12/31/2022
Salutations.
It is now 8:12 AM EST for me.
Before I begin looking for that music video and trailer, I want to say something about a service that I subscribed to yesterday. Again, I’m not financially benefitting from this recommendation, and I am not obligating anyone to use it. If you think the advice is useful, then you may choose to use it, but there’s no obligation involved.
I enrolled yesterday in ‘YouTube Premium’ for about $12 a month individual membership. They’re offering the 1st month for free, and after that, it’s about $12 a month. If you choose to subscribe to it, and you have a youtube account(and youtube accounts are free), just search in www.google.com for phrase ‘how to subscribe to youtube premium’, and a link to youtube should present itself saying ‘YouTube Premium – Try YouTube without the ads’, and that’s the reason I subscribed to it, no more ads. For years, I didn’t think I had a choice, I would have to wait for the ads to finish. Of course, on the lower right hand side, it would give you the option to stop the ads after 5 seconds, but what also happens in my experience is that the ads also last for 15 seconds as a requirement. With YouTube Premium, if you choose to select a music video, there are no more ad requirements, and if you are doing something similar to what I am doing, recommending music videos and trailers, then in my opinion, researching without ads will allow you to have a lot more free time to do your music video and trailer selections. I didn’t know that YouTube offered such a service, not until yesterday. I found out about it on my own yesterday, and searched in www.youtube.com via television app and Apple TV Plus device the phrase ‘youtube premium benefits’, and I watched some of one of the video clips that explains that to you. He was very informative.
When I started using YouTube Premium, I noticed more that the youtube tv app using the Apple TV Plus device seemed to present to me exclusive music video availability, as opposed to using the computer, and the experience allowed me to believe that I can now raise my standards for music video selections for this advice. They offer a few more services, but the reason I subscribe to it was to remove the commercials.
Anyway, yesterday, I ‘saved later’ a few music videos I discovered, in case I can’t find one when I would normally look for them. I call them ‘reserves’. I’ll still use the computer, the ‘signed-in’ youtube homepage, and my regular sources to look for those music videos and trailers, and I look forward to looking for them without commercials. Again, you are not obligated by me to have a subscription to YouTube Premium. If you think it may be useful to you to do your research without commercial interruptions, than that’s just an option to consider. I’m not obligating you to use such a service.
I’m going to look for that music video and trailer again. After I prepare them later today, I’ll start typing again. So, if you are there later today, I’ll see you then.
—
It is now 10:27 AM EST for me.
For this music video, I selected it before yesterday, before I subscribed to YouTube Premium yesterday. Even though it was published 8 years ago, I don’t believe that I have recommended it before. The music video that I watched again earlier today and recommend for this idea is called ‘Goodness Gracious’ by Ellie Goulding. As I was checking the usual references, I changed my mind and decided to recommend a music video that I already selected in the past. It has 33 million views, and was published by ‘elliegoulding’. Here is a short quote from www.billboard.com about the music video. I found it by searching in www.google.com for phrase ‘Ellie Goulding Goodness Gracious music video reviews’. The article was published Jan 6, 2014:
‘ Ellie Goulding Lights Up In ‘Goodness Gracious’ Video: Watch ‘
‘ Any lingering doubts that Ellie Goulding is not ultra-cool should be squashed with the arrival of the “Goodness Gracious” music video, which shows the U.K. songstress dancing in light-up shoes, partying with futuristic-looking pals and even skateboarding with ease. ‘
—
And here is a quote from the lyrics to song ‘Goodness Gracious’:
Goodness gracious I can’t seem to stop
Calling you up
Calling you up
Just to keep crawling to your arms
Goodness gracious I can’t seem to stop
Calling you up
Calling you up
Just to keep crawling to your arms
—
If you choose to watch the music video ‘Goodness Gracious’, just search for phrase in www.youtube.com ‘goodness gracious’, and it should be one of the 1st selections offered. If you choose to watch it, in my opinion, it’s like neon colors are mixed into it. I’ve seen younger kids wear shoes that use blinking lights when they walk, but I’ve never seen adults wear shoes that use consistent lights. I’ve only seen such a thing watching this music video. 1 minute and 34 seconds into the music video, Ellie Goulding and another dancer are wearing shoes that have consistent lighting while dancing. 2 minutes and 20 seconds, you get to see a pair of shoes with consistent lighting and a skateboard with neon lighting. And 3 minutes and 40 seconds near the end of the music video, an image of Ellie Goulding fades as you are shown a beach. In my opinion, watching the music video and listening to it’s music helps you ‘feel good’.
