1/27/2018

Lara Croft! (said as a greeting. Movie ‘Tomb Raider’ starring Alicia Vikander is scheduled to be in theaters March 16). It is now 5:41 PM EST for me. Since I could not find a new music video for this list, I will instead recommend to you the ‘Beastmaster’ intro again. This intro is from the tv show ‘Beastmaster(1999-2002)’ starring Daniel Goddard as Dar. To see the intro, search for phrase ‘beastmaster tv series intro’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be the 1st selection offered, with over 9.9 thousand views by MFM791.

Before I start giving you examples from an idea created with Allan Krill’s pseudo numerology web site, I choose to address the possible problem, that instigators may improperly exploit your use of logical associations. Since my use of Allan Krill’s pseudo numerology web site involves examples involving logical association development, I think it’s in your interest that I address an instigator’s possible exploitation of your use of logical associations. So, to try to be brief and concise, here is an illustration example, refurbished for advice and with inapproprieities removed. I am only recommending that you use the recommended illustration, and not the rest of the episode, for this advice. The illustration is in episode 3.17 ‘Pusher’ from sci-fi tv show ‘The X-Files(1996)’. You can purchase the standard definition of the episode from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars. According to Amazon Video, the illustration is located 16 minutes and 59 seconds into the episode, when Agent Mulder(David Duchovny) is talking to Robert Modell(Robert Wisden). Here is a quote:

Mulder:-‘Hey, you’re shoe’s untied.’

Modell:-(Modell looks at his shoes, then at Mulder.)

Mulder:-‘Made you look.’

Even though Modell is the suspected criminal, in this illustration, Mulder is the instigator that is manipulating Modell’s use of logical associations.

Not time:

To start addressing the problem that instigators may improperly impose upon your use of logical associations, here is an illustration. The illustration is from movie ‘Star Trek: Generations(1994)’ starring Malcolm McDowell as Soran and Patrick Stewart as Picard. This is the main illustration. However, if you want to see the movie with the inapproprieities removed, there are other illustrations involving Soran looking at his watch, and of course Picard with the help of Captain Kirk(William Shatner) trying to restore the timeline. A Standard Definition rental from Amazon.com for streaming costs about 3 dollars. If you have the movie available already, then you may use that instead of watching it streaming. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 58 minutes and 57 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:

Picard:-‘Klingon vessel. We know what you are doing, and we will destroy any probe launched toward the Veridian star. We demand that you return our chief engineer and leave this system immediately.’

Soran:-‘There’s no time for this.’

The actual illustration is when Soran said quote-‘There’s no time for this.’, but I wanted you to have some sort of context use for that illustration.

So, here’s an example for idea ‘Not time’: Suppose an employee who has been working for a company for more than 10 years experiences an instigation from another employee from that company who has also been working for that company for more than 10 years. The instigation encourages an evaluation that wants the innocent employee who experienced the instigation to connect all the previous experiences with that instigator, saying that you have agreed to include those experiences as it is dictated by the instigation.

The point is that the innocent employee did not agree to participate with being instigated by the other employee, not in the past, present, or near future. Idea ‘Not time’ helps you identify that the moments in time in the past, present, and near future, are not associated with the false impressions of participation that the instigator is improperly trying to impose upon you to believe in. So, when you experience a mild to moderate instigation, you can contemplationally use phrase ‘Not time’ to let yourself know that you did not subscribe to the instigation’s falsely proposed sense of time in regards to instigation participation. So, using the illustration provided, when Picard and Kirk were trying to stop Soran, they were trying to stop Soran from adversely changing the timeline. The illustration, of course, is refurbished for advice, if you are having trouble seeing it that way.

Not only:

This past Wednesday or Thursday, January 24 or 25, I invented idea ‘Not only’ while I was in the bus. While I was in the bus, I was using idea ‘Not time’ based on the refurbished example of how metal detectors are used as a deterrant. When people knowingly walk through metal detectors, they know they’re not supposed to be carrying anything metal through the detectors, or else the metal detectors will indicate that you have metal. There is an illustration of a metal detector use in movie ‘The Next Three Days(2010’. The streaming SD rental is about 3 dollars. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 8 minutes and 55 seconds into the movie, when Luke(Ty Simpkins), as he walks through the metal detector, the metal detector helped the security guard find that the boy was carrying a metal toy car. The point is that the idea ‘Not time’ was being used by me in an objective context. Innocent people also walk through the metal detector, so to speak.

