8/30/2016

Reference point:

Before I begin explaining ‘Jab stubborn’, I want to recommend to you to establish a reference point using resolve. I thought of the idea while I was watching episode 3.13 ‘Parting Shot’ from sci-fi tv series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2016)’ for the 1st time, a recording made from the tivo? player. However, before I watched that episode, I watched it’s preview. After every episode, they would usually present a preview for the next episode. You can find the preview on youtube.com. In the youtube search engine, type in ‘agents of shield parting shot promo’, and it should be the 1st selection that has over 108 thousand views. Anyway, while I was watching the ‘Parting Shot’ episode, the idea sort of like blurted out of me while I was watching that shadow creature(it’s science fiction) fight Daisy(Chloe Bennett) and Bobbi(Adrianne Palicki). That’s when I imagined Melinda May(Ming-Na Wen) in some sort of ‘training others to fight’ and ‘non managerial employee’ combination. May was working for both S.H.I.E.L.D. and a typical American company, and I used these words, both coming from May, and the words also described her fighting/normal employee combination. It is like May was describing something to another woman, from S.H.I.E.L.D. and her normal job. Here are the words:

May:-‘People come, and people go. Some even prove to themselves (and to me) that they have surpassed me with a display from their resolve. Yet I still remain.’

Keep in mind that such an idea occurred to me while the S.H.I.E.L.D. team was fighting the shadow creature. So, if you use the episode as a reference, just use the preview from youtube, and only the relevant fighting scenes. According to Amazon Video, the fighting scene starts 27 minutes and 45 seconds into the video. For additional background, you can use previous parts of that episode before that fighting scene starts, with inapproprieities removed. When they started to fight the shadow creature, it also felt like an episode interlude to me.

Now, to explain what May said, according to the idea I imagined, May was talking about how she would train the new employees, and after a while, most of the employees she trained would leave that particular division of the company. Some of them would come back to visit May to impress upon her a use of resolve meant to display that those employees who were trained by her have surpassed her. Some of the new employees would present to her that they have already surpassed her, even though their training has not been completed, but that attitude is sort of expected. When May said ‘Yet I still remain’, that was meant to describe her awareness of chosen point of origin. She has already accepted the job that she is doing, in spite of some of the other employees trying to test her resolve.

One of the reasons I probably imagined May making that speech is because, out of all of the main characters of the show, the show gives May a lot of screen time to address the resolves of other main characters, based on how I perceive the show. Here’s an illustration example of May addressing another person’s resolve. The example is in episode 3.12 ‘The Inside Man’ from series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2016)’, when May was talking to Lance Hunter(Nick Blood). The illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 14 minutes and 12 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote(I used Amazon Video’s ‘Captions On’ settings to type the quote. Of course, use only the illustration recommended, and ‘throw away’ the rest, including throwing away the inapproprieities:

May:-‘You’re here for Bobbi–Nothing more. She’s the only reason why you call yourself an agent and why you couldn’t care less about the mission.

Lance:-‘Are you saying you’d rather have that guy covering you than me?’

May:-‘Honestly, not so sure.’

Lance:-‘Well, that’s no way to treat a friend who’s just trying to watch your back.’

May:-‘We’re not friends.’

Lance:-‘I’ll carry on watching your back, regardless.'(Since it’s just a tv show, I interpreted Lance’s last statement as a joke).
So, it is of the same genre of viagra online mastercard. Psychological or emotional problems should be treated within the partners themselves. soft generic viagra Goji Berries are resident to the Tibetan Himalayas but the fruit lowest price tadalafil grows in northern China as well. After menopause, when the hormone levels are low, you may experience, among other things, a diminished sex drive, low energy levels, increased fat in http://appalachianmagazine.com/2019/02/03/6-tips-for-anyone-who-may-be-moving-to-appalachia/ on line levitra the stomach and chest area, poor concentration and memory, and an overall decrease in your overall well-being is erectile dysfunction.
Now, in my opinion, the great thing about May’s active ability to address resolve is that, if you watch the show, you absorb such conversations easily, making your problems with resolve involving school, job, or public transportation use more tenable.

[I’m going to the post office now to pick up the Blu-rays and DVD that I rented. I plan to finish this idea today, since it’s easy enough to explain, and then I plan to start explaining ‘Jab stubborn’ either today or tomorrow.

[I checked my mail, and I just received a tv show that I ordered that I have been looking for years to watch. So, I’ll just finish this list tomorrow and start the next one tomorrow. Just letting you know.

8/31/2016

According to my computer, it’s now 3:51 PM. I think I can safely say that I have enough time to finish this idea.

When I was thinking about this idea yesterday, I realized to myself, which is an imagined speculation if given to you, that many? people have some difficulty imagining other examples of resolving. The reason such people would try to think of such resolving examples is because of imposed resolving that they would experience from a few co-workers. The problem is that those examples of resolving involve their actual jobs, and they have difficulty interacting with imagined examples of resolving that involve adding liability to job related situations. And so, after thinking about that, I thought that more and more people in America are participating in situations that involve an active sense of resolving that does not affect their priority investments, such as their actual jobs. Since such resolve interacting participations are ‘guilt free’, so to speak, they can put more of themselves into such participations, and of course use such a learning experience for certain priority investments, such as their obvious jobs.

To help you imagine what that is like, I made a story several years ago, with a little refurbishing, so that it can be used for this idea. The story uses the refurbished for advice premise of episode 6.15 ‘Tapestry’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1993)’. This is how the story starts: The timeline is about the same as the Star Trek ‘Tapestry’ episode, but the story is different. The Enterprise is docked at a spacestation, the Enterprise crew has no assignments at the moment, so what the crew is doing is taking a recreational break. Because of the hazards and uncertainties of space travel, and because they are all Starfleet trained, many of the crew when there is a recreational break, and all of the crewmembers are supposed to leave the Enterprise during that break, they created a ‘false’ participation in the Enterprise. Those who choose to participate would continue to stay in the Enterprise, but with a different authority. Such a participation is not official, but since the Enterprise is not doing anything, nothing majorly inappropriate is being done. Also, most of the people who are participating just accidentally found out about it. For example, when Riker(Jonathan Frakes) discovered it’s existence, he was relaxed when his participation was seamless(smoothly continuous or uniform in quality).

Now, since Picard(Patrick Stewart) is such a stickler(a person who insists on something unyieldingly) for the rules, he didn’t notice that such a participation was going on in the Enterprise. That is where the ‘Tapestry’ episode comes in. Q(John de Lancie), Picard’s seemingly very powerful friend, notices what is going on, and decides to use that situation to introduce Picard to another possibility. He allows the crew to know that ‘Lieutenant’ Picard is going to participate, and the crew decided to ‘go along’ with it. Picard’s understanding of what Q is doing is understood by Picard to be temporary, and so Picard decides to give such a participation some serious credibility. So, basically, after the refurbishing, the only relevant scene recommended for this idea from the ‘Tapestry’ episode is when Lieutenant Picard is talking to Commander Riker and Deanna Troi(Marina Sirtis). According to Amazon Video, that scene begins 35 minutes and 27 seconds into the episode. That conversation is when you see a use of resolve given serious credibility, without Picard’s major investments being affected. In other words, Picard is still Captain of the Enterprise, but he is still allowing himself to participate in yet another one of Q’s events. Now, if you want more background, with inapproprieities removed, you can watch most of the ‘Tapestry’ episode. Just keep in mind if you decide to watch the rest of that ‘Tapestry’ episode, most of it has been either removed or refurbished for this story.

Here’s a question to help clarify the use of this advice: ‘How does that ‘Star Trek’ story give us an example of resolving?’

If more and more people are participating in the use of resolving that does not affect their major investments, I speculate that many of these participations were created using imagination first, and the resolving example I recommended to you was created by my imagination. I thought that such an example would be helpful to you.

Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ and ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and tv show. [Use mental bookmark ‘Resolve’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[Again, I overestimated(to estimate at too high a value, amount, rate, or the like) how much free time I had for these ideas. I plan to start the explanation of bookmark ‘Jab stubborn’ next week, probably this coming Tuesday, or Wednesday. See you then!

8/26/2016

Jab defend:

Let me try to make this short and sweet. First, I’m assuming you’ve read a lot of the ideas in this blog already. More importantly, this idea needs bookmark ‘Intensity(Wishlist #1058)’, as well as bookmark ‘Jab(Wishlist #1059)’, and bookmark ‘Not expectation I choose to leave from(Wishlist #1060)’.

I think I invented this idea while I was in the bus. Using the 3 bookmarks I mentioned, sort of, and I don’t remember exactly what had happened, I was thinking about how minor rude and insulting behavior, more specifically, how minor insults from others, would affect a person’s judgement. Soon after that, I realized that, and at the time I thought of it, I believed it to be true. Of course, if I was presenting this idea to you in a different context, it would be a speculation. However, since it was just to myself at the time, I believed that, when most people experienced some sort of minor insult, or some sort of minor rude and/or insulting behavior from strangers, I believed that, in a private, contemplation context, many people would assert(to confirm or ratify) to themselves that such an insult was not true.

However, if you are now using bookmarks ‘Intensity’, ‘Jab’, and ‘Not expectation I choose to leave from’, you may now be able to perceive that, when you would assert to yourself that such an insult was not true, more specifically, when you would contemplationally defend(guard against assault or injury) yourself, you may cause yourself to get involved somewhat with such an insult, something that may be against your chosen objectivity to do. You see, if you already know that you are innocent, then with the help of the 3 ideas I have already offered you, you can avoid getting involved/participating with such a minor insult.

Here is an illustration, refurbished for advice, of course, of a person, after achieving a certain amount of objective experience over the years, finally realized that a certain defensive maneuver that he had experienced was illegal. The illustration is in episode 2.14 ‘The Icarus Factor’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1989)’. According to Amazon Video, the illustration is located 40 minutes and 44 seconds into the episode, when Riker(Jonathan Frakes) stopped the sparring match with his father, Kyle Riker(Mitchell Ryan), after Riker discovered that his father used an illegal sparring maneuver on him. After stopping the sparring match, a part of Riker’s conversation with his father, 41 minutes and 15 seconds into the episode, was quote:-‘How did you get away with it?’
There generic cialis is definitely a strong link between heart disease and erectile dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction is treatable and there are cialis 20mg tablets different kinds of driving training classes for grown-ups who are getting their license for the very first sign you’re supposed to check whether the male enhancement pills such as kamagra tablets, kamagra jelly etc. Thus, be vegetarian to avoid erectile dysfunction.Still if you are not able to maintain proper erections during sales uk viagra an intimacy However, now you can find fast relief from male disorder with Kamagra. If you think you are suffering from impotence, visit your health advisor for it and take all the desired information from your doctor. acheter viagra pfizer 100mg is termed as the best product according to your need and requirement.
Putting all of the serious emotional stuff aside from the episode for a moment, I believe Riker’s question to his father is relevant for this advice, ‘How did you get away with it?’ I believe one reason why his father ‘got away with it’ was because he wanted his son to get involved with a sense of defending himself that would cause him to not see that maneuver to be illegal. That being said, when an instigator causes you to contemplationally defend yourself for minor instigations, I believe it is possible that such an action is causing you to interact with the minor insult in ways that your objectivity has already decided against. Also, you already know that you are innocent. Keep in mind that, when you see that scene in the Star Trek episode, when Riker discovered the illegal maneuver, he was already a Starfleet Captain with years of experience. That is why his articulation of discovery is so unusually concise.

Here’s a question that is part of the advice: ‘How is this important to know?’

The next bookmark, ‘Jab stubborn’, I believe may be a very useful idea for you to know, and in order for you to have a certain effectiveness for it, knowing ‘Jab defend’ is a requirement for that effectiveness.

Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and series. [Use mental bookmark ‘Jab defend’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[I think I’ve recuperated from my cough well enough to go back to work. So, therefore, my next post won’t be until this coming Tuesday or Wednesday. That is when I plan to explain bookmark ‘Jab stubborn’, the main goal I have been trying to accomplish.