—
The tv show trailer that I watched for the 1st time and recommend for this advice is called ‘Fantasy Island’ Season 2 Teaser’. Based on what I read from the ‘Google News’ app, tv series ‘Fantasy Island season 2’ was going to premiere in the 1st week of next month. I verified from www.google.com that it will premiere January 2, 2023. I don’t know how it works, but to me, that means that it’s very likely that there’s a trailer for it. I checked using www.google.com using phrase ‘fantasy island season 2’, and I found a few of them. For this list, I chose the one that was published by ‘Global TV’. It was published 2 weeks ago, and has 1.4 thousand views.
—
It is now 11:02 AM EST for me.
So, here’s the plan: I’m going to type in an idea that consists of 4 ideas, the 1st part of the idea is from a recent list called ‘Not agree to address or discuss anything’, and 2nd part is als from a recent list called ‘Not able’, and 3rd part is an idea that I invented within the past 2 weeks or so involving blame, and the 4th idea, which is the main idea, is called ‘Admit happen’. The way the idea is made, if you choose to use it, you read all 4, and all 4 by it’s intent of use will work together to allow the 4th idea to work. To help you use these ideas, you contemplationally say ‘Admit happen’. Based on my experience extrapolated by intent for this advice, there should be a sense of epiphany while using idea ‘Admit happen’ for the 1st time. One reason is because, since you may not have used such an idea before, you may have some ‘build up’ from previous experienced instigations. As you make them more tenable using idea ‘Admit happen’, that should allow you to feel better.
It is also my experience that such a feeling of epiphany won’t last. It may last for a week, less than 2 weeks. There is a cartoon from ‘The Transformers’, an old one, when Grimlock who acts like a dinosaur was temporarily turned into a very intelligent robot, and during that short time he was made very intelligent, he created Computron. I recommend that, if you intend to make ideas with this stuff, that you use as an option to make ideas using idea ‘Admit happen’, as you are still experiencing that feeling of epiphany. I’m guessing you have like a week’s worth of epiphany to use to make more ideas using idea ‘Admit happen’. Of course, just because that feeling of epiphany won’t last, that doesn’t mean that the idea doesn’t work anymore. You still learned something, in my opinion. It’s just that, in my opinion, that feeling of epiphany is kind of obvious.
Keep in mind that I’ve been typing ideas in this blog for a certain amount of years. I’d like to believe that I’ve been developing my ability to explain certain ideas over those years. That’s why it may seem like I’m very casually typing these ideas in. Also, I would usually type these ideas only once a week. I have an entire week to think about what to type in before I actually type it in.
I forgot to say that it was not my intent to insult anyone by comparing anyone to Grimlock. That scene was just meant to help me articulate a meaning. Sorry for the misunderstanding, if there was misunderstanding.
—
Not agree to address or discuss anything:
To find a previous list, just go to www.ionicbreeze.com, go to the bottom of the homepage to ‘Search… ‘, and type in the list’s number. For example, to find Wishlist #1353, just search for phrase/numbers ‘1353’, and it’s link should be presented for you to select.
—
Here’s a copy from Wishlist #1353:
‘ If you did not agree to address or discuss anything, if what is presented to you, what is usually overemphasized for you to notice, if you did not agree to address or discuss anything, then especially if it’s out of context, not relevant for you to address or discuss, then you can moot/disavow/choose to not contemplationally address or discuss it. I have imagined from time to time people in instigation groups talking to management, and a topic that is addressed from time to time is if the innocent person being talked about agreed to address or discuss certain things. In such situations, management would clarify amongst such instigation groups that said innocent person did not agree to address or discuss such things. If you choose to also imagine such situations, then you can also refurbish such conversations to when you experience certain mild to moderate forms of instigation, especially instigations that cause you to ‘experience a sense of realizing that you are not able to resolve’.
