9/29/2018

Salutations.

It is now 2:22 PM EST for me. It took me about 2 hours to find the music video today, and by the time I found it, I decided to order food. So, I waited for the food, ate some of it, and here I am. The music video I am recommending for this idea is from the song ‘Picture This’ by Annie LeBlanc. Here’s a quote from www.wikipedia.org about Annie LeBlanc:

‘ Julianna Grace “Annie” LeBlanc (born December 5, 2004) is an American singer, YouTuber, actress, and gymnast. LeBlanc has been featured in online videos since she was four years old and has an extensive online following. She stars as Rhyme in the family drama Chicken Girls on the Brat digital network on YouTube, starred in the YouTube Brat show A Girl Named Jo playing the part of Jo Chambers, and also played Rhyme in Chicken Girls: The Movie.  She has starred on the Bratayley family vlog  since 2010 and the YouTube Red Originals series We Are Savvy since 2017.

On September 9, 2017, LeBlanc’s cover of the song “Fly” by Maddie & Tae peaked at #34 on the Billboard Charts in “Country” songs. She has also produced several original songs. In April 2018, LeBlanc won a Shorty Award for “Muser of the Year”. ‘

To be clear about her age, Annie LeBlanc is now 13 years old. Wikipedia doesn’t say anything specific about Annie LeBlanc’s music video. I watched it today once for the 1st time. According to youtube, there are over 41 thousand comments about this music video. I glanced at a few of the beginning comments, and I noticed at least 3 different people calling it a ‘Sprite’ commercial. So, here’s my opinion about the music video. Of course, you may see it differently if you choose to watch it. 13 year old Annie LeBlanc is having a daydream, having fun with her boyfriend. Near the end of the music video, her friend helps her to stop thinking about that daydream, and she realizes that she is now in a diner. I think that the music video is made specifically for kids and younger teenagers to watch.

One of the main reasons I chose music video ‘Picture This’ is because is because of an article in www.wikipedia.org called ‘8th Streamy Awards’. Here’s a quote from that article:

‘ The 8th Streamy Awards will honor the best in U.S. web television programming as chosen by the Streamys Blue Ribbon Panel. The ceremony will be held live on October 22, 2018, at the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, California, and streamed on YouTube. ‘

In my opinion, U.S. web television programming is still relatively new, but still, according to the impressions I’m getting from www.youtube.com, a lot of teenagers are already giving such television a lot of attention. The television programming I usually watch is from cable tv. I do watch a little CBS All Access, such as ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ and ‘The Good Fight’. Most of my tv watching, however, is from an actual tv. Anyway, according to that article, the ‘Drama’ series ‘Chicken Girls’ is nominated, and according to wikipedia, Annie Leblanc is one of the main characters. I haven’t watched the show, but certain music videos from this web television growth look promising to me. Also, I tried to look at the new mainstream music videos, but I couldn’t find any to recommend. Also, keep in mind that watching music videos is not my expertise. I just ‘look’ using my laptop and cable modem service.

Just recently, my cable modem service was faltering. I looked at the diagnostic the browser was offering me, and it said to go to ‘Advanced’ in the ‘Settings’ selection for my Google browser, and deselect ‘Use a prediction service to load pages more quickly’. After I did that, the problem was fixed. In case you are also using a cable modem, I thought you might want to know that.

To watch music video ‘Picture This’ for free, search for phrase ‘annie leblanc picture this’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with almost 12 million views. It was published June 2, 2018, almost 4 months ago.

Before and after:

Before I begin this new idea, you may be experiencing some difficulty evaluating yourself as you learn certain new ideas, how you compare yourself before learning something, and after you have learned something. Nobody knows everything. Not even The Doctor from that sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who’ knows everything. So, even as you learn something new, you still don’t know everything. For an illustration, I recommend a scene from the movie ‘Click(2006)’, starring Adam Sandler as Michael Newman, Joseph Castanon as Ben Newman, and Tatum McCann as Samantha Newman. You can watch the movie streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 55 minutes and 32 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Ben: ‘Dad?’

Michael: ‘Yeah.’

Ben: ‘We have some designs for you.’

Michael: ‘Oh, it’s not a good time, man.’

Samantha: ‘Maybe they’ll help you finish quicker.’

Michael: ‘All right. You want me to look at it? Let me see. Uh…ceiling’s too high, the hallway’s too narrow. Stairway placement makes no sense at all. What the heck’s the room made of?’

Ben: ‘Pizza.’

Michael: ‘Well, it’s stupid. Next. What is yours made of?’

Samantha:(crying) ‘Pickles.’ (Samantha crumples the paper.)

Both kids run away.

Refurbished for advice, of course, the kids represent ‘before knowing something, and Michael represents ‘after knowing something’. The point is to recommend to you to not be so hard on yourself as you evaluate yourself after you have learned something.

Another illustration example is a typical company Christmas party, except you refurbish the employees in it to represent yourself at different stages in your learning development. Notice that everyone in the imagined office Christmas party is still having a good time. They’re not criticizing each other for knowing things that the others do not know.

Have you watched old episodes of ‘Married with Children(1986-1997)’, starring Christina Applegate as Kelly Bundy, and David Faustino as Bud Bundy? Amazon.com seems to offer all 11 of their seasons streaming. Anyway, in some? of those episodes, Bud Bundy would say something to his sister, and after the conversation is over, Kelly would say to herself ‘Hey! twice’, because she just realized that her brother misled her in the conversation. I have invented an idea based on situations like that, when someone may cause you to just agree to something in the conversation, but soon after that conversation is over, you may think to yourself ‘Hey!’, that you did not agree to other aspects of that conversation, just on what you actually agreed upon.

The idea I am going to try and explain is based on the use of idea ‘Not add’, Wishlist #1141. If you choose to use this idea, you’re going to use idea ‘Not add’ to create a sense of active intent use that will ‘not add’ certain things to it in advance.

Now:

I just realized a few minutes ago that I may not have explained idea ‘Now’ to you. I explained a variation of it a few months or so ago, but that variation is not the new idea called ‘Now’. I looked at the recent lists, and it looks like I haven’t explained it yet. I could be wrong, but since I couldn’t find it, I’m going to explain it now. An instigator may improperly impose for you to use a fortified acknowledgement in the now. For example, if you are an adult, certain past mild to moderate instigations may bother you because they contain a contemplation inclination for you to give a fortified acknowledgement in the now. Past experienced instigations that cause you to be confounded, perplexed, bewildered, can from time to time cause you to try to resolve such instigations in your ‘now’.

The solution is to simply manage better what contemplations you give acknowledgement in the now. Thanks to the ‘Not add’ idea, you should be better able to not give certain credence for certain acknowledgements in the ‘now’. Here are 2 variations of idea ‘Now’, 1)’Who’, and 2)’Know’.

Who:

In the movie ‘Captain America: Civil War(2016)’, after Tony Stark(Robert Downey Jr.) talked to Hawkeye(Jeremy Renner) in the Super Max prison, Ant-Man/Scott Lang(Paul Rudd) wanted to talk to talk to Stark. The movie is available streaming as a rental and for purchase, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 53 minutes, and 38 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Ant-Man/Scott Lang: ‘Hank Pym always said you can never trust a Stark.’

Tony Stark: ‘Who are you?’

Ant-Man/Scott Lang: ‘Come on, man.’

I know I used this scene for another idea called ‘Discover’. This scene refurbished could also be used for idea ‘Now’. Tony Stark chose not to give the impression of personal acknowledgement to Scott Lang. Tony Stark even said to Scott Lang quote: ‘Who are you?’, to clarify to Scott Lang that he is not pursuing such a personal impression of acknowledgement.

Know:

Many of you probably own the movie ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens(2015)’ on Blu-ray. It also showed up on cable tv for a moment. Idea ‘Know’ is made from a scene in that movie, when Finn(John Boyega) is talking to Maz Kanata(Lupita Nyong’o) in her place of establishment. You can watch the movie streaming as a rental or purchase, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 1 minute, and 7 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Maz: ‘If you live long enough…you see the same eyes in different people. I’m looking at the eyes of a man who wants to run.’

Finn: ‘You don’t know a thing about me.’

If you experience what you believe to be a mild to moderate form of instigation, impressions in conversation that seems to address your personal life may be construed as inappropriate to you. Since Finn interpreted what Maz said to him as inappropriate, Finn also interpreted that personal impression of conversation Maz seemed to use talking to him as inappropriate. Here’s a situation from the same movie where a personal use in conversation was not deemed as inappropriate when Finn was using it. That scene was in a conversation Finn was having with Han Solo(Harrison Ford). That scene begins 54 minutes and 59 seconds into the movie. I am aware that guns are being handled in that scene, but those guns are just being stored, not used. Of course, the handling of guns in that scene is not being used, only the conversation between Finn and Han Solo. In other words, refurbished with inapproprieities removed. Here is the quote:

Finn: ‘Hey, Solo, I’m not sure what we’re walking into here…’

Han Solo: ‘Did you just call me Solo?’

Finn: ‘Sorry. Han. Mr. Solo. You should know…I’m a big deal in the Resistance. Which puts a real target on my back. Are there any conspirators here? Like, First Order sympathizers?’

Han Solo: ‘Listen, Big Deal. You got another problem. Women always figure out the truth. Always.’

So, it’s my opinion that Finn wanted Han Solo to give him advice about Finn’s friendship with Rey(Daisy Ridley), even though Finn was not direct about it to Han Solo. To be clear, Finn was being very ‘personal’ with Han Solo, but did not construe his use of personal dialog as inappropriate.

So, now you have 2 variations for idea ‘Now’, 1)’Who’, and 2)’Know’. You should be able to remember Tony Stark saying ‘Who are you?’ to the Ant-Man’, and you should be able to remember Finn saying ‘You don’t know a thing about me.’ to Maz. [11/2/2018: You should also be able to remember Han Solo saying quote: ‘Did you just call me Solo?’ to Finn. 11/2/2018] That means, if not now, then very soon, if you choose to, you should have the ability to choose to not use personal interjections from what you deem to be inappropriate, such as instigations. If you think an inappropriate personal interjection is being imposed upon you, contemplationally say the word ‘Now’, to decide to choose whether or not you should use such an interjection in the now.

[It’s now 5:21 PM EST for me, so I’ll stop explaining this idea now. I did not anticipate that I hadn’t explained idea ‘Now’ before. Next week, I plan to finish explaining idea ‘Now’, and also finish this new contraption idea. I’ll also provide another music video for next week. So, if you are there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

[I know I haven’t said this before, but keep in mind that I haven’t finished this idea yet. For example, a completed idea would have a disclaimer at the end of it.

10/6/2018

Greetings.