The most important advantage cheapest brand viagra of taking this drug. It levitra tablets also promotes hair growth on bald area. Do you know cialis professional cipla the side effects of excessive semen leakage problem? As per studies, impotence, premature ejaculation and excessive wet dreams are found to be as the common side effects include: headache, dizziness, flushing, indigestion, nasal congestion, diarrhoea, rash. There’s a time for individual achievement and a time and cost contingency allowance should be set aside for these commensurate viagra online store with the risk of them occurring. While I was contemplationally using idea ‘Not time’ on everyone, I discovered that you may be able to create certain ideas to be used objectively without needing to experience an instigation first in order to use an idea.(In other words, you don’t need to be contemplationally ‘nudged’ by an instigator to use your ideas.) And while I was using idea ‘Not time’ on everyone, without needing to experience an instigation in order to use idea ‘Not time’, I realized that instigators may improperly impose a stereotyped, exclusive use of your ideas that depend upon adverse aspects of the instigation in order for you to use your ideas. Soon after I made that deduction, I invented idea ‘Not only’, which identifies certain aspects of instigations that encourage an adverse, exclusive use of the ideas used. This reminds me of a story I read, I think I read it in high school. I think the story was called ‘The Black Pearl’ by Scott O’ Dell. You can find the story’s plot in www.wikipedia.org. If memory serves, I remember the protagonist trying to sell the pearl, but wasn’t able to because he believed that all of the sellers that were available to him were working together in a way that would not give the protagonist a fair price for the pearl. That part of the story, refurbished for advice, reminds me of idea ‘Not only’, when the mild to moderate instigations that you may experience may be imposing upon you a stereotyped, exclusive use of your ideas, the ideas that you are using to more tenably experience such instigation.

Not follow:

Idea ‘Not follow’ is based on the phrase ‘I don’t follow.’ or ‘I don’t follow you.’, Without looking in an online dictionary or search engine, ‘I don’t follow’ means that you’re not able to understand and interact with the point or notion presented to you. However, idea ‘Not follow’ means that you are intentionally choosing to ‘not follow’ a certain understanding or interaction imposed upon an instigation and/or inadvertency that you do not believe is relevant to contemplantionally continue interacting with.

Take not attend:

Now, idea ‘Take not attend’ is an idea that I discovered while I was in the supermarket earlier today, on 1/27/2018. Idea ‘Take not attend’ identifies an instigation that is improperly imposing a sense that you did not subscribe to, a sense that feels like you are choosing to take a notion/sense/feeling in an adverse, eager context that is not attended. In other words, it feels like you are choosing to grudgingly(displaying or reflecting reluctance or unwillingness) experiencing something that is unattended.

Not take, not use:

Now, idea ‘Not take, not use’ is an idea I invented a few hours ago, using my experiences in the supermarket to invent idea ‘Take not attend’. Basically, an instigator is improperly encouraging you to ‘use’ an adverse sense to ‘not take’ something, for example, if that something is a notion, a sense, an experience, an interaction. Suppose you experience an instigation, and you choose to ‘not take’ from that experience. The instigator, I am assuming, has already anticipated that you will try to ‘not take’ from that experience, and so what the instigator will do is improperly impose an adverse experience identity of your efforts to ‘not take’ something. An illustration example, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, is in episode 4.5 ‘Haunted’ from action sci-fi tv show ‘Arrow(2015)’. I recommend that you buy the episode for about 2 dollars from Amazon.com instead of just renting it for about a dollar. If you buy it, for only 1 extra dollar, you won’t need to continually pay extra to reference it in the future, so to speak.(You may be able to download the episode, but I don’t know how long the agreement is to stream that episode). In the illustration, Thea(Willa Holland) is talking to her brother Oliver(Stephen Amell). The illustration starts 35 minutes and 35 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Thea:-‘Well, he’s a very specific kind of yummy.’

Oliver:-‘Oh! I’m going to pretend I didn’t hear you just say that.’

I don’t know what Thea specifically meant by saying quote-‘Well, he’s a very specific kind of yummy.’, but it did obviously create an adverse reaction from Oliver, causing him to say quote-‘Oh! I’m going to pretend I didn’t hear you just say that.’ That illustration can be refurbished to show a person not using an adverse sense of ‘not taking’ by pretending that such a person wasn’t introduced to such an adverse sense of ‘not taking’ to begin with.

The solution for mild to moderate instigations identified by idea ‘Not take, not use’ is to simply? not use the adverse impression of ‘not taking’ that the instigator is trying to put into your mind, and instead use a more reasonable sense of ‘not taking’. So, the question some? of you may be asking yourself eventually is ‘What other sense of ‘not taking’ am I suppose to use?’ It is my belief that, once you are able to identify that the instigator is trying to convince/mislead you into trying to use an adverse sense of ‘not taking’, you should be able to ‘not take’ from the adverse impression of ‘not taking’ rather easily, by simply doing what you were usually reasonably trying to do when confronted with such an instigation(in relation to advice said), except instead of being bothered by such an experience, you should feel less bothered by it, and/or even have better results.

Not from:

Idea ‘Not from’ is the idea I am using now. It allows me to more objectively use the ideas I invented recently, such as idea ‘Not take, not use’. So, instead of using contemplationally ‘Not take, not use’, I contemplationally use idea ‘Not from’, meaning that it’s not from me.

[Look, I realize that I can explain more, but I believe that you still have something useful with what I have typed in. You will still probably upgrade these ideas, if you choose to, and I still plan to add more ideas to this blog. The reason for the inconsistency is that my normal routine was changed for yesterday and today, but I believe that situation is now resolved.

All right! I am going to try and proofread and finish this list today, so that I can start another list. According to WordPress, there’s less than 2,000 words to proofread.

Violence and viewer discretion from sci-fi tv show ‘Beastmaster’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘The X-Files’. Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Star Trek: Generations’. Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘The Next Three Days’. Reading discretion for novel ‘The Black Pearl’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Arrow’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and novel. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not time’, ‘Not only’, ‘Not follow’, ‘Take not attend’, ‘Not take, not use’, and ‘Not from’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.