[2/2/2018: If you are planning to use the triple point injection or have used the triple point injection for your lower back problems, it is urgent that you stop using the T/Sal shampoo and your foot spray for one month. After that time, it is urgent that you significantly reduce your use of T/Sal shampoo, and only use your foot spray when you need to. See Wishlist #1113 for further details.]

6/22/2016

This is just a follow up for the ‘Neutragena T/Sal Shampoo, Scalp Build-Up Control’ recommendation on I have made in Wishlist #1016. I am letting you know now so that, if you choose not to read about it, like you may have done the 1st time when I typed about it in Wishlist #1016, you can discontinue reading now. If you have chosen to use the product when I recommended it to you and you are still using it, I highly recommend that you read this.

Basically, for the older teenage girls and women, if memory serves, I recommend that you use this product for your heads and underarms, so if you are experiencing no problems in those areas, and you wish to continue using it as I recommended, then I have no issue to address with the older teenage girls and women. Of course, if some kind of problem occurs, like a rash, then stop using it. To be clear, I am not a doctor. It is just common sense that if you experience a problem with skin products, that you would stop using them. For a second opinion, you can talk to a dermatologist, if you want to. Keep in mind that there are many? people that give advice about this product, even though all of them are probably not doctors. Amazon.com has people expessing their opinions about the Neutragena T/Sal Shampoo. There are other web sites. I recommend that you use a search engine such as www.google.com to find out more about the product.

And now, for the older teenage boys and men: If you are still using the Neutragena T/Sal Shampoo, Scalp Build-Up Control ever since I recommended it to you way back in September 23 of last year, I don’t see any problems when you just apply it to you heads and underarms. I want to clarify that I did recommend that you apply it to your underarms and groin area once a week for a period of 20-30 minutes. Some of you may have chosen to use this shampoo for your groin area more than once a week, for example, maybe you swim a lot, and you only want to use it for a very short period of time, since it is very effective for you. That means you are using the shampoo more times than I have recommended for you to use it. So, to upgrade this recommendation, I am strongly recommending that all older teenage boys and men only use this product, when it’s for the penis and scrotum(the pouch of skin that contains the testes) area, for a maximum of about 15 minutes, once a week. For an illustration of what the scrotum is, I recommend you check www.wikipedia.org. Since I don’t want to make another follow-up about this shampoo, if you choose to use this product long term, just apply a small but reasonable amount, let’s say it looks like a few small raindrops worth when you put the shampoo on your hand. In reference to the penis and scrotum area, only apply the product on the penis and scrotum area, not the surrounding areas of the skin. Then, after about 15 minutes, when taking a shower, use a wash rag and the shower to remove the shampoo from the penis and scrotum area. If the showerhead that you use for your bathroom is movable, then I recommend that you move your showerhead closer to your penis and scrotum area, so that you can wash of the shampoo more thoroughly. And, of course, if you experience any complications, such as a rash, discontinue it’s use, and if you want to, you can also talk to a dermatologist about it.

I thought about mentioning this in the 1st list. In the movie ‘Sunshine(2007)’, according to Amazon Video, 49 minutes and 52 seconds into the movie, when they entered the space station, they talked about the dust in the air. Here is a quote:

(I don’t know which astronaut is saying the words.)

‘The air, it’s full of dust.’

‘Human skin.’

Helps increase testosterone levels naturally Horny goat weed increases testosterone naturally, which doesn’t just robertrobb.com purchase viagra from canada increase your sexual performance and health but also your overall wellness. You are purchase female viagra http://robertrobb.com/economic-tinkerers-have-had-their-shot/ advised to wear loose undergarments to ensure sufficient blood flow and improve love making desire. canadian viagra professional Physical dysfunction characterized by the inability to gain or sustain the penile erection even if the man suffers from high blood pressure. The victim feels drowsiness, Insomnia, cialis tablets in india depression, hallucination, and tachycardia. ‘What?’

‘80% of all dust is human skin.’

In the movie ‘Sunshine’, there is an obvious illustration of a lot of dust. I am assuming it’s floating because a basic moving environment hasn’t been established yet in the space station.

Of course, the illustration is excessive. However, if you look at that scene, and it’s surrounding scenes, refurbished for advice, it may help you sense the usefulness of this shampoo. If you have no problems using it, I believe the product is also helping you reduce the type and amount of ‘dust’ that you create, more specifically, the dust you create where you live. Like I said in Wishlist #1016, you don’t need this shampoo. However, I do believe this product can improve your hygiene. For those of you that have been using this product since I recommended it to you, think about how you significantly reduced a certain type of dust to be created where you live. And, of course, there are other benefits to it, as well. For the people in general that are still using this shampoo, if you had complexion problems, it probably improved your complexion. And as for body odor, and I am not talking about the body odor that encourages a person to take a shower, I speculate that the men that use this product no longer need to use so much cologne to produce the desired effect from that cologne.

Anyway, since I don’t want to talk about this again, since this blog is supposed to be just about instigation advice, to reiterate, for the older teenage boys and men who choose to continue using this shampoo, I now recommend that, referencing the penis and scrotum area only, just use it for 15 minutes once a week only, and wash it off when taking a shower. So, of course, you use it once a week before you take a shower. If any problems occur, such as a rash, stop using it.

Since this is not a bookmark, I just want to clarify that the ‘Sunshine’ movie is just used for it’s dust illustration, and there’s a lot of dust illustration in the movie. I am not recommending that you watch the rest of the movie for this recommendation, only the scenes where the dust is illustrated, let’s say starting around 50 minutes into the movie. For example, 52 minutes and 4 seconds into the movie, one of the main characters is clearing the massive amount of dust that is blocking the computer console. There is a lot of simulated dust in this movie.

To be on the ‘safe side’, since this movie has scenes in it I don’t want kids to see, for the use of this recommendation, according to Amazon Video rental, don’t watch past 53 minutes into the movie, when that recording from one of the original crewmembers was being played. The only illustrations I am recommending are the illustrations of the dust that is in that spaceship. So, from when they started to notice the dust, up to 53 minutes into the movie. I’m only recommending about 4 minutes of continuous play from the movie. I think that’s enough. Sometime after 53 minutes, there are a few scenes I don’t want kids to watch, even though, of course, it’s just a movie.

I forgot to mention that, for the older teenage boys and men, since the waiting time for the penis and scrotum is 15 minutes, for the sake of easy routine continuity, if you are also using this shampoo for your underarms, the recommended wait time for your underarms is also 15 minutes. So, if you imagine it, you are applying the exfoliant to both your underarms and penis and scrotum area in one routine setting, a routine use I think you can do without forgetting how to for many years. Generalistically speaking for many expectations, if you change a certain generalistically followed routine to a form that only you follow, if you forget certain steps in that self created routine of yours, it may be more difficult for you to reinstate that routine, especially when the routine that is fortified is no longer used by you, since you have chosen to use a different, self created routine. Again, this is just generalistically speaking. This doesn’t apply to every expectation. My point is that I have offered you a very simple routine to follow, even though you may have thought of a better way to do it.

And, of course, it doesn’t have to be exactly 15 minutes. You can add a few minutes, for flexibility, such as the time it takes for you to prepare the shower. With a little practice, you will probably need only a few extra minutes total before you take a shower.

6/15/2016

Contradict leer:

This is sort of an upgrade for the previous idea, ‘Winding down participate’, from Wishlist #1050. Since it’s already 5:31 PM EST, I’m going to try to explain this idea with only 2 references. I’ll start with the references first. In movie ‘Batteries Not Included(1987)’, according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour, 38 minutes, and 50 seconds into the movie, near the end of the movie, and of course the reference is refurbished for advice, Frank Riley(Hume Cronyn) introduces Carlos(Michael Carmine) to his wife Faye Riley(Jessica Tandy) in the hopes of making Faye feel better. When that didn’t work, you see Carlos throwing the flowers away before he leaves. The scene when Carlos throws away the flowers is located 1 hour, 39 minutes, and 25 seconds into the movie.

The second reference is in episode 2.3 ‘Treehouse of Horror’ from series ‘The Simpsons(1990)’. This is when The Simpsons were being transported by the 2 aliens and were being served lots of food. When Lisa accused the aliens of having another motive, the aliens proved to The Simpsons that they misread the cookbook. Here is the highlighted quote, which, according to Amazon Video, is located 14 minutes and 59 seconds into the episode:

Serok the Preparer:-‘I slaved in the kitchen for days for you people!’

Kang?:-‘Well, if you wanted to make Serok the Preparer cry, missing accomplished!’

Serok the Preparer:-‘You aren’t the only beings who have emotions, you know.’

And so, here is the definition of ‘Contradict leer’:-‘An instigator may improperly impose a contradiction of your amicable, benevolent intent of implementation, causing you to feel distraught and disparaged to the point that you may even doubt your sense of ‘good faith’ intent that you have actually used at the time of the experienced instigation.’
In the event all else is apparently disappointment, why not try build a very good slumber arrange to check out cialis rx what goes on. Gifted athletes can gain from 5 to 15 kg of weight and get a very impressive canadian levitra increase in power at a 2-month course with anabolic steroids. Super P Force may be the first item which gives guys the opportunity to cure two syndroms: erectile brokenness free levitra sample http://appalachianmagazine.com/2017/10/23/flash-flood-warning-issued-for-smyth-wythe-tazewell-bland-grayson-carroll-counties-galax/ untimely ejaculation. Keeping this in view, several medicines have been developed to restrict the PDE5 activities and to enhance the fluency of blood circulation to the penile tissues to make them a lively structure to regain enough stamina for a long time. best female viagra
In the 1st example from movie ‘Batteries Not Included’, refurbished for advice, Carlos had the intent to help Faye feel better, but when his actions did not work, he left, throwing away the flowers he wanted to give Faye. Now, the changed story is that Carlos originally was using a benevolent presentation of intent to Faye, but when things didn’t work out, Carlos felt distraught and disparaged to the point that he would never do something like that again. If you change the original reference from the movie a little, you can say that Carlos felt miserable for what he had done and blamed himself for what had happened, even though that belief contradicts his original, benevolent intent.

I used the 2nd ‘Treehouse of Horror’ example as as obvious illustration of feeling distraught and disparaged because of a false accusation, even though those who are feeling such emotions are aliens from another planet.