It is now 10:55 AM EST for me. Since it took me about 2 hours again to find this music video, I’m going to order food after I recommend the video to you, and start typing again within 2 hours from now. The music video is from the song ‘Lullaby’ by English DJ and record producer Sigala and English singer-songwriter Paloma Faith. I found this music video from www.youtube.com, a selection published by TopMusicMafia called ‘Top 100 Songs Of The Week – October 6, 2018’. The selections usually shows a brief clip of the songs that have associated music videos. According to that selection, the song ‘Lullaby’ is #20. Here is a quote about the song from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ Talking about the song, Sigala said: “Lullaby is about always going back to that person who has stuck with you through all the highs and the lows. ‘

And here’s a quote from the song’s lyrics:

Won’t you sing me your sweet lullaby?
Just the sound of your voice is the thing that I need
Won’t you sing me your sweet lullaby?
I could fall for the sound of your sweet melody
‘Cause I just need your song
Something to sing along
When I’m not feeling strong
I need you to sing me your sweet lullaby
Need the sound of your sweet melody
So sing to me

When I finally decided to recommend music video ‘Lullaby’ today, I felt a disappointment like it was an ache in my back, or the beginnings of the flu. However, I am not ignoring the obvious, that I like the upbeat song, and the professional? dancers do seem to me to individually present a corresponding upbeat dance performance to that song. I’m sure that if I watch the music video a few more times, I’ll probably acclimate to it more. I don’t plan on doing that, but I have the option to choose to do so.

To watch the music for free, search for phrase ‘lullaby sigala’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with almost 40 million views. The music video was published Feb. 28, 2018, about 7 months ago.

So, I’m going to order the food now, and I’ll see you in 2 hours.

5000:

It is now 12:47 PM EST for me. Before I continue, I want to offer you an idea to help improve the effectiveness of your ideas, the ideas that you use when you experience mild to moderate forms of instigation. The idea is based on the idea I offered you in Wishlist #1104 called ‘The Phonetic System’. In that list, I offered you 100 noun based words. The new idea called ‘5000’ interprets those 100 noun based words into a unit of measurement. So, basically, you’re using 50 100 noun based words, like multiplying 50 x 100. I know that I just tried to ‘sell’ the use of only 100 noun based words, so if you considered that you should use more than just 100 locations, but because of me you only used 100, then in that context, and I will not defend myself, I admit that I had made a mistake, and I apologize for that mistake. [10/6/2018: Since I don’t know what your specific school of thought is, let’s say that, generalistically speaking, I made some sort of promise to you, in an advice giving context of course, and I did not honor that promise. So, I say to you that I owe you one. It doesn’t have to involve a casino. The casino idea is just an idea. You don’t have to use it. You can use the rest of the explanation without the ‘casino’ part of it. 10/6/2018] So, let’s say that I went to your casino, and some sort of debt occurred. Just put that on my tab, like I owe you something. I have no idea how that bill will be paid back. Maybe it never will. Maybe it’s just something that just exists with certain expectations, and that the context of it’s use will decide it’s purpose. Of course, you don’t even have to do that. The best illustration I can think of right now regarding units of measurement is in episode ‘Planet of the Dead’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2009)’, starring Lee Evans as Malcolm, and David Tennant as The Doctor. Amazon.com has the episode available streaming. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available to you without additional payment. You can find the episode by searching in Amazon.com for phase ‘david tennant specials’, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 23 minutes and 53 seconds into the episode, The Doctor is talking to Malcolm over the phone. Here is the quote:

Malcolm: ‘I’m measuring an oscillation of 15 Malcolms per second.’

The Doctor: ’15 what?’

Malcolm: ’15 Malcolms. It’s my own little term. A wavelength parcel of 10 kilohertz operating in 4 dimensions equals 1 Malcolm.’

The Doctor: ‘You named a unit of measurement after yourself?’

Malcolm: ‘Well, it didn’t do Mr. Watt any harm. Furthermore, 100 Malcolms equals a Bernard.’

The Doctor: ‘Who’s that, your dad?’

Malcolm: ‘Don’t be ridiculous. That’s Quatermass.’

These 5000 ideas are just recommended to be used by you to allow your ideas to work. It doesn’t have any actual substance to it, like something that you are actually doing. It’s like an intentional air ball. According to www.dictionary.com, an ‘air ball’ in reference to basketball is ‘a missed shot that fails to touch the rim, net, or backboard’. It may seem to be a little clunky to use at 1st, but in time, the more you use it, the better you’ll get at using it.

The reason I am offering you this idea now is because I believe that having the ability to resolve your instigation problems can be very useful to you. I also believe that, since it’s already 2018, a certain obvious whole number percentage of mild to moderate instigations experienced by innocent people do provide some sort of solution to the victim, let’s say 15% of casual instigations experienced have some sort of solution provided to the innocent victim. However, even if that were true, I do not recommend that you should depend upon that. Here’s a starting example of using your 5000 ideas. This example is based on that Sean Connery Green Lantern story I offered you for idea ‘Gratitude’ in Wishlist #1125. Here is the quote:

‘ So, based on that ‘Indiana Jones’ illustration, the more you do with other people, the more you would have to learn how to interact with the gratitudes of others. Based on how people may want you to respond to their gratitudes, it may not be possible for you to interact with everyone in such a context. And so, what I recommend is that you imagine that everyone in your school or job has individually an exorbitant(highly excessive) amount of gratitude for you to interact with, and you have chosen to not interact directly with such excessive amounts of gratitude. This should be easy to do, since in reality such a thing is probably not true for you. I could be wrong, of course. This is just an idea. ‘

When you experience a mild to moderate instigation, and you’re trying to figure it out, I recommend that you consider that the instigator has 5000 gratitudes that can apply to you that you should not use, and that is the instigation. You are using your ‘5000 locations’ idea to prevent yourself from interacting with 5000 gratitudes that you believe you should not interact with. Of course, it doesn’t always have to be gratitude. Instead, it could be something positive that is imaginitively imposed as an instigation, like 5000 examples of colleague or student admiration imposed by the instigator that you should not acknowledge. It’s 5000 of something that is positive that can help you make some sort of mitigating solution for that experience, and of course, those 5000 of something is an ‘air ball’. It doesn’t actually exist. It’s just there to help you with the use of your ideas. Soon after I finish explaining this list, I’ll give you another idea as to how to use idea ‘5000’.

I want to introduce to you 8 more ideas before I continue with this explanation: 1)’Lead’, 2)’Tinker’, 3)’Admit’, 4)’Cause’, and the 4 ideas for idea ‘Intensity’:1)’Intense’, 2)’Rate’, 3)’Bright’, and 4)’Loud’. If I don’t finish this list today, I have decided to take the day off from work 10/8/2018, Columbus Day, this Monday, and I’ll finish it then.

Lead:

Unfortunately, this idea was exclusively created from the movie ‘The Heist(1989)’, starring Pierce Brosnan as Neil Skinner. I checked Amazon.com, and it’s not available for streaming. The DVD is available for Prime purchase for about 11 dollars, which includes the 2 day Prime shipping. I checked wikipedia, and there’s not even a plot explanation. So, I’ll have to explain idea ‘Lead’ to you with words only. Idea ‘Lead’ is created using 2 scenes from the movie ‘The Heist’: 1)Once Neil Skinner gets out of jail, he sees a man with one of those signs and a person’s name on it. The man is a limo driver looking for a man from the airport. Neil Skinner pretends to be that man, and causes that limo driver to drive him to a used car dealership to help him buy a car. The limo driver eventually discovers that Neil Skinner is not who he says he is, and tells Neil Skinner that.

2)The 2nd scene is when Neil Skinner leads Ebbet Berens(Tom Skerritt) to the diamonds, which are in the trunk of the car. As Mr. Berens looks at the diamonds, he also sees Neil Skinner leading Sheila(Wendy Hughes) in a dance move called a ‘dip'(the meaning and photo of the dip can be found in www.wikipedia.org).

So, basically, based on those 2 scenes in the movie ‘The Heist’, an instigator may improperly cause you to contemplationally respond to a notion that is contemplationally leading you. In the 1st scene from the movie ‘The Heist’, Neil Skinner was leading the limo driver to believe that he is the person the limo driver was supposed to be giving a ride to. The limo driver eventually discovered that Neil Skinner was not that person, as Neil Skinner was leading him to help him find a used car to buy. In the 2nd scene, Neil Skinner wanted to show his former boss Mr. Berens that he was ‘leading’ him to find those diamonds by actually showing him a dance maneuver that involves Neil giving a dip to Sheila. At the moment, even though Mr. Berens notices that dance maneuver, he was too distracted by the fact that he found the diamonds in the trunk of that car. Although I don’t think the movie shows it, soon after that, Mr. Berens gets arrested by the police.

So, if you combine those 2 scenes from the movie ‘The Heist’, you should get an idea of how to use idea ‘Lead’. Just contemplationally say the word ‘Lead’ to check if an instigation is trying to lead you.

Tinker:

I created idea ‘Tinker’ specifically just from the title of the movie ‘Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy(2011)’ starring Mark Strong as Jim Prideaux, and the scenes of actor Sherman Augustus as Richie adversely tinkering, refurbished with inapproprieities removed of course, in the movie ‘Virus(1999)’, also starring Jamie Lee Curtis as Kit Foster. So, based on my experience and imagination, instigators may improperly encourage you to tinker(to busy oneself with a thing without useful results) with certain contemplation inducing aspects of an instigation. The reason ‘tinker’ was created from the movie ‘Virus’ is because the character Richie was tinkering with something that I would call gross(obscene), and was threatened by 2 others in that scene to stop tinkering with it. Of course when interpreting their threats, don’t interpret their threats literally. They just want Richie to stop tinkering with that thing. When you think about that scene from the movie ‘Virus’, that should help you to stop tinkering with certain aspects of an instigation that you choose not to tinker with. To be clear, the movie ‘Virus’ is a rated R horror thriller movie. Richie is illustrated to be tinkering with something that one may initially think you would need some sort of special protection for, but Richie tinkers with it with his bare hands, something I think people in general would NOT do. Here’s a quick explanation of what the movie ‘Virus’ is about from www.wikipedia.org:

‘…it tells the story of a ship beset by a malevolent extraterrestrial entity that seeks to turn humanity into cyborg slaves. ‘

So, basically, in my opinion, you got some alien combining people with computer technology, and not in a good way.

So, if you choose to use the streaming movie ‘Virus’ from Amazon.com, according to Amazon Video, that scene is located 52 minutes and 2 seconds into the movie. Richie is shown tinkering with the body of a person that was compromised by that alien. Here is the refurbished for advice quote:

Richie: ‘The brain is still alive.’ (faint electronic whirring)

(the compromised body flinches, causing everyone to react in a surprised, scared manner

Steve Baker(William Baldwin): ‘Stop messing around with the damn thing, Richie!’

