8/5/15
The beginnings of bookmark use:
Before I begin, the only motivation I can think of right now that I will use to start explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ is episode 9.1 ‘The Magician’s Apprentice’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2015)’. According to web site www.wikipedia.com, the episode is scheduled to be broadcasted on September 19th of this year. What I am trying to say is that I look forward to the new season of tv series ‘Doctor Who’. I don’t know what ‘The Magician’s Apprentice’ is about. I just want to see new ‘Doctor Who’ episodes. Now, in my opinion, to use only a ‘Doctor Who’ episode as motivation is disappointing, considering what I believe is actually out there. Of course, there are other tv shows and movies that may be made available to me, such as the fact that I have a DVD/Blu-ray mail rental service and cable tv service available to me, but because of the standards I give this advice, the only thing I can think of right now worth mentioning is the next new ‘Doctor Who’ episode. I mention this to you because I am using those new ‘Doctor Who’ episodes as motivation to type in this idea. I am not recommending the use of those new ‘Doctor Who’ episodes specifically for this advice. If I do in the near future, I will specifically say so.
Since I also wanted a song to go with the beginning of my explanation of ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’, I just spent the last 10 or so minutes looking for one. Since keeping up with the latest music trends is not my expertise, the only song and music video I can think of right now is ’22’ by Taylor Swift. A few minutes ago, I just purchased the song from Amazon, and I think I only paid a dollar and 29 cents for it. According to an article about the song ’22’ in web site wikipedia.com, the song is identified as ‘a fun anthem for sleepover parties’. Since I also watched it’s music video, it is my belief that it’s music video is also a fun anthem for sleepover parties. Although I am not sure, the music video ’22’ is probably available at youtube.com, and if you have cable tv service, your cable tv service may be able to provide music video’22’ for free with your service. Although according to wikipedia.com, the song was released in March 12, 2013, it’s still the best song I can think of to help me type this idea in. So, basically, I recommend that, if you choose to, just for motivation, that you listen to song ’22’ and/or watch it’s music video either before or during the beginnings of explanation ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ I just recommend listening to that song in the beginning of this explanation. You don’t have to listen to it throughout the entire explanation. And, of course, you don’t have to listen to it at all if you don’t want to. It’s just a recommendation.
OK, here it is: I’ll start with one of the discoveries I’ve made concerning the contemplational resolving of instigation. I think I’ve made this discovery over a year ago. Since I don’t have volunteers working for me to make bookmarks, I’ll only use my own experiences as a reference. Over a year ago, I made the discovery that certain instigations, when you try to resolve them in your mind, try to maintain a certain resisting identity. To represent that resisting to resolve identity, I use the conceptualization of wrestling, in a mild, reasonable context to be imagined, of course, one of the wrestlers is the instigator, the other wrestler is not necessarily you, but is encouraged to be you.(For an example of wrestling, I recommend movie ‘Vision Quest(1985)’ starring Matthew Modine as Louden Swain). Here is an example of how the wrestling conceptualization is used: Let’s say you are trying to resolve a mildly experienced instigation that you have experienced in your mind, and in this situation, you are trying to reason with the instigator. However, the problem with this situation is that the instigator seems to only want to reason with you while you are wrestling with the instigator! One obvious problem with trying to reason with such an identity is that, for certain instigations, even if you managed to create some sort of progress involving some sort of wrestling with the instigator, that progress may not be enough compared to the expectations of resolving that you are trying to achieve. Another problem that may not be so obvious to you is that, since the identity of the instigation is trying to ‘wrestle’ you, even for someone who is persistent to try to find a solution, many people without a technique will simply not even try to resolve such an instigation for many expectations, one obvious reason is because the wrestling instigation, based on the innocent person’s assumptions, will wear down their efforts to try to resolve it.
Before I continue explaining this ‘wrestling’ phenomena, I would like to say that one obvious usefulness from this idea for you is the results of your choice to upgrade this idea. If you have read the ideas I have typed in Amazon, then you may have already experienced that one of the benefits of reading these ideas is that you can easily upgrade them for your use. When I offer you this explanation, even though it is the best explanation within reason I can give you, it’s obvious benefit that I simply cannot give to you, but that you may develop on your own, so to speak, is your ability to upgrade the idea from time to time. Basically, over time, if you choose to, your intent will probably develop this idea, offering? you a more developed use of this idea to you. The reason I am mentioning this to you now is that many of you may compare the obvious words of this advice to concepts that you have already developed and made useful to you. If you do that, such a comparison may make these words look unacceptable to you. However, if you decide to develop these ideas, in time, these ideas may become more acceptable for you to use. Here is an example of how at first advice given was not acceptable, and yet because of it’s presented sincerity, and the capabilities of the person trying to use the advice, the advice in a short amount of time was made useful. The example is in episode 3.13 ‘Deja Q’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’, episode watchable from Amazon Instant Video, and starting at 16 minutes and 14 seconds according to Amazon Instant Video, Data(Brent Spiner) asks Q(John de Lancie) the question quote-‘Can you recommend a way to counter the effect?’, and Q responds-‘Simple. Change the gravitational constant of the universe.'(You can also find the quote at web site imdb.com). At first, both Geordi and Data said to Q that the Enterprise and it’s crew lack the resourcefulness to change the gravitational constant of the universe. However, Geordi later invents an idea with the help of Q’s recommendation.
Going back to the wrestling situation, here is the solution I invented: Since the problem was that the instigator encourages you to resolve the instigation using a resisting identity, the solution I invented was to simply place the instigator in a different, more conducive environment of contemplation resolving. Even though this idea is probably over a year old, I think I invented 2 possible situations for the instigation to be evaluated upon in just one day, the same day. The 1st situation was invented from what I remember watching movie ‘Lean on Me(1989)’, starring Morgan Freeman as Principal Joe Clark. Just 10 or so minutes ago, I tried to look for the scene to introduce to you from Amazon Instant Video, but I could not find it. Instead, I offer you the scene that is available, according to Amazon Instant Video. It starts 41 minutes and 7 seconds into the movie, when Principal Clark suspends Mr. Darnell(Michael Beach). Soon after Clark suspended Mr. Darnell, Mr. Darnell in a fit of anger, flips Mr. Darnell’s desk. Although this helps explain the scene, this is not the scene I am referring to. According to memory, the scene is when Mr. Darnell comes back to Principal Clark’s office. You see him sitting down, and the scene implies that, after a conversation between the two, Mr. Darnell would be able to get his job back. Basically, you see Mr. Darnell sitting down, getting ready to talk to Principal Clark. And so, what I did to give a more conducive situation contemplationally is imagine the instigator sitting down and/or already sitting down to talk to Principal Clark. Here’s a question for the advice: ‘Why would that ‘Lean on Me’ scene work?’: Well, at least they’ll stop wrestling you! In imagination, the instigator/s you imagine sitting by Principal Clark’s desk are more likely to be in a conducive situation to help you resolve your experienced instigation. Now, when I used this ‘Lean on Me’ solution I invented, I thought that was the end of it, that I have found a solution for certain wrestling situations, and that’s that. However, the ‘Lean on Me’ solution for me lasted for only about 6 months.