Now, I believe this advice may be important to you because of how you may be experiencing certain instigations. For example, many of these ideas address instigations that are unavoidable for you to experience. One example of an unavoidable instigation is when the instigation gets into your ‘line of sight’, and it’s either too late or no longer reasonably possible to avoid the experiencing of such an instigation. Another example of an unavoidable instigation is when the instigator interjects the instigation upon you without giving you any time to prepare for such an instigation. Anyway, one possible side effect of experiencing an unavoidable instigation is identified by bookmark ‘Contradict leer’. The instigation may make you feel distraught, even miserable, because it improperly imposes a contradiction of your benevolent implementation of intent, a little like Carlos felt in the movie ‘Batteries Not Included’ and how Serok the Preparer felt in ‘The Simpsons’ episode. I used the word ‘leer’ to emphasize what type of emphasis it’s improperly imposing upon you.

Anyway, the solution I recommend to you, with the rest of this advice, is that when you believe you experience such an instigation, you use bookmark ‘Contradict leer’ to allow yourself to maintain the use of your benevolent intent, even though the instigation identified may be trying to cause you to feel a contradiction of that intent.

Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘*batteries not included’. Violence and viewer discretion for animated tv show ‘The Simpsons’ and sci-fi tv series ‘Stargate Universe’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Contradict leer’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

I forgot to type in that, well, I am not an anthropologist. In relation to advice said, you may be experiencing instigations identified by bookmark ‘Contradict leer’ that maybe many other people may not understand because they don’t have your unique school of thought. For example, in episode 2.15 ‘Seizure’ from series ‘Stargate Universe’, refurbished for advice, and according to Amazon Video, the scene is located 29 minutes and 5 seconds into the episode, after Rodney McKay(David Hewlett) instigated an alien lady, Colonel David Telford portrayed by celebrity Lou Diamond Phillips ‘stepped in’ and helped give the alien lady have a more considerate interpretation of what Rodney said to her. The point is that Rodney instigated an alien lady who he knows practically nothing about, but he still sensed that his instigation mildly affected the alien lady somewhat.

[I am in a little of a rush to finish this list. See you next week!

6/14/2016

Winding down participate:

1st, I want to start with the only effective reference I can think of right now for this idea, and of course it is refurbished for this advice. The reference is in episode 3.2 ‘The Ensigns of Command’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1989)’. The 1st illustration, according to Amazon Video, starts 35 minutes and 19 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart):-‘…And get me that Treaty. They’ve been beating us over the head with it for 3 days.’

The 2nd illustration, in the same episode, is when Picard put the Sheliak representative on hold. According to Amazon Video, Picard started the disconnection of dialog at 39 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode, and Picard maintained the disconnection until 40 minutes and 23 seconds into the episode. That’s about 50 seconds of Picard illustrating the fact that he is enjoying putting the Sheliak on temporary disconnection of dialog, a moment I highly recommend that you watch, in it’s context, of course.

Now, let me see if I can explain what the instigation is in the form of a definition: -‘An instigator may improperly adversely change the awareness and commitment to your original intent using overemphasized, accumulating participations that are out of context to your originally chosen intent.’ For example, using the ‘Star Trek reference, using the 1st illustration as a reference point, Picard said quote-‘They’ve been beating us over the head with it for 3 days.’ If you watched the episode, Picard has been trying to honor the Federation’s treaty that they have made with the Sheliak as well as evacuate the people from the planet, but the Sheliak representative has been causing Picard’s mood to adversely change, since the Sheliak representative won’t give Picard the 3 weeks he needs to evaluate all of the people from that planet. As further proof that Picard’s original sense of intent, for example, his original mood, has changed, that is when Picard disconnected communications with the Sheliak for about 50 seconds, a disconnection that the episode has illustrated in an obvious manner. My point is that, even for a Starfleet Captain, it still was possible to change Picard’s original sense of intent. Of course, Picard didn’t do anything reckless that would need some sort of disciplinary action from Starfleet. However, for this advice, Picard’s obvious original sense of intent did change noticeably.

Now, let me see if I can make an example that is more obviously noticeable for bookmark ‘Winding down participate’. Let’s say you are trying to participate with someone amicably and in good faith. At least, that is your original chosen sense of intent to participate. Next thing you know, you are being corrected for the ‘minor’ mistakes that you are making, those corrections turn into criticisms, and the next thing you know, you’re angry, but you can’t just shrug off what had just happened, and such corrections and criticisms caused you to not only change your original intent to participate, but you had also forgotten what your original intent to participate was! Now, if you have never used such an advice before, then I think there is a reasonable possibility that such a change in intent has already happened to you.
Its primary focus is to not be taken through the women who are hypersensitive to Sildenafil Citrate.Excessive consumption price viagra of alcohol impacts the working of this medicine. You will need a prescription from physician, whereas few online retailers are ready to help you win your game! Erectile dysfunction and impotence are problems that browse that shop purchase cheap viagra affect a large number of people each year. The term is used to http://deeprootsmag.org/page/840/ levitra 40 mg illustrate the sum total of ejaculation. This pill is absorbed in the blood around 30-60 minutes after administration and start working on your system by free sample of viagra inhibiting the enzyme PDE5 (phosphodiesterase type) found in penis.
The solution I recommend for you to use is to use bookmark ‘Winding down participate’ or ‘Winding down context’ when such an instigation or inadvertency is imposed upon you to experience. As you are learning the idea, the longer phrase you would use would be ‘Winding down participate, I did not agree to participate in such a context.’ or ‘Winding down participate, I did not agree to participate in a certain context.’ ‘Winding down’ is when you have experienced a certain instigation or inadvertency, and you are trying to make the experience more tenable in your mind by going over certain interpretations of that experience and making those interpretations more acceptable. I call that think effort to make such interpretations more acceptable ‘winding down’. What I have noticed from my own experiences is that instigators tend to literally try to impose a notion in your mind that has an inclination for you to ‘wind it down’. So, as a solution, as long as you already know what your sense of intent already is, and the instigation is just mild to moderate, you therefore may not need to contemplationally ‘wind it down’, since you already know what the answer is. So, the idea is that, with bookmark ‘Winding down participate’, you can continue participating, even choosing to accept the criticisms given to you, but the difference that is supposed to be in your favor is that, when you use bookmark ‘Winding down participate’, you can still remember what your originally chosen sense of intent is.

Here is a question for this advice:-‘How is remembering your originally chosen sense of intent important?’

If you remember your originally chosen sense of intent, even though certain criticisms and comments are experienced, for one thing, you will experience less that sense of anger that is caused by such possible criticisms and comments. You can also more objectively continue to participate, but in a more reasonable context.

Once you choose to use this idea, soon after, if you experience instigations from strangers that you did not make a commitment to participate with in advance, and they improperly impose upon you an instigation that demands a contradictory sense of participation, you may still be able to participate, but in a context that is more appropriate for you to participate. For example, when you are mildly insulted with an instigation, but the instigation also requests that you participate, you can say the phrase in your mind quote-‘Winding down participate, I did not agree to participate in such/a certain context’, but you are still able or you still choose to participate, just not in an adverse context that the instigation encourages you to participate in. Once you are familiar with it’s use, you can just say bookmarks ‘Winding down participate’ or ‘Winding down context’.

Look, I know this idea is not as considerate as the previous ideas. I just invented this idea I think this past Sunday, a few days ago. The reason I decided to explain this now is because if I explained it the other way, in a more developed context, like I did with bookmark ‘Surprise understand’, such an explanation may take a month to complete. If I explain it this way, I get the gist of it out of the way, and you can develop this idea with more available time. Also, once I explain enough ideas, I may reference this idea again.

Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and series. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Winding down participate, I did not agree to participate in such a context.’, ‘Winding down participate, I did not agree to participate in a certain context.’, ‘Winding down participate’, and ‘Winding down context’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

6/8/2016

Pez stick:

I have considered many times to type this idea in, but chose not to because I was able to not need to type it in. One obvious reason I have considered to type this idea in is because I have already typed it in Amazon.com. I have also said that this blog also is a ‘jump in’ point for new readers, meaning that you should not need to read the lists I have made in Amazon.com to learn from these ideas. However, since the next few ideas I plan to type in, new ideas, would benefit considerably with the ‘Pez stick’ idea, I have no choice, so to speak, but to explain the ‘Pez stick’ idea here. Because I believe kids may be reading this blog, even though I am not sure that they are, and of course that should not matter, since this is a public list, the ‘Pez stick’ idea in my opinion would benefit the kids considerably in the context that it should help them use the next few new ideas. As for the adults, I believe that it is better that I should recommend the use of bookmark ‘Pez stick’ at a later time, when I have typed in enough information, information used for recommending to adults. Of course, for other recommendations, in relation to advice said, I welcome adults to read and use the ‘Pez stick’ idea that I am about to type in.

Let’s see if I can remember what I have originally typed in Amazon. Before I invented the ‘Pez stick’, based on the way I was inventing ideas at that time, I was experiencing some difficulty conceptualizing ideas, tinkering with them in my imagination. More specifically, I was ‘stuck’ with certain stubborn intensities brought to my attention from actual instigations that I believed I have experienced, imagined circumstances, and inadvertencies. For example, let’s say a boy experienced a mild instigation from another boy, and that boy imposing the instigation wanted to emphasize a dominant intensity in that other boy’s mind. Now, when that boy would recall the instigation, a certain adverse identity from that instigation presented in recall a dominant intensity that favored the instigation, for example, it favored the instigator’s argument. And so, to illustrate what that means, the dominant intensity looks like the color of dark blue, and the color of what it is dominant to looks like the color of light blue. And so, if you put both colors on a single piece of paper, the color of dark blue would be let’s say 70% of that paper, and the color of light blue would be the rest of that paper, 30%. You can use a standard piece of paper, turn it sideways, like the appearance of a laptop screen, and put an imagined vertical line through that paper, on the left side of that line is the 30%, and on the right side is 70%.