Richie: (chuckles nervously) ‘I’m just looking at it, Steve.’

After another incident occurs because Richie is still tinkering with it, someone threatens Richie:

Hiko(Cliff Curtis): (talking to Richie) ‘Touch it again, and I’ll beat you up.’

Richie: ‘I can respect that.’

Of course, I’m recommending that you watch that scene, and of course 2 of the characters said something else to Richie. Keep in mind that they just don’t want Richie to keep tinkering with it. Don’t interpret what they said literally.

So, when you experience an instigation that encourages you to contemplationally ‘tinker’, contemplationally say the word ‘tinker’ to see if it will help you allocate the experience better.

[11/2/2018: When you contemplationally consider using idea ‘Tinker’, just imagine Richie(Sherman Augustus) eagerly tinkering. His impression of eagerness may help encourage you to ‘not’ contemplationally tinker with something that the instigator caused you to experience. All those other melodramatic details in that scene from the movie ‘Virus’ should not be important to think about. You just see Richie tinkering with something not specific, and that’s it. Richie’s eagernesss to tinker is used by you to encourage you to ‘not’ tinker. That’s how it works. 11/2/2018:]

[It’s now 4:34 PM for me. I’m going to stop now, but I believe I will be able to finish this idea 10/8/2018, this coming Monday. So, if you will be there, I’ll see you then.

10/8/2018

Greetings.

It is now 10:04 AM EST for me. I haven’t looked for a music video yet, because I want to explain further idea ‘Tinker’, to make it more acceptable for kids to use. I made a new explanation today, but before I say that, here’s what I originally experienced for the idea. Keep in mind that the movie ‘Virus’ came out in 1999, and it’s been years since I saw it last time. So, when I invented idea ‘Tinker’, it may have been several years ago. Based on my experience, after using idea ‘Tinker’ for a while, you won’t remember that scene from the movie ‘Virus’ like you do now, with all of that visual melodrama. When I would think about that scene from the movie ‘Virus’, all I would conceptualize about is Richie overeagerly tinkering. And, of course, you would use idea ‘Tinker’ with whatever mild to moderate instigation or inadvertency you choose to use it with.

Now, here’s the new explanation I’m adding to idea ‘Tinker’. I just thought of it today, and I did not plan ahead to tell you this. Here’s a quote from Wishlist #1141:

‘ The illustration that you are going to be recommended to imagine that will help you remove certain notions that you choose to ‘not add’ to your chosen sense of intent is in episode 2.12 ‘The Secret of the Fire Nation’, also known as 2.12 ‘The Serpent’s Pass’ from animated action adventure tv show ‘Avatar: The Last Airbender(2006)’. ‘

If you chose to purchase that ‘Serpent’s Pass’ episode, 16 minutes and 26 seconds into the episode, that big Serpent surprised their flying pet. I imagined a girl complaining that she is not that flying pet that was surprised. I made the deduction that, if you used idea ‘Not add’, that some kids may jokingly and seriously get the impression that they can relate to that flying pet getting surprised. The problem is, of course, that it’s a flying pet, not a human, and they don’t want to be compared to a flying animal. I believed that, as soon as they give idea ‘Not add’ more usefulness, it won’t be as much of a problem anymore. Now, if you chose to use that ‘Virus’ scene, not only are all of the adults surprised, but they also experienced shock and panic as well. You may choose to use their shock, panic, and surprise as an illustration of people experiencing shock, panic, and surprise. Keep in mind that I’m only recommending that scene from the movie ‘Virus’. I’m not recommending that you watch the whole movie. Throw away the rest of the movie in relation to this advice. Just use that scene. It is a rated R horror thriller movie, and I believe that there are other scenes in that movie that are not appropriate for this blog. Also, to be blunt, that scene also has 3 celebrities in it to make it more acceptable as a reference: Jamie Lee Curtis, William Baldwin, and Donald Sutherland.

Also, I want to address another scene from the movie ‘Virus’, for the sake of safety. To be blunt, you go to the hospital if a nail or nails are somehow protruding from you. You don’t get someone just to pull it out. I’m not a doctor, but I remember there was an episode I watched from the medical drama ER(1994-2009) where a man had something that looked like a nail stuck on his shoulder. He managed to get to the hospital without removing it, but when he was there, for some reason, he removed it himself, and then he passed out. I’m saying this because Kit Foster portrayed by Jamie Lee Curtis literally just pulled nails out of a man’s shoulder, and I believe that is a bad idea to do. Of course, it’s a movie, but you might get the wrong impression from that movie.

That’s all I have to say about ‘Tinker’. I’m going to look for a music video now.

Its now 1:39 PM EST for me. I just recently found the music video. Unfortunately, it took me so long to find it, I don’t think I’ll finish this list today. I’ll do what I can. I think I found it looking at those recommendations youtube.com offers. Before I offer the music video to you, I’ll have to tell you a quick story to prepare you for it. A man works for a company, and the company wants him to give some sort of viable credibility to a woman doing something in the neighborhood. The man does not know what the company discovered about the woman, and based on the use of the man’s resources, the lady does not have any convenient identifier to work with. So, the 1st thing the man did was create associations to that woman, such as schools in the immediate area, and community activities. And that’s where the music video comes in. The music video is for the song ‘Sweet Lovin’ from British musician Sigala. Here’s a quote for the song and the music video from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ It was released on 4 December 2015 as a digital download in the United Kingdom through Ministry of Sound. ‘

‘ The song reached number 3 in the United Kingdom and number 6 in Ireland. ‘

‘ The official music video was filmed in Los Angeles, California….It features Candice Heiden (of LA Roller Girls Entertainment) rollerskating around the streets and leaving clouds of red smoke in her wake, causing anyone in the path of the smoke to dance to the tropical track’s infectious beat. ‘

Here’s a quote from the lyrics:

As long as you love me Your sweet, sweet loving, loving, loving me
Keep me coming, coming, me
Your sweet, sweet loving, loving, loving me
As long as you love me
Your sweet, sweet loving, loving, loving me
Keep me coming, coming, me
Your sweet, sweet loving, loving, loving me

To watch the music video for free, search for phrase ‘sigala sweet lovin’ in www.youtube.com. It should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 200 million views. The music video was published on Nov. 13, 2015.

So, based on the story I just gave you, there’s nothing special to look at, so to speak, with the lady rollerskating while colored smoke comes out of her rollerskates. If you look at just her, she may seem boring to look at. It’s how the smoke positively affects the people who are exposed to it. The music video gives you a variety of people to look at, to show you how the smoke affects them. They all seem to dance as they are exposed to the smoke. So, if you refurbish that music video, the people dancing represents the man’s discovery of associations he is making with other community events associated with those people, and those associations can relate to that woman who is rollerskating, viable credibility the company can use when evaluating her.

I forgot to mention to not emulate that lady dancing with the dark workout clothes. You might get hurt if you try to copy what’s she’s able to do with her body, the very flexible lady dancer. [10/8/2018: I just found the word that describes what a flexible performer is: a contortionist. You can look up the word ‘contortion’ in www.wikipedia.org. Here’s the 1st definition of ‘contortion’ from www.wikipedia.org:

‘ Contortion (sometimes contortionism) is a performance art in which performers, contortionists, showcase their skills of extreme physical flexibility. ‘

So, if you haven’t seen a contortionist before, don’t just try to stretch like they do. You can get hurt trying. Also, seeing a contortionist in this music video may help you collect yourself better, in case you have never seen an actual contortionist in person, and you may witness a contortionist act in your future. I believe that it’s possible that a contortionist can just show it to you without any warning, whether you are at work or at school, and if you have never seen a contortionist impression before, that could be a little perplexing for you to experience. I’m just trying to say that seeing that contortionist in the music video ‘Sweet Lovin’ could help you avoid some unnecessary confounding. Also, there’s that article for ‘contortion’ in www.wikipedia.org, if you are interested. To reiterate, don’t try it. You could get hurt trying to copy a contortionist.

Before I continue, I want to say that, after I explain to you these ideas, when I explain to you the new idea, you should be more objective, and your newly acquired objectivity will allow these ideas I’m explaining to you to have obvious effectiveness. The obvious effectiveness I want you to have is not there now because I haven’t explained the new idea yet. That I’ll explain last in this list. So, if you noticed that these ideas aren’t so great, that is because the actual idea will be explained last. So, I humbly request that you just bear with me for a while longer. Once you have the new idea, which will be explained last in this list, soon after, you should notice the obvious effectiveness for these ideas. [11/2/2018: I forgot I typed that in, that I’ll explain it last. 11/2/2018:]

Admit:

In my opinion, idea ‘Admit’ is the most effective idea, as compared to the other ideas I’m explaining to you. I’ll start with the best illustration in my opinion that I am aware of for using idea ‘Admit’. That illustration is in movie ‘Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country(1991)’, starring Christopher Plummer as General Chang, William Shatner as Captain Kirk, and Michael Dorn as Colonel Worf. It is how General Chang as prosecutor questions Kirk that makes the illustration for idea ‘Admit’ so effective, refurbished in your favor of course. The movie ‘Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country’, the Director’s Cut’, is available as a streaming rental for about 3 dollars from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 49 minutes and 38 seconds into the movie. Although I’ll type the words of General Chang, I highly recommend that you actually watch that scene in the movie, so that you can sense better it’s effectiveness. It is my belief that the effectiveness for idea ‘Admit’ for that illustration comes more from Christopher Plummer’s experience with theatre than from his portrayal of General Chang. If you choose to glance at Christopher Plummer’s theatre experience shown in www.wikipedia.org, you may agree with me. Here is the quote:

General Chang: ‘On the contrary! Captain Kirk’s views and motives are indeed at the very heart of the matter! This officer’s record shows him to be an insubordinate, unprincipled, career-minded opportunist with a history of violating the chain of command whenever it suited him!

Klingon judge: ‘Continue.’

General Chang: ‘Indeed, the record shows that Captain Kirk once held the rank of admiral and that Admiral Kirk was broken for taking matters into his own hands in defiance of regulations of the law. Do you deny being demoted for these charges? Don’t wait for the translation! Answer me now!’

To be clear, this is the part of General Chang’s questioning that is recommended to be actively used when using idea ‘Admit’:

General Chang: ‘Do you deny being demoted for these charges? Don’t wait for the translation! Answer me now!’

