit of the kids, to give them some sort of acknowledgement for how they think. So, instead of me just giving you the answer, and the moment comes and goes, at least with these words, the kids may choose to use it as a reference, some sort of validation, to use to talk with their friends, classmates, and certain adults. I’m not trying to define their school of thought. So, here it is: I imagined that the kids told certain adults that I made a really big promise with the use of Wishlist #1108. I speculate that one reason the kids said this is because they sense that the adults give Wishlist #1108 some sort of acknowledgement. And so, with that in mind, they also believe that the reason they believe Wishlist #1108 is getting attention is because I made a really big promise, that I would give advice that would cause the instigation to contemplationally ‘not work’. And so, as they think about these 2 premises, their use of intent quantifies those 2 pieces of information in accordance to their use of school of thought, and so on. So, for example, for one school of thought, for a certain expectation, with the 2 pieces of information thought about, a kid may think that what the adults do with it is moot(of little or no practical value, meaning, or relevance), and their beliefs are what they give credence(something giving a claim to belief or confidence) to. Of course, this is only 1 school of thought example. I hope the kids find this useful.
Also, and I just thought of this less than a minute ago, the reference is also designed to help you make useful the idea ‘Say’. I didn’t think of that until now. I considered deleting that previous message, but it wasn’t my intent to mislead you in any way. Instead, I think this can be an important lesson, in case you make your own ideas and post such ideas publicly.
OK! So, here is the definition of ‘Say’: An instigator may improperly impose a contemplation sense of ‘saying’ the blame/liability of the instigation imposed upon you to unavoidably experience. By doing such a thing, you may eventually feel and believe that you chose to interact with such a blame/liability of instigation, when in reality, at least in the context that you were able to perceive the experience of you experiencing the instigation from another vantage point, for example, like you were able to see yourself experience the instigation as if it was recorded by a surveillance camera, then you may notice that you did not agree to experience such an instigation, and you did not agree to interact with the blame/liability of such an instigation. When you believe that those 2 notions are true, then you may be able to sense that blame/liability part of the instigation that the instigator caused you to unavoidably experience may have a misleading identity that encourages you to believe that you have actually contemplationally agreed to ‘say’ such a thing, and such an impression of acknowledgement, which of course is not true, since the 1st 2 notions are true, that you did not agree to experience such an instigation, and you did not agree to interact with it’s blame/liability.
Don’t worry if you did not understand what I just typed in at 1st. Here’s an example from the ‘Andromeda’ episode: When Rhade said to Hunt quote-‘Not a word.’, he wanted to make sure that nothing bothersome is contemplationally said in his own mind. Both Rhade and Hunt have experience putting instigation in the form of jokes in the minds of their enemies as Rhade and Hunt fight them. That is why Rhade experienced some sort of trepidation when he made the wrong decision as to what door to open, and Hunt made the right one. It was a situation that made Rhade more vulnerable to a possible joke that Hunt might say to him. That is why Rhade said ‘Not a word.’ to Hunt. Now, in your situation, the instigator may try to put in your mind something that may cause you to contemplationally believe that you said such a blame/liability. The instigator doesn’t have to actually say anything to you to cause you to feel that you contemplationally identified such a blame/liability. For example, the instigation could be an intentionally adverse, awkward identification of what the instigator is doing as wrong. So, even though you are doing nothing wrong, just identifying the intentionally adverse, awkward instigation of another may cause you to believe that you have contemplationally said such a thing, which may eventually cause you to interact with such a blame/liability, when in reality, you did not agree to participate witch such an instigation, and you did not agree to interact with it’s blame/liability.
In the beginning of using this idea, when you are aware that the instigator is trying to put an identification of instigation in your mind that may influence you to believe that you have contemplationally said such an instigation, you can contemplationally say to yourself quote-‘I did not say that.’ Saying that phrase to yourself may help you maintain your chosen sense of objectivity.
Put another way:
I believe that phrases like ‘Let me put it another way.’, ‘In other words…’, and ‘Let me rephrase that.’ are common phrases. Just because tv shows and movies use such phrases, doesn’t mean that such tv shows and movies exclusively quantify the use of such phrases. These phrases existed before the tv shows and movies broadcasted a use of such phrases. For this idea, I have chosen the use of words ‘Put another way’ to represent the common phrase ‘Let me put it another way.’ So, here’s the explanation associated with idea ‘Put another way’: I speculate that sometimes, if you experience mild to moderate instigation, sometimes the instigator may cause you to try to resolve an instigation that the instigator knows from experience that such an instigator should very likely be difficult for you to resolve. You would try to resolve it, and by doing so, you may experience a state of having a sense of unresolved quandry for less than a minute, or for a few minutes.