Let’s say that you are a new reader, and you may choose to use idea ‘Not agree to address or discuss anything’. In my opinion, it’s like a game of chess. It’s easy to learn, and if you choose to, you may improve how you play the game of chess later by reading a few of the many books of strategy pertaining to the game of chess. In other words, there’s a lot of room for improvement for the idea ‘Not agree to address or discuss anything’. ‘
—
To help you use idea ‘Not agree to address or discuss anything, here are 3 ideas to use from Wishlist #1345, 1)’Now’, 2)’Time lapse’, and 3)’Prove’:
—
Now:
Since I have 3 ideas I want to explain by the end of my list allotted time for today, I’ll just offer 1 illustration example for idea ‘Now’. It is in movie ‘Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian(2009)’, starring Amy Adams(Amelia Earhart), Craig Robinson(Tuskegee Airman #2), and Ben Stiller(Larry Daley). The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 3 minutes, and 54 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote(You can see more of the movie, refurbished with inaproprieities removed, to understand that scene more, if you choose to):
Tuskegee Airman #2: ‘Miss Earhart.’
Amelia Earhart: ‘Yes?’
Tuskegee Airman #2: ‘I want to say thank you.’
Amelia Earhart: ‘What for, Captain?’
Tuskegee Airman #2: ‘Lot of people didn’t think we could fly, either. Thanks for clearing the runway, ma’am. Race you to Paris?’
Amelia Earhart: ‘You’re on.’
Larry Daley: ‘Whoa. Hey, hey! No, no! Not now. We got to… ‘
Amelia Earhart: ‘But it’s just a quick jaunt over the pond.’
Larry Daley: ‘Gotta find the Einsteins.’
Larry Daley: ‘No, come on, we got to go. We got to go. We don’t have time. Come on.’
Amelia Earhart: ‘Sorry, it’s in the blood.’
—
So, in the ‘Night at the Museum’ illustration example provided, Larry Daley had to convince Amelia Earhart that she could not participate in that race ‘in the now’, because she already has other commitments.
All right. Here’s a quick story. If you go to other places, if you want to live in other places in America, you would also want a certain definitiveness, a certain integrity, to also exist in those other places. Let’s oversimplifyingly say that there are 20 rockets in the air in a cluster, seemingly close together, all all 20 of those rockets have an individually fortified similar definitiveness and integrity examples, so in imagination, if you visit those rockets individually, they all have examples of definitiveness and integrity that, metaphorically speaking, allows you to live there.
Now, let’s say that while you are in a bus going to school, you experience a certain confusion, a quandry, something that perplexes you, encouraging you to resolve something that is somewhat bothersome or adverse to resolve. If that something is not relevant to resolve, then you may choose to believe that you don’t have to resolve that bothersome contemplation ‘in the now’, since, for that circumstance, you are just a bus passenger that was somehow led to resolve such a thing. If such a contemplation is not relevant, out of context, etc. to resolve, then you may choose to not resolve it ‘in the now’.
Now, let’s say you are in school, and while you are sitting in class paying attention to your teacher, another perplexing contemplation encouraging you to resolve it occurs. Since you are supposed to be paying attention to your teacher, and the perplexing contemplation is not relevant to resolve, then you may choose to not resolve such a perplexing contemplation ‘in the now’. Let’s say it’s one of those definitive contemplations that exists in one of those rockets. Even though it’s definitive, contemplationally recall what your state of predicament is. Is it relevant to try to resolve such a definitiveness? If the answer is no, for example, and you’re supposed to be paying attention to your teacher, then you may choose to not resolve such a contemplation definitiveness ‘in the now’.
With a little practice, such perplexing contemplations may be noticeable to you, but even though you feel them, even though you notice them, even though they may be presented to you, by person or circumstance, you may still choose to not resolve them ‘in the now’. Sure, it is my belief that, the more you use idea ‘Now’, in a matter of speaking, the more you’ll get better at it’s use.
—
Time lapse:
I just thought of it a few minutes ago. Since the ‘Stargate’ episodes are supposed to be available streaming in Amazon.com now, I’m going to look for one of those ‘Stargate: Atlantis’ episodes to use as an illustration reference for idea ‘Time lapse’. Soon after I prepare it today, I’ll quote it. I’ll be back.