Here’s another example. It’s from the James Bond movie ‘The World Is Not Enough(1999)’, starring Pierce Brosnan as James Bond, and Denise Richards as Dr. Christmas Jones. Amazon.com only offers the streaming movie for purchase, about 14 dollars, so I’m not recommending that you purchase that streaming movie just to see a short illustration. Instead, I’ll just give you the quote. Besides, if you have cable tv, your cable tv service probably offers James Bond movie marathons regularly. The movie ‘The World Is Not Enough’ I think is shown regularly on cable tv. Anyway, the quote is from a conversation between Dr. Christmas Jones and James Bond, who is pretending to be a Russian nuclear scientist. The quote is available from www.imdb.com:

Dr. Christmas Jones: Are You here for a reason, or are you just hoping for a glimmer?

James Bond: [With a bad Russian accent] Mikhail Arkov, Russian atomic energy department,

[Hands her the transport documents]

James Bond: and you are miss?

Dr. Christmas Jones: Doctor Jones. Christmas Jones, and don’t tell me any jokes, I’ve heard them all.

James Bond: I don’t know any doctor jokes.

Dr. Christmas Jones: [after looking at the transport documents] Here, they’re okay, you can take the elevator, your friends are already down there.

James Bond: Do I get some type of protection?

Dr. Christmas Jones: What is down there is just weapons-grade plutonium. It’s completely safe.

[Seeing Bond walking away]

Dr. Christmas Jones: Oh, doctor, aren’t you forgetting something?

[Points to a board with badges on it]

James Bond: Yes, of course.

Dr. Christmas Jones: By the way.

[In Russian]

Dr. Christmas Jones: Your English is very good for a Russian.

James Bond: [In Russian] I studied at Oxford

So, here is the scene from the movie I recommend that you use when using idea ‘Admit’:

‘ James Bond: I don’t know any doctor jokes. ‘

James Bond is pretending to be a scientist. He is not really a scientist. However, he knows that Dr. Christmas Jones is a very intelligent woman, so what he does is use his government training to validate further in his conversation with Christmas Jones that he is, indeed, a scientist, by telling her quote: ‘I don’t know any doctor jokes.’ He’s trying to prove to her that he does not know what she is talking about, since he is not from America, and does not understand why the name Christmas Jones may be interpreted as funny. In other words, James Bond is avoiding responding to a sense of admitting.

So, basically, an instigator may improperly impose an interaction with a contemplation sense of admitting. So, even though you disagree with an induced contemplation sense of admitting, you are still partially evaluating such a sense of admitting. When I finally finish explaining this idea, your newly acquired sense of objectivity should allow you to temporarily sense such an induced sense of admitting, knowing that you will be able to more objectively allocate such a misleading sense of admitting. Here is the best example I can think of now involving a misleading, instigation induced sense of admitting. It involves the use of the riddle, refurbished for advice,  ‘As I was going to St. Ives’, which can be found in www.wikipedia.org:

As I was going to St. Ives,

Upon the road I met seven wives;

Each wife had seven sacks,

Each sack had seven cats,

Each cat had seven kits:

Kits, cats, sacks, and wives,

How many were going to St. Ives?

Here is a quote from www.wikipedia.org as to what the answer is as it is used for this idea:

‘ If the group that the narrator meets is assumed not to be travelling to St. Ives the answer could be one person going to St. Ives: the narrator. This is the most common assumption, as the purpose of the riddle was most likely to trick the listener into making long winded calculations only to be surprised by the simplicity of the answer. ‘

So, to avoid the ‘long winded calculations’, so to speak, that instigators may want you to experience as you try to resolve such a misleading impression of admitting, you instead use the final explanation in this blog, which should allow you to more objectively experience such an impression of admitting, and should allow you to more tenably allocate such an experience of admitting.

When you use these ideas, I am assuming that you are going to shuffle these ideas with other ideas that you have chosen to use. For example, when I use idea ‘Admit’, I combine it with idea ‘Expose’ from Wishlist #1139, as it applies to an illustration in episode 1.2 ‘Forced Perspective’ from tv show ‘Deception(2018)’, starring Jack Cutmore-Scott as magician Cameron Black. I then would contemplationally say idea ‘Expose admit’, to more tenably allocate the misleading sense of admitting.

[It’s 4:41 PM for me, so I’ll stop now and continue explaining this list on Saturday. So, if you are there this coming Saturday, I’ll see you then.

10/13/2018

Salutations.

It is now 11:21 AM EST for me. I looked over 2 hours, and I did not find a music video. Well, I did find one, but I could not remember it’s name. So, if you want to know, it’s the one where a girl is roaming around her house, showing off many bedrooms. If you know what I’m talking about, then there it is, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course. The house may not actually exist. In my opinion, it’s just an impression of a house with many bedrooms that a young girl is giving you a tour to see. Well, since I did not give you a clear enough description of what that music video is, the ‘official’ music video I am offering you is from the song ‘How Far I’ll Go’ from Disney’s 2016 animated feature film Moana. Canadian singer Alessia Cara recorded the song for the Moana soundtrack, and is in the music video. The main reason I am recommending the music video is that Alessia Cara looks like she is creating what looks like ‘crop circles’ on the beach. You can look up what ‘crop circles’ means in www.wikipeda.org. Sure, it’s also a well made Disney music video. Here’s a quote from the lyrics:

See the line where the sky meets the sea? It calls me
And no one knows, how far it goes
If the wind in my sail on the sea stays behind me
One day I’ll know, if I go there’s just no telling how far I’ll go

To watch the music video ‘How Far I’ll Go’ for free, search for phrase ‘alessia cara how far i’ll go’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 209 million views. The music video was published on Nov. 3, 2016, almost 2 years ago. I looked at wikipedia to find out something about the music video, but it doesn’t say much about it.

I made a few new ideas, but I usually interpret such ideas as an indicator to me that this idea, once I finish it, could be very useful to, that the new ideas I invented is a good indicator that you, too, will make ideas from it’s use. So, therefore, I’m not typing those ideas now. However, there is an idea I want to add to this list. It’s an idea that I used originally. I just forgot to add it to this list.

Not compatible:

The idea is called ‘Not compatible’. It doesn’t have the ‘huff and puff’ that the other ideas have. However, I believe it’s still could be a very important idea for you to use. Basically, when you are using your phrases, let’s say you are in the bus, and the ideas you are using on the people you are perceiving while you are in the bus does not work, then I recommend that you try idea ‘Not compatible’. That just means that the results that you are experiencing from looking at the people while you are a bus passenger, for example, are ‘not compatible’ with whatever ideas you are trying to use on them. It’s basically an idea that allows you to continue developing your own ideas. To use it, just contemplationally say the phrase ‘Not compatible’, and the results that you sense that does not work may be construed by you to be ‘not compatible’ with how you are using your ideas.

Cause:

Idea ’cause’ represents the phrase ‘Not causing to happen’, which is a phrase that could represent the bookmark name for this idea, once it’s completed. I created the phrase ‘Not causing to happen’, not is meaning, just the phrasing itself, from episode 2.5 ‘Evander Holyfield’ from reality-tv tv show ‘Hi-Jinks(2006)’. The episode is available for purchase streaming from Amazon.com for about 2 dollars. If you want to purchase the entire season 2, that’s only about 6 dollars. The prank is being hosted by Priscilla Star. I’m just going to quote about the prank done to 6 year old Lucas. To explain the prank, that scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 1 minute and 45 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote in reference to Lucas:

Priscilla Star: ‘No one likes to be blamed for something they didn’t do, especially when it coes to–how should I say–um, bodily sounds. We took this ordinary waiting room and loaded it with hidden cameras. Then we took this ordinary dog and loaded him up with…Not really. But we did hide a fart machine under him. Let’s see if these kids pass the buck when I accuse them of passing the gas.

2 minutes and 14 seconds into the episode:

Juaca(Lucas’s mom): ‘My name is Juaca, and my son Lucas is 6. I don’t think Lucas will ever think about something like this will happen to him. Lucas, you are about to be Hi-jinks’d.’

So, basically, after believing that he heard the dog farting, and Priscilla Star adding to the effect with some sort of comment about it, Lucas may say the phrase:

Lucas: ‘It’s not me.’

I highly recommend that you watch those scenes in the episode with Lucas in order to understand further. After the dog would seemingly fart, Priscilla would make a comment that indicated that Lucas farted, but Lucas would say to Priscilla it’s not him that farted, but rather it’s the dog that farted. It’s my belief that you should watch the scene for further understanding.

So, I don’t expect you to fully understand the use of idea ‘Cause’, not until I finish explaining this list. This explanation is to help you prepare to use idea ‘Cause’. When I started inventing the idea, I started with phrase ‘I did not do it.’, using that scene where Lucas would say ‘It wasn’t me’. I wanted to invent a phrase that would benefit you when you would contemplationally say it. The 1st phrase I started to use was ‘I did not do it.’ The 2nd try tried to address causality itself. I didn’t think of it before, but that ‘Hi-Jinks’ scene has obvious causality examples: Lucas believing that he did not fart, that the dog was farting, Priscilla causing Lucas to entertainingly defend himself, the room they are in loaded with cameras because it was a prank created for a tv show, a prank with Lucas’s mom participating. There are obvious examples of causality in that ‘Hi-Jinks’ episode. For this idea, the 2nd phrase called ‘I did not cause this to happen’, is a clarification that it is not you that caused it to happen, when addressing certain aspects of how you experienced the instigation. I then added a 3rd phrase called ‘I am not causing this to happen.’ I then used a 4th phrase called ‘Not causing to happen’. I think ‘Not causing to happen’ is the best one to use contemplationally, with a casual understanding as to how that phrase works for you.

[I now want to order some food. I should start this again in 2 hours. I’ll see you then.