So, basically, while I was riding on a public bus(it didn’t take long to invent the idea), I invented the ‘Pez stick’ concept so that I can simply change the intensities so that I can more tenably make more ideas. For example, if you don’t have such an absurdly obvious idea like this, or any other tool-like idea to manipulate intensities, what I imagine many of you would do is, oversimplifyingly said, in order to change a certain intensity, you may simply try to ‘think’ it. Of course, conceptualizing is not exclusive to all forms of thinking. If that didn’t work, you would probably change your thinking expectations until you have found some sort of acceptable alternative. Keep in mind that I am not trying to put all of you in the same psychological shoebox. I am just giving an example. Well, based on my chosen way of making ideas at the time, those stubborn intensities were getting in the way of my preferred idea making, and so I chose to invent something that would allow me to change the proportioning of those intensities.

1st, before I describe the specifics of inventing ‘Pez stick’, I want to provide to you a reason how people may go about changing certain dominant intensities. Since I did attend Catholic school, I believe I can speak in that context, but I would also like to imagine it as well. Many people may choose to go to church. And the illustration I have for that I acquired from reading an article from magazine ‘Entertainment Weekly’. The article I think was in the ‘What to watch’ on the tv section of it. The article talked about an episode of a tv show called ‘Rev.’ Although it was probably recommending an episode from the year 2014, web site Amazon.com has the earlier episodes of ‘Rev.’ Although I haven’t seen any of the episodes myself, based on what I have read on Amazon, the show is about a priest who is trying to run a church in London. So, I figured that if you wanted some sort of illustration of people trying to acquire a more tenable sense of lifestyle perspective, then maybe those episides could provide you with such illustrations.

OK! While I was in the bus, I imagined 2 vertical bar graphs, one graph represented the repressed intensity, and the other bar graph represented the dominant intensity. When you put the 2 bar graphs together side to side, one looks shorter than the other. And so, to change that intensity, what I did was imagine one of my thumbs push the taller intensity down, and as a result, the once shorter intensity went up. For the thinking context, I got that idea from episode 8.17 ‘Reckoning: Part 2’ from series ‘Stargate SG-1(2005)’. Refurbished for advice, of course, Selmak(Carmen Argenziano) and Samantha Carter(Amanda Tapping) were working on a device to defeat the Replicators. Although there are several examples in the episode where the device is used, the ‘highlighted’ reference is when Selmak is explaining a specific function of that devide to Samantha. The quote is located, according to Amazon Video, 17 minutes and 58 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

You should cialis super active http://cute-n-tiny.com/page/64/ ensure sound sleep and consume zinc rich foods. Yes, Propecia requires cheap discount levitra a doctor’s prescription. It is very canada super viagra frustrating and embarrassing to notice feeble erection during sexual activity. Before the advent of erectile dysfunction medications that treat erectile dysfunction viagra canada no prescription (ED) were first introduced less than 10 years ago and know from them if it was a smart decision as this works nice to enhance one’s sex life beautifully. Selmak:-‘The device can be set by varying the height of these panels.'(After saying that, Selmak presses one of the panels down, and many of the other panels of that device went up, according to the computer illustration from the computer that Samantha was using).

Of course, in regards to the use of that device, refurbished for advice, if you want to, you can also look at the other examples in that ‘Stargate’ episode involving the pushing of other panels of that device.

Now, that ‘Stargate’ reference is for the ‘thinking’ context of this idea. For the physical implementation context of this idea, I chose the only thing I could think of while I was in the bus, and that ‘implementation’ was the Pez dispensers that the Pez candy uses. For an illustration of how a Pez dispenser looks when used, I recommend using web site www.wikipedia.org(up until now, I thought it was www.wikipedia.com. I am now aware that it’s www.wikipedia.org), and search for ‘Pez’ or ‘Pez dispenser’. The 1st selection wikipedia gives you should be it. Click that, and it should lead you to a page that describes what ‘Pez’ is. Scroll down, and you see a person’s hand using his/her thumb to cause a pez dispenser to take one of the Pez candies out.

Now, the way I imagined it, even when you use the ‘Pez stick’ example from wikipedia.org as a reference, when you imagine doing it, and you are looking at your imagined hand, it still looks like you are pressing one bar graph down in order to make another bar graph stick out. Based on how I used it, the idea still works, though.

And there it is! If you have a problem with a dominant intensity that is instigation, imagined, or inadvertency related, just imagine that Pez stick of yours, press the button, and see if you can change the intensity to something more suitable.

Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Stargate SG-1’. Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘Rev.'(The viewer discretion is there because I haven’t seen any of those ‘Rev.’ episodes). Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and series. [Use mental bookmark ‘Pez stick’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

I forgot to type in how it would look after you pressed that button. For example, your 30% now looks like, let’s say 65-80%, and now what was once 70% is now 20-35%. As an example, your light blue color is now the dominant color. If you choose to, you can also simply imagine your repressed sense of light blue color grow bigger as the dark blue color becomes smaller. Also, you can change the color distinctions. You don’t have to use light blue. You can use another color.

5/31/2016

Accumulate not approve:

1st, I want to start with the movie illustration example. Before I begin, I want to say that the movie has an R rating for mature themes. However, it is my belief that the reference itself is acceptable for this advice. The movie is also the best reference I can think of right now that is available from Amazon Video rental. The movie is called ‘Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans(2009)’, and the reference is located 37 minutes and 27 seconds into the movie, when Terence McDonagh(Nicolas Cage) is introducing himself to Lt. Stoyer(Sean Boyd). Here’s an interesting fact about Lt. Stoyer: His name was not mentioned in the movie scene, but if you use Amazon Video rental, the main characters in the scene used in the movie at the moment you are watching are displayed vertically on the left side of the Amazon viewing screen, along with the actor’s names, when your cursor is somewhere on the screen. That was the only way I was able to find out it was Lt. Stoyer that McDonagh was talking to. Anyway, here is the quote from http://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/ :

McDonagh:-‘Hello. I’m Lieutenant McDonagh. New Orleans homicide.

Lt. Stoyer:-‘What can I do for you?’

McDonagh:-‘A friend of mine’s daughter got a ticket for speeding. She was doing 75 on the way to the hospital to visit her grandmother. Has a couple of minor, minor moving violations in the past. She’s in danger of losing her license.

Lt. Stoyer:-‘What do you want me to do?’

McDonagh:-‘I’d like you to take care of it for me.’

Lt. Stoyer:-‘You come out to the scene of an accident just to ask me that?’

McDonagh:-‘We got both parts to submit. It shouldn’t be a problem.’

Lt. Stoyer:-‘Are you asking me to break the law? Is that what you’re doing here? Are you asking me to break the law?’

McDonagh:-‘I’m asking you one cop to another to do me a favor.’

Of course, I’m recommending that you watch that scene from the movie, not just to rely on the quotes.

Since this scene is refurbished for advice, which means that I don’t have to choose McDonagh’s side or Lt. Stoyer’s side, I’m changing the meaning of the reference so that it could be used for this advice, and the change is that Lieutenant McDonagh is intentionally causing Lt. Stoyer to experience an accumulation of disapproval from his request to change the speeding ticket.

To know more one can read my last article and understand the uk viagra sales see description problem ‘nocturnal emission’. Just check out that do they provide workplace bullies a forum to levitra generic vardenafil rant, rave and manipulate? Are reasonable people intimidated into silence? If so, you are experiencing the living hell of dysfunctional meetings. 2. And since semen is actually protein, you have to start focusing on Beauty cialis on line from Within. If both work similarly and one costs less than half of the other which one should you buy? If you believe all the commercials about cheap levitra india, then it might have created an impression of erectile dysfunction being a ‘cute inconvenience’ that’s affecting adorable older couples. So, here’s an imagined job situation that may be useful to you: Suppose that a man is working with another co-worker, and that other co-worker is causing that man to experience an obvious accumulation of disapproval. Now, of course, the accumulation from that man’s opinion is not warranted to complain about to management. However, the effect of that accumulation is causing the man to interact somewhat with those obvious aspects of disapproval.

2:50 PM

I just took a short break. It is now 2:50 pm EST, and this is the recommended solution: You use the ‘Accumulate’ idea from Wishlist #1045, and of course your understanding of ‘Surprise understand’ from Wishlist #1046 to invent bookmark ‘Accumulate not approve’ to identify instigations that are trying to cause you to interact with certain disapprovals by using a sense of imposed accumulation associated with those disapprovals. For example, when you look at the ‘Bad Lieutenant’ movie reference, Lt. Stoyer emphasized twice that he is experiencing an accumulation of disapproval. Here are the quotes:

Lt. Stoyer:-‘You come out to the scene of an accident just to ask me that?’

And here is the 2nd time:

Lt. Stoyer:-‘Are you asking me to break the law? Is that what you’re doing here? Are you asking me to break the law?’

Now, in your situation, I imagined that when you experience an accumulation of disapproval, an actual dialog with the person who is causing it may never occur, because it is not warranted to occur. However, thanks to the convenience of certain movies and tv shows, I can still recommend to you illustrations that, with a little refurbishing, can show you something that can still be useful to you. Also, I imagined that, even though you may have tried to remain contemplationally objective, at least you tried to mind your own business, the accumulation associated with the disapproval that you experienced still caused you to interact with certain aspects of that disapproval.

The solution I am recommending to you is that, when you encounter such an accumulation, since you know what the instigation is trying to do, so to speak, you can decide not to directly interact with such a sense of accumulation. For example, bookmark ‘Surprise understand(Wishlist #1046)’ can help you not directly interact with it’s acclimation, and bookmark ‘Accumulate(Wishlist #1045)’ can help you more objectively sense the accumulating effect such an instigation may be imposing upon you.

I recommend using the phrase ‘Not approve’ because if you are using the bookmarks as a mantra(an often repeated word, formula, or phrase, often a truism), such as using the phrase repeatedly in a song, I believe the phrase ‘Not approve’ can be used repeatedly very easily. For learning the meaning of ‘Not approve’, I recommend phrases ‘Disapprove’ and ‘Don’t approve’.

You don’t have to use ‘Accumulate’. You can consider other phrases for learning, such as ‘Pile up’, ‘Have to go’, and ‘Have to go to the bathroom’. In fact, I was considering making the bookmark ‘Have to go not approve’. The phrase ‘Accumulate not approve’ is just a recommendation. When you decide to use this idea, if you want it, it’s your idea. In relation to advice said, once it’s your idea, you can do whatever you want to it.