[So, after the ‘Lean on Me’ idea no longer worked, I tried the 2nd idea. I invented the idea from an episode of ‘Nash Bridges’. The episode is called ‘Ripcord(1997)’, episode 3.6(‘Nash Bridges’ is available on DVD, but you can also rent the DVD from a DVD rental service that offers it, or maybe you can find the episode on youtube.com). In the episode, Joe Dominguez(Cheech Marin) participates in an airline experiment.
[It looks like that time again. I plan to continue explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ next week.
8/12/2015
As of now, I looked over an hour trying to find something that would motivate me to continue explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ to you, and since I did not find anything based on my original expectations, I have decided to use a new idea I plan to explain to you in a month or two, to allow me to use something that is currently available. The idea is based on contemplation effort managing. Using that idea, I have chosen for motivation, and this decision is based on what I have read in web site www.wikipedia.com, I have chosen movie ‘Star Trek Beyond’. According to wikipedia, the movie is scheduled to be released July 8, 2016. To me, it has an unappealing sense of contemplation effort identity associated to it for the purposes of it being used by me as motivation. To illustrate the experience, it is like episode 6.2 ‘A Slice of Life’ from series ‘The Facts of Life(1984)'(The episode is available from Amazon.com on DVD, or you may find the episode in web site youtube.com). From what I remember from the episode, when Jo(Nancy McKeon) started to sell more pizza but with less quality, even though members from a fraternity noticed the quality of the pizza not taste as good as the original orders they made from Jo, they still continued to eat the pizza. Refurbished for my motivation, of course, I choose to use the next Star Trek movie, even though how I sense it’s contemplation effort identity is not as acceptable for motivation as I would want it to be. [4:58 PM EST: I just returned from getting something to eat. Also, I want to say that the ‘contemplation effort’ idea I used for the ‘Star Trek’ motivation was just invented in the past week. I believe that such an idea may be very useful to you. However, I believe you should get a few more ideas first before I explain that one.
So, from where I left off last week, since the ‘Lean on Me’ idea no longer worked for me after 6 months, I started using the 2nd idea I invented. I used the Nash Bridges ‘Ripcord’ episode, the scene where Joe Dominguez was participating in an airline experiment. With the help of that scene, I imagined the concept of people for the purposes of vacation and recreation participating in an airline simulation. Basically, it’s a real airplane that people go into, but the airplane doesn’t fly. What happens is that the people who run the airplane set you up to stay there for a certain period of time, let’s say 6 hours, 12 hours, and longer, as if you are actually in an airplane flying to a certain destination. When I originally imagined it, the appeal to participate in such a thing was that the experience gives you all? of the pleasantries of flying in a commercial airplane, but without any of the worries. If you think about it, many people rely on airplane travel as part of their business routine. Maybe after a certain amount of years traveling in an airplane, some of them have developed some sort of appreciation for airplane travel. However, such an appreciation is inhibited by whatever they think are the discomforts of airplane travel. And so, to experience a certain appreciation without the discomfort, they may find that just being in an airplane that just gives them the simulation of flying may actually be an experience that they would want.
Well, anyway, what I think I did first was fill those airplane simulations up with instigators. They would all be there for recreational purposes, enjoying an airplane simulation. I would imagine them sitting in an airplane, and place them in some sort of negotiation situation. Of course, they don’t believe they are negotiating anything, since they are there to relax, for example. So, what I would do is just negotiate and discuss with them anyway, even though they are not in a negotiating situation. In other words, I would just imagine discussing with them anyway, even though they don’t hear me, and they don’t see me. The change in ambiance is relaxing enough to give the evaluation some progress.
Soon after that idea, I would just imagine a few of them just seemingly be there all of the sudden. For example, let’s say a businessman while he is at a business meeting all of a sudden finds himself in that airplane. He is startled, of course, but then he realizes he is not that far from where he lives or works, and that calms him down. Keep in mind that I am just imagining that happen. Of course, if you choose to use this idea, the airplane is always close to where the people live or work, and they could always leave and go back to what they were doing, so to speak.
That ‘putting people in the airplane’ idea didn’t last long either, and so what I did afterwards is what I believe to be the moment when I made an obvious improvement to how I use ad libbing. I call the moment ‘Reverse polarity’. I got the name from episode 3.17 ‘That Which Survives’ from series ‘Star Trek(1969)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference begins 42 minutes and 16 seconds into the episode, when Spock(Leonard Nimoy) said to Scott(James Doohan) quote-‘Mr. Scott, reverse polarity on your magnetic probe.’ Of course, the reference is refurbished with inapproprieieties removed for advice. You look for the moment when Scott physically changes the polarity on his magnetic probe. Keep in mind that, at this point, I used the ‘Lean on Me’ idea and it lasted for 6 months and no longer works the way I want it to, and now the ‘put people in the airplane’ idea has also lost it’s effectiveness. And so, at this point, I decided to try something different. I imagined 2 instigators, 1 instigator to my left holding my arm, and one instigator to my right holding my right arm, forcing me to go into one of those airplanes. However, even though they have forced me to be in one of those airplanes, in the context of the idea, that is where I wanted to be! Basically, I have reversed the polarity of certain instigations to be in my favor, instigations that, for the purposes of explanation, would not occur at all in reality, simply because such instigations benefit the innocent person unusually well, in the context for the innocent person to learn and build his/her ideas for instigation. When I imagined 2 of those men forcing me to be in that airplane, that was my 1st obvious example of ‘ad libbing’ imagined instigations that have an obvious ‘reverse polarity’ identity in order to build more ideas.
[It’s about that time again for me. I plan to continue explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ next week.
