5/19/2018

Lara Croft.

(Calmly said as a greeting.)

It is now 11:45 AM for me. As usual, I spent a lot of time today fast forwarding through music videos, even though I already know, so to speak, what idea I plan to give to you. The ‘music video’, so to speak, I have recently discovered in www.youtube.com while considering a music video that I have chosen to offer you is made by someone in www.youtube.com called ‘Km Music’. This person gathered some people dancing individually and in groups of 2 to the song ‘What Is Love’ by artist Haddaway. According to wikipedia, the song was released August 1993 and it’s a No. 1 hit in 13 countries. Here is a quote:

The song is recognizable by its refrain “What is love? Baby don’t hurt me, don’t hurt me… no more.”

To watch the video edit, search for phrase ‘haddaway what is love’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, made by Km music, and it has over 42 million views. If you choose to watch it, I recommend that you only watch it once. I watched the whole thing once, since you probably will, but based on my experience, the associated insight you may experience while and after watching it the 1st time will fade as you try to watch it again and again. In other words, in my opinion, it’s not conveniently made for repeated watchings. Of course, if you decide to watch it more than once, I’m not discouraging you from doing that either. I recommend that you try to remember how you experienced it during you’re 1st watching of the video edit. Also, as a caution, when you watch the man wearing the suit dancing on the rooftop, don’t go on any rooftop and try and dance. Dancing on rooftops can be dangerous, and I don’t encourage such dancing. If you choose to notice the rooftop that man is dancing on, there’s a lot of graffiti on it, which I think is interesting to look at in it’s context, but what is also noticeable is that there is no protection at the edges of that rooftop. Such a thing is common for rooftops, I think, which is why it is not safe to walk on rooftops in a generalistic sense, compared to let’s say walking on a sidewalk.

The reason I chose ‘What Is Love’ video edit by Km Music is because of it’s illustrations of individual self expression. Here is an illustration example from episode 2.11 ‘Buried’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Warehouse 13(2010)’. In the episode, Myka Bering(Joanne Kelly) is talking to H.G. Wells(Jaime Murray) about what H.G. Wells is wearing. The episode is about 2 dollars Standard Definition from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 15 minutes and 4 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

H.G. Wells: ‘–What? I checked. This is what fashionable British archaeologists are wearing nowadays.’

Myka: ‘-No, it’s what American filmmakers think fashionable British archaeologists are wearing nowadays.’

H.G. Wells: ‘Oh, really? Well, it’s ever so comfy.’

It is my opinion that when kids play with their toys, they do it all the time. They use their imaginations to articulate a sense of individual self expression. One example when adults use individual self expression is like when H.G. Wells used tv to decide what to wear. To be clear, I am not obligating you to use your sense of individual self expression. I just wanted to show you what may be for you an entertaining and/or useful illustration of individual self expression from people in a video edit dancing to the song ‘What Is Love’, which was a very popular song, according to wikipedia, a video edit that is also presented with this advice. No obligation to use individual self expression required.

Before I begin, I want to introduce to you an exercise to imagine. Because of that idea I took out in Wishlist #1122, it was a little difficult for me to type this idea in. I believe this mental exercise may be useful to you, and of course you don’t have to use it. The exercise is based on a scene in movie ‘Star Trek: Insurrection(1998)’. In the movie, Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart) and Worf(Michael Dorn) are trying to capture a malfunctioning Data(Brent Spiner). You may choose to rent the movie from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene is located 21 minutes and 37 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:

Picard: ‘Now, Mr. Worf.’

Soon after Picard said that to Worf, Worf entered the spaceshuttle Data was using, and used some sort of gizmo to temporarily deactivate Data.

Now, in my imagined idea, when Worf entered the spaceshuttle, Picard caused the space shuttle Data was in to tilt, causing Data to fall, and allowing Worf to use his gizmo to temporarily deactivate Data. So, based on that, here’s the story: A man in the job is working with Data. Data’s use of job experience and knowhow is like the way Data works in a typical ‘Star Trek’ episode and movie. He is, after all, an android. And certain aspects of the man’s training and experience feels awkward, when working with Data. There’s going to be an obvious moment when Data will falter in the job, like the way Data faltered when Picard caused the space shuttle Data was using to tilt. All the man has to do is maintain his use of reasonable routine, and the man can participate in that opportunity Data created. However, since the man’s training and experience sometimes does not interact well when working with Data, when Data fell, so to speak, the man did not use that opportunity, since the man during that moment chose not to maintain his reasonable use of routine. In the story, I sent celebrity Lucy Liu as an avatar based on the character Dr. Joan Watson she portrays on the tv show ‘Elementary’. She represents me when I sent her to talk to that man. She explained it to her, and she said to the man that she understands. Soon afterwards, the man’s boss talked to him about the opportunity lost, and since the boss does not know why the man did not use the opportunity, the boss said to the man ‘–but Data fell!’

So, I recommend that you just imagine a man working with Data in the job, and make ideas to help that man use the opportunity in the job that Data will create. Of course, don’t take literally Data actually falling to the ground. That just represents something to help you imagine an opportunity being made available to the man, even though Data has an incredibly fortified use of knowhow.

I just remembered that, for many of you that have experienced mild to moderate instigation, an instigator may improperly impose an instigation that causes you to contemplationally exist with that instigation more than you would want to. You may refurbish the story to say that those instigations, certain ones, may be causing you to not maintain consistently certain aspects of your normal school or job routine.

So, here’s the purpose of this list. Some of you probably read all the lists in this blog. There are only about 120 lists in this blog. Since you don’t have to read the Amazon lists, I only counted the lists that are presented in this blog. So, what I’m doing here is just recommending a few basic requirements before I continue with the ‘Not my sense of knowing’ ideas.

So, the 1st thing I recommend you use are the ‘Blinking’ ideas, Wishlist #1003-1008. To find them, just open the www.ionicbreeze1.com blog, and under the category ‘ARCHIVES’, click ‘April 2015’. Wishlists #1003-1008 should all be in there.

Private thoughts not introduced:

Although I explained this idea in Wishlist #1032 on 1/13/2016, of course you can look at that list, I want to review it again. I want to start with an illustration, and based on my awareness of illustrations, this illustration is very important to use for idea ‘Private thoughts not introduced’. The illustration is near the beginning of mystery movie ‘Mr. Holmes(2015)’, starring Ian McKellen as Sherlock Holmes. The movie from Amazon.com is available for streaming rental Standard Definition for about 3 dollars, and to buy streaming for about 8 dollars. I chose to buy it today, since I may reference it again in the future. So, according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts near the beginning of the movie, 1 minute and 30 seconds into the movie, a boy(Kit Connor) in a train compartment with is mother(Zoe Rainey) and Mr. Holmes, and he is looking at a wasp outside of the train window. Here is a quote:

Mr. Holmes: ‘You shouldn’t do that. Tap the glass.’

The boy: ‘How did you know I was going to?’

The 2nd illustration is in episode 3.19 ‘Blue Ribbon Panel’ from lawyer tv show ‘The Good Wife(2012)’. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available to watch without additional payment. The 1st scene starts 18 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode. Julius Cain(Michael Boatman) is talking to Eli Gold(Alan Cumming). Here is the quote:

Julius Cain: ‘Okay. I’m listening.’

Eli Gold: ‘You want Will’s seat, David Lee wants Will’s seat, and I want Will’s seat. One of us has to give, or they benefit from our squabble.’

Julius Cain: ‘Then give. I already asked you to vote for me.’

Eli Gold: ‘We flip a coin. I win, you get your votes to support me. You win…’

Julius Cain: ‘…I get your votes.’

The 2nd scene starts near the end of the episode, 39 minutes and 26 seconds into the episode.

Eli Gold: ‘But I have decided, after much reflection, to support Julius Cain as a name partner, because I feel he will best exemplify, um, the things…that we want.

Julius Cain: ‘Thank you, Eli. And, uh, I would like to applaud you for that selfless act.’

David Lee(Zach Grenier): ‘Oh, come on. You flipped a coin or something.’

After you look over those 3 scenes, here’s my explanation: I believe that knowing that you have private thoughts that are not introduced to other people allows you to develop your ideas at your own chosen pace, and with a chosen availability of resourcefulness. So, even though certain people may give you the impression that they know of certain things that you are privately thinking about, knowing that you did not introduce such private thoughts to those certain people allows you to more tenably interact and develop your private thoughts. For example, in the movie ‘Mr. Holmes’, the boy said to Mr. Holmes quote ‘How did you know I was going to?’ I believe that many people in America may still respond like that boy did to Mr. Holmes, whether you are a kid, teenager, or an adult. Such a response may indicate that the use of such private thoughts, that person’s sense of objectivity with such private thoughts, may be adversely affected.