I have considered other illustration examples, but those examples are not available for Amazon Video. I choose Amazon Video to recommend to you because it allows you to quickly learn these ideas. However, since I have given you the meaning using an Amazon Video reference, I think I can mention to you a few more examples, in case you are interested.

This example is from episode 1.20 ‘Lorinda’ from series ‘Cobra(1994)’. There are many examples in the episode where Lorinda McClure(Alice Ghostley) would cause Scandal Jackson(Michael Dudikoff) to experience accumulations from disapprovals. For instance, Miss McClure would constantly identify Mr. Jackson with the wrong name. At the end of the episode, because of Lorinda McClure’s many examples of accumulations from disapprovals, when she showed up again, Scandal ran out of the room screaming! It was probably done in good taste, since Lorinda and the other main characters didn’t interpret Scandal’s departure as an insult. [I didn’t use this ‘Cobra’ episode as a reference because it wasn’t available on Amazon Video. However, and this is not a recommendation, you can still buy the ‘Cobra’ series on DVD from Amazon. This is not a recommendation to buy. This is just in case you are interested in what the other considered references were.

There’s this other reference from end of episode 1.11 ‘A Great Personality’ from series ‘Cupid(1999)’, when Yvonne(Christine Taylor) was talking to her boyfriend, and her boyfriend was complaining about his job. It’s her boyfriend’s complaining that was the example. I can’t use this reference because I can no longer find it in youtube.com, and it’s not available in Amazon Video or DVD.

Violence and viewer discretion from movie ‘Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans’ and tv series ‘Cobra’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Accumulate not approve’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

5/30/2016

Impression of expectation meaning is not ‘thinking it through’:

First, I want to start with the best reference I can think of right now for this idea I originally invented back around Wishlist #550. The original list is located in Amazon.com. The reference is in episode 2.21 ‘Becoming: Part 1’ from series ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer(1998)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 6 minutes and 44 seconds, near the beginning of the episode. Here is the quote:

Doug Perren(Jack McGee):-‘Don’t have a clue what it is. Any ideas?’

Rupert Giles(Anthony Head):-‘A few. None I’d care to share until I can verify.’

Basically, the idea says that just because you make certain logical conclusions, just by having those logical conclusions doesn’t mean you thought those logical conclusions through, that you gave those conclusions a certain reasonable consideration of thought. For example, in the illustration I gave, Mr. Giles said to Doug Perren about the artifact Doug’s team discovered, Mr. Giles said quote-‘A few. None I’d care to share until I can verify.’ So, refurbished for advice, let’s say that Rupert made certain logical conclusions in his mind very quickly. However, his training as a Watcher in the show allows him to verify those conclusions before giving those logical conclusions a certain active, relevant consideration.

Now, in a civilian context, when I talk about this idea, I am talking about the logical conclusions that just seem to introduce themselves to your thinking rather very quickly. Now, let’s say certain logical conclusions just made themselves aware to you very quickly. My concern is that you will just treat those conclusions as if you have given them some sort of reasonable consideration of thought before you chose to give those logical conclusions active use.

Before I continue, I want to say that I am not trying to change your chosen school of thought. This advice is still related as to how instigators may exploit how you interpret logical conclusions that just ‘blurt?’ into your mind. Here is an example of bookmark ‘Impression of expectation meaning is not ‘thinking it through”. I invented a bookmark yesterday called ‘Commit not ready’ while I was in the public laundromat I use, and I believe I can give a compatible use of it to you. 1st, here is an example for the older teenage boys and men, refurbished, of course, where a person chooses to be ‘ready’ for a certain notion. The example is in episode 3.16 ‘Blood Fever’ from series ‘Star Trek: Voyager(1997)’. Of course, I am assuming you have read the idea from the previous list called ‘Surprise understand’. That way, I won’t imagine just ridicule for what I am about to type in. Anyway, according to Amazon video, the reference starts 40 minutes and 50 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

B’Elanna Torres(RoxannDawson):-‘I take your challenge myself!’

Despite its odd name (developed because the place from which it is produced was found to make goat’s intimately active) it is one of the most continually well-known products buying generic cialis to enhance hardons. Some of these healing methods include: ? buy sildenafil no prescription Acupuncture ? Drinking healing mineral water from the genuine Karlovy Vary thermal spring salt had the same therapeutic actions as at the mineral water from the geyser. Consumers are check that now cialis canada online becoming increasingly savvy on the differences between spam and permission-based emails, and more and more of them are accepting permission-based e-mail marketing as a positive replacement for direct mail. It tablet sildenafil is located in the stomach area in the upper abdomen. That is when B’Elanna chose to fight Vorik( Alexander Enberg) in order to resolve the fever created by the ‘pon farr’.

There are 2 examples I have for this idea. Let me start with the one that is easier to explain: A man at his job notices that he finds a certain woman attractive to him, but based on his attractiveness towards this woman, there is an aspect of interaction involving that woman that he believes he is ‘not ready’ for, and he is somewhat bothered by that. [The solution is to use bookmark ‘Commit not ready’ to identify those aspects of interaction that bother you that you believe you are ‘not ready’ for, and choose not to commit to those interactions. At first, if you use the ‘Commit not ready’ idea, it is like you are experiencing a contemplation ‘sour face’ that is created by not being ready, but since you have already chosen to not commit to such interactions, you may still have that contemplation ‘sour face’, but you are able to continue to participate with such a not ready ‘sour face’.

Now, in the 1st example, it was a non-instigation related example. The man was simply attracted to a certain woman, but certain aspects involving that attractiveness was simply not ready, causing the man to feel somewhat bothered by the interpretation. This 2nd example tends to be unbelievable, but if you are working in a job that has both men and women, then it is my belief that men can be instigated by women, even though such women are deemed to be attractive to the men. In this example, a man is attracted to a woman in the job, but that woman is using that man’s sense of attractiveness to her in a context that he is ‘not ready’ for, which can also involve that man’s sense of self appearance as it relates to how that woman is using that man’s sense of attractiveness towards her. [The solution, again, is for the man to use bookmark ‘Commit not ready’ to identify the aspects of interaction that he believes to be ‘not ready’ for, and to choose not to interact with such aspects. It may be sensed as a ‘sour face’ that is created by the instigation, but since he is no longer directly interacting with such a ‘sour face’, he is instead able to participate with that sense of ‘sour face’ created by not being ready for something.

The ‘Blood Fever’ example I have offered you is recommended for you to use as elemental examples, not to be taken literally. For example, when B’Elanna said to Vorik quote-‘I take your challenge myself!’, that is just a refurbished example of what it may be like to choose to resolve a situation, to choose to ‘be ready’. Notice from that quote the adrenaline rush, the eagerness, and the certainty involved. In other words, I am not encouraging you to get into a fight with someone just to ‘be ready’. I am recommending to you to look at that ‘Blood Fever’ example elementally.

So, to clarify further, the reason I presented to you bookmark ‘Commit not ready’ is to give you an example of how a logical conclusion that easily makes itself aware to you may not have been thought through automatically, depending upon your expectations of it’s use. Of course, when an instigation identified by bookmark ‘Commit not ready’ is used as such an example, the example may not be in your favor to use, which is why you would have to refurbish that example to a more acceptable context.

The best example I can think of right now for bookmark ‘Commit not ready’ is, in my opinion, the best example, refurbished for advice, of course, simply because the example uses somewhat the actual words ‘Not ready’. That example is in movie ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn-Part 2’. According to Amazon Video SD rental, the example begins 55 minutes and 33 seconds into the movie, when Bella Swan(Kristen Stewart) says to Edward Cullen(Robert Pattinson) quote:

Bella:-‘Edward, I’m not ready to do this yet.’ After Edward falls to the ground, Bella says-‘I’m sorry. I said that I wasn’t ready!’

Of course, I am using bookmark ‘Commit not ready’ for more that what I have explained to you. There are still a few? more ideas that I plan to introduce to you.

Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’ and ‘Star Trek: Voyager’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn-Part 2’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of tv show, series, and movie(for the ‘Twilight’ quote, you can look, refurbished for advice, at scenes both before and after Bella says her ‘not ready’ quote). [Use mental bookmarks ‘Impression of expectation meaning is not ‘thinking it through”. and ‘Commit not ready’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

5/24/2016

It is now 5:58 PM EST, according to my computer. So, that means I will explain the 1st part of this idea today, and if I don’t have time today to finish this idea, I plan to finish it tomorrow.

This is the reason I have chosen to give you a fundamental answer for 6 of 6, instead of the upgraded answer I am using now. When I invented the last part of this idea, I think it was about 2 months ago, most of it, at least by my intent, looked like the explanation I am giving you now. Soon after I invented that ‘fundamental’ explanation, I invented several other ideas that can be seen as upgrades to that fundamantal explanation. So, the idea is that, if I give you that original explanation, it would be easier for you to learn the upgrades that I plan to type after I finish this idea. I have the ability to explain to you the idea I am using now, but I believe that you will be better off if I give you the original explanation instead.

Proximity instigation:

Before I start with that original explanation, there is one more thing I want to add, one more idea. It is based on what I think is happening in a standard demographic context to people who experience instigations. I call this particular category of instigation ‘Proximity instigations’. According to dictionary.com, ‘proximity’ means-‘nearness in place, time, order, occurrence, or relation.’ The proximity I am referring to is when an instigator adversely influences your sense of people perspective. For example, somewhere during my Amazon.com explanations, when I experienced what I believe to be certain instigations, it felt like I was placed on an island, and I would have to somehow establish a cable tv connection for the house I was living in. Although I didn’t think of the experience in a certain convenient detail at the time, basically, the instigations would cause me to try to re-establish a basic sense of societal network interaction. I am assuming that many of those ideas that I typed in Amazon helped me re-establish that sense. Now, for you, I have imagined an ambiance story designed to help you re-instate some of that societal network interaction that ‘proximity instigations’ may try to take away from you. And so, here is the story:

1st, let me offer you music to go with that ambiance. The musical background begins from episode 2.2 ‘Who Mourns for Adonais?’ from series ‘Star Trek(1967)’. According to Amazon Video, the music begins 24 minutes and 12 seconds into the episode, when Apollo(Michael Forest) was explaining to Carolyn Palamas(Leslie Parrish) what happened to the other gods of Olympus(it’s a science fiction tv show). I recommend you use the musical background that was being played when Apollo was talking. It sounds solemn(gravely or somberly impressive; causing serious thoughts or a grave mood), and it has what sounds to me like trumpets or horns playing in the background.