10/13/2018

Rate:

It is now 2:01 PM EST for me. I invented idea ‘Rate’ from what I said in Wishlist #1141. Here is a quote from Wishlist #1141:

‘ I’m saying this now because H.G. Wells portrayed by Rod Taylor escaped danger with it. If you choose to see that scene again, keep in mind that you are seeing events in an impossibly accelerated rate of time. ‘

Now, here’s a quote from that scene in the movie ‘The Time Machine(1960)’, starring Rod Taylor as H.G. Wells. Because it may be a popular reference for you to use, you could rent it, but if you plan to see it again, I recommend that you buy it’s streaming version for about 9 dollars. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 43 minutes and 42 seconds into the movie. To escape danger, H.G. Wells pushed the time machine lever to forward maximum. He then covered his head and eyes, because the events surrounding him would be shown to him at an ‘impossibly accelerated rate’. He then narrated his progress, until he was able to stop the time machine. Idea ‘Rate’ is designed by intent to help you quantify and allocate impressions of rate imposed by instigations and inadvertencies. When you watch that scene from the movie ‘The Time Machine’, I think the 1st example of ‘rate’ is an unusually fast rate, not the same that H.G. Wells experienced, but if you use that illustration, a rate you experienced that still bothers you that may be unusually fast for you to evaluate and experience. Soon after I typed that phrase:

‘impossibly accelerated rate’

I started imagining certain people where I work in that time machine. Individually, he or she would be like H.G. Wells. Let’s say ‘he’ would push the lever forward, and then cover his eyes. I don’t need for him to narrate it, but I would imagine him use one of his matches to see the terminal, to see how fast he is going, and so on. Just like the movie, I would imagine the spinning of the numbers, and only one number is fixed. He would then shake his hand to put out the fire on his match. So, basically, I am recommending that you do the same. If someone from school or work caused you to experience some sort of minor instigation involving ‘rate’, you can choose to imagine him or her using that time machine, going through the same situation that H.G. Wells did. Keep in mind that it is his 1st time using the time machine. Later in the movie, he went back in time to his original time period. I’m pretty sure, even though it’s just a movie, that the 2nd time around wasn’t as bad as the 1st time. Also, you’re just imagining that person doing it, and according to tv show ‘Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman(1993-1997)’ starring Dean Cain as Clark Kent/Superman, H.G. Wells portrayed by actor Terry Kiser, eventually meets Superman! Also, I’m assuming that H.G. Wells probably was tinkering with history, starting with preventing that calamity that he experienced the 1st time. I’m guessing that time travel is like the tv show ‘Timeless(2016)’, starring Abigail Spencer as Lucy Preston. You remember the timeline that you changed.

Loud:

Bright:

The words ‘Loud’ and ‘Bright’ are the 2 words that I selected to help identify an imposed experience’s ‘intensity’. For example, if you have a smart phone, or for your computer, you regulate for your computer how bright the screen is. If you type things in a word processor, you probably would adjust the screen’s brightness, because you don’t want the screen to be too bright as you type words into your computer. When you are taking a test or are in a library, you keep verbal sounds to a minimum, making sure your conversations aren’t too loud. Here’s an illustration where a monk is in church. A sense of solitude is assumed. However, the main character who is pretending to be a monk, Christopher Chance(Mark Valley), is talking to a monk, asking him questions. I’m guessing that Chance is presenting himself to be a monk who is learning what the routine is for that monastary. That illustration is in episode 1.4 ‘Sanctuary’ from tv show ‘Human Target(2010)’, and that episode is available streaming from Amazon.com Standard Definition for about 2 dollars. According to Amazon Video, that illustration starts 6 minutes and 2 seconds into the episode, Mr. Chance is talking to a monk in a church. Here is the quote:

Mr. Chance: ‘Funny story. I’m headed up here. Friend of mine says he knows a guy here. His name’s John Gray. Any idea how I could find him?’

Monk: (motions to Mr. Chance that he is praying.)

Mr. Chance: ‘Oh. I get it. You’re kind of in the middle of something here. I won’t bother you.’

Monk: (another monk in the churchs says ‘Shh.’)

Mr. Chance: ‘Say, if I wanted to get everybody together here just in one room, how would I do that?’

Monk: (the monk looks at Mr. Chance in a mildly judgemental manner, but of course Mr. Chance is ‘new’ to the monastary).

Before I continue, I sense that, for many kids learning this stuff, there seems to be a question as to how to give purpose to this advice, as they compare their use of ideas with other students. So, to help with that, here is a quote from the movie ‘Two Weeks Notice(2002)’, refurbished for advice, of course, starring Sandra Bullock as Lucy Kelson, and Hugh Grant as George Wade. The movie is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 14 minutes and 17 seconds into the movie, Miss Kelson is talking to George Wade. Here is the quote:

George Wade: ‘…what I really need is a new chief counsel. Okay, if you take the job, I promise to save your Community Center, on top of which, you can direct all our pro bono efforts. That’s millions of dollars at your charitable disposal.’

Miss Kelson: ‘But…you couldn’t possibly want me. I’ve spent my entire life working against people like you.’

George Wade: ‘Well, maybe if you work for me, you’ll win occasionally.’

If you watched the movie, when Miss Kelson is George Wade’s lawyer, George Wade is dependant upon Miss Kelson’s advice. Now, I’m not a businessman, but when young people, especially teenagers, get a job, it’s the teenagers that are supposed to be dependant upon the rules and guidance of their jobs. So, when you get older and get jobs, you also will probably participate in a context that requires you to learn and follow the rules of the job that you will choose to work in. And every job will have different rules. So, maybe you’re focusing on just one set of rules, as you evaluate other people following a different set of rules. Of course, if you are going to be like Miss Kelson in the movie ‘Two Weeks Notice’, people in the company will rely on your guidance, your presentation of rules. My point is that, when you are comparing your use of ideas with other people’s use of ideas, those other people may not be following the same sense of rules that you are following.

Before I begin explaining the main idea, I have decided to explain it in 3 parts. The 1st part I’ll call ‘Focus’, the 2nd part for now will just be called ‘2nd part’, and the 3rd part will finally have the name ‘Not causing to happen’.

Focus:

Idea ‘Focus’ is based on the music video I recommended in the beginning of this Wishlist. The music video is called ‘Picture This’ sung and performed by Annie LeBlanc. According to the selection in www.youtube.com, 3 minutes and 10 seconds into the music video, the music video shows you that most of what was shown in the music video was Annie LeBlanc having a daydream. Here’s a definition of ‘daydreaming’ from www.wikipedia.org:

‘  Daydreaming is a short-term detachment from one’s immediate surroundings, during which a person’s contact with reality is blurred and partially substituted by a visionary fantasy, especially one of happy, pleasant thoughts, hopes or ambitions, imagined as coming to pass, and experienced while awake. ‘

Annie LeBlanc, near the end of the music video, was in a diner, and her friend was trying to help Annie ‘snap out of it’. So, I’ll give you a story to go with that. When you’re in school, such as grammar school and high school, you are in situations that require you to obligate your attention to school related routines, such as paying attention to your teacher’s lectures, taking tests, along those lines. If you daydream too much during such routines, those daydreams could inhibit the amount of basic focus that you need in order to participate with those school related routines. Of course, in the music video, Annie LeBlanc is not in school, but in a diner with her friends. Still, as her friend indicated to her, Annie’s use of daydreaming is inhibiting her use of focus to be with her friends in the diner. So, you can use the music video ‘Picture This’ as an indicator to help you decide what contemplations should be given more priority to get more active use of focus. You may reasonably conceptualize Annie LeBlanc with her ‘Sprite’ shirt on to help remind you where the focus should go. I know the music video has been out for only about 4 months, but I am a little surprised that I haven’t seen anyone with a ‘Sprite’ shirt on, like the one Annie LeBlanc has on. I guess I’m just affected by how much I like that music video ‘Picture This’. In other words, if someone just watched the music video for the 1st time, for some unexplained reason, that person may also expect at least a few people to wear a ‘Sprite’ shirt.

[I have to step outside for a few minutes. I’ll be back.

2nd part:

[10/13/2018: Private contemplations not the same as obvious appearance:

The ‘2nd part’ uses 3 illustrations. The 1st illustration is in episode 1.2 ‘Treasure of the Mind’ from tv show ‘SeaQuest 2032(1993)’. Since the episode is not available streaming in Amazon.com, I’m using the one available from youtube. To see that episode, search for phrase ‘seaquest treasure of the mind’ in www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 14 thousand views. According to that selection, it has a view time of 43 minutes and 31 seconds. Here is a quote from www.imdb.com about the episode:

‘ The UEO orders Bridger to mediate the dispute and sends a team of ESP parapsychologists to help the negotiations. ‘

The scene starts, according to that selection, 9 minutes and 23 seconds into the episode. Lucas Wolenczak(Jonathan Brandis) is using an exercise machine while the ESP parapsychologists are walking through the gym. I’m guessing that, based on the conduct of some of the Seaquest staff, that many of them have prepared their thoughts. That is what I think Lucas did when the ESP parapsychologists walked through the gym. I’m guessing that he created some sort of elaborate idea to protect his thoughts. However, one of the parapsychologists, Savannah Rossovich(Lindsay Frost), said something to him. What she said to him specifically, refurbished for advice, is not important. What is important is the fact? that Lucas forgot why he was on the exercise machine to begin with: I imagined that he allowed himself to be on the exercise machine to remind himself that, based on physical appearance, that he is not doing anything wrong. This idea is similar to the idea ‘Private thoughts not introduced’ from Wishlist #1123. Maybe it is the same. I’ll call this illustration ‘Private contemplations not the same as obvious appearance’. I believe that Lucas allowed himself to exercise on the treadmill to remind himself that his obvious interactions were not the same as his private contemplations. However, when Miss Rossovich said something to Lucas, Lucas placed more credibility on his private contemplations, and completely forgot that he did nothing wrong with his obvious interactions, more specifically, why he was on the treadmill to begin with. Now, I’m not saying that the fact that you did nothing wrong as indicated by how you look when you experienced the instigation is enough to not be bothered by instigation. If that was the case, I probably would not have started this blog in the first place. I am saying that you should take into consideration more that you have done nothing wrong, easily indicated by how you look as you experienced the instigation, instead of letting yourself put too much credence on how your private contemplations were affected by the experienced instigation. I recommend that you use that scene when he was affected by what Miss Rossovich said to Lucas. That scene started 9 minutes and 35 seconds into the episode. Refurbish it’s purpose, then use it as a reference to remind yourself that your private contemplations are not the same as your physical appearance.

[Since it’s 6:36 PM for me, I’m stopping now. I’ll very likely finish at least the actual words part of this list next Saturday. Hopefully, I’ll also finish proofreading it, but since there’s already over 10 thousand words, it may take me over 2 hours to read it over and correct the grammar that I can recognize, as well as make more additions to it. So, if you are going to be here next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

10/20/2018

Salutations.

It is now 11:11 AM EST for me. Since it is possible that kids and teenagers are reading this blog, as well as adults, a few minutes ago, I have chosen song ‘My Story’ by 16 year old Loren Gray. Here’s a quote from www.wikipedia.org:

Loren Gray (born April 19, 2002) is an American YouTube personality, muser, actress, singer, and dancer. She was a 2016, 2017, and 2018 Teen Choice Award nominee. In 2018, she collaborated with HRVY on a music video.  On August 10, 2018, she released her first single, “My Story.”