—
OK, it’s ready. The illustration reference for idea ‘Time lapse’ is in episode 4.20 ‘The Last Man’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Stargate: Atlantis(2008)’. The episode is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 21 minutes and 31 seconds into the episode. Oh, before I make that quote, here is a quote from the summary provided by www.imdb.com:
‘ Sheppard then finds a hologram of an aged Dr. McKay, telling him that a solar flare had sent him 48,000 years into the future. Once he learns the demise of Atlantis and everyone on it, and worse yet that the sun in the solar system is dying and he won’t survive there much longer, he and the holographic McKay must find a way to send Sheppard home and potentially change all of this. ‘
—
Here’s the quote:
John Sheppard(Joe Flanigan): ‘Come on, Rodney, you got to think of something!’
Dr. Rodney McKay hologram(David Hewlett): ‘I am trying! It’s like I said… ‘
John Sheppard: ‘You didn’t anticipate the variable. I get it. All right. Can the Mark-12 power the shields?’
Dr. Rodney McKay hologram: ‘Theoretically, but there would never be enough power to maintain my systems, the long-range sensors, the stasis chamber… ‘
John Sheppard: ‘The city has solar power generators, right?
Dr. Rodney McKay hologram: ‘Yes, which would come in very handy if we were trying to power a couple of electric golf carts.’
John Sheppard: ‘See, you’re still thinking like the old McKay.’
Dr. Rodney McKay hologram: ‘I can’t really help that! Look, what are you saying?’
John Sheppard: ‘The sun’s going red giant, right? Increased solar energy… The worse it gets, the more power we’ll have. ‘
Dr. Rodney McKay hologram: ‘Oh, my goodness(edited), that might work. We use the shields to protect the atmosphere.’
John Sheppard: ‘Exactly.’
Dr. Rodney McKay hologram: ‘We wouldn’t be able to do it indefinitely, but it would buy us 100 years or so.’
—
Imagine noticing how John Sheppard was going from idea to idea very quickly, without waiting for any time lapses to resolve that discarded ideas may have created.
All right. This is an experience that helped me create idea ‘Time lapse’. Normally, when going to work and back, I would use a bus. I would also wait in the bus terminal, when many teenagers would walk back and forth, I’m assuming that they’re going to school. And from time to time, a few of them would show me something quirky, something that would cause me to think about something that was shown to me for a few seconds or so. And that’s how I partly invented idea ‘Time lapse’. I created/invented a rule that, if I could not resolve something in 5 seconds or so, and depending upon the circumstance, for example, if the contemplation being resolved was out of context/not relevant, for example, a teenager while I was waiting for the bus just showed me something that was perplexing, if I was distracted enough to try to resolve it and I couldn’t resolve it in 5 seconds or so, I would stop trying to resolve it. I called that idea ‘Time lapse’.
Now, I have been using idea ‘Time lapse’ for several years already, and the upgrade that I invented for it relatively recently is that all I have to do is feel the identity of an unresolving contemplation, and to choose to no longer resolve such a feeling. The explanation/logic is that, over time, I developed a collection of experiences that were already previously identified to be discontinued by idea ‘Time lapse’, and all I have to do now is disregard/stop resolving it just by how it feels. I don’t have to wait 5 seconds or so to resolve such a perplexing identity. As soon as I feel such a contemplation, I have the option to immediately stop resolving it.
—
Prove:
Here’s the definition of ‘prove’ that I’m using for idea ‘Prove’:
‘ to establish the truth or genuineness of, as by evidence or argument:
to prove one’s claim. ‘
—
Since it’s getting late for me, the explanation for idea ‘Prove’ is going to be sloppy. No illustration, just an explanation, and then I’ll close this list. Whether you are in a public area where people congregate, like a bus terminal or a supermarket, or at school or work, an instigator may improperly encourage you to contemplationally prove to yourself certain things. For example, that ‘Stick and stones may break my bones, but names may never harm me.’ rhyme. In my opinion, it identifies situations where people may insult you, and that may contemplationally cause you to prove to yourself that you are not what they say you are. It is my belief that, with some experience, if you choose to use idea ‘Prove’, with experience, you may improve upon it’s use. With a little experience, you may choose to participate in situations that may impose a sense of proof, but you do not need to contemplationally provide that proof to yourself. But for now, ide ‘Prove’ is used as an indicator to help you identify instigation and inadvertency induced contemplations that may cause you to excessively pursue a sense of proof to yourself, proof that you should not need to provide for yourself.