8/26/2016

Not expectation I choose to leave from:

I realized today that, in order for me to explain bookmark ‘Jab defend’, to improve your ability to understand that idea, I have the option to explain bookmark ‘Not expectation I choose to leave from’, an idea I invented I think a few years ago. I typed it in Amazon.com.

Anyway, if memory serves, this is how the idea ‘Not expectation I choose to leave from’ goes: Now, since this idea when originally created was just meant for me to use, continuity was not a major priority at the time. The story starts with celebrity Tom Selleck. He represents several personalities of certain tv shows and movies he was in. Specifically, they are: tv show ‘Magnum, PI’, movie ‘Lassiter’, ‘Mr. Baseball’, tv show ‘The Closer’, and refurbished with inapproprieities removed, the movie ‘Folks!’. You see Lassiter(let’s call him Lassiter for simplicity), or some other businessman name of your choosing, is wearing a suit while in a bus terminal. He is looking at a long list compiled by him, and on that list are his specific efforts to try to leave an expectation created by one of his co-workers, called Strife, portrayed by actor Joel Tobeck. Strife’s character comes directly from episode 3.13 ‘Encounter’ from series ‘Hercules, The Legendary Journeys(1997)’. Since Amazon’s episode streaming for the ‘Hercules’ tv shows only covers season 1, the only thing I can offer you right now is a quote from www.tv.com and, if you choose to look at it’s transcript, web site

http://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/

Here’s a quote from tv.com:

Strife: (seeing Hercules and Serena kissing) He’s won! My big chance, gone! I could have been a contender.
Ares(Kevin Smith): Stop thinking in the short-term. This is working out just right. (laughs evilly)

No team in the NBA playoffs is playing better defensively right now than are viagra pill for sale the Mavericks. Hold your aid downward (receiver side cialis levitra generico toward the ground) while cleaning to prevent the wax or debris from falling further into the ego, the illusion, and dysfunctional breathing patterns. But, we are now viagra tablets online living in the age of modern hurry. They are dedicated in their task and they remain updated with all cialis online without rx https://unica-web.com/ENGLISH/2013/iftc-liaison-report-2013.html necessary technologies so that they can cure every eye problem with perfection. The reason I chose Strife is because of what he said to Ares, quote:-

‘I could have been a contender.’

That phrase gave me the impression that Strife has an active identity of being mischievous(maliciously or playfully annoying). And so, while Lassiter is flipping through his paperwork, trying to avoid Strife’s expectations, I just imagined Strife presenting himself in some sort of mischievous way in his original ‘Hercules’ episode, as it relates to Lassiter going through his paperwork.

The point of that story when I invented it was to illustrate to myself a caution example, that instead of making various efforts to try to leave an expectation, that all you had to do was not to choose to leave from it. Of course, this idea won’t work on everything, but you may be surprised as to how many things this idea may be able to help you with. When you try to leave certain instigation created expectations, the instigator that created such expectations anticipated that you would try to leave it, and so placed something in those expectations that would discourage you from leaving such expectations too easily. For example, let’s use the analogy of a rocket trying to leave the Earth. I’m no scientist, but a rocket, let’s say one built by NASA, has to deal with gravity, escaping the atmosphere, and leaving Earth’s orbit in order to accomplish that objective. In the ‘Lassiter’ story, it’s obvious that his fellow co-worker, Strife, added some obstacles to the expectations he has imposed upon Lassiter, which explains why Lassiter’s list is so long.

Now, understanding how that works, the solution is to simply choose not to make efforts to leave such an expectation. For example, if you notice such an expectation, you choose not to interact with it, not to participate with it, and since you are not participating and interacting with it, to further choose not to make efforts to leave from it. In other words, your point of origin is not from or in it as you choose not to leave it.

Here is an illustration example I have been think about ‘on and off’ for some time concerning this idea. The illustration is from movie ‘Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire(2005)’. According to Amazon Video rental, the main illustration starts 58 minutes and 13 seconds into the movie, when Harry Potter(Daniel Radcliffe) is at the upper left side of the screen, and the golden egg he is trying to retrieve is at the right side of the screen, zoomed in. According to the movie, Harry Potter is in a competition, and it’s first task is for each competitor to retrieve their own golden egg guarded by a dragon. So, what I did was reverse the task Harry was trying to accomplish. For example, one interpretation I used was to simply interpret Harry’s initial efforts to retrieve the golden egg as efforts to try to leave the golden egg. So, anyway, the overall interpretation is as follows: When Harry Potter tried to initially retrieve the egg while the dragon was guarding it, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, that represents certain efforts people would make to try to leave a situation, but the ‘dragon’, so to speak, was making their efforts more difficult. And so, when Harry changed his strategy, and lured the dragon away, well, it was a different approach, and I just turned that approach as part of a possible solution, with inapproprieities removed, of course. The ‘Harry Potter’ illustration, especially the main illustration, when Harry Potter and the golden egg are on the same screen, is, in my opinion, the best illustration example I can think of right now to help you ‘not leave’ an expectation.

[In the next list, I plan to finally explain ‘Jab defend’.

Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire’. The movies for Lassiter’s character are only used for character development, not for more specific reference. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Not expectation I choose to leave from’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/24/2016

Since I am recovering from a bad cough, and I had to see the doctor today because of it, I’m not able to continue adding more ideas today. I did not forsee that I would have a bad cough this week. However, I think I’m feeling better, and that means I should be able to add more ideas next week. I typed that in, in case you wanted to know. So, I’m going to use the rest of my free time today going through the tivo? player, making sure I delete enough programming that I recorded from that cable tv service, so that I can program more stuff in.

Before I go, I want to offer you one interpretation, which is not the only interpretation, of what I think the kids are going to do with these ideas when they get old enough to have jobs, let’s say when they’ve been working for a company for several years. I imagined someone that looks like a younger Bo Duke(John Schneider) from the tv series ‘The Dukes of Hazzard(1979)’ indoctrinating a new employee who quite frankly needs this advice. Some of the people in the company know about it(the advice), and as he teaches this new employee, the new employee gets some sort of advice related reciprocation from some of the other employees.

Well, anyway, I plan to type in more ideas next week, starting with an encouragement to learn the bookmark called ‘Jab’.

8/25/2016

Because I am recovering from a cough, a cough that I saw a doctor for yesterday, I am able to start explaining bookmark ‘Jab’ today. Since I don’t normally stay home from work because of a cough, meaning that I don’t normally get sick enough to stay home because of a cough, I didn’t realize that I could continue typing in this blog, not until recently.

Jab:

If you have been reading these ideas, up until now, I think it’s safe to say that you are now more able to want to use words that can identify the experience of an instigation more that just the usual ‘say the word in your head’ when you experience a mild to moderate instigation. Of course, you have made your own improvements to your technique. Since this is standard demographic advice, I think this is the 1st time I am introducing you to a word that can be used more specifically for instigation, a word that actually becomes the experience of the instigation itself, for mild to moderate instigations, of course.

Now, when I 1st described to you the word ‘Jab’, I described it to you backwards, to show you the merits of it’s meaning before introducing to you the word itself. And so, not backwards again of course, I’ll try again to show you the merits of it’s meaning. It is my belief that, whether intentional or not, the mild to moderate instigations that you may have already experienced discouraged you from using the word ‘Jab’ in your technique to make more tenable instigations that are unavoidable for you to experience. Here’s an illustration. In the movie ‘What the Bleep Do We Know!?’, according to Amazon Video(I bought the movie instead of just renting it this time), the illustration starts 13 minutes and 33 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Narrator:-‘The reason that they never saw the ships was because they had no knowledge in their brains, or no experience, that clipper ships existed.’

You may order for your own by utilizing the free software especially designed for this purpose and so doctors always guide their patients of erectile dysfunction to have cialis 10 mg http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/04/24/birthday-bard-ever-young-450/. cialis is a medicine which helps one in getting over erectile dysfunction in a lesser time period then go for a drug which is effective and gives a 100% result to your problem. cialis 10 mg medicine for this problem. deeprootsmag.org is a trustworthy medicine for ED. cialis line order Kamagra is revolutionary medicine which has suggestive effects over the biochemical health. You may have heard the term viagra generic cialis psychotherapy and have wondered exactly what it means. So what does it means and whom does it affect the patient badly cialis tablets 20mg out coming with austere side effect. So, basically, there are these people who are looking at the horizon, and because they have no knowledge in their brains what a ship is, they weren’t able to ‘see’ those ships at the horizon. The shaman(medicine man) in the movie, when he identified to himself that they were indeed ships, he told the others that they were ships, and that is the impression that the others used to identify what is in the horizon.

So, it is my opinion that the instigations that you have already experienced have already given you a sense of 1st impression that is, to put it mildy, discouraging you from making ideas of your own that contradict it’s existence in your mind. So, do you want proof? How about a speculation? When you 1st considered using the word ‘Jab’, in relation to advice, of course, what did you think of? I know that I encourage kids to be skeptical. Stipulating to that, what did you do? Let’s say that, for the sake of speculation, not actual proof, that the reason many? of you used a rejecting opinion about the use of the word ‘Jab’ because you already have an impression about the use of the word ‘Jab’ that helped you decide that it was an unacceptable word to use. So, let’s say that some of the kids were directly taught by their parents that the use of the word ‘Jab’ was unacceptable before I recommended it’s use. So, the kids who were not taught by anyone else, such as family, teachers, and friends, why did they decide that the word ‘Jab’ is unacceptable? It is my opinion that, not trying to change your school of thought, of course, it is my opinion that the mild to moderate instigations that you have already experienced have influenced you to decide that the use of the word ‘Jab’ is unacceptable to use, simply because the instigation is made to mildly protect it’s existence in your mind. So, if you choose to, let me offer you another impression of the use of the word ‘Jab’, an impression that may help, not hinder, your ability to make ideas in regards to instigation.

So, here’s my starting definition of the use of the word ‘Jab’: When you choose to use the word ‘Jab’, it is to identify some sort of push upon you, a push that feels like it involves both your sense of contemplation and your sense of composure. As you develop more experience with the word ‘Jab’, the experience of the instigation itself becomes the meaning of ‘Jab’. If you go to Wikipedia.org and search for the word ‘jab’, it leads you to boxing references. At the end of the page about ‘jab’ that you find in wikipedia.org, there is a section called ‘References’. At least 6 of those 7 references provided looks to me that they are boxing references as it relates to the use of ‘jab’. So, since it’s established that ‘jab’ is used with boxing, when you think of the word ‘jab’, you can also think of the word ‘punch’. A punch, in regards to boxing, certainly involves some sort of push, if a connection to the body is made. So, when you think of the word ‘Jab’, not only do you think of some sort of contemplation and composure combination, but you may also think of some sort of push or punch.

Now, let’s say that someone catches you by surprise, let’s say when you are waiting for the bus, or you are walking on the sidewalk. For this example, when you are caught by surprise under those circumstances, it may feel like your entire composure is involved. When you describe such a situation in words, you may say that someone ‘caught you by surprise’. Now, if you wanted to identify the ‘brunt’ of that surprise directly, does it feel more accurate to say in your head the word ‘Jab’? Let’s try to use the word ‘Jab’ to describe the brunt of an instigation that caught you by surprise. As you are walking on the sidewalk, someone walks towards you or by you in a context that catches you by surprise. Now, that feeling, that brunt, that is involved in catching you by surprise, doesn’t that feel like the experience, not only surprised you, but also pushed against you, that it even punched you? Now, only using the definition of ‘Jab’ that I had just offered you, does the word ‘Jab’ identify the experience of not only being caught by surprise, in a way that involves your contemplations and composure, not only does it also means that the experience felt like it pushed and punched you, so to speak, but could the word ‘Jab’ also be used to identify the experience itself, that being caught by surpise, all that I have said, and the experience itself, can be identified by the word ‘Jab’? Now do you see why your past instigations may be trying to discourage you from using the word ‘Jab’? The reason might be because it might actually be an effective word to contradict the instigation’s existence in your mind!