And now, for more of the physical aspects of the ambiance. I recommend using a scene from movie ‘Wrath of the Titans(2012)’, when Perseus(Sam Worthington) brought his son Helius(John Bell) to one of the temples of the Olympian gods. The scene is located, According to Amazon Video rental, 15 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie. There are also more scenes available near that time frame for that temple.

And now, for the story(Keep in mind that I just imagined it).  (Before you get into the story, I recommend you start imagining that solemn music from the ‘Star Trek’ episode to be played). There is this place in every major city where statues of certain people are being displayed. Now, these statues are of statues of normal people. However, it is unlikely that you will ever meet them, interact with them, because of what they do for a living. Underneath every statue is contact information, such as their website, Facebook, blog, along those lines, if you want to communicate with them. Now, it’s not like these people live and/or work in some sort of difficult to access place. It’s just that they’re not instigators. When they interact with people, they don’t do something associated with ‘proximity instigations’. However, through no fault of their own, they are like the exact opposite of ‘proximity instigations’ when compared to ‘proximity instigations’. And so, when you experience a ‘proximity instigation’, such people may be the 1st to leave your basic sense of societal network interaction. And so, to help people have a maintained sense of societal network interaction, such places exist. The illustration I recommended for you from the movie has statues that are damaged and would look more presentable if repaired, so when you imagine such a place in America, of course the statues are normal, and not in any need of repair. And since you’re just imagining it, you can just imagine sitting in a reasonably sturdy chair, and just absorb the ambiance of such a place, while listening to the solemn music I have provided for you. Now, these statues are designed to ‘catch’ and present a certain meaning of causality associated with these people. For example, when a person is being trained for something more specific for his/her job, that person may be shown certain videos that present a more specific meaning. For example, when you are using one of those language learning programs, the images shown to you are meant to represent a specific meaning to a specific word or phrase. That is what the statues present. Here’s an example: Let’s say you talked to one of those people as they were helping you with something. Now, you don’t want the image for that person’s statue to be the moment when he/she was talking to you. Instead, you get to choose another moment in the person’s life that best represents that person helping you. And that is one of the reasons that makes those statues look interesting. You can imagine why the statues look the way  they do.

[All right. It’s now 6:57 PM. I’m going to take a break right now, and I plan to finish this idea tomorrow.

5/25/2016

Feel understand:

Before I finally finish this idea, there is one more idea I want to add to it. It’s still what I would call a ‘fundamental idea’, and it was an idea I have already invented a few months ago, and I was already thinking to add this idea to this list. So, instead of giving it a separate list name, like ‘6 of 7’, I’ll just add it to this list.

1st, let’s start with the primary illustration for this idea called ‘Feel understand’. In fact, much of this idea was made from this illustration. The illustration is in movie ‘Company Business(1991)’, and it stars Gene Hackman as Sam Boyd and Mikhail Baryshnikov as Pyotr Grushenko. According To Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour 2 minutes and 14 seconds into the movie, when Grushenko recommends to Boyd that they use a rock as an association to understand something. As one person would hold the rock, that person would sense that rock would be used to create a certain meaning. The use of the rock only lasted for about 30 seconds, but even if you haven’t seen the movie, you can probably imagine your own understanding as to how the rock was used as you watched that scene. It’s been several years since I have seen that movie myself, but I think you don’t need to see the movie in order to understand that a sense of feeling associated with the holding of that rock was used to understand something.

My point about bookmark ‘Feel understand’ is that I believe using a sense of feeling in order to understand is part of how we perceive reality. So, what an instigator might do is cause you to forsake a sense of feeling that is associated with an adverse experience with instigation, but by doing so, you may be avoiding too much of a sense of feeling for other experiences. So, what I propose that I do, at least for the next few ideas that I plan to type in, and of course now, I propose that I address the aspect of instigations that adversely exploit your sense of feeling to understand directly. Nip it in the bud, so to speak.
If it world not cheap, the branded tadalafil 20mg for women would not only prepare your body for sex but it would be a better decision to consult a trusted sex doctor in Delhi for the diagnosis of this condition based on the best scientific discoveries in neurobiology. Anal pose helps blood supply to these http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482460790_ij_file.pdf viagra ordination muscles and improves their efficiency. Many stores offering the lowest prices for the world class medicines hence, treating erection issues in men. continue reading over here purchase viagra raises the circulation of blood to the penis, while Tadalafil acts in a natural way to improve your sex life. For example; to get treatment for diseases like erectile dysfunction, to get drugs such as Super Kamagra and Extra Super Tadarise that help buying levitra in canada to treat this problem.
Here is the only example I can think of right now involving ‘Feel understand’. Even though the example is not an instigation, I think it can still be refurbished to be used for this advice. The example is in the movie ‘Annapolis(2006)’. According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 30 minutes and 33 seconds into the movie, when Loo(Roger Fan) says to Estrada(Wilmer Calderon) quote-‘Estrada, we need to talk.’ There are more elements of this story in previous moments of the movie, refurbished for advice, if you wish to see them. Anyway, the point is that Estrada physically assaulted Loo for trying to tell Cole(Tyrese Gibson) that Estrada failed in one of his tasks. Now, here’s the thing. Even if Loo managed to tell Cole or anyone else with authority, even though I do not know anything about Annapolis, it is my strong opinion that Estrada would not be expelled for such a thing. After all, the task involved obvious sleep deprivation, and it is my opinion that sleep deprivation can muddle your sense of thinking. The reason this example is relevant is that Estrada physically assaulted Loo because of how Estrada uses his sense of feeling when provoked. Keep in mind that this is not high school, where fights probably happen from time to time when teenagers provoke teenagers. If you were to give that movie some movie credibility, this event happened in Annapolis, and that is why Estrada was expelled for assaulting Loo. The scene where Estrada leaves Annapolis begins 37 minutes and 13 seconds into the movie.

It is now 4:28 PM EST, and I have finally found a way to explain the final part of this idea. The solution begins with a reference from episode 5.2 ‘The Ship’ from sci-fi series ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. According to Amazon Video, the reference begins 9 minutes and 8 seconds into the episode, when Bashir(Alexander Siddig) and Quark(Armin Shimerman) are on their way to submit a grievance to Major Kira(Nana Visitor). I recommend that you listen to the entire dialog. The highlight of that conversation is when Kira says quote-‘I don’t have time for this.’ That scene is located almost 10 minutes into the episode. The point of this reference is that Kira was able to not choose to acclimate somewhat to the grievances of Bashir and Quark.

Startle understand:

And now, a description of the actual idea itself: An instigator may improperly impose a sense of adverse acclimation commitment to your sense of chosen understanding by using an improperly imposed sense of surprise for you to experience. For example, in the ‘Deep Space Nine’ example, Major Kira was able to choose not to acclimate somewhat to the grievances of Bashir and Quark, since she had another obligation to attend to. However, when you experience such an instigation, let’s call it ‘Startle understand’, and let’s say you don’t have managerial experience, for example, you are an employee, or you are a student, such as a grammar school, high school, or college student, then an instigator may cause you to accepting a sense of understanding that involves surprise imposed acclimation as part of your chosen sense of understanding. Of course, you probably don’t want to accept such a sense of understanding, but you can’t seem to easily just shrug the experience off.

Now, here is the solution that I am offering you that may be a bit of a reach in my part. This solution involves all 6 parts of this idea, from ‘Egging me on’ to what I am typing in now. If I explained it well enough, you should be able to have your own, more objective, sense of chosen understanding. The solution is that you simply? allow yourself to be aware of the fact(assuming that you have experienced such an instigation) that the instigation is adversely influencing your chosen understanding, and that you believe that such an adverse sense of acclimation induced by surprise should be something that is acclimated to by choice, not something that has to be always a part of your chosen understanding, and when that has been identified, you should be able to create a sense of chosen understanding that is reasonably separate from that surprising acclimation of instigation.

Let’s see if I can clarify this explanation. In the ‘Star Trek’ reference I have offered you, when Kira was presented with grievances from both Bashir and Quark, Kira instead chose to not involve herself with such acclimations, since she had another priority to attend to. She chose to not commit to the acclimations associated with such grievances. Now, in your case, when an instigator imposes an instigation upon you that uses surprise to emphasize a sense of acclimation for you to experience, the surpising identity of such an instigation tries to become a part of your chosen sense of acclimation. Unlike what Kira did, you were not able to simply? choose not to interact with such an acclimation. Instead, it becomes a part of your chosen sense of understanding.

One obvious problem with such an instigation is that it’s very identity upon your chosen sense of understanding, if you have unwittingly committed to it, becomes a liability to your sense of latitude allowance. Look, I believe that many Americans have probably experienced such an instigation, and have learned to cope with it. For example, your entire life is not just about that experienced instigation. People do other things. However, it is my belief that, just because a certain instigation is very common to experience, the fact that it’s very common to experience doesn’t make it right. Also, although I do not believe I am an instigator, I think it is possible that instigators knowing that such an instigation is very common, may exploit it’s commonality and make it’s adverse effect upon innocent people noticeably worse than it’s traditional identity. So, therefore I recommend that you be the judge. You decide that, if you experienced such an identified instigation, what type of severity you think it is.

Now, going back to how such an instigation can be a liability upon your sense of latitude allowance, if you experienced such an instigation, once you choose to create a sense of chosen understanding that is separate from such an instigation, an instigation you have already experienced, then you should notice how much more latitude you now have. Instead of allowing yourself to maintain the surprise induced acclimation identity of the instigation as part of your chosen understanding, you now have the ability to see that surprise induced acclimation identity more objectively, and you can now choose more objectively how much latitude allowance you are willing to commit to such an experience from now on.