8/19/2015:
A day or so after typing in the 8/12/2015 revision, I imagined that I may have typed in something that some kids may have found disappointing and unacceptable according to their schools of thought. Here is the copy of the paragraph in question:
“Soon after that idea, I would just imagine a few of them just seemingly being there all of the sudden. For example, let’s say a businessman while he is at a business meeting all of a sudden finds himself in that airplane. He is startled, of course, but then he realizes he is not that far from where he lives or works, and that calms him down. Keep in mind that I am just imagining that happen. Of course, if you choose to use this idea, the airplane is always close to where the people live or work, and they could always leave and go back to what they were doing, so to speak.”
I am not trying to change the ‘schools of thought’ for those kids that believe that such an excerpt is unacceptable. I am just offering an explanation for it. You see, this line of reasonong I am offering to you was used over a year ago, maybe even over a year and a half ago. That means this idea was invented before the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks that are offered in this blog. That means that, if you used the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation’ bookmarks, you may have an expectation of me that was not met when you read that part about people ‘being there all of a sudden’. There is one example that I have found that may be used as a reference as to how you may have felt when you reaffirmed to yourself that people ‘being there all of a sudden’ was not acceptable to you. The example is in episode 5.19 ‘One More Day’s Light’ from series ‘Andromeda(2005)'(You can rent the episode from a DVD rental service that offers it, or you can buy the series from Amazon, if you choose to). The conversation is between Captain Hunt(Kevin Sorbo) and Trance Gemini(Laura Bertram) talking about the evacuation of Seefra planets, and here is the quote:
Trance: ‘Dylan, Seefra-5 is inhabited by Sectarians who refuse to accept or face the inevitable.
Captain Hunt: ‘Yes, that’s correct.’
Trance: ‘But the reality is that if innocents die, then this whole evacuation seems almost futile.’
Captain Hunt: ‘Come on. You don’t believe that.’
To reasonably sense the effectiveness of this reference, I recommend that you actually watch that scene from sci-fi series ‘Andromeda’. The quote alone is not enough. Anyway, if you watched that scene in the Andromeda episode, both responses from Captain Hunt and Trance, refurbished, of course, may represent the kids that find that ‘being there all of a sudden’ reference unacceptable. For example, Captain Hunt is started that Trance would say something like that, and Trance presents a resilience of belief that allows me to imagine the resilience of belief of the kids that find that ‘being there all of a sudden’ reference as unacceptable. I highly recommend that, if you want to understand more of what I am trying to explain, you watch that scene in the ‘Andromeda’ episode. Of course, that ‘Andromeda’ reference is refurbshed for advice.
Anyway, what I was trying to say before is that you are probably judging what I typed in based on the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks that I have typed in this blog, and what I am trying to say to you is that this idea was invented ‘before’ I invented the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks. That is why you may not have sensed the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks from that ‘being there all of a sudden’ statement. Of course, you still find that ‘being there all of a sudden’ meaning unacceptable. Therefore, I offer you another option: Based on my assumption that you are evaluating the actual words that I type in, I am now also presenting a second version of this advice, but with the ‘being there all of a sudden’ paragraph removed. Instead of typing this whole thing all over again without that paragraph, I am just saying that the second version is offered with this 1st version. So, for those kids who find that ‘being there all of a sudden’ version unacceptable, maybe you can use the 2nd version instead, the version that I now offer you that does not have that ‘being there all of a sudden’ paragraph in it.
The reason I have now made available that 2nd version is because I believe that this ‘beginnings of bookmark use’ idea can be very useful to you, and that I don’t want minor misunderstandings to inhibit your ability to learn this idea, if you choose to.
[And now, I am at the part of this advice giving again to talk about what motivation I am using to help me continue with the explanation of this idea. The bad news is that I am not able to think of any DVD, Blu-Ray, or cable tv show that I can use for motivation. In it’s context, of course, I am very disappointed in that. Therefore, just a few minutes ago, I decided to use a different type of motivation. This is a motivation that I have discovered recently that I believe is being inhibited and disparaged by certain instigations. For example, I believe that many mild to moderate instigations fundamentally try to change an innocent person’s ability to judge instigators. One result of changing an innocent person’s ability to judge instigators is causing that innocent person to avoid and reject more people who do not meet certain expectations. Now, of course, the avoiding and rejecting is intentionally ambiguously stated. To make it more specific, let’s say that if you don’t meet a certain expectation for many job qualifications, the innocent person who is affected by such an instigation would avoid and reject people more for not meeting certain job qualifications. Of course, there are many job qualifications that have to be met, so I request that you bear with me for a little longer to see the point I am making. Now, here is when such instigations may adversely affect your sense of motivation: Suppose a person has the ability to create a job opportunity, and if you participate in such a job opportunity, there will be no problems with your salary or other basic resources. However, there is one problem you may identify: The person that can create such an opportunity, and that will also actively participate in such an opportunity, does not meet certain basic qualifications for the job he/she can create. Now, the job opportunities I am talking about is not like being a doctor or a lawyer, where the qualifications are absolutely needed. I’m talking about a person who can create a job opportunity, and the only obstacle that may prevent you from participating is that you believe that such a person who may create such a job opportunity simply does not meet certain basic requirements to have such a job. There are no problems with salary or resources with such a job.
So, therefore, because of certain instigations that you may have experienced, your sense of motivation is not used or is adversely inhibited because you believe that the person who is creating such an opportunity is not worthy to do so. There is the obvious example of knowing the person that you do not want to participate with. One reference is from movie ‘The Second Best Exotic Marigold Hotel(2015)’, refurbished for advice, of course, when Sonny Kapoor(Dev Patel) refuses to be partners with his formerly best friend Kushal(Shazad Latif). That is not the example I am trying to explain. If you choose to use this motivation example, than the example I am trying to explain is that, because you experienced instigations that caused you to avoid and reject people more, that instigation caused you to not see people who do not meet certain qualifications in an excessive context! For example, let’s say I show you the covers of 100 books, and all of these people do not meet certain qualifications, but the projects they could create will have no financial or resource problems. Because of certain instigations you experienced, you completely rejected all 100 books! You didn’t even bother opening those books! My advice to you is not to just go out there and work for such people. My advice is that certain instigations may have caused you to not use or to have an inhibited sense of motivation when such people are made known to you.
Here’s an example of me using this motivation example for this advice. Before using this advice, I was unable to find any DVD’s, Blu-rays, or cable tv shows to use as motivation. Now that I am using this new motivation advice, even though it’s just imagined, I am able to imagine now that there are other opportunities of motivation from DVD’s, Blu-rays, and cable tv shows However, those opportunities are associated with people that may not meet a preferred sense of qualification, but there are no problems with their project finances and resources. And so, now, in just imagination, I can now consider those other options. Of course, in reality, I still don’t have any DVD’s, Blu-rays, or cable tv shows to use as direct motivation. Instead, I have a new perspective of motivation, that probably will only last for today. Next week, I’ll have to find some other thing for motivation.