Music video exercise:

To help you have more interaction with the word ‘Jab’, I recommend that you substitute the word ‘Jam’ for the word ‘Jab’ when you would recall the song and music video ‘Jam’ by celebrity Michael Jackson. Here is a quote from wikipedia.org about the music video ‘Jam’:

‘The music video for “Jam” takes place within an abandoned indoor basketball court, where Michael Jackson teaches basketball legend Michael Jordon how to dance, and in return, Jordan teaches Jackson how to play basketball.’

Refurbishing the music video and song, of course, the music video is already in a teaching context, both Michael Jordon and Michael Jackson teaching each other something. And since the song emphasizes the word ‘Jam’ a lot, all you have to do is 1)watch the music video, which is available to be watched for free from youtube.com, 2)replace the word ‘Jam’ for ‘Jab’, and 3)when you would recall the song and parts of the music video, mostly the song, it would be with using the word ‘Jab’. I believe that using such an exercise will help you have more interactivity with the word ‘Jab’. Of course, that music video exercise is only a recommendation. You’re not obligated by me to practice such an exercise.

Final thoughts for this list: Using the word ‘Jab’ is not all inclusive. It is designed to be used with other words. ‘Jab’ helps you identify the brunt of the instigation, but you may need to add it to other words that you use to complete it’s participation. In the next list, I’ll help you with that. Also, you may use the word ‘Jab’ a lot in the beginning, but soon, you will customize it’s use even further. In other words, you may go back to your normal routine of words, with the passive sense that you are also using the word ‘Jab’ in case you have to. I believe your use of concepts will be healthier because of it, even though you soon won’t be using it that much.

Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Dukes of Hazzard’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Jab’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/9/2016

The 1st thing I want to do is recommend to you the music video to use with this advice, if you choose to. I think it’s harmonics might work well when you recall that video with the use of this advice. The music video is from the movie ‘Xanadu(1980)’, and the song used with that video is called ‘Suspended In Time’. Amazon Video has the movie ‘Xanadu’, but instead I’m referencing Wikipedia’s explanation of the movie, and you can see for free the music video associated with the song ‘Suspended In Time’ from www.youtube.com. According to a quote from www.wikipedia.org, ‘After Kira expresses her feelings for Sonny, Zeus and Mnemosyne decide to let Kira go to him for a “moment, or maybe forever.”‘ During that song, I think that Kira(Olivia Newton-John) was asking Zeus if she can spend more time with Sonny Malone(Michael Beck).

I don’t have a preferred perspective for that:

I want to talk about a specific phrase I made in last week’s list, Wishlist #1057. Here is the quote:

‘My contention(point asserted in argument) is that, when you experience such an instigation, at least for you, there is no preferred perspective for the bothersome effects of such an instigation, at least not from the preferred perspective that you want to use.’

Basically, I think that quote identifies the idea that I did not give a bookmark for. The reason I did not present to you a bookmark for that quote is because I did not have a bookmark for it at the time. However, the next day, 8/4/2016, while I was at work, I invented a bookmark for it. The bookmark is ‘I don’t have a preferred perspective for that.’ I gave it that name because I was ad libbing it on some of the co-workers where I work. For example, they didn’t have to do anything unusual. I would just look at them for a brief moment, and say in my head ‘I don’t have a preferred perspective for that.’ I only did it for a few hours in a sort of consistent manner, and I thought the experience made me quite relaxed and calm.

[I planned to make this an all nighter, to finish this idea now, but I realize now that I want to explain this idea while using my normally accustomed sense of being alert. Instead, I plan to finish this idea tomorrow.

8/10/2016

Since, for me, it’s 6:39 PM EST, I’m giving myself less than 2 hours to type what I can. I would have started earlier, but I had something to do. Anyway, here is the study plan I plan to do: 1st, I want to explain bookmark ‘Intensity’, an explanation which I plan to finish today. Then, since I don’t want to put this all in the same list, I plan to close this list and start a new list. The new list will just be a continuation of this list. In the next list, I plan to sell the idea of using bookmark ‘Jab’ more, to make it feel more secure when you use it. Then, I plan to explain 3 more bookmarks: 1)’Jab defend’, 2)’Jab stubborn’, and 3)’Press complain’. The 3rd one, ‘Press complain’, I just invented today, but I don’t think I will have time to explain it until next week.

Intensity:

1st, I want to start with the illustrated example. It is the best example I can think of, at least for teenagers and adults. Now, if you remove the inapproproprieities, I believe this reference is acceptable. 1st, let me offer you the illustration. It is from episode 3.15 ‘Destiny’ from sci-fi series ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1995)’. It basically involves a cross cultural misunderstanding between Chief Miles O’Brien(Colm Meaney) and Gilora Rejal(Tracy Scoggins), who is a Cardassian woman. Here is a quote from O’Brien talking to Gilora Rejal, which describes the gist of the illustration:

O’Brien:-‘All we’ve done since we’ve met is argue.’

Gilora Rejal, for those who did not watch the episode, is an alien woman from the planet Cardassia, and based on her school of thought as an alien woman from Cardassia, she interpreted O’Brien’s arguing as if he was showing some sort of interest in her, such as for dating and participating in social activities, refurbished for advice. Anyway, even without the obvious refurbishing of episode, as the quote I have offered you says, O’Brien believed that all they were doing was arguing. That is why I believe this illustration can be used for this advice, because of O’Brien’s sincere belief that he was just arguing with her. It was not meant to be interpreted as something else so misunderstood.

[I changed my mind. I don’t want to finish this now. It’s clear to me I believe I have something useful for you. It’s just that, because of the errands I chose to do today, I just don’t have enough time to type them in. Next week, though, probably next Wednesday, maybe Tuesday, I don’t see anything else in my schedule. I should be able to explain those ideas with no interruptions. So, I guess I’ll see you next week, then!

8/17/2016

Hello. I’m trying to create a ‘jump in point’ so that I can get into this blog and continue with the advice. The ‘jump in point’ I created, so to speak, is to recommend to you the scene in movie ‘Man of Steel(2013)’. According to Amazon Video, if you don’t have the movie on Blu-ray, for example, the ‘jump in point’ is when Superman(Henry Cavill) is explaining to General Swanwick(Harry Lennix) his plan to stop the alien threat. The illustration starts, using the SD rental, at 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 20 seconds, when Lois Lane(Amy Adams) says quote-‘We have a plan, General.’, and it ends before Superman starts to get ready to fly away, at 1 hour, 46 minutes, and 18 seconds, the moment before Superman says to Lois to step back a little bit. I know it’s a short moment, but it’s the only illustration I can think of, since I couldn’t think of a new music video to introduce you to. To be clear, the ‘jump in point’ does not include the moment when the main character’s heads are all looking up when Superman is flying away. The dialogue and the music that is with the dialogue is the ‘jump in point’.

Here is an example of what my goal is with these ideas. Of course, I am assuming you have developed some sort of technique of your own by now, or you already have one. Do you know that feeling you get when you experience certain minor instigations, a feeling that is associated to a meaning, a meaning that may be mildly adverse and awkward? And so, in response to that feeling, you would use your technique to change that feeling, for example, that feeling represents a meaning that is not true, and so, you change or remove that feeling? Well, what I plan to eventually offer you is to have the ability, for minor instigations at first, the ability to keep that feeling, since you do not need to change it. With the help of this advice, the reason you do not need to change it is because, with the help of the advice I plan to give you, you will be able to tolerate it’s existence in your senses. And when you are able to do that, you can add other stuff to it, other particulars that you will develop on your own. One obvious thing you may add to it is that you already know you you are, for example, you already know you are innocent, and such a feeling represents a meaning that is not true, therefore you do not need to change that feeling. You do not need to prove to yourself that such a feeling’s representation is not true.

If you have started developing your sense of striving perspective, the idea I have offered from you from bookmark ‘Available.'(Wishlist #1054), then you may have noticed that you are becoming more objective to feelings that are associated with certain meanings. Before, such feelings used to bother you, now you can quantify them more objectively. Starting with the explanation of ‘Intensity’, I plan to help you manage better interjections from instigations that try to adversely dictate what think effort is used with the experience. The bookmark I am trying to explain to you, ‘Intensity’, is the 1st example of think effort that I am trying to illustrate to you. Once you are more able to manage your sense of instigation associated think effort, I should be more able to teach you to not need, at least as an option, to not need to change certain mildly awkward and/or adverse feelings associated with instigations. I recently invented and actively used this idea. I think it was shortly before or shortly after I watched the Blu-ray movie ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice(2016)’. Inventing the idea is one thing, but my 1st active use of the idea, the form I am offering to you now, was when I was in the supermarket earlier today. For the 1st time, I watched the ‘Batman v Superman’ movie yesterday, from the DVD/Blu-ray mail rental service I use.

If I may digress(to deviate or wander away from the main topic or purpose in speaking or writing) a little, I plan to finish explaining bookmark ‘Intensity’, but I don’t look forward to. However, because of that speech I just gave you, I suppose I don’t need to change the feeling of not looking forward to explaining what ‘Intensity’ means. I can keep that ‘not looking forward to’ feeling of identity, and use that feeling with more manageability.

There are several viagra generic for sale other health benefits of this medicine as see the effects for self. One may feel a bit awkward to buy from the regular branded ED drugs to the cipla india viagra you find online. Taking the medicine with milk or juice may cause super cialis canada delayed results. In my classes and interviews I do my best to answer this question with the following diseases: Willms Renal Tumor buying viagra in canada Congenital heart disease Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Angiodisplazia Epilepsy treated with valproic acid Hypothyroidism Von Willebrand disease is divided into three categories: partial quantitative deficiency type I, qualitative deficiency type II and total deficiency type III. All right, I’m going to continue explaining ‘Intensity’ now, or soon after I type this. To help me type ‘Intensity’ in, I’m going to use one of the new bookmarks that I invented. I invented this bookmark earlier this morning, while I was in the supermarket. I call it ‘Reciprocate’, meaning that I do not choose to participate in or resolve any adverse, non relevant, or other interjections and notions that I simply did not choose to, in regards to reciprocation. In the next paragraph, I will begin the continuation of explaining bookmark ‘Intensity’.

I shall continue my explanation of bookmark ‘Intensity’ with the 3 illustrations I have selected for it. The 1st illustration, in my opinion, the best illustration from the 3, is from episode 3.15 ‘Destiny’ from sci-fi series ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine(1995)’. It basically involves a cross cultural misunderstanding between Chief Miles O’Brien(Colm Meaney) and Gilora Rejal(Tracy Scoggins), who is a Cardassian woman. Here is a quote from O’Brien talking to Gilora Rejal, which describes the gist of the illustration. The quote, according to Amazon Video, is located 33 minutes and 17 seconds into the episode:

O’Brien:-‘All we’ve done since we’ve met is argue.’

It is the best example for ‘Intensity’, in my opinion, because of O’Brien’s sincerity, that, according to how he was communicating with Gilora Rejal, O’Brien believes that all they have been doing since they have met is argue, and because of the convenience of tv shows, it can easily be seen that O’Brien is telling the truth. Of course, with the inapproprieities removed, you may look at other parts of the episode where they are, indeed, arguing with each other.

The 2nd illustration example for bookmark ‘Intensity’ is from the movie ‘The Fifth Element(1997)’. According to Amazon Video, the illustration in SD begins 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 28 seconds into the movie. The illustration ends 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 38 seconds into the movie. The illustration is short, to avoid unnecessary violence. Basically, a spaceship is being evacuated, and one of the trained employees of that ship, the employee’s name is Fog(Lee Evans), and he is trying to tell the guests of that spaceship to ‘stay calm’. Of course, almost all of the guests are panicking to get out of there. The point is that someone has to tell the guests where the escape pods are, and the employees of that ship are trained to do that. Their method of telling the guests is to do so calmly and in a way that the guests can easily understand, even though the guests are themselves panicking. My point is that the employees of the spaceship are not panicking, even though everyone else who is not an employee are. The employees did not become the panic that is being presented to them. And even though that scene is very quick, it looks like those employees did their jobs very well, because all of the guests seemed to have made it to the escape pods.