—
The purpose for idea ‘Not agree to address or discuss anything’ is to help you dismiss/disavow/manage better particulars from experienced instigations and it’s inadvertencies. If you believe that such particulars are not relevant, out of context, etc. , then you may contemplationally say ‘Not agree to address or discuss anything’ to help you allocate such particulars/contemplations. I offered to you the use of ideas ‘Now’, ‘Time lapse’, and ‘Prove’ to help you use idea ‘Not agree to address or discuss anything’.
—
It is now 12:34 PM EST for me. I am going to watch the trailer ‘Fantasy Island’ Season 2 Teaser’ again, to make sure that I watched the whole thing. I may have watched most of it, but that could have been me just agreeing to myself to select it, so I’m going to make sure now.
—
Not able to resolve:
It is now 12:37 PM EST for me.
I am going to quote Wishlist #1353 for idea ‘Starve not able’, but for this list, it will be refurbished to be used as ‘Not able to resolve’:
—
Starve not able:
It is now 12:33 PM EST for me.
I invented idea ‘Starve not able’ I think it was yesterday, while I was shopping in the supermarket. However, idea ‘Starve not able’ is a variation of idea ‘Not able’, and I invented idea ‘Not able’ this past Thursday, 12/8/2022, while I was in the public restaurant that was connected to the bus and train stations. I would eat there before I would go to work regularly. It uses glass windows, allowing you to see the many people that walk by. I’m assuming that at least most of them are going to work using the trains and/or the buses. While I was sitting there this past Thursday, that’s when I invented idea ‘Not able’.
So, here’s the impression of idea ‘Not able’ that I invented in that place and time:
… (thinking about it)
I forgot to type that in, that I’m thinking about it before I type the actual idea in, that ‘…’ thing.
Anyway, here it is: an instigator may improperly cause you to have a sense of realizing that you cannot immediately resolve, which would cause you to contemplationally ‘realize’ something in that context.
One example without tv show/movie illustration is when a new student is participating in a study group, for example, similar to this blog. Again, this is something that I just imagine. I don’t have any proof that it actually happened. So, for example, a boy joins a study group, and during their participation, soon after they have one of their frenzy conversations about that blog, all of the students who have been in the study group for a while would stop talking. The new student in the study group, let’s say a boy, soon after would ask the group something, since the boy feels a need to ask a few questions. All of the other students, however, are quiet, and choose to just? remain silent for a while. It’s like how that boy feels in that study group, the new participant, when he wants to ask a few questions while everyone else in the study group is not talking. It’s like that feeling.
The most convenient single reference, refurbished of course, for idea ‘Not able’ is in episode 3.6 ‘It’s My Round’ from animated tv series ‘The Daily Life of the Immortal King(2022)’. It aired Oct 30, 2022, and it’s available streaming on Crunchyroll. So, let me quote a few scenes and refurbish them for your use.
The 1st scene, according to Crunchyroll, starts 6 minutes and 54 seconds into the episode:
Zhuo Yi: ‘It’s just an old book, and the price just multiplied in a matter of seconds.’
Lord Thunder: ‘It’s no ordinary book.’
Zhuo Yi: (reacts in surprise)
—
Here is the illustration that is going to be refurbished:
Zhuo Yi: ‘It’s just an old book, and the price just multiplied in a matter of seconds.’
—
So, instead of Zhuo Yi actually saying that phrase, you refurbish it, and he is now contemplationally saying it instead of actually saying it because it’s a sense of realizing that he is not able to resolve.
—
The 2nd refurbished illustration reference starts about 13 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode. Again, the reaction is from Zhuo Yi:
Zhuo Yi: ‘Lord Thunder, you just said you didn’t have that many spiritual coins.’
Lord Thunder: ‘Don’t be so excited, Master Zhuo. I was telling you the truth.’
Zhuo Yi: ‘How come you have so many spiritual coins all of a sudden?’
Lord Thunder: ‘The red long johns are from my collection.
—
So, again, instead of actually saying it, Zhuo Yi instead contemplationally says it, indicating again that he is not able to resolve such a sense of realizing. Those 2 references are also convenient because Lord Thunder quickly gives him an answer. But in your situation, if an instigator causes you to have a sense of realizing that you are not able to resolve, well, you may not be able to very quickly find a solution for such a contemplation.