Here’s another example, refurbished for advice, where a person may have identified certain private thoughts, but that other person with the private thoughts only temporarily paused, and then continued. That example is from ‘The Good Wife’ episode, when David Lee identified that Julius Cain just flipped a coin. Here is the quote:

Julius Cain: ‘Thank you, Eli. And, uh, I would like to applaud you for that selfless act.’

David Lee(Zach Grenier): ‘Oh, come on. You flipped a coin or something.’

Yes, it’s true according to ‘The Good Wife’ episode that a coin was flipped to allow Eli Gold to give his votes to Julius Cain. Julius Cain did pause for a moment when David Lee said that. However, since Julius Cain is a lawyer, he only paused for a moment, and then continued with what he was doing.

To help you with your awareness that your private thoughts are not introduced to anyone, I have invented an exercise for you to imagine. I got the idea using a scene in episode 13.20 ‘Unfinished Business’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Supernatural(2018)’. The episode streaming is available from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and it’s use of course is refurbished for advice. The scene, according to Amazon Video, starts 31 minutes and 5 seconds into the episode, when Loki(Richard Speight Jr.) is holding a lollipop and is placing it in a case with a number of lollipops. The story I invented uses an imagined refurbished for advice version of one of those lollipops. You can give the lollipops different colors, but if you want to, for the story, let’s say that the red lollipop is used. So, here’s how the idea goes: You imagine that you are working in a job, not the job you have now, but in another job, and you are a new employee there. You are trained to not use a certain resourcefulness a certain way in the job, since you are a new employee, but everyone else where you work are using some aspect of that resourcefulness in an obvious, active way, since they have worked for the company for several years or more already. So, what you imagine you do is that you hold that red? lollipop in front of you where you can imagine seeing it, and that represents that you are not using a certain sense of resourcefulness. The other people that you are talking to individually in the company are also holding a red? lollipop, but they are regularly putting it in their mouths.

Now, since you are a new employee, it is understood that you are learning to use that certain resourcefulness, and many people in the company understand that. That is why the company and it’s employees give you some time to learn to use such a resourcefulness. In other words, you are allowed to put that lollipop in your mouth from time to time as you talk to the employees. Of course, in time, you will eventually learn to not put that lollipop in your mouth. It could take up to a year, let’s say when it seems like you don’t have to even think about it as you are not doing it. Of course, real life expectations vary, and you may not even have to be good at it to be good at it, so to speak. So, let’s give you some beginning examples: You are holding that red lollipop in front of you, and you are talking to your new boss, who is also holding a red lollipop, and he is talking about sports to you. In one moment, he places his red? lollipop in his mouth, and that causes you reflexively to place your red lollipop in your mouth.

The 2nd example, if you are a man, you are talking to an attractive blond lady co-worker who is single and available for dating, if you are a woman, she is just a blonde lady co-worker. She is talking to you about the job while holding her red? lollipop, and then she eventually places her red? lollipop in her mouth, and that causes you to place your red? lollipop in your mouth.

So, basically, since you’re just imagining it, it’s like that with many of the people you talk to in that job. You’re learning to not put that red? lollipop into that imagined mouth of yours. I believe this exercise will allow you to more objectively allow the development of your private thoughts, even though other people where you go to school or work may have a certain odd? causality with certain impressions of private thoughts that you may have.

[Well, it’s now 5:09 PM EST where I’m at. I’m going to stop now, and I plan to continue sometime next week, maybe this coming Thursday, maybe next Saturday. I’ll continue making ideas for this list, ideas that will help you with the ideas for ‘Not my sense of knowing’. So, if you are there, then I’ll see you then.

5/26/2018

Lara Croft.

(said as a greeting).

It is now 1:33 PM EST for me. I’m not typing anything today because I feel kind of hungry, and I won’t start eating normal foods, not until tomorrow. So, what I’ll do is start typing in ideas tomorrow. I don’t feel sick. I just want to be able to normally replenish myself with food as I type this stuff in. So, I’ll see you tomorrow.

5/26/2018

Nonsensical resolvings:

It is now 3:43 PM EST for me. After eating some baked salmon, I am no longer hungry, and am able to give you advice today. Less than a week ago I think, I invented the idea that certain instigators may improperly impose what I call ‘nonsensical’ resolvings in the contemplations of their identities by innocent people they instigated. And so, I made what I believe is a logical deduction, that a person should have the ability to interpret an instigator’s identity without the need to interpret such nonsensical resolvings that the instigator may encourage you to evaluate as part of the instigator’s identity. I imagined that, before this idea, glitter represents the nonsensical resolvings, and it’s on their clothes. During and after the use of this completed idea, you may have the evaluation ability to evaluate an instigator, but without all of that nonsensical glitter that was a part of their clothing. Of course, this is just an evaluation. You don’t have to always evaluate such instigators without nonsensical resolvings. After choosing to learn this idea, you will simply have the ability to evaluate them with or without such nonsensical resolvings.

One illustration I can think of right now involving nonsensical resolvings is in the movie ‘Alice Through the Looking Glass(2016)’, starring Sacha Baron Cohen as Time, and Johnny Depp as The Hatter. I looked at Amazon’s streaming option for the movie, and it offers a Standard Definition purchase of the movie for about 13 dollars. I’m not purchasing the movie. I’m getting this reference from memory from the Blu-ray? mail order rental I watched. And if memory serves, The Hatter and his friends were imposing comments that involve the use of the word ‘time’ for their guest Time to hear. Here is a quote of that conversation from www.imdb.com:

Mad Hatter: [to Time] Is it true that you heal all wounds?

March Hare: [sits next to Time and elbows him] Time is on my side!

Mad Hatter: Why is it that you wait for no man?

Mallymkun: [covers one eye] I just can’t find the time!

[Cheshire appears behind Time]

Mallymkun: Cheshire! Where have you been? You’re late.

Cheshire Cat: [lands on Time’s shoulders] Actually, I’m right on time.

[Cheshire disappears and Mallymkun, March Hare, and Mad Hatter all laugh]

Mad Hatter: [grabs Time’s hand] I have time on my hand!

Time: [losing patience] You silly nitwits really think that I’ve not heard these cheap jabs before? Your attempts at mockery fall flat.

Mad Hatter: [plays with Time’s shoulder pads] Look! Time is flying!

Time: [stands up furiously] Enough! No more wasting me!

Mad Hatter: [nervously] I’m having the time of my life?

The 2nd illustration for nonsensical resolvings is in the movie ‘The Breakfast Club(1985)’. Here is a quote from Wishlist #1117:

The 2nd illustration is from the comedy drama movie ‘The Breakfast Club(1985)’. Keep in mind that the illustration from this movie is refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice. Also, you don’t use the illustrations that are immediately near where this illustration comes from. There are mature themes used in the movie that are not used in this blog. In the illustration, Claire Standish(Molly Ringwald) is talking to Allison Reynolds(Ally Sheedy). The illustration is available from Amazon.com streaming as a rental for about 3 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 1 hour, 10 minutes, and 57 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:

Claire:-‘I can’t believe you. You’re so weird. You don’t say anything all day, and then when you open your mouth, you unload all these tremendous lies all over me.’

‘The Breakfast Club’ illustration, in my opinion, is actually the best illustration example I can think of regarding the idea of ‘nonsensical’ resolvings. For example, when Claire said to Allison quote: ‘I can’t believe you. You’re so weird. You don’t say anything all day, and then when you open your mouth, you unload all these tremendous lies all over me.’ , it is like how I imagined kids, teenagers, and adults think to themselves about the instigations and inadvertencies of other people as they(the innocent people) perceive them(the instigators and inadvertencies). When you look at a person that caused you to experience a minor instigation, do you casually think about that instigation? That is what I’m talking about. Let’s use the character Allison Reynolds from the movie ‘The Breakfast Club’ as an example. Whether you are a kid, teenager, or an adult, I recommend that you imagine having an Allison Reynolds in your school or job, and she’s like the Allison Reynolds in the movie. She already caused you to experience obvious lies about her own identity, and every time you look at her from a distance, you think about some of those lies, and you make personal comments about them. Idea ‘Nonsensical resolvings’ is like that. When you look at an instigator from a distance, or think about that instigator from time to time, such instigations cause you to think about it’s associated ‘nonsensical’ resolvings, and it is my belief that such resolving unnecessarily tax your sense of objectivity. However, if you have the ability to temporarily not need to interact with such resolvings, then I believe your sense of objectivity will improve considerably.