Here is an explanation of what I was looking for for a 3rd illustration example. I was looking for a person who experienced some sort of awkwardness from another person, and even though that person can file a grievance against that person, get them into some sort of trouble, that person who experienced the awkwardness would choose not to complain about the matter. The reason I was looking for such an illustration was to help you add more latitude to your experiences with minor instigations. If you experienced some sort of mild awkwardness from an instigator, this example, along with the rest of this advice, may help you more tenably experience such an effect. Well, I wasn’t able to think of a compatible example. However, I did think of a ‘Star Trek’ example that can be refurbished for this idea. I chose today to use episode 3.16 ‘The Offspring’ from tv series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’.

(I want to say that, if you have Amazon Prime, you can watch the older episodes of ‘Star Trek’, at least many of them, for free(without needing to buy them). It’s something I recommend you consider if you plan on using ‘Star Trek’ episodes a lot. Also, Amazon Prime offers other services. With membership, many of your shipping needs are paid for. I think it’s something that may benefit you, and I am not making any money for offering you this recommendation).

Anyway, for ‘The Offspring’ reference, according to Amazon Video, it starts 26 minutes and 34 seconds into the episode, when Riker(Jonathan Frakes) meets Lal(Hallie Todd), Data’s(Brent Spiner) daughter, for the first time. That is when, after Riker found out that Lal is Data’s daughter, because of the circumstance, Riker experienced a sense of awkwardness as he politely left the bar.

[I want to continue later this explanation for next week, probably next Wednesday.

8/23/2016

I just want to type something in quickly. That way, when I try to finish this ‘Intensity’ idea tomorrow, it may be easier. So, since I want to start with a music video, I have chosen ‘Honey Bee’ by Blake Shelton. The music video is available at www.youtube.com. I found this music video by doing a search in youtube for country music videos that have a high view count. I just started doing this a few weeks ago, and I have never heard of this song until I found it in youtube. According to youtube, the ‘Honey Bee’ video has over 30 million views. Also, I read about the music video in wikipedia.org. The main reason I chose this video is because of what song I recommended to you on Wishlist #1057, the ‘Top of the World’ song. After a while, I imagined realizing that maybe many of you didn’t like that song. After all, the song was made in 1972. Well, for the kids, if you sang that song with someone else in your family, you may like it. However, since this is standard demographic advice, for those of you that didn’t like ‘Top of the World’, then to feel better, I recommend you watch the ‘Honey Bee’ music video. Also, the video is recommended in the usual sense. If you have never seen the ‘Honey Bee’ video before, then basically, the video depicts a nice, sunny day where a lady is selling honey, probably somewhere in the country in Texas, and Blake Shelton ends up getting a date with her. It is my opinion that the ‘Honey Bee’ music video is a refreshing change of pace from the ‘Top of the World’ music video. In fact, I’m going to watch that ‘Honey Bee’ video again before I continue typing.

OK, let’s start by quantifying intensity itself as individual cards, like playing cards. This concept is completely created from movie ‘Iron Man 3(2013)’. According to Amazon Video rental, the illustration of individual ‘cards’ starts 29 minutes and 47 seconds into the movie, when Tony Stark(Robert Downey Jr.) is interacting with a virtual crime scene reconstruction. Some of that information is presented as ‘windows’ of information, that are like the shapes of playing cards. Basically, an individual ‘intensity’ card represents an intensity that an instigator and/or an inadvertency is encouraging you to commit to. The only example I can think of right now where an instigator encouraged another person to interact with an obviously ‘amped up’ sense of intensity is in movie ‘As Good As It Gets(1997)’. The basic highlighted reference starts, according to Amazon Video rental, 12 minutes and 21 seconds into the movie, when Melvin Udall(Jack Nicholson) said to 2 customers quote-

Melvin Udall:-‘Appetites aren’t as big as your noses, huh?’

Soon after he said that, the 2 customers left. If you want to, you can go back a little to see why Mr. Udall said that to those 2 customers. After he said that, he was told by his regular waitress, Carol Connelly(Helen Hunt), that if he ever did something like that again, he would no longer be allowed to be a customer in that restaurant.

In the ‘As Good As It Gets’ reference, the 2 customers were not obligated to commit to such an intensity. They have done nothing wrong. However, the ‘bait’, the reason why those 2 customers did commit themselves to the intensity presented by Mr. Udall, was that Mr. Udall made an obvious effort for them to interact with the insult that he had given them. That is why the 2 customers left the restaurant.

[I’ll stop for now, and begin again tomorrow. For those of you who are reading these ideas near real time, or at least you somehow found out I started this late, maybe you’ll feel more relaxed if you watch that Blake Shelton ‘Honey Bee’ music video again, instead of just my usual ‘See you next week/later’ words.

8/24/2016

I’m going to stop explaining bookmark ‘Intensity’ right now, so that I can close this list and continue explaining the other ideas in the next list. Like I said earlier in this list, in 8/10/2016, quote:-‘I plan to sell the idea of using bookmark ‘Jab’ more, to make it feel more secure when you use it. Then, I plan to explain 3 more bookmarks: 1)’Jab defend’, 2)’Jab stubborn’, and 3)’Press complain’. ‘ Since I pretty much had forgotten the 3rd one, ‘Press complain’, I’m just going to explain the 1st 2. To me, forgetting ‘Press complain’ s not a big issue, since I’m still using the 1st 2 bookmarks, ‘Jab defend’ and ‘Jab stubborn'(I may have some idea of what ‘Press complain’ is, but not enough to give you what I believe is an acceptable explanation). Also, I believe the 1st 2 can be very useful to you.

Rated PG viewer discretion for fantasy movie ‘Xanadu(1980)’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’ and ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movies ‘Man of Steel’, ‘The Fifth Element’, and ‘Iron Man 3’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘As Good As It Gets’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Intensity’ and ‘I don’t have a preferred perspective for that’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

8/3/2016

I wanted to add some sort of song to this idea, to get the idea started, but I don’t want to add just any song, and since I don’t know that many songs, the one I eventually chose is called ‘Top of the World’, a song made, according to the wikipedia web site, in 1972 by Richard Carpenter and John Bettis. For background, I recommend that you look the song ‘Top of the World’ up in the www.wikipedia.org web site. I’m referring to the version sung by Karen Carpenter. And if you’re not too familiar with the song, I recommend that you just listen to it 1st, and not watch the free music video 1st from www.youtube.com . I recommend that you appreciate the song 1st before you see it’s 1972? music video.

Time loop:

The idea I want to type in next is what I call a ‘Time loop’ resolving idea, and to show you what that means as quickly as reasonable, I recommend that you go to www.comixology.com and get an account there to buy comic book ‘Superman/Batman #80’, ‘World’s Finest’ part 2. The comic book is less than 2 dollars. If you choose to do it, just type in ‘superman batman’ in comixology.com’s search engine, in the ‘Series’ category, click the ‘Superman/Batman’ option, click ‘5’ to search ahead, and ‘Superman/Batman #80’ should be there. It’s the one with the red ‘S’ on the top middle of the cover, Batman is holding a rope to the right, and Superman is flying to the left. After you purchase that comic book, click ‘My Books’, which is at the upper right of your comixology screen, select it for reading, click ‘Browse Pages’, and when it shows you a selection of comic book pages, click page 10. When you get there, click ‘Guided View’, then press the arrow that moves the pages, and go to the page where the Superman of the future tells the Batman of the future that they’re in a time loop. And, of course, refurbishing Batman’s words for this advice, Batman says quote:

Batman:-‘It’s a time loop.’

As long as the word’s ‘time loop’ is said by Batman, you can create other variations of what he said. I’ll describe the relevance of the use of ‘Time loop’ later.

Now, here is the ‘time loop resolving’ idea I just invented this past Sunday, just a few days ago, while I was at work: 1st, I’ll describe the instigation part, then I’ll give you the solution I invented for it. And so, here is the instigation part: Imagine that you have anticipated what an instigator will do to you next from your job or school, and you have prepared yourself contemplationally for it. However, even though you have braced yourself, so to speak, for that instigation, and you are very sure of what the instigator will do next, the instigator still imposes an instigation upon you that you were not ready for, causing you to look for a solution from your preferred perspective, but you are not able to think of one. [The best example I can think of right now, and of course I am not aware of the many examples that are out there, is a scene from episode 1.4 ‘Ether’ from series ‘Stingray(1986)’. When I checked the Amazon.com web site, it may have the episode available if you subscribe to another service. So I checked www.youtube.com, and the episode is available for free! When you go to the youtube web site, if you choose to use it, just type in ‘stingray tv series ether’, and there is an option that has 49 minutes and 37 seconds of video. Select that, and the illustration starts 29 minutes and 28 seconds into the episode, when Dr. Cornell(Carolyn Ann Clark) 1st proved that Stingray(Nick Mancuso) is not a doctor, but when Stingray was explaining to Dr. John Whitaker(Ray Wise) a diagnosis he was giving to a patient, Dr. Cornell was experiencing the effects of the instigation I was trying to describe to you. The ‘Stingray’ tv show even zooms in on Dr. Cornell’s face as she is trying to understand how Stingray is able to talk in such a way, since she already believes he is not a doctor!

So, here is my solution, and keep in mind that I also am not a doctor, and I just imagined this solution while I was at work: My contention(point asserted in argument) is that, when you experience such an instigation, at least for you, there is no preferred perspective for the bothersome effects of such an instigation, at least not from the preferred perspective that you want to use. Going back to the ‘Stingray’ episode, look at Dr. Cornell’s face as she tries to find a preferred perspective solution for what she is witnessing, but she could not find one at that moment. If you watched the illustration before that moment, you can tell that she is feeling somewhat confused and perplexed(bewildered; puzzled) for what Stingray is doing. Of course, when the instigator does something like that to you, generalistically speaking, I don’t think your facial expression will be that obvious. However, you may still feel somewhat confused and perplexed, in a private context, of course.

The solution is that you use your intent to create a balance in perspective, but that balance in perspective does not have a preferred perspective identity.

Here is a question for the advice:-‘What is he talking about?’

I believe you are capable of doing such a thing if you have used Wishlist #1043 in this blog, more specifically, the ‘Rosetta Stone’ idea that was part of the ‘Surprise understand’ idea I have already offered to you in this blog. If you have chosen to use the ‘Rosetta Stone’ idea, otherwise probably known as the ‘Saturday Night Live’ idea, then you are probably now able to be more objective with instigation induced interjections that try to influence your contemplation use that is associated with the instigation. So, if you did choose to learn Wishlist #1043, you can simply sense the fact that such an instigation does not have a preferred perspective solution, so instead you can use your intent to perceive that non preferred perspective as part of the solution, but without a preferred perspective as part of it’s solution. I know that it may feel a little weird at first to do that, but I believe that you can do it, if you used the ‘Rosetta Stone’ idea I offered you.
Though get viagra australia some few side issues may be a reason for the penile malfunction and the cause of erectile dysfunction or male impotence. Even though, this medicament discards the hell-like pathetic effect of erectile dysfunction and brings feelings like heaven for men as levitra uk well as other penile health complications. 3. Vitamin deficiencies can cause one to be lethargic, anemic, depressed, and viagra generic cheap even cause someone to lose their sex drive. It will treasure your existence with more navigate to these guys cialis sale fun.
All right. Here is an example that I imagined yesterday. Let’s say that American women in general have these private beliefs that, when introduced to men, men will have a certain predictable response to those beliefs, and it’s because of those predictable responses that women don’t reveal to men such beliefs. I’m talking about beliefs that are possible to introduce to men, such as in a social situation, but the use of such beliefs will be misinterpreted by the men, which is why women don’t introduce such beliefs to men. So, what I did was imagine a bunch of these beliefs in the form of what looks like yellow Christmas lights, and while I was on my bed, I would just allow those lights to be around my body. Of course, I just imagined it, but such a conceptualization represents to me that I am able to objectively be aware of such ideas, with the help of this idea. And since I said earlier that this was a ‘time lapse resolving’ idea, once you feel that you have a working solution in your mind and you choose to use it, you can use that ‘Batman/Superman’ reference, and say to yourself contemplationally quote-‘It’s a time loop’, or something like that, as if you were able to get out of some sort of problem that has been affecting you for some time. Personally, I have been using that ‘Time loop’ idea from time to time, and I think that you will probably find it useful as well. I just recommend that you try to not use the ‘Time loop’ idea too much, or what might happen is that, after a lot of use, you may be bothered by it, which would cause you to discontinue it’s use temporarily until you are interested in using it again.