What I recommend for such unresolved quandries is to have the option to ‘put it another way’. You are choosing to explain it, address it, or possibly resolve it, but not in the context that you were presented. You can choose to not resolve such an instigation based on the context that it was unavoidably experienced for you. One bookmark I recommend to identify such an instigation is called ‘Confront put another way’. That means you experienced an instigation that is causing you to confront a resolving attempt that you have chosen to not resolve such an instigation in such a context, and instead you choose to ‘put it another way’.
Another option definition of ‘Put another way’ that you may choose to have available to you is when you use the bothersome experience itself as an identified attempt of an instigator trying to ‘put it another way’ in your own thoughts. You can say to yourself that you did not choose to ‘put it that way’ in your mind.
Seek:
This is the idea that I invented this past Wednesday while at work, on 1/17/18. I got the word ‘Seek’ while thinking about the character Merriman Lyon portrayed by celebrity Ian McShane from the sci-fi movie ‘The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising(2007)’ saying quote-‘What is it that you seek?’, since he is a teacher to the 14 year old boy Will Stanton(Alexander Ludwig). The main reason is that the title of the movie has the word ‘Seeker’ in it. So, for me, that was a lot to make an idea out of it. However, to explain the idea in this blog, it would help a great deal if I had an illustration to go with it. I found an illustration from my memory, a repeat episode of tv show ‘L.A. Law’ that I watched. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to find the specific episode. I looked in the google search engine, and I looked in the episode descriptions from www.wikipedia.org. I couldn’t find it. So, what I’ll do is explain the refurbished for advice use of the episode from memory. If memory serves, Roxanne(Susan Ruttan) for some reason chose to give advice to the employees in the law firm. What happened soon after she was giving advice, and the advice was actually useful to the employees, many of them requested advice from her in a context that overwhelmed her senses, causing Roxanne to no longer give advice in such a manner.
Idea ‘Seek’ identifies instigation that gives you the false impression that you are actually choosing to ‘seek’ to experience instigation in an adverse context. If you read the ‘Blinking’ idea near the beginning of this blog,(Wishlist #1003-1008), you can use the phrase ‘Seek’ to identify instigations you have already experienced, and instigations and inadvertencies you experience ‘real time’, and you may choose to ‘Blink’ that aspect of the experience out. Just contemplationally say the word ‘Seek’, then contemplationally? blink it’s false impression out of your evaluation use, or ‘Blink’ to clarify the false impression as you evaluate it. The important thing is that you now have a new idea called ‘Seek’ to more objectively evaluate such false impressions of seeking.
Late:
Idea ‘Late’ is a variation idea that is designed to be added to your other selection of words. It is designed to identify an experienced instigation that is causing you to feel like you have just joined an ongoing business meeting. You are joining a meeting that you are late to attend. You can also use the word ‘Precede’ to identify an experience that is preceding you. In my opinion, kids and teenagers already have the experience to be late for class for one reason or another. Even if you have an excuse to be late for class, you still experience the fact that you are late for an ongoing class participation. I believe using idea ‘Late’ is a great idea to finally? use you experiences of being late, whether the experiences are from school or your job, to identify instigation experience that tries to falsely cause you to interact with being ‘late’. Just contemplationally use the word ‘Late’ to see if instigation experience is trying to improperly cause you to give credence to a false sense of being late. You may also add the word ‘Late’ to other words that you have. For example, ‘Confront late’ means a false impression of confrontation that also wants you to feel late about it.
Forget:
For idea ‘Forget’, near end of movie ‘Sphere(1998)’, the character Dr. Harry Adams(Samuel L. Jackson) discovered a solution to a problem he, Dr. Goodman(Dustin Hoffman), and and Dr. Halperin(Sharon Stone) faced. To get rid of the use of their power, he discovered that they have the power to forget. Based on my understanding of the movie, Dr. Adams believed that they can choose to negate their powers by choosing to forget that they have such powers. According to Amazon Video SD(standard definition) rental, the refurbished with inapproprieities quote begins 2 hours, 46 minutes, and 45 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:
Dr. Adams:-‘Because we have the power…to forget.’