[Now, the power of ‘Reverse polarity.’ is the improvement of your technique, not results specifically. This idea is not something you should depend upon simply to help you have a solution. This is an idea that is used to improve how you make ideas that help you experience unavoidable instigation. To illustrate, here is the best example I can think of, refurbished for advice, of course, of the use of the definition of ‘ad libbing’ that I introduced to you earlier. The example is in episode 1.11 ‘A Great Personality’ from series ‘Cupid(1999)’. Since the tv series as far as I can tell is not available on DVD or Blu-ray yet, you can find it on youtube.com. Just type in ‘cupid a great personality’, and web site youtube.com should offer it to you. The reference starts 30 minutes and 1 second into the episode, according to the youtube video. In the illustration, Yvonne(Christine Taylor) is talking to Ken(Grant Heslov) while ice skating, and while they are ice skating, both Yvonne and Ken are ad libbing/imagining what certain people at the ice skating area are saying and doing. Here are the quotes:
(Yvonne identifies a father using his cell phone while ice skating with his young daughter)
Yvonne: ‘So, what do you make of that?(Yvonne points at the father ice skating with his young daughter, and then just imagines something about them). ‘Divorced dad spending quality time with his daughter. What could possibly be important enough to warrant the cell phone?’
As a response, Ken imitates the father, and says that the father is demanding a Barney tape for his daughter.
Another example of ad libbing in the episode follows. The point is that, even though the ad libbing is used for just entertainment purposes, both Yvonne and Ken made the ad libbing useful to them. Now, when you use ad libbing to help you build your own ideas, it is like the 2 examples in the ‘Cupid’ episode shown in youtube. You just imagine other people while you are in a safe context doing something that is useful to you. Keep in mind that, in the ‘Cupid’ episode, they are just imagining these evaluations. If Yvonne and Ken told that man with his young daughter what they said about him, that man could be offended! However, if you watch the ‘Cupid’ episode, you can see that both Yvonne and Ken are just imagining what that man ice skating with his young daughter are doing. What they both imagined is not used as a statement of fact. It is just used for entertainment.
Now, this is how I recommend you use ‘Reverse polarity.’ Basically, you maintain some sort of periodic sense of ad lib blame from other people. The purpose is that the periodic use of imagining other people blaming you for something, the intensity and type of blame is, of course, reasonable and of your choosing, is used for circulation. Based on my experience, if you periodically just imagine certain blames to come upon you, what will happen is that you will create epiphany-like ideas of your own! Based on my experience, these epiphany-like ideas will seem to just come to you. Soon after that, you will have more of an active contemplation choice as to what those ideas will be. Now, this is where that ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements.’ idea comes in that I typed in earlier. If you decide to use this idea, you will be imagining a lot of blame coming upon you from other people. To help prepare you for that, I have given you the ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements.’ idea to help you experience those blames.
Here is an example of how I use the periodically imagined blames from other people. When I use the publicly available buses for transportation, I look out the bus window and just openly imagine that the people that I perceive are instigating me for something. Sometimes, it’s for a specific instigation. Of course, I don’t always imagine that they are instigating me for something. And, of course, when I use this idea, I don’t present myself in a context that is intentionally encouraging others to instigate me. All I am doing is ad libbing/imagining it, like the way Yvonne and Ken did in the ‘Cupid’ episode. Also, when I am at work, I sometimes imagine that all of the people where I work are blaming me for a specific something, or they are all instigating me using a specific instigation. Of course, the context of that blame and/or instigation is reasonable, and benefits me! Now, since I have using this idea maybe for over a year and a half now, I have developed unique particulars of this idea. I believe that, over time, you too will develop unique particulars using this idea. Also, you may be able to incorporate ad libbing with other ideas that I will introduce you to.
If you choose to use such an ad libbing technique, over time, you may realize for yourself that the instigations that you imagine others impose upon you, but in your benefit, should be significant enough proof that it is unlikely to impossible that the mild to moderate instigations that you may experience would ever impose such instigations upon you. The reason why, in an oversimplified way, is that certain instigations that you have imagined would just benefit you too much if an instigator would impose such instigations upon you. Also, you are using the instigations that you may choose to imagine to build ideas for yourself. I don’t realistically see instigations conveniently made available to you in such a context that they would help you build specific ideas for yourself. For example, I don’t see instigations imposed upon you in the same context as the lab equipment was made available to you in the school you attend or attended.
[I think I’ll stop now and continue next week. Next week, I plan to begin the explanation of the concept of ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ to you.
8/26/2015:
Before I begin explaining ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’, I was thinking it over the past week about giving you a few specific examples for ‘Reverse polarity.’ The problem, so to speak, is that many of you have recently read and used bookmark ‘Articulation not the same as impression of interjection of grievance.’, a bookmark I offered you in this blog a few weeks ago. The problem is that, using the definition from web site www.wikipedia.com, the ‘Articulation not the same.’ bookmark is a ‘sleeper hit’. According to wikipedia, ‘sleeper hit’ is a term used in the entertainment industry for a film that plays successfully for a long period and becomes a big success, despite having relatively little promotion or lacking a successful opening. The point is that I realized after the fact that the epiphany effect for bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’, based on my experience, comes back in different forms. For example, even though it’s been a few weeks already, I imagined a boy saying outloud so that his sister can hear the words ‘Articulation not the same.’ His sister said ‘Why did you say that?(Both sister and brother have read the idea)’, and the boy said smiling, ‘I don’t know.'(I also know that it’s none of my business to know that, even though I just imagined it. I am not trying to re-purpose the kid’s conversation to each other). Anyway, because it is likely that both kids and adults that have chosen to use the ‘Articulation..’ idea are both still experiencing some sort of epiphany from it, that means you may compare the results of your ‘Articulation’ experience with the examples I give you for bookmark ‘Reverse polarity.’, and that means that the epiphany results for the ‘Reverse polarity.’ examples won’t last as long as they would if you did not learn the ‘Articulation not the same.’ idea first.