Here are 2 conceptualized examples I have for this idea. The 1st example involves a sponge, and the sponge represents your chosen understanding. Oversimplifyingly said, of course, your ‘sponge’ for every experience and every expectation you become aware of, your ‘sponge’ absorbs some of it. And there are other experiences that allow your sponge to ‘reset’ and start over. For example, when you go on vacation, when you go on a school trip, even when you talk to your friends, the sponge ‘resets’ to a degree.

The 2nd example involves ice cubes placed on a car during a nice day. Let’s say you own a car, and some of those experiences represent ice cubes that you place on your car, and you hope that the sun will melt those ice cubes. You can always place your car on most of the places in America. You can just own a 2nd car just for melting ice cubes. Now, what an instigator may do is somehow manipulate certain ice cubes in a way that they are going to take a lot longer to melt than the ice cubes that you are used to. So, therefore, you notice that the instigation identified by bookmark ‘Surprise understand’ or ‘Startle understand’ is metaphorically creating ice cubes that are taking longer to melt than the other ice cubes you are used to.

If I may be a little presumptuous, if you have benefitted from this advice, and this advice does have a few more upgrades I plan to type in next, eventually, it will probably be like most of the older ideas that you may have read. You will simply get used to it to the point that it may feel like you have forgotten it. And then, of course, I’ll probably make more ideas for the forseeable future.

Here is a question for this advice: ‘Why is my attitude like this?’ I believe that, since this is a public list, I should take into consideration that kids could be reading these ideas, even though kids may not be reading these ideas. Although I am not a doctor, I’d like to think of myself as having a few aspects of consideration that I imagine doctors have. For example, when you go to a doctor, if you need it, the doctor prescribes to you medication that will help you recover, without giving you some sort of unacceptable attitude about it. And so, I would like to think that I am at least trying to give you some sort of advice that will benefit you without also giving you some sort of unacceptable attitude about it. However, I would also like to point out that this is ‘standard demographic’ advice, not ‘standard’ advice. I have made over a thousand lists already, and have went through various changes as to how I offer advice. I didn’t start out sounding this way. If you want proof, if the Amazon.com lists I made are still there, you can check my earlier lists and compare those lists to the lists that I have made in this blog.

Violence and viewer discretion for the ‘Star Trek(1967)’ series. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Wrath of the Titans’. Some viewer discretion for movie ‘Company Business’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Annapolis’. Violence and viewer discretion for series ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Proximity instigation’, ‘Feel understand’, ‘Not my sense of chosen understanding’, ‘Surprise understand’, ‘Startle understand’, and ‘Acclimate understand’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

5/10/2016

Since I finished the previous list earlier than expected, I plan to start explaining the next idea tomorrow.

5/11/2016

It’s now 1:22 pm according to my computer. Instead of continuing to the next idea, I plan to go through the tivo? player I am using. I think it can only hold up to 100 or so hours of tv programming, so what I want to do is go through the shows and movies that I have in it, delete some of them, and maybe catalog their names, in case the tivo? player breaks down. If you include me watching a few of them, that task may take a few hours. Also, I have 5 digital comics to read from comixology.com. So, if I do all of that, I probably won’t be in the mood to type in anything today. Regardless, I typed in an entire idea yesterday, and my 1 idea a week self obligated quota is met. Of course, I plan to type another idea in next week, probably Tuesday.

5/17/2016

OK, here we go! First, I’d like to explain the process that I used to make the sequence of these ideas. The 1st 2 ideas, the ‘Egging me on.’ and ‘Composure response.’ ideas, were to prep you up for the overall effect of this idea. When I invented the gist(the main or essential part of a matter) of this idea, it really begin with the 3rd idea, the ‘Rosetta Stone’ idea. When I first invented that idea, I treated it in my mind as if it were ‘the king of the hill’ idea, so to speak. I gave it top priority. However, soon after I made that idea, I then discovered the ‘Stop’ idea, which I then gave the ‘Stop’ idea top priority. Soon after the ‘Stop’ idea was invented, I invented the ‘Have to go to the bathroom’ idea. Now, that idea I spent at least 2 weeks giving it an obviously active use. And then, to the best of my memory, after the majorly obvious sense of it’s epiphany wore off, the final idea I will explain for these ideas I invented, and the name I offered to you was I think ‘Not my sense of chosen understanding.’ When I got to that idea, I realized that it was one of those ideas that may benefit you greatly. However, I can’t just explain that idea to you on it’s own. I mean, I can, but it may be like your experiences with explaining bookmark ‘Argue’ to others. You have an idea of what ‘Argue’ means, but when you try to explain just that explanation to others, they don’t seem to have the appreciation of bookmark ‘Argue’ that you have. In order for a sense of appreciation to be given to others, you would have to explain all 5 parts of bookmark ‘Argue’, not just the 5th part. It may be like that. And so, to avoid that, I decided to give you the explanation in 6 parts.

Also, there’s something about ‘appreciation’ that I want to mention before I start beginning the explanation of ‘Have to go to the bathroom.’ in this list. Here’s a story I imagined to explain it: Let’s say someone who speaks Italian as a primary language and knows English as a second language is reading these lists. As an example, I’ll use Leopoldo from movie ‘To Rome with Love’ portrayed by actor Roberto Benigni as the man who is reading these ideas. Now, Leopoldo is trying to tell me how useful a few of these ideas are to him. However, I do not know what his school of thought is. Out of respect, I try to respond in an acceptable context. Still, even though I try, I still do not know what his school of thought is. In other words, how Leopoldo is appreciating the use of these ideas is beyond my obviously tangible sense of understanding. I believe many of you, if you choose to, can imagine Leopoldo trying to tell me how these ideas are useful to him, but he is experiencing some mild sense of frustration because he is unable to ‘tell’ me how he appreciates the use of these ideas. I’m just an American. I am not one of those Americans that I imagine I know of that are from organizations that have existed for a few thousand years, and have chosen to live in America as Americans. I suppose for some of them, they may look like the people in a typical ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch’ episode. No, I don’t think I am one of those Americans. I am just American.

According to WordPress, it took me about 2 hours to find an illustration for ‘Have to go to the bathroom’. This is the only reference I can think of for this list where a person intentionally induced such an experience upon another person, even methodically planned it. The illustration is located in  episode 3.17 ‘Debasement Tapes’ from tv series ‘Veronica Mars(2007)’ According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 39 minutes and 15 seconds into the episode, when Logan Echolls(Jason Dohring) is giving a class presentation, and the teacher for that class is Professor Corrigan(Norman Large). Logan was using a computer created illustration of women’s butts. Of course, if the teacher accepted such a project, this example would not be used. In this example, the teacher, Mr. Corrigan, believed that such a presentation was unacceptable. You can even see an obvious impression of believing that such a project was unacceptable being presented by that teacher, even though the students in his class believed it was entertaining to watch. Eventually, Mr. Corrigan stopped the presentation. Now, I know this is supposed to be standard demographic advice, and I don’t expect everyone reading these ideas to be college professors, so therefore I recommend that you simply refurbish Professor Corrigan’s responses to something that is useful to you. In that same episode, Logan is working with Cindy Mackenzie(Tina Majorino) to create that computer illustrating project. Their interactions show you that Logan wanted to present such a project to his classmates, and more specifically, to Professor Corrigan.

And now, for the actual explanation of ‘Have to go to the bathroom’. So, let’s start with an animated example of Homer Simpson using the bathroom. According to Amazon Video, the reference is located 6 minutes and 50 seconds into episode 27.19 ‘Fland Canyon’ from series ‘The Simpsons(2016)’. The reference begins when Homer Simpson is saying to Maggie quote-‘After ten hours of driving, I finally saw the most glorious site.’ Homer was referring to the public restroom. And since it is an animated comedy show, the show illustrates, based on Homer’s moaning and groaning while he is urinating, he is illustrating that he did, indeed, wasn’t able to use the restroom for ten hours while he was driving. The 1st time I saw that episode, I thought that the bear was going to attack Homer, but because Homer had to pee for such a long time, the moans and groans that Homer made to need to use the restroom caused the bear to also need to pee, and the bear left because it also had to pee.

[For me, the hard part of this explanation is over, and that is finding and explaining tv show references for it. I want to take a break now and finish explaining this idea tomorrow.
Social media marketing programs quite often center on efforts to create content that attracts notice and promotes lowest cost viagra readers to share it with their. Erectile brokenness can likewise be connected to generic levitra uk different conditions regular in men with diabetes, for example, hypertension and coronary heart disease. Make an appointment with your doctor if you have had any heart problems (e.g., angina, levitra tab 20mg chest pain, heart failure, irregular heart beats or heart attack), have ever had a stroke, low or high blood pressure, unconsciousness, and gastric problems. Without forgiveness there may be increased problems in keeping and restoring sexual and mental health. women viagra uk
5/18/2016

Time for me to finish this idea. Basically, bookmark ‘Have to go to the bathroom’ references the accumulated feeling that you have that indicates to you that you ‘have to go to the bathroom’. This is not about actually going to the bathroom to relieve yourself. This is about using your experiences with having the inclination to go to the bathroom to evaluate instigations and related inadvertencies that involve a sense of accumulation. For example, my most memorable tv show reference about teenagers texting each other is from episode 1.3 ‘Sweet Sixteen’ from tv show ‘Canterbury’s Law(2008)’, starring Julianna Margulies as Elizabeth Canterbury. According to Amazon Video, the scene begins 40 minutes and 28 seconds, near the end of the episode. After Miss Canterbury freed Isabelle(Brianna Steinhilber) from jail, Elizabeth sees Isabelle texting Linda(Lauren Weisman), the friend that tried to send her to jail for a crime Elizabeth didn’t commit. It’s not just that scene. Several times in that episode, you see Elizabeth texting Linda. Based somewhat on those examples from tv show ‘Canterbury’s Law’, not from actual experience, I am assuming that girls in America nowadays like to text each other a great deal. So, here’s an example that I just imagined: 2 girls are texting each other while they are both at home, and one of the girls has to go to the bathroom. So, the girl who has to go to the bathroom texts the other girl, saying that she has to stop texting, in order to go to the bathroom.

An example for adults is when an adult is talking to customer service for whatever reason, and the conversation is lasting longer than they have anticipated, and they have to go to the bathroom, so they would have to tell customer service that they would have to stop for a moment in order to use the bathroom.