The episodes have a few more examples, but if you have some experience watching anime, those examples are intentionally extreme, part of how anime may possibly entertain you, if you choose to use that interpretation of entertainment.
—
The idea for ‘Not able to resolve’ using episode 3.6 ‘It’s My Round’ from animated tv series ‘The Daily Life of the Immortal King(2022)’ is to give you an illustration example of an inability to resolve, so that you may quantify and manage it better. Notice that, in that episode, Zhuo Yi acts somewhat hysterically when experiencing such things that he cannot immediately resolve on his own. With this idea in mind, the intent is to allow you to manage better contemplations induced by instigation that causes you to react when you are not able to immediately resolve such contemplations.
—
Nip it in the bud:(created 12:57 PM EST)
All right. For this 3rd idea, I’ll try to explain it: An instigator may adversely cause you to contemplationally blame him/her with the intent to allow that instigator to use partial justification for the blame that instigator may impose upon you to again experience.
The purpose of this idea is to nip the experience in the bud, so to speak. If you search in www.google.com for the phrase ‘nip it in the bud’, here’s the definition that I used from that search:
‘ to stop (something) immediately so that it does not become a worse problem. ‘
—
Let’s say you experience such an instigation while using public transportation, and from someone you don’t even know. The idea is that you are doing other things while using public transportation. For example, your main reason for using public transportation is to get you to another destination, not to cope with experienced instigation. You’re not there to just manage experienced instigation, and for this idea, an instigator, so to speak, may exploit that truth to it’s hilt. In search engine www.google.com, when searching for phrase ‘to the hilt’, that means ‘as much as possible; to the utmost degree.’ “we’re mortgaged to the hilt”. The intent to use this idea is to ‘nip it in the bud’. The idea is that, if you don’t use that encouraged blame, then the secondary blame imposed upon you to experience, which depends upon that blame the 1st blame encouraged you to use, that secondary blame should be contemplationally considered by you to be moot. You can more easily choose to not use it.
Let’s say for example a person doesn’t have this idea, and decides to contemplationally blame that instigator, as encouraged by the 1st blame imposed by that instigator, allowing the 2nd blame to have a partial justification context in it. After all, that person did nothing wrong, ‘No harm, no foul’, so to speak. The problem is that, based on the idea, I don’t think people in general are as objective as they think they are. Yes, that person did nothing wrong, and that person just thought of it, but will that person always treat that experience that way? If you ‘nip it in the bud’… [As of 12:56 PM EST, I have decided that this idea’s name is ‘Nip it in the bud’.] As I was saying, if you ‘nip it in the bud’, you can experience it more objectively, and you may also have the ability to not become it.
Thanks to the ‘miracle’, so to speak, of conveniently copying and pasting information from other lists, here are 3 illustration examples from Wishlist #1343 to help you manage your sense of blame better:
All right. It is now 12:14 PM EST for me. I’m going to quote the 1st illustration example, refurbished for advice. The scene is near end of movie ‘Dirty Rotten Scoundrels(1988)’ starring Michael Caine as Lawrence Jamieson, and Steve Martin as Freddy Benson. The movie is available streaming from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts near end of movie, 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 30 seconds into the movie. You can watch more of the movie with inapproprieities removed, for more understanding:
Janet Colgate(Glenne Headly): ‘Aren’t you gonna say anything?’
Chips O’Toole: (Australian accent) ‘G’day, Nikos. How’s it going, sport?’
—
1 hour, 46 minutes into the movie:
Janet Colgate: ‘I almost forgot somebody. Mr. Junior Partner. The man Chips can’t do without. The whiz kid, Randy Bentwick. Unfortunately, Randy is a mute.(silent; refraining from speech or utterance) ‘
—
So, refurbished for advice of course, when Janet Colgate said:
‘Aren’t you gonna say anything?’
refurbished for advice, that represents your ability to contemplationally articulate your innocence. The 2 men were speechless for a moment. They were unable to talk.
This scene refurbished is useful because it illustrates 2 people for a moment unable to talk, and then it illustrates one of those people being able to articulate his/her innocence, as well as a person who is still unable to articulate contemplationally his/her innocence.