Here is a quote from www.famousbirthdays.com about Loren Gray:

‘ She has been featured by Teen Vogue and Seventeen Magazine. In 2016, she received award nominations at the People’s Choice Awards, the Teen Choice Awards, and the VMAs. She has more than 13 million followers on Instagram and more than 3.3 million subscribers on YouTube. She has also been known on social media as Loren Beech. ‘

And here is a quote from her song ‘My Story’:

I never listened to what they told me
I’ll only do it again, yeah, do it again
Gotta mess up to write my story
So I’ll do it again, yeah, do it again

To watch music video ‘My Story’ for free, search for phrase ‘loren gray my story’ from www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 5.6 million views. The music video was published on Aug 13, 2018, about 2 months ago.

When I search for music videos to recommend, almost all of them are presented by adult singers. And since I am also trying to help kids and teenagers with their instigation problems, or at least help them be more informed about such possible problems, it makes more sense to offer them more of a selection of music videos that are also presented by singers who are also kids and teenagers. I try to offer a variety of music videos to watch.

Keep in mind that I have been trying to offer advice to many different kinds of schools of thought for a while now. I guess you can call me an eclectic. I dabble. When I make an effort to try certain ideas, one example is like taking your tv remote control and just moving it. Comparing my actions to others is not the only thing that I do. I’m saying this because I recommended a music video from Loren Gray. In my opinion, people who have fortified resourcefulness tend to be the ones that are available. Loren Gray, according to the internet and my opinion, has such a fortified resourcefulness. Of course, there are other personalities in America. This reminds me of something I read from the book ‘The Eugenics Wars, Vol. 2: The Rise and Fall of Khan Noonien Singh’, when Khan tried to recruit a group of people who were also intellectually enhanced. He recruited many of them already, using the list he acquired from Gary Seven. However, the people he was trying to recruit were already established leaders in the world. I’m not requiring you to read that book, and I believe that all people have many virtues, including virtues I am not able to recognize. Having intelligence like the tv show ‘MacGyver(2016)’ illustrates is just one possible virtue. I’m just saying, so to speak, that the music video is rare, even though you may not like comparing yourself to her.

The 2nd illustration is from the movie ‘Nancy Drew(2007)’, starring Emma Roberts as Nancy Drew, Josh Flitter as Corky Veinshtein, and Daniella Monet as Inga Veinshtein. This is the scene where Corky and his older sister Inga prank(a trick of an amusing, playful, and sometimes malicious nature) Nancy Drew during a basketball game. According to the movie, no one else knows about the prank except Corky, his sister Inga, and I think Inga’s friend Trish(Kelly Vitz). You can rent the streaming movie from Amazon.com for about 3 dollars, but since in my opinion, it’s a reference you may want to see again, if you choose to, you can instead buy the movie for about 10 dollars. If you buy it, you can repeatedly see that prank again and again without paying the rental fee, since you now own that streaming movie. Of course, you can always buy the Blu-ray(if it has one) or DVD, but if you give advice using tv shows and movies as a reference, if you buy it, you can also reference other scenes in the movie without needing to rent it again. Only renting it is great, too. According to Amazon.com, I rented the streaming movie ‘Nancy Drew’ 3 times before finally deciding to buy it on 10/13/2018. So, if you are unsure whether or not to buy it, I recommend that you just rent it. After all, from my end, I’m giving you the advice for free, and being able to rent streaming movies is a convenient, very useful service to use.

Anyway, according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 25 minutes and 57 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Inga: ‘Does anyone know CPR? Does anyone know CPR?’

Nancy: ‘I do. I know CPR. Excuse me.’ (Nancy walks down the platform) ‘Don’t worry, everything’s gonna be okay.’ (While Nancy looks like she is performing CPR, Corky spits out the supposed food that caused him to choke.)

Corky: (Before Nancy starts to give Corky what I think is mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, Corky starts laughing.)

Inga: ‘Oh, you idiot! You were supposed to kiss her, lip lock–that was the plan!’

(Most of the people in the auditorium were laughing, realizing that it was a prank.)

In my opinion, as a reference used in your favor, that scene is incredibly convenient for you to use. Of course, that scene includes Nancy Drew walking away from that situation, as some of the people are still laughing about it. Nancy chooses not to go back and see the rest of the basketball game.

The use of the 2nd illustration is to show you that Nancy Drew did nothing wrong. Her actions were sincere. However, since it was a prank, the laughing crowd still caused Nancy to leave the basketball game, somewhat confused and ashamed at what she had done. However, since she is incredibly intelligent, I speculate that she will logically clarify to herself that she did nothing wrong, even though it was a prank. The effectiveness of this 2nd illustration is to show you how experienced instigation may cause you to doubt yourself, even though you did nothing wrong. Notice that, since that scene is supposed to have high school students as spectators, many of them were laughing ‘at’ Nancy Drew, not ‘with’ Nancy Drew. The purpose of such laughter, being laughed ‘at’, is to cause the person being laughed at to respond in a context that he/she had just experienced a prank, and it worked. Nancy left the basketball game feeling somewhat confused and guilty, showing the other teenagers that their laughter was being reciprocated.

The 3rd illustration is from an episode of ‘Elementary(2012+)’ starring Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock Holmes, and Lucy Liu as Dr. Joan Watson. I believe I watched all of the episodes of ‘Elementary’, and that in general, the main characters always accuse someone who is innocent of committing the crime, giving those people the option to prove to them that they were somewhere else during the time of the crime. You can just choose a random episode, and there should be someone in that episode who is accused of the crime, but that person is able to usually prove to them that he/she was somewhere else during the crime. So, when you experience a minor instigation, you may imagine that, let’s say you can show your teacher or boss proof of where you were during that experienced instigation. If the instigation happened while you were in school or at work, the proof could be just people in general that go to that school or are employees for that job. You can then imagine giving that list to someone with authority. It’s something that happens in almost all of the episodes of ‘Elementary’, which is why I believe such a strategy may be useful to you.

If I were to choose which episode specifically to recommend for you to watch, and I thought about this ‘on and off’ for weeks, the episode would be episode 6.14 ‘Through the Fog’ from tv show ‘Elementary(2018)’. The episode is relatively new. It aired Aug 6, 2018. When you would use the other episodes of ‘Elementary’, I would recommend that you refurbish those episodes. When the person provides proof, the proof is for a crime that is not so extreme, and does not need specific details. That allows you to use those other examples from other episodes for this advice. When you use the ‘Through the Fog’ scene, you don’t have to refurbish it so much, since the crime was stealing computers. That’s bad too, but they were able to recover their computers. No harm, no foul, so to speak. The episode is available for purchase streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 34 minutes and 41 seconds into the episode, Dr. Bridget Tanaka(Suzy Nakamura) and the rest of the HAZMAT team are trying to explain to Captain Gregson(Aidan Quinn) that they did not steal the computers. Here is the quote:

Dr. Tanaka: ‘What you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. How could anyone from our agency b responsible for an attack that happened 30 minutes before we showed up?’

Captain Gregson: ‘Somebody walked out of here with all our servers. They were wearing a CDC suit, and they were carrying a CDC I.D. card.

I know the moment is short, but notice the composures of the HAZMAT team when Captain Gregson said quote:

‘and they were carrying a CDC I.D. card.’

So, even though the HAZMAT team individually knew that they were innocent, they still adversely reacted to Captain Gregson’s accusations. They didn’t do anything wrong, like threaten someone violently. However, their contemplations were so bothered by Captain Gregson’s accusations that you can also tell by the way that they look when Captain Gregson said ‘and they were carrying a CDC I.D. card.’.

So, those are your 3 illustrations: 1)Lucas Wolenczak forgetting that his obvious appearance is innocent, because the ideas he created in his mind did not create preferred results, 2)Nancy Drew still feeling confused and miserable, even though she did nothing wrong when trying to perform CPR on Corky, and 3)The HAZMAT team still adversely reacting to Captain Gregson’s accusations, even though they all know that they are innocent.

Before I begin the actual idea, I want to recommend that you do not use a standard conceptualization for it. You can conceptualize when using it, of course, but to use the idea, and it doesn’t have an actual conceptualization yet to go with it. To start, here’s a scene from the movie ‘Thor: The Dark World(2013)’, starring Natalie Portman as Jane Foster, and Kat Dennings as Darcy Lewis. The movie is available as a streaming rental for about 3 dollars from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 14 minutes and 14 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Darcy: ‘So, I show up to work at the lab/you mom’s house, fully expecting you to be moping around in your pajamas, eating ice cream and obsessing about…’

Jane: (clears throat)

Darcy: ‘You know who. But you’re not. You’re wearing lady clothes. You even showered, didn’t you? You smell good.’

Jane: ‘Is there a point to all this? Because there really needs to be a point to all this.’

And now, the story: A woman is in a relationship with a man, and she has all sorts of ideas that she wants the man to be a part of. However, many of these ideas are not reasonably practical to give the man she is in a relationship with an understanding for, and the other ideas the man will get the ‘wrong idea’ in it’s interpretation. So, she convinced the man to learn certain things without having an understanding for it. For example, in the movie ‘Thor: The Dark World’, Jane said quote:

‘Is there a point to all this? Because there really needs to be a point to all this.’

‘In my opinion, a lot of what people do requires some sort of reason to do it. For example, ‘Why am I attending school?’, ‘Where am I driving to?’, ‘Why do I want to attend a certain college?(if you want to go to college)’. So, the man chose to learn certain things brought to the attention by the woman he is in a relationship. However, even though he is learning certain things without needing an understanding as to why he is learning such things, he still adds certain things to it, certain courtesies, as he is learning them.

So, if you choose to learn the idea I am about to explain to you, at least initially, choose to learn it without it having an official conceptualization for it. For example, when I learn certain things, certain conceptualizations may just ‘blurt out’ in association with those things. However, those conceptualizations may not even be relevant to those things I am trying to learn. So, what I would do is choose not to use them. In your situation, you may get conceptualizations that just ‘blurt out’ when learning certain things. For this idea, those conceptualizations that you may also think about may not be as relevant. What I am saying is that you can choose to use whatever conceptualizations that you believe is useful in a reasonable context. Just keep in mind that the idea that is to be explained does not yet have an ‘official’ conceptualization to go with it. That way, you may be like that man. He still uses courteous expectations as he is learning something that does not need to have a specific purpose.

So, here is the idea: I invented it around 2 weeks ago. To explain how this idea works, I’ll give you a situation for it: Suppose an instigator talks to you, and the instigator causes you to respond to the instigator’s response. Let’s say you give a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’ answer, but there was other information in that conversation that was a lie when it’s given a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’ response. So, basically, you said ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to something, but a few seconds later, you realized that your answer also addressed something else in that conversation that you did not choose to address. Of course, you did not intend to address such a thing, but by giving a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’ to that conversation with that instigator, it does seem that you have addressed such a thing. The best illustration I can think of right now are certain ‘Married with Children’ episodes starring Christina Applegate as Kelly Bundy, and David Faustino as Bud Bundy. If memory serves, Kelly and her brother Bud would have a short conversation, and then a few seconds later after the conversation is over, Kelly would say to herself ‘Hey?…Hey!’. I don’t remember specifically what those conversations are, but I think Bud would cause Kelly to acknowledge something, but soon afterwards, she would realize that is not what she wanted to agree or disagree to.