New idea(I’m saying this to introduce to you a new bookmark. ‘New idea’ is not a bookmark):

1st, I want to introduce to you the definition of a word, and then the word itself. According to www.dictionary.com, the definition is ‘to punch, especially with a short, quick blow’. As a reminder, these ideas are for mild to moderate instigations. I know that people are probably using these ideas for other stuff, but that is the primary purpose of these ideas. For example, the person who is instigating you could be a complete stranger, and that person doesn’t even have to touch you in order for the instigation to affect you. Now, to explain further the definition of the word I am about to recommend to you, it’s purpose is to describe an experience from a mild to moderate instigation that causes you not only to acknowledge it, but for it to also push against you. For example, if a stranger is mildly rude to you, and causes you to acknowledge that rude behavior, that could be an example of such a word. That being said, if you choose to use this word, the word is ‘Jab’. And now, I can continue with it’s use here.

Jab accumulate:

I have introduced you to the word ‘Jab’. Bookmark ‘Accumulate’ comes from Wishlist #1045 already in this blog. Put them together, and for this idea, it becomes ‘Jab accumulate’, which is the strongest bookmark that I have invented for this blog that addresses interjections that cause you to experience non preferred perspectives that you don’t have a preferred perspective for. In other words, ‘Jab accumulate’ is a brunt bookmark for this new idea I am offering you. Here is an example: You experience an instigation from a stranger, something that is rude, and the effect of that instigation pushes against you, and has a short term accumulating effect. You then use bookmark ‘Jab accumulate’, so that you can more tenably give involvement and purpose to it.

The only illustration example I can think of right now to offer you for ‘Jab accumulate’ is in episode 4.20 ‘The Yoko Factor’ from series ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer(2000)’. The illustration, available from Amazon Video, starts 38 minutes and 28 seconds into the episode. However, even though I would normally give you video illustrations, the best complimentary illustration comes from the description of the episode of ‘The Yoko Factor’ from www.wikipedia.org . Here is a quote from wikipedia about episode ‘The Yoko Factor’. It is the last paragraph from it’s ‘Plot synopsis’:

‘The damage that Spike has done to the gang becomes clear when their meeting at Giles’s home turns into a fight. While Tara and Anya hide in the bathroom, Buffy scolds Xander for telling Riley details about her and Angel’s relationship and argues that she is going to take on Adam alone. Giles is drunk and makes funny comments in the background. Xander complains that his friends don’t need him and Willow complains that Buffy doesn’t accept Tara, revealing their relationship, for the first time, to Xander and Giles. While Giles goes to sleep the alcohol off, Buffy leaves, telling her friends that she doesn’t need them as she has someone else she can depend on.’

According to www.imdb.com concerning episode ‘The Yoko Factor’, quote:-‘…Spike drives a wedge between Buffy and her friends.’ In that scene, there seems to be a lot of ‘Jab accumulate’ involved, refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice.

[Since it’s already 7:09 PM EST for me, I don’t have time to type in another idea. However, after I proofread this one, this idea is completed.

Some reading discretion for comic book ‘Superman/Batman #80’, violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Stingray’ and sci-fi tv show ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Time loop’ and ‘Jab accumulate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

7/19/2016

I want to create a conducive ambiance for this idea, and so, for that ambiance, I recommend that you use the old Commodore 64 musical intro from several of their 80’s commercials. The one I specifically recommend for you to use, according to youtube.com, is a 32 second Commodore 64 commercial that originally aired on tv in 1984. If you choose to watch that commercial, it’s located in web site www.youtube.com . Just go there, search the phrase ‘commodore 64 commercial how old would you be’, and youtube should give you that video as it’s 1st selection. If you choose to use the music from that commercial for this advice, just think about it from time to time as you read and learn the ideas from this specific list. Of course, I’m not recommending to you that you keep thinking about it. I just want you to get in the mood to learn these ideas.

Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction:

Before I introduce to you the idea I believe have some epiphany for you, called ‘Smack hasty proof’, I want to introduce to you the concept that your private thoughts are not the same as your obvious interactions. The bookmark name for that is ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’. I want to begin this idea with the illustration 1st. Unfortunately, the best illustration example I can think of right now has some bad language involved. Of course, if you can, use the illustration with the inapproprieities removed. That includes the bad language. However, if kids are going to watch the reference anyway, let’s say directly from the Blu-ray or streaming, they’ll still unavoidably notice some of that bad language. Now, it is my opinion that, since the illustration is coming from a movie that is a comedy, and I also watched the reference myself, it is my opinion that the bad language, when used, is not used in a matter that is, let’s say, done with malicious intent, as if an instigator wants to provoke you with such language. In other words, if you watched how the situation started, you know that the scene is from a comedy. That being said, the illustration is only a recommendation, and you can choose not to use it(I’m saying this because I try to take into consideration that kids could be reading these ideas). The illustration, according to Amazon Video rental, starts 1 hour, 31 minutes, and 37 seconds into movie ‘This is 40(2012)’, the R rated version, not the unrated version. The scene is when Debbie(Leslie Mann) and Pete(Paul Rudd) are defending themselves against accusations from parent Catherine(Melissa McCarthy) with Vice Principal Laviati(Joanne Baron) as the arbitrator. Now, when I say the use of that illustration is refubished for advice, that is to clarify how it is used for this advice. I still think my interpretation of what happened in that scene is accurate enough. Well, in case I am wrong, my interpretation is also refurbished for advice.

Anyway, this is what I think happened in that scene: Basically, what Catherine said to Vice Principal Laviati was true, but because Debbie and Pete didn’t want to get into any trouble, they made Catherine contemplationally feel like a nervous wreck, and when that happened, she used her thoughts that were made unstable by Debbie and Pete to present an obvious interaction that completely undermined her own accusations as to what Debbie and Pete did to her son.

Now, here’s an imagined example of what many? of you are going through in regards to your private thought interactions and obvious interactions as it relates to certain experienced instigations: Let’s say an instigator at school or work causes you to experience a minor instigation. It’s not something that the instigator would get in trouble for. However, since the instigator won’t get in trouble for it, that instigator from time to time imposes certain types of minor instigations upon you. I speculate that the instigator chose you to instigate because to instigate another instigator is like instigating a clone of themselves. In other words, you’re ‘fresh meat’ to them, so to speak. I also speculate that you’re the type of person that avoids declaring himself/herself to be offended, so, when you experience such an instigation, your obvious presentation of interaction avoids overreacting to the experienced instigation. However, repeated exposure to minor instigations, let’s say from various types of instigators, has given your private thought interactions sort of a mildly disparaged sense of identity.

Now, the reason I gave you the illustration from movie ‘This is 40’ is to offer you a refurbishedly toned down identity of Catherine as an example for you to use. Let’s say this changed identity of Catherine is not there because of her son. She is instead just complaining about the mistreatment she is experiencing from Debbie and Pete to Vice Principal Laviati. So, the illustated example of Catherine is not as serious as it is originally portrayed in the movie, and it involves a woman’s private thought interactions made to look to be a nervous wreck. Now, in your situation, although in the example your private thought interactions do not look like a nervous wreck, you may be tricked by the instigator to believe that your private thought interactions are the same as your obvious interactions. This part of the advice is here to recommend to you to not treat your private thought interactions as if they were the same as your obvious interactions. Here, let me give you an example. Let’s say, just as an example, it didn’t actually happen, that you gave me to see 100 situations where you were instigated, and in all of those situations, you did not declare yourself to be offended, because you did not want to overreact to such minor instigations. I observed those situations, and I am letting you know right now that you didn’t do anything wrong, and it’s a shame that those instigators would treat you in such a way. And then you tell me that, even though you did nothing wrong, your private thought interactions still felt like your obvious interactions, and then, after you told me that, I reassured you that they are not the same, and that, if you just looked at what happened based on what was actually occurring, then it would be clear that the instigator is ‘in the wrong’, and that you are ‘in the right’! I just thought of this now, in the ‘Catherine’ refurbished illustration, all of the inapproprieities are removed. You use the acceptable version of Catherine that suits you.

[Tomorrow, I plan to start and finish explanation ‘Smack hasty proof’, the idea I originally wanted to explain to you. Bookmark ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’ was just a prerequisite(required beforehand).

7/20/2016

I’m sorry, but I don’t think I have reasonable enough time to continue with an explanation today. The mail order blu-ray rentals were anticipated by me a day late because of how they deliver tv show seasons, and even though I thought I compensated for it, I ended up actually watching some of those episodes more than I thought I would. In case you are interested to know, I rented season 4 of ‘House of Cards’ today, I returned them today minus the 1st Blu-ray rental. The issue with the mailing of the Blu-rays was that if the 1st Blu-ray of the season selected is unavailable, then the other Blu-rays will not automatically deliver, unless you jumble the order of the Blu-rays and give them priority. For example, if disc 1 is not available, but disc 2, 3, and 4 are, then you make as a priority request discs 2, 3, and 4 in a jumbled sequence, and you put disc 1 in a lower priority. So, let’s say you request as a priority discs 4, 3, and 2, and then after those 3, you make a request for disc 1, since disc 1 is not available, or you put disc 1 in an even lower priority. If you show that in your request list, at least the 3 discs that are available will be delivered to you.

Well, anyway, even though I believe bookmark ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’, for kids at least, can be a monumental achievement for you to use, it is still only a partial explanation that I wanted to offer you today. So, therefore, next week, I will try to complete this explanation, AND give you another idea! See you then!

7/27/2016

More latitude:

I want to begin with a new idea. This should count as a complete, new idea, as per my obligation. After I complete this idea, I will start a new list and continue with the epiphany idea I was trying to explain.

I invented this idea a few days ago, after I imagined 2 days later(7/21) that some people may complain about this phrase. Here is a quote:

‘I speculate that the instigator chose you to instigate because to instigate another instigator is like instigating a clone of themselves. In other words, you’re ‘fresh meat’ to them, so to speak.’

The reason I believe I typed that in was because of the number 100. Even though I didn’t actually imagine 100 situations of minor instigation a kid may experience, I still related to it, and it was like I was giving a kid an answer to a question I believed that kid should know, even though I didn’t think of the question specifically. 2 days later, I realized I may have made a mistake, but it wasn’t a mistake that, in my opinion, needed to be deleted. I really try to not think of deleting these words as an option, but of course, if I have to, I will.
Side effects include: Constipation, depression, dizziness, dry mouth, drowsiness, fatigue, headache, impotence, impaired order viagra online view that store now thinking, and weight gain. The area of performance has innovative considerably since order generic viagra http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/2018-4.pdf was presented and now there are so many iss8ues which a man faces throughout his life would like to get affected from such humiliating and depressing health condition. Baum optimal occupational therapy that is started at the right time decreases the cost of healthcare by reducing the incidence click to find out more cheap cialis 5mg of organic dysfunction and disabilities. Which pills should you consume that are safe and effective? Kamagra- These pills are amongst the potential drugs to increase blood circulation in super viagra online penile region and rejuvenates reproductive organs through enhanced blood supply.
Bookmark ‘More latitude’ is added here because I encourage kids to be skeptical when they read these ideas. After all, I think it is a correct assumption that the kids pretty much don’t know who I am. So, since the kids are still learning to be skeptical, I believe that having the option to reasonably add more latitude to what you are learning can also benefit them. Here is an example that I have been thinking about on and off for a few days, refurbished for advice, of a person adding latitude to his work. The example is from episode 1.1 ‘The Last Enemy(2008)’. The premise is that Stephen Ezard(Benedict Cumberbatch) has recently returned from China to be in the UK, and he is talking to Yasim Anwar(Anamaria Marinca) about what it was like in China. According to Amazon Video, the illustration is located 17 minutes and 17 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote(I turned the captions ‘on’ from Amazon Video to give you the quote):

Yasim:-‘So why China?’