Well, anyway, here are the examples for ‘Reverse polarity.’: The 1st example’s reference is the 1st example that I can remember for using ‘Reverse polarity.’, and it’s an example I’m still using now and then. The example is from a digital comic book from web site www.comixology.com called Batman/Superman(2013) #1: Annual. Even though the comic book is only about 5 dollars, you don’t have to buy it. The comic book provides a free preview, and the preview has the reference I am referring to. To find it, just go to www.comixology.com, type in ‘batman superman’ in the ‘search’ engine, click the ‘Batman/Superman(2013)’ series, and the digital comic book is located between issue #8 and #9 of the series. When you click the Annual, you go to another internet page that has the words ‘See what’s inside’ underneath the picture cover of the comic book. Click that, and you see 4 images vertically lined up. The reference is the 3rd image going down. Click the 3rd image, and Batman and Superman are talking about a prisoner in the Phantom Zone. The reference is basically from the last image from that page, when Batman says to Superman quote-‘No. I’m just surprised you can’t, Clark.’, and Superman says-‘Hmp.’, which I believe is an indication that Superman is experiencing a variety of emotions, all those emotions related to Superman being insulted and offended by what Batman had said, but in it’s non-violent context, of course. If the reference is no longer there for free, the digital comic book only costs about 5 dollars. Of course, with inapproprieities removed and in relation to advice, you can read the rest of that page to understand what they are talking about. However, that quote is what will be used in the ‘Reverse polarity.’ example I am giving you.
And so, here is how I recommend you use the ‘Batman/Superman #1: Annual’ quote: One possible recommendation is to go to a public restaurant that allows you to see a lot of public transportation traffic. For example, I eat at a place that has both bus and train transportation traffic. The restaurant has a window that lets you see people go back and forth somewhat. Of course, you have bought something from that restaurant that allows you to sit there. As you see the people walk back and forth, reasonably imagine/ad lib that they are all individually Batman, from older kids to adults, and they are individually saying the words from the comic book quote-‘I’m just surprised you can’t, Clark.’, and then you, just reasonably imagining that you are Superman, just like the comic book, would think the words quote-‘Hmp.’, which means that you are reasonably offended by what Batman said to you. Now, the question I present as part of the advice is ‘How is this useful?’ When you imagine this, you do so in a context that benefits you. For example, imagine the scenario that it is unlikely that an instigator would instigate you in such a manner, because the instigation would benefit you too much. In other words, why would an instigator present himself/herself as Batman to you, and say the words ‘I’m just surprised you can’t, Clark.’ as an instigation? Of course, again, when you consider such a possibility, you also use instigations that you can reasonably consider. I still use this idea now, but I’d like to also believe that I am not using it like I did the 1st few months of using it.
I also recommend using the ‘Batman/Superman’ idea when you are sitting in a public bus. For example, when I am sitting in a public bus, I have the option of imagining all of the people in the bus, except the bus driver, being Batman from that comic book, and saying the words ‘I’m just surprised you can’t, Clark.’, and then I would imagine being genuinely reasonably offended by what they said to me. Of course, the words are meant to empower me instead. I also look at the people outside of the bus. Usually, they’re standing or walking on the sidewalks that the bus passes by. I would imagine them being Batman saying those words, and then I would imagine being insulted and offended by Batman again. Well, anyway, that’s what I used to do quite a bit in the beginning. Notice that, in both the restaurant and bus examples, I was sitting down when I was imagining it. Of course, you just use this recommendation in a safe, reasonable context. Also, when you are doing this, you’re not supposed to show others that you are doing it. After all, you are only imagining it. Well, of course, you you are imagining being upset or offended, you’re face may respond a little to that anger. However, I believe that, with a little practice, you should be able to present a facial expression that can both respond to your imagined anger, and be normal for others to see.
I have changed my mind, and have decided to just give you the ‘Batman/Superman’ example. Later, as I introduce new bookmarks to you, I also plan to give you examples of ‘Reverse polarity.’ for certain future bookmarks.
Sildigra ,a generic version of levitra from canada .Sildigra 50mg is used for treatment of patients suffering from erectile dysfunction. Kamagra, an excellent treatment for erectile dysfunction is a serious health issue which can ruin cialis 40 mg your sexual life. http://amerikabulteni.com/2012/01/22/ve-46nci-super-bowl-finali-ezeli-rekabete-sahne-olacak-boston-new-york/ cialis generic usa To eradicate stress and treat sexual troubles, millions of individuals are moving to yoga. This medicine has to be taken amalgamated with well maintained calorie managed diet which is found rich in fruits & vegetables. viagra sample overnight
Shuffling bookmarks:
I shall begin this advice with the motivation I have prepared already a few days ago. I already used the motivation for this idea, but I will explain it now, in case you may find it useful. Before I continue explaining this idea, the motivation part of this idea that I believe may be useful to you is in the premise that, even though you may have seen something on TV or watched it in a movie, that doesn’t necessarily mean that you will use it. It is my belief that many of the adults may discover that they have heard of seen something like this idea before, but the question is not whether you have heard or seen it before. The question is:-‘Are you using such an idea?’ Now, this postulate may sound like you can just add it to any other idea, so to speak, but the reason I am typing this is because I believe that many people, even though they have heard or seen such an idea before, are not really using the idea in regards to certain experienced mild to moderate instigations. And so, to help you use this idea, if you choose to, I am trying to bring it to your attention.
The idea begins from a scene in the sci-fi series ‘Lexx(1997)’. I think it was a deleted scene shown from it’s DVD collection. The scene involves Stanley Tweedle(Brian Downey) talking to the sentient ship called ‘Lexx’. They were just recently attacked by robot arms, and some of those robot arms managed to get into the Lexx. However, soon after the attack, the robot arms disappeared, and Mr. Tweedle asked Lexx ‘Where did they go?’, and the Lexx said, according to my memory, quote-‘They were resorbed.’ The Lexx absorbed the robot arms. Anyway, the point is that I refurbished the ‘Lexx’ reference, and it allowed me to imagine that so many different schools of thought coexist in America, and if you look at the buildings that people coexist in, such as private schools and buildings tourists often visit, the insides of those buildings used for this example is surprisingly clean.
The ‘Lexx’ reference leads to episode ‘Doctor Who: Last Christmas(2014)’. It was during the 3rd time I was watching just the beginning of that episode, when Clara Oswald(Jenna Coleman) was trying to accept that the person she was talking to was Santa Claus. It was at the beginning of the episode. That’s the moment when I imagined how people would create certain conceptualized goals in their minds, but when they use such goals with certain agendas that they have chosen to participate in, those conceptualized goals would disappear. And so, during the beginning of that ‘Doctor Who’ episode, I imagined the remote control I was using to be thrown/added to certain test imagined goals(basically, I would just throw the remote control on something nearby), and sure enough, the remote control disappeared, in imagination of course. After that, I postulated that one of the main reasons that many women in America have memorabilias(mementos; souvenirs) is so that they can keep the identities of certain conceptualized goals, since they believe that such goals tend to get changed, or even disappear, when they are mixed with other agendas.