So, if you want to learn idea ‘Nonsensical resolvings’, then I am going to explain that idea now in this list.

Over acknowledge(revisited):

The 1st part of idea ‘Nonsensical resolvings’ is from idea ‘Over acknowledge’, that I explained in Wishlist #1116. Here is a quote:

To start with the illustration, it is in episode 1.5 ’12 Hours’ from action crime tv show ‘Transporter: The Series(2012)’. The episode is available from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 46 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode, near the end of the episode. In that illustration, Giles(Josh Blacker) compliments Frank Martin(Chris Vance) who is pretending to be Dieter(Charly Hubner) so that the actual Dieter who is pretending to just be a mechanic that works for Dieter would respond. Of course, the illustration is refurbished for the advice with the inapproprieities removed. Here is the quote:

Giles: (talking to Frank Martin who is pretending to be Dieter)-‘You’re not such a bad person after all, Dieter.’

Dieter:-‘Thanks.’

Giles:- (When the actual Dieter said ‘Thanks’, Giles turns around and looks at the actual Dieter).

The ‘Over acknowledgement’ illustration from the ‘Transporter’ episode is how the actual Dieter reacted to Giles turning around and looking at him. That illustration starts 46 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode, when Dieter rolled his eyes up. When Dieter rolled his eyes up, I speculated that Dieter did not have an obvious technique of his own when responding to instigation. I’m recommending that you use idea ‘Over acknowledge’ to allow yourself to be aware of your chosen sense of intent, and when you use idea ‘Over acknowledge’, that idea can be used as an indicator to allow yourself to manage better what you deem to be over acknowledgements induced by instigation. In the ‘Transporter’ episode, since Dieter did not have his own technique, when he experienced an over acknowledgement, since the acknowledgement came from him, he had no reason to blame it, so to speak, and that caused Dieter to roll his eyes up when Giles looked at him. Now, when you experience an over acknowledgement, you can use idea ‘Over acknowledge’, and that could allow you to allocate better what you believe are over acknowledgements as they relate to your chosen sense of intent. In other words, with a little practice, you probably won’t roll your eyes up if you experience a minor misleading sense of over acknowledgement, since you already know that it is not part of your chosen sense of intent.

[Since I am going to type in more tomorrow, I’ll stop now and continue tomorrow. Less than 20 seconds ago, I just remembered that I forgot to give you your ‘music video’ for today. I plan to give you another one tomorrow, so the one for today will be like a brunch or a light snack. The ‘music video’ is one of the commercials for movie ‘La La Land(2016)’, starring Emma Stone as Mia, and Ryan Gosling as Sebastian. The commercial is identified by the word ‘Radiant’. I looked at a few of those ‘La La Land’ commercials, and I think the ‘Radiant’ one is the most entertaining to watch. To watch that commercial for free, search for phrase ‘la la land tv spot radiant’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 370 thousand views. It has a run time of 31 seconds. It’s short, but sweet, so to speak. So, I’ll see you tomorrow, then.

5/27/2018

Lara Croft.

(written down and shown to another as a greeting.)

It is now 8:47 AM EST for me. The reason I am recommending the next ‘music video’ to you is because I have already recommended music videos ‘Stay’ by Lisa Loeb and ‘As I Lay Me Down’ by Sophie B. Hawkins. In other words, if you responded positively in the past with the ‘music videos’ I recommended to you in the past, I am speculating that, if you choose to, you may also respond positively to this next ‘music video’ recommendation. The recommended ‘music video’ is from song ‘Because the Night’, the acoustics version, performed by American alternative rock band 10,000 Maniacs, in 1993 for tv show MTV Unplugged. For more information about 10,000 Maniacs and MTV Unplugged, go to www.wikipedia.org. Here is a quote about the music video from wikipedia:

The song was originally recorded by Bruce Springsteen…He was not satisfied with the song and later declared he already knew he wasn’t going to finish it since it was “a[nother] love song”. A well-known acoustic version was recorded by 10,000 Maniacs in 1993 for MTV Unplugged,  with a few lyrical alterations. The recording gained considerable radio airplay and reached #11 on the Billboard Hot 100.

To watch ‘Because the Night’ by 10,000 Maniacs for free, search for phrase ‘10000 maniacs because the night’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 1.3 million views, provided by Marco Camppos. So, it’s a love song, according to Bruce Springsteen’s quote on wikipedia. I recommend that you just listen and watch the video, to see if you like it. There’s an audience in the music video, so even though it’s a love song, if you choose to, you can still watch it for relaxation purposes. It is my belief that the purpose of music videos in general are subjective; when you watch them, you decide what purpose to give it. Of course, I am recommending to you ‘Because the Night’ also in the context of this particular advice, this ‘Nonsensical resolvings’ idea. However, you still decide what purpose this music video has for you.

I discovered this music video several weeks ago I think in a tv show called ‘Total Request Playlist’ from channel ‘MTV Classic’ from the cable tv service I am using. I deleted it, but recently was looking for it again. I found it in a recent recording of ‘Total Request Playlist’ on 5/24/2018. Since only a few seconds of that music video was in that recording, I watched it I think for the 1st time in it’s entirety yesterday and less than an hour ago today. I’m going to watch it one more time before I begin typing.

I just finished watching ‘Because the Night’ by 10,000 Maniacs again. Here is a quote from the song:

Come on now, try and understand
The way I feel under your command
Take my hand, as the sun descends
They can’t hurt you now
Can’t hurt you now
Can’t hurt you now

Since this is standard demographic advice by intent, here’s a recommendation for you to imagine using the music video ‘Because the Night’: According to Wikipedia, Natalie Merchant was the singer for ‘Because the Night’. Let’s say that, for the kids, teenagers, and adults, Natalie Merchant is your adult friend that invited you to watch her live performance for the tv show ‘MTV Unplugged’. She said to you that it would mean a lot to her if you were there. So, you went there, and you were reasonably supportive of her performance.

I did not bring that up:

All right! Since it is my belief that one of the best features of giving advice like this the illustrations from tv shows, movies, etc., I am starting this advice with an illustration. Although there are probably other illustrations from tv shows and movies, the only one I can think of right now is in episode 29.16 ‘King Leer’ from animation comedy tv show ‘The Simpsons(2018)’. There are 2 scenes in this episode for idea ‘I did not bring that up’. The episode is available for purchase by Amazon.com for about 2 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, the 1st scene begins 11 minutes and 39 seconds into the episode. Homer Simpson is talking with his daughter, Lisa. Here is a quote:

Homer: ‘You know, when this all ends horribly, it’s gonna be pretty hard not to say “I told you so.”‘

Lisa: ‘Just don’t say it.’

Homer: ‘You’ve never been married, have you, Lisa?(Of course, that is said in a comedic context, not to be taken literally) When you love someone very much, the toughest thing is not to rub their face in their horrible screw-ups.’

The 2nd scene is when Homer is thinking to himself, trying very hard to not say ‘I told you so.’ to his wife Marge as she is talking to him. That scene starts 15 minutes and 36 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Marge: ‘But I-I brought them together. How could things end so badly?’

Homer: (thinking to himself) ‘Don’t say “I told you so.” Don’t say “I told you so.” Don’t say “I told you so.”

Marge: ‘Maybe I shouldn’t have gotten involved.’

Homer: ‘Don’t say “I told you so.” ‘Don’t say “I told you so.”

Marge: ‘Why didn’t somebody warn me?’

Homer soon afterwards melodramatically collapses on one of the beds.

The purpose of this 2nd idea is to allow yourself to exerience certain contemplation interjections, such as the ones caused by instigations, and because of your chosen intent, such interjections are not treated as actively used. Instead, they are experienced as something that you ‘did not bring up’, that you ‘did not bring to your own attention’, even though you are experiencing such interjections. For example, for older kids, teenagers, and adults, let’s say that when you are talking to your friends and classmates in school, or for adults, you are talking to some co-workers at work, and those people said certain jokes to you that you thought were funny. Sometime afterwards, let’s say several months later, you find yourself thinking about a certain joke someone told you, but it’s inappropriate based on the circumstance and how you want to think at the time. You may shake your head to yourself and contemplationally indicate to yourself that it is ‘just a joke’, meaning that you are not using that joke at that moment, since you believe it is inaproppriate for you to do so.