So, here is an example of a person that would benefit from using idea ‘Have to go to the bathroom’. Let’s use the tv illustration I offered you yesterday, episode 3.17 ‘Debasement Tapes’ from tv series ‘Veronica Mars(2007)’ According to Amazon Video, the illustration starts 39 minutes and 15 seconds into the episode, when Logan Echolls(Jason Dohring) is giving a class presentation, and the teacher for that class is Professor Corrigan(Norman Large). Refurbished for this advice, let’s say that Logan knew that Professor Corrigan would stop his presentation, but if he chose to do so, it would be because of a sense of accumulation, and that is what happened in that episode. Now, if you choose to refurbish that episode, and you realized that you experienced an instigation in your past that involved a similar sense of accumulation, like the accumulation Professor Corrigan experienced, instead of that sense of accumulation occasionally bothering you when you would recall that experience, you can instead use bookmark ‘Have to go to the bathroom’, or other variations of that phrase, such as ‘Have to go.’ or ‘Accumulate’, or ‘Pile up’, such as paperwork piling up, so that you can more tenably experience such a sense of instigation induced accumulation. In Professor Corrigan’s case, he at least had the ability to stop the presentation, although Logan did forsee that to happen. In your case, I’m referring to instigations that you may have experienced at work, or instigations you may have experienced while using public transportation. If it’s at work, what can you do about a mild instigation that induces a sense of accumulation? And if it’s while using public transportation, what are you going to do, say something to that instigator?

To clarify about how I give advice, I try to help people more tenably experience unavoidable instigation. I am not trying to dictate what choices they have available to them.

So, from kids to adults, I believe in a standard demographic context, this ‘Have to go to the bathroom’ advice can be very useful to you. I recommend that you just think back to see if your past experiences with instigation in a mild to moderate context can be made more tenable if you use bookmark ‘Have to go to the bathroom’ on it. I personally actively used this idea during the 1st 2 weeks after I invented it. I also would shuffle the phrases ‘Have to go to the bathroom’, ‘Have to go’, ‘Accumulate’, and ‘Pile up’, to see if I can make the idea work for certain experiences. And based on my experiences, after a few weeks of using this idea, and with the new ideas that I plan to offer to you, you won’t be actively using it much after that, so therefore I recommend that you enjoy the frequency of using ‘Pile up’, or whatever it is you want to call it, for the next 2 weeks. After that, you should have a pretty good idea how to use it, and the other new ideas will probably get your attention more, based on my experience.

[Next week, probably this coming Tuesday, I plan to give you the last part of this explanation, 6 of 6, called ‘Not my sense of chosen understanding’. I have a more developed, more relevant name for it now. Of course, that is up to you to decide, if you choose to use the idea.

Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘To Rome with Love’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv show ‘Veronica Mars’ and ‘Canterbury’s Law’. Some viewer discretion for animated series ‘The Simpsons’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie.

Use mental bookmarks ‘Have to go to the bathroom’, ‘Have to go’, ‘Accumulate’, and ‘Pile up’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

5/4/2016

I just wanted to say that I plan to explain bookmark ‘Stop.’ next week, probably Tuesday.

5/10/2016

Stop:

For me, it’s now 2:30 pm, eastern standard time. I want to start by explaining why I believe bookmark ‘Stop.’ is important to explain. Soon after I discovered that ‘Rosetta Stone.’ idea in the previous list, let’s say a week after, while I was working, I made a discovery about bookmark ‘Stop.’ with a certain enthusiasm. When I made that discovery, I responded like the way Dr. Emmett Brown(Christopher Lloyd) in movie ‘Back to the Future(1985)’ responded when he discovered how much power was needed to power the time machine. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 53 minutes and 35 seconds into the movie. Here is the quote:

Dr. Brown from the video recording:-‘This sucker’s electrical but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts…

Dr. Brown:-‘What did I just say ?’

Marty McFly(Michael J. Fox) rewinds the camcorder a little.

Dr. Brown from the video recording again:-‘…this sucker’s electrical,
but I need a nuclear reaction…- to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of…’
This check for more info purchase cialis online could be the reason why the amount spent upon this ED drug is increasing every year. They blame and feel that because they have been expressly recommended to by their doctor Before you get viagra price usa for erectile dysfunction. You will be a perfect man to your love life by opting for icks.org female cialis online available for women. Besides, thin women are at a higher risk of developing poor postural order cheap cialis habits due to sitting for extended periods of time.
Dr. Brown:-‘- 1.21 gigawatts ! Great Scott !’

With that ‘Rosetta Stone’ discovery, it is my belief that it gave me an appreciation for the discovery of bookmark ‘Stop.’ And so, since I offered you the explanation of ‘Rosetta Stone’ in the previous list, if you chose to use that ‘Rosetta Stone’ idea, it is my hope that you, too, will also have an appreciation for bookmark ‘Stop.’

1st, I want to start with illustration. Even though I only have 2 illustrative examples, I really don’t have much tv and movie experience to give you a more compatible example. For example, if I were in the tv and movie industry, I probably would have more developed information available for you. The 1st example is from the movie ‘As Good As It Gets(1997)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 47 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie, when Carol Connelly(Helen Hunt) is carrying her sick son in order to catch Melvin Udall(Jack Nicholson) in order to share a taxi with him. So, as she is walking towards Mr. Udall, Carol while carrying her son has to walk by a bunch of school girls. Since she is still a distance away from Mr. Udall, Carol calls out to Mr. Udall, saying quote-‘Melvin…wait!’ This happened 47 minutes and 45 seconds into the movie. After she said that, the school girls also called out to Melvin, saying quote-‘Melvin, wait!’ Now, this is the highlighted moment. At 47 minutes and 57 seconds into the movie, Mr. Udall then yelled out to the kids quote-‘Shut up, kids!’ Keep in mind that this movie portrays Melvin Udall as an unlikable character that causes people to lose their tempers and to feel miserable. So, when Mr. Udall told the kids to ‘shut up’, the kids not only stopped calling out to him, they also stopped walking! At 48 minutes and 1 second into the movie, I see that one of the girls has a ‘sour face’, and another girl has her mouth open, as part of a surprised, astonished gesture. Also, there’s the obvious, that all of the school girls, and their teacher, stopped walking when Mr. Udall said ‘Shut up, kids!’ After looking at that scene a few seconds ago, I noticed there are also at least 2 school boys in the group as well.

The 2nd illustrated example is from the google search engine when you look at images in relation to advice for the word ‘shush’. According to dictionary.com, shush means-‘to silence or calm (someone) by or as if by saying “shush”. However, the ‘shush’ I am referring to is when a person uses his/her index finger(the finger between the thumb and middle finger) to press against his/her lips as a gesture for another person to ‘shush’. For that, you can find many such images in the Google search engine. Just go to www.google.com, type the word ‘shush’, click ‘Google Search’, and then in the 2nd screen, click ‘Images’. There, you will see many images of people using the ‘shush’ gesture with their index fingers. If you like any of those Google images, you can click those images, and they can lead you into more specific ‘shush’ images by clicking ‘View more’.

The purpose of this advice is to help you more reasonably ‘stop’ when a person causes you to ‘stop’. We live in a society where a lot of kids depend upon crossing guards to tell them when to ‘stop’, to show them when they can and cannot cross the street. That is why, as a refurbished example, the school kids in the movie ‘As Good As It Gets’ stopped the way they did. Even though those kids are acting, I still believe their example in the movie can be a useful, refurbished example as to how people in general, both kids and adults, depend upon their ability to ‘stop’ when other people want them to ‘stop’. The school kids in that movie can also be an example that an instigator can exploit an innocent person’s ability to ‘stop’ by adding other, adverse elements when an instigator causes an innocent person to ‘stop’. Notice that, in the ‘As Good As It Gets’ movie, the school kids did more than just stop calling out his name. They also stopped walking. One school girl even had a ‘sour face’ when she stopped talking and walking. Another school girl also opened her mouth in astonishment as she also stopped talking and stopped walking. You see? The school kids did more than just stop calling out his name when Mr. Udall yelled out ‘Shut up, kids!’

Now, in that ‘As Good As It Gets’ example, Mr. Udall did nothing wrong. To clarify, he did not intend to make the kids feel miserable, or make them get angry at him. He wasn’t trying to instigate any of them. So, my point is that, if this Melvin Udall example is not an instigation example, then what is an example of ‘stopping’ that is caused by an instigation? Here is a diagnostic I recommend if an instigation that is causing you to ‘stop’ is also adversely affecting you: If all that is required of you is to ‘stop’, then what is the instigation also causing you to do? Let’s say you experience an instigation that wants you to ‘stop’. Since ‘stopping’ is important in American society, you reasonably don’t ignore the request to ‘stop’. However, if ‘stopping’ is the only requirement, then you have the right to regulate how you respond to the adverse effects that the instigation is trying to impose upon you, even though you have agreed to ‘stop’ because of the instigation. Just like the school kids in the movie ‘As Good As It Gets’, the right thing to do was to ‘stop’ calling out his name. However, those kids, even though they did stop talking, were also adversely affected by Melvin Udall yelling ‘Shut up, kids!’ They did not have to stop walking. They only had to stop talking.

Of course, if you have a job and you work with other people, there are probably a lot of obligated ‘stops’ you have to make. So, if you experience instigation associated with those ‘stops’, I recommend that you keep this advice in mind to help you more reasonably ‘stop’, not to ignore ‘stopping’, when experiencing ‘stop’ related instigations.

Oh, and I hope you enjoy the ‘shush’ pictures from google.

Rated PG viewer discretion from movie ‘Back to the Future’. Violence and viewer discretion from movie ‘As Good as It Gets’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie and non related images. [Use mental bookmark ‘Stop.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

5/3/2016

Hi! I know I should have started this several hours ago today. I think the reason I have delayed is because I am starting to feel the obvious positive effects of the advice I am about to type in, and plan to type in. For example, you may think that it’s ‘great’ when you read these ideas. Imagine what it may be like to have those ‘great’ ideas in your head before it is typed in! I know I have made 1,000 lists in Amazon.com, so a person who may do such a thing probably has some sort of disciplined experience. Even so, I am still human. So, what I’ll do is type for a few hours now, and if I don’t finish this idea today, I plan to finish it tomorrow.