And so, what is the point to the Lexx/Doctor Who example? less than 10 years ago, I watched the preview, not the movie, of the movie ‘Bratz(2007)’, and in the preview, 4 best friends for a moment were fighting each other as they were participating in a separate social category. Soon after the fight, they realized what had happened, and chose not to do it again. My point is that I believe many people are experiencing some sort of mild disappointment when their conceptualized goals are not manifesting in the participations that they choose to have, and life goes on. In other words, I don’t think they get that ‘Bratz’ epiphany, like those girls experienced in that movie. What I call a ‘solution’ that I have invented is not a solution, but instead it is what I think is more of a reasonable way to manage the purpose of your conceptualized goals, is to just remember what your conceptualized goals are, knowing that you may not recognize those goals in the agendas you choose to participate in. Here’s an example that might show how that may benefit you. I imagined, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, that I visited Michael(Tom Wisdom) from series ‘Dominion(2014)’ in his alternate reality, but recently, in the year 2015, not during the events of that TV show. During our conversation, Michael is talking about the disappointments that mankind has shown him from their businesses and corporations. In response, I pointed out to Michael how many of the women have memorabilias that manifest their true intent, even though such an intent is changed and even removed when mixed in with their chosen agendas(Of course, it is implied that the example from the women can be extrapolated for the men). And then I said to Michael quote-‘People are not clones of you.’, since Michael believes himself to be an archangel, and believes to be using an archangel mentality. Also, if you watched the tv show ‘Dominion’, with the inapproprieities removed, of course, you may easily notice that the only conversations that Michael seem to have with Alex Lannen(Christopher Egen) are candid(frank; outspoken; open and sincere; straightforward) ones.
The point of the ‘Dominion’ reference is to show you that being able to manage better what your conceptualized goals are, even as they disappear on you in your chosen participations, can be useful to you.
[Well, it looks like I have underestimated how much time I have available for this list. I think it’s because of the ‘Batman/Superman’ example I chose to type in. Anyway, I plan to start explaining ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ next week.
9/2/2015:
Pinch justify:
I know I said that I planned to start explaining ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ now, but I just invented a bookmark yesterday called ‘Pinch justify.’, and I believe I can give you an explanation of the idea that you may find useful. If you liked bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’ that I explained in a previous list in this blog, then you may also find useful bookmark ‘Pinch justify.’ One difference between the 2 bookmarks is that ‘Pinch justify.’ is more direct, more specific, than bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’ In fact, I anticipate that, if you choose to use bookmark ‘Pinch justify.’, your sense of contemplation use at first may probably go through a sense of obvious change.
I have imagined witnessing, within reason, of course, your initial change in contemplation use, as a courtesy for you to use. Have you ever heard of the term ‘wheelhouse’? I think it is a term I discovered from an episode of tv series ‘Elementary(2012+)’, the detective show that stars Lucy Liu and Jonny Lee Miller. If you choose to use bookmark ‘Pinch justify’ at first, it may be as if you are building a new wheelhouse for yourself. The best example I can think of, even though it is refubished with inapproprieities removed, of course, it’s original form still has some obvious bad language. Because of it’s obvious bad language, if you can’t use the reference, then don’t. However, the refurbished reference does not need the bad language to make it’s point. The reference is from movie ‘Die Hard: With a Vengeance(1995)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference starts at 1:11:06 into the movie, when Zeus Carver(Samuel L. Jackson) asks John McClane(Bruce Willis) quote-‘What was in the room?’, and McClane shows Mr. Carver the bar of gold that was on the floor. The reference ends before the next scene in the movie is shown. So, basically, and it’s just a recommendation that you can refurbish, I represent John McClane and you represent Zeus Carver responding to that bar of gold that I just introduced to you. Of course, I am aware that you want to take that bar of gold with you to the next place that we plan to go to. Like I said, it’s just a refurbished reference that you could change around, in relation to advice, of course.
And so, here is how the idea starts: About a week ago, I invented bookmark ‘Why now?’ For example, an instigator imposes upon you the inclination to ponder a notion that is unnecessary to ponder. The reason you may have chosen to think about such a notion is because of the circumstance you were experiencing at the time you may have experienced such an instigation. For example, you are in a public bus, and someone in the bus is playing on the radio a news broadcast that may be mildly upsetting to you. While you are listening to that news broadcast, an instigator in that bus imposes an instigation that causes you to ponder a notion that is not only associated with that news broadcast, but the manner in which you ponder such a notion is also dictated by the instigation you have experienced. Now, if you use this ‘Why now?’ idea, if you are in another bus ride, and the situation happens again, instead of pondering the notion imposed by the instigator, you can instead think to yourself ‘Why now? Why do I have to address such a notion?’ As one possible solution, if you already know that the notion imposed upon you to address is unnecessary to address, you can choose to just see such a notion as a reference only, not something that needs a certain involved scrutiny.
Another example of using ‘Why now?’ is when you are watching television for entertainment purposes, and there is a moment in that tv show you are watching that causes you to recall a certain mild to moderate instigation that you have experienced in the past, an instigation that causes you to interact in a bothersome context such a notion. Now, if you choose to use this idea, instead of being in a bothersome mood when you watch tv, you can instead think to yourself ‘Why now? Why do I have to address such a notion, when I’m just watching tv?’
Well anyway, the reason I am bringing to your attention bookmark ‘Why now?’ is because ‘Pinch justify.’ is a more specific category use of bookmark ‘Why now?’ I invented ‘Pinch justify.’ yesterday. Basically, bookmark ‘Pinch justify.’ is used to identify an instigation that intends to overemphasize your sense of justification in order for you to have a misled overemphasized sense of justification response. The best example I can think of right now for this blog involving a temporary overemphasized sense of justification is in episode 3.13 ‘Deja Q’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference begins 9 minutes and 24 seconds into the episode, when Q(John de Lancie) calls Lieutenant Worf(Michael Dorn) a Romulan. Worf responds by stopping his walk momentarily, before he leaves the room. Now, that is just a temporarily overemphasized sense of justification. When you experience a ‘Pinch justify.’, your overemphasized justification’s response is also being misled by the instigation. One example of a ‘Pinch justify.’ is what I call an ‘air ball’. According to web site dictionary.com, an ‘air ball’ in reference to basketball, is ‘a missed shot that fails to touch the rim, net, or backboard.’. For example, the justification you experience in regards to such an instigation is understandable, but how you go about resolving such a justification is being misled, like an ‘air ball’ in basketball.