Even though I have no proof that such a thing is happening to other people, it has happened to me several times, and I am speculating that such an experience is very common in America, since I am speculating that most people, especially when they are young, use humor to learn.

I can’t believe I am still typing after saying that, so to speak.[5/30/2018: I said “I can’t believe I am still typing after saying that, so to speak.”  because I thought I was typing in information that had an obviously noticeable amount of contemplation involved, taking into consideration, so to speak, that such an idea will obviously change the way you think.] Anyway, if you have done that in the past, that you tried to stop yourself from using a joke that you believed was inappropriate for you to use contemplationally, then you have already experienced something that you have tried not to use contemplationally. If you choose to, you may also choose to separately interpret such an experience as something that you did not want to bring to your own attention. I use the phrase to identify such an experience ‘I did not bring that up’. And, of course, there are the 2 scenes from ‘The Simpsons’ episode. Here is a quote again from Homer: ‘You know, when this all ends horribly, it’s gonna be pretty hard not to say “I told you so.”‘

[I am going to take a break right now. I’m going to watch 2 or more of those ‘The Good Fight’ episodes from season 2 I didn’t watch yet, and then I plan to eat in a certain restaurant today, since this restaurant serves a certain food only on Sundays. After that, I plan to finish this list today. So, if you are there, I’ll see you later today.

[5/27/2018: Just to clarify, me watching ‘The Good Fight’ episodes is just what I am doing today, in case you want to know what I’m doing. I’m not recommending to anyone to watch any specific ‘The Good Fight’ episodes right now, and if I did, it would probably be watched with the inapropprieities removed and in relation to advice. I have recommended in the past to watch a scene from ‘The Good Fight’, but I’m not doing so now. I just wanted you to know what I was doing during my break.

It’s 1:51 PM EST for me. I just came back from the restaurant. So, using the ‘Private thoughts not introduced’ idea and the ‘Over acknowledge’ idea in this list, and keep in mind that this is the 1st time I am explaining this idea, there are no other explanations out there that I have made, when you experience contemplation interjections that are not part of your chosen contemplation sense of intent, such as a joke that you are trying not to think about, or what Homer Simpson experienced in the cartoon ‘The Simpsons’, the ‘I told you so.’ contemplation, then you can identify that contemplation as ‘something that you did not bring up’. It’s an obvious contemplation in your mind, but you’re choosing to not make that obvious contemplation an active contemplation. Let’s say, just as an example, when you were younger, if another person, let’s say in school, caused you to experience a contemplation interjection, you would address that interjection as if it were an active, chosen thought in your mind. For example, you would try to resolve it. If it was a verbal insult, you would contemplationally clarify to yourself that it is not true. Now, with this idea, if an uninvited, out of context, non relevant, not part of your chosen intent contemplation interjection would be caused by an instigator or inadvertency, you may now have the ability to contemplationally say to yourself quote ‘I did not bring that up’, that you did not choose to bring that to your own attention. To oversimplistically conceptually explain this idea, it is like you now have a bigger house to think with, and more than one garage to put your extra stuff in. The interjections you may possibly experience from instigations and inadvertencies probably have too many names for me to ‘make up’ to identify, but this ‘I did not bring that up’ should give you a lot to work with.

More avoid:

2 illustrations to start explanation. The 1st illustration is one of the illustrations used earlier from the movie ‘The Breakfast Club’. Here’s a copy:

” The 2nd illustration is from the comedy drama movie ‘The Breakfast Club(1985)’. Keep in mind that the illustration from this movie is refurbished with inapropprieities removed for advice. Also, you don’t use the illustrations that are immediately near where this illustration comes from. There are mature themes used in the movie that are not used in this blog. In the illustration, Claire Standish(Molly Ringwald) is talking to Allison Reynolds(Ally Sheedy). The illustration is available from Amazon.com streaming as a rental for about 3 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 1 hour, 10 minutes, and 57 seconds into the movie. Here is a quote:

Claire:-‘I can’t believe you. You’re so weird. You don’t say anything all day, and then when you open your mouth, you unload all these tremendous lies all over me.’ ”

The 2nd illustration is from Wishlist #1120 for movie ‘Mistress America’. Here is a quote from that list:

” For example, here’s an illustration from movie ‘Mistress America(2015)’ starring Rebecca Henderson as Anna Wheeler and Greta Gerwig as Brooke. The illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 28 minutes and 36 seconds into the movie, and the illustration is, of course, edited and refurbished for this advice. Here is a quote:

Anna:-‘Hi, I don’t know if you remember me, we went to high school together. Anna Wheeler?’

Brooke:-‘Oh, yeah! What are you doing in the city? Do you live here?’

Anna:-‘No, I’m in Tenafly.’

Brooke:-‘What are you guys drinking? Let me buy you a drink.’

Anna:-‘I just wanted to tell you because I never had the courage to do it when I was actually in high school: you really hurt my feelings.’

Brooke:-(chuckles) ‘What?’

Anna:-‘You don’t remember?’

Brooke:-‘What did I do?’

Anna:-‘That thing? ‘Yep, bitter. You and your friend Abe?’

Brooke:-‘Abe!’

Anna:-‘You guys used to do this thing where you would walk up to me, touch my skin, and then like taste it and think for a minute, and then say: ‘Yep, bitter.’, and then laugh.’

Brooke:-‘Right! We did do that, didn’t we? We were weird.’

Anna:-‘I was standing right there, every single time you did it. It was really mean. The way you treated me really messed me up for a long time. You made a lot of people feel bad, not just me.’ ”

In both illustrations, both people, one person as a high school student, and the other while she was a high school student and years after that experience, both experienced something about the instigator that, if given the ability, both would avoid such an experience. For example, what Claire experienced from Allison from the movie ‘The Breakfast Club’:

Claire:-‘I can’t believe you. You’re so weird. You don’t say anything all day, and then when you open your mouth, you unload all these tremendous lies all over me.’

So, just as an example, and you don’t have to use this example, let’s say when a girl from school imagines being Claire and she sees Allison, she addresses a resolving identity that she wants to avoid experiencing again. And in the movie ‘Mistress America’, if Anna had the ability to, Anna would choose to avoid Brooke’s ‘Yep, bitter.’ instigations. Here is a quote:

Anna:-‘You guys used to do this thing where you would walk up to me, touch my skin, and then like taste it and think for a minute, and then say: ‘Yep, bitter.’, and then laugh.’

Brooke:-‘Right! We did do that, didn’t we? We were weird.’

Anna:-‘I was standing right there, every single time you did it. It was really mean. The way you treated me really messed me up for a long time. You made a lot of people feel bad, not just me.’

The relaxed muscle cialis discount cheap starts receiving adequate blood and oxygen after releasing the lactic acid. He provides Best Treatment For Erectile Dysfunction In Delhi and make your sexual life more passionate. cost of viagra Although these drugs have other medical uses, it is very important and so should not levitra 20 mg icks.org be skipped at any cost. So not everyone would be suitable for men with rare hereditary order viagra generic problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption. I call that phenomena ‘More avoid’. That means that the instigator would cause you to experience a contemplation accumulation of an experience that you are trying to avoid. I believe that the purpose of such an effect is to cause you to continue to address ‘nonsensical’ resolvings from an instigator’s identity that the instigator wants you to continue to address. So, for example, let’s change the setting to college instead of high school, when Allison from the movie ‘The Breakfast Club’ is attending a certain college, and she is doing pretty much the same thing she is doing in high school, basically putting lies as part of her identity in the minds of other college students, when other college students would look at her from a distance, of course they would use a certain courtesy when thinking about her. However, the results seem the same for most college students. To make this more thinkable as a story, this is happening around the 80s, since the movie was in theaters in 1985. So, when a group of college students would unavoidably confront Allison, they would all experience resolving identities that Allison had already established in their minds, and that is why they would all ‘shift gears’, so to speak, when thinking about Allison.