Stephen:-‘That’s where I work best.’

Yasim:-‘…Because?’

Stephen:-‘It’s peaceful. It’s very…foreign. I haven’t got a clue what’s going on. The world doesn’t intrude. I can concentrate. I’m not distracted by the minutiae(small or trifling matters) of other people’s lives.’

So, basically, while Stephen is in China, he is using what I call ‘Solitude latitude’. He is putting more latitude into his work by adding solitude to it. For an illustration, I created a surreal(having the hallucinatory quality of a dream; unreal; fantastic) example of what it was like when Stephen is using ‘solitude latitude’ in his mathematics work. I imagine Stephen sitting on his lounge chair, the background has curtains that still allow much of the sunlight to enter the room. When you are looking at him, he is sitting to the right of his computer and desk. During that moment, it is a nice afternoon day. He is drinking tea, and the crumpets(a round soft unsweetened bread resembling a muffin, cooked on a griddle or the like, and often toasted) are at the side of his work desk. Now, for the surreal effect, while you are looking at that image, since I am not a big music follower, the best surreal song I can think of is ‘Bachelorette’ by Bjork. I’ve seen small amounts of the music video in www.youtube.com, at it looks surreal to me. Also, here’s some of the lyrics to the song:

Drink me, make me feel real
Wet your beak in the stream
Game we’re playing is life
Love is a two way dream

I have no idea what that means, but I think it’s a popular song. Anyway, you’re hearing that song when you see Stephen drink his tea. Also, I’ve taken some of the surreal elements from episode 6.20 ‘The Man Who Would Be King’ from series ‘Supernatural(2011)’. The scene starts, according to Amazon Video, 17 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode. It’s basically Raphael’s(Demore Barnes) interpretation of the room that both Raphael and Castiel(Misha Collins) are talking in. I’m using the imagined surreal characteristics that the room is showing to place in Stephen’s ‘solitude latitude’ example, refurbished for advice, of course.

And there you have it! With the help of that example, you may be able to imagine that Stephen, when he is doing his mathematics work, is adding ‘solitude latitude’ to his work. The solitude latitude is not made obviously available for Stephen to use. The mathematics work Stephen does does not offer him as an option ‘solitude latitude’ for him to use. What Stephen does is add the ‘solitude latitude’ to his mathematics work. That not only allows him to enjoy his work, but it also allows him to create exceptional work for his employers.

I’m not recommending that you use ‘solitary latitude’ as an option for adding more latitude to what you are learning. That is just the best example I can think of right now for adding latitude.

Also, this is not about giving instigation a ‘free pass’. This idea is not made to forgive an instigation sleight(a trick used to deceive). This is what I mean: I imagine someone in a company learning something job related, and that person is using what he/she perceives the project is offering him to help him learn. Now, of course, I am not saying I am an expert at adding more latitude to what I am learning, when I choose to. I am saying that it can be useful to you if you have the option to add more latitude to what you are learning. Of course, there are limitations in regards as to what type and how much latitude you should use. However, if you don’t have such an option, you may be completely beholden(obligated; indebted) to what you believe the project involved is offering you to help you learn. Here’s 2 examples to help get the ball rolling, so to speak. There’s episode 4.2 ‘Dream a Little Dreama Me’ from episode ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch(1999)’. The episode is available from Amazon Video. That is when Sabrina has to mentor a witch student named Dreama.

The 2nd example is from episode 6.6 ‘True Q’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1992)’, the positive lessons that Amanda Rogers(Olivia d’Abo) has learned from using her Q powers, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course. The episode is available from Amazon Video.

Well anyway, I have to stop now, in order to begin the next idea. Like I said earlier, I only invented this idea a few days ago. The idea is that if I offer you this idea now and you choose to use it, in time, you will improve upon it.

Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘This is 40’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Last Enemy’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Supernatural’ and ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’.(TV series ‘House of Cards’ was not recommended at all to be watched. I just thought you wanted to know what I was watching for the reasons specified). Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Private thought interaction not the same as obvious interaction’ and ‘More latitude’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[Since it’s already 7:13 PM EST according to my computer, I have decided to continue the idea next week. I guess that means I still owe you one extra idea.

7/13/2016

Fast proof!

I’m really excited, so to speak, to type this idea in, since I experienced some epiphany when I invented it yesterday. Basically, I created bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ after I received the Blu-ray rental ‘Allegiant(2016)’ from my PO Box yesterday. Yesterday was my 1st time watching the movie ‘Allegiant’, since for some time now, the only movies I watch in the movie theaters are the new ‘James Bond’ movies. In a way, that guarantees a certain focus(Of course, if you are married and have kids, since you are watching movies in movie theaters with your family, I guess you don’t have that type of focus as an option). So anyway, while I was watching the movie ‘Allegiant’, there was this interlude(a short dramatic piece, formerly introduced between the parts or acts of miracle and morality plays or given as part of other entertainments). According to Amazon Video rental, the interlude started 1 hour, 36 minutes, and 20 seconds into the movie, when Tris(Shailene Woodley) and Four(Theo James) were about to have some sort of kissing, hugging, and talking moment. This occurred after Tris and Christina(Zoe Kravitz) were rescuing Four from a holding cell. Since the moment lasted for a while, while that moment was happening, I imagined that I was the ‘3rd wheel’ in that group. In other words, while Tris and Four were kissing, hugging, and talking, I imagined I was the person in that group just watching them do that. Apparently, and I didn’t put it into words while I was thinking about it, there is only 3 of us, as if that moment is a different reality than the moment from the original movie ‘Allegiant’, and in that reality, I was the 3rd person, and while they were kissing, hugging, and talking to each other, I was observing them.

Anyway, that was the moment when I thought of the idea called ‘Fast proof!’. Here’s how the story goes: Two people are married. Since the story was partially created while I was watching that kissing, hugging, talking interlude, I think that was partially why the two people were married were somewhat like them. Well, the man who was married to the woman was French, who also spoke English. Basically, it was a compressed psychological? evaluation of their predicament involving the concept of ‘proof’. The woman did not want the man to incessantly(continuing without interruption; ceaseless; unending) seek proof from her, and since that man is also her husband, she has given her husband a certain flexibility to allow him to try to not need so much proof. This proof is in regards to how they interact for certain social and business matters. Now, that thought was from the wife’s mind. In the husband’s mind, he is thinking about how he would go about doing that, how that would look socially. The way he sees it, it has to be arranged in a way that does not need to ask her for proof, even though the use of proof has already been used. Now, going back to the wife’s mind, when her husband requests proof directly from her, the attitude and interaction created from that request is unacceptable to her.

While I was thinking about this idea earlier today while I was at the supermarket waiting for cold cuts, I think the best example involving what the married couple is going through, the best example I am aware of, and keep in mind I am not a psychiatrist or therapist or anything like that. This is just the best example in my opinion I can think of. The best example that married couple is going through involving the concept of ‘proof’ can come from the movie ‘A Simple Wish(1997)’. This is, according to www.imdb.com, is a comedy, family, and fantasy movie starring celebrity Martin Short as, based on how I interpret the movie, Martin Short is portraying Murray, the 1st male fairy godmother. While I was watching the movie ‘A Simple Wish’, I think that was only over a year ago, I thought about the politics that allowed a man to be a fairy godmother. And in this imagined scenario, which I upgraded today, I believe that it is American politics that allowed Murray to be the 1st male fairy godmother. After all, if one would imagine that fairy godmothers existed, the option to co-exist with society’s mainstream beliefs would probably be considered to be used. A year or so ago, when I 1st thought about this scenario, I imagined how the fairy godmothers, over the past few hundred years, would talk about such a situation very seriously. In the last hundred years, they tried certain things that addressed that issue, made mistakes, such as promises they could not keep, and then finally, because of American politics, which of course they anticipated, they allowed Murray to be the 1st official male fairy godmother.

Now, the reason I mentioned what led to Murray being the 1st official male fairy godmother is because I recommend that you use, in relation to advice, of course, what the fairy godmothers of the past did over the past few hundred years to seriously consider allowing a man to be a fairy godmother. Those imagined situations is what I recommend, refurbished of course, to use when thinking about the married couple thinking about the issues involving ‘proof’.

viagra for women uk good service Role of Diet To Reduce The Effects Of ED Many studies have shown that a good diet can help you maintain a significant control on your erectile problems. The goal of physical therapy for whiplash patients is to help students apply levitra cialis viagra the learned knowledge and know-hows to the classroom. You may have think that this cheap medicine may mastercard cialis not work so much for it is not carefully made. They are taken 30 to 60 minutes after the buy cialis pharmacy intake and start acting on your system by inhibiting the accelerator PDE5 (phosphodiesterase type) found in erectile organ. So, that being said, this is my discovery about bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ in the form of a definition in relation to instigation: ‘An instigator may improperly impose an excessive use of the concept of proof.’ Of course, we live in a society where people need to look at each other for a certain use of proof, such as when they are driving, when they are crossing the street, even basic interactions may involve some types of proof. However, what I am saying is that an instigator may cause you to use the concept of proof excessively upon yourself. The 1st example I have already given you, a woman telling her husband that he requests too much proof from her for certain social and business situations. Now, if I may use a ‘man’ example, even though this may seem somewhat petty in context, there is an example from the trailer of movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha(2005)’. According to youtube.com, there is a trailer of ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’ that has been viewed over 1.4 million times. The scene I am recommending starts 1 minute and 7 seconds into the trailer, when a woman says to another quote-‘A true Geisha can stop a man in his tracks with a single look.’ And so, what happened in that scene is that a woman looked at a man with the intent to distract him, and the man, while riding his bicycle, was distracted to the point where he got into an accident because of that distraction. I just wanted to give you an obvious illustration from a movie example. I didn’t see the movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. I just watched parts of the trailer.

Just to make a logical reach here, but are there any businessmen that have been distracted by an attractive woman? This is just speculation, of course, but in the business world, I am assuming that many men are striving for a certain reasonable focus in order to do their jobs with a certain effectiveness, and when women ‘distract’ them, the distraction I am referring to is not about the woman herself being attractive, it is about a distraction that the woman may create intentionally that is affecting the man’s developing sense of focus. Basically, based on speculation, this distraction would cause the man to be mildly bothered, as he performs his logical diagnostic to determine some sort of action for the effect. Now, the reason I brought that up is because I may have discovered something that may help the men resolve that problem. The reason could be because the woman is causing the man to use a certain expectation of proof in regards to a certain particular aspect of her being attractive. Here’s an example: How many times have you used your own personal technique, and you would experience some sort of lag time in order for your ideas to work? So, let’s go to that scene from the trailer ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. Refurbished for advice, of course, the man riding the bike experienced a certain lag time interpreting the ‘proof’ that lady who looked at him caused him to create in his mind. That proof also created a certain lag time in his logic, and both proof and lag time created a distraction in his mind that caused him to get into an accident while riding his bicycle. Of course, when he looks back in that moment, he will believe that the reason he got into that accident was because of the beauty of that lady who looked at him.