The solution I recommend for you to avoid this ‘air ball’ effect is to simply check if the instigation you are experiencing is trying to cause you to have an overemphasized sense of justification, and if it is, to check if that attempt at overemphasized justification is being misled. To help you more objectively identify such an instigation, I invented what I call a ‘variation’ bookmark. It’s an addendum/word that you can add to other bookmarks to change the bookmark’s purpose. The variation bookmark I am referring to is the word ‘pinch’. Basically, if you choose to use the idea, you’re going to use a conceptually imagined sense of pinching to allow yourself to more objectively identify an instigation trying to overemphasize your sense of justification, and of course try to mislead your overemphasized sense of justification as well. The only reference I can think of that illustrates a pinch, the reference refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, is found in movie ‘Cruel Intentions 2(2000)’. Keep in mind that the movie has mature themes in it. Although I am not using those mature themes in this advice, if you cannot use the movie because of those mature themes, then don’t. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference is located 31 minutes and 21 seconds into the movie. Kathryn Merteuil(Amy Adams) pinches Cherie Claymon(Keri Lynn Pratt). Miss Claymon says ‘Ouch!’ in response to the pinch, Kathryn says to Miss Claymon-‘Want some more?’, and Miss Claymon says ‘No.!’ So, you use that moment as a reference, and conceptualize it differently. Here’s my recommendation: Let’s say you’re sitting down in a bus. When you look outside, imagine Cherie Claymon from the movie puckering up her lips as she is being pinched by Kathryn Merteuil. So, even though Cherie Claymon is experiencing some discomfort as she is being pinched by Kathryn, her lips are puckered, meaning that she looks like she is sticking her lips out and she wants to kiss someone. Keep in mind that her lips are sticking out as she is being pinched by Kathryn. Cherie is wearing a shirt with no sleeves so that you can see her arm being pinched by Kathryn, and while Kathryn is pinching Cherie, Kathryn is showing her teeth, as if she is angry at Cherie. So, while you are sitting in the bus, within reason, you can just imagine those 2 women standing on a sidewalk somewhere, a sidewalk that you can see from the bus window, and of course as you see those 2 women, one is pinching the other. Now, that’s the basic image of it. What you will do now with that image is ‘zoom in’ using your imagination on the area where Kathryn’s hand is pinching Cherie’s arm, and what you will do, if you choose to, is shake Kathryn’s hand as it is pinching Cherie’s arm, and reasonably imagine what that pinching feeling feels like to you. That feeling is what you will use as an indicator to allow yourself to more objectively identify an instigation that is trying to overemphasize your sense of justification. And that is what I call a ‘Pinch justify.’
And so, here is a question for the pinching illustration:-‘Why those two women?’ First, it’s the only pinching illustration idea I can think of. And second, since this advice is supposed to be standard demographic advice for many schools of thought(that’s like watching the weather channel), I believe that having a tv show or movie reference, for example, gives the illustration use a more reliable foundation to work with. Keep in mind that when you use the pinching illustration, it’s based on the characters those two actresses portrayed in the movie, not the actresses themselves. Also, although imagining Cherie puckering her lips as she is being pinched in the arm by Kathryn may seem comical, the reason I made them look that way is to hopefully allow you to be able to use the idea. For example, before many of you have chosen to use this idea, how many times before using this idea have you imagined something like this before? Before I finish this pinching illustration explanation, I’d like to say that, in this list, I will be making more examples of ‘Pinch justify.’ in the ‘Shuffling bookmarks’ idea, but with different variations other than ‘Pinch.’ For example, I can change ‘Pinch justify.’ into ‘Pull justify.’, ‘Snap justify.’, ‘Slap justify.’, ‘Smack justify.’, and so on.
[I plan to finally start the explanation for ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ next week.
I forgot to mention that, when you use this idea, keep in mind that you are using it as a diagnostic. Although I do not have time right now to explain this, but an instigator may discourage your sense of using ideas that are meant to help you more tenably experience instigation. Here’s a question that you may choose to use to reference yourself:-‘How does an instigator know that I am using this idea?’ Let me try to answer that question with another question: ‘How is it that you are so calmly responding to instigation?’
I plan to type in more advice next week.
9/9/2015:
Shuffling bookmarks:
First, I am going to type in the reference for bookmark ‘Marry the two.’. This bookmark is part the explanation for ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ The reference is in episode 4.9 ‘The Sting’ from tv series ‘MI-5(Spooks)(2005)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference starts 20 minutes and 56 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote from the reference:
Colin Wells(Rory MacGregor):-“It’s been chewing up his bank details, credit cards, travel movements, college classmates and tutor lists, mobile and cell positioning, NHS files.”
Adam Carter(Rupert Penry-Jones):-“Won’t the Americans have done this?”
Colin:-“Yes, but we have access to information that they don’t have. By marrying the two, we can find new links that they won’t.”
[And so, I’ll begin by explaining what a bookmark is made of. A bookmark is basically made of 3 parts, 1): some sort of word or catch phrase to help you reference the meaning when you experience instigation, 2): the explanation, and 3): although not required, it usually has a reference, such as a moment from a tv show or movie, something used to give a foundation for the idea, something to help illustrate the idea’s point. [‘Shuffling bookmarks’ is when you are combining and separating individual bookmarks in order to find a bookmark that could be used effectively upon the instigation that you have experienced. As of now, the requirements recommended to use the idea of ‘shuffling bookmarks’ is conveniently located in this blog. The 2 basic requirements are to know the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks that I have already introduced to you. Of course, you can also read this entire blog to help you use ‘shuffling bookmarks.’ After all, it is my opinion that this blog is still relatively new in development, from my perspective.
‘Marry the two.’ is a reference, refurbished for advice, that can illustrate to you an example that shows you the value of grouping different bookmarks together. In the MI-5 example I typed in, Colin said quote-“By marrying the two, we can find new links that they won’t.” I am using the ‘MI-5’ example to show you that, even though you know what the bookmarks mean, and you think that they have no relevant data as bookmarks individually for the specific instigation you have experienced, if you start grouping different bookmarks together, if you start ‘marrying the two’, so to speak, than you may be able to create new, useful information that wasn’t there before.