The solution that I have invented for the instigation identified by phrase ‘More avoid’ is to partition the experience, to separate that accumulating sense to avoid from the ‘back story’ that the instigator is improperly imposing with that feeling. For example, in the movie ‘Mistress America’, when Brooke and Abe did that ‘Yep, bitter.’ instigation upon Anna, they wanted to make sure that a sense of accumulation to avoid is associated with Anna’s sense of composure. They even called the experience ‘Yep, bitter.’ That is an obvious ‘back story’, an obvious circumstance, that Brooke and Abe wanted Anna to commit to. When you use this idea, you are allowing yourself to sense a changed sense of accumulation to avoid, but you are not committing to the improperly imposed circumstance that the ‘More avoid’ is associated with. For example, you experience a minor instigation that involves a contemplating accumulating sense to avoid. You allow yourself to experience that, but you don’t use the ‘circumstance’ part it seems to be a part of. Practice this idea for a few days, and based on my own experiences with this idea, you will notice that a lot of the very minor instigations that try to do this to you, since you are now more experienced with sensing an accumulating sense to avoid, those very minor instigations don’t bother you as much anymore. So, if you use this idea, what I will try to address from now on are the more stubborn forms of contemplation accumulation to avoid.

Reserve:

Let’s start with the illustration: The illustration is from a scene in episode 3.25 ‘Worst Case Scenario’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Voyager(1997)’. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available to watch from Amazon.com without additional payment, and according to Amazon Video, the scene is located 27 minutes and 24 minutes into the episode, Tuvok(Tim Russ) and Tom Paris are talking. Here is the quote:

Tuvok: ‘According to the “Dictates of Poetics”, by T’Hain of Vulcan, a character’s actions must flow inexorably from his or her traits.’

Tom Paris: ‘Well, I don’t know anything about T’Hain, but I do know what makes an interesting story, and that’s unexpected plot twists.’

Soon after you start using idea ‘More avoid’, let’s say after a few days, for very minor instigations, even if the instigation has some ‘More avoid’ involved, you should be able to choose to not resolve it. Idea ‘Reserve’ is a ‘contemplation effort to resolve’ idea. More specifically, idea ‘Reserve’ helps you to acknowledge more that an instigation may try to encourage you to commit to an excessive sense of contemplation effort to resolve, and you may choose instead to use a more sensible contemplation effort to resolve. One way of doing that is to choose not to resolve the instigation at all. In the example I offered you, Tom Paris said quote: ‘Well, I don’t know anything about T’Hain, but I do know what makes an interesting story, and that’s unexpected plot twists.’ Tom Paris is not resolving what Tuvok said about T’Hain because Tom Paris doesn’t know anything about T’Hain.

Strain resolve:

I realize that I am supposed to present to you this idea as if it is a new idea to you. So, for idea ‘Strain resolve’, here is an illustration: In episode 3.10 ‘Flaming Moe’s’ from animation comedy ‘The Simpsons(1991)’, Homer Simpson is experiencing some sort of weird daze because he believes Moe stole his drink idea. The episode is available from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars, and according to Amazon Video, the scene being quoted starts 18 minutes and 58 seconds into the episode. Homer is so dazed and distracted by Moe stealing his drink idea, he starts hearing his family saying Moe’s name. Here is the quote:

Homer: ‘Moe, Moe, Moe…’

Marge: ‘Bart, are you going to mow the lawn today?’

Bart: ‘Okay, but you promised me moe money.’

Marge: ‘I Moe, I Moe.’

Homer: ‘Moe, Moe, Moe…’

Lisa: ‘When Bart’s done, can we moe to the moevies?  There’s a moetinee.’

Marge: ‘Of course. All work and moe play makes moe a moe moe.’

Bart: ‘Moe Moe Moe Moe Moe?’

Marge: ‘Moe Moe Moe.’

So, Bart, Lisa, and Marge to Homer seem like they are all just saying the word ‘Moe’ many times in gibberish. Finally, even the baby Maggie is about to speak.

Maggie: (after she takes off her pacifier) ‘Moe.’

Here’s a quote from wikipedia about the ‘Flaming Moe’s episode:

” He subsequently becomes obsessed with Moe and his betrayal, even having a hallucination where he sees Moe’s face everywhere. ”

” Homer, unhinged by resentment, arrives at the tavern. ”

So anyway, the point about the scene in the ‘Flaming Moe’s’ episode is to help you more tenably sense a straining sense of avoiding that is encouraging you to resolve a certain experience. Refurbished for advice, of course, what Homer is going through is an example of a straining sense of resolving that Homer can’t seem to not resolve. Don’t address the fact that Homer believes he was cheated by Moe. Instead, address the affect that Homer is also experiencing a contemplation strain that he is not able to dismiss from his mind. Since I am treating you as if you are new to idea ‘More avoid’, that contemplation strain at 1st may simply be from a minor in…

[I’m going to stop now and finish this tomorrow. In the meantime, I plan to finish those ‘The Good Fight’ episodes today. That’s just a personal goal, if you are interested in knowing. It’s not a recommendation for you to watch. So, if you are there tomorrow, I’ll see you then.

5/28/2018

Lara Croft.

(imagined said as a greeting by getting a celebrity to say it as a greeting.)

It is now 3:26 PM EST. Before I recommend to you the next music video, I want to say that the only reason I am recommending you this video is because I already recently vetted(to appraise, verify, or check for accuracy, authenticity, validity, etc) this music video. The only thing I didn’t do with it before was watch the entire music video, and I just finished doing that a few minutes ago. Since it’s almost 3:30 PM for me now, I don’t want to spend over an hour or worse looking for another music video. And so, I eventually compromised to recommending to you this music video. The priority of the ‘music video’ experience is to give you something to watch. However, even if the watchable part of the music video is great, if the song is terrible, or the lyrics are unacceptable, then I will probably choose not to recommend such a music video with this advice. I probably do other things with it, so to speak, but that is the explanation I can easily type in.

The music video is from song ‘Little of Your Love’ by Haim. Here is a quote about ‘Little of Your Love’ from wikipedia:

” The reworked version of the song was then debuted by the band on May 13, 2017 on an episode of Saturday Night Live. ”

” The song’s music video …was released on October 2, 2017 and features the group line dancing with patrons at the Oil Can Harry’s bar in Los Angeles. ”

So, after the basic vetting, the reason I am recommending the music video to you is because of the possible novelty of line dancing. Even though line dancing may be illustrated in other music videos, like country music videos, it is the only music video I am aware of that illustrates line dancing. According to wikipedia, Haim is an American pop rock band. That means, when Haim shows you line dancing, seeing it from the perspective of a pop rock band may interest you. Like I said before, I recently watched the entire music video. You’re not obligated to watch it.

Strain strive:

The reason I am starting so late is because I just finished today watching those ‘The Good Fight’ episodes. I’m not recommending for you to watch them for this advice generalistically, except for the scenes I already recommended to you. I just thought you might want to know why I’m late. I want to finish talking about idea ‘Strain resolve’, and start talking about ‘Strain strive’. I invented this idea this past Thursday, 5/25/2018, and of course it is a specific type of ‘More avoid’. Idea ‘Strain strive’ identifies an accumulating sense of avoiding that inhibits your ability to help other people’s efforts to strive. I believe this instigation involves a paradox(a person, thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature) because of how I imagine other people who are able to more tenably interact with instigators treat instigators. For example, let’s say a co-worker from years of experience learned to more tenably interact with such an issue. That co-worker, while interacting with an instigator, learned to help somewhat in a casual sense that instigator’s sense of striving. Of course, it’s not that simple in explanation, but when I imagine those 2 people talk, it’s obvious that such a co-worker even in conversation is able to help that instigator with certain strivings. So, if you choose to imagine such a thing, you may think that’s a good idea. The problem is, that same instigator who accepted that co-worker’s help turns around and instigates you, but in a context that inhibits somewhat your own sense, your own ability, to help other people with their strivings. That’s where the paradox comes from: the instigator gets help with striving, but instigates you to cause you to have an inhibited sense to help other people’s strivings. In other words, you are discouraged from using the ability to help other people’s use of striving.

The only illustration I can think of right now is from the movie ‘As Good as It Gets(1997)’, starring Jack Nicholson as Melvin Udall and Helen Hunt as Carol Connelly. You can rent or purchase the movie streaming from Amazon.com. According to Amazon, I rented the movie in the past 6 times already, so I finally decided today to purchase the movie streaming for about 10 dollars. If you’re doing something like I am doing in your blog, web site, etc., in my opinion, the movie is one of the best public and popular references out there to address instigation, and you might want to also purchase it streaming, since you may be using it more times in the near future. I’m not making money from this recommendation. I’m just speaking from experience. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 42 minutes and 20 seconds into the movie. The new waitress portrayed by Patricia Childress is serving Melvin Udall, because none of the other waitresses will. Here is a quote:

Melvin Udall: (looking at the new waitress) ‘No, no, no. Get Carol.’