—
The 2nd illustration example is in episode 3.9 ‘The One Where the Sun Comes Out’ from lawyer tv series ‘The Good Fight(2019)’. You can watch it streaming from Amazon Channel Paramount Plus, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts about 2 minutes and 5 seconds into the episode. Again, you can watch more of that episode with inaproprieities removed for more understanding. Here is the quote:
Roland Blum(Michael Sheen): ‘Put that down. Let’s go.’
Maia Rindell(Rose Leslie): ‘Excuse me?’
Roland Blum: ‘Put down the headset, come on. This place gives me the creeps.’
Maia Rindell: ‘What do you want, Blum?’
Roland Blum: ‘I want you to come with me. Did I not make that clear? I got a job.’
Maia Rindell: ‘You got me fired.’
Roland Blum: ‘Yes, and that was five weeks ago. Now I want to give you a job. Keep up.’
Maia Rindell: ‘What job?’
Lili Brenner(Rachel Wenitsky): ‘What does it matter?’
Roland Blum: ‘Exactly. My job is not in this place.(edited)’
Roland Blum: ‘I’m counting to three.’
Lili Brenner: ‘I’ll take it.’
Lili Brenner: ‘I’ll take it.’
—
Like in the 1st example, refurbished, someone is speechless, unable to articulate his/her innocence, but soon after, that person is able to articulate his/her innocence. To be clear, even though this ‘lawyer’ illustration is useful to idea ‘Innocent’, it’s unrealistic, since the 2 people that responded very quickly were lawyers. It is my belief that people in general are not lawyers. And of course, the example is refurbished so that you can still use it.
—
Now, the 3rd illustration example is like how I imagine(d) various people from various companies and corporations getting the entertainment industry to get actors to portray things that these various people would think to be impossible to portray, and yet sure enough, these various people would see the paid video clip of actors portraying such a thing, and it would amaze them that such a thing could be portrayed. That is how I also evaluate this illustration example. It is in episode 2.10 ‘I Know Who Did It’ from tv series ‘Only Murders in the Building(2022)’. The scene as far as I am aware of is only available from the streaming service Hulu, and according to Hulu, that scene starts 9 minutes and 56 seconds into the video clip.
Charles-Haden Savage(Steve Martin): ‘You must know things that upset her, that make her feel vulnerable.’
—
10 minutes and 5 seconds into the video:
Charles-Haden Savage: ‘Are there things that disturb her, that might break down her defenses?’
Poppy White(Adina Verson): ‘She does not like the inside of a tomato?’
—
Anyway, 19 minutes and 4 seconds into the video, they start doing those things that they discussed with Poppy, causing Cinda Canning(Tina Fey), refurbished for advice, to not be able to contemplationally articulate her innocence, like moving in slow motion, and looking at the inside of a tomato.(in a manner of speaking, I can’t believe that I just typed that in.) Of course, remove the inapproprieities in relation to advice.
—
All right. It is now 1:20 PM EST for me. Now that you have the 3 illustration examples, you may now have a better understanding as to how idea ‘Innocent’ works. As a recommendation, this is how you practice using it: From time to time, in a safe context, you just contemplationally explain your innocence, as it relates to situations that you believe experienced instigation is involved inhibiting somewhat your ability to contemplationally articulate your innocence. If you noticed from those 3 illustration examples, refurbished of course, an experienced instigation may cause you to commit some of your contemplation time to contemplationally complain about the instigation, to ‘blame’ it, if you will, and that contemplation blame is what may cause you to have an inhibited ability to be able to more acceptably contemplationally articulate your innocence.
—
Admit happen:
It is now 1:04 PM EST for me.
Here’s the explanation for idea ‘Admit happen’: An instigator improperly imposes upon you a sense of admitting, instigation related, that causes you to think about it further as if it actually happened, but the reality(in the context of this advice) is that such a sense of admitting is false, it is not true. For example, you experience some sort of instigation which creates a sense of admitting that causes you to think about that sense of admitting from time to time, but the truth is that, soon after causing you to experience that sense of admitting from that instigator, let’s say this situation occurred at work, that instigator was confronted about that incident by management, and eventually that instigator admitted to management that the imposed admitting was false, and that the instigator does not subscribe to such a sense of admitting. In the meantime, however, you are still from time to time interacting with that sense of admitting, even though that instigator not only confessed that it was not true, but also said to managment that the instigator is also not subscribed to such a sense of admitting.