One easy way to create different bookmarks from let’s say your favorite bookmark, a bookmark that you would want to use, even though it may not be effective on the instigation you have experienced, is to add addendums to it. ‘Addendums’ can be adjectives, but basically I define ‘addendums’ as words that you can just add to bookmarks in general that can change it’s purpose easily. For example, an addendum can change a bookmark’s intensity, sequence, texture, and so on. Here are some addendums that I used to use and still use actively: Able, offer, agree, eager, want, snap, sting, pinch, pull, fast, speed, add, slap, smack. Those are the addendums that I can think of right now. Also, even though you may not see it as such, as you are trying to invent a bookmark that works on the instigation, you are also addressing different characteristics of that experience. For example, in episode 3.2 ‘The Ensigns of Command’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1989)’, according to Amazon Instant Video, 27 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode, Deanna Troi(Marina Sirtis) is showing a cup to Picard(Patrick Stewart), and then she says the word ‘S’marith’, and then she asks Picard ‘What did I just say?’ Picard says ‘Cup?’-‘Glass?’, and Deanna says to Picard-‘Are you sure? I may have meant liquid, clear, brown, hot.’ [The point is that, as you are ‘shuffling bookmarks’ to find a bookmark that would work for the instigation, you are also already using many bookmarks to address certain characteristics of that experienced instigation! However, since you have a preference of experience, you will continue to shuffle more bookmarks until you find a solution that is acceptable to you. To illustrate, if you choose to, for minor instigations, of course, you can use the ‘S’marith’ example from Star Trek. You can think of the other characteristics of the experienced instigation like determining what ‘S’marith’ means. Did she say cup?, glass?, or maybe it was liquid, clear, brown, hot? As an example of ‘shuffling bookmarks’, let’s use bookmark ‘Pinch justify.’, a bookmark that I had explained yesterday. Instead of ‘Pinch justify.’, you can change the word ‘pinch’ to ‘sting’, ‘slap’, ‘smack’, or ‘snap’. Instead of using the ‘pinch’ example, you can change the intensity of the meaning by switching the addendum ‘pinch’ to another word that represents a different intensity. For example, ‘sting’ can represent a sting that you may feel when you place a rubber band around your wrist, you pull back on the rubber band, and you let the rubber band hit your skin. That feeling may represent a ‘sting'(this is just an example. You don’t have to use it literally). ‘Snap’ could represent the intensity of snapping your fingers, ‘Smack’ may represent when you clap your hands. OK, even though you may not find those explanations adequate, you may still be able to use those explanations to help you sense the different intensities associated with such words.
[Although I did not type much in today, after I finish explaining ‘Shuffling bookmarks’, which should be by next week, I am going to read over this list, and then finally start making new, individual lists again. I could be done with the explanation already, and all I have to do next week is read over this list and add it’s disclaimer.
9/16/2015:
Testy:
Before I finally finish this list, which I hope will be today, I want to add one more idea. I call the bookmark ‘Testy.’ I looked in web site www.dictionary.com, and I did not find the definition I was looking for. I also used the search engine google.com. And so, I’ll try to explain it myself. ‘Testy.’ means-‘to test the foundation of someone’. The definition of ”Testy.’ as a bookmark is-‘An instigator may inappropriately encourage you to test the foundations of others. Here’s an example. In episode 1.4 ‘Aliens of London’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2006)’, 30 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode according to Amazon Instant Video, here is a quote:
Mickey Smith(Noel Clarke):-‘So, what’re you doing down there?’
The Doctor(Christopher Eccleston):-‘Rickey.’
Mickey Smith:-‘Mickey.’
The Doctor:-‘Rickey, If I was to tell you what I was doing to the controls of my frankly magnificent time ship, would you even begin to understand?’
Mickey Smith:-‘Well, I suppose not…’
The Doctor:-‘Well, shut it, then.’
[When an instigator improperly imposes a sense of testy behavior upon an innocent person, it is my belief that if he/she experiences such testy behavior long enough, that innocent person, although not in the form of an instigation, may also impose upon others a sense of testy behavior. It is my belief that many people in America already use some sort of testy behavior in one form or another, a behavior that they have created because of instigations they have experienced in the past. As I was typing this in, I have chosen to try to be more tolerant of such behavior. However, even though many people have chosen to integrate a sense of imposing testy behavior upon others, there is a possible caution, when such behavior is learned from and because of instigation. Testy behavior imposed upon others may discourage those who are experiencing testy behavior from learning and communicating with others. Although I have only recently been actively using the word ‘testy’ to identify such an instigation, it is also my belief that, as I was typing in ideas for others to read, from web site amazon.com to this blog, even though I did not call it that at the time, in order to help others to use such advice, I have been learning to avoid being unnecessarily testy to those that may read such advice. So, I guess you may choose an evaluation that may say that, for certain participations, I am the exception to the rule, since I have been avoiding being unnecessarily testy to others without even calling it ‘testy’! Just seconds ago, I thought of another example of ‘testy’. The example is from episode 7.20 ‘Journey’s End’, 9 minutes and 54 seconds into the episode according to Amazon Instant Video, from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1994)’, when Geordi(LeVar Burton) wanted to show Wesley(Wil Wheaton) something that he created. Here is a quote:
Geordi:-‘I don’t know what’s gotten into you.’
Wesley:-‘Do you want my help or not?’
Geordi:-‘With this attitude, absolutely not. You’re dismissed.’
Since this is by intent standard demographic advice, I’m using the reasonable assumption that not everyone that is reading these ideas is a certified teacher. My point is that, if you are testy with others, you may be discouraging them to communicate in a context that is within their means to communicate. You may also be inhibiting their sense of learning, their sense of motivation. My recommendation is that you take into consideration that nobody knows everything, and that, if you choose to, you should give people a little latitude to allow others to communicate and learn, with the possible fact that others may still exhibit testy behavior. So, for example, one interpretation of this advice is that you simply do both: if you choose to, you use testy behavior, ‘and’ you try to give a little latitude to others that allows them to learn and communicate.
[Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Doctor Who’, tv series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’, tv series ‘Star Trek: The Original Series(1969)’, tv series ‘Nash Bridges’, TV sci-fi series ‘Andromeda’, rated R discretion for movie ‘Vision Quest’, rated PG-13 discretion for movie ‘Lean on Me’, violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi series ‘Lexx’, TV sci-fi series ‘Dominion’, tv series ‘MI-5’, rated PG discretion for movie ‘The Second Best Exotic Marigold Hotel’, rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Cruel Intentions 2’, violence and viewer discretion for comic book series ‘Batman/Superman’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Reverse polarity.’, ‘Why now?’, ‘Pinch justify.’, ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’, ‘Marry the two.’, and ‘Testy.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.