New waitress: ‘Oh, I’m fillin’ in. We don’t know if she’s comin’ back. You know, I think she might be getting a job closer to home. Why plastic?’

Melvin Udall: ‘Wh-what are you tryin’ to do to me?’

New waitress: ‘What the heck do you mean?’

Melvin Udall: ‘Look, elephant girl, just–just g-go get Carol or something. Just have her do my one meal here. I– You know, I’ll pay whatever you want. I’ll wait. Do it!(and that is when Mr. Udall hits the table and scares the new waitress)’

New waitress: (she walks to her boss) ‘Bryan, Bryan. Code blue. Bryan.’

Of course, this scene from the movie ‘As Good as It Gets’ is not taken literally. But if you look at the events that led to that moment, the only waitress that already experienced Mr. Udall’s attitude is Carol Connelly, and like the new waitress said, she may be looking for another job that is closer to her home. And if you watched the movie, Carol is the only person that is regularly consoling the other employees about Mr. Udall. Without Carol, the other employees won’t choose to tolerate Mr. Udall’s attitude. And if you choose to extrapolate from that, one of the many things that means is that Mr. Udall causes the employees of that restaurant to have an inhibited sense used to help other people with their use of striving, but with Carol’s consoling(giving solace or comfort), they recover from Mr. Udall’s attitude. However, without Carol’s consoling, they’re making it clear to Mr. Udall that his attitude is no longer allowed in the restaurant. You can keep watching that scene, when almost everyone in the restaurant is applauding that Mr. Udall has to leave the restaurant. So, I believe an illustration for idea ‘Strain strive’ is there. You just have to sort through it.

To clarify, the main purpose of this blog is to help you more tenably experience unavoidable instigation. Idea ‘Strain strive’ I believe may help you experience what the idea helps you identify, if such a moment ever occurs. To use the idea, just contemplationally say the phrase ‘Strain strive’ to identify the instigation. That way, you can separate it’s avoiding sense of accumulation from it’s impression of intent, making it more tenable to experience. I’m not encouraging you to change your school of thought, or put you on some sort of high moral ground.

[Even though I didn’t type much in today, I’m going to continue tomorrow. So, if you’re there, I’ll see you then.

5/29/2018

Lara Croft.

(imagined acceptably and usefully said as a greeting by character Wyatt Logan(Matt Lander) in one of the episodes of sci-fi tv show ‘Timeless’. Since they travel in time, if you choose to, there are all sorts of situations Wyatt may say ‘Lara Croft’ as a greeting)

It is now 10:46 AM EST for me. To start, the music video I recommend for today is from song ‘There’s Nothing Holdin’ Me Back’ by Canadian singer Shawn Mendes. Here is a quote from wikipedia:

” …it was released as a single on April 20, 2017. The single reached the top 10 in several countries, including the US and the UK. ”

” The music video for the song was released on June 20, 2017. The clip, filmed in Paris, Amsterdam and the United Kingdom, sees Mendes and his love interest (played by actress Ellie Bamber)  exploring Europe while the singer is out on tour. The couple races through transportation hubs, ride trains and trek along the coastline. The video also shows footage from Mendes’ concerts. ”

Here is a quote from the lyrics:

Oh, I’ve been shaking
I love it when you go crazy
You take all my inhibitions
Baby, there’s nothing holding me back
You take me places that tear up my reputation
Manipulate my decisions
Baby, there’s nothing holding me back
There’s nothing holding me back
There’s nothing holding me back

Purpose:

It is now 11:21 AM EST for me. I want to finish this idea today, because I don’t want to look for another music video for it. It’s a hassle. Before I continue, I want to go over an idea I made up for this advice to help the kids learn this stuff. I call the idea ‘Purpose’. I imagine the kids, when they learn stuff like this, it is like a big wave: other kids give certain ideas attention. However, the wave subsides, and then other ideas are given attention. Of course, I am not saying anything bad about how kids learn these ideas. I just believe that, while the kids are learning ideas like this, they should be able to give such ideas their own unique purpose. That way, when the wave subsides, the wave created by other kids that allowed them to be aware and have an interest in certain ideas, they can still give a certain usefulness to such ideas, even after the wave subsides.

The 1st illustration is from the movie ‘The Big Year(2011)’, starring Steve Martin as Stu Preissler. According to wikipedia, Stu Preissler is founder and CEO of a New York company bearing his name. You can just imaging Mr. Preissler talking to another CEO of a company, trying to buy some sort of resource material in bulk from another man. The resource material is relatively cheap, but his company needs the material. Using a time machine, so to speak, the man he is talking to is portrayed by actor Clifton James from the movie ‘The Man with the Golden Gun(1974)’. The character portrayed is like Sheriff J.W. Pepper from that movie. So, let’s call him J.W. J.W. is making a joke from his office, and Mr. Preissler from his office is patiently responding to it. Since they’re both CEO’s, and I don’t have any CEO experience to reference, I don’t know how to specifically interpret that(it’s just an imagined story). The point that Mr. Preissler is buying something from J.W. is just to show you that Mr. Preissler is giving purpose to something that is very cheap to buy in bulk. I think that, if you choose to, you can refurbish that moment to be more acceptable and useful to you.

The 2nd illustration for idea ‘Purpose’ is in episode 7.1 ‘Bond’ from lawyer tv show ‘The Good Wife(2015)’. The episode is character Lucca Quinn’s(Cush Jumbo) 1st appearance in the tv show. Based on the scene I am referencing in my opinion, the tv show wanted to give Lucca Quinn a good 1st impression. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available from Amazon.com without additional payment. Otherwise, I think you may be able to purchase the episode for about 2 dollars. So, according To Amazon Video, the scene starts 38 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode, Lucca Quinn is talking to Judge Farley(Jane Curtin). Of course, the quote is refurbished for this advice. Here is the quote:

Lucca: ‘And this is about an inheritance?’

Judge Farley: ‘Yes, it is. You catch on quickly.’

Lucca: ‘And was the person an invalid?’

Madeline Smulders(Bridget Regan): ‘She was in a wheelchair. Why?’

Lucca: ‘And I’m guessing this asset, this painting, was worth more than $20,000?’

Judge Farley: ‘Yes, it is. $8 million. Again, why?’

Lucca: ‘The housekeeper can’t inherit it.’

David Lee(Zach Grenier): ‘Of course she can.’

Lucca: ‘No, according to Illinois law, a caretaker to an invalid cannot inherit more than $20,000.’

Keep in mind that the illustration is just a tv show. You don’t have to interpret any of it seriously. None of it’s portrayals are real. Anyway, Lucca made a reference that, apparently, none of the other lawyers seemed to have known about, not even the judge. The point is that, refurbishing the tv show scene for this advice, Lucca seemed to have turned something that may be interpreted as seemingly innocuous that she had learned into something that allowed her to win the case. Of course, in relation to advice said, if you want to, you can watch more of that episode for content. I just don’t want to type in too much.

This 3rd illustration was something I think I typed in the Amazon lists several years ago. It’s an idea I learned from the tv show ‘MI-5’, starring Peter Firth as Harry Pearce. I imagined a certain video taped evidence was given to other government agencies to look at 1st, and when MI-5 looked at it, they used their own unique resourcefulness to find something about the evidence that the other government agencies weren’t able to find. You can extrapolate that example, and imagine people in your school individually giving ideas like these ideas some sort of purpose. For an ‘MI-5’ illustration, episode 4.9 from spy tv show ‘MI-5(2005)’ has Colin Wells(Rory MacGregor) explaining to Ruth(Nicola Walker), Adam(Rupert Penry-Jones) and Juliet(Anna Chancellor) that he is ‘marrying’ 2 forms of information to create new links. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 20 minutes and 58 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote:

Colin: ‘It’s been chewing up his bank details, credit cards, travel movements, college classmates, and tutor lists, mobile phone records and cell positioning, NHS files…’

Adam: ‘Won’t the Americans have done all this?’

Colin: ‘Yes, but we have access to information from our surveillance that they don’t have. By marrying the two, we can find new links that they won’t.’