The solution is based on idea ‘Not add’ from Wishlist #1141. Basically, you just create and commit to a sense of intent that does not add certain contemplations, certain expectations, certain evaluations, certain notions to it. Here’s a conversation of a man who was able to contemplationally take it out. The scene is from movie ‘Major League 3’ starring Scott Bakula as Gus Cantrell, and Walton Goggins as Billy ‘Downtown’ Anderson. The movie is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour, 10 minutes, and 7 seconds into the movie, and is refurbished with inaproprieities removed for this advice. It’s a conversation between Gus and Billy. Here is the quote:

Billy: ‘Man, you can say ‘I told you so’ if you want.’

Gus: ‘Ain’t no point in that.’

Billy: ‘Look, about all those things I said to you, I’m sorry.’

Gus: ‘Well…it’s water over the bridge, or under the dam, or wherever the heck the water goes. Sit down.’

There’s also another scene from the movie ‘Dirty Rotten Scoundrels(1988)’, starring Steve Martin as Freddy Benson, Michael Caine as Lawrence Jamieson, and Glenne Headly as Janet Colgate. The movie is available streaming without additional payment to watch if you have Amazon Prime from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video ,that scene starts near the end of the movie, 1 hour 45 minutes, and 18 seconds into the movie. Here is the premise: Janet conned Freddy and Lawrence, but came back with people all 3 of them can take advantage of financially. It’s probably not as bad as you think it may be. Anyway, since Freddy and Lawrence did not expect Janet to come back with such a project, they were both speechless. Eventually, Lawrence decided to join Janet’s plan, and talked to the others using an Australian accent. Freddy Benson wasn’t able to say anything at all. The point of using that scene from the movie ‘Dirty Rotten Scoundrels’, is to illustrate refurbished a man, Lawrence Jamieson, who was able to ‘not add’ a certain previous indiscretion created by Janet Colgate. That allowed Lawrence to participate in the con that Janet just introduced to him. Of course, the scene is refurbished with inaproprieities removed to be used for this advice.

So, you got a scene from the movie ‘Major League 3’, and a scene from the movie ‘Dirty Rotten Scoundrels’ to help give you an idea as to how to ‘not add’ certain things to a chosen sense of intent.

The 3rd illustration is from a quote from www.wikipedia.org about the movie ‘Surviving Christmas(2004)’, starring Ben Affleck as Drew Latham. Here is the quote:

‘ He tracks down Missy’s therapist, Dr. Freeman, at the airport, hoping to squeeze in a therapy session. ‘

Concern:

I don’t think you need to, but the movie is available as a streaming rental from Amazon.com. In that scene, Drew confronted Dr. Freeman, who was on his way with his family to enjoy his Christmas vacation. The point is that we make appointments with certain people that we need to see, such as doctors. Doctors get to treat you in a preferred context that allows them to treat you. They are able to control how they evaluate you. That is what this ‘Not add’ idea is going to help you do, to manage better how you evaluate certain experiences. So, with the help of all of these ideas I have offered you in this list, you’re going to create one sense of intent that you don’t have to always use. Let’s say it’s name is ‘Concern’. Choose moments in your school or job that has the use of reasonable concern, but you’re not actively confronting anything, not in the context that involves what you believe to be excessive, such as excessive instigation, and those moments will be your chosen sense of intent. Anything that exceeds the expectations of those moments will not be added to it.

The 2nd thing is how you use that chosen sense of intent. I believe that one obvious mistake that people tend to make when they make ideas like this to more tenably evaluate instigation is that they only use it when they experience such an instigation. I recommend that your invented intent idea called ‘Concern’ should be considered to be used many times, especially when you are not at work or school. That allows you to practice how such an actively used sense of intent should feel to you. Also, such a sense of intent should also be used as a supplement, not a replacement, to other actively used senses of intent. You mix that sense of intent with other uses of intent.

Here’s an example using idea ‘Concern’: Let’s say an instigator is trying to establish an identity of a contemplation using an adverse sense of intensity. You don’t have to keep up with that adverse sense of intensity in order to evaluate such an idea. Start with that sense of intent you have chosen. Perhaps such a contemplation can be made without using such an adverse sense of identity of intensity. Perhaps you just need more time to make such an evaluation. For example, you may not have to find the answer very quickly, like you’re a game show. And perhaps it is not even relevant to address such a contemplation. It’s just something the instigator wants you to think about in order to wind you up. That’s what idea ‘Concern’ help you do. It helps you maintain a reasonable sense of intent.

Going back to the ‘Peggy Bundy’ problem, when you use your chosen sense of intent, when you are at home, for example, your sense of intent in advance no longer agrees to address such a logic trick. So, you are doing it even before you are confronted with another problem from the instigator.

Addressing the ‘Concern’ idea, when you are taking a test, you have concern, but your focus is used to take the test. When you are at a party, you have concern, but you are at the part to have fun. So, what the instigator may be doing to you is cause you to excessively address certain notions, notions that you may not be obligated to address, but if you don’t contemplationally address such notions, then the instigator may have somehow caused you to believe that you lack adequate concern for such notions. Let’s put that possible instigation to the test: imagine bringing those notions up to your teachers at school or someone with authority at work. Will that person agree with the instigator, that just because you don’t contemplationally address such notions, that you don’t have acceptable concern? I believe that there are issues out there that people don’t tell you about because such issues may hurt you to think about, and yet, as you are doing nothing wrong while at school or at work, an instigator causes you to believe that you lack acceptable concern, even though you didn’t even agree to address such notions. People have concern. Kids have concern. Adults have concern. That is something that you should keep. But just because you are not able to answer a question that was improperly imposed upon you to begin with, that doesn’t mean that you don’t have concern. If you bring such notions to your teacher or someone with authority in your job, what will that person say? I’m curious. If you are a student, has an instigator ever instigated you while you were taking a test, knowing that everyone taking that test needs his/her focus to take that test? You see, if you bring such notions to another adult with authority, the experience probably won’t be as bad as it is now. And to be clear, I am just recommending that you imagine that you are doing that. I am not discouraging you from actually doing that. But if you just imagine that, I believe that certain minor instigation problems that you have may not be as bad to think it is.

[I have invented other ideas to go with this ‘Not add’ idea, but they’re designed to be explained in a separate list, not here. So, what I’ll do is continue explaining this ‘Not add’ idea next Saturday, or even this coming Friday, and hopefully I’ll finish this idea by next Saturday. There’s already over 14 thousand words in this list. However, I believe I can add more to it. I want you to be able to sense it’s use in your mind before I give you the new ideas in the next lists. The purpose of the new ideas is to use your ‘Not add’ idea, and improve it’s effectiveness in a noticeable way. So, if you are there this coming Friday or next Saturday, I’ll see you then.

10/27/2018

Greetings.

It is now 2:04 PM EST for me. I spent too much of my free time buying something from Amazon.com, and then after I bought it, I looked for the music video, and I couldn’t find one. So, what I’ll do is use the ‘spare tire’ tv show intro again, from the tv series ‘Beastmaster(1999-2002)’, starring Daniel Goddard as Dar. To watch that intro, search for phrase ‘beastmaster intro’ from www.youtube.com, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered, with over 12 thousand views. It is the one that is published by MFM791. I did consider a few that I found, but I dismissed them for a variety? of reasons. I think that one of the reasons why you may continue watching the ‘beastmaster intro’, even though I’ve offered it to you several times before already, is because there are a lot of people in America that have pets. Even when I’m in the bus, I see people walking either their own pets, usually dogs, or someone else’s pets. And of course, there are probably a lot of kids, for example if they have dogs, they would have to walk their dogs regularly. So, in my opinion, the ‘beastmaster intro’ should be useful for a very long time as a possible, feasible option.

I want to stop adding more ideas in this specific list, so whatever I type in today, that’s it. I’m going to try to close this list today, and hopefully by next week, I’ll start adding the upgrades that I have invented for it. My plan now is to try to offer you a reason to use this idea, and then offer you something to conceptualize this idea with, like a starter kit. You’ll do what you want with it, but at least you may have something to work with.

So, here’s the ‘reason’ idea: This involves the use of ‘The Phonetic System’, from Wishlist #1104. With those 100 noun based words, I recommend that you turn them into memory locations using a 10×10 grid. For an image of a 10×10 grid, go to search engine www.google.com, and search for phrase ’10×10 grid’, and google should display a lot of 10×10 grids to look at. Look at the ones that specifically say that they’re 10×10 grids as illustration examples. So, here’s how the explanation goes: I’ll use water as an example. Each box in the grid, and you don’t have to actually imagine all of it, contains a reasonable example of how you use water. So, you have 100 separate examples of using water. To start you off, you drink water. You use water for taking a shower. If you own a car, you may take your car to a car wash service. I noticed a few times someone from the fire department turn on a fire hydrant to allow kids to play using the water from that fire hydrant during the summer. And in all of your chosen examples, and you don’t have to imagine it, you should have no problems thinking about them individually.

Now, with certain mild to moderate forms of instigation that you may have experienced in the past, an instigator may cause you to lose some of that objectivity. Even though, for example, you try to honor a certain sense of chosen focus, a certain instigation that you experienced in the past may discourage you from achieving that focus. One movie example is how you may imagine the waitresses in the movie ‘As Good as It Gets’ had trouble achieving a certain chosen sense of focus after experiencing something Mr. Udall(Jack Nicholson) showed them several times. So, let’s start with that: Let’s say that your chosen sense of focus is in one of those memory locations, and an imagined experienced instigation from Mr. Udall is in another. Your chosen sense of focus should objectively exist in your mind, so if you choose to, you can imagine still being bothered by the instigations Mr. Udall exposed you to in the past. So, that’s what you’re working on. You want a preferred sense of focus to at least exist in one memory location, and the instigation should be separate from that sense of focus.