If you choose to use idea ‘Admit happen’, if you have such an idea at work, and an instigator imposes upon you once again a sense of admitting, and you suspect that such a sense of admiiting is false, and that instigator if confronted by management, would confess that such a sense of admitting was false, and that even that instigator would confess that he/she is also not subscribed to such a sense of admitting, then you may choose to ‘get rid of the middleman’, so to speak, and treat that experience as a sense of admitting that did not happen. When you contemplationally say ‘Admit happen’, you are choosing to evaluate an instigation and/or inadvertency as ‘a sense of admitting that did not happen’. You’re choosing to not use that sense of admitting.
The best illustration example I can think of, refurbished for advice, and it’s also probably the funniest, is near the end of the movie ‘Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery(2022)’, after Miles Bron(Edward Norton) destroyed the evidence. I’m using Netflix streaming to get the quote, so around 1 hour, 59 minutes, and 13 seconds into the movie, here is the quote:
Miles Bron: ‘Wanna take that to the cops? You wanna take it to the courts? Look, you pick your poison. Anywhere you go, it’s going to be your word against mine. How do you think that’s gonna go? … And, I do want to say, your sister was a complicated woman, but she meant the world to me. And I’m so sorry for your loss.’
—
In normal circumstances, of course, for example, when you experience instigation at work, and you’ve been working there for a few years or more, let’s say as a speculation, without some sort of idea or strategy that manages absurdly obvious false admittings, and it’s something that’s shown to you, you don’t even have to agree to experience it, those false admittings may bother you from time to time. However, with idea ‘Admit happen’, you just contemplationally say ‘Admit happen’, and the intent of the use of the idea is that that can help you treat that false sense of admitting as a false sense of admitting that you obviously notice, but you choose to not use it. You don’t even use it as something that actually happened. For example, an instigation identified by idea ‘Admit happen’, since from the vantage point of the instigator, since it’s an obvious lie, that instigator may present to you a false sense of admitting that can really bother you, and it’s an obvious lie to that instigator! Refurbished with inapproprieities removed said of course, it’s probably not as bad as what Miles Bron said in that ‘Glass Onion’ movie, but that’s the reason why I offered you that ‘Glass Onion’ reference: under normal circumstances, when is it ever that bad? It’s a movie illustration, so you know it’s all portraying and not real, and so you refurbish it to a form that can help you with idea ‘Admit happen’. So, just refurbish what you use from that ‘Glass Onion’ movie with the inapproprieities removed. Take the bad stuff out, and make that movie useful to you. And, to reiterate, that instigator may not even be doing that anymore!
—
It is now 1:42 PM EST for me. I’ve decided to give you a ‘Star Trek’ movie reference to think about for idea ‘Admit happen’. The scene is near end of movie ‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier(1989)’. The movie is available from Amazon.com, and according to Amazon Video, that scene starts 1 hour, 37 minutes, and 33 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:
Korrd(Charles Cooper): ‘Kirk, my junior officer has something to say to you.’
I think it’s Captain Klaa(Todd Bryant), but I’m not sure: ‘I apologize. The attack upon your vessel was not authorized by my government.’
—
So, if you watched the movie ‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier’, imagined politically, how does the actions of that junior officer translate? I’m assuming that much of what he did to Kirk and his crew was identified as moot/dismissed by his government.
—
It is now 1:53 PM EST for me. I am going to close this list now. Next week, I plan to make a few comments about that ‘Glass Onion’ movie, since I recommended that you watch it, unless I change my mind again and type something else. So, if you are there next Saturday, I’ll see you then.
—
Rated PG sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian’. Rated TV-PG sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Stargate: Atlantis’. Rated TV-14 animated violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘‘The Daily Life of the Immortal King’. Rated PG mature themes, viewer discretion for movie ‘‘Dirty Rotten Scoundrels’. Rated TV-MA mature themes, viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Good Fight’. Rated TV-MA mature themes, violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘‘Only Murders in the Building’. Rated PG-13 mature themes, violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery’. Rated PG sci-fi violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier’. Use only refurbished for advice reference recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Not agree to address or discuss anything’, ‘Not able to resolve’, ‘Nip it in the bud’, and ‘Admit happen’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.