OK, this next illustration is partly based on how I imagine women dating for years, let’s say women in their 40s, how they learned to not tell men many things about their personal lives because they would get the ‘wrong idea’. For the things addressed for this idea, it’s not like these women did anything wrong. Part of the reason is because of how men interpret certain information based on their chosen school of thought and how they give importance to certain acknowledgements. For example, in the movie ‘The Quest(1996)’, starring James Remar as Maxie Devine, according to the movie, in 1925, a tournament involving many different fighting styles from different countries was created, and Maxie Devine was a heavyweight boxing champion. Using his skills as a boxer, Maxie Devine wasn’t going to win the tournament. But, of course, he is still an acknowledged boxing champion. When I would think about the movie ‘The Quest’, I would interpret the champions selected as a convenient reference as to what fighting styles they represent from their countries. There is a reason whey they are good at what they do. So, let’s just imagine that we already know who is going to win based on that person’s fighting style. In my opinion, to judge a person’s value simply based on who will win in this tournament is misleading, since they are already champions using their own unique fighting styles. You see? It’s like that. A comparison can be misleading. Even with normal American civilian interactions, certain comparisons can mislead, even inhibit, another person’s use of self esteem, self worth, and sense of resourcefulness. That is why, in my opinion, many adult women who still date don’t want men to get the ‘wrong idea’.

Here’s an illustration example I think the kids may find interesting involving comparing yourself to another. Here’s a quote from www.comixology.com from comic book ‘Injustice 2 #60’ It’s digital release is today, 5/29/2018. It’s purchase price is only about 1 dollar. The comic book quote starts in page 17. The New Blue Beetle, Jaime, who is still being trained to be a superhero, is talking to his teacher, Booster Gold, about what Batman said to him. Here is the quote:

Jaime: ‘Batman thinks…’

Booster Gold: ‘Oh God! That guy. You know what? Bats claims he has no powers, but that’s not true. His superpower is filling his fellow heroes with crippling insecurities. Seriously, every single Robin gets a pair of tights and an inferiority complex.’

Don’t get me wrong. Superheroes as they are portrayed in movies nowadays and most comic books can help a great deal. However, even comparing yourself with superheroes may mildly adversely affect your expectations of resource use, self esteem and self worth. For example, of course, Batman is not an American standard. According to the comic books that I have read, Batman and Lex Luthor are considered the 2 smartest men on Earth. Their intelligence certainly is not a standard. To say that Batman is a standard based on intelligence is like saying Reed Richards from Marvel Comics based on intelligence is an American standard. And, of course, there are other capabilities that Batman has that also should not be considered ‘standard’. I believe that can be useful to you when you compare yourself to Batman.

[I’m going to take a break now to get something to eat. I’ll start again later today.

Penalty:

It is now 3:35 PM EST for me. I am going to explain 2 words individually: ‘Penalty’ and ‘Already’. Then, I plan to explain a technique to see if it will work for you. After I do all 3, I’ll let you know what I’ll do next. So, for now, I’m explaining idea ‘Penalty’, starting with 2 illustrations. The 1st illustration is from episode 1.6 ’12 Hours’ from action tv show ‘Transporter: The Series(2012)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 46 minutes and 37 seconds into the episode, Giles(Josh Blacker) is talking to Frank Martin(Chris Vance) who Giles knows is not Dieter Hausmann(Charly Hubner). The illustration is refurbished for advice. Here is the quote:

Giles: ‘You’re not such a bad person after all, Dieter.’

Dieter: ‘Thanks.’

Giles: (Giles then turns around and looks at the man who claimed not to be Dieter.)

Dieter: (After Dieter realized that he just accidentally admitted? that he lied to Giles about his identity, his eyes rolls up.)

The scene used for this idea is when Giles caused Dieter to roll his eyes up.

The 2nd illustration is from fantasy movie ‘Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children(2016)’. The scene is when Enoch(Finlay MacMillan) moves his head back into the couch(of course, don’t make it a habit of moving your head back in places you are unfamiliar with) when Olive(Lauren McCrostie) recommends that Jake(Asa Butterfield) stays for the reset. I purchased this movie this past November for about 10 dollars from Amazon. I see now that it’s only available for purchase for about 14 dollars. I think that if you have cable tv, you can just program your cable tv box to copy it, or something else. I’m not recommending that you buy the movie just for this advice. Just read what I have to say about it. If you want to and you have cable, satellite, or whatever, you can just get a copy from that. Anyway, according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 48 minutes and 24 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Olive: ‘Won’t you at least stay to see the reset, Jake?’

Enoch: (Olive’s statement caused Enoch to arch his head back into the couch.)

So, starting with the ‘Transporter’ illustration, when Giles said ‘You’re not such a bad person after all, Dieter.’ , Giles already knew that Frank is only pretending to be Dieter. Giles said that to cause Dieter to say something, a something that would prove to Dieter that he lied about not being Dieter. And that is what happened. When Giles said ‘You’re not such a bad person after all, Dieter.’ , that caused the real Dieter to say ‘Thanks.’ , and by saying that, Dieter accidentally revealed to Giles that he is the real Dieter, and that he has been telling lies to him. That is when Giles turned around and looked at Dieter. And when Giles turned around and looked at Dieter, Dieter experienced a sense of penalty coming from himself. And since that sense of penalty was coming from himself, Dieter reacted to that sense of penalty, which caused Dieter to roll his eyes up. So, even though Giles obviously caused Dieter to experience that sense of penalty, that sense of penalty still came from Dieter himself.

In the 2nd illustration refurbished for advice, when Enoch arched his head back, it was in response to a penalty created by Jake not yet being familiar with the routine that they have established over the years. He knows that Jake is a guest, with Miss Peregrine’s approval. Yet, even so, he still feels the penalty of Jake not knowing that routine, and Enoch knows that such a feeling of penalty is not warranted. Still, Enoch reacts to it, and he mitigates that feeling. For example, Enoch’s mitigation includes him not complaining about Jake staying for the reset. Such a sense of penalty, however, is still unavoidable to Enoch, causing him to arch his head back.

So, here is the point I am trying to make: Mild to moderate instigations in general, at least for the innocent beginners, in my opinion cause such people to feel justified that they are innocent. However, such innocence is created from an instigation that is causing innocent people to also experience a contemplation accumulation to avoid that is associated with another meaning. So, when innocent people experience an instigation that causes them to also experience an evaluation involving penalty, such innocent people already believe that they are innocent, and that sense of circumstantial innocence, in my opinion, is biased. For example, in the ‘Transporter’ example, Giles caused Dieter to experience a biased sense of penalty. It is my opinion that, if you have experienced an evaluation penalty before that you believe was obviously caused by a mild to moderate instigation, that such an experience was designed to ‘wind you up’, for example, to cause you to worry too much. I don’t have proof, but I believe that many Americans experience such an instigation. It’s probably a very common instigation in America.

Already:

According to www.dictionary.com, here is the definition of ‘already’: ‘by this or that time; previously; prior to or at some specified or implied time’. Here’s the sentence example: ‘When we came in, we found they had already arrived.’ Idea ‘already’ identifies instigations that give the impression that it’s affects have already existed for some yet to be determined specified amount of time, even though you believe at the time you had just recently experienced it. You can try to identify such an instigation by contemplationally saying the word ‘Already’. I can’t think of an illustration for idea ‘Already’ right now.

Contemplation effort to resolve, sense of penalty, and a supposedly overjustified sense of innocence:

And now, for what I discovered I think was less than a week ago, that I am going to encourage you to try: while I was waiting for the bus in the bus terminal, what would usually happen is that people, mostly teenagers, would walk back and forth. The adults would usually walk back and forth, but farther away. Mainly using the ‘Transporter’ illustration, when Giles would cause Dieter to experience a penalty, I allowed myself to sense that the people I would normally perceive, mostly the teenagers, were trying to manipulate my contemplation effort to resolve, and my sense of penalty. And so, what I did was allow myself to more objectively sense my contemplation efforts to resolve, and my sense of penalty. I also suspected that those teenagers probably believed that I was overly justified to believe that I was innocent. And so, with the objectivity, I tried the evaluation to allow myself to sense that my efforts to experience penalty should also be more objectively sensed, taking into consideration my supposed overjustified sense of innocence. That is when I noticed that, before this idea, I was using mostly a defensive contemplation stance: for example, if I experienced a minor instigation, I may contemplationally use a bookmark to more objectively experience such an instigation. Now, with this idea, it feels like I am doing the opposite. Instead of defending myself, I would instead allocate my contemplation sense of resolving, sense of penalty, and supposedly overjustified sense of being innocent. It feels like the instigator is placing 3 false perspectives in my mind, so what I would do is remove and change those perspectives. So, maybe after explaining that to you, you also may be able to do the same.