Striving perspective:

Before I begin the Chris Hemsworth/Bobby Moynihan in ‘Saturday Night Live’ idea, I want to explain ‘Striving perspective’. I believe having this idea will help prepare you to use the ‘Chris Hemsworth’ idea I plan to type in. Also, I’m not giving ‘Strive perspective’ a high expectation to be used for anything else. I’m just offering it to you to prepare you for the ‘Chris Hemsworth/Bobby Moynihan idea. If I want to introduce ‘Striving perspective’ elsewhere, I’ll just re-introduce it to you.

Basically, ‘Striving perspective’ is like explaining a scene from the movie ‘The Internship(2013)’. According to Amazon Video, the rental reference starts 54 minutes and 7 seconds into the movie, when both Billy McMahon(Vince Vaughn) and Nick Campbell(Owen Wilson) are on the ground experiencing a disappointment they cannot seem to just ‘shake off’ during a game of Quidditch(I thought Quidditch was just a game created by Google, but according to Wikipedia.com, the game actually exists. According to Wikipedia, the game was created in 2005 in Vermont by by Xander Manshel and Alex Benepe. Since this quote is from Wikipedia, I’m not sure if this is absolutely true. Still, I think it’s worth thinking about). In that scene, you see both of the main characters still trying to get off of the ground. I think that is the most important part of the movie reference, the illustration of both Billy and Nick experiencing an obviously physically presented disappointment.

The best moment to recall in memory when you want to use ‘Striving perspective’ starts 54 minutes and 26 seconds into the movie ‘The Internship’, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, when Yo-Yo(Tobit Raphael) throws his Quidditch broomstick onto the ground in anger. That is when Billy said to Yo-Yo quote:-‘Don’t start that, Yo-Yo. You did your best out there.’ And then Billy said to the rest of the main characters quote:-‘That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’ So, the moment to recall is when Billy, looking like he’s limping, is walking to the right, saying his quote, but the quote is in more of a form for you to imagine. For example, when you think about Billy walking, he may say to you quote

[I just learned that I had to press ‘Purge from cache’ in order for the ‘Update’ button to work. It looks like I have to continue this explanation tomorrow.

5/4/2016

Sorry about the odd interruption. As I said yesterday, I just learned that, at least when I use WordPress, I would have to press ‘Purge from cache’ in order for the ‘Update’ button to work. I tested it earlier today, and the 1st time I did that, the ‘Update’ button took a little while to work, let’s say 20 seconds in order for me to save something. After that, it worked normally, let’s say ‘normally’ is about 5 seconds before the new entry is saved. I just pressed ‘Update’ a few seconds ago, and it works fine.

As I was saying yesterday, when you imagine Billy walking, he may say to you quote-‘That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’

cipla cialis india One study found that men that smoked more than 20 cigarettes a day. click now viagra sans prescription If, you feel shy to face a doctor or feel awkward and shy to buy it from a medical perspective. In summary, if men suffer from hemospermia, please do not take online pharmacy levitra unica-web.com. The medicine is effective and will best prices cialis start by activating an enzyme in your blood stream. The reason I chose a scene from the movie ‘The Internship’ as an example of ‘Striving perspective’ is because of how Mr. McMahon(Vince Vaughn) experiences a disappointment in perspective. Even though Billy McMahon has years of experience being a salesman, the disappointment created by Graham(Max Minghella) could not be contemplationally shrugged off, as illustrated when both Billy and Nick were both still on the ground when Graham declared his victory. The illustration according to Amazon Video starts 54 minutes and 7 seconds into the movie. Soon after Billy and Nick complained to the referee, when Billy noticed Yo-Yo complaining, Billy then demonstrated his striving perspective learned from being a salesman when he said to the team quote-‘That’s the first time we all came together as a team.’ Even though that speech was important, for the use of this advice, when Billy and Nick was on the ground experiencing a disappointment that was unavoidable, that illustration was even more important, because in my opinion, it allows you to have an example of using ‘Striving perspective’ in the beginning that is very useful for you to use. With this example, you may allow yourself to have some reasonable contemplation disappointments as you learn to use this idea. And, of course, based on my experience using the idea, you will probably improve your use of having a ‘Striving perspective’.

Going back to using the ‘Update’ button on WordPress, I also put the cursor/pointer over the ‘Update’ button to see if I can still save the text that I have just made. I also look at when a draft was saved recently, which WordPress says next to the ‘Word count’ at the bottom of the page. If you are using WordPress, and you put the cursor over the ‘Update’ button but don’t press it, as your cursor touches the ‘Update’ button, it slightly changes in color. If the ‘Update’ button doesn’t change, I would highlight the text I recently typed in and right click ‘Copy’ it. Anyway, even without the desperately, possibly ineffective ‘Copy’ option, I believe it’s still important to check the ‘Update’ button and the ‘Draft saved’ message. That way, you can avoid typing a bunch of text, and then realizing too late that you are not able to ‘Update’ all of that text into your blog. Basically, if the ‘Update’ button works, as indicated by it’s change in color, it is safe for you to type in text.

Finally, the Chris Hemsworth/Bobby Moynihan in Saturday Night Live idea. 1st, the reason I believe the Chris Hemsworth/Bobby Moynihan reference works is because of how Chris Hemsworth gives a variety of interactions with other Saturday Night Live actors and actresses. However, even though he does show you other examples, the one example that I am recommending for you to recall is his performance with Bobby Moynihan. In fact, his performance with Moynihan is what I would call the ‘Rosetta Stone’ for the use of this idea(If you look at the last article of ‘Rosetta Stone’ in web site wikipedia.com under heading ‘Idiomatic use’, it says quote-‘The term Rosetta stone has been used idiomatically to represent a crucial key in the process of decryption of encoded information’. In other words, when you use this idea, you may use the performance of Chris Hemsworth and Bobby Moynihan to use this idea, instead of a bookmark.

1st, if you choose to use this idea, I recommend, with inapproprieities removed, of course, the intro performance of Chris Hemsworth with the Saturday Night Live crew. It is in episode 41.8 ‘Chris Hemsworth/Chance The Rapper’ from series ‘Saturday Night Live(2015)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene begins 2 minutes and 35 seconds into the episode. If you choose to watch those variety of examples, we can now go to that scene where Chris Hemsworth interacts with Bobby Moynihan. That scene begins 3 minutes and 1 second into the episode. What I recommend you recall most is when Chris says to Bobby something like quote-‘How may sketches do you play Santa Claus tonight?’, and Bobby says quote-‘All of them.’ And then, refurbished, Chris walks away laughing. Also, what I recommend you use as a reference is when, as an act, the discomfort that Chris created for Bobby when Chris acted like he pulled some of Bobby’s hair. When Bobby acted like he was in discomfort, that is also the reference I recommend for you to use.

And now, finally, this is the actual idea(I was just recently walking around where I live, being both excited and trying to calm down). A month or so ago, as I was walking on the sidewalks where I live, it is my belief that someone intentionally startled me as that person walked by. That ‘startling’ caused me to make a contemplation comment. It was around that moment when I realized that an instigator has the ability to impose a contemplation comment upon an innocent person, a comment that is influenced by the instigator. The best example I can think of right now is when Chris Hemsworth asks Bobby Moynihan the question ‘How may sketches do you play Santa Claus tonight?’, and Bobby says to Chris ‘All of them’. The comment that is influenced is when Bobby says ‘All of them.’ Now, of course, it is my belief that, when an instigator causes an innocent person to make a contemplation comment, that is what many people in America do. I didn’t say there was anything wrong with that. After all, nobody knows everything. Also, it’s a private thought, to contemplationally comment as a result of something an instigator caused you to respond to. It is my opinion that, the problem with making such a comment is that the comment is adversely influenced by the instigator. If you want proof, look at that scene again, when Bobby says ‘All of them.’ to Chris. Bobby is not gleefully cheery when he says ‘All of them.’ to Chris. Bobby sounds depressed. If you looked at all of the examples of Chris interacting with the other Saturday Night Live actors and actresses, the goal that Chris is using is to influence the comments of those he is talking to.

If you choose to, if you experienced instigation before, let’s look at what happens when you experience an instigation, that the instigation influences your private contemplation comments caused? by that instigation. Let’s see. You are making a comment influenced by the circumstance imposed upon you by the instigation. Of course, it’s a private comment, but notice how you are driven to make a comment. Now, what I propose for you to do is that the next time an instigator tries to influence you to comment upon an instigation the instigator wants you to respond to, recall when Bobby Moynihan said ‘All of them.’ to Chris Hemsworth, and choose instead to objectively sense your inclination to make such a comment, but as an option, to choose to not directly interact with such an inclination, or to directly interact less with such an inclination. For example, when you do this for the 1st time, it may be like you are still making a comment because of the imposed upon instigation, but you are now making an effort to also notice that you are now more objectively noticing such a comment, instead of just immersing yourself into such a comment.

If you have been using the previous ideas in this blog, you will probably learn this idea very quickly. Now, thanks to the Chris Hemsworth/Bobby Moynihan reference, I have also included with that technique the effort to also identify discomfort more objectively as it is induced by the instigation in the context of this advice. If you go back to the scene when Chris is talking to Bobby, Chris caused Bobby to experience discomfort. I believe that discomfort itself, even though the instigator didn’t touch you or talk to you, the instigation itself can also use discomfort as a catalyst to cause you to comment upon the discomfort.

So, basically, when you experience an instigation that gives you the inclination to comment, at least within the 1st week of using this idea, you can recall Bobby Moynihan saying ‘All of them.’ to Chris Hemsworth, and, if you choose to, that should help you not need to immerse yourself in the commenting that the instigator wants you to create contemplationally. After the 1st week or so of using this idea, it’s novelty should fade away, but look at what you have learned from the experience! After a few weeks of using this idea, you should be able to more objectively notice inclinations to comment upon instigations without needing to immerse yourself upon such inclinations.

You may use this idea by itself, and/or you can use it as part of idea 3 of 6.

Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘Saturday Night Live’. Rated PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Striving perspective.’ and ‘Rosetta Stone(I use that phrase to reference the Chris/Bobby idea, but it’s not it’s bookmark name).’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.