Dr. Halperin:-‘You want us to agree to forget?’
So, the use of idea ‘Forget’ is to help you to have the option to identify certain out of context identities of instigations as something that you chose to forget. You don’t want to interact with such a resolving, especially if it’s out of context, so therefore you choose to identify such a resolving as something to ‘forget’. For example, instead of pursuing or confronting such an adverse out of context impression of pursuing or resolving, you contemplationally address it in a context that you choose to forget. In other words, you choose to not chase your own tail, so to speak. You can also use the idea ‘Forget’ to add to other words. For example, ‘Forget confront’ addresses an instigation’s impression of confronting that you choose to forget.
Not want to talk about it:
Idea ‘Not want to talk about it’ identifies instigations that encourage you to contemplationally resolve aspects of instigations that you would normally not want to talk about. I can’t think of an illustration right now, but one example is a person that insists upon talking about personal issues about yourself, and you may say to that person something like ‘I don’t want to talk about it.’ After all, you are reasonably addressing some sort of absurd eagerness from an instigator to talk about something that you believe is a personal issue. So, unless you are obligated to talk about personal issues to instigators, I believe that you should consider the option to say to the instigator that you ‘don’t want to talk about it’.
Now, I don’t believe that I am an instigator, at least mostly, but based on how I imagine many non professional instigators get their experience, part of their experience is from discussing their problems to instigate with those that have authority, such as teachers, management, and those that are trained to address such matters. For example, I imagine an instigator talking to someone with authority about a past transgression involving another employee that he/she instigated, and that instigator, when confronted directly about what he/she said to that employee, that instigator chose not to say anything about the event. So, that person’s response, to not say anything, is an example of ‘not wanting to talk about it’. I speculate that instigators are using such experiences of ‘not wanting to talk about it’ as something to use on innocent people to cause innocent people to try to resolve instigations that encourage them to address notions that they would normally not want to address, that they would normally not want to talk about with others.
You may also be placed in a situation that created a new vulnerability to talk about something, whether it’s instigation or inadvertently induced, and let’s say the instigator is pressing for you to address it. The solution is to simply? have the ability to say to that person that you choose not to talk about it. Examine the situation: Is it wrong to reasonably say that you don’t want to talk about something? Let’s say, for example, while you are at work, someone wants you to address an issue, and you reasonably say to that person that you don’t want to talk about it. That person later gets another person to talk to you about that issue. Now, let’s say in this example that you haven’t done anything wrong. And that’s it! I believe that being able to reasonably say that you don’t want to talk about something is a very effective solution to many instigation induced situations. Of course, it doesn’t work on everything, but being able to use such an option can be very useful to you.
Forget not want to talk about it:
Idea ‘Forget not want to talk about it’ is an idea I invented a few hours ago. You may experience an instigation that may encourage you to address notions, to resolve notions, that you don’t want to talk about, and you also believe it’s inappropriate for you to talk about, at least in the context that is improperly imposed by the instigation. The solution I invented, based on the definition of ‘Forget’ that I have offered you, is to choose to forget to not want to talk about it in such an adverse context. For example, if you experience such an instigation, based on the context of your participation, you are not obligated to interact with such a notion, so of course you did not ignore the instigator, but you are also choosing to ‘forget’ the notion that the instigator is improperly encouraging you to resolve, to contemplationally talk about.
[I am going to stop typing now, and I plan to proofread and finish this idea either this coming Friday or next Saturday. The next list I plan to make is called ‘Attitude’. It’s supposed to be in this list, but I don’t want too much information to be in this list. Compared to this list, it should be relatively easy to explain. I should finish that either Friday or next Saturday, and I should be able to begin the next idea called ‘Re-calibrate’. So, if you are there next week, I’ll see you then.
1/26/2018
Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. Rated R for language viewer discretion for movie ‘My Cousin Vinny’. Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Andromeda’. Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice’. Not rated viewer discretion for movie ‘Ask Me Anything’. Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘L.A. Law’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Sphere’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not address’, ‘Say’, ‘I did not say that’, ‘Seek’, ‘Late’, ‘Put another way’, and ‘I don’t want to talk about it’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.