Before I continue, keep in mind that I don’t expect you to learn and use very well these ideas all in one day. For example, you’ll use it with certain minor instigation experience, you’ll sleep some of it off, and you’ll repeat that process. Your progress should improve daily, as you ‘sleep off’ some of the mild adverse effects of certain instigations that you may be experiencing. You’ll probably shuffle the phrases, and improve daily. Also, this is the 1st time I’m explaining this idea, and that means I should be able to explain it better later. So, I recommend that you see this as just the beginning. I should be able to explain this idea better over time.

Lag penalty:

Now that I have…

[I don’t want to spend the rest of my free time today typing this stuff up, so I’ll just finish this tomorrow. So, if you are going to be there, then I’ll see you then.

5/30/2018

Lara Croft.

Before I say what type of greeting this one is, keep in mind that it is just an idea that I think may be useful to you. You don’t have to use it.

Lara Croft.

(allowing yourself to say ‘Lara Croft’ as a greeting to others, even though those others say it better than you, and some of those people criticize you for saying it so badly, according to their perspectives)

For example, in episode 2.1 ‘The War to End All Wars’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Timeless(2018)’, when Lucy Preston(Abigail Spencer) was talking to Irene Curie(Melissa Farman), Irene Curie originally talked to her in French. They eventually talked English, and Irene Curie commented on how bad Lucy Preston’s spoken French was. The episode is available from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars Standard Definition, and according to Amazon Video, the scene is located 17 minutes and 55 seconds into the episode, Lucy Preston is talking to Irene Curie. Here is the quote:

Lucy Preston: ‘You’re…You’re Irene Curie?’

Irene Curie: ‘Who are you?’

Lucy Preston: ‘Your English is excellent.’

Irene Curie: ‘Your French is terrible. What do you want?’

Why is this idea useful? I recommend that you ‘reverse’ it, so to speak. It is my believe that more and more kids in America are learning to be aware that they have a unique perspective that other people do not have. (I’m not trying to oversimplify living as a kid in America. This is just an idea.) So, how would such kids use such a perspective when interacting with others? I am assuming that, as the kids get older and become adults, they will learn to use such a perspective in a coexisting context with other people. Such a unique perspective will be useful to them in their careers, and they can also choose to use it to more tenably coexist and interact with other people. Of course, the coexisting part is something that they will learn to do over many years of experience. Now, just because such kids may learn to use their unique perspectives in such a manner, that does not mean that others will have such a skill. So, maybe their unique perspective experience will help them interact with others that do not have such a coexisting experience.

It is now 9:48 AM EST for me. The music video I am recommending is from song ‘Lush Life’ by Swedish singer Zara Larsson. It is the 2nd version of the song, which shows Zara dancing solo. This version has over 554 million views on youtube so far. Here is a quote from wikipedia:

” “Lush Life” topped the charts in Sweden for five weeks, becoming Larsson’s second number–one single in her home country, also topping the charts in Mexico and Poland. The song debuted at number 97 on the Billboard How 100 in July 2016… ”

As far as I can remember, today while looking through youtube was the 1st time I’ve heard of Zara Larsson. To watch her music video ‘Lush Life’ for free, the 2nd version, search for phrase ‘zara larsson lush life’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 554 million views.

I recommend watching the video because, if you are used to the body languages from American trained performers for music videos, tv shows, and movies, then you may find refreshing the body language that Swedish singer Zara Larsson uses in her performance for music video ‘Lush Life’.

Perplex:

According to www.dictionary.com, here is the definition of ‘perplex’: ‘to cause to be puzzled or bewildered over what is not understood or certain’, and here is the sentence example: ‘Her strange response perplexed me.’

Basically, an instigator and/or inadvertency may impose an instigation to cause you to feel perplexed, and that perplexed feeling may accumulate if you try to resolve it. To help diversify your sense of feeling perplexed, I recommend you watch the tv show intro from the tv show ‘Stingray(1985+), starring Nick Mancuso as Stingray. Here’s a description of the show from www.imdb.com:

” “Ray”, a man of mystery, gets people out of trouble, asking for favors in return. ”

He tries to use the impression of having a perplexing identity, even on the people that he is helping. I recommend that you just watch it’s tv show intro, not the episodes. So, to watch the tv show intro for tv show ‘Stingray’ for free, just search for phrase ‘stingray intro’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 13 thousand views. It is the one that is from ‘classiktelevision’.

All right! So, what I am going to do is start with Allison Reynolds(Ally Sheedy) from the movie ‘The Breakfast Club’, and Brooke(Greta Gerwig) from the movie ‘Mistress America’. Just imagine looking at those 2 women from a distance, and they have nonsensical resolvings as part of their identity. I’m going to introduce to you several variations of bookmarks, and we’ll see if those bookmarks will allow you to mitigate(lessen) such nonsensical resolvings so that you no longer feel obligated to interpret such resolving identities.

Lag penalty:

One way an instigator may make an accumulating sense of dismissing to cause you to evaluate such a nonsensical resolving is to cause such an accumulating sense of dismissing to have a lagging sense of penalty. According to dictionary.com ‘lag’ means ‘to fail to maintain a desired pace or to keep up’. The sentence example is ‘After five minutes of hard running, some of them began to lag.’ I explained idea ‘penalty’ earlier in this list, so a ‘lagging’ sense of penalty is your inability to resolve such a sense of induced penalty in what you deem to be a reasonable amount of time. Since you didn’t resolve that sense of penalty, the experience creates the feeling of contemplationally lagging in your mind.

The good news is, with the help of this idea, instead of being distracted by such a sense of lagging, you can contemplationally say the phrase ‘lag penalty’, allowing you to stop interacting with it based on it’s misleading influence. Two more variations I recommend are ‘Already penalty’, which means that such a sense of contemplation induced penalty is already there, and ‘Late penalty’, which means that the imposed sense of penalty wants you to sense that you are late in it’s interpretation.

Lag perplex:

Like the previous idea, ‘Lag perplex’ is a sense of perplexing that lags in your mind, and you can also use ‘Already perplex’ and ‘Late perplex’.

Persist:

According to www.dictionary.com, ‘persist’ means ‘to pursue steadfastly or firmly in some state, purpose, course of action, or the like, especially in spite of opposition, remonstrance?, etc.’

So, let’s start with an example of ‘persist’ from school. Let’s say that you’re a student, and certain instigators in school you already know were talked to by the teachers because of their instigation antics. So, even though you believed that helped somewhat, those instigators still use persistence to continue to instigate. The same thing is true if you’re an adult, and you have a few instigators in your job. You believe they were talked to by management, but such instigators still persist in their instigation ways. Now, when I invented idea ‘Persist’, I didn’t type in all these ideas in this list. The explanation for idea ‘Persist’ originally had more melodrama. Now, I guess you don’t need the original melodrama explanation in order to use it. You can just ‘shuffle’ the word ‘Persist’ to other ideas that you have. For example, ‘Persist penalty’ means a contemplation accumulation to avoid from a sense of penalty that is persistent. ‘Persist perplex’ refers to a persistent sense of perplexing.

I think you have enough to work with. I plan to eventually come back to this.

Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Warehouse 13’. Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Star Trek: Insurrection’. Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for mystery movie ‘Mr. Holmes’. Rated TV-14 viewer discretion for lawyer tv show ‘The Good Wife’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi horror tv show ‘Supernatural’. Rated PG action/peril viewer discretion for fantasy movie ‘Alice Through the Looking Glass’. Rated R for language viewer discretion for movie ‘The Breakfast Club’. Rated R for language viewer discretion for movie ‘Mistress America’. Rated TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Star Trek: Voyager’. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for animated tv show ‘The Simpsons’. Rated PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘As Good as It Gets’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv show ‘Timeless’. Rated PG viewer discretion for comedy movie ‘The Big Year’. Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for action thriller movie ‘The Man with the Golden Gun’. Violence and viewer discretion for thriller tv show ‘MI-5’. Rated PG-13 for adventure violence and martial arts fights for action thriller movie ‘The Quest’. Violence and viewer discretion for the ‘Injustice 2’ comic books. Rated TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for action tv show ‘Transporter: The Series’. Rated PG-13 for fantasy movie ‘Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Private thoughts not introduced’, ‘Nonsensical resolvings’, ‘Over acknowledge’, ‘I did not bring that up’, ‘More avoid’, ‘Reserve’, ‘Strain resolve’, ‘Strain strive’, ‘Purpose’, ‘Penalty’, ‘Already’, ‘Already perplex’, ‘Lag penalty’, ‘Lag perplex’, and ‘Persist’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.