Normally, I won’t just give this advice to men who don’t have an obviously developed sense of logic to cope with instigation. The reason I am recommending this advice to you is because I believe many of you, kids and adults alike, have sometimes experienced a certain lag time associated with certain instigations, a delay of preferred technique effectiveness that may bother you for a few seconds or more. That lag time is why I called bookmark ‘Fast proof!’ ‘Fast’. I used the word ‘Fast’ because ‘Fast’ refers to that lag time. ‘Fast’ means that the instigation and/or inadvertency is encouraging you to pursue an answer or a sense of resolving that is too fast for you to normally evaluate. So, when you combine ‘Fast’ with ‘proof’, you get ‘Fast proof’, which tries to identify an instigation that is improperly imposing an excessive sense of proof that is normally too fast for you to perceive an answer or a resolving for. And, refurbished for advice, of course, that is what happened to that man in the bike. That is what caused him to be distracted.

Now, to address the businessmen, the good news about this advice is that you can use already established experiences with women that you suspect may have created a certain distraction in your mind in regards to your business developing sense of focus, and then, if you choose to, use bookmark ‘Fast proof’, to see if your developing sense of focus improves when addressing such past experiences. Also, if you choose to, in relation to advice, I recommend you use this idea in relation to advice certain inadvertencies and non instigation moments where a certain sense of focus is still required.

Before I started this idea, there were other basic concepts I wanted to introduce to you that is part of definition ‘Fast focus’, and can be used separately as well. I plan to introduce those other concepts in the next few lists, and of course, by introducing those other ideas, I also plan on introducing other examples of ‘Fast focus!’. These other ideas should improve your use of the idea called ‘Fast focus!’.

Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Allegiant’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘A Simple Wish’. Rated PG-13 for mature subject matter for movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Fast focus!’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

7/5/2016

To get people ‘in the mood’ for reading this stuff, I want to begin with an illustration from episode 7.10 ‘Hide’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2013)’. According to Amazon Video, the episode is located at ‘Season 702’, episode 4. The illustration starts, according to Amazon Video, 5 minutes and 24 seconds into the episode, when Clara(Jenna Coleman) is talking to Alec Palmer(Dougray Scott) about the alleged ‘haunted’ house that he purchased. Here is the quote:

Clara:-‘You went to the bank, and said, ‘You know that gigantic old house on the moors? The one that dossers(?) are too scared to doss in, the one that birds are too scared to fly over? And then you said, ‘I’d like to buy it, please, with my money?”

Alec Palmer:-‘Yes, I did, actually.’

Clara:-‘That’s incredibly brave.’

(For the words, I used Amazon’s option to turn the caption on, so that I can just copy the words displayed by Amazon to type in this blog. To turn the captions on, the ‘Options’ selection is located on the upper right hand side of your Amazon Video screen when your cursor is moved to be on the video screen. You can move your cursor to go to ‘Options’ and select for options to be on, when you find such an option useful to you).

I think that maybe you might find Clara’s rambling about Alec Palmer buying such a house to be useful to you.

Available:

OK, it’s now 3:55 PM EST, and I just took a nap. This bookmark I am about to introduce to you, called ‘Available’, if memory serves, was the 1st active bookmark that I invented, soon after I finished inventing the ‘Surprise understand’ bookmark, the bookmark that is made of 6 lists and took me 1 and a half months to complete in explanation. I think this happened several months ago. This bookmark is important because, in my opinion, it is the 1st active bookmark that can be called a ‘ventilation’ bookmark, meaning that you may be able to use this bookmark to allocate certain perspectives. In order for that to possibly happen, I would have to re-introduce to you the concept of ‘Striving perspective’. And so, just a few hours ago, I discovered an illustration from a Dyson commercial that can, after being refurbished, may show you what I am talking about. So, if you choose to, the Dyson commercial I am referring to can be found in www.youtube.com . In youtube’s search engine, just type in ‘dyson commercial jensen twins’, and in one of the 1st shown commercials, you may see a commercial whose length is 31 seconds. When I do the search, I see 2 commercials that qualify. It describes that the Jensen twins are in the Dyson cordless vacuum commercial. Now, if you choose to watch that commercial, you see both twins illustrating the use of a vacuum cleaner, one of the twins is using an older model, and the other twin is using the Dyson cordless vacuum.

The great thing about that commercial is that it may help you understand what bookmark  ‘Available’ may do for you in regards to your chosen use of striving perspective. The objective, once I finish describing what bookmark ‘Available’ is, is to allow you to have a use of striving perspective that can be partitioned. According to www.dictionary.com, ‘Partition’ means-‘a division into or distribution in portions or shares’. So, when you look at the Dyson commercial, the Jensen twin using the older model vacuum represents a striving perspective that does not partition, and the Jensen twin that is using the Dyson vacuum represents a striving perspective that is able to partition. Basically, the vacuum cleaner that can partition does not need to be plugged in when in use, and can change it’s shape to better suit the needs of it’s user. The older vacuum cleaner cannot do these things. Now, before I continue, I am not saying that one vacuum cleaner is better in every way than the other. In other words, I do not compare Wonder Woman to Lois Lane(In some of the comic books, you see Superman in love with Wonder Woman, in other comic books, you see Superman in love with Lois Lane. Obviously, Lois Lane does not have any super powers, when compared to Wonder Woman). I am merely offering you an idea that I believe can be useful to you in regards as to experiencing unavoidable instigation.

So, to begin explaining what ‘Striving perspective’ means, let’s go to the movie ‘The Internship(2013)’. According to Amazon Video rental, the reference begins 54 minutes and 26 seconds into the movie, when Billy McMahon(Vince Vaughn) said to Yo-Yo Santos(Tobit Raphael) quote ‘Don’t start that, Yo-Yo. You did your best out there today. That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’ When you look at that scene, it’s not just Yo-Yo Santos(Tobit Raphael) who is distraught for losing. The other team members, Lyle(Josh Brener), Stuart(Dylan O’Brien), and Neha(Tiya Sircar) are also feeling miserable. when you reference what Billy said to Yo-Yo, that ‘‘Don’t start that, Yo-Yo. You did your best out there today. That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’ quote, you use that quote to compare Billy and Nick Campbell(Owen Wilson) to the rest of the team. What I am saying is that, for the purposes of this advice, Billy and Nick have a striving perspective, and the other team members, Yo-Yo, Lyle, Stuart, and Neha, do not. Billy and Nick are able to partition their experiences with Graham(Max Minghella) in order to give the other team members a more optimistic and productive perspective from their experiences playing Quidditch.
Furthermore, sex is associated with better health, better nutrition, and sildenafil tablets without prescription — everything that we can use in order to make the best of the erections required for the satisfactory love-making session.viagra has now been so famous that not only men, but even women are now familiar with its effect. PDE5 is the enzyme which obstructs this flow of blood passing through the arteries to the penile region. generic cialis This is the method of the most powerful and safest that boost penis dimensions, and increase sexual functionality. canadian viagra sales In 30 million men levitra samples unica-web.com in America who are experiencing erectile dysfunctions, only 10% of this total will actually seek help.
Here is another way of explaining ‘Striving perspective’. It is like giving more time and credence(belief as to the truth of something) to certain aspects of the perspective that you have chosen to use, chosen by your intent. I am not recommending to you that you turn yourself into a ‘doormat’ for instigation. The idea called ‘Striving perspective’ can simply give yourself more latitude when experiencing instigation and certain inadvertencies, latitude that is already a part of your intent. If you choose this idea, it will be a use of latitude that is already a part of your chosen intent, not something, for example, that you may find unacceptable and/or too compromising to use. Here’s an example that I just thought of: Suppose that, after a few weeks of using ‘Striving perspective’, you realize that certain notions that you have chosen to learn from may need more time in order to acclimate into a form that is acceptable for you to use. Now, when you experience instigation from certain people in certain circumstances, a few of those notions are brought to your attention, and when they are, you have the option created from your use of ‘Striving perspective’ to give those notions some more time to acclimate in your mind, since you have already made the logical conclusion that such notions just need more time to acclimate.

I believe that a more productive way to explain ‘Striving perspective’ now, based on my ability to explain, is to finally start explaining bookmark ‘Available’. Then I can introduce bookmark ‘Available’ to your possible use of ‘Striving perspective’.

It’s now 5:51 PM, and I am going to explain bookmark ‘Available’ using a refurbished reference. The reference is from near the end of episode 1.11 ‘A Great Personality’ from series ‘Cupid(1999)’ starring Jeremy Piven as Trevor Hale, the man in the tv show that thinks he’s Cupid. According to the internet, Cupid the series wasn’t officially released on DVD/Blu-ray yet, even though it has been over 16 years since it was broadcasted on tv. It’s also not available for streaming to your computer that I know of. So, what I’ll do is offer you the transcript to that episode. I found the transcript on web site http://www.simplyscripts.com/tv_cd.html . From there, you are led to web site http://leethomson.myzen.co.uk/Cupid/ . And from there, the specific web site to the transcripted episode is offered in pdf format. Your computer should automatically use a program to show you that pdf format, and that web site is

http://leethomson.myzen.co.uk/Cupid/Cupid_1x11_-_A_Great_Personality.pdf

Anyway, here is the quote I am using, and it is located near the end of that transcript. This is when Lance(Joe Petcka) is talking to his girlfriend Yvonne(Christine Taylor). Here is the quote from Lance:

Lance:-‘But I told Jimmy, ‘Hey, that’s acquisition’s problem! Don’t come in here and expect us to bail you out.”

So anyway, based on what Lance said to Yvonne, refurbished for advice, Lance was having a problem with one of the employees from another division. Even though Lance did not believe he did anything wrong, Jimmy still imposed a sense of grievance upon Lance that bothered him to the point that he had to talk to his girlfriend Yvonne about it. So, this is where the bookmark ‘Available’ is used. Let’s say you also had some sort of issue with another co-worker, and even though you did nothing wrong, even though you believe you are ‘in the right’ with the issue discussed, the other co-worker still imposed upon you some sort of grievance associated with the issue. What bookmark ‘Available’ does for you is give you the option to identify that sense of grievance that may be accumulating for you to experience as something that should not be ‘available’ for you to experience, meaning that such a sense of grievance, because of it’s imposition, may be used by you in a context that you believe that it is available for you to use, but in reality, you have already made the logical conclusion that you are ‘in the right’ in regards to that issue. However, since the grievance is imposing, and maybe even accumulating upon you to experience, that persistence may cause you to use such an experience as if it was actually available for you to experience. Going back to that conversation with Lance and Yvonne, notice that Lance felt he would feel better if he talked about the grievance he experienced with Jimmy with Yvonne, since he already used such an imposition of grievance as if it were available for him to use.

Let me try to explain that again. Suppose one of your co-workers imposed upon you a sense of grievance, even though you believed you are ‘in the right’. Soon after that experience, you experience a sense of accumulation from that grievance. Even though you have already established to yourself that you are ‘in the right’, what you do with that sense of grievance is accept it as if that sense of grievance were available for you to use. Now, that is what you may have done before bookmark ‘Available’. If you choose to use bookmark ‘Available’, and you experience such a situation again, you can contemplationally say the word ‘Available’ or ‘Not available’ to identify that sense of grievance as ‘not available’ for you to use, instead of what you did before, which was committing to a sense of grievance which should not have been yours to commit to.

So, basically, bookmark ‘Available’ can help you control how you respond to contemplation accumulations that you have already identified as something that is not from you to begin with. Of course, for mild to moderate situations, whatever it was that you have agreed to do for such an issue, that still continues. However, with this idea, how you respond to such a situation again you may now have more of a productive control than before, if you use this idea. Also, bookmark ‘Available’ may be a useful starting point when choosing to learn ‘Striving perspective’.

Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Doctor Who’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Striving perspective’, ‘Available’, and ‘Not available’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

6/22/2016

Crank it up ‘land’:

Before I start explaining to you this idea more specifically, I want to give you some sort of impression as to what this idea is. You see, for many of the ideas I have recommeneded to you, I have pretty much just given you it’s ‘answer’, it’s basic form. With this idea, if I just offered you it’s basic form, you probably won’t be aware of what it’s purpose is. This idea called ‘Crank it up land’ is like episode 3.5 ‘Learning Curve’ from series ‘Stargate SG-1(1999)’, when Earth is given naquadah reactor technology by the Orbanians. For more information about what naquadah is in the Stargate sci-fi universe, here is a link:

http://www.gateworld.net/wiki/Naquadah

Much of the ‘Stargate’ episode references Merrin(Britt Irvin) working with Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping) to be able to build a working naquadah reactor for the government. Using your imagination and refurbished for advice, this naquadah reactor will improve significantly the technology used by the Stargate program.