Present:

I would rather not give you this idea now, since it’s a new idea, but I want you to have a reason now, instead of just hoping that you will develop one. This idea I invented I think a few weeks ago, and it’s called ‘Present’. It’s based on how people present information to you, let’s say during a discussion. One illustration example, and you don’t have to rent the movie, is from the www.wikipedia.org description of movie ‘Last Action Hero(1993)’ starring Arnold Schwarzenegger as Jack Slater, and Frank McRae as Lieutenant Dekker. Here is a quote:

• Frank McRae as Lieutenant Dekker, Slater’s immediate supervisor, who is always screaming at him

Foods for building muscle mass: Some foods are very high in Trans fat and can cause the risks of obesity, heart attack, depression, low blood viagra prescription for woman pressure, poor memory, anxiety disorder etc. All these herbs have been blended in right combination to Lawax capsule one of tadalafil 100mg the best natural ways to restore lost desire, are Semal Musli, Musli Sya, Safed Musli and Safed Musli. Sildenafil Citrate available in the drug is exercised all over the viagra cost in canada globe to erase ED in men. The full-color illustrations on picture boards and calling cards are included within the game, in handy strings bridge-size, but large online viagra canada enough to dream of the drawing’s details.
If you watched the movie ‘Last Action Hero’, Mr. Dekker, not towards the end of the movie, but I think throughout most of it, Mr. Dekker does seem to be very angry at Jack Slater, and he does seem like he is shouting at him for something. Now, if you use the ‘Present’ idea on that situation, Jack Slater is experiencing a loud conversation from Mr. Dekker. He is not making such a conversation, he is experiencing it. Loud, interjecting words are being presented to him, but he is not making them himself. The difference is everything. So, when you think back to at least many of the mild to moderate instigations you have experienced in the past, you may make the discovery that such instigations were presented to you. You did not create them yourself. That distinction should allow you to separate yourself more from the experienced instigation.

Not agree to address:

I tried to explain ‘Not agree to address’ several times in past lists. You can always type in ‘not agree to address’ in the ‘Search…’ option in the front page of the blog to find those examples. Idea ‘Present’ is a new idea, but ‘Not agree to address’ is one of the main ideas that should allow this idea to work. When you choose your sense of intent and you choose not to address certain things, just because you are not addressing something doesn’t mean you have to resolve it. You don’t have to agree with it, you don’t have to disagree with it. You just choose to not address it. For example, you may consider using idea ‘Not agree to address’ like a focus example. When you are taking a test in school, in order to maintain a useful sense of focus, you choose to not address many things. If you go to church, and I’m just guessing, there’s probably a specific use of focus that you choose to commit to while you are attending church.

So, here’s the conceptualization part: I’m using an illustration from the tv show ‘RightThisMinute’. Here’s a quote about the show from it’s web site, www.rightthisminute.com, in the ‘About’ category at the bottom of it’s web page:

‘ RightThisMinute is the viral videos show – now seen in over 90% of the U.S. on America’s best TV stations.

Every day, our team of e-journalists scour the internet to find you the videos everyone will be talking about.  Our hosts then share the best videos on TV, online and on mobile. ‘

It’s a show that’s less than 30 minutes. I copy the show for my cable tv box, and I mostly fast forward through it, unless I see something like the pranks that the show does on people. The pranks are like the ‘Hi-Jinks’ episodes, except the pranks are done to adults. I remember one scene where a man was just mildly yet awkwardly touching people, and the people’s reactions were being filmed. There was another scene where an attractive woman was asking college male students to carry her to another destination on campus, since she was tired. Several college male students carried her on their backs. This one in particular I think was one of the 1st ones that I watched, that caused me to record the show. To watch it, go to www.google.com, and search for phrase ‘rightthisminute magician makes beer disappear’. One of the 1st selections should be ‘Viral Magician’s Baffling Beer Trick’, and it should be a link that leads you into one of rightthisminute’s videos. Click that link, and here’s a quote from that link about the video:

‘ The typical phrase “now you see it, now you don’t” is much like how this trick in Santiago, Chile happened. A beer wizard by the name of Jordin takes a cup of lager and pours its entire contents into a paper bag, revealing a completely full cup inside. Things don’t begin to get weird until he turns a newspaper into a funnel where the beer magically disappears, leaving no trace. ‘

The great thing about this video is that it’s explained to those that choose to watch it by the rightthisminute team. In one scene, Jordin wraps a newspaper, and makes it look like a cone. So, refurbish that, and just imagine the inside of a cone to be a conceptualized representation of this idea. You can imagine light coming out of that cone. The cone can look like an ice cream cone. Since I encourage you to be skeptical, this is regarding the light that you may imagine coming out of the cone. I’m quoting an article from ‘The Newswheel’ concerning headlights being too bright:

‘ Does it feel like vehicle headlights are getting brighter and brighter these days? Maybe you’re driving home from work late in the evening, and it feels like every car going in the opposite direction is blinding you with their brights on. Or maybe you drive a newer car model, and you’ve noticed that others flash their brights at you even when you don’t have yours on.

Whether you’re blinding others or being blinded, it’s not just in your head.

According to a survey of 2,061 motorists completed by RAC, an automotive company based out of the United Kingdom, 65% of drivers say that they are “regularly dazzled” by headlights on the road, specifically newer models. ‘

Here’s a quote from www.wikipedia.org from article ‘Headlamp’ for ‘High beam’:

‘ High beam (main beam, driving beam, full beam) headlamps provide a bright, centre-weighted distribution of light with no particular control of light directed towards other road users’ eyes. As such, they are only suitable for use when alone on the road, as the glare they produce will dazzle other drivers. ‘

So, addressing the kids, the possiblility of you being exposed to bright light that may take you a little while to recover from may occur. Here’s another quote from ‘The Newswheel’ article:

“Of those who claimed to regularly get dazzled by oncoming dipped headlights, the majority felt it takes up to five seconds before they can see clearly again,” reported the RAC. “One in 10 (10%), however, say it takes from as long as 10 seconds before their vision is back to normal. Only 16% said it takes less than a second to recover.”

So, if you just imagine the light from those cones bothering you a little, I recommend that you just keep in mind that, when you learn how to drive, there may be a possibility that the high beams that you may be exposed to occasionally? by other cars may also bother you. I just want you to be more reasonably informed as you use your skepticism. Of course, be skeptical.

[10/27/2018: I think I thought about this less than 2 hours ago. Don’t practice exposing your eyes to bright light. Your eyes may get damaged if you do that. Even I don’t know this for certain, I believe that car manufacturers do take into consideration how high beams affect people who are exposed to them when they are more vulnerable to such light intensity. For the kids, you are not even obligated to prepare to learn how to drive. In fact, if you live where public transportation is very fortified available, you may not even choose to buy a car because you don’t need one. Well, the main point is that I’m not encouraging you to practice exposing your eyes to bright light, for your own safety and well being.

Since I am here again, I want to recommend a scene in episode 4.10 ‘Forest of the Dead’ from sci-fi tv show ‘Doctor Who(2008)’. In that scene, Donna Noble(Catherine Tate) is having a conversation with Miss Evangelista(Talulah Riley) while they are stored as information in a computer. If you have Amazon Prime, the episode is available from Amazon.com to be watched at no additional cost. According to Amazon Video, that scene is located 22 minutes and 50 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Miss Evangelista: ‘Your physical self is stored in the library as an energy signature. It can be actualised again whenever you or the library requires.’

Donna Noble: ‘The Library? If my face ends up on one of those statues…’

Miss Evangelista: ‘You remember those statues?’

Donna Noble: ‘Wait. No. Just hang on. So…This isn’t the real me. This isn’t my body. I’ve been dieting!’

To be clear, the emphasis is when Donna Noble said quote:

‘ I’ve been dieting! ‘

Donna Noble had been trying to lose weight by reducing how much she eats, and she just realised that she didn’t have to. My point is that, there may be a certain idea I will recommend to you soon that may cause you to look at how you are doing things, and you may complain about such things for a short moment to yourself. I think it was within a month ago that one of the ideas that I invented caused me to complain to myself for less than a minute. I addressed an issue like this in the past, but it may occur again. I just want you to know in advance. 10/27/2018]

[I really don’t want to proofread this idea now, since I didn’t get anything to eat yet. I plan to go to a diner today and get something to eat. So, what I’ll do is plan to proofread and close this list this coming Friday, and Next Saturday, I’ll give you a new idea. So, if you are there, I’ll see you then.

11/2/2018

Greetings. It is now 7:26 PM EST for me. I am about to proofread this entire list, and hopefully I’ll close this list today, and start a new one tomorrow. While I’m doing this, if you want something more to do, I saw a commercial on tv I thought you might want to watch. It’s one of those celebrity Anna Kendrick advertising for the Hilton hotels. You can watch it by searching for phrase ‘hilton anna kendrick commercial’ in www.google.com, and from there, www.ispot.tv is offering the commercial. Here is the link:

https://www.ispot.tv/ad/dzom/hilton-com-acting-featuring-anna-kendrick

And here’s the description of the commercial from www.ispot.tv:

‘ In a dressing room, Anna Kendrick is asked if you really get the best hotel prices on travel sites. Anna tells the woman that with Hilton.com, the hotel will give you a price match guarantee. She acts as both an employee for Hilton that is enthusiastic about helping customers save money and a nonchalant travel site employee that couldn’t care less. The woman is impressed with Anna’s performances but it’s just another day for Anna. ‘

I’m recommending ispot because it’s the best copy of the commercial I am aware of. I think you may like the effect of Anna entering the wardrobe and changing her clothes several times very quickly.

[11/2/2018: Since it is 9:51 PM EST for me, I am no longer proofreading this list. I think I finished more than 65% of it. I’m going to leave the rest of it without proofreading it. It’s just too much, in my opinion. Tomorrow, I’ll make a new list. 11/2/2018:]

PG-13 language and viewer discretion for movie ‘Click’. TV-PG language and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Married with Children’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Captain America: Civil War’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’. TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Doctor Who(2005+)’. Rated R violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘The Heist’. Rated R violence, language, and viewer discretion for movie ‘Virus’. Rated PG violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘The World Is Not Enough’. TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Deception’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘The Time Machine’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Human Target’. PG-13 language and viewer discretion for movie ‘Two Weeks Notice’. TV-PG violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘SeaQuest 2032’. PG violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Nancy Drew’. TV-14 violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Elementary’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Thor: The Dark World’. PG-13 brief language and viewer discretion for movie ‘Major League 3’. PG language and viewer discretion for movie ‘Dirty Rotten Scoundrels’. PG-13 language and viewer discretion for movie ‘Surviving Christmas’. PG-13 language, violence, and viewer discretion for movie ‘As Good as It Gets’. PG-13 violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Last Action Hero’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Now’, ‘Who’, ‘Know’, ‘5000’, ‘Lead’, ‘Tinker’, ‘Admit’, ‘Not compatible’, ‘Cause’, ‘Rate’, [6/8/2019: ‘Intensity’], ‘Loud’, ‘Bright’, ‘Focus’, ‘Concern’, ‘Present’, and ‘Not agree to address’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.