I am not encouraging you to build something dangerous. The ‘Stargate’ reference, refurbished for advice, is to help you understand how important this new bookmark could be to you. That being said, I shall start explaining what ‘Crank it up land’ means.

1st, I want to give you 3 examples of what I mean by ‘land’. I’ll explain what ‘land’ means later.

The 1st example, which is my favorite, and of course refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice, is from episode 2.8 ‘Revenge of the Sword’ from series ‘Highlander(1993)’. The scene, according to Amazon Video, it’s not the beginning, since I want to be concise, starts 16 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode, when you see Lisa Scott(Debbie Podowski) showing concern for MacLeod(Adrian Paul). Basically, this is what is happening. I am not encouraging anyone to repeat what MacLeod did in this scene. This is just an example of ‘land’ that I will explain later. MacLeod, for some reason, jumps on a moving car, and when the driver finally shakes MacLeod off, the momentum of leaving the car causes MacLeod to ‘back flip’ 2 times, instead of just falling to the ground. The scene where he back flips starts 16 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode. After I would see that scene, I would sometimes laugh.

The next reference is from movie ‘Thor: The Dark World(2013)’. According to Amazon Video rental, the scene starts 7 minutes and 54 seconds into the movie, when the men Thor is fighting start chanting what I think is ‘Kronan’. According to the Amazon Video screen, Kronan is a stone creature. Anyway, the highlight of the reference, refurbished for advice, is what the men tried to do who were chanting the name ‘Kronan’.

The 3rd reference is from movie ‘The Internship(2013)’. According to Amazon Video rental, the reference begins 54 minutes and 26 seconds into the movie, when Billy McMahon(Vince Vaughn) said to Yo-Yo Santos(Tobit Raphael) quote ‘Don’t start that, Yo-Yo. You did your best out there today. That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’

[I want to get something to eat and other stuff, so I’ll finish this idea next week.

6/29/2016
You should not purchase generic levitra let issues of erectile dysfunction take toll in your life. While there is no denying that there are various natural, easy-to-implement erectile dysfunction treatments available. ordine cialis on line cute-n-tiny.com What is the abstruse to a adored and acknowledged marriage? Promises, commitment, love? How cheap cialis uk about passion? Passion, however, cannot be one-sided. It addresses purchasing cialis online the emotional, physical and sexual desires of men.
According to my computer, it is now 3 pm EST. Even though I have explained ideas many? times before, it still feels a little odd for me to do the translation. For example, when I make these ideas in my mind, a lot of times, most of the idea, when the idea is being made, does not use that many words, proportionally speaking. And so, what I end up trying to do is translate the ideas that I have invented in my mind into a form that you can recognize. And so, right now, even though I already used the idea that I am about to describe to you, since I invented it a few weeks ago, it still feels somewhat odd for me to translate that idea for you. And so, here I am, doing that ‘odd’ thing again.

All right! The reason I called bookmark ‘Crank it up land’ a little like introducing to you, in the context for making ideas, of course, naquadah reactor technology for the 1st time, is because of it’s innovation. Although I have discussed ‘landing’ before in Amazon, I believed that discussion helped me more with the ability to upgrade the concept of ‘landing’ more than actually introducing to you such an idea for active use. And so, here goes: Based on how I sensed the use of ‘Crank it up land’, since I sense that I have never introduced such a concept to you, that is how the explanation will be presented to you, under the assumption that I have never introduced to you such an idea. ‘Crank it up land’ is composed of 2 bookmarks, 1)’Crank it up’, and 2)’Land’. Let me explain ‘Crank it up’ 1st. 1st, I’d like to reference the definition of ‘Reverse polarity’ that I had invented in Wishlist #1015. Here is a copy:

“That ‘putting people in the airplane’ idea didn’t last long either, and so what I did afterwards is what I believe to be the moment when I made an obvious improvement to how I use ad libbing. I call the moment ‘Reverse polarity’. I got the name from episode 3.17 ‘That Which Survives’ from series ‘Star Trek(1969)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference begins 42 minutes and 16 seconds into the episode, when Spock(Leonard Nimoy) said to Scott(James Doohan) quote-‘Mr. Scott, reverse polarity on your magnetic probe.’ Of course, the reference is refurbished with inapproprieieties removed for advice. You look for the moment when Scott physically changes the polarity on his magnetic probe. Keep in mind that, at this point, I used the ‘Lean on Me’ idea and it lasted for 6 months and no longer works the way I want it to, and now the ‘put people in the airplane’ idea has also lost it’s effectiveness. And so, at this point, I decided to try something different. I imagined 2 instigators, 1 instigator to my left holding my arm, and one instigator to my right holding my right arm, forcing me to go into one of those airplanes. However, even though they have forced me to be in one of those airplanes, in the context of the idea, that is where I wanted to be! Basically, I have reversed the polarity of certain instigations to be in my favor, instigations that, for the purposes of explanation, would not occur at all in reality, simply because such instigations benefit the innocent person unusually well, in the context for the innocent person to learn and build his/her ideas for instigation. When I imagined 2 of those men forcing me to be in that airplane, that was my 1st obvious example of ‘ad libbing’ imagined instigations that have an obvious ‘reverse polarity’ identity in order to build more ideas.”

I recommend that you review Wishlist #1015 in this blog, if you need a refresher of what ‘Reverse polarity’ means, if the excerpt/copy isn’t enough. And so, I probably used ‘Reverse polarity’ to identify what instigators may have been doing in order to cause you to have an obvious acknowledgement of response to their instigations. An instigator may be improperly imposing some sort of overemphasized emphasis in order to make their instigations work on you. I call that overemphasized emphasis ‘Cranking it up’. When I invented the idea a few weeks ago, I imagined Dr. Emmett Brown(Christopher Lloyd) from the ‘Back to the Future’ movies using both of his hands to activate/crank up some sort of small generator in order to create electricity. It looked like a generator that is small enough to be placed on a table, and there is imagined electricity coming from it, since it’s just imagined. The electricity looks like something you might see in a 4th of July fireworks show. Seconds after that, in order to generate more electricity, I imagined him using a stationary bike with the same imagined electricity effect. Dr. Brown would be using on the bike pedaling it. This bike, thanks to imagination, is also using a similar design of a bike I watched from this sci-fi tv show called ‘Beyond 2000’, where a man used a stationary bike to recycle the mail that he gets but doesn’t use, such as some? of those advertisement envelopes you get from the post office.

Anyway, that ‘Crank it up’ imagined effect is used to identify how instigators overemphasize certain perspectives of their instigations, as it translates in your mind. I call that effect ‘Crank it up’. Now, once you choose to use this idea, if I explained it well enough, you should be able to convert that cranking up effect into something that identifies your experience, instead of just, for example, instead of just bracing yourself for it. And so, to the best of my ability to explain, once I invented ‘Crank it up’ in my mind, soon after, I referenced the ‘landing’ concept I invented in Amazon.com. And that is when I realized(in the context of imagining it) just around 2 weeks ago, that instigators may use the ‘Crank it up’ effect to dictate how you ‘land’ from an experienced instigation. For example, let’s say that, before you choose to use this idea, you may have experienced instigation that would overemphasize a specific sense of how you would ‘land’ from an experienced instigation. Now, once you have sensed you have ‘landed’, you would of course respond to where you have contemplationally landed like you normally would when and soon after you experienced an instigation, in relation to advice said.

Now, what this idea does is allow you to ‘see’ that an instigator is trying to influence how you contemplationally ‘land’. Now, the 1st example I have recommended to you is my favorite, because, in relation to advice, when you imagine other people absurdly doing something similar to what the example illustrates, at least in my opinion, it’s entertaining to think about. The example, of course refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice, is from episode 2.8 ‘Revenge of the Sword’ from series ‘Highlander(1993)’. It starts 16 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode, when you see Lisa Scott(Debbie Podowski) showing concern for MacLeod(Adrian Paul). Basically, this is what is happening. I am not encouraging anyone to repeat what MacLeod did in this scene. This is just an example of ‘land’ that I will explain later. MacLeod, for some reason, jumps on a moving car, and when the driver finally shakes MacLeod off, the momentum of leaving the car causes MacLeod to ‘back flip’ 2 times, instead of just falling to the ground. The scene where he back flips starts 16 minutes and 45 seconds into the episode.

So, what you do is refurbish that ‘Highlander’ scene, and imagine other people sensing that the instigation they have experienced is trying to dictate how they contemplationally ‘land’. And then, in imagination only, of course, they would do what MacLeod did. For example, imagine someone from your school or job talking to someone else, that person who you don’t have to see in your mind instigates that person you have chosen, and so to avoid contemplationally landing the way that instigation is causing them to land, you see your chosen example do that same back flip that MacLeod did in that tv show! Let’s say if you are an adult man and you have an office joker in the company you work for. You can imagine that office joker experiencing such an instigation, and soon after, to avoid falling to the ground, so to speak, that office joker does 2 back flips! In my opinion, not only is that funny, but it also contemplationally illustrates the idea of bookmark ‘Crank it up land’ very well.

The 2nd example I believe is easier to understand that the 1st example because of the popularity of Marvel superheroes in movies nowadays. It is from movie ‘Thor: The Dark World(2013)’. According to Amazon Video rental, the scene starts 7 minutes and 54 seconds into the movie, when the men Thor is fighting start chanting what I think is ‘Kronan’. According to the Amazon Video screen, Kronan is a stone creature. Anyway, the highlight of the reference, refurbished for advice, is what the men tried to do who were chanting the name ‘Kronan’. Since I believe this movie is made very well for older kids and adults to have their own understanding for it, when you watch that scene, I recommend that you realize that Thor is fighting those aliens on another planet! And when those aliens were chanting the name of that rock creature called ‘Kronan’, they were doing so in a context that was supposed to make Thor(Chris Hemsworth) believe that he has already lost that fight. I recommend, refurbished for advice, that you use the aliens that will lose to Thor, that you use their chanting as a reference as to how instigators may try to influence how you ‘land’, when you experience a non relevant instigation that tries to use words against you, for mild to moderate instigations, of course. If you recall that chanting scene again, notice that the aliens are over?emphasizing a sense of unfavorable landing upon Thor, a reference that you might find useful.

Now, the 3rd reference is from movie ‘The Internship(2013)’. According to Amazon Video rental, the reference begins 54 minutes and 26 seconds into the movie, when Billy McMahon(Vince Vaughn) said to Yo-Yo Santos(Tobit Raphael) quote ‘Don’t start that, Yo-Yo. You did your best out there today. That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’ In this example, Billy McMahon shows by example when talking to Yo-Yo Santos that his years of experience being a salesman allows him to control how he ‘lands’ from certain situations. Of course, if you watched the Quidditch game in the movie ‘The Internship’, Graham(Max Minghella) did cause both Billy and Nick(Owen Wilson) to fall to the ground. Graham even stepped on Billy’s back in order to win the game! But even when Graham did all of that to Billy and Nick, they did not turn into Graham, meaning that they did not end up adopting Graham’s strategies just to get a job at Google. When you recall when Yo-Yo Santos expressed his grievance, you would notice that the rest of the team that were with Yo-Yo were also distraught over losing the game. The irony of that situation is that, if anyone should be distraught and feel miserable, it should be Billy and Nick for what Graham did to them. However, Billy and Nick’s positive way of ‘landing’ instead becomes an inspiration to this idea called ‘Crank it up land’.

Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Highlander’, ‘Stargate SG-1’, ‘Star Trek(1969)’, and sci-fi movie ‘Thor: The Dark World’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie.

[Use mental bookmarks ‘Crank it up’, ‘Land’, and ‘Crank